Multiple dose pharmacokinetics of artemether in Chinese patients with uncomplicated falciparum malaria

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of the Diastereomers of Arteether in Healthy Volunteers

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of alpha- and beta-diastereomers of arteether in healthy male volunteers.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

The study was a single-centre clinical pharmacokinetic trial in healthy male subjects. A group comprising 13 subjects aged 25-50 years received a single intramuscular 150 mg individual dose of the arteether formulation containing alpha- and beta-isomers in a 30:70 ratio. Serial blood samples collected over a period of 0-192 hours were analysed by high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionisation/tandem mass spectrometry and the plasma concentrations were subjected to compartmental and noncompartmental analyses. Pharmacodynamic parameters such as area under the inhibitory curve, ratio of area under the concentration-time curve to minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC), maximum plasma concentration to MIC (Cmax/MIC) and time that plasma concentration exceeds the MIC (T>MIC) were calculated in vitro in four strains of Plasmodium falciparum to evaluate the in vivo effectiveness of the proposed dosage regimen.

RESULTS

There were no adverse effects observed during the study. The extent of metabolism of arteether to dihydroartemisinin (DHA) was low (approximately 5%) so as to be therapeutically nonsignificant. The pharmacokinetic profiles of the arteether diastereomers were different, and the maximum plasma concentrations of alpha- and beta-isomers were reached at 4.77+/-1.21 hours and 6.96+/-1.62 hours, respectively, after which they showed biphasic decline with apparent terminal elimination half-lives of 13.24+/-1.08 hours and 30.17+/-2.44 hours, respectively. The plasma and renal clearances, as well as whole blood to plasma partition ratios of the isomers, were comparable, while the apparent volume of distribution during terminal phase of the beta-isomer was approximately 3-fold higher than that of the alpha-isomer. In vitro erythrocyte culture experiments with four strains of P. falciparum showed similar MICs for both isomers of arteether. The highest observed MIC of 8 microg/L was selected for estimating the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters, which showed excellent correlation with published data on the clinical efficacy of arteether.

CONCLUSION

The pharmacokinetics of arteether isomers demonstrated stereoselectivity, which was reflected mainly in the volume of distribution and the terminal elimination half-life. The alpha- and beta-isomers of arteether appeared to compliment each other pharmacokinetically, with the alpha-isomer providing comparatively rapid and higher plasma concentrations resulting in immediate reduction in percentage parasitaemia, while the beta-isomer, with its longer terminal elimination half-life, mean residence time and sustained plasma concentrations, maintained the activity for longer periods. The extent of metabolic conversion of arteether to DHA was minimal, so as to have any therapeutic or toxic significance.

Artemether bioavailability after oral or intramuscular administration in uncomplicated falciparum malaria

The antimalarial activity of artemether following oral or intramuscular administration in the plasma of 15 adults with acute uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria was measured by bioassay. The peak concentrations in plasma following oral administration were higher in patients with acute illness (median, 1,905 mmol of dihydroartemisinin [DHA] equivalents per liter; range, 955 to 3,358 mmol of DHA equivalents per liter) than in patients in the convalescent phase (median, 955 mmol of DHA equivalents per liter; range, 576 to 1,363 mmol of DHA equivalents per liter), and clearance (CL/F) was lower in patients in the acute phase (1.11 liters/kg/h; range, 0.21 to 3.08 liters/kg/h) than in patients in the convalescent phase (median, 2.76 liters/kg/h; range, 1.56 to 5.74 liters/kg/h) (P< or =0.008). Antimalarial activity in terms of the peak concentration in plasma (Cmax) after oral administration was a median of 16 times higher than that after intramuscular administration. The ratio of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve during the first 24 h (AUC(0-24)) after oral administration of artemether to the AUC(0-24) after intramuscular administration was a median of 3.3 (range, 1 to 11) (P=0.0001). In the acute phase, the time to Cmax was significantly shorter after oral administration (median, 1 h; range, 0.5 to 3.0 h) than after intramuscular administration (median, 8 h; range, 4 to 24 h) (P=0.001). Intramuscular artemether is absorbed very slowly in patients with acute malaria.

Pharmacokinetics and electrocardiographic pharmacodynamics of artemether-lumefantrine (Riamet) with concomitant administration of ketoconazole in healthy subjects

AIMS

To evaluate whether the potent CYP3A4 inhibitor ketoconazole has any influence on the pharmacokinetic and electrocardiographic parameters of the antimalarial co-artemether (artemether-lumefantrine) in healthy subjects.

METHODS

Sixteen subjects were randomized in an open-label, two period crossover design study. Subjects received a single dose of co-artemether (day 1) either alone or in combination with multiple oral doses of ketoconazole (400 mg on day 1 followed by 200 mg o.d. for 4 additional days). Serial blood samples were taken and assayed for artemether and its main active metabolite dihydroartemisinin (DHA), and lumefantrine.

RESULTS

The pharmacokinetics of artemether, its metabolite DHA, and lumefantrine were influenced by the presence of ketoconazole. AUC(0, infinity ) was increased from 320 to 740 ng ml-1 h (ratio 2.4, 90% CI 2.00, 2.86) for artemether, from 331 to 501 ng ml-1 h (ratio 1.7, 90% CI 1.40, 1.98) for DHA, and from 207 to 333 micro g ml-1 h (ratio 1.7, 90% CI 1.23, 2.21) for lumefantrine in the presence of ketoconazole. Cmax also increased in similar proportions for the three compounds (ratio 2.2 (90% CI 1.78, 2.83), 1.4 (90% CI 1.12, 1.74), and 1.3 (90% CI 0.96, 1.64), respectively). The terminal elimination half-life was increased for artemether (2.5 vs 1.9 h, 90% CI 1.12, 1.72) and DHA (3.1 vs 2.1 h, 90% CI 0.02, 3.36), but remained unchanged for lumefantrine (88 vs 95 h, 90% CI 0.81, 1.04). These increases in exposure to the antimalarial combination were much smaller than observed with food intake (up to 16 fold), and were not associated with increased side-effects or changes in electrocardiographic parameters. The study medications were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

The concurrent administration of ketoconazole with co-artemether led to modest increases in artemether, DHA, and lumefantrine exposure in healthy subjects. Dose adjustment of co-artemether is probably unnecessary in falciparum malaria patients when administered in association with ketoconazole or other potent CYP3A4 inhibitors.

Schistosoma japonicum: effect of artemether on glutathione S-transferase and superoxide dismutase

Glutathione S-transferase (GST) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) are major antioxidant enzymes of schistosomes that are involved in detoxification processes. To study the effect of artemether on these enzymes, mice infected with adult Schistosoma japonicum, were treated with artemether either at a subcurative (100 mg/kg) or a curative dose (300 mg/kg). Schistosomes were recovered 24-72 h post-treatment separated by sex and used for GST and SOD activity measurements. Female worms showed consistently higher GST inhibitions than males. For instance, 24 h after administration of 100 mg/kg artemether, GST activities of female worms were inhibited by 23.3%, as compared to 12.7% in males. Both activities were significantly lower when compared to worms recovered from untreated mice. Slightly higher inhibitions were observed at the higher dose of artemether, which gradually increased to levels of 52.5-55.1%, 72 h post-treatment. GST inhibitions could be reversed by application of 1,4-dithiothreitol at a concentration of 10 mmol/L. Adding L-cysteine also reduced GST inhibitions, but in female worms, GST activities remained significantly higher than in worms from untreated animals. Administration of 300 mg/kg artemether resulted in significant reductions of SOD activities in both sexes. In conclusion, these results suggest that the inhibition of GST and, to a lesser extent also SOD enzymes, could lead to increased schistosome susceptibility to oxidant attacks and might be linked with the antischistosomal action of artemether.

Artemisinin and derivatives: the future for malaria treatment?

The isolation in 1972 of artemisinin by Chinese scientists, and their development of all the derivatives now used in the treatment of malaria today, were of outstanding importance. The results which have accumulated both from the Chinese work and from that subsequently conducted on a worldwide basis provide for a relatively comprehensive understanding of the chemistry, pharmacological profiles, toxicology, metabolism, and effects on the malaria parasite. The optimal regimens for use in the field are also apparent, particularly in combinations with longer half-life quinoline antimalarials. Thus the future use of the artemisinin class of drug appears assured. However, the mechanism of action needs to be clarified. More importantly from a clinical viewpoint, problems inherent in the current derivatives must be addressed, particularly that of neurotoxicity, if new artemisinin derivatives are to be introduced in a normal drug regulatory environment. The application of established principles of modern drug design should indeed allow for the first truly rationally designed, in so far as the target is still unknown, derivatives to come to hand.

A comparison of oral artesunate and artemether antimalarial bioactivities in acute falciparum malaria

AIMS

Artesunate and artemether are the two most widely used artemisinin derivatives in the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria, but there is little information on their comparative pharmacokinetics. The aim of this study was to examine the relative oral antimalarial bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of the two derivatives.

METHODS

The pharmacokinetic properties of oral artesunate and artemether (4 mg kg(-1)) were compared in a randomized cross-over study of 14 adult patients in western Thailand with acute uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Antimalarial activity was compared using a previously validated, sensitive bioassay.

RESULTS

Despite a 29% lower molar dose, oral artesunate administration resulted in significantly larger mean area under the plasma antimalarial activity time curve and median maximum plasma antimalarial activity than after oral artemether (P

CONCLUSIONS

The oral antimalarial bioavailability following artemether was significantly lower than that after artesunate. Artemether oral antimalarial bioavailability is reduced in acute malaria.

Collapse

Key Words

• artemether
• artesunate
• bioassay
• bioavailability
• combination
• malaria
• pharmacokinetics
• plasmodium falciparum
• thailand

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Acute Disease
• Administration, Oral
• Adolescent
• Adult
• Antimalarials/administration & dosage
• Antimalarials/pharmacokinetics
• Antimalarials/therapeutic use
• Area Under Curve
• Artemether
• Artemisinins
• Artesunate
• Biological Availability
• Cross-Over Studies
• Female
• Humans
• Malaria, Falciparum/drug therapy
• Malaria, Falciparum/metabolism
• Male
• Models, Biological
• Sesquiterpenes/administration & dosage
• Sesquiterpenes/pharmacokinetics
• Sesquiterpenes/therapeutic use
• Thailand
• Time Factors

Collapse

Grants

• Wellcome Trust

Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Y Suputtamongkol Department of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
P N Newton
B Angus
P Teja-Isavadharm
D Keeratithakul
M Rasameesoraj
S Pukrittayakamee
N J White

Collapse

Pharmacokinetic interactions of antimalarial agents

Combination of antimalarial agents has been introduced as a response to widespread drug resistance. The higher number of mutations required to express complete resistance against combinations may retard the further development of resistance. Combination of drugs, especially with the artemisinin drugs, may also offer complete and rapid eradication of the parasite load in symptomatic patients and thus reduce the chance of survival of resistant strains. The advantages of combination therapy should be balanced against the increased chance of drug interactions. During the last decade, much of the pharmacokinetics and metabolic pathways of antimalarial drugs have been elucidated, including the role of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme complex. Change in protein binding is not a significant cause of interactions between antimalarial agents. CYP3A4 and CYP2C19 are frequently involved in the metabolism of antimalarial agents. Quinidine is a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6, but it appears that this enzyme does not mediate the metabolism of any other antimalarial agent. The new combinations proguanil-atovaquone and chlorproguanil-dapsone do not show significant interactions. CYP2B6 and CYP3A4 are involved in the metabolism of artemisinin and derivatives, but further studies may reveal involvement of more enzymes. Artemisinin may induce CYP2C19. Several artemisinin drugs suffer from auto-induction of the first-pass effect, resulting in a decline of bioavailability after repeated doses. The mechanism of this effect is not yet clear, but induction by other agents cannot be excluded. The combination of artemisinin drugs with mefloquine and the fixed combination artemether-lumefantrine have been studied widely, and no significant drug interactions have been found. The artemisinin drugs will be used at an increasing rate, particularly in combination with other agents. Although clinical studies have so far not shown any significant interactions, drug interactions should be given appropriate attention when other combinations are used.

Multiple dose study of interactions between artesunate and artemisinin in healthy volunteers

AIMS

To investigate whether coadministration of the antimalarials artesunate and artemisinin alters the clearance of either drug.

METHODS

Ten healthy Vietnamese males (Group AS) were randomized to receive a single dose of 100 mg oral artesunate (pro-drug of dihydroartemisinin) on day -5 and then once daily for 5 consecutive days (days 1-5). Oral artemisinin (500 mg) was coadministered on days 1 and 5. Another 10 subjects (Group AM) were given 500 mg oral artemisinin on day -5 and then further doses on days 1-5. Artesunate 100 mg was given on days 1 and 5. Artemisinin and dihydroartemisinin plasma concentrations on days -5, 1 and 5 were quantified by h.p.l.c. with on-line postcolumn derivatization and u.v. detection.

RESULTS

In Group AS, dihydroartemisinin oral clearance values (mean (95% CI)) were similar on day 1 (32 (22, 47)) l h(-1) and day 5 (38 (28, 51)) l h(-1) of daily artesunate administration but these mean values were approximately three fold higher compared with day -5 after a single dose (95 (56, 159)). In this group, artemisinin oral clearance increased from 196 (165, 232) l h(-1) on day 1-315 (241, 410) l h(-1) on day 5. In Group AM, dihydroartemisinin oral clearance on day 1 was 39 (34, 46) l h(-1) and increased 1.6 fold to 64 (48, 85) l h(-1) on day 5. In this group, artemisinin oral clearance increased sequentially (1.5 and 4.7 fold, respectively) from 207 (151, 285) l h(-1) on day -5-308 (257, 368) l h(-1) on day 1 and to 981 (678, 1420) l h(-1) on day 5. The increase in artemisinin oral clearance between days -5 and 1 (in the absence of artesunate) was similar to that between days 1 and 5 in Group AS subjects who took daily artesunate. Dihydroartemisinin was not a significant metabolite of artemisinin.

CONCLUSIONS

Artesunate (dihydroartemisinin) did not alter the elimination of artemisinin. However, dihydroartemisinin elimination was inhibited by artemisinin. Artemisinin induced its own elimination even 5 days after a single oral dose. There was no evidence for the formation of dihydroartemisinin from artemisinin.

In vitro evidence for auto-induction of artemisinin metabolism in the rat

Artemisinin disappearance rate was more rapid in incubations with liver microsomes from rats pre-treated with oral artemisinin (60 mg/kg/day for 5 days) compared with microsomes from control animals. A single pathway Michaelis-Menten saturable elimination model was fitted to the concentration-time data of artemisinin incubations by non-linear regression. Model parameters were obtained after fitting results for each animal separately and by pooling data for pre-treated and control animals. Parameter estimates (% coefficient of variation) from fitting the pooled data was maximum velocities (Vmax) = 1.8 (12) mmole/min/mg protein and Michaelis constants (Km) = 20(22) microM for artemisinin pre-treated and Vmax = 0.85 (35) mmole/min/mg protein and Km = 67(52) microM for control animals indicating a 2-fold increase in Vmax and a 3-fold decrease in Km with microsomes from artemisinin pre-treated animals. Estimates of intrinsic clearance in microsomes from the pre-treated animals were 8-fold higher compared with controls. Thus, artemisinin appears to be a potent auto-inducer of drug metabolism in rats as has also been observed in humans. The present findings suggest caution in the interpretation of repeat-dose rat toxicity studies with artemisinin unless its pharmacokinetics are simultaneously monitored, since during multiple administration, the exposure of the drug will not be constant over time.

Pharmacokinetics of artemisinin-type compounds

Various compounds of the artemisinin family are currently used for the treatment of patients with malaria worldwide. They are characterised by a short half-life and feature the most rapidly acting antimalarial drugs to date. They are increasingly being used, often in combination with other drugs, although our knowledge of their main pharmacological features (including their absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion) is still incomplete. Such data are particularly important in the case of combinations. Artemisinin derivatives are converted primarily, but to different extents, to the bioactive metabolite artenimol after either parenteral or gastrointestinal administration. The rate of conversion is lowest for artelinic acid (designed to protect the molecule against metabolism) and highest for the water-soluble artesunate. The absolute and relative bioavailability of these compounds has been established in animals, but not in humans, with the exception of artesunate. Oral bioavailability in animals ranges, approximately, between 19 and 35%. A first-pass effect is highly probably for all compounds when administered orally. Artemisinin compounds bind selectively to malaria-infected erythrocytes to yet unidentified targets. They also bind modestly to human plasma proteins, ranging from 43% for artenimol to 81.5% for artelinic acid. Their mode of action is still not completely understood, although different theories have been proposed. The lipid-soluble artemether and artemotil are released slowly when administered intramuscularly because of the 'depot' effect related to the oil formulation. Understanding the pharmacokinetic profile of these 2 drugs helps us to explain the characteristics of the toxicity and neurotoxicity. The water-soluble artesunate is rapidly converted to artenimol at rates that vary with the route of administration, but the processes need to be characterised further, including the relative contribution of pH and enzymes in tissues, blood and liver. This paper intends to summarise contemporary knowledge of the pharmacokinetics of this class of compounds and highlight areas that need further research.

Pharmacokinetic interaction trial between co-artemether and mefloquine

Forty-two healthy subjects were randomized in a parallel three-group design trial to investigate potential electrocardiographic and pharmacokinetic interactions between the new antimalarial co-artemether, a combination of artemether and lumefantrine (both of which are predominantly metabolized through CYP3A4), and mefloquine, another antimalarial described as a substrate (and possible inhibitor) of CYP3A4. Subjects were assigned to one of the three possible treatment groups (i.e., co-artemether alone or mefloquine alone or the combination of both). The dosage was 1000 mg mefloquine (divided into three doses over 12 h) followed 12 h later by six applications of co-artemether (40 mg artemether+480 mg lumefantrine each) over 60 h. The study medications were generally well tolerated after all treatments. Concomitant administration with mefloquine caused statistically significant lower (around 30-40%) plasma concentrations of lumefantrine than when co-artemether was administered alone. Even if important, this decrease in lumefantrine exposure was considered unlikely to impact clinical efficacy given the wide therapeutic index of co-artemether and the usual high variability in lumefantrine plasma levels, mostly and more importantly influenced by food intake. However, patients should be encouraged to eat at dosing times to compensate for this decreased bioavailability. The pharmacokinetics of artemether, DHA or mefloquine were not affected. Artemether concentrations significantly decreased over doses, independently of mefloquine co-administration, while DHA concentrations slightly (not significantly) increased. Therefore, no clinically relevant risks due to pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction are expected at the enzymatic level following co-administration of co-artemether with CYP3A4 substrates with similar affinity to that of mefloquine.