Modification of the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Scale for use in bipolar illness (BP): the CGI-BP

Levetiracetam adjunct to quetiapine for the acute manic phase of bipolar disorder: a randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled clinical trial of efficacy, safety and tolerability

Unsatisfactory responses to bipolar disorder treatments have necessitated novel therapeutic approaches. Evidence of levetiracetam's effectiveness in mania was reported in previous studies. This study evaluated its efficacy, safety and tolerability as an adjunct to quetiapine in mania. Forty-four patients with Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) score ≥20 entered and were randomized to receive levetiracetam plus quetiapine or placebo plus quetiapine for 6 weeks. Patients were assessed using the YMRS and Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideations (BSSI) at baseline and weeks 2, 4 and 6. Changes in the scores, remission rates and response to treatment were compared between the groups. Forty patients completed the trial. The general linear model (GLM) repeated measures demonstrated a significant effect for time × treatment interaction on the YMRS score during the trial (P = 0.04). A greater reduction in YMRS scores was seen in the levetiracetam group compared with the placebo group from baseline to week 4 (P = 0.045). Response to treatment was significantly better in the levetiracetam group (P = 0.046). No significant effect for time × treatment interaction on BSSI score was seen in GLM repeated measures. Finally, there was no significant difference in the frequency of adverse events. Adjunctive levetiracetam is effective, safe and well-tolerated in patients with mania. Further high-quality, large-scale trials are recommended.

Cardiometabolic risk markers during mood-stabilizing treatment: Correlation with drug-specific effects, depressive symptoms and treatment response

BACKGROUND

Patients with bipolar disorder have higher rates of cardiometabolic comorbidities and mortality. Although guidelines emphasize the importance of cardiovascular monitoring, few studies characterized the cardiometabolic risk profile during treatment and their relation to symptomatology and treatment response.

METHODS

We analyzed data from two similar 24-weeks comparative effectiveness trials, with a combined sample of 770 participants randomized to two different lithium doses, quetiapine (300 mg/day), or standard treatment without lithium. Glucose, lipids and vital signs were measured before and after 24 weeks of treatment. We calculated several cardiovascular risk scores, assessed baseline correlations and compared the four treatment arms via multiple linear regression models.

RESULTS

Higher cholesterol and LDL levels were associated with greater depression severity, showing differential correlations to specific symptoms, particularly agitation, low energy and suicidality. Those randomized to quetiapine showed a significant worsening of cardiometabolic markers during the 24-week trial. Neither baseline nor change in lipid levels correlated with differential treatment response.

LIMITATIONS

Study duration was short from the perspective of cardiometabolic risk markers, and all treatment arms included patients taking adjunct antipsychotics. The trials compared quetiapine to lithium, but not to other medications known to affect similar risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with 300 mg/day quetiapine for 24 weeks, representing a short and common dose course, resulted in increased cardiometabolic risk markers, emphasizing the importance of monitoring during mood-stabilizing treatment. The symptom-specific associations are in line with previous studies in unipolar depression, suggesting a cardiometabolic-depression link that needs to be further studied in bipolar depression.

Care at door-steps for persons with severe mental disorders: A pilot experience from Karnataka district mental health program

BACKGROUND

Public funded outreach services for persons with severe mental disorders (SMDs), a norm in developed nations, is non-existent in India. We share our pilot experience with an indigenous model named 'Care at Doorsteps' (CADs) for persons with SMDs who dropped out from clinical care of District Mental Health Program (DMHP) at three sites of Karnataka, a south Indian state.

AIM

The objectives of this study were to identify the reasons for drop outs from routine care and to assess the burden of illness and disability after the intervention.

METHODOLOGY

Six-month prospective observational study on patients aged 18-60 years, diagnosed as Schizophrenia or bipolar disorder was conducted. Three home visits were made by the team and provided medications, also offered brief psychoeducation and counselling. Care-givers were interviewed to identify the reasons for drop outs and their expectations from the treating team. Patients were also assessed using the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI), Indian Disability Evaluation and Assessment Scale (IDEAS) and Burden Assessment Schedule (BAS) during each visit.

RESULTS

Ninety-six patients (50 males and 46 females) were followed up, of which 85 had a diagnosis of schizophrenia and 11 with bipolar illness. Common reasons for drop out were: single caregiver (breadwinner) unable to accompany the patient, loss of faith in medical treatment and financial constraints. Symptomatic improvement and restoration of productive work were the priority expectations. Over the course, the mean CGI-S showed significant reduction (4.81 ± 1.57, 4.46 ± 1.32 and 4.11 ± 1.39 respectively; p = 0.001). Mean score on BAS showed a significant reduction (85.76 ± 12.15, 83.46 ± 11.30, 84.27 ± 11.82; p = 0.04). Mean total IDEAS scores did not show significant change (13.27 ± 4.78, 12.82 ± 4.24, 13.17 ± 4.40; p = 0.16).

CONCLUSION

Meaningful assertive outreach care is feasible in India and is found to be useful for persons with SMDs by utilising the already existing public sector resources.

Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis: Efficacy and Safety of Second-Generation Antipsychotics in Youths With Bipolar Depression

OBJECTIVE

To assess the relative efficacy and safety of second-generation antipsychotics for treating major depressive episodes in youths with bipolar disorder.

METHOD

A systematic literature review using PRISMA guidelines and network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of second-generation antipsychotics for bipolar depression in youths 10 to 18 years of age was conducted. Efficacy measures included Children's Depression Rating Scale, Revised (CDRS-R) and Clinical Global Impressions-Bipolar Disorder-Severity Depression (CGI-BP-S-depression) and Overall (CGI-BP-S-overall) scores. Available safety outcomes included discontinuations (all-cause, lack of efficacy, adverse events), metabolic parameters (weight change, cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose), changes in prolactin, and somnolence. Results from the NMA were reported as mean changes from baseline or odds ratios (OR) with 95% credible intervals (CrIs).

RESULTS

Four RCTs comparing placebo to lurasidone, quetiapine (1 each for immediate- and extended-release), and the olanzapine-fluoxetine combination (OFC) met all of the inclusion criteria. Lurasidone and OFC demonstrated similar and statistically significant improvements in CDRS-R, but quetiapine did not (lurasidone: -5.70 [-8.66, -2.76]; OFC: -5.01 [-8.63, -1.38]; quetiapine: -1.85 [-5.99, 2.27]). Lurasidone was associated with smaller changes in weight, cholesterol, and triglycerides from baseline compared to OFC and quetiapine. There were no differences in changes in glucose levels among antipsychotics. In addition, lurasidone was associated with smaller change in prolactin levels compared to OFC but not quetiapine.

CONCLUSION

Evidence from 4 studies in this NMA indicated that lurasidone and OFC, but not quetiapine, were efficacious for the treatment of bipolar depression in youths. Lurasidone was associated with less weight gain and smaller impacts on cholesterol and triglycerides compared with quetiapine and OFC.

Using the Clinical Global Impression scale to assess social communication change in minimally verbal children with autism spectrum disorder

Assessing improvements in social communication behaviors in minimally verbal children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is often challenging. The Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) is a 7-point scale that has been adapted so that clinicians can easily and quickly rate social communication behaviors. The current study evaluated the CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) subscale as a measure of social communication change in minimally verbal children with ASD. The sample included 54 minimally verbal school-age children with ASD enrolled in a social communication intervention trial. CGIs were rated by interventionists and the study coordinator at baseline and at Week 6 of intervention, and were compared to scores on the Communication Complexity Scale (CCS). Results indicated that CGI ratings corresponded with CCS scores at baseline and Week 6. Children who were rated as more severe on social communication at baseline demonstrated lower complexity of communication compared to those who were rated as less severe. Those who demonstrated fast response to intervention at Week 6 showed greater improvement in their joint attention than those who were slower responders. These results provide support for the utility and validity of the CGI-I as a measure of social communication change in minimally verbal children. This study tested the CGI, a clinician rating scale, with a group of children with ASD with limited language who received intervention to improve social interactions and communication. Children's CGI ratings were comparable to other assessments in measuring social communication. The CGI may be a useful tool for those interested in quickly and easily tracking changes in children's social communication over the course of treatment. LAY SUMMARY: This study tested the Clinical Global Impression (CGI), a clinician rating scale, with a group of children with ASD with limited language who received intervention to improve social interactions and communication. Children's CGI ratings were comparable to other assessments in measuring social communication. The CGI may be a useful tool for those interested in quickly and easily tracking changes in children's social communication over the course of treatment.

Internalized-stigma and dissociative experiences in bipolar disorder

INTRODUCTION

Dissociative symptoms have been recently related to bipolar disorder (BD) symptomatology. Moreover, the disease burden carries on a share of perceived self-stigma that amplifies the BD impairment. Internalized stigma and dissociative symptoms often seem overlapping, leading toward common outcomes, with reduced treatment seeking and poor adherence. We hypothesize a potential relationship between dissociation and self-stigma in patients suffering from BD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this cross-sectional study we enrolled a total of 120 adult clinically stable BD outpatients. All participants completed the Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness (ISMI), Dissociative Experiences Scale-II (DES-II), and Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA).

RESULTS

Average age and age at BD (BD-I n = 66, 55%; BD-II n = 54, 45%) onset were 46.14 (±4.23), and 27.45 (±10.35) years, with mean disease duration of 18.56 (±13.08) years. Most participants were female (n = 71; 59.2%) and 40 (33%) of them experienced lifetime abuse, with an average of 1.05 (±0.78) suicide attempts. DES scores (mean 31.8, ±21.6) correlated with ISMI total-score, with significant association with spikes in Alienation (13.1, SD±3.1) (p < 0.001) and Stereotype (13.8, SD±3.9) (p < 0.001). Linear regression analysis has shown a significant association between DES total score and alienation (p < 0.001), stereotype (p < 0.001) and MANSA total-score (p < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

For the first time, our data suggests that self-stigma is associated to dissociative symptoms, reducing overall quality of life in BD. The early identification of at-risk patients with previous lifetime abuse and high perceived stigma could lead the way for an ever more precise tailoring of treatment management.

Efficacy and safety of daily home-based transcranial direct current stimulation as adjunct treatment for bipolar depressive episodes: Double-blind sham-controlled randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Although transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is known to be a promising therapeutic modality for unipolar depression, the efficacy and safety of tDCS for bipolar depressive episodes (BD) are still unknown and clinical trials of home-based tDCS treatment are scarce. As a result, we set out to investigate the efficacy and safety of home-based tDCS for the treatment BD.

METHODS

Participants (n = 64), diagnosed as bipolar disorder as per the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5), were randomly assigned to receive tDCS. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) scores were measured at the baseline, week 2, 4, and 6, and home-based tDCS (for 30 min with 2 mA) was self-administered daily.

RESULTS

Of the 64 patients (15.6% bipolar disorder I, 84.4% bipolar disorder II), 41 patients completed the entire assessment. In the intention-to-treat analysis, time-group interaction for the HDRS-17 [F _{(3, 146.36)} = 2.060; p = 0.108] and adverse effect differences between two groups were not statistically significant, except the pain score, which was higher in the active group than the sham group (week 0-2: p < 0.01, week 2-4: p < 0.05, and week 4-6: p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Even though we found no evidence for the efficacy of home-based tDCS for patients with BD, this tool was found to be a safe and tolerable treatment modality for BD.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

[https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT03974815], identifier [NCT03974815].

[Premorbid features of youth depression patients with attenuated schizophrenic symptoms]

OBJECTIVE

To establish the premorbid features in youth depression patients with attenuated symptoms of schizophrenia (ASS) and in a comparison group, with an analysis of the course of age crises, signs of personality disorders, level of premorbid functioning and their relationship with the level of functioning after five-year follow-up.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Two hundred and nineteen youth depression patients with ASS (according to ICD-10: F32.1, F32.2, F32.28, F32.8) (main group) and 52 patients with «pure» adolescent depression without ASS (comparison group) were examined. A total of 124 patients from the main group and 27 patients from the comparison group were examined in 5-year follow-up. The Perceptual Awareness Scale (PAS) was used to assess premorbid functioning and the Personal and Social Performance (PSP) scale was used to determine function at the time of the follow-up. The method of χ2 was used to analyze qualitative data. The correlation analysis was performed with Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Results are presented as median values [Q1; Q3].

RESULTS

The main group of patients with ASS have worse psychopathological symptoms compared with the comparison group (χ2=4.74; p=0.029). Premorbid functioning was also lower in the period 12-15 years (0.4 [0.33; 0.5]) and 16-18 years (0.47 [0.385; 0.585]) than in the comparison group (0.3 [0.23; 0.43] and 0.37 [0.23; 0.462], respectively, (p<0.05)). Negative correlation has been established between average PAS scores in the age of 12-15 and 16-18 years and the five-year follow-up on the PSP scale (r=-0.276, p<0.05 and r=-0.359, p<0.05 respectively).

CONCLUSION

Similar characteristics of the premorbid period in childhood and an increase in differences starting from the pubertal period reflect the pathogenetic significance of the pubertal crisis and suggest compensatory mechanisms that, in patients with youth depression with ASS, are able to restrain the development of the endogenous process for a certain time, but subsequently become exhausted, which leads to persistence of psychopathological symptoms in intercrisis periods and serves as the first clinical marker of the onset of schizophrenia.

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Proof-of-Concept Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Non-racemic Amisulpride (SEP-4199) for the Treatment of Bipolar I Depression

BACKGROUND

Non-racemic amisulpride (SEP-4199) is an 85:15 ratio of aramisulpride:esamisulpride with a 5-HT7 and D2 receptor binding profile optimized for the treatment of bipolar depression. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SEP-4199 for the treatment of bipolar depression.

METHODS

Patients meeting DSM-5 criteria for bipolar I depression were randomized to 6 weeks of double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment with SEP-4199 200 mg/d or 400 mg/d. The primary endpoint was change in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at Week 6. The primary efficacy analysis population consisted of patients in Europe and US (n = 289); the secondary efficacy analysis population (ITT; n = 337) included patients in Japan.

RESULTS

Endpoint improvement in MADRS total score was observed on both the primary analysis for SEP-4199 200 mg/d (P = 0.054; effect size [ES], 0.31) and 400 mg/d (P = 0.054; ES, 0.29), and on the secondary (full ITT) analysis for SEP-4199 200 mg/d (P = 0.016; ES, 0.34) and 400 mg/d (P = 0.024; ES, 0.31). Study completion rates were 81% on SEP-4199 200 mg/d, 88% on 400 mg/d, and 86% on placebo. SEP-4199 had low rates of individual adverse events (<8%) and minimal effects on weight and lipids; median increases in prolactin were +83.6 μg/L on 200 mg/d, +95.2 μg/L on 400 mg/d compared with 0.0 μg/L on placebo.

LIMITATIONS

The study excluded patients with bipolar II depression and serious psychiatric or medical comorbidity.

CONCLUSION

Study results provide preliminary proof of concept, needing confirmation in subsequent randomized trials, for the efficacy of non-racemic amisulpride in bipolar depression.

Depressive and Anxious Temperaments as Predictors of Late Onset Bipolar Disorder? Preliminary Results of a "Real World" Exploratory Study

INTRODUCTION

Bipolar disorder (BD) onset typically occurs between 15 and 30 years, being diagnosed under the age of 50 in 90% of cases, named "non-late onset BD" (non-LOBD). However, clinical observation of late-onset BD (LOBD) raised some concern regarding a differential psychopathological pattern, outcomes and treatment, including a specific affective temperament vulnerability. Therefore, an exploratory study in the "real world" was carried out by investigating psychopathological and temperamental features of a psychogeriatric cohort of LOBD and non-LOBD subjects.

METHODS

A total of 180 patients affected with BD-I, BD-II, and Cyclothymic Disorder were screened in a Mood Disorder Outpatient Service, during the timeframe January 2019-August 2021. Out of 78 enrolled outpatients, 66 (33 non-LOBD, 33 LOBD) were recruited, by the retrospective collection of sociodemographic, cognitive, psychopathological and clinical assessment, including the short-version of the Temperament Evaluation of Memphis, Pisa, and San Diego (TEMPS-M).

RESULTS

LOBD is significantly associated with higher rates of BD-II diagnosis (χ² = 27.692, p < 0.001), depressive episodes (p = 0.025), mixed states (p = 0.009), predominant depressive and anxious affective temperaments (p < 0.001). Non-LOBD is significantly associated with higher endocrinological (χ² = 6.988, p = 0.008) and metabolic comorbidity (χ² = 5.987, p = 0.014), a diagnosis of BD-I, manic episodes, and predominant hyperthymic affective temperaments (p = 0.001). GDS (p < 0.001) and MSRS (p = 0.005) scores were significantly higher in LOBD.

CONCLUSION

Further longitudinal studies with larger sample sizes and a control group are needed to determine whether LOBD may represent a distinct psychopathological entity from non-LOBD and evaluate differences (if any) in terms of prognosis and treatment between non-LOBD and LOBD.

Expanding bipolar outreach during college

OBJECTIVES

To assess feasibility and clinical significance of tracking mania and depression in community college students before and after early identification and intervention.

METHODS

From Affective Illness to Recovery: STudent Access to Rapid Treatment (FAIRSTART) is an early intervention program to provide diagnostic therapeutic consultation, short-term care, and community ongoing care referral for 18-28 year-old outpatient community college students (mean age 22.9±4.0 years) experiencing manic symptoms. Over three years, 54 FAIRSTART participants (70% with DSM-IV bipolar I/II/not otherwise specified disorder, BDI/II/NOS) were assessed with the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for BD (STEP-BD) Affective Disorders Evaluation (ADE) and followed (range: one-time consult to 4.3±3.6 visits over 3-6 month follow-up) with the STEP-BD Clinical Monitoring Form.

RESULTS

38/54 patients (70%) had BDI/II/NOS, 11 unipolar depression (20%), 1 psychosis spectrum disorder (2%), 2 dysthymia/persistent depressive disorder (4%), and 2 incomplete intake with mood disorder diagnosis undetermined (4%). Average illness duration was 9.1±5.3 years. Among the 38 BD I/II/NOS patients, depression (SUM-D, t(30)=6.5; p<0.001) and mania (SUM-M, t(30)=4.7; p<0.001) scores improved significantly from baseline to last visit, with 17 (44.7%) reporting recovery by time transitioned from FAIRSTART to community care (after 4.3±3.6 visits).

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term, early intervention in community college students with mood symptoms appeared feasible and yielded significant improvements in depression and mania scores. However, additional studies, with longer-term follow-ups, larger sample sizes, and comparison to current care standards, are needed to determine this early intervention program's impact on trajectory of mania symptoms in transitional age young adult populations.

Efficacy and Safety of Lumateperone for Major Depressive Episodes Associated With Bipolar I or Bipolar II Disorder: A Phase 3 Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

In a phase 3 randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study, the authors investigated the efficacy and safety of 42 mg/day of lumateperone in patients with bipolar I or bipolar II disorder experiencing a major depressive episode.

METHODS

Patients 18-75 years old with a clinical diagnosis of bipolar I or bipolar II disorder and experiencing a major depressive episode were eligible for the study. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive 42 mg/day of lumateperone (N=188) or placebo (N=189), administered orally once daily in the evening for 6 weeks. The primary and key secondary efficacy endpoints were change from baseline to day 43 in score on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and total score on the Clinical Global Impressions Scale-Bipolar Version severity scale (CGI-BP-S), respectively. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events, laboratory parameters, vital signs, extrapyramidal symptoms, and suicidality.

RESULTS

At day 43, lumateperone treatment was associated with significantly greater improvement from baseline in MADRS score compared with placebo (least squares mean difference compared with placebo, -4.6 points; effect size=-0.56) and CGI-BP-S total score (least squares mean difference compared with placebo, -0.9; effect size=-0.46). Significant MADRS superiority for lumateperone over placebo was observed both in patients with bipolar I and bipolar II disorders. Somnolence and nausea were the only treatment-emergent adverse events that occurred with lumateperone at a clinically meaningful greater rate than placebo. The incidence of extrapyramidal symptom-related treatment-emergent adverse events was low and similar to that for placebo. Minimal changes were observed in weight, vital signs, or metabolic or endocrine assessments.

CONCLUSIONS

Lumateperone at 42 mg/day significantly improved depression symptoms and was generally well tolerated in patients with major depressive episodes associated with both bipolar I and bipolar II disorders.

Jamal AR, Wan Ngah WZ, Mohd Badli Shah FS, Chan LF. The Role of Oxidative Stress in Suicidal Behaviour Among Bipolar Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Malaysian Sample

Background: Oxidative stress markers are found to be linked with depression and suicide attempts in bipolar disorder (BD), although the role of DNA damage as a marker of suicidal ideation and attempt has yet to be determined. We aim to investigate the association between DNA damage and suicidal behaviour, i.e., suicidal ideation and suicide attempt, among suicidal ideators in BD patients while accounting for clinical and psychosocial risk factors. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre on 62 consecutive BD patients diagnosed using the M.I.N.I. Neuropsychiatric Interview and 26 healthy control participants. Socio-demographic and clinical assessments were performed using the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) for lifetime suicidal ideation and attempt, Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) for depression severity, Clinical Global Impression for Bipolar Disorder (CGI-BD) for illness severity [both mania (CGI-Mania) and major depressive episode (CGI-MDE)], Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SRRS) for change in life events, and Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS) for behavioural impulsivity. The degree of DNA damage in peripheral blood samples was determined using a standard protocol of comet assay. Results: Multivariable logistic regression revealed higher scores of CGI-MDE as the sole significant factor for lifetime suicidal ideation (OR = 1.937, 95% CI = 1.799-2.076). Although initial bivariate analysis showed a significant association between DNA damage, malondialdehyde (MDA), catalase (CAT), and suicidal behaviour, the findings were not seen in multivariable logistic regression. Bivariate subgroup analysis showed that moderate and severe DNA damage (p = 0.032 and p = 0.047, respectively) was significantly associated with lifetime suicide attempts among lifetime suicidal ideators. The study is the first to look at the connexion between DNA damage and suicidal risk in bipolar patients. It is limited by the small sample size and lack of information on illicit substance use. Conclusions: More severe DNA damage was significantly associated with lifetime suicide attempts among lifetime suicidal ideators in BD. However, the severity of depression was found to be independently associated with lifetime suicidal ideation per se rather than DNA damage in BD. Larger prospective studies are required to ascertain the potential of DNA damage as a biomarker for the transition from suicidal ideation to a suicide attempt.

Response and remission rates during 24 weeks of mood-stabilizing treatment for bipolar depression depending on early non-response

BACKGROUND

We aimed to study the probability of bipolar depression response at 24 weeks given initial non-response.

METHODS

We combined two multi-site, 24-week trials including similar populations following the same evidence-based guidelines randomizing patients to lithium or quetiapine. Additional mood-stabilizing treatment was possible if clinically indicated. We report cumulative proportions of response (>50% improvement in MADRS) and remission (MADRS<10).

RESULTS

We included 592 participants with bipolar depression (mean 39 years, 59% female, mean MADRS 25). Among 393 (66%) participants without response after 2 weeks, 46% responded by 24 weeks; for 291 (49%) without response at 4 weeks, 40% responded and 33% remitted by 24 weeks; for 222 (38%) without a response at 6 weeks, 36% responded and 29% remitted by 24 weeks; for 185 (31%) without a response at 8 weeks, 29% responded and 24% remitted by 24 weeks. Rates were similar for participants who had started an additional mood-stabilizing drug during the first 6 or 8 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with bipolar depression and non-response after 6 weeks treatment, representing an adequate bipolar depression trial, only one-third responded by 24 weeks. These results highlight the need for better treatment alternatives for non-responders to evidence-based treatments for bipolar depression.

The effects of JNJ-39393406 a positive allosteric nicotine modulator on mood and cognition in patients with unipolar depression: A double-blind, add-on, placebo-controlled trial

Nicotinic agonists have been shown to improve cognition and mood, but this improvement is inconsistent and short-lived, possibly due to receptor desensitization. Positive Allosteric Modulators (PAMs) of the nicotinic alpha-7 nicotinic-acetyl-choline receptor (a7nAChR) are hypothesized to change the configuration of the nicotinic receptor and delay desensitization, potentially increasing the duration of the activation of the receptor, and improving clinical efficacy. This was a randomized controlled trial (RCT) adding JNJ-39393406 9 (a PAM of the a7nAChR) (n=35) or placebo (n=36) to treatment as usual for two weeks in 71 patients with unipolar depression. Mixed models for repeated measures analyses were performed Primary outcome measures were the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS) composite and the Montgomery-Asperg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores. The drug was well tolerated, however mixed models for repeated measures comparing JNJ-39393406 to placebo showed no significant difference for MADRS total score (p=0.78), BACS composite score (p=0.34), or any of the secondary outcome measures. There was no significant difference in adverse events between the study groups (p=0.44). In conclusion, this study's findings do not support the hypothesis that a positive nicotinic receptor modulator can improve cognitive or depressive symptomatology in patients with unipolar depression.

Electroconvulsive Therapy for Bipolar Depression in Older Adults

OBJECTIVES

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a well-established treatment for mood disorders in younger adults and has been consistently shown to be safe and effective in unipolar depression in older adults. However, data on this treatment in older adults with bipolar disorder are limited. In this retrospective study, we report outcomes from all cases of older adults with bipolar depression who received ECT from a large academic institution over a 7-year period.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified all patients 65 years and older with bipolar depression who were treated with ECT over a 7-year period. Patients receiving ECT for an episode of bipolar depression were included in the study based on chart review and availability of documented outcome measures. Primary outcomes were changes in Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Clinical Global Impressions scores.

RESULTS

We identified 34 patients meeting inclusion criteria. Collectively, patients had statistically significant improvement in Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores and reductions in Clinical Global Impressions severity scores after treatment. Pre- and posttreatment Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale scores were also available for a subset of 20 patients and demonstrated a similarly significant reduction in severity with treatment. There were no serious adverse effects of treatment, and no patients discontinued treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Electroconvulsive therapy was well tolerated and effective in treating bipolar depression in older adults. Importantly, these findings challenge commonly held worries about cognitive decline in older adults receiving ECT. It should be a regular consideration for management of this challenging illness in a population that may otherwise not respond to pharmacotherapy.

The impact of lifetime interpersonal and intentional trauma on cognition and vulnerability to psychosis in bipolar disorder

Background

Studies have shown that over half of individuals with bipolar disorder experience early-life trauma, which may influence clinical outcomes, including suicidality and presence of psychotic features. However, studies report inconsistent findings regarding the effect of trauma on cognitive outcomes in bipolar disorder.

Aims

Our study explores the effect of lifetime trauma on the level of vulnerability to psychosis and cognitive performance in participants with bipolar disorder.

Method

We evaluated lifetime trauma history in 236 participants with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder type 1 or 2, using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV and the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. We classified trauma types based on the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's concept of trauma, which characterises the type of experienced trauma (e.g. interpersonal and intentional, accidental or naturally occurring). Our primary outcome measures of interest were vulnerability to psychosis (Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire), cognitive performance (MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery) and social functioning (Social Adjustment Scale Self-Report).

Results

Multivariate analysis of covariance showed a significant effect of trauma type on the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire cognitive–perceptual domain (F(3) = 6.7, P < 0.001). The no-trauma group had lower cognitive–perceptual schizotypal features compared with the accidental and intentional trauma (P < 0.001) and interpersonal and intentional trauma (P = 0.01) groups.

Conclusions

Our results highlight the need for careful trauma inquiry in patients with bipolar disorder, and consideration of how trauma-focused or -informed treatments may be an integral part of treatment planning to improve outcomes in bipolar disorder.

Endoxifen: A new, protein kinase C inhibitor to treat acute and mixed mania associated with bipolar I disorder

OBJECTIVES

Endoxifen is a protein kinase C inhibitor. The objective of the present phase III study was to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of endoxifen in treating bipolar I disorder (BPD I) patients.

METHODS

A multicenter, double-blind, active-controlled study was conducted using a daily dose of 8 mg endoxifen compared to 1000 mg divalproex, the current standard treatment, in patients with BPD I acute manic episodes with/without mixed features. The primary endpoint of our study was the mean change in total Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) score at day 21.

RESULTS

Endoxifen (n = 116) significantly (p < 0.0001) reduced total YMRS score (from 33.1 to 17.8. A significant (p < 0.001) improvement in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score was observed for endoxifen (4.8 to 2.5). Early time to remission of the disease was observed with endoxifen compared to divalproex. None of the patients required rescue medication and there was no drug-associated withdrawals. Changes in Clinical Global Impressions-Bipolar Disorder and Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness scores showed that treatment with endoxifen was well-tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoxifen at a low daily dose of 8 mg was as efficacious and safe in patients with BPD I acute manic episodes with/without mixed features.

A Systematic Review of the Clinical Use of Gabapentin and Pregabalin in Bipolar Disorder

Despite its prevalence and disease burden, several chasms still exist with regard to the pharmacotherapy of bipolar disorder (BD). Polypharmacy is commonly encountered as a significant proportion of patients remain symptomatic, and the management of the depressive phase of the illness is a particular challenge. Gabapentin and pregabalin have often been prescribed off-label in spite of a paucity of evidence and clinical practice guidelines to support its use. This systematic review aimed to synthesize the available human clinical trials and inform evidence-based pharmacological approaches to BD management. A total of six randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) and 13 open-label trials involving the use of gabapentin and pregabalin in BD patients were reviewed. Overall, the studies show that gabapentin and its related drug pregabalin do not have significant clinical efficacy as either monotherapy or adjunctive therapy for BD. Gabapentin and pregabalin are probably ineffective for acute mania based on the findings of RCT, with only small open-label trials to support its potential adjunctive role. However, its effects on the long-term outcomes of BD remain to be elucidated. The evidence base was significantly limited by the generally small sample sizes and the trials also had heterogeneous designs and generally high risk of bias.

Lurasidone in the long-term treatment of Japanese patients with bipolar I disorder: a 52 week open label study

Background

The current study evaluated the long-term (52 week) safety and impact on symptom measures of lurasidone (with or without lithium or valproate) for the treatment of bipolar I disorder in Japanese patients.

Methods

Bipolar patients for this open-label flexibly dosed lurasidone (20–120 mg/day) study were recruited from those with a recent/current depressive episode who completed an initial 6 week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, lurasidone study (depressed group), and those with a recent/current manic, hypomanic, or mixed episode (non-depressed group) who agreed to enroll directly into the long-term study. Measures of adverse events and safety included treatment-emergent adverse events, vital signs, body weight, ECG, laboratory tests, and measures of suicidality and extrapyramidal symptoms. Symptom measures included Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS).

Results

The most common adverse events associated with lurasidone were akathisia (30.7%), nasopharyngitis (26.6%), nausea (12.1%), and somnolence (12.1%). Minimal changes in lipids and measures of glycemic control occurred. Mean change in body weight was + 1.0 kg in the non-depressed group and − 0.8 kg in the depressed group. MADRS total scores declined by a mean (SD) of 2.0 (14.7) points from long-term baseline to endpoint in the depressed group who had received placebo in the prior 6 week trial. The depressed group that had received lurasidone during the prior 6 week study maintained their depressive symptom improvements. For the non-depressed group, YMRS total scores decreased over time.

Limitations

No control group was included, treatment was open-label, and 49.7% of patients completed the 52 week study.

Conclusions

Long-term treatment with lurasidone 20–120 mg/day for Japanese patients with bipolar disorder maintained improvements in depressive symptoms for depressed patients who were treated in a prior 6 week trial and led to improvements in manic symptoms among a newly recruited subgroup of patients with a recent/current manic, hypomanic, or mixed episode. Few changes in weight or metabolic parameters were evident.

Clinical trial registration: JapicCTI-132319, clinicaltrials.gov—NCT01986114.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40345-021-00230-8.

Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials and one open-label, long-term trial of brexpiprazole for the acute treatment of bipolar mania

BACKGROUND

Brexpiprazole is a dopamine/serotonin receptor partial agonist (D₂, 5-HT_1A) and antagonist (5-HT_2A) approved for treatment of schizophrenia and major depressive disorder (adjunct to antidepressants).

AIMS

This study aimed to investigate brexpiprazole as monotherapy in acute mania (bipolar I disorder) in two short-term (ST) studies (study 080 and study 081) and one open-label (OL) extension (study 083).

METHODS

ST studies were three-week randomized, double-blind, flexible dose (2-4 mg/day), placebo-controlled studies. The primary endpoint was mean change in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) total score from baseline to day 21. The OL study was a 26-week flexible dose (2-4 mg/day) study for patients completing the ST studies.

RESULTS

A total of 164 and 158 (study 080) and 170 and 162 (study 081) inpatients with DSM-5 mania with/without mixed features were randomized to placebo or brexpiprazole, respectively. The primary analyses did not show a statistically significant difference between brexpiprazole and placebo: study 080: least squares mean difference (95% confidence limits): 0.14 (-1.74, 2.03), p = 0.8797; study 081: -1.62 (-3.56, 0.32), p = 0.1011. OL study patients (n = 381) demonstrated a gradual improvement in YMRS total score. Akathisia was the only adverse event, with an incidence of ⩾5% with brexpiprazole and more than placebo in the ST studies, or ⩾5% in the OL study. Brexpiprazole was more efficacious in patients with impaired or no insight (predominantly EU patients) than in patients with excellent insight (predominantly US patients).

CONCLUSIONS

Further studies are necessary to address the potential efficacy of brexpiprazole in acute mania, which should ensure that the study sample is severe enough (especially with regard to insight), and that the dose/titration schedule is not too modest.

Illness stage and predominant polarity in bipolar disorder: Correlation with burden of illness and moderation of treatment outcome

Bipolar disorder often follows a set progression best described in stages where advanced stages are associated with poorer outcomes. Bipolar disorder is also often characterized by a predominance of episode polarity, where some individuals experience more depressive episodes (termed predominant depressive polarity) while others experience more hypo/manic episodes (termed predominant hypo/manic polarity). We examined the associations between staging and predominant polarity with measures of illness burden and treatment outcome utilizing data from a six-month comparative effectiveness trial of lithium and quetiapine in bipolar disorder (Bipolar CHOICE). We used number of self-reported lifetime mood (depressive and hypo/manic) episodes as a proxy for staging and ratio of depressive to manic episodes to define predominant polarity. Polarity and staging were correlated with several measures of burden of illness. Childhood abuse was correlated with more lifetime mood episodes, while more depressive episodes and depressive polarity were correlated with more anxiety disorder comorbidity. Depressive polarity was also correlated with more past trials of psychotropics, particularly antidepressants. However, neither staging nor predominant polarity moderated the randomized treatment effect of lithium vs. quetiapine. Number of depressive episodes in the past year was identified as a potential predictor of overall worse treatment outcome, regardless of medication condition. In conclusion, though staging and predominant episode polarity correlated with several measures of illness burden, they were not associated with differential treatment outcomes. This could be because many of our patients presented for treatment at advanced stages of illness and further highlights the need for early intervention in bipolar disorder.

A Single-Blind Randomized Comparison of Lithium and Lamotrigine as Maintenance Treatments for Managing Bipolar II Disorder

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND

No study to date has compared lithium and lamotrigine as maintenance mood stabilizers for bipolar II disorder. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare these two medications in terms of their maintenance efficacy and side effect profile, thus evaluating their comparative cost/benefit profile.

METHODS/PROCEDURES

Forty-four subjects with a newly diagnosed bipolar II disorder were randomly assigned to receive either lithium or lamotrigine treatment in a 20-week single-blinded study. Subjects received either slow-release lithium progressively up-titrated to achieve a serum level of 0.8 mEq/L, or lamotrigine increased progressively to a maintenance dose of 200 mg/d. Our primary outcome measure examined daily data on hypomanic and depressive symptoms. Secondary measures evaluated hypomanic and depressive symptom severity, global functioning, and global improvement in hypomanic and depressive symptoms.

FINDINGS/RESULTS

We terminated the trial principally because of severe ongoing side effects experienced by many of those receiving lithium, and with additional concerns about initial severe side effects (including psychosis) experienced by several assigned to lamotrigine. Analyses of study completer data for 28 participants suggested comparable efficacy of both medications; however, lamotrigine had a distinctly lower rate of severe side effects across the study. We calculated that if study trends on outcome measures were valid, then an extremely large sample would be required to demonstrate superiority of either drug, thus making it unlikely that any such adequately powered study will be mounted in the future.

IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS

The small sample size limits any definitive conclusions, but our data suggest that lithium and lamotrigine are likely to have equal efficacy as mood stabilizers for those with a bipolar II condition but that, as maintenance treatments, lithium has more distinctive side effects.

The effect of N-acetylcysteine on bipolar depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

RATIONALE

The current pharmacotherapy of bipolar depression often presents limited efficacy and increased risk for adverse events. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) has been suggested as potentially effective and well-tolerated adjunctive treatment for bipolar disorder (BD).

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the efficacy of N-acetylcysteine, as an adjunctive therapy, for treating bipolar depression.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus databases, and grey literature were searched for studies retrieval. Randomized controlled trials including patients with a diagnosed bipolar disorder and a current depressive episode were included in the analysis. The measured variables included symptoms, functioning, and quality of life scales. The mean change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) was set as the primary outcome.

RESULTS

A total of five studies were included in the analysis. A significant improvement was not observed from the addition of NAC to standard therapy in symptomatology [MADRS (MD = -3.32; 95% CI = -12.79 to 6.16), Young Mania Rating Scale (MD = -0.7; 95% CI = -2.15 to 0.75), Bipolar Depression Rating Scale (MD = -3.19; 95% CI = -15.48 to 9.1), and Clinical Global Impression for severity (MD = -0.13; 95% CI = -0.33 to 0.08)], functioning, [Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (MD = 3.21; 95% CI = -12.55 to 18.97), Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (MD = 0.47; 95% CI = -4.60 to 5.53), or quality of life [Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (MD = 2.27; 95% CI = -9.13 to 13.67)].

CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence indicating that NAC has beneficial effects as an adjunctive treatment for bipolar depression. Future trials with improved methodological design and efficient sample sizes are required to draw safer conclusions.

Use of Patient and Investigator Global Impression Scales: A Review of Food and Drug Administration-Approved Labeling, 2009 to 2019

OBJECTIVE

Identify disease categories in which single-item global impression (GI) scales were included in product labeling of new drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in January 2009-December 2019 and review the characteristics of GIs included in product labeling of new FDA-approved drugs (January 2017-December 2019).

METHODS

FDA Clinical Outcome Assessment (COA) Compendium was reviewed for drug labels that included GIs for drugs approved in 2009-2016. The indication, year of approval, ICD-10 code, and GI respondent were noted. A manual review of labels of FDA-approved drugs (2017-2019) was undertaken to identify GIs included in the labels. Corresponding drug approval packages were reviewed to identify details of any regulatory reviewer comments related to GIs. GI characteristics were noted from the drug label or the review documents, including the respondent, type of measure (static or dynamic), item wording, concept assessed, and response options.

RESULTS

Product labeling containing GIs was most common in diseases related to the skin, nervous system, behavioral disorders, and the musculoskeletal system. GIs were included in 30/77 (39.0%) drug labels in the four disease categories.

CONCLUSION

In the past 10 years, GIs have been included as endpoint measures in confirmatory clinical trials and have generated evidence of treatment benefit in diseases related to the skin, nervous system, behavioral disorders, and the musculoskeletal system. GIs frequently provide important insights into the patient experience. Before GIs are included in clinical trials to assess treatment benefit, it is important to ensure that they are valid, reliable, and responsive.

Magnetic seizure therapy for treatment-resistant depression

BACKGROUND

Magnetic seizure therapy (MST) is a potential alternative to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Reports to date on use of MST for patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) are limited.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of MST in comparison with sham-MST, antidepressant, and other forms of electric or magnetic treatment for adults with TRD.

SEARCH METHODS

In March 2020, we searched a wide range of international electronic sources for published, unpublished, and ongoing studies. We handsearched the reference lists of all included studies and relevant systematic reviews and conference proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology (ACNP), the Annual Scientific Convention and Meeting, and the Annual Meeting of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology (ECNP) to identify additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised clinical trials (RCTs) focused on MST for adults with TRD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors extracted data independently. For binary outcomes, we calculated risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For continuous data, we estimated mean differences (MDs) between groups and 95% CIs. We employed a random-effects model for analyses. We assessed risk of bias for included studies and created a 'Summary of findings' table using the GRADE approach. Our main outcomes of interest were symptom severity, cognitive function, suicide, quality of life, social functioning, dropout for any reason, serious adverse events, and adverse events that led to discontinuation of treatment.

MAIN RESULTS

We included three studies (65 participants) comparing MST with ECT. Two studies reported depressive symptoms with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD). However, in one study, the data were skewed and there was an imbalance in baseline characteristics. Analysis of these two studies showed no clear differences in depressive symptoms between treatment groups (MD 0.71, 95% CI -2.23 to 3.65; 2 studies, 40 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Two studies investigated multiple domains of cognitive function. However most of the outcomes were not measured by validated neuropsychological tests, and many of the data suffered from unbalanced baseline and skewed distribution. Analysis of immediate memory performance measured by the Wechsler Memory Scale showed no clear differences between treatment groups (MD 0.40, 95% CI -4.16 to 4.96; 1 study, 20 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Analysis of delayed memory performance measured by the Wechsler Memory Scale also showed no clear differences between treatment groups (MD 2.57, 95% CI -2.39 to 7.53; 1 study, 20 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Only one study reported quality of life, but the data were skewed and baseline data were unbalanced across groups. Analysis of quality of life showed no clear differences between treatment groups (MD 14.86, 95% CI -42.26 to 71.98; 1 study, 20 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Only one study reported dropout and adverse events that led to discontinuation of treatment. Analysis of reported data showed no clear differences between treatment groups for this outcome (RR 1.38, 95% CI 0.28 to 6.91; 1 study, 25 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Adverse events occurred in only two participants who received ECT (worsening of preexisting coronary heart disease and a cognitive adverse effect). None of the included studies reported outcomes on suicide and social functioning. No RCTs comparing MST with other treatments were identified.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Evidence regarding effects of MST on patients with TRD is currently insufficient. Our analyses of available data did not reveal clearly different effects between MST and ECT. We are uncertain about these findings because of risk of bias and imprecision of estimates. Large, long, well-designed, and well-reported trials are needed to further examine the effects of MST.

Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) in Bipolar Disorder Patients with Ultra-Rapid Cycling and Unstable Mixed States

Background and Objectives: Unstable mixed episodes or rapid switching between opposite affective poles within the scope of short cycles was first characterized in 1967 by S. Mentzos as complex polymorphous states with chaotic overlap of manic and depressive symptoms. Well-known examples include antidepressant-induced mania/hypomania and rapid/ultra-rapid/ultradian cycling, when clinicians observe an almost continuous mixed state with a constant change of preponderance of manic or depressive symptoms. Achieving stable remission in these cases is challenging with almost no data on evidence-based treatment. When mood stabilizers are ineffective, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been suggested. Objectives: After reviewing the evidence from available literature, this article presents our own clinical experience of ECT efficacy and tolerability in patients with ultra-rapid cycling bipolar disorder (BD) and unstable mixed states. Materials and Methods: We conducted an open, one-year observational prospective study with a "mirror image" design, including 30 patients with rapid and ultra-rapid cycling BD on long-term mood stabilizer treatment (18 received lithium carbonate, 6 on valproate and 6 on carbamazepine) with limited effectiveness. A bilateral ECT course (5-10 sessions) was prescribed for regaining mood stability. Results: ECT was very effective in 12 patients (40%) with a history of ineffective mood stabilizer treatment who achieved and maintained remission; all of them received lithium except for 1 patient who received carbamazepine and 2 with valproate. Nine patients (30%) showed partial response (one on carbamazepine and two on valproate) and nine patients (30%) had no improvement at all (four on carbamazepine and two on valproate). For the whole sample, the duration of affective episodes was significantly reduced from 36.05 ± 4.32 weeks in the year prior to ECT to 21.74 ± 12.14 weeks in the year post-ECT (p < 0.001). Depressive episodes with mixed and/or catatonic features according to DSM-5 specifiers were associated with a better acute ECT response and/or long-term mood stabilizer treatment outcome after ECT. Conclusions: ECT could be considered as a useful option for getting mood instability under control in rapid and ultra-rapid cycling bipolar patients. Further randomized trials are needed to confirm these results.

Recovering the Capacity to Live outside of a Psychiatric Hospital: Impact of a Specialized Inpatient Program

Deinstitutionalization in psychiatry led to a decrease in hospital beds, short hospital admissions focussed on symptoms reduction, and the development of ambulatory care. However, the needs of patients who despite symptoms reduction do not display the minimal competencies to live alone or in a sheltered accommodation, are not met in such a context. They usually go through long admissions and fail to improve. In 2016, we implemented a new inpatient program focused on fostering the development of the competencies needed to adapt to living outside the hospital; the aim of this study was to evaluate if it lead to the resolution of these situations or in contrary if it turned into a long stay unit. 116 patients admitted to the program between 2016 and 2018 were included in the study. They were psychiatric inpatients who had no home, did not find a place in a sheltered accommodation and couldn't be discharged. In the majority of cases, the situation was resolved within 180 days and the majority of patients was referred to a sheltered accommodation. Functional and symptom levels improved significantly over time. A specific focus on restoring competencies to live outside of hospital allows complex patients to improve their functional level and to find a place to live in the community within a relatively short time. While deinstitutionalization has been beneficial to the vast majority of patients, denying the specific needs of a minority of patients leads to unnecessary long and inefficient hospital admissions.

Comorbidities, Depression Severity, and Circadian Rhythms Disturbances as Clinical Correlates of Duration of Untreated Illness in Affective Disorders

Background and Objectives: Affective disorders, namely bipolar (BDs) and depressive disorders (DDs) are characterized by high prevalence and functional impairment. From a dimensional point of view, BDs and DDs can be considered as psychopathological entities lying on a continuum. A delay in treatment initiation might increase the burden associated with affective disorders. The aim of this study is to analyze the correlates of a long duration of untreated illness (DUI) in these conditions. Materials and Methods: Subjects with BDs and DDs, both in- and outpatients, were recruited. Long DUI was defined according to previous research criteria as >2 years for BDs or >1 year for DDs. Socio-demographic, clinical and psychopathological characteristics of the recruited subjects were collected. Bivariate analyses were performed to compare subjects with a long and short DUI (p < 0.05). Results: In our sample (n = 61), 34.4% of subjects presented a long DUI. A long DUI was significantly associated with longer overall illness duration (p = 0.022) and a higher rate of psychiatric (p = 0.048) and physical comorbidities (p = 0.023). As for psychopathological features, depressive symptoms were more severe in the long DUI subgroup, as demonstrated by a higher score at the Clinical Global Impression-severity of depression (p = 0.012) item and at the anxiety/depression factor of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (p = 0.041). Furthermore, subjects with a long DUI displayed more severe disruption of circadian rhythms, as evaluated by the Biological Rhythms Interview for Assessment in Neuropsychiatry total (p = 0.044) and social domain (p = 0.005) scores and by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale diurnal variation items (18a: p = 0.029, 18b: p = 0.047). Conclusions: A long DUI may underpin higher clinical severity, as well as worse illness course and unfavorable prognosis in affective disorders. Intervention strategies targeting comorbidities, depressive symptoms and circadian rhythms may decrease disease burden in subjects with a long DUI.

Influence of childhood trauma on the treatment outcomes of pharmacological and/or psychological interventions for adolescents and adults with bipolar disorder: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Despite available pharmacological and psychological treatments, remission rates for bipolar disorder remain relatively low. Current research implicates the experience of childhood trauma as a potential moderator of poor treatment outcomes among individuals with bipolar disorder. To date, the evidence reporting the influence of childhood trauma on the treatment outcomes of pharmacological and/or psychological interventions for adolescents and adults with bipolar disorder has not been systematically reviewed.

METHOD AND ANALYSIS

MEDLINE Complete, Embase, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials will be searched to identify randomised and nonrandomised studies of pharmacological and/or psychological interventions for bipolar disorder, which also assessed childhood trauma. To be eligible for inclusion, studies must have been conducted with adolescents or adults (≥10 years). Data will be screened and extracted by two independent reviewers. The methodological quality of the included studies will be assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. If deemed viable, a meta-analysis will be conducted using a random effects model. Heterogeneity of evidence will be estimated with the I² statistics.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This systematic review will use only previously published data. Therefore, ethical approval is not required. The results will be written in concordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines, published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020201891.

Development of Evidence-Based Rehabilitation Practice in Botanical Garden for People With Mental Health Disorders

AIM

This article aims to make clearer, with supporting evidence, the clinical benefits of the nature-based rehabilitation program (NBRP) and the restorative values of visiting botanical garden for people with stress-related mental disorders.

BACKGROUND

Throughout the years, nature-based therapy has been acknowledged as a valuable rehabilitation practice that integrates specially designed natural environments and nature-related activities for people with mental health conditions.

SUBJECT AND METHODS

The comparative analyses of parallel conducted the NBRP at botanical garden and occupational therapy realised at the Day Hospital of the Institute of Mental Health in Belgrade included 27 participants divided into two groups. The data collection employed a mixed method combining a Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Scale and on-site observations.

RESULTS

The positive findings on the psychological recovery of the participants seem to be related to NBRP. The restorative potential of the garden was recognized through the observed interaction between participants and the natural entities employed through the various themed activities. The observed landscape elements especially solitary plant specimens or tall and single-form trees within the garden can be embraced as design guidelines for the development of an evidence-based practice that can support the recovery process of people with mental health conditions.

CONCLUSION

Our findings endorse that ongoing social development and progressive urbanization have broadened the interest in scientific research involving nature-based solutions that help preserve the physical and mental health of people in low- and middle-income Western Balkan countries with a high prevalence of mental disorders in the urban environment that relates to social inequalities and natural disasters.

Clinically meaningful changes on depressive symptom measures and patient-reported outcomes in patients with treatment-resistant depression

OBJECTIVE

To use the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scale to estimate clinically meaningful and clinically substantial changes as measured using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD).

METHODS

Pooled data were derived from two 4-week, randomized, active-controlled studies evaluating esketamine nasal spray (ESK) plus oral antidepressant (OAD) or OAD plus placebo nasal spray (PBO) in adults with TRD (N = 565). CGI-S, MADRS, SDS, and PHQ-9 scores were obtained at baseline and over 4 weeks of treatment. In this post hoc analysis, change scores on the MADRS, SDS, and PHQ-9 that corresponded to a clinically meaningful (1-point) or clinically substantial (2-point) change on the CGI-S scale were identified.

RESULTS

Clinically meaningful changes in CGI-S scores after 28 days corresponded to 6-, 4-, and 3-point changes from baseline on the MADRS, SDS, and PHQ-9, respectively. Similarly, a 2-point CGI-S score change (clinically substantial change) corresponded to a 12-, 8-, and 6-point change on the MADRS, SDS, and PHQ-9, respectively. The proportion of patients showing substantial clinical improvement in the ESK plus OAD group versus the OAD plus PBO group after 28 days of treatment favored ESK plus OAD: 69.0% vs 55.3% (MADRS), 64.5% vs 48.9% (SDS), and 77.1% vs 64.7% (PHQ-9).

CONCLUSION

We provide a basis for identifying clinically meaningful and clinically substantial changes as assessed with commonly used outcome measures for depression to facilitate the translation of clinical trial results into clinical practice.

Effects of psychotherapy on comorbid bipolar disorder and substance use disorder: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

This review aim was to examine whether psychotherapy is more or less effective in patients with SUD, compared to those without; whether there is a differential effect of a particular psychotherapy in patients with SUD.

METHODS

A quantitative systematic review following the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews was used.

RESULTS

Five studies of psychotherapy for BD and two studies of an integrated psychotherapy for comorbid BD and SUD were included in the review. Five studies provided a sub-analysis of the effect of SUD on overall outcomes with only one finding an overall detrimental effect. The results indicated equal, if not better outcomes for individuals with comorbid BD and SUD.

CONCLUSION

There was little evidence that interventions targeted at both BD and SUD may be more efficacious. Further research in to psychotherapeutic treatment for BD should include individuals with comorbid SUD, and analyse substance use as an outcome. Additionally, research into treatments specifically developed for these commonly comorbid disorders is indicated.

Psychotic symptoms during bipolar depressive episodes and suicidal ideation

BACKGROUND

Psychotic symptoms during bipolar depressive episodes, especially in outpatients, are under recognized and studied by clinicians and researchers. We examined the relationship between psychotic symptoms during a depressive episode and suicidal ideation in bipolar patients.

METHODS

Participants (N = 351) were adult, depressed outpatients with bipolar disorder (BD) in a comparative effectiveness study of quetiapine versus lithium. Psychotic symptoms were assessed via Bipolar Inventory of Signs and Symptoms Scale (BISS) and depressive episodes via Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). Because only 4.84% (N = 17) endorsed psychotic symptoms, we performed iterative multivariate matching with non-psychotic participants. On every matched population, a multiple regression analysis examined whether psychotic symptoms were associated with suicidal ideation, via the Concise Health Risk Taking scale (CHRT-12).

RESULTS

Averaged across the 50 matched populations, current psychotic symptoms predicted active suicidal ideation on the CHRT, but not a passive propensity toward suicide or total CHRT scores, after adjusting for common correlates of suicidality (e.g., previous suicidal behavior) (β=0.59, p=.01, R2= 0.41).

LIMITATIONS

Our study was limited by three factors. First, the generalizability of our study was limited as the sample included only outpatients. Next, the analysis was cross-sectional and does not allow for causal interpretation. Lastly, our study lacked information regarding the content and mood congruency of participants' psychosis.

CONCLUSION

While a small proportion of BD outpatients had current symptoms of psychosis during their depressive episode, those who did were more likely to endorse active suicidal thoughts, including suicide methods and plans.

Lurasidone in the Long-Term Treatment of Bipolar I Depression: A 28-week Open Label Extension Study

BACKGROUND

Lurasidone has demonstrated efficacy for short-term treatment of bipolar depression in a diverse ethnic population including Japanese. This study evaluated the long-term safety and effectiveness of open-label lurasidone treatment in these patients.

METHODS

Patients for this 28-week extension study were recruited from those who completed a 6-week double-blind study of lurasidone, 20-60 mg/day, lurasidone 80-120 mg/day, and placebo. In the extension study, lurasidone was flexibly dosed (20 to 120 mg/day). Safety was evaluated in terms of change from extension-phase baseline to endpoint including adverse events, vital signs, body weight, ECG, laboratory tests, and measures of suicidality and extrapyramidal symptoms. Effectiveness was determined by Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and other measures.

RESULTS

303 of 413 (73.3%) subjects completed the extension study. Discontinuation due to a treatment-emergent adverse event occurred for 11.4% of those who received placebo, and 8.9% of those who received lurasidone, in the prior 6-week trial. The most common treatment-emergent adverse event was akathisia. Minimal changes were evident on body weight and metabolic parameters. Long-term treatment with lurasidone further reduced mean MADRS total scores from long-term baseline to week 28 (or endpoint) for both those who had received prior placebo (-11.3), and those who had receive prior lurasidone (-8.9), in the 6-week double-blind trial.

LIMITATIONS

There was no placebo control and treatment was not double-blind.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term treatment with lurasidone (20-120 mg/day) was well-tolerated with no new safety concerns and associated with continued improvement in depressive symptoms in this international sample of patients with bipolar depression.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

JapicCTI-132319, clinicaltrials.gov - NCT01986114.

The Koukopoulos mixed depression rating scale (KMDRS) and the assessment of mixed symptoms during the perinatal period

BACKGROUND

Mixed symptoms in depression may underlie bipolar diathesis rather than unipolarity. Uncovering mixed depression (MxD) is crucial for appropriate management, especially in the perinatal period, as it may affect treatment planning and impact future child development. We used a scale specific for identifying MxD and tested its validity in pregnant and postpartum women with depression.

METHODS

Women developing a major depressive episode (MDE) during their perinatal period extending from pregnancy to one year postpartum from November-2012 through June-2019 were assessed with BPRS-18, EPDS, CGI-S, GAF, HAM-A, HAM-D, Koukopoulos' Mixed Depression Rating Scale (KMDRS), TEMPS, and YMRS. They were classified, based on KMDRS criteria, as with mixed (MxD) or without (nonMxD) mixed symptoms. We conducted ROC analysis and performed factor analysis of the KMDRS.

RESULTS

Of 45 included, MxD (N = 19) were biased towards diagnosis of bipolar disorder and nonMxD (N = 26) towards major depressive disorder. Other sociodemographic variables did not differ significantly between MxD and nonMxD. MxD scored higher on total YMRS, BPRS, and KMDRS, and on KMDRS-6 Subjective Feelings of Irritability and KMDRS-12 Suicidal Impulsiveness items. The KMDRS correlated in the entire sample, in MxD and nonMxD, with the YMRS and the BPRS, while correlating with the HAM-D in nonMxD only. The KMDRS showed acceptable AUC distribution, with a 68% sensitivity and 58% specificity. Best-fit was three-factor-structure, explaining 54.66% of cumulative variance.

LIMITATIONS

Small sample and cross-sectional design.

CONCLUSIONS

The KMDRS is fit for investigating MxD along with the YMRS and the BPRS in perinatal women with a MDE.

A taxonomy of clinical response to mood stabilizers

INTRODUCTION

Although clinical practice guidelines (CPG) identify first, second- and third-line mood stabilizer (MS) treatments, they rarely define clinical response to prophylaxis or the core issues to be considered. This project aimed to develop a template for describing how clinical response may be classified and a framework to assist decision-making and monitoring of response in day-to-day practice.

METHOD

A scoping exercise was undertaken followed by narrative synthesis of (a) qualitative and quantitative definitions of MS response applied in clinical and research practice and (b) potential confounders (eg, non-adherence; tolerability issues) of relevance to routine practice, for example, the concepts are applicable to individuals with bipolar disorder for whom sustained remission is a less realistic goal. Expert consensus was employed to develop a taxonomy of response and key concepts that inform clinical judgements about MS response.

RESULTS

Five core constructs can be used to systematize clinical judgements regarding MS response and its monitoring: (a) quantitative, qualitative and/or patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS), (b) personalized assessment of the acceptable benefit-to-harm ratio of a proposed treatment, (c) adequacy of treatment exposure (dose, duration, therapeutic monitoring and adherence), (d) illness activity pre- and post-MS initiation, and (e) other potential confounders (co-prescription of MS; polypharmacy) or protective factors (eg, psychosocial factors).

CONCLUSIONS

This heuristic framework might be used as a teaching aid or by clinicians who wish to take a more systematic approach to developing shared criteria for judging MS response that better match patient expectations and preferences. Heuristic approaches also allow seamless introduction of new evidence.

Adjunctive antidepressant treatment among 763 outpatients with bipolar disorder: Findings from the Bipolar CHOICE and LiTMUS trials

BACKGROUND

Adjunctive antidepressants are frequently used for bipolar depression but their clinical efficacy has been studied in few trials and little is known about how co-occurring manic symptoms affect treatment response.

METHODS

Bipolar Clinical Health Outcomes Initiative in Comparative Effectiveness (N = 482) and Lithium Treatment Moderate-Dose Use Study (N = 281) were similar comparative effectiveness trials on outpatients with bipolar disorder comparing four different randomized treatment arms with adjunctive personalized guideline-based treatment for 24 weeks. Adjunctive antidepressant treatment could be used if clinically indicated and was assessed at every study visit. Adjusted mixed effects linear regression analyses compared users of antidepressants to nonusers overall and in different subcohorts.

RESULTS

Of the 763 patients, 282 (37.0%) used antidepressant drugs during the study. Antidepressant users had less improvement compared to nonusers on the Clinical Global Impression Scale for Bipolar Disorder and on measures of depression. This was particularly true among patients with co-occurring manic symptoms. Exclusion of individuals begun on antidepressants late in the study (potentially due to overall worse response) resulted in no differences between users and nonusers. We found no differences in treatment effects on mania scales.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large cohort of outpatients with bipolar disorder, clinically indicated and guideline-based adjunctive antidepressant treatment was not associated with lower depressive symptoms or higher mania symptoms. The treatment-by-indication confounding due to the nonrandomized design of the trials complicates causal interpretations, but no analyses indicated better treatment effects of adjunctive antidepressants.

Development of an adapted Clinical Global Impression scale for use in Angelman syndrome

Background

The Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) and CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) scales are widely accepted tools that measure overall disease severity and change, synthesizing the clinician’s impression of the global state of an individual. Frequently employed in clinical trials for neuropsychiatric disorders, the CGI scales are typically used in conjunction with disease-specific rating scales. When no disease-specific rating scale is available, the CGI scales can be adapted to reflect the specific symptom domains that are relevant to the disorder. Angelman syndrome (AS) is a rare, clinically heterogeneous condition for which there is no disease-specific rating scale. This paper describes efforts to develop standardized, adapted CGI scales specific to AS for use in clinical trials.

Methods

In order to develop adapted CGI scales specific to AS, we (1) reviewed literature and interviewed caregivers and clinicians to determine the most impactful symptoms, (2) engaged expert panels to define and operationalize the symptom domains identified, (3) developed detailed rating anchors for each domain and for global severity and improvement ratings, (4) reviewed the anchors with expert clinicians and established minimally clinically meaningful change for each symptom domain, and (5) generated mock patient vignettes to test the reliability of the resulting scales and to standardize rater training. This systematic approach to developing, validating, and training raters on a standardized, adapted CGI scale specifically for AS is described herein.

Results

The resulting CGI-S/I-AS scales capture six critical domains (behavior, gross and fine motor function, expressive and receptive communication, and sleep) defined by caregivers and expert clinicians as the most challenging for patients with AS and their families.

Conclusions

Rigorous training and careful calibration for clinicians will allow the CGI-S/-I-AS scales to be reliable in the context of randomized controlled trials. The CGI-S/-I-AS scales are being utilized in a Phase 3 trial of gaboxadol for the treatment of AS.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s11689-020-09349-8.

Autobiographical Memory and Episodic Specificity Across Different Affective States in Bipolar Disorder

Autobiographical memory is essential to ground a sense of self-identity, contributing to social functioning and the development of future plans, and being an essential source for the psychiatric interview. Previous studies have suggested loss of autobiographical episodic specificity in unipolar depression, but relatively fewer investigations have been conducted in bipolar disorder (BD) patients, particularly across different mood states. Similarly, there is a scarcity of systematic investigations about mood-congruent and mood-dependent memory in relation to autobiographical memory in BD. Considering this, a total of 74 patients with BD (24 in euthymia, 26 in mania, and 24 in depression) responded with autobiographical memories to cue words belonging to four categories: mania, depression, BD, and neutral. Episodic specificity was scored according to the Autobiographical Interview, with high intra- and inter-rater reliability. Results indicated that patients in mania generally re-experience more episodic details than those in depression. Depressed bipolar patients reported fewer details of perception and less time integration of memories than those in euthymia or mania. Words linked to depression and BD induced greater episodic re-experiencing than neutral words, just as words about BD provided greater episodic re-experiencing and more details of emotion/thoughts than words about mania. Words linked to depression provoked more time details about the recalled episodes than words on BD or neutral themes. No mood-congruent or mood-dependent effects were observed. Current findings may improve the ability of clinicians to conduct psychiatric interviews and the diagnosis of BD, with special attention to how memory details are generated across different mood states of the condition. Additionally, interventions to foster autobiographical recollection in BD may be developed, similar to what has already been done in the context of schizophrenia.

Asenapine: an atypical antipsychotic with atypical formulations

Asenapine is a second-generation (atypical) antipsychotic medication not available in a pill that can be swallowed; rather, it is commercialized in sublingual and transdermal formulations. This is a consequence of extensive first-pass metabolism if ingested. The sublingual formulation is approved in many jurisdictions for the treatment of schizophrenia and manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder and is available generically. The efficacy profile is well characterized in a number of clinical trials, including an off-label use for the management of agitation. Obstacles to its use include food and drink restrictions, twice-daily dosing and adverse effects such as dysgeusia (distorted, altered, or unpleasant taste) and oral hypoesthesia (numbness). Transdermal asenapine was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2019 for the treatment of schizophrenia in adults. Efficacy was established in a registrational study examining acutely ill inpatients with schizophrenia. The patch needs to changed once daily. Obstacles to its use include the potential for skin reactions such as erythema and pruritis, and being a branded product, it is more costly than other options. This is a narrative review of the chemistry and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of asenapine, as well as summarizing the efficacy and tolerability of both sublingual and transdermal asenapine, and its possible place in treatment.

Does guideline-concordant care predict naturalistic outcomes in youth with early stage bipolar I disorder?

BACKGROUND

The impact of guideline concordance on naturalistic maintenance treatment outcomes in BD is not known. We sought to evaluate the effect of guideline-concordant care on symptomatic, course and functional outcomes in youth with early-stage BD-I.

METHODS

In this file audit study, we examined the prospective course of 64 clients with first treatment seeking manic episode of BD-I. Eighteen-month outcome measures included Clinical Global Impressions Scale - Bipolar Version (CGI-BP), Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS) and number of relapses. Correlations and hierarchical linear regressions were used to examine the relationships between guideline concordance and outcomes, while controlling for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Although higher guideline-concordant care in the maintenance phase was associated with a higher discharge CGI-BP score and thus worse outcome, baseline CGI-BP and insight were more predictive of illness severity at follow-up than guideline concordance. There was no association with SOFAS and guideline-concordant care at follow-up. Greater concordance with maintenance medication guideline statements was also associated with greater number of relapses even after controlling for sex, medication adherence, duration of care and baseline illness severity.

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by sample size and its single pool of clients which may limit generalizability.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to our hypotheses, higher guideline concordance was associated with worse outcomes, although this relationship was moderated by the client's illness characteristics, severity and insight. More unwell youth with poor insight, greater severity, and mixed/rapid cycling features may need other interventions or modified guidelines.

Dissociative Symptoms in Bipolar Disorder: Impact on Clinical Course and Treatment Response

Background: Dissociative symptoms are under recognized and scarcely studied by clinicians and researchers in patients with bipolar disorder (BD). We examined the relationship between dissociative symptoms and the psychotic features in patients with BD and assessed clinical and socio-demographic characteristics more frequently associated with dissociative symptoms and treatment response. Methods: Participants were 100 adult outpatients with BD. They were screened with semi-structured interview to collect socio-demographic and clinical characteristics; the Dissociative Experiences Scale-II (DES-II) and the ALDA scale were used to assess dissociative psychopathologies and response to treatment with mood stabilizers, respectively. Results: DES score (mean 31.7 ± 21.7) correlated with clinical variables, BD features, and course of illness. Psychotic symptoms, mixed features, and previous suicide attempts significantly predicted DES score [F _{(3, 47)} = 39.880, p < 0.001, R ² corrected = 0.713]. Dissociative symptoms were inversely correlated with poor response to treatment (r = -0.593; p < 0.001). Limitations: Cross-sectional design with a small sample and backward clinical assessment of psychotic symptoms. Conclusions: Dissociative phenomena are closely related to the presence of psychotic symptoms, mixed features, and previous suicide attempts in BD, especially in BD-I. Given the close association between dissociative and psychotic symptoms, this association could represent a diagnostic indicator of BD-I that may guide the clinician to plan the most appropriate treatment.

Community-Based Rehabilitation for Persons with Severe Mental Illness in a Rural Community of Karnataka: Methodology of a Randomized Controlled Study

BACKGROUND

Task shifting has been recommended as a strategy to reach out to persons with mental illness and bridge the treatment gap. There is a need to explore task-shifting using existing health staff like Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs).

AIM AND CONTEXT

ASHAs are involved in ongoing community-based rehabilitation (CBR) program run with a public-private partnership over the last 5 years at Jagaluru Taluk (an administrative block) in Davanagere district (Karnataka, India). This article aims to summarize a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to examine whether CBR delivered by ASHAs is more effective than treatment as usual (TAU) control group in reducing disability associated with severe mental illness (SMI).

METHOD

A group of proactive ASHAs is already working with us for a follow-up of persons with SMI. For the study, we would allocate areas that are currently not being covered proactively by ASHAs randomly in a 1:1 ratio via computer-generated randomization list to receive either ASHAs delivered CBR arm or TAU control group. A sample size of about 100 in each arm is enough to identify an effect size of 0.5 in total IDEAS score between the intervention and control arms with a power of 90% and an alpha of 0.05. We use the SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) statement to describe the methods of the trial.

RESULT

The study has been approved by the institute ethics committee and registered with CTRI (CTRI/2019/08/020585 dated 6th August 2019). The recruitment of subjects is ongoing. The patients will be followed up for 1 year and assessed. The trial is funded by the Indian Council of Medical Research, Government of India.

DISCUSSION

The results of the study will be helpful from a public health perspective in delivering cost-effective and replicable CBR for persons with SMI through ASHAs. If the model turns successful, this could be expanded throughout the state/country. This would go a long way in bridging the huge treatment gap.

Impact Evaluation of VKN-NIMHANS-ECHO Model of Capacity Building for Mental Health and Addiction: Methodology of Two Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Bridging the alarming treatment gap for mental disorders in India requires a monumental effort from all stakeholders. Harnessing digital technology is one of the potential ways to leapfrog many known barriers for capacity building.

AIM AND CONTEXT

The ongoing Virtual Knowledge Network (VKN)-National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS)-Extension of Community Health Outcomes (ECHO) (VKN-NIMHANS-ECHO: hub and spokes model) model for skilled capacity building is a collaborative effort between NIMHANS and the University of New Mexico Health Sciences Centre, USA. This article aims to summarize the methodology of two randomized controlled trials funded by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) designed to evaluate the effectiveness of the VKN-NIMHANS-ECHO model of training as compared to training as usual (TAU).

METHODS

Both RCTs were conducted in Karnataka, a southern Indian state in which the DMHP operates in all districts. We compared the impact of the following two models of capacity building for the DMHP workforce (a) the VKN-NIMHANS-ECHO model and (b) the traditional method. We use the SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) statement to describe the methods of these two trials.Trial 1 is to evaluate the "Effectiveness of addition of Virtual-NIMHANS-ECHO tele-mentoring model for skilled capacity building in providing quality care in alcohol use disorders by the existing staff of DMHP districts of Karnataka." Hub for trial 1 was set up at NIMHANS and the spokes were psychiatrists and other mental health professionals headquartered in the district level office. Trial 2 assesses the implementation and evaluation of the NIMHANS-ECHO blended training program for the DMHP workforce in a rural south-Indian district of Karnataka state. The hub for trial 2 was set up in the district headquarter of Ramanagaram. Hub specialists are DMHP psychiatrists, whereas spokes are the non-doctor workforce (including auxiliary nurse midwives [ANMs] and accredited social health activists [ASHA] workers) medical officers of primary health centers. The location of the HubHub differs in these two studies. Both trials are funded by the ICMR, Government of India.

DISCUSSION

Both these trials, though conceptually similar, have some operational differences which have been highlighted. If demonstrated to be effective, this model of telementoring can be generalized and widely merged into the Indian health care system, thus aiding in reducing the treatment gap for patients unable to access care.

Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of lurasidone monotherapy for the treatment of bipolar I depression

AIM

Previous studies conducted primarily in the USA and Europe have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of lurasidone 20-120 mg/day for the treatment of bipolar I depression. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lurasidone monotherapy for the treatment of bipolar I depression among patients from diverse ethnic backgrounds, including those from Japan.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment for 6 weeks with lurasidone, 20-60 mg/day (n = 184) or 80-120 mg/day (n = 169), or placebo (n = 172). The primary end-point was change from baseline to Week 6 on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS).

RESULTS

Lurasidone treatment significantly reduced mean MADRS total scores from baseline to Week 6 for the 20-60-mg/day group (-13.6; adjusted P = 0.007; effect size = 0.33), but not for the 80-120-mg/day group (-12.6; adjusted P = 0.057; effect size = 0.22) compared with placebo (-10.6). Treatment with lurasidone 20-60 mg/day also improved MADRS response rates, functional impairment, and anxiety symptoms. The most common adverse events associated with lurasidone were akathisia and nausea. Lurasidone treatments were associated with minimal changes in weight, lipids, and measures of glycemic control.

CONCLUSION

Monotherapy with once daily doses of lurasidone 20-60 mg, but not 80-120 mg, significantly reduced depressive symptoms and improved functioning in patients with bipolar I depression. Results overall were consistent with previous studies, suggesting that lurasidone 20-60 mg/day is effective and safe in diverse ethnic populations, including Japanese.

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Asenapine versus Olanzapine in Management of Schizophrenia

Objective

Schizophrenia is a serious disease characterized by impairment in the perception or expression of reality, leading to occupational and social dysfunction. The use of antipsychotic medication is now universal in the first-line treatment of schizophrenia. This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of asenapine with a standard atypical antipsychotic, olanzapine in treating this disease.

Methods

It was designed as a single blind, randomized, controlled, parallel group, single centre Phase IV trial of a newer atypical antipsychotic, asenapine versus existing standard atypical antipsychotic, olanzapine. Total 80 subjects were enrolled as per eligibility criteria.Each recruited subject received daily treatment with the trial medication (Olanzapine 10 mg or Asenapine 10 mg daily) for duration of 12 weeks. BPRS, CGI-S, CGI-I, Laboratory parameters and compliance was assessed and analyzed. Continuous variables were compared by t test and non-parametric data was analyzed by Mann−Whitney U test and Wilcoxon signed rank test. Likely categorical variables were analyzed by chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate.

Results

The duration of schizophrenia at presentation was comparable in both the treatment groups. There was significant reduction of BPRS score between any two visits of each treatment groups. The decline in CGI-S and CGI-I scores was statistically significant (p < 0.001) when compared between visits of any of the both treatment arms. Adherence to treatment was excellent for all patients.

Conclusion

Newer atypical antipsychotic asenapine is more effective than standard olanzapine in reducing the symptoms of schizophrenia in this study and further larger studies are to be done.

Defining phenotypes of long-term lithium and valproate response, including combination therapy: a modified application of the Alda scale in patients with bipolar disorders

BACKGROUND

When evaluating the long-term treatment response to mood stabilizers using the Alda scale, mood stabilizer combination therapy is typically considered a confounding factor, and patients receiving combination therapy are excluded from the analysis. However, this may result in bias if those under combination therapy are worse treatment responders. This study aims to explore whether the Alda scale is applicable to patients taking lithium and valproate combination therapy. We compared long-term treatment response in patients receiving monotherapy and combination therapy of the two drugs, and investigated clinical correlates of the responses to each drug.

METHODS

The study subjects consisted of 102 patients with bipolar I (BD-I) or bipolar II (BD-II) disorder who had been undergoing maintenance treatment with lithium and/or valproate for more than 2 years at a single specialized bipolar disorder clinic. Long-term treatment response was measured using the Alda scale and compared among the lithium monotherapy group, the valproate monotherapy group, and the mood stabilizer combination group. Clinical correlates of long-term treatment response were evaluated in lithium users and valproate users separately.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in terms of baseline illness characteristics among groups. The combination group showed the worst treatment response for all the response measurements applied. This group also had the higher rate of 'poor responder' with a statistically significant difference compared to valproate group. Older age at onset and (hypo)manic episode at onset showed significant positive associations with total Alda score in lithium users, while comorbid anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder and mixed episode showed significant negative associations in valproate users.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination group had poorer long-term treatment response but did not show distinct clinical characteristics compared to the monotherapy groups. When exploring the long-term effects of mood stabilizers, excluding patients undergoing combination treatment could result in bias because they may represent a poor response group. The long-term treatment responses of lithium and valproate had different clinical correlates.

Is low FODMAP diet effective in children with irritable bowel syndrome?

OBJECTIVE:

There is growing evidence that suggests that consumption of fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAPs) may result in some symptoms in certain patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a low FODMAP diet in children with IBS by comparing it with the standard diet.

METHODS:

Sixty children between the ages of 6 and 18 who were diagnosed with IBS according to Rome IV criteria were included in this study. Randomly selected patients were divided into two groups as 30 patients on a low FODMAP diet and 30 patients on a general protective standard diet for the gastrointestinal tract. Patients were evaluated at the beginning, second and fourth months of the study. The data of the patients were recorded in the demographic data form. Patients were asked to score abdominal pain using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The clinical status of the patient was scored by the doctor using the Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) scale.

RESULTS:

There were no significant differences between groups about age, sex and symptom duration. When the pre-diet VAS scores were compared, the two groups were similar. The mean decrease in VAS score after two months of diet was 3.80±1.10 in the low FODMAP group and 2.03±1.03 in the standard group and was statistically significant. Post-dietary CGI-I score evaluation was determined to be statistically significant between the two groups. The increase in VAS scores in the fourth month was 2.97±1.10 points in the Low FODMAP group and 1.63±0.71 in the standard group, and was statistically significant. CGI-I score after the diet at the 4^th month was also statistically significant between the two groups.

CONCLUSION:

A low FODMAP diet seems to be more effective for symptom control in IBS when compared to standard dietary advice. Further studies are needed for the unknowns that will be used in clinical practice, such as how long the diet will be continued and how effective it will be in which GIS diseases.