Risk factors for surgical site infection after posterior cervical spine surgery: an analysis of 5,441 patients from the ACS NSQIP 2005-2012

Risk factors for deep surgical site infection after posterior cervical spine surgery in adults: a multicentre observational cohort study

Surgical site infection (SSI) is a serious complication following spine surgery and is correlated with significant morbidities, poor clinical outcomes, and increased healthcare costs. Accurately identifying risk factors can help develop strategies to reduce this devastating consequence; however, few multicentre studies have investigated risk factors for SSI following posterior cervical spine surgeries. Between July 2010 and June 2015, we performed an observational cohort study on deep SSI in adult patients who underwent posterior cervical spine surgery at 10 research hospitals. Detailed patient- and procedure-specific potential risk variables were prospectively recorded using a standardised data collection chart and were reviewed retrospectively. Among the 2184 consecutive adult patients enrolled, 28 (1.3%) developed postoperative deep SSI. Multivariable regression analysis revealed 2 statistically significant independent risk factors: occipitocervical surgery (P < 0.001) and male sex (P = 0.024). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that occipitocervical surgery (P = 0.001) was the sole independent risk factor for deep SSI in patients with instrumented fusion. Occipitocervical surgery is a relatively rare procedure; therefore, our findings were based on a large cohort acquired using a multicentre study. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to identify occipitocervical procedure as an independent risk variable for deep SSI after spinal surgery.

Preoperative Medical Referral Prior to Hepatopancreatic Surgery-Is It Worth it?

INTRODUCTION

Many patients who present for complex surgery have underlying medical comorbidities. While surgeons often refer these patients to medical appointments for preoperative "optimization" or "clearance," the actual impact of these visits remains poorly examined. The objective of the current study was to define the potential benefit of preoperative medical appointments on outcomes and costs associated with hepatopancreatic (HP) surgery.

METHODS

Patients with modifiable comorbidities undergoing HP surgery were identified in the Medicare claims data. The association of preoperative non-surgical visit and postoperative outcomes and expenditures was assessed using inverse propensity treatment weighting analysis and multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among the 5574 Medicare beneficiaries who underwent a hepatopancreatic surgery, one in seven patients (n = 830, 14.9%) was "optimized" preoperatively. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, age (OR 1.02; 95% CI 1.01-1.03; p = 0.006) and higher comorbidity burden (OR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01-1.05; p = 0.007) were associated with modest increased odds of being referred in the preoperative period for a non-surgical evaluation; the factor most associated with preoperative non-surgical visit was male patient sex (OR 1.33; 95% CI 1.14-1.56; p < 0.001). After adjustment for competing risk factors and random site effect, patients with an "optimization" visit had 28% lower odds (OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.59-0.86; p < 0.001) of experiencing an operative complication. Additionally, patients who had a non-surgical visit had 13% higher median total expenditures compared with individuals who did not undergo an "optimization" visit (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, roughly one in seven Medicare beneficiaries who underwent HP surgery may have been risk stratified by a non-surgical provider prior to surgery. Preoperative evaluation was associated with modestly lower odds of complications following HP surgery and higher Medicare expenditures. Further research is needed to determine its routine utility as a means to decrease the morbidity surrounding HP surgery.

Comparison of the surgeries for the ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament-related cervical spondylosis: A PRISMA-compliant network meta-analysis and literature review

OBJECTIVE

We designed and performed a network meta-analysis to compare the clinical outcomes among the 5 surgeries-anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF), anterior controllable antedisplacement fusion (ACAF), laminoplasty (LP), laminectomy (LC), and posterior decompression with instrumented fusion (PDF)-for patients with cervical spondylosis related to the ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL).

METHODS

Databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and Web of Science (firstly available-2019) were selected for literature search. We performed a network meta-analysis with the included studies. A Newcastle-Ottawa scale was employed to assess the study quality of the included studies.

RESULTS

Total 23 studies with 1516 patients were included in our analysis. We found that ACCF achieved the most improvement in the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scores and excellent and good recovery rate, ACAF achieved the best improvement of the improvement rate and lordosis. LP got the best operative time and blood loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggested that both anterior (ACCF and ACAF) and posterior (LP, LC, and PDF) procedures have their strengths and weaknesses. Clinicians need to select the most appropriate surgery with a comprehensive consideration of the clinical condition of each patient with OPLL-related cervical spondylosis.

Underweight patients are an often under looked “At risk” population after undergoing posterior cervical spine surgery

Background

Body Mass Index (BMI) is a weight-for-height metric that is used to quantify tissue mass and weight levels. Past studies have mainly focused on the association of high BMI on spine surgery outcomes and shown variable conclusions. Prior results may have varied due to insufficient power or inconsistent categorical separation of BMI groups (e.g. underweight, overweight, or obese). Additionally, few studies have considered outcomes of patients with low BMI. The aim of the current study was to analyze patients along the entirety of the BMI spectrum and to establish specific granular BMI categories for which patients become at risk for complication and mortality following posterior cervical spine surgery.

Methods

Patients undergoing elective posterior cervical spine surgery were abstracted from the 2005–2016 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) databases. Patients were aggregated into pre-established WHO BMI categories and adverse outcomes were normalized to average risk of normal-weight subjects (BMI 18.5–24.9 kg/m²). Risk-adjusted multivariate regressions were performed controlling for patient demographics and overall health.

Results

A total of 16,806 patients met inclusion criteria. Odds for adverse events for underweight patients (BMI < 18.5 kg/m²) were the highest among any category of patients along the BMI spectrum. These patients experienced increased odds of any adverse event (Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.67, p = 0.008, major adverse events (OR=2.08, p = 0.001), post-operative infection (OR = 1.95, p = 0.002), and reoperation (OR = 1.84, p = 0.020). Interestingly, none of the overweight or obese categories were found to be correlated with increased risk of adverse event categories other than super-morbidly obese patients (BMI>50.0 kg/m²) for post-operative infection (OR = 1.54, p = 0.041).

Conclusions

The current study found underweight patients to have the highest risk of adverse events after posterior cervical spine surgery. Increased pre-surgical planning and resource allocation for this population should be considered by physicians and healthcare systems, as is often already done for patients on the other end of the BMI spectrum.

Cervical Spinal Fusion in Adult Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A National Analysis of Complications and 90-day Readmissions

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to utilize the National Readmission Database to determine the national estimates of complication and 90-day readmission rates associated with cervical spinal fusion in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND

RA patients who undergo cervical spine surgery are known to be at high risk for readmissions, which are costly and may not be reimbursed by Medicare.

METHODS

The National Readmission Database was queried for adults (>18 years) diagnosed with RA undergoing cervical spine fusion. Patient, operative, and hospital factors were assessed in bivariate analyses. Independent risk factors for readmissions were identified using stepwise multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

From 2013 to 2014, a total of 5597 RA patients (average age: 61.5 ± 11.2 years, 70.9% female) underwent cervical spine fusion. A total of 691 (12.3%) patients were readmitted within 90 days (). Index inpatient complications included dysphagia (readmitted: 7.9% vs. non-readmitted: 5.1%; P = 0.003), urinary tract infection (UTI) (8.8% vs. 3.7%; P < 0.001), respiratory-related complications (7.6% vs. 3.4%; P < 0.001), and implant-related complications (5.4% vs. 2.7%; P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated the following as the strongest independent predictors for 90-day readmission: intraoperative bleeding (odds ratio [OR]: 3.6, P = 0.001), inpatient Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) (OR 4.1, P = 0.004), and patient discharge against medical advice (OR 33.5, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Readmission rates for RA patients undergoing cervical spine surgery are high and most often due to postoperative infection (septicemia, UTI, pneumonia, wound). Potential modifiable factors which may improve outcomes include minimizing intraoperative blood loses, postoperative DVT prophylaxis, and discharge disposition.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Risk Factors Associated with 90-Day Readmissions Following Occipitocervical Fusion-A Nationwide Readmissions Database Study

BACKGROUND

Occipitocervical fusion (OCF) procedures are increasing due to an aging population and the prevalence of trauma, rheumatoid arthritis, and tumors. Reoperation rates and readmission risk factors for cervical fusions have been established, but in relation to OCF they have not been explored. This study investigates the patterns of readmissions and complications following OCF using a national database.

METHODS

The 2016 U.S. Nationwide Readmissions Database was used for sample collection. Adults (>18 years) who underwent OCF were identified using the 2016 ICD-10 coding system, and we examined the readmission rates (30-day and 90-day) and reoperation rates.

RESULTS

Between January and September 2016, a total of 477 patients underwent OCF; the 30-day and 90-day readmission rates were 10.4% and 22.4%, respectively. The 90-day reoperation rate related to the index surgery was 5.7%. Mean age (68.58 years) was significantly greater in the readmitted group versus nonreadmitted group (61.76 years) (P < 0.001). The readmitted group had a significantly higher Charlson Comorbidity Index and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (5.00 and 2.41, respectively) than the nonreadmitted group (3.25 and 1.15, respectively; P < 0.001). Nonelective OCF showed a higher readmission rate (29.18%) versus elective OCF (12.23%) (P < 0.001). Medicare and Medicaid patients showed the highest rates of readmission (27.27% and 20.41%, respectively). Readmitted patients had higher total health care costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonelective OCF was found to have a readmission rate of almost 2½× that of elective OCF. Understanding risk factors associated with OCF will help with operative planning and patient optimization.

Drivers for nonhome discharge in a consecutive series of 1502 patients undergoing 1- or 2-level lumbar fusion

OBJECTIVE

Unexpected nonhome discharge causes additional costs in the current reimbursement models, especially to the payor. Nonhome discharge is also related to longer length of hospital stay and therefore higher healthcare costs to society. With increasing demand for spine surgery, it is important to minimize costs by streamlining discharges and reducing length of hospital stay. Identifying factors associated with nonhome discharge can be useful for early intervention for discharge planning. The authors aimed to identify the drivers of nonhome discharge in patients undergoing 1- or 2-level instrumented lumbar fusion.

METHODS

The electronic medical records from a single-center hospital administrative database were analyzed for consecutive patients who underwent 1- to 2-level instrumented lumbar fusion for degenerative lumbar conditions during the period from 2016 to 2018. Discharge disposition was determined as home or nonhome. A logistic regression analysis was used to determine associations between nonhome discharge and age, sex, body mass index (BMI), race, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, smoking status, marital status, insurance type, residence in an underserved zip code, and operative factors.

RESULTS

A total of 1502 patients were included. The majority (81%) were discharged home. Factors associated with a nonhome discharge were older age, higher BMI, living in an underserved zip code, not being married, being on government insurance, and having more levels fused. Patients discharged to a nonhome facility had longer lengths of hospital stay (5.6 vs 3.0 days, p < 0.001) and significantly increased hospital costs ($21,204 vs $17,518, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased age, greater BMI, residence in an underserved zip code, not being married, and government insurance are drivers for discharge to a nonhome facility after a 1- to 2-level instrumented lumbar fusion. Early identification and intervention for these patients, even before admission, may decrease the length of hospital stay and medical costs.

Nomogram prediction of surgical site infection of HIV-infected patients following orthopedic surgery: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infection (SSI) is a devastating complication of orthopedic surgery, related with increased morbidity and mortality. This study was performed with the aim to compare the SSI rate in human immunodeficiency virus HIV-positive patients, to identify other risk factors for SSI and to establish a nomogram model to predict the risk of SSI.

METHODS

A total of 101 HIV-positive individuals following orthopedic surgery patients admitted to Beijing Ditan Hospital. Their characteristics were gathered. The univariate and multiple logistic regression analysis were performed to explore the risk factors of SSI. And the Nomogram prediction model was constructed and verified.

RESULTS

The independent predictive factors of SSI included CD4 (Odds ratio [OR], 0.041; P = 0.040), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (OR, 89.773; P = 0.030), and procalcitonin (PCT) (OR, 220.746; P = 0.006). The scoring nomogram model was as follows: Logit (SSI) = - 2.63589-0.00314*CD4 < 430.75 = 1) + 0.04695*(ESR < 17.46 = 1) + 2.93694*(PCT < 0.22 = 1). The area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.946. The cutoff score was - 2.1026 with a sensitivity of 93.33% and a specificity of 84.88%.

CONCLUSIONS

CD4, ESR, PCT might affect the occurrence of SSI after orthopedic surgery. The nomogram model constructed in this study is helpful for predicting the probability of SSI.

Single-level Posterolateral Fusion (PLF) Alone and Posterior Interbody Fusion (PLIF/TLIF) Alone Lead to a Decreased Risk of Short-term Complications Compared to Combined PLF With PLIF/TLIF Procedures: A Matched Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of a database cohort.

OBJECTIVE

To compare short-term outcome measures and complications between single-level posterolateral fusion (PLF), single-level posterior interbody fusion (PLIF/TLIF), and combined single-level PLF+PLIF/TLIF.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Both PLF and interbody fusion are well-established procedures for degenerative spinal disease. However, there is lack of consensus as to the ideal surgical approach for specific applications. Additionally, the difference in risk of complications with traditional PLF, interbody fusion with posterior approach, and circumferential fusion is still contested.

METHODS

The ACS NSQIP database was used to identify 24,228 patients who underwent either a single-level PLF, single-level PLIF/TLIF, or combined single-level PLF+PLIF/TLIF between 2014 and 2017. To control for potential confounding variables, exact matching was used to pair individuals from each treatment group based on several factors, including sex, age, body mass index, various comorbidities, and American Society of Anesthesiologists classification. After appropriate matching, the rate of various short-term outcome measures and complications were compared between the three treatment groups.

RESULTS

After exact matching, 13,251 patients were included in the final analysis. The rates of non-home discharge, overall surgical complications, and bleeding requiring transfusion were significantly lower in the PLF group and PLIF/TLIF group relative to the PLF+PLIF/TLIF group (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). The rate of deep venous thrombosis was lower in the PLIF/TLIF group relative to the PLF group (P = 0.006). There were no significant differences in other medical complications, unplanned readmission, reoperation, or return to the OR between any of the treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of single-level PLF+PLIF/TLIF is associated with higher rates of short-term complications relative to either single-level PLF or PLIF/TLIF alone. The associated risks of this therapy should be considered when considering surgical management for lumbar disease.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Can natural language processing provide accurate, automated reporting of wound infection requiring reoperation after lumbar discectomy?

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infections are a major driver of morbidity and increased costs in the postoperative period after spine surgery. Current tools for surveillance of these adverse events rely on prospective clinical tracking, manual retrospective chart review, or administrative procedural and diagnosis codes.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to develop natural language processing (NLP) algorithms for automated reporting of postoperative wound infection requiring reoperation after lumbar discectomy.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Adult patients undergoing discectomy at two academic and three community medical centers between January 1, 2000 and July 31, 2019 for lumbar disc herniation.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Reoperation for wound infection within 90 days after surgery METHODS: Free-text notes of patients who underwent surgery from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2015 were used for algorithm training. Free-text notes of patients who underwent surgery after January 1, 2016 were used for algorithm testing. Manual chart review was used to label which patients had reoperation for wound infection. An extreme gradient-boosting NLP algorithm was developed to detect reoperation for postoperative wound infection.

RESULTS

Overall, 5,860 patients were included in this study and 62 (1.1%) had a reoperation for wound infection. In patients who underwent surgery after January 1, 2016 (n=1,377), the NLP algorithm detected 15 of the 16 patients (sensitivity=0.94) who had reoperation for infection. In comparison, current procedural terminology and international classification of disease codes detected 12 of these 16 patients (sensitivity=0.75). At a threshold of 0.05, the NLP algorithm had positive predictive value of 0.83 and F1-score of 0.88.

CONCLUSION

Temporal validation of the algorithm developed in this study demonstrates a proof-of-concept application of NLP for automated reporting of adverse events after spine surgery. Adapting this methodology for other procedures and outcomes in spine and orthopedics has the potential to dramatically improve and automatize quality and safety reporting.

The impact of long-term corticosteroid use on acute postoperative complications following lumbar decompression surgery

BACKGROUND

Corticosteroids have a negative impact on the human immune system's ability to function at an optimal level. Studies have shown that patients on long-term corticosteroids have higher infection rates. However, the rates of infection and other complications following lumbar decompression surgery remains under-investigated. The aim of our study was to determine the impact of preoperative long-term corticosteroid usage on acute, 30-day postoperative complications in a subset of patients undergoing lumbar spine decompression surgery, without fusion or instrumentation. We hypothesize that patients on long-term corticosteroids will have higher rates of infection and other postoperative complications after undergoing lumbar decompression surgery of the spine.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data collected from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database data from 2005 to 2016. Lumbar decompression surgeries, including discectomies, laminectomies, and others were identified using CPT codes. Chi-square analysis was used to evaluate differences among the corticosteroid and non-corticosteroid groups for demographics, preoperative comorbidities, and postoperative complications. Logistic regression analysis was done to determine if long-term corticosteroid use predicts incidence of postoperative infections following adjustment.

RESULTS

26,734 subjects met inclusion criteria. A total of 1044 patients (3.9%) were on long-term corticosteroids prior to surgical intervention, and 25,690 patients (96.1%) were not on long-term corticosteroids. Patients on long-term corticosteroids were more likely to be older (p < 0.001), female (p < 0.001), nonsmokers (p < 0.001), and have a higher American Society of Anesthesiologist class (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that long-term corticosteroid usage was associated with increased overall complications (odds ratio [OR]: 1.543; p < 0.001), and an independent risk factor for the development of minor complications (OR: 1.808; p < 0.001), urinary tract infection (OR: 2.033; p = 0.002), extended length of stay (OR: 1.244; p = 0.039), thromboembolic complications (OR: 1.919; p = 0.023), and sepsis complications (OR: 2.032; p = 0.024).

CONCLUSION

Long-term corticosteroid usage is associated with a significant increased risk of acute postoperative complication development, including urinary tract infection, sepsis and septic shock, thromboembolic complications, and extended length of hospital stay, but not with superficial or deep infection in patients undergoing lumbar decompression procedures. Spine surgeons should remain vigilant regarding postoperative complications in patients on long-term corticosteroids, especially as it relates to UTI and propensity to decompensate into sepsis or septic shock. Thromboembolic risk attenuation is also imperative in this patient group during the postoperative period and the surgeon should weigh the risks and benefits of more intensive anticoagulation measures.

Spine Infections Reduced at Dedicated Orthopaedics and Spine Hospital

BACKGROUND

Previous studies stratified postoperative infection risk by patient comorbidities. However, it is unclear whether the incidence varies by surgical approach in a specialized orthopaedic setting. This study aims to compare infection rates and microbiologic characteristics of postoperative spine infections requiring return to the operating room for debridement by hospital setting: a dedicated orthopaedic and spine hospital versus a general hospital serving multiple surgical specialties.

METHODS

The study is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data. Procedures performed between March 2006 and August 2008 at the multispecialty university hospital were compared with cases at an orthopaedic specialty hospital from September 2008 through August 2016. The surgeons, residents, and patients were similar, but the operative venue changed in 2008.

RESULTS

The overall general university hospital infection rate was 2.03%, higher than the overall infection rate at the dedicated orthopaedic and spine hospital of 1.31% (P < .0104). The general university infection rate was 2.27% in the final years of practice, compared with 0.91% at the dedicated orthopaedic and spine hospital (P < .0001) during a recent 2-year time frame. Demographic variables did not significantly differ between the 2 settings. The overall proportion of Gram-negative infection rates was not statistically different (21.7% vs 18.6%), despite an increased proportion of Gram-negative infections at the general university hospital following surgery from an anterior approach. Most of the organisms isolated in both facilities were Staphylococcus species. There was no difference in the seasonality of postoperative spine infections in either setting.

CONCLUSIONS

In transitioning from a multispecialty university hospital to a dedicated orthopaedic hospital, the incidence of postoperative spine infections was significantly reduced to 0.91%. Despite the change in venue, the proportion of Gram-negative infections (∼20%) following spine surgery did not significantly change. These results suggest improved infection rates during the course of the last 10 years with consistent proportions of Gram-negative infections.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Development of a Risk Prediction Model With Improved Clinical Utility in Elective Cervical and Lumbar Spine Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

OBJECTIVE

We present a universal model of risk prediction for patients undergoing elective cervical and lumbar spine surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Previous studies illustrate predictive risk models as possible tools to identify individuals at increased risk for postoperative complications and high resource utilization following spine surgery. Many are specific to one condition or procedure, cumbersome to calculate, or include subjective variables limiting applicability and utility.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of 177,928 spine surgeries (lumbar (L) Ln = 129,800; cervical (C) Cn = 48,128) was constructed from the 2012 to 2016 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (ACS-NSQIP) database. Cases were identified by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for cervical fusion, lumbar fusion, and lumbar decompression laminectomy. Significant preoperative risk factors for postoperative complications were identified and included in logistic regression. Sum of odds ratios from each factor was used to develop the Universal Spine Surgery (USS) score. Model performance was assessed using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves and tested on 20% of the total sample.

RESULTS

Eighteen risk factors were identified, including sixteen found to be significant outcomes predictors. At least one complication was present among 11.1% of patients, the most common of which included bleeding requiring transfusion (4.86%), surgical site infection (1.54%), and urinary tract infection (1.08%). Complication rate increased as a function of the model score and ROC area under the curve analyses demonstrated fair predictive accuracy (lumbar = 0.741; cervical = 0.776). There were no significant deviations between score development and testing datasets.

CONCLUSION

We present the Universal Spine Surgery score as a robust, easily administered, and cross-validated instrument to quickly identify spine surgery candidates at increased risk for postoperative complications and high resource utilization without need for algorithmic software. This may serve as a useful adjunct in preoperative patient counseling and perioperative resource allocation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Risk factors associated with reoperation in posterior cervical fusions: A large-scale retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVES

To identify risk factors for reoperation in patients who have undergone posterior cervical fusion (PCF).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis was performed of patients undergoing PCF during a 12-year period at a single institution. Demographic and surgical characteristics were collected from electronic medical records. This study addressed reoperations, from all causes, of PCF. Different strategies, including the addition of anterior fusion, were also compared.

RESULTS

Of the 370 patients meeting inclusion criteria there were 44 patients (11.9 %) that required a revision and of those 5 required a second revision. The most common reasons for revision were adjacent segment disease and infection, 13 (3.5 %) and 11 patients (3.0 %), respectively. There was not a higher revision rate (for any cause) for patients who had a subaxial fusion and compared with those that included C2 or those that failed to cross the cervicothoracic junction. Of patients who required reoperation, there was a statistically significant higher fraction of smokers (p =  0.023).

CONCLUSION

The risks and benefits of posterior cervical instrumentation and fusion should be thoroughly discussed with patients. This report implicates smoking as a risk factor for all-cause reoperation in patients who have had this PCF and provides surgeons with additional data regarding this complication. When possible, preoperative optimization should include smoking cessation therapy.

Comparison of Perioperative Complications Between Anterior Decompression With Fusion and Laminoplasty For Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Propensity Score-matching Analysis Using Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination Database

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective comparative study with a large national database.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the perioperative complications and costs of anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) and laminoplasty (LAMP) for patients who had cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

CSM is the most common spinal cord disorder in the upper middle-aged people in Japan. ADF and LAMP represent 2 major treatments; however, few studies have reported large-scale investigations for perioperative complications with CSM. Thus, it is controversial which surgical approach will lead to the best clinical outcome in CSM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All data in this study were collected from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database for patients diagnosed with CSM. We adjusted for known confounding biases with propensity score matching. One-to-one matched pairs between each surgical procedure were analyzed for the purposes of comparing systemic complication rates, local complication rates, medical costs, and mortality.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, 1638 pairs of patients undergoing ADF and LAMP were made. More perioperative systemic complications were observed in the ADF group, such as atrial fibrillation (ADF/LAMP=0.7%/0.2%, P=0.032), respiratory failure (1.4%/0.1%, P<0.001), dysphagia (2.2%/0.2%, P<0.001), and sepsis (0.5%/0.1%, P=0.019). In contrast, a high rate of pulmonary embolism was observed with LAMP groups (ADF/LAMP=0%/0.2%, P=0.045). Local complications, such as infection (ADF/LAMP=0.8%/1.7%, P=0.026) and meningitis (0%/0.2%, P<0.045), were more common in the LAMP group. Conversely, spinal fluid leakage (ADF/LAMP=0.6%/0%, P=0.003) was more common in the ADF group. The costs (P<0.001) were higher in the ADF group.

CONCLUSIONS

More systemic complications, such as respiratory disease, cardiovascular events, and sepsis, were observed in the ADF group, although local infection was more frequently seen in the LAMP group. Medical costs were higher in the ADF group. The findings in this study will contribute to each CSM patient by allowing suitable adaptation of cervical surgeries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Postoperative Non-Pathological Fever Following Posterior Cervical Fusion Surgery : Is Laminoplasty a Better Preventive Method than Laminectomy?

Objective

To analyze the incidence and characteristics of delayed postoperative fever in posterior cervical fusion using cervical pedicle screws (CPS).

Methods

This study analyzed 119 patients who underwent posterior cervical fusion surgery using CPS. Delayed fever was defined as no fever for the first 3 postoperative days, followed by an ear temperature ≥38℃ on postoperative day 4 and subsequent days. Patient age, sex, diagnosis, laminectomy, surgical level, revision status, body mass index, underlying medical disease, surgical duration, and transfusion status were retrospectively reviewed.

Results

Of 119 patients, seven were excluded due to surgical site infection, spondylitis, pneumonia, or surgical level that included the thoracic spine. Of the 112 included patients, 28 (25%) were febrile and 84 (75%) were afebrile. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that laminectomy was a statistically significant risk factor for postoperative non-pathological fever (odds ratio, 10.251; p=0.000). In contrast, trauma or tumor surgery and underlying medical disease were not significant risk factors for fever.

Conclusion

Patients who develop delayed fever 4 days after posterior cervical fusion surgery using CPS are more likely to have non-pathologic fever than surgical site infection. Laminectomy is a significant risk factor for non-pathologic fever.

Complications following posterior cervical decompression and fusion: a review of incidence, risk factors, and prevention strategies

Posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCF) is a common surgical technique used to treat various cervical spine pathologies. However, there are various complications associated with PCF that can negatively impact patient outcome. We performed a comprehensive literature review to identify the most common complications following PCF using PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Google Scholar. The overall complication rates of PCF are estimated to range from about 15% to 25% in the current literature. The most common immediate complications include acute blood loss anemia, surgical site infection (SSI), C5 palsy, and incidental durotomy; the most common long-term complications include adjacent segment degeneration, junctional kyphosis, and pseudoarthrosis. Three principal mechanisms are thought to contribute to complications. First, higher number of fusion levels, obesity, and more complex pathologies can increase the invasiveness of the planned procedure, thus increase complications. Second, wound healing and arthrodesis may be impaired due to poor blood flow due to various patient factors such as smoking, diabetes, increased frailty, steroid use, and other medical comorbidities. Finally, increased biomechanical stress on the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) and lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) may predispose patient to chronic degeneration and result in adjacent level degeneration and/or junctional problems. Reducing the modifiable risk factors pre-operatively can decrease the overall complication rate. Neurologic deficits may be reduced with adequate intraoperative decompression of neural elements. SSI may be reduced with meticulous wound closure that minimizes dead space, drain placement, and the use of intra-wound antibiotics. Careful design of the fusion construct with consideration in spinal alignment and biomechanics can help to reduce the rate of junctional problems. Spine surgeons should be aware of these complications associated with PCF and the corresponding prevention strategies optimize patient outcomes.

Infection prevention in cervical spine surgery

Surgical site infections (SSI) following cervical spine surgery can lead to significant patient morbidity and costs. Prevention of SSIs is multifactorial and can be divided in to preoperative patient optimization and intraoperative surgical factors. We performed a literature review to identify methods that can be used to prevent SSI development specifically in the cervical spine. We also present specific surgical pearls and techniques that have the potential to significantly decrease rates of cervical SSIs.

Revision surgery in cervical spine

PURPOSE

To report the indications, presurgical planning, operative techniques, complications for making decisions in cervical revision surgery (CRS).

METHODS

Hundred and two patients underwent CRS over a four-year period. Epidemiological data, the type of first surgery, CRS surgical techniques and complications were retrospectively evaluated. Pain and neurological symptoms were assessed according to the validated Odom criteria. CRS indications were classified into five categories: adjacent segment disease (ASD), infection (INF), implant failure-pseudarthrosis (IFP), non-infectious complication, and deformity. Patients were classified into three groups, according to the approach of the index procedure: anterior, posterior, or 360°.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 63 years (59% males). ASD (40%), INF (23%), and IFP (22%) were observed in 85% of patients. CRS was performed with the same approach that was used in the index procedure in 64% of the anterior group and in 83% of the posterior group. In the 360° group, 64% of CRSs was performed with a posterior access. The early complication rate was 4.9%. The outcome was excellent in 19 patients (19%), good in 37 patients (36%), satisfactory in 27 patients (26%), and poor in six patients (6%). Thirteen patients (13%) were lost to follow-up. No implants failed radiologically or required surgical revision.

CONCLUSIONS

CRS required painstaking planning and mastery of a variety of surgical techniques. The results were rewarding in half and satisfactory in a quarter of the patients. The complication rate was lower than expected. In the most complex cases, referral to a specialized center is recommended. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Quality and Safety Improvement in Spine Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Review article.

OBJECTIVES

A narrative review of the literature on the current advances and limitations in quality and safety improvement initiatives in spine surgery.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed using Ovid MEDLINE focusing on 3 preidentified concepts: (1) quality and safety improvement, (2) reporting of outcomes and adverse events, and (3) prediction model and practice guidelines. The search was conducted under appropriate subject headings and using relevant text words. Articles were screened, and manuscripts relevant to this discussion were included in the narrative review.

RESULTS

Quality and safety improvement remains a major research focus attracting investigators from the global spine community. Multiple databases and registries have been developed for the purpose of generating data and monitoring the progress of quality and safety improvement initiatives. The development of various prediction models and clinical practice guidelines has helped shape the care of spine patients in the modern era. With the reported success of exemplary programs initiated by the Northwestern and Seattle Spine Team, other quality and safety improvement initiatives are anticipated to follow. However, despite these advancements, the reporting metrics for outcomes and adverse events remain heterogeneous in the literature.

CONCLUSION

Constant surveillance and continuous improvement of the quality and safety of spine treatments is imperative in modern health care. Although great advancement has been made, issues with reporting outcomes and adverse events persist, and improvement in this regard is certainly needed.

Can machine learning algorithms accurately predict discharge to nonhome facility and early unplanned readmissions following spinal fusion? Analysis of a national surgical registry

OBJECTIVE

Nonhome discharge and unplanned readmissions represent important cost drivers following spinal fusion. The authors sought to utilize different machine learning algorithms to predict discharge to rehabilitation and unplanned readmissions in patients receiving spinal fusion.

METHODS

The authors queried the 2012-2013 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) for patients undergoing cervical or lumbar spinal fusion. Outcomes assessed included discharge to nonhome facility and unplanned readmissions within 30 days after surgery. A total of 7 machine learning algorithms were evaluated. Predictive hierarchical clustering of procedure codes was used to increase model performance. Model performance was evaluated using overall accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), as well as sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. These performance metrics were computed for both the imputed and unimputed (missing values dropped) datasets.

RESULTS

A total of 59,145 spinal fusion cases were analyzed. The incidence rates of discharge to nonhome facility and 30-day unplanned readmission were 12.6% and 4.5%, respectively. All classification algorithms showed excellent discrimination (AUC > 0.80, range 0.85-0.87) for predicting nonhome discharge. The generalized linear model showed comparable performance to other machine learning algorithms. By comparison, all models showed poorer predictive performance for unplanned readmission, with AUC ranging between 0.63 and 0.66. Better predictive performance was noted with models using imputed data.

CONCLUSIONS

In an analysis of patients undergoing spinal fusion, multiple machine learning algorithms were found to reliably predict nonhome discharge with modest performance noted for unplanned readmissions. These results provide early evidence regarding the feasibility of modern machine learning classifiers in predicting these outcomes and serve as possible clinical decision support tools to facilitate shared decision making.

Extended Laminoplasty for Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Involving the C2 Segment

BACKGROUND

To evaluate effectiveness and safety of extended laminoplasty for the treatment of ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) involving the C2 segment.

METHODS

A total of 132 cases who accepted laminoplasty for treating the OPLL from 2010 to 2015 were included and divided into Group A (n = 26, with C2 OPLL and C2-C7 laminoplasty), Group B (n = 29, with C2 OPLL and C3-C7 laminoplasty), and Group C (n = 77, without C2 OPLL and had C3-C7 laminoplasty). Clinical and radiologic outcomes were compared among the 3 groups.

RESULTS

At the final visit, significant improvements in Japanese Orthopedic Association score, Neck Disability Index, Health-Related Quality-of-Life Short Form 36 Physical Component Summary, and Visual Analog Scale score in neck were observed in all 3 groups. However, all the C2-C7 Cobb angle, C2-C3 Cobb angle, sagittal vertical axis, and number of cases with cervical or segmental kyphosis in the 3 groups were not significantly changed. Although total blood loss, operation time, maximum Visual Analog Scale score in neck, incidence of axial pain, change of C2-C7, or sagittal vertical axis in Group A were all significantly larger than that in Group B or Group C, differences in neurologic recovery rate, Neck Disability Index, Health-Related Quality-of-Life Short Form 36 Physical Component Summary, change of the C2-C3 Cobb angle, and incidence of cervical or segmental malalignment among the 3 groups were not significant at the final visit.

CONCLUSIONS

If decompression indication for cases with OPLL involving the C2 segment was appropriate, extended laminoplasty up to the C2 segment could provide satisfactory neurologic recovery and would not accelerate cervical or segmental malalignment progression.

Reporting Methodology of Neurosurgical Studies Utilizing the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal

BACKGROUND

Use of large databases such as the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) has become increasingly common in neurosurgical research.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a critical appraisal and evaluation of the methodological reporting for studies in neurosurgical literature that utilize the ACS-NSQIP database.

METHODS

We queried Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed databases for all neurosurgical studies utilizing the ACS-NSQIP. We assessed each study according to number of criteria fulfilled with respect to Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement, REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected Health Data (RECORD) Statement, and Journal of American Medical Association–Surgical Section (JAMA-Surgery) Checklist. A separate analysis was conducted among papers published in core and noncore journals in neurosurgery according to Bradford's law.

RESULTS

A total of 117 studies were included. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) scores for number of fulfilled criteria for STROBE Statement, RECORD Statement, and JAMA-Surgery Checklist were 20 (IQR:19-21), 9 (IQR:8-9), and 6 (IQR:5-6), respectively. For STROBE Statement, RECORD Statement, and JAMA-Surgery Checklist, item 9 (potential sources of bias), item 13 (supplemental information), and item 9 (missing data/sensitivity analysis) had the highest number of studies with no fulfillment among all studies (56, 68, 50%), respectively. When comparing core journals vs noncore journals, no significant difference was found (STROBE, P = .94; RECORD, P = .24; JAMA-Surgery checklist, P = .60).

CONCLUSION

While we observed an overall satisfactory reporting of methodology, most studies lacked mention of potential sources of bias, data cleaning methods, supplemental information, and external validity. Given the pervasive role of national databases and registries for research and health care policy, the surgical community needs to ensure the credibility and quality of such studies that ultimately aim to improve the value of surgical care delivery to patients.

Effect of Obesity on the Development, Management, and Outcomes of Spinal Disorders

Obesity is a major public health issue in the United States, and rates of obesity continue to increase across the population. The association of obesity with degenerative spinal pathology underlies the observation that a substantial number of patients undergoing spine surgery are either overweight or obese. Obesity is a notable independent risk factor for both surgical and medical complications in the perioperative period and an important consideration in preoperative planning, intraoperative strategies, and postoperative management. Despite these increased risks, surgery in obese patients for a variety of degenerative conditions results in improvement in outcomes. Although obese patients may undergo gains that are absolutely lower than their nonobese counterparts, they still experience a positive treatment effect with surgery appropriate for their condition. An evidence-based approach to both preoperative and perioperative management of patients with obesity is not well established. The purpose of this article is to review the effect of obesity on the development, management, and outcomes of patients with spinal disorders and to provide data that may guide an evidence-based approach to care in this expanding patient population.

Factors Associated with Deep Surgical Site Infection Following Spinal Surgery: A Pilot Study

Introduction

Surgical site infection (SSI) is the most common healthcare-related infection in surgical patients. Patients who have undergone spinal surgeries and have contracted postoperative SSI face increased morbidity and mortality, which invariably leads to additional burden on the healthcare system and higher costs. The risk factors for the increase in SSI in patients who have undergone spinal surgery have been investigated in numerous studies but no studies have been performed in Malaysia. The aim of this pilot study is to determine the incidence and factors associated with deep SSIs in patients that have undergone spinal surgeries.

Methods

This retrospective study includes all patients who underwent spinal surgeries at Tengku Ampuan Afzan Hospital, Kuantan, from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2017. Patients with an active spinal infection, polytrauma, and open fractures were excluded from this study. Patient characteristics and laboratory investigations were extracted to determine the risk factors for deep SSI events. Associations between SSI and risk factors were analyzed with SPSS V21.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY).

Results

The univariate analysis indicated that fracture dislocation at the thoraco-lumbar junction (p=0.008) and a history of preoperative blood product transfusion (p=0.003) were associated with deep SSI. Other factors such as age (p=0.162), gender (p=0.262), body mass index (p=0.215), smoking status (0.272), number of vertebrae involved in the surgery (p=0.837), spinal cord involvement (p=0.259), postoperative hemoglobin reduction (p=0.816), and preoperative white blood cell count (p=0.278) were not associated with deep SSI.

Conclusions

This pilot study highlights the factors associated with deep SSI in spinal surgeries. A larger study is needed to further confirm these findings.

Perioperative complications of anterior decompression with fusion versus laminoplasty for the treatment of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: propensity score matching analysis using a nation-wide inpatient database

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Surgical treatment of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) has a high risk of various complications. Anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) and laminoplasty (LAMP) are the most representative surgical procedures. However, few studies have compared the two procedures in terms of perioperative surgical complications.

PURPOSE

To compare the perioperative complications post-ADF and LAMP for cervical OPLL using a large national inpatient database.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching analysis.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Overall, 8,718 (ADF/LAMP:1,333/7,485) patients who underwent surgery for cervical OPLL from April 1, 2010 to March 31, 2016 in hospitals using the diagnosis procedure combination were analyzed.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The occurrence of postoperative complications during hospitalization.

METHODS

We compared the perioperative systemic and local complications, reoperation rates, and costs between ADF and LAMP using propensity score matching analysis.

RESULTS

One-to-one matching resulted in 1,192 pairs of patients who underwent ADF and LAMP. The postoperative cardiovascular event rate was significantly higher (ADF/LAMP=1.9/0.8%, p=.013) in the ADF group. The incidence rates of dysphagia (similarly, 2.4/0.2%, p<.001), pneumonia (1.0/0.3%, p=.045), and spinal fluid leakage (2.4/0.4%, p<.001) were also higher in the ADF group, even after matching. The costs were also higher in the ADF group. However, surgical site infection (2.0/3.4%, p=.033) was significantly lower in the ADF group. No significant difference in the reoperation rates was found between the groups.

CONCLUSION

The present study, using a large nationwide database, demonstrated that perioperative complications were more common in the ADF group, but that surgical site infection (SSI) was more frequently observed in the LAMP group.

Body mass index and the risk of deep surgical site infection following posterior cervical instrumented fusion

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infection (SSI) following spine surgery is associated with increased morbidity, reoperation rates, hospital readmissions, and cost. The incidence of SSI following posterior cervical spine surgery is higher than anterior cervical spine surgery, with rates from 4.5% to 18%. It is well documented that higher body mass index (BMI) is associated with increased risk of SSI after spine surgery. There are only a few studies that examine the correlation of BMI and SSI after posterior cervical instrumented fusion (PCIF) using national databases, however, none that compare trauma and nontraumatic patients.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to determine the odds of developing SSI with increasing BMI after PCIF, and to determine the risk of SSI in both trauma and nontraumatic adult patients.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study of a prospective surgical database collected at one academic institution.

PATIENT SAMPLE

The patient sample is from a prospectively collected surgical registry from one institution, which includes patients who underwent PCIF from April 2011 to October 2017.

OUTCOME MEASURES

A SSI that required return to the operating room for surgical debridement.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study using a prospectively collected database of all spine surgeries performed at our institution from April 2011 to October 2017. We identified 1,406 patients, who underwent PCIF for both traumatic injuries and nontraumatic pathologies using International Classification of Diseases 9 and 10 procedural codes. Thirty-day readmission data were obtained. Patient's demographics, BMI, presence of diabetes, preoperative diagnosis, and surgical procedures performed were identified. Using logistic regression analysis, the risk of SSI associated with every one-unit increase in BMI was determined. This study received no funding. All the authors in this study report no conflict of interests relevant to this study.

RESULTS

Of the 1,406 patients identified, 1,143 met our inclusion criteria. Of those patients, 688 had PCIF for traumatic injuries and 454 for nontraumatic pathologies. The incidence of SSI for all patients, who underwent PCIF was 3.9%. There was no significant difference in the rate of SSI between our trauma group and nontraumatic group. There was a higher rate of infection in patients, who were diabetic and with BMI≥30 kg/m². The presence of both diabetes and BMI≥30 kg/m² had an added effect on the risk of developing SSI in all patients, who underwent PCIF. Additionally, logistic regression analysis showed that there was a positive difference measure between BMI and SSI. Our results demonstrate that for one-unit increase in BMI, the odds of having a SSI is 1.048 (95% CI: 1.007-1.092, p=.023).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that our rate of SSI after PCIF is within the range of what is cited in the literature. Interestingly, we did not see a statistically significant difference in the rate of infection between our trauma and nontrauma group. Overall, diabetes and elevated BMI are associated with increased risk of SSI in all patients, who underwent PCIF with even a higher risk in patient, who are both diabetic and obese. Obese patients should be counseled on elevated SSI risk after PCIF, and those with diabetes should be medically optimized before and after surgery when possible to minimize SSI.

Risk of Surgical Site Infection and Mortality Following Lumbar Fusion Surgery in Patients With Chronic Steroid Usage and Chronic Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective database analysis among Medicare beneficiaries OBJECTIVE.: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of chronic steroid use and chronic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection on rates of surgical site infection (SSI) and mortality in patients 65 years of age and older who were treated with lumbar spine fusion.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Systemic immunosuppression and infection focus elsewhere in the body are considered risk factors for SSI. Chronic steroid use and previous MRSA infection have been associated with an increased risk of SSI in some surgical procedures, but their impact on the risk of infection and mortality after lumbar fusion surgery has not been studied in detail.

METHODS

The PearlDiver insurance-based database (2005-2012) was queried to identify 360,005 patients over 65 years of age who had undergone lumbar spine fusion. Of these patients, those who had been taking oral glucocorticoids chronically and those with a history of chronic MRSA infection were identified. The rates of SSI and mortality in these two cohorts were compared with an age- and risk-factor matched control cohort and odds ratio (OR) was calculated.

RESULTS

Chronic oral steroid use was associated with a significantly increased risk of 1-year mortality [OR = 2.06, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.13-3.78, P = 0.018] and significantly increased risk of SSI at 90 days (OR = 1.74, 95% CI 1.33-1.92, P < 0.001) and 1 year (OR = 1.88, 95% CI 1.41-2.01, P < 0.001). Chronic MRSA infection was associated with a significantly increased risk of SSI at 90 days (OR = 6.99, 95% CI 5.61-9.91, P < 0.001) and 1 year (OR = 24.0, 95%CI 22.20-28.46, P < 0.001) but did not significantly impact mortality.

CONCLUSION

Patients over 65 years of age who are on chronic oral steroids or have a history of chronic MRSA infection are at a significantly increased risk of SSI following lumbar spine fusion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Development of a machine learning algorithm predicting discharge placement after surgery for spondylolisthesis

PURPOSE

We aimed to develop a machine learning algorithm that can accurately predict discharge placement in patients undergoing elective surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis.

METHODS

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was used to select patients that underwent surgical treatment for degenerative spondylolisthesis between 2009 and 2016. Our primary outcome measure was non-home discharge which was defined as any discharge not to home for which we grouped together all non-home discharge destinations including rehabilitation facility, skilled nursing facility, and unskilled nursing facility. We used Akaike information criterion to select the most appropriate model based on the outcomes of the stepwise backward logistic regression. Four machine learning algorithms were developed to predict discharge placement and were assessed by discrimination, calibration, and overall performance.

RESULTS

Nine thousand three hundred and thirty-eight patients were included. Median age was 63 (interquartile range [IQR] 54-71), and 63% (n = 5,887) were female. The non-home discharge rate was 18.6%. Our models included age, sex, diabetes, elective surgery, BMI, procedure, number of levels, ASA class, preoperative white blood cell count, and preoperative creatinine. The Bayes point machine was considered the best model based on discrimination (AUC = 0.753), calibration (slope = 1.111; intercept = - 0.002), and overall model performance (Brier score = 0.132).

CONCLUSION

This study has shown that it is possible to create a predictive machine learning algorithm with both good accuracy and calibration to predict discharge placement. Using our methodology, this type of model can be developed for many other conditions and (elective) treatments. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Effect of Obesity on Radiographic Alignment and Short-Term Complications After Surgical Treatment of Adult Cervical Deformity

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the 30-day complication incidence and 1-year radiographic correction in obese patients undergoing surgical treatment of cervical deformity.

METHODS

The patients were stratified according to World Health Organization's definition for obesity: obese, patients with a body mass index of ≥30 kg/m²; and nonobese, patients with a body mass index of <30 kg/m². The patients had undergone surgery for the treatment of cervical deformity. The patient baseline demographic, comorbidity, and radiographic data were compared between the 2 groups at baseline and 1 year postoperatively. The 30-day complication incidence was stratified according to complication severity (any, major, or minor), and type (cardiopulmonary, dysphagia, infection, neurological, and operative). Binary logistic regression models were used to assess the effect of obesity on developing those complications, with adjustment for patient age and levels fused.

RESULTS

A total of 124 patients were included, 53 obese and 71 nonobese patients. The 2 groups had a similar T1 slope minus cervical lordosis (obese, 37.2° vs. nonobese, 36.9°; P = 0.932) and a similar C2-C7 (-5.9° vs. -7.3°; P = 0.718) and C2-C7 (50.1 mm vs. 44.1 mm; P = 0.184) sagittal vertical axis. At the 1-year follow-up examination, the T1 pelvic angle (1.0° vs. -3.1°; P = 0.021) and C2-S1 sagittal vertical axis (-5.9 mm vs. -35.0 mm; P = 0.036) were different, and the T1 spinopelvic inclination (-1.0° vs. -2.9°; P = 0.123) was similar. The obese patients had a greater risk of overall short-term complications (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-6.1) and infectious complications (odds ratio, 5.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-25.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Obese patients had a 5 times greater odds of developing infections after surgery for adult cervical deformity. Obese patients also showed significantly greater pelvic anteversion after cervical correction.

Perioperative Catheter Use as a Risk Factor for Surgical Site Infection After Cervical Surgery: An Analysis of 39,893 Patients

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the relationship between perioperative use of catheters and the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) after cervical spine surgery, after adjusting for patient's age, severity of comorbidity, surgical approach, and use of instrumentation.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Although the association between SSI and the use of arterial catheters (ACs) or central venous catheters (CVCs) is established in cardiac surgery, the relation in the cervical spine was not well elucidated.

METHODS

A private insurance database was analyzed. The incidence of SSI within 1 month postoperatively and the crude odds ratio (cOR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated based on the use of catheters. Subsequently, logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent factors for SSI. Independent variables of the regression analysis included Charlson comorbidity index with the score of age, the use of CVC, the use of AC, surgical approach (anterior or posterior), and instrumentation (fusion or decompression alone).

RESULTS

A total of 39,893 patients received cervical surgery between 2007 and 2015. Of these, 1.6% patients experienced an SSI. The incidence of SSI in patients treated with and without AC was 3.2% and 1.3%, respectively (cOR 2.44, 95% CI: 2.05-2.99, P < 0.001). Likewise, incidence of SSI in patients with and without CVC was 5.8% and 1.5%, respectively (cOR 2.61, 95% CI: 2.97-5.55, P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the adjusted OR was 1.66 in CVC use (95% CI: 1.08-2.46, P = 0.016), whereas the AC use was not significant variable (P = 0.086).

CONCLUSION

The use of CVC can be a potential risk factor for SSI regardless of age, severity of comorbidity, surgical approach, or presence of instrumentation. Although the essential benefits of catheters are undisputed, our data can bring up the surgeon's attention to appropriate management of the CVC.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Predictors of Postoperative Complications After Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Introduction:

The aim of this study was to determine the predictors of 30-day postoperative complications for surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis (LSSDS) in patients undergoing decompression and fusion or decompression alone.

Methods:

A retrospective review of 253 unique patients undergoing surgical intervention for LSSDS in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was conducted.

Results:

The overall 30-day postoperative complication rate for the population was 16.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.0% to 21.0%). Transfusions (8.9%), readmissions (5.9%), and unplanned returns to the OR (3.6%) were the most frequently observed complications across the population. ASA score and surgical time were found to be significant predictors of 30-day complications (ASA score: OR = 1.971; 95% CI, 1.077 to 3.609; P = 0.028; surgical time: OR = 1.006; 95% CI, 1.003 to 1.010; P < 0.001). Holding all other variables constant, multilevel cases, the inclusion of a fusion procedure, and body mass index were not found to be significant predictors of 30-day complications (P = 0.917, P = 0.464, and P = 0.572, respectively).

Discussion and Conclusions:

ASA score and OR time are leading indicators of complications, specifically for the LSSDS patient population. These are two easily attainable data points that are available for all surgical cases and could be used a clinical red flag for potential complications.

The relationship between surgical site drains and reoperation for wound-related complications following posterior cervical spine surgery: a multicenter retrospective study

OBJECTIVEUse of surgical site drains following posterior cervical spine surgery is variable, and its impact on outcomes remains controversial. Studies of drain use in the lumbar spine have suggested that drains are not associated with reduction of reoperations for wound infection or hematoma. There is a paucity of studies examining this relationship in the cervical spine, where hematomas and infections can have severe consequences. This study aims to examine the relationship between surgical site drains and reoperation for wound-related complications following posterior cervical spine surgery.METHODSThis study is a multicenter retrospective review of 1799 consecutive patients who underwent posterior cervical decompression with instrumentation at 4 tertiary care centers between 2004 and 2016. Demographic and perioperative data were analyzed for associations with drain placement and return to the operating room.RESULTSOf 1799 patients, 1180 (65.6%) had a drain placed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified history of diabetes (OR 1.37, p = 0.03) and total number of levels operated (OR 1.32, p < 0.001) as independent predictors of drain placement. Rates of reoperation for any surgical site complication were not different between the drain and no-drain groups (4.07% vs 3.88%, p = 0.85). Similarly, rates of reoperation for surgical site infection (1.61% vs 2.58%, p = 0.16) and hematoma (0.68% vs 0.48%, p = 0.62) were not different between the drain and no-drain groups. However, after adjusting for history of diabetes and the number of operative levels, patients with drains had significantly lower odds of returning to the operating room for surgical site infection (OR 0.48, p = 0.04) but not for hematoma (OR 1.22, p = 0.77).CONCLUSIONSThis large study characterizes current practice patterns in the utilization of surgical site drains during posterior cervical decompression and instrumentation. Patients with drains placed did not have lower odds of returning to the operating room for postoperative hematoma. However, the authors' data suggest that patients with drains may be less likely to return to the operating room for surgical site infection, although the absolute number of infections in the entire population was small, limiting the analysis.

Surgical Site Infections in Spine Surgery: Preoperative Prevention Strategies to Minimize Risk

STUDY DESIGN

Literature review.

OBJECTIVES

A review of the literature identifying preoperative risk factors for developing surgical site infections after spine surgery and discussion of the preventive strategies to minimize risks.

METHODS

A review of the literature and synthesis of the data to provide an updated review on the preoperative management of surgical site infection.

RESULTS

Preoperative prevention strategies of reducing surgical site infections in spine surgery remains a challenging problem. Careful mitigation of modifiable patient comorbidities, blood glucose control, smoking, obesity, and screening for pathologic microorganisms is paramount to reduce this risk. Individualized antibiotic regimens, skin preparation, and hand hygiene also play a critical role in surgical site infection prevention.

CONCLUSIONS

This review of the literature discusses the preoperative preventive strategies and risk management techniques of surgical site infections in spine surgery. Significant decreases in surgical site infections after spine surgery have been noted over the past decade due to increased awareness and implementation of the prevention strategies described in this article. However, it is important to recognize that prevention of surgical site infection requires a system-wide approach that includes the hospital system, the surgeon, and the patient. Continued efforts should focus on system-wide implementation programs including careful patient selection, individualized antibiotic treatment algorithms, identification of pathologic organisms, and preoperative decolonization programs to further prevent surgical site infections and optimize patient outcomes.

Surgical Site Infection in Spine Surgery: Who Is at Risk?

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective literature review of spine surgical site infection (SSI).

OBJECTIVE

To perform a review of SSI risk factors and more specifically, categorize them into patient and surgical factors.

METHODS

A review of published literature on SSI risk factors in adult spine surgery was performed. We included studies that reported risk factors for SSI in adult spinal surgery. Excluded are pediatric patient populations, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Overall, we identified 72 cohort studies, 1 controlled-cohort study, 1 matched-cohort study, 1 matched-paired cohort study, 12 case-controlled studies (CCS), 6 case series, and 1 cross-sectional study.

RESULTS

Patient-associated risk factors-diabetes mellitus, obesity (body mass index >35 kg/m²), subcutaneous fat thickness, multiple medical comorbidities, current smoker, and malnutrition were associated with SSI. Surgical associated factors-preoperative radiation/postoperative blood transfusion, combined anterior/posterior approach, surgical invasiveness, or levels of instrumentation were associated with increased SSI. There is mixed evidence of age, duration of surgery, surgical team, intraoperative blood loss, dural tear, and urinary tract infection/urinary catheter in association with SSI.

CONCLUSION

SSIs are associated with many risk factors that can be patient or surgically related. Our review was able to identify important modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors that can be essential in surgical planning and discussion with patients.

Risk Factors and Prevention of Surgical Site Infections Following Spinal Procedures

STUDY DESIGN

Focused literature review.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this article was to help identify potential risk factors as well as strategies to help prevent surgical site infections (SSIs) in spine surgery.

METHODS

An article search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane database of systematic reviews using the terms "surgery" OR "surgical" AND "spine" OR "spinal" AND "infection". Systematic review articles, meta-analyses, and clinical trials with more than 100 patients were reviewed.

RESULTS

Both patient and perioperative factors contribute to the development of SSIs. Patient factors such as smoking, obesity, diabetes, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization, and malnutrition are all modifiable risk factors that can lead to SSIs. Procedural steps, including preoperative MRSA screening and treatment for colonization, preoperative antibiotics, skin preparation, minimizing operative time, antibiotic or betadine irrigation, avoiding personnel turnover, and postoperative wound care have also been shown to decrease infection rates.

CONCLUSION

There are several measures a spine practitioner may be able to take in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative settings. Protocols to counsel patients regarding modification of preexisting risk factors and ensure adequate antimicrobial therapy in the perioperative period may be developed to reduce SSIs in spine surgery.

Chronic preoperative opioid use is a risk factor for increased complications, resource use, and costs after cervical fusion

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

As health-care transitions to value-based models, there has been an increased focus on patient factors that can influence peri- and postoperative adverse events, resource use, and costs. Many studies have reported risk factors for systemic complications after cervical fusion, but none have studied chronic opioid therapy (COT) as a risk factor.

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to answer the following questions from a large cohort of patients who underwent primary cervical fusion for degenerative pathology: (1) What is the patient profile associated with preoperative COT? (2) Is preoperative COT a risk factor for 90-day systemic complications, emergency department (ED) visits, readmission, and 1-year adverse events? (3) What are the risk factors and 1-year adverse events related to long-term postoperative opioid use? (4) How much did payers reimburse for management of complications and adverse events?

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective review of Humana commercial insurance data (2007-Q3 2015).

PATIENT SAMPLE

The patient sample included 29,101 patients undergoing primary cervical fusion for degenerative pathology.

METHODS

Patients and procedures of interest were included using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) coding. Patients with opioid prescriptions for >6 months before surgery were considered as having preoperative COT. Patients with continued opioid use until 1-year after surgery were considered as long-term users. Descriptive analysis of patient cohorts has been done. Multiple-variable logistic regression analyses adjusting for approach, number of levels of surgery, discharge disposition, and comorbidities were done to answer first three study questions. Reimbursement data from insurers have been reported to answer our fourth study question.

RESULTS

Of the entire cohort, 6,643 (22.8%) had preoperative COT. Preoperative COT was associated with a higher risk of 90-day wound complications (odds ratio [OR] 1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16-1.66), all-cause 90-day ED visits (adjusted OR 1.22, 95% CI: 1.13-1.32), and pain-related ED visits (adjusted OR 1.39, 95% CI: 1.24-1.55). Patients who had preoperative COT were more likely to receive epidural or facet joint injections within 1 year after surgery (adjusted OR 1.68, 95% CI: 1.47-1.92). These patients were also more likely to undergo a repeat cervical fusion within a year than patients who did not have preoperative COT (adjusted OR 1.21, 95% CI: 1.01-1.43). Preoperative COT had a higher likelihood of long-term use after surgery (adjusted OR 4.72, 95% CI: 4.41-5.06). Long-term opioid use after surgery was associated with a higher risk of new-onsetconstipation (adjusted OR 1.34, 95% CI: 1.22-1.48). The risk of complications and adverse events was not found to be significant in patients with <3 months of preoperative opioid use or those who stopped opioids for at least 6 weeks before surgery. The cost of additional resource use for medications, ED visits, constipation, injections, and revision fusion ranged from $623 to $27,360 per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative opioid use among patients who underwent cervical fusion increases complication rates, postoperative opioid usage, health-care resource use, and costs. These risks may be reduced by restricting the duration of preoperative opioid use or weaning off before surgery. Better understanding and management of pain in the preoperative period with judicious use of opioids is critical to enhance outcomes after cervical fusion surgery.

Risk factors for infectious complications following transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy

Objective

To explore risk factors of infectious complications following transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUSPB).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 1,203 patients with suspected prostate cancer who underwent TRUSPB at our center between December 2012 and December 2016. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and data regarding complications were collected, and then univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent risk factors for infectious complications after prostate biopsy.

Results

Multivariate logistic analysis demonstrated that body mass index (BMI) (OR=2.339, 95% CI 2.029–2.697, P<0.001), history of diabetes (OR=2.203, 95% CI 1.090–4.455, P=0.028), and preoperative catheterization (OR=2.303, 95% CI 1.119–4.737, P=0.023) were risk factors for infection after prostate biopsy. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for infectious complications was 0.930 (95% CI 0.907–0.953, P<0.001). BMI=28.196 kg/m² was the best cut-off threshold for predicting infection after TRUSPB.

Conclusion

BMI >28.196 kg/m², history of diabetes, and preoperative catheterization are independent risk factors for infection after prostate biopsy.

Short-term outcomes following posterior cervical fusion among octogenarians with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a NSQIP database analysis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Degenerative changes in the cervical spine occur in an age-dependent manner. As the US population continues to age, the incidence of age-dependent, multilevel, degenerative cervical pathologies is expected to increase. Similarly, the average age of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) will likely trend upward. Posterior cervical fusion (PCF) is often the treatment modality of choice in the management of multilevel cervical spine disease. Although outcomes following anterior cervical fusion for degenerative disease have been studied among older patients (aged 80 years and older), it is unknown if these results extend to octogenarian patients undergoing PCF for the surgical management of CSM.

PURPOSE

The present study aimed to quantify surgical outcomes following PCF for the treatment of CSM among the octogenarian patient population compared with patients younger than 80 years old.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

This was a retrospective study that used the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP).

PATIENT SAMPLE

The sample included patients aged 60-89 who had CSM and who underwent PCF from 2012 to 2014.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The outcome measures were multimorbidity, prolonged length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition (to home or skilled nursing/rehabilitation facility), 30-day all-cause readmission, and 30-day reoperation.

METHODS

The NSQIP database was queried for patients with CSM (International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code 721.1) aged 60-89 who underwent PCF (Current Procedural Terminology code 22600) from 2012 to 2014. Cohorts were defined by age group (60-69, 70-79, 80-89). Data were collected on gender, race, elective or emergent status, inpatientor outpatient status, where patients were admitted from (home vs. skilled nursing facility), American Society of Anesthesiologists class, comorbidities, and single- or multilevel fusion. After controllingfor these variables, logistic regression analysis was used to compare outcome measures in the different age groups.

RESULTS

A total of 819 patients with CSM who underwent PCF (416 aged 60-69, 320 aged 70-79, and 83 aged 80-89) were identified from 2012 to 2014. Of the PCF procedures, 79.7% were multilevel. There were no significant differences in the odds of multimorbidity, prolonged LOS, readmission, or reoperation when comparing octogenarian patients with CSM with patients aged 60-69 or 70-79. Patients aged 60-69 and 70-79 were significantly more likely to be discharged to home than patients over 80 (odds ratio [OR] 4.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-10.4, p<.0001, and OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.1-6.4, p=.0005, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with patients aged 60-69 and 70-79, octogenarian patients with CSM were significantly more likely to be discharged to a location other than home following PCF. After controlling for patient comorbidities and demographics, 80- to 89-year-old patients with CSM who underwent PCF did not differ in other outcomes when compared with the other age cohorts. These results can improve preoperative risk counseling and surgical decision-making.

Cervical Spine Osteomyelitis: A Systematic Review of Instrumented Fusion in the Modern Era

OBJECTIVE

For cases of cervical osteomyelitis that require surgery, concern has continued regarding instrumentation owing to the potential for bacterial seeding of the hardware. We performed a systematic review of the current data.

METHODS

A search was performed using Medline, Embase, and Ovid for articles using the keywords "cervical osteomyelitis/spondylodiscitis" and "fusion" or "instrumentation" reported from 1980 to 2017. Prospective or retrospective studies describing ≥2 patients with cervical osteomyelitis were included in the analysis; non-English reports were excluded. Individual patients were excluded from the final analysis if they had previously undergone spinal instrumentation.

RESULTS

A total of 239 patients from 24 studies met our criteria. Surgical approaches were classified as anterior-only, combined anteroposterior, and posterior-only for 64.8%, 31.9%, and 3.3% of the patients respectively. Of the patients treated using an anterior-only approach, 76.5% had received anterior plating and 85.3%, a cage or spacer implants. Of the patients who had undergone combined approaches, 85.1% underwent circumferential fixation and 14.9%, anterior debridement with posterior instrumentation. The follow-up period ranged from 6 weeks to 11 years (mean, 31.0 months). All the studies reporting the fusion rates, except for 1, reported a 100% fusion rate. The reported rates of pain improvement and neurologic recovery were favorable. The incidence of hardware failure and wound complications was 4.6% and 4.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite placing instrumentation during active infection, the rates of hardware failure and wound complications were comparable to those of elective cervical spine procedures. These results suggest that surgical intervention with instrumentation is a safe treatment option for patients with cervical spine osteomyelitis.

Predictive Risk Factors of Nonhome Discharge Following Elective Posterior Cervical Fusion

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors that are predictive of nonhome discharge after elective posterior cervical fusion.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult patients who underwent elective posterior cervical fusion using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2010 to 2014. Patients were divided into 2 groups: home discharge and nonhome discharge. Univariate analysis was performed to compare incidence of 30-day postoperative complications between groups. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify complications that were predictive of nonhome discharge.

RESULTS

The cohort included 2875 patients; 24.1% were discharged to a nonhome facility, including skilled and nonskilled care facilities, nursing homes, assisted living facilities, and rehabilitation facilities. Nonhome discharge was associated with higher rates of 30-day pulmonary complication, cardiac complication, venous thromboembolism, urinary tract infection, blood transfusion, sepsis, and reoperation. Significant predictors of nonhome discharge were wound complication (odds ratio [OR] = 1.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-2.80; P = 0.024), pulmonary complication (OR = 3.61; 95% CI, 1.96-6.63; P < 0.001), cardiac complication (OR = 6.13; 95% CI, 1.61-23.4; P = 0.008), venous thromboembolism (OR = 2.97; 95% CI, 1.43-6.19; P = 0.004), urinary tract infection (OR = 2.69; 95% CI, 1.50-4.82; P < 0.001), blood transfusion (OR = 1.70; 95% CI, 1.20-2.39; P = 0.003), sepsis (OR = 2.75; 95% CI, 1.25-6.02; P = 0.012), and prolonged length of stay (OR = 4.07; 95% CI, 3.34-4.95; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Early identification of patients who are at high risk for nonhome discharge is important to implement early comprehensive discharge planning protocols and minimize hospital-acquired conditions related to prolonged length of stay and associated health care costs.

Decreased rate of surgical site infection after spinal surgery with instrumentation using bundled approach including surveillance and intrawound vancomycin application

Surgical site infections (SSIs) increase the risk of mortality, postsurgery, extend hospital stay, and increase the costs of healthcare. Our aim in this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary, evidence-based, surveillance program combined with intrawound application of vancomycin in lowering the incidence rate of SSI after spinal surgery with instrumentation.We conducted a retrospective analysis of 637 patients who underwent spinal fusion with instrumentation in our institution at 3 different time periods: prior to our surveillance program (control group), surveillance only (surveillance group 1), and surveillance combined with intrawound vancomycin application (surveillance group 2). The following covariates were considered in the evaluation of between-group differences in SSI rate: sex, age, surgical site, National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance (NNIS) risk index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification, and other health comorbidities. The causative organism in cases of SSI was confirmed in all cases.The rate of SSI was significantly lower in the surveillance group 2 (1.4%) than in the control group (4.6%; P = .04). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, steroid use (adjusted odd's ratio (OR), 6.06; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.45-23.6) and operative time (adjusted OR.1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.01) were identified as independent risk factors of SSI. Staphylococcus species and Propionibacterium acnes were the principal causative organisms.A bundled approach that includes surveillance and intrawound application of vancomycin is an effective strategy to lower the risk of SSI after spinal fusion with instrumentation. The use of steroid and longer operative time are risk factors of SSI.Our findings support the implementation of a program of surveillance, combined with intrawound vancomycin application, to reduce the incidence rate of SSIs in spinal surgery.

Age Stratification of 30-Day Postoperative Outcomes Following Excisional Laminectomy for Extradural Cervical and Thoracic Tumors

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate age as an independent predictive factor for perioperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing surgical decompression for metastatic cervical and thoracic spinal tumors using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database from 2011 to 2014.

METHODS

We identified 1673 adult patients undergoing excisional laminectomy of cervical and thoracic extradural tumors. Patients were stratified into quartiles based on age, with Q1 including patients aged 18 to 49 years, Q2 including patients aged 50 to 60 years, Q3 including patients aged 61 to 69 years, and Q4 including patients ≥70 years. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to examine the association between age and 30-day perioperative morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

Age was an independent risk factor for 30-day venous thromboembolism (VTE) and reoperation. Patients in Q3 for age had nearly a 4 times increased risk of VTE than patients in Q1 (odds ratio [OR] 3.97; 95% CI 1.91-8.25; P < .001). However, there was no significant difference in VTE between patients in Q4 and Q1 (P = .069). Patients in Q2 (OR 1.99; 95% CI 1.06-3.74; P = .032) and Q4 (OR 2.18; 95% CI 1.06-4.52; P = .036) for age had a 2 times increased risk of reoperation compared with patients in Q1.

CONCLUSIONS

Age was an independent predictive factor for perioperative VTE and reoperation, but there was no clear age-dependent relationship between increasing age and the risk of these perioperative complications.

The association of inflammatory bowel disease and immediate postoperative outcomes following lumbar fusion

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates the prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) at more than 3.1 million people. As diagnostic techniques and treatment options for IBD improve, the prevalence of IBD is expected to increase. For spine surgeons, patients with IBD have a unique complication profile because patients with IBD may present with poor nutritional status and because the medications used to manage IBD have been associated with poor vertebral bone mineralization and immunosuppression. Presently, there are very limited data regarding perioperative outcomes among patients with IBD who undergo spinal surgery. The present study begins to address this knowledge gap by describing trends in patients with IBD undergoing lumbar fusion and by quantifying the association between IBD and immediate postoperative outcomes using a large, national database.

PURPOSE

To advance our understanding of the potential pitfalls and risks associated with lumbar fusion surgery in patients with IBD.

DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective cross-sectional analysis.

PATIENT SAMPLE

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was queried from 1998 to 2011 to identify adult patients (18+) who underwent primary lumbar fusion operations using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) coding.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Incidence of lumbar fusion procedures, prevalence of IBD, complication rates, length of stay, and total hospital charges.

METHODS

The annual number of primary lumbar fusion operations performed between 1998 and 2011 was obtained from the NIS database. Patients younger than 18 years of age were excluded. The prevalence of IBD in this population (both Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis) was determined using ICD-9-CM codes. Logistic regression models were estimated to determine the association between IBD and the odds of postoperative medical and surgical complications, while controlling for patient demographics, comorbidity burden, and hospital characteristics. The complex survey design of the NIS was taken into account by clustering on hospitals and assuming an exchangeable working correlation using the discharge weights supplied by the NIS. We accounted for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni correction and an alpha level for statistical significance of . 0028.

RESULTS

The prevalence of IBD is increasing among patients undergoing lumbar fusion, from 0.21% of all patients undergoing lumbar fusion in 1998 to 0.48% of all patients undergoing lumbar fusion in 2011 (p<.001). The odds of experiencing a postoperative medical or surgical complication were not significantly different when comparing patients with IBD with control patients without IBD after controlling for patient demographics, comorbidity burden, and hospital characteristics (adjusted odds ratio=1.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99-1.3, p=.08). On multivariable analysis, the presence of IBD in patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery was associated with longer length of stay and greater hospitalization charges.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients who underwent lumbar fusion, IBD is a rare comorbidity that is becoming increasingly more common. Importantly, patients with IBD were not at increased risk of postoperative complications. Spine surgeons should be prepared to treat more patients with IBD and should incorporate the present findings into preoperative risk counseling and patient selection.