Reliability of transient elastography for the detection of fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and chronic viral hepatitis

Elevated liver stiffness without histological evidence of liver fibrosis in rural Ugandans

Liver fibrosis may be assessed noninvasively with transient electrography (TE). Data on the performance of TE for detecting liver fibrosis in sub-Saharan Africa are limited. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of TE by performing liver biopsies on persons with liver fibrosis indicated by TE. We enrolled HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected participants with TE scores consistent with at least minimal disease (liver stiffness measurement [LSM]≥7.1 kPa). Biopsies were performed and staged using the Ishak scoring system. A concordant result was defined using accepted thresholds for significant fibrosis by TE (LSM ≥ 9.3 kPa) and liver biopsy (Ishak score ≥ 2). We used modified Poisson regression methods to quantify the univariate and adjusted prevalence risk ratios (PRR) of the association between covariates and the concordance status of TE and liver biopsy in defining the presence of liver fibrosis. Of 131 participants with valid liver biopsy and TE data, only 5 participants (3.8%) had Ishak score ≥ 2 of whom 4 had LSM ≥ 9.3 kPa (sensitivity = 80%); of the 126 (96.2%) with Ishak score < 2, 76 had LSM < 9.3 kPa (specificity = 61%). In multivariable analysis, discordance was associated with female gender (adjPRR = 1.80, 95%CI 1.1-2.9; P = .019), herbal medicine use (adjPRR 1.64, 95% CI = 1.0-2.5; P = .022), exposure to lake or river water (adjPRR 2.05, 95% CI = 1.1-3.7; P = .016), and current smoking (adjPRR 1.72, 95%CI 1.0-2.9; P = .045). These data suggest that TE among rural Ugandans has low specificity for detection of histologically confirmed liver fibrosis. Caution should be exercised when using this tool to confirm significant liver fibrosis.

Controlled attenuation parameter value-based diagnostic algorithm improves the accuracy of liver stiffness measurement in chronic hepatitis B patients

Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) frequently overestimates the severity of liver fibrosis because of steatosis. However, the impact of the controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) on liver stiffness cutoff values remains unknown; CAP was used to quantify and diagnose the severity of hepatic steatosis. The study was conducted to determine the effect of CAP on liver stiffness cutoff values in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. A retrospective cross-sectional study was performed in liver biopsy-proven CHB patients. The median LSM (kPa) in the elevated CAP group was higher than that in the normal CAP group at the same fibrosis stage. For S2-4, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of LSM was 0.78 and 0.72 in the normal and elevated CAP groups, respectively. When a cutoff value of 8.9 kPa was used, the diagnostic accuracy was 77.82% and 63.41% in the normal and elevated CAP groups, respectively. Compared with the alanine transaminase (ALT)-based LSM algorithm, the CAP-based LSM algorithm had a similar correct diagnosis rate (33.64% vs. 33.94%, respectively) but a lower misdiagnosis rate (16.97% vs. 20.30%, respectively). The new CAP-based LSM diagnostic algorithm will improve the diagnostic accuracy of liver fibrosis in CHB patients.

Liver Fibrosis Assessment in a Cohort of Greek HIV Mono-Infected Patients by Non-Invasive Biomarkers

BACKGROUND

Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) is common in HIV-infected individuals. Liver biopsy remains the gold-standard procedure for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis, but both Transient Elastography (TE) and Non-invasive Biomarkers (NIBMs) have emerged as alternatives.

OBJECTIVES

Our study's aim was to validate commonly used NIBMs for the assessment of liver fibrosis in a cohort of Greek HIV-mono-infected patients.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria were confirmed HIV-infection and age>18 years and exclusion criteria HBV or HCV seropositivity, liver disease other than NAFLD, alcohol abuse, ascites, transaminases levels>4xULN(upper limit of normal) and Body-Mass index(BMI)>40. Liver stiffness (LS) measurement with TE and thorough laboratory work up and medical history were acquired at study entry. FIB-4, APRI, NFS, BARD, Forns and Lok scores were calculated for each patient.

RESULTS

A total of 157 patients were eligible for this study. Significant liver fibrosis, compatible with Metavir score of F3-F4, was found in only 11(7%) patients. These findings were in accordance with those of the NIBMs; the BARD score constituting the only exception, allocating 102(65%) patients as having significant liver fibrosis. In order to obtain a balance between sensitivity and specificity new cut-offs for each NIBM were calculated; FIB-4 score yielded the best results, since by changing the cut-off to 1.49 a sensitivity and specificity balanced for both close to 85% was achieved.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that NIBMs can be used for the evaluation of liver fibrosis in HIV mono-infected patients. New cut-offs for NIBMs should probably be calculated, to help distinguishing patients with significant from those with mild/no fibrosis.

Accuracy of FibroScan in analysis of liver fibrosis in patients with concomitant chronic Hepatitis B and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

Liver steatosis could affect the accuracy of FibroScan in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). This study aimed to assess the accuracy and cut-off values of FibroScan for diagnosing liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with concomitant CHB and NAFLD.A total of 116 patients with concomitant CHB and NAFLD who underwent FibroScan test and liver biopsy were retrospectively enrolled. Liver fibrosis was staged according to the METAVIR scoring system. Calculations of the areas under receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUROC) were performed and compared for the staging of liver fibrosis.The AUROCs for FibroScan, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase to platelet ratio (GPR), aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI), fibrosis index based on 4 factors (FIB-4), and NAFLD Fibrosis Score (NFS) were 0.87, 0.73, 0.69, 0.57, and 0.57 for the diagnosis of significant liver fibrosis (METAVIR ≥ F2); 0.89, 0.77, 0.75, 0.68, and 0.60 for severe liver fibrosis (METAVIR ≥ F3); and 0.94, 0.86, 0.80, 0.74, and 0.63 for cirrhosis (F4), respectively. The cutoff values of FibroScan for staging liver fibrosis with sensitivity at least 90% were: 8.0 kPa for significant liver fibrosis, and 10.5 kPa for cirrhosis. The cutoff values of FibroScan for staging liver fibrosis with specificity at least 90% were: 10.8 kPa for significant liver fibrosis, and 17.8 kPa for cirrhosis.FibroScan provides high value for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with concomitant CHB and NAFLD.

When the liver gets stiff, the tough get moving

Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by FibroScan-determined transient elastography is a noninvasive approach to estimate liver fibrosis severity. In non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), advanced liver fibrosis is excluded by normal liver stiffness, but a wide range of cutoffs have been used to predict advanced liver fibrosis or cirrhosis. This may be partly because steatosis (measured by controlled attenuation parameter [CAP]) contributes to liver stiffness and also because LSM fluctuates in NAFLD. In a recent pivotal study, one-third of patients with liver stiffness > 12.0 kPa showed reversal after 4-6 months; these cases did not have advanced liver fibrosis on biopsy. We performed serial FibroScans 6-36 months apart in 73 NAFLD patients, 38 with LSM > 10 kPa at entry. Those who lost ≥ 1 kg of weight (n = 31) significantly reduced liver stiffness (3.6 ± 6.1 vs 0.53 ± 4.1 kPa, P < 0.05) and CAP score (39 ± 63 dB/m of loss vs 24 ± 65 dB/m of gain, P < 0.05) compared with those who did not (n = 29). Patients who reported increased physical activity (n = 25) also reduced liver stiffness (3.6 ± 6 vs 0.35 ± 6 kPa) and CAP (20 ± 71 dB/m of loss vs 32 ± 71 dB/m of gain). Overall, those with improved LSM were significantly more likely to have lost weight and/or improved physical activity. These effects of lifestyle adjustments partly explain why a single measurement of 12.0 kPa is not a reliable cutoff for advanced liver fibrosis in NAFLD. In addition to repeating the study after 6-12 months, documentation of response to lifestyle advice and weight reduction should be determined before assuming any cutoff indicates advanced liver fibrosis. Despite this reservation about diagnostic accuracy, we consider that measurement of liver stiffness and CAP score serve to motivate patients to enact lifestyle modifications that can improve NAFLD severity.

Non-obese patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease may use a lower liver stiffness cut-off to assess fibrosis stages

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to estimate the optimal cut-off values of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) for diagnosing and staging fibrosis in non-obese and obese patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).

METHODS

NAFLD patients diagnosed by liver biopsy according to the Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network scoring system were enrolled in this study. Non-obesity was defined as a body mass index (BMI) less than 25 kg/m² . LSM was performed by experienced physicians within 2 weeks before or after liver biopsy.

RESULTS

A total of 158 patients were included. Average BMI of the non-obese (n = 68) and obese (n = 90) groups was 23.2 ± 1.6 and 27.9 ± 2.5 kg/m² , respectively. After adjusted for age, fibrosis stage, steatosis grade and type 2 diabetes mellitus, the obese group had a LSM of 3.522 kPa higher than the non-obese patients (P = 0.003). LSM values of the non-obese patients had a lower trend when stratified by fibrosis stage, especially in cirrhosis (F4; P = 0.021). Applying separate cut-off values for patients with NAFLD in individual fibrosis stage, 5.8 vs 7.5 kPa (≥ F1), 7.6 vs 8.5 kPa (≥ F2), 9.1 vs 11.2 kPa (≥ F3), and 12.5 vs 14.3 kPa (F4), improved their diagnostic odds ratios compared with overall cut-off values. In the non-obese NAFLD group, using a separate cut-off avoided underestimating 9.1% of patients with cirrhosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-obese NAFLD group had lower LSM than the obese group. Different cut-off values should be used to measure liver fibrosis stage in non-obese and obese NAFLD patients.

Noninvasive Serum Fibrosis Markers are Associated with Coronary Artery Calcification in Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Background/Aims

Advanced hepatic fibrosis is associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We investigated the association between noninvasive serum fibrosis markers and the coronary artery calcium score (CACS) in subjects with NAFLD.

Methods

We analyzed 665 NAFLD subjects without chronic liver disease or heart disease between 2011 and 2015. The noninvasive fibrosis markers that were used to evaluate the severity of hepatic fibrosis included the NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS), fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score, Forn's index, and the aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI).

Results

The areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves for the NFS, FIB-4 score, Forn's index and APRI for predicting CACS >100 were 0.689, 0.683, 0.659, and 0.595, respectively. According to the multivariate analysis, older age, increased body mass index (BMI), and decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were significant factors associated with CACS >100. The NFS, FIB-4 score and APRI were significantly associated with CACS >100 after adjusting for age and gender (p=0.006, p=0.012, and p=0.012, respectively) and after adjusting for age, gender, BMI and eGFR (p=0.013, p=0.022, and p=0.027, respectively). Scores integrating noninvasive fibrosis markers and other risk factors improved the predictive accuracy.

Conclusions

The NFS and FIB-4 score were associated with coronary atherosclerosis in subjects with NAFLD. Furthermore, scores integrating these noninvasive scores and risk factors for CVD showed good discriminatory power in predicting CACS >100. Therefore, noninvasive serum fibrosis markers may be useful tools for identifying NAFLD subjects at a high risk for CVD.

Non-invasive diagnosis of cirrhosis and long-term disease monitoring by transient elastography in patients with Wilson disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The value of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by transient elastography (TE) for non-invasive fibrosis staging and disease monitoring has not been established in patients with Wilson disease (WD).

METHODS

Liver stiffness measurement by TE and non-invasive fibrosis scores (APRI, FIB-4) were analysed from 188 WD patients with liver biopsy (LBX). Longitudinal LSM was performed in 128 (68.1%) patients.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty-eight patients (mean age: 35 ± 14 years, 54.8% women; 27.1% with histological cirrhosis) were studied. Forty-four[23.4%] patients were recently diagnosed with WD, while 144[76.6%] were previously diagnosed (>1 year between LBX and LSM). Overall, LSM (11.3 vs 6.1 kPa, P < .001), APRI (0.72 vs 0.38, P < .001) and FIB-4 (1.54 vs 0.89, P < .001) were higher in cirrhotic than in non-cirrhotic patients. This was even more pronounced in recently diagnosed patients (35.2 kPa vs 6.4 kPa, P < .001). Accuracy for diagnosing cirrhosis at an LSM cut-off ≥9.9 kPa was better in recently diagnosed (PPV: 74%, NPV: 100%) vs previously diagnosed (PPV: 53%, NPV: 82%) patients. Recently diagnosed patients had higher Area Under the Curve (AUC) for APRI (0.79 vs 0.61) and FIB-4 (0.84 vs 0.65) than previously diagnosed patients. At APRI <1.5 and FIB-4 <3.25 cirrhosis was ruled out with a specificity of 93% and 95% respectively. During a median follow-up of 46 (24-66) months, only 5.9% (5/85) of non-cirrhotic WD patients showed progression to cirrhotic LSM values, while 30.8% (4/13) of cirrhotic WD patients showed LSM suggestive of cirrhosis regression.

CONCLUSION

TE-based LSM ≥9.9 kPa accurately identifies cirrhosis in WD patients. Next to TE-LSM <9.9 kPa, APRI <1.5 and FIB-4 <3.25 values assist to non-invasively rule out cirrhosis. LSM remains stable in most non-cirrhotic patients on WD therapy, while one-third of cirrhotic patients present clinically relevant decreases in LSM.

Precise fibrosis staging with shear wave elastography in chronic hepatitis B depends on liver inflammation and steatosis

BACKGROUND

Two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) is the latest generation of ultrasound elastography for the non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B (CHB). We aimed to identify confounders of 2D-SWE in fibrosis grading.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of 440 CHB patients (286 with liver biopsy and 154 with clinical decompensated cirrhosis) was consecutively enrolled from a clinical trial (registration number: ChiCTR-DCD-15006000) aimed at optimizing 2D-SWE assessments from 2015 to 2018. All patients underwent 2D-SWE examination, anthropometric measurement, and serum biomarker assessment. Steatosis was graded by the magnetic resonance imaging-derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF).

RESULTS

Overall, the prevalence of incorrect fibrosis staging by 2D-SWE was 26.1% (n = 115), with 43.5% of patients under-staged and 56.5% over-staged. In multivariate analysis, the steatosis degree was an independent predictor of 2D-SWE discordance in the overall cohort, with moderate-severe steatosis for underestimation (odds ratio, [OR] = 4.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-18.2, p = 0.049) and overestimation (OR = 8.2, 95% CI 2.9-23.5, p < 0.001), and mild steatosis for overestimation (OR = 3.7, 95% CI 1.5-9.0, p = 0.004). In patients with liver biopsy, both histological inflammation activity over 2 (OR = 5.0, 95% CI 2.0-25.3, p = 0.048) and moderate-severe steatosis (OR = 5.2, 95% CI 2.1-13.4, p < 0.001) were independent factors associated with discordance. For the risk of 2D-SWE mis-staging, a nomogram that integrated these confounders was established and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the model was 0.861.

CONCLUSIONS

Steatosis and inflammation activities were confounders for 2D-SWE. The combination of these confounders could predict mis-staging risks of CHB-related fibrosis with 2D-SWE and may be valuable to decision-making on liver biopsy for fibrosis staging.

Application of transient elastography in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is currently the most common chronic liver disease worldwide. Although it has become one of the leading causes of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in the Western world, the proportion of NAFLD patients developing these complications is rather small. Therefore, current guidelines recommend non-invasive tests for the initial assessment of NAFLD. Among the available non-invasive tests, transient elastography by FibroScan^® (Echosens, Paris, France) is commonly used by hepatologists in Europe and Asia, and the machine has been introduced to the United States in 2013 with rapid adoption. Transient elastography measures liver stiffness and the controlled attenuation parameter simultaneously and can serve as a one-stop examination for both liver steatosis and fibrosis. Liver stiffness measurement also correlates with clinical outcomes and can be used to select patients for varices screening. Although obesity is a common reason for measurement failures, the development of the XL probe allows successful measurements in the majority of obese patients. This article reviews the performance and limitations of transient elastography in NAFLD and highlights its clinical applications. We also discuss the reliability criteria for transient elastography examination and factors associated with false-positive liver stiffness measurements.

Correlation between Liver Elasticity by Ultrasound Elastography and Liver Functional Reserve

No worldwide consensus on the assessment tool for liver functional reserve is currently available. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between liver elasticity of both hepatic lobes and liver functional reserve tests. This prospective observational study comprised 40 patients scheduled for hepatectomy. Liver elasticity was assessed by Virtual Touch Quantification (VTQ). The mean VTQ value for the right and left lobes was defined as the mVTQ. Liver functional reserve was measured with technetium-99m-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid-galactosyl-human serum albumin scintigraphy as LHL15 and HH15 and the indocyanine green (ICG) excretion test as ICG-R15 and ICG-K. All examinations were measured after biliary decompression confirmed serum a total bilirubin level ≤2 mg/dL. Mean VTQ values were moderately correlated with LHL15 (r = -0.42, p < 0.01), HH15 (r = 0.48, p < 0.01), ICG-R15 (r = 0.53, p < 0.01) and ICG-K (r = -0.61, p < 0.01) values. In conclusion, the liver elasticity determined by VTQ would be a useful predictor of liver functional reserve in patients scheduled for hepatectomy.

A Novel Non-invasive Method for Predicting Liver Fibrosis by Quantifying the Hepatic Vein Waveform

The hepatic vein (HV) waveform by Doppler ultrasound reflects the severity of liver fibrosis. We conducted a proof-of-concept study of a new method for quantifying the HV waveform. We calculated the coefficient of variation (CV) of the HV flow velocity and created a new index "q-HV" (quantified HV) and analyzed its performance for predicting histologic liver fibrosis in 114 patients with chronic liver disease. The CV of the HV flow velocity was well associated with flattening of the waveform and the q-HV significantly increased with the progression of liver fibrosis. The areas under the curve for the prediction of fibrosis stage were 0.732 for F2, 0.772 for F3 and 0.805 for F4. Combined q-HV and FIB-4 index (widely used liver fibrosis score) increased the diagnostic accuracy for liver fibrosis. The q-HV showed good accuracy for predicting liver fibrosis; thus, q-HV is feasible and acceptable as a non-invasive tool for predicting liver fibrosis.

Performance of common imaging techniques vs serum biomarkers in assessing fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive biomarkers have been developed to predict hepatitis B virus (HBV) related fibrosis owing to the significant limitations of liver biopsy. Both serum biomarkers and imaging techniques have shown promising results and may improve the evaluation of liver fibrosis. However, most of the previous studies focused on the diagnostic effects of various imaging techniques on fibrosis in all chronic liver diseases.

AIM

To compare the performance of common imaging methods and serum biomarkers for prediction of significant fibrosis caused only by HBV infection.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted on the records available in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library electronic databases until December 2018. We systematically assessed the effectiveness of two serum biomarkers and three imagine techniques in predicting significant fibrosis solely caused by HBV infection. The serum biomarkers included aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) and fibrosis index based on the 4 factors (FIB-4). The three imaging techniques included acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI), FibroScan, and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE). Three parameters, the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUSROC), the summary diagnostic odds ratio, and the summary sensitivity and specificity, were used to examine the accuracy of all tests for liver fibrosis.

RESULTS

Out of 2831 articles evaluated for eligibility, 204 satisfied the predetermined inclusion criteria for this current meta-analysis. Eventually, our final data contained 81 studies. The AUSROCs of serum biomarkers of APRI and FIB-4 were both 0.75. For imaging techniques (ARFI, FibroScan, and MRE), the areas were 0.89, 0.83, and 0.97, respectively. The heterogeneities of ARFI and FibroScan were statistically significant (I² > 50%). The publication bias was not observed in any of the serum biomarkers or imaging methods.

CONCLUSION

These five methods have attained an acceptable level of diagnostic accuracy. Imaging techniques, MRE in particular, demonstrate significant advantages in accurately predicting HBV-related significant fibrosis, while serum biomarkers are admissible methods.

Assessing significant fibrosis using imaging-based elastography in chronic hepatitis B patients: Pilot study

BACKGROUND

Accurate detection of significant fibrosis (fibrosis stage 2 or higher on the METAVIR scale) is important especially for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with high viral loads but with normal or mildly elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels because the presence of significant fibrosis is accepted as the indication for antiviral treatment. Liver biopsy is the reference standard for diagnosing significant fibrosis, but it is an invasive procedure. Consequently, noninvasive imaging-based measurements, such as magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) or two-dimensional shear-wave elastography (2D-SWE), have been proposed for the quantitative assessment of liver fibrosis.

AIM

To explore MRE and 2D-SWE to identify fibrosis stage, and to compare their performance with that of serum-based indices.

METHODS

The study enrolled 63 treatment-naïve CHB patients with high viral loads but with normal or mildly elevated ALT levels who underwent liver biopsy before a decision was made to initiate antiviral therapy. MRE and 2D-SWE were performed, and serum-based indices, such as FIB-4 and aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index (APRI), were calculated. The diagnostic performances of MRE, 2D-SWE, FIB-4, and APRI for assessing significant fibrosis (≥ F2) and cirrhosis (F4) were evaluated with liver histology as the reference standard, using receiver operating characteristic analyses.

RESULTS

The liver fibrosis stage was F0/F1 in 19, F2 in 14, F3 in 14, and F4 in 16 patients, respectively. MRE significantly discriminated F2 from F0/1 (P = 0.022), whereas 2D-SWE showed a broad overlap in distinguishing those stages. MRE showed a higher correlation coefficient value with fibrosis stage than 2D-SWE with fibrosis stage (0.869 vs 0.649, Spearman test; P < 0.001). Multivariate linear regression analyses showed that fibrosis stage was the only factor affecting the values of MRE (P < 0.001), whereas body mass index (P = 0.042) and fibrosis stage (P < 0.001) were independent factors affecting 2D-SWE values. MRE performance for diagnosing significant fibrosis was better [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.906, positive predictive value (PPV) 97.3%, negative predictive value (NPV) 69.2%] than that of FIB-4 (AUC = 0.697, P = 0.002) and APRI (AUC = 0.717, P = 0.010), whereas the performance of 2D-SWE (AUC = 0.843, PPV 86%, NPV 65%) was not significantly different from that of FIB-4 or APRI.

CONCLUSION

Compared to SWE, MRE might be more precise non-invasive assessment for depicting significant fibrosis and for making-decision to initiate antiviral-therapy in treatment-naïve CHB patients with normal or mildly-elevated ALT levels.

Moderate to severe hepatic steatosis leads to overestimation of liver stiffness measurement in chronic hepatitis B patients without significant fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by transient elastography is a noninvasive method for the diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis. The impact of hepatic steatosis on LSM remains to be explored.

AIM

To determine whether LSM is affected by hepatic steatosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

METHODS

Consecutive patients with biopsy-proven CHB were prospectively enrolled. Hepatic steatosis was classified by pathology as none (S0, <5%), mild (S1, 5%-33%), and moderate-severe (S2-3, >33%), and quantitatively by controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) as CAP S0 (≤247 dB/m), CAP S1 (248-267 dB/m) and CAP S2-3 (≥268 dB/m). Liver fibrosis was assessed by METAVIR classification and noninvasively by LSM.

RESULTS

The prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (n = 223) in CHB patients (n = 593) was 37.6%. Forty-eight belonged to S2-3 and 127 belonged to CAP S2-3. In patients without significant fibrosis (F0-1), the median LSM (kPa) was 7.4 in S2-3 and 7.1 in CAP S2-3, which was significantly higher than that in S0/S1 (P = 0.005) and CAP S0/S1 (P = 0.003). No significant difference was found in significant fibrosis (F2-4). For LSM identifying significant fibrosis (F2-4), the negative predictive value was higher in CHB patients with CAP ≥ 268 compared to those with CAP < 268 (0.81 vs 0.73); the positive predictive value was lower in CAP ≥ 268 than its counterpart (0.65 vs 0.76).

CONCLUSIONS

Moderate-severe steatosis increased the LSM value in CHB patients without significant fibrosis. A CAP ≥ 268 did not affect LSM for ruling out, but it slightly affected LSM for ruling in significant fibrosis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR-DDT-13003983.

Usefulness of Transient Elastography for Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Liver Fibrosis in Pediatric Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis

BACKGROUND

Transient elastography (FibroScan®) is a non-invasive and rapid method for assessing liver fibrosis. While the feasibility and usefulness of FibroScan® have been proven in adults, few studies have focused on pediatric populations. We aimed to determine the feasibility and usefulness of FibroScan® in Korean children.

METHODS

FibroScan® examinations were performed in 106 children (age, 5-15 years) who visited the Konyang University Hospital between June and September 2018. Liver steatosis was measured in terms of the controlled attenuation parameter (CAP), while hepatic fibrosis was evaluated in terms of the liver stiffness measurement (LSM). Children were stratified into obese and non-obese controls, according to body mass index (≥ or < 95th percentile, respectively).

RESULTS

The obese group was characterized by significantly higher levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST, 57.00 ± 48.47 vs. 26.40 ± 11.80 IU/L; P < 0.001) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT, 91.27 ± 97.67 vs. 16.28 ± 9.78 IU/L; P < 0.001), frequency of hypertension and abdominal obesity (abdominal circumference > 95% percentile) (P < 0.001), CAP (244.4-340.98 dB/m), and LSM (3.85-7.77 kPa) (P < 0.001). On FibroScan®, 30 of 59 obese children had fibrosis (LSM > 5.5 kPa), whereas the remaining 29 did not (LSM < 5.5 kPa). Obese children with fibrosis had higher levels of AST (73.57 ± 56.00 vs. 39.86 ± 31.93 IU/L; P = 0.009), ALT (132.47 ± 113.88 vs. 48.66 ± 51.29 IU/L; P = 0.001), and gamma-glutamyl transferase (106.67 ± 69.31 vs. 28.80 ± 24.26 IU/L; P = 0.042) compared to obese children without fibrosis. LSM had high and significant correlation (P < 0.05) with AST, ALT, homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance, and AST-to-platelet ratio index.

CONCLUSION

FibroScan® is clinically feasible and facilitates non-invasive, rapid, reproducible, and reliable detection of hepatic steatosis and liver fibrosis in the Korean pediatric population.

Effects of Hepatic Steatosis on Non-Invasive Liver Fibrosis Measurements Between Hepatitis B and Other Etiologies

Fibrosis-4 (FIB4), transient elastography (TE), and acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) are popular modalities to assess liver fibrosis. Their cutoff values for degrees of fibrosis vary between studies. The influence of hepatic steatosis on fibrosis measurements for different etiologies was evaluated. Data from a consecutive series of patients who received fibrosis measurement were included for the training group. An additional series with histology served as the validation group. A standardized protocol was performed for both TE and ARFI, mostly by a single technician. Patients with alcoholism, autoimmune disease, active inflammation, or who were receiving therapy were excluded. The training group included 215 patients and the validation group included 221. The correlation of liver stiffness between TE and ARFI was good (R2 linear = 0.798; p < 0.001). Different correlations between ARFI and TE were noted between high and low control attenuation parameter (CAP) values (cutoff: 290 dB/m), especially in the non-hepatitis B subgroups. Relatively lower FIB4 and TE values were seen in the high CAP versus low CAP in patients with histology-proven non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and chronic hepatitis C. FIB4 cutoff values were >25% lower among F2-F4 stages and the TE cutoff value for F4 was 8.5% lower in the high versus low CAP group. Such findings were not observed in chronic hepatitis B. Different fibrogenesis mechanisms between hepatitis B and non-B are discussed. We conclude that hepatic steatosis significantly impacts FIB4 and TE fibrosis measurements in non-hepatitis B-related liver diseases. Fibrosis grade should be interpreted with caution in severe steatosis.

Serum cytokeratin-18 and its relation to liver fibrosis and steatosis diagnosed by FibroScan and controlled attenuation parameter in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and hepatitis C virus patients

BACKGROUND

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has emerged as the most common cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. Multiple diagnostic noninvasive methods for NAFLD were studied (both serological and imaging), either single or combined. Attention has been focused on cytokeratin-18 (CK18) as a novel serological marker for the diagnosis of steatosis/fibrosis in NAFLD and hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients.

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate serum CK18 in NAFLD and HCV fibrosis/steatosis and also to correlate its performance with the diagnostic accuracy of transient elastography (TE) and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) in the diagnosis of fibrosis/steatosis in these patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three equal groups of participants were enrolled (n=135): group I included patients with chronic HCV, group II included NAFLD patients, and group III included control participants. For all groups, TE/CAP and labs including serum CK18 were performed. Liver biopsy was performed for the NAFLD group.

RESULTS

Serum CK18 was significantly higher in the NAFLD group (19.01±3.49 ng/ml) versus the HCV group (8.95±1.06 ng/ml) and the control group (4.83±1.6 ng/ml) (P<0.001). The CK18 levels in biopsy stages (steatosis, ballooning, inflammation, and fibrosis) and FibroScan/CAP degrees showed that CK18 increased significantly with steatosis and fibrosis stages (biopsy or FibroScan/CAP), but did not reach significance with ballooning or inflammation grades. CK18 was significantly different in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis versus non-nonalcoholic steatohepatitis patients (P=0.041). The best CK18 cutoff to detect steatosis (S≥2) in NAFLD and HCV was 11.65 and 6.84 ng/ml, respectively with an overall sensitivity and specificity over 97%. The CK18 cutoff for significant fibrosis (F≥2) by FibroScan in the NAFLD/HCV groups was 9.115 ng/ml, with 62.5%/69.2% sensitivity/specificity (P=0.031). However, inflammation had a cutoff with a marginal P value (P=0.080), and a reliable cutoff for ballooning was not attained (P=0.386). There was a positive correlation between CK18 and fibrosis (by FibroScan) in the NAFLD and HCV groups (P<0.05). The correlation between CK18 and steatosis in CAP and the nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score was very good (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Serum CK18 is related strongly to the development/progression of NAFLD and HCV-related fibrosis/steatosis. TE was correlated highly with liver biopsy results. The combination of CK18 with other noninvasive modalities increases the diagnostic yield of these tests.

Noninvasive Assessment of Liver Disease in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is estimated to afflict approximately 1 billion individuals worldwide. In a subset of NAFLD patients, who have the progressive form of NAFLD termed nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), it can progress to advanced fibrosis, cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver-related morbidity and mortality. NASH is typically characterized by a specific pattern on liver histology, including steatosis, lobular inflammation, and ballooning with or without peri-sinusoidal fibrosis. Thus, key issues in NAFLD patients are the differentiation of NASH from simple steatosis and identification of advanced hepatic fibrosis. Until now, liver biopsy has been the gold standard for identifying these 2 critical end points, but has well-known limitations, including invasiveness; rare but potentially life-threatening complications; poor acceptability; sampling variability; and cost. Furthermore, due to the epidemic proportion of individuals with NAFLD worldwide, liver biopsy evaluation is impractical, and noninvasive assessment for the diagnosis of NASH and fibrosis is needed. Although much of the work remains to be done in establishing cost-effective strategies for screening for NASH, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis, in this review, we summarize the current state of the noninvasive assessment of liver disease in NAFLD, and we provide an expert synthesis of how these noninvasive tools could be utilized in clinical practice. Finally, we also list the key areas of research priorities in this area to move forward clinical practice.

Transient Elastography and Ultrasonography: Optimal Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis and Cirrhosis in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B Concurrent with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Background and Aims

Concordance between transient elastography (TE) and ultrasonography (US) in assessing liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and concurrent nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has been rarely studied. This study aimed to evaluate the individual and combined performances of TE and US in assessing liver fibrosis and cirrhosis.

Patients and Methods

Consecutive CHB patients with NAFLD were prospectively enrolled. TE and US examinations were performed, with liver biopsy as a reference standard. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were obtained to evaluate the diagnostic performance. Differences between the areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) were compared using DeLong's test.

Results

TE and US scores correlated significantly with the histological fibrosis staging scores. TE was significantly superior to US in the diagnosis of significant fibrosis (AUC, 0.84 vs 0.73; P=0.02), advanced fibrosis (AUC, 0.95 vs 0.76; P<0.001), and cirrhosis (AUC, 0.96 vs 0.71; P<0.001). Combining TE with US did not increase the accuracy of detecting significant fibrosis, advanced cirrhosis, or cirrhosis (P=0.62, P=0.69, and P=0.38, respectively) compared to TE alone. However, TE combined with US significantly increased the positive predictive value for significant fibrosis when compared to TE alone. The optimal cut-off values of TE for predicting advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis were 8.7 kPa and 10.9 kPa, with negative predictive values of 92.4% and 98.7%, respectively.

Conclusions

TE is useful for predicting hepatic fibrosis and excluding cirrhosis in CHB patients with NAFLD. A combination of TE and US does not improve the accuracy in assessing liver fibrosis or cirrhosis.

Applicability of liver stiffness measurement based nomograms to the assessments of hepatitis B related significant fibrosis and cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

We evaluated liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and mildly raised alanine transaminase (ALT) activities between 1-2 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) which was near the threshold for initiating treatment.

METHODS

Nomogram-Fibrosis and Nomogram-Cirrhosis were elaborated with variables independently associated with significant fibrosis and cirrhosis determined by multivariate logistic regression. Calibration, receiver operator characteristic (ROC) and decision curves were applied to comparing nomograms with aspartate aminotransferase (AST) to platelet count (PLT) ratio index (APRI), age-AST-PLT-ALT index (FIB-4) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM).

RESULTS

The Nomogram-Fibrosis was constructed with LSM, PLT, and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT). Nomogram-Cirrhosis contained one more variable of age other than Nomogram-Fibrosis. The calibration demonstrated that the assessments of significant fibrosis or cirrhosis by nomograms were in line with liver biopsy. The AUROC of Nomogram-Fibrosis was 0.788, lager than APRI (0.586), FIB-4 (0.656) and LSM (0.735). The AUROC of Nomogram-Cirrhosis was 0.889, larger than APRI (0.642), FIB-4 (0.725) and LSM (0.837). Furthermore, the decision curve analysis suggested the most net benefits were provided by the nomograms.

CONCLUSIONS

Nomogram-Fibrosis and Nomogram-Cirrhosis could be promising tools for recognizing significant fibrosis and cirrhosis for CHB patients with mild raised ALT activities.

Validation and comparison of seventeen noninvasive models for evaluating liver fibrosis in Chinese hepatitis B patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

To avoid liver biopsy, many noninvasive models comprised of serum markers for liver fibrosis assessment have been developed. Given that most of them were developed in hepatitis C cohorts and few of them have been validated in Chinese hepatitis B patients, we aim to conduct this validation and compare their diagnostic accuracies in such a population.

METHODS

A total of 937 HBV-infected patients who underwent liver biopsy were included in this single-centre retrospective study. The diagnostic accuracies of the 17 noninvasive models were assessed by areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUROCs), using histologically evaluated fibrotic stages of the biopsy specimens as standards. To compare efficiencies of the models, a grading system based on AUROC levels was developed.

RESULTS

For discriminating significant fibrosis in all patients, the best three noninvasive models were King's score (AUROC = 0.756), Virahep-C model (AUROC = 0.756) and GPR (AUROC = 0.744); and for diagnosing cirrhosis, Lok index (AUROC = 0.832), FI (AUROC = 0.820) and FIB-4 (AUROC = 0.818) got the first three places. AUROCs in HBeAg-positive group were generally higher than those in HBeAg-negative group. In addition, based on the grading system, Virahep-C and GPR outstood others in evaluating liver fibrosis in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In Chinese HBV-infected patients, Virahep-C models and GPR had high accuracies in diagnosing liver fibrosis and cirrhosis, while the most discussed models like APRI and FIB-4 did not outstand. Assessment should take into account the HBeAg sero-status, since these noninvasive models were more appropriate for HBeAg-positive patients than HBeAg-negative ones.

Chronic Hepatitis C Patients with Obesity: Do we Need two Operators for Accurate Evaluation of Liver Stiffness?

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

Transient elastography is gaining popularity as a non-invasive method for predicting liver fibrosis, but inter observer agreement and factors influencing reproducibility have not been adequately assessed.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted at Specialized Medical Hospital and the Egyptian Liver Foundation, Mansoura, Egypt. The inclusion criteria were: age older than 18 years and chronic infection by hepatitis C. The exclusion criteria were the presence of ascites, pacemaker or pregnancy. Three hundred and fifty-six patients participated in the study. Therefore, 356 pairs of exams were done by two operators on the same day.

RESULTS

The overall inter observer agreement ICC was 0.921. The correlation the two operators was excellent (Spearman's value q = 0.808, p < 0.001). Inter-observer reliability values were κ = 0.557 (p < 0.001). A not negligible discordance of fibrosis staging between operators was observed (87 cases, 24.4%). Discordance of at least one stage and for two or more stages of fibrosis occurred in 60 (16.9%) and 27 cases (7.6%) respectively. Obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) is the main factor associated with discordance (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Although liver stiffness measurement has had an excellent correlation between the two operators, TE presented an inter-observer variability that may not be negligible.

Diagnostic accuracy of point shear wave elastography and transient elastography for staging hepatic fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the accuracy of staging liver fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) usingpoint shear wave elastography (pSWE) and transient elastography (TE).

SETTING

Relevant records on NAFLD were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases up to 20 December 2017. A bivariate mixed-effects model was conducted to combine sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) between pSWE and TE. A sensitivity analysis was implemented to explore the source of heterogeneity.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with NAFLD who had a liver stiffness measurement using pSWE and TE before liver biopsy were enrolled according to the following criteria: 2×2 contingency tables can be calculated via the reported number of cases; sensitivity and specificity were excluded according to the following criteria: history of other hepatic damage, such as chronic hepatitis C, concurrent active hepatitis B infection, autoimmune hepatitis, suspicious drug usage and alcohol abuse.

RESULTS

Nine pSWE studies comprising a total of 982 patients and 11 TE studies comprising a total of 1753 patients were included. For detection of significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis, the summary AUC was 0.86 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.89), 0.94 (95% CI 0.91 to 0.95) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.93 to 0.97) for pSWE, and the summary AUC was 0.85 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.88), 0.92 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.94) and 0.94 (95% CI 0.93 to 0.97) for TE, respectively. The proportion of failure measurement was over tenfold as common with TE using an M probe compared with pSWE.

CONCLUSION

pSWE and TE, providing precise non-invasive staging of liver fibrosis in NAFLD, are promising techniques, particularly for advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis.

Transient Elastography for Significant Liver Fibrosis and Cirrhosis in Chronic Hepatitis B: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The hepatitis B virus infection is a global health issue and the stage of liver fibrosis affects the prognosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). We performed the meta-analysis describing diagnostic accuracy of transient elastography (TE) for predicting CHB-related fibrosis.

METHODS

We performed an adequate literature search to identify studies that assessed the diagnostic accuracy of TE in CHB patients using biopsy as reference standard. Hierarchical summary receiver-operating curves model and the bivariate mixed-effects binary regression model were applied to generate summary receiver-operating characteristic curves and pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

The area under the summary receiver-operating curve for significant fibrosis and cirrhosis was 0.86 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83-0.89) and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.90-0.94), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio of TE for significant fibrosis were 0.78 (95% CI: 0.73-0.81, p < 0.01; I² = 85.59%), 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77-0.84, p < 0.01; I² = 88.20%), and 14.44 (95% CI: 10.80-19.31, p < 0.01; I² = 100%) and for cirrhosis were 0.84 (95% CI: 0.80-0.88, p < 0.01; I² = 76.67%), 0.87 (95% CI: 0.84-0.90, p < 0.01; I² = 90.89%), and 36.63 (95% CI: 25.38-52.87, p < 0.01; I² = 100%), respectively. The optimal cut-off values of TE were 7.25 kPa for diagnosing significant fibrosis and 12.4 kPa for diagnosing cirrhosis, respectively.

CONCLUSION

TE is of great value in the detection of patients with CHB-related cirrhosis but has a suboptimal accuracy in the detection of significant fibrosis.

Comparison of Machine Learning Approaches for Prediction of Advanced Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis C Patients

BACKGROUND/AIM

Using machine learning approaches as non-invasive methods have been used recently as an alternative method in staging chronic liver diseases for avoiding the drawbacks of biopsy. This study aims to evaluate different machine learning techniques in prediction of advanced fibrosis by combining the serum bio-markers and clinical information to develop the classification models.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of 39,567 patients with chronic hepatitis C was divided into two sets-one categorized as mild to moderate fibrosis (F0-F2), and the other categorized as advanced fibrosis (F3-F4) according to METAVIR score. Decision tree, genetic algorithm, particle swarm optimization, and multi-linear regression models for advanced fibrosis risk prediction were developed. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to evaluate the performance of the proposed models.

RESULTS

Age, platelet count, AST, and albumin were found to be statistically significant to advanced fibrosis. The machine learning algorithms under study were able to predict advanced fibrosis in patients with HCC with AUROC ranging between 0.73 and 0.76 and accuracy between 66.3 and 84.4 percent.

CONCLUSIONS

Machine-learning approaches could be used as alternative methods in prediction of the risk of advanced liver fibrosis due to chronic hepatitis C.

Noninvasive imaging biomarker assessment of liver fibrosis by elastography in NAFLD

NAFLD is a global epidemic. The prevalence of NAFLD is 20-30% in North America, northern Europe, Australia, Japan, India and China. It is crucial that patients with NAFLD receive an assessment for their risk of advanced fibrosis, which increases the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma and other complications of cirrhosis. Risk stratification that is efficient, cost-effective, patient-centred and evidence-based is one of the most important issues facing clinicians who care for those with liver disease. Given patients' preference to avoid liver biopsy, noninvasive alternatives to assess liver fibrosis are in high demand. The most accurate noninvasive methods are based on liver elastography. Research on these techniques - which include vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE), magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), shear-wave elastography and acoustic radiation force impulse - has proliferated. Unfortunately, the literature has not kept pace with clinical practice. There is limited guidance for how clinicians should anticipate and manage the pitfalls of these tests. Furthermore, guidance is unavailable for clinicians regarding the optimal incorporation of VCTE, MRE or the emerging elastographic techniques into their clinical strategy, particularly for patients with NAFLD. In this Review, we summarize the available evidence, highlight gaps to address in further research and explore optimization of these techniques in clinical practice.

Quantitative Elastography Methods in Liver Disease: Current Evidence and Future Directions

Chronic liver diseases often result in the development of liver fibrosis and ultimately, cirrhosis. Treatment strategies and prognosis differ greatly depending on the severity of liver fibrosis, thus liver fibrosis staging is clinically relevant. Traditionally, liver biopsy has been the method of choice for fibrosis evaluation. Because of liver biopsy limitations, noninvasive methods have become a key research interest in the field. Elastography enables the noninvasive measurement of tissue mechanical properties through observation of shear-wave propagation in the tissue of interest. Increasing fibrosis stage is associated with increased liver stiffness, providing a discriminatory feature that can be exploited by elastographic methods. Ultrasonographic (US) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging elastographic methods are commercially available, each with their respective strengths and limitations. Here, the authors review the technical basis, acquisition techniques, and results and limitations of US- and MR-based elastography techniques. Diagnostic performance in the most common etiologies of chronic liver disease will be presented. Reliability, reproducibility, failure rate, and emerging advances will be discussed. ^© RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Prognostic Relevance of Liver Stiffness Assessed by Transient Elastography in Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is often accompanied by liver congestion through increased right atrial pressure (RAP). Liver stiffness (LS) assessed non-invasively using transient elastography is related to increased RAP and liver congestion in patients with general HF. We investigated the relationship of LS with clinical and echocardiographic variables and outcomes in patients with ADHF.Methods and Results:The subjects were 105 patients with ADHF admitted to hospital between October 2016 and June 2017. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on median LS at admission (low LS <8.8 kPa [n=52] vs. high LS ≥8.8 kPa [n=53]). Death from cardiovascular disease and readmission for HF were primary endpoints. Total bilirubin and γ-glutamyl transpeptidase levels, MELD-XI score, diameters of the inferior vena cava and right ventricle, and severity of tricuspid regurgitation were greater in the high LS group (all P<0.05). During a median (interquartile range) follow-up period of 153 (83-231) days, cardiac events occurred in 29 patients (54%) in the high LS group and in 13 (25%) in the low LS group (P=0.001). After adjusting for variables that influence organ congestion, a high LS ≥8.8 kPa was still significantly associated with cardiac events (all P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased LS measured by transient elastography reflects RAP elevation, hepatic congestion, and hepatic dysfunction. LS upon admission may be a useful prognostic marker in patients with ADHF.

The Clinical Difference in the Platelet Counts between Liver Cirrhosis with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Hepatitis C Virus

Objective The rate of platelet count reduction appears to differ among different liver diseases. In the present study, we investigated the difference in the platelet counts of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and those with chronic liver disease due to hepatitis C virus (CLD-HCV). Methods The study population included 620 patients with NAFLD and 405 patients with CLD-HCV, all of whom were diagnosed by liver biopsy. The relationships between the grade of fibrosis and the platelet count in the two diseases were compared. The optimal cut-off value for the diagnosis of liver cirrhosis (LC) was measured. The relationships between the platelet count and anti-platelet antibodies, the serum thrombopoietin level, the grade of splenomegaly and liver stiffness were also investigated in both LC groups. Results In NAFLD patients, the platelet count was significantly higher at each grade of fibrosis in comparison to CLD-HCV. The optimal cut-off value for the diagnosis of LC was 16.0×10⁴/μL [sensitivity, 86.7%; specificity, 87.6%; area under the curve (AUC), 0.930] in NAFLD and 12.7×10⁴/μL (sensitivity, 57.8%; specificity, 88.2%; AUC, 0.863) in CLD-HCV. No anti-platelet antibodies were detected in patients with either type of LC. The serum thrombopoietin levels, the distribution of splenomegaly grades, and liver stiffness did not differ between the two LC groups to a statistically significant extent. As the splenomegaly grade increased, the platelet count decreased. Conclusion The optimal cut-off values for diagnosing LC differed between the two diseases and should be determined separately. The reason for the difference in platelet reduction is still unclear, and requires further investigation.

Impact of controlled attenuation parameter on detecting fibrosis using liver stiffness measurement

BACKGROUND

Liver fibrosis is often accompanied by steatosis, particularly in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and its non-invasive characterisation is of utmost importance. Vibration-controlled transient elastography is the non-invasive method of choice; however, recent research suggests that steatosis may influence its diagnostic performance. Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP) added to transient elastography enables simultaneous assessment of steatosis and fibrosis.

AIM

To determine how to use CAP in interpreting liver stiffness measurements.

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of data from an individual patient data meta-analysis on CAP. The main exclusion criteria for the current analysis were unknown aetiology, unreliable elastography measurement and data already used for the same research question. Aetiology-specific liver stiffness measurement cut-offs were determined and used to estimate positive and negative predictive values (PPV/NPV) with logistic regression as functions of CAP.

RESULTS

Two thousand and fifty eight patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria (37% women, 18% NAFLD/NASH, 42% HBV, 40% HCV, 51% significant fibrosis ≥ F2). Youden optimised cut-offs were only sufficient for ruling out cirrhosis (NPV of 98%). With sensitivity and specificity-optimised cut-offs, NPV for ruling out significant fibrosis was moderate (70%) and could be improved slightly through consideration of CAP. PPV for significant fibrosis and cirrhosis were 68% and 55% respectively, despite specificity-optimised cut-offs for cirrhosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver stiffness measurement values below aetiology-specific cut-offs are very useful for ruling out cirrhosis, and to a lesser extent for ruling out significant fibrosis. In the case of the latter, Controlled Attenuation Parameter can improve interpretation slightly. Even if cut-offs are very high, liver stiffness measurements are not very reliable for ruling in fibrosis or cirrhosis.

Association of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis with subclinical myocardial dysfunction in non-cirrhotic patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Among categories of NAFLD, hepatic fibrosis is most likely to affect mortality. Myocardial function and its energy metabolism are tightly linked, which might be altered by an insulin resistant condition such as NAFLD. We investigated whether hepatic steatosis and fibrosis were associated with myocardial dysfunction relative to myocardial glucose uptake.

METHODS

A total of 308 patients (190 without NAFLD, 118 with NAFLD) were studied in a tertiary care hospital. Myocardial glucose uptake was evaluated at fasted state using [¹⁸F]-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (¹⁸FDG-PET). Hepatic steatosis and fibrosis were assessed by transient liver elastography (Fibroscan®) with controlled attenuation parameter, which quantifies hepatic fat and by surrogate indices (fatty liver index and NAFLD fibrosis score). Cardiac structure and function were examined by echocardiogram.

RESULTS

Compared to those without NAFLD, patients with NAFLD had alterations in cardiac remodeling, manifested by increased left ventricular mass index, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, and left atrial volume index (all p <0.05). Hepatic steatosis was significantly associated with left ventricular filling pressure (E/e' ratio), which reflects diastolic dysfunction (p for trend <0.05). Those without NAFLD were more likely to have higher myocardial glucose uptake compared to those with NAFLD. Significant hepatic fibrosis was also correlated with diastolic dysfunction and impaired myocardial glucose uptake. Using multivariable linear regression, E/e' ratio was independently associated with hepatic fibrosis (standardized β = 0.12 to 0.27; all p <0.05). Association between hepatic steatosis and E/e' ratio was also significant (standardized β = 0.10 to 0.15; all p <0.05 excluding the model adjusted for adiposity).

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatic steatosis and fibrosis are significantly associated with diastolic heart dysfunction. This association is linked with myocardial glucose uptake evaluated by ¹⁸FDG-PET.

LAY SUMMARY

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. More severe forms of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, where hepatic fibrosis occurs, are linked to increased mortality. In this study, we have shown that hepatic steatosis and fibrosis are associated with subclinical myocardial dysfunction. This association is linked to altered myocardial glucose uptake.

Usefulness of the index of NASH - ION for the diagnosis of steatohepatitis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver: An external validation study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The non-invasive identification of steatohepatitis (NASH) in patients with Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease is an unmet need in clinical practice. Index of NASH (ION) is a new tool for the prediction of NASH. We aimed to externally validate ION and to compare it with CK-18. Since necroinflammation precedes fibrosis, we also tested ION in combination with non-invasive tools for fibrosis.

METHODS

We analysed data from 292 Italian patients (169 Southern cohort, and 123 Northern cohort) with an histological diagnosis of NAFLD. The ION, FIB-4 and NFS scores were calculated according to published algorithms. Serum cytokeratin18-Aspartate396 levels and liver stiffness (LS) by Fibroscan were assessed within three months from liver biopsy.

RESULTS

The diagnostic accuracy of ION for the identification of NASH was not as satisfactory as reported (area under the ROC curve, AUROC = 0.687 [95% CI = 0.62-0.75]). The proposed cut-off value ≥50 showed a poor sensitivity (Se) (28%) and a good specificity (Sp) (92%), with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 91% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 30%. A new cut-off value >26 improved Se (73%) but decreased Sp (60%) (PPV of 84% and a NPV of 43%). ION performed slightly better in obese NAFLD (AUROC = 0.700). The combination of ION and markers of fibrosis did not improve the identification of advanced liver disease.

CONCLUSIONS

ION is not feasible for the non-invasive diagnosis of NASH across different populations of NAFLD patients, mainly because its limited reproducibility in non-obese subjects.

Clinicopathological and immunological characteristics and outcome of concomitant coeliac disease and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in adults: a large prospective longitudinal study

Objective

Concomitant non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and coeliac disease (CD) have not been adequately studied. This study investigated the frequency of CD among NAFLD patients and the clinicopathological and immunological patterns and outcome of concomitant NAFLD and CD.

Design

This prospective longitudinal study screened patients with NAFLD for CD (tissue transglutaminase antibodies (TTGA); anti-TTGA and antiendomysial antibodies (EMA)). Patients with concomitant NAFLD and CD and patients with either NAFLD or CD were enrolled and followed. Duodenal biopsy, transient elastography, tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, transforming growth factor-beta, interleukins (ILs) 1, 6, 10, 15 and 17, folic acid and vitamins B12 and D were performed at baseline and 1 year after gluten-free diet (GFD).

Results

CD was confirmed in 7.2% of patients with NAFLD. Refractory anaemia and nutritional deficiencies were frequent in patients with concomitant NAFLD and CD who had advanced intestinal and hepatic lesions, higher levels of TNF-α, IL-15 and IL-17 compared with patients with CD and NAFLD. Patients concomittant CD and NAFLD showed clinical response to GFD, but intestinal histological improvement was suboptimal. Combining EMA-IgA or anti-TTGA with either IL-15 or IL-17 enhances the prognostic performance of both tests in predicting histological response to GFD.

Conclusion

Concomitant NAFLD and CD is not uncommon. Recurrent abdominal symptoms, refractory anaemia, nutritional deficiencies in patients with NAFLD warrant screening for CD. The study has important clinical implications since failure in diagnosing CD in patients with NAFLD patients results in marked intestinal and hepatic damage and suboptimal response to GFD that can be alleviated by early diagnosis and initiation of GFD.

MEASUREMENT OF CONTROLLED ATTENUATION PARAMETER: A SURROGATE MARKER OF HEPATIC STEATOSIS IN PATIENTS OF NONALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE ON LIFESTYLE MODIFICATION - A PROSPECTIVE FOLLOW-UP STUDY

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Liver biopsy is a gold standard method for hepatic steatosis assessment. However, liver biopsy is an invasive and painful procedure and can cause severe complications therefore it cannot be frequently used in case of follow-up of patients. Non-invasive assessment of steatosis and fibrosis is of growing relevance in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). To evaluate hepatic steatosis, transient elastography with controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) measurement is an option now days. OBJECTIVE: Aim of this study is to evaluate role of measurement of controlled attenuation parameter, a surrogate marker of hepatic steatosis in patients of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease on lifestyle modification. METHODS: In this study, initially 37 participants were included who were followed up after 6 months with transient elastography, blood biochemical tests and anthropometric measurements. The results were analyzed by Multivariate linear regression analysis and paired samples t-test (Dependent t-test) with 95% confidence interval. Correlation is calculated by Pearson correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Mean CAP value for assessing hepatic steatosis during 1st consultation (278.57±49.13 dB/m) was significantly improved (P=0.03) after 6 months of lifestyle modification (252.91±62.02 dB/m). Only fasting blood sugar (P=0.008), weight (P=0.000), body mass index (BMI) (P=0.000) showed significant positive correlation with CAP. Only BMI (P=0.034) and weight (P=0.035) were the independent predictor of CAP value in NAFLD patients. CONCLUSION: Lifestyle modification improves the hepatic steatosis, and CAP can be used to detect the improvement of hepatic steatosis during follow-up in patients with NAFLD on lifestyle modification. There is no relation between CAP and Fibroscan score in NAFLD patients. Only BMI and weight can predict CAP value independently.

Clinical strategy of diagnosing and following patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease based on invasive and noninvasive methods

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is an important cause of chronic liver injury in many countries. The incidence of NAFLD is rising rapidly in both adults and children, because of the currently ongoing epidemics of obesity and type 2 diabetes. Notably, histological liver fibrosis is recognized as the main predictive factor for the overall long-term outcome of NAFLD, including cardiovascular disease and liver-related mortality. Thus, staging of liver fibrosis is essential in determining the prognosis and optimal treatment for patients with NAFLD and in guiding surveillance for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Whereas liver biopsy remains the gold standard for staging liver fibrosis, it is impossible to enforce liver biopsy in all patients with NAFLD. Noninvasive biological markers, scoring systems and noninvasive modalities are increasingly being developed and investigated to evaluate fibrosis stage of NAFLD patients. This review will highlight recent studies on the diagnosis and staging of NAFLD based on invasive (liver biopsy) or noninvasive (biomarker, scoring systems, US-based elastography and MR elastography) methods.

Liver fibrosis: noninvasive assessment using supersonic shear imaging and FIB4 index in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

PURPOSE

Shear wave elastography (SWE) has been validated in chronic hepatitis C and B; however, limited data are available in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of SWE and FIB4 index for the diagnosis of fibrosis in a cohort of consecutive patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD, and to evaluate the effects of other histologic parameters on SWE measurement.

METHODS

Written informed consent was obtained from all patients, and this study was approved by our internal review board and ethics committee. Seventy-one patients with histologically proven NAFLD (mean age 50.8 years ± 15.7) were examined. All patients underwent SWE (Aixplorer™; SuperSonic Imagine) and FIB4 index (based on age, aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels, and platelet counts) measurements. SWE measurements were compared with the histologic features based on the NAFLD activity score and FIB4 index.

RESULTS

The area under the ROC curve for the diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis stage 3 or higher was 0.821 (optimal cut-off value 13.1 kPa, sensitivity 62.5%, specificity 57.4%) for SWE and 0.822 (optimal cut-off value 1.41, sensitivity 71.9%, specificity 53.9%) for FIB4 index. The median liver stiffness values measured using SWE showed a stepwise increase with increasing hepatic fibrosis stage (P < 0.001), inflammation score (P = 0.018), and ballooning score (P < 0.001), and showed a stepwise decrease with increasing hepatic steatosis stage (P = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

SWE and FIB4 index are useful noninvasive tools for estimating the severity of fibrosis in NAFLD patients. However, the presence of severe steatosis may affect the liver stiffness measurement, resulting in underestimations of liver fibrosis.

Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography and Fibroscan for detecting liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Aim

This systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out to compare the diagnostic accuracy of Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and Fibroscan for detecting liver fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB) patients.

Methods

The PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the Web of science databases were searched for studies that evaluated the diagnostic value of MRE and Fibroscan for liver fibrosis in CHB patients until March 1^st 2017. The quality of the included studies was assessed by the revised Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy tool (QUADAS-2). Meta-disc 4.1 was used to summary the area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratios to assess the accuracy of staging liver fibrosis using MRE and Fibroscan.

Results

A total of nine MRE studies with 1470 patients and fifteen Fibroscan studies with 3641 patients were included in this systematic review. The summary AUROC values using MRE and Fibroscan for detecting significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis were 0.981 vs. 0.796(p<0.001), 0.972 vs. 0.893(p<0.001), and 0.972 vs. 0.905 (p<0.001). The pooled sensitivity and specificity using MRE for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis were 92.8% and 93.7%, 89.6% and 93.2%, 89.5% and 92.0%, respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity using Fibroscan for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis were 71.6% and 81.6%, 79.0% and 84.6%, 80.0% and 86.6%, respectively.

Conclusion

MRE is more accurate than Fibroscan in diagnosing liver fibrosis in CHB patients, especially in diagnosing significant fibrosis and advanced fibrosis.

A diagnostic algorithm for assessment of liver fibrosis by liver stiffness measurement in patients with chronic hepatitis B

Steatosis could affect liver stiffness measurement in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and chronic hepatitis C. In this study, we aimed to investigate the impact of steatosis on liver stiffness in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected patients and develop a diagnostic algorithm for prediction of liver fibrosis by liver stiffness based on the controlled attenuation parameter. A total of 488 HBV-infected patients who underwent clinical examination, Fibroscan and liver biopsy were prospectively enrolled. The best liver stiffness measurement (kPa) cut-offs for significant fibrosis (S≥3) and advanced fibrosis (S≥4) were 8.1 and 10.9, respectively. The best controlled attenuation parameter cut-off for severe steatosis (≥30%) was 287 dB/m. Among patients with low-grade fibrosis (S0-S2/S0-S3), mean liver stiffness values were significantly higher in subjects with severe steatosis or controlled attenuation parameter ≥287 dB/m compared with those without. Moreover, in subjects with low-grade fibrosis, a higher rate of false-positive rate was observed in patients with severe steatosis than those in patients without (F0-F2: 28.2% vs 9.7%; F0-F3: 17.0% vs 5.3%), and in patients with CAP≥287 dB/m compared with their counterpart (F0-F2: 23.7% vs 9.2%; F0-F3: 14.1% vs 4.8%). Low-grade fibrosis was accurately identified by γ-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-platelet ratio (GPR) with a cut-off value of 0.17. In patients with GPR<0.17, similar results were observed. The presence of steatosis may lead to overestimation of fibrosis assessed by liver stiffness measurement in patient with chronic hepatitis B. A diagnostic algorithm for assessing fibrosis using liver stiffness was developed by combining both controlled attenuation parameter and GPR values.

Assessing Hepatic Fibrosis Using 2-D Shear Wave Elastography in Patients with Liver Tumors: A Prospective Single-Center Study

The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic performance of 2-D shear wave elastography (2-D-SWE) in evaluations of liver stiffness in patients with liver tumors before resection. A total of 121 consecutive patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (n = 93), intra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma (n = 6), mixed hepatocellular carcinoma and intra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma (n = 6), liver metastases (n = 10) and benign tumors (n = 6) were prospectively enrolled in this study from June 2015 to March 2016. Three valid 2-D-SWE measurements for each patient and median liver stiffness values were calculated. Fibrosis staging was evaluated according to the METAVIR scoring system. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to assess diagnostic performance. In this study, we found that median liver stiffness values were significantly higher in patients with primary liver tumors than in those with liver metastases and benign tumors (11.80 kPa vs. 5.85 kPa, p < 0.001). In addition, liver stiffness, assessed using 2-D-SWE, was highly correlated with pathologically confirmed liver fibrosis stage. Liver fibrosis stage and liver stiffness values were analyzed using Spearman's correlation (0.708, p < 0.001). The median liver stiffness values were as follows: F1, 6.7 kPa; F2, 6.33 kPa; F3, 9.2 kPa; F4, 13.7 kPa. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of the liver stiffness values that predicted significant fibrosis (≥F2), severe fibrosis (≥F3) and cirrhosis (=F4) were 83.5%, 91.6% and 88.1%, respectively. According to the Youden index, the optimal cutoff values for predicting significant fibrosis (≥F2), severe fibrosis (≥F3) and cirrhosis (=F4) were 7.05 kPa (sensitivity = 74.6%, specificity = 100.0%), 9.45 kPa (sensitivity = 78.8%, specificity = 100.0%) and 11.1 kPa (sensitivity = 83.1%, specificity = 89.3%), respectively. We conclude that 2-D-SWE is a useful, accurate and non-invasive method for evaluating hepatic fibrosis in patients with liver tumors adapted to hepatectomy (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02958592).

American Gastroenterological Association Institute Technical Review on the Role of Elastography in Chronic Liver Diseases

Chronic liver diseases (CLDs), due to chronic hepatitis C; hepatitis B; nonalcoholic fatty liver diseases (NAFLD); and alcoholic liver disease, are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Early identification of patients with cirrhosis at high risk of progression to liver-related complications may facilitate timely care and improve outcomes. With risks and misclassification associated with invasive tests, such as liver biopsy, noninvasive imaging modalities for liver fibrosis assessment have gained popularity. Therefore, the American Gastroenterological Association prioritized clinical guidelines on the role of elastography in CLDs, focusing on vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE). To inform these clinical guidelines, the current technical review was developed in accordance with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework for diagnostic accuracy studies. This technical review addresses focused questions related to: (1) comparative diagnostic performance of VCTE and MRE relative to nonproprietary, serum-based fibrosis markers for detection of cirrhosis in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), NAFLD, and alcoholic liver diseases; (2) performance of specific VCTE-defined liver stiffness cutoffs as a test replacement strategy (to replace liver biopsy) in making key decisions in the management of patients with CLDs; and (3) performance of specific VCTE-defined liver stiffness cutoffs as a triage test to identify patients with low likelihood of harboring high-risk esophageal varices (EVs) or having clinically significant portal hypertension (for presurgical risk stratification). This technical review does not address performance of other noninvasive modalities for assessing fibrosis (eg, acoustic radiation force pulse imaging or shear wave elastography) or steatosis (controlled attenuation parameter or magnetic resonance imaging-estimated proton density fat fraction).

Magnetic resonance imaging and transient elastography in the management of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD)

INTRODUCTION

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common cause of chronic liver disease and cirrhosis worldwide and the second most common cause of liver transplantation in major medical centers. Because liver steatosis and fibrosis severity are related to disease morbidity and mortality, the extent of disease, and disease progression, they need to be assessed and monitored. In addition, innovation with new drug developments requires disease staging and monitoring in both phase 2 and 3 clinical trials. Currently, disease assessment in both clinical practice and research is mostly performed by liver biopsy, an invasive, procedure with risks. Noninvasive, highly accurate tests are needed that could be used in clinical trials as surrogate endpoints and in clinical practice for monitoring patients. Area Covered: We discuss noninvasive tests, transient elastography (TE) with controlled attenuation parameter (CAP), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and MR elastography (MRE), summarize the available evidence of their usefulness for assessing steatosis and fibrosis. Therefore they could be used as clinical trials outcomes and in disease monitoring in clinical practice. Expert Commentary: TE with CAP, MRI and MRE are highly accurate noninvasive diagnostic tools for quantifying hepatic steatosis and fibrosis. Therefore they could be used as clinical trials outcomes and in disease monitoring in clinical practice.

What we need to know when performing and interpreting US elastography

According to the increasing need for accurate staging of hepatic fibrosis, the ultrasound (US) elastography techniques have evolved significantly over the past two decades. Currently, US elastography is increasingly used in clinical practice. Previously published studies have demonstrated the excellent diagnostic performance of US elastography for the detection and staging of liver fibrosis. Although US elastography may seem easy to perform and interpret, there are many technical and clinical factors which can affect the results of US elastography. Therefore, clinicians who are involved with US elastography should be aware of these factors. The purpose of this article is to present a brief overview of US techniques with the relevant technology, the clinical indications, diagnostic performance, and technical and biological factors which should be considered in order to avoid misinterpretation of US elastography results.

Two-dimensional Shear-Wave Elastography Performance in the Noninvasive Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B: Comparison with Serum Fibrosis Indexes

Purpose To investigate the value of two-dimensional (2D) shear-wave elastography (SWE) in the assessment of hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and to compare the diagnostic performance of this modality with that of liver fibrosis indexes. Materials and Methods The ethics committee approved this study, and informed consent was obtained. From July 2015 to May 2016, 539 subjects who underwent partial hepatectomy were divided into groups according to the Scheuer system by using a resected liver specimen. All patients were examined with 2D SWE and underwent preoperative serologic testing to measure liver stiffness and values of serum fibrosis models, which were compared with histologic findings. Performance of noninvasive methods was determined for index (304 patients) and validation (155 patients) cohorts by using areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs). Results For association with substantial fibrosis (≥S2), severe fibrosis (≥S3), and cirrhosis (S4) in the index cohort, the optimal cutoff values of liver stiffness were 7.6, 9.2, and 10.4 kPa, respectively, and AUC values were 0.97, 0.96, and 0.98, respectively. The 2D SWE findings, aspartate transaminase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), fibrosis index based on the four factors (FIB-4), King's score, and Forns index significantly correlated with hepatic fibrosis stages (ρ = 0.88, ρ = 0.41, ρ = 0.40, ρ = 0.43 and ρ = 0.45, respectively; P < .05). The AUCs for APRI, FIB-4, King's score, and Forns index were 0.77, 0.73, 0.79, and 0.77, respectively, in the diagnosis of substantial fibrosis and 0.70, 0.71, 0.72, and 0.74, respectively, in the diagnosis of cirrhosis. In the validation cohort, AUCs of noninvasive methods used to assess different fibrosis stages did not significantly differ from those for the index cohort. AUCs of 2D SWE in the diagnosis of substantial fibrosis, severe fibrosis, and cirrhosis were 0.97, 0.97, and 0.98, respectively, which were significantly higher than those in serum models (P < .05). Conclusion The 2D SWE protocol could be used to predict substantial fibrosis, severe fibrosis, and cirrhosis in patients with CHB with notably higher diagnostic accuracy than that attained with serum fibrosis models. ^© RSNA, 2016.

Noninvasive imaging methods to determine severity of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is now the most common form of liver disease in developed countries, with an estimated prevalence of 20%-30% and increasing to as high as 90% in diabetics. As the rates of NAFLD continue to rise in parallel with those of the obesity pandemic, it is increasingly important to differentiate those patients with the highest risk of progression to fibrosis and cirrhosis. In fact, those patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and fibrosis are at the greatest risk of progression to advanced disease, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular cancer and are more likely to develop liver-related mortality. Thus, it is critically important to distinguish between NASH and non-NASH NAFLD. Whereas liver biopsy remains the gold standard for staging of disease, complications of this procedure and other well-recognized limitations make it impractical for widespread use given the overall NAFLD disease burden. Noninvasive imaging modalities are increasingly being utilized to evaluate and stage NAFLD in patients with such a wide spectrum of disease. In this article, the role of these new and promising noninvasive imaging modalities to assess disease severity in NAFLD are reviewed. (Hepatology 2016;64:2234-2243).

Transient elastography in healthy subjects and factors influencing liver stiffness in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: An Italian community-based population study

BACKGROUND

Few studies have been performed to explore parameters that influence liver stiffness measurement (LSM) using transient elastography in general population.

AIM

To explore factors influencing LSM in healthy and in subjects with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).

METHODS

LSM was performed in a well-characterized cohort of subjects aged between 30 and 63 years. After exclusion of any causes of liver disease, the healthy cohort was defined and was compared with participants with NAFLD. The 95th percentile value of LSM in healthy was used as a cutoff suggesting relevant fibrosis.

RESULTS

Among 780 subjects evaluated, 331 were defined as healthy. The median value was 4.4kPa (3.7-5.2) and the 95th percentile was 6.8kPa. LSM was not influenced by gender, age, anthropometrics and biochemical parameters. Only insulin resistance was independently associated with increasing of LSM. In the cohort of 157 subjects with NAFLD, LSM was higher than in healthy (5.6±1.9 vs 4.6±1.3kPa; p<0.001). On multivariate analysis, the degree of steatosis was independently associated with increasing of LSM in NAFLD cohort (β=0.271; 95% CI=0.026-0.095; p<0.001). Participants with diabetes and/or severe steatosis had the highest probabilities of relevant fibrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

LSM varies between 3.7 and 5.2kPa in healthy Caucasians and is influenced only by insulin resistance. In NAFLD, severe steatosis and diabetes are factors influencing LSM.