Omalizumab for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Expert consensus on the use of omalizumab in chronic urticaria in China

Chronic urticaria (CU) is a debilitating skin disease that lasts for more than 6 weeks with wheals and/or angioedema, including chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU). In China, the prevalence of this disease is high, more than 1%, and on the rise. CU has a major impact on the quality of life (QoL) of patients who frequently experience sleep disturbance, depression, and anxiety. Nearly one-third of patients with CSU, in China, are resistant to second-generation H₁-antihistamines (sgAHs), even at a fourfold dose (second line; off-label). Omalizumab is approved for the treatment of CSU treatment in Europe and shows remarkable efficacy and safety. In China, regulatory approval for the use of omalizumab is pending, and its use in clinical practice varies widely. Consensus on omalizumab CU treatment in China is urgently needed. The aim of this article is to propose a practical omalizumab treatment algorithm for the management of antihistamine-resistant CSU and CIndU in adults and special population including children and adolescents, and pregnant or breast feeding women, to guide daily clinical practice in China. In the development of this consensus, an expert group including mainly dermatologists, allergists, but also pulmonologists, ENTs, immunologists, and pediatricians in Allergic Disease Prevention and Control Committee, Chinese Preventive Medicine Association, reviewed the existing evidence and developed consensus on the use of omalizumab in CU patients from China. The goal of this consensus is to assist clinicians in making rational decisions in the management of refractory CU with omalizumab. The key clinical questions covered by the treatment algorithm are: 1) Omalizumab treatment routine strategy in both CSU and CIndU patients; 2) Recommended dose and treatment duration for different age stratification; 3) Treatment duration for CU patients with other allergic comorbidities; 4) Recommendation on omalizumab stopping strategy.

Quality of life in patients with allergic and immunologic skin diseases: in the eye of the beholder

Allergic and immunologic skin diseases negatively impact the quality of life (QoL) of affected patients with detrimental consequences. Nonetheless, in everyday clinical practice the evaluation of QoL is often overlooked. Considering the increasing prevalence of atopic dermatitis, allergic contact dermatitis, hereditary angioedema, cutaneous mastocytosis, and urticaria, it is essential to determine the effects of allergic and immunologic skin diseases on QoL. A joint meeting (GET TOGETHER 2021) of the Italian Society of Allergology, Asthma and Clinical Immunology (SIAAIC) and the Italian Society of Allergological, Occupational and Environmental Dermatology (SIDAPA) aimed to summarize the features of the main QoL tools used in these diseases and to describe the extent of QoL impairment as well as the impact of treatments on QoL, particularly biologic therapies. The assessment of QoL in patients with allergic and immunologic skin diseases relies on generic, organ-specific and disease-specific questionnaires. While generic and organ-specific questionnaires allow comparison between different diseases, disease-specific questionnaires are designed and validated for specific cohorts: the QoL Index for Atopic Dermatitis (QoLIAD) and the Childhood Atopic Dermatitis Impact Scale (CADIS) in atopic dermatitis, the ACD-11 in allergic contact dermatitis, the Angioedema QoL Questionnaire (AE-QoL) and the Hereditary Angioedema QoL questionnaire (HAE-QoL) in hereditary angioedema, the Mastocytosis QoL Questionnaires (MCQoL e MQLQ) in cutaneous mastocytosis, and the Chronic Urticaria QoL questionnaire (CU-Q2oL) in urticaria. Among the many factors that variably contribute to QoL impairment, pruritus can represent the leading cause of patient discomfort. Biologic therapies significantly ameliorate QoL in atopic dermatitis, hereditary angioedema, mastocytosis and chronic urticaria. In general, adequate management strategies are essential for improving QoL in patients with allergic and immunologic skin diseases.

Analysis of clinical factors as possible predictors of response to omalizumab and relapse after treatment discontinuation in chronic spontaneous urticaria

Omalizumab is a monoclonal anti-IgE antibody which is effective in chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), although clinical response appears to be variable in the real-life setting. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the response of CSU to omalizumab and disease relapse are associated with individual and/or clinical characteristics of patients. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical records of 124 patients treated with omalizumab for moderate to severe CSU refractory to antihistamines. Disease activity was assessed using the urticaria activity score over the last 7 days (UAS7). After 24 weeks of treatment, 91% of patients showed complete remission (UAS7 = 0) or good control (UAS7 < 7) of CSU. Omalizumab was re-administered in 45 patients because of recurrence of moderate to severe symptoms at week 8 after treatment discontinuation or later, and clinical results achieved with retreatment were similar to those observed in the first course. Among the parameters included in our analysis (age and sex of patients, documented history of atopy or autoimmune thyroid disease, CSU duration and baseline severity, concurrent angioedema, and association with chronic inducible urticaria), none was associated with response to omalizumab in our study population. Similarly, these parameters did not significantly differ between patients who experienced CSU relapse and those without relapse. Predictors of response to omalizumab treatment in CSU patients are still unclear, and further studies are needed to evaluate the presence of baseline factors that can influence treatment outcome.

Exploring Machine Learning Techniques to Predict the Response to Omalizumab in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria

Background: Omalizumab is the best treatment for patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). Machine learning (ML) approaches can be used to predict response to therapy and the effectiveness of a treatment. No studies are available on the use of ML techniques to predict the response to Omalizumab in CSU. Methods: Data from 132 CSU outpatients were analyzed. Urticaria Activity Score over 7 days (UAS7) and treatment efficacy were assessed. Clinical and demographic characteristics were used for training and validating ML models to predict the response to treatment. Two methodologies were used to label the data based on the response to treatment (UAS7 ≥ 6): (A) at 1, 3 and 5 months; (B) classifying the patients as early responders (ER), late responders (LR) or non-responders (NR) (ER: UAS 7 ≥ 6 at first month, LR: UAS 7 ≥ 6 at third month, NR: if none of the previous conditions occurred). Results: ER were predominantly characterized by hypertension, while LR mainly suffered from asthma and hypothyroidism. A slight positive correlation (R² = 0.21) was found between total IgE levels and UAS7 at 1 month. Variable Importance Analysis (VIA) reported D-dimer and C-reactive proteins as the key blood tests for the performance of learning techniques. Using methodology (A), SVM (specificity of 0.81) and k-NN (sensitivity of 0.8) are the best models to predict LR at the third month. Conclusion: k-NN plus the SVM model could be used to identify the response to treatment. D-dimer and C-reactive proteins have greater predictive power in training ML models.

Predictors of treatment response in chronic spontaneous urticaria

The current therapeutic algorithm for chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), endorsed by the international guideline, entails treatment escalation from second-generation H₁ -antihistamines (sgAHs) to omalizumab and cyclosporine until complete response is achieved. Recently, several predictors of response to these treatment options have been described. Here, we discuss the most promising predictors of response and nonresponse to these treatments in CSU. A systematic search was performed by two independent researchers using the MEDLINE/PubMed database with specific keywords and 73 studies included in the review. Levels of evidence were categorized as strong (robust predictors), weak (emerging predictors) or no association, based on the outcome and number of studies available. High disease activity, high levels of C-reactive protein and D-dimer are robust predictors for a poor or no response to sgAHs. Poor or no response to omalizumab is robustly predicted by low serum levels of total IgE. A good response to cyclosporine is robustly predicted by a positive basophil histamine release assay, whereas low total IgE is an emerging predictor. The response to treatment with sgAHs, omalizumab and cyclosporine can be predicted by the use of markers that are readily available in routine clinical practice. Further studies are needed to confirm these predictors.

Chronic Urticaria: Advances in Understanding of the Disease and Clinical Management

Chronic urticaria (CU) is a common skin condition characterized by the recurrence of wheals, with or without angioedema, which lasts for at least 6 weeks. Owing to its pruritus and incurability, this disease adversely affects the patients' physical and mental health and diminishes the quality of life. CU is generally classified into two subtypes based on the relevance of eliciting factors: chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU), the latter of which is further divided into several subtypes. To improve the understanding and clinical management of this highly heterogeneous disorder, the EAACI/GA²LEN/EDF/WAO guideline was developed and published in 2018 based on evidence and expert consensus. The diagnostic and treatment algorithms proposed by the guideline have largely facilitated dermatologists in clinical practice. However, several questions remained unsolved and have been widely investigated in the recent years. First, a better understanding of the association between chronic urticaria and its potential underlying causes or eliciting factors such as autoimmunity, infections, coagulation aberrance, and vitamin D deficiency is warranted. This would lead to updates in the diagnostic and treatment procedures of different subtypes of chronic urticaria. Secondly, treatment for recalcitrant cases, especially those resistant to or intolerant of second-generation antihistamines and (or) omalizumab, calls for novel therapeutic measures or strategies. In the present review, we summarized recent advances in the understanding and management of both CSU and CIndU, with special emphasis on their underlying causes or eliciting factors, pathogenic mechanisms, potential targets for intervention, and advances in treatment strategies.

The therapeutic role of methotrexate in chronic urticaria: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Chronic urticaria, in many cases, has an unsatisfactory response to antihistamines. The current recommendations in urticaria do not mention the dose and duration for methotrexate.

AIMS

This study aims to systematically review the use/efficacy of methotrexate in chronic urticaria.

METHODS

A systematic search in four databases, that is, PubMed/Medline, Cochrane central, Google Scholar and Clinicaltrials.gov was done to identify studies on the use of methotrexate in chronic urticaria using key words "methotrexate [MeSH terms]" and "urticaria" or "urticaria, chronic" or "urticaria, chronic spontaneous."

RESULTS

Nine articles (study participants 127), including three randomized control trials, one prospective interventional trial without control, three retrospective reviews and two case reports, were identified and finally included in the systematic review. There was a paucity of literature and the three randomized control trials did not show any benefit of methotrexate over antihistamines alone. However, in studies where steroid-dependent cases were given methotrexate, marked benefit was reported with steroid-sparing effect, particularly on methotrexate dose escalation.

LIMITATIONS

Due to a paucity of published literature on methotrexate in urticaria, a meta-analysis could not be done.

CONCLUSION

In chronic recalcitrant or steroid-dependent cases, methotrexate may be a therapeutic agent of interest; however, current evidence does not point to any added advantage in efficacy over antihistamines. More evidence based on larger, well-executed randomized control trials is needed in the future to get more definitive answers.

Elastic meta-analytic-predictive prior for dynamically borrowing information from historical data with application to biosimilar clinical trials

A biosimilar is a biological product that is highly similar to and has no clinically meaningful differences from an approved reference product. Focusing on two-arm randomized clinical trials that aim to establish the equivalence between a test biosimilar product and the reference product, we propose the elastic meta-analytic-predictive (EMAP) prior method to leverage rich historical data available on the reference product to improve the power of the biosimilar trials. We first extract the prior information from multiple historical studies through meta-analysis, and then we discount the resulting meta-analytic-predictive (MAP) prior adaptively according to the congruence between the historical reference data and the trial reference arm data via an elastic function. The EMAP prior method is information-borrowing consistent in that asymptotically it achieves full information borrowing when trial reference arm data are congruent to historical reference data, and no information borrowing when trial reference arm data are not congruent to historical reference data. As a result, the method asymptotically controls the type I error rate at the nominal value. Extensive simulation studies show that the EMAP prior outperforms the robust MAP prior. The EMAP prior generates comparable or higher power and provides better-controlled type I errors. We illustrate the proposed methodology using two trial examples.

Evaluation of Pharmacologic Treatments for H1 Antihistamine-Refractory Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Importance

The comparative benefits and harms of all available treatments for H1 antihistamine-refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) have not been established.

Objective

To evaluate different treatment effects of pharmacologic treatments among patients with H1 antihistamine-refractory CSU.

Data Sources

Searches were conducted of MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and CINAHL from inception to April 19, 2021, with no language restrictions. Gray literature from Google Scholar, ongoing trial registers, and preprint reports was added to the searches of electronic databases.

Study Selection

Randomized clinical trials using validated measurement tools that investigated the benefits and harms of pharmacologic treatments among adolescent or adult patients with CSU who had an inadequate response to H1 antihistamines were screened for inclusion independently by 2 investigators.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Two investigators independently extracted study data according to the predefined list of interests. A random-effects model was used to calculate the network estimates reported as standardized mean differences and odds ratios with corresponding 95% CIs.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcomes that reflect the patient's perspective included changes in urticaria symptoms from baseline and unacceptability of treatment (all-cause dropouts).

Results

Twenty-three randomized clinical trials with 2480 participants that compared 18 different interventions or dosages and placebo were included. The standardized mean differences for change in urticaria symptoms were -1.05 (95% CI, -1.37 to -0.73) for ligelizumab, 72 mg; -1.07 (95% CI, -1.39 to -0.75) for ligelizumab, 240 mg; -0.77 (95% CI, -0.91 to -0.63) for omalizumab, 300 mg; and -0.59 (95% CI, -1.10 to -0.08) for omalizumab, 600 mg. No significant differences in treatment unacceptability were observed. With respect to benefits and harms, the network estimates illustrated that the most efficacious treatments were achieved with ligelizumab, 72 or 240 mg (large beneficial effect) and omalizumab, 300 or 600 mg (moderate beneficial effect).

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings in this meta-analysis suggest that the biologic agents ligelizumab, 72 or 240 mg, and omalizumab, 300 or 600 mg, can be recommended as effective treatments for patients with CSU who have had an inadequate response to H1 antihistamines. Head-to-head trials with high methodologic quality and harmonized design and outcome definitions are needed to help inform subsequent international guidelines for the management of CSU.

Targeted Therapy for Chronıc Spontaneous Urtıcarıa: Ratıonale and Recent Progress

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is characterized by the presence of wheals, angioedema, or both for at least 6 weeks. It may persist for a long time-up to 50% of the patients have been reported to be symptomatic 5 years after the onset. Some patients can suffer more than one episode of CSU during their lifetime. Considering the recurrences, disabling symptoms, and significant impact on quality of life, proper and effective treatment of CSU is critical. The use of antihistamines (AHs) is still the mainstay of treatment. However, given the low rates of response to AHs (38.6% and 63.2% to standard doses and higher doses, respectively), the complete control of symptoms seems difficult to attain. The use of omalizumab for CSU has been a major breakthrough in the care of patients with CSU. However, the partial response and lack of response to omalizumab in a subgroup of patients, as high as 70% in some studies, make the development of alternative treatments desirable. Ever-increasing knowledge on the pathogenesis is making new target molecules available and enabling drug development for CSU. In addition to drug repurposing as in anti-IL-4/13, IL-5, and IL-17 antibodies, novel targeted therapy options such as ligelizumab and Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors are currently undergoing clinical trials and will be available in the near future. This article reviews the current challenges in the treatment of CSU, the pathogenesis and potential target molecules, and the rationale for novel treatments and their rapidly developing status.

The Classification, Pathogenesis, Diagnostic Workup, and Management of Urticaria: An Update

Wheals and angioedema are the signature signs of urticaria, and itch is the key symptom. Urticaria, in most patients, is acute and resolves within days (acute urticaria, AU). Chronic urticaria (CU) can be of long duration and results not only in severely impaired quality of life but also has a socioeconomic impact due to work productivity impairment. In some patients with CU, the wheals and angioedema are induced exclusively by defined and definite triggers (chronic inducible urticaria, CIndU). In most patients with CU, wheals and angioedema develop unprompted, spontaneously (chronic spontaneous urticaria, CSU). The management of CU aims for the complete control and absence of its signs and symptoms. This is achieved, in most patients, by prophylactic treatment until spontaneous remission occurs. Modern, second-generation H1-antihistamines are the first-line therapy, with the option of updosing to fourfold, and omalizumab is used when this fails.

A patient-oriented approach to long-term use of omalizumab in chronic spontaneous urticaria

BACKGROUND

Omalizumab is an effective and safe treatment for antihistamine resistant chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), however, long-term efficacy and safety remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of omalizumab in CSU patients treated for long term and to identify long-term management strategies.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed demographic characteristics, clinical features, laboratory parameters and treatment outcomes of 41 CSU patients who received omalizumab for at least 3 years. Treatment responses were evaluated with urticaria control test (UCT). Treatment safety was evaluated by comparing laboratory findings before and three years after omalizumab initiation as well as considering patients' adverse event reports.

RESULTS

The patients (mean age 40.46 years; 63.4% women) received omalizumab for an average of 41.93 months (mean 31.68 injections/patient). The mean baseline UCT score was 5.56 and average number of injections to reach UCT score ≥12 was 3.3. Nine patients (22%) responded insufficiently to 300 mg/4 weeks omalizumab and required updosing. Thirty-eight patients (92.7%) could tolerate longer dose intervals (>4 weeks) and the dose interval was increased after a mean of 11.53 injections. There was no loss of efficacy of omalizumab. Sixteen patients (39%) had been retreated with omalizumab after a mean discontinuation time of 24 weeks. Five patients (12.2%) reported mild and transient adverse effects. Liver and renal function tests as well as full blood count before and after omalizumab were in normal ranges.

CONCLUSION

For the long-term management of CSU, omalizumab is a safe and effective treatment which can be tailored according to patients' disease activity.

Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immune checkpoint inhibitor-related adverse events

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the standard of care for the treatment of several cancers. While these immunotherapies have improved patient outcomes in many clinical settings, they bring accompanying risks of toxicity, specifically immune-related adverse events (irAEs). There is a need for clear, effective guidelines for the management of irAEs during ICI treatment, motivating the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) to convene an expert panel to develop a clinical practice guideline. The panel discussed the recognition and management of single and combination ICI irAEs and ultimately developed evidence- and consensus-based recommendations to assist medical professionals in clinical decision-making and to improve outcomes for patients.

The challenges of chronic urticaria part 2: Pharmacological treatment, chronic inducible urticaria, urticaria in special situations

This is Part 2 of an updated follow-up review of the World Allergy Organization (WAO) position paper on the diagnosis and treatment of urticaria and angioedema. Since that document was published, new advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis of chronic urticaria, and greater experience with the use of biologics in patients with severe refractory disease, mainly omalizumab, have been gained. For these reasons, WAO decided to initiate an update targeted to general practitioners around the world, incorporating the most recent information on epidemiology, immunopathogenesis, comorbidities, quality of life, clinical case presentations, and the management of chronic spontaneous and chronic inducible urticaria, and urticaria in special situations such as childhood and pregnancy. A special task force of WAO experts was invited to write the different sections of the manuscript, and the final document was approved by the WAO Board of Directors. This paper is not intended to be a substitute for current national and international guidelines on the management of urticaria and angioedema, but to provide an updated simplified guidance for physicians around the world who have to manage patients with this common ailment.

Biologics for the Use in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: When and Which

Guidelines for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) recommend the use of the IgE-targeted biologic omalizumab in patients with antihistamine-refractory disease. The rationale for this is supported by the key role of IgE and its high-affinity receptor, FcεRI, in the degranulation of skin mast cells that drives the development of the signs and symptoms of CSU, itchy wheals, and angioedema. Here, we review the current understanding of the pathogenesis of CSU and its autoimmune endotypes. We describe the mechanisms of action of omalizumab, the only biologic currently approved for CSU, its efficacy and ways to improve it, biomarkers for treatment response, and strategies for its discontinuation. We provide information on the effects of the off-label use, in CSU, of biologics licensed for the treatment of other diseases, including dupilumab, benralizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, and secukinumab. Finally, we discuss targets for novel biologics and where we stand with their clinical development. These include IgE/ligelizumab, IgE/GI-310, thymic stromal lymphopoietin/tezepelumab, C5a receptor/avdoralimab, sialic acid-binding Ig-like lectin 8/lirentelimab, CD200R/LY3454738, and KIT/CDX-0159. Our aim is to provide updated information and guidance on the use of biologics in the treatment of patients with CSU, now and in the near future.

Expertenkonsensus zu praxisrelevanten Aspekten bei der Behandlung der chronischen Urtikaria

Hintergrund: Die chronische Urtikaria (CU) ist eine häufige und für viele Patienten stark belastende Erkrankung. Die aktuelle Urtikaria-Leitlinie beschreibt die evidenzbasierte Diagnostik und Therapie der CU. Darüber hinaus treten jedoch oftmals Fragen im praktischen Alltag auf, die durch die Leitlinie nicht beantwortet werden.

Methoden: Im Mai 2020 fand ein digitales Treffen deutscher Urtikaria-Experten statt, in dem praxisrelevante Aspekte der Behandlung der CU erörtert und unterstützende Hilfestellungen für den klinischen Behandlungsalltag formuliert wurden. Die resultierenden Hinweise dieses Dokumentes fokussieren auf praktische Fragen und der hierzu verfügbaren Literatur und Erfahrungen der Teilnehmer.

Ergebnisse: Die Diagnose einer CU kann in kurzer Zeit mittels gründlicher Anamnese, einer körperlichen Untersuchung und einer laborchemischen Basisdiagnostik gestellt werden. Hierzu werden in dieser Arbeit praktische Empfehlungen für den Praxisalltag gegeben. Eine erweiterte Diagnostik ist nur in wenigen Fällen indiziert und sollte grundsätzlich parallel zu einer effektiven Therapie erfolgen. Generell gilt, dass die CU immer auf gleiche Weise zu therapieren ist, unabhängig davon, ob Quaddeln, Angioödeme oder beides auftreten. Eine symptomatische Therapie sollte nach dem von den Leitlinien empfohlenen Stufenschema erfolgen. Die vorliegende Publikation gibt hierzu praktische Hinweise für Fragen in der Praxis, wie zum Beispiel dem Vorgehen in der aktuellen COVID-19-Pandemie, dem kardialen Risiko unter höher dosierten H 1-Antihistaminika, der Selbstapplikation von Omalizumab sowie dem Impfen unter Omalizumab-Therapie. Zusätzlich zu den Behandlungsempfehlungen werden Themen wie die Dokumentation in der Praxis und Familienplanung bei Urtikaria besprochen.

Diskussion: Diese unterstützenden Behandlungsempfehlungen dienen als Ergänzung zu den aktuellen Leitlinien der CU und geben beim Umgang mit Patienten mit CU eine Hilfestellung für den Praxisalltag. Ziel ist es, dass Patienten, die unter einer CU leiden, mithilfe einer optimalen Therapie eine vollständige Beschwerdefreiheit erreichen.

Case Report: Omalizumab for Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria in Pregnancy

Most chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) patients are female, and pregnancy can aggravate the disease activity of patients, but little is known about the efficacy and safety of omalizumab in pregnant CSU patients. We report two pregnant CSU patients treated with omalizumab and review the published information on omalizumab treatment during 11 pregnancies. The outcomes reported on patients with known pregnancies showed they had normal pregnancies and healthy babies as well as complete control of their CSU. The two new cases we reported support the view that omalizumab could be an effective and safe treatment option for pregnant and breastfeeding CSU patients. Further high-quality studies need to be carried out in order to obtain more information on the long-term efficacy and safety of the use of omalizumab during pregnancy in patients with chronic urticaria, including CSU.

The global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the management and course of chronic urticaria

INTRODUCTION

The COVID-19 pandemic dramatically disrupts health care around the globe. The impact of the pandemic on chronic urticaria (CU) and its management are largely unknown.

AIM

To understand how CU patients are affected by the COVID-19 pandemic; how specialists alter CU patient management; and the course of CU in patients with COVID-19.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our cross-sectional, international, questionnaire-based, multicenter UCARE COVID-CU study assessed the impact of the pandemic on patient consultations, remote treatment, changes in medications, and clinical consequences.

RESULTS

The COVID-19 pandemic severely impairs CU patient care, with less than 50% of the weekly numbers of patients treated as compared to before the pandemic. Reduced patient referrals and clinic hours were the major reasons. Almost half of responding UCARE physicians were involved in COVID-19 patient care, which negatively impacted on the care of urticaria patients. The rate of face-to-face consultations decreased by 62%, from 90% to less than half, whereas the rate of remote consultations increased by more than 600%, from one in 10 to more than two thirds. Cyclosporine and systemic corticosteroids, but not antihistamines or omalizumab, are used less during the pandemic. CU does not affect the course of COVID-19, but COVID-19 results in CU exacerbation in one of three patients, with higher rates in patients with severe COVID-19.

CONCLUSIONS

The COVID-19 pandemic brings major changes and challenges for CU patients and their physicians. The long-term consequences of these changes, especially the increased use of remote consultations, require careful evaluation.

Anti-IgE for the Treatment of Chronic Urticaria

Urticaria and angioedema are very common. Management of chronic urticaria subtypes, which usually persist for many years, is challenging. Recent years have demonstrated that targeting IgE with antibodies provides a safe and efficient treatment approach. Whilst several anti-IgE antibodies have been developed, omalizumab is currently the only one approved for use. International and national guidelines recommend its use after failure of antihistamines at standard and increased dose. Whilst not yet approved, many new anti-IgE approaches are currently being investigated in pre-clinical studies or clinical trials. This non-systematic focused review summarizes current knowledge of omalizumab and other anti-IgE biologics in chronic urticaria using data extracted from PubMed, Google Scholar and clinical trial databases, clinicaltrials.gov and clinicaltrials.eu. For adults, there is good evidence from randomized clinical trials and real-world data that symptomatic treatment with omalizumab is efficacious and safe in chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), whereas evidence in chronic inducible urticaria (CINDU) and special populations is limited. Easy-to-use tools to identify non-responders and predict the required duration of treatment have not been established yet. Phase 2 b results of ligelizumab have not only demonstrated efficacy and safety but also superiority to omalizumab. Indeed, there is preliminary evidence that omalizumab non- or partial responders benefit from ligelizumab. Whereas further development of quilizumab was discontinued, other approaches, eg UB-221 or DARPins are under investigation. Anti-IgE treatment with omalizumab represents a landmark in the treatment of chronic urticaria, with and without angioedema, and there is light on the horizon suggesting success may come with various next-generation anti-IgE approaches.

Expert consensus on practical aspects in the treatment of chronic urticaria

Background

Chronic urticaria (CU) is a common disease which represents a considerable burden for many patients. The current urticaria guideline describes the evidence-based diagnosis and treatment of CU. In addition, however, questions often arise in everyday practice that are not addressed by the guideline.

Methods

In May 2020, a digital meeting with German urticaria experts was held, in which practical aspects of CU treatment were discussed and supporting aids for everyday clinical treatment formulated. The resulting advice in this document focus on practical questions and the available literature and experiences of the participants.

Results

The diagnosis of CU can be made in a short time by means of a thorough anamnesis, a physical examination, and a basic laboratory chemical diagnosis. For this purpose, practical recommendations for everyday practice are given in this paper. An extended diagnosis is only indicated in a few cases and should always be carried out in parallel with an effective therapy. In general, CU should always be treated in the same way, regardless of whether wheals, angioedema or both occur. Symptomatic therapy should be carried out according to the treatment steps recommended by the guidelines. This publication provides practical advice on issues in everyday practice, such as the procedure in the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the cardiac risk under higher dosed H1 antihistamines, the self-administration of omalizumab as well as vaccination under omalizumab therapy. In addition to treatment recommendations, topics such as documentation in the practice and family planning with urticaria will be discussed.

Discussion

These supporting treatment recommendations serve as an addendum to the current CU guideline and provide support in dealing with CU patients in everyday practice. The aim is to ensure that patients suffering from CU achieve complete freedom of symptoms with the help of an optimal therapy.

Supplementary Information

The online version of this article (10.1007/s40629-021-00162-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Novel Strategies to Target Mast Cells in Disease

Mast cells (MCs) are versatile effector cells of the immune system, characterized by a large content of secretory granules containing a variety of inflammatory mediators. They are implicated in the host protection toward various external insults, but are mostly well known for their detrimental impact on a variety of pathological conditions, including allergic disorders such as asthma and a range of additional disease settings. Based on this, there is currently a large demand for therapeutic regimens that can dampen the detrimental impact of MCs in these respective pathological conditions. This can be accomplished by several strategies, including targeting of individual mediators released by MCs, blockade of receptors for MC-released compounds, inhibition of MC activation, limiting mast cell growth or by inducing mast cell apoptosis. Here, we review the currently available and emerging regimens to interfere with harmful mast cell activities in asthma and other pathological settings and discuss the advantages and limitations of such strategies.

Use of biologics in chronic spontaneous urticaria - beyond omalizumab therapy?

In chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), itchy wheals, angioedema, or both occur regularly, often daily, and for years. An effective therapy for CSU aims at achieving complete symptom control. The current guideline for the management of CSU patients recommends non-sedative anthistamines in standard or up to 4-fold higher dosages as 1 and 2 line treatment. For most CSU patients this treatment is not sufficient; for them, the anti-IgE antibody omalizumab is the therapy of choice. Although good to very good symptom control can be achieved in most cases, there are many patients with insufficient response. For these patients, but also as an alternative to therapy with omalizumab, numerous other biologicals are currently under development. In this review, we provide an overview of possible future biologic therapies for chronic urticaria.

Increased grey matter volume and associated resting-state functional connectivity in chronic spontaneous urticaria: A structural and functional MRI study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Chronic itch is one of the most common irritating sensations, yet its mechanisms have not been fully elucidated. Although some studies have revealed relationships between itching and brain function, the structural changes in the brain induced by chronic itching, such as those accompanying chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), remain unclear. In this study, we aimed to explore the potential changes in brain structure and the associated functional circuitry in CSU patients to generate insights to aid chronic itch management.

METHODS

Forty CSU patients and forty healthy controls (HCs) were recruited. Seven-day urticaria activity score (UAS7) values were collected to evaluate clinical symptoms. Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) and seed-based resting-state functional connectivity (rs-FC) analysis were used to assess structural changes in the brain and associated changes in functional circuitry.

RESULTS

Compared with HCs, CSU patients had significantly increased grey matter (GM) volume in the right premotor cortex, left fusiform cortex, and cerebellum. UAS7 values were positively associated with GM volume in the left fusiform cortex. In CSU patients relative to HCs, the left fusiform cortex as extracted by VBM analysis demonstrated decreased functional connectivity with the right orbitofrontal cortex, medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), premotor cortex, primary motor cortex (MI), and cerebellum and increased functional connectivity with the right posterior insular cortex, primary somatosensory cortex (SI), and secondary somatosensory cortex (SII). The left cerebellum as extracted from VBM analysis demonstrated decreased functional connectivity with the right supplementary motor area (SMA) and MI in CSU patients relative to HCs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that patients suffering from chronic itching conditions, such as CSU, are likely to demonstrate altered GM volume in some brain regions. These changes may affect not only the sensorimotor area but also brain regions associated with cognitive function.

Effects of Patients' Expectation in Dermatology: Evidence from Experimental and Clinical Placebo Studies and Implications for Dermatologic Practice and Research

Patients' expectations towards the benefit of a treatment are key determinants of placebo responses and can affect the development and course of medical conditions and the efficacy and tolerability of active medical treatment. The mechanisms mediating these placebo and nocebo effects have been best described in the field of experimental pain and placebo analgesia. However, also in dermatology experimental and clinical studies demonstrate that various skin diseases such as inflammatory dermatoses and allergic reactions can be modulated by patients' expectations. Dermatologists should consider the important modulatory role of patients' expectations on the efficacy and tolerability of specific treatments and the key role of verbal information, patients' prior treatment experiences (associative learning), and the quality and quantity of doctor-patient communication in shaping treatment expectation. As a consequence, techniques aiming at maximizing patients' expectation effects should be implemented into daily clinical routine. By contrast, in clinical studies expectation effects should be maximally controlled and harmonized to improve the "assay sensitivity" to detect new compounds. Further translational studies, also in dermatoses that have not been investigated yet, are needed to better characterize the mechanisms underlying patients' expectation and to gain further insights into potential clinical implications of these effects in dermatologic conditions. Therefore, in this review, we provide a brief overview on the concept of expectation effects on treatment outcome in general, summarize what is already known about this topic for dermatologic diseases, and finally present the relevance of this topic in clinical dermatology.

Omalizumab Updosing in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: an Overview of Real-World Evidence

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is defined as the spontaneous development of itchy hives and/or angioedema due to known or unknown causes that last for at least 6 weeks. At any given time, CSU is believed to affect 0.5–1% of the global population. Omalizumab (a recombinant, humanized anti-immunoglobulin-E antibody) is the only approved treatment for antihistamine refractory CSU. However, ~ 30% of patients remain symptomatic at licensed doses of omalizumab 150 mg and 300 mg, even after a treatment period of over 6 months. In the recent years, there have been several studies on updosing of the drug, suggesting that the individualized approach for urticaria treatment with omalizumab is useful. In this article, we provide an overview of these studies and the real-world data on omalizumab updosing as it became necessary to obtain complete CSU symptom control in a proportion of patients. Published observational studies (from June 2003 to October 2019) on the updosing of omalizumab in CSU were identified using PubMed and Ovid databases. Reports mainly show that updosing/dose adjustment evaluated with the assessment of disease activity (Urticaria Activity Score) and control (Urticaria Control Test) achieves better clinical response to omalizumab with a good safety profile in a pool of patients with CSU. These real-world data will provide an overview of updosing of omalizumab in CSU and aid in setting informed clinical practice treatment expectations.

Biologics for atopic diseases: Indication, side effect management, and new developments

With the advent of biologicals, more and more therapeutics are available that specifically address specific switch points in the pathomechanism of immunologically dominated diseases. Thus, the focus of diagnostics and therapy (precision medicine) is more on the individual disease characteristics of the individual patient. Regarding the different phenotypes of atopic diseases, severe asthma was the first entity for which biologicals were approved, followed by urticaria, and finally atopic dermatitis and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Experience in the treatment of severe bronchial asthma has shown that the intensity of the response to biological therapy depends on the quality of clinical and immunological phenotyping of the patients. This also applies to different diseases of the atopic form, as patients can suffer from several atopic diseases at the same time, each with different characteristics. Biologics are already emerging that may represent a suitable therapy for allergic bronchial asthma, which often occurs together with severe neurodermatitis, and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. In practice, however, the question of possible combinations of biologicals for the therapy of complex clinical pictures of individual patients is increasingly arising. In doing so, the side effect profile must be taken into account, including hypersensitivity reactions, whose diagnostic and logistical management must aim at a safe and efficient therapy of the underlying disease. Increased attention must also be paid to biological therapy in pregnancy and planned (predictable) vaccinations as well as existing infections, such as SARS-CoV-2 infection. Before starting a biological therapy, the immune status should be checked with regard to chronic viral and bacterial infections and, if necessary, the vaccination status should be refreshed or missing vaccinations should be made up for before starting therapy. Currently, reliable data on the effect of biologicals on the immunological situation of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 are not available. Therefore, research and development of suitable diagnostic methods for detection of immunologically caused side effects as well as detection of potential therapy responders and non-responders is of great importance.

Economic considerations on the usage of biologics in the allergy clinic

The advent of biologic therapies has transformed care for severe atopic disorders but their high cost poses new challenges with regard to long-term sustainability and fair allocation of resources. This article covers the basic concepts of cost-utility analyses and reviews the available literature on cost utility of biologic drugs in atopic disorders. When used within their limits as part of a multi-dimensional assessment, economic analyses can be extremely useful to guide decision-making and prioritization of care. Despite the good quality of most cost-utility analyses conducted for the use of biologics in asthma and other atopic diseases, their conclusions regarding cost-effectiveness are extremely variable. This is mainly due to the use of inconsistent estimates of health utility benefit with therapy. Development of reliable and validated instruments to measure disutility in atopic disorders and measure of indirect costs in atopic disease are identified as a priority for future research.

Efficacy and safety of treatment with omalizumab for chronic spontaneous urticaria: A systematic review for the EAACI Biologicals Guidelines

This systematic review evaluates the efficacy and safety of omalizumab for chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for RCTs. Critical and important CSU-related outcomes were considered. The risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence were assessed using GRADE. Ten RCTs including 1620 subjects aged 12 to 75 years old treated with omalizumab for 16 to 40 weeks were evaluated. Omalizumab 150 mg does not result in clinically meaningful improvement (high certainty) of the urticaria activity score (UAS)7 (mean difference (MD) -5; 95%CI -7.75 to -2.25), and the itch severity score (ISS)7 (MD -2.15; 95% CI -3.2 to -1.1) does not increase (moderate certainty) quality of life (QoL) (Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI); MD -2.01; 95%CI -3.22 to -0.81) and decreases (moderate certainty) rescue medication use (MD -1.68; 95%CI -2.95 to -0.4). Omalizumab 300 mg results in clinically meaningful improvements (moderate certainty) of the UAS7 (MD -11.05; 95%CI -12.87 to -9.24), the ISS7 (MD -4.45; 95%CI -5.39 to -3.51), and QoL (high certainty) (DLQI; MD -4.03; 95% CI -5.56 to -2.5) and decreases (moderate certainty) rescue medication use (MD -2.04; 95%CI -3.19 to -0.88) and drug-related serious AEs (RR 0.77; 95%CI 0.20 to 2.91).

The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the management of patients with chronic urticaria: An observational two-center study from Turkey

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID‐19) outbreak significantly affected the clinical practice in hospitals and the management of many diseases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of pandemic‐related factors on the severity and course of chronic urticaria (CU). A total of 194 CU patients who were on regular follow‐up, were enrolled in the study. The disease activity was assessed by means of the weekly urticaria activity score (UAS7) and urticaria control test (UCT). Patients were divided into two subgroups according to their disease aggravation as “aggravated” and “non‐aggravated”. Two groups were compared in terms of demographic, clinical, COVID‐19‐associated parameters, and parameters related with the effect of COVID‐19 pandemic on CU management. The omalizumab use was statistically higher (P = .017), and the systemic corticosteroid use was statistically lower (P = .025) in the “aggravated” group. Adherence to quarantine was significantly lower in the “aggravated” group (P = .027). 173 patients (89.2%) were unable to contact a dermatologist during the pandemic. Among 186 patients who received treatment for CU before the pandemic, 48 (25.8%) did not continue the existing treatment during the pandemic. CU aggravated in one patient with COVID‐19 and remained stable in the other. This study showed that CU patients, especially those on omalizumab therapy, had difficulties in attending medical care and even in the maintenance of their existing therapies during the pandemic. Creating novel follow‐up and treatment models as well as the increased use of teledermatology might be beneficial in the management of this life‐disturbing condition.

Therapeutic management of chronic spontaneous urticaria in clinical practice: results from a pilot survey

BACKGROUND

The therapeutic approaches to patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) differ among health care professionals and may be influenced by many factors. This cross-sectional survey was aimed at evaluating physicians' attitudes regarding therapeutic management of CSU in clinical practice.

METHODS

A study-specific questionnaire was administered to a group of physicians (N.=21) with a specialist interest in CSU from different areas of Italy (group A) and also to other physicians (N.=25) who manage CSU only occasionally in their clinical activity (group B).

RESULTS

In case of ineffectiveness of second-generation antihistamines at standard doses, higher doses of the same drug were always or frequently prescribed by most physicians in both groups, and 64% in group B and one third in group A usually increased the dose up to twice. Old-generation antihistamines were never used in clinical practice by 14% of survey participants in group A and 24% in group B, with the remaining physicians reporting rare or occasional uses. The prescription of systemic corticosteroids appeared to be more common among physicians in group B. The question concerning the use of alternative drugs in refractory CSU produced different answers between the two groups. Costs and access to specialist reference centers were indicated as the most important barriers to the use of medications different from antihistamines.

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary results suggest that therapeutic approaches to CSU seem to be heterogeneous in clinical practice and could be at least in part conditioned by the different medical settings where physicians usually work.

Effectiveness of as-needed antihistamines in chronic spontaneous urticaria patients under omalizumab treatment

The question how second-generation antihistamines (sgAHs) should be used when chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is under control with omalizumab is still unanswered. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of as-needed sgAHs in patients with well-controlled urticaria under omalizumab treatment. Patients from four different urticaria centers who were treated with omalizumab 300 mg/4 weeks for at least 3 months, had well-controlled urticaria (Urticaria Control Test: 16 > UCT≥12) and were using sgAHs only if needed, were included in this study. In order to assess effectiveness of sgAHs, change in the itch, hives, and total itch-hives scores before and after sgAHs were evaluated using modified urticaria activity score-twice daily. Fifty-three patients [38 female (71.7%)] with mean age 41.1 ± 11.4 years were included in this study. Median sgAH intake per patient throughout the 4 week-intervals was 3 (2-5) tablets. sgAH intake decreased itch, hives and total itch-hives scores 45.7% ± 52.9, 42.4% ± 39.1, and 50.2% ± 51.1, respectively (P < .001 for all). This decrease was similar in both isolated-urticaria and urticaria-and-angioedema phenotypes. Baseline IgE levels were positively correlated with the decrease of three symptom scores (r = 0.31, P = .05; r = 0.375, P = .017; r = 0.31, P = .05, respectively) that showed in patients with higher baseline total IgE levels, as needed sgAH intake decreased the symptom scores less. Our study showed that sgAHs may still be an effective option for the treatment of the intermittent symptoms in patients with well-controlled urticaria under omalizumab treatment. Baseline total IgE levels may be used as a potential biomarker for sgAH effectiveness in these patients.

Past, present, and future of anti-IgE biologics

About 20 years after the identification of immunoglobulin E (IgE) and its key role in allergic hypersensitivity reactions against normally harmless substances, scientists have started inventing strategies to block its pathophysiological activity in 1986. The initial concept of specific IgE targeting through the use of anti-IgE antibodies has gained a lot of momentum and within a few years independent research groups have reported successful generation of first murine monoclonal anti-IgE antibodies. Subsequent generation of optimized chimeric and humanized versions of these antibodies has paved the way for the development of therapeutic anti-IgE biologicals as we know them today. With omalizumab, there is currently still only one therapeutic anti-IgE antibody approved for the treatment of allergic conditions. Since its application is limited to the treatment of moderate-to-severe persistent asthma and chronic spontaneous urticaria, major efforts have been undertaken to develop alternative anti-IgE biologicals that could potentially be used in a broader spectrum of allergic diseases. Several new drug candidates have been generated and are currently assessed in pre-clinical studies or clinical trials. In this review, we highlight the molecular properties of past and present anti-IgE biologicals and suggest concepts that might improve treatment efficacy of future drug candidates.

Omalizumab and adalimumab: a winning couple

Introduction: We report a case of a young female patient, previously affected by psoriatic arthritis, and treated with adalimumab, who developed a chronic spontaneous urticaria and started a concomitant therapy with omalizumab. Methods & results: A 50% reduction of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (from 7 at baseline to 4 in weeks 12 and 24) and a complete reset of the Urticaria Activity Score for 7 days (from 27 at baseline to 0 in weeks 12 and 24) were recorded. During all treatment with omalizumab, administering of adalimumab was continued. Due to complete control of urticaria symptoms, the patient stopped treatment with omalizumab after 24 weeks. Conclusion: The combination of adalimumab and omalizumab could offer a favorable efficacy and safety profile. The synergistic action of the two biological drugs in reducing systemic inflammation could be responsible for a shorter time to obtain clinical response.

Current and Potential Biologic Drugs for the Treatment of Chronic Urticaria

This article reviews biologic treatments that are currently applied for the treatment of severe chronic urticaria. Monoclonal anti-immunoglobulin E (omalizumab) is effective and safe in many patients, but accessibility and cost constitute barriers to its wider use. Questions on the optimal duration of the treatment and possible symptom recurrences after discontinuing the drug are still raised. A discussion is presented about several other biologics currently under investigation with potential to be incorporated in the near future in patients with severe chronic urticaria.

IL-24: A new player in the pathogenesis of pro-inflammatory and allergic skin diseases

Interleukin (IL)-24 is a member of the IL-20 family of cytokines and is produced by various types of cells, such as CD4⁺ T cells, NK cells, mast cells, keratinocytes, bronchial epithelial cells, and myofibroblasts. Previous studies suggest that IL-24 plays an essential role in the pathogenesis of pro-inflammatory autoimmune disorders such as psoriasis, arthritis, and inflammatory bowel diseases. However, the role of IL-24 in the pathogenesis of allergic diseases has been elusive. It has already been reported that IL-24 is involved in the pathogenesis of allergic lung and skin diseases. Moreover, we have recently revealed for the first time the pivotal functions of IL-24 in IL-13-mediated skin barrier dysfunction in atopic dermatitis (AD), which is known to be a characteristic of AD caused by Th2 cytokines such as IL-4 or IL-13. In this review, we show recent advances in the basic characteristics of IL-24 and its novel functions in the pathogenesis of allergic skin inflammation, focusing on AD. A better understanding of the role of IL-24 in allergic diseases can lead to the development of new therapeutic options.

Cupping therapy for patients with chronic urticaria: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic urticaria (CU) is a common skin disease, which has a negative effect on quality of life. Current treatments do not fully control the symptoms of urticaria for many CU patients, thus effective and safe treatments for CU are still needed.

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of cupping therapy in patients with CU.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The search strategy looked for the presence of related keywords, such as "chronic urticaria" and "cupping therapy," in the title and abstract of research articles indexed in major databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected after querying nine electronic databases from their inception to May 2019 with the above search terms.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

RCTs were included if they recruited patients with CU who were intervened with dry or wet cupping. Publications could be written in Chinese or English.

DATA EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted, and the studies were assessed for the quality of their methodological design and risk of bias. Meta-analyses of the RCT data were conducted to assess the total effective rate of the treatment as the primary outcome. Skin disease quality of life index score, recurrence rate, and adverse events were assessed as secondary outcomes. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on different interventions.

RESULTS

Thirteen comparisons from 12 RCTs involving 842 participants were included. There were no significant differences between wet cupping and medications in total effective rate (n = 372; risk ratio [RR] = 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97 to 1.25; P = 0.14) or recurrence rate (n = 240; RR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.36; P = 0.20). Cupping therapy, in combination with antihistamine treatment was more efficacious than antihistamines alone, with a greater total effective rate (n = 342; RR = 1.18, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.39; P = 0.03) and lower recurrence rate (n = 342; RR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.84; P = 0.007). Cupping therapy combined with acupuncture was more effective than acupuncture alone (n = 156; RR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.46; P = 0.006). No serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

Wet cupping may be as effective as treatment with antihistamines. When cupping therapy is used as an adjuvant therapy to antihistamines or acupuncture, it may enhance the efficacy. Results drawn from these studies should be interpreted with caution and applied with care to clinical practice, because of the poor quality among the studies that were reviewed.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42019137451.

Long-term follow-up effect of omalizumab in chronic spontaneous urticaria and its association with serum C-reactive protein levels

This study aims to determine the efficacy of omalizumab, a humanized monoclonal anti-immunoglobulin E antibody, in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) refractory to conventional therapy, together with the evaluation of serum CRP levels. All the patients with a diagnosis of CSU who were continuously treated with omalizumab (300 mg/mo) for at least 3 months between June 2016 and July 2019 were included in this study. Urticaria activity score (UAS-7) was used for assessment of disease activity. Serum CRP levels were also retrospectively analyzed. When UAS-7 scores before the initiation of therapy were compared to the week 4, 12, 24, and 36 scores after the treatment, each were significantly different from the pretreatment results (P < .01). CRP level prior to treatment was found to be strongly correlated with baseline UAS scores of the patients' (P = .00). At the 12th week of treatment, decline of CRP level was positively and strongly correlated with the decline of UAS (P = .037). In this study, mean UAS decreased, mean rescue medication use declined, and overall therapeutic response improved with omalizumab treatment. Additionally, significant correlation between the decline of CRP levels and treatment response was found.

Roles of omalizumab in various allergic diseases

IgE and mast cells play a pivotal role in various allergic diseases, including asthma, allergic rhinitis, and urticaria. Treatment with omalizumab, a monoclonal anti-IgE antibody, has significantly improved control of these allergic diseases and introduced a new era for the management of severe allergic conditions. About 10 years of experience with omalizumab treatment for severe allergic asthma confirmed its effectiveness and safety, reducing symptoms, frequency of reliever use, and severe exacerbations in patients with intractable conditions. Omalizumab is particularly useful in childhood asthma, where atopic conditions often determine clinical courses of asthma. Recently, omalizumab is approved for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) with the fixed dose of 300 mg. Although the mechanisms underlying the actions of omalizumab in CSU are not fully clarified, nearly 90% of patients with CSU showed a complete or a partial response to omalizumab treatment. Furthermore, omalizumab is just approved for the treatment of severe Japanese cedar pollinosis (JC) based on the successful results of an add-on study of omalizumab for inadequately controlled severe pollinosis despite antihistamines and nasal corticosteroids. For proper use of omalizumab to treat severe JC, co-administration of antihistamines is necessary, while patients should meet the criteria including strong sensitization to Japanese cedar pollen (≥class 3) and poor control under standard treatment. In the management of severe allergic diseases using omalizumab, issues including cost and concerns about relapse after its discontinuation should be overcome. At the same time, possibilities for application to other intractable allergic diseases should be considered.

Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: A Review of Pathological Mechanisms, Diagnosis, Clinical Management, and Treatment

Urticaria is a poorly understood and underestimated clinical condition characterised by the sudden onset of itchy wheals and/or angioedema, which usually resolve within 24 and 72 hours, respectively. It is generally classified as being acute (lasting <6 weeks) or chronic (continuous or intermittent for ≥6 weeks). Chronic urticaria can be further classified as chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and chronic inducible urticaria, appearing in response to specific eliciting factors, such as heat, cold, or sun exposure, or following the application of pressure. Scientific advances have been made in the understanding of pathological mechanisms and treatment, especially associated with CSU. The exact pathological mechanism of how urticaria develops is still not yet fully understood, but the clinical implications on the patients’ quality of life are severe and have been associated with mental disorders and metabolic diseases. The diagnosis of urticaria is based on medical history and clinical manifestations. The treatment pathway begins with the administration of second-generation, nonsedating, nonimpairing histamine 1 receptor antihistamines and, in case of nonresponse, with new-generation biological drugs. The current review presents an update of the pathological mechanisms, diagnosis, clinical management, and treatment of CSU. It also focusses on the future implications of new-generation drugs and their effects on the clinical practice.

Urticaria: Collegium Internationale Allergologicum (CIA) Update 2020

This update on chronic urticaria (CU) focuses on the prevalence and pathogenesis of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), the expanding spectrum of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for assessing CU disease activity, impact, and control, as well as future treatment options for CU. This update is needed, as several recently reported findings have led to significant advances in these areas. Some of these key discoveries were first presented at past meetings of the Collegium Internationale Allergologicum (CIA). New evidence shows that the prevalence of CSU is geographically heterogeneous, high in all age groups, and increasing. Several recent reports have helped to better characterize two endotypes of CSU: type I autoimmune (or autoallergic) CSU, driven by IgE to autoallergens, and type IIb autoimmune CSU, which is due to mast cell (MC)-targeted autoantibodies. The aim of treatment in CU is complete disease control with absence of signs and symptoms as well as normalization of quality of life (QoL). This is best monitored by the use of an expanding set of PROMs, to which the Angioedema Control Test, the Cholinergic Urticaria Quality of Life Questionnaire, and the Cholinergic Urticaria Activity Score have recently been added. Current treatment approaches for CU under development include drugs that inhibit the effects of signals that drive MC activation and accumulation, drugs that inhibit intracellular pathways of MC activation and degranulation, and drugs that silence MCs by binding to inhibitory receptors. The understanding, knowledge, and management of CU are rapidly increasing. The aim of this review is to provide physicians who treat CU patients with an update on where we stand and where we will go. Many questions and unmet needs remain to be addressed, such as the development of routine diagnostic tests for type I and type IIb autoimmune CSU, the global dissemination and consistent use of PROMs to assess disease activity, impact, and control, and the development of more effective and well-tolerated long-term treatments for all forms of CU.

Chronic Urticaria: An Overview of Treatment and Recent Patents

Background:

Up to 1% of the general population in the USA and Europe suffer from chronic urticaria (CU) at some point in their lifetime. CU has an adverse effect on the quality of life.

Objective:

This study aims to provide an update on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifesta-tions, diagnosis, aggravating factors, complications, treatment and prognosis of CU.

Methods:

The search strategy included meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, reviews and pertinent references. Patents were searched using the key term “chronic urticaria” at the following links: www.google.com/patents, www.uspto.gov, and www.freepatentsonline.com.

Results:

CU is a clinical diagnosis, based on the episodic appearance of characteristic urticarial lesions that wax and wane rapidly, with or without angioedema, on most days of the week, for a period of six weeks or longer. Triggers such as medications, physical stimuli, and stress can be identified in 10 to 20% of cases. C-reactive protein/erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and complete blood cell count with differential are the screening tests that may be used to rule out an underlying disorder. The mainstay of therapy is reassurance, patient education, avoidance of known triggers, and pharmacotherapy. Second-generation H1 antihistamines are the drugs of choice for initial therapy because of their safety and efficacy profile. If satisfactory improvement does not occur after 2 to 4 weeks or earlier if the symptoms are intolerable, the dose of second-generation H1 antihistamines can be increased up to fourfold the manufacturer’s recom-mended dose (all be it off license). If satisfactory improvement does not occur after 2 to 4 weeks or earlier if the symptoms are intolerable after the fourfold increase in the dosage of second-generation H1 antihis-tamines, omalizumab should be added. If satisfactory improvement does not occur after 6 months or earli-er if the symptoms are intolerable after omalizumab has been added, treatment with cyclosporine and sec-ond-generation H1 antihistamines is recommended. Short-term use of systemic corticosteroids may be considered for acute exacerbation of CU and in refractory cases. Recent patents for the management of chronic urticaria are also discussed. Complications of CU may include skin excoriations, adverse effect on quality of life, anxiety, depression, and considerable humanistic and economic impacts. On average, the duration of CU is around two to five years. Disease severity has an association with disease duration.

Conclusion:

CU is idiopathic in the majority of cases. On average, the duration of CU is around two to five years. Treatment is primarily symptomatic with second generation antihistamines being the first line. Omalizumab has been a remarkable advancement in the management of CU and improves the quality of life beyond symptom control.

Biologics in Children with Allergic Diseases

The prevalence of allergic diseases has been remarkably increased in the last decades. The global health burden of these conditions is substantial, since patients may experience disability, anxiety and emotional distress, social restrictions, and reduced quality of life and productivity, in particular, in the most severe cases. Recent advances in understanding the pathophysiology of allergic disorders have allowed identifying novel therapeutic strategies for the treatment of severe and uncontrolled allergic diseases. Although most studies have been performed in allergic asthma, biological drugs targeting other allergic diseases such as chronic spontaneous urticaria, atopic dermatitis, and food allergy are showing promising results. In this review, the most recent evidence on biologic therapies for allergic diseases, focusing on the pediatric age has been presented.