Clopidogrel as adjunctive antiplatelet therapy during coronary stenting

Effects of 2 different antiplatelet regimens with abciximab or tirofiban on platelet function in patients undergoing coronary stenting

BACKGROUND

We sought to compare the antiplatelet effects of the glycoprotein IIb-IIIa receptor blockers abciximab or tirofiban, combined with an adjuvant therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Twenty patients undergoing coronary stenting were randomly assigned to receive either abciximab or tirofiban combined with aspirin and clopidogrel. Serial blood samples were taken to assess platelet aggregation, P-selectin expression, thrombin generation, and platelet-induced endothelial cell expression of MCP-1, uPAR, and ICAM-1. Results and conclusions The therapy with aspirin plus clopidogrel attenuated agonist-induced platelet aggregation and P-selectin surface exposure (P <.05 vs aspirin monotherapy). Both tirofiban and abciximab further reduced agonist-induced platelet aggregation (P <.05), and decreased thrombin generation but had no effect on platelet alpha-granule release. None of the antithrombotic strategies significantly affected platelet-induced endothelial cell activation. Since platelet adhesion/degranulation initiates an inflammatory/mitogenic response in the vascular wall, future therapeutic strategies will have to be aimed at the inhibition of platelet release reactions.

Comparison of clopidogrel versus ticlopidine for prevention of minor myocardial injury after elective coronary stenting

We searched a randomized, double-blinded, prospective study that compared the effectiveness of clopidogrel versus ticlopidine for prevention of minor myocardial injury (MMI) and major clinical events (MCEs) after elective coronary stenting. A total of 158 consecutive patients (98 male, 60 female patients with a mean age of 59.3+/-5.4 years) were divided into two arms based on treatment with thienopyridines: group I, clopidogrel 1 x 300 mg as a loading dose, and 1 x 75 mg per day thereafter, group II, ticlopidine 2 x 250 mg daily. Both thienopyridines were started on the same day as stent placement. Cardiac troponin T (cTnT) was measured immediately before and 12 h after the procedures. All patients were followed-up during the hospital stay (6+/-2 days) with respect to MMI and MCEs. The increase frequency and the amount of cTnT level in group I was found significantly lower compared with group II (5 vs.15; P<0.01; 0.38+/-0.11 vs. 0.44+/-0.12 ng/ml; P<0.001, respectively). Patients with elevated cTnT levels more likely to have C type lesion (P<0.004). Though there was a trend toward increased major clinical events rate in group II than those of group I, the statistical difference was not different (4 vs. 1.3%; P>0.05). The present study showed that the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin was more effective than the combination of ticlopidine and aspirin in decreasing the rate of MMI.

Effects of pretreatment with clopidogrel on platelet and coagulation activation in patients undergoing elective coronary stenting

BACKGROUND

Current data suggest that pretreatment with clopidogrel (in addition to aspirin) prior to elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) might be associated with a reduced incidence of subsequent adverse ischemic events. The aim of this placebo-controlled study was to find out whether an extended pretreatment period with clopidogrel before an elective PCI might confer a superior inhibition of the platelet activation and aggregation than clopidogrel given not until PCI.

METHODS

Twenty patients with stable angina being already on aspirin were randomly assigned to receive the loading dose of 300 mg clopidogrel, either 24 h before or immediately after stent implantation. At several time points before and after PCI, the activation of both the platelet and the coagulation system was determined by measuring beta-thromboglobulin (beta-TG) and prothrombin fragment f1.2 (f1.2), respectively, in venous blood and in blood emerging from a microvascular injury (shed blood).

RESULTS

Pretreatment with clopidogrel before PCI exhibited a slight reduction of beta-TG (from 178 to 139 ng/ml, p=0.085) and of f1.2 (from 0.81 to 0.75 nmol/l, p=0.045) in venous blood. Heparin administration (at the beginning of PCI) resulted in a 65% inhibition of ss-TG (from 10,590 to 2833 ng/ml) and 90% inhibition of f1.2 formation (from 38.7 to 4.2 nmol/l) in shed blood of patients with clopidogrel pretreatment. The extent of inhibition was, however, comparable to that observed in patients without clopidogrel pretreatment (beta-TG: from 8025 to 2812 ng/ml, 76% inhibition, p=0.47; f1.2: from 34.9 to 3.8 nmol/l, 86% inhibition, p=0.80). After PTT normalisation (6 h after PCI), levels of beta-TG and f1.2 both in venous blood and in shed blood did not differ between the two treatment regimens up to 48 h after PCI.

CONCLUSION

Pretreatment with clopidogrel did not result in a pronounced inhibition of the platelet and coagulation system activation in patients on aspirin undergoing elective coronary stent implantation.

Antiplatelet agents for preventing thrombosis after peripheral arterial bypass surgery

BACKGROUND

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) may cause occlusions (blockages) in the main arteries of the lower limbs. It is frequently treated by implantation of either an infrainguinal autologous (using the patient's own tissue) venous or artificial graft. A number of factors influence occlusion rates, including the material used. To prevent graft occlusion, patients are usually treated with either an antiplatelet or antithrombotic drug, or a combination of both.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether antiplatelet treatment in patients with symptomatic PAD undergoing infrainguinal bypass surgery improves graft patency, limb salvage and survival.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The reviewers searched the Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group Specialised Register, (last searched April 2003), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (last searched Issue 1, 2003). Additional trials were sought through reference lists of papers and by reviewing proceedings from the vascular surgical society meetings.

SELECTION CRITERIA

The methodological quality of each trial was assessed independently by two reviewers (JD, MMK), with emphasis on concealment of randomisation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Details of the studies selected were extracted independently by two reviewers (JD, MMK), and an 'intention-to-treat' analysis performed. The treatment and control groups were compared for important prognostic factors and differences described. If any data were not available, further information was sought from the author. Data were synthesized by comparing group results.

MAIN RESULTS

The administration of a variety of platelet-inhibitors resulted in improved venous and artificial graft patency compared to no treatment. However, analysing patients for graft-type indicated that patients receiving a prosthetic graft were more likely to profit from administration of platelet-inhibitors than those treated with a venous graft.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Antiplatelet therapy with aspirin had a slight beneficial effect on the patency of peripheral bypasses, but seemed to have an inferior effect on venous graft patency compared with artificial grafts. The effect of aspirin on cardiovascular outcomes and survival was mild and not statistically significant; this might be due to the fact that the majority of patients receiving a peripheral graft have an advanced stage of PAD with critical ischemia. These patients are usually seriously ill with respect to cardiovascular diseases with high mortality rates of 20% per year. Additionally, the number of patients included in this analysis might still be too small to reach a statistically significant effect for mortality and cardiovascular morbidity.

Pharmacotherapeutic options for the management of myocardial infarction

The pharmacological treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), including unstable angina, non-ST- and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI) is dynamic and continues to evolve. Expert guidelines based on the results of clinical trials for the management of different types of ACS have been published. In both ST-segment elevation and non-ST-segment elevation MI, aspirin/clopidogrel, heparin/low molecular weight heparin/direct thrombin inhibitors, beta-blockers and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors are part of the routine regimens. In patients with ST-segment elevation MI, eligibility for thrombolytic therapy needs to be determined and utilised as soon as possible. In patients with non-ST-segment elevation MI, the risks of thrombolytic therapy outweigh the benefits. The use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors has become increasingly important. The use of antihyperlipidaemic agents for the prevention of secondary events in both types of patients continue to be essential and the early aggressive use of lipid-lowering therapy also plays a role in improving endothelial function and stabilising atherosclerotic plaques.

The effect of clopidogrel in combination with aspirin when given before coronary artery bypass grafting

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to evaluate the effect of preoperative clopidogrel on coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) outcomes.

BACKGROUND

Clopidogrel in combination with aspirin, given before percutaneous coronary intervention, has become the standard for stent thrombosis prevention. Some premedicated patients, however, are found to have surgical disease on angiography, and irreversible platelet inhibition becomes a concern for upcoming CABG.

METHODS

We prospectively studied 224 consecutive patients undergoing nonemergent first-time CABG, and compared those with preoperative clopidogrel exposure within seven days (n = 59) to those without exposure (n = 165).

RESULTS

The groups were comparable in age, gender, body surface area, preoperative hematocrit, preoperative prothrombin time and prior myocardial infarction. The clopidogrel group had higher 24-h mean chest tube output (1,224 ml vs. 840 ml, p = 0.001), and more transfusions of red blood cells (2.51 U vs. 1.74 U, p = 0.036), platelets (0.86 U vs. 0.24 U, p = 0.001) and fresh frozen plasma (0.68 U vs. 0.24 U, p = 0.015). Moreover, reoperation for bleeding was 10-fold higher in the clopidogrel group (6.8% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.018). The clopidogrel group also had less extubation within 8 h (54.2% vs. 75.8%, p = 0.002) and a trend towards less hospital discharge within five days (33.9% vs. 46.7%, p = 0.094).

CONCLUSIONS

Clopidogrel in combination with aspirin before CABG is associated with higher postoperative bleeding and morbidity. These findings raise concern regarding the routine administration of clopidogrel before anticipated coronary stent implantation.

Safety and efficacy of only 2 weeks of ticlopidine therapy in patients at increased risk of coronary stent thrombosis: results from the Antiplatelet Therapy alone versus Lovenox plus Antiplatelet therapy in patients at increased risk of Stent Thrombosis (ATLAST) trial

BACKGROUND

Controversy exists regarding the frequency of late stent thrombosis among patients treated with intracoronary stents and the most appropriate duration of treatment with a thienopyridine that is required to prevent this complication.

METHODS

We analyzed the frequency of stent thrombosis and other ischemic events in the Antiplatelet Therapy alone versus Lovenox plus Antiplatelet therapy in patients at increased risk of Stent Thrombosis (ATLAST) trial. In the ATLAST trial, 1102 patients at increased risk of stent thrombosis (ST-elevation myocardial infarction within 48 hours, diffuse distal disease, a large amount of thrombus, acute closure, residual dissection, etc) were randomly assigned to receive either enoxaparin (40 or 60 mg given every 12 hours for 14 days) or placebo; all patients received aspirin (325 mg daily) and ticlopidine (250 mg twice daily) for only 14 days.

RESULTS

The primary end point, the 30-day combined incidence of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and urgent revascularization, was reached in 2.3% of patients (1.8% of patients taking enoxaparin vs 2.7% of patients taking placebo; P =.295). However, during the 15th through 30th days, the frequency of ischemic events was only 0.73%, and only 0.27% (3/1102) of patients had possible stent thrombosis (95% CI 0.06, 0.77).

CONCLUSION

The frequency of stent thrombosis and other adverse ischemic events in the 15th through 30th days after stent placement in even high-risk stent patients treated with ticlopidine for only 2 weeks is low whether or not enoxaparin is administered.

Effect of clopidogrel on platelet aggregation and plasma concentration of fibrinogen in subjects with cerebral or coronary atherosclerotic disease

Acetylsalicylic acid inhibits thromboxane A2 production and reduces the risk of vascular occlusive events by 20% to 25%. Ticlopidine inhibits ADP-dependent platelet aggregation and reduces the same risk by 30% to 35%, but produces some adverse effects. Clopidogrel is a ticlopidin-related antiplatelet drug, with the same mechanism of action; it reduces the expression of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa, the fibrinogen receptor on the platelet surface. Clopidogrel has the same clinical efficacy of ticlopidin and has a decreased incidence of adverse effects. The effect of one daily dose of 75 mg of clopidogrel on platelet function in 90 subjects was evaluated; 41 with coronary artery disease and 49 with cerebral vascular disease. Before treatment and after 6 and 12 weeks, bleeding time and fibrinogen plasma concentration were also evaluated. There was a reduction in 5-microM ADP-induced platelet aggregation of 38%+/-27% at 6 weeks and 44%+/-29% at 12 weeks in patients with coronary artery disease; 35%+/-41%, 29%+/-59% in the cerebral vascular disease group; and 36%+/-36% and 35%+/-49% in the total group. Reduction of 20 microg/mL collagen-induced platelet aggregation was not significant in any group. Plasma fibrinogen levels did not vary during treatment. Bleeding time was significantly prolonged in all studied groups. There were no hemorrhagic complications; only digestive discomfort in less than 3% of patients. Clopidogrel efficiently reduces ADP-induced platelet aggregation and prolongs bleeding time and is a safe and efficacious antiplatelet drug.

Clopidogrel therapy in patients undergoing coronary stenting: value of a high-loading-dose regimen

The objective of this study was to assess the value of a clopidogrel regimen based on a high loading dose initiated before the stent placement procedure. A consecutive series of 864 patients treated with a high-loading-dose clopidogrel regimen (600 mg given 2-4 hr prior to intervention) was compared with 870 patients treated with conventional ticlopidine therapy. Abciximab was given periprocedurally in 62% of the patients. The composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularization was reached by 39 (4.5%) clopidogrel patients and 59 (6.8%) ticlopidine patients. Clopidogrel therapy was associated with a 35% reduction of the risk for early adverse events (odds ratio 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.98). Thus, a high-loading-dose clopidogrel regimen in patients undergoing coronary artery stenting was safe and led to a more favorable clinical outcome than conventional therapy with ticlopidine regardless of concomitant treatment with abciximab.

Meta-analysis of randomized and registry comparisons of ticlopidine with clopidogrel after stenting

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine whether clopidogrel is at least as efficacious as ticlopidine.

BACKGROUND

Several trials have supported the enhanced safety and tolerability of clopidogrel compared with ticlopidine after coronary stent deployment. However, none of these individual trials were powered to detect possible differences in the efficacy for reducing ischemic end points.

METHODS

Published data from trials and registries that compared clopidogrel with ticlopidine in patients receiving coronary stents were pooled, and a formal meta-analysis was performed. The rate of 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE), as defined in each trial, was used as the primary end point.

RESULTS

There were a total of 13,955 patients. The pooled rate of major adverse cardiac events was 2.10% in the clopidogrel group and 4.04% in the ticlopidine group. After adjustment for heterogeneity in the trials, the odds ratio (OR) of having an ischemic event with clopidogrel, as compared with ticlopidine, was 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59 to 0.89, p = 0.002). Mortality was also lower in the clopidogrel group compared with the ticlopidine group-0.48% versus 1.09% (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.82; p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on all available evidence from randomized clinical trials or registries, clopidogrel, in addition to better tolerability and fewer side effects, is at least as efficacious as ticlopidine in reducing MACE. This finding may be due to the more rapid onset of an antiplatelet effect seen with the loading dose of clopidogrel, which was used in most of these studies, or to better patient compliance with clopidogrel therapy. Therefore, clopidogrel plus aspirin should replace ticlopidine plus aspirin as the standard antiplatelet regimen after stent deployment.

Cilostazol for prevention of thrombosis and restenosis after intracoronary stenting

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the potential use of cilostazol in intracoronary stenting.

DATA SOURCES

Clinical literature was accessed through MEDLINE (1966-March 2001). Key search terms included cilostazol, intracoronary stenting, and coronary angioplasty. Abstracts of clinical trials presented at major cardiology professional association meetings were also reviewed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Intracoronary stent placement represents the fastest growing medical device implant. Complications of stent implantation include acute and subacute vessel closure, as well as late restenosis. Currently, antiplatelet agents are used for preventive therapy. Cilostazol is a vasodilating antiplatelet agent that reversibly inhibits platelet aggregation induced by many factors. In seven randomized trials comparing cilostazol with either aspirin or ticlopidine, cilostazol was found to be superior to aspirin and equivalent to ticlopidine in decreasing both cardiac events and rates of restenosis. In addition, cilostazol was found to be well tolerated, with no reports of adverse hematologic events.

CONCLUSIONS

Although further comparative trials are required, cilostazol appears to be a safe and effective alternative to clopidogrel and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists following intracoronary stent implantation.

Adjunctive pharmacologic treatment for elective stenting of the extracranial carotid arteries

Endovascular stenting of the extracranial carotid arteries is a viable treatment option to carotid endarterectomy in selected patients. Patients undergoing this procedure must be treated with aspirin 325 mg at least 24 hours prior to the procedure and clopidogrel 75 mg oral, three to five days prior to the procedure (or 300 mg at least six hours prior to stenting). During the intervention, heparin is given to maintain an activated clotting time of at least 300 seconds. Although there are theoretical advantages on the use of a platelet IIb/IIIa inhibitor, their routine use during elective carotid stenting is not recommended until their clinical benefits have been clearly demonstrated in this patient population. Hemodynamic instability during balloon inflation and stent deployment should be treated with intravenous fluids, atropine, and an alpha agonist such as neosynephrine. All the oral antihypertensive must be discontinued after the procedure and if there is persistence of hypotension making discontinuation of neosynephrine difficult, an oral alpha agonist such as midodrine (2.5 to 5 mg two to three times daily) is helpful. In the majority of patients this medication can be tapered off three to five days following stenting.

The role of adenosine 5'-diphosphate receptor blockade in patients with cardiovascular disease

Aspirin, which has been the mainstay of antiplatelet agent for many decades, affects a single pathway in the platelet activation process and provides incomplete protection against cardiovascular events. Aspirin also may blunt the hemodynamic effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Dipyridamole may provide some additional benefit, but there is little evidence to suggest its superiority alone or in combination with aspirin compared to standard doses of aspirin. Oral platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, although initially promising, have had disappointing results in recent clinical studies. A new class of medications, the thienopyridines, blocks the activity of platelet adenosine 5'-diphosphate (ADP) receptors, thereby reducing platelet activation. This review discusses the pharmacology, clinical studies, and potential uses of these agents, which include ticlopidine and clopidogrel. ADP inhibitors, by blocking an alternate pathway of platelet activation, are slightly more effective than aspirin in reducing cardiovascular events.

Incidence of thrombotic occlusion and major adverse cardiac events between two and four weeks after coronary stent placement: analysis of 5,678 patients with a four-week ticlopidine regimen

OBJECTIVES

We attempted to make a comprehensive assessment of the risk of stent failure (death, myocardial infarction or angiographically documented occlusion), differentiating early (first and second weeks) and late (third and fourth weeks) events.

BACKGROUND

The risk of stent failure decreases rapidly within the first week. It has been suggested that the risk rate for late events is close to 0% and that the thienopyridine regimen (ticlopidine or clopidogrel) could be safely reduced from four to two weeks, minimizing the risk of hematological complications.

METHODS

We analyzed 5,678 patients with successful coronary stent placement and a four-week ticlopidine regimen.

RESULTS

The rate of stent failure was 2.5% at four weeks, with 112 early (2.0%) and 30 late events (0.5%). Multivariate analysis identified different risk factors for early versus late events. While variables on stenosis severity and procedural results that can be influenced by the operator were identified as independent risk factors for early events (percent stenosis before and after the procedure, residual dissection, length of stented segment), more clinical variables were associated with late events (age, reduced left ventricular function, systemic hypertension as a protective factor). The late-event rate was <0.1% in the absence of these factors, but it was 2.5% with all three risk factors present.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of late stent failure is low with a four-week ticlopidine regimen. However, high-risk subgroups have a risk of 2.5%. As this rate is presumably higher if thienopyridines are discontinued after two weeks, these data suggest that a risk stratification to a two- or four-week regimen is preferable to a general reduction.

New recommendations from the 1999 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association acute myocardial infarction guidelines

OBJECTIVE

To review literature relating to significant changes in drug therapy recommendations in the 1999 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for treating patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

DATA SOURCES

1999 ACC/AHA AMI guidelines, English-language clinical trials, reviews, and editorials researching the role of drug therapy and primary angioplasty for AMI that were referenced in the guidelines were included. Additional data published in 2000 or unpublished were also included if relevant to interpretation of the guidelines.

STUDY SELECTION

The articles selected influence AMI treatment recommendations.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Many clinicians and health systems use the ACC/AHA AMI guidelines to develop treatment plans for AMI patients. This review highlights important changes in AMI drug therapy recommendations by reviewing the results of recent clinical trials. Insights into evolving drug therapy strategies that may impact future guideline development are also described.

CONCLUSIONS

Several changes in drug therapy recommendations were included in the 1999 AMI ACC/AHA guidelines. There is emphasis on administering fibrin-specific thrombolytics secondary to enhanced efficacy. Selection between fibrin-specific agents is unclear at this time. Low response rates to thrombolytics have been noted in the elderly, women, patients with heart failure, and those showing left bundle-branch block on the electrocardiogram. These patient groups should be targeted for improved utilization programs. The use of glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors in non-ST-segment elevation MI was emphasized. Small trials combining reduced doses of thrombolytics with GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors have shown promise by increasing reperfusion rates without increasing bleeding risk, but firm conclusions cannot be made until the results of larger trials are known. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) trials suggest lower mortality rates for primary PCI when compared with thrombolysis alone. However, primary PCI, including coronary angioplasty, is only available at approximately 13% of US hospitals, making thrombolysis the preferred strategy for most patients. Clopidogrel has supplanted ticlopidine as the recommended antiplatelet agent for patients with aspirin allergy or intolerance following reports of a better safety profile. The recommended dose of unfractionated heparin is lower than previously recommended, necessitating a separate nomogram for patients with acute coronary syndromes. Routine use of warfarin, either alone or in combination with aspirin, is not supported by clinical trials; however, warfarin remains a choice for antithrombotic therapy in patients intolerant to aspirin. Beta-adrenergic receptor blockers continue to be recommended, and emphasis is placed on improving rates of early administration (during hospitalization), even in patients with moderate left ventricular dysfunction. New recommendations for drug treatment of post-AMI patients with low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and/or elevated triglycerides are included, with either niacin or gemfibrozil recommended as an option. Supplementary antioxidants are not recommended for either primary or secondary prevention of AMI, with new data demonstrating lack of efficacy vitamin E in primary prevention. Estrogen replacement therapy or hormonal replacement therapy should not be initiated solely for prevention of cardiovascular disease, but can be continued in cardiovascular patients already taking long-term therapy for other reasons. Bupropion has been added as a new treatment option for smoking cessation. As drug therapy continues to evolve in treating AMI, more frequent updates of therapy guidelines will be necessary.

Novel platelet inhibitors

Platelet-inhibitory drugs are of proven benefit to individuals who suffer from atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Despite substantial effort to identify more potent platelet-inhibitory agents, aspirin, an irreversible inhibitor of platelet cyclooxygenase activity, remains the standard against which other drugs are judged. Drugs that appear to be at least as efficacious as aspirin in specific clinical settings include the thienopyridines ticlopidine and clopidogrel, specific inhibitors of ADP-stimulated platelet function, and the phosphodiesterase 3 inhibitor cilostazol. Ligand binding to the platelet integrin alphaIIbbeta3 (GPIIb-IIIa), a prerequisite for platelet thrombus formation, has been a prominent target for drug development. Currently, three types of alphaIIbbeta3 antagonists are available: the monoclonal antibody Fab fragment abciximab, cyclic peptides based on the Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) or related amino acid motifs, and RGD-based peptidomimetics. The efficacy of each type of alphaIIbbeta3 antagonist in the setting of acute coronary artery disease has been confirmed in multicenter clinical trials.

The use of antiplatelet agents in acute cardiac care

Antiplatelet therapy with aspirin has long been established as standard therapy in the management of conditions such as ST-elevation myocardial infarction and the acute coronary syndromes (unstable angina and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction). Recently, several more potent platelet inhibitors have been developed and tested in randomized clinical trials. This article reviews the current state of the art of antiplatelet therapy.

Combination therapy with aspirin plus clopidogrel versus aspirin plus ticlopidine for prevention of subacute thrombosis after successful native coronary stenting

We compared the combination of aspirin plus clopidrogrel (A+C) with aspirin and ticlopidine (A+T) for prevention of subacute stent thrombosis in 827 patients. At 30-day follow-up, there were trends toward increased subacute thrombosis with A+C compared with A+T (1.3% vs 0.2%, p = 0.10). These results suggest that A+C may have marginally higher subacute stent thrombosis than A+T.

Comparison of effects of clopidogrel versus ticlopidine on platelet function in patients undergoing coronary stent placement

Clopidogrel in combination with aspirin administered as a loading dose of 450 mg reveals an accelerated antiplatelet effect in the early hours after first administration in patients undergoing coronary stent placement.

Antiplatelet therapy in the elderly. Aspirin, ticlopidine-clopidogrel, and GPIIb/GPIIIa antagonists

Antiplatelet agents including aspirin, dipyridamole, the thienopyridines, and the GPIIb/IIIa antagonists have collectively demonstrated their ability to have a significant impact on the incidence of recurrent MIs, strokes, and other vascular ischemic events in the geriatric population. Low-dose aspirin also seems to be effective and safe for the primary prevention of ischemic heart disease in men considered at high risk. There is no evidence that the recommendations from these studies had increased relevance to younger adults, and the studies considering age as a variable found antiplatelet agents had either similar or increased benefit in older patients. In view of the relatively reduced adverse effects of these agents when compared with their potential therapeutic benefit, it is important that they be considered in all older patients for secondary prevention and in certain high-risk groups for primary prevention of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy in elective percutaneous coronary intervention

Thrombosis plays a major role in acute vessel closure both after coronary balloon angioplasty and after stenting. This review will address the role of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy in preventing early thrombotic complications after percutaneous coronary intervention. The focus will be on agents that are routinely available and commonly used.

Cilostazol: treatment of intermittent claudication

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacology and clinical utility of cilostazol, an antiplatelet and vasodilator agent approved for the management of intermittent claudication.

DATA SOURCES

Primary literature on cilostazol was identified from a comprehensive MEDLINE literature search (1980-February 2000). Selected meeting abstracts and manufacturer literature were also used as source material. Indexing terms included cilostazol, intermittent claudication, platelet inhibitors, and restenosis.

STUDY SELECTION

Human clinical, pharmacokinetic and randomized comparative trials performed in the US and Asia were reviewed. Selected in vitro, ex vivo, and animal studies were evaluated when human data were not available.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Intermittent claudication, defined as reproducible discomfort of a muscle group induced by exercise and relieved by rest, is the most common clinical manifestation of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Cilostazol, a specific inhibitor of cyclic adenosine monophosphate phosphodiesterase in platelets and vascular smooth-muscle cells, is a potent antiplatelet agent and vasodilator that reduces vascular proliferation and has lipid-lowering effects in vivo. Recent multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trials have led to approval of cilostazol by the Food and Drug Administration for relief of intermittent claudication in patients with stable PAD. Cilostazol doubled walking distances and improved quality of life compared with placebo in these studies. One trial found that cilostazol was more effective than pentoxifylline, the only alternative pharmacologic therapy for claudication. Although frequent (approximately 50%) minor adverse effects, including headache, diarrhea, and palpitations, may occur in clinical practice, cilostazol has not been associated with major adverse events or increased mortality. Small, nonblind studies suggest that cilostazol may prove useful in preventing thrombosis and restenosis following percutaneous coronary interventions, although these remain unlabeled uses.

CONCLUSIONS

The unique combination of antiplatelet, vasodilatory, and antiproliferative effects of cilostazol appear to make it an attractive agent for use in patients with PAD. Clinical trials demonstrating a significant improvement in walking distances with cilostazol therapy suggest that it will be an important tool in improving symptoms and quality of life in patients with intermittent claudication.

Value of antiplatelet therapy in preventing thrombotic events in generalized vascular disease

Atherothrombosis is the major underlying cause of acute coronary syndromes, ischemic stroke, and peripheral artery disease, and thus is the leading cause of death and disability in Western countries. Platelet inhibitors play a major role in preventing these ischemic complications. There is strong evidence from the Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration meta-analysis that aspirin reduces the combined risk of stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), or vascular death in atherosclerotic patients. The Ticlopidine Aspirin Stroke Study (TASS) compared aspirin and ticlopidine in the secondary prevention of high-risk patients after ischemic stroke and demonstrated a significant advantage for ticlopidine over aspirin. In peripheral arterial disease, the Swedish Ticlopidine Multicentre Study (STIMS) showed that ticlopidine was very effective against placebo. Intravenous antiplatelet agents, such as abciximab, tirofiban, and eptifibitide were also proven effective in acute coronary syndromes and unstable angina. In the Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischaemic Events (CAPRIE) trial, clopidogrel was compared with aspirin in patients with symptomatic atherothrombosis regardless of the initial localization of the ischemic event (coronary, cerebral, or peripheral). The efficacy of clopidogrel based on the first occurrence of ischemic stroke, MI, or vascular death showed a relative risk reduction of 8.7% over and above the 25% reduction currently accepted with aspirin (p < 0.05). The greatest benefit of clopidogrel was in the reduction of fatal and nonfatal MI in the most severe groups of patients, providing a 19% relative risk reduction (p = 0.008). The recent disappointing results obtained with oral glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blocking agents may emphasize the need for other antiplatelet combination therapy, such as aspirin-clopidogrel, in coronary disease, stents, stroke, and possibly atherothrombosis in high-risk patients.

The future of antiplatelet therapy: optimizing management in patients with acute coronary syndrome

In the past few years, the antiplatelet armamentarium has been markedly enriched. With the intravenous platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and the new thienopyridine clopidogrel, the options for acute and chronic antiplatelet therapy have expanded. Future therapies will optimize the application of these agents. For example, in percutaneous coronary intervention, it appears that patients may benefit by loading with an adenosine diphosphate receptor blocker before the procedure and may well benefit indefinitely from continuation of this therapy. Patients with aspirin resistance or the P1A2 single nucleotide polymorphism that is common in the population may derive particular benefit from dual antiplatelet therapy. Similarly, patients who present with unstable angina while receiving chronic aspirin therapy and those with involvement of more than one atherosclerotic bed deserve consideration for dual antiplatelet therapy. New applications will be facilitated by point-of-care testing for platelet biology and genotyping, pharmacogenomics, and protection from inflammation in patients with serologic evidence of elevated markers, such as C-reactive protein. Indeed, even with the recent explosion of relevant data and enriched therapeutic choices, we are just beginning to understand the optimal application of these therapies to the appropriate clinical indications and patient groups.

Acute antithrombotic effect of a front-loaded regimen of clopidogrel in patients with atherosclerosis on aspirin

There is a need for a rapid antithrombotic effect after the administration of antiplatelet drugs in the setting of acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous interventions. Clopidogrel, a new thienopyridine derivative, is an efficient antiplatelet agent. However, the standard regimen of clopidogrel (75 mg/d) requires 2 to 3 days before significant antithrombotic effects. Patients with stable arterial disease on chronic aspirin therapy (n=20) were treated with clopidogrel either with a front-loaded regimen, 300 mg the first day and 75 mg/d the next 7 days, or with a standard regimen, 75 mg/d for 8 days. Blood thrombogenicity was assessed by quantification of platelet-thrombus formation in an ex vivo perfusion chamber, by ADP-induced platelet aggregation, and by ADP-induced fibrinogen binding. At 2 hours, mean total thrombus area with the standard regimen was not significantly reduced. In contrast, at 2 hours, the mean total thrombus area with the front-loaded regimen was significantly decreased by 23.1+/-8.5% versus baseline (P<0.05). ADP-induced platelet aggregation (with 5 and 10 micromol/L) was also significantly (P<0.05) reduced with the front-loaded regimen at 2 hours, with the mean platelet aggregation being 82.2+/-4.4% and 81.8+/-4.5%, respectively, versus baseline. Similarly, flow cytometry demonstrated a significant decrease (P<0. 05) in the ADP-induced fibrinogen binding (with 0.12 and 0.6 micromol/L) at 2 hours in this front-loaded regimen group (36.1+/-2. 0% and 53.2+/-9.3%). With the standard regimen, platelet activity was not significantly reduced at 2 hours. Our data suggest that a front-loaded regimen of clopidogrel added to aspirin achieves a significant antithrombotic effect at 2 hours in patients with known atherosclerotic disease on chronic aspirin therapy. This provides a rationale for using front-loaded clopidogrel in combination with aspirin in percutaneous coronary interventions.

Clopidogrel and coronary stenting: what is the next question?

Today, following coronary stenting, clopidogrel has largely replaced ticlopidine as part of combination antiplatelet therapy following coronary stenting primarily due to its better tolerability. While there is no randomized, blinded, efficacy trial of ticlopidine versus clopidogrel, there are ample data from a number of observational studies, randomized non-blinded trials, and a randomized blinded safety trial to prove that clopidogrel is not only safer than ticlopidine, but also at least as efficacious following stenting. With over 10,000 treated patients, pooled data suggest similar rates of stent thrombosis (clopidogrel 0.98% vs. ticlopidine 0.98%) and lower rates of major adverse cardiac events with clopidogrel (clopidogrel 1.63% vs. ticlopidine 4.52%, p<0.001), with a clear advantage for clopidogrel regarding adverse events (clopidogrel 5.91% vs. ticlopidine 9.75%, p<0.001). With clopidogrel's superior safety and at least equivalent efficacy, the question of "which thienopyridine?" post-stenting has been answered. Now the questions "how much?", "how soon?" and "how long?" must be addressed. The Clopidogrel for the Reduction of Events During Observation (CREDO) trial is a multi-center, double-blind, randomized trial designed to answer these remaining questions. CREDO will evaluate the efficacy and safety of clopidogrel pretreatment versus no pretreatment, and prolonged (1 year), versus short-term (1 month) dual antiplatelet therapy in 2,000 patients undergoing planned or highly probable coronary intervention with a stent.

Antithrombotic Therapy during and after Intracoronary Stenting

Objective:

To evaluate the impact on patient outcomes of antithrombotic therapy during and after intracoronary stenting.

Data Sources:

A MEDLINE search (1966-July 2000) for English-language clinical trials and review articles using the search terms stent and coronary with one or more of the following search terms: abciximab, tirofiban, orofiban, xemilofiban, eptifibatide, aspirin, heparin, enoxaparin, tinzaparin, dalteparin, hirudin, danaparoid, dipyridamole, cilostazol, dextran, warfarin, anticoagulant, ticlopidine, and Clopidogrel. References from these articles were reviewed for additional articles. Pharmaceutical companies were contacted to identify unpublished studies. A total of 177 sources were initially identified.

Study Selection:

Studies were selected through an unblinded individual review for prospective, randomized clinical trials evaluating patient outcomes related to antithrombotic therapy during or after intracoronary stent placement. Additional human and animal studies were included for background and introductory information.

Data Extraction:

Patient characteristics in each study were compared with those of the overall stent population. The primary end point measurements were defined. The completeness of follow-up and power analysis was assessed.

Data Synthesis:

Intracoronary stenting is now a common modality for maintaining patency of occluded arteries. Antithrombotic therapy during coronary artery stent placement is changing as knowledge about the pathophysiology of thrombus formation expands and new medications become available. Development of new stent placement techniques, new stent designs, and methods of restenosis irradiation or prevention have coincided with evolving antithrombotic regimens.

Conclusions:

The current antithrombotic regimen used in coronary artery stenting is complex, but has a lower incidence of hemorrhagic complications and thrombosis compared with previous anticoagulant regimens. Antithrombotic therapy may need to be tailored to individual patient contraindications.

Antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel compared with aspirin after myocardial infarction: enhanced inhibitory effects of combination therapy

OBJECTIVES

We sought to compare the inhibitory effects of the combination of two doses of aspirin plus clopidogrel with either drug alone on platelet aggregation and activation.

BACKGROUND

Enhanced platelet inhibitory effects of clopidogrel by aspirin on platelet aggregation and activation are suggested by experimental studies but have not been shown in humans.

METHODS

The effects of clopidogrel 75 mg or aspirin 100 (300) mg on platelet aggregation and activation by flow cytometry after stimulation with various agonists were determined in 30 patients with a past history of myocardial infarction.

RESULTS

Clopidogrel alone or in combination with aspirin markedly inhibited adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-mediated platelet aggregation compared with monotherapy with aspirin (24.6 +/- 3.3% or 26.6 +/- 2.7% vs. 44.7 +/- 2.9%; p < 0.001). Combined treatment significantly inhibited collagen-induced aggregation compared with aspirin and clopidogrel (16.4 +/- 2.4%, 36.5 +/- 4.2% and 59.3 +/- 5.1%, respectively;, p < 0.001) and resulted in considerable inhibition of aggregation induced by thrombin receptor agonist peptide (TRAP, p < 0.03). Clopidogrel with or without aspirin significantly suppressed expression of platelet activation markers CD 62p, CD 63 and PAC-1 after stimulation with ADP or thrombin (p < 0.001). In addition, the combined treatment was more effective than either agent alone after activation with low dose thrombin (p < 0.05). Both doses of aspirin equally potentiated the platelet inhibitory effects of clopidogrel. CONCLUSIONS In this prospective clinical ex vivo platelet study, clopidogrel was more effective than aspirin in inhibiting ADP-mediated platelet aggregation and activation. Clopidogrel in combination with aspirin showed synergistic inhibitory effects after stimulation with collagen and thrombin compared with monotherapies. Thus, this dual antiplatelet treatment strategy deserves further evaluation in clinical trials for secondary prevention of acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina.

Antithrombotic therapy in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: focus on antiplatelet agents

Pharmacologic advances in the use of antithrombotic agents have paralleled the technologic innovations used in patients undergoing coronary interventions. The recognition of the central role of platelets in the development of complications related to coronary interventions led to the investigation and subsequent routine use of several antiplatelet agents as adjuvants to coronary intervention. Thus, the oral agents aspirin and either ticlopidine or clopidogrel are routinely administered after coronary stenting. Intravenous glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonists have been extensively studied and reduce adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing coronary interventions, especially those receiving intracoronary stents. Despite the growing use of GP IIb/IIIa antagonists, much information remains unknown as to the proper dosing and the effects these agents have on other elements of the hemostatic and vascular systems.

Stent thrombosis: historical perspectives and current trends

Coronary stents are now implanted in more than 70% of percutaneous coronary revascularization procedures. Early enthusiasm for improved acute angiographic results and limited restenosis was dampened initially by a high rate of stent thrombosis and later by the increased bleeding complications of aggressive and complex anticoagulation protocols designed to lower the stent thrombosis risk. More recently, routine high-pressure deployment strategies and anti-platelet drug regimens have lowered the incidence of stent thrombosis to approximately 1% without an increased bleeding risk. The timing of stent thrombosis has also changed from a median of 4-5 days to a median of 1 day after the stent procedure. Risk factors in earlier studies included stenting for threatened or abrupt closure, smaller vessels, longer lesions, and possibly left anterior descending artery lesion location. Modern studies have shown a slightly increased risk for multiple stent use, residual dissection, and smaller final lumen. Optimal therapy for stent thrombosis includes emergent revascularization and anti-thrombotic treatment, although the clinical consequences remain dire despite successful reperfusion. The use of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, especially in high-risk situations may further reduce the incidence of stent thrombosis.

Results of the Ticlid or Plavix Post-Stents (TOPPS) trial: do they justify the switch from ticlopidine to clopidogrel after coronary stent placement?

In the Ticlid or Plavix Post-Stents (TOPPS) trial, 1016 patients undergoing successful coronary stent placement were randomized to receive aspirin and either ticlopidine or clopidogrel. In this trial, the dosages and regimens of ticlopidine and clopidogrel resembled more closely those used in most catheterization laboratories than did the two previous randomized trials comparing ticlopidine and clopidogrel. The results of the TOPPS trial support the current practice of substituting ticlopidine for clopidogrel in stent patients.