51
|
Ludmir EB, Kachnic LA, Czito BG. Evolution and Management of Treatment-Related Toxicity in Anal Cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2018; 26:91-113. [PMID: 27889040 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2016.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Over the past several decades, clinical trials have demonstrated improved disease-related outcomes in the definitive treatment of anal cancer. Although treatment with radiation and concurrent chemotherapy results in high rates of cure, significant acute and late toxicities are seen. This review focuses on the evolution of treatment-related toxicity for anal cancer. Management of these adverse effects is reviewed, as are future directions in anal cancer treatment and their impact on toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethan B Ludmir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Unit 1422, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Lisa A Kachnic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2220 Pierce Avenue, Suite B1034, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Brian G Czito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3085, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Battersby NJ, Bouliotis G, Emmertsen KJ, Juul T, Glynne-Jones R, Branagan G, Christensen P, Laurberg S, Moran BJ. Development and external validation of a nomogram and online tool to predict bowel dysfunction following restorative rectal cancer resection: the POLARS score. Gut 2018; 67:688-696. [PMID: 28115491 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2016] [Revised: 12/22/2016] [Accepted: 12/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Bowel dysfunction is common following a restorative rectal cancer resection, but symptom severity and the degree of quality of life impairment is highly variable. An internationally validated patient-reported outcome measure, Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) score, now enables these symptoms to be measured. The study purpose was: (1) to develop a model that predicts postoperative bowel function; (2) externally validate the model and (3) incorporate these findings into a nomogram and online tool in order to individualise patient counselling and aid preoperative consent. DESIGN Patients more than 1 year after curative restorative anterior resection (UK, median 54 months; Denmark (DK), 56 months since surgery) were invited to complete The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 version3 (EORTC QLQ-C30 v3), LARS and Wexner incontinence scores. Demographics, tumour characteristics, preoperative/postoperative treatment and surgical procedures were recorded. Using transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD) guidelines, risk factors for bowel dysfunction were independently assessed by advanced linear regression shrinkage techniques for each dataset (UK:DK). RESULTS Patients in the development (UK, n=463) and validation (DK, n=938) datasets reported mean (SD) LARS scores of 26 (11) and 24 (11), respectively. Key predictive factors for LARS were: age (at surgery); tumour height, total versus partial mesorectal excision, stoma and preoperative radiotherapy, with satisfactory model calibration and a Mallow's Cp of 7.5 and 5.5, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The Pre-Operative LARS score (POLARS) is the first nomogram and online tool to predict bowel dysfunction severity prior to anterior resection. Colorectal surgeons, gastroenterologist and nurse specialists may use POLARS to help patients understand their risk of bowel dysfunction and to preoperatively highlight patients who may require additional postoperative support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nick J Battersby
- The Pelican Cancer Foundation, The Ark, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK.,Department of Colorectal and Peritoneal Malignancy Surgery, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK
| | - George Bouliotis
- Department of Clinical Statistics, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Therese Juul
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Rob Glynne-Jones
- Radiotherapy Department, Mount-Vernon Cancer Centre, Mount-Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK
| | - Graham Branagan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust, Salisbury, Wiltshire, UK
| | | | - Søren Laurberg
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Brendan J Moran
- The Pelican Cancer Foundation, The Ark, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK.,Department of Colorectal and Peritoneal Malignancy Surgery, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
53
|
Trzcinski R, Dziki A, Brys M, Moszynska-Zielinska M, Chalubinska-Fendler J, Mik M, Kujawski R, Dziki L. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and its correlation with clinical symptoms and endoscopic findings in patients with chronic radiation proctitis. Colorectal Dis 2018; 20:321-330. [PMID: 28963746 DOI: 10.1111/codi.13902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2017] [Accepted: 09/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this study was to assess the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) as a key proangiogenic factor and determine whether there is any correlation between its expression and clinical symptoms or endoscopic changes in patients with chronic radiation proctitis (ChRP). METHOD Fifty patients who had all undergone radiotherapy for prostate, cervical or uterine cancer were included in the study (37 women, 13 men). There was a control group of 20 patients (9 women, 11 men). The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (RTOG/EORTC) scoring system was used for grading the severity of the proctitis. Endoscopic scoring of late rectal mucosal damage was performed using Gilinsky's classification. Serum levels of VEGF were analysed by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method. RESULTS Most patients presented with Grade 1 symptoms. Endoscopic assessment showed that most patients had Grade 1 late rectal mucosal damage. The predominant endoscopic finding was the presence of telangiectasia. Assessment of VEGF correlation between the control group and the degrees of endoscopic changes showed statistically significant differences for all three degrees (P < 0.0001, P = 0.0251 and P = 0.0005, respectively). Due to the small numbers of patients with Grades 2 and 3 symptoms using the RTOG/EORTC scoring system, they were grouped with Grades 1 and 4 respectively forming two groups for statistical purposes. VEGF expression differed significantly between controls and group I and between controls and group II (P = 0.0001, P = 0.0009, respectively). CONCLUSION A significant increase in VEGF expression was found to correlate with clinical symptoms and endoscopic rectal mucosa changes in patients with ChRP, suggesting that it may play an important role in pathological angiogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Trzcinski
- Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - A Dziki
- Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - M Brys
- Department of Cytobiochemistry, University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - M Moszynska-Zielinska
- Department of Radiotherapy, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Regional Cancer Center, Lodz, Poland
| | | | - M Mik
- Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - R Kujawski
- Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - L Dziki
- Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Gee C, Andreyev J, Muls A. Developing advanced clinical practice skills in gastrointestinal consequences of cancer treatment. BRITISH JOURNAL OF NURSING (MARK ALLEN PUBLISHING) 2018. [PMID: 29517330 DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2018.27.5.237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
This article explores the transition from a clinical nurse specialist (CNS) towards developing advanced clinical practice skills within a gastrointestinal consequences of cancer clinic. It presents data on the first 50 patients assessed by the CNS from a prospective service evaluation, demonstrating how this informed the nurse's future learning. There is high demand for advanced clinical practice skills to address unmet health needs and improve the quality, efficiency, and sustainability of healthcare services. However, a literature review found no literature on developing advanced clinical practice skills in this setting. Emerging themes from the service evaluation focused on barriers and enablers, ongoing support, organisational commitment and working in a multidisciplinary team. Blended learning provided both structured and opportunistic learning, embedding both formal and tacit knowledge, as roles require increasing flexibility. Clinical supervision and reflective practice were key in maintaining professional and peer support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Gee
- Senior Clinical Nurse Specialist GI Consequences of Cancer Treatment, Royal Marsden Hospital, London
| | - Jervoise Andreyev
- Consultant Gastroenterologist, United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Lincoln
| | - Ann Muls
- Macmillan Nurse Consultant GI Consequences of Cancer Treatment, Royal Marsden Hospital, London
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Lawler M, Alsina D, Adams RA, Anderson AS, Brown G, Fearnhead NS, Fenwick SW, Halloran SP, Hochhauser D, Hull MA, Koelzer VH, McNair AGK, Monahan KJ, Näthke I, Norton C, Novelli MR, Steele RJC, Thomas AL, Wilde LM, Wilson RH, Tomlinson I. Critical research gaps and recommendations to inform research prioritisation for more effective prevention and improved outcomes in colorectal cancer. Gut 2018; 67:179-193. [PMID: 29233930 PMCID: PMC5754857 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2017] [Revised: 10/24/2017] [Accepted: 10/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Colorectal cancer (CRC) leads to significant morbidity/mortality worldwide. Defining critical research gaps (RG), their prioritisation and resolution, could improve patient outcomes. DESIGN RG analysis was conducted by a multidisciplinary panel of patients, clinicians and researchers (n=71). Eight working groups (WG) were constituted: discovery science; risk; prevention; early diagnosis and screening; pathology; curative treatment; stage IV disease; and living with and beyond CRC. A series of discussions led to development of draft papers by each WG, which were evaluated by a 20-strong patient panel. A final list of RGs and research recommendations (RR) was endorsed by all participants. RESULTS Fifteen critical RGs are summarised below: RG1: Lack of realistic models that recapitulate tumour/tumour micro/macroenvironment; RG2: Insufficient evidence on precise contributions of genetic/environmental/lifestyle factors to CRC risk; RG3: Pressing need for prevention trials; RG4: Lack of integration of different prevention approaches; RG5: Lack of optimal strategies for CRC screening; RG6: Lack of effective triage systems for invasive investigations; RG7: Imprecise pathological assessment of CRC; RG8: Lack of qualified personnel in genomics, data sciences and digital pathology; RG9: Inadequate assessment/communication of risk, benefit and uncertainty of treatment choices; RG10: Need for novel technologies/interventions to improve curative outcomes; RG11: Lack of approaches that recognise molecular interplay between metastasising tumours and their microenvironment; RG12: Lack of reliable biomarkers to guide stage IV treatment; RG13: Need to increase understanding of health related quality of life (HRQOL) and promote residual symptom resolution; RG14: Lack of coordination of CRC research/funding; RG15: Lack of effective communication between relevant stakeholders. CONCLUSION Prioritising research activity and funding could have a significant impact on reducing CRC disease burden over the next 5 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Lawler
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | | | | | - Annie S Anderson
- Research into Cancer Prevention and Screening, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Gina Brown
- Department of Radiology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK
| | | | - Stephen W Fenwick
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Stephen P Halloran
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Daniel Hochhauser
- Department of Oncology, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | - Mark A Hull
- Leeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Viktor H Koelzer
- Molecular and Population Genetics Laboratory, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Angus G K McNair
- Centre for Surgical Research, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Kevin J Monahan
- Family History of Bowel Cancer Clinic, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Inke Näthke
- School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Christine Norton
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Marco R Novelli
- Research Department of Pathology, University College London Medical School, London, UK
| | - Robert J C Steele
- Research into Cancer Prevention and Screening, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Anne L Thomas
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Lisa M Wilde
- Bowel Cancer UK, London, UK
- Atticus Consultants Ltd, Croydon, UK
| | - Richard H Wilson
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Ian Tomlinson
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Jackson A, Lalji A, Kabir M, Muls A, Gee C, Vyoral S, Shaw C, Andreyev HJN. The efficacy of a low-fat diet to manage the symptoms of bile acid malabsorption - outcomes in patients previously treated for cancer. Clin Med (Lond) 2017; 17:412-418. [PMID: 28974589 PMCID: PMC6301937 DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.17-5-412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Dietary fat ingestion triggers bile secretion into the gastrointestinal tract. Bile acid malabsorption affects >1% of the population, causing loose stool and other gastrointestinal symptoms. The diagnosis is frequently missed. Treatments are often considered ineffective. We evaluated low-fat diets for managing gastrointestinal symptoms in these patients. All patients reporting type 6 or 7 stool were offered a selenium-75 homocholic acid taurine (SeHCAT) scan. Prospective data in patients with 7-day scan retention <20% were analysed. -Patients requiring a bile acid sequestrant were given this before receiving dietary advice. Patients completed a 7-day food diary before dietetic consultations. Personalised dietary interventions, providing 20% of daily energy from fat, were prescribed. Symptoms were assessed using a modified gastrointestinal symptom rating scale questionnaire before and 4-12 weeks after dietary intervention. A total of 114 patients (49 male, median age 64 years, median body mass index 27 kg/m2) were evaluated. 44% of these patients were taking colesevelam. After dietary intervention, there was statistically significant improvement in abdominal pain and nocturnal defecation (0.2% alpha, p=0.001). Improvement in bowel frequency, urgency, flatulence, belching, borborygmi and stool consistency were seen, but did not reach statistical significance (p≤0.004-0.031). Dietary intervention is an effective treatment option for patients with symptomatic bile acid malabsorption and should be routinely considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Jackson
- GI unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Amyn Lalji
- GI unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Mohammed Kabir
- Department of Research and Development, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Ann Muls
- GI unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Caroline Gee
- GI unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Susan Vyoral
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - Clare Shaw
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Sutton, UK
| | - H Jervoise N Andreyev
- GI unit, United Licolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Lincoln County Hospital, Lincoln, UK
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Muls AC, Klimova K, Andreyev HJN. Clinical decision-making in managing changes in gastrointestinal function following cancer therapies: Is experience enough? Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2017; 27. [PMID: 28892252 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/03/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
In patients with gastrointestinal (GI) disorders, identical symptoms may occur for many different reasons. This prospective study assessed whether experienced clinicians can predict accurately the underlying diagnosis or diagnoses contributing to specific symptoms based on the history and physical examination. Three clinicians assessed 47 patients referred for management of troublesome GI symptoms identified after treatment for cancer. Investigations were requested following our comprehensive, peer-reviewed algorithm. The clinicians then recorded their predictions as to the results of those investigations. After each patient had completed all their investigations, had received optimal management and had been discharged from the clinic, the predicted diagnoses were compared to those made. The clinicians predicted 92 diagnoses (1.9 per patient). After investigation, a total of 168 unique diagnoses were identified (3.5 per patient). Of the 92 predicted diagnoses, 41 (43%) matched the diagnosis. Of the 168 actual diagnoses identified, only 24% matched the prediction. None of the clinicians predicted the correct combination of diagnoses contributing to bowel symptoms. Clinical acumen alone is inadequate at determining cause for symptoms in patients with GI symptoms developing after cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A C Muls
- The GI Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - K Klimova
- The GI Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - H J N Andreyev
- The GI Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Wedlake L, Shaw C, McNair H, Lalji A, Mohammed K, Klopper T, Allan L, Tait D, Hawkins M, Somaiah N, Lalondrelle S, Taylor A, VanAs N, Stewart A, Essapen S, Gage H, Whelan K, Andreyev HJN. Randomized controlled trial of dietary fiber for the prevention of radiation-induced gastrointestinal toxicity during pelvic radiotherapy. Am J Clin Nutr 2017; 106:849-857. [PMID: 28679552 DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.116.150565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2016] [Accepted: 06/08/2017] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Therapeutic radiotherapy is an important treatment of pelvic cancers. Historically, low-fiber diets have been recommended despite a lack of evidence and potentially beneficial mechanisms of fiber.Objective: This randomized controlled trial compared low-, habitual-, and high-fiber diets for the prevention of gastrointestinal toxicity in patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy.Design: Patients were randomly assigned to low-fiber [≤10 g nonstarch polysaccharide (NSP)/d], habitual-fiber (control), or high-fiber (≥18 g NSP/d) diets and received individualized counseling at the start of radiotherapy to achieve these targets. The primary endpoint was the difference between groups in the change in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire-Bowel Subset (IBDQ-B) score between the starting and nadir (worst) score during treatment. Other measures included macronutrient intake, stool diaries, and fecal short-chain fatty acid concentrations.Results: Patients were randomly assigned to low-fiber (n = 55), habitual-fiber (n = 55), or high-fiber (n = 56) dietary advice. Fiber intakes were significantly different between groups (P < 0.001). The difference between groups in the change in IBDQ-B scores between the start and nadir was not significant (P = 0.093). However, the change in score between the start and end of radiotherapy was smaller in the high-fiber group (mean ± SD: -3.7 ± 12.8) than in the habitual-fiber group (-10.8 ± 13.5; P = 0.011). At 1-y postradiotherapy (n = 126) the difference in IBDQ-B scores between the high-fiber (+0.1 ± 14.5) and the habitual-fiber (-8.4 ± 13.3) groups was significant (P = 0.004). No significant differences were observed in stool frequency or form or in short-chain fatty acid concentrations. Significant reductions in energy, protein, and fat intake occurred in the low- and habitual-fiber groups only.Conclusions: Dietary advice to follow a high-fiber diet during pelvic radiotherapy resulted in reduced gastrointestinal toxicity both acutely and at 1 y compared with habitual-fiber intake. Restrictive, non-evidence-based advice to reduce fiber intake in this setting should be abandoned. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT 01170299.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Diana Tait
- Radiotherapy, Breast and Gastrointestinal Unit
| | | | | | | | | | - Nicholas VanAs
- Clinical Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alexandra Stewart
- Oncology, The Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, United Kingdom
| | - Sharadah Essapen
- Oncology, The Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, United Kingdom
| | - Heather Gage
- School of Economics, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom; and
| | - Kevin Whelan
- Diabetes and Nutritional Sciences Division, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
59
|
Sini C, Noris Chiorda B, Gabriele P, Sanguineti G, Morlino S, Badenchini F, Cante D, Carillo V, Gaetano M, Giandini T, Landoni V, Maggio A, Perna L, Petrucci E, Sacco V, Valdagni R, Rancati T, Fiorino C, Cozzarini C. Patient-reported intestinal toxicity from whole pelvis intensity-modulated radiotherapy: First quantification of bowel dose-volume effects. Radiother Oncol 2017; 124:296-301. [PMID: 28739383 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2016] [Revised: 06/06/2017] [Accepted: 07/06/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Intestinal toxicity is commonly experienced during whole-pelvis intensity-modulated radiotherapy (WPRT) for prostate cancer. The aim of the current study was to assess bowel dose-volume relationships for acute patient-reported intestinal symptoms of patients treated with WPRT for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Complete data of 206 patients were available; the median dose to pelvic nodes was 51.8Gy (range 50.4-54.4, 1.7-2Gy/fr). Intestinal symptoms were assessed as changes in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire scores relative to the Bowel Domain (IBDQ-B) between baseline and radiotherapy mid-point/end. The 25th percentiles of the most severe worsening from baseline (ΔIBDQ-B) were set as end-points. The impact of bowel loops and sigmoid colon dose-volume/surface parameters as well as selected clinical parameters were investigated using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS Analyses were focused on the four questions showing a median ΔIBDQ-B>0. No dose volume/surface parameters were predictive, other than ΔIBDQ5≥3 (loose stools): when grouping patients according to bowel DVHs (high risk: V20>470cc, V30>245cc, V42>110cc; low risk: all the remaining patients), a two-variable model including high-risk DVH-shape (OR: 9.3) and age (protective, OR: 0.94) was assessed. The model showed good calibration (slope: 1.003, R2=0.92) and was found to be robust after bootstrap-based internal validation. CONCLUSIONS Constraining the bowel loops may reduce the risk of loose stools. The risk is higher for younger patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla Sini
- Medical Physics, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Pietro Gabriele
- Radiotherapy Department, Candiolo Cancer Institute - FPO, IRCCS, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Sanguineti
- Department of Radiotherapy, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Sara Morlino
- Radiation Oncology 1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Fabio Badenchini
- Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Viviana Carillo
- Radiotherapy, Centro AKTIS Diagnostica e terapia, Napoli, Italy
| | | | - Tommaso Giandini
- Medical Physics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Valeria Landoni
- Department of Physics, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Angelo Maggio
- Medical Physics Department, Candiolo Cancer Institute - FPO, IRCCS, Italy
| | - Lucia Perna
- Medical Physics, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Vincenzo Sacco
- Radiotherapy, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
| | - Riccardo Valdagni
- Radiation Oncology 1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy; Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy; UNIV Hematology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy
| | - Tiziana Rancati
- Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Claudio Fiorino
- Medical Physics, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
60
|
Citrin DE, Prasanna PGS, Walker AJ, Freeman ML, Eke I, Barcellos-Hoff MH, Arankalayil MJ, Cohen EP, Wilkins RC, Ahmed MM, Anscher MS, Movsas B, Buchsbaum JC, Mendonca MS, Wynn TA, Coleman CN. Radiation-Induced Fibrosis: Mechanisms and Opportunities to Mitigate. Report of an NCI Workshop, September 19, 2016. Radiat Res 2017; 188:1-20. [PMID: 28489488 PMCID: PMC5558616 DOI: 10.1667/rr14784.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
A workshop entitled "Radiation-Induced Fibrosis: Mechanisms and Opportunities to Mitigate" (held in Rockville, MD, September 19, 2016) was organized by the Radiation Research Program and Radiation Oncology Branch of the Center for Cancer Research (CCR) of the National Cancer Institute (NCI), to identify critical research areas and directions that will advance the understanding of radiation-induced fibrosis (RIF) and accelerate the development of strategies to mitigate or treat it. Experts in radiation biology, radiation oncology and related fields met to identify and prioritize the key areas for future research and clinical translation. The consensus was that several known and newly identified targets can prevent or mitigate RIF in pre-clinical models. Further, basic and translational research and focused clinical trials are needed to identify optimal agents and strategies for therapeutic use. It was felt that optimally designed preclinical models are needed to better study biomarkers that predict for development of RIF, as well as to understand when effective therapies need to be initiated in relationship to manifestation of injury. Integrating appropriate endpoints and defining efficacy in clinical trials testing treatment of RIF were felt to be critical to demonstrating efficacy. The objective of this meeting report is to (a) highlight the significance of RIF in a global context, (b) summarize recent advances in our understanding of mechanisms of RIF,
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah E. Citrin
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Pataje G. S. Prasanna
- Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Amanda J. Walker
- Office of Hematology and Oncology Products, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Michael L. Freeman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Iris Eke
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Mary Helen Barcellos-Hoff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | | | - Eric P. Cohen
- Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ruth C. Wilkins
- Radiobiology Division, Consumer and Clinical Radiation Protection Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario
| | - Mansoor M. Ahmed
- Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Mitchell S. Anscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Benjamin Movsas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Jeffrey C. Buchsbaum
- Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Marc S. Mendonca
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Thomas A. Wynn
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - C. Norman Coleman
- Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Hughes DL, Cornish J, Morris C. Functional outcome following rectal surgery-predisposing factors for low anterior resection syndrome. Int J Colorectal Dis 2017; 32:691-697. [PMID: 28130593 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-017-2765-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/16/2017] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Developments in surgical techniques and neoadjuvant treatment have enabled an increasing proportion of patients with rectal cancer to undergo sphincter-sparing resections. The avoidance of a permanent stoma can come at the cost of poor bowel function which can significantly impact patients' quality of life. The objective of this study was to identify the incidence and risk factors for the development of bowel dysfunction following rectal cancer surgery. METHODS Patients undergoing anterior resection for rectal cancer between January 2009 and January 2015 were identified from a rectal cancer database at a single centre. All patients who had bowel continuity restored and underwent curative resection were sent a validated low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) questionnaire. Pre-, inter- and postoperative factors were compared between patients with major LARS and those with minor or no LARS using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS There was an 80% response rate (n = 68). Thirty-eight patients (56%) had major LARS symptoms. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy, predominantly long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCCRT), was an independent risk factor for development of major LARS symptoms, while restoration of bowel continuity within 6 months was protective. CONCLUSIONS The use of neoadjuvant radiotherapy (LCCRT) and timing of stoma reversal are risk factors for the development of severe bowel dysfunction. The potential for long-term poor functional results after LCCRT should be discussed with patients and form a part of the decision-making in individual treatment plans. The timing of the ileostomy closure, where safe and feasible, should be performed within 6 months to improve outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Ll Hughes
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, UK
| | - Julie Cornish
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Glamorgan Hospital, Llantrisant, CF72 8XR, UK.
| | - Chris Morris
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
62
|
Jordan J, Gage H, Benton B, Lalji A, Norton C, Andreyev HJN. Gastroenterologist and nurse management of symptoms after pelvic radiotherapy for cancer: an economic evaluation of a clinical randomized controlled trial (the ORBIT study). CLINICOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2017; 9:241-249. [PMID: 28496343 PMCID: PMC5417736 DOI: 10.2147/ceor.s122104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over 20 distressing gastrointestinal symptoms affect many patients after pelvic radiotherapy, but in the United Kingdom few are referred for assessment. Algorithmic-based treatment delivered by either a consultant gastroenterologist or a clinical nurse specialist has been shown in a randomized trial to be statistically and clinically more effective than provision of a self-help booklet. In this study, we assessed cost-effectiveness. METHODS Outcomes were measured at baseline (pre-randomization) and 6 months. Change in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) was the primary outcome for the economic evaluation; a secondary analysis used change in the bowel subset score of the modified Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ-B). Intervention costs, British pounds 2013, covered visits with the gastroenterologist or nurse, investigations, medications and treatments. Incremental outcomes and incremental costs were estimated simultaneously using multivariate linear regression. Uncertainty was handled non-parametrically using bootstrap with replacement. RESULTS The mean (SD) cost of treatment was £895 (499) for the nurse and £1101 (567) for the consultant. The nurse was dominated by usual care, which was cheaper and achieved better outcomes. The mean cost per QALY gained from the consultant, compared to usual care, was £250,455; comparing the consultant to the nurse, it was £25,875. Algorithmic care produced better outcomes compared to the booklet only, as reflected in the IBDQ-B results, at a cost of ~£1,000. CONCLUSION Algorithmic treatment of radiation bowel injury by a consultant or a nurse results in significant symptom relief for patients but was not found to be cost-effective according to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jake Jordan
- Surrey Health Economics Centre, School of Economics, University of Surrey, Guildford
| | - Heather Gage
- Surrey Health Economics Centre, School of Economics, University of Surrey, Guildford
| | - Barbara Benton
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Amyn Lalji
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Christine Norton
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, King’s College, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
63
|
Harrington J, White J. The late medical effects of cancer treatments: a growing challenge for all medical professionals. Clin Med (Lond) 2017; 17:137-139. [PMID: 28365623 PMCID: PMC6297612 DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.17-2-137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jeff White
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
64
|
Ludlow H, Green J, Turner J. Late gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiation: a nurse-led service. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017; 26:S15-S22. [DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2017.26.4.s15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Ludlow
- Macmillan Senior Nurse for Late GI Effects of Treatment, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Clinical Nurse Specialist and Nurse Endoscopist, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board
| | - John Green
- Consultant Gastroenterologist, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board
| | - Jeff Turner
- Consultant Gastroenterologist, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Selph JP, Peterson AC. Review Article: Past, Present and Future of Cancer Survivorship and the Importance of the Urologist. UROLOGY PRACTICE 2017; 4:60-70. [PMID: 37592636 DOI: 10.1016/j.urpr.2016.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cancer survivorship is a concept that focuses on the complete medical and holistic care of the patient with cancer from the time of diagnosis to the time of death. In 2015 the number of cancer survivors in the United States was expected to exceed 14.5 million people and a significant portion of these patients have malignancies that affect the genitourinary health of the survivor. In this review we describe the concept of cancer survivorship and review the important role of the urologist in cancer survivor care. METHODS A literature search concerning cancer survivorship and urogenital neoplasms was performed. We systematically searched Medline® from inception until July 2015 with the objective of identifying studies specifically targeting broad survivorship care concerns for genitourinary neoplasms. We also included nonsystematically identified publications, and governmental and agency produced reports that are currently available through various government entities and organizations. RESULTS Systematic searching yielded 35 articles and 7 reports for inclusion in our literature review. Urology relevant Medline findings were categorized into review articles, biopsychosocial aspects of cancer care, guidelines or society recommendations, diet and exercise related materials, models or coordination of care, or other. We found that the development of guidelines and recommendations for survivorship care in urology has been limited by the quality of the studies published to date. CONCLUSIONS More patients are surviving cancer and living with the consequences of treatment of the primary disease. Awareness of the components of survivorship will be critical as more national organizations require specific survivorship care programs to address these issues. Given that a large number of cancer survivors in the United States have survived urological malignancy or have urological side effects of treatment, the urology community must be familiar with the global concept of survivorship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Patrick Selph
- Department of Urology, University of Alabama-Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
- Divisions of Urology and Reconstructive Urology, Duke University Medical Center (ACP), Durham, North Carolina
| | - Andrew C Peterson
- Department of Urology, University of Alabama-Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
- Divisions of Urology and Reconstructive Urology, Duke University Medical Center (ACP), Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
66
|
Muircroft W. An Australasian perspective on the curative treatment of patients with pancreatic cancer, supportive care, and future directions for management. Ecancermedicalscience 2016; 10:700. [PMID: 28105071 PMCID: PMC5221644 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2016.700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
The management of patients with pancreatic cancer requires an individualised approach and the support of a multidisciplinary team to accurately stage patients and determine their suitability for curative treatment. Guidelines have been developed in Australasia to define the operability for patients who have been diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. This is supported by advances in pancreatic cancer genetics, which show potential for developing targeted therapies for pancreatic cancer. Both surgery and targeted therapies aim to extend the overall survival of patients. Patients who are cured of their cancer may live with permanent changes in gut anatomy and physiology leading to distressing symptoms that may not be addressed. Patients who cannot be cured of pancreatic cancer may have supportive care issues that are often complex, and a strategic approach to manage these needs for patients with pancreatic cancer is underdeveloped in Australasia. Supportive care services need to be in a position to adapt patient care as the evidence base develops.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy Muircroft
- Southern Adelaide Palliative Service, Adelaide 5041, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
Taylor S, Demeyin W, Muls A, Ferguson C, Farnell DJJ, Cohen D, Andreyev J, Green J, Smith L, Ahmedzai S, Pickett S, Nelson A, Staffurth J. Improving the well-being of men by Evaluating and Addressing the Gastrointestinal Late Effects (EAGLE) of radical treatment for prostate cancer: study protocol for a mixed-method implementation project. BMJ Open 2016; 6:e011773. [PMID: 27697869 PMCID: PMC5073602 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radiotherapy treatment for prostate cancer can cause bowel problems, which may lead to severe difficulties for cancer survivors including limiting travel, work or socialising. These symptoms can appear at any time following radiotherapy. This study focuses on the early identification and protocol-based management of effects known to cause long-term, or even permanent, changes to the well-being of prostate cancer survivors. The rationale of this study is to improve the care offered to men and their families following pelvic radiotherapy for prostate cancer. METHOD AND ANALYSIS Implementation research methodology will be used to adopt a multicomponent intervention at three UK centres. The intervention package comprises a standardised clinical assessment of relevant symptoms in oncology outpatient clinics and rapid referral to an enhanced gastroenterological service for patients identified with bowel problems. Gastroenterology staff will be trained to use an expert-practice algorithm of targeted gastroenterology investigations and treatments. The evaluation of the intervention and its embedding within local practices will be conducted using a mixed-methods design. The effect of the new service will be measured in terms of the following outcomes: acceptability to staff and patients; quality of life; symptom control and cost-effectiveness. Data collection will take place at baseline, 6 months (±2 months), and 12 months (±2 months) after entry into the study. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study has ethical approval from the North West-Liverpool East Research Ethics Committee and the appropriate NHS governance clearance. All participants provide written informed consent. The study team aim to publish the results of the study in peer-reviewed journals as well as at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER UKCRN16974.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia Taylor
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Weyinmi Demeyin
- Specialist Unit for Review Evidence, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Ann Muls
- Gastroenterology Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Catherine Ferguson
- Department of Oncology, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - David Cohen
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Education, Health Economics and Policy Research Unit (HEPRU), University of South Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | | | - John Green
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Llandough, Cardiff, UK
| | | | - Sam Ahmedzai
- Department of Oncology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Sara Pickett
- Swansea Centre for Health Economics, College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | - Annmarie Nelson
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - John Staffurth
- Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
- Institute of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
68
|
Weiner J, Schwartz D, Martinez M, Safdieh J, Aytaman A, Schreiber D. Long-term results on the efficacy of argon plasma coagulation for patients with chronic radiation proctitis after conventionally fractionated, dose-escalated radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Pract Radiat Oncol 2016; 7:e35-e42. [PMID: 27663931 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2016.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2016] [Revised: 07/23/2016] [Accepted: 07/27/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study was designed to assess the efficacy and outcomes of argon plasma coagulation (APC) in the management of chronic radiation proctitis after conventionally fractionated, dose-escalated radiation therapy (≥7560 cGy). METHODS AND MATERIALS We retrospectively reviewed the charts on all patients treated with external beam radiation therapy (minimum dose, 7560 cGy) for histologically confirmed prostate cancer at our institution from 2003 to 2011. Five hundred patients met these criteria; of these, 35 patients (7.0%) developed radiation proctitis necessitating intervention with APC. Indications for APC treatment were either the need for blood transfusions resulting from proctitis-related anemia or refractory bleeding despite medical management. RESULTS The median follow-up from the completion of radiation treatment was 78 months (range, 19-129) and the median follow up from the most recent APC treatment was 56 months (range, 3-112). Fifteen men (42.9%) needed blood transfusions because of proctitis-related anemia. For 19 patients (54.3%), bleeding was controlled after 1 or 2 treatments. Eventual bleeding control was obtained in 30 patients (85.7%). The median number of sessions per patient was 2 (range, 1-13). Post-APC ulceration was noted in 8 cases (22.9%). Two patients (5.7%) developed colovesicular fistulas, with 1 patient dying from this complication. A short interval between treatments (≤35 days) was associated with an increased risk of ulcer or fistula formation. CONCLUSIONS APC is an effective treatment for patients with medically refractive radiation proctitis after dose-escalated radiation therapy, frequently controlling bleeding after only one or two sessions. However, rectal ulceration is a common complication, along with a small risk of life-threatening toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Weiner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Veterans Affairs New York Harbor Healthcare System, Brooklyn, New York; Department of Radiation Oncology, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York.
| | - David Schwartz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Veterans Affairs New York Harbor Healthcare System, Brooklyn, New York; Department of Radiation Oncology, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York
| | - Manuel Martinez
- Department of Gastroenterology, Veterans Affairs New York Harbor Healthcare System, Brooklyn, New York; Department of Gastroenterology, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York
| | - Joseph Safdieh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Veterans Affairs New York Harbor Healthcare System, Brooklyn, New York; Department of Radiation Oncology, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York
| | - Ayse Aytaman
- Department of Gastroenterology, Veterans Affairs New York Harbor Healthcare System, Brooklyn, New York
| | - David Schreiber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Veterans Affairs New York Harbor Healthcare System, Brooklyn, New York; Department of Radiation Oncology, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York
| |
Collapse
|
69
|
Petit C, Dumas I, Chargari C, Martinetti F, Maroun P, Doyeux K, Tailleur A, Haie-Meder C, Mazeron R. MRI-guided brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: Small bowelD0.1cm3andD2cm3are not predictive of late morbidity. Brachytherapy 2016; 15:463-470. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2016.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2016] [Revised: 04/05/2016] [Accepted: 04/08/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
70
|
Jefford M, Gough K, Drosdowsky A, Russell L, Aranda S, Butow P, Phipps-Nelson J, Young J, Krishnasamy M, Ugalde A, King D, Strickland A, Franco M, Blum R, Johnson C, Ganju V, Shapiro J, Chong G, Charlton J, Haydon A, Schofield P. A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Nurse-Led Supportive Care Package (SurvivorCare) for Survivors of Colorectal Cancer. Oncologist 2016; 21:1014-23. [PMID: 27306909 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2015] [Accepted: 03/08/2016] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colorectal cancer (CRC) and its treatments can cause distressing sequelae. We conducted a multicenter randomized controlled trial aiming to improve psychological distress, supportive care needs (SCNs), and quality of life (QOL) of patients with CRC. The intervention, called SurvivorCare (SC), comprised educational materials, needs assessment, survivorship care plan, end-of-treatment session, and three follow-up telephone calls. METHODS At the end of treatment for stage I-III CRC, eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to usual care (UC) or to UC plus SC. Distress (Brief Symptom Inventory 18), SCNs (Cancer Survivors' Unmet Needs measure), and QOL (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] QOL questionnaires C30 and EORTC CRC module CR29) were assessed at baseline and at 2 and 6 months (follow-up 1 [FU1] and FU2, respectively). The primary hypothesis was that SC would have a beneficial effect on distress at FU1. The secondary hypotheses were that SC would have a beneficial effect on (a) SCN and QOL at FU1 and on (b) distress, SCNs, and QOL at FU2. A total of 15 items assessed experience of care. RESULTS Of 221 patients randomly assigned, 4 were ineligible for the study and 1 was lost to FU, leaving 110 in the UC group and 106 in the SC group. Patients' characteristics included the following: median age, 64 years; men, 52%; colon cancer, 56%; rectal cancer, 35%; overlapping sites of disease, 10%; stage I disease, 7%; stage II, 22%; stage III, 71%. Baseline distress and QOL scores were similar to population norms. Between-group differences in distress at FU1 (primary outcome) and at FU2, and SCNs and QOL at FU1 and FU2 were small and nonsignificant. Patients in the SC group were more satisfied with survivorship care than those in the UC group (significant differences on 10 of 15 items). CONCLUSION The addition of SC to UC did not have a beneficial effect on distress, SCNs, or QOL outcomes, but patients in the SC group were more satisfied with care. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Some survivors of colorectal cancer report distressing effects after completing treatment. Strategies to identify and respond to survivors' issues are needed. In a randomized controlled trial, the addition of a nurse-led supportive care package (SurvivorCare) to usual post-treatment care did not impact survivors' distress, quality of life, or unmet needs. However, patients receiving the SurvivorCare intervention were more satisfied with survivorship care. Factors for consideration in the design of subsequent studies are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Jefford
- Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Karla Gough
- Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Allison Drosdowsky
- Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lahiru Russell
- Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sanchia Aranda
- Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Cancer Institute NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Phyllis Butow
- University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jo Phipps-Nelson
- Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jane Young
- Cancer Institute NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mei Krishnasamy
- Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anna Ugalde
- Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dorothy King
- Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | - Robert Blum
- Bendigo Health, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Vinod Ganju
- Peninsula and Southeast Oncology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Geoffrey Chong
- Ballarat Regional Integrated Cancer Centre, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
| | - Julie Charlton
- Newcastle Private Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Penelope Schofield
- Department of Cancer Experiences Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia Department of Psychology, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
71
|
Muls AC, Lalji A, Marshall C, Butler L, Shaw C, Vyoral S, Mohammed K, Andreyev HJN. The holistic management of consequences of cancer treatment by a gastrointestinal and nutrition team: a financially viable approach to an enormous problem? Clin Med (Lond) 2016; 16:240-6. [PMID: 27251913 PMCID: PMC5922702 DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.16-3-240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
There is no national NHS tariff to fund services for patients experiencing long-term bowel and nutritional problems after cancer treatment. In this paper, we report the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients referred to our service and the estimated cost of a completed episode of care. Patient characteristics, symptom severity, investigations, diagnoses, number of clinic visits and referrals elsewhere were recorded in a prospective cohort study. During 2013-14, 325 patients completed assessment and treatment. The majority of original cancer diagnoses were urological (43%) and gynaecological (21%). A median of six investigations were requested. 62% were found to have three or more new diagnoses including small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (46%), vitamin D deficiency (38%), bile acid malabsorption (28%), gastritis (22%), radiation-induced bleeding (20%), vitamin B12 deficiency (17%), pelvic floor weakness (17%), colorectal polyps (13%) and pancreatic insufficiency (5%). A median of three visits were required and all commonly reported gastrointestinal symptoms improved by discharge. The mean episode of care per patient was costed at £1,563. Effective amelioration of chronic gastrointestinal toxicity after cancer treatment costs substantially less than treating the cancer in the first place and requires an NHS tariff.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann C Muls
- GI Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Amyn Lalji
- GI Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | - Clare Shaw
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Susan Vyoral
- GI Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
72
|
Bugeja S, Ivaz S, Frost A, Andrich DE, Mundy AR. Complex Fistula Disease in the Pelvic Malignancy Cancer Survivor Who Has Been Treated with Radiation. CURRENT BLADDER DYSFUNCTION REPORTS 2016. [DOI: 10.1007/s11884-016-0358-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
73
|
Liu Z, Tian H, Jiang J, Yang Y, Tan S, Lin X, Liu H, Wu B. β-Arrestin-2 modulates radiation-induced intestinal crypt progenitor/stem cell injury. Cell Death Differ 2016; 23:1529-41. [PMID: 27128598 PMCID: PMC5072429 DOI: 10.1038/cdd.2016.38] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2015] [Revised: 03/14/2016] [Accepted: 03/21/2016] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Intestinal crypt progenitor/stem (ICPS) cell apoptosis and vascular endothelial cell apoptosis are responsible for the initiation and development of ionizing radiation (IR)-evoked gastrointestinal syndrome. The signaling mechanisms underlying IR-induced ICPS cell apoptosis remain largely unclear. Our findings provide evidence that β-arrestin-2 (βarr2)-mediated ICPS cell apoptosis is crucial for IR-stimulated intestinal injury. βArr2-deficient mice exhibited decreased ICPS cell and intestinal Lgr5+ (leucine-rich repeat-containing G-protein-coupled receptor 5-positive) stem cell apoptosis, promoted crypt proliferation and reproduction, and protracted survival following lethal doses of radiation. Radioprotection in the ICPS cells isolated from βarr2-deficient mice depended on prolonged nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) activation via direct interaction of βarr2 with IκBα and subsequent inhibition of p53-upregulated modulator of apoptosis (PUMA)-mediated mitochondrial dysfunction. Unexpectedly, βarr2 deficiency had little effect on IR-induced intestinal vascular endothelial cell apoptosis in mice. Consistently, βarr2 knockdown also provided significant radioresistance by manipulating NF-κB/PUMA signaling in Lgr5+ cells in vitro. Collectively, these observations show that targeting the βarr2/NF-κB/PUMA novel pathway is a potential radiomitigator for limiting the damaging effect of radiotherapy on the gastrointestinal system. Significance statement: acute injury to the intestinal mucosa is a major dose-limiting complication of abdominal radiotherapy. The issue of whether the critical factor for the initiation of radiation-induced intestinal injury is intestinal stem cell apoptosis or endothelial cell apoptosis remains unresolved. βArrs have recently been found to be multifunctional adaptor of apoptosis. Here, we found that β-arrestin-2 (βarr2) deficiency was associated with decreased radiation-induced ICPS cell apoptosis, which prolonged survival in abdominally irradiated mice. Moreover, βarr2 deficiency-mediated intestinal progenitor/stem cell radioprotection relied on protracted NF-κB activation and subsequent suppression of PUMA induction. Our results suggest that ICPS cell apoptosis is the factor involved in the initiation and development of radiation-induced gastrointestinal syndrome. βArr2 is a potential target for lessening radiation-induced ICPS cell apoptosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Z Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - H Tian
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - J Jiang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Y Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - S Tan
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - X Lin
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - H Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - B Wu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
74
|
van de Wetering FT, Verleye L, Andreyev HJN, Maher J, Vlayen J, Pieters BR, van Tienhoven G, Scholten RJPM. Non-surgical interventions for late rectal problems (proctopathy) of radiotherapy in people who have received radiotherapy to the pelvis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 4:CD003455. [PMID: 27111831 PMCID: PMC7173735 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003455.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2002, and previously updated in 2007. Late radiation rectal problems (proctopathy) include bleeding, pain, faecal urgency, and incontinence and may develop after pelvic radiotherapy treatment for cancer. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness and safety of non-surgical interventions for managing late radiation proctopathy. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 11, 2015); MEDLINE (Ovid); EMBASE (Ovid); CANCERCD; Science Citation Index; and CINAHL from inception to November 2015. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing non-surgical interventions for the management of late radiation proctopathy in people with cancer who have undergone pelvic radiotherapy for cancer. Primary outcomes considered were: episodes of bowel activity, bleeding, pain, tenesmus, urgency, and sphincter dysfunction. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Study selection, 'Risk of bias' assessment, and data extraction were performed in duplicate, and any disagreements were resolved by involving a third review author. MAIN RESULTS We identified 1221 unique references and 16 studies including 993 participants that met our inclusion criteria. One study found through the last update was moved to the 'Studies awaiting classification' section. We did not pool outcomes for a meta-analysis due to variation in study characteristics and endpoints across included studies.Since radiation proctopathy is a condition with various symptoms or combinations of symptoms, the studies were heterogeneous in their intended effect. Some studies investigated treatments targeted at bleeding only (group 1), some investigated treatments targeted at a combination of anorectal symptoms, but not a single treatment (group 2). The third group focused on the treatment of the collection of symptoms referred to as pelvic radiation disease. In order to enable some comparison of this heterogeneous collection of studies, we describe the effects in these three groups separately.Nine studies assessed treatments for rectal bleeding and were unclear or at high risk of bias. The only treatments that made a significant difference on primary outcomes were argon plasma coagulation (APC) followed by oral sucralfate versus APC with placebo (endoscopic score 6 to 9 in favour of APC with placebo, risk ratio (RR) 2.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12 to 4.55; 1 study, 122 participants, low- to moderate-quality evidence); formalin dab treatment (4%) versus sucralfate steroid retention enema (symptom score after treatment graded by the Radiation Proctopathy System Assessments Scale (RPSAS) and sigmoidoscopic score in favour of formalin (P = 0.001, effect not quantified, 1 study, 102 participants, very low- to low-quality evidence), and colonic irrigation plus ciprofloxacin and metronidazole versus formalin application (4%) (bleeding (P = 0.007, effect not quantified), urgency (P = 0.0004, effect not quantified), and diarrhoea (P = 0.007, effect not quantified) in favour of colonic irrigation (1 study, 50 participants, low-quality evidence).Three studies, of unclear and high risk of bias, assessed treatments targeted at something very localised but not a single pathology. We identified no significant differences on our primary outcomes. We graded all studies as very low-quality evidence due to unclear risk of bias and very serious imprecision.Four studies, of unclear and high risk of bias, assessed treatments targeted at more than one symptom yet confined to the anorectal region. Studies that demonstrated an effect on symptoms included: gastroenterologist-led algorithm-based treatment versus usual care (detailed self help booklet) (significant difference in favour of gastroenterologist-led algorithm-based treatment on change in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire-Bowel (IBDQ-B) score at six months, mean difference (MD) 5.47, 95% CI 1.14 to 9.81) and nurse-led algorithm-based treatment versus usual care (significant difference in favour of the nurse-led algorithm-based treatment on change in IBDQ-B score at six months, MD 4.12, 95% CI 0.04 to 8.19) (1 study, 218 participants, low-quality evidence); hyperbaric oxygen therapy (at 2.0 atmospheres absolute) versus placebo (improvement of Subjective, Objective, Management, Analytic - Late Effects of Normal Tissue (SOMA-LENT) score in favour of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT), P = 0.0019) (1 study, 150 participants, moderate-quality evidence, retinol palmitate versus placebo (improvement in RPSAS in favour of retinol palmitate, P = 0.01) (1 study, 19 participants, low-quality evidence) and integrated Chinese traditional plus Western medicine versus Western medicine (grade 0 to 1 radio-proctopathy after treatment in favour of integrated Chinese traditional medicine, RR 2.55, 95% CI 1.30 to 5.02) (1 study, 58 participants, low-quality evidence).The level of evidence for the majority of outcomes was downgraded using GRADE to low or very low, mainly due to imprecision and study limitations. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Although some interventions for late radiation proctopathy look promising (including rectal sucralfate, metronidazole added to an anti-inflammatory regimen, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy), single small studies provide limited evidence. Furthermore, outcomes important to people with cancer, including quality of life (QoL) and long-term effects, were not well recorded. The episodic and variable nature of late radiation proctopathy requires large multi-centre placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) to establish whether treatments are effective. Future studies should address the possibility of associated injury to other gastro-intestinal, urinary, or sexual organs, known as pelvic radiation disease. The interventions, as well as the outcome parameters, should be broader and include those important to people with cancer, such as QoL evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fleur T van de Wetering
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care / University Medical Center UtrechtDutch Cochrane CentrePO Box 85500UtrechtNetherlands3508 GA
| | - Leen Verleye
- Belgian Health Care Knowledge CentreKruidtuinlaan 55BrusselsBelgium1000
| | | | - Jane Maher
- Mount Vernon HospitalDepartment of Radiotherapy and OncologyRickmansworth RoadNorthwoodMiddlesexUKHA6 2RN
| | - Joan Vlayen
- Belgian Health Care Knowledge CentreKruidtuinlaan 55BrusselsBelgium1000
| | - Bradley R Pieters
- Academic Medical Center / University of AmsterdamDepartment of Radiation OncologyMeibergdreef 9AmsterdamNetherlands1105
| | - Geertjan van Tienhoven
- Academic Medical CenterRadiation Oncology and HyperthermiaP.O. Box 22700Meibergdreef 9AmsterdamNetherlands1100 DE
| | - Rob JPM Scholten
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care / University Medical Center UtrechtDutch Cochrane CentrePO Box 85500UtrechtNetherlands3508 GA
| | | |
Collapse
|
75
|
|
76
|
Predicting the Risk of Bowel-Related Quality-of-Life Impairment After Restorative Resection for Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study. Dis Colon Rectum 2016; 59:270-80. [PMID: 26953985 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000000552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 118] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Restorative anterior resection is considered the optimal procedure for most patients with rectal cancer and is frequently preceded by radiotherapy. Both surgery and preoperative radiotherapy impair bowel function, which adversely affects quality of life. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to report symptoms associated with and key predictors for bowel-related quality-of-life impairment. DESIGN The study included a cross-sectional cohort. SETTINGS This was a multicenter study from 12 United Kingdom centers. PATIENTS A total of 578 patients with rectal cancer underwent curative restorative anterior resection between 2001 and 2012 (median, 5.25 years postsurgery). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Patients completed outcome measures that assessed bowel dysfunction (low anterior resection syndrome score), incontinence (Wexner score), and quality of life (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30), plus an anchor question: "Overall how does bowel function affect your quality of life?" RESULTS The response rate was 80% (462/578). Overall, 85% (391/462) of patients reported bowel-related quality-of-life impairment, with 40% (187/462) reporting major impairment. A large difference in global quality of life (22 points; p < 0.001) was reported for "none" versus "major" impairment, with greatest symptom severity being diarrhea (25 points; p < 0.001), insomnia (24 points; p < 0.001), and fatigue (20 points; p < 0.001). Regression analysis identified major impairment in 60% and 45% of patients with low rectal cancer treated with and without preoperative radiotherapy compared with 47% and 33% of middle/upper rectal cancers with and without preoperative radiotherapy. LIMITATIONS Advances in radiotherapy delivery and improvements in posttreatment symptom control, although currently of limited efficacy, imply that the content of this consent aid should be re-evaluated in 5 to 10 years. CONCLUSIONS Before a restorative anterior resection, patients with rectal cancer should be informed that bowel-related quality-of-life impairment is common. The key risk factors are neoadjuvant therapy and a low tumor height. This study presents quality-of-life and functional outcome data, along with a consent aid, that will enhance this preoperative patient discussion.
Collapse
|
77
|
Wallington M. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for chronic bowel dysfunction after pelvic radiotherapy. Lancet Oncol 2016; 17:e128. [PMID: 27300665 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(16)00089-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2016] [Accepted: 02/05/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
78
|
Glover M, Smerdon GR, Andreyev HJ, Benton BE, Bothma P, Firth O, Gothard L, Harrison J, Ignatescu M, Laden G, Martin S, Maynard L, McCann D, Penny CEL, Phillips S, Sharp G, Yarnold J. Hyperbaric oxygen for patients with chronic bowel dysfunction after pelvic radiotherapy (HOT2): a randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2016; 17:224-233. [PMID: 26703894 PMCID: PMC4737893 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00461-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2015] [Revised: 10/16/2015] [Accepted: 10/27/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hyperbaric oxygen has been used as a therapy for patients experiencing chronic intestinal syndromes after pelvic radiotherapy for decades, yet the evidence to support the use of this therapy is based almost exclusively on non-randomised studies. We aimed to provide conclusive results for the clinical benefits of hyperbaric oxygen in patients with chronic bowel dysfunction after radiotherapy for pelvic malignancies. METHODS HOT2 was a double-blind, sham-controlled, phase 3 randomised study of patients (≥18 years) with chronic gastrointestinal symptoms for 12 months or more after radiotherapy and which persisted despite at least 3 months of optimal medical therapy and no evidence of cancer recurrence. Participants were stratified by participating hyperbaric centre and randomly assigned (2:1) by a computer-generated list (block size nine or 12) to receive treatment with hyperbaric oxygen therapy or sham. Participants in the active treatment group breathed 100% oxygen at 2·4 atmospheres of absolute pressure (ATA) and the control group breathed 21% oxygen at 1·3 ATA; both treatment groups received 90-min air pressure exposures once daily for 5 days per week for a total of 8 weeks (total of 40 exposures). Staff at the participating hyperbaric medicine facilities knew the allocated treatment, but patients, clinicians, nurse practitioners, and other health-care professionals associated with patients' care were masked to treatment allocation. Primary endpoints were changes in the bowel component of the modified Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) score and the IBDQ rectal bleeding score 12 months after start of treatment relative to baseline. The primary outcome was analysed in a modified intention-to-treat population, excluding patients who did not provide IBDQ scores within a predetermined time-frame. All patients have completed 12 months of follow-up and the final analysis is complete. The trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN86894066. FINDINGS Between Aug 14, 2009, and Oct 23, 2012, 84 participants were randomly assigned: 55 to hyperbaric oxygen and 29 to sham control. 75 (89%) participants received 40 pressure exposures, all participants returned the IBDQ at baseline, 75 (89%) participants returned the IBDQ at 2 weeks post-treatment, and 79 (94%) participants returned the IBDQ at 12 months post-start of treatment. Patients were excluded from analyses of co-primary endpoints if they had missing IBDQ scores for intestinal function or rectal bleeding at baseline or at 12 months. In an analysis of 46 participants in the active treatment group and 23 participants in the control group, we found no significant differences in the change of IBDQ bowel component score (median change from baseline to 12 months of 4 (IQR -3 to 11) in the treatment group vs 4 (-6 to 9) in the sham group; Mann-Whitney U score 0·67, p=0·50). In an analysis of 29 participants in the active treatment group and 11 participants in the sham group with rectal bleeding at baseline, we also found no significant differences in the change of IBDQ rectal bleeding score (median change from baseline to 12 months of 3 [1 to 3] in the treatment group vs 1 [1 to 2] in the sham group; U score 1·69, p=0·092). Common adverse events in both groups were eye refractive changes (three [11%] of 28 patients in the control group vs 16 [30%] of 53 patients in the treatment group), increased fatigue (three [11%] vs two [4%]), and ear pain (six [21%] vs 15 [28%]). Eight serious adverse events were reported in eight patients: two were reported in two patients in the control group (tonsillitis requiring surgery [grade 3]; recurrent cancer of the vulva [grade 4]) and six serious adverse events were reported in six patients in the treatment group (malignant spinal cord compression requiring surgery [grade 3]; malignant paraortic lymph node involvement requiring surgery [grade 3]; recurrence of vomiting and dehydration [grade 3]; diarrhoea and fever associated with Campylobacter infection [grade 3]; recurrence of abdominal pain, bloating, diarrhoea, and urinary tract infection [grade 3]; aneurysm [grade 4]), none of which were deemed treatment-related. INTERPRETATION We found no evidence that patients with radiation-induced chronic gastrointestinal symptoms, including those patients with rectal bleeding, benefit from hyperbaric oxygen therapy. These findings contrast with evidence used to justify current practices, and more level 1 evidence is urgently needed. FUNDING Cancer Research UK and National Health Service (NHS) funding to the National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at The Royal Marsden and the Institute of Cancer Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Glover
- Hyperbaric Medicine Unit, St Richard's Hospital, Chichester, UK
| | | | | | | | - Pieter Bothma
- Whipps Cross University Hospital, Leytonstone, London & East of England Hyperbaric Unit, Great Yarmouth, UK
| | - Oliver Firth
- London Diving Chamber, Hospital of St John and St Elizabeth, London, UK
| | - Lone Gothard
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - John Harrison
- North West Emergency Recompression Unit, Murrayfield Hospital, Wirral, UK
| | | | - Gerard Laden
- North of England Medical and Hyperbaric Services, Spire Hull & East Riding Hospital, Kingston-upon-Hull, UK
| | - Sue Martin
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Lauren Maynard
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at the Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Grace Sharp
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - John Yarnold
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
79
|
Creutzberg CL. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for radiation-induced injury: evidence is needed. Lancet Oncol 2016; 17:132-134. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00534-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2015] [Revised: 11/12/2015] [Accepted: 11/13/2015] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
|
80
|
Watson L, Lalji A, Bodla S, Muls A, Andreyev HJN, Shaw C. Management of bile acid malabsorption using low-fat dietary interventions: a useful strategy applicable to some patients with diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome? Clin Med (Lond) 2015; 15:536-40. [PMID: 26621941 PMCID: PMC4953254 DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.15-6-536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
This study evaluates the efficacy of low-fat dietary interventions in the management of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms due to bile acid malabsorption. In total, 40 patients with GI symptoms and a 7-day (75)selenium homocholic acid taurine (SeHCAT) scan result of <20%, were prospectively recruited and then advised regarding a low-fat dietary intervention. Before and after dietary intervention, patients rated their GI symptoms using a 10-point numerical scale, and recorded their intake in 7-day dietary diaries. After dietary intervention, the median scores for all GI symptoms decreased, with a significant reduction for urgency, bloating, lack of control, bowel frequency (p ≥: 0.01). Mean dietary fat intake reduced to 42 g fat after intervention (p ≥: 0.01). Low-fat dietary interventions in patients with a SeHCAT scan result of <20% leads to clinically important improvement in GI symptoms and should be widely used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorraine Watson
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Amyn Lalji
- GI Unit, Department of Medicine, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Shankar Bodla
- Department of Statistics, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - Ann Muls
- GI Unit, Department of Medicine, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Clare Shaw
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Road, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
81
|
Morris KAL, Haboubi NY. Pelvic radiation therapy: Between delight and disaster. World J Gastrointest Surg 2015; 7:279-88. [PMID: 26649150 PMCID: PMC4663381 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v7.i11.279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2015] [Revised: 08/10/2015] [Accepted: 10/01/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
In the last few decades radiotherapy was established as one of the best and most widely used treatment modalities for certain tumours. Unfortunately that came with a price. As more people with cancer survive longer an ever increasing number of patients are living with the complications of radiotherapy and have become, in certain cases, difficult to manage. Pelvic radiation disease (PRD) can result from ionising radiation-induced damage to surrounding non-cancerous tissues resulting in disruption of normal physiological functions and symptoms such as diarrhoea, tenesmus, incontinence and rectal bleeding. The burden of PRD-related symptoms, which impact on a patient's quality of life, has been under appreciated and sub-optimally managed. This article serves to promote awareness of PRD and the vast potential there is to improve current service provision and research activities.
Collapse
|
82
|
Abstract
Cancer and its treatment exert a heavy psychological and physical toll. Of the myriad symptoms which result, pain is common, encountered in between 30% and 60% of cancer survivors. Pain in cancer survivors is a major and growing problem, impeding the recovery and rehabilitation of patients who have beaten cancer and negatively impacting on cancer patients' quality of life, work prospects and mental health. Persistent pain in cancer survivors remains challenging to treat successfully. Pain can arise both due to the underlying disease and the various treatments the patient has been subjected to. Chemotherapy causes painful chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), radiotherapy can produce late effect radiation toxicity and surgery may lead to the development of persistent post-surgical pain syndromes. This review explores a selection of the common causes of persistent pain in cancer survivors, detailing our current understanding of the pathophysiology and outlining both the clinical manifestations of individual pain states and the treatment options available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Rd Brown
- Pain Management Department, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK ; Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Juan D Ramirez
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
83
|
Norton C, Dibley LB, Hart A, Duncan J, Emmanuel A, Knowles CH, Stevens N, Terry H, Verjee A, Kerry S, Hounsome N. Faecal incontinence intervention study (FINS): self-management booklet information with or without nurse support to improve continence in people with inflammatory bowel disease: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2015; 16:444. [PMID: 26445224 PMCID: PMC4594995 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-015-0962-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2015] [Accepted: 09/17/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inflammatory bowel disease, comprising Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, is a life-long currently incurable illness. It causes bouts of acute intestinal inflammation, in an unpredictable relapsing-remitting course, with bloody diarrhoea and extreme urgency to access a toilet. Faecal incontinence is a devastating social and hygiene problem, impacting heavily on quality of life and ability to work and socialise. Faecal incontinence affects 2-10 % of adults in the general population. People with inflammatory bowel disease have a high risk of incontinence with up to 74 % affected. No previous study has explored conservative interventions for these patients. METHODS This randomised controlled trial will recruit 186 participants to answer the research question: does implementation of the UK nationally recommended guidance approach to stepwise management of faecal incontinence improve bowel control and quality of life in people with inflammatory bowel disease? We have worked with people with inflammatory bowel disease to translate this guidance into a condition-specific information booklet on managing incontinence. We will randomise participants to receive the booklet, or the booklet plus up to four 30-minute sessions with an inflammatory bowel disease specialist nurse. To be eligible, patients must be in disease remission and report incontinence. The primary outcome measure at 6 months after randomisation is the St Mark's incontinence score. Other outcomes include quality of life, MY-MOP (generic tool: participants set two goals for intervention, grading goals at baseline and then re-scoring after intervention) and EQ-5D-5 L to enable calculation of quality-adjusted life years. Analysis will be on an intention-to-treat basis. Qualitative interviews will explore participant and health professionals' views on the interventions. DISCUSSION Few high-quality studies of conservative interventions in inflammatory bowel disease, and none for faecal incontinence, have been conducted. We have collaborated with patients to design this study. Blinding to this behavioural intervention is not possible, but our self-report outcome measures with a degree of objectivity. There is genuine equipoise between the booklet only and booklet plus nurse arms, and the study will determine if additional support from a nurse is a crucial element in implementing advice. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinitrials.gov.uk: NCT02355834 (Date of registration: 12 December 2014). Protocol version: 4.0. 08.04.15.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Norton
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College, 57 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8WA, UK.
| | - Lesley B Dibley
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College, 57 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8WA, UK.
| | - Ailsa Hart
- St Mark's Hospital, Watford Road, Harrow, HA1 3UJ, UK.
| | - Julie Duncan
- Guy's and St Thomas's NHS Trust, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
| | - Anton Emmanuel
- University College Hospital, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, UK.
| | - Charles H Knowles
- Blizard Institute, Queen Mary, University of London, 4 Newark Street, London, E1 2AT, UK.
- Barts Health NHS Trust, 80 Newark Street, London, E1 2ES, UK.
| | - Natasha Stevens
- Blizard Institute, Queen Mary, University of London, 4 Newark Street, London, E1 2AT, UK.
| | - Helen Terry
- Crohn's and Colitis UK, 4 Beaumont House, Sutton Road, St Albans, Hertfordshire, AL1 5HH, UK.
| | - Azmina Verjee
- Bowel Disease Research Foundation, The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 35-43 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London, WC2A 3PE, UK
| | - Sally Kerry
- Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary, University of London, 4 Newark Street, London, E1 2AT, UK.
| | - Natalia Hounsome
- Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary, University of London, 4 Newark Street, London, E1 2AT, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
84
|
Vanneste BGL, Van De Voorde L, de Ridder RJ, Van Limbergen EJ, Lambin P, van Lin EN. Chronic radiation proctitis: tricks to prevent and treat. Int J Colorectal Dis 2015; 30:1293-303. [PMID: 26198994 PMCID: PMC4575375 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-015-2289-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/13/2015] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to give an overview of the measures used to prevent chronic radiation proctitis (CRP) and to provide an algorithm for the treatment of CRP. METHODS Medical literature databases including PubMed and Medline were screened and critically analyzed for relevance in the scope of our purpose. RESULTS CRP is a relatively frequent late side effect (5-20%) and mainly dependent on the dose and volume of irradiated rectum. Radiation treatment (RT) techniques to prevent CRP are constantly improving thanks to image-guided RT and intensity-modulated RT. Also, newer techniques like protons and new devices such as rectum spacers and balloons have been developed to spare rectal structures. Biopsies do not contribute to diagnosing CRP and should be avoided because of the risk of severe rectal wall damage, such as necrosis and fistulas. There is no consensus on the optimal treatment of CRP. A variety of possibilities is available and includes topical and oral agents, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, and endoscopic interventions. CONCLUSIONS CRP has a natural history of improving over time, even without treatment. This is important to take into account when considering these treatments: first be conservative (topical and oral agents) and be aware that invasive treatments can be very toxic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben G L Vanneste
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO Clinic), GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 3035, 6202 NA, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Lien Van De Voorde
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO Clinic), GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 3035, 6202 NA, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Rogier J de Ridder
- Department of Gastroenterology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Evert J Van Limbergen
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO Clinic), GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 3035, 6202 NA, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Philippe Lambin
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO Clinic), GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 3035, 6202 NA, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Emile N van Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO Clinic), GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 3035, 6202 NA, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
85
|
|
86
|
Long-Term Impact of Endometrial Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment on Health-Related Quality of Life and Cancer Survivorship: Results From the Randomized PORTEC-2 Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015; 93:797-809. [PMID: 26530748 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.08.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2015] [Revised: 07/16/2015] [Accepted: 08/07/2015] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the long-term health-related quality of life (HRQL) after external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) or vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) among PORTEC-2 trial patients, evaluate long-term bowel and bladder symptoms, and assess the impact of cancer on these endometrial cancer (EC) survivors. PATIENTS AND METHODS In the PORTEC-2 trial, 427 patients with stage I high-intermediate-risk EC were randomly allocated to EBRT or VBT. The 7- and 10-year HRQL questionnaires consisted of EORTC QLQ-C30; subscales for bowel and bladder symptoms; the Impact of Cancer Questionnaire; and 14 questions on comorbidities, walking aids, and incontinence pads. Analysis was done using linear mixed models for subscales and (ordinal) logistic regression with random effects for single items. A two-sided P value <.01 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS Longitudinal HRQL analysis showed persisting higher rates of bowel symptoms with EBRT, without significant differences in global health or any of the functioning scales. At 7 years, clinically relevant fecal leakage was reported by 10.6% in the EBRT group, versus 1.8% for VBT (P=.03), diarrhea by 8.4% versus 0.9% (P=.04), limitations due to bowel symptoms by 10.5% versus 1.8% (P=.001), and bowel urgency by 23.3% versus 6.6% (P<.001). Urinary urgency was reported by 39.3% of EBRT patients, 25.5% for VBT, P=.05. No difference in sexual activity was seen between treatment arms. Long-term impact of cancer scores was higher among the patients who had an EC recurrence or second cancer. CONCLUSIONS More than 7 years after treatment, EBRT patients reported more bowel symptoms with impact on daily activities, and a trend for more urinary symptoms, without impact on overall quality of life or difference in cancer survivorship issues.
Collapse
|
87
|
Phillips F, Muls ACG, Lalji A, Andreyev HJN. Are bile acid malabsorption and bile acid diarrhoea important causes of loose stool complicating cancer therapy? Colorectal Dis 2015; 17:730-4. [PMID: 25728737 DOI: 10.1111/codi.12932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2014] [Accepted: 12/22/2014] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIM Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms during and after cancer therapy can significantly affect quality of life and interfere with treatment. This study assessed whether bile acid malabsorption (BAM) or bile acid diarrhoea (BAD) are important causes of diarrhoea associated with cancer treatment. METHOD A retrospective analysis was carried out of consecutive patients assessed for BAM using ((75) Se) Selenium homocholic acid taurocholate (SeHCAT) scanning, after reporting any episodes of loose stool, attending a gastroenterology clinic in a cancer centre. RESULTS Between 2009 and 2013, 506 consecutive patients (54.5% male; age range: 20-91 years), were scanned. BAM/BAD was diagnosed in 215 (42.5%). It was mild in 25.6%, moderate in 29.3% and severe in 45.1%. Pelvic chemoradiation had induced BAM in > 50% of patients. BAM was also frequent after treatment for conditions not previously associated with BAM, such as anal and colorectal cancer, and was present in > 75% of patients referred after pancreatic surgery. It was also unexpectedly frequent in patients who were treated for malignancy outside the GI tract, such as breast cancer and haematological malignancy. CONCLUSION BAM/BAD are very common and under-appreciated causes of GI symptoms after cancer treatment. Health professionals should have a low threshold in suspecting this condition, as diagnosis and treatment can significantly improve quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Phillips
- The GI unit, The Department of Medicine, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - A C G Muls
- The GI unit, The Department of Medicine, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - A Lalji
- The GI unit, The Department of Medicine, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - H J N Andreyev
- The GI unit, The Department of Medicine, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
88
|
Boulton M, Adams E, Horne A, Durrant L, Rose P, Watson E. A qualitative study of cancer survivors’ responses to information on the long-term and late effects of pelvic radiotherapy 1-11 years post treatment. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2015. [DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- M. Boulton
- Department of Clinical Health Care; Oxford Brookes University; Oxford UK
| | - E. Adams
- School of Psychology; College of Life Sciences; Birmingham University; Birmingham UK
| | - A. Horne
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust; Department of Radiotherapy; Oxford Cancer and Haematology Centre; Churchill Hospital; Oxford UK
| | - L. Durrant
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust; Department of Radiotherapy; Oxford Cancer and Haematology Centre; Churchill Hospital; Oxford UK
| | - P. Rose
- Department of Primary Health Care Sciences; University of Oxford; Oxford UK
| | - E. Watson
- Department of Clinical Health Care; Oxford Brookes University; Oxford UK
| |
Collapse
|
89
|
Pelvic Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy: Can we Better Quantify the Late Side-effects? Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2015; 27:428. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2015.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2015] [Accepted: 02/10/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
90
|
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Resnick
- Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, A-1302 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| |
Collapse
|
91
|
Lenalidomide-induced diarrhea in patients with myeloma is caused by bile acid malabsorption that responds to treatment. Blood 2015; 124:2467-8. [PMID: 25301337 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2014-06-583302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
|
92
|
Outcomes from treating bile acid malabsorption using a multidisciplinary approach. Support Care Cancer 2015; 23:2881-90. [DOI: 10.1007/s00520-015-2653-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2014] [Accepted: 02/08/2015] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
93
|
Downing A, Morris EJA, Richards M, Corner J, Wright P, Sebag-Montefiore D, Finan P, Kind P, Wood C, Lawton S, Feltbower R, Wagland R, Vernon S, Thomas J, Glaser AW. Health-related quality of life after colorectal cancer in England: a patient-reported outcomes study of individuals 12 to 36 months after diagnosis. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33:616-24. [PMID: 25559806 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.56.6539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This population-level study was conducted to define the health-related quality of life (HRQL) of individuals living with and beyond colorectal cancer (CRC) and to identify factors associated with poor health outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS All individuals diagnosed with CRC in England in 2010 and 2011 who were alive 12 to 36 months after diagnosis were sent a questionnaire. This included questions related to treatment, disease status, other long-term conditions (LTCs), generic HRQL (EuroQol-5D), and cancer-specific outcomes (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy and Social Difficulties Inventory items). RESULTS The response rate was 63.3% (21,802 of 34,467 patients). One or more generic health problems were reported by 65% of respondents, with 10% of patients reporting problems in all five domains. The reporting of problems was higher than in the general population and was most marked in those age less than 55 years. Certain subgroups reported a higher number of problems, notably those with one or more other LTCs, those with active or recurrent disease, those with a stoma, and those at the extremes of the age range (< 55 and > 85 years). Of respondents without a stoma, 16.3% reported no bowel control. Reversal of a stoma resulted in fewer severe bowel problems but more moderate problems than those who had never had a stoma. A quarter of rectal cancer respondents (25.1%) reported difficulties with sexual matters (compared with 11.2% of colon cancer respondents). CONCLUSION This study demonstrates the success of a national patient-reported outcomes survey. The results have the potential to support system-wide improvement in health outcomes through the identification of particular challenges faced by individuals after treatment for CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Downing
- Amy Downing, Eva J.A. Morris, Penny Wright, David Sebag-Montefiore, Paul Finan, and Adam W. Glaser, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital; David Sebag-Montefiore, Paul Finan, and Adam W. Glaser, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital; Paul Kind, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds; Richard Feltbower, Leeds Institute of Genetics, Health, and Therapeutics, University of Leeds; James Thomas, National Cancer Registration Service (Northern and Yorkshire), Public Health England, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mike Richards, Care Quality Commission; Paul Finan, National Cancer Intelligence Network, London; Jessica Corner and Richard Wagland, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton; Charlotte Wood and Sarah Lawton, Knowledge and Intelligence Team (Northern and Yorkshire), Public Health England, York; and Sally Vernon, National Cancer Registration Service (Eastern), Public Health England, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Eva J A Morris
- Amy Downing, Eva J.A. Morris, Penny Wright, David Sebag-Montefiore, Paul Finan, and Adam W. Glaser, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital; David Sebag-Montefiore, Paul Finan, and Adam W. Glaser, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital; Paul Kind, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds; Richard Feltbower, Leeds Institute of Genetics, Health, and Therapeutics, University of Leeds; James Thomas, National Cancer Registration Service (Northern and Yorkshire), Public Health England, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mike Richards, Care Quality Commission; Paul Finan, National Cancer Intelligence Network, London; Jessica Corner and Richard Wagland, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton; Charlotte Wood and Sarah Lawton, Knowledge and Intelligence Team (Northern and Yorkshire), Public Health England, York; and Sally Vernon, National Cancer Registration Service (Eastern), Public Health England, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Mike Richards
- Amy Downing, Eva J.A. Morris, Penny Wright, David Sebag-Montefiore, Paul Finan, and Adam W. Glaser, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital; David Sebag-Montefiore, Paul Finan, and Adam W. Glaser, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital; Paul Kind, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds; Richard Feltbower, Leeds Institute of Genetics, Health, and Therapeutics, University of Leeds; James Thomas, National Cancer Registration Service (Northern and Yorkshire), Public Health England, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mike Richards, Care Quality Commission; Paul Finan, National Cancer Intelligence Network, London; Jessica Corner and Richard Wagland, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton; Charlotte Wood and Sarah Lawton, Knowledge and Intelligence Team (Northern and Yorkshire), Public Health England, York; and Sally Vernon, National Cancer Registration Service (Eastern), Public Health England, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Jessica Corner
- Amy Downing, Eva J.A. Morris, Penny Wright, David Sebag-Montefiore, Paul Finan, and Adam W. Glaser, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital; David Sebag-Montefiore, Paul Finan, and Adam W. Glaser, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital; Paul Kind, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds; Richard Feltbower, Leeds Institute of Genetics, Health, and Therapeutics, University of Leeds; James Thomas, National Cancer Registration Service (Northern and Yorkshire), Public Health England, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mike Richards, Care Quality Commission; Paul Finan, National Cancer Intelligence Network, London; Jessica Corner and Richard Wagland, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton; Charlotte Wood and Sarah Lawton, Knowledge and Intelligence Team (Northern and Yorkshire), Public Health England, York; and Sally Vernon, National Cancer Registration Service (Eastern), Public Health England, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Penny Wright
- Amy Downing, Eva J.A. Morris, Penny Wright, David Sebag-Montefiore, Paul Finan, and Adam W. Glaser, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital; David Sebag-Montefiore, Paul Finan, and Adam W. Glaser, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital; Paul Kind, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds; Richard Feltbower, Leeds Institute of Genetics, Health, and Therapeutics, University of Leeds; James Thomas, National Cancer Registration Service (Northern and Yorkshire), Public Health England, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mike Richards, Care Quality Commission; Paul Finan, National Cancer Intelligence Network, London; Jessica Corner and Richard Wagland, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton; Charlotte Wood and Sarah Lawton, Knowledge and Intelligence Team (Northern and Yorkshire), Public Health England, York; and Sally Vernon, National Cancer Registration Service (Eastern), Public Health England, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - David Sebag-Montefiore
- Amy Downing, Eva J.A. Morris, Penny Wright, David Sebag-Montefiore, Paul Finan, and Adam W. Glaser, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital; David Sebag-Montefiore, Paul Finan, and Adam W. Glaser, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital; Paul Kind, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds; Richard Feltbower, Leeds Institute of Genetics, Health, and Therapeutics, University of Leeds; James Thomas, National Cancer Registration Service (Northern and Yorkshire), Public Health England, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mike Richards, Care Quality Commission; Paul Finan, National Cancer Intelligence Network, London; Jessica Corner and Richard Wagland, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton; Charlotte Wood and Sarah Lawton, Knowledge and Intelligence Team (Northern and Yorkshire), Public Health England, York; and Sally Vernon, National Cancer Registration Service (Eastern), Public Health England, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Finan
- Amy Downing, Eva J.A. Morris, Penny Wright, David Sebag-Montefiore, Paul Finan, and Adam W. Glaser, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital; David Sebag-Montefiore, Paul Finan, and Adam W. Glaser, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital; Paul Kind, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds; Richard Feltbower, Leeds Institute of Genetics, Health, and Therapeutics, University of Leeds; James Thomas, National Cancer Registration Service (Northern and Yorkshire), Public Health England, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mike Richards, Care Quality Commission; Paul Finan, National Cancer Intelligence Network, London; Jessica Corner and Richard Wagland, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton; Charlotte Wood and Sarah Lawton, Knowledge and Intelligence Team (Northern and Yorkshire), Public Health England, York; and Sally Vernon, National Cancer Registration Service (Eastern), Public Health England, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Kind
- Amy Downing, Eva J.A. Morris, Penny Wright, David Sebag-Montefiore, Paul Finan, and Adam W. Glaser, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital; David Sebag-Montefiore, Paul Finan, and Adam W. Glaser, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital; Paul Kind, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds; Richard Feltbower, Leeds Institute of Genetics, Health, and Therapeutics, University of Leeds; James Thomas, National Cancer Registration Service (Northern and Yorkshire), Public Health England, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mike Richards, Care Quality Commission; Paul Finan, National Cancer Intelligence Network, London; Jessica Corner and Richard Wagland, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton; Charlotte Wood and Sarah Lawton, Knowledge and Intelligence Team (Northern and Yorkshire), Public Health England, York; and Sally Vernon, National Cancer Registration Service (Eastern), Public Health England, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Charlotte Wood
- Amy Downing, Eva J.A. Morris, Penny Wright, David Sebag-Montefiore, Paul Finan, and Adam W. Glaser, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital; David Sebag-Montefiore, Paul Finan, and Adam W. Glaser, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital; Paul Kind, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds; Richard Feltbower, Leeds Institute of Genetics, Health, and Therapeutics, University of Leeds; James Thomas, National Cancer Registration Service (Northern and Yorkshire), Public Health England, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mike Richards, Care Quality Commission; Paul Finan, National Cancer Intelligence Network, London; Jessica Corner and Richard Wagland, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton; Charlotte Wood and Sarah Lawton, Knowledge and Intelligence Team (Northern and Yorkshire), Public Health England, York; and Sally Vernon, National Cancer Registration Service (Eastern), Public Health England, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Lawton
- Amy Downing, Eva J.A. Morris, Penny Wright, David Sebag-Montefiore, Paul Finan, and Adam W. Glaser, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital; David Sebag-Montefiore, Paul Finan, and Adam W. Glaser, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital; Paul Kind, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds; Richard Feltbower, Leeds Institute of Genetics, Health, and Therapeutics, University of Leeds; James Thomas, National Cancer Registration Service (Northern and Yorkshire), Public Health England, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mike Richards, Care Quality Commission; Paul Finan, National Cancer Intelligence Network, London; Jessica Corner and Richard Wagland, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton; Charlotte Wood and Sarah Lawton, Knowledge and Intelligence Team (Northern and Yorkshire), Public Health England, York; and Sally Vernon, National Cancer Registration Service (Eastern), Public Health England, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Feltbower
- Amy Downing, Eva J.A. Morris, Penny Wright, David Sebag-Montefiore, Paul Finan, and Adam W. Glaser, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital; David Sebag-Montefiore, Paul Finan, and Adam W. Glaser, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital; Paul Kind, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds; Richard Feltbower, Leeds Institute of Genetics, Health, and Therapeutics, University of Leeds; James Thomas, National Cancer Registration Service (Northern and Yorkshire), Public Health England, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mike Richards, Care Quality Commission; Paul Finan, National Cancer Intelligence Network, London; Jessica Corner and Richard Wagland, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton; Charlotte Wood and Sarah Lawton, Knowledge and Intelligence Team (Northern and Yorkshire), Public Health England, York; and Sally Vernon, National Cancer Registration Service (Eastern), Public Health England, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Wagland
- Amy Downing, Eva J.A. Morris, Penny Wright, David Sebag-Montefiore, Paul Finan, and Adam W. Glaser, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital; David Sebag-Montefiore, Paul Finan, and Adam W. Glaser, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital; Paul Kind, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds; Richard Feltbower, Leeds Institute of Genetics, Health, and Therapeutics, University of Leeds; James Thomas, National Cancer Registration Service (Northern and Yorkshire), Public Health England, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mike Richards, Care Quality Commission; Paul Finan, National Cancer Intelligence Network, London; Jessica Corner and Richard Wagland, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton; Charlotte Wood and Sarah Lawton, Knowledge and Intelligence Team (Northern and Yorkshire), Public Health England, York; and Sally Vernon, National Cancer Registration Service (Eastern), Public Health England, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Sally Vernon
- Amy Downing, Eva J.A. Morris, Penny Wright, David Sebag-Montefiore, Paul Finan, and Adam W. Glaser, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital; David Sebag-Montefiore, Paul Finan, and Adam W. Glaser, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital; Paul Kind, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds; Richard Feltbower, Leeds Institute of Genetics, Health, and Therapeutics, University of Leeds; James Thomas, National Cancer Registration Service (Northern and Yorkshire), Public Health England, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mike Richards, Care Quality Commission; Paul Finan, National Cancer Intelligence Network, London; Jessica Corner and Richard Wagland, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton; Charlotte Wood and Sarah Lawton, Knowledge and Intelligence Team (Northern and Yorkshire), Public Health England, York; and Sally Vernon, National Cancer Registration Service (Eastern), Public Health England, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - James Thomas
- Amy Downing, Eva J.A. Morris, Penny Wright, David Sebag-Montefiore, Paul Finan, and Adam W. Glaser, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital; David Sebag-Montefiore, Paul Finan, and Adam W. Glaser, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital; Paul Kind, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds; Richard Feltbower, Leeds Institute of Genetics, Health, and Therapeutics, University of Leeds; James Thomas, National Cancer Registration Service (Northern and Yorkshire), Public Health England, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mike Richards, Care Quality Commission; Paul Finan, National Cancer Intelligence Network, London; Jessica Corner and Richard Wagland, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton; Charlotte Wood and Sarah Lawton, Knowledge and Intelligence Team (Northern and Yorkshire), Public Health England, York; and Sally Vernon, National Cancer Registration Service (Eastern), Public Health England, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Adam W Glaser
- Amy Downing, Eva J.A. Morris, Penny Wright, David Sebag-Montefiore, Paul Finan, and Adam W. Glaser, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital; David Sebag-Montefiore, Paul Finan, and Adam W. Glaser, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital; Paul Kind, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds; Richard Feltbower, Leeds Institute of Genetics, Health, and Therapeutics, University of Leeds; James Thomas, National Cancer Registration Service (Northern and Yorkshire), Public Health England, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mike Richards, Care Quality Commission; Paul Finan, National Cancer Intelligence Network, London; Jessica Corner and Richard Wagland, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton; Charlotte Wood and Sarah Lawton, Knowledge and Intelligence Team (Northern and Yorkshire), Public Health England, York; and Sally Vernon, National Cancer Registration Service (Eastern), Public Health England, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
94
|
Affiliation(s)
- H J N Andreyev
- The GI Unit, Department of Medicine, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
95
|
Abstract
With the implementation of total mesorectal excision surgery and neoadjuvant (chemo) radiotherapy, the outcome of rectal cancer patients has improved and a substantial proportion of them have become long-term survivors. These advances come at the expense of radiation- and chemotherapy-related toxicity which remains an underestimated problem. Radiation-induced early toxicity in rectal cancer treatment mainly includes diarrhea, cystitis, and perineal dermatitis, while bowel dysfunction, fecal incontinence, bleeding, and perforation, genitourinary dysfunction, and pelvic fractures constitute the majority of late toxicity. It is now generally accepted that short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) and immediate surgery is associated with less early toxicity compared to conventionally fractionated chemoradiotherapy with delayed surgery. There are no significant differences in late toxicity between both treatment regimens. While there is hardly an increase in early toxicity after preoperative SCRT with immediate surgery, late toxicity is substantial compared to surgery alone. Early toxicity is more frequent when a longer interval between SCRT and surgery is used and is comparable to the toxicity observed with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy except that it occurs after the end of the radiotherapy. So far, randomized phase III trials failed to demonstrate a substantial gain in tumoural response when oxaliplatin or molecular agents are added to the multimodality treatment. Moreover, the addition of these drugs increases toxicity and remains therefore experimental.
Collapse
|
96
|
Wiltink LM, Chen TY, Nout RA, Kranenbarg EMK, Fiocco M, Laurberg S, van de Velde CJ, Marijnen CA. Health-related quality of life 14years after preoperative short-term radiotherapy and total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Report of a multicenter randomised trial. Eur J Cancer 2014; 50:2390-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.06.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2014] [Accepted: 06/30/2014] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
97
|
Nutrition in pelvic radiation disease and inflammatory bowel disease: similarities and differences. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2014; 2014:716579. [PMID: 24982906 PMCID: PMC4058479 DOI: 10.1155/2014/716579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2014] [Revised: 05/09/2014] [Accepted: 05/19/2014] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Due to the intestinal inflammation, tissue damage, and painful abdominal symptoms restricting dietary intake associated with both diseases, patients with intestinal pelvic radiation disease (PRD) or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk to develop protein calorie malnutrition and micronutrient deficiencies. In the current paper, we review the nutritional management of both diseases, listing the similar approaches of nutritional management and the nutritional implications of intestinal dysfunction of both diseases. Malnutrition is prevalent in patients with either disease and nutritional risk screening and assessment of nutritional status are required for designing the proper nutritional intervention plan. This plan may include dietary management, oral nutritional supplementation, and enteral and/or parenteral nutrition. In addition to managing malnutrition, nutrients exert immune modulating effects during periods of intestinal inflammation and can play a role in mitigating the risks associated with the disease activity. Consistently, exclusive enteral feeding is recommended for inducing remission in pediatric patients with active Crohn's disease, with less clear guidelines on use in patients with ulcerative colitis. The field of immune modulating nutrition is an evolving science that takes into consideration the specific mechanism of action of nutrients, nutrient-nutrient interaction, and preexisting nutritional status of the patients.
Collapse
|
98
|
Muls AC. Acta Oncologica Lecture. Gastrointestinal consequences of cancer treatment and the wider context: a bad gut feeling. Acta Oncol 2014; 53:297-306. [PMID: 24460087 DOI: 10.3109/0284186x.2013.873140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The percentage of people living with a diagnosis of cancer is rising globally. Between 20% and 25% of people treated for cancer experience a consequence of cancer which has an adverse impact on the quality of their life. Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms are the most common of all consequences of cancer treatment and have the greatest impact on daily activity. PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF LONG-TERM BOWEL DAMAGE AFTER PELVIC RADIOTHERAPY: Long-term damage to the bowel after radiotherapy is mediated by ischaemic changes and fibrosis. Each fraction of radiotherapy causes a series of repetitive injuries to the intestinal tissue resulting in an altered healing process, which affects the integrity of the repair and changes the architecture of the bowel wall. THE NATURE OF GI SYMPTOMS THAT DEVELOP: Patient-reported outcome measures show that diarrhoea, urgency, increased bowel frequency, tenesmus and flatulence are the five most prevalent GI symptoms with a moderate or severe impact on patients' daily lives after treatment with pelvic radiotherapy. Many patients also experience fatigue, urinary problems and have sexual concerns. SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT: The complex nature of those symptoms warrants systematic assessment and management. The use of a tested algorithm can assist in achieving this. The most common contributing factors to ongoing bowel problems after pelvic radiotherapy are small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, bile acid malabsorption, pancreatic insufficiency, rectal bleeding and its impact on bone health. THE WIDER CONTEXT Symptom burden, socio-psychosocial impact, memory and cognitive function, fatigue, urinary problems and sexual concerns need to be taken into account when thinking about consequences of cancer treatment. CONCLUSION As our understanding of consequences of cancer treatments continues to emerge and encompass a wide variety of specialties, a holistic, multifaceted and multidisciplinary approach is required to manage those consequences long-term.
Collapse
|
99
|
Affiliation(s)
- James W Denham
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia.
| | - Martin Hauer-Jensen
- Division of Radiation Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| |
Collapse
|