Multifocal motor neuropathy

Concurrence of Multifocal Motor Neuropathy and Hashimoto's Thyroiditis

Background

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is an immune-mediated disorder that is characterized by slowly progressive and asymmetrical weakness, but its pathophysiological mechanism is uncertain. The hypothesis that MMN is an immunological disease has been supported by the proven therapeutic effects of intravenous immunoglobulin and the detection of antiganglioside antibodies in MMN patients. The coexistence of MMN with other immune diseases has been rarely reported.

Case Report

A 37-year-old woman visited our hospital complaining of weakness in both hands. The clinical manifestations coincided well with MMN: predominantly distal upper-limb weakness, asymmetric involvement, a progressive course, absence of sensory symptoms, absence of pyramidal signs, and sparing of the cranial muscles. The electrophysiological findings also supported a diagnosis of MMN, with motor nerve conduction block in the median, ulnar, and radial nerves, without sensory nerve involvement. The patient was simultaneously diagnosed as having Hashimoto's thyroiditis, which is a well-known immune-mediated disease.

Conclusions

The concurrence of MMN and Hashimoto's thyroiditis in our patient is significant for understanding the immunological characteristics of the two diseases.

Pathogenesis and treatment of immune-mediated neuropathies

Immune-mediated neuropathies represent a heterogeneous spectrum of peripheral nerve disorders that can be classified according to time course, predominant involvement of motor/sensory fibers, distribution of deficits and paraclinical parameters such as electrophysiology and serum antibodies. In the last few years, significant advances have been achieved in elucidating underlying pathomechanisms, which made it possible to identify potential therapeutic targets. In this review, we discuss the latest development in pathogenesis and treatment of immune-mediated neuropathies.

Plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulins: mechanism of action in immune-mediated neuropathies

Immune-mediated neuropathies are a heterogeneous group of peripheral nerve disorders, which are classified by time course, clinical pattern, affected nerves and pathological features. Plasma exchange (PE) and intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) are mainstays in the treatment of immune-mediated neuropathies. Of all treatments currently used, IVIg has probably the widest application range in immune-mediated neuropathies and efficacy has been well documented in several randomized controlled trials for Guillain-Barré syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). Beneficial effects of IVIg have also been proven for multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN). Likewise, PE is an established treatment for GBS and CIDP, whereas it is considered to be ineffective in MMN. Different mechanisms of action are sought to be responsible for the immunemodulatory effect of PE and IVIg in autoimmune disorders. Some of those might be important for immune-mediated neuropathies, while others are probably negligible. The aim of this review is to summarize the recent advances in elucidating disease-specific mechanisms of actions of PE and IVIg in the treatment of immune-mediated neuropathies.

Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in multifocal motor neuropathy

Introduction

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is characterized by asymmetric weakness of limbs and the electrophysiological finding of conduction block in motor nerves. Conduction block is the inability of nerves to propagate action potentials and is probably caused by immune-mediated dysfunction of the axon at the nodes of Ranvier or the myelin sheath. MMN immune pathogenesis has not been elucidated.

Results

In approximately 50% of all patients, IgM antibodies that bind to the glycolipid GM1, which is abundantly expressed in peripheral motor nerves, can be detected. A recent study showed an association with HLA-DRB1*15, and virtually all patients respond to treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in at least the early stages of the disease.

Conclusion

This review aims at providing a concise overview of what is known about MMN pathogenesis, and how the beneficial effect of IVIG might be explained.

Treatment in inflammatory neuropathies

This review focuses on recent developments in the treatment of inflammatory neuropathies arising from immune dysregulation, rather than from infectious causes. The dysimmune inflammatory neuropathies are diseases of the peripheral nerves that have varying etiologies and may respond to immunomodulatory therapies. They are characterized by inflammatory changes in the nerve with associated destruction of myelin and axons. The underlying immune mechanisms are better understood in some of these conditions than others. Correct diagnosis and treatment is important to prevent clinical progression. Randomized controlled trials of some treatments in the more common inflammatory neuropathies have clarified their effectiveness; however, there are still groups of patients who are resistant to currently available treatments and for whom little effective treatment is available. Newer, targeted biologics and larger controlled trials of existing and novel therapies in these conditions offer promise of improved morbidity and mortality in this group of diseases.

Peripheral neuropathy

Patients presenting with symptoms of peripheral neuropathy are commonplace in the practice of generalist physicians, office based or hospitalists. Although there are at least a thousand different causes for peripheral neuropathy, the majority of patients can be properly diagnosed (and managed) based on framing the diagnostic possibilities within one of six typical scenarios. The case presentations in this article illustrate common and less common but essential presentations and the approach to evaluation and treatment. For these patients the key to success lies in the history and clinical examination findings.

Immunosuppressant and immunomodulatory treatments for multifocal motor neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Multifocal motor neuropathy is characterised by progressive, predominantly distal, asymmetrical limb weakness and usually multiple partial motor nerve conduction blocks. Intravenous immunoglobulin is beneficial but the role of immunosuppressive agents is uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

To provide the best available evidence from randomised controlled trials on the role of immunosuppressive agents for the treatment of multifocal motor neuropathy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

For this update, we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Trials Register (October 8 2008), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2008, Issue 4), MEDLINE (from January 1966 to October 8 2008), and EMBASE (from January 1980 to October 8 2008), for trials of multifocal motor neuropathy.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials were to be included and one was found. Prospective and retrospective case series and case reports were considered in the Discussion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors searched the titles and abstracts of the articles identified and extracted the data independently.

MAIN RESULTS

In this update, we found the first randomised controlled trial of multifocal motor neuropathy. This study, which randomised 28 patients, showed that mycophenolate mofetil did not significantly improve strength or function or reduce the need for intravenous immunoglobulin. We summarised the results of retrospective and prospective case series in the discussion.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In the only randomised placebo-controlled trial of any immunosuppressive agent, mycophenolate mofetil did not produce significant benefit. Trials of other immunosuppressants should be undertaken.

The clinical value of therapeutic plasma exchange in multifocal motor neuropathy

OBJECTIVE

Although there is evidence for a pathogenic role of humoral factors in multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN), plasma exchange (PE) is assumed to be an ineffective treatment. We set out to elucidate possible reasons for this apparent contradiction.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of seven patients with MMN, who underwent 4 to 18 sessions of PE. Clinical response, electrophysiological parameter and anti-ganglioside antibody titers were reviewed.

RESULTS

Two patients, who had anti-ganglioside antibodies, exhibited transient clinical responses to PE, manifested by improved neurological function. Whereas electrophysiological parameters continued to worsen in all patients, anti-ganglioside antibody titers declined during PE, but increased after PE.

CONCLUSION

PE is of limited therapeutic value in patients with MMN, who do not respond to established treatment options. It may only be useful as an adjunctive treatment in a subset of patients. The transient decrease of anti-ganglioside-antibodies titers suggests that pathogenic humoral factors in MMN are only temporarily reduced. Further, PE treatment alone is insufficient to prevent axons from continuing degeneration, which may explain the failure of PE to substantially influence the disease course of patients with MMN.

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonists and neuropathy

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha plays an important role in many aspects of immune system development, immune-response regulation, and T-cell-mediated tissue injury. The evidence that TNF-alpha, released by autoreactive T cells and macrophages, may contribute to the pathogenesis of immune-mediated demyelinating neuropathies is reviewed. TNF-alpha antagonists (infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab) are indicated for the treatment of advanced inflammatory rheumatic and bowel disease, but these drugs can induce a range of autoimmune diseases that also attack the central and peripheral nervous systems. Case histories and series report on the association between anti-TNF-alpha treatment and various disorders of peripheral nerve such as Guillain-Barré syndrome, Miller Fisher syndrome, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction block, mononeuropathy multiplex, and axonal sensorimotor polyneuropathies. The proposed pathogeneses of TNF-alpha-associated neuropathies include both a T-cell and humoral immune attack against peripheral nerve myelin, vasculitis-induced nerve ischemia, and inhibition of signaling support for axons. Most neuropathies improve over a period of months by withdrawal of the TNF-alpha antagonist, with or without additional immune-modulating treatment. Preliminary observations suggest that TNF-alpha antagonists may be useful as an antigen-nonspecific treatment approach to immune-mediated neuropathies in patients with a poor response to, or intolerance of, standard therapies, but further studies are required.

Anti-GM1 antibodies as a model of the immune response to self-glycans

Glycans are a class of molecules with high structural variability, frequently found in the plasma membrane facing the extracellular space. Because of these characteristics, glycans are often considered as recognition molecules involved in cell social functions, and as targets of pathogenic factors. Induction of anti-glycan antibodies is one of the early events in immunological defense against bacteria that colonize the body. Because of this natural infection, antibodies recognizing a variety of bacterial glycans are found in sera of adult humans and animals. The immune response to glycans is restricted by self-tolerance, and no antibodies to self-glycans should exist in normal subjects. However, antibodies recognizing structures closely related to self-glycans do exist, and can lead to production of harmful anti-self antibodies. Normal human sera contain low-affinity anti-GM1 IgM-antibodies. Similar antibodies with higher affinity or different isotype are found in some neuropathy patients. Two hypotheses have been developed to explain the origin of disease-associated anti-GM1 antibodies. According to the "molecular mimicry" hypothesis, similarity between GM1 and Campylobacter jejuni lipopolysaccharide carrying a GM1-like glycan is the cause of Guillain-Barré syndrome associated with anti-GM1 IgG-antibodies. According to the "binding site drift" hypothesis, IgM-antibodies associated with disease originate through changes in the binding site of normally occurring anti-GM1 antibodies. We now present an "integrated" hypothesis, combining the "mimicry" and "drift" concepts, which satisfactorily explains most of the published data on anti-GM1 antibodies.

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathies: Current treatment strategies

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculopathy (CIDP), considered an immune-mediated disease, is likely under-recognized and under-treated due to its heterogeneous presentation and the limitations of clinical, serologic, and electrophysiologic diagnostic criteria. Despite these limitations, early diagnosis and treatment is important in preventing irreversible axonal loss and improving functional recovery. Primary treatment modalities include intravenous immunoglobulin and plasmapheresis, for which there is randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled evidence. In addition, despite less definitive published evidence of efficacy, corticosteroids are considered standard therapies because of their long history of use. Studies have failed to demonstrate a difference in efficacy among these three treatments; consequently, the choice is usually based on availability and side-effect profile. A number of chemotherapeutic and immunosuppressive agents have also shown to be effective in treating CIDP but significant evidence is lacking; therefore, these agents are primarily used in conjunction with other modalities. Regardless of the treatment choice, long-term therapy is required to maintain a response and prevent relapse.

[Plasma exchange as a therapeutic option in neurological disorders]

Plasma exchange is a therapeutic procedure commonly used in various neurological disorders. Here we review its current role as a treatment option in diseases of the central and peripheral nervous system.

Multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction block: Distribution of demyelination and axonal degeneration

OBJECTIVE

Multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction block (MMN) is an immune-mediated neuropathy, characterized by progressive muscle weakness. Although demyelination is regarded as the underlying pathophysiologic mechanism of MMN, recently, it was reported that different pathophysiologic mechanisms were responsible for disease in the upper and lower limbs. Specifically, demyelination in the upper limbs and axonal loss in the lower limbs. Consequently, the aim of the present study was to assess, through clinical neurophysiology studies, whether different pathophysiologic mechanisms were occurring in the upper and lower extremities. Furthermore, we wanted to investigate whether the presence of conduction block (CB) correlated with axonal degeneration (AD), and to determine the electrophysiological abnormalities that correlate with muscle weakness.

METHODS

We reviewed medical records of 18 patients with MMN for clinical features (using the Medical Research Council score and Guys Neurology Disability Scale) and neurophysiologic abnormalities (CB, AD prolongation of distal motor and F-wave latencies, and reduction of conduction velocity in the demyelinating range).

RESULTS

Electrophysiological abnormalities deemed specific of demyelination were non-significantly different in the upper and lower extremities. The presence of axonal degeneration correlated significantly with conduction block (odds ratio 10.4, 95% CI 4.2-25.6), and both parameters correlated with muscle weakness (P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that the same pathophysiologic process occurs in the upper and lower extremity nerves. Moreover, one pathophysiologic process may be responsible for the development of CB and AD, and therefore muscle weakness.

SIGNIFICANCE

The present study has established that both AD and CB occur in MMN, irrespective of extremity, and both correlate with muscle weakness.

B cells in the pathophysiology of autoimmune neurological disorders: A credible therapeutic target

There is evidence that B cells are involved in the pathophysiology of many neurological diseases, either in a causative or contributory role, via production of autoantibodies, cytokine secretion, or by acting as antigen-presenting cells leading to T cell activation. Clonal expansion of B cells either in situ or intrathecally and circulating autoantibodies are critical elements in multiple sclerosis (MS), Devic's disease, paraneoplastic central nervous system disorders, stiff-person syndrome, myasthenia gravis, autoimmune demyelinating neuropathies and dermatomyositis. The pathogenic role of B cells and autoantibodies in central and peripheral nervous system disorders, as reviewed here, provides a rationale for investigating whether depletion of B cells with new agents can improve clinical symptomatology and, potentially, restore immune function. Preliminary results from several clinical studies and case reports suggest that B cell depletion may become a viable alternative approach to the treatment of autoimmune neurological disorders.

European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society guideline on management of multifocal motor neuropathy

Several diagnostic criteria for multifocal motor neuropathy have been proposed in recent years and a beneficial effect of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and various other immunomodulatory drugs has been suggested in several trials and uncontrolled studies. The objectives were to prepare consensus guidelines on the definition, investigation and treatment of multifocal motor neuropathy. Disease experts and a patient representative considered references retrieved from MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library in July 2004 and prepared statements which were agreed in an iterative fashion. The Task Force agreed good practice points to define clinical and electrophysiological diagnostic criteria for multifocal motor neuropathy and investigations to be considered. The principal recommendations and good practice points were: (i) IVIg (2 g/kg given over 2-5 days) should be considered as the first line treatment (level A recommendation) when disability is sufficiently severe to warrant treatment. (ii) Corticosteroids are not recommended (good practice point). (iii) If initial treatment with IVIg is effective, repeated IVIg treatment should be considered (level C recommendation). The frequency of IVIg maintenance therapy should be guided by the individual response (good practice point). Typical treatment regimens are 1 g/kg every 2-4 weeks or 2 g/kg every 4-8 weeks (good practice point). (iv) If IVIg is not or not sufficiently effective then immunosuppressive treatment may be considered. Cyclophosphamide, ciclosporin, azathioprine, interferon beta1a, or rituximab are possible agents (good practice point). (v) Toxicity makes cyclophosphamide a less desirable option (good practice point).

European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society Guideline on management of multifocal motor neuropathy. Report of a joint task force of the European Federation of Neurological Societies and the Peripheral Nerve Society

BACKGROUND

Several diagnostic criteria for multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) have been proposed in recent years, and a beneficial effect of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and various other immunomodulatory drugs has been suggested in several trials and uncontrolled studies.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this guideline was to prepare consensus guidelines on the definition, investigation, and treatment of MMN.

METHODS

Disease experts and a representative of patients considered references retrieved from MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library in July 2004 and prepared statements that were agreed in an iterative fashion.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The Task Force agreed on good practice points to define clinical and electrophysiological diagnostic criteria for MMN and investigations to be considered. The principal recommendations and good practice points were as follows: (1) IVIg (2 g/kg given over 2-5 days) should be considered as the first line of treatment (level A recommendation) when disability is sufficiently severe to warrant treatment; (2) corticosteroids are not recommended (good practice point); (3) if initial treatment with IVIg is effective, repeated IVIg treatment should be considered (level C recommendation). The frequency of IVIg maintenance therapy should be guided by the individual response (good practice point). Typical treatment regimens are 1 g/kg every 2-4 weeks or 2 g/kg every 4-8 weeks (good practice point); (4) if IVIg is not (or not sufficiently) effective, then immunosuppressive treatment may be considered. Cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, azathioprine, interferon-beta1a, or rituximab are possible agents (good practice point); and (5) toxicity makes cyclophosphamide a less desirable option (good practice point).

Neuropathie motrice multifocale avec blocs de conduction persistants

Multifocal motor neuropathy with persistent conduction blocks was first specifically identified in 1986. Its major criterion is conduction blocks in motor nerves only. Clinically, this is a multifocal, thus asymmetric, neuropathy that begins and predominant touches upper limbs; it especially affects men after the age of 50 years and has a chronic course with relapses. Approximately 40-50% of patients also have IgM serum antibodies directed against GM1 ganglioside. There are no other laboratory criteria, although moderately high protein levels are found in cerebrospinal fluid. Its course is unpredictable, because the neuropathy may remain limited to one or two motor nerves or extend progressively to all the motor nerves of all four limbs. In general, there is no damage to sensory or cranial nerves or to the autonomic or central nervous systems. Intravenous polyvalent immunoglobulins at high doses are remarkably effective in the short term in 70 to 80% of cases. Corticosteroids and plasma exchange are generally ineffective and may aggravate the neuropathy. The long-term efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulins in delaying motor decline and axon loss in the affected motor nerves is controversial. No information is currently available about the long-term efficacy of other immunomodulatory treatment.

IgM-containing fraction suppressed voltage-gated potassium channels in acquired neuromyotonia

OBJECTIVES

Acquired neuromyotonia (ANM) is an autoimmune disorder caused by antibodies to voltage-gated potassium channels (VGKC). Previously, we reported a patient with immunoglobulin M (IgM), instead of immunoglobulin G (IgG), anti-VGKC antibody. The purpose of this study was to determine the function of IgM-containing fraction in ANM patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We determined whether anti-VGKC antibodies in the IgG or IgM-containing fractions suppressed outward potassium current (OKC) using the patch clamp method in three patients with ANM. Whole sera from all patients suppressed OKCs.

RESULT

Only the purified IgG, not the IgM-containing fractions from two patients suppressed VGKCs, whereas in a patient with IgM anti-VGKC antibody, only the IgM-containing fractions, not the IgG-containing fractions suppressed VGKCs.

CONCLUSION

Anti-VGKC antibodies belonging to the IgM subclass should be determined in seronegative ANM patients.

Initial and long-term management of autoimmune neuropathies

The inflammatory neuropathies (chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy [CIDP], Guillain-Barré syndrome [GBS] and multifocal motor neuropathy [MMN]) affect only one to two individuals per 100 000 of the population, but result in major disability and impairment. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) can be used as an initial treatment for CIDP, GBS and MMN. While plasma exchange and corticosteroids can also be used initially, they are not as uniformly effective for each of these disorders as IVIg. Substituting corticosteroids, plasma exchange or immunosuppressants may be appropriate for patients not responding to initial IVIg therapy, and combination therapy may be needed in some patients. There are no data from controlled clinical trials of long-term management strategies for CIDP and MMN; however, empirical evidence suggests that a positive long-term response to IVIg can be achieved by increasing the initial dose or its frequency of administration. Corticosteroids and immunosuppressants may be appropriate in some patients with CIDP. Adverse events with IVIg are usually mild and not treatment limiting; however, patients do need to be monitored for uncommon, but serious, adverse events such as renal insufficiency, stroke and thromboembolic events. Nevertheless, the safety profile of IVIg is exceptional relative to the potential complications of other long-term treatments for CIDP and MMN, especially corticosteroids and immunosuppressants. Predictors of response have been reported for each of the neuropathies, and until controlled clinical trials provide evidence on which to base treatment strategies, effective management will require individualising therapy according to patient response.

Multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy presenting as a peripheral nerve tumor

A man with multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy (MADSAM), or Lewis-Sumner syndrome, presented with a progressive left lumbosacral plexus lesion resembling a neurofibroma. After 7 years he developed a left ulnar nerve lesion with conduction block in its upper segment. Treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin improved the symptoms and signs of both lesions. We conclude that inflammatory neuropathy must be considered in the differential diagnosis of peripheral nerve tumors, and that unifocal lesions may precede multifocal involvement in MADSAM by several years. In addition, we discuss the clinical features in 9 patients attending a specialist peripheral nerve clinic and review the literature.

A new type of anti-ganglioside antibodies present in neurological patients

High titers of anti-GA1 antibodies have been associated with neurological syndromes. In most cases, these antibodies cross-react with the structurally related glycolipids GM1 and GD1b, although specific anti-GA1 antibodies have also been reported. The role of specific anti-GA1 antibodies is uncertain since the presence of GA1 in the human nervous system has not been clarified. A rabbit was immunized with GD1a and its sera were screened for antibody reactivity by standard immunoassay methods (HPTLC-immunostaining and ELISA). Anti-GD1a antibodies were not detected but, unexpectedly, anti-GA1 IgG-antibodies were found. Antibody binding to GA1 was inhibited by soluble GA1 but also by GD1a. These results indicate that the rabbit produced antibodies that recognize epitopes present on the glycolipids, that are absent or not exposed on solid phase adsorbed GD1a. We investigated the presence of these unusual anti-ganglioside antibodies in normal and neurological patient sera. Approximately, 10% of normal human sera contained low titer of specific anti-GA1 IgG-antibodies but none of them recognized soluble GD1a. High titers of IgG-antibodies reacting only with GA1 were detected in 12 patient sera out of 325 analyzed. Of these, 6 sera showed binding that was inhibited by soluble GD1a and four of them also by GM1. This new type of anti-ganglioside antibodies should be considered important elements for understanding of the pathogenesis of these diseases as well as their diagnosis.

[The use of intravenous immunoglobulins in neurology]

INTRODUCTION

In the past decade, intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) have been widely used and their administration has grown throughout the world. The current indications of IVIG in neurological diseases are discussed on the basis of the passed and current trials. Unlike other immuomodulatory agents, IVIG are well tolerated and have very few side effects and a good viral safety.

STATE OF ART

There is clinical evidence, based on controlled trials, for the effectiveness of IVIG in Guillain-Barré syndrome, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy and multifocal neuropathy with conduction blocks. In myasthenia gravis, the IVIG are effective especially in myasthenic crisis, but their synergistic effect with other treatments, the steroid sparing effect, and their long-term effect are unknown. These issues need to be addressed in further controlled clinical trials. In dermatoploymyositis, IVIG are reserved for steroid resistant patients. There is actually no support or no significant clinical benefit for the routine use of IVIG in other neurological diseases.

PERSPECTIVES

Further controlled trials are warranted to assess the quality of life, the dose-finding effect and their long-term efficacy in order to improve clinical practices.

CONCLUSION

Routine use of IVIG should be reserved for diseases in which positive controlled trials are available. For the remaining dysimmune diseases, IVIG should be assess in comparison with the other available therapies, taking into consideration the age of the patients, the safety of the IVIG and, in our country, the economic aspect.

Multifocal motor neuropathy

PURPOSE OF THIS REVIEW

To conduct a critical review of recent studies on the clinical and therapeutic aspects of multifocal motor neuropathy, and to analyse their implications for patient management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have contributed to defining the specific position of multifocal motor neuropathy within the spectrum of chronic immune-mediated polyneuropathies. One study compared features of this condition with multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy, while others have focused on pathological alterations at the site of conduction blocks. A further study described six new cases of multifocal acquired motor neuropathy, which should be considered as a variant of multifocal motor neuropathy. Several Cochrane reviews and review articles have shown evidence of the efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulins in the treatment of multifocal motor neuropathy. The issue of long-term intravenous immunoglobulins in multifocal motor neuropathy, however, has yielded controversial results. Two studies have shown progressive motor deterioration in most patients, correlated with electrophysiological signs indicative of axonal degeneration, while a third study found signs of sustained clinical and electrophysiological improvement after a mean follow up of 7.25 years.

SUMMARY

Multifocal motor neuropathy is a distinct clinical entity that differs from chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy and multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy, although they share some electrophysiological characteristics. Although the aetiology remains unsolved, frequent association with high-titer antibodies against ganglioside GM1, together with an often positive response to intravenous immunoglobulins further support an autoimmune mechanism. New therapeutic strategies are required, however, that focus on the effects and the costs of treatment over long-term follow up.

[Autoimmune neuropathies--current aspects of immunopathologic diagnostics and therapy]

The group of autoimmune neuropathies includes the Guillain-Barré syndrome, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuritis, multifocal motor neuropathy, neuropathies associated with monoclonal gammopathies, and vasculitic neuropathies. This educational review first addresses diagnostic pathways that facilitate more rational diagnostic decisions. Many therapies are effective for treating immune neuropathies. Unfortunately, none of the available therapies are specific. In the acute phase, glucocorticosteroids, plasmapheresis, and intravenous immunoglobulins play key roles. The list of long-term therapies includes azathioprine, cyclosporine, cyclophosphamide, and immunoglobulins. The therapeutic mechanisms involved are not clear for most of these compounds. Modern immunotherapy has to consider medical aspects, available therapeutic evidence, and long-term economic burden.

Immunosuppressant and immunomodulatory treatments for multifocal motor neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Multifocal motor neuropathy is a distinct clinical entity characterised by progressive, predominantly distal, asymmetrical limb weakness and minimal sensory abnormality. The diagnostic feature of this condition is the presence of multiple partial motor nerve conduction blocks. Controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy of regular intravenous immunoglobulin infusions. Immunosuppressive agents have been used as primary, second-line or adjunctive agents for its treatment. This review was undertaken to identify and review systematically randomised controlled trials of immunosuppressive agents. The use of intravenous immunoglobulin will be the subject of a separate review.

OBJECTIVES

To provide the best available evidence from randomised controlled trials on the role of immunosuppressive agents for the treatment of multifocal motor neuropathy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group trials register for all trials of multifocal motor neuropathy published, using 'multifocal motor neuropathy' OR 'chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy' OR ' conduction block' OR ' motor neuropathy' AND 'immunosuppressive agents', 'immunosuppressants', 'corticosteroids', 'plasma exchange', 'azathioprine', 'cyclophosphamide', 'cyclosporin', 'ciclosporin', 'methotrexate', and 'mycophenolate', 'immunomodulatory agents', 'interferon', 'total lymphoid irradiation' or 'bone marrow transplantation' as search terms. In addition we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE for 2000 and 2001 and CINAHL, LILACS for all years. We updated the register search in February 2004 and searched MEDLINE (January 1966 to end May 2004) and EMBASE (January 1980 to end May 2004).

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised clinical trials in which allocation was not random but was intended to be unbiased (e.g. alternate allocation) were to have been selected. Since no such trials were discovered, all prospective and retrospective case series were included in the 'background' or 'discussion' sections of the review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

All studies on multifocal motor neuropathy or lower motor neuron weakness with conduction block and no sensory abnormality were scrutinised for data on patients treated with any form of immunosuppressive agents besides intravenous immunoglobulin. The information on the outcome of treatment was then collated and summarised.

MAIN RESULTS

We found no randomised controlled trials of any immunosuppressive agents for multifocal motor neuropathy. We summarised the results of retrospective and prospective case series in the discussion of the review.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There are no randomised controlled trials to indicate whether immunosuppressive agents are beneficial in multifocal motor neuropathy.

Multifocal motor neuropathy: current concepts and controversies

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is now a well-defined purely motor multineuropathy characterized by the presence of multifocal partial motor conduction blocks (CB), frequent association with anti-GM1 IgM antibodies, and usually a good response to high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy. However, several issues remain to be clarified in the diagnosis, pathogenesis, and therapy of this condition including its nosological position and its relation to other chronic dysimmune neuropathies; the degree of CB necessary for the diagnosis of MMN; the existence of an axonal form of MMN; the pathophysiological basis of CB; the pathogenetic role of antiganglioside antibodies; the mechanism of action of IVIg treatments in MMN and the most effective regimen; and the treatment to be used in unresponsive patients. These issues are addressed in this review of the main clinical, electrophysiological, immunological, and therapeutic features of this neuropathy.

IgM paraproteinaemic neuropathies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To conduct a critical review of recent studies on the pathogenesis and treatment of IgM paraproteinaemic neuropathies and analyse their implication for patient management.

RECENT FINDINGS

A better definition and classification of IgM monoclonal gammopathies has led to recommendations on therapeutic strategies for these patients, particularly for those with the asymptomatic form of Waldenström macroglobulinemia. Studies on the pathogenetic role of IgM paraprotein in neuropathy have led to the identification of a novel antibody reactivity against trisulfated heparin disaccharide, which was associated with painful, predominantly sensory, axonal distal neuropathy. Pathological studies on patients with axonal polyneuropathy and no antibody reactivity of the IgM paraprotein have shown that vasculitis may play an important role in this form of neuropathy, as possibly confirmed by its positive response to steroids. A number of open pilot trials have addressed the effect in IgM paraproteinaemic neuropathies of the humanized monoclonal antibody (rituximab) directed against the CD20 antigen. Even if the results of these studies are less promising than initially hoped, they provide evidence that rituximab may be effective in some patients with this neuropathy.

SUMMARY

New insights into the pathogenesis of axonal forms of IgM paraproteinaemic neuropathy have derived from the identification of novel antibody reactivity and of vasculitis. The latter finding may justify the use of steroids, otherwise ineffective in IgM paraproteinaemic neuropathy. Rituximab has opened the way to more selective and apparently safer immune therapies for this neuropathy, but its efficacy needs to be confirmed by randomized controlled trials.

Multifocal motor neuropathy

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is an immune-mediated disorder characterised by slowly progressive, asymmetrical weakness of limbs without sensory loss. The clinical presentation of MMN mimics that of lower-motor-neuron disease, but in nerve-conduction studies of patients with MMN motor-conduction block has been found. By contrast with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, treatment with prednisolone and plasma exchange is generally ineffective in MMN and even associated with clinical worsening in some patients. Of the immunosuppressants, cyclophosphamide has been reported as effective but only anecdotally. Various open trials and four placebo-controlled trials have shown that treatment with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin leads to improvement of muscle strength in patients with MMN. Although clinical, pathological, imaging, immunological, and electrophysiological studies have improved our understanding of MMN over the past 15 years, further research is needed to elucidate pathogenetic disease mechanisms in the disorder.

IVIg in idiopathic autoimmune neuropathies: analysis in the light of the latest results

High-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is effective in the treatment of idiopathic autoimmune neuropathies including Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), chronic inflammatory demyelinating neuropathy (CIDP) and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN), representing a useful option or, as in MMN, the gold standard for their treatment. In GBS, two randomised, controlled trials (RCT) showed that IVIg is at least as effective as plasma exchange (PE). IVIg may however be preferred due to its low number of contraindications and complications and the fact that it can be administered at any time, in any department, including patients with contraindications to PE, or in intensive care units. In CIDP, at least four RCTs have demonstrated the efficacy of IVIg in over 60% of CIDP patients, while two additional RCTs have shown a comparable effect to steroids and PE as initial treatment. As with PE, the effects of IVIg usually last a few weeks meaning that the majority of patients require periodic maintenance infusions. The lower cost and easier administration of oral steroids compared to IVIg may be partly compensated by the safer long-term profile of IVIg over steroids. In MMN, almost 80% of patients improve with IVIg, the efficacy of which has been confirmed by four RCTs, making of IVIg the first-choice therapy in MMN, for which steroids and PE are ineffective or even detrimental. Also in these patients, IVIg induces a rapid improvement that usually lasts only a few weeks and has to be maintained with periodic IVIg infusions for long periods of time, if not indefinitely.

A review of the medical management of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

Chronic idiopathic demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a rare condition, but merits consideration due to its disabling consequences for patients and the growing existence of efficacious therapies during the last few decades. The first step is to characterise this neuropathy among the chronic dysimmune polyneuropathies, according to clinical, electrophysiologicalal and sometimes pathologicalal and immunochemical criteria. Typical CIDP is currently defined by criteria which have progressively improved since the first attempt made by an Ad Hoc Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology in 1991. However, CIDP may be associated with several concurrent diseases, and other chronic demyelinating polyneuropathies may be considered as either subtypes of CIDP, such as sensory CIDP and multifocal acquired sensory and motor neuropathy, or frontiers of CIDP, such as multi-focal motor neuropathy and polyneuropathy associated with monoclonal gammopathy. These considerations are helpful in the choice of treatments, as the response to immunomodulatory agents is different according to the type of the dysimmune neuropathy. CIDP is considered to be an immune-mediated disorder and may respond dramatically to numerous short-term therapies, such as corticosteroids, plasma exchanges, or intravenous immunoglobulin. The aim of this review is both to summarise the main results of the published open and randomised controlled trials for CIDP, and to provide some information about randomised controlled trials currently in progress. The objectives of the current and future trials are firstly, to choose the best regimen for short-term treatments, and secondly, to test new immunosuppressants in long-term therapy, if the neurological condition requires it.

Intravenous immunoglobulin for multifocal motor neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Multifocal motor neuropathy is a rare, probably immune mediated disorder characterised by slowly progressive, asymmetric, distal weakness of one or more limbs with no objective loss of sensation. It may cause prolonged periods of disability. The treatment options for multifocal motor neuropathy are sparse. Patients with multifocal motor neuropathy do not usually respond to steroids or plasma exchange, and may even worsen with these treatments. Many uncontrolled studies have suggested a beneficial effect of intravenous immunoglobulin.

OBJECTIVES

To review systematically the evidence from randomised controlled trials concerning the efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin in multifocal motor neuropathy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We used the search strategy of the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Review Group to search the Disease Group register (searched September 2003), MEDLINE (January 1990 to September 2003), EMBASE (January 1990 to September 2003) and ISI (January 1990 to September 2003) databases for randomised controlled trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled studies examining the effects of any dose of intravenous immunoglobulin versus placebo in patients with definite or probable multifocal motor neuropathy. Outcome measures had to include one of the following: disability, strength, or conduction block. Studies which reported the frequency of adverse effects were used to assess safety.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors reviewed literature searches to identify potentially relevant trials, scored their quality and extracted data independently. For dichotomous data, we calculated relative risks, and for continuous data, effect sizes and weighted pooled effect sizes. Statistical uncertainty was expressed with 95% confidence intervals.

MAIN RESULTS

Four randomised controlled trials including a total of 34 patients were suitable for this systematic review. Strength improved in 78% of patients treated with intravenous immunoglobulin and only 4% of placebo-treated patients. Disability improved in 39% of patients after intravenous immunoglobulin treatment and in 11% after placebo (statistically not significantly different). Mild, transient side effects were reported in 71% of intravenous immunoglobulin treated patients. Serious side effects were not encountered.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Limited evidence from randomised controlled trials shows that intravenous immunoglobulin has a beneficial effect on strength. There was a non-significant trend towards improvement in disability. More research is needed to discover whether intravenous immunoglobulin improves disability and is cost-effective.

Treatment of dysimmune neuropathies

Several therapies are currently used in dys-immune neuropathies including steroids,plasma exchange (PE), high-dose intravenous immunoglobulins(IVIg), and immuno-suppressive agents (IS). Even if there is substantial evidence that these treatments may improve the course of the neuropathy, their effectiveness is far from being complete and is sometime hampered by the occurrence of associated side effects. In Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS),IVIg and PE are similarly effective in accelerating the recovery but there is still little evidence that they can reduce mortality or long-term disability. Recent reports on the association of intravenous methylprednisolone or interferon-beta (IFN-beta) to IVIg did not result in significant further improvement. In chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy(CIDP) steroids, PE, and IVIG are initially similarly effective. The short-term effect of PE and IVIgand the side effects associated with the long-term use of steroids have prompted the use of several IS, interferon and,more recently, the anti-CD20 monoclonal-antibody Rituximab, but their efficacy has still to be proved in controlled studies. The recent identification of multifocal motor neuropathy(MMN) was shortly followed by the finding of an effective therapy. Almost 80% of patients respond toIVIg whose effect needs to be maintained with periodic infusions for long periods of time, and tends to decrease after several years. Also in this condition a number of immune modulating agents have been used to reduce the frequency or improve the effectiveness of IVIg,but their efficacy has not been sofar confirmed in randomized trials. Similar conclusions can be drawn for neuropathies associated with monoclonal gammopathies where only PE and IVIg have proved to be effective in controlled studies,while the promising initial results obtained with Rituximab in neuropathy associated IgM monoclonal gammopathy awaits confirmation from controlled trials.