1
|
Konradsson E, Ericsson Szecsenyi R, Wahlqvist P, Thoft A, Blad B, Bäck SÅ, Ceberg C, Petersson K. Reconfiguring a Plane-Parallel Transmission Ionization Chamber to Extend the Operating Range into the Ultra-High Dose-per-pulse Regime. Radiat Res 2024; 201:252-260. [PMID: 38308528 DOI: 10.1667/rade-23-00177.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/04/2024]
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the feasibility of enhancing the charge collection efficiency (CCE) of a transmission chamber by reconfiguring its design and operation. The goal was to extend the range of dose-per-pulse (DPP) values with no or minimal recombination effects up to the ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) regime. The response of two transmission chambers, with electrode distance of 1 mm and 0.6 mm, respectively, was investigated as a function of applied voltage. The chambers were mounted one-by-one in the electron applicator of a 10 MeV FLASH-modified clinical linear accelerator. The chamber signals were measured as a function of nominal DPP, which was determined at the depth of dose maximum using EBT-XD film in solid water and ranged from 0.6 mGy per pulse to 0.9 Gy per pulse, for both the standard voltage of 320 V and the highest possible safe voltage of 1,200 V. The CCE was calculated and fitted with an empirical logistic function that incorporated the electrode distance and the chamber voltage. The CCE decreased with increased DPP. The CCE at the highest achievable DPP was 24% (36%) at 320 V and 51% (82%) at 1,200 V, for chambers with 1 mm (0.6 mm) electrode distance. For the combination of 1,200 V- and 0.6-mm electrode distance, the CCE was ∼100% for average dose rate up to 70 Gy/s at the depth of dose maximum in the phantom at a source-to-surface distance of 100 cm. Our findings indicate that minor modifications to a plane-parallel transmission chamber can substantially enhance the CCE and extending the chamber's operating range to the UHDR regime. This supports the potential of using transmission chamber-based monitoring solutions for UHDR beams, which could facilitate the delivery of UHDR treatments using an approach similar to conventional clinical delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise Konradsson
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Pontus Wahlqvist
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Andreas Thoft
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Börje Blad
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Sven Åj Bäck
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Crister Ceberg
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Kristoffer Petersson
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
- Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sesink A, Becerra M, Ruan JL, Leboucher S, Dubail M, Heinrich S, Jdey W, Petersson K, Fouillade C, Berthault N, Dutreix M, Girard PM. The AsiDNA™ decoy mimicking DSBs protects the normal tissue from radiation toxicity through a DNA-PK/p53/p21-dependent G1/S arrest. NAR Cancer 2024; 6:zcae011. [PMID: 38476631 PMCID: PMC10928987 DOI: 10.1093/narcan/zcae011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
AsiDNA™, a cholesterol-coupled oligonucleotide mimicking double-stranded DNA breaks, was developed to sensitize tumour cells to radio- and chemotherapy. This drug acts as a decoy hijacking the DNA damage response. Previous studies have demonstrated that standalone AsiDNA™ administration is well tolerated with no additional adverse effects when combined with chemo- and/or radiotherapy. The lack of normal tissue complication encouraged further examination into the role of AsiDNA™ in normal cells. This research demonstrates the radioprotective properties of AsiDNA™. In vitro, AsiDNA™ induces a DNA-PK/p53/p21-dependent G1/S arrest in normal epithelial cells and fibroblasts that is absent in p53 deficient and proficient tumour cells. This cell cycle arrest improved survival after irradiation only in p53 proficient normal cells. Combined administration of AsiDNA™ with conventional radiotherapy in mouse models of late and early radiation toxicity resulted in decreased onset of lung fibrosis and increased intestinal crypt survival. Similar results were observed following FLASH radiotherapy in standalone or combined with AsiDNA™. Mechanisms comparable to those identified in vitro were detected both in vivo, in the intestine and ex vivo, in precision cut lung slices. Collectively, the results suggest that AsiDNA™ can partially protect healthy tissues from radiation toxicity by triggering a G1/S arrest in normal cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anouk Sesink
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, 91405 Orsay, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR 3347, INSERM U1021, 91405 Orsay, France
| | - Margaux Becerra
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, 91405 Orsay, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR 3347, INSERM U1021, 91405 Orsay, France
| | - Jia-Ling Ruan
- Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, UK
| | - Sophie Leboucher
- Histology platform, Institut Curie, CNRS UMR3348, 91405 Orsay, France
| | - Maxime Dubail
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, 91405 Orsay, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR 3347, INSERM U1021, 91405 Orsay, France
| | - Sophie Heinrich
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, 91405 Orsay, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR 3347, INSERM U1021, 91405 Orsay, France
| | - Wael Jdey
- Valerio Therapeutics, 49 Bd du Général Martial Valin, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Kristoffer Petersson
- Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, UK
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Charles Fouillade
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, 91405 Orsay, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR 3347, INSERM U1021, 91405 Orsay, France
| | - Nathalie Berthault
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, 91405 Orsay, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR 3347, INSERM U1021, 91405 Orsay, France
| | - Marie Dutreix
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, 91405 Orsay, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR 3347, INSERM U1021, 91405 Orsay, France
| | - Pierre-Marie Girard
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, 91405 Orsay, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR 3347, INSERM U1021, 91405 Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Konradsson E, Wahlqvist P, Thoft A, Blad B, Bäck S, Ceberg C, Petersson K. Beam control system and output fine-tuning for safe and precise delivery of FLASH radiotherapy at a clinical linear accelerator. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1342488. [PMID: 38304871 PMCID: PMC10830783 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1342488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction We have previously adapted a clinical linear accelerator (Elekta Precise, Elekta AB) for ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) electron delivery. To enhance reliability in future clinical FLASH radiotherapy trials, the aim of this study was to introduce and evaluate an upgraded beam control system and beam tuning process for safe and precise UHDR delivery. Materials and Methods The beam control system is designed to interrupt the beam based on 1) a preset number of monitor units (MUs) measured by a monitor detector, 2) a preset number of pulses measured by a pulse-counting diode, or 3) a preset delivery time. For UHDR delivery, an optocoupler facilitates external control of the accelerator's thyratron trigger pulses. A beam tuning process was established to maximize the output. We assessed the stability of the delivery, and the independent interruption capabilities of the three systems (monitor detector, pulse counter, and timer). Additionally, we explored a novel approach to enhance dosimetric precision in the delivery by synchronizing the trigger pulse with the charging cycle of the pulse forming network (PFN). Results Improved beam tuning of gun current and magnetron frequency resulted in average dose rates at the dose maximum at isocenter distance of >160 Gy/s or >200 Gy/s, with or without an external monitor chamber in the beam path, respectively. The delivery showed a good repeatability (standard deviation (SD) in total film dose of 2.2%) and reproducibility (SD in film dose of 2.6%). The estimated variation in DPP resulted in an SD of 1.7%. The output in the initial pulse depended on the PFN delay time. Over the course of 50 measurements employing PFN synchronization, the absolute percentage error between the delivered number of MUs calculated by the monitor detector and the preset MUs was 0.8 ± 0.6% (mean ± SD). Conclusion We present an upgraded beam control system and beam tuning process for safe and stable UHDR electron delivery of hundreds of Gy/s at isocenter distance at a clinical linac. The system can interrupt the beam based on monitor units and utilize PFN synchronization for improved dosimetric precision in the dose delivery, representing an important advancement toward reliable clinical FLASH trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise Konradsson
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Pontus Wahlqvist
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Andreas Thoft
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Börje Blad
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Sven Bäck
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Crister Ceberg
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Kristoffer Petersson
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
- Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liljedahl E, Konradsson E, Linderfalk K, Gustafsson E, Petersson K, Ceberg C, Redebrandt HN. Comparable survival in rats with intracranial glioblastoma irradiated with single-fraction conventional radiotherapy or FLASH radiotherapy. Front Oncol 2024; 13:1309174. [PMID: 38322292 PMCID: PMC10845047 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1309174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Radiotherapy increases survival in patients with glioblastoma. However, the prescribed dose is limited by unwanted side effects on normal tissue. Previous experimental studies have shown that FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) can reduce these side effects. Still, it is important to establish an equal anti-tumor efficacy comparing FLASH-RT to conventional radiotherapy (CONV-RT). Methods Fully immunocompetent Fischer 344 rats with the GFP-positive NS1 intracranial glioblastoma model were irradiated with CONV-RT or FLASH-RT in one fraction of 20 Gy, 25 Gy or 30 Gy. Animals were monitored for survival and acute dermal side effects. The brains were harvested upon euthanasia and tumors were examined post mortem. Results Survival was significantly increased in animals irradiated with CONV-RT and FLASH-RT at 20 Gy and 25 Gy compared to control animals. The longest survival was reached in animals irradiated with FLASH-RT and CONV-RT at 25 Gy. Irradiation at 30 Gy did not lead to increased survival, despite smaller tumors. Tumor size correlated inversely with irradiation dose, both in animals treated with CONV-RT and FLASH-RT. Acute dermal side effects were mild, but only a small proportion of the animals were alive for evaluation of those side effects. Conclusion The dose response was similar for CONV-RT and FLASH-RT in the present model. Tumor size upon the time of euthanasia correlated inversely with the irradiation dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Liljedahl
- The Rausing Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Elise Konradsson
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Karin Linderfalk
- The Rausing Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Emma Gustafsson
- The Rausing Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Kristoffer Petersson
- Department of Oncology, Medical Research Council Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Radiation Physics, Department of Haematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Crister Ceberg
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Henrietta Nittby Redebrandt
- The Rausing Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Neurosurgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Böhlen TT, Germond JF, Petersson K, Ozsahin EM, Herrera FG, Bailat C, Bochud F, Bourhis J, Moeckli R, Adrian G. Effect of Conventional and Ultrahigh Dose Rate FLASH Irradiations on Preclinical Tumor Models: A Systematic Analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:1007-1017. [PMID: 37276928 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.05.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2022] [Revised: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Compared with conventional dose rate irradiation (CONV), ultrahigh dose rate irradiation (UHDR) has shown superior normal tissue sparing. However, a clinically relevant widening of the therapeutic window by UHDR, termed "FLASH effect," also depends on the tumor toxicity obtained by UHDR. Based on a combined analysis of published literature, the current study examined the hypothesis of tumor isoefficacy for UHDR versus CONV and aimed to identify potential knowledge gaps to inspire future in vivo studies. METHODS AND MATERIALS A systematic literature search identified publications assessing in vivo tumor responses comparing UHDR and CONV. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed, including combined analyses of tumor growth and survival data. RESULTS We identified 66 data sets from 15 publications that compared UHDR and CONV for tumor efficacy. The median number of animals per group was 9 (range 3-15) and the median follow-up period was 30.5 days (range 11-230) after the first irradiation. Tumor growth assays were the predominant model used. Combined statistical analyses of tumor growth and survival data are consistent with UHDR isoefficacy compared with CONV. Only 1 study determined tumor-controlling dose (TCD50) and reported statistically nonsignificant differences. CONCLUSIONS The combined quantitative analyses of tumor responses support the assumption of UHDR isoefficacy compared with CONV. However, the comparisons are primarily based on heterogeneous tumor growth assays with limited numbers of animals and short follow-up, and most studies do not assess long-term tumor control probability. Therefore, the assays may be insensitive in resolving smaller response differences, such as responses of radioresistant tumor subclones. Hence, tumor cure experiments, including additional TCD50 experiments, are needed to confirm the assumption of isoeffectiveness in curative settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Till Tobias Böhlen
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean-François Germond
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Kristoffer Petersson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Esat Mahmut Ozsahin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Fernanda G Herrera
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Claude Bailat
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - François Bochud
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean Bourhis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Raphaël Moeckli
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Gabriel Adrian
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Konradsson E, Szecsenyi RE, Adrian G, Coskun M, Børresen B, Arendt ML, Erhart K, Bäck SÅ, Petersson K, Ceberg C. Evaluation of intensity-modulated electron FLASH radiotherapy in a clinical setting using veterinary cases. Med Phys 2023; 50:6569-6579. [PMID: 37696040 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The increased normal tissue tolerance for FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT), as compared to conventional radiotherapy, was first observed in ultra-high dose rate electron beams. Initial clinical trials in companion animals have revealed a high risk of developing osteoradionecrosis following high-dose single-fraction electron FLASH-RT, which may be related to inhomogeneities in the dose distribution. In the current study, we aim to evaluate the possibilities of intensity-modulated electron FLASH-RT in a clinical setting to ensure a homogeneous dose distribution in future veterinary and human clinical trials. METHODS Our beam model in the treatment planning system electronRT (.decimal, LLC, Sanford, FL, USA) was based on a 10-MeV electron beam from a clinical linear accelerator used to treat veterinary patients with FLASH-RT in a clinical setting. In electronRT, the beam can be intensity-modulated using tungsten island blocks in the electron block cutout, and range-modulated using a customized bolus with variable thickness. Modulations were first validated in a heterogeneous phantom by comparing measured and calculated dose distributions. To evaluate the impact of intensity modulation in superficial single-fraction FLASH-RT, a treatment planning study was conducted, including eight canine cancer patient cases with simulated tumors in the head-and-neck region. For each case, treatment plans with and without intensity modulation were created for a uniform bolus and a range-modulating bolus. Treatment plans were evaluated using a target dose homogeneity index (HI), a conformity index (CI), the near-maximum dose outside the target (D 2 % , Body - PTV ${D_{2{\mathrm{\% }},{\mathrm{\ Body}} - {\mathrm{PTV}}}}$ ), and the near-minimum dose to the target (D 98 % ${D_{98\% }}$ ). RESULTS By adding intensity modulation to plans with a uniform bolus, the HI could be improved (p = 0.017). The combination of a range-modulating bolus and intensity modulation provided a further significant improvement of the HI as compared to using intensity modulation in combination with a uniform bolus (p = 0.036). The range-modulating bolus also improved the CI compared to using a uniform bolus, both with an open beam (p = 0.046) and with intensity modulation (p = 0.018), as well as increased theD 98 % ${D_{98\% }}$ (p = 0.036 with open beam and p = 0.05 with intensity modulation) and reduced the medianD 2 % , Body - PTV ${D_{2\% ,{\mathrm{\ Body}} - {\mathrm{PTV}}}}$ (not significant). CONCLUSIONS By using intensity-modulated electron FLASH-RT in combination with range-modulating bolus, the target dose homogeneity and conformity in canine patients with simulated tumors in complex areas in the head-and-neck region could be improved. By utilizing this technique, we hope to decrease the dose outside the target volume and avoid hot spots in future clinical electron FLASH-RT studies, thereby reducing the risk of radiation-induced toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise Konradsson
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Rebecka Ericsson Szecsenyi
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Gabriel Adrian
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Mizgin Coskun
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Betina Børresen
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - Maja Louise Arendt
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | | | - Sven Åj Bäck
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Kristoffer Petersson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
- Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Crister Ceberg
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Børresen B, Arendt ML, Konradsson E, Bastholm Jensen K, Bäck SÅJ, Munck af Rosenschöld P, Ceberg C, Petersson K. Evaluation of single-fraction high dose FLASH radiotherapy in a cohort of canine oral cancer patients. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1256760. [PMID: 37766866 PMCID: PMC10520273 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1256760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background FLASH radiotherapy (RT) is a novel method for delivering ionizing radiation, which has been shown in preclinical studies to have a normal tissue sparing effect and to maintain anticancer efficacy as compared to conventional RT. Treatment of head and neck tumors with conventional RT is commonly associated with severe toxicity, hence the normal tissue sparing effect of FLASH RT potentially makes it especially advantageous for treating oral tumors. In this work, the objective was to study the adverse effects of dogs with spontaneous oral tumors treated with FLASH RT. Methods Privately-owned dogs with macroscopic malignant tumors of the oral cavity were treated with a single fraction of ≥30Gy electron FLASH RT and subsequently followed for 12 months. A modified conventional linear accelerator was used to deliver the FLASH RT. Results Eleven dogs were enrolled in this prospective study. High grade adverse effects were common, especially if bone was included in the treatment field. Four out of six dogs, who had bone in their treatment field and lived at least 5 months after RT, developed osteoradionecrosis at 3-12 months post treatment. The treatment was overall effective with 8/11 complete clinical responses and 3/11 partial responses. Conclusion This study shows that single-fraction high dose FLASH RT was generally effective in this mixed group of malignant oral tumors, but the risk of osteoradionecrosis is a serious clinical concern. It is possible that the risk of osteonecrosis can be mitigated through fractionation and improved dose conformity, which needs to be addressed before moving forward with clinical trials in human cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Betina Børresen
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - Maja L. Arendt
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - Elise Konradsson
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Sven ÅJ. Bäck
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Per Munck af Rosenschöld
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Crister Ceberg
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Kristoffer Petersson
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zou W, Zhang R, Schüler E, Taylor PA, Mascia AE, Diffenderfer ES, Zhao T, Ayan AS, Sharma M, Yu SJ, Lu W, Bosch WR, Tsien C, Surucu M, Pollard-Larkin JM, Schuemann J, Moros EG, Bazalova-Carter M, Gladstone DJ, Li H, Simone CB, Petersson K, Kry SF, Maity A, Loo BW, Dong L, Maxim PG, Xiao Y, Buchsbaum JC. Framework for Quality Assurance of Ultrahigh Dose Rate Clinical Trials Investigating FLASH Effects and Current Technology Gaps. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 116:1202-1217. [PMID: 37121362 PMCID: PMC10526970 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.04.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Revised: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
FLASH radiation therapy (FLASH-RT), delivered with ultrahigh dose rate (UHDR), may allow patients to be treated with less normal tissue toxicity for a given tumor dose compared with currently used conventional dose rate. Clinical trials are being carried out and are needed to test whether this improved therapeutic ratio can be achieved clinically. During the clinical trials, quality assurance and credentialing of equipment and participating sites, particularly pertaining to UHDR-specific aspects, will be crucial for the validity of the outcomes of such trials. This report represents an initial framework proposed by the NRG Oncology Center for Innovation in Radiation Oncology FLASH working group on quality assurance of potential UHDR clinical trials and reviews current technology gaps to overcome. An important but separate consideration is the appropriate design of trials to most effectively answer clinical and scientific questions about FLASH. This paper begins with an overview of UHDR RT delivery methods. UHDR beam delivery parameters are then covered, with a focus on electron and proton modalities. The definition and control of safe UHDR beam delivery and current and needed dosimetry technologies are reviewed and discussed. System and site credentialing for large, multi-institution trials are reviewed. Quality assurance is then discussed, and new requirements are presented for treatment system standard analysis, patient positioning, and treatment planning. The tables and figures in this paper are meant to serve as reference points as we move toward FLASH-RT clinical trial performance. Some major questions regarding FLASH-RT are discussed, and next steps in this field are proposed. FLASH-RT has potential but is associated with significant risks and complexities. We need to redefine optimization to focus not only on the dose but also on the dose rate in a manner that is robust and understandable and that can be prescribed, validated, and confirmed in real time. Robust patient safety systems and access to treatment data will be critical as FLASH-RT moves into the clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Zou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Rongxiao Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Emil Schüler
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Paige A Taylor
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Eric S Diffenderfer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Tianyu Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Ahmet S Ayan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Manju Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Shu-Jung Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Weiguo Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Walter R Bosch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Christina Tsien
- Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Murat Surucu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Julianne M Pollard-Larkin
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jan Schuemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Eduardo G Moros
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | - David J Gladstone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Heng Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kristoffer Petersson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Stephen F Kry
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amit Maity
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Billy W Loo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Lei Dong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Peter G Maxim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Ying Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jeffrey C Buchsbaum
- Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cooper CR, Jones DJL, Jones GDD, Petersson K. Comet Assay Profiling of FLASH-Induced Damage: Mechanistic Insights into the Effects of FLASH Irradiation. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:7195. [PMID: 37108360 PMCID: PMC10138874 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24087195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Numerous studies have demonstrated the normal tissue-sparing effects of ultra-high dose rate 'FLASH' irradiation in vivo, with an associated reduction in damage burden being reported in vitro. Towards this, two key radiochemical mechanisms have been proposed: radical-radical recombination (RRR) and transient oxygen depletion (TOD), with both being proposed to lead to reduced levels of induced damage. Previously, we reported that FLASH induces lower levels of DNA strand break damage in whole-blood peripheral blood lymphocytes (WB-PBL) ex vivo, but our study failed to distinguish the mechanism(s) involved. A potential outcome of RRR is the formation of crosslink damage (particularly, if any organic radicals recombine), whilst a possible outcome of TOD is a more anoxic profile of induced damage resulting from FLASH. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to profile FLASH-induced damage via the Comet assay, assessing any DNA crosslink formation as a putative marker of RRR and/or anoxic DNA damage formation as an indicative marker of TOD, to determine the extent to which either mechanism contributes to the "FLASH effect". Following FLASH irradiation, we see no evidence of any crosslink formation; however, FLASH irradiation induces a more anoxic profile of induced damage, supporting the TOD mechanism. Furthermore, treatment of WB-PBLs pre-irradiation with BSO abrogates the reduced strand break damage burden mediated by FLASH exposures. In summary, we do not see any experimental evidence to support the RRR mechanism contributing to the reduced damage burden induced by FLASH. However, the observation of a greater anoxic profile of damage following FLASH irradiation, together with the BSO abrogation of the reduced strand break damage burden mediated by FLASH, lends further support to TOD being a driver of the reduced damage burden plus a change in the damage profile mediated by FLASH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian R. Cooper
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Robert Kilpatrick Clinical Sciences Building, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE2 7LX, UK; (D.J.L.J.); (G.D.D.J.)
- MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK
| | - Donald J. L. Jones
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Robert Kilpatrick Clinical Sciences Building, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE2 7LX, UK; (D.J.L.J.); (G.D.D.J.)
| | - George D. D. Jones
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Robert Kilpatrick Clinical Sciences Building, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE2 7LX, UK; (D.J.L.J.); (G.D.D.J.)
| | - Kristoffer Petersson
- MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK
- Department of Haematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital Lund University, 221 85 Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Konradsson E, Liljedahl E, Gustafsson E, Adrian G, Beyer S, Ilaahi SE, Petersson K, Ceberg C, Nittby Redebrandt H. Comparable Long-Term Tumor Control for Hypofractionated FLASH Versus Conventional Radiation Therapy in an Immunocompetent Rat Glioma Model. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:101011. [PMID: 36092986 PMCID: PMC9449779 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To ensure a clinical translation of FLASH radiation therapy (FLASH-RT) for a specific tumor type, studies on tumor control and toxicity within the same biological system are needed. In this study, our objective was to evaluate tumor control and toxicity for hypofractionated FLASH-RT and conventional radiation therapy (CONV-RT) in an immunocompetent rat glioma model. Methods and Materials Fisher 344 rats (N = 68) were inoculated subcutaneously with NS1 glioma cells and randomized into groups (n = 9-10 per group). CONV-RT (∼8 Gy/min) or FLASH-RT (70-90 Gy/s) was administered in 3 fractions of either 8 Gy, 12.5 Gy, or 15 Gy using a 10-MeV electron beam. The maximum tumor diameter was measured weekly, and overall survival was determined until day 100. Long-term tumor control was defined as no evident tumor on day 100. Animals were evaluated for acute dermal side effects at 2 to 5 weeks after completed RT and for late dermal side effects at 3 months after initiation of treatment. Results Survival was significantly increased in all irradiated groups compared with control animals (P < .001). In general, irradiated tumors started to shrink at 1 week post-completed RT. In 40% (23 of 58) of the irradiated animals, long-term tumor control was achieved. Radiation-induced skin toxic effects were mild and consisted of hair loss, erythema, and dry desquamation. No severe toxic effect was observed. There was no significant difference between FLASH-RT and CONV-RT in overall survival, acute side effects, or late side effects for any of the dose levels. Conclusions This study shows that hypofractionated FLASH-RT results in long-term tumor control rates similar to those of CONV-RT for the treatment of large subcutaneous glioblastomas in immunocompetent rats. Neither treatment technique induced severe skin toxic effects. Consequently, no significant difference in toxicity could be resolved, suggesting that higher doses may be required to detect a FLASH sparing of skin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise Konradsson
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Emma Liljedahl
- Rausing Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Emma Gustafsson
- Rausing Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Gabriel Adrian
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Sarah Beyer
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Suhayb Ehsaan Ilaahi
- Rausing Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Kristoffer Petersson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
- MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Crister Ceberg
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Henrietta Nittby Redebrandt
- Rausing Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Neurosurgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mannerberg A, Konradsson E, Edvardsson A, Kügele M, Kadhim M, Ceberg C, Petersson K, Thomasson H, Arendt M, Børresen B, Bastholm Jensen K. PO-1711 Accurate FLASH delivery requires motion monitoring – SGRT is a feasible option for canine patients. Radiother Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(22)03675-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
12
|
Cooper CR, Jones D, Jones GDD, Petersson K. FLASH irradiation induces lower levels of DNA damage ex vivo, an effect modulated by oxygen tension, dose, and dose rate. Br J Radiol 2022; 95:20211150. [PMID: 35171701 PMCID: PMC10993968 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20211150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Revised: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE FLASH irradiation reportedly produces less normal tissue toxicity, while maintaining tumour response. To investigate oxygen's role in the 'FLASH effect', we assessed DNA damage levels following irradiation at different oxygen tensions, doses and dose rates. METHODS Samples of whole blood were irradiated (20 Gy) at various oxygen tensions (0.25-21%) with 6 MeV electrons at dose rates of either 2 kGy/s (FLASH) or 0.1 Gy/s (CONV), and subsequently with various doses (0-40 Gy) and intermediate dose rates (0.3-1000 Gy/s). DNA damage of peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) were assessed by the alkaline comet assay. RESULTS Following 20 Gy irradiation, lower levels of DNA damage were induced for FLASH, the difference being significant at 0.25% (p < 0.05) and 0.5% O2 (p < 0.01). The differential in DNA damage at 0.5% O2 was found to increase with total dose and dose rate, becoming significant for doses ≥20 Gy and dose rates ≥30 Gy/s. CONCLUSION This study shows, using the alkaline comet assay, that lower levels of DNA damage are induced following FLASH irradiation, an effect that is modulated by the oxygen tension, and increases with the total dose and dose rate of irradiation, indicating that an oxygen related mechanism, e.g. transient radiation-induced oxygen depletion, may contribute to the tissue sparing effect of FLASH irradiation. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE This paper is first to directly show that FLASH-induced DNA damage is modulated by oxygen tension, total dose and dose rate, with FLASH inducing significantly lower levels of DNA damage for doses ≥20 Gy and dose rates ≥30 Gy/s, at 0.5% O2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian R Cooper
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester,
Robert Kilpatrick Clinical Sciences Building, Leicester Royal
Infirmary, Leicester,
UK
| | - Donald Jones
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester,
Robert Kilpatrick Clinical Sciences Building, Leicester Royal
Infirmary, Leicester,
UK
| | - George DD Jones
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester,
Robert Kilpatrick Clinical Sciences Building, Leicester Royal
Infirmary, Leicester,
UK
| | - Kristoffer Petersson
- MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of
Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building,
Oxford, UK
- Department of Haematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics,
Skåne University Hospital Lund University,
Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lovgren N, Petersson K, Labarbe R, Hotoiu L, Fagerström Kristensen I. PO-1685 Creating clinically competitive FLASH proton therapy treatment plans. Radiother Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(22)03649-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
14
|
Petersson K. SP-0017 For the motion (FLASH: Increasing the therapeutic index of radiotherapy). Radiother Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(22)03870-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
15
|
Kim MM, Darafsheh A, Schuemann J, Dokic I, Lundh O, Zhao T, Ramos-Méndez J, Dong L, Petersson K. Development of Ultra-High Dose-Rate (FLASH) Particle Therapy. IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci 2022; 6:252-262. [PMID: 36092270 PMCID: PMC9457346 DOI: 10.1109/trpms.2021.3091406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Research efforts in FLASH radiotherapy have increased at an accelerated pace recently. FLASH radiotherapy involves ultra-high dose rates and has shown to reduce toxicity to normal tissue while maintaining tumor response in pre-clinical studies when compared to conventional dose rate radiotherapy. The goal of this review is to summarize the studies performed to-date with proton, electron, and heavy ion FLASH radiotherapy, with particular emphasis on the physical aspects of each study and the advantages and disadvantages of each modality. Beam delivery parameters, experimental set-up, and the dosimetry tools used are described for each FLASH modality. In addition, modeling efforts and treatment planning for FLASH radiotherapy is discussed along with potential drawbacks when translated into the clinical setting. The final section concludes with further questions that have yet to be answered before safe clinical implementation of FLASH radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele M Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Arash Darafsheh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Jan Schuemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ivana Dokic
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 222, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Olle Lundh
- Department of Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Tianyu Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - José Ramos-Méndez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Lei Dong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kristoffer Petersson
- Department of Oncology, The Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Radiation Physics, Department of Haematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Petersson K, Konradsson E, Arendt M, Jensen KB, Børresen B, Kristensen A, Hansen A, Af Rosenschöld PM, Bäck S, Ceberg C. FLASH in the Clinic Track FLASH RADIOTHERAPY TREATMENT OF CANINE PATIENTS. Phys Med 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s1120-1797(22)01446-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
17
|
Karlsson T, Augustin H, Lindqvist M, Otten J, Petersson K, Storck-Lindholm E, Mogren I, Winkvist A. Effect of the New Nordic Diet compared with usual care on glucose control in gestational diabetes mellitus: Study protocol for the randomized controlled trial intervention with new Nordic DIet in women with GestatiOnal diabetes mellitus (iNDIGO). Contemp Clin Trials 2022; 115:106706. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2021] [Revised: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
18
|
Jones G, Cooper C, Petersson K. FLASH Mechanisms Track (Oral Presentations) COMET ASSAY MEASURES INDICATE LOWER DNA DAMAGE LEVELS IN WHOLE BLOOD PBLS FOLLOWING EX VIVO ELECTRON FLASH EXPOSURES OVER 0.25–1% OXYGEN. Phys Med 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s1120-1797(22)01556-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
|
19
|
Adrian G, Brus A, Konradsson E, Eriksson S, Andresen T, Petersson K, Carneiro A, Hansen A, Ceberg C. FLASH Mechanisms Track (Oral Presentations) FLASH SPARING OF MELANOMA CELLS IN VITRO AND IN VIVO. Phys Med 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s1120-1797(22)01461-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
|
20
|
Konradsson E, Lempart M, Blad B, Petersson K, Ceberg C. ION COLLECTION EFFICIENCY IN A PLANE-PARALLEL TRANSMISSION CHAMBER OPERATED AT HIGH POLARIZING VOLTAGES IN A PULSED ELECTRON BEAM. Phys Med 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s1120-1797(22)01665-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
|
21
|
Abstract
PURPOSE Hypoxia (low oxygen) is a common feature of solid tumors that has been intensely studied for more than six decades. Here we review the importance of hypoxia to radiotherapy with a particular focus on the contribution of hypoxia to immune responses, metastatic potential and FLASH radiotherapy, active areas of research by leading women in the field. CONCLUSION Although hypoxia-driven metastasis and immunosuppression can negatively impact clinical outcome, understanding these processes can also provide tumor-specific vulnerabilities that may be therapeutically exploited. The different oxygen tensions present in tumors and normal tissues may underpin the beneficial FLASH sparing effect seen in normal tissue and represents a perfect example of advances in the field that can leverage tumor hypoxia to improve future radiotherapy treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eui Jung Moon
- MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK,Equal Contribution and to whom correspondence should be addressed. ; :
| | - Kristoffer Petersson
- MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK,Radiation Physics, Department of Haematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Sweden,Equal Contribution and to whom correspondence should be addressed. ; :
| | - Monica M. Oleina
- MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK,Equal Contribution and to whom correspondence should be addressed. ; :
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ruan JL, Lee C, Wouters S, Tullis IDC, Verslegers M, Mysara M, Then CK, Smart SC, Hill MA, Muschel RJ, Giaccia AJ, Vojnovic B, Kiltie AE, Petersson K. Irradiation at Ultra-High (FLASH) Dose Rates Reduces Acute Normal Tissue Toxicity in the Mouse Gastrointestinal System. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 111:1250-1261. [PMID: 34400268 PMCID: PMC7612009 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Revised: 08/03/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Preclinical studies using ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) irradiation have demonstrated reduced normal tissue toxicity compared with conventional dose rate (CONV) irradiation, although this finding is not universal. We investigated the effect of temporal pulse structure and average dose rate of FLASH compared with CONV irradiation on acute intestinal toxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS Whole abdomens of C3H mice were irradiated with a single fraction to various doses, using a 6 MeV electron linear accelerator with single pulse FLASH (dose rate = 2-6 × 106 Gy/s) or conventional (CONV; 0.25 Gy/s) irradiation. At 3.75 days postirradiation, fresh feces were collected for 16S rRNA sequencing to assess changes in the gut microbiota. A Swiss roll-based crypt assay was used to quantify acute damage to the intestinal crypts to determine how tissue toxicity was affected by the different temporal pulse structures of FLASH delivery. RESULTS We found statistically significant improvements in crypt survival for mice irradiated with FLASH at doses between 7.5 and 12.5 Gy, with a dose modifying factor of 1.1 for FLASH (7.5 Gy, P < .01; 10 Gy, P < .05; 12.5 Gy, P < .01). This sparing effect was lost when the delivery time was increased, either by increasing the number of irradiation pulses or by prolonging the time between 2 successive pulses. Sparing was observed for average dose rates of ≥280 Gy/s. Fecal microbiome analysis showed that FLASH irradiation caused fewer changes to the microbiota than CONV irradiation. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that FLASH irradiation can spare mouse small intestinal crypts and reduce changes in gut microbiome composition compared with CONV irradiation. The higher the average dose rate, the larger the FLASH effect, which is also influenced by temporal pulse structure of the delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia-Ling Ruan
- MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Carl Lee
- Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, Nuffield Department of Orthopedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Shari Wouters
- Interdisciplinary Biosciences Group, Belgian Nuclear Research Center (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium; Molecular Pathology Group, Cell Biology and Histology and Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute, Campus Drie Eiken, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Iain D C Tullis
- MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Mieke Verslegers
- Interdisciplinary Biosciences Group, Belgian Nuclear Research Center (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium
| | - Mohamed Mysara
- Interdisciplinary Biosciences Group, Belgian Nuclear Research Center (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium
| | - Chee Kin Then
- MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Sean C Smart
- MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Mark A Hill
- MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Ruth J Muschel
- MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Amato J Giaccia
- MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Borivoj Vojnovic
- MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Anne E Kiltie
- MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Kristoffer Petersson
- MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, United Kingdom; Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Konradsson E, Arendt M, Jensen K, Thomasson H, Børresen B, Petersson K, Ceberg C. Intracavitary Electron FLASH Radiotherapy in a Canine Cancer Patient With Oral Malignant Melanoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.07.097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
24
|
Mannerberg A, Kügele M, Hamid S, Edvardsson A, Petersson K, Gunnlaugsson A, Bäck SÅ, Engelholm S, Ceberg S. Faster and more accurate patient positioning with surface guided radiotherapy for ultra-hypofractionated prostate cancer patients. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2021; 19:41-45. [PMID: 34527818 PMCID: PMC8430426 DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2021.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Revised: 06/24/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to evaluate if surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) can decrease patient positioning time for localized prostate cancer patients compared to the conventional 3-point localization setup method. The patient setup accuracy was also compared between the two setup methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 40 localized prostate cancer patients were enrolled in this study, where 20 patients were positioned with surface imaging (SI) and 20 patients were positioned with 3-point localization. The setup time was obtained from the system log files of the linear accelerator and compared between the two methods. The patient setup was verified with daily orthogonal kV images which were matched based on the implanted gold fiducial markers. Resulting setup deviations between planned and online positions were compared between SI and 3-point localization. RESULTS Median setup time was 2:50 min and 3:28 min for SI and 3-point localization, respectively (p < 0.001). The median vector offset was 4.7 mm (range: 0-10.4 mm) for SI and 5.2 mm for 3-point localization (range: 0.41-17.3 mm) (p = 0.01). Median setup deviation in the individual translations for SI and 3-point localization respectively was: 1.1 mm and 1.9 mm in lateral direction (p = 0.02), 1.8 and 1.6 mm in the longitudinal direction (p = 0.41) and 2.2 mm and 2.6 mm in the vertical direction (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Using SGRT for positioning of prostate cancer patients provided a faster and more accurate patient positioning compared to the conventional 3-point localization setup.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annika Mannerberg
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden,Corresponding author.
| | - Malin Kügele
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden,Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Sandra Hamid
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Anneli Edvardsson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Kristoffer Petersson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden,Department of Oncology, Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Adalsteinn Gunnlaugsson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Sven Å.J. Bäck
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Silke Engelholm
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Sofie Ceberg
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Adrian G, Konradsson E, Beyer S, Wittrup A, Butterworth KT, McMahon SJ, Ghita M, Petersson K, Ceberg C. Cancer Cells Can Exhibit a Sparing FLASH Effect at Low Doses Under Normoxic In Vitro-Conditions. Front Oncol 2021; 11:686142. [PMID: 34395253 PMCID: PMC8358772 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.686142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Irradiation with ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) has been shown to spare normal tissue without hampering tumor control in several in vivo studies. Few cell lines have been investigated in vitro, and previous results are inconsistent. Assuming that oxygen depletion accounts for the FLASH sparing effect, no sparing should appear for cells irradiated with low doses in normoxia. Methods Seven cancer cell lines (MDA-MB-231, MCF7, WiDr, LU-HNSCC4, HeLa [early passage and subclone]) and normal lung fibroblasts (MRC-5) were irradiated with doses ranging from 0 to 12 Gy using FLASH (≥800 Gy/s) or conventional dose rates (CONV, 14 Gy/min), with a 10 MeV electron beam from a clinical linear accelerator. Surviving fraction (SF) was determined with clonogenic assays. Three cell lines were further studied for radiation-induced DNA-damage foci using a 53BP1-marker and for cell cycle synchronization after irradiation. Results A tendency of increased survival following FLASH compared with CONV was suggested for all cell lines, with significant differences for 4/7 cell lines. The magnitude of the FLASH-sparing expressed as a dose-modifying factor at SF=0.1 was around 1.1 for 6/7 cell lines and around 1.3 for the HeLasubclone. Similar cell cycle distributions and 53BP1-foci numbers were found comparing FLASH to CONV. Conclusion We have found a FLASH effect appearing at low doses under normoxic conditions for several cell lines in vitro. The magnitude of the FLASH effect differed between the cell lines, suggesting inherited biological susceptibilities for FLASH irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Adrian
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Clinical Sciences, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Elise Konradsson
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Sarah Beyer
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Clinical Sciences, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Anders Wittrup
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Clinical Sciences, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,Wallenberg Center for Molecular Medicine, Lund, Sweden
| | - Karl T Butterworth
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen J McMahon
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Mihaela Ghita
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Kristoffer Petersson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,Medical Research Council Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Crister Ceberg
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Konradsson E, Arendt ML, Bastholm Jensen K, Børresen B, Hansen AE, Bäck S, Kristensen AT, Munck Af Rosenschöld P, Ceberg C, Petersson K. Establishment and Initial Experience of Clinical FLASH Radiotherapy in Canine Cancer Patients. Front Oncol 2021; 11:658004. [PMID: 34055624 PMCID: PMC8155542 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.658004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
FLASH radiotherapy has emerged as a treatment technique with great potential to increase the differential effect between normal tissue toxicity and tumor response compared to conventional radiotherapy. To evaluate the feasibility of FLASH radiotherapy in a relevant clinical setting, we have commenced a feasibility and safety study of FLASH radiotherapy in canine cancer patients with spontaneous superficial solid tumors or microscopic residual disease, using the electron beam of our modified clinical linear accelerator. The setup for FLASH radiotherapy was established using a short electron applicator with a nominal source-to-surface distance of 70 cm and custom-made Cerrobend blocks for collimation. The beam was characterized by measuring dose profiles and depth dose curves for various field sizes. Ten canine cancer patients were included in this initial study; seven patients with nine solid superficial tumors and three patients with microscopic disease. The administered dose ranged from 15 to 35 Gy. To ensure correct delivery of the prescribed dose, film measurements were performed prior to and during treatment, and a Farmer-type ion-chamber was used for monitoring. Treatments were found to be feasible, with partial response, complete response or stable disease recorded in 11/13 irradiated tumors. Adverse events observed at follow-up ranging from 3-6 months were mild and consisted of local alopecia, leukotricia, dry desquamation, mild erythema or swelling. One patient receiving a 35 Gy dose to the nasal planum, had a grade 3 skin adverse event. Dosimetric procedures, safety and an efficient clincal workflow for FLASH radiotherapy was established. The experience from this initial study will be used as a basis for a veterinary phase I/II clinical trial with more specific patient inclusion selection, and subsequently for human trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise Konradsson
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Maja L Arendt
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | | | - Betina Børresen
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - Anders E Hansen
- Department of Biotherapeutic Engineering and Drug Targeting, DTU Health Tech, Kgs, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Sven Bäck
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Annemarie T Kristensen
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - Per Munck Af Rosenschöld
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Crister Ceberg
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Kristoffer Petersson
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Oncology, Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Svendsen K, Guénot D, Svensson JB, Petersson K, Persson A, Lundh O. A focused very high energy electron beam for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. Sci Rep 2021; 11:5844. [PMID: 33712653 PMCID: PMC7971008 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-85451-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
An electron beam of very high energy (50-250 MeV) can potentially produce a more favourable radiotherapy dose distribution compared to a state-of-the-art photon based radiotherapy technique. To produce an electron beam of sufficiently high energy to allow for a long penetration depth (several cm), very large accelerating structures are needed when using conventional radio-frequency technology, which may not be possible due to economical or spatial constraints. In this paper, we show transport and focusing of laser wakefield accelerated electron beams with a maximum energy of 160 MeV using electromagnetic quadrupole magnets in a point-to-point imaging configuration, yielding a spatial uncertainty of less than 0.1 mm, a total charge variation below [Formula: see text] and a focal spot of [Formula: see text]. The electron beam was focused to control the depth dose distribution and to improve the dose conformality inside a phantom of cast acrylic slabs and radiochromic film. The phantom was irradiated from 36 different angles to obtain a dose distribution mimicking a stereotactic radiotherapy treatment, with a peak fractional dose of 2.72 Gy and a total maximum dose of 65 Gy. This was achieved with realistic constraints, including 23 cm of propagation through air before any dose deposition in the phantom.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Diego Guénot
- Department of Physics, Lund University, P.O. Box 118, 22100, Lund, Sweden
| | - Jonas Björklund Svensson
- Department of Physics, Lund University, P.O. Box 118, 22100, Lund, Sweden
- Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, NotkestraSSe 85, 22607, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kristoffer Petersson
- Department of Oncology, The Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Radiation Physics, Department of Haematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Anders Persson
- Department of Physics, Lund University, P.O. Box 118, 22100, Lund, Sweden
| | - Olle Lundh
- Department of Physics, Lund University, P.O. Box 118, 22100, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Konradsson E, Ceberg C, Lempart M, Blad B, Bäck S, Knöös T, Petersson K. Correction for Ion Recombination in a Built-in Monitor Chamber of a Clinical Linear Accelerator at Ultra-High Dose Rates. Radiat Res 2021; 194:580-586. [PMID: 33348371 DOI: 10.1667/rade-19-00012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2019] [Accepted: 04/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
In the novel and promising radiotherapy technique known as FLASH, ultra-high dose-rate electron beams are used. As a step towards clinical trials, dosimetric advances will be required for accurate dose delivery of FLASH. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a built-in transmission chamber of a clinical linear accelerator can be used as a real-time dosimeter to monitor the delivery of ultra-high-dose-rate electron beams. This was done by modeling the drop-in ion-collection efficiency of the chamber with increasing dose-per-pulse values, so that the ion recombination effect could be considered. The raw transmission chamber signal was extracted from the linear accelerator and its response was measured using radiochromic film at different dose rates/dose-per-pulse values, at a source-to-surface distance of 100 cm. An increase of the polarizing voltage, applied over the transmission chamber, by a factor of 2 and 3, improved the ion-collection efficiency, with corresponding increased efficiency at the highest dose-per-pulse values by a factor 1.4 and 2.2, respectively. The drop-in ion-collection efficiency with increasing dose-per-pulse was accurately modeled using a logistic function fitted to the transmission chamber data. The performance of the model was compared to that of the general theoretical Boag models of ion recombination in ionization chambers. The logistic model was subsequently used to correct for ion recombination at dose rates ranging from conventional to ultra-high, making the transmission chamber useful as a real-time monitor for the dose delivery of FLASH electron beams in a clinical setup.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise Konradsson
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Crister Ceberg
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Michael Lempart
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Börje Blad
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Sven Bäck
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Tommy Knöös
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Kristoffer Petersson
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,The CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Chabi S, To THV, Leavitt R, Poglio S, Jorge PG, Jaccard M, Petersson K, Petit B, Roméo PH, Pflumio F, Vozenin MC, Uzan B. Ultra-high-dose-rate FLASH and Conventional-Dose-Rate Irradiation Differentially Affect Human Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Normal Hematopoiesis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 109:819-829. [PMID: 33075474 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Revised: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Ultra-high-dose-rate FLASH radiation therapy has been shown to minimize side effects of irradiation in various organs while keeping antitumor efficacy. This property, called the FLASH effect, has caused enthusiasm in the radiation oncology community because it opens opportunities for safe dose escalation and improved radiation therapy outcome. Here, we investigated the impact of ultra-high-dose-rate FLASH versus conventional-dose-rate (CONV) total body irradiation (TBI) on humanized models of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) and normal human hematopoiesis. METHODS AND MATERIALS We optimized the geometry of irradiation to ensure reproducible and homogeneous procedures using eRT6/Oriatron. Three T-ALL patient-derived xenografts and hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) and CD34+ cells isolated from umbilical cord blood were transplanted into immunocompromised mice, together or separately. After reconstitution, mice received 4 Gy FLASH and CONV-TBI, and tumor growth and normal hematopoiesis were studied. A retrospective study of clinical and gene-profiling data previously obtained on the 3 T-ALL patient-derived xenografts was performed. RESULTS FLASH-TBI was more efficient than CONV-TBI in controlling the propagation of 2 cases of T-ALL, whereas the third case of T-ALL was more responsive to CONV-TBI. The 2 FLASH-sensitive cases of T-ALL had similar genetic abnormalities, and a putative susceptibility imprint to FLASH-RT was found. In addition, FLASH-TBI was able to preserve some HSPC/CD34+ cell potential. Interestingly, when HSPC and T-ALL were present in the same animals, FLASH-TBI could control tumor development in most (3 of 4) of the secondary grafted animals, whereas among the mice receiving CONV-TBI, treated cells died with high leukemia infiltration. CONCLUSIONS Compared with CONV-TBI, FLASH-TBI reduced functional damage to human blood stem cells and had a therapeutic effect on human T-ALL with a common genetic and genomic profile. The validity of the defined susceptibility imprint needs to be investigated further; however, to our knowledge, the present findings are the first to show benefits of FLASH-TBI on human hematopoiesis and leukemia treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Chabi
- Team Niche and Cancer in Hematopoiesis, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France; Laboratoire des cellules Souches Hématopoïétiques et des Leucémies, Service Cellules Souches et Radiations, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France; UMRE008 Stabilité Génétique, Cellules Souches et Radiations, Université de Paris and Université Paris-Saclay, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Thi Hong Van To
- Laboratoire des cellules Souches Hématopoïétiques et des Leucémies, Service Cellules Souches et Radiations, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France; UMRE008 Stabilité Génétique, Cellules Souches et Radiations, Université de Paris and Université Paris-Saclay, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France; Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Ron Leavitt
- Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Sandrine Poglio
- Team Niche and Cancer in Hematopoiesis, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France; Laboratoire des cellules Souches Hématopoïétiques et des Leucémies, Service Cellules Souches et Radiations, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France; UMRE008 Stabilité Génétique, Cellules Souches et Radiations, Université de Paris and Université Paris-Saclay, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Patrik Gonçalves Jorge
- Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland; Institute of Radiation Physics/CHUV, Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland
| | - Maud Jaccard
- Institute of Radiation Physics/CHUV, Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland
| | - Kristoffer Petersson
- Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland; Institute of Radiation Physics/CHUV, Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland
| | - Benoit Petit
- Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Paul-Henri Roméo
- Team Niche and Cancer in Hematopoiesis, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France; UMRE008 Stabilité Génétique, Cellules Souches et Radiations, Université de Paris and Université Paris-Saclay, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France; Laboratoire de la Régulation de la Transcription dans les cellules Souches, Service Cellules Souches et Radiations, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Françoise Pflumio
- Team Niche and Cancer in Hematopoiesis, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France; Laboratoire des cellules Souches Hématopoïétiques et des Leucémies, Service Cellules Souches et Radiations, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France; UMRE008 Stabilité Génétique, Cellules Souches et Radiations, Université de Paris and Université Paris-Saclay, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Marie-Catherine Vozenin
- Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Benjamin Uzan
- Team Niche and Cancer in Hematopoiesis, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France; Laboratoire des cellules Souches Hématopoïétiques et des Leucémies, Service Cellules Souches et Radiations, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France; UMRE008 Stabilité Génétique, Cellules Souches et Radiations, Université de Paris and Université Paris-Saclay, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Berne A, Petersson K, Tullis IDC, Newman RG, Vojnovic B. Monitoring electron energies during FLASH irradiations. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66:045015. [PMID: 33361551 PMCID: PMC8208618 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abd672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Revised: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
When relativistic electrons are used to irradiate tissues, such as during FLASH pre-clinical irradiations, the electron beam energy is one of the critical parameters that determine the dose distribution. Moreover, during such irradiations, linear accelerators (linacs) usually operate with significant beam loading, where a small change in the accelerator output current can lead to beam energy reduction. Optimisation of the tuning of the accelerator's radio frequency system is often required. We describe here a robust, easy-to-use device for non-interceptive monitoring of potential variations in the electron beam energy during every linac macro-pulse of an irradiation run. Our approach monitors the accelerated electron fringe beam using two unbiased aluminium annular charge collection plates, positioned in the beam path and with apertures (5 cm in diameter) for the central beam. These plates are complemented by two thin annular screening plates to eliminate crosstalk and equalise the capacitances of the charge collection plates. The ratio of the charge picked up on the downstream collection plate to the sum of charges picked up on the both plates is sensitive to the beam energy and to changes in the energy spectrum shape. The energy sensitivity range is optimised to the investigated beam by the choice of thickness of the first plate. We present simulation and measurement data using electrons generated by a nominal 6 MeV energy linac as well as information on the design, the practical implementation and the use of this monitor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Berne
- Medical Research Council Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, United Kingdom
| | - Kristoffer Petersson
- Medical Research Council Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, United Kingdom
- Radiation Physics, Department of Haematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Iain D C Tullis
- Medical Research Council Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, United Kingdom
| | - Robert G Newman
- Medical Research Council Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, United Kingdom
| | - Borivoj Vojnovic
- Medical Research Council Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Montay-Gruel P, Acharya MM, Gonçalves Jorge P, Petit B, Petridis IG, Fuchs P, Leavitt R, Petersson K, Gondré M, Ollivier J, Moeckli R, Bochud F, Bailat C, Bourhis J, Germond JF, Limoli CL, Vozenin MC. Hypofractionated FLASH-RT as an Effective Treatment against Glioblastoma that Reduces Neurocognitive Side Effects in Mice. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:775-784. [PMID: 33060122 PMCID: PMC7854480 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-0894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 125] [Impact Index Per Article: 41.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2020] [Revised: 09/03/2020] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Recent data have shown that single-fraction irradiation delivered to the whole brain in less than tenths of a second using FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT), does not elicit neurocognitive deficits in mice. This observation has important clinical implications for the management of invasive and treatment-resistant brain tumors that involves relatively large irradiation volumes with high cytotoxic doses. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Therefore, we aimed at simultaneously investigating the antitumor efficacy and neuroprotective benefits of FLASH-RT 1-month after exposure, using a well-characterized murine orthotopic glioblastoma model. As fractionated regimens of radiotherapy are the standard of care for glioblastoma treatment, we incorporated dose fractionation to simultaneously validate the neuroprotective effects and optimized tumor treatments with FLASH-RT. RESULTS The capability of FLASH-RT to minimize the induction of radiation-induced brain toxicities has been attributed to the reduction of reactive oxygen species, casting some concern that this might translate to a possible loss of antitumor efficacy. Our study shows that FLASH and CONV-RT are isoefficient in delaying glioblastoma growth for all tested regimens. Furthermore, only FLASH-RT was found to significantly spare radiation-induced cognitive deficits in learning and memory in tumor-bearing animals after the delivery of large neurotoxic single dose or hypofractionated regimens. CONCLUSIONS The present results show that FLASH-RT delivered with hypofractionated regimens is able to spare the normal brain from radiation-induced toxicities without compromising tumor cure. This exciting capability provides an initial framework for future clinical applications of FLASH-RT.See related commentary by Huang and Mendonca, p. 662.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Montay-Gruel
- Laboratory of Radiation Oncology/DO/Radio-Oncology/CHUV, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Munjal M Acharya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Irvine, California
| | - Patrik Gonçalves Jorge
- Laboratory of Radiation Oncology/DO/Radio-Oncology/CHUV, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland
- Institute of Radiation Physics/CHUV, Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland
| | - Benoît Petit
- Laboratory of Radiation Oncology/DO/Radio-Oncology/CHUV, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Ioannis G Petridis
- Laboratory of Radiation Oncology/DO/Radio-Oncology/CHUV, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Philippe Fuchs
- Laboratory of Radiation Oncology/DO/Radio-Oncology/CHUV, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Ron Leavitt
- Laboratory of Radiation Oncology/DO/Radio-Oncology/CHUV, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Kristoffer Petersson
- Laboratory of Radiation Oncology/DO/Radio-Oncology/CHUV, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland
- Institute of Radiation Physics/CHUV, Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland
| | - Maude Gondré
- Laboratory of Radiation Oncology/DO/Radio-Oncology/CHUV, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland
- Institute of Radiation Physics/CHUV, Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland
| | - Jonathan Ollivier
- Laboratory of Radiation Oncology/DO/Radio-Oncology/CHUV, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Raphael Moeckli
- Institute of Radiation Physics/CHUV, Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland
| | - François Bochud
- Institute of Radiation Physics/CHUV, Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland
| | - Claude Bailat
- Institute of Radiation Physics/CHUV, Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland
| | - Jean Bourhis
- Laboratory of Radiation Oncology/DO/Radio-Oncology/CHUV, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Charles L Limoli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Irvine, California
| | - Marie-Catherine Vozenin
- Laboratory of Radiation Oncology/DO/Radio-Oncology/CHUV, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Van Den Heuvel F, Petersson K, Vojnovic B, Hill M, Vella A, Ryan A, Brooke M, Maughan T, Giaccia A. Oxygen Related Factors in FLASH Radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.07.1668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
33
|
Mannerberg A, Kügele M, Hamid S, Petersson K, Gunnlaugsson A, Bäck S, Engelholm S, Ceberg S. OC-0352: Increased accuracy in reduced time – surface guided RT for hypofractionated prostate cancer patients. Radiother Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)00376-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
34
|
Konradsson E, Lempart M, Blad B, Ceberg C, Petersson K. OC-0634: Correction for ion recombination in a built-in monitor chamber at ultra-high dose rates. Radiother Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)00656-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
35
|
Larsson E, Kilander H, Weinryb M, Vikström M, Petersson K. The Swedish study on improved contraceptive counselling for immigrant women postpartum. Eur J Public Health 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa165.1068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Contraceptive choices postpartum have not previously been studied in Sweden. Being foreign born is a risk factor for induced abortion. Improving postpartum contraceptive counseling could potentially fulfill unmet needs for contraception.
This is an organizational case study using a Quality Improvement Collaborative (QIC) within the regular healthcare setting at 3 maternal health clinics in Stockholm. The active phase of the study was Sep2018-Sep2019. Quantitative and qualitative methods were combined. Routine registration of choice of postpartum contraception was introduced at the clinics and analyzed focusing on Swedish born and foreign-born women. Midwives and researchers met continuously, and during the active phase every 2-3 months in learning seminars with around 20 participants. During the learning seminars PDSA-cycles were used and areas of improvements for continuous performance measures were chosen. The midwives decided on and tested multiple evidence-based changes in contraceptive counselling and services during action periods. Goals were set and competency building in areas chosen by the midwifes were held. In addition, both foreign- and Swedish born women gave their input to the improvement areas. Qualitative data was analyzed through content analysis from field notes and verbatim transcripts.
Preliminary results show that the proportion of women choosing an effective contraceptive method (SARC or LARC) among immigrant women increased from 40% to 55% when comparing the start and the end of the project. The midwives reported how they had changed their approach when counselling women who were skeptical about contraception and tried to find a new way to meet women's needs.
As much as the QIC showed positive results, it was a small-scale study in 3 clinics in one geographical area. A larger study to determine and explain the effectiveness of QIC on the proportion of immigrant women choosing an effective contraceptive method postpartum is planned for 2021-2024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Larsson
- Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - H Kilander
- Region Jönköping county, Jönköping, Sweden
| | - M Weinryb
- Stockholm South General Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Vikström
- Maternal healthcare unit, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - K Petersson
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Swedish Pregnancy Register/Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Griffin RJ, Ahmed MM, Amendola B, Belyakov O, Bentzen SM, Butterworth KT, Chang S, Coleman CN, Djonov V, Formenti SC, Glatstein E, Guha C, Kalnicki S, Le QT, Loo BW, Mahadevan A, Massaccesi M, Maxim PG, Mohiuddin M, Mohiuddin M, Mayr NA, Obcemea C, Petersson K, Regine W, Roach M, Romanelli P, Simone CB, Snider JW, Spitz DR, Vikram B, Vozenin MC, Abdel-Wahab M, Welsh J, Wu X, Limoli CL. Understanding High-Dose, Ultra-High Dose Rate, and Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 107:766-778. [PMID: 32298811 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.03.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Revised: 03/13/2020] [Accepted: 03/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The National Cancer Institute's Radiation Research Program, in collaboration with the Radiosurgery Society, hosted a workshop called Understanding High-Dose, Ultra-High Dose Rate and Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy on August 20 and 21, 2018 to bring together experts in experimental and clinical experience in these and related fields. Critically, the overall aims were to understand the biological underpinning of these emerging techniques and the technical/physical parameters that must be further defined to drive clinical practice through innovative biologically based clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Griffin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Mansoor M Ahmed
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, Rockville, Maryland
| | | | - Oleg Belyakov
- International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna International Centre, Vienna, Austria
| | - Søren M Bentzen
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Karl T Butterworth
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Sha Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | | - Valentin Djonov
- Bern Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Sylvia C Formenti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Eli Glatstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Chandan Guha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| | - Shalom Kalnicki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| | - Quynh-Thu Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
| | - Billy W Loo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
| | - Anand Mahadevan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geisinger Health Systems, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - Mariangela Massaccesi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Peter G Maxim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | | | | | - Nina A Mayr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Kristoffer Petersson
- Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - William Regine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Mack Roach
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | | | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, New York
| | - James W Snider
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Douglas R Spitz
- Free Radical & Radiation Biology Program, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | | | - Marie-Catherine Vozenin
- Laboratory of Radiation Oncology/DO/Radio-Oncology/CHUV, Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland
| | - May Abdel-Wahab
- International Atomic Energy Agency Headquarters, Vienna International Centre, Vienna, Austria
| | - James Welsh
- Edward Hines VA Medical Center and Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Xiaodong Wu
- Executive Medical Physics Associates, Miami, Florida; Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Charles L Limoli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, California.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Petersson K, Adrian G, Butterworth K, McMahon SJ. A Quantitative Analysis of the Role of Oxygen Tension in FLASH Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 107:539-547. [PMID: 32145319 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.02.634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2019] [Revised: 02/14/2020] [Accepted: 02/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Recent demonstrations of normal tissue sparing by high-dose, high-dose-rate FLASH radiation therapy have driven considerable interest in its application to improve clinical outcomes. However, significant uncertainty remains about the underlying mechanisms of FLASH sparing and how deliveries can be optimized to maximize benefit from this effect. Rapid oxygen depletion has been suggested as a potential mechanism by which these effects occur, but this has yet to be quantitatively tested against experimental data. METHODS AND MATERIALS Models of oxygen kinetics during irradiation were used to develop a time-dependent model of the oxygen enhancement ratio in mammalian cells that incorporates oxygen depletion. The characteristics of this model were then explored in terms of the dose and dose-rate dependence of the oxygen enhancement ratio. This model was also fit to experimental data from both in vitro and in vivo data sets. RESULTS In cases of FLASH radiation therapy, this model suggests that oxygen levels can be depleted by amounts that are sufficient to affect radiosensitivity only in conditions of intermediate oxygen tension, with no effect seen at high or very low initial oxygen levels. The model also effectively reproduced the dose, dose rate, and oxygen tension dependence of responses to FLASH radiation therapy in a range of systems, with model parameters compatible with published data. CONCLUSIONS Oxygen depletion provides a credible quantitative model to understand the biological effects of FLASH radiation therapy and is compatible with a range of experimental observations of FLASH sparing. These results highlight the need for more detailed quantification of oxygen depletion under high-dose-rate radiation exposures in relevant systems and the importance of oxygen tension in target tissues for FLASH sparing to be observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristoffer Petersson
- Department of Oncology, Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Department of Haematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Gabriel Adrian
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Karl Butterworth
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Stephen J McMahon
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kyroudi A, Petersson K, Ozsahin E, Bourhis J, Bochud F, Moeckli R. Exploration of clinical preferences in treatment planning of radiotherapy for prostate cancer using Pareto fronts and clinical grading analysis. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2020; 14:82-86. [PMID: 33458319 PMCID: PMC7807626 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2020.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Revised: 05/26/2020] [Accepted: 05/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radiotherapy treatment planning is a multi-criteria problem. Any optimization of the process produces a set of mathematically optimal solutions. These optimal plans are considered mathematically equal, but they differ in terms of the trade-offs involved. Since the various objectives are conflicting, the choice of the best plan for treatment is dependent on the preferences of the radiation oncologists or the medical physicists (decision makers).We defined a clinically relevant area on a prostate Pareto front which better represented clinical preferences and determined if there were differences among radiation oncologists and medical physicists. METHODS AND MATERIALS Pareto fronts of five localized prostate cancer patients were used to analyze and visualize the trade-off between the rectum sparing and the PTV under-dosage. Clinical preferences were evaluated with Clinical Grading Analysis by asking nine radiation oncologists and ten medical physicists to rate pairs of plans presented side by side. A choice of the optimal plan on the Pareto front was made by all decision makers. RESULTS The plans in the central region of the Pareto front (1-4% PTV under-dosage) received the best evaluations. Radiation oncologists preferred the organ at risk (OAR) sparing region (2.5-4% PTV under-dosage) while medical physicists preferred better PTV coverage (1-2.5% PTV under-dosage). When the Pareto fronts were additionally presented to the decisions makers they systematically chose the plan in the trade-off region (0.5-1% PTV under-dosage). CONCLUSION We determined a specific region on the Pareto front preferred by the radiation oncologists and medical physicists and found a difference between them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Kyroudi
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital, Rue du Grand-Pré 1, CH 1007 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - K. Petersson
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital, Rue du Grand-Pré 1, CH 1007 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - E. Ozsahin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, Rue du Bugnon 46, CH 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - J. Bourhis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, Rue du Bugnon 46, CH 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - F. Bochud
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital, Rue du Grand-Pré 1, CH 1007 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - R. Moeckli
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital, Rue du Grand-Pré 1, CH 1007 Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Wilson JD, Hammond EM, Higgins GS, Petersson K. Corrigendum: Ultra-High Dose Rate (FLASH) Radiotherapy: Silver Bullet or Fool's Gold? Front Oncol 2020; 10:210. [PMID: 32161721 PMCID: PMC7053480 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2020] [Accepted: 02/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01563.].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph D. Wilson
- Department of Oncology, The Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Ester M. Hammond
- Department of Oncology, The Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Geoff S. Higgins
- Department of Oncology, The Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Kristoffer Petersson
- Department of Oncology, The Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Radiation Physics, Department of Haematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Borg D, Sundberg J, Brun E, Kjellén E, Petersson K, Hermansson M, Johansson J, Eberhard J, Johnsson A. Palliative short-course hypofractionated radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy in esophageal adenocarcinoma: the phase II PALAESTRA trial. Acta Oncol 2020; 59:212-218. [PMID: 31564184 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2019.1670861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Background: The majority of patients with incurable esophageal adenocarcinoma suffer from dysphagia. We assessed a novel treatment strategy with initial short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy with the primary aim to achieve long-term relief of dysphagia.Methods: This phase II trial included treatment-naîve patients with dysphagia due to esophageal adenocarcinoma not eligible for curative treatment. External beam radiotherapy with 20 Gy in five fractions to the primary tumor was followed by four cycles of chemotherapy (FOLFOX regimen). Dysphagia was assessed using a five-grade scale.Results: From October 2014 to May 2018 a total of 29 patients were enrolled. The rate of dysphagia improvement was 79%, median duration of improvement 6.7 months (12.2 months for responders) and median overall survival 9.9 months. In the pre-specified per protocol analysis (23 patients) the rate of dysphagia improvement was 91%, median duration of improvement 12.2 months (14.0 months for responders) and median overall survival 16.0 months. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (29%), infection (25%), anorexia (11%), esophagitis (11%) and fatigue (11%).Conclusion: Initial palliative short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy is a promising treatment strategy that can provide long-lasting relief of dysphagia in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Borg
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Oncology and Pathology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Jan Sundberg
- Department of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Eva Brun
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Oncology and Pathology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Elisabeth Kjellén
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Oncology and Pathology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Kristoffer Petersson
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Michael Hermansson
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Jan Johansson
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Jakob Eberhard
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Oncology and Pathology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Anders Johnsson
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Oncology and Pathology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Recent in vivo results have shown prominent tissue sparing effect of radiotherapy with ultra-high dose rates (FLASH) compared to conventional dose rates (CONV). Oxygen depletion has been proposed as the underlying mechanism, but in vitro data to support this have been lacking. The aim of the current study was to compare FLASH to CONV irradiation under different oxygen concentrations in vitro. METHODS Prostate cancer cells were irradiated at different oxygen concentrations (relative partial pressure ranging between 1.6 and 20%) with a 10 MeV electron beam at a dose rate of either 600 Gy/s (FLASH) or 14 Gy/min (CONV), using a modified clinical linear accelerator. We evaluated the surviving fraction of cells using clonogenic assays after irradiation with doses ranging from 0 to 25 Gy. RESULTS Under normoxic conditions, no differences between FLASH and CONV irradiation were found. For hypoxic cells (1.6%), the radiation response was similar up to a dose of about 5-10 Gy, above which increased survival was shown for FLASH compared to CONV irradiation. The increased survival was shown to be significant at 18 Gy, and the effect was shown to depend on oxygen concentration. CONCLUSION The in vitro FLASH effect depends on oxygen concentration. Further studies to characterize and optimize the use of FLASH in order to widen the therapeutic window are indicated. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE This paper shows in vitro evidence for the role of oxygen concentration underlying the difference between FLASH and CONV irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Adrian
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Clinical Sciences, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Elise Konradsson
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Michael Lempart
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Sven Bäck
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Crister Ceberg
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Kristoffer Petersson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Wilson JD, Hammond EM, Higgins GS, Petersson K. Ultra-High Dose Rate (FLASH) Radiotherapy: Silver Bullet or Fool's Gold? Front Oncol 2020; 9:1563. [PMID: 32010633 PMCID: PMC6979639 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 235] [Impact Index Per Article: 58.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2019] [Accepted: 12/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy is a cornerstone of both curative and palliative cancer care. However, radiotherapy is severely limited by radiation-induced toxicities. If these toxicities could be reduced, a greater dose of radiation could be given therefore facilitating a better tumor response. Initial pre-clinical studies have shown that irradiation at dose rates far exceeding those currently used in clinical contexts reduce radiation-induced toxicities whilst maintaining an equivalent tumor response. This is known as the FLASH effect. To date, a single patient has been subjected to FLASH radiotherapy for the treatment of subcutaneous T-cell lymphoma resulting in complete response and minimal toxicities. The mechanism responsible for reduced tissue toxicity following FLASH radiotherapy is yet to be elucidated, but the most prominent hypothesis so far proposed is that acute oxygen depletion occurs within the irradiated tissue. This review examines the tissue response to FLASH radiotherapy, critically evaluates the evidence supporting hypotheses surrounding the biological basis of the FLASH effect, and considers the potential for FLASH radiotherapy to be translated into clinical contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph D. Wilson
- Department of Oncology, The Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Ester M. Hammond
- Department of Oncology, The Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Geoff S. Higgins
- Department of Oncology, The Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Kristoffer Petersson
- Department of Oncology, The Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Radiation Physics, Department of Haematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Petersson K. FLASH radiotherapy: What, how and why? Res Outreach 2020; 2020:66-69. [PMID: 34993417 PMCID: PMC7612183 DOI: 10.32907/ro-117-6669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) radiotherapy is a new way of treating tumours caused by cancer. Higher doses of radiotherapy are associated with trauma to the healthy tissue surrounding the tumour, whereas FLASH radiotherapy demonstrates a sparing effect of the healthy tissues without compromising the anti-tumour action. Dr Kristoffer Petersson at the Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, along with collaborators Joseph D. Wilson, Ester M. Hammond and Geoff S. Higgins, review the available data on FLASH radiotherapy and its clinical potential in the treatment of cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristoffer Petersson
- Department of Oncology, Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Borg D, Sundberg J, Brun E, Kjellén E, Petersson K, Hermansson M, Johansson J, Eberhard J, Johnsson A. PALAESTRA: A phase II trial with short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy as palliative treatment in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz247.097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
45
|
Troensegaard Nielsen K, Huss Eriksson A, Funch Carlsen M, Engell K, Jansson J, Petersson K, Røpke M, Kemp P. 387 Ex Vivo Visualization and Extended Drug Release from a Dissolvable Microarray. J Invest Dermatol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2019.07.389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
46
|
Montay-Gruel P, Acharya MM, Petersson K, Alikhani L, Yakkala C, Allen BD, Ollivier J, Petit B, Jorge PG, Syage AR, Nguyen TA, Baddour AAD, Lu C, Singh P, Moeckli R, Bochud F, Germond JF, Froidevaux P, Bailat C, Bourhis J, Vozenin MC, Limoli CL. Long-term neurocognitive benefits of FLASH radiotherapy driven by reduced reactive oxygen species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2019; 116:10943-10951. [PMID: 31097580 PMCID: PMC6561167 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1901777116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 261] [Impact Index Per Article: 52.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Here, we highlight the potential translational benefits of delivering FLASH radiotherapy using ultra-high dose rates (>100 Gy⋅s-1). Compared with conventional dose-rate (CONV; 0.07-0.1 Gy⋅s-1) modalities, we showed that FLASH did not cause radiation-induced deficits in learning and memory in mice. Moreover, 6 months after exposure, CONV caused permanent alterations in neurocognitive end points, whereas FLASH did not induce behaviors characteristic of anxiety and depression and did not impair extinction memory. Mechanistic investigations showed that increasing the oxygen tension in the brain through carbogen breathing reversed the neuroprotective effects of FLASH, while radiochemical studies confirmed that FLASH produced lower levels of the toxic reactive oxygen species hydrogen peroxide. In addition, FLASH did not induce neuroinflammation, a process described as oxidative stress-dependent, and was also associated with a marked preservation of neuronal morphology and dendritic spine density. The remarkable normal tissue sparing afforded by FLASH may someday provide heretofore unrealized opportunities for dose escalation to the tumor bed, capabilities that promise to hasten the translation of this groundbreaking irradiation modality into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Montay-Gruel
- Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne VD-1011, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne VD-1011, Switzerland
| | - Munjal M Acharya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-2695
| | - Kristoffer Petersson
- Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne VD-1011, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne VD-1011, Switzerland
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne VD-1011, Switzerland
| | - Leila Alikhani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-2695
| | - Chakradhar Yakkala
- Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne VD-1011, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne VD-1011, Switzerland
| | - Barrett D Allen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-2695
| | - Jonathan Ollivier
- Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne VD-1011, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne VD-1011, Switzerland
| | - Benoit Petit
- Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne VD-1011, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne VD-1011, Switzerland
| | - Patrik Gonçalves Jorge
- Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne VD-1011, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne VD-1011, Switzerland
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne VD-1011, Switzerland
| | - Amber R Syage
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-2695
| | - Thuan A Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-2695
| | - Al Anoud D Baddour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-2695
| | - Celine Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-2695
| | - Paramvir Singh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-2695
| | - Raphael Moeckli
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne VD-1011, Switzerland
| | - François Bochud
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne VD-1011, Switzerland
| | - Jean-François Germond
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne VD-1011, Switzerland
| | - Pascal Froidevaux
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne VD-1011, Switzerland
| | - Claude Bailat
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne VD-1011, Switzerland
| | - Jean Bourhis
- Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne VD-1011, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne VD-1011, Switzerland
| | - Marie-Catherine Vozenin
- Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne VD-1011, Switzerland;
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne VD-1011, Switzerland
| | - Charles L Limoli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-2695;
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Konradsson E, Kügele M, Petersson K, Berg L, Gebre-Medhin M, Ceberg S. EP-1978 Surface guided coplanar and non-coplanar stereotactic radiotherapy with open masks – a phantom study. Radiother Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(19)32398-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
48
|
Lempart M, Blad B, Adrian G, Bäck S, Knöös T, Ceberg C, Petersson K. Modifying a clinical linear accelerator for delivery of ultra-high dose rate irradiation. Radiother Oncol 2019; 139:40-45. [PMID: 30755324 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.01.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2018] [Revised: 01/24/2019] [Accepted: 01/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to modify a clinical linear accelerator, making it capable of electron beam ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) irradiation. Modifications had to be quick, reversible, and without interfering with clinical treatments. METHODS Performed modifications: (1) reduced distance with three setup positions, (2) adjusted/optimized gun current, modulator charge rate and beam steering values for a high dose rate, (3) delivery was controlled with a microcontroller on an electron pulse level, and (4) moving the primary and/or secondary scattering foils from the beam path. RESULTS The variation in dose for a five-pulse delivery was measured to be 1% (using a diode, 4% using film) during 10 minutes after a warm-up procedure, later increasing to 7% (11% using film). A FLASH irradiation dose rate was reached at the cross-hair foil, MLC, and wedge position, with ≥30, ≥80, and ≥300 Gy/s, respectively. Moving the scattering foils resulted in an increased output of ≥120, ≥250, and ≥1000 Gy/s, at the three positions. The beam flatness was 5% at the cross-hair position for a 20 × 20 and a 10 × 10 cm2 area, with and without both scattering foils in the beam. The beam flatness was 10% at the wedge position for a 6 and 2.5 cm diametric area, with and without the scattering foils in the beam path. CONCLUSIONS A clinical accelerator was modified to produce ultra-high dose rates, high enough for FLASH irradiation. Future work aims to fine-tune the dose delivery, using the on-board transmission chamber signal and adjusting the dose-per-pulse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Lempart
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Sweden
| | - Börje Blad
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Sweden
| | - Gabriel Adrian
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Clinical Sciences, Lund, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Sweden
| | - Sven Bäck
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Sweden; Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Clinical Sciences, Lund, Lund University, Sweden
| | - Tommy Knöös
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Sweden; Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Clinical Sciences, Lund, Lund University, Sweden
| | - Crister Ceberg
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Clinical Sciences, Lund, Lund University, Sweden
| | - Kristoffer Petersson
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Montay-Gruel P, Bouchet A, Jaccard M, Patin D, Serduc R, Aim W, Petersson K, Petit B, Bailat C, Bourhis J, Bräuer-Krisch E, Vozenin MC. X-rays can trigger the FLASH effect: Ultra-high dose-rate synchrotron light source prevents normal brain injury after whole brain irradiation in mice. Radiother Oncol 2018; 129:582-588. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 173] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2018] [Revised: 08/06/2018] [Accepted: 08/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
50
|
Kyroudi A, Petersson K, Ozsahin M, Bourhis J, Bochud F, Moeckli R. Analysis of the treatment plan evaluation process in radiotherapy through eye tracking. Z Med Phys 2018; 28:318-324. [DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2017.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2017] [Revised: 11/08/2017] [Accepted: 11/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|