Clinical outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged younger than 60 years

Implant Selection for Proximal Humerus Fractures

Proximal humerus fractures (PHF) are a common orthopedic injury; however, their treatment remains largely controversial with evidence supporting a wide array of treatments. Although many injuries can be treated nonoperatively, there has been much debate about surgical management of PHF. A detailed review of the literature was performed relative to operative management options specifically related to implant choices. Although no definitive answers are available regarding best practice, there is literature to guide operative decision-making and implant selection based on both patient- and surgeon-specific factors.

Treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tears with superior capsular reconstruction

Abstract

The treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tears with severe muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration remains a challenge, especially in young patients. Many surgical procedures for these tears have been reported. No one surgical treatment has proven to be an optimal solution. Recently, reconstruction of the superior capsule with an allograft or autograft has gained popularity. In this manuscript, we reviewed the biomechanical and clinical reports that have assessed superior capsular reconstruction and clarified the issues about the surgical techniques and indication which have been discussed recently. Reconstruction of the superior capsule has shown promising early results with good clinical outcomes. Biomechanical studies have suggested various mechanisms of this procedure. Although good clinical results and biomechanical data are available, more research is necessary to further define the surgical indications and improve the surgical outcomes of this procedure.

Level of evidence

Level V.

Superior Capsular Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Surgical Techniques and Clinical Outcomes

PURPOSE

To evaluate surgical techniques and clinical outcomes of arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) for the treatment of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears.

METHODS

A systematic review was registered with PROSPERO and performed using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. The PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched. Studies investigating SCR with reported surgical techniques were included. Animal studies, cadaveric studies, review studies, and letters to the editor were excluded. The technical aspects of the surgical techniques for SCR were analyzed in each article, which included graft type, glenoid fixation method, greater tuberosity fixation method, graft passage technique, suture management, margin convergence, concomitant procedures, and postoperative rehabilitation protocol. Clinical outcomes, when available, were also analyzed.

RESULTS

We screened 365 articles, of which 29 described surgical techniques for SCR. According to the Modified Coleman Methodology Score, 24 articles were rated as poor (score < 55), 4 were rated as fair (score between 55 and 69), and 1 was rated as good (score between 70 and 84), with an average score of 25.8 ± 20.9. The most commonly performed technique for SCR used the following: an acellular dermal allograft, 2 biocomposite suture anchors for glenoid fixation, transosseous-equivalent double-row suture anchor fixation for greater tuberosity fixation with 2 biocomposite medial-row anchors and 2 biocomposite lateral-row anchors, the double-pulley technique combined with an arthroscopic grasper and/or pull suture to pass the graft into the shoulder, the performance of both anterior and posterior margin convergence, and a native rotator cuff repair when possible. Only 8 studies reported clinical outcomes, and they showed that SCR provides significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes, significant improvement in shoulder range of motion, variable graft failure rates, low complication rates, and variable reoperation rates. There were no studies comparing outcomes among the various surgical techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Many surgical techniques exist for arthroscopic SCR. However, no superior technique was shown because there were no studies comparing clinical outcomes among these various techniques.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V, systematic review of Level III, IV, and V studies.

Comparison of Different Fixation Techniques of the Long Head of the Biceps Tendon in Superior Capsule Reconstruction for Irreparable Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears: A Dynamic Biomechanical Evaluation

BACKGROUND

In the past decade, superior capsular reconstruction has emerged as a potential surgical approach in young patients with irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears (RCT) and absence of severe degenerative changes. Recently, the use of locally available and biological viable autografts, such as the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) for SCR has emerged, with promising early results.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of using the LHBT for reconstruction of the superior capsule on shoulder kinematics, along with different fixation constructs in a dynamic biomechanical model. The authors hypothesized that each of the 3 proposed fixation techniques would restore native joint kinematics, including glenohumeral superior translation (ghST), maximum abduction angle (MAA), maximum cumulative deltoid force (cDF), and subacromial peak contact pressure (sCP).

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders (mean age, 53.4 ± 14.2 years) were tested using a dynamic shoulder simulator. Each specimen underwent the following 5 conditions: (1) intact, (2) irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tear (psRCT), (3) V-shaped LHBT reconstruction, (4) box-shaped LHBT reconstruction, and (5) single-stranded LHBT reconstruction. MAA, ghST, cDF and sCP were assessed in each tested condition.

RESULTS

Each of the 3 LHBT techniques for reconstruction of the superior capsule significantly increased MAA while significantly decreasing ghST and cDF compared with the psRCT (P < .001 and P < .001, respectively). Additionally, the V-shaped and box-shaped techniques significantly decreased sCP (P = .009 and P = .016, respectively) compared with the psRCT. The V-shaped technique further showed a significantly increased MAA (P < .001, respectively) and decreased cDF (P = .042 and P = .039, respectively) when compared with the box-shaped and single-stranded techniques, as well as a significantly decreased ghST (P = .027) when compared with the box-shaped technique.

CONCLUSION

In a dynamic biomechanical cadaveric model, using the LHBT for reconstruction of the superior capsule improved shoulder function by preventing superior humeral migration, decreasing deltoid forces and sCP. As such, the development of rotator cuff tear arthropathy in patients with irreparable psRCTs could potentially be delayed.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Using a biologically viable and locally available LHBT autograft is a cost-effective, potentially time-saving, and technically feasible alternative for reconstruction of the superior capsule, which may result in favorable outcomes in irreparable psRCTs. Moreover, each of the 3 techniques restored native shoulder biomechanics, which may help improve shoulder function by preventing superior humeral head migration and the development of rotator cuff tear arthropathy in young patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears.

Arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction of the shoulder: a narrative review

Irreparable rotator cuff tears (IRCTs) in young and considerably active patients are difficult to treat because it is mostly associated with poor outcome which may lead to a painful and dysfunctional shoulder. Most of the IRCTs are encountered in massive size rotator cuff tears which associated with high failure rate following surgical repair. Thus, the IRCTs was considered challenging for its poor healing rate following repair which may induce the arthritic changes. Since the advent of arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (ASCR) of the shoulder in 2013, it has gained its popularity. The procedure has become the most popular option for joint-preserving shoulder surgery for patients with IRCTs. It works by providing a static restraint to the superior humeral head migration to optimize the rotator cuff force couples, hence improving joint kinematics. The acceptance of superior capsular reconstruction has made it rapidly evolving in terms of a wider variety of procedures and broader surgical indications. Despite the enthusiasm and widely acceptance towards the procedure, there are still many queries that exist regarding the best indications, surgical technique particularly graft of choice, the long-term outcome, and the complication and risk of the superior capsular reconstruction (SCR). This narrative review provide the current evidence of SCR in an attempt to provide a state-of-the-art knowledge.

Superior Capsular Reconstruction Using Dermal Allograft Is a Safe and Effective Treatment for Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: 2-Year Clinical Outcomes

PURPOSE

To evaluate functional, symptomatic, and diagnostic imaging outcomes after arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) using dermal allograft in patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears.

METHODS

From 2015 to 2017, this multicenter study retrospectively evaluated patients undergoing arthroscopic SCR for treatment of symptomatic massive rotator cuff tears. Study criteria included the presence of a massive irreparable rotator cuff tear with retraction to the glenoid without diffuse bipolar cartilage loss, Grade 4 or 5 Hamada classification, and subscapularis pathology that could not be addressed. All SCR procedures were performed with neutral abduction of the arm at the time of implantation. Outcome measures included visual analog pain scale (VAS) score, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score, and active forward elevation (FE) through 2 years postoperatively. Imaging analyses included radiographs, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging at 6 months and 1 year.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients met all study criteria including required follow-up. There were statistically significant improvements in VAS pain (3.3-0.6, P = .001), ASES (55.0-86.5, P < .0001), SANE (33.1-71.5, P < .0001), and active FE (128-172, P = .0005) with mean follow-up of 2.1 years. Twelve patients (86%) met the minimum clinically important difference in VAS pain, ASES, and SANE. Thirteen grafts (93%) had ultrasonographic evidence for vascularity by 1 year postoperatively. There were 2 graft complications (14%) with one (7%) requiring revision to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic SCR using dermal allograft can be a safe and effective treatment option for patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears with statistically significant improvements in VAS pain, ASES, SANE, and active FE at 2-years postoperatively, with 93% of grafts demonstrating vascularity at 1-year postoperatively. Neutral abduction of the arm at the time of implantation resulted in positive clinical outcomes and may decrease graft failure rate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Effects of Increased Retroversion Angle on Glenoid Baseplate Fixation in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Finite Element Analysis

Background

Increased glenoid retroversion occurs in patients with severe arthritis but its effect on baseplate fixation of a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is not clear. The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of increasing glenoid retroversion on baseplate fixation in rTSA using finite element analysis (FEA) modelling.

Methods

Five sets of computerized tomographic (CT) images of healthy normal shoulders were selected and segmented with Amira (Thermo Fisher Scientific) to obtain the solid geometries. Scapula FEA models with 5°, 10°, 15°, 20° and 25° retroversion angles were generated for each healthy scapula geometry and a rTSA glenoid baseplate was implanted on each model. Maximum stress at the anterior and posterior portions of the glenoid and the micromotion between the bone and baseplate were recorded. After simulation with normal scapular bone material properties (Young's modulus 4GPa and Poisson's ratio 0.3), another set of simulations was run on each subject with a 25° retroversion angle and poor bone quality (Young's modulus 500 MPa and Poisson's ratio 0.3) to study a worst-case scenario. Micromotions in each model were also recorded. All statistical analysis was done with SPSS.

Results

Simulation results of models generated from the same subject but with different retroversion angles showed a clear pattern: as retroversion angle increased, the stresses increased posteriorly and decreased anteriorly. Also, micromotion between the bone and the baseplate increased with the increase of retroversion angle. With analysis of variance (ANOVA), we found that all three values change significantly as the retroversion angle increases (p < 0.001). The simulation results also showed that micromotion was large in shoulders with small glenoid size and poor bone quality. However, even in the model with the worst-case scenario (smallest glenoid size, poorest bone quality and 25° retroversion angle), the maximum micromotion and the maximum stresses are still within the safe range.

Discussion

In all cases with both normal and poor bone quality, the stresses and micromotion stayed below the threshold to allow for bone ingrowth of the glenoid baseplate to occur. Based on these results, for glenoid baseplates with a central peg/post and 4 screws for fixation, rTSA baseplate retroversion does not need to be corrected to less than 10° to provide good initial fixation as has been recommended for a cemented glenoid component and can withstand the initial stresses and micromotion up to 25° of retroversion.

Level of evidence

Basic Science Study; Computer Modeling.

Superior Capsular Reconstruction Provides Sufficient Biomechanical Outcomes for Massive, Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To critically review the literature reporting biomechanical outcomes of superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) for the treatment of massive and/or irreparable rotator cuff tears.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines using the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library databases in August 2020. Cadaveric studies were assessed for glenohumeral translation, subacromial contact pressure, and superior humeral translation comparing SCR with an intact cuff with reference to a torn control state.

RESULTS

A total of 15 studies (142 shoulders) were included in our data analysis. SCR showed improvements in superior humeral translation, subacromial contact force, and glenohumeral contact force when biomechanically compared with the massive and/or irreparably torn rotator cuff. No statistically significant differences were found between SCR and the intact rotator cuff regarding superior humeral translation (standard mean difference [SMD], 2.09 mm vs 2.50 mm; P = .54) or subacromial contact force (SMD, 2.85 mPa vs 2.83 mPa; P = .99). Significant differences were observed between SCR and the intact cuff for glenohumeral contact force only, in favor of the intact cuff (SMD, 1.73 N vs 5.45 N; P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

SCR may largely restore static restraints to superior humeral translation in irreparable rotator cuff tears, although active glenohumeral compression is diminished relative to the intact rotator cuff.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Investigating the biomechanical outcomes of SCR will help surgeons better understand the effectiveness of this treatment option.

Anterior Capsular Reconstruction with Dermal Allograft in Combination With Anatomic Glenohumeral Arthroplasty: A Case Report

CASE

A 43-year-old man with chronic right shoulder pain and dysfunction due to recurrent anterior instability, irreparable subscapularis tear, and glenohumeral arthritis presented to our practice. After workup and counseling, he was treated with anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty augmented by anterior capsular reconstruction using human acellular dermal allograft. At 15 months postoperatively, his forward elevation, external rotation, and internal rotation were 160, 45, and T12, nearly equal to contralateral values. His glenohumeral joint remained reduced, and no complications were encountered.

CONCLUSION

We report the first known anterior capsular reconstruction performed in combination with anatomic shoulder arthroplasty.

Surgical Management of Massive Irreparable Cuff Tears: Superior Capsular Reconstruction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) is a surgical procedure that has been developed to provide an alternative for joint preservation in patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. The purpose of this review is to assess the improvements in biomechanical properties and functional outcomes of this novel procedure.

RECENT FINDINGS

Biomechanically, SCR decreases superior translation and subacromial contact pressure. Glenoid fixation is maximized with three anchors, while margin convergence to any remaining rotator cuff improves stability, and findings vary based on graft type. Clinically, SCR has been associated with improvement in functional outcome in the setting of an isolated procedure, or in conjunction with rotator cuff repair. Outcomes appear to be dependent upon indications. However, in select cases, SCR may even be successful in reversing pseudoparalysis. SCR seems to lead to improved biomechanics for the cuff-deficient shoulder resulting in satisfactory functional outcomes. While surgical techniques have evolved, further research is needed to optimize graft healing and longer follow-up studies are needed to continue to refine indications for SCR as a joint preservation effort in the setting of irreparable massive rotator cuff tears without arthritis.

Minimum 2-year clinical outcomes after superior capsule reconstruction compared with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears in patients younger than 70 years

BACKGROUND

To compare clinical outcomes following arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) using a dermal allograft (DA) with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) when used to treat irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears without glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA) in patients younger than 70 years.

METHODS

In this case-control study, patients who underwent SCR or RTSA for the treatment of irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears, who were younger than 70 years at the time of surgery, and who were at least 2 years out of surgery were included. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) scores and the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). Return to sports and patient satisfaction along with clinical failures (recurrent pain or persistent pain or loss of function), revisions, and complications were reported.

RESULTS

Two-year follow-up was obtained on 22/22 patients (100%) in the SCR group and 29/33 patients (88%) in the RTSA group. Group differences were significant for age (SCR mean, 57 ± 6.6 years, vs. RTSA mean, 63 ± 4.9 years; P < .001) and follow-up interval (SCR mean, 2.1 years, vs. RTSA mean, 2.9 years; P = .001). Preoperative outcome scores showed no significant differences (all P > .05) between groups. No significant differences in postoperative outcome scores were detected (P > .05) between SCR and RTSA: the mean ASES score was 82.6 ± 15.5 vs. 79.3 ± 21.4, mean SANE score was 71.4 ± 24.5 vs. 75.4 ± 23.3, mean QuickDASH score was 16.2 ± 16.9 vs. 25.3 ± 21.0, and mean SF-12 was 47.7 ± 8.8 vs. 46.9 ± 10.4. No significant differences in return-to-sport responses were noticed between groups at baseline or postoperatively (P = .585, P = .758). One SCR was revised at 1.2 years with revision SCR and 1 RTSA had the glenoid component revised day 1 postoperatively for instability. Both patient groups achieved successful clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

SCR using DA results in similar postoperative functional outcomes in a younger patient population when compared to RTSA for the treatment of irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears, without GHOA, at short-term follow-up.

Effect of scapular notching on clinical outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Aims

Scapular notching is thought to have an adverse effect on the outcome of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). However, the matter is still controversial. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical impact of scapular notching on outcomes after RTSA.

Methods

Three electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Database, and EMBASE) were searched for studies which evaluated the influence of scapular notching on clinical outcome after RTSA. The quality of each study was assessed. Functional outcome scores (the Constant-Murley scores (CMS), and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores), and postoperative range of movement (forward flexion (FF), abduction, and external rotation (ER)) were extracted and subjected to meta-analysis. Effect sizes were expressed as weighted mean differences (WMD).

Results

In all, 11 studies (two level III and nine level IV) were included in the meta-analysis. All analyzed variables indicated that scapular notching has a negative effect on the outcome of RTSA . Statistical significance was found for the CMS (WMD –3.11; 95% confidence interval (CI) –4.98 to –1.23), the ASES score (WMD –6.50; 95% CI –10.80 to –2.19), FF (WMD –6.3°; 95% CI –9.9° to –2.6°), and abduction (WMD –9.4°; 95% CI –17.8° to –1.0°), but not for ER (WMD –0.6°; 95% CI –3.7° to 2.5°).

Conclusion

The current literature suggests that patients with scapular notching after RTSA have significantly worse results when evaluated by the CMS, ASES score, and range of movement in flexion and abduction.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(11):1438–1445.

Superior Capsule Reconstruction for Irreparable Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: Does It Make Sense? A Systematic Review of Early Clinical Evidence

BACKGROUND

Treatment of irreparable massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs) in patients without advanced glenohumeral osteoarthritis remains a challenge. Arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) represents a newer method for treatment with increasing popularity and acceptance.

PURPOSE

To analyze the clinical evidence surrounding SCR and determine the current clinical outcomes postoperatively.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Electronic databases of PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Google Scholar were used for the literature search. The study quality was evaluated according to the Modified Coleman Methodology Score. Studies in English evaluating SCR outcomes were included.

RESULTS

Seven studies were reviewed, including 352 patients (358 shoulders) treated with arthroscopic SCR with the mean duration of follow-up ranging from 15 to 48 months (range, 12-88 months). Fourteen patients were lost to follow-up, leaving 338 patients (344 shoulders) with clinical outcome data. Graft types included dermal allografts (n = 3 studies), fascia lata autografts (n = 3), or both (n = 1). Most commonly, a double-row technique was utilized for humeral graft fixation. The most common complication included graft tears in 13% of patients, resulting in 15 SCR revisions and 7 reverse shoulder arthroplasties. Postoperatively, improvements in visual analog scale (2.5 to 5.9), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (20 to 56), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (38.0), Subjective Shoulder Value (37.0 to 41.3), and Constant (11.6 to 47.4) scores were observed. Three studies reported respective satisfaction rates of 72.9%, 85.7% and 90%. Increases in external rotation, internal rotation, and abduction with improved strength in external rotation were observed postoperatively. Improvement of pseudoparalysis was also observed in 3 studies. One study reported return to sports in 100% of patients (2 competitively, 24 recreationally) with no adverse outcomes.

CONCLUSION

SCR showed good to excellent short-term clinical outcomes with adequate pain relief and functional improvement. The current evidence suggests that the procedure is an alternative for symptomatic patients with irreparable MRCT; however, the included studies were fair to poor in quality, and there were some notable complications. Long-term follow-up will determine the longevity and ultimate role of this new method in the treatment of irreparable MRCT.

Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction With Mesh Augmentation for the Treatment of Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: A Comparative Study of Surgical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (ASCR) is an alternative to open surgery for irreparable chronic rotator cuff tears (RCTs). This approach can provide static restraint while avoiding upward migration of the humeral head. However, graft tears and their effect on clinical outcomes after ASCR remain a debated topic.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of ASCR with mesh augmentation for the treatment of irreparable RCTs.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

The data of 72 patients with irreparable RCTs who underwent ASCR between 2013 and 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. Among them, 64 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled in this study. Fascia lata grafts augmented with a polypropylene mesh were used for 30 patients (mesh group), and grafts without mesh augmentation were used for 34 patients (control group). Clinical outcomes were evaluated using range of motion, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) questionnaire, and visual analog scale for pain. Radiological outcomes were evaluated according to acromiohumeral distance and stage of rotator cuff arthropathy. The status of fatty infiltration and graft integrity was evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging. Outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at the final follow-up.

RESULTS

Both groups showed improvement in clinical and radiological outcomes at the final follow-up. The mesh group demonstrated a larger improvement in ASES score (mean ± SD, 29.1 ± 15.8) than the control group (18.1 ± 15.9) (P = .006). The mean improvement in active forward flexion was significantly higher in mesh group (40°± 26°) than in control group (28°± 23°) (P = .003). The mean improvement in active external rotation was also significantly higher in the mesh group (11°± 5°) than in the control group (6°± 3°) (P = .004). Graft healing rate was significantly higher in the mesh group (83.3%) than in the control group (58.8%) (P = .039), and acromiohumeral distance was significantly greater in the mesh group (9.1 ± 2.4 mm) than in the control group (6.3 ± 1.8 mm) at the final follow-up (P = .001). Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with graft failure generally showed progression of fatty infiltration without improvement in the stage of rotator cuff arthropathy. Patients with intact grafts demonstrated a more substantial improvement in functional outcomes (ASES score and forward flexion motion).

CONCLUSION

ASCR with mesh augmentation reduced graft failure rate to restore superior shoulder joint stability.

Effect of complications on outcomes after revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Background

Revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) reliably improves shoulder pain and function in patients with failed shoulder arthroplasty, although it can lead to significant postoperative complications. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of postoperative complications on shoulder pain and function after revision RTSA.

Methods

We evaluated 36 patients at an average of 4.3 years (range, 2-8.6 years) after revision of a shoulder arthroplasty to RTSA. Of these patients, 9 had a failed anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty, 23 had a failed hemiarthroplasty, and 4 had a failed RTSA. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and visual analog scale (VAS) pain score were evaluated postoperatively, and patients with and without postoperative complications were compared.

Results

The final ASES score and VAS pain score were 61 ± 23 and 2.4 ± 2.3, respectively. A major postoperative complication occurred in 7 patients (19%) (infection in 3, hematoma in 1, instability in 1, and acromial and/or scapular spine fracture in 2). Further surgical treatment was required in 5 patients (14%) (irrigation and débridement and component exchange for infection in 3, irrigation and débridement for hematoma in 1, and open reduction–internal fixation of scapular spine fracture in 1). On comparison of clinical outcomes between patients with and patients without complications, the ASES score and VAS pain score were significantly worse in patients with complications vs. those without them (ASES score, 43 ± 24 vs. 66 ± 21 [P = .04]; VAS pain score, 4.3 ± 2 vs. 2 ± 2.2 [P = .03]).

Conclusion

Revision RTSA resulted in postoperative pain and shoulder function comparable to primary RTSA reported in the literature, although postoperative complications led to clinically significant declines in function and increases in pain.

The modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty and an updated systematic review for each complication: part II

Background

Globally, reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has moved away from the Grammont design to modern prosthesis designs. The purpose of this study was to provide a focused, updated systematic review for each of the most common complications of RSA by limiting each search to publications after 2010. In this part II, the following were examined: (1) instability, (2) humerus/glenoid fracture, (3) acromial/scapular spine fractures (AF/SSF), and (4) problems/miscellaneous.

Methods

Four separate PubMed database searches were performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Overall, 137 studies for instability, 94 for humerus/glenoid fracture, 120 for AF/SSF, and 74 for problems/miscellaneous were included in each review, respectively. Univariate analysis was performed with chi-square and Fisher exact tests.

Results

The Grammont design had a higher instability rate vs. all other designs combined (4.0%, 1.3%; P < .001), and the onlay humerus design had a lower rate than the lateralized glenoid design (0.9%, 2.0%; P = .02). The rate for intraoperative humerus fracture was 1.8%; intraoperative glenoid fracture, 0.3%; postoperative humerus fracture, 1.2%; and postoperative glenoid fracture, 0.1%. The rate of AF/SSF was 2.6% (371/14235). The rate for complex regional pain syndrome was 0.4%; deltoid injury, 0.1%; hematoma, 0.3%; and heterotopic ossification, 0.8%.

Conclusions

Focused systematic reviews of recent literature with a large volume of shoulders demonstrate that using non-Grammont modern prosthesis designs, complications including instability, intraoperative humerus and glenoid fractures, and hematoma are significantly reduced compared with previous studies. As the indications continue to expand for RSA, it is imperative to accurately track the rate and types of complications in order to justify its cost and increased indications.

The modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty and an updated systematic review for each complication: part I

Background

Globally, reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has moved away from the Grammont design to modern prosthesis designs. The purpose of this 2-part study was to systematically review each of the most common complications of RSA, limiting each search to publications in 2010 or later. In this part (part I), we examined (1) scapular notching (SN), (2) periprosthetic infection (PJI), (3) mechanical failure (glenoid or humeral component), and (4) neurologic injury (NI).

Methods

Four separate PubMed database searches were performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Overall, 113 studies on SN, 62 on PJI, 34 on mechanical failure, and 48 on NI were included in our reviews. Univariate analysis was performed with the χ² or Fisher exact test.

Results

The Grammont design had a higher SN rate vs. all other designs combined (42.5% vs. 12.3%, P < .001). The onlay humeral design had a lower rate than the lateralized glenoid design (10.5% vs. 14.8%, P < .001). The PJI rate was 2.4% for primary RSA and 2.6% for revision RSA. The incidence of glenoid and humeral component loosening was 2.3% and 1.4%, respectively. The Grammont design had an increased NI rate vs. all other designs combined (0.9% vs. 0.1%, P = .04).

Conclusions

Focused systematic reviews of the recent literature with a large volume of RSAs demonstrate that with the use of non-Grammont modern prosthesis designs, complications including SN, PJI, glenoid component loosening, and NI are significantly reduced compared with previous studies. As the indications for RSA continue to expand, it is imperative to accurately track the rates and types of complications to justify its cost and increased indications.

National Trends in the Surgical Treatment of Chronic Rotator Cuff Tear in Patients Without Arthritis

Both rotator cuff repair (RCR) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) are effective treatment options for chronic large degenerative rotator cuff tear (RCT) in the elderly. The goal of this study was to evaluate national trends for surgical management of chronic RCT among patients without glenohumeral arthritis. The authors conducted a retrospective review from 2007 to 2015 using the PearlDiver database. The study included patients who had the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, diagnosis of chronic RCT without shoulder arthritis. Procedural codes from the Current Procedural Terminology and the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, were used to identify patients undergoing RCR or RTSA. Chi-square analysis assessed differences between the groups, and Cochran-Armitage trend tests were used to evaluate trends over time. Overall, 428,651 patients had chronic RCT without arthritis; 364,141 (84.9%) were treated nonoperatively, 53,566 (12.5%) underwent RCR, and 10,944 (2.6%) underwent RTSA. Patients who were 60 to 79 years old had the highest rate of surgical intervention (70.8% of all surgical patients), with 69.2% and 78.4% who underwent RCR and RTSA, respectively. A 3-fold increase in RTSA use was noted among patients 60 years and older vs patients younger than 60 years. Overall revision rates 2 years after RCR and RTSA among patients 60 to 79 years old were 13.0% and 3.7%, respectively. Revision rates after RCR remained constant over time (9.3% to 13.0%; P=.082), whereas revision rates after RTSA decreased significantly over time (12.1% to 2.2%; P=.016). Older patients were more likely to be treated nonoperatively compared with younger patients, but among those patients treated with RTSA, there was a 3-fold increase in the use of RTSA in patients older than 60 years compared with patients younger than 60 years. Further, the authors found that revision rates after RTSA decreased over time (from 12% to 2%), suggesting better implant design, improved knowledge of implant positioning, and increased surgical proficiency. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(5):e409-e414.].

A Lasso-Loop Traction Technique for Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction

Irreparable rotator cuff tears (RCTs) cause shoulder pain and disfunction. Management of RCT patients has classically been difficult due to few treatment options. Since Mihata et al. in 2013 introduced the superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) technique as a treatment option, it has become widespread among surgeons, especially for young active patients in whom reverse shoulder arthroplasty is not recommended. With SCR, a reduced humeral head can be maintained and superior displacement is avoided, improving shoulder pain and restoring active shoulder motion. A variety of grafts may be used, but the surgery can be technically complicated. An arthroscopic lasso-loop traction technique for SCR is described here, which simplifies graft shoulder reduction by traction from the anteromedial and posteromedial portals.

Fast track rehabilitation after reversed total shoulder arthroplasty: a protocol for an international multicentre prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

The use of reversed total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has increased because of an increasing number of indications for this procedure and by ageing of the population. Usual postoperative care consists of immobilisation of the shoulder for a period of 2-6 weeks to allow healing of the subscapularis tendon and protection of the joint. However, new literature proved that reattachment of the subscapularis tendon is unnecessary. Therefore we hypothesised that immobilisation of the shoulder is not necessary and patients can start safely with mobilisation on the first postoperative day. We expect this fast track protocol to be safe and result in better short-term and long-term functional outcomes.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

In our prospective cohort, we will include at least 75 patients aged 50 years and older indicated for rTSA, with acute fracture treatment as an exclusion criterion. Patients will be selected and operated in three hospitals: two in the Netherlands and one in Curacao.Patients will visit the outpatient clinic preoperative, at 6 weeks, 3 months and 1 year postoperative. The data that will be collected includes baseline characteristics, reason for surgery, complications and adverse events, patient reported outcomes (Oxford Shoulder Score, EuroQol-5D and Numeric Rating Scale for pain) and range of motion of the shoulder.All patients will be instructed to use a sling only for 1 day and to follow a progressive physiotherapy schedule for 12 weeks. The primary outcome is the occurrence of complications and adverse events.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The Medical Ethics Committee from the VUmc and Curacao reviewed this study protocol and granted exemption from ethical approval (METC VUmc 2019.111, METC Curacao 2019-02). Study results will be presented at (inter)national conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Netherlands Trial Register (NL7656).

Complications and implant survivorship following primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients younger than 65 years: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Concerns exist regarding the complication rates and implant survivorship of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) in younger patients.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature regarding the existing evidence on RTSA in patients younger than 65 years was performed using the CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), PubMed, and Embase databases on June 9, 2019. Articles published between 1995 and 2019 with combinations of the following keywords were identified: "reverse shoulder arthroplasty" and "65," "60," and/or "55." Complications, reoperations, and revisions were recorded. Reoperation-free survival and implant survival rates were grouped at 2, 5, and 10 years. Range of motion and clinical outcomes, along with postoperative radiographic results, were recorded.

RESULTS

Data from 7 studies with a total of 286 shoulders were obtained for quantitative analysis. The mean patient age was 58.4 years (mean age range, 48.9-60.4 years), and the mean follow-up period was 4.7 years (mean follow-up range, 3.0-7.8 years). The overall rate of complications was 18.6%; reoperations, 14.4%; and revisions, 11.2%. The reoperation-free survival rate was 97% at 2 years, 88%-90% at 5 years, and 76% at 10 years. The implant survival rate was 99% at 2 years, 91%-98% at 5 years, and 88% at 10 years. Active abduction, forward elevation, and external rotation significantly improved from preoperatively to postoperatively. All clinical outcome measures significantly improved from preoperatively to postoperatively, with no decline seen over time. The overall rate of infrascapular notching was 22.7% at final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

RTSA is safe and effective in patients younger than 65 years. Complication, reoperation, and revision rates were similar to those seen in older patient cohorts, without an increase in revisions owing to aseptic loosening. Clinical outcome scores showed significant and lasting improvements.

The Superior Capsular Reconstruction: Lessons Learned and Future Directions

The ideal solution for the irreparable rotator cuff tear remains in question. A recent innovative technique, superior capsular reconstruction (SCR), has demonstrated promising results with some early clinical outcomes demonstrating statistically notable improvements in active forward flexion and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores. Multiple biomechanical studies have also demonstrated its ability to reduce superior translation of the humerus after massive rotator cuff tear. Even so, these results are still early and durability of the reconstruction over time needs to be determined. Although more than 15,000 SCRs have been done worldwide, there remains a paucity of outcome data and one must be vigilant to not allow enthusiasm to overtake critical evaluation. The potential mechanisms of action, including tenodesis effect, force coupler, or subacromial spacer, need further elucidation and the ideal indications for this procedure, as well as its technical optimization, and limitations have yet to be fully determined. The purpose of this review is to critically evaluate the biomechanical and clinical literature that has assessed SCR, along with the controversies and considerations encountered with this procedure.

Defining the younger patient: age as a predictive factor for outcomes in shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to define an age cutoff at which clinical outcomes and revision rates differ for patients undergoing primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and patients undergoing primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 1250 primary shoulder arthroplasties (1131 patients) with minimum 2-year clinical follow-up (mean, 50 months [range, 24-146 months]). TSA (n = 518; mean age, 68.1 years [range, 28-90 years]) was performed for osteoarthritis in most cases (99%), whereas the primary diagnoses for RSA (n = 732; mean age, 70.8 years [range, 22-91 years]) included rotator cuff arthropathy (35%), massive cuff tear without osteoarthritis (29.8%), and osteoarthritis (20.5%). Outcomes included range of motion, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and the revision rate. The relationship between age at the time of surgery in 5-year increments (46-50 years, 51-55 years, and so on) and the revision rate was examined to identify the age cutoff; this was then used to assess clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

In patients younger than 65 years, TSA was associated with a 3.4-fold increased risk of revision (P = .01). RSA performed in patients younger than 60 years was associated with a 4.8-fold increased risk of revision (P < .001). TSA patients aged 65 years or older and RSA patients aged 60 years or older had better total ASES scores (82 vs. 77 [P = .03] and 72 vs. 62 [P = .002], respectively) and better internal rotation (interquartile range, TSA 5-6 vs. 4-5 [P = .002] and RSA 4-5 vs 3-4 [P = .04])-where 6 represents T4 to T6 and 4 represents T11 to L1-than their younger counterparts.

CONCLUSION

Age at index arthroplasty affects outcomes and the risk of revision. Primary TSA patients younger than 65 years and RSA patients younger than 60 years have a significantly increased revision risk. These age cutoffs are also correlated with differences in ASES scores and internal rotation.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients younger than 65 years, minimum 5-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Indications for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) are expanding, and more young patients are undergoing RTSA. Younger patients are expected to place increased functional demands on their shoulder, which may affect implant performance and longevity. Reports on longer-term outcomes in young patients remain limited. This study evaluates the minimum 5-year functional outcomes of RTSA in patients younger than 65 years.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed using a multinational prospective shoulder arthroplasty database of a single implant system, Exactech Equinoxe (Gainesville, FL, USA). All RTSAs performed between 2007 and 2014 in patients younger than 65 years with minimum 5-year follow-up were included. Shoulder function was assessed preoperatively and at last follow-up via range-of-motion measurements and multiple patient-reported outcome measures.

RESULTS

Fifty-two shoulders were evaluated at an average follow-up of 6.3 years. Abduction, forward flexion, internal rotation, and Simple Shoulder Test, Constant, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, University of California-Los Angeles, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, and visual analog scale scores all showed statistically significant improvements greater than the minimum clinically important difference at the time of last follow-up. Three patients (5.8%) required revision surgery after a mean of 7.5 years and 1 more suffered an acromial stress fracture, bringing the total complication rate to 7.7%. Five patients (9.6%) demonstrated scapular notching, one of whom required revision arthroplasty.

CONCLUSION

RTSA provides clinically significant improvement in nearly all functional measures at a mean follow-up of 6.3 years in patients younger than 65 years. The implants appear to have good midterm survivorship; only 5.8% of patients required revision.

Improvement in sleep quality after total shoulder arthroplasty

Objective: Poor sleep quality due to nocturnal pain is increasingly reported as a major symptom in advanced glenohumeral arthritis. The current study aimed to evaluate preoperative and postoperative sleep quality, shoulder pain, and function in patients who underwent total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Preoperative factors contributing to delayed improvements in sleep quality were examined.Methods: Patients scheduled for anatomic or reverse TSA due to glenohumeral arthritis were included. Patients completed the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) survey preoperatively, and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year following surgery. A higher PSQI score (maximum 21) indicated greater sleep disturbance.Results: Seventy-four patients (34 males, 40 females), with a mean age of 65.8 years were prospectively enrolled. Eighty-four percent of patients reported preoperative PSQI scores indicative of sleep disturbance (6 or greater), with a mean of 10.1 ± 4.3. The PSQI score significantly improved to 7.7 at 6 weeks (P = .003), and to 6.1 at 3 months (P = .08). At 12 months, the PSQI was within normal limits (less than or equal to 5) with a mean score of 4.3. A normal PSQI score was achieved by 40.8%, at 6 weeks, 50% at 3 months, 53.7% at 6 months, and 73.9% at 1 year. The ASES score significantly improved from 32.6 ± 17.2 at baseline to 58.4 at 6 weeks (p < .001), 76.1 at 3 months (p < .001), and 85.3 at 12 months. Linear regression demonstrated that the ASES and PSQI scores were negatively associated with each other at each time point. Body mass index and female gender were associated with a delayed return to baseline sleep quality.Conclusion: Shoulder-related sleep disturbance significantly improved at 6 weeks following TSA, and normalized for most patients by 1 year post-operatively. Enhanced sleep quality after TSA was directly related to improved functional outcomes.

Delta Xtend reverse shoulder arthroplasty - Results at a minimum of five years

BACKGROUND

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty provides predictable pain relief and improvements in function, but concerns remain regarding complication rates and there is little long-term outcome data. The aim of this study was to review the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the Delta Xtend reverse shoulder arthroplasty at a minimum of five years.

METHODS

Ninety-six Delta Xtend reverse shoulder arthroplasty procedures were performed in 93 patients. There were 41 males and 52 females with an average age of 74.9 years. All available patients returned for clinical and radiographic analysis, including completion of patient reported outcome measures.

RESULTS

The complication rate was 9.4%. There were three revisions (3.1%) and two other reoperations (2.1%). Fifty-nine shoulders were available for review at an average of 81 months. Average forward flexion was 142°. Average American Shoulder and Elbow Assessment Score improved from 27.6 to 78.5 (p<0.001). Radiolucent lines and/or proximal bone resorption was seen in 35.4%. Scapula notching was observed in 69.1%, with Grade III or IV notching in 20%. These findings had no effect on patient reported outcome measures.

DISCUSSION

This study confirms the clinical benefits of reverse shoulder arthroplasty, with improvements maintained out to 10 years. The high rate of scapula notching remains a concern. Further study is needed to fully understand the clinical significance of notching, as well as the potential benefits of newer implant designs.

Clinical and Imaging Outcomes After Arthroscopic Superior Capsule Reconstruction With Human Dermal Allograft for Irreparable Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears: A Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up

PURPOSE

To report the clinical and structural outcomes for non-pseudoparalytic irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears treated with superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) using dermal allograft (DA).

METHODS

Patients who underwent SCR using DA with a mean thickness of 3 mm for irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears and underwent surgery at least 2 years earlier were included. Outcomes were assessed prospectively by the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) scores; patient satisfaction; and visual analog scale for pain. Structurally, acromiohumeral distances (AHDs) were assessed both preoperatively and postoperatively (standard radiographs). Graft integrity was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Clinical failures were reported.

RESULTS

We included 22 patients with a mean age of 56 years (range, 41-65 years) and a mean follow-up period of 2.1 years (range, 2-3 years). The ASES score improved from 54.0 to 83.9 (P < .001); the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score improved from 44.9 to 71.4 (P < .001); and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (QuickDASH) improved from 37.6 to 16.2 (P = .001). Of the patients, 85% achieved an improvement in the ASES score that exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (11.1 points). The median patient satisfaction rating was 8.5 (range, 1-10). The median preoperative visual analog scale score decreased from 4 to 0 (range, 0-3) postoperatively (P < .001). Complete radiographs of 19 of 22 patients (86%) were obtained at a mean of 5.2 months (range, 1.4-10 months) postoperatively and showed a significant increase in the mean AHD from 7.0 mm preoperatively to 8.3 mm postoperatively (P = .029). Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging scans were obtained in 95% of the patients (21 of 22) at a mean of 2.5 months (range, 0.3-10.2 months) postoperatively and showed graft integrity rates of 100% (21 of 21) on the tuberosity side, 76% (16 of 21) at the midsubstance, and 81% (17 of 21) on the glenoid side. No significant differences in clinical outcome scores (P > 0.930) were found in patients with intact grafts versus those with torn grafts. The number of previous shoulder surgical procedures was a negative predictor of clinical outcome. There was 1 clinical failure.

CONCLUSIONS

SCR using DA for irreparable tears improves outcomes with high satisfaction and high graft integrity at short-term follow-up. Graft integrity, although correlated with an increased AHD, had no correlation with clinical outcomes at final follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Outcomes of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients 60 Years of Age or Younger: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has been traditionally performed in elderly, low-demand patients. However, indications for RTSA are expanding, and patients who potentially benefit from this procedure are not restricted to those who are elderly. The purpose of this review was to summarize reported outcomes of RTSA in patients aged 60 years or younger.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature to search for outcomes of RTSA in patients aged 60 years or less. Inclusion criteria were studies reporting clinical and/or functional outcomes of RTSA in patients aged 60 years or less with follow-up of greater than 2 years. Cadaveric studies and studies including patients aged greater than 60 years were excluded. Outcomes of interest were range of motion, functional scores (Constant, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Simple Shoulder Test, and visual analog scale for pain), implant survival, and complications.

RESULTS

Four studies with a total of 193 patients met inclusion criteria with mean durations of follow-up of 34 to 140.4 months. At the final follow-up, all studies showed significant improvements in flexion, abduction, and all reported functional scores. Mean postoperative flexion and abduction ranged from 85.7° to 134° and from 79° to 111°, respectively. Implant survival ranged from 87.5% to 94.3% at the latest follow-up. Complication rates ranged from 15% to 39.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Early clinical and functional outcomes of RTSA in patients aged 60 years or less are favorable. Long-term functional results and implant survival rates of RTSA are comparable to previous data from older patients.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Comparison Between Autografts and Allografts in Superior Capsular Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Outcomes

BACKGROUND

The treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tears (IRCTs) is a significant challenge, and various treatment options have emerged. Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) is a promising procedure for patients with IRCTs.

PURPOSE

To investigate the clinical outcomes of SCR and compare allografts with autografts.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A search for relevant articles was carried out using the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases. We used medical subject heading (MeSH) terms and natural keywords (superior AND (capsule OR capsular) AND reconstruction). Also, we filtered for high-quality articles using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). We summarized the characteristic data and commonly used outcome measures of each included study and performed a descriptive analysis using an evidence-based tendency concept as proposed by Huisstede et al (2013).

RESULTS

A total of 10 articles (374 shoulders) with a mean follow-up of 27.2 months were selected and analyzed. There were 4 articles on SCR with an autograft, 4 on SCR with an allograft, and 2 on SCR with both an autograft and allograft. For autografts and allografts, respectively, the mean gain in forward elevation (FE) was 48.7° and 33.3°, the visual analog scale for pain score improved by 3.5 and 3.3, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score increased by 47.3 and 31.9, and the acromiohumeral distance increased by 1.2 and 1.8 mm. In addition, the number of graft tears was 16 (10.0%) and 17 (12.9%), the number of other complications was 12 (7.5%) and 6 (3.9%), and the number of reoperations was 5 (3.1%) and 14 (8.2%) for autografts and allografts, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Both autografts and allografts improved clinical outcomes. Although the graft tear rate appeared similar between the autograft and allograft groups, the autograft group had no cases of conversion to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. In addition, we found 3 evidence-based tendencies: (1) a tendency for both autografts and allografts to have significantly improved FE and clinical scores, (2) a tendency that autografts improved internal rotation and allografts improved abduction, and (3) a weak tendency that autografts improved abduction and allografts improved internal and external rotation. Although it was not possible to compare the groups statistically, the differences in ASES scores might be clinically important and will need to be explored in future comparative studies.

Superior Capsule Reconstruction With Subacromial Allograft Spacer: Biomechanical Cadaveric Study of Subacromial Contact Pressure and Superior Humeral Head Translation

PURPOSE

To investigate the biomechanical effects of superior capsule reconstruction with subacromial allograft spacer on superior humeral head translation and subacromial contact pressure.

METHODS

Eight cadaveric shoulder specimens were tested in 4 conditions: (1) intact rotator cuff, (2) supraspinatus tear and superior capsule excision, (3) superior capsule reconstruction with human dermal allograft, and (4) superior capsule reconstruction with subacromial resurfacing using human dermal allograft. In each condition, specimens were tested at 0, 30, 60, and 90° of shoulder abduction in balanced and unbalanced loaded states for subacromial contact pressure and superior humeral head translation. Statistical comparisons were made using a repeated-measures analysis of variance test, followed by a Tukey post hoc test for pairwise comparisons. A P value <.05 was set as statistically significant.

RESULTS

Superior humeral head translation and subacromial contact pressure were increased after irreparable rotator cuff tear (P = .001). There was no significant difference between superior capsule reconstruction and intact cuff in regard to superior humeral head translation and subacromial contact pressure at all abduction angles. Superior capsule reconstruction with subacromial resurfacing decreased superior humeral head translation relative to intact (0°, P = .004; 30°, P = .02; 60°, P = .08; 90°, P = .01), superior capsule reconstruction (0°, P = .001; 30°, P = .003; 60°, P = .019; 90°, P = .001), and cuff-deficient states (P = .001). Superior capsule reconstruction with subacromial resurfacing resulted in nonsignificant increases in subacromial contact pressure relative to intact cuff at 0 to 90° abduction angles.

CONCLUSIONS

Superior capsule reconstruction with subacromial resurfacing using human dermal allograft results in decreased superior humeral head translation relative to superior capsule reconstruction with human dermal allograft only, while increasing subacromial contact pressure.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Superior capsule reconstruction with subacromial resurfacing using human dermal allograft reduces superior humeral head translation while increasing subacromial contact pressure in a cadaveric model.

Superior capsule reconstruction for irreparable rotator cuff tears: a systematic review of biomechanical and clinical outcomes by graft type

BACKGROUND

Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) has recently been proposed as a surgical solution to the irreparable rotator cuff tear and has gained popularity because of promising early results. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to review the biomechanical and clinical outcomes in shoulders with this condition treated with SCR.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Studies were included if they reported biomechanical, radiographic, or clinical outcomes data after undergoing SCR in shoulders with irreparable rotator cuff tears. Studies were broken down into 3 categories: cadaveric biomechanical studies, autograft clinical outcome studies, and allograft clinical outcome studies. Biomechanical, radiographic, patient-reported, and functional outcomes data were recorded for each study.

RESULTS

Eight cadaveric biomechanical studies, 5 autograft clinical studies, and 4 allograft clinical studies met inclusion criteria. In biomechanical studies, subacromial contact pressure and superior humeral translation were decreased in most tested scenarios. An increase in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, forward elevation and external rotation values, and acromiohumeral distance (AHD) were found in all autograft clinical studies reporting. Allograft clinical studies reported increases in ASES scores, forward elevation values, and AHD but decreases in visual analog scale scores in all studies reporting.

CONCLUSIONS

SCR is emerging as a viable surgical option to address the irreparable rotator cuff tear. Biomechanical studies suggest that the humeral head-stabilizing effect of SCR appears to translate into improved clinical outcomes. Future research should focus on further defining the indications, limitations, and optimal technique.

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in the younger patient (≤65 years): a systematic review

The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) in patients aged ≤65 years. MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed were searched for relevant studies from database inception to September 18, 2018. All studies that evaluated RTSA in patients aged ≤65 years were included. Two independent reviewers screened all studies and performed a quality assessment. In the total of 6 studies reviewed, 245 participants underwent RTSA, with the most common indications being failed rotator cuff repair and rotator cuff tear arthropathy. Postoperative functional outcomes indicated a significant level of improvement across all reported outcomes at a mean follow-up of 49 months (range, 19-140 months) (P < .05). The pooled mean complication rate was 18% (n = 44/245), and this higher rate may be due to 36% of patients undergoing an RTSA for a failed arthroplasty procedure and the inclusion of older studies that lacked modern implants and techniques. Although there is a significant improvement in functional outcomes at midterm follow-up for RTSA in the patients aged ≤65 years, the pooled complication rates are high. However, the results of this systematic review are limited because of the heterogenous patient population undergoing surgery for various indications, including revision arthroplasty. Long-term studies and registry data are required using current modern techniques and implants to provide an accurate assessment of outcomes following RTSA in a young patient population.

Proximal Humeral Bone Loss in Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty

Proximal humeral bone loss in revision shoulder arthroplasty poses a significant obstacle to achieving stable and reliable fixation of the humeral stem. It is important to identify and classify this bone loss preoperatively, which can range from epiphyseal to substantial diaphyseal bone loss. There are several reconstructive options that can address the varying levels of bone loss, including cemented long-stem fixation, a composite construct using proximal humeral allograft or femoral allograft, proximal humeral endoprosthetic replacement, or total humeral replacement. All of these are viable reconstructive options that have demonstrated adequate to good outcomes.

Onlay versus Inlay humeral steam in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA): clinical and biomechanical study

Background and aim of the work: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is becoming treatment of choice in glenohumeral arthropathies with massive lesion of the rotator cuff, due to a gradual extension of indications and new designs that provide better outcome. In this study we compared two different reverse shoulder prosthesis designs, defined as Inlay (or typical Grammont type) and a relatively new model defined as Onlay (that preserves tuberosity bone stock). We analyzed clinical, biomechanical and radiological outcomes, as well as complications of RSA in these two groups. Methods: We performed a prospective study on a population of 42 patients undergoing Reverse Shoulder Replacement by a single expert surgeon. We consider 21 patients (group A) who underwent to reverse shoulder replacement with a curved onlay steam with 145° inclination (Ascend Flex group, Wright medical, Memphis, TN, USA) and 21 patients who underwent to reverse shoulder replacement with a traditional Inlay Grammont steam (Modular Shoulder System SMR, Systema Multiplana Randelli; Lima-LTO, San Daniele del Friuli, Italy) between August 2010 and October 2018. We studied the following items: active range of motion (AROM), radiological parameters (lateralization shoulder angle LSA, Distalization Shoulder Angle DSA), functional scale (Constant-Murley Score), post-operative complications (infection, aseptical implant mobilitazion, residual pain, scapular notching, fractures, tuberosity reabsorbtion, dislocation, bleedings, nerve palsy, pulmonary embolus). Results: A significant improvement in ROM and functional score (Constant Shoulder Score) were observed in both groups. Group A (Onlay design 145°, medial tray) provides improvement in adduction, extension and external rotation compared to group B. No significant differences were found in abduction, external rotation and forward flexion. At 6 months follow-up, pain relief was detected in all patients. Although complications occur in a high percentage of patients in literature, no postoperative complications were observed in our cases series. Conclusions: Our results showed how RSA is a real solution to improve quality of life and to restore pain-free shoulder ROM in patients where cuff tear arthropathy occurs. Onlay design 145° may provides better active external rotation, extension, adduction: it is necessary to continue follow up and include more cases to prove these data. (www.actabiomedica.it)

The role of Superior Capsule Reconstruction in the irreparable rotator cuff tear - A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Irreparable rotator cuff tears in active patients provide a significant challenge and a consensus on the gold standard treatment is currently lacking. Superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) has recently been advocated and functions by providing a passive biological constraint to superior humeral head migration. The aim of this study is to systematically review the literature to evaluate the role of SCR in terms of functional outcome scores and failure rates.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A review of the online databases Medline and EMBASE was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines on the 28th January 2019. Clinical studies reporting SCR using any type of graft or surgical technique were included if reporting either functional outcome scores or rate of secondary surgery. The studies were appraised using the Methodological index for non-randomised studies tool.

RESULTS

The search strategy identified nine studies eligible for inclusion; five reported on fascia lata autografts and four studies reported on dermal allografts. All nine studies reported significant improvement in functional scores after SCR. Rates of secondary surgery were only provided in the dermal allograft studies at short-term follow-up (mean 10.9 to 32.4months) and ranged from 0 to 18.6%. Radiological assessment revealed graft failure in 5.5 to 55% of dermal allografts and 4.2 to 36.1% of fascia lata autografts.

CONCLUSION

This review demonstrates that SCR is a useful treatment modality for patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears. SCR was associated with significantly improved functional outcome scores in all studies. All studies reported a preserved or increased mean AHD. The radiological graft failure rate ranged from 4.2 to 55% and the short duration of follow-up in most studies means that this remains an important concern that requires longer-term evaluation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, systematic review.

Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction With Acellular Porcine Dermal Xenograft for the Treatment of Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears

Purpose

To evaluate the short-term clinical outcomes and the complications related to arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) with acellular porcine dermal xenograft for the treatment of irreparable massive rotator cuff tears.

Methods

A prospective observational study of patients treated with arthroscopic SCR for irreparable massive rotator cuff tears in the period from 2016 to 2017 was performed. Range of motion and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) scores were assessed preoperatively, at 6 months postoperatively, and at 12 months postoperatively.

Results

A total of 20 shoulders in 19 patients, with an average age of 60 years, were included in the study. Twelve patients met the criterion for the minimal clinically important difference in the SPADI score. The mean SPADI score showed significant improvement from 51.3% to 10.4% at 1-year follow-up. Active abduction improved from 65.4° to 149.3° and active forward flexion improved from 68.6° to 151.4° at 1-year follow-up. The procedure had a 30% complication rate, including a 15% rate of immunologic rejection of the xenograft. Five patients underwent revision procedures, including arthroscopic debridement and removal of xenograft residuals, implantation of a balloon spacer, and revision SCR with a fascia lata autograft.

Conclusions

Arthroscopic SCR with an acellular porcine dermal xenograft led to a successful outcome in 60% of cases. The procedure showed a quite high complication rate; the most severe cases were related to acute immunologic rejection of the xenograft.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, case series.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged 65 years or younger: a systematic review of the literature

Background

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is offered to young patients with a failed previous arthroplasty or a cuff-deficient shoulder, but the overall results are still uncertain. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to report the midterm outcomes and complications of RSA in patients younger than 65 years.

Methods

A search of the MEDLINE and Cochrane electronic databases identified clinical studies reporting the results, at a minimum 2-year follow-up, of patients younger than 65 years treated with an RSA. The methodologic quality was assessed with the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies score by 2 independent reviewers. Complications, reoperations, range of motion, functional scores, and radiologic outcomes were analyzed.

Results

Eight articles were included, with a total of 417 patients. The mean age at surgery was 56 years (range, 21-65 years). RSA was used as a primary arthroplasty in 79% of cases and revision of a failed arthroplasty in 21%. In primary cases, the indications were cuff tear arthropathy and/or massive irreparable cuff tear in 72% of cases. The overall complication rate was 17% (range, 7%-38%), with the most common complications being instability (5%) and infection (4%). The reintervention rate was 10% at 4 years, with implant revision in 7% of cases. The mean weighted American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, active forward elevation, and external rotation were 64 points, 121°, and 29°, respectively.

Conclusions

RSA provides reliable clinical improvements in patients younger than 65 years with a cuff-deficient shoulder or failed arthroplasty. The complication and revision rates are comparable to those in older patients.

Mid- to long-term follow-up of shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis in patients aged 60 or under

BACKGROUND

Shoulder arthroplasty in young patients with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis is an area of continued controversy.

METHODS

A retrospective multicenter study was performed for all patients aged 60 years or less undergoing either hemiarthroplasty (HA) or total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis with a minimum of 24-month follow-up. Clinical and functional outcomes, complications, and need for revision surgery were analyzed. Survivorship analysis using revision arthroplasty as an endpoint was determined.

RESULTS

A total of 202 patients with a mean age of 55.3 years (range, 36-60 years) underwent TSA with a mean follow-up of 9 years (range, 2-24.7 years). Revision arthroplasty was performed in 33 (16.3%) shoulders, with glenoid failure associated with the revision in 29 shoulders (88%). TSA survivorship analysis demonstrated 95% free of revision at 5 years, 83% at 10 years, and 60% at 20-year follow-up. A total of 31 patients with a mean age of 52.5 years (range, 38-60 years) underwent HA with a mean follow-up of 8.7 years (range, 2-21.4 years). Revision arthroplasty was performed in 5 (16.1%) shoulders, with glenoid erosion as the cause for revision in 4 shoulders (80%). HA survivorship analysis demonstrated 84% free from revision at 5 years and 79% at the final follow-up. TSA resulted in a significantly better range of motion, pain, subjective shoulder value, and Constant score compared with HA.

CONCLUSION

In young patients with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis, TSA resulted in significantly better functional and subjective outcomes with no significant difference in longitudinal survivorship compared with patients treated with HA.

Superior Capsule Reconstruction for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To evaluate the preliminary clinical outcomes and complications of superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) for irreparable rotator cuff tears.

METHODS

A systematic review of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies reporting clinical outcomes of irreparable rotator cuff tears managed by SCR were included. Clinical outcome analyses of pre- and postoperative range of motion, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, visual analog scale pain scores, and acromiohumeral intervals (AHIs) were performed and reported as range or frequency.

RESULTS

Five studies (285 patients, 291 shoulders) of level III-IV evidence were included, with a weighted mean (± standard deviation) follow-up of 27.7 ± 17.3 months. Forward flexion improved from 91°-130° preoperatively to 147°-160° postoperatively, external rotation from 26°-41° to 41°-45°, and internal rotation from L4-L1 to L1. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores increased from 36-52.2 to 77.5-92, and visual analog scale pain scores decreased from 4.0-6.3 to 0.4-1.7. Radiographically, AHIs with acellular dermal allograft ranged from 4.5 to 7.1 mm preoperatively, improving to 7.6-10.8 mm immediately postoperation before decreasing to 6.7-9.7 mm by final follow-up. Complication and graft failure rates were 17.2% and 11.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary results of SCR show consistent improvement in shoulder functionality and pain reduction. However, a decrease in postoperative AHIs indicates dermal allograft elongation and persistent superior migration of the humerus, potentially contributing to later graft failure. Studies with longer follow-up will be essential to evaluate the long-term utility of SCR in the treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tears.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of level III-IV studies.

Activity following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: What should surgeons be advising?

BACKGROUND

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is now the most frequently performed form of shoulder arthroplasty. There is currently no consensus on recommended levels of activity and sport following RTSA. The aim of this review is to outline the current evidence and provide a guide for surgeons on what to advise their patients regarding activity level following RTSA.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed using the Preferred Reporting for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The search was performed using the electronic databases PubMed and Medline. Included studies were of level 1 to 4 evidence in the English language evaluating complications and return to sport after RTSA.

RESULTS

Eleven studies were selected and included a total of 621 patients (67% female) with a mean age of 73 years (range 22-92). All of the included patients participated in sports prior to RTSA. The rate of return to sport ranged from 60 to 86% and varied with the level of sport activity. Mean time to return to sport after surgery varied greatly between studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Return to sport is tolerated following RTSA; however, studies are short to medium term only and although the reported complication rate is low, the studies did not include radiographic evaluation. Longer term studies with subgroup analysis evaluating common recreational activities after RTSA are required, particularly in the younger population, in order to establish clear post-operative guidelines.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty has higher perioperative implant complications and transfusion rates than total shoulder arthroplasty

Background

Indications for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) have expanded. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate national trends in shoulder arthroplasty utilization and to compare national perioperative complication rates for hemiarthroplasty (HA), total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), and RTSA in a matched cohort.

Methods

The National Inpatient Sample was queried from 2011-2013 to identify patients who underwent HA, TSA, or RTSA. Age, sex, race, insurance type, Elixhauser comorbidity index, and perioperative complications were identified. A coarsened exact matching algorithm was used to match RTSA patients with TSA and HA patients to compare medical and implant-related perioperative in-hospital complications. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed on unmatched data to identify risk factors for development of perioperative complications.

Results

Overall, 42,832 shoulder arthroplasties were identified (44% TSAs, 34% RTSAs, 19% HAs). After matching, RTSAs had 6.2 times the odds of a perioperative implant-related complication (P < .001) and 2 times the odds of a red blood cell transfusion compared with TSAs (P < .001). The logistic regression model showed that prior shoulder arthroplasty (odds ratio [OR], 15.1; P < .001), younger age (OR, 0.98; P = .006), earlier year of index surgery (OR, 0.83; P = .002), history of illicit drug use (OR, 6.2; P = .008), and depression (OR, 2.3; P = .003) were risk factors for development of in-hospital implant-related complications after RTSA.

Conclusion

The perioperative implant-related complication rate and postoperative transfusion rate of RTSAs were significantly higher than those of TSAs. In addition, prior shoulder surgery, younger age, earlier year of index surgery, history of illicit drug use, and depression were risk factors for implant-related complications after RTSA. However, the perioperative RTSA implant-related complications did decline each year, suggesting a growing national proficiency with performing RTSA.

Patient-Reported and Objectively Measured Function Before and After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Documenting functional outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is critical to advancing patient care. The interplay been self-reported and objectively measured outcome measures has not been widely described. The utilization of wearable devices to document upper extremity limb activity is a new approach for objectively measuring outcomes. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate changes in pain, and self-reported function and objectively measured limb activity after RSA. We also assessed the influence of pain on self-reported function and objectively measured limb activity to determine the impact of pain on outcomes after RSA.

MATERIALS

This study implemented a prospective, repeated-measures design. Fourteen patients undergoing RSA underwent testing before surgery, and 2 and 12 months after surgery. Patient-reported instruments included pain, Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and hands (DASH), and physical component summary (PCS) of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey. Objective limb activity (mean activity value, m/s/min epoch; inactive time, %; low activity, %; and high activity, %) was captured with triaxial accelerometers worn on the upper and lower arm. A repeated-measures ANOVA tested for differences across time. The Spearman rank-order correlation was calculated to evaluate the influence of pain on DASH, PCS scores, and mean limb activity.

RESULTS

Patient-reported measures improved after surgery (pain, P < .01; DASH, P < .01; PCS, P = .01). No change in limb activity was found at 1 year compared with preoperative values for mean (forearm, P = 1.00; arm, P = .36), inactivity (forearm, P = .33; arm, P = .22), low (forearm, P = .77; arm, P = .11) or high (forearm, P = 1.00; arm, P = .20) activity. There was a relationship between pain and DASH scores 1 year after surgery (P = .04) but not before surgery (P = .16), or 2 months after surgery (P = .30). There was no relationship between pain and PCS scores at any time point (preoperative, P = .97; 2 months, P = .21; 1 year, P = .08) nor pain and limb activity (forearm: preoperative, P = .36; 2 months, P = .67; 1 year, P = .16; arm: preoperative, P = .97; 2 months, P = .59; 1 year, P = .51).

CONCLUSIONS

RSA reduced pain and enhanced patient-perceived function. Objectively measured upper extremity limb activity is not different 1 year after surgery compared with preoperative levels.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

How common are acromial and scapular spine fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty?: A systematic review

AIMS

Acromial fractures following reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have a wide range of incidences in reported case series. This study evaluates their incidence following RSA by systematically reviewing the current literature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review using the search terms "reverse shoulder", "reverse total shoulder", or "inverted shoulder" was performed using PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases between 1 January 2010 and 31 March 2018. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used. Studies were included if they reported on RSA outcomes and the incidence rate of acromial and/or scapular spine fractures. The rate of these fractures was evaluated for primary RSA, revision RSA, RSA indications, and RSA implant design.

RESULTS

The review included 90 articles out of 686 identified after exclusions. The incidence rate of acromial and/or scapular spine fractures was 2.8% (253/9048 RSAs). The fracture rate was similar for primary and revision RSA (2.8% vs 2.1%; p = 0.4). Acromial fractures were most common after RSA for inflammatory arthritis (10.9%) and massive rotator cuff tears (3.8%). The incidence was lowest in RSA for post-traumatic arthritis (2.1%) and acute proximal humerus fractures (0%). Lateralized glenosphere design had a significantly higher rate of acromial fractures compared with medial glenosphere designs.

CONCLUSION

Based on current English literature, acromial and/or scapular spine fractures occur at a rate of 2.8% after RSA. The incidence is slightly more common after primary compared with revision arthroplasty. Also, higher rates of acromial fractures are reported in RSA performed for inflammatory arthritis and in the lateralized glenoid design. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:627-634.

Superior Capsular Reconstruction for Massive Rotator Cuff Tear Leads to Significant Improvement in Range of Motion and Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To determine if arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears results in statistically significant and clinically significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes and shoulder range of motion with low graft failure, complication, and reoperation rates.

METHODS

A systematic review was registered with PROSPERO and performed using PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases were searched. Studies investigating superior capsular reconstruction in adults were included. Animal, cadaveric, and review studies, letters to the editor, and technique papers were excluded. Study methodological quality was analyzed using the Modified Coleman Methodology Score. Shoulder motion and patient-reported outcome scores were analyzed. Statistical significance was defined by P < .05, and clinical significance was defined by the minimal clinically important difference.

RESULTS

Six articles (286 subjects, 292 shoulders, 67.7% males, mean age 63.4 ± 4.1 years, mean follow-up 25.7 ± 14.5 months) were analyzed. The methodological quality was fair (59.7 ± 13.8). Five studies reported significant improvement in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score (mean range: 30-55, P < .001 for all). Visual analog scale (VAS) scores significantly improved in 3 studies (mean range: 2.5-5.9, P < .001 for 2 and P = .005 for 1). Shoulder forward flexion (mean range: 28°-56°, P < .001 for 2 and P = .04 for 1) significantly increased in 3 studies. One hundred percent of subjects from 2 studies had clinically significant improvement in ASES and VAS scores and shoulder forward flexion. Thirty-six subjects (14.2% of 254) had graft failure on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Eleven subjects (3.8%) had complications, and 34 (11.7%) underwent reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears results in statistically significant and clinically significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes and shoulder range of motion with low graft failure, complication, and reoperation rates at short-term follow-up in fair-quality studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level III and IV studies.

Clinical outcomes and complications of cementless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty during the early learning curve period

Background

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is a treatment option for patients with severe osteoarthritis, rotator cuff arthropathy, or massive rotator cuff tear with pseudoparalysis. We are to deduce not only the early functional outcomes and complications of cementless RTSA during the learning curve period but also complication-based, and operation time-based learning curve of RTSA.

Methods

Between March 2010 and February 2014, we retrospectively evaluated 38 shoulders (6 male, 32 female). The average age of the patients was 73.0 years (range, 63 to 83 years), and the average follow-up was at 24 months (range, 12–53 months). The visual analog scale (VAS), University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) score and constant score were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes. We evaluated patients radiographically at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and then annually thereafter for any evidence of complications.

Results

The VAS score improved from 4.0 to 2.8 (p = 0.013). The UCLA score improved from 16.0 to 27.9 (p = 0.002), and the constant score improved from 41.4 to 78.9 (p < 0.001), which were statistically significant. While active forward flexion, abduction, and internal rotation improved (p value = 0.001, < 0.01, 0.15), external rotation did not show significant improvement (p = 0.764). Postoperative complications included acromion fracture (one case), glenoid fracture (one case), peripristhetic humeral fracture (one case), axillary nerve injury (one case), infection (one case), and arterial injury (one case). Our study presented an intraoperative complication-based learning curve of 20 shoulders, and operation time-based learning curve of 15 shoulders.

Conclusions

The clinical outcomes of RTSA were satisfactory with overall complication rates of 15.7%. An orthopedic surgeon within the learning curve period for the operation of RTSA should be cautious when selecting the patients and performing RTSA.

Trial registration

Retrospectively registered.

Outcomes of Primary Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients Younger Than 65 Years Old

PURPOSE

We compare clinical outcomes of primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) in patients 65 years old or younger with a matched control group of patients 70 years old or older.

METHODS

Forty-three patients (17 men and 26 women) 65 years old or younger were retrospectively identified. The mean age was 60 years and average follow-up was 4.0 years. The most common surgical indication was rotator cuff arthropathy. Patients were sex- and diagnosis-matched to control patients 70 years old or older with a mean follow-up of 4.1 years. Active range of motion (ROM) and functional outcomes in the 2 groups were evaluated before and after surgery.

RESULTS

Patients 65 years old or younger had significantly lower preoperative functional scores; preoperative ROM, however, was similar in the 2 groups. Both groups significantly improved in postoperative ROM and functional scores (with no difference in Shoulder Pain and Disability Index [SPADI]-130, Simple Shoulder Test [SST], University of California-Los Angeles [UCLA], and Constant scores); however, the younger cohort had lower functional scores; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) were significantly lower after surgery. The change in ROM and outcome measures before to after surgery was similar between groups. Similar complications and notching rates were seen between the groups at final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

An RTSA in patients 65 years old or younger improves ROM comparably with patients 70 years old or older. Younger patients have lower functional scores before and after surgery. An RTSA in younger patients improves pain and function but is associated with worse perceived outcomes.

TYPE OF STUDY AND LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic III.