51
|
Fernandes A, Wang D, Domachowske JB, Suryadevara M. Vaccine knowledge, attitudes, and recommendation practices among health care providers in New York State. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2023; 19:2173914. [PMID: 36749617 PMCID: PMC10026857 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2173914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Community-wide vaccine uptake remains sub-optimal. Healthcare provider (HCP) vaccine recommendations influence patient vaccination; however, provider vaccine recommendation behavior is highly influenced by one's own vaccine attitudes and/or knowledge. We aim to describe vaccine knowledge, attitudes, and recommendation practices (KAP) among New York State HCPs. A survey to assess HCP KAP was developed and electronically distributed to NYS members of national medical organizations via their local chapter administrators. Descriptive statistical methods were used to define provider KAP. A total of 864 surveys were included, 500 (60%) and 336 (40%) primary and specialty care providers, respectively. Eighty-one percent (402/499) of primary care providers (PCPs) report encountering vaccine hesitant patients daily or weekly. Of the 500 PCPs who responded, only 204 (41%) stated strong agreement with confidence in their communications with vaccine hesitant patients. HCPs who correctly answered all four knowledge questions were more likely to self-report routine recommendations of standard vaccines to all patients when compared to those who correctly answered fewer questions (489/588 (83%) vs 135/241 (56%), p < .05). HCPs were more likely to routinely recommend standard vaccines to all patients if they also report initiating vaccine discussion (476/485 (98%) vs 148/344 (43%), p < .05) and reviewing and recommending vaccinations at each encounter (315/320 (98%) vs 308/508 (61%), p < .05). Vaccine hesitancy exists across healthcare specialties and provider roles. Focused interventions should include reaching all HCPs to promote vaccinations for disease prevention, tailoring messages to reduce HCP vaccine misperceptions, and increasing awareness of evidence-based office strategies known to facilitate immunizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dongliang Wang
- Public Health and Preventive Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
52
|
Adella GA, Ambaw Kassie G, Yosef Gebrekidan A, Atnafu Gebeyehu N, Mesele Gesese M, Chekol Abebe E, Asmamaw Mengstie M, Abdu Seid M, Dagnaw Tegegne K, Fenta Feleke S, Asmamaw Dejenie T, Bantie B, Moges N, Solomon Y, Aderajew Zemene M, Mengist Dessie A, Tenaw Anley D. Knowledge and attitude towards Covid-19 vaccine in Ethiopia: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2023; 19:2179224. [PMID: 36882983 PMCID: PMC10026859 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2179224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/09/2023] Open
Abstract
The biggest threat to the effectiveness of vaccination initiatives is a lack of information about and trust in immunization. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of knowledge of and positive attitudes toward the COVID-19 vaccine in Ethiopia. PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, EMBASE, and the Ethiopian University online library were searched. To look for heterogeneity, I2 values were computed and an overall estimated analysis was carried out. Although 2108 research articles were retrieved, only 12 studies with a total of 5,472 participants met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled estimates of participants with good knowledge of and positive attitudes toward the COVID-19 vaccine were found to be 65.06% (95% CI: 56.69-73.44%; I2 = 82.3%) and 60.15% (95% CI: 45.56-74.74%; I2 = 89.4%), respectively, revealing that there is a gap in knowledge of and positive attitudes toward the COVID-19 vaccine in Ethiopia. A holistic and multi-sectoral partnership is necessary for a successful COVID-19 vaccination campaign.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Getachew Asmare Adella
- School of Public Health, College of Health Science and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia
| | - Gizachew Ambaw Kassie
- School of Public Health, College of Health Science and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia
| | - Amanuel Yosef Gebrekidan
- School of Public Health, College of Health Science and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia
| | - Natnael Atnafu Gebeyehu
- School of Midwifery, College of Health Science and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia
| | - Molalegn Mesele Gesese
- School of Midwifery, College of Health Science and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia
| | - Endeshaw Chekol Abebe
- Department of Biochemistry, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Misganaw Asmamaw Mengstie
- Department of Biochemistry, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Mohammed Abdu Seid
- Unit of Physiology, Department of Biomedical Science, College of Health Science, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Kirubel Dagnaw Tegegne
- Department of nursing, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia
| | - Sefineh Fenta Feleke
- Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia
| | - Tadesse Asmamaw Dejenie
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| | - Berihun Bantie
- Department of Comprehensive Nursing, College of Health sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Natnael Moges
- Department of Pediatrics and Child Health Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Yenealem Solomon
- Department of Medical Laboratory Science, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Melkamu Aderajew Zemene
- Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Anteneh Mengist Dessie
- Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Denekew Tenaw Anley
- Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Abubakar AT, Suleiman K, Ahmad SI, Yahaya SS, Bello UI, Suleiman BA, Haladu SA, Al-Mustapha AI, Abubakar MI. Acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine and associated factors among healthcare workers in Katsina state: a cross-sectional study in Northwest Nigeria. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e063281. [PMID: 38135321 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Healthcare workers were prioritised to receive the COVID-19 vaccine in Nigeria. Administration of COVID-19 vaccination in Nigeria was challenging because of a lack of trust in vaccine safety and vaccine effectiveness among healthcare workers, who are expected to provide reliable information about vaccines and vaccine-preventable diseases in the communities. Hence, their acceptance and attitudes towards COVID-19 preventive practices could influence the acceptance of the vaccine by the local population. This cross-sectional study assessed the acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine among healthcare workers in Katsina State. We predicted the variables that increased the vaccine acceptance using logistic regression analysis. SETTING This hospital-based study was conducted at primary, secondary and tertiary healthcare facilities in Nigeria. PARTICIPANTS A total of 793 healthcare workers were included in this study. Of these, 65.4% (n=519) were male. OUTCOME MEASURES To assess acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine measures, and factors increasing acceptance among healthcare workers. RESULTS Of the healthcare workers, 80% (638) were tested for the SARS-CoV-2, of whom 10.8% (n=65) tested positive. Approximately 97% (n=765) of them believed that the COVID-19 vaccine was safe, and 90% (n=714) received the first dose of the vaccine. Healthcare workers between 30 and 39 years were more likely to accept the vaccine (aOR: 7.06; 95% CI 2.36 to 21.07; p<0.001). Those who had been tested for COVID-19 were more likely (aOR:7.64; 95% CI 3.62 to 16.16; p<0.001) to accept the vaccine. CONCLUSIONS Our findings showed that the age and prior COVID-19 testing were the main factors influencing the acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine. There was high acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine among healthcare workers in Katsina State, Nigeria. Future studies should focus on the completion of doses and serological testing for immunity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kabir Suleiman
- Epidemiology, Katsina State Primary Healthcare Agency, Katsina, Nigeria
| | - Suleiman Idris Ahmad
- African Field Epidemiology Network Nigeria, Abuja, Nigeria
- Nigeria Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program, Abuja, Nigeria
| | | | | | | | | | - Ahmad Ibrahim Al-Mustapha
- Department of Veterinary Services, Kwara State Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Ilorin, Nigeria
| | - Musa Imam Abubakar
- REDISSE Project, Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Abuja, Nigeria
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Dimitrova V, Stoitsova S, Rangelov V, Raycheva R, Martinova M, Nenova G, Iakimova M, Georgieva I, Georgiev I, Krumova S, Minkova A, Vladimirova N, Nikolaeva-Glomb L. High vaccine confidence and strong approval of the mandatory immunization schedule among Bulgarian general practitioners in 2022. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2023; 19:2265640. [PMID: 37846744 PMCID: PMC10583620 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2265640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023] Open
Abstract
In a context of recently decreasing childhood immunization coverage and low uptake of COVID-19 vaccines in Bulgaria, this study measures vaccine hesitancy among general practitioners (GPs) in the country, as they are central to forming patients' attitudes. In 2022, a face-to-face survey was conducted through a simple random sample from an exhaustive national database of Bulgarian GPs. This study measured attitudes on vaccine importance, safety, and effectiveness, and attitudes toward the Bulgarian immunization schedule. Information was collected on demographic and GP practice characteristics and possible predictors of vaccine confidence in order to test for associations with attitudes toward immunization. GP attitudes toward vaccines and the immunization schedule in Bulgaria were generally positive. Among 358 respondents, 351 (98%,95%CI96-99%) strongly agreed/agreed that vaccines are important, 352 (98%,95%CI96-99%) that vaccines are effective, and 341 (95%,95%CI93-97%) that vaccines are safe. 347 respondents (97%,95%CI95-98%) affirmed that "it's good that vaccines from the children's immunization schedule are mandatory", and 331 (92%,95%CI89-95%) agreed with the statement "Bulgaria's childhood immunization has my approval". Trust in information from official institutions was among the strongest predictors of vaccine confidence. Respondents' vaccine confidence levels are within the ranges reported by GPs in other European countries and above those reported within the general Bulgarian population. GPs' vaccine confidence is highly associated with trust in official institutions. It is important to maintain trust in official institutions and to support GPs in communicating vaccine knowledge with patients so that vaccine hesitancy in the general population is countered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veronika Dimitrova
- Department of Sociology, Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Savina Stoitsova
- Department of Epidemiology, National Center of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Vanya Rangelov
- Department of Epidemiology, National Center of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Sofia, Bulgaria
- Department of Epidemiology and Disaster Medicine, Medical University Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Ralitsa Raycheva
- Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Medical University Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Maria Martinova
- Communities and Identities Department, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Gergana Nenova
- Department of Sociology, Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Milena Iakimova
- Department of Sociology, Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Irina Georgieva
- Department of Virology, National Center for Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Ivo Georgiev
- Department of Epidemiology, National Center of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Stefka Krumova
- Department of Virology, National Center for Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Antoaneta Minkova
- Department of Epidemiology, National Center of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Nadezhda Vladimirova
- Department of Epidemiology, National Center of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | | |
Collapse
|
55
|
Arzilli G, Stacchini L, Casigliani V, Mazzilli S, Aquino F, Oradini-Alacreu A, Bruni B, Quattrone F, Papini F, Sironi D, Porretta AD, Privitera GP, Rizzo C, Tavoschi L, Lopalco PL. Assessing vaccine hesitancy and health literacy using a new Italian vaccine confidence index and a modified Italian medical term recognition test: A cross-sectional survey on Italian parents. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2023; 19:2271765. [PMID: 37906161 PMCID: PMC10760377 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2271765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023] Open
Abstract
The decline in children's vaccination coverage and the resurgence of preventable infectious diseases draw attention to parents' vaccine hesitancy. Our study introduces two validated tools to independently assess vaccine hesitancy and health literacy among parents with school-age children. We developed a Vaccine Confidence Index (VCI) from 10 Likert items, exploring their relationships through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. We modified the IMETER (Italian medical term recognition test) to measure health literacy. We assessed the internal consistency of the modified IMETER and the 10 Likert items using Cronbach's alpha test (α) and McDonald's omega total coefficient (ω) with good results (ω = 0.92, α = 0.90; ω = 0.87, α = 0.82 respectively). We used these tools within a questionnaire conducted on 743 parents recruited from pediatric clinic waiting rooms in Italy, collecting demographic data, information sources on vaccines and vaccine-preventable diseases knowledge. The VCI resulting from factor analyses consisted of six items on a ten-point Likert scale, reflecting the ratio of positive to negative items. The survey revealed significant variations in the VCI according to individual features such as education, use of social networks, or Health institutions as sources of information. Multivariate logistic regression identified an association between vaccine intention and the VCI. Health literacy was functional for 91.2% of participants, but knowledge about vaccine-preventable diseases was generally low. The VCI showed no significant association with health literacy and vaccine-preventable diseases knowledge. The VCI and the modified IMETER effectively assess vaccination attitude and health literacy, offering valuable public health tools for tailoring vaccination campaigns to hesitant population subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guglielmo Arzilli
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Stacchini
- Department of Health Science, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Virginia Casigliani
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Aquino
- Department of Public Health and Hygiene, Azienda USL Toscana Nord Ovest, Versilia, Italy
| | - Aurea Oradini-Alacreu
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Beatrice Bruni
- Department of Public Health and Hygiene, Azienda USL Toscana Nord Ovest, Versilia, Italy
| | - Filippo Quattrone
- Management and Healthcare Laboratory, Institute of Management and Department EMbeDS, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa, Italy
| | - Francesca Papini
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Daniele Sironi
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Andrea Davide Porretta
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Gaetano Pierpaolo Privitera
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Caterina Rizzo
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Lara Tavoschi
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Pier Luigi Lopalco
- Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technology, University of Salento, Lecce, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Pouvrasseau A, Jeannot E. Vaccine hesitancy among nursing and midwifery undergraduate students in Switzerland: protocol for an online national study. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1302676. [PMID: 38155889 PMCID: PMC10754524 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1302676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Vaccine hesitancy is a persistent challenge in public health, exacerbated by the proliferation of anti-vaccine sentiments facilitated by social networks. The COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the importance of addressing vaccine hesitancy, designated by the WHO as a top global health threat. This study explores vaccine hesitancy among nursing and midwifery undergraduate students in Switzerland-a cohort crucial to public health given their future roles as healthcare professionals-with a particular emphasis on the HPV vaccine, which exhibits lower confidence levels compared to other vaccines. Methods This study will employ an online questionnaire distributed to nursing and midwifery undergraduate students from various healthcare universities. The questionnaire will collect data on vaccine hesitancy (general confidence in vaccines and specifically in the HPV vaccine), HPV vaccine coverage, socio-demographics, likelihood to recommend vaccines to patients, perception of vaccination education and interest in complementary medicine. Conclusion The study's findings will contribute to our understanding of vaccine hesitancy among nursing and midwifery undergraduate students, providing insights that can inform targeted interventions and education strategies to bolster vaccine confidence among future healthcare professionals, thereby enhancing public health efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Audrey Pouvrasseau
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Global Health, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Emilien Jeannot
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Global Health, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Psychiatry, Center for Excessive Gambling, Addiction Medicine (Service), Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Gaviola GC, McCarville M, Shendale S, Goodman T, Lomazzi M, Desai S. A review of health worker vaccination programs in low, middle and upper middle-income countries. PUBLIC HEALTH IN PRACTICE 2023; 6:100415. [PMID: 37547811 PMCID: PMC10400463 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhip.2023.100415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Revised: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives Health workers (HW) are at risk of contracting vaccine preventable diseases when caring for patients and communities. This study aims to evaluate the existing literature on the routine vaccination of health workers against a variety of antigens in low and middle income countries, focusing on facilitators, barriers, and considerations in the implementation of immunization programs and campaigns. Study design A PubMed Literature search. Methods A PubMed search was conducted to find articles that addressed vaccination programs and policies for HW in low-income countries (LIC), lower middle-income countries (LMIC), and upper middle-income countries (UMIC). Original articles, meta-analyses, and reviews published in English between January 2000 and July 2022 were included in the search. Inductive content analysis was used to identify themes that illustrate facilitators, barriers, and considerations in the implementation of immunization programs and campaigns. Results The search identified 4240 studies, 90 were used for analysis as they provided antigen specific details on immunization policies or programs. Hepatitis B was the most frequently discussed antigen, followed by Influenza, then Measles, Rubella and Mumps. With considerable variability by vaccine and country, in most cases the vaccination was not offered free to HW or included in a regular vaccination schedule. Utilizing existing immunization infrastructure such as the Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) and having effective management of vaccination programs were found to be key facilitators to vaccinate HW. Conclusions The low vaccination coverage of health workers in LMIC is of concern; attention towards the key considerations, barriers and facilitators of immunization implementation is central to the advancement of health worker vaccination coverage in LMIC's. The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated the swift vaccination of HW. Many LIC countries lacking established HW immunization infrastructure are now administering COVID-19 vaccines. As we move beyond the pandemic's acute phase, there is a chance for those countries to enhance their immunization initiatives and policies for HW concerning other antigens, even if it is not a standard practice currently.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel C. Gaviola
- Department of Occupational Medicine, Cambridge Health Alliance, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Maddison McCarville
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
- World Federation of Public Health Associations, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Stephanie Shendale
- Department of Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Tracey Goodman
- Department of Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Marta Lomazzi
- World Federation of Public Health Associations, Geneva, Switzerland
- University of Geneva, Institute of Global Health, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Shalini Desai
- Department of Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Shirley EAL, Francisco J, Elisabet DS, Teresa GVDC, María BM. Attitudes and perceptions about COVID-19 vaccination in the population with chronic HIV infection: A systematic review. Health Sci Rep 2023; 6:e1653. [PMID: 38098974 PMCID: PMC10719484 DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.1653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Revised: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Aims The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-infected population has been increasing during the last 3 years worldwide. Moreover, simultaneously, COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials were launched. By the end of 2020, the Food and Drug Administration had authorized the emergency use of two messenger RNA vaccines against COVID-19. These fast-track vaccine approvals have produced controversy about their safety and efficacy. The purpose of this research was to discover attitudes and perceptions regarding vaccination against COVID-19 disease among vulnerable groups such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients. Methods Between June 2, 2021 and March 4, 2022, we conducted a cross-sectional study through a survey of high-risk patients with severe COVID-19, such as HIV-infected patients in the Infectious Diseases Unit (Hospital Clínico Universitario San Juan, Alicante). For the data collection strategy, a nonprobabilistic snowball sampling was adopted. A structured, anonymous, self-administered questionnaire was developed in which questions and statements were designed to evaluate their attitudes and perceptions about COVID-19 vaccination. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were performed for the obtained data. Results Forty-eight participants were recruited with a mean age of 51.5 ± 11.9 years. Thirty-nine of them (81.3%) were male. The acceptance rate of COVID-19 vaccination was extremely high (95.7%). Bivariate analysis showed older patients significantly received a higher proportion of vaccine doses at the time of the survey (p = 0.047). Older patients were more aware of the vaccine safety controversy (61.1%) compared to younger patients (p = 0.054). There were no other significant differences between groups among questions regarding safety, efficacy, or attitudes about COVID-19 vaccination. Conclusion An extremely high degree of acceptance for COVID-19 vaccination was reported. Older patients were more aware of the vaccine safety controversy. Medical staff is the most trustworthy source of information, far above all other sources. Social networks and opinion leaders have not been shown to significantly influence our population.
Collapse
|
59
|
Dali-Ali A, Beneddine I, Midoun N, Oukebdane A. Factors associated with COVID-19 vaccination among healthcare workers in an Algerian University Teaching Hospital: A cross-sectional study. Vaccine X 2023; 15:100413. [PMID: 38161987 PMCID: PMC10755102 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2023.100413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Revised: 11/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The global COVID-19 pandemic has deeply impacted health systems, emphasizing the need for effective vaccination campaigns. However, vaccine hesitancy, particularly among healthcare workers, challenges achieving comprehensive immunization coverage. The primary objective of this study is to elucidate the factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine uptake among healthcare workers at an Algerian University Teaching Hospital. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted at the University Teaching Hospital of Oran, Algeria, from February 17 to April 11, 2022. We investigated factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine uptake among 196 hospital staff members, including 98 physicians and 98 nurses. Factors independently associated with vaccination were identified using a multivariable logistic regression analysis, and adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were provided. Results The COVID-19 vaccination rate among HCWs was 32.1%. Several factors were significantly associated with COVID-19 vaccination in the multivariable analysis. These include the belief that even healthy individuals should be vaccinated against COVID-19 (aOR = 3.13; 95% CI: 1.13-8.63), the perception that comprehensive vaccination coverage against COVID-19 could support the healthcare system in future epidemics (aOR = 4.15; 95% CI: 1.68-10.23), endorsement of mandatory COVID-19 vaccination (aOR = 4.37; 95% CI: 1.42-13.45), and adherence to all recommended vaccines for HCWs or compliance with the recommended immunization schedules for their children (aOR = 4.75; 95% CI: 1.47-15.36). Conclusion This study highlights key beliefs influencing COVID-19 vaccine uptake among healthcare workers, including the necessity of vaccinating healthy individuals, the perceived importance of comprehensive vaccination in supporting the healthcare system during future epidemics, agreement with mandatory vaccination policies, and adherence to recommended vaccine schedules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdessamad Dali-Ali
- University of Oran 1, Faculty of Medicine, Oran, Algeria
- University Teaching Hospital of Oran, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Oran, Algeria
| | - Imene Beneddine
- University Teaching Hospital of Oran, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Oran, Algeria
| | - Nori Midoun
- University of Oran 1, Faculty of Medicine, Oran, Algeria
- University Teaching Hospital of Oran, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Oran, Algeria
| | - Asmaa Oukebdane
- Canastel Specialized Hospital, Ophthalmology Department, Oran, Algeria
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Sakanishi Y, Takeuchi J, Suganaga R, Nakayama K, Nishioka Y, Chiba H, Kishi T, Machino A, Mastumura M, Okada T, Suzuki T. Association between administration or recommendation of the human papillomavirus vaccine and primary care physicians' knowledge about vaccination during proactive recommendation suspension: a nationwide cross-sectional study in Japan. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e074305. [PMID: 37993154 PMCID: PMC10668282 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/24/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Japanese government suspended the proactive recommendation of the human papillomavirus vaccine (HPVv) in 2013, and the vaccination rate of HPVv declined to <1% during 2014-2015. Previous studies have shown that the recommendation by a physician affects a recipient's decision to receive a vaccine, and physicians' accurate knowledge about vaccination is important to increase vaccine administration. This study aimed to evaluate the association between physicians' knowledge of vaccination and the administration or recommendation of HPVv by primary care physicians (PCPs) in the absence of proactive recommendations from the Japanese government. DESIGN Cross-sectional study analysed data obtained through a web-based, self-administered questionnaire survey. SETTING The questionnaire was distributed to Japan Primary Care Association (JPCA) members. PARTICIPANTS JPCA members who were physicians and on the official JPCA mailing list (n=5395) were included. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES The primary and secondary outcomes were the administration and recommendation of HPVv, respectively, by PCPs. The association between PCPs' knowledge regarding vaccination and each outcome was determined based on their background and vaccination quiz scores and a logistic regression analysis to estimate the adjusted ORs (AORs). RESULTS We received responses from 1084 PCPs and included 981 of them in the analysis. PCPs with a higher score on the vaccination quiz were significantly more likely to administer the HPVv for routine and voluntary vaccination (AOR 2.28, 95% CI 1.58 to 3.28; AOR 2.71, 95% CI 1.81 to 4.04, respectively) and recommend the HPVv for routine and voluntary vaccination than PCPs with a lower score (AOR 2.17, 95% CI 1.62 to 2.92; AOR 1.88, 95% CI 1.32 to 2.67, respectively). CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that providing accurate knowledge regarding vaccination to PCPs may improve their administration and recommendation of HPVv, even in the absence of active government recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuta Sakanishi
- Sakanishi Internal Medicine and Pediatrics Clinic, Omuta, Fukuoka, Japan
- Committee for Infectious Diseases, Vaccine Team, Japan Primary Care Association, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jiro Takeuchi
- Committee for Infectious Diseases, Vaccine Team, Japan Primary Care Association, Tokyo, Japan
- Institute for Clinical and Translational Science, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Rei Suganaga
- Committee for Infectious Diseases, Vaccine Team, Japan Primary Care Association, Tokyo, Japan
- Tessyoukai Kameda Family Clinic Tateyama, Tateyama, Japan
| | - Kuniko Nakayama
- Committee for Infectious Diseases, Vaccine Team, Japan Primary Care Association, Tokyo, Japan
- My family Clinic Gamagori, Gamagori, Japan
| | - Yosuke Nishioka
- Committee for Infectious Diseases, Vaccine Team, Japan Primary Care Association, Tokyo, Japan
- Nishioka Memorial Central Clinic, Shima, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Chiba
- Committee for Infectious Diseases, Vaccine Team, Japan Primary Care Association, Tokyo, Japan
- Family Medical Practice Hanoi, Hanoi, Viet Nam
| | - Tomomi Kishi
- Committee for Infectious Diseases, Vaccine Team, Japan Primary Care Association, Tokyo, Japan
- Japan Baptist Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | | | - Mami Mastumura
- Committee for Infectious Diseases, Vaccine Team, Japan Primary Care Association, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Preventive Services, School of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Tadao Okada
- Committee for Infectious Diseases, Vaccine Team, Japan Primary Care Association, Tokyo, Japan
- Tessyoukai Kameda Family Clinic Tateyama, Tateyama, Japan
| | - Tomio Suzuki
- Committee for Infectious Diseases, Vaccine Team, Japan Primary Care Association, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of General Medicine, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Saidu Y, Gu J, Ngenge BM, Nchinjoh SC, Adidja A, Nnang NE, Muteh NJ, Zambou VM, Mbanga CM, Agbor VN, Ousmane D, Njoh AA, Flegere J, Diack D, Wiwa O, Montomoli E, Clemens SAC, Clemens R. The faces behind vaccination: unpacking the attitudes, knowledge, and practices of staff of Cameroon's Expanded program on Immunization. HUMAN RESOURCES FOR HEALTH 2023; 21:88. [PMID: 37957695 PMCID: PMC10644616 DOI: 10.1186/s12960-023-00869-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immunization is regarded as one of the most cost-effective public health interventions in global health. However, its cost-effectiveness depends greatly on the knowledge and skills of vaccinators. With the growing complexity of immunization programs, the need for a well-trained vaccination workforce cannot be overemphasized. In this study, we assessed the knowledge, attitudes, and practices among vaccination staff in Cameroon. METHODS Through a descriptive cross-sectional design, we used structured questionnaires and observation guides to collect data from vaccination staff in health facilities that were selected by a multistage sampling method. Data were analyzed using STATA 13 software. RESULTS Overall, we collected data from Expanded Program on Immunization focal staff in 265 health facilities across 68 health districts. Over half (53%) of the surveyed facilities were found in rural areas. Nearly two-thirds of health facilities had immunization focal staff with knowledge gaps for each of the four basic immunization indicators assessed. In other words, only 37% of staff knew how to estimate coverages, 36% knew how to inteprete the EPI monitoring curve, 35% knew how to prepare vaccine orders, and 37% knew how to estimate vaccine wastage. In terms of practices, staff waited for more than ten children to be present before opening a 20-dose vaccine vial in 63% of health facilities, and more than five children to be present before opening a 10-dose vaccine vial in 80% of surveyed facilities. Provision of vaccine-specific information (informing caregiver about vaccine received, explanation of benefits and potential side effects) during immunization sessions was suboptimal for the most part. CONCLUSION This study suggests marked deficits in immunization knowledge among vaccination staff and exposes common attitudes and practices that could contribute to missed opportunities for vaccination and hinder vaccination coverage and equity in Cameroon. Our findings highlight the urgent need to invest in comprehensive capacity building of vaccination staff in Cameroon, especially now that the immunization program is becoming increasingly complex.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yauba Saidu
- Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc., PO Box 2664, Yaounde, Cameroon.
- Institute for Global Health, University of Siena, 53100, Siena, Italy.
| | - Jessica Gu
- Global Vaccine Delivery, Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc, Boston, MA, 02127, United States of America
| | | | | | - Amani Adidja
- Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaoundé 1, Yaoundé, Cameroon
| | | | | | | | | | - Valirie Ndip Agbor
- Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit (CTSU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Diaby Ousmane
- Department of Projects, Ministry of Public Health, Yaounde, Cameroon
| | - Andreas Ateke Njoh
- Expanded Program on Immunization, Cameroon Ministry of Public Health, PO Box 2084, Yaoundé, Cameroon
- School of Global Health and Bioethics, Euclid University, PO Box 157, Bangui, Central African Republic
| | - Junie Flegere
- Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaoundé 1, Yaoundé, Cameroon
| | - Demba Diack
- Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaoundé 1, Yaoundé, Cameroon
| | - Owens Wiwa
- Clinton Health Access Iniative Inc., Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Emanuele Montomoli
- Institute for Global Health, University of Siena, 53100, Siena, Italy
- Department Molecular Medicine, University of Siena, Via Aldo Moro 3, 53100, Siena, Italy
- VisMederi Srl, Via Ferrini 53, 53035, Siena, Italy
| | - Sue Ann Costa Clemens
- Institute for Global Health, University of Siena, 53100, Siena, Italy
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Ralf Clemens
- Institute for Global Health, University of Siena, 53100, Siena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
Wie SH, Jung J, Kim WJ. Effective Vaccination and Education Strategies for Emerging Infectious Diseases Such as COVID-19. J Korean Med Sci 2023; 38:e371. [PMID: 37967881 PMCID: PMC10643251 DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Social isolation and control owing to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are easing; however, concerns regarding new infectious diseases have not disappeared. Given epidemic experiences such as severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), the influenza pandemic, Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), and COVID-19, it is necessary to prepare for the outbreak of new infectious diseases and situations in which large-scale vaccinations are required. Although the development of vaccines against COVID-19 has contributed greatly to overcoming the pandemic, concerning vaccine side effects from the general public, including medical personnel, and decreased confidence in vaccine efficacy and side effects, present many challenges in promoting and educating vaccinations for new infectious diseases in the future. In addition to plans to develop vaccines for the outbreak of new infectious diseases, education and promotion plans are necessary to administer the latest developments of vaccines to the general public. Moreover, efforts are needed to secure the necessity, legitimacy, and evidence for rapid vaccination on a large scale at the national level. It is also necessary to carefully prepare scientific bases and explanatory statements so that the general public can easily understand them. This study aimed to establish vaccine strategies and vaccination education plans for new infectious diseases that may occur in the future. Many ways to promote vaccination to the general public and healthcare workers should be prepared to ensure that the latest vaccines against new infectious diseases are administered safely. Thus, education and promotion of vaccine efficacy and safety based on specific data from clinical studies are necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seong-Heon Wie
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea
| | - Jaehun Jung
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Woo Joo Kim
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Tselebis A, Sikaras C, Milionis C, Sideri EP, Fytsilis K, Papageorgiou SM, Ilias I, Pachi A. A Moderated Mediation Model of the Influence of Cynical Distrust, Medical Mistrust, and Anger on Vaccination Hesitancy in Nursing Staff. Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ 2023; 13:2373-2387. [PMID: 37998057 PMCID: PMC10669979 DOI: 10.3390/ejihpe13110167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
During the pandemic, nurses experienced anger that stemmed from a sense of threat, frustration, or even a sense of injustice. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between vaccination hesitancy, anger, cynicism, and medical mistrust among nurses, as there are no relevant studies in the literature. This study was conducted online by completing self-report questionnaires. The Dimensions of Anger Reactions-5, the 8-item "Cynical Distrust" scale, and the Medical Mistrust Multiformat Scale were used. For vaccination hesitancy, two questions with a 5-point scale were used: one question examining hesitancy to get vaccinated with the COVID-19 vaccine, and another question examining hesitancy to get vaccinated with the influenza vaccine. In total, 387 nurses (66 men and 321 women) participated in this study. Nurses showed statistically greater hesitancy toward the COVID-19 vaccine compared to hesitancy toward the influenza vaccine. The variation in vaccine hesitancy was explained by the scores in the Medical Mistrust Multiformat Scale, the Dimensions of Anger Reactions, and the Cynical Distrust Scale. The Medical Mistrust Multiformat Scale mediated the relationship between the Cynical Distrust Scale and total vaccine hesitancy. The Dimensions of Anger Reactions Scale significantly moderated the indirect effect of the Cynical Distrust Scale on total vaccine hesitancy through the Medical Mistrust Multiformat Scale. In conclusion, it is highly likely that anger is involved in reported vaccine hesitancy both by activating schemas of distrust in others and by adopting anti-systemic views of mistrust in the medical system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athanasios Tselebis
- Psychiatric Department, Sotiria Thoracic Diseases Hospital of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece; (K.F.); (S.M.P.); (A.P.)
| | - Christos Sikaras
- Nursing Department, Sotiria Thoracic Diseases Hospital of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece;
| | - Charalampos Milionis
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Elena Venizelou General and Maternity Hospital, 11521 Athens, Greece; (C.M.); (I.I.)
| | - Eleni Paraskevi Sideri
- Emergency Department of General Hospital of Athens Korgialeneio—Benakeio Hellenic Red Cross, 11526 Athens, Greece;
| | - Konstantinos Fytsilis
- Psychiatric Department, Sotiria Thoracic Diseases Hospital of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece; (K.F.); (S.M.P.); (A.P.)
| | - Styliani Maria Papageorgiou
- Psychiatric Department, Sotiria Thoracic Diseases Hospital of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece; (K.F.); (S.M.P.); (A.P.)
| | - Ioannis Ilias
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Elena Venizelou General and Maternity Hospital, 11521 Athens, Greece; (C.M.); (I.I.)
| | - Argyro Pachi
- Psychiatric Department, Sotiria Thoracic Diseases Hospital of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece; (K.F.); (S.M.P.); (A.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
64
|
Ozawa S, Schuh HB, Nakamura T, Yemeke TT, Lee YFA, MacDonald NE. How to increase and maintain high immunization coverage: Vaccination Demand Resilience (VDR) framework. Vaccine 2023; 41:6710-6718. [PMID: 37798209 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.09.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resilience in vaccination demand is ever more critical as the COVID-19 pandemic has increased our understanding of the importance of vaccines on health and well-being. Yet timid demand for COVID-19 vaccines where available and reduced uptake of routine immunizations globally further raise the urgent need to build vaccination resilience. We demonstrate the complexity of vaccination demand and resilience in a framework where relevant dimensions are intertwined, fluid, and contextual. METHODS We developed the Vaccination Demand Resilience (VDR) framework based on a literature review on vaccination demand and expert consultation. The matrix framework builds on three main axes: 1) vaccination attitudes and beliefs; 2) vaccination seeking behavior; and 3) vaccination status. The matrix generated eight quadrants, which can help explain people's levels of vaccination demand and resilience. We selected four scenarios as examples to demonstrate different interventions that could move people across quadrants and build vaccination resilience. RESULTS Incongruence between individuals' attitudes and beliefs, vaccination behavior, and vaccination status can arise. For example, an individual can be vaccinated due to mandates but reject vaccination benefits and otherwise avoid seeking vaccination. Such incongruence could be altered by interventions to build resilience in vaccination demand. These interventions include information, education and communication to change individuals' vaccination attitudes and beliefs, incentive programs and reminder-recalls to facilitate vaccination seeking, or by strengthening healthcare provider communications to reduce missed opportunities. CONCLUSIONS Vaccination decision-making is complex. Individuals can be vaccinated without necessarily accepting the benefits of vaccination or seeking vaccination, threatening resilience in vaccination demand. The VDR framework can provide a useful lens for program managers and policy makers considering interventions and policies to improve vaccination resilience. This would help build and sustain confidence and demand for vaccinations, and help to continue to prevent disease, disability, and death from vaccine-preventable diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sachiko Ozawa
- Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Maternal Child Health, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Holly B Schuh
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Tomoka Nakamura
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom; Nagasaki University, School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Tatenda T Yemeke
- Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Yi-Fang Ashley Lee
- Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Noni E MacDonald
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Penot P, Chateauneuf J, Auperin I, Cordel H, Letembet VA, Bottero J, Cailhol J. Socioeconomic impact of the COVID-19 crisis and early perceptions of COVID-19 vaccines among immigrant and nonimmigrant people living with HIV followed up in public hospitals in Seine-Saint-Denis, France. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0276038. [PMID: 37862300 PMCID: PMC10588853 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 10/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023] Open
Abstract
The burden of the first year of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic was greater for vulnerable populations, such as immigrants, people living in disadvantaged urban areas, and people with chronic illnesses whose usual follow-up may have been disrupted. Immigrants receiving care for HIV in Seine-Saint-Denis' hospitals have a combination of such vulnerabilities, while nonimmigrant people living with HIV (PLWHIV) have more heterogeneous vulnerability profiles. The ICOVIH study aimed to compare the socioeconomic effects of the COVID-19 crisis as well as attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination among immigrant and nonimmigrant PLWHIV. A questionnaire assessed vulnerabilities prior to the COVID-19 epidemic and the impact of the early epidemic on administrative, residential, professional, and financial fields. We surveyed 296 adults living with HIV at four hospitals in Seine-Saint-Denis, the poorest metropolitan French department, between January and May 2021. Administrative barriers affected 9% of French-born versus 26.3% of immigrant participants. Immigrants experienced financial insecurity and hunger more often than nonimmigrant participants (21.8% versus 7.1% and 6.6% versus 3%, respectively). Spontaneous acceptance of vaccination was higher among nonimmigrant than among immigrant participants (56.7% versus 32.1%), while immigrants were more likely to wait for their doctor's recommendation or for their doctor to convince them than their French-born counterparts (34.2% versus 19.6%). The trust-based doctor‒patient relationship established through HIV follow-up appeared to be a determining factor in the high acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine among immigrant participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pauline Penot
- CEGIDD (Sexual Health and Infectious Disease Clinic), Centre Hospitalier André Grégoire, Montreuil, France
- Centre Population et Développement (Ceped), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD) et Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Julie Chateauneuf
- CEGIDD (Sexual Health and Infectious Disease Clinic), Centre Hospitalier André Grégoire, Montreuil, France
- Perinatal Network “Naître dans l’Est Francilien”, Centre Hospitalier André Grégoire, Montreuil, France
| | - Isabelle Auperin
- Addictology and Infectious Disease Unit, Centre Hospitalier André Grégoire, Montreuil, France
| | - Hugues Cordel
- Infectious and Tropical Disease Ward, Avicenne Hospital, Bobigny, France
| | - Valerie-Anne Letembet
- CEGIDD (Sexual Health and Infectious Disease Clinic), Centre Hospitalier André Grégoire, Montreuil, France
| | - Julie Bottero
- Infectious and Tropical Disease Ward, Avicenne Hospital, Bobigny, France
| | - Johann Cailhol
- Infectious and Tropical Disease Ward, Avicenne Hospital, Bobigny, France
| |
Collapse
|
66
|
Bosankic-Cmajcanin N, Musa S, Draganovic S. In the Face of a Pandemic: "I Felt the Same as When the War Started"-A Qualitative Study on COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Int J Public Health 2023; 68:1606411. [PMID: 37901591 PMCID: PMC10603202 DOI: 10.3389/ijph.2023.1606411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives: To conduct qualitative study with different target groups in Bosnia and Herzegovina in order to explore their views on barriers and drivers for COVID-19 vaccination, and to see if and how barriers and drivers vary between urban and rural locations, and different professional roles. Methods: The theoretical framework underpinning the study is the capability-opportunity-motivation (COM-B) behavior change framework, which has been adapted to monitor vaccine related behavior and attitudes. Data was collected from June to September 2022 through moderated discussions in focus groups. The total of 162 participants participated in 16 focus groups. Results: Among the key barriers to successful immunization identified across target groups were insufficient knowledge about vaccines, pandemic fatigue, concerns about the rapid development of the vaccine and its effectiveness, lack of confidence in the healthcare system. Some of the main drivers of vaccination against COVID-19 were confidence in science and expert recommendations. Conclusion: The COVID-19 immunization policy undergoes continuous changes, as do the pandemic prospects; we encourage further research to track the evolution of vaccine related attitudes, inform immunization policy, and create evidence-based interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sanjin Musa
- Public Health Institute of Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Selvira Draganovic
- Psychology Program, International University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
Alsaif F, Twigg M, Scott S, Blyth A, Wright D, Patel A. A systematic review of barriers and enablers associated with uptake of influenza vaccine among care home staff. Vaccine 2023; 41:6156-6173. [PMID: 37673716 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.08.082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
Barriers and enablers to vaccination of care home (CH) staff should be identified in order to develop interventions to address them that increase uptake and protect residents. We aimed to synthesis the evidence describing the barriers and enablers that affect the influenza vaccination uptake of care home (CH) staff. METHOD We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, AMED, IBSS, SCOPUS to identify quantitative, qualitative or mixed-method studies. Data related to health or social care workers in CHs reported barriers or enablers were extracted and mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF); the data within each domain were grouped and categorized into key factors affecting influenza vaccine uptake among CH staff. RESULTS We screened 4025 studies; 42 studies met our inclusion criteria. Thirty-four (81 %) were surveys. Five theoretical domains were frequently reported as mediators of influenza vaccine uptake: Beliefs about consequences (32 studies), Environmental context and resources (30 studies), Emotions (26 studies), Social influences (25 studies), Knowledge (22 studies). The low acceptance rate of the influenza vaccine among CH staff can be attributed to multiple factors, including insufficient understanding of the vaccine, its efficacy, or misconceptions about the vaccine (knowledge), perceiving the vaccine as ineffective and unsafe (beliefs about consequences), fear of influenza vaccine and its side effects (emotions), and experiencing limited accessibility to the vaccine (environmental context and resources). CONCLUSION Interventions aimed at increasing influenza vaccine uptake among CH staff should focus on addressing the barriers identified in this review. These interventions should include components such as enhancing knowledge by providing accurate information about vaccine benefits and safety, addressing negative beliefs by challenging misconceptions, managing concerns and fears through open communication, and improving accessibility to the vaccine through convenient on-site options. This review provides a foundation for the development of tailored Interventions to improve influenza vaccine uptake among CH staff.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faisal Alsaif
- School of Pharmacy, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.
| | - Michael Twigg
- School of Pharmacy, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.
| | - Sion Scott
- School of Healthcare, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.
| | - Annie Blyth
- School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.
| | - David Wright
- School of Healthcare, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.
| | - Amrish Patel
- School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
68
|
Dimitrova V, Stoitsova S, Nenova G, Martinova M, Yakimova M, Rangelova V, Georgieva I, Georgiev I, Krumova S, Minkova A, Vladimirova N, Nikolaeva-Glomb L. Bulgarian General Practitioners' Communication Styles about Child Vaccinations, Mainly Focused on Parental Decision Making in the Context of a Mandatory Immunization Schedule. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:2566. [PMID: 37761763 PMCID: PMC10531209 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11182566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The communication practices of general practitioners in relation with vaccines have not been a topic of wide scientific interest. In this article, we outline them in the context of Bulgaria. A representative, cross-sectional, quantitative, face-to-face survey was conducted among 358 Bulgarian general practitioners in 2022 using simple random sampling. We conducted an exploratory factor analysis using questions about the role of the GPs, which measure models of communication. Based on the factor analysis, we distinguished four communication styles. They were called: active communicator, restrictive communicator, informing communicator, and strained communicator. One-way ANOVA and the T-test were carried out to explore the connections between factor scores (communication styles) and other variables. One of the most important results in the study was that the informing physician (emphasizing the choice of the parents) was the most common model in Bulgaria. This is somewhat contradictory, because of the mandatory status of most vaccines. We found connections between the communication styles and other variables-such as the type of settlement, having a hesitant parent in the practice, recommendations of non-mandatory vaccines, and experience with vaccine-preventable diseases. On the basis of the factor analysis and analysis of relationships with other variables, we reached the conclusion that in Bulgaria, hesitant parents are not sufficiently involved in active, effective communication about vaccines by GPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veronika Dimitrova
- Department of Sociology, Sofia University, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria; (G.N.); (M.Y.)
| | - Savina Stoitsova
- Department of Epidemiology, National Centre of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, 1504 Sofia, Bulgaria; (S.S.); (I.G.); (A.M.); (N.V.)
| | - Gergana Nenova
- Department of Sociology, Sofia University, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria; (G.N.); (M.Y.)
| | - Maria Martinova
- Communities and Identities Department, Institute of Sociology and Philosophy at the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria;
| | - Milena Yakimova
- Department of Sociology, Sofia University, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria; (G.N.); (M.Y.)
| | - Vanya Rangelova
- Department of Epidemiology and Disaster Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria;
| | - Irina Georgieva
- Department of Virology, National Centre of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, 1504 Sofia, Bulgaria; (I.G.); (S.K.); (L.N.-G.)
| | - Ivo Georgiev
- Department of Epidemiology, National Centre of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, 1504 Sofia, Bulgaria; (S.S.); (I.G.); (A.M.); (N.V.)
| | - Stefka Krumova
- Department of Virology, National Centre of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, 1504 Sofia, Bulgaria; (I.G.); (S.K.); (L.N.-G.)
| | - Antoaneta Minkova
- Department of Epidemiology, National Centre of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, 1504 Sofia, Bulgaria; (S.S.); (I.G.); (A.M.); (N.V.)
| | - Nadezhda Vladimirova
- Department of Epidemiology, National Centre of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, 1504 Sofia, Bulgaria; (S.S.); (I.G.); (A.M.); (N.V.)
| | - Lubomira Nikolaeva-Glomb
- Department of Virology, National Centre of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, 1504 Sofia, Bulgaria; (I.G.); (S.K.); (L.N.-G.)
| |
Collapse
|
69
|
Nuzhath T, Spiegelman A, Scobee J, Goidel K, Washburn D, Callaghan T. Primary care physicians' strategies for addressing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Soc Sci Med 2023; 333:116150. [PMID: 37595423 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Revised: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the strategies that primary care physicians use to address patient COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. METHOD We administered an online survey to 625 primary care physicians from May 14 to May 25, 2021, to assess the messages that primary care physicians use to encourage hesitant patients to get vaccinated against COVID-19.589 physicians from the total pool of 625 provided open-ended responses. We conducted thematic content analysis on the responses based on previous research and themes identified within the data. SETTING The survey was administered online using the survey research firm Dynata. RESULTS Eleven primary themes emerged from our analysis, which included, physicians addressing specific concerns about vaccine safety (including costs versus benefits), physicians helping patients understand what it means to remain unvaccinated, or whether physicians try to connect emotionally through the use of guilt, or personal experience, whether physicians use derisive language to communicate with unvaccinated patients. In addition, a small number of physicians indicated they would not attempt to persuade someone who is vaccine hesitant. CONCLUSIONS Our study shows that while some of the physicians used different strategies to address vaccine hesitancy, some of the physicians used harsh language or did not make any effort to reduce COVID-19 related vaccine hesitancy among their patients. Focused advocacy and training are needed to increase physician engagement in vaccine-related dialogues with their patients. Such efforts will ensure that critical opportunities for patient education and awareness-building are not missed and ensure high levels of vaccination uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tasmiah Nuzhath
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health. Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA; Department of Health Promotion and Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University. 212 Adriance Lab Rd. 1266 TAMU, College Station, TX, USA.
| | | | - Julia Scobee
- Department of Health Law, Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Boston University, 715 Albany Street, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kirby Goidel
- Department of Political Science, Texas A&M University, 2935, Research Pkwy, College Station, TX, USA
| | - David Washburn
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, 1440 Canal Street, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Timothy Callaghan
- Department of Health Law, Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Boston University, 715 Albany Street, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
70
|
MERENSTEIN ZACHARY, SHUEMAKER JILLC, PHILLIPS ROBERTL. Measuring Trust in Primary Care. Milbank Q 2023; 101:841-880. [PMID: 37167452 PMCID: PMC10509519 DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Revised: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Policy Points Trust in primary care clinicians is essential for effective patient care and is associated with better health outcomes, but it is rarely assessed, and existing measures have not been thoroughly evaluated. This scoping review reveals that research assessing patients' trust in primary care clinicians largely stopped more than a decade ago but offers candidate measures for future testing, implementation, and policy applications. CONTEXT Trust is a fundamental aspect of any human relationship, and medical care is no exception. An ongoing, trusting relationship between clinicians and patients has shown demonstrable value to primary care. However, there is currently no measure of trust in general use, and none endorsed for use by most value-based payment programs. This review searched the literature for any existing measures of patient trust in primary care clinicians and assessed their potential to be implemented as a patient-reported outcome measure. METHODS A keyword search on PubMed along with scanning references was conducted to find any trust measures in health care. Measures that did not address primary care clinicians were eliminated and the remaining measures were then assessed for their utility to primary care. RESULTS This purposeful, scoping review found four tested measures for assessing patients' trust in primary care clinicians that are candidates for general use. Of these four, the revised Trust in Physicians Scale and Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale are the most tested and viable options. CONCLUSION Renewed national interest in trust in health care should focus on the capacity to measure it. This review informs the effort to test trust measures for use in research, practice improvement, and value-based payment. Measuring trust, how it relates to outcomes, and learning how it is produced or lost are key to assisting practices and health systems toward earning it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - JILL C. SHUEMAKER
- American Board of Family Medicine Foundation, The Center for Professionalism & Value in Health Care
| | - ROBERT L. PHILLIPS
- American Board of Family Medicine Foundation, The Center for Professionalism & Value in Health Care
| |
Collapse
|
71
|
Harris MJ, Murtfeldt R, Wang S, Mordecai EA, West JD. The role and influence of perceived experts in an anti-vaccine misinformation community. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.07.12.23292568. [PMID: 37546922 PMCID: PMC10398812 DOI: 10.1101/2023.07.12.23292568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
The role of perceived experts (i.e., medical professionals and biomedical scientists) as potential anti-vaccine influencers has not been characterized systematically. We describe the prevalence and importance of anti-vaccine perceived experts by constructing a coengagement network based on a Twitter data set containing over 4.2 million posts from April 2021. The coengagement network primarily broke into two large communities that differed in their stance toward COVID-19 vaccines, and misinformation was predominantly shared by the anti-vaccine community. Perceived experts had a sizable presence within the anti-vaccine community and shared academic sources at higher rates compared to others in that community. Perceived experts occupied important network positions as central anti-vaccine nodes and bridges between the anti- and pro-vaccine communities. Perceived experts received significantly more engagements than other individuals within the anti- and pro-vaccine communities and there was no significant difference in the influence boost for perceived experts between the two communities. Interventions designed to reduce the impact of perceived experts who spread anti-vaccine misinformation may be warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mallory J. Harris
- Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
- Center for an Informed Public, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Ryan Murtfeldt
- Information School, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Shufan Wang
- Information School, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Jevin D. West
- Center for an Informed Public, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
- Information School, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
72
|
Collini F, Bonaccorsi G, Del Riccio M, Bruschi M, Forni S, Galletti G, Gemmi F, Ierardi F, Lorini C. Does Vaccine Confidence Mediate the Relationship between Vaccine Literacy and Influenza Vaccination? Exploring Determinants of Vaccination among Staff Members of Nursing Homes in Tuscany, Italy, during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1375. [PMID: 37631943 PMCID: PMC10458978 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11081375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low coverage of influenza vaccination in nursing home (NH) staff may be attributed to factors such as vaccine confidence (VC) and vaccine literacy (VL). Our study aimed to evaluate the role of VL and VC in predicting the intention to get the influenza vaccine in a sample of employees of NHs in Tuscany, Italy. METHODS Data from staff members in Tuscany were collected using an online questionnaire that examined influenza vaccination history, intentions, demographic information, health status, and VL. Statistical analyses explored the relationships between VC, VL, and vaccination intentions. RESULTS The study included 1794 respondents, (86.3%) and assistants/aides (58.1%), with a median age of 46 years. The intention to get vaccinated was significantly higher among those with health risk conditions, and there was a positive association between VC and VL, specifically its interactive/critical component. The mediation analysis showed that VC completely mediated the relationship between VL and the intention to get vaccinated, with significant effects observed in different subgroups. CONCLUSIONS VC is a key factor that mediates the effect of VL on vaccine intention. These results suggest that interventions aimed at improving VL alone may not be sufficient to increase vaccine uptake unless VC is also addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Collini
- Quality and Equity Unit, Regional Health Agency of Tuscany, 50141 Florence, Italy
| | | | - Marco Del Riccio
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Mario Bruschi
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Silvia Forni
- Quality and Equity Unit, Regional Health Agency of Tuscany, 50141 Florence, Italy
| | - Giacomo Galletti
- Quality and Equity Unit, Regional Health Agency of Tuscany, 50141 Florence, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Gemmi
- Quality and Equity Unit, Regional Health Agency of Tuscany, 50141 Florence, Italy
| | - Francesca Ierardi
- Quality and Equity Unit, Regional Health Agency of Tuscany, 50141 Florence, Italy
| | - Chiara Lorini
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
73
|
Tay WC, Bewley A, Maul JT, Oon HH. Attitudes towards COVID Vaccine and Vaccine Hesitancy in Dermatology: A Narrative Review. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1365. [PMID: 37631933 PMCID: PMC10459048 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11081365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Revised: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Vaccine hesitancy has been a contentious issue even before the pandemic. The COVID-19 crisis has further amplified vaccine hesitancy, with worries about adverse effects, cultural and religious beliefs, and misinformation on social media. In dermatology, patients with pre-existing skin conditions may have specific concerns about the impact of the vaccine on their skin health. Factors such as cutaneous reactions, potential flares of underlying conditions, and fears of psoriasis worsening post-vaccination contribute to vaccine hesitancy. Healthcare professionals, including dermatologists, play a crucial role in addressing vaccine hesitancy by providing accurate information, addressing concerns, and understanding the psychological impact on patients. The concept of vaccine fatigue is also explored, noting the challenges in sustaining vaccine acceptance over time, especially with regards to booster vaccinations. Overcoming vaccine hesitancy requires trust-building, effective communication strategies, and collaboration between healthcare workers and non-healthcare individuals to combat misinformation. By recognizing and addressing psychological factors, dermatologists can increase vaccine acceptance and improve public health efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Woo Chiao Tay
- National Skin Centre, 1 Mandalay Road, Singapore 308205, Singapore
| | - Anthony Bewley
- Department of Dermatology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E11 1NR, UK
- Queen Mary University, London E1 4NS, UK
| | - Julia-Tatjana Maul
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, University Hospital of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Hazel H. Oon
- National Skin Centre, Skin Research Institute of Singapore, 1 Mandalay Road, Singapore 308205, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
74
|
Frozanfar MK, Hamajima N, Fayaz SH, Rahimzad AD, Stanekzai H, Inthaphatha S, Nishino K, Yamamoto E. Factors associated with pentavalent vaccine coverage among 12-23-month-old children in Afghanistan: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0289744. [PMID: 37552707 PMCID: PMC10409276 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study aimed to identify the factors associated with the coverage of the third dose of pentavalent vaccine (Penta3) among children aged 12-23 months in Afghanistan. METHODS The data of 3,040 children aged 12-23 months were taken from the Afghanistan Health Survey 2018, including characteristics of the children and their households, household heads, and mothers/primary care givers. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a logistic model. Multivariable stepwise logistic regression analysis with forward-selection (Model 1) and backward-selection (Model 2) was performed using variables that showed significant differences by bivariate analysis. RESULTS The coverage of Penta3 among 12-23-month-old children was 82.3%. Factors associated with Penta3 coverage in the two models of multivariable analysis were 18-23 months old compared to 12-17 months old; having no diarrhea in the last two weeks compared to having diarrhea; no bipedal edema compared to having edema; taking vitamin A supplement; 1-2 children under five years in a household compared to three or more; distance from residence to the nearest health facility ≤2 hours on foot; having a radio; having a TV; educated heads of households; non-smoking of heads of households; and literacy of mothers/primary caregivers. CONCLUSIONS Penta3 coverage among 12-23-month-old children improved but was still lower than the target. Primary education should be provided to all children throughout the country. TV and radio are useful tools for providing health information. Mobile outreach programs and the establishment of new health facilities should be promoted to improve access to health service for all people in Afghanistan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Kamel Frozanfar
- Department of Healthcare Administration, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
- Healthcare-Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance Program, Office of Epidemiology, Virginia Department of Health, Richmond, Virginia, United States of America
| | - Nobuyuki Hamajima
- Department of Healthcare Administration, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Said Hafizullah Fayaz
- Department of Healthcare Administration, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
- National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Abdullah Darman Rahimzad
- Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, Balkh University Faculty of Medicine, Mazar-i-Sharif, Balkh, Afghanistan
| | | | - Souphalak Inthaphatha
- Department of Healthcare Administration, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Kimihiro Nishino
- Department of Healthcare Administration, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Eiko Yamamoto
- Department of Healthcare Administration, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
75
|
Fasce A, Karlsson L, Verger P, Mäki O, Taubert F, Garrison A, Schmid P, Holford DL, Lewandowsky S, Rodrigues F, Betsch C, Soveri A. Endorsement of alternative medicine and vaccine hesitancy among physicians: A cross-sectional study in four European countries. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2023; 19:2242748. [PMID: 37581343 PMCID: PMC10431744 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2242748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Revised: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Vaccine hesitancy has become a threat to public health, especially as it is a phenomenon that has also been observed among healthcare professionals. In this study, we analyzed the relationship between endorsement of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and vaccination attitudes and behaviors among healthcare professionals, using a cross-sectional sample of physicians with vaccination responsibilities from four European countries: Germany, Finland, Portugal, and France (total N = 2,787). Our results suggest that, in all the participating countries, CAM endorsement is associated with lower frequency of vaccine recommendation, lower self-vaccination rates, and being more open to patients delaying vaccination, with these relationships being mediated by distrust in vaccines. A latent profile analysis revealed that a profile characterized by higher-than-average CAM endorsement and lower-than-average confidence and recommendation of vaccines occurs, to some degree, among 19% of the total sample, although these percentages varied from one country to another: 23.72% in Germany, 17.83% in France, 9.77% in Finland, and 5.86% in Portugal. These results constitute a call to consider health care professionals' attitudes toward CAM as a factor that could hinder the implementation of immunization campaigns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelo Fasce
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Linda Karlsson
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Pierre Verger
- Faculté des Sciences Médicales et Paramédicales, Southeastern Health Regional Observatory (Observatoire Régional de la Santé, ORS-PACA), Marseille, France
| | - Otto Mäki
- Department of Psychology and Speech-Language Pathology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Frederike Taubert
- Institute for Planetary Health Behavior, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany
- Health Communication Working Group, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Amanda Garrison
- Faculté des Sciences Médicales et Paramédicales, Southeastern Health Regional Observatory (Observatoire Régional de la Santé, ORS-PACA), Marseille, France
| | - Philipp Schmid
- Institute for Planetary Health Behavior, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany
- Department of Implementation Research, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Dawn Liu Holford
- School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Stephan Lewandowsky
- School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- School of Psychological Science, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
- Department of Psychology, University of Potsdam, Postdam, Germany
| | | | - Cornelia Betsch
- Health Communication Working Group, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anna Soveri
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
76
|
Beccia F, Lontano A, Rossi MF, Marziali E, Pascucci D, Raponi M, Santoro PE, Moscato U, Laurenti P. Three-year COVID-19 and flu vaccinations among medical residents in a tertiary hospital in Italy: The threat of acceptance decline in seasonal campaigns. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2023; 19:2252708. [PMID: 37706326 PMCID: PMC10503443 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2252708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Revised: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 vaccination campaign in Italy started in December 2020, and, due to the Omicron variant's emergence, a second booster dose was recommended for high-risk individuals and healthcare workers from July 2022. The aim of the study was to evaluate the vaccination coverages for the COVID-19 second booster dose and to identify predictors of its acceptance within the population of medical residents (MRs) of the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS (FPG) University Hospital. The study was conducted at FPG from October 4th to December 21st, 2022, and COVID-19 second booster dose and influenza vaccines were administered. The study analyzed collected data and conducted multivariate logistic regressions to explore potential predictors of vaccination adherence. The analyses performed were compared with the sample enrolled in FPG residency programs at the start of the COVID-19 vaccination campaign. 1968 MRs were involved in the 2022-2023 vaccination campaign (mean age 28.97, SD 3.44), and the second booster dose of COVID-19 vaccination coverage was low (18.80%). Almost all participants opted for co-administration of COVID-19 and influenza vaccinations, leading to a similar rate of influenza vaccination coverage (16.26%). Being a frontline resident, meaning a direct involvement in managing COVID-19 patients and vaccination campaigns, was the main predictor of vaccination adherence (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.25-2.17). The dropping in influenza vaccination coverage in 2022-2023 and the low adherence to COVID-19 second booster dose among young physicians is concerning, calling for tailored vaccination campaigns and interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flavia Beccia
- Section of Hygiene - Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Lontano
- Section of Hygiene - Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Francesca Rossi
- Section of Occupational Health - Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Eleonora Marziali
- Section of Hygiene - Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Domenico Pascucci
- Section of Hygiene - Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Health Management, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Matteo Raponi
- Department of Women, Child and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Emilio Santoro
- Section of Occupational Health - Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Department of Women, Child and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Umberto Moscato
- Section of Occupational Health - Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Department of Women, Child and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Patrizia Laurenti
- Section of Hygiene - Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Department of Women, Child and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
77
|
Chen C, Yang Q, Tian H, Wu J, Chen L, Ji Z, Zheng D, Chen Y, Li Z, Lu H. Bibliometric and visual analysis of vaccination hesitancy research from 2013 to 2022. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2023; 19:2226584. [PMID: 37387233 PMCID: PMC10332187 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2226584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2023] [Revised: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Although vaccination is regarded as one of the most significant achievements of public health, there also exists the phenomenon of vaccination hesitancy which refers to delay in acceptance or refusal of vaccination despite availability of vaccination services. In this study, we conducted a bibliometric analysis to provide a comprehensive overview of vaccination hesitancy research from 2013 to 2022. All related publications were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection Database. Information on annual publications, countries, organizations, journals, authors, keywords, and documents was analyzed adopting the bibliometix R-package, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace software. A total of 4042 publications were enrolled. The annual publications increased slightly before 2020 but had an extremely dramatic increase from 2020 to 2022. The United States contributed the most articles and had the greatest collaboration with other countries and organizations. The London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine was the most active institution. Vaccine was the most cited and influential journal while Vaccines was the most productive journal. It was Dube E who was the most productive authors with the highest h-index. The most frequent keywords were "vaccine hesitancy," "COVID-19," "SARS-CoV2," "immunization," "attitudes," and "willingness." Vaccination hesitancy to some extent hinders the achievement of global public health. The influencing factors vary across time, space, and vaccines. The COVID-19 pandemic and the development of COVID-19 vaccines have made this issue the focus of interest. The complexity and specific contexts of influencing factors of vaccination hesitancy require further study and will potentially be the focus of future research direction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chaojian Chen
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| | - Qiuping Yang
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| | - Huiting Tian
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jinyao Wu
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| | - Lingzhi Chen
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| | - Zeqi Ji
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| | - Daitian Zheng
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yexi Chen
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhiyang Li
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| | - Hai Lu
- Department of Breast, The First People’s Hospital of Shao Guan, Shaoguan, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
78
|
Kigongo E, Kabunga A, Tumwesigye R, Musinguzi M, Izaruku R, Acup W. Prevalence and predictors of COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy among healthcare workers in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0289295. [PMID: 37506132 PMCID: PMC10381063 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/16/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 vaccination is regarded as an effective intervention for controlling the pandemic. However, COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy is hampering efforts geared towards reducing the burden of the pandemic. Therefore, examining COVID-19 hesitancy and its predictors among healthcare workers is essential to improving COVID-19 uptake. In sub-Saharan Africa, the pooled proportion of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy is yet to be known. PURPOSE The present study was to estimate the pooled proportion of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and its predictors among healthcare workers in Sub-Saharan Africa. METHODS A systematic search of articles was conducted in PubMed, Science Direct, African Journal Online, and Google Scholar. Data was extracted with the help of Excel. Data analysis was conducted using STATA 17. Heterogeneity in the studies was assessed using Cochrane Q and 12 tests. A random effects model was used to examine the pooled estimates to determine if heterogeneity was exhibited. RESULTS A total of 15 studies involving 7498 participants were included in the final analysis. The pooled prevalence of COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy among healthcare workers was 46%, 95% CI (0.38-0.54). The predictors of COVID-19 hesitancy were negative beliefs towards vaccine 14.0% (OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.06), perceived low risk of COVID-19 infection 24.0% (OR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.23, 1.28), and vaccine side effects 25.0% (OR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.21, 1.24). CONCLUSION The data revealed generally high hesitancy of COVID-19 vaccine among health workers in Sub-Saharan Africa. Future COVID-19 adoption and uptake should be improved by national and individual level efforts. In Sub-Saharan Africa, it is crucial to address the myths and obstacles preventing healthcare professionals from accepting the COVID-19 vaccination as soon as feasible since their willingness to get the vaccine serves as an important example for the broader public.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eustes Kigongo
- Faculty of Public Health, Department of Environmental Health and Disease Control, Lira University, Lira, Uganda
| | - Amir Kabunga
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Lira University, Lira, Uganda
| | - Raymond Tumwesigye
- Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Department of Nursing, Lira University, Lira, Uganda
| | - Marvin Musinguzi
- Faculty of Public Health, Department of Community Health, Lira University, Lira, Uganda
| | - Ronald Izaruku
- Department of Library and Information Services, Lira University, Lira, Uganda
| | - Walter Acup
- Faculty of Public Health, Department of Community Health, Lira University, Lira, Uganda
| |
Collapse
|
79
|
Doshi RH, Garbern SC, Kulkarni S, Perera SM, Fleming MK, Muhayangabo RF, Ombeni AB, Tchoualeu DD, Kallay R, Song E, Powell J, Gainey M, Glenn B, Mutumwa RM, Hans Bateyi Mustafa S, Earle-Richardson G, Gao H, Abad N, Soke GN, Fitter DL, Hyde TB, Prybylski D, Levine AC, Jalloh MF, Mbong EN. Ebola vaccine uptake and attitudes among healthcare workers in North Kivu, Democratic Republic of the Congo, 2021. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1080700. [PMID: 37559741 PMCID: PMC10408297 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1080700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction During the 2018-2020 Ebola virus disease (EVD) outbreak in the eastern part of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), prevention and control measures, such as Ebola vaccination were challenging by community mistrust. We aimed to understand perceptions regarding Ebola vaccination and identify determinants of Ebola vaccine uptake among HCWs. Methods In March 2021, we conducted a cross-sectional survey among 438 HCWs from 100 randomly selected health facilities in three health zones (Butembo, Beni, Mabalako) affected by the 10th EVD outbreak in North Kivu, DRC. HCWs were eligible if they were ≥ 18 years and were working in a health facility during the outbreak. We used survey logistic regression to assess correlates of first-offer uptake (i.e., having received the vaccine the first time it was offered vs. after subsequent offers). Results Of the 438 HCWs enrolled in the study, 420 (95.8%) reported that they were eligible and offered an Ebola vaccine. Among those offered vaccination, self-reported uptake of the Ebola vaccine was 99.0% (95% confidence interval (CI) [98.5-99.4]), but first-offer uptake was 70.2% (95% CI [67.1, 73.5]). Nearly all HCWs (94.3%; 95% CI [92.7-95.5]) perceived themselves to be at risk of contracting EVD. The most common concern was that the vaccine would cause side effects (65.7%; 95% CI [61.4-69.7]). In the multivariable analysis, mistrust of the vaccine source or how the vaccine was produced decreased the odds of first-time uptake. Discussion Overall uptake of the Ebola vaccine was high among HCWs, but uptake at the first offer was substantially lower, which was associated with mistrust of the vaccine source. Future Ebola vaccination efforts should plan to make repeated vaccination offers to HCWs and address their underlying mistrust in the vaccines, which can, in turn, improve community uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reena H. Doshi
- Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Stephanie C. Garbern
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Shibani Kulkarni
- Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | | | - Monica K. Fleming
- Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | | | | | | | - Ruth Kallay
- Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | | | | | | | - Bailey Glenn
- James A. Ferguson Infectious Disease Program, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | | | | | - Giulia Earle-Richardson
- National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Hongjiang Gao
- Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Neetu Abad
- Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Gnakub Norbert Soke
- Division of Global Health Protection, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo
| | - David L. Fitter
- Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Terri B. Hyde
- Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Dimitri Prybylski
- Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Adam C. Levine
- International Medical Corps, Washington, DC, United States
- International Medical Corps, Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo
| | - Mohamed F. Jalloh
- Division of Global HIV and TB, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Eta Ngole Mbong
- International Medical Corps, Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo
| |
Collapse
|
80
|
Rykowska D, Sobierajski T, Okarska-Napierała M, Wanke-Rytt M, Kuchar E. Influenza vaccination from the perspective of health care workers at university hospitals. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0288470. [PMID: 37478110 PMCID: PMC10361510 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The influenza vaccination rate of healthcare workers (HWs) in Poland is low. Before implementing methods for promoting influenza vaccination, it is crucial to identify attitudes towards vaccination. We aimed to examine the knowledge and attitudes towards influenza vaccination of HWs at university hospitals. Moreover, we evaluated the incentives for getting influenza vaccination among HWs. METHODS From September 2020 to October 2020, we surveyed HWs in one children's hospital and two adults' hospitals in Warsaw (Poland). We included only fully and correctly completed surveys into final analysis. RESULTS A total of 950 questionnaires (85% women, 45% <40 years old, 33% physicians and 48% nurses, 56% working in a children's hospital) were evaluated. Of all HWs, 25% declared they were vaccinated and 54% planned to get vaccinated in the next season. We have analyzed attitudes towards influenza vaccination and motivations to get vaccinated. CONCLUSIONS Among HWs in academic hospitals, males, people <40 years old, physicians and those working in children's hospital are more likely to get vaccinated and their attitudes towards influenza vaccination are more positive. Of those less likely to get vaccinated, people >40 years old and nurses could be effectively persuaded by free and on-site influenza vaccination. Moreover, free access to vaccination is the strongest motivator for vaccination among all HWs. The attitudes towards mandatory influenza vaccination differ sharply among HWs-while physicians are ready to accept it, nurses are not. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04569019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominika Rykowska
- Department of Pediatrics with Clinical Assessment Unit, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Tomasz Sobierajski
- Faculty of Applied Social Sciences and Resocialization, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Monika Wanke-Rytt
- Department of Pediatrics with Clinical Assessment Unit, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Ernest Kuchar
- Department of Pediatrics with Clinical Assessment Unit, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
81
|
Hashemi P, Mahmoodi S, Ghasemian A. An updated review on oral protein-based antigen vaccines efficiency and delivery approaches: a special attention to infectious diseases. Arch Microbiol 2023; 205:289. [PMID: 37468763 DOI: 10.1007/s00203-023-03629-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2023] [Revised: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
Various infectious agents affect human health via the oral entrance. The majority of pathogens lack approved vaccines. Oral vaccination is a convenient, safe and cost-effective approach with the potential of provoking mucosal and systemic immunity and maintaining individual satisfaction. However, vaccines should overcome the intricate environment of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). Oral protein-based antigen vaccines (OPAVs) are easier to administer than injectable vaccines and do not require trained healthcare professionals. Additionally, the risk of needle-related injuries, pain, and discomfort is eliminated. However, OPAVs stability at environmental and GIT conditions should be considered to enhance their stability and facilitate their transport and storage. These vaccines elicit the local immunity, protecting GIT, genital tract and respiratory epithelial surfaces, where numerous pathogens penetrate the body. OPAVs can also be manipulated (such as using specific incorporated ligand and receptors) to elicit targeted immune response. However, low bioavailability of OPAVs necessitates development of proper protein carriers and formulations to enhance their stability and efficacy. There are several strategies to improve their efficacy or protective effects, such as incorporation of adjuvants, enzyme inhibitors, mucoadhesive or penetrating devices and permeation enhancers. Hence, efficient delivery of OPAVs into GIT require proper delivery systems mainly including smart target systems, probiotics, muco-adhesive carriers, lipid- and plant-based delivery systems and nano- and microparticles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parisa Hashemi
- Department of Medical Biotechnology, School of Medicine, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran
| | - Shirin Mahmoodi
- Department of Medical Biotechnology, School of Medicine, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.
| | - Abdolmajid Ghasemian
- Noncommunicable Diseases Research Center, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
82
|
Mansfield LN, Choi K, Delgado JR, Macias M, Munoz-Plaza C, Lewin B, Bronstein D, Chang J, Bruxvoort K. Decision-Making about COVID-19 Vaccines among Health Care Workers and Their Adolescent Children. West J Nurs Res 2023; 45:665-673. [PMID: 37096318 PMCID: PMC10280115 DOI: 10.1177/01939459231170981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2023]
Abstract
Health care workers promote COVID-19 vaccination for adolescent patients, and as parents, may influence their own children to get vaccinated. We conducted virtual, semi-structured qualitative interviews with vaccinated health care workers and their adolescent children to explore their decision-making process for COVID-19 vaccination. In total, 21 health care workers (physicians, nurses, and medical staff) and their adolescent children (N = 17) participated in interviews. The following three themes described parent-adolescent decision-making for COVID-19 vaccination: (1) family anticipation and hesitation about COVID-19 vaccine approval; (2) parents' or adolescents' choice: the decision maker for adolescent COVID-19 vaccination; and (3) leveraging one's vaccination status to encourage others to get vaccinated. Nurses encouraged adolescent autonomy in decisions for COVID-19 vaccination while physicians viewed vaccination as the parent's decision. Health care workers and their adolescent children used role-modeling to motivate unvaccinated peers and may model their decision-making process for adolescent COVID-19 vaccination with their own children to support their patients' and parents' vaccine decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa N. Mansfield
- National Clinician Scholars Program,
Division of General Medicine & Health Services Research, Department of Medicine,
David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California, Los Angeles, CA,
USA
- School of Nursing, University of North
Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Kristen Choi
- Department of Research &
Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA
- School of Nursing, University of
California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Health Policy and
Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles,
CA, USA
| | - Jeanne R. Delgado
- National Clinician Scholars Program,
Division of General Medicine & Health Services Research, Department of Medicine,
David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California, Los Angeles, CA,
USA
- Division of General Pediatrics,
Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern
California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Mayra Macias
- Department of Research &
Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Corrine Munoz-Plaza
- Department of Research &
Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Bruno Lewin
- Southern California Permanente Medical
Group, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - David Bronstein
- Southern California Permanente Medical
Group, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - John Chang
- Department of Research &
Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Katia Bruxvoort
- Department of Research &
Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, School of
Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
83
|
Takagi MA, Hess S, Gawronski K, Haddad N, Noveloso B, Zyzanski S, Ragina N. COVID-19 Virus and Vaccination Attitudes among Healthcare Workers in Michigan: A Cross-Sectional Study. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1105. [PMID: 37376494 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11061105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Revised: 06/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Defining the characteristics of healthcare worker (HCW) attitudes toward the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine can provide insights into vaccine hesitancy. This study's goal is to determine HCWs' attitudes regarding the COVID-19 vaccination and reasons for vaccine hesitancy. METHODS This cross-sectional study surveyed HCWs working in institutions in Saginaw, Sanilac, and Wayne counties in Michigan (N = 120) using tipping-scale questions. Analysis of variance and t-test were used to measure HCWs' attitudes toward the COVID-19 virus and vaccines. RESULTS Most HCWs received (95.9%) and recommended (98.3%) a COVID-19 vaccine. The top three factors that HCWs cited for recommending a COVID-19 vaccine were: (1) efficacy of the vaccine, (2) current exposure to patients with active COVID-19 infection and risk of virus spread, and (3) safety of vaccine and long-term follow-up. Female HCWs or HCWs aged 25-54 years were more concerned about contracting COVID-19. Physicians or HCWs aged 55-64 were less concerned regarding the effectiveness and side effects of the vaccine. CONCLUSIONS Gender, age, ethnicity, provider type, and medical specialty showed statistically significant differences among COVID-19 attitudes. Focusing educational efforts on HCW demographics who are more likely to have negative attitudes can potentially decrease vaccine hesitancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maya Asami Takagi
- College of Medicine, Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, MI 48859, USA
| | - Samantha Hess
- College of Medicine, Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, MI 48859, USA
| | - Karissa Gawronski
- College of Medicine, Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, MI 48859, USA
| | - Nicholas Haddad
- College of Medicine, Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, MI 48859, USA
| | - Bernard Noveloso
- College of Medicine, Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, MI 48859, USA
| | - Stephen Zyzanski
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Neli Ragina
- College of Medicine, Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, MI 48859, USA
| |
Collapse
|
84
|
Li M, Luo Y, Watson R, Zheng Y, Ren J, Tang J, Chen Y. Healthcare workers' (HCWs) attitudes and related factors towards COVID-19 vaccination: a rapid systematic review. Postgrad Med J 2023; 99:520-528. [PMID: 37319159 DOI: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2021-140195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 122.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Herd immunity through vaccination is a key measure to control COVID-19 pandemic. However, vaccine hesitancy remains a public health threat, which is still common among healthcare workers (HCWs). This systematic review aimed to synthesise evidence on HCWs' attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination and analyse associated factors to provide information for vaccine policy development and practice. We searched PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, Web of Science and three Chinese databases for literature published on 12 February 2021. Two researchers screened the literature independently, and 13 studies were included in the systematic review. Vaccine acceptance varied widely and ranged from 27.7% to 77.3%. HCWs had positive attitudes towards future COVID-19 vaccines, while vaccine hesitancy was still common. Demographic variables such as men, older age and physicians were positive predictive factors. Women and nurses had more vaccine hesitancy. Previous influenza vaccination and self-perceived risk were facilitators. Concerns for safety, efficacy and effectiveness and distrust of the government were barriers. Influences of direct (COVID-19) patient care towards vaccination intention were less conclusive. Tailored communication strategies were needed to increase the uptake rate of COVID-19 vaccines among HCWs. More importantly, more data and information on the safety and efficacy of vaccines should be provided with transparency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mei Li
- School of Nursing, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
| | - Yue Luo
- School of Nursing, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
| | - Roger Watson
- Health and Social Care Faculty, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Yu Zheng
- Department of Rheumatism and Immunology, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
| | - Jianlan Ren
- Department of Anesthesiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| | - Jian Tang
- Department of Central Sterile Supply, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
| | - Yanhua Chen
- Department of Nursing, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
85
|
Lombebo AA, Wolde GD, Shomoro BT, Efa AG, Bscho MT, Suleiman EH, Temesgen AS, Arega MZ, Obsa MS. COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance, Attitude, Hesitancy, and Its Associated Factors among Wolaita Sodo University Students: A Mixed-Method Study. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 2023:2082695. [PMID: 37305076 PMCID: PMC10250102 DOI: 10.1155/2023/2082695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Revised: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Background Countries in the world have been experiencing the ongoing impact and spread of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) virus pandemic. The health and financial burden of the pandemic has prompted the need for timely and effective vaccination to be considered as the best strategy for controlling disease transmission. However, vaccine acceptability remains an area of concern in developing countries like Ethiopia. Objective To assess attitude, hesitancy in the COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, and associated factors among health science students at Wolaita Sodo University. Methods A triangulated mixed-method study was conducted. Quantitative data were entered into SPSS Windows version 25 for analysis, and the qualitative data were transcribed using open code version 4.3. A binary logistic regression model was used to establish the association between dependent and independent variables. Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to measure the strengths of the association. Thematic approach was used for qualitative data analysis. Results A total of 352 students participated in this study. Having family members who were infected with COVID-19, information about COVID-19 vaccine, the need for a vaccine with the level of concern, intention to take COVID-19 vaccine, and academic year were strongly associated with vaccine acceptability. Graduating class and other senior students were about 4 and 2 times more likely to accept vaccination as compared to freshman-year students (AOR = 4.128; 95% CI: 1.351-12.610;P = 0.012) and (AOR = 2.195; 95% CI: 1.182-4.077; P value = 0.013), respectively. Even if 67% of students had a good attitude towards the vaccine, 56% of the students hesitated to take the vaccine. Conclusion The majority of respondents had a constructive attitude towards the COVID-19 vaccine, and only a few of them were vaccinated against the COVID-19 virus. It is of utmost importance to design an evidence-based strategy to increase the uptake of vaccination for healthcare students and other nonhealth science students in universities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Afework Alemu Lombebo
- School of Medicine, College of Health Science and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia
| | - Getahun Dendir Wolde
- School of Anaesthesia, College of Health Science and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia
| | - Bezabish Taffese Shomoro
- School of Anaesthesia, College of Health Science and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia
| | - Amelework Gonfa Efa
- School of Medicine, College of Health Science and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia
| | - Mebratu Tila Bscho
- School of Anaesthesia, College of Health Science and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia
| | - Elias Habtu Suleiman
- School of Anaesthesia, College of Health Science and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia
| | - Ashagrie Sintayhu Temesgen
- School of Anaesthesia, College of Health Science and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia
| | - Mahlet Zerfu Arega
- Yekatit 12 College of Health Science and Medicine, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | | |
Collapse
|
86
|
Thanasuwat B, Leung SOA, Welch K, Duffey-Lind E, Pena N, Feldman S, Villa A. Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Education and Knowledge Among Medical and Dental Trainees. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2023; 38:971-976. [PMID: 36002641 PMCID: PMC9402407 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-022-02215-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
Persistent human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is responsible for the majority of oropharyngeal and cervical cancers in the USA. Currently, HPV curricula within medical and dental schools are not standardized. As such, we implemented a brief online educational intervention to increase medical and dental trainees' knowledge of the HPV vaccine and the association between HPV and cancer. The objectives of this study were to (1) assess medical and dental trainees' baseline knowledge regarding HPV and HPV vaccine, (2) determine the willingness to recommend the HPV vaccine to patients, and (3) evaluate the impact of an online intervention on HPV-related knowledge. Medical and dental trainees from two large academic centers in the USA were asked to fill out an online pre-intervention questionnaire, followed by a 10-min HPV educational intervention based on the Center of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) resources, and then a post-intervention questionnaire. There were 75 participants (67.4% females; median age 18-30 years). When asked about HPV-related cancer types, the correct response increased from 28.4% (pre-intervention) to 51.9% (post-intervention; p < 0.01). When asked about the prevalence of HPV infections, the correct response improved from 36 to 72% (p < 0.01). There was also a 25.2% improvement in identifying the correct HPV vaccination dosing schedule (p < 0.01). Eighty-seven percent of the participants mentioned that the online education improved their HPV knowledge, and 68.5% reported that they were more likely to recommend HPV vaccine after the online intervention. The proposed online educational intervention was effective at improving HPV-related cancer and HPV vaccine knowledge as well as attitudes towards vaccine recommendation among dental and medical trainees and could be implemented in medical and dental school curricula in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Burinrutt Thanasuwat
- Department of Orofacial Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA
| | - Shuk On Annie Leung
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC Canada
| | | | - Eileen Duffey-Lind
- Team Maureen, North Falmouth, MA USA
- Division of Pediatric Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Center, Boston, MA USA
| | - Nancy Pena
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Sarah Feldman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Alessandro Villa
- Department of Orofacial Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA
| |
Collapse
|
87
|
Fernández-Basanta S, López-Villasenín S, Freijomil-Vázquez C, Movilla-Fernández MJ, Coronado C. COVID-19 Vaccination and Community Management: A Qualitative Study. J Nurs Educ 2023; 62:343-350. [PMID: 37279977 DOI: 10.3928/01484834-20230404-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nurses play key roles as vaccination agents and frontline workers who deal with prejudice and misinformation. This study examined the attitudes and perceptions of nursing students regarding corona-virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination and its social and institutional management. METHOD This qualitative study consisted of an exploratory phase involving first- and fourth-year nursing students and a second phase using the PhotoVoice tool SHOWED mnemonic method followed by discussion groups with second-year nursing students. RESULTS Three themes emerged: (1) hope tinged with fear; (2) too much information generating fear, uncertainty, and mistrust; and (3) leaders without recognition or voice. CONCLUSION The results inform the body of knowledge in nursing science and enhance changes in clinical practice by providing new insights regarding the perceptions of nursing students on vaccination and its management, highlighting the need to train future nurses in health literacy and new ways to interact with community members. [J Nurs Educ. 2023;62(6):343-350.].
Collapse
|
88
|
Goidel K, Callaghan T, Washburn DJ, Nuzhath T, Scobee J, Spiegelman A, Motta M. Physician Trust in the News Media and Attitudes toward COVID-19. JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLITICS, POLICY AND LAW 2023; 48:317-350. [PMID: 36441631 DOI: 10.1215/03616878-10358696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Previous research has established the importance of primary care physicians in communicating public health directives. The implicit assumption is that, because of their expertise, doctors provide accurate and up-to-date information to their patients independent of partisan affiliation or media trust. METHODS The authors conducted an online survey of 625 primary care physicians and used the results to test (1) whether physician trust in media outlets is consistent with their political partisanship, and (2) whether trust in media outlets influences (a) personal concern that someone in their family will get sick, (b) perceptions about the seriousness of the pandemic as portrayed in the media, and (c) trust in federal government agencies and scientists. FINDINGS Physicians are better positioned to critically evaluate health-related news, but they are subject to the same biases that influence public opinion. Physicians' partisan commitments influence media trust, and media trust influences concern that a family member will get sick, perceptions regarding the seriousness of the pandemic, and trust in federal government agencies and scientists. CONCLUSIONS Physician trust in specific media outlets shapes their understanding of the pandemic, and-to the extent that they trust conservative media outlets-it may limit their effectiveness as health policy messengers.
Collapse
|
89
|
Bengoa Terrero C, Bas Villalobos M, Rodríguez-Moñino AP, Lasheras Carbajo MD, Pérez-Villacastín J, García Torrent MJ, Sánchez-Del-Hoyo R, Bengoa San Sebastian E, García Lledó A. Effect of Primary Care Center Characteristics, Healthcare Worker Vaccination Status and Patient Economic Setting on Patient Influenza Vaccination Coverage Rates. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1025. [PMID: 37376414 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11061025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2023] [Revised: 05/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reaching the public health organizations targets of influenza vaccination in at-risk patient groups remains a challenge worldwide. Recognizing the relationship between the healthcare system characteristics and the economic environment of the population with vaccination uptake can be of great importance to improve. METHODS Several characteristics were correlated in this retrospective ecological study with data from 6.8 million citizens, 15,812 healthcare workers across 258 primary care health centers, and average income by area of the care center in Spain. RESULTS No correlation between HCW vaccination status and patient vaccination was found. A weak negative significant correlation between the size of the population the care center covers and their vaccination status did exist (6 mo.-59 yr., r = 0.19, p = 0.002; 60-64 yr., r = 0.23, p < 0.001; ≥65 yr., r = 0.23, p ≥ 0.001). The primary care centers with fewer HCWs had better uptake in the at-risk groups in the age groups of 60-64 yr. (r = 0.20, p = 0.002) and ≥65 (r = 0.023, p ≥ 0.001). A negative correlation was found regarding workload in the 6 mo.-59 yr. age group (r = 0.18, p = 0.004), which showed the at-risk groups that lived in the most economically deprived areas were more likely to be vaccinated. CONCLUSIONS This study reveals that the confounding variables that determine influenza vaccination in a population and in HCWs are complex. Future influenza campaigns should address these especially considering the possibility of combining influenza and SARS-CoV-2 vaccines each year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Rafael Sánchez-Del-Hoyo
- Unidad de Apoyo Metodológico a la Investigación, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Alberto García Lledó
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Príncipe de Asturias, Alcalá de Henares, 28805 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
90
|
Pikkel Geva HZ, Gershgoren H, Nir D, Khazen M, Rose AJ. Vaccine hesitancy among health-care professionals in the era of COVID-19. HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH 2023; 38:193-203. [PMID: 36718591 DOI: 10.1093/her/cyad003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2022] [Revised: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Health-care professionals (HCPs) are key trusted figures in addressing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) challenges. They are thought to influence others' health decisions by personal example. However, during the COVID-19 crisis, some HCPs hesitated to be vaccinated. We examined factors contributing to that decision. We performed 12 semi-structured interviews, between February and May 2021, with Israeli HCPs who had declined or delayed COVID-19 vaccination. Three coders conducted a combined top-down and bottom-up analysis. We identified four main themes shaping vaccine decision-making: (i) sources of information, (ii) perceptions of necessity and risks of the vaccine, (iii) individual versus collective responsibility and (iv) political climate and media influence. Participants were worried about long-term effectiveness and safety, and while many agreed that high-risk populations should be vaccinated, all considered themselves to be at low risk for serious disease. Some felt they should avoid taking a perceived risk (accepting a new vaccine) to protect society, although they felt pressured to do so. Vaccination campaign politization and the way the media approached the subject also contributed to mistrust and hesitancy to be vaccinated. These findings help us understand HCP beliefs and uncertainties about COVID-19 vaccinations. This study can help inform future campaigns targeted at HCPs to promote the acceptance of vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hagar Z Pikkel Geva
- Rambam Medical Center, Ha'aliya Hashnia 8, Haifa 3525408, Israel
- Braum School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty od Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Ein Kerem, P.O. Box 12271, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel
| | - Harel Gershgoren
- Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Ein Keren, P.O. Box 12271, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel
| | - Dana Nir
- Soroka University Medical Center, Yitzhack I. Rager Blvd 151, Be'er-Sheva, Beer-Sheva 8400101, Israel
| | - Maram Khazen
- Braum School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty od Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Ein Kerem, P.O. Box 12271, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel
- School of Public Health, University of Haifa, Abba Khoushy ave. 199, Haifa 3498838, Israel
| | - Adam J Rose
- Braum School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty od Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Ein Kerem, P.O. Box 12271, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
91
|
Pecoraro N, Malatesta F, Carpinelli L, Fornino D, Giordano C, Moccia G, Perillo M, Capunzo M, Savarese G, De Caro F. Individual and Contextual Determinants of Flu Vaccination Adherence: A University Nudge Intervention. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:ijerph20105900. [PMID: 37239626 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20105900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The University of Salerno has implemented a nudge intervention with the aim of promoting vaccine adherence among employees of academia and identifying individual and contextual determinants that influence adherence. METHOD A purpose-built questionnaire was used during the reference period of October-December 2022 in order to assess levels of state anxiety (STAI-Y1), perceived stress (PSS-10), and public sentiments, which influence vaccination behavior, with consequences for the whole population (VCI). RESULTS Analysis of the results revealed a difference in mean scores on the PSS: those who have always adhered to the vaccination campaign compared to those who have never been vaccinated perceived higher levels of stress (12.01 vs. 11.33; F = 4.744, p = 0.031); furthermore, there was a relationship between the presence/absence of pathologies and VCI (F = 3,93; df = 1; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS The University of Salerno's nudge intervention made its employees more responsible for protecting the health of the academic community and encouraged good adherence to the flu vaccination campaign. University employees, equipped with high cultural tools, sought information primarily from institutional sources indicated by the university during the free vaccination campaign at the university's vaccine center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Pecoraro
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry-Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, 84081 Baronissi, Italy
| | - Francesca Malatesta
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry-Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, 84081 Baronissi, Italy
| | - Luna Carpinelli
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry-Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, 84081 Baronissi, Italy
| | - Domenico Fornino
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry-Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, 84081 Baronissi, Italy
| | - Claudio Giordano
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry-Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, 84081 Baronissi, Italy
| | - Giuseppina Moccia
- Hospital "San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona", 84081 Salerno, Italy
| | - Matilde Perillo
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry-Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, 84081 Baronissi, Italy
| | - Mario Capunzo
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry-Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, 84081 Baronissi, Italy
| | - Giulia Savarese
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry-Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, 84081 Baronissi, Italy
| | - Francesco De Caro
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry-Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, 84081 Baronissi, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
92
|
Malo B, Labbé F, Meyer SB, Filice E, Graham JE, MacDonald NE, Bettinger JA, Greyson D, MacDonald SE, Driedger SM, Kawchuk G, Dubé E. "I Want People to Be Able to Make an Informed Choice": How Quebec naturopaths discuss vaccination in their practice. Vaccine 2023:S0264-410X(23)00553-4. [PMID: 37210310 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.05.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2022] [Revised: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
Health care providers' recommendations can play an important role in individuals' vaccination decisions. Despite being one of the most popular complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), naturopathy is understudied in relation to vaccination decisions. We sought to address this gap through this study of vaccination perspectives of naturopathy practitioners in the province of Quebec, Canada. We conducted in-depth interviews with 30 naturopaths. Thematic analysis was conducted. Main themes were developed deductively (i.e., based on prior literature) and expanded through inductive coding of the data. Participants noted that they discuss vaccination in their practice, but only when clients asked questions or wanted advice. Naturopaths described refraining from explicitly recommending for or against vaccination. Instead, they focus on empowering their clients to make their own informed decision regarding vaccination. Most participants noted that they direct clients towards sources of information so that clients could decide for themselves, but some mentioned they discussed with clients what they considered to be risks associated with vaccination, as well as its benefits. These discussions were framed through a personalized and individual approach with clients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Malo
- Axe Maladies infectieuses et immunitaires, Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Canada; Département d'anthropologie, Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - Fabienne Labbé
- Axe Santé des populations et pratiques optimales en santé, Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - Samantha B Meyer
- School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada
| | - Eric Filice
- School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada
| | - Janice E Graham
- Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | | | - Julie A Bettinger
- Vaccine Evaluation Center, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Devon Greyson
- Vaccine Evaluation Center, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - S Michelle Driedger
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Gregory Kawchuk
- Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Eve Dubé
- Axe Maladies infectieuses et immunitaires, Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Canada; Département d'anthropologie, Université Laval, Québec, Canada; Direction des risques biologiques et de la santé au travail, Institut national de santé publique du Québec, Québec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
93
|
Song D, Liu P, Wu D, Zhao F, Wang Y, Zhang Y. Knowledge and Attitudes towards Human Papillomavirus Vaccination (HPV) among Healthcare Providers Involved in the Governmental Free HPV Vaccination Program in Shenzhen, Southern China. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:vaccines11050997. [PMID: 37243101 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11050997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Revised: 05/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
No research has been conducted to explore the variables associated with healthcare providers' (HCPs) knowledge and attitudes toward the human papillomavirus vaccine (HPV) since the vaccine was approved for free use in some Chinese cities. In Shenzhen, southern China, a convenience sample strategy was used to distribute questionnaires to HCPs involved in the government's HPV vaccination program from Shenzhen. There were 828 questionnaires collected in total, with 770 used in the analysis. The mean HPV and HPV vaccine knowledge score was 12.0 among HCPs involved in the government HPV vaccination program (with a total score of 15). the average scores for HPV and HPV vaccine knowledge varied among different types of medical institutions. District hospitals had the highest mean score of 12.4, while private hospitals ranked fourth with a mean score of 10.9. Multivariate logistic regression results revealed significant disparities in the type of license and after-tax annual income across HCPs (p < 0.05). The future education and training for HCPs should focus on private community health centers (CHCs), HCPs whose license type is other than a doctor, and HCPs with low after-tax annual income.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danhong Song
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Peiyi Liu
- Affiliated Shenzhen Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen 518000, China
| | - Dadong Wu
- Affiliated Shenzhen Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen 518000, China
| | - Fanghui Zhao
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Yueyun Wang
- Affiliated Shenzhen Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen 518000, China
| | - Yong Zhang
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| |
Collapse
|
94
|
Block Ngaybe M, Schmitt HJ, Mallahan S, Sena R, Werts S, Rooney B, Magrath P, Madhivanan P. Qualitative assessment of COVID-19 vaccination acceptance among healthcare workers in Pima County. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2023:2211464. [PMID: 37190772 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2211464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
In the Spring of 2021, the COVID-19 vaccination was authorized for emergency use by the Food and Drug Administration. Healthcare workers (HCWs) are one of the most trusted sources of information for vaccination choices. However, HCWs at this time appeared to continue to have lower rates of COVID-19 vaccination uptake than expected in Arizona. The objective of this study was to examine factors that play a role in the vaccination decision-making process among Arizona HCWs. Between January and April 2021, 18 semi-structured interviews were conducted among physicians, emergency medical technicians and long-term care nurses in Pima County. The informed consent process was completed for each participant. The interview guide was informed by the Increasing Vaccination model to collect information on vaccination decision-making. A codebook was developed using an inductive approach. Coding and analysis was conducted using the software MAXQDA. Participants were primarily male (11/18, 61%) and white (11/18, 61%). Three participants identified as Hispanic. Initial themes that emerged included: mixed opinions concerning the innovations in COVID-19 vaccine development, access-related barriers, issues related to distribution inequities, concerns about misinformation and conspiracy theories, and dialogue concerning the benefits of requiring mandatory vaccination. The results gathered from this study indicate that there continues to be hesitancy among some healthcare professionals in Pima County. These results will be used to help Arizonan Health Departments promote rollout of novel vaccines more effectively through targeting relevant vaccination decision-making factors among HCWs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maiya Block Ngaybe
- Department of Health Promotion Sciences, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | | | - Stephanie Mallahan
- Clinical Translational Sciences Graduate Program, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Riley Sena
- Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Samantha Werts
- Department of Health Promotion Sciences, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Brianna Rooney
- Department of Health Promotion Sciences, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Priscilla Magrath
- Department of Health Promotion Sciences, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Purnima Madhivanan
- Department of Health Promotion Sciences, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Tucson, AZ, USA
- Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
- Clinical Translational Sciences Graduate Program, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
95
|
Schellenberg N, Petrucka P, Dietrich Leurer M, Crizzle AM. Determinants of vaccine refusal, delay and reluctance in parents of 2-year-old children in Canada: Findings from the 2017 Childhood National Immunization Coverage Survey (cNICS). Travel Med Infect Dis 2023; 53:102584. [PMID: 37149239 DOI: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2023.102584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 04/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
Vaccine hesitancy is a barrier to improving childhood vaccination rates in Canada, but the scope of this problem is unclear due to inconsistent measurement of vaccine uptake indicators. Using 2017 data from a Canadian national vaccine coverage survey, this study analyzed the impact of demographics and parental knowledge, attitudes and beliefs (KAB) on vaccine decisions (refusal, delay and reluctance) in parents of 2-year-old children who had received at least one vaccine. The findings show that 16.8% had refused a vaccine, specifically influenza (73%), rotavirus (13%) and varicella (9%); female parents or those from Quebec or the Territories more likely to refuse. 12.8% were reluctant to accept a vaccine, usually influenza (34%), MMR (21%) and varicella (19%), but eventually accepted them upon advice from a health care provider. 13.1% had delayed a vaccine, usually because their child had health issues (54%) or was too young (18.6%) and was predicted by five or six person households. Recent immigration to Canada decreased likelihood of refusal, delay, or reluctance; however, after 10 years in Canada, these parents were as likely to refuse or be reluctant as parents born in Canada. Poor KAB increased likelihood of refusal and delay by 5 times, and reluctance by 15 times, while moderate KAB increased likelihood of refusal (OR 1.6), delay (OR 2.3) and reluctance (OR 3.6). Future research into vaccine decisions by female and/or single parents, and predictors of vaccine KAB would provide valuable information and help protect our children from vaccine preventable diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Schellenberg
- School of Public Health, University of Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - P Petrucka
- College of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan, Canada
| | | | - A M Crizzle
- School of Public Health, University of Saskatchewan, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
96
|
Pierz AJ, Rauh L, Masoud D, Cruz AK, Palmedo PC, Ratzan SC, Parker R. Supporting US healthcare providers for successful vaccine communication. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:423. [PMID: 37131261 PMCID: PMC10152412 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09348-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While many healthcare providers (HCPs) have navigated patients' vaccine concerns and questions prior to the rollout of the COVID-19 vaccines, sentiments surrounding the COVID-19 vaccines have presented new and distinct challenges. OBJECTIVE To understand the provider experience of counseling patients about COVID-19 vaccinations, aspects of the pandemic environment that impacted vaccine trust, and communication strategies providers found supportive of patient vaccine education. METHODS 7 focus groups of healthcare providers were conducted and recorded during December 2021 and January 2022, at the height of the Omicron wave in the United States. Recordings were transcribed, and iterative coding and analysis was applied. RESULTS 44 focus group participants representing 24 US states with the majority (80%) fully vaccinated at the time of data collection. Most participants were doctors (34%) or physician's assistants and nurse practitioners (34%). The negative impact of COVID-19 misinformation on patient-provider communication at both intrapersonal and interpersonal levels as well as barriers and facilitators to patient vaccine uptake are reported. People or sources that play a role in health communication ("messengers") and persuasive messages that impact behavior or attitudes towards vaccination ("messages") are described. Providers expressed frustration in the need to continuously address vaccine misinformation in clinical appointments among patients who remained unvaccinated. Many providers found value in resources that provided up-to-date and evidence-based information as COVID-19 guidelines continued to change. Additionally, providers indicated that patient-facing materials designed to support vaccination education were not frequently available, but they were the most valuable to providers in a changing information environment. CONCLUSIONS While vaccine decision-making is complex and hinges on diverse factors such as health care access (i.e., convenience, expense) and individual knowledge, providers can play a major role in navigating these factors with their patients. But to strengthen provider vaccine communication and promote vaccine uptake, a comprehensive communication infrastructure must be sustained to support the patient-provider dyad. The findings provide recommendations to maintain an environment that facilitates effective provider-patient communication at the community, organizational and policy levels. There is a need for a unified multisectoral response to reinforce the recommendations in patient settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda J Pierz
- Department of Community Health and Social Sciences, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York, 55 W 125th Street, New York, NY, 10027, USA.
| | - Lauren Rauh
- Department of Community Health and Social Sciences, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York, 55 W 125th Street, New York, NY, 10027, USA
| | - Dima Masoud
- Department of Community Health and Social Sciences, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York, 55 W 125th Street, New York, NY, 10027, USA
| | - Alanna Kate Cruz
- Department of Community Health and Social Sciences, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York, 55 W 125th Street, New York, NY, 10027, USA
| | - P Christopher Palmedo
- Department of Community Health and Social Sciences, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York, 55 W 125th Street, New York, NY, 10027, USA
| | - Scott C Ratzan
- Department of Community Health and Social Sciences, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York, 55 W 125th Street, New York, NY, 10027, USA
| | - Ruth Parker
- Division of General Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
97
|
Siegel MR, James KE, Jaffe E, L'Heureux MM, Kaimal AJ, Goldfarb IT. Provider confidence in counseling preconception, pregnant, and postpartum patients regarding COVID-19 vaccination: A cross-sectional survey study. Health Sci Rep 2023; 6:e1163. [PMID: 37197087 PMCID: PMC10183650 DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.1163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Revised: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Aims Healthcare provider counseling surrounding COVID-19 vaccine in pregnancy and lactation is essential to vaccination uptake in this population; however, provider knowledge and confidence are not well characterized. We aimed to assess knowledge and confidence in COVID-19 vaccine counseling among practitioners who provide care to pregnant persons and to describe factors associated with confidence in counseling. Methods A web-based anonymous survey was distributed via email to a cross-sectional convenience sample of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Primary Care, and Internal Medicine faculty at three hospitals in a single healthcare network in Massachusetts, United States. Individual demographics and institution-specific variables were included in the survey along with questions assessing both attitudes toward COVID-19 illness and confidence in counseling regarding the use of the vaccine in pregnancy. Results Almost all providers (151, 98.1%) reported that they received a COVID-19 vaccine, and most (111, 72.1%) reported that they believe the benefits of the vaccine in pregnancy outweigh the risks. Forty-one (26.6%) reported feeling very confident in counseling patients who primarily speak English about the evidence for messenger ribonucleic acid vaccination in pregnancy, and 36 (23%) reported feeling very confident in counseling patients who are not primarily English-speaking. Forty-three providers (28.1%) expressed strong confidence in their comfort talking to individuals with vaccine hesitancy based on historic and continued racism and systemic injustices. The sources that survey respondents most used to find information regarding COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy were the Centers for Disease Control (112, 74.2%), hospital-specific resources (94, 62.3%), and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (82, 54.3%). Conclusion Ensuring that providers feel comfortable bridging the gap between their belief that the vaccine is beneficial for pregnant patients and their comfort with holding conversations with patients regarding vaccination is paramount to ensure equitable access to vaccines for pregnant patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly R. Siegel
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyMassachusetts General HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Kaitlyn E. James
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyMassachusetts General HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Elana Jaffe
- University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public HealthUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA
| | | | - Anjali J. Kaimal
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyMassachusetts General HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Ilona T. Goldfarb
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyMassachusetts General HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
| |
Collapse
|
98
|
Cernasev A, Hohmeier KC, Oyedeji O, Hagemann T, Kintziger KW, Wisdom T, Gatwood J. Perspectives Associated with Human Papillomavirus Vaccination in Adults: A Qualitative Study. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:vaccines11040850. [PMID: 37112762 PMCID: PMC10146521 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11040850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Revised: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the last several decades, vaccine hesitancy has become a significant global public health concern. The human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine has been on the United States of America (USA) market since 2006, with extended approval up to age 45 granted in 2018. To date, there is limited research evaluating barriers and facilitators related to HPV vaccine initiation among adults and the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on individuals' vaccine-related behaviors. This study's main objective was to characterize the contributing factors that could promote or inhibit HPV vaccine uptake for adults. METHODS A qualitative approach consisting of focus group discussions (FGDs) was used for this study. The FGD guide was informed by concepts from the Transtheoretical Model, Health Belief Model, and Social Cognitive Theory. All virtual FGDs were led by two researchers, who recorded audio for data collection. The data were transcribed by a third party, and the transcripts were imported into Dedoose® software and analyzed using the six steps recommended by thematic analysis. RESULTS A total of 35 individuals participated in 6 focus groups over a 6-month period. Thematic analysis revealed four themes: (1) Intrinsic motivators for HPV vaccination, (2) Extrinsic motivators for HPV vaccination, (3) Vaccine promotion strategies, and (4) Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on vaccine hesitancy. CONCLUSION Both intrinsic and extrinsic factors play a role in influencing HPV vaccine uptake, and such considerations can guide efforts to improve the odds of HPV vaccination in working-age adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alina Cernasev
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Translational Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Nashville, TN 37211, USA
| | - Kenneth C Hohmeier
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Translational Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Nashville, TN 37211, USA
| | - Oluwafemifola Oyedeji
- Department of Public Health, University of Tennessee Knoxville, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA
| | - Tracy Hagemann
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Translational Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Nashville, TN 37211, USA
| | - Kristina W Kintziger
- Department of Environmental, Agricultural & Occupational Health, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA
| | - Taylor Wisdom
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Translational Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Nashville, TN 37211, USA
| | - Justin Gatwood
- US Health Outcomes Vaccines, GSK, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
99
|
Oyeyemi SO, Fagbemi S, Busari II, Wynn R. Health workers' beliefs in COVID-19 conspiracy theories, level of trust in government information and their willingness to take COVID-19 vaccines: A survey from Nigeria. JMIR Form Res 2023; 7:e41925. [PMID: 37068055 DOI: 10.2196/41925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Revised: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The World Health Organization recently declared vaccine hesitancy or refusal as a threat to global health. The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines have been proven efficacious and central to combatting the pandemic. However, many - including skilled healthcare workers (HCWs) - have been hesitant in taking the vaccines. Conspiracy theories spread on social media may play a central role in fueling vaccine hesitancy. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to investigate HCWs' beliefs in COVID-19 vaccines conspiracy theories (that the vaccines could alter one's DNA or genetic information; and that vaccines contain microchips) and trust in government information on COVID-19 vaccines. METHODS Healthcare workers in Ondo-State, Nigeria, representing different healthcare professions, were asked to participate anonymously in an online survey. The participants were asked about their beliefs in two viral conspiracy theories, and their trust in government information on COVID-19 vaccines. We used multivariable logistic regressions to investigate the relationships between trust in government information on COVID-19 vaccines and the beliefs in (a) DNA alteration, (b) microchip implant through the vaccine, and (c) willingness to accept the vaccine. RESULTS A total of 557 HCWs (28.0% men, 70.9% women) were included in the study. 26.4% (147/557) of the sampled HCWs believed COVID-19 vaccines contained digital microchips, while 30.0% (167/557) believed the vaccine could alter one's DNA or genetic information. The beliefs varied especially according to professional group, with 45.8% and 50.0% of the nurses and pharmacists, respectively, believing in the DNA alteration theory and 33.3% and 37.5% of the nurses and laboratory scientists, respectively, believing in the microchip theory. Social media was an important source of COVID-19 information for 45.4% of HCWs. In total 76.2% of the participants expressed a willingness to take the vaccine. The odds of HCWs believing that COVID-19 vaccines contained digital microchips increased significantly with decreasing level of trust in government information on COVID-19 vaccines when compared to those with a high level of trust (OR 4.6, 95%CI 2.6-8.0). We observed a similar finding in those who believed COVID-19 vaccines could alter DNA and genetic information (OR 5.2, 95%CI 3.1-8.8). CONCLUSIONS Misinformation regarding COVID-19 vaccines reaches and influences HCWs. A high proportion of the sampled HCWs believed that COVID-19 vaccines contained microchips, and or that the vaccines could alter recipients' DNA and genetic information. This might have negative consequences in terms of their own COVID-19 vaccination and on their influence on other people. Lack of trust in government and its institutions might explain the belief in both conspiracy theories and vaccine hesitancy. There is a need for healthcare stakeholders in Nigeria and around the world to actively counteract misinformation especially on social media and give HCWs necessary scientifically sound information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunday Oluwafemi Oyeyemi
- Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT-The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, NO
- Department of Community Health, University of Medical Science, Akure, NG
| | | | | | - Rolf Wynn
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, N-9038, Tromsø, NO
- Department of Education, ICT and Learning, Østfold University College, Halden, NO
| |
Collapse
|
100
|
Sahakyan S, Gharibyan N, Aslanyan L, Hayrumyan V, Harutyunyan A, Libaridian L, Grigoryan Z. Multi-Perspective Views and Hesitancy toward COVID-19 Vaccines: A Mixed Method Study. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:vaccines11040801. [PMID: 37112713 PMCID: PMC10147024 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11040801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Revised: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023] Open
Abstract
The worldwide uptake of COVID-19 vaccines was suboptimal throughout the pandemic; vaccine hesitancy played a principle role in low vaccine acceptance both globally and in Armenia. In order to understand the factors behind the slow vaccine uptake in Armenia, we aimed to explore the prevailing perceptions and experiences of healthcare providers and the general public related to COVID-19 vaccines. The study applied a convergent parallel mixed-methods study design (QUAL-quant) through in-depth interviews (IDI) and a telephone survey. We completed 34 IDIs with different physician and beneficiary groups and a telephone survey with 355 primary healthcare (PHC) providers. The IDIs found that physicians held variable views on the need for COVID-19 vaccination which, combined with mixed messaging in the media landscape, fueled the public’s vaccine hesitancy. The survey results were mostly consistent with the qualitative findings as 54% of physicians hypothesized that COVID-19 vaccines were rushed without appropriate testing and 42% were concerned about the safety of those vaccines. Strategies to improve vaccination rates must target the main drivers of hesitancy, such as physicians’ poor knowledge of specific vaccines and spiraling misconceptions about them. Meanwhile, timely educational campaigns with targeted messaging for the general public should address misinformation, promote vaccine acceptance, and empower their capacity to make decisions about their health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serine Sahakyan
- Turpanjian College of Health Sciences, American University of Armenia, Yerevan 0019, Armenia
| | - Natella Gharibyan
- Turpanjian College of Health Sciences, American University of Armenia, Yerevan 0019, Armenia
| | - Lusine Aslanyan
- Turpanjian College of Health Sciences, American University of Armenia, Yerevan 0019, Armenia
| | - Varduhi Hayrumyan
- Turpanjian College of Health Sciences, American University of Armenia, Yerevan 0019, Armenia
| | - Arusyak Harutyunyan
- Turpanjian College of Health Sciences, American University of Armenia, Yerevan 0019, Armenia
| | - Lorky Libaridian
- Cambridge Health Alliance, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Zaruhi Grigoryan
- Turpanjian College of Health Sciences, American University of Armenia, Yerevan 0019, Armenia
| |
Collapse
|