Ropeginterferon alfa-2b versus standard therapy for polycythaemia vera (PROUD-PV and CONTINUATION-PV): a randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial and its extension study

A phase II trial to assess the efficacy and safety of ropeginterferon α-2b in Chinese patients with polycythemia vera

Ropeginterferon α-2b is a mono-PEGylated proline-interferon for the treatment of polycythemia vera (PV). This drug is used biweekly with a starting dose of 100 μg (50 μg if patients receiving hydroxyurea) and 50 μg increments up to a maximum dose of 500 μg. Increasing evidence indicates that patients can tolerate higher starting doses of ropeginterferon α-2b. This phase II trial utilizes 250 μg as the starting dose, 350 μg at week 2 and 500 μg at week 4 as the target dose. Doses can be adjusted according to tolerability. This study assesses the safety, efficacy and molecular response of ropeginterferon α-2b in Chinese patients with PV utilizing the 250-350-500 μg dosing schema. This study will be used to support the application of a biologics license for PV treatment in China.

Targeting CHAF1B Enhances IFN Activity against Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Cells

Interferons (IFNs) are cytokines with potent antineoplastic and antiviral properties. IFNα has significant clinical activity in the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), but the precise mechanisms by which it acts are not well understood. Here, we demonstrate that chromatin assembly factor 1 subunit B (CHAF1B), an Unc-51-like kinase 1 (ULK1)-interactive protein in the nuclear compartment of malignant cells, is overexpressed in patients with MPN. Remarkably, targeted silencing of CHAF1B enhances transcription of IFNα-stimulated genes and promotes IFNα-dependent antineoplastic responses in primary MPN progenitor cells. Taken together, our findings indicate that CHAF1B is a promising newly identified therapeutic target in MPN and that CHAF1B inhibition in combination with IFNα therapy might offer a novel strategy for treating patients with MPN.

Significance

Our findings raise the potential for clinical development of drugs targeting CHAF1B to enhance IFN antitumor responses in the treatment of patients with MPN and should have important clinical translational implications for the treatment of MPN and possibly in other malignancies.

Novel therapeutic strategies for essential thrombocythemia/polycythemia vera

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are clonal disorders of hematopoietic stem cells; these include polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). MPNs are inflammatory cancers, wherein the malignant clone generates cytokines that sustain the inflammatory drive in a self-perpetuating vicious cycle. The course of MPNs follows a biological continuum, that is, from early cancer stages (ET/PV) to advanced myelofibrosis as well as impending leukemic transformation. MPN-related symptoms, e.g., fatigue, general weakness, and itching, are caused by inflammatory cytokines. Thrombosis and bleeding are also exacerbated by inflammatory cytokines in patients with MPN. Until recently, the primary objective of ET and PV therapy was to increase survival rates by preventing thrombosis. However, several medications have recently demonstrated the ability to modify the course of the disease; symptom relief is expected for most patients. In addition, there is increasing interest in the active treatment of patients at low risk with PV and ET. This review focuses on the ET/PV treatment strategies as well as novel treatment options for clinical development.

An anti-cancer surveillance by the interplay between interferon-beta and retinoblastoma protein RB1

Interferon-beta (IFN-β), an extracellular cytokine that initiates signaling pathways for gene regulation, has been demonstrated to function as a tumor suppressor protein through lentiviral gene transduction. In this article, I review the relevant previous works and propose a cell cycle-based, tumor suppressor protein-mediated mechanism of anti-cancer surveillance. IFN-β induces a tumor cell cycle alteration that leads to S phase accumulation, senescence entry, and a loss of tumorigenicity in solid tumor cells. IFN-β does not show a significant cell cycle effect in their normal counterparts. Retinoblastoma protein RB1, another tumor suppressor protein, tightly controls the cell cycle and differentiation of normal cells, preventing them from being significantly impacted by the IFN-β effect. The interplay between IFN-β and RB1 acts as a mechanism of cell cycle-based, tumor suppressor protein-mediated anti-cancer surveillance that can selectively suppress solid tumor or proliferating transformed cells from the loss of control leading to cancer. This mechanism has important implications for the treatment of solid tumors.

JAK2 V617F allele burden in polycythemia vera: burden of proof

Polycythemia vera (PV) is a hematopoietic stem cell neoplasm defined by activating somatic mutations in the JAK2 gene and characterized clinically by overproduction of red blood cells, platelets, and neutrophils; a significant burden of disease-specific symptoms; high rates of vascular events; and evolution to a myelofibrosis phase or acute leukemia. The JAK2V617F variant allele frequency (VAF) is a key determinant of outcomes in PV, including thrombosis and myelofibrotic progression. Here, we critically review the dynamic role of JAK2V617F mutation burden in the pathogenesis and natural history of PV, the suitability of JAK2V617F VAF as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker, and the utility of JAK2V617F VAF reduction in PV treatment.

Evaluating ropeginterferon alfa-2b for the treatment of adults with polycythemia vera

INTRODUCTION

Interferons (IFNs) have been used for decades to treat polycythemia vera (PV). Single-arm clinical trials assessing IFN in PV patients demonstrated high hematological and molecular response rates, indicating potential disease-modifying activity of IFN. However, discontinuation rates of IFNs have been rather high due to frequent treatment-related side-effects.

AREAS COVERED

Ropeginterferon alfa-2b (ROPEG) is a monopegylated IFN consisting of a single isoform, which differentiates it from previous IFNs with respect to tolerability and dosing frequency. ROPEG has improved pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, which allow extended dosing every 2 weeks and monthly administration during maintenance phase. This review covers ROPEG's pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, presents results of randomized clinical trials (RCT) that evaluated ROPEG in the treatment of PV patients, and discusses contemporary findings regarding the potential disease-modifying activity of ROPEG.

EXPERT OPINION

RCT have demonstrated high rates of hematological and molecular responses in PV patients treated with ROPEG, irrespective of thrombotic risk. Drug discontinuation rates were generally low. However, even though RCT captured the most important surrogate endpoints of thrombotic risk and disease progression in PV, they were not statistically powered to fully determine whether therapeutic intervention with ROPEG indeed has a direct positive effect on these important clinical outcomes.

Treatment of hydroxyurea-resistant/intolerant polycythemia vera: a discussion of best practices

Polycythemia vera (PV) is a burdensome, chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by activating mutations in Janus kinase 2, erythrocytosis, and bone marrow hypercellularity. The goals of treatment are to achieve hematocrit and blood count control to ultimately reduce the risk of thrombohemorrhagic events and improve PV-related symptoms. Treatment is risk-stratified and typically includes cytoreduction with hydroxyurea or interferon formulations in first line for high-risk disease. However, inadequate response, resistance, or intolerance to first-line cytoreductive therapies may warrant introduction of second-line treatments, such as ruxolitinib. In this review, I detail preferred treatment and patient management approaches following inadequate response to or intolerance of first-line treatment for PV.

Myeloproliferative neoplasms and splanchnic vein thrombosis: Contemporary diagnostic and therapeutic strategies

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are the most common etiologies of primary splanchnic vein thrombosis, present in almost forty percent of patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome or portal vein thrombosis. Diagnosis of MPNs can be difficult in these patients because key characteristics, such as elevated blood cell counts and splenomegaly, are confounded by portal hypertension or bleeding complications. In recent years, diagnostic tools have improved to provide more accurate diagnosis and classification of MPNs. Although bone marrow biopsy findings remain a major diagnostic criterion, molecular markers are playing an increasing role not only in diagnosis but also in better estimating prognosis. Therefore, though screening for JAK2V617F mutation should be the starting point of the diagnostic workup performed in all patients with splanchnic vein thrombosis, a multidisciplinary approach is needed to accurately diagnose the subtype of myeloproliferative neoplasm, recommend the useful additional tests (bone marrow biopsy, search for an additional mutation using targeted next-generation sequencing), and suggest the best treatment strategy. Indeed, providing a specific expert care pathway for patients with splanchnic vein thrombosis and underlying myeloproliferative neoplasm is crucial to determine the optimal management to reduce the risk of both hematological and hepatic complications.

A Case Report of Ropeginterferon Alfa-2b for Polycythemia Vera during Pregnancy

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) such as essential thrombocythemia (ET) and polycythemia vera (PV) are rare during pregnancy. However, they are harmful because they are associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic, hemorrhagic, or microcirculatory disturbances or placental dysfunction leading to fetal growth restriction or loss. Low-dose aspirin and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) are recommended to reduce pregnancy complications, and interferon (IFN) is the only treatment option for cytoreductive therapy based on the likelihood of live birth in pregnant women with MPN. Since ropeginterferon alfa-2b is the only available IFN in South Korea, we present a case report of ropeginterferon alfa-2b use during pregnancy in an MPN patient. A 40-year-old woman who had been diagnosed with low-risk PV in 2017 and had been maintained on phlebotomy, hydroxyurea (HU), and anagrelide (ANA) for 4 years was confirmed as 5 weeks pregnant on 9 December 2021. After stopping treatment with HU and ANA, the patient showed a rapid increase in platelet count (1113 × 109/L to 2074 × 109/L, normal range, 150–450 × 109/L) and white blood cell count (21.93 × 109/L to 35.55 × 109/L, normal range, 4.0–10.0 × 109/L). Considering the high risk of complications, aggressive cytoreductive treatment was required, for which we chose ropeginterferon alfa-2b, as it is the only available IFN agent in South Korea. The patient underwent 8 cycles of ropeginterferon alfa-2b over 6 months during pregnancy and delivered without any neonatal or maternal complications. This case report highlights the importance of considering treatment options for MPN patients who are pregnant or planning a pregnancy, as well as the need for further investigation into the safety and efficacy of ropeginterferon alfa-2b in this population.

Hepcidin mimetics in polycythemia vera: resolving the irony of iron deficiency and erythrocytosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Development of hepcidin therapeutics has been a ground-breaking discovery in restoring iron homeostasis in several haematological disorders. The hepcidin mimetic, rusfertide, is in late-stage clinical development for treating polycythemia vera patients with a global phase 3 trial [NCT05210790] currently underway. Rusfertide serves as the first possible noncytoreductive therapeutic option to maintain haematocrit control and avoid phlebotomy in polycythemia vera patients. In this comprehensive review, we discuss the pathobiology of dysregulated iron metabolism in polycythemia vera, provide the rationale for targeting the hepcidin-ferroportin axis and elaborate on the preclinical and clinical trial evidence supporting the role of hepcidin mimetics in polycythemia vera.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recently, updated results from two phase 2 clinical trials [NCT04057040 & NCT04767802] of rusfertide (PTG300) demonstrate that the drug is highly effective in eliminating the need for therapeutic phlebotomies, normalizing haematological parameters, repleting iron stores and relieving constitutional symptoms in patients with polycythemia vera. In light of these findings, additional hepcidin mimetic agents are also being evaluated in polycythemia vera patients.

SUMMARY

Hepcidin agonists essentially serve as a 'chemical phlebotomy' and are poised to vastly improve the quality of life for phlebotomy requiring polycythemia vera patients.

A novel integrated biomarker index for the assessment of hematological responses in MPNs during treatment with hydroxyurea and interferon-alpha2

BACKGROUND

Conventional cytoreductive therapy for patients with chronic Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) includes hydroxyurea (HU), interferon-alpha2 (IFN), and anagrelide. HU is worldwide the most used cytoreductive agent, which lowers elevated blood cell counts within days in the large majority of patients. However, some patients may experience rebound cytosis when HU is reduced due to cytopenia, thereby potentially giving rise to fluctuating cell counts during therapy. Such rapid oscillations may be harmful and potentially elicit thrombosis. Treatment with IFN gradually lowers elevated cell counts within weeks and when the dosage is reduced, the cell counts do not rapidly increase but are sustained within the normal range in the large majority of patients. Conventional hematological response criteria are among others based upon single absolute cell count values and do not take into account the relative decreases toward normal for each cell count.

MATERIALS, METHODS & RESULTS

Using serial data from the Danish DALIAH trial, we herein describe a novel integrated biomarker index for the assessment of hematological and molecular (JAK2V617F) responses in patients with MPNs during treatment with IFN or HU.

DISCUSSION

This novel tool convincingly displays the superiority of IFN versus HU in normalizing elevated cell counts. Our results need to be validated in larger studies but already now call for studies of the safety and efficacy of combination therapy during the initial treatment of patients with MPNs.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Polycythemia Vera: Is It Time to Rethink Treatment?

Polycythemia vera (PV) is a Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by excessive myeloid cells production, mostly secondary to mutations in the Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) gene. PV natural history might be burdened by thrombotic events (TEs) and evolution into post-PV myelofibrosis (PPV-MF) or blast phase (BP). To date, no treatment strategies have been shown to have disease modifying effects, so therapy is directed at preventing TEs. All patients require phlebotomies (PHLs) to keep hematocrit below 45% and once-daily low dose aspirin (if not contraindicated). Apart from patients at "high risk" because of age over 60 years or a thrombosis history, cytoreductive therapies (CT) should be given to patients with relevant signs of myeloproliferation or intolerance to PHLs. Approved choices both for first and second line CT are hydroxyurea (HU) and pegylated forms of interferon (peg-IFN), the latter probably being better for young patients, and subjects without critical and recent vascular events or massive splenomegaly. The JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib is the treatment of choice in case of resistance/intolerance to HU, with proved efficacy in terms of thrombotic prevention. Data are too preliminary to consider CT for "low risk" PV cases, but ropeg-IFN is being studied in this setting with a short follow-up. A careful monitoring for signs of evolution into PPV-MF is fundamental for optimizing patient management.

An alternative dosing strategy for ropeginterferon alfa-2b may help improve outcomes in myeloproliferative neoplasms: An overview of previous and ongoing studies with perspectives on the future

Ropeginterferon alfa-2b is a novel, long-acting mono-pegylated proline-IFN-alpha-2b approved for treatment of polycythemia vera in adults, regardless of thrombotic risk level or treatment history. Clinical trial data indicate the dose and titration of ropeginterferon alfa-2b is safe and effective. However, additional studies may provide rationale for an amended, higher initial dosage and rapid titration. This article is an overview of current and upcoming studies of ropeginterferon alfa-2b in myeloproliferative neoplasms that support the exploration of an amended dosing scheme in order to optimize patient tolerability and efficacy outcomes.

Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in patients with newly-diagnosed polycythemia vera: futility analysis of the RuxoBEAT clinical trial of the GSG-MPN study group

Patients (pts) with polycythemia vera (PV) suffer from pruritus, night sweats, and other symptoms, as well as from thromboembolic complications and progression to post-PV myelofibrosis. Ruxolitinib (RUX) is approved for second-line therapy in high-risk PV pts with hydroxyurea intolerance or resistance. The RuxoBEAT trial (NCT02577926, registered on October 1, 2015, at clinicaltrials.gov) is a multicenter, open-label, two-arm phase-IIb trial with a target population of 380 pts with PV or ET, randomized to receive RUX or best available therapy. This pre-specified futility analysis assesses the early clinical benefit and tolerability of RUX in previously untreated PV pts (6-week cytoreduction was allowed). Twenty-eight patients were randomly assigned to receive RUX. Compared to baseline, after 6 months of treatment, there was a significant reduction of median hematocrit (46 to 41%), the median number of phlebotomies per year (4.0 to 0), and median patient-reported pruritus scores (2 to 1), and a trend for reduced night sweat scores (1.5 to 0). JAK2V617F allele burden, as part of the scientific research program, also significantly decreased. One hundred nine adverse events (AEs) occurred in 24/28 patients (all grade 1 to 3), and no pt permanently discontinued treatment because of AEs. Thus, treatment with ruxolitinib in untreated PV pts is feasible, well-tolerated, and efficient regarding the above-mentioned endpoints.

The international consensus classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute Leukemias: myeloproliferative neoplasms

A group of international experts, including hematopathologists, oncologists, and geneticists were recently summoned (September 2021, Chicago, IL, USA) to update the 2016/17 World Health Organization classification system for hematopoietic tumors. After careful deliberation, the group introduced the new International Consensus Classification (ICC) for Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukemias. This current in-depth review focuses on the ICC-2022 category of JAK2 mutation-prevalent myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs): essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera, primary myelofibrosis, and MPN, unclassifiable. The ICC MPN subcommittee chose to preserve the primary role of bone marrow morphology in disease classification and diagnostics, while also acknowledging the complementary role of genetic markers for establishing clonality, facilitating MPN subtype designation, and disease prognostication.

Real world experience with ropeginterferon alpha-2b (Besremi) in essential thrombocythaemia and polycythaemia vera following exposure to pegylated interferon alfa-2a (Pegasys)

Despite widespread use of Pegylated forms of Inteferon in the management of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPN), most clinicians have experience predominantly with peginterferon alfa-2a (Pegasys). Third generation pegylated IFNα, ropeginterferon alfa-2b (ropegIFN; Besremi), was recommended by the European Medicine Authority (EMA) for treatment of Polycythaemia Vera (PV) following a Phase III trial (PROUD-PV / CONTINUATION-PV). FDA approval for PV, regardless of treatment history, was subsequently granted in November 2021. We hereby demonstrate the safety and tolerability of ropegIFN in a series of MPN patients at variable doses. It corroborates reports of efficacy of ropegIFN in patients with PV and use in pregnancy.

Hitting the brakes on accelerated and blast-phase myeloproliferative neoplasms: current and emerging concepts

The BCR-ABL-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) have a variable risk of progressing to accelerated- or blast-phase MPN (MPN-AP/MPN-BP), defined by the presence of 10% to 19% and more than or equal to 20% myeloid blasts in the peripheral blood or bone marrow, respectively. The molecular processes underlying the progression to MPN-AP/MPN-BP are becoming increasingly understood with the acquisition of additional mutations in epigenetic modifiers (eg, ASXL1, EZH2, TET2), TP53, the Ras pathway, or splicing factors (eg, SRSF2, U2AF1), having been described as important steps in this evolutionary process. At least partially driven by the enrichment of these high-risk molecular features, the prognosis of patients with MPN-BP remains inferior to other patients with acute myeloid leukemia, with a median overall survival of 3 to 6 months. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation remains the only potentially curative therapeutic modality, but only a minority of patients are eligible. In the absence of curative intent, therapeutic strategies or palliative treatment with hypomethylating agents as monotherapy or in combination with ruxolitinib or venetoclax can be considered. Several novel agents are in various stages of clinical development but are not available for routine use at this point, highlighting the need for ongoing research and the prioritization of clinical trial enrollment when feasible.

Molecular prognostication in Ph-negative MPNs in 2022

The application of genomic techniques, including cytogenetics and DNA sequencing, to decipher the molecular landscape of patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) has radically modified diagnostic approach and management through improved risk stratification. Three driver mutated genes (JAK2, MPL, CALR) are variably harbored by >80% of patients and associated with clinical characteristics, as well as major disease-related complications and different survival outcomes. Therefore, JAK2 V617F mutation is included in the revised International Prognosis Score of Thrombosis for Essential Thrombocythemia score for prediction of thrombosis in patients with essential thrombocythemia and prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis, while a CALR type 1 mutated genotype constitutes a favorable variable for survival in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). Novel, integrated clinical and cytogenetic/mutation scores (Mutation-Enhanced International Prognostic Score System for Transplantation-Age Patients with Primary Myelofibrosis [MIPSS70/v2], genetically inspired prognostic scoring system [GIPSS], Myelofibrosis Secondary to PV and ET- Prognostic Model [MYSEC-PM]) have been devised that guide selection of stem cell transplantation candidates with MF or help predict the risk associated with the transplant procedure (Myelofibrosis Transplant Scoring System), with greater performance compared with conventional scores based on hematologic and clinical variables only. On the other hand, several clinical needs remain unmet despite the great amount of molecular information available nowadays. These include the prediction of evolution to acute leukemia in a clinically actionable time frame, the identification of patients most likely to derive durable benefits from target agents, in primis JAK inhibitors, and, conversely, the significance of molecular responses that develop in patients receiving interferon or some novel agents. Here, we discuss briefly the significance and the role of genomic analysis for prognostication in patients with MPNs from a clinician's point of view, with the intent to provide how-to-use hints.

Clinical characteristics of a patient with de novo acute promyelocytic leukemia with JAK2 v617f mutation

BACKGROUND

The V617F mutation of Janus-associated kinase 2 (JAK2) is common in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). JAK2 V617F mutation can be detected in patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but de novo acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) with JAK2 V617F mutation is rare.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a case of APL with both the t(15;17) translocation as well as the JAK2 V617F mutation that transformed into MPN (PV/ET).

CONCLUSIONS

A de novo APL patient presented initially with JAK2 V617F. After ATRA and ATO dual induction and chemotherapy consolidation, the patient achieved complete remission (CR) with undetectable PML/RARα. However, the JAK2 V617F remained positive, and the patient developed MPN (PV/ET) 22 months later, which responded well to interferon therapy.AML, acute myeloid leukemia; APL, acute promyelocytic leukemia; ATRA, all-trans retinoic acid; ATO, arsenic trioxide; BM, bone marrow; CR, complete remission; ET, essential thrombocythemia; Hb, hemoglobin; JAK2, Janus-associated kinase 2; MPN, myeloproliferative neoplasms; PLT, platelets; PMF, primary myelofibrosis; PML/RARα; PV, polycythemia vera; WBC, white blood cells.

Genomic profiling for clinical decision making in myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia

Myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemias derive from the clonal expansion of hematopoietic cells driven by somatic gene mutations. Although assessment of morphology plays a crucial role in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with these malignancies, genomic characterization has become increasingly important for accurate diagnosis, risk assessment, and therapeutic decision making. Conventional cytogenetics, a comprehensive and unbiased method for assessing chromosomal abnormalities, has been the mainstay of genomic testing over the past several decades and remains relevant today. However, more recent advances in sequencing technology have increased our ability to detect somatic mutations through the use of targeted gene panels, whole-exome sequencing, whole-genome sequencing, and whole-transcriptome sequencing or RNA sequencing. In patients with myeloid neoplasms, whole-genome sequencing represents a potential replacement for both conventional cytogenetic and sequencing approaches, providing rapid and accurate comprehensive genomic profiling. DNA sequencing methods are used not only for detecting somatically acquired gene mutations but also for identifying germline gene mutations associated with inherited predisposition to hematologic neoplasms. The 2022 International Consensus Classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemias makes extensive use of genomic data. The aim of this report is to help physicians and laboratorians implement genomic testing for diagnosis, risk stratification, and clinical decision making and illustrates the potential of genomic profiling for enabling personalized medicine in patients with hematologic neoplasms.

Recombinant Interferon-β in the Treatment of Polycythemia Vera and Related Neoplasms: Rationales and Perspectives

About 30 years ago, the first clinical trials of the safety and efficacy of recombinant interferon-α2 (rIFN-α2) were performed. Since then, several single-arm studies have shown rIFN-α2 to be a highly potent anticancer agent against several cancer types. Unfortunately, however, a high toxicity profile in early studies with rIFN-α2 -among other reasons likely due to the high dosages being used-disqualified rIFN-α2, which was accordingly replaced with competitive drugs that might at first glance look more attractive to clinicians. Later, pegylated IFN-α2a (Pegasys) and pegylated IFN-α2b (PegIntron) were introduced, which have since been reported to be better tolerated due to reduced toxicity. Today, treatment with rIFN-α2 is virtually outdated in non-hematological cancers, where other immunotherapies-e.g., immune-checkpoint inhibitors-are routinely used in several cancer types and are being intensively investigated in others, either as monotherapy or in combination with immunomodulatory agents, although only rarely in combination with rIFN-α2. Within the hematological malignancies, rIFN-α2 has been used off-label for decades in patients with Philadelphia-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs)-i.e., essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera, and myelofibrosis-and in recent years rIFN-α2 has been revived with the marketing of ropeginterferon-α2b (Besremi) for the treatment of polycythemia vera patients. Additionally, rIFN-α2 has been revived for the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia in combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Another rIFN formulation-recombinant interferon-β (rIFN-β)-has been used for decades in the treatment of multiple sclerosis but has never been studied as a potential agent to be used in patients with MPNs, although several studies and reviews have repeatedly described rIFN-β as an effective anticancer agent as well. In this paper, we describe the rationales and perspectives for launching studies on the safety and efficacy of rIFN-β in patients with MPNs.

A Phase 3 clinical trial validating the potency and safety of an innovative, extra‐long‐acting interferon in chronic hepatitis C

Background and Aim

Ropeginterferon alfa‐2b is a novel mono‐pegylated, extra‐long‐acting interferon. It is administered infrequently and showed good tolerability and clinical activity for the chronic hepatitis B or C treatment in our previous Phase 2 clinical trials. This study aims to validate the potency and safety of this novel agent in a Phase 3 chronic viral hepatitis setting.

Methods

Patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 2 were randomized to receive subcutaneous injections of ropeginterferon alfa‐2b biweekly or the conventional pegylated interferon alfa‐2b weekly for 24 weeks, combined with ribavirin. The primary endpoint was to assess the safety and antiviral potency of ropeginterferon alfa‐2b by the non‐inferiority in sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after treatment.

Results

A total of 222 patients were enrolled. Ropeginterferon alfa‐2b group showed a favorable safety profile. Side effects that were generally associated with prior interferon therapies, including neutropenia, asthenia, fatigue, alopecia, dizziness, decreased appetite, nausea, flu‐like symptoms including myalgia, pyrexia, and headache, and administration site reactions, were notably less in the ropeginterferon alfa‐2b group. The cumulative incidence of adverse events of special interest was also notably higher in the control group. The primary endpoint was met and ropeginterferon alfa‐2b showed a better SVR12 rate of 79.8% than 71.9% of the control group.

Conclusion

Ropeginterferon alfa‐2b is efficacious and has a favorable safety profile as compared with the conventional pegylated interferon alfa‐2b. This study together with previous Phase 2 data validated ropeginterferon alfa‐2b to be a new treatment option for chronic hepatitis C genotype 2.

SURPASS-ET: phase III study of ropeginterferon alfa-2b versus anagrelide as second-line therapy in essential thrombocythemia

Patients diagnosed with high-risk essential thrombocythemia (ET) have limited treatment options to reduce the risk of thrombosis and lessen the progression of the disease by targeting the molecular source. Hydroxyurea is the recommended treatment, but many patients experience resistance or intolerance. Anagrelide is an approved second-line option for ET, but concerns of a higher frequency of disease transformation may affect its role as a suitable long-term option. Interferons have been evaluated in myeloproliferative neoplasms for over 30 years, but early formulations had safety and tolerability issues. SURPASS-ET (NCT04285086) is a phase III, open-label, multicenter, global, randomized, active-controlled trial that will evaluate the safety, efficacy, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of ropeginterferon alfa-2b compared with anagrelide as second-line therapy in high-risk ET.

Interferons as the First Choice of Cytoreduction in Essential Thrombocythemia and Polycythemia Vera

Interferons are cytokines with immunomodulatory properties that have been used in the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) for decades. However, their widespread use has been hampered by their adverse effect profile and difficulty with administration. Recently there has been a resurgence of interest in the use of interferons in MPNs given the development of pegylated formulations with improved tolerability. Currently, treatments for polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) are targeted toward decreasing the risk of thrombotic complications, because there are no approved therapies that are known to modify disease. However, recent data on interferons in MPNs have suggested the potential for disease-modifying activity, including the achievement of molecular remission and sustained clinical response. This development has led to the question of whether interferons should move forward as the preferred frontline cytoreductive agent for ET and PV, and challenges the criteria currently used to initiate therapy. We review randomized controlled trial data evaluating interferon's efficacy and tolerability in patients with ET and PV. We then consider the data in the context of interferon's known advantages and disadvantages to address whether interferons should be the first choice for cytoreductive treatment in patients with ET and PV.

Prediction of thrombosis in post-polycythemia vera and post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis: a study on 1258 patients

Patients with Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms are at high risk of thrombotic events (TEs). Predisposing factors have been identified in essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV) and primary myelofibrosis (primary MF, PMF), while yet not recognized in post PV/ET-MF (known as secondary MF, SMF). Within the 1258 SMF of the MYSEC (MYelofibrosis SECondary to PV and ET) dataset, 135 (10.7%) developed a TE at a median follow-up of 3.5 years (range, 1-21.4), with an incidence of 2.3% patients per year. Venous events accounted for two-thirds of the total. Cox multivariable analysis, supported by Fine-Gray models with death as competitive risk, showed that being on cytoreductive therapy at time of SMF evolution is associated with an absolute risk reduction of thrombosis equal to 3.3% within 3 years. Considering individually cytoreductive therapies, univariate regression model found that both conventional cytoreduction, mainly hydroxyurea, (HR 0.41, 95% CI: 0.26-0.65, p = 0.0001) and JAK inhibitors, mostly ruxolitinib, (HR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.24-1.02, p = 0.05) were associated with fewer thrombosis. Our study informs treating physicians of a non-low incidence of TEs in post PV/ET-MF and of the potential protective role of cytoreductive therapy in terms of thrombotic events.

Novel Therapies in Myelofibrosis: Beyond JAK Inhibitors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss the current treatment paradigm, review novel targets, and summarize completed and ongoing clinical trials that may lead to a paradigm shifts in the management of myelofibrosis (MF).

RECENT FINDINGS

In addition to the recent approval and ongoing late-stage development of multiple novel JAK inhibitors, recent clinical studies demonstrate therapeutic potential of targeting multiple alternate proteins and pathways including BET, MDM2, telomerase, BCL2, LSD1, PI3K, SMAC, and PTX2 in patients with MF. MF is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by clonal proliferation of myeloid cells and bone marrow fibrosis often causing cytopenias, extramedullary hematopoiesis resulting in hepatosplenomegaly, and increased pro-inflammatory cytokine production driving systemic symptoms. A significant proportion of morbidity and mortality is related to the propensity to transform to acute leukemia. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is the only curative therapy; however, due to the high associated mortality, this treatment is not an option for the majority of patients with MF. Currently, there are three targeted Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved therapies for MF which include ruxolitinib, fedratinib, and pacritinib, all part of the JAK inhibitor class. Many patients are unable to tolerate, do not respond, or develop resistance to existing therapies, leaving a large unmet medical need. In this review, we discuss the current treatment paradigm and novel therapies in development for the treatment of MF. We review the scientific rationale of each targeted pathway. We summarize updated clinical data and ongoing trials that may lead to FDA approval of these agents.

Advances in Risk Stratification and Treatment of Polycythemia Vera and Essential Thrombocythemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Estimating and modifying thrombotic risk is currently the mainstay of care for patients with polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET). In recent years, however, increased attention has shifted towards quality of life and disease modification. In this review, we discuss recent advances in risk stratification, present updated results for ruxolitinib and interferon randomized clinical trials, discuss new approaches in antiplatelet and anticoagulant treatment, and summarize early phase trials of novel agents and emerging therapeutic concepts for the treatment of PV and ET.

RECENT FINDINGS

International collaborations and novel technologies, i.e., next-generation sequencing and machine learning techniques, have demonstrated excellent abilities to improve thrombotic risk stratification in PV and ET. Updated results from ruxolitinib and interferon randomized clinical trials have confirmed excellent efficacy and safety of these agents, both as first- and second-line treatments. Early trials of novel agents (histone deacetylase inhibitors, telomerase inhibitors, lysine-specific demethylase-1 inhibitors, human double-minute 2 inhibitors, and hepcidin mimetics) have shown encouraging efficacy and safety in blood count control, reduction of splenomegaly, and alleviation of disease-related symptoms. Finally, accumulating evidence suggested that direct oral anticoagulants may be a valid therapeutic alternative to warfarin for prolonged thromboprophylaxis. International collaborations ("big data") with the help of new technologies represent an exciting new approach to analyze rare outcomes in rare diseases, especially for identifying novel prognostic biomarkers in PV and ET. Randomized clinical trials are also needed to fully elucidate whether novel agents may establish new standards of care.

Anagrelide for platelet-directed cytoreduction in polycythemia vera: Insights into utility and safety outcomes from a large multi-center database

Anagrelide (ANA) is a platelet-specific cytoreductive agent utilized in the guideline-directed management of high-risk essential thrombocythemia. In the context of polycythemia vera (PV), ANA is occasionally employed in clinical practice, although data has not consistently demonstrated a benefit to targeting a platelet goal as a therapeutic endpoint. The aim of the current study was to delineate the patterns of ANA use in PV, and to describe outcomes and toxicities. Within a multi-center cohort of 527 patients with PV, 48 received ANA (9 excluded for absent data). 27 (69.2%) had high-risk PV, 10 (25.6%) had prior thrombosis, and none had extreme thrombocytosis, acquired von Willebrand disease, and/or documented resistance to hydroxyurea. While ANA effectively lowered median platelet count, 43.5% of patients had an unresolved thrombocytosis at time of ANA discontinuation. Treatment-emergent adverse events-including headaches, cardiac palpitations and arrhythmias, nausea, vomiting and/or diarrhea-led to ANA discontinuation in 76.9% of patients. Further, three patients experienced arterial thromboses during a median duration of 27.5 months of ANA therapy. In conclusion, this study highlights ANA's restrictive tolerability profile which, compounded by the absence of clear advantage to strict platelet control in PV, suggests the use of ANA should be limited in this setting.

Novel Pegylated Interferon for the Treatment of Chronic Viral Hepatitis

Ropeginterferon alfa-2b is a novel mono-pegylated and extra-long-acting interferon, being developed for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) and chronic viral hepatitis. It has a favorable pharmacokinetic profile and less frequent dosing schedule, i.e., once every two to four weeks, compared to conventional pegylated interferon products, which have multiple isomers and are administered weekly. It was approved for the long-term treatment of polycythemia vera, an MPN, and has been included in the NCCN clinical practice guidelines for this indication. Ropeginterferon alfa-2b has demonstrated efficacy and showed a favorable safety profile for the treatment of chronic viral hepatitis in several clinical studies. In this article, we review its pharmacokinetics and available clinical data and suggest that ropeginterferon alfa-2b administered once every two weeks can serve as a new treatment option for patients with chronic viral hepatitis, including chronic hepatitis B, C, and D.

A randomized phase 3 trial of interferon-α vs hydroxyurea in polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia

The goal of therapy for patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET) and polycythemia vera (PV) is to reduce thrombotic events by normalizing blood counts. Hydroxyurea (HU) and interferon-α (IFN-α) are the most frequently used cytoreductive options for patients with ET and PV at high risk for vascular complications. Myeloproliferative Disorders Research Consortium 112 was an investigator-initiated, phase 3 trial comparing HU to pegylated IFN-α (PEG) in treatment-naïve, high-risk patients with ET/PV. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) rate at 12 months. A total of 168 patients were treated for a median of 81.0 weeks. CR for HU was 37% and 35% for PEG (P = .80) at 12 months. At 24 to 36 months, CR was 20% to 17% for HU and 29% to 33% for PEG. PEG led to a greater reduction in JAK2V617F at 24 months, but histopathologic responses were more frequent with HU. Thrombotic events and disease progression were infrequent in both arms, whereas grade 3/4 adverse events were more frequent with PEG (46% vs 28%). At 12 months of treatment, there was no significant difference in CR rates between HU and PEG. This study indicates that PEG and HU are both effective treatments for PV and ET. With longer treatment, PEG was more effective in normalizing blood counts and reducing driver mutation burden, whereas HU produced more histopathologic responses. Despite these differences, both agents did not differ in limiting thrombotic events and disease progression in high-risk patients with ET/PV. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01259856.

The roles of sex and genetics in the MPN

The Philadelphia chromosome negative myeloproliferative neoplasms(MPNs), polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF) are acquired hematopoietic stem cell disorders driven by activating mutations of intracellular signal transduction pathways that control the production of circulating blood cells. The MPN are characterized clinically by marked variation in degrees of vascular risk, familial clustering, and evolution to myelofibrosis and acute leukemia. MPN disease presentations and outcomes are highly variable, and are markedly influenced by both sex and germline genetic variation. This chapter will focus on the evidence of sex and germline genetic background as modifiers of MPN development and outcomes. Large population genome wide association studies in both clonal hematopoiesis and MPN have revealed novel mechanisms, including inflammatory pathways and genomic instability, which further our understanding of how sex and genetic background mediate MPN risk. Recent advances in our understanding of clonal hematopoiesis and MPN development in various contexts informs the mechanisms by which sex, inflammation, exposures and genetics influence MPN incidence and outcomes, and provide opportunities to develop new strategies for prognostics and therapeutics in the MPN.

Immunomodulatory and Direct Activities of Ropeginterferon Alfa-2b on Cancer Cells in Mouse Models of Leukemia

Although ropeginterferon alfa‐2b has recently been clinically applied to myeloproliferative neoplasms with promising results, its antitumor mechanism has not been thoroughly investigated. Using a leukemia model developed in immunocompetent mice, we evaluated the direct cytotoxic effects and indirect effects induced by ropeginterferon alfa‐2b in tumor cells. Ropeginterferon alfa‐2b therapy significantly prolonged the survival of mice bearing leukemia cells and led to long‐term remission in some mice. Alternatively, conventional interferon‐alpha treatment slightly extended the survival and all mice died. When ropeginterferon alfa‐2b was administered to interferon‐alpha receptor 1–knockout mice after the development of leukemia to verify the direct effect on the tumor, the survival of these mice was slightly prolonged; nevertheless, all of them died. In vivo CD4⁺ or CD8⁺ T‐cell depletion resulted in a significant loss of therapeutic efficacy in mice. These results indicate that the host adoptive immunostimulatory effect of ropeginterferon alfa‐2b is the dominant mechanism through which tumor cells are suppressed. Moreover, mice in long‐term remission did not develop leukemia, even after tumor rechallenge. Rejection of rechallenge tumors was canceled only when both CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells were removed in vivo, which indicates that each T‐cell group functions independently in immunological memory. We show that ropeginterferon alfa‐2b induces excellent antitumor immunomodulation in hosts. Our finding serves in devising therapeutic strategies with ropeginterferon alfa‐2b.

Real-world analysis of main clinical outcomes in patients with polycythemia vera treated with ruxolitinib or best available therapy after developing resistance/intolerance to hydroxyurea

Background

Ruxolitinib is approved for patients with polycythemia vera (PV) who are resistant/intolerant to hydroxyurea, but its impact on preventing thrombosis or disease‐progression is unknown.

Methods

A retrospective, real‐world analysis was performed on the outcomes of 377 patients with resistance/intolerance to hydroxyurea from the Spanish Registry of Polycythemia Vera according to subsequent treatment with ruxolitinib (n = 105) or the best available therapy (BAT; n = 272). Survival probabilities and rates of thrombosis, hemorrhage, acute myeloid leukemia, myelofibrosis, and second primary cancers were calculated according to treatment. To minimize biases in treatment allocation, all results were adjusted by a propensity score for receiving ruxolitinib or BAT.

Results

Patients receiving ruxolitinib had a significantly lower rate of arterial thrombosis than those on BAT (0.4% vs 2.3% per year; P = .03), and this persisted as a trend after adjustment for the propensity to have received the drug (incidence rate ratio, 0.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.02‐1.3; P = .09). There were no significant differences in the rates of venous thrombosis (0.8% and 1.1% for ruxolitinib and BAT, respectively; P = .7) and major bleeding (0.8% and 0.9%, respectively; P = .9). Ruxolitinib exposure was not associated with a higher rate of second primary cancers, including all types of neoplasia, noncutaneous cancers, and nonmelanoma skin cancers. After a median follow‐up of 3.5 years, there were no differences in survival or progression to acute leukemia or myelofibrosis between the 2 groups.

Conclusions

The results suggest that ruxolitinib treatment for PV patients with resistance/intolerance to hydroxyurea may reduce the incidence of arterial thrombosis.

Lay Summary

Ruxolitinib is better than other available therapies in achieving hematocrit control and symptom relief in patients with polycythemia vera who are resistant/intolerant to hydroxyurea, but we still do not know whether ruxolitinib provides an additional benefit in preventing thrombosis or disease progression.

We retrospectively studied the outcomes of 377 patients with resistance/intolerance to hydroxyurea from the Spanish Registry of Polycythemia Vera according to whether they subsequently received ruxolitinib (n = 105) or the best available therapy (n = 272).

Our findings suggest that ruxolitinib could reduce the incidence of arterial thrombosis, but a disease‐modifying effect could not be demonstrated for ruxolitinib in this patient population.

Ruxolitinib may reduce the incidence of arterial thrombosis in patients with polycythemia vera resistant/intolerant to hydroxyurea.

Treatment options and pregnancy management for patients with PV and ET

Polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) are the two most common subtypes of Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN). PV results in erythrocytosis and ET in thrombocytosis. The discovery of JAK2 mutations in the majority of patients with MPN over the last 2 decades has led to the development of JAK inhibitors. Because PV and ET progress relatively slowly, the main treatment strategy for these two diseases is to prevent thrombotic complications. The first-line agent for both PV and ET is hydroxyurea, although some patients are intolerant or refractory to this compound and need other treatment options. Notably, hydroxyurea is contraindicated during pregnancy. In addition to JAK inhibitors, several new agents, such as HDAC inhibitors, LSD1 inhibitors, MDM2 inhibitors and hepcidin mimetics, have been developed as treatment options. Classical agents, such as busulfan and interferon, are still used to treat patients with PV or ET as well. Based on this context, treatment options and pregnancy management for patients with PV or ET are discussed in this review.

Discovery of a signaling feedback circuit that defines interferon responses in myeloproliferative neoplasms

Interferons (IFNs) are key initiators and effectors of the immune response against malignant cells and also directly inhibit tumor growth. IFNα is highly effective in the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), but the mechanisms of action are unclear and it remains unknown why some patients respond to IFNα and others do not. Here, we identify and characterize a pathway involving PKCδ-dependent phosphorylation of ULK1 on serine residues 341 and 495, required for subsequent activation of p38 MAPK. We show that this pathway is essential for IFN-suppressive effects on primary malignant erythroid precursors from MPN patients, and that increased levels of ULK1 and p38 MAPK correlate with clinical response to IFNα therapy in these patients. We also demonstrate that IFNα treatment induces cleavage/activation of the ULK1-interacting ROCK1/2 proteins in vitro and in vivo, triggering a negative feedback loop that suppresses IFN responses. Overexpression of ROCK1/2 is seen in MPN patients and their genetic or pharmacological inhibition enhances IFN-anti-neoplastic responses in malignant erythroid precursors from MPN patients. These findings suggest the clinical potential of pharmacological inhibition of ROCK1/2 in combination with IFN-therapy for the treatment of MPNs.

Interferon alpha (IFNalpha) therapy is showing promising results to treat myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Here, the authors show that IFNalpha response requires ULK1 phosphorylation to induce p38-MAPK signalling but it is counteracted by ROCK1-2 activation suggesting combination therapy of IFNalpha-ROCK1-2 inhibition may improve MPNs treatment.

Low-risk polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia: management considerations and future directions

Thrombotic events are a distinctive feature of the myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET). Patients with these MPNs may also experience a poor quality of life secondary to symptom burden, as well as progression of disease to acute leukemia or myelofibrosis. Over the years, various risk stratification methods have evolved in order to attempt to predict thrombotic risk, which is the largest contributor of morbidity and mortality in these patients. More than half of PV and ET patients are low- or intermediate-risk disease status at the time of diagnosis. While therapeutic development is presently focused on high-risk patients, there is a paucity of therapies, outside of aspirin and therapeutic phlebotomy, which can reduce the thrombotic risk or delay disease progression in low-risk patients. In this review, we first describe the various complications that patients with PV and ET experience, and then detail our evolving understanding of risk stratification in these diseases. We then highlight the available evidence on the management of low-risk PV and ET and include a description of novel therapies currently under investigation in this space. We conclude with recommendations for future directions to advance our understanding and improve the treatment of low-risk PV and ET.

[What's new in myeloproliferative neoplasia?]

Treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasia (MPN) is based on patients' individual risk-stratification and includes cytoreductive agents for high-risk essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV) and Myelofibrosis (MF). Classical cytoreductive drugs largely fail to modify the basic clonal composition of the disease. In contrast, in PV for example treatment with Ropeg-Interferon not only results in higher hematological response rates compared to hydroxyurea but in addition significantly reduces JAK2 allele-burden in high-risk PV patients as well as it depletes concurrent cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities. Treatment with Ropeg-Interferon so far is only approved for high-risk PV. A very recent trial however also demonstrated this disease-modifying effect also in low-risk PV patients in addition to an increased rate of transfusion independence. Thus, Ropeg-Interferon is the current standard for first line treatment of high-risk PV and we assume that the data in low-risk PV will lead also to a broader clinical use of Ropeg-Interferon this particular patient group, as it may decrease transformation to MF or even MPN-blast crisis.Myelofibrosis management has been extended by novel JAKi. Fedratinib is the first second generation JAK-inhibitor approved for Ruxolitinib-intolerant or refractory patients. Fedratinib reduces both spleen volume as well as symptom burden. Two other second generation JAK-inhibitors are in clinical development for MPN treatment. Pacritinib has demonstrated efficacy in reducing both spleen volume and symptom score in MF including a cohort of Ruxolitinib-pretreated patients and Momelotinib is the only JAK-inhibitor which has been shown to alleviate anemia in addition to its effect on improving spleen volume and symptom. So far, neither Pacritinib nor Momelotinib are currently EMA-approved for MPN treatment.Finally, it has recently been acknowledged that inflammation is a key driver of MPN pathogenesis. Both, mutated as well as non-clonal inflammatory and other stromal cells produce significant amounts of local cytokines. Also the initiation of the neoplastic process itself seems to depend on inflammatory cytokines. Recent scRNASeq data revealed components of the alarmin complex (S100A8 und S100A9) drive this local sterile inflammation process, which also represents a potential therapeutic target, as the S100A8 and A9 inhibitor Tasquinimod reduced fibrosis in a pre-clinical animal model.

Treatment and Clinical Endpoints in Polycythemia Vera: Seeking the Best Obtainable Version of the Truth

Polycythemia vera (PV) is a Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm driven by the JAK2 V617F (or rarely exon 12) mutation. Its natural history can extend over a few decades, and therefore treatment planning is predicated on continual re-assessment of traditional risk features (age, prior thrombosis) to evaluate the need for cytoreduction besides foundational therapy with low-dose aspirin and stringent phlebotomy. Shorter- and longer-term patient goals should be considered in light of several variables such as co-morbid conditions (especially cardiovascular risk factors), disease symptoms, and the risk-benefit profile of available drugs. While hydroxyurea has been the pro forma choice of cytoreduction for many practitioners over the last half-century, the more recent regulatory approvals of ruxolitinib and ropeginterferon-alfa-2b, based on phase 3 randomized trials, highlight an expanding portfolio of active drugs. Obtaining high-level evidence for short-term clinical trial endpoints such as hematocrit control, symptom burden/quality of life, splenomegaly, and JAK2 V617F allele burden lies within the timeline of most studies. However, in many cases, it may not be possible to adequately power trials to capture significant differences in the typically low event rates of thrombosis, as well as longer-horizon endpoints such as evolution to myelofibrosis and acute myeloid leukemia, and survival. This Perspective highlights the challenges of addressing these data gaps and outstanding questions in the emerging treatment landscape of PV.

The MDM2 antagonist idasanutlin in patients with polycythemia vera: results from a single-arm phase 2 study

Idasanutlin, an MDM2 antagonist, showed clinical activity and a rapid reduction in JAK2 V617F allele burden in patients with polycythemia vera (PV) in a phase 1 study. This open-label phase 2 study evaluated idasanutlin in patients with hydroxyurea (HU)-resistant/-intolerant PV, per the European LeukemiaNet criteria, and phlebotomy dependence; prior ruxolitinib exposure was permitted. Idasanutlin was administered once daily on days 1 through 5 of each 28-day cycle. The primary end point was composite response (hematocrit control and spleen volume reduction > 35%) in patients with splenomegaly and hematocrit control in patients without splenomegaly at week 32. Key secondary end points included safety, complete hematologic response (CHR), patient-reported outcomes, and molecular responses. All patients (n = 27) received idasanutlin; 16 had response assessment (week 32). Among responders with baseline splenomegaly (n = 13), 9 (69%) attained any spleen volume reduction, and 1 achieved composite response. Nine patients (56%) achieved hematocrit control, and 8 patients (50%) achieved CHR. Overall, 43% of evaluable patients (6/14) showed a ≥50% reduction in the Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score (week 32). Nausea (93%), diarrhea (78%), and vomiting (41%) were the most common adverse events, with grade ≥ 3 nausea or vomiting experienced by 3 patients (11%) and 1 patient (4%), respectively. Reduced JAK2 V617F allele burden occurred early (after 3 cycles), with a median reduction of 76%, and was associated with achieving CHR and hematocrit control. Overall, the idasanutlin dosing regimen showed clinical activity and rapidly reduced JAK2 allele burden in patients with HU-resistant/- intolerant PV but was associated with low-grade gastrointestinal toxicity, leading to poor long-term tolerability. This trial was registered at www.clinincaltrials.gov as #NCT03287245.

Understanding Aberrant Signaling to Elude Therapy Escape Mechanisms in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Aberrant signaling in myeloproliferative neoplasms may arise from alterations in genes coding for signal transduction proteins or epigenetic regulators. Both mutated and normal cells cooperate, altering fragile balances in bone marrow niches and fueling persistent inflammation through paracrine or systemic signals. Despite the hopes placed in targeted therapies, myeloid proliferative neoplasms remain incurable diseases in patients not eligible for stem cell transplantation. Due to the emergence of drug resistance, patient management is often very difficult in the long term. Unexpected connections among signal transduction pathways highlighted in neoplastic cells suggest new strategies to overcome neoplastic cell adaptation.