Nucleus accumbens dopamine and learned fear revisited: a review and some new findings

Neural mechanisms of freezing and passive aversive behaviors

Cues that predict aversive outcomes often produce marked inhibitions of behavior known as freezing, but it is unknown exactly what neural pathways cause this inhibition. The amygdala and bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, along with their projections to the periaqueductal gray, are strongly implicated in freezing, but it is not known how these structures inhibit motor output. The median raphe nucleus (MRN), which contains a major population of serotonin neurons, has also been implicated in freezing, but the serotonin neurons themselves do not seem to be involved, leaving it uncertain which neurons in this area promote freezing. Our recent work suggests that GABAergic neurons just lateral to the MRN, but not within the MRN, regulate freezing via projections to midbrain dopamine neurons. Because freezing pathways may control a variety of other passive aversive behaviors, their elucidation may help understand the mechanisms of addictions and compulsions, which involve a failure of aversive outcomes to inhibit behavior.

The nucleus accumbens is not critically involved in mediating the effects of a safety signal on behavior

Although considerable progress has been made towards understanding the neural systems mediating conditioned fear, little is known about the neural mechanisms underlying conditioned inhibitors of fear (or safety signals). The present series of experiments examined the involvement of the nucleus accumbens (NAC) in mediating the effects of safety signals on behavior using a conditioned inhibition of fear-potentiated startle paradigm. Neither increasing dopaminergic nor decreasing glutamatergic function in the NAC altered the magnitude of conditioned fear or conditioned inhibition of fear in rats. Furthermore, large pre- or post-training electrolytic lesions of the NAC did not affect acquisition or expression of fear-potentiated startle or conditioned inhibition of fear-potentiated startle. Taken together, these data suggest that the NAC is not critically involved in the acquisition or expression of fear-potentiated startle or conditioned inhibition of fear-potentiated startle. Previous research has implicated the NAC in 'reward-attenuated startle' in which presentation of a stimulus paired with food decreased startle responding. The present results, therefore, indicate important neural dissociations between the processing of appetitive and safety signals, even though behavioral studies and learning theories have suggested that these two forms of learning share some commonalities.

Motivation concepts in behavioral neuroscience

Concepts of motivation are vital to progress in behavioral neuroscience. Motivational concepts help us to understand what limbic brain systems are chiefly evolved to do, i.e., to mediate psychological processes that guide real behavior. This article evaluates some major motivation concepts that have historic importance or have influenced the interpretation of behavioral neuroscience research. These concepts include homeostasis, setpoints and settling points, intervening variables, hydraulic drives, drive reduction, appetitive and consummatory behavior, opponent processes, hedonic reactions, incentive motivation, drive centers, dedicated drive neurons (and drive neuropeptides and receptors), neural hierarchies, and new concepts from affective neuroscience such as allostasis, cognitive incentives, and reward 'liking' versus 'wanting'.

Emotion-induced amnesia in rats: working memory-specific impairment, corticosterone-memory correlation, and fear versus arousal effects on memory

We have shown previously that psychological stress (predator exposure) impairs spatial memory in rats. We have extended that finding here to show that predator stress selectively impaired recently acquired (hippocampal-dependent) spatial working memory without affecting long-term (hippocampal-independent) spatial reference memory. We also investigated why predator exposure impairs memory. Was spatial memory impaired because of the fear-provoking aspects of predator exposure or only because the cat was a novel and arousing stimulus? If the latter possibility was correct, then any novel and arousing stimulus, independent of its emotional valence (i.e., aversive or appetitive), would impair memory. We found that spatial working memory was not impaired when the male rats were exposed to a sexually receptive female rat, a stimulus that was novel and arousing to them, but not aversive. We also found that there was an equivalent increase in serum corticosterone levels in male rats exposed to either a cat or a female rat, but only the cat-exposed rats exhibited a significant correlation between corticosterone levels and impaired memory. Overall, this series of experiments demonstrates that (1). predator stress selectively impaired working (hippocampal-dependent), but not reference (hippocampal-independent), memory; (2). a fear-provoking stimulus, and not merely novelty and increased arousal, impaired spatial memory; and (3). increased corticosterone levels correlated with impaired spatial working memory only under predator exposure, that is, fear-provoking conditions.

Parsing reward

Advances in neurobiology permit neuroscientists to manipulate specific brain molecules, neurons and systems. This has lead to major advances in the neuroscience of reward. Here, it is argued that further advances will require equal sophistication in parsing reward into its specific psychological components: (1) learning (including explicit and implicit knowledge produced by associative conditioning and cognitive processes); (2) affect or emotion (implicit 'liking' and conscious pleasure) and (3) motivation (implicit incentive salience 'wanting' and cognitive incentive goals). The challenge is to identify how different brain circuits mediate different psychological components of reward, and how these components interact.

Basolateral amygdala efferents to the ventral subiculum preferentially innervate pyramidal cell dendritic spines

The basolateral amygdala and the ventral subiculum of the hippocampal formation are two of the major limbic-related regions within the brain, both of which project heavily to the nucleus accumbens. The nucleus accumbens is regarded as the limbic-motor interface, in view of these limbic afferent and its somatomotor and autonomic efferent connections. These afferent inputs have been suggested to converge monosynaptically on cells within the accumbens and are hypothesised to play a role in functions such as affective motivational behaviour. Convergence between inputs from the basolateral amygdala and the hippocampus at the level of the accumbens can be demonstrated with electrophysiological recording methods, but these do not conclusively preclude polysynaptic mechanisms. In fact there is a robust reciprocal projection between the basolateral amygdala and the hippocampus, synaptic details of which have not been fully investigated. We examined the synaptic input from the basolateral amygdala to the projection neurons of the subiculum, the spiny pyramidal neurons. We labelled the afferents from basolateral amygdala with a small injection of biotinylated dextran amine, and revealed the anterogradely labeled fibers within the subiculum. The labeled basolateral amygdala fibers were studied with electron microscopy to identify their postsynaptic target structures. With this technique we have demonstrated anatomically that the basolateral amygdala preferentially innervates spiny subiculum neurons, presumed pyramidal projection neurons, although some dendrites and possibly local circuit neurons may be targeted.

The neurobiology and control of anxious states

Fear is an adaptive component of the acute "stress" response to potentially-dangerous (external and internal) stimuli which threaten to perturb homeostasis. However, when disproportional in intensity, chronic and/or irreversible, or not associated with any genuine risk, it may be symptomatic of a debilitating anxious state: for example, social phobia, panic attacks or generalized anxiety disorder. In view of the importance of guaranteeing an appropriate emotional response to aversive events, it is not surprising that a diversity of mechanisms are involved in the induction and inhibition of anxious states. Apart from conventional neurotransmitters, such as monoamines, gamma-amino-butyric acid (GABA) and glutamate, many other modulators have been implicated, including: adenosine, cannabinoids, numerous neuropeptides, hormones, neurotrophins, cytokines and several cellular mediators. Accordingly, though benzodiazepines (which reinforce transmission at GABA(A) receptors), serotonin (5-HT)(1A) receptor agonists and 5-HT reuptake inhibitors are currently the principle drugs employed in the management of anxiety disorders, there is considerable scope for the development of alternative therapies. In addition to cellular, anatomical and neurochemical strategies, behavioral models are indispensable for the characterization of anxious states and their modulation. Amongst diverse paradigms, conflict procedures--in which subjects experience opposing impulses of desire and fear--are of especial conceptual and therapeutic pertinence. For example, in the Vogel Conflict Test (VCT), the ability of drugs to release punishment-suppressed drinking behavior is evaluated. In reviewing the neurobiology of anxious states, the present article focuses in particular upon: the multifarious and complex roles of individual modulators, often as a function of the specific receptor type and neuronal substrate involved in their actions; novel targets for the management of anxiety disorders; the influence of neurotransmitters and other agents upon performance in the VCT; data acquired from complementary pharmacological and genetic strategies and, finally, several open questions likely to orientate future experimental- and clinical-research. In view of the recent proliferation of mechanisms implicated in the pathogenesis, modulation and, potentially, treatment of anxiety disorders, this is an opportune moment to survey their functional and pathophysiological significance, and to assess their influence upon performance in the VCT and other models of potential anxiolytic properties.