51
|
High Keratin-7 Expression in Benign Peri-Tumoral Prostatic Glands Is Predictive of Bone Metastasis Onset and Prostate Cancer-Specific Mortality. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14071623. [PMID: 35406395 PMCID: PMC8997075 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND New predictive biomarkers are needed to accurately predict metastasis-free survival (MFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in localized prostate cancer (PC). Keratin-7 (KRT7) overexpression has been associated with poor prognosis in several cancers and is described as a novel prostate progenitor marker in the mouse prostate. METHODS KRT7 expression was evaluated in prostatic cell lines and in human tissue by immunohistochemistry (IHC, on advanced PC, n = 91) and immunofluorescence (IF, on localized PC, n = 285). The KRT7 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was quantified in different compartments by digital analysis and correlated to clinical endpoints in the localized PC cohort. RESULTS KRT7 is expressed in prostatic cell lines and found in the basal and supra-basal compartment from healthy prostatic glands and benign peri-tumoral glands from localized PC. The KRT7 staining is lost in luminal cells from localized tumors and found as an aberrant sporadic staining (2.2%) in advanced PC. In the localized PC cohort, high KRT7 MFI above the 80th percentile in the basal compartment was significantly and independently correlated with MFS and CSS, and with hypertrophic basal cell phenotype. CONCLUSION High KRT7 expression in benign glands is an independent biomarker of MFS and CSS, and its expression is lost in tumoral cells. These results require further validation on larger cohorts.
Collapse
|
52
|
Haghighat M, Browning L, Sirinukunwattana K, Malacrino S, Khalid Alham N, Colling R, Cui Y, Rakha E, Hamdy FC, Verrill C, Rittscher J. Automated quality assessment of large digitised histology cohorts by artificial intelligence. Sci Rep 2022; 12:5002. [PMID: 35322056 PMCID: PMC8943120 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-08351-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Research using whole slide images (WSIs) of histopathology slides has increased exponentially over recent years. Glass slides from retrospective cohorts, some with patient follow-up data are digitised for the development and validation of artificial intelligence (AI) tools. Such resources, therefore, become very important, with the need to ensure that their quality is of the standard necessary for downstream AI development. However, manual quality control of large cohorts of WSIs by visual assessment is unfeasible, and whilst quality control AI algorithms exist, these focus on bespoke aspects of image quality, e.g. focus, or use traditional machine-learning methods, which are unable to classify the range of potential image artefacts that should be considered. In this study, we have trained and validated a multi-task deep neural network to automate the process of quality control of a large retrospective cohort of prostate cases from which glass slides have been scanned several years after production, to determine both the usability of the images at the diagnostic level (considered in this study to be the minimal standard for research) and the common image artefacts present. Using a two-layer approach, quality overlays of WSIs were generated from a quality assessment (QA) undertaken at patch-level at \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}$$5\times$$\end{document}5× magnification. From these quality overlays the slide-level quality scores were predicted and then compared to those generated by three specialist urological pathologists, with a Pearson correlation of 0.89 for overall ‘usability’ (at a diagnostic level), and 0.87 and 0.82 for focus and H&E staining quality scores respectively. To demonstrate its wider potential utility, we subsequently applied our QA pipeline to the TCGA prostate cancer cohort and to a colorectal cancer cohort, for comparison. Our model, designated as PathProfiler, indicates comparable predicted usability of images from the cohorts assessed (86–90% of WSIs predicted to be usable), and perhaps more significantly is able to predict WSIs that could benefit from an intervention such as re-scanning or re-staining for quality improvement. We have shown in this study that AI can be used to automate the process of quality control of large retrospective WSI cohorts to maximise their utility for research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Haghighat
- Department of Engineering Science, Institute of Biomedical Engineering (IBME), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. .,CSIRO, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
| | - Lisa Browning
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.,NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Korsuk Sirinukunwattana
- Department of Engineering Science, Institute of Biomedical Engineering (IBME), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Stefano Malacrino
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Nasullah Khalid Alham
- Department of Engineering Science, Institute of Biomedical Engineering (IBME), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Richard Colling
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.,Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Ying Cui
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Emad Rakha
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Freddie C Hamdy
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.,Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Clare Verrill
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.,NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.,Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Jens Rittscher
- Department of Engineering Science, Institute of Biomedical Engineering (IBME), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. .,NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Chao HH, Soni PD, Dahman B, Stilianoudakis SC, Ford H, Singh R, Freedland SJ, Moghanaki D, Vapiwala N, Chang MG. Outcomes following radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation for veterans with Gleason 9 and 10 prostate cancer. Cancer Med 2022; 11:2886-2895. [PMID: 35289111 PMCID: PMC9359878 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Revised: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The optimal upfront treatment modality for patients with nonmetastatic Gleason Score 9 and 10 prostate cancer (GS 9–10 PCa) is unknown. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) with GS 9–10 PCa treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) or external beam radiation therapy with androgen deprivation therapy (EBRT+ADT) from 1/2000 to 12/2010. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), distant metastasis‐free survival (DMFS), and salvage/adjuvant therapy‐free survival (SAFS), as assessed by Kaplan–Meier analysis. Results We identified 1220 veterans with GS 9–10 PCa; 335 were treated with RP, and 885 were treated with EBRT+ADT. With a median follow‐up of 9.9 years, propensity score‐matched analyses demonstrated that RP had superior 10‐year OS (70.8% [RP] vs. 61.2% [EBRT+ADT], p < 0.001), 10‐year DMFS rates were similar between RP (76.7%) and EBRT+ADT (81.0%), and 10‐year SAFS rates were lower for RP vs EBRT + ADT (35.2% [RP] vs. 75.2% [EBRT+ADT], p < 0.001). The receipt of salvage ADT was higher with upfront RP (51.9% vs. 26.1%, p < 0.001), despite receipt of adjuvant/salvage EBRT in 41.8% of RP patients. Among patients treated with RP, there were no differences in outcomes by race. However, higher survival rates were noted among Black patients treated with EBRT+ADT compared with White patients. Conclusions This analysis demonstrated higher 10‐year OS rates among men treated with upfront RP versus EBRT+ADT, though missing confounders and similar DMFS rates suggest the long‐term cause‐specific OS rates may be similar. We also highlight real‐world outcomes of a diverse patient population in the VHA and improved outcomes for Black patients receiving EBRT+ADT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hann-Hsiang Chao
- Radiation Oncology Service, Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Payal D Soni
- Radiation Oncology Service, Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Bassam Dahman
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.,Department of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | | | - Hampton Ford
- Radiation Oncology Service, Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Raj Singh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Stephen J Freedland
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Section of Urology, Durham, VA Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States
| | - Drew Moghanaki
- Radiation Oncology Service, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Neha Vapiwala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Michael G Chang
- Radiation Oncology Service, Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Jones CU, Pugh SL, Sandler HM, Chetner MP, Amin MB, Bruner DW, Zietman AL, Den RB, Leibenhaut MH, Longo JM, Bahary JP, Rosenthal SA, Souhami L, Michalski JM, Hartford AC, Amin PP, Roach M, Yee D, Efstathiou JA, Rodgers JP, Feng FY, Shipley WU. Adding Short-Term Androgen Deprivation Therapy to Radiation Therapy in Men With Localized Prostate Cancer: Long-Term Update of the NRG/RTOG 9408 Randomized Clinical Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 112:294-303. [PMID: 34481017 PMCID: PMC8748315 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.08.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2021] [Revised: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE For men with localized prostate cancer, NRG Oncology/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9408 demonstrated that adding short-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to radiation therapy (RT) improved the primary endpoint of overall survival (OS) and improved disease-specific mortality (DSM), biochemical failure (BF), local progression, and freedom from distant metastases (DM). This study was performed to determine whether the short-term ADT continued to improve OS, DSM, BF, and freedom from DM with longer follow-up. METHODS AND MATERIALS From 1994 to 2001, NRG/RTOG 9408 randomized 2028 men from 212 North American institutions with T1b-T2b, N0 prostate adenocarcinoma and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤20ng/mL to RT alone or RT plus short-term ADT. Patients were stratified by PSA, tumor grade, and surgical versus clinical nodal staging. ADT was flutamide with either goserelin or leuprolide for 4 months. Prostate RT (66.6 Gy) was started after 2 months. OS was calculated at the date of death from any cause or at last follow-up. Secondary endpoints were DSM, BF, local progression, and DM. Acute and late toxic effects were assessed using RTOG toxicity scales. RESULTS Median follow-up in surviving patients was 14.8 years (range, 0.16-21.98). The 10-year and 18-year OS was 56% and 23%, respectively, with RT alone versus 63% and 23% with combined therapy (HR 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-1.05; P = .94). The hazards were not proportional (P = .003). Estimated restricted mean survival time at 18 years was 11.8 years (95% CI, 11.4-12.1) with combined therapy versus 11.3 years with RT alone (95% CI, 10.9-11.6; P = .05). The 10-year and 18-year DSM was 7% and 14%, respectively, with RT alone versus 3% and 8% with combined therapy (HR 0.56; 95% CI, 0.41-0.75; P < .01). DM and BF favored combined therapy at 18 years. Rates of late grade ≥3 hepatic, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary toxicity were ≤1%, 3%, and 8%, respectively, with combined therapy versus ≤1%, 2%, and 5% with RT alone. CONCLUSIONS Further follow-up demonstrates that OS converges at approximately 15 years, by which point the administration of 4 months of ADT had conferred an estimated additional 6 months of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stephanie L Pugh
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | - Mahul B Amin
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | | | | | - Robert B Den
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - John M Longo
- Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Jean-Paul Bahary
- Centre Hospitalier De L`Université De Montréal-Notre Dame, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Luis Souhami
- The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | - Pradip P Amin
- University of Maryland/Greenebaum Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Mack Roach
- UCSF Medical Center-Mount Zion, San Francisco, California
| | - Don Yee
- Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Joseph P Rodgers
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Felix Y Feng
- UCSF Medical Center-Mount Zion, San Francisco, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
55
|
Narrative Review of the Post-Operative Management of Prostate Cancer Patients: Is It Really the End of Adjuvant Radiotherapy? Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14030719. [PMID: 35158986 PMCID: PMC8833528 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Revised: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Among patients with prostate cancer who have been operated on, a subset harboring high-risk features will present with a biochemical recurrence (BCR). Adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) was proven to significantly reduce the risk of BCR when compared to salvage radiotherapy (SRT) but suffered from several limitations: a lack of patient selection criteria, a higher treatment-related morbidity and an uncertain benefit for long-term clinical endpoints. In the same clinical setting, early SRT (eSRT) appears as non-inferior to aRT with a lower morbidity, replacing aRT as the preferred option. In this review, we insist on the need for multidisciplinary discussions to fully comprehend the individual characteristics of each patient and propose the best treatment strategy for every patient. Abstract Despite three randomized trials indicating a significant reduction in biochemical recurrence (BCR) in high-risk patients, adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) was rarely performed, even in patients harboring high-risk features. aRT is associated with a higher risk of urinary incontinence and is often criticized for the lack of patient selection criteria. With a BCR rate reaching 30–70% in high-risk patients, a consensus between urologists and radiation oncologists was needed, leading to three different randomized trials challenging aRT with early salvage radiotherapy (eSRT). In these three different randomized trials with event-free survival as the primary outcome and a planned meta-analysis, eSRT appeared as non-inferior to aRT, answering, for some, this never-ending question. For many, however, the debate persists; these results raised several questions among urologists and radiation oncologists. BCR is thought to be a surrogate for clinically meaningful endpoints such as overall survival and cancer-specific survival but may be poorly efficient in comparison with metastasis-free survival. Imaging of rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA), post-operative persistent PSA and BCR was revolutionized by the broader use of MRI and nuclear imaging such as PET-PSMA; these imaging modalities were not analyzed in the previous randomized trials. A sub-group of very high-risk patients could possibly benefit from an adjuvant radiotherapy; but their usual risk factors such as high Gleason score or invaded surgical margins mean they are unable to be selected. More precise biomarkers of early BCR or even metastatic-relapse were developed in this setting and could be useful for the patients’ stratification. In this review, we insist on the need for multidisciplinary discussions to fully comprehend the individual characteristics of each patient and propose the best treatment strategy for every patient.
Collapse
|
56
|
Zumsteg ZS. Simultaneous Integrated Micro-boost: Reigniting the FLAME for Dose Escalation in Prostate Cancer? Eur Urol 2022; 82:258-260. [PMID: 35109972 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.01.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary S Zumsteg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Kishan AU, Sun Y, Hartman H, Pisansky TM, Bolla M, Neven A, Steigler A, Denham JW, Feng FY, Zapatero A, Armstrong JG, Nabid A, Carrier N, Souhami L, Dunne MT, Efstathiou JA, Sandler HM, Guerrero A, Joseph D, Maingon P, de Reijke TM, Maldonado X, Ma TM, Romero T, Wang X, Rettig MB, Reiter RE, Zaorsky NG, Steinberg ML, Nickols NG, Jia AY, Garcia JA, Spratt DE. Androgen deprivation therapy use and duration with definitive radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:304-316. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00705-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Revised: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
58
|
Glicksman RM, Berlin A. FACE Value of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 112:93-95. [PMID: 34919885 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.08.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Revised: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel M Glicksman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Alejandro Berlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Data Science and Smart Cancer Care Programs, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Techna Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Groen VH, Haustermans K, Pos FJ, Draulans C, Isebaert S, Monninkhof EM, Smeenk RJ, Kunze-Busch M, de Boer JCJ, van der Voort van Zijp J, Kerkmeijer LGW, van der Heide UA. Patterns of Failure Following External Beam Radiotherapy With or Without an Additional Focal Boost in the Randomized Controlled FLAME Trial for Localized Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2021; 82:252-257. [PMID: 34953603 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Revised: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Focal dose escalation in external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) showed an increase in 5-yr biochemical disease-free survival in the Focal Lesion Ablative Microboost in Prostate Cancer (FLAME) trial. OBJECTIVE To analyze the effect of a focal boost to intraprostatic lesions on local failure-free survival (LFS) and regional + distant metastasis-free survival (rdMFS). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Patients with intermediate- or high-risk localized prostate cancer were included in FLAME, a phase 3, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. INTERVENTION Standard treatment of 77 Gy to the entire prostate in 35 fractions was compared to an additional boost to the macroscopic tumor of up to 95 Gy during EBRT. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS LFS and rdMFS, measured via any type of imaging, were compared between the treatment arms using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. Dose-response curves were created for local failure (LF) and regional + distant metastatic failure (rdMF) using logistic regression. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 571 patients were included in the FLAME trial. Over median follow-up of 72 mo (interquartile range 58-86), focal boosting decreased LF (hazard ratio [HR] 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14-0.78) and rdMF (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.35-0.93). Dose-response curves showed that a greater dose to the tumor resulted in lower LF and rdMF rates. CONCLUSIONS A clear dose-response relation for LF and rdMF was observed, suggesting that adequate focal dose escalation to intraprostatic lesions prevents undertreatment of the primary tumor, resulting in an improvement rdMF. PATIENT SUMMARY Radiotherapy is a treatment option for high-risk prostate cancer. The FLAME trial has shown that a high dose specifically targeted at the tumor within the prostate will result in better disease outcome, with less likelihood of regional and distant disease spread. The FLAME trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT01168479.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veerle H Groen
- Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Floris J Pos
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cédric Draulans
- Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sofie Isebaert
- Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Evelyn M Monninkhof
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Robert J Smeenk
- Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Martina Kunze-Busch
- Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Linda G W Kerkmeijer
- Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
60
|
Lee SU, Kim JS, Kim YS, Cho J, Choi SH, Nam TK, Jeong SM, Kim Y, Choi Y, Lee DE, Park W, Cho KH. Optimal Definition of Biochemical Recurrence in Patients Who Receive Salvage Radiotherapy Following Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer. Cancer Res Treat 2021; 54:1191-1199. [PMID: 34883554 PMCID: PMC9582474 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2021.985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study proposed the optimal definition of biochemical recurrence (BCR) after salvage radiotherapy (SRT) following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Materials and Methods Among 1,117 patients who had received SRT, data from 205 hormone-naïve patients who experienced post-SRT prostate-specific antigen (PSA) elevation were included in a multi-institutional database. The primary endpoint was to determine the PSA parameters predictive of distant metastasis (DM). Absolute serum PSA levels and the prostate-specific antigen doubling time (PSA-DT) were adopted as PSA parameters. Results When BCR was defined based on serum PSA levels ranging from 0.4 ng/mL to nadir+2.0 ng/mL, the 5-year probability of DM was 27.6%–33.7%. The difference in the 5-year probability of DM became significant when BCR was defined as a serum PSA level of 0.8 ng/ml or higher (1.0–2.0 ng/mL). Application of a serum PSA level of ≥ 0.8 ng/mL yielded a c-index value of 0.589. When BCR was defined based on the PSA-DT, the 5-year probability was 22.7%–39.4%. The difference was significant when BCR was defined as a PSA-DT ≤ 3 months and ≤ 6 months. Application of a PSA-DT ≤ 6 months yielded the highest c-index (0.660). These two parameters complemented each other; for patients meeting both PSA parameters, the probability of DM was 39.5%–44.5%; for those not meeting either parameter, the probability was 0.0%–3.1%. Conclusion A serum PSA level > 0.8 ng/mL was a reasonable threshold for the definition of BCR after SRT. In addition, a PSA-DT ≤ 6 months was significantly predictive of subsequent DM, and combined application of both parameters enhanced predictability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung Uk Lee
- The Proton Therapy Center, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jae-Sung Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Young Seok Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jaeho Cho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seo Hee Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea
| | - Taek-Keun Nam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University College of Medicine, Hwasun, Korea
| | - Song Mi Jeong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University Medical Center, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Youngkyong Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Youngmin Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Dong Eun Lee
- Biostatistics Collaboration Team, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Won Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kwan Ho Cho
- The Proton Therapy Center, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol 2021; 18:739-762. [PMID: 34526701 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-021-00514-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Patients with high-risk prostate cancer treated with curative intent are at an increased risk of biochemical recurrence, metastatic progression and cancer-related death compared with patients treated for low-risk or intermediate-risk disease. Thus, these patients often need multimodal therapy to achieve complete disease control. Over the past two decades, multiple studies on the use of neoadjuvant treatment have been performed using conventional androgen deprivation therapy, which comprises luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists or antagonists and/or first-line anti-androgens. However, despite results from these studies demonstrating a reduction in positive surgical margins and tumour volume, no benefit has been observed in hard oncological end points, such as cancer-related death. The introduction of potent androgen receptor signalling inhibitors (ARSIs), such as abiraterone, apalutamide, enzalutamide and darolutamide, has led to a renewed interest in using neoadjuvant hormonal treatment in high-risk prostate cancer. The addition of ARSIs to androgen deprivation therapy has demonstrated substantial survival benefits in the metastatic castration-resistant, non-metastatic castration-resistant and metastatic hormone-sensitive settings. Intuitively, a similar survival effect can be expected when applying ARSIs as a neoadjuvant strategy in high-risk prostate cancer. Most studies on neoadjuvant ARSIs use a pathological end point as a surrogate for long-term oncological outcome. However, no consensus yet exists regarding the ideal definition of pathological response following neoadjuvant hormonal therapy and pathologists might encounter difficulties in determining pathological response in hormonally treated prostate specimens. The neoadjuvant setting also provides opportunities to gain insight into resistance mechanisms against neoadjuvant hormonal therapy and, consequently, to guide personalized therapy.
Collapse
|
62
|
Glicksman RM, Kishan AU, Katz AJ, Mantz CA, Collins SP, Fuller DB, Steinberg ML, Shabsovich D, Zhang L, Loblaw A. Four-year Prostate-specific Antigen Response Rate as a Predictive Measure in Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer Treated With Ablative Therapies: The SPRAT Analysis. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 34:36-41. [PMID: 34836735 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2021] [Revised: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 11/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
AIMS There is a lack of early predictive measures of outcome for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa) treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). The aim of the present study was to explore 4-year prostate-specific antigen response rate (4yPSARR) as an early predictive measure. MATERIALS AND METHODS Individual patient data from six institutions for patients with intermediate-risk PCa treated with SBRT between 2006 and 2016 with a 4-year (42-54 months) PSA available were analysed. Cumulative incidences of biochemical failure and metastasis were calculated using Nelson-Aalen estimates and overall survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Biochemical failure-free survival was analysed according to 4yPSARR, with groups dichotomised based on PSA <0.4 ng/ml or ≥0.4 ng/ml and compared using the Log-rank test. A multivariable competing risk analysis was carried out to predict for biochemical failure and the development of metastases. RESULTS Six hundred and thirty-seven patients were included, including 424 (67%) with favourable and 213 (33%) with unfavourable intermediate-risk disease. The median follow-up was 6.2 years (interquartile range 4.9-7.9). The cumulative incidence of biochemical failure and metastasis was 7 and 0.6%, respectively; overall survival at 6 years was 97%. The cumulative incidence of biochemical failure at 6 years if 4yPSARR <0.4 ng/ml was 1.7% compared with 27% if 4yPSARR ≥0.4 ng/ml (P < 0.0001). On multivariable competing risk analysis, 4yPSARR was a statistically significant predictor of biochemical failure-free survival (subdistribution hazard ratio 15.3, 95% confidence interval 7.5-31.3, P < 0.001) and metastasis-free survival (subdistribution hazard ratio 31.2, 95% confidence interval 3.1-311.6, P = 0.003). CONCLUSION 4yPSARR is an encouraging early predictor of outcome in patients with intermediate-risk PCa treated with SBRT. Validation in prospective trials is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R M Glicksman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - A U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - A J Katz
- St. Francis Hospital, Roslyn, New York, USA
| | - C A Mantz
- 21st Century Oncology, Fort Myers, Florida, USA
| | - S P Collins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - D B Fuller
- Division of Genesis Healthcare Partners Inc, Cyberknife Centres of San Diego Inc, San Diego, California, USA
| | - M L Steinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - D Shabsovich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - L Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - A Loblaw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Schnog JJB, Samson MJ, Gans ROB, Duits AJ. An urgent call to raise the bar in oncology. Br J Cancer 2021; 125:1477-1485. [PMID: 34400802 PMCID: PMC8365561 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-021-01495-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2021] [Revised: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Important breakthroughs in medical treatments have improved outcomes for patients suffering from several types of cancer. However, many oncological treatments approved by regulatory agencies are of low value and do not contribute significantly to cancer mortality reduction, but lead to unrealistic patient expectations and push even affluent societies to unsustainable health care costs. Several factors that contribute to approvals of low-value oncology treatments are addressed, including issues with clinical trials, bias in reporting, regulatory agency shortcomings and drug pricing. With the COVID-19 pandemic enforcing the elimination of low-value interventions in all fields of medicine, efforts should urgently be made by all involved in cancer care to select only high-value and sustainable interventions. Transformation of medical education, improvement in clinical trial design, quality, conduct and reporting, strict adherence to scientific norms by regulatory agencies and use of value-based scales can all contribute to raising the bar for oncology drug approvals and influence drug pricing and availability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John-John B. Schnog
- Department of Hematology-Medical Oncology, Curaçao Medical Center, Willemstad, Curaçao ,Curaçao Biomedical and Health Research Institute, Willemstad, Curaçao
| | - Michael J. Samson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Curaçao Medical Center, Willemstad, Curaçao
| | - Rijk O. B. Gans
- grid.4494.d0000 0000 9558 4598Department of Internal Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ashley J. Duits
- Curaçao Biomedical and Health Research Institute, Willemstad, Curaçao ,grid.4494.d0000 0000 9558 4598Institute for Medical Education, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands ,Red Cross Blood Bank Foundation, Willemstad, Curaçao
| |
Collapse
|
64
|
Brooks MA, Thomas L, Magi-Galluzzi C, Li J, Crager MR, Lu R, Baehner FL, Abran J, Aboushwareb T, Klein EA. Validating the Association of Adverse Pathology with Distant Metastasis and Prostate Cancer Mortality 20-Years After Radical Prostatectomy. Urol Oncol 2021; 40:104.e1-104.e7. [PMID: 34824014 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Revised: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the association of adverse pathology (AP), defined as high-grade (≥ Gleason Grade Group 3) and/or non-organ confined disease, with long-term oncologic outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIALS AND METHODS Using a stratified cohort sampling design, we evaluated the association of AP with the risk of distant metastasis (DM) and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) up to 20 years after RP in 428 patients treated between 1987 to 2004. Cox regression of cause-specific hazards was used to estimate the absolute risk of both endpoints, with death from other causes treated as a competing risk. Additionally, subgroup analysis in patients with low and/or intermediate-risk disease, who are potentially eligible for active surveillance (AS), was performed. RESULTS Within the cohort sample, 53% of men exhibited AP at time of RP, with median follow up of 15.5 years (IQR 14.6-16.6 years) thereafter. Adverse pathology was highly associated with DM and PCSM in the overall cohort (HR 12.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.30-28.55, and HR 10.03, 95% CI 3.42-29.47, respectively, both P < 0.001). Adverse pathology was also highly associated with DM and PCSM in the low/intermediate-risk subgroup (HR 10.48, 95% CI 4.18-26.28, and 8.60, 95% CI 2.40-30.48, respectively, both P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Adverse pathology at the time of RP is highly associated with future development of DM and PCSM. Accurate prediction of AP may thus be useful for individualizing risk-based surveillance and treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Brooks
- Scott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Lewis Thomas
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | | | - Jianbo Li
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - Ruixiao Lu
- Exact Sciences Corporation, Redwood City, CA
| | | | - John Abran
- Exact Sciences Corporation, Redwood City, CA
| | | | - Eric A Klein
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Zaorsky NG, Spratt DE. Elective Nodal Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: For None, Some, or all? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 111:965-967. [PMID: 34655565 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.07.1699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas G Zaorsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA.
| | - Daniel E Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
66
|
The impact of drainage pathways on the detection of nodal metastases in prostate cancer: a phase II randomized comparison of intratumoral vs intraprostatic tracer injection for sentinel node detection. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 49:1743-1753. [PMID: 34748059 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05580-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Previous studies indicated that location and amount of detected sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in prostate cancer (PCa) are influenced where SLN-tracer is deposited within the prostate. To validate whether intratumoral (IT) tracer injection helps to increase identification of tumor-positive lymph nodes (LNs) better than intraprostatic (IP) tracer injection, a prospective randomized phase II trial was performed. METHODS PCa patients with a > 5% risk of lymphatic involvement were randomized between ultrasound-guided transrectal injection of indocyanine green-[99mTc]Tc-nanocolloid in 2 depots of 1 mL in the tumor (n = 55, IT-group) or in 4 depots of 0.5 mL in the peripheral zone of the prostate (n = 58, IP-group). Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and SPECT/CT were used to define the location of the SLNs. SLNs were dissected using combination of radio- and fluorescence-guidance, followed by extended pelvic LN dissection and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Outcome measurements were number of tumor-bearing SNs, tumor-bearing LNs, removed nodes, number of patients with nodal metastases, and metastasis-free survival (MFS) of 4-7-year follow-up data. RESULTS IT-injection did not result in significant difference of removed SLNs (5.0 vs 6.0, p = 0.317) and histologically positive SLNs (28 vs 22, p = 0.571). However, in IT-group, the SLN-positive nodes were 73.7% of total positive nodes compared to 37.3% in IP-group (p = 0.015). Moreover, significantly more node-positive patients were found in IT-group (42% vs 24%, p = 0.045), which did not result in worse MFS. In two patients (3.6%) from whom the IT-tracer injection only partly covered intraprostatic tumor spread, nodal metastases in ePLND without tumor-positive SNs were yielded. CONCLUSIONS The percentage-positive SLNs found after IT-injection were significantly higher compared to IP-injection. Significantly more node-positive patients were found using IT-injection, which did not affect MFS. IT-injection failed to detect nodal metastases from non-index satellite lesions. Therefore, we suggest to combine IT- and IP-tracer injections in men with visible tumor on imaging.
Collapse
|
67
|
Abstract
More than 40% of men with intermediate-risk or high-risk prostate cancer will experience a biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Clinical guidelines for the management of these patients largely focus on the use of salvage radiotherapy with or without systemic therapy. However, not all patients with biochemical recurrence will go on to develop metastases or die from their disease. The optimal pre-salvage therapy investigational workup for patients who experience biochemical recurrence should, therefore, include novel techniques such as PET imaging and genomic analysis of radical prostatectomy specimen tissue, as well as consideration of more traditional clinical variables such as PSA value, PSA kinetics, Gleason score and pathological stage of disease. In patients without metastatic disease, the only known curative intervention is salvage radiotherapy but, given the therapeutic burden of this treatment, importance must be placed on accurate timing of treatment, radiation dose, fractionation and field size. Systemic therapy also has a role in the salvage setting, both concurrently with radiotherapy and as salvage monotherapy.
Collapse
|
68
|
Yun Ooi K, Pereira I, Nagar H, Simcock R, Katz MS, Parker CC, Lawton C, Saeed H. Time management: Improving the timing of post-prostatectomy radiotherapy, clinical trials, and knowledge translation. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2021; 31:21-27. [PMID: 34522795 PMCID: PMC8424081 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Management of prostate cancer after surgery is controversial. Past studies on adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) for higher-risk features have had conflicting results. Through the collaborative conversations of the global radiation oncology Twitter-based journal club (#RadOnc #JC), we explored this complex topic to share recent advances, better understand what the global radiation oncology community felt was important and inspire next steps. Methods We selected the recent publication of a landmark international randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing immediate and salvage radiotherapy for prostate cancer, RADICALS-RT, for discussion over the weekend of January 16 to 17, 2021. Coordination included open access to the article and an asynchronous portion to decrease barriers to participation, cooperation of study authors (CP, MS) who participated to share deeper insights including a live hour, and curation of related resources and tweet content through a blog post and Wakelet journal club summary. Discussion of Results Our conversations created 2,370,104 impressions over 599 tweets with 51 participants spanning 11 countries and 5 continents. A quarter of the participants were from the US (13/51) followed by 10% from the UK (5/51). Clinical or Radiation Oncologists comprised 59% of active participants (16/27) with 62% (18/29) reporting giving aRT within the last 5 years. Discussion was interdisciplinary with three urologists (11%), three trainees (11%), and two physiotherapists (7%). Four months after the journal club its article Altmetric score had increased by 7% (214 to 229). Thematic analysis of tweet content suggested participants wanted clarification on definitions of adjuvant (aRT) and salvage radiotherapy (sRT) including indications, timing, and decision-making tools including guidelines; more interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral collaboration including with patients for study design including survivorship and meaningful outcomes; more effective knowledge translation including faster clinical trials; and more data including mature results of current trials, particular high-risk features (Gleason Group 4+, pT4b+, and margin-positive disease), implications of newer technologies such as PSMA-PET and genomic classifiers, and better explanations for practice pattern variations including underutilization of radiotherapy. This was further explored in the context of relevant literature. Conclusion Together, this global collaborative review on the postoperative management of prostate cancer suggested a stronger signal for the uptake of early salvage radiation treatment with careful PSA monitoring, more sensitive PSA triggers, and expected access to radiotherapy. Questions still remain on potential exceptions and barriers to use. These require better decision-making tools for all practice settings, consideration of newer technologies, more pragmatic trials, and better use of social media for knowledge translation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Yun Ooi
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK.,Kuala Lumpur Hospital, Malaysia
| | - Ian Pereira
- Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Richard Simcock
- Sussex Cancer Centre, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Sussex, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
69
|
Wenzel M, Dariane C, Saad F, Karakiewicz PI, Mandel P, Chun FKH, Tilki D, Graefen M, Delouya G, Taussky D, Würnschimmel C. The impact of time to prostate specific antigen nadir on biochemical recurrence and mortality rates after radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. Urol Oncol 2021; 40:57.e15-57.e23. [PMID: 34325988 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.06.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Revised: 06/13/2021] [Accepted: 06/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the effect of time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir (TTN) after radiation therapy (RTx) for prostate cancer (PCa) on biochemical recurrence (BCR) and overall survival (OS) rates. PATIENTS AND METHODS We analyzed 2,506 patients treated with RTx (external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy or combinations) between years 2000 and 2021. Kaplan Meier and multivariable Cox regression models tested BCR-free survival and OS after stratification according to TTN (≤24 vs. 24.1-60 vs. >60 months). Similar analyses were performed after stratification according to absolute PSA values at nadir (<0.01 vs. 0.01-0.1 vs. 0.11-0.4 vs. >0.4 ng/ml). Finally, we repeated analyses after setting the time point of PSA nadir as the beginning of follow up in survival analyses. RESULTS 10-year BCR-free survival rates were 55.5, 81.7 and 91.1% and OS rates were 71.5, 79.4 and 96.1% for TTN ≤24 months, 24.1 month-60 month and >60 months, respectively. Longer TTN was an independent predictor for BCR-free survival and OS (all P<0.001). However, after accounting for lead-time bias, in multivariable analyses, this association remained only significant for BCR-free survival (P≤0.03), but not for OS (P≥0.1). Finally, compared to a PSA nadir of <0.01 ng/ml, PSA nadir of 0.01-0.1 ng/ml, 0.11-0.4 ng/ml as well as >0.4 ng/ml were independent predictors for shorter BCR-free survival (P≤0.02), but not OS (P≥0.08). CONCLUSION Shorter time to TTN and high PSA values at nadir are indicative of early treatment failure (BCR) and OS. However, after accounting for lead-time bias, this effect only remained valid for BCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mike Wenzel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Charles Dariane
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Canada; Department of Urology, Hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou - Paris University, Paris, France
| | - Fred Saad
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Canada
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Philipp Mandel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Guila Delouya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Canada
| | - Daniel Taussky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Canada
| | - Christoph Würnschimmel
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
70
|
Glicksman RM, Berlin A. Reply to Wei Liu, Katherine Zukotynski, and Glenn Bauman's Letter to the Editor re: Rachel M. Glicksman, Ur Metser, Douglass Vines, et al. Curative-intent Metastasis-directed Therapies for Molecularly-defined Oligorecurrent Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Phase II Trial Testing the Oligometastasis Hypothesis. Eur Urol 2021;80:374-82. Eur Urol 2021; 80:e79-e80. [PMID: 34158186 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel M Glicksman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Alejandro Berlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; TECHNA Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
71
|
Kumar S. Round Up. Indian J Urol 2021; 37:111-112. [PMID: 34103791 PMCID: PMC8173942 DOI: 10.4103/iju.iju_98_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Santosh Kumar
- Department of Urology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| |
Collapse
|
72
|
Sundar S, Symonds P. Prostate ultra-radical radiotherapy: reinventing the wheel. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:e223. [PMID: 34087133 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00185-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Santhanam Sundar
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK.
| | - Paul Symonds
- Department of Oncology, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
73
|
Würnschimmel C, Wenzel M, Wang N, Tian Z, Karakiewicz PI, Graefen M, Huland H, Tilki D. Radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer: 20-year oncological outcomes from a German high-volume center. Urol Oncol 2021; 39:830.e17-830.e26. [PMID: 34092484 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.04.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Revised: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Long-term outcomes of prostate cancer (CaP) patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) from European cohorts are under-reported. We report on 22,843 RP patients from the Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Centre treated between 1992 and 2017. PATIENTS AND METHODS Biochemical recurrence (BCR) free survival, metastasis free survival (MFS), and cancer specific survival (CSS) were stratified according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk categories, pT, and pN stages, RP Gleason Grade Groups (GGG), and surgical margin status (R0/R1). For time to event analyses, uni- and multivariable Cox's proportional hazards models and univariable Kaplan-Meier analyses were applied. RESULTS Median follow up was 68 months. Most favourable 20-year survival rates were exhibited in NCCN low risk (78.7% BCR-free, 96.8% MFS, 90.1% CSS) and pT2, GGG 1 to 2, R0 patients (83.1% BCR-free, 96.7% MFS, 92.6% CSS). 20-year follow up was not constantly reached in patients with aggressive CaP features. For example, NCCN very high-risk patients exhibited 15-year BCR-free survival of 30.5%, while 20-year MFS and CSS in these individuals was reached (64.1% and 60.8%, respectively). Lowest 10-year BCR-free survival (35.6%) was exhibited in pT3b, GGG 4 to 5, R0. Lowest 10-year MFS (49.5%) was exhibited in pT2, GGG 4 to 5, R1. Lowest 10-year CSS (69.8%) was exhibited in pT3b, GGG 4 to 5, R1 patients. In separate pN1 analyses, lowest 10-year BCR-free survival (14.5%), MFS (56.9%), and CSS (71.9%) were exhibited in patients with 3 or more positive lymph nodes. CONCLUSION Oncological outcomes after RP can be excellent for individuals with favorable CaP characteristics, also after 20 years of follow up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Würnschimmel
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada.
| | - Mike Wenzel
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada; Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Nuowei Wang
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Zhe Tian
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hartwig Huland
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
74
|
Is the Age of Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Over? The Devil Is in the Details. Eur Urol Oncol 2021; 4:540-542. [PMID: 34049848 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
75
|
Tree AC, Dearnaley DP, Hall E. Intermediate clinical endpoints in localised prostate cancer. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:294-296. [PMID: 33662281 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00025-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2021] [Revised: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alison C Tree
- Urology Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5PT, UK; Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5PT, UK
| | - David P Dearnaley
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5PT, UK.
| | - Emma Hall
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5PT, UK
| |
Collapse
|