Hevein-like protein domains as a possible cause for allergen cross-reactivity between latex and banana

Natural rubber latex allergy in children: a follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Natural rubber latex (NRL) allergy occurs frequently in children with spina bifida and other children with disorders requiring multiple operations. Also atopic children who have not undergone surgery can be sensitized to NRL, but the outcome of these children has not been studied.

OBJECTIVE

To study how NRL-allergic children manage at home and whether their skin prick test (SPT) reactivity, latex RAST or IgE antibody levels to NRL allergens change during the follow-up.

METHODS

Twenty-four NRL-allergic children who had not undergone surgery and eight children with histories of multiple operations were followed up for a mean of 2.8 years. Clinical symptoms were recorded and all children were re-examined with SPT, latex RAST and ELISA for IgE antibodies to prohevein (Hev b 6.01), hevein (Hev b 6.02) and rubber elongation factor (REF, Hev b 1).

RESULTS

Nineteen of the 24 NRL-allergic children (79%) who had not undergone surgery had occasionally contacts to balloons and other NRL products at home, and 10 of them experienced symptoms ranging from contact urticaria to systemic reactions. Three of the eight NRL-allergic children with a history of multiple operations had contacts to rubber balloons without any symptoms, and five children underwent 1-8 uneventful operations in a latex-free environment. SPT reactivity to NRL allergens, latex-RAST or IgE antibody levels to prohevein or hevein did not change in either group of NRL-allergic children during the follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Occurrence of clinical symptoms and no decrease in SPT reactivity or IgE levels to NRL allergens in the course of the present follow-up study imply that more attention should be paid to the protection of NRL-allergic children from rubber contacts in the home environment.

The latex and food allergy connection

Natural rubber latex is used in the manufacture of many products in the United States. As natural rubber latex allergy becomes of increasing concern, dietitians need to have an understanding of this allergy and how it relates to workplace safety, employee health, and patient feeding and counseling. Natural rubber latex contains more than 35 proteins that may be related to Type I, Ig-E-mediated allergy in numerous segments of the population, including health care workers and patients. Many foods, especially chestnut, banana, and avocado, have the potential to cross-react with natural rubber latex. Chitinase enzymes, related to plant defense, are believed to be involved in this cross-reaction. A strong connection between food allergy and natural rubber latex allergy is recognized and described in this review.

Digestibility of allergens extracted from natural rubber latex and vegetable foods

BACKGROUND

Several cross-reactive allergens are now known to be involved in the defense responses of higher plants. Such proteins are drawing the attention of plant breeders because of their antimicrobial or stress-alleviating activities. Plants genetically modified to express defense-related proteins are being developed. The current concern is focused on the allergenicity of these intentionally expressed proteins.

OBJECTIVE

It is believed that food allergens are proteins resistant to digestion. Digestibility tests have been accepted as an appropriate method for evaluating the allergenicity of newly introduced proteins. In this study we investigated the usefulness of this method for detecting allergens from natural rubber latex and vegetable foods.

METHODS

Proteins were extracted from rubber latex, potato, and 5 kinds of fruits. Simulated gastric fluid (SGF) and simulated intestinal fluid (SIF) were used for the digestibility test. An aliquot of each digest was periodically withdrawn and analyzed. Allergens were detected with pooled sera from individuals with latex allergy or patients given a diagnosis of oral allergy syndrome.

RESULTS

Most latex and vegetable food proteins were digested by the SGF within 4 minutes. Numerous allergens were also decomposed by the SGF within 8 minutes. Although vegetable food allergens were relatively stable in the SIF, kiwi allergens were substantially degraded by the SIF within 16 hours.

CONCLUSION

The pronounced lability of the plant-derived allergens was thought to reflect the discrete sensitization and elicitation processes of patients with latex-fruit syndrome or oral allergy syndrome. These results indicate that the allergenicity of a newly expressed protein should be carefully evaluated according to not only its digestibility but also other important properties.

Class I chitinases, the panallergens responsible for the latex-fruit syndrome, are induced by ethylene treatment and inactivated by heating

BACKGROUND

Class I chitinases have been identified as the major panallergens in fruits associated with the latex-fruit syndrome, such as avocado, banana, and chestnut. However, other plant foods containing these enzymes have not been related to this syndrome.

OBJECTIVE

We sought out class I chitinases in the green bean, a legume that is known to express chitinases but is not associated with latex allergy, and examined whether the content or allergenic activity of chitinases can be modified by physical or chemical treatments.

METHODS

IgE-binding proteins in untreated bean samples, as well as in ethylene- and heat-treated samples, were detected by using a pool of sera from patients with latex-fruit allergy. Putative allergens were purified by cation-exchange chromatography and characterized by N-terminal sequencing, enzymatic activity assays, immunodetection with sera and antichitinase antibodies, and immunoblot inhibition tests. Skin prick tests with untreated and heated purified allergens were also carried out.

RESULTS

An IgE-binding protein of 32 kd that was also recognized by antichitinase antibodies was detected in green bean extracts. This reactive component was strongly induced by ethylene treatment. The protein, designated PvChI, was identified as a class I chitinase closely related to the major avocado allergen Prs a 1. Immunoblot inhibition assays demonstrated cross-reactivity between both allergens. Purified PvChI induced positive skin prick test responses in 7 of 8 patients with latex-fruit allergy. Heat treatment of both Prs a 1 and PvChI produced a full loss of their allergenic capacities both in vitro and in vivo. No IgE-binding component was detected in the white mature bean in which the main isolated 32-kd protein corresponded to a nonreactive phytohemagglutinin.

CONCLUSIONS

Ethylene treatment induces the expression of plant class I chitinases. The allergenic activity of plant class I chitinases seems to be lost by heating. This fact could explain why plant foods containing these putative allergens that are consumed after cooking are not usually associated with the latex-fruit syndrome.

IgE reactivity to patatin-like latex allergen, Hev b 7, and to patatin of potato tuber, Sol t 1, in adults and children allergic to natural rubber latex

BACKGROUND

Patients allergic to natural rubber latex (NRL) frequently show positive skin prick tests (SPT) and hypersensitivity reactions to various fruits, such as avocado, banana, and kiwi, as well as to vegetables such as potato.

METHODS

Hev b 7 was purified from NRL "C-serum" and Sol t 1 from potato extract, and they were detected by immunoblotting. IgE antibodies to Hev b 7 and Sol t 1 were measured with ELISA in sera from 35 adults and 35 children allergic to NRL. ELISA inhibition and immunoblotting were used to study allergen cross-reactivity. The in vivo reactivity of Hev b 7 and Sol t 1 were demonstrated in the SPT.

RESULTS

Seventeen (49%) of the 35 NRL-allergic adults had IgE antibodies to Hev b 7, in contrast to only one of the 35 NRL-allergic children. Fifteen (43%) of the NRL-allergic adults and 29 (83%) of the NRL-allergic children had IgE antibodies to Sol t 1. Ten (29%) of the adult sera showed IgE binding to both Sol t 1 and Hev b 7, and crosswise inhibition tests with pooled sera revealed marked cross-reactivity. In the SPT, both natural Hev b 7 and Sol t 1 were able to produce a wheal and flare reaction.

CONCLUSIONS

One-half of the NRL-allergic adults, but only one of the NRL-allergic children, had IgE antibodies to natural Hev b 7. These results suggest that Hev b 7 is an important NRL allergen for adults, but not for children. Elucidation of the clinical importance of the observed cross-reactivity between Hev b 7 and Sol t 1 requires further studies.

Allergic sensitization and clinical reactions to latex, food and pollen in adult patients

BACKGROUND

Many latex-allergic patients are sensitized to one or more foods. Patients allergic to tree and/or grass pollens are also often sensitized to plant-derived foods. Atopy, defined in most studies as sensitivity to an aeroallergen, is a risk factor for latex allergy. The relative importance of pollen sensitivity, a sign of atopy, as a risk factor for food allergy in latex-allergic patients has not, however, been examined.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between pollen sensitivity and sensitivity to food in latex-allergic patients.

METHODS

Forty-four latex-allergic patients (Groups 1 and 2), 24 of whom were also allergic to tree and/or grass pollen (Group 1) and 25 pollinosis patients who were not allergic to latex (Group 3) were studied. We obtained a history of reactions to food and skin tested them with 12 fresh-frozen fruits.

RESULTS

All 12 foods induced a skin test reaction in at least one patient in each of the three Groups. There were, however, twice as many positive skin test reactions to food in patients with pollinosis, whether or not they were allergic to latex, as there were in patients allergic to latex but not to pollen. Latex-allergic patients were most likely to have a positive skin test and a history of a reaction to avocado or banana whereas patients with pollinosis only were most likely to have a positive skin test and a history of a reaction to apple, peach or celery.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that concomitant allergy to pollen is an important risk factor in determining which plant-derived foods sensitize latex-allergic patients.

Cross-reactions in the latex-fruit syndrome: A relevant role of chitinases but not of complex asparagine-linked glycans

BACKGROUND

Cross-reactions between latex and plant foods (mainly fruits) have been widely reported. Although the cross-reactive components have not been well identified, class I chitinases seem to be the most credible candidates in chestnut, avocado, and banana.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the potential role of chitinases and complex glycans as cross-reactive determinants linked to latex-food allergy.

METHODS

Extracts from 20 different plant foods and from latex were obtained. These preparations were immunodetected with anticomplex glycans and antichitinase sera raised in rabbits, as well as with sera from patients with latex-fruit allergy and sera from patients allergic to latex without food allergy. Immunoblot inhibition assays were carried out by using a purified class I chitinase from avocado or latex extract as inhibitors.

RESULTS

Reactive proteins of approximately 30 to 45 kd (putative class I chitinases) were recognized by both specific polyclonal antibodies to chitinases and sera from patients with latex-fruit allergy in chestnut, cherimoya, passion fruit, kiwi, papaya, mango, tomato, and flour wheat extracts. Prs a 1, the major allergen and class I chitinase from avocado, and the latex extract strongly or fully inhibited IgE binding by these components when tested in immunoblot inhibition assays. Additional bands of 16 to 20 kd, 23 to 28 kd, and 50 to 70 kd were detected by the antichitinase serum but not with the patients' pooled sera. The putative 30- to 45-kd chitinases present in different food extracts did not react with a pool of sera from subjects allergic to latex but not to fruit. Very different immunodetection patterns were produced with the anticomplex glycan serum and the sera from allergic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Putative class I chitinases seem to be relevant cross-reactive components in foods associated with the latex-fruit syndrome, but do not play a specific role in allergy to latex but not to fruit. Cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants are not important structures in the context of latex-fruit cross-sensitization.