51
|
Schwietzke S, Pétron G, Conley S, Pickering C, Mielke-Maday I, Dlugokencky EJ, Tans PP, Vaughn T, Bell C, Zimmerle D, Wolter S, King CW, White AB, Coleman T, Bianco L, Schnell RC. Improved Mechanistic Understanding of Natural Gas Methane Emissions from Spatially Resolved Aircraft Measurements. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2017; 51:7286-7294. [PMID: 28548824 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b01810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
Divergence in recent oil and gas related methane emission estimates between aircraft studies (basin total for a midday window) and emissions inventories (annualized regional and national statistics) indicate the need for better understanding the experimental design, including temporal and spatial alignment and interpretation of results. Our aircraft-based methane emission estimates in a major U.S. shale gas basin resolved from west to east show (i) similar spatial distributions for 2 days, (ii) strong spatial correlations with reported NG production (R2 = 0.75) and active gas well pad count (R2 = 0.81), and (iii) 2× higher emissions in the western half (normalized by gas production) despite relatively homogeneous dry gas and well characteristics. Operator reported hourly activity data show that midday episodic emissions from manual liquid unloadings (a routine operation in this basin and elsewhere) could explain ∼1/3 of the total emissions detected midday by the aircraft and ∼2/3 of the west-east difference in emissions. The 22% emission difference between both days further emphasizes that episodic sources can substantially impact midday methane emissions and that aircraft may detect daily peak emissions rather than daily averages that are generally employed in emissions inventories. While the aircraft approach is valid, quantitative, and independent, our study sheds new light on the interpretation of previous basin scale aircraft studies, and provides an improved mechanistic understanding of oil and gas related methane emissions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Schwietzke
- Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado , 216 UCB, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States
- NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory , 325 Broadway, Boulder, Colorado 80305, United States
| | - Gabrielle Pétron
- Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado , 216 UCB, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States
- NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory , 325 Broadway, Boulder, Colorado 80305, United States
| | - Stephen Conley
- Scientific Aviation, Inc. , 3335 Airport Road Suite B, Boulder, Colorado 80301, United States
- Department of Land, Air, and Water Resources, University of California , One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616, United States
| | - Cody Pickering
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University , 400 Isotope Dr, Fort Collins, Colorado 80521, United States
| | - Ingrid Mielke-Maday
- Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado , 216 UCB, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States
- NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory , 325 Broadway, Boulder, Colorado 80305, United States
| | - Edward J Dlugokencky
- NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory , 325 Broadway, Boulder, Colorado 80305, United States
| | - Pieter P Tans
- NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory , 325 Broadway, Boulder, Colorado 80305, United States
| | - Tim Vaughn
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University , 400 Isotope Dr, Fort Collins, Colorado 80521, United States
| | - Clay Bell
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University , 400 Isotope Dr, Fort Collins, Colorado 80521, United States
| | - Daniel Zimmerle
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University , 400 Isotope Dr, Fort Collins, Colorado 80521, United States
| | - Sonja Wolter
- Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado , 216 UCB, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States
- NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory , 325 Broadway, Boulder, Colorado 80305, United States
| | - Clark W King
- NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory , 325 Broadway, Boulder, Colorado 80305, United States
| | - Allen B White
- NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory , 325 Broadway, Boulder, Colorado 80305, United States
| | - Timothy Coleman
- Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado , 216 UCB, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States
- NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory , 325 Broadway, Boulder, Colorado 80305, United States
| | - Laura Bianco
- Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado , 216 UCB, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States
- NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory , 325 Broadway, Boulder, Colorado 80305, United States
| | - Russell C Schnell
- NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory , 325 Broadway, Boulder, Colorado 80305, United States
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Smith ML, Gvakharia A, Kort EA, Sweeney C, Conley SA, Faloona I, Newberger T, Schnell R, Schwietzke S, Wolter S. Airborne Quantification of Methane Emissions over the Four Corners Region. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2017; 51:5832-5837. [PMID: 28418663 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b06107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
Methane (CH4) is a potent greenhouse gas and the primary component of natural gas. The San Juan Basin (SJB) is one of the largest coal-bed methane producing regions in North America and, including gas production from conventional and shale sources, contributed ∼2% of U.S. natural gas production in 2015. In this work, we quantify the CH4 flux from the SJB using continuous atmospheric sampling from aircraft collected during the TOPDOWN2015 field campaign in April 2015. Using five independent days of measurements and the aircraft-based mass balance method, we calculate an average CH4 flux of 0.54 ± 0.20 Tg yr-1 (1σ), in close agreement with the previous space-based estimate made for 2003-2009. These results agree within error with the U.S. EPA gridded inventory for 2012. These flights combined with the previous satellite study suggest CH4 emissions have not changed. While there have been significant declines in natural gas production between measurements, recent increases in oil production in the SJB may explain why emission of CH4 has not declined. Airborne quantification of outcrops where seepage occurs are consistent with ground-based studies that indicate these geological sources are a small fraction of the basin total (0.02-0.12 Tg yr-1) and cannot explain basinwide consistent emissions from 2003 to 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mackenzie L Smith
- Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
| | - Alexander Gvakharia
- Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
| | - Eric A Kort
- Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
| | - Colm Sweeney
- Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado , Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States
- NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory , Boulder, Colorado 80305, United States
| | - Stephen A Conley
- Scientific Aviation , Boulder, Colorado 80301, United States
- Department of Land, Air, & Water Resources, University of California Davis , Davis, California 95616, United States
| | - Ian Faloona
- Department of Land, Air, & Water Resources, University of California Davis , Davis, California 95616, United States
| | - Tim Newberger
- Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado , Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States
- NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory , Boulder, Colorado 80305, United States
| | - Russell Schnell
- NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory , Boulder, Colorado 80305, United States
| | - Stefan Schwietzke
- Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado , Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States
- NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory , Boulder, Colorado 80305, United States
| | - Sonja Wolter
- Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado , Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States
- NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory , Boulder, Colorado 80305, United States
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Boothroyd IM, Almond S, Worrall F, Davies RJ. Assessing the fugitive emission of CH 4 via migration along fault zones - Comparing potential shale gas basins to non-shale basins in the UK. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2017; 580:412-424. [PMID: 27914640 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2016] [Revised: 08/22/2016] [Accepted: 09/07/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
This study considered whether faults bounding hydrocarbon-bearing basins could be conduits for methane release to the atmosphere. Five basin bounding faults in the UK were considered: two which bounded potential shale gas basins; two faults that bounded coal basins; and one that bounded a basin with no known hydrocarbon deposits. In each basin, two mobile methane surveys were conducted, one along the surface expression of the basin bounding fault and one along a line of similar length but not intersecting the fault. All survey data was corrected for wind direction, the ambient CH4 concentration and the distance to the possible source. The survey design allowed for Analysis of Variance and this showed that there was a significant difference between the fault and control survey lines though a significant flux from the fault was not found in all basins and there was no apparent link to the presence, or absence, of hydrocarbons. As such, shale basins did not have a significantly different CH4 flux to non-shale hydrocarbon basins and non-hydrocarbon basins. These results could have implications for CH4 emissions from faults both in the UK and globally. Including all the corrected fault data, we estimate faults have an emissions factor of 11.5±6.3tCH4/km/yr, while the most conservative estimate of the flux from faults is 0.7±0.3tCH4/km/yr. The use of isotopes meant that at least one site of thermogenic flux from a fault could be identified. However, the total length of faults that penetrate through-basins and go from the surface to hydrocarbon reservoirs at depth in the UK is not known; as such, the emissions factor could not be multiplied by an activity level to estimate a total UK CH4 flux.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I M Boothroyd
- Department of Earth Sciences, Durham University, Science Labs, Durham DH1 3LE, UK.
| | - S Almond
- School of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE1 7RU, UK
| | - F Worrall
- Department of Earth Sciences, Durham University, Science Labs, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
| | - R J Davies
- School of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE1 7RU, UK
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Hildenbrand ZL, Mach PM, McBride EM, Dorreyatim MN, Taylor JT, Carlton DD, Meik JM, Fontenot BE, Wright KC, Schug KA, Verbeck GF. Point source attribution of ambient contamination events near unconventional oil and gas development. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2016; 573:382-388. [PMID: 27572531 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2016] [Revised: 08/17/2016] [Accepted: 08/17/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
We present an analysis of ambient benzene, toluene, and xylene isomers in the Eagle Ford shale region of southern Texas. In situ air quality measurements using membrane inlet mobile mass spectrometry revealed ambient benzene and toluene concentrations as high as 1000 and 5000 parts-per-billion, respectively, originating from specific sub-processes on unconventional oil and gas well pad sites. The detection of highly variant contamination events attributable to natural gas flaring units, condensate tanks, compressor units, and hydrogen sulfide scavengers indicates that mechanical inefficiencies, and not necessarily the inherent nature of the extraction process as a whole, result in the release of these compounds into the environment. This awareness of ongoing contamination events contributes to an enhanced knowledge of ambient volatile organic compounds on a regional scale. While these reconnaissance measurements on their own do not fully characterize the fluctuations of ambient BTEX concentrations that likely exist in the atmosphere of the Eagle Ford Shale region, they do suggest that contamination events from unconventional oil and gas development can be monitored, controlled, and reduced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zacariah L Hildenbrand
- Affiliate of the Collaborative Laboratories for Environmental Analysis and Remediation, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, United States; Inform Environmental, LLC, Dallas, TX 75206, United States
| | - Phillip M Mach
- Department of Chemistry, University of North Texas, Denton, TX 76203, United States
| | - Ethan M McBride
- Department of Chemistry, University of North Texas, Denton, TX 76203, United States
| | - M Navid Dorreyatim
- Department of Mechanical and Energy Engineering, University of North Texas, Denton, TX 76203, United States
| | - Josh T Taylor
- Inform Environmental, LLC, Dallas, TX 75206, United States
| | - Doug D Carlton
- Affiliate of the Collaborative Laboratories for Environmental Analysis and Remediation, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, United States; Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, United States
| | - Jesse M Meik
- Affiliate of the Collaborative Laboratories for Environmental Analysis and Remediation, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, United States; Department of Biological Sciences, Tarleton State University, Stephenville, TX 76401, United States
| | - Brian E Fontenot
- Affiliate of the Collaborative Laboratories for Environmental Analysis and Remediation, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, United States
| | | | - Kevin A Schug
- Affiliate of the Collaborative Laboratories for Environmental Analysis and Remediation, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, United States; Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, United States.
| | - Guido F Verbeck
- Department of Chemistry, University of North Texas, Denton, TX 76203, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Thoma ED, Brantley HL, Oliver KD, Whitaker DA, Mukerjee S, Mitchell B, Wu T, Squier B, Escobar E, Cousett TA, Gross-Davis CA, Schmidt H, Sosna D, Weiss H. South Philadelphia passive sampler and sensor study. JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION (1995) 2016; 66:959-70. [PMID: 27192142 DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2016.1184724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED From June 2013 to March 2015, in total 41 passive sampler deployments of 2 wk duration each were conducted at 17 sites in South Philadelphia, PA, with results for benzene discussed here. Complementary time-resolved measurements with lower cost prototype fenceline sensors and an open-path ultraviolet differential optical absorption spectrometer were also conducted. Minimum passive sampler benzene concentrations for each sampling period ranged from 0.08 ppbv to 0.65 ppbv, with a mean of 0.25 ppbv, and were negatively correlated with ambient temperature (-0.01 ppbv/°C, R(2) = 0.68). Co-deployed duplicate passive sampler pairs (N = 609) demonstrated good precision with an average and maximum percent difference of 1.5% and 34%, respectively. A group of passive samplers located within 50 m of a refinery fenceline had a study mean benzene concentration of 1.22 ppbv, whereas a group of samplers located in communities >1 km distant from facilities had a mean of 0.29 ppbv. The difference in the means of these groups was statistically significant at the 95% confidence level (p < 0.001). A decreasing gradient in benzene concentrations moving away from the facilities was observed, as was a significant period-to-period variation. The highest recorded 2-wk average benzene concentration for the fenceline group was 3.11 ppbv. During this period, time-resolved data from the prototype sensors and the open-path spectrometer detected a benzene signal from the west on one day in particular, with the highest 5-min path-averaged benzene concentration measured at 24 ppbv. IMPLICATIONS Using a variation of EPA's passive sampler refinery fenceline monitoring method, coupled with time-resolved measurements, a multiyear study in South Philadelphia informed benzene concentrations near facilities and in communities. The combination of measurement strategies can assist facilities in identification and mitigation of emissions from fugitive sources and improve information on air quality complex air sheds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eben D Thoma
- a U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development , National Risk Managment Research Laboratory , Durham , NC , USA
| | - Halley L Brantley
- a U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development , National Risk Managment Research Laboratory , Durham , NC , USA
- b Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Engineering Fellow , Durham , NC , USA
| | - Karen D Oliver
- c U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development , National Exposure Research Laboratory , Durham , NC , USA
| | - Donald A Whitaker
- a U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development , National Risk Managment Research Laboratory , Durham , NC , USA
| | - Shaibal Mukerjee
- a U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development , National Risk Managment Research Laboratory , Durham , NC , USA
| | - Bill Mitchell
- a U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development , National Risk Managment Research Laboratory , Durham , NC , USA
| | - Tai Wu
- a U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development , National Risk Managment Research Laboratory , Durham , NC , USA
| | - Bill Squier
- d U.S. EPA, Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance , National Environmental Investigations Center , Denver , CO , USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Dennis Sosna
- h City of Philadelphia, Department of Public Health , Air Management Services Laboratory , Philadelphia , PA , USA
| | - Hallie Weiss
- h City of Philadelphia, Department of Public Health , Air Management Services Laboratory , Philadelphia , PA , USA
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Hendrick MF, Ackley R, Sanaie-Movahed B, Tang X, Phillips NG. Fugitive methane emissions from leak-prone natural gas distribution infrastructure in urban environments. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION (BARKING, ESSEX : 1987) 2016; 213:710-716. [PMID: 27023280 DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.01.094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2015] [Revised: 01/27/2016] [Accepted: 01/30/2016] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
Fugitive emissions from natural gas systems are the largest anthropogenic source of the greenhouse gas methane (CH4) in the U.S. and contribute to the risk of explosions in urban environments. Here, we report on a survey of CH4 emissions from 100 natural gas leaks in cast iron distribution mains in Metro Boston, MA. Direct measures of CH4 flux from individual leaks ranged from 4.0 - 2.3 × 10(4) g CH4•day(-1). The distribution of leak size is positively skewed, with 7% of leaks contributing 50% of total CH4 emissions measured. We identify parallels in the skewed distribution of leak size found in downstream systems with midstream and upstream stages of the gas process chain. Fixing 'superemitter' leaks will disproportionately stem greenhouse gas emissions. Fifteen percent of leaks surveyed qualified as potentially explosive (Grade 1), and we found no difference in CH4 flux between Grade 1 leaks and all remaining leaks surveyed (p = 0.24). All leaks must be addressed, as even small leaks cannot be disregarded as 'safely leaking.' Key methodological impediments to quantifying and addressing the impacts of leaking natural gas distribution infrastructure involve inconsistencies in the manner in which gas leaks are defined, detected, and classified. To address this need, we propose a two-part leak classification system that reflects both the safety and climatic impacts of natural gas leaks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret F Hendrick
- Boston University, Department of Earth and Environment, 685 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
| | | | - Bahare Sanaie-Movahed
- Boston University, Department of Earth and Environment, 685 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
| | - Xiaojing Tang
- Boston University, Department of Earth and Environment, 685 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
| | - Nathan G Phillips
- Boston University, Department of Earth and Environment, 685 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Allen DT. Emissions from oil and gas operations in the United States and their air quality implications. JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION (1995) 2016; 66:549-575. [PMID: 27249104 DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2016.1171263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED The energy supply infrastructure in the United States has been changing dramatically over the past decade. Increased production of oil and natural gas, particularly from shale resources using horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing, made the United States the world's largest producer of oil and natural gas in 2014. This review examines air quality impacts, specifically, changes in greenhouse gas, criteria air pollutant, and air toxics emissions from oil and gas production activities that are a result of these changes in energy supplies and use. National emission inventories indicate that volatile organic compound (VOC) and nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from oil and gas supply chains in the United States have been increasing significantly, whereas emission inventories for greenhouse gases have seen slight declines over the past decade. These emission inventories are based on counts of equipment and operational activities (activity factors), multiplied by average emission factors, and therefore are subject to uncertainties in these factors. Although uncertainties associated with activity data and missing emission source types can be significant, multiple recent measurement studies indicate that the greatest uncertainties are associated with emission factors. In many source categories, small groups of devices or sites, referred to as super-emitters, contribute a large fraction of emissions. When super-emitters are accounted for, multiple measurement approaches, at multiple scales, produce similar results for estimated emissions. Challenges moving forward include identifying super-emitters and reducing their emission magnitudes. Work done to date suggests that both equipment malfunction and operational practices can be important. Finally, although most of this review focuses on emissions from energy supply infrastructures, the regional air quality implications of some coupled energy production and use scenarios are examined. These case studies suggest that both energy production and use should be considered in assessing air quality implications of changes in energy infrastructures, and that impacts are likely to vary among regions. IMPLICATIONS The energy supply infrastructure in the United States has been changing dramatically over the past decade, leading to changes in emissions from oil and natural gas supply chain sources. In many source categories along these supply chains, small groups of devices or sites, referred to as super-emitters, contribute a large fraction of emissions. Effective emission reductions will require technologies for both identifying super-emitters and reducing their emission magnitudes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David T Allen
- a Department of Chemical Engineering, and Center for Energy and Environmental Resources , University of Texas , Austin , TX , USA
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Lyon DR, Alvarez RA, Zavala-Araiza D, Brandt AR, Jackson RB, Hamburg SP. Aerial Surveys of Elevated Hydrocarbon Emissions from Oil and Gas Production Sites. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2016; 50:4877-4886. [PMID: 27045743 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b00705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
Oil and gas (O&G) well pads with high hydrocarbon emission rates may disproportionally contribute to total methane and volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from the production sector. In turn, these emissions may be missing from most bottom-up emission inventories. We performed helicopter-based infrared camera surveys of more than 8000 O&G well pads in seven U.S. basins to assess the prevalence and distribution of high-emitting hydrocarbon sources (detection threshold ∼ 1-3 g s(-1)). The proportion of sites with such high-emitting sources was 4% nationally but ranged from 1% in the Powder River (Wyoming) to 14% in the Bakken (North Dakota). Emissions were observed three times more frequently at sites in the oil-producing Bakken and oil-producing regions of mixed basins (p < 0.0001, χ(2) test). However, statistical models using basin and well pad characteristics explained 14% or less of the variance in observed emission patterns, indicating that stochastic processes dominate the occurrence of high emissions at individual sites. Over 90% of almost 500 detected sources were from tank vents and hatches. Although tank emissions may be partially attributable to flash gas, observed frequencies in most basins exceed those expected if emissions were effectively captured and controlled, demonstrating that tank emission control systems commonly underperform. Tanks represent a key mitigation opportunity for reducing methane and VOC emissions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David R Lyon
- Environmental Defense Fund , 301 Congress Avenue, Suite 1300, Austin, Texas 78701, United States
- Environmental Dynamics Program, University of Arkansas , Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701, United States
| | - Ramón A Alvarez
- Environmental Defense Fund , 301 Congress Avenue, Suite 1300, Austin, Texas 78701, United States
| | - Daniel Zavala-Araiza
- Environmental Defense Fund , 301 Congress Avenue, Suite 1300, Austin, Texas 78701, United States
| | - Adam R Brandt
- Department of Energy Resources Engineering, Stanford University , Stanford, California 94305, United States
| | - Robert B Jackson
- Department of Earth System Science, Woods Institute for the Environment, and Precourt Institute for Energy, Stanford University , Stanford, California 94305, United States
| | - Steven P Hamburg
- Environmental Defense Fund , 301 Congress Avenue, Suite 1300, Austin, Texas 78701, United States
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Eisele AP, Mukerjee S, Smith LA, Thoma ED, Whitaker DA, Oliver KD, Wu T, Colon M, Alston L, Cousett TA, Miller MC, Smith DM, Stallings C. Volatile organic compounds at two oil and natural gas production well pads in Colorado and Texas using passive samplers. JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION (1995) 2016; 66:412-9. [PMID: 26771215 DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2016.1141808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED A pilot study was conducted in application of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Methods 325A/B variant for monitoring volatile organic compounds (VOCs) near two oil and natural gas (ONG) production well pads in the Texas Barnett Shale formation and Colorado Denver-Julesburg Basin (DJB), along with a traffic-dominated site in downtown Denver, CO. As indicated in the EPA method, VOC concentrations were measured for 14-day sampling periods using passive-diffusive tube samplers with Carbopack X sorbent at fenceline perimeter and other locations. VOCs were significantly higher at the DJB well pad versus the Barnett well pad and were likely due to higher production levels at the DJB well pad during the study. Benzene and toluene were significantly higher at the DJB well pad versus downtown Denver. Except for perchloroethylene, VOCs measured at passive sampler locations (PSs) along the perimeter of the Barnett well pad were significantly higher than PSs farther away. At the DJB well pad, most VOC concentrations, except perchloroethylene, were significantly higher prior to operational changes than after these changes were made. Though limited, the results suggest passive samplers are precise (duplicate precision usually ≤10%) and that they can be useful to assess spatial gradients and operational conditions at well pad locations over time-integrated periods. IMPLICATIONS Recently enacted EPA Methods 325A/B use passive-diffusive tube samplers to measure benzene at multiple fenceline locations at petrochemical refineries. This pilot study presents initial data demonstrating the utility of Methods 325A/B for monitoring at ONG facilities. Measurements revealed elevated concentrations reflective of production levels and spatial gradients of VOCs relative to source proximity at the Barnett well pad, as well as operational changes at the DJB well pad. Though limited, these findings indicate that Methods 325A/B can be useful in application to characterize VOCs at well pad boundaries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam P Eisele
- a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency , Region 8, Denver , Colorado , USA
| | - Shaibal Mukerjee
- b U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Exposure Research Laboratory, Research Triangle Park , North Carolina , USA
| | - Luther A Smith
- c Alion Science and Technology , Durham , North Carolina , USA
| | - Eben D Thoma
- d U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory Research Triangle Park , North Carolina , USA
| | - Donald A Whitaker
- b U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Exposure Research Laboratory, Research Triangle Park , North Carolina , USA
| | - Karen D Oliver
- b U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Exposure Research Laboratory, Research Triangle Park , North Carolina , USA
| | - Tai Wu
- d U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory Research Triangle Park , North Carolina , USA
| | - Maribel Colon
- b U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Exposure Research Laboratory, Research Triangle Park , North Carolina , USA
| | - Lillian Alston
- b U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Exposure Research Laboratory, Research Triangle Park , North Carolina , USA
- e Senior Environmental Employment Program, Research Triangle Park , North Carolina , USA
| | | | - Michael C Miller
- f U.S. Environmental Protection Agency , Region 6, Dallas , Texas , USA
| | - Donald M Smith
- f U.S. Environmental Protection Agency , Region 6, Dallas , Texas , USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
60
|
Albertson JD, Harvey T, Foderaro G, Zhu P, Zhou X, Ferrari S, Amin MS, Modrak M, Brantley H, Thoma ED. A Mobile Sensing Approach for Regional Surveillance of Fugitive Methane Emissions in Oil and Gas Production. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2016; 50:2487-2497. [PMID: 26807713 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b05059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
This paper addresses the need for surveillance of fugitive methane emissions over broad geographical regions. Most existing techniques suffer from being either extensive (but qualitative) or quantitative (but intensive with poor scalability). A total of two novel advancements are made here. First, a recursive Bayesian method is presented for probabilistically characterizing fugitive point-sources from mobile sensor data. This approach is made possible by a new cross-plume integrated dispersion formulation that overcomes much of the need for time-averaging concentration data. The method is tested here against a limited data set of controlled methane release and shown to perform well. We then present an information-theoretic approach to plan the paths of the sensor-equipped vehicle, where the path is chosen so as to maximize expected reduction in integrated target source rate uncertainty in the region, subject to given starting and ending positions and prevailing meteorological conditions. The information-driven sensor path planning algorithm is tested and shown to provide robust results across a wide range of conditions. An overall system concept is presented for optionally piggybacking of these techniques onto normal industry maintenance operations using sensor-equipped work trucks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - M Shahrooz Amin
- Arcadis-US Inc. , 4915 Prospectus Drive F, Durham, North Carolina 27713, United States
| | - Mark Modrak
- Arcadis-US Inc. , 4915 Prospectus Drive F, Durham, North Carolina 27713, United States
| | - Halley Brantley
- Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, United States Environmental Protection Agency , 109 TW Alexander Drive, E343-02, RTP, North Carolina 27711, United States
| | - Eben D Thoma
- Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, United States Environmental Protection Agency , 109 TW Alexander Drive, E343-02, RTP, North Carolina 27711, United States
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Omara M, Sullivan MR, Li X, Subramanian R, Robinson AL, Presto AA. Methane Emissions from Conventional and Unconventional Natural Gas Production Sites in the Marcellus Shale Basin. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2016; 50:2099-107. [PMID: 26824407 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b05503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
There is a need for continued assessment of methane (CH4) emissions associated with natural gas (NG) production, especially as recent advancements in horizontal drilling combined with staged hydraulic fracturing technologies have dramatically increased NG production (we refer to these wells as "unconventional" NG wells). In this study, we measured facility-level CH4 emissions rates from the NG production sector in the Marcellus region, and compared CH4 emissions between unconventional NG (UNG) well pad sites and the relatively smaller and older "conventional" NG (CvNG) sites that consist of wells drilled vertically into permeable geologic formations. A top-down tracer-flux CH4 measurement approach utilizing mobile downwind intercepts of CH4, ethane, and tracer (nitrous oxide and acetylene) plumes was performed at 18 CvNG sites (19 individual wells) and 17 UNG sites (88 individual wells). The 17 UNG sites included four sites undergoing completion flowback (FB). The mean facility-level CH4 emission rate among UNG well pad sites in routine production (18.8 kg/h (95% confidence interval (CI) on the mean of 12.0-26.8 kg/h)) was 23 times greater than the mean CH4 emissions from CvNG sites. These differences were attributed, in part, to the large size (based on number of wells and ancillary NG production equipment) and the significantly higher production rate of UNG sites. However, CvNG sites generally had much higher production-normalized CH4 emission rates (median: 11%; range: 0.35-91%) compared to UNG sites (median: 0.13%, range: 0.01-1.2%), likely resulting from a greater prevalence of avoidable process operating conditions (e.g., unresolved equipment maintenance issues). At the regional scale, we estimate that total annual CH4 emissions from 88 500 combined CvNG well pads in Pennsylvania and West Virginia (660 Gg (95% CI: 500 to 800 Gg)) exceeded that from 3390 UNG well pads by 170 Gg, reflecting the large number of CvNG wells and the comparably large fraction of CH4 lost per unit production. The new emissions data suggest that the recently instituted Pennsylvania CH4 emissions inventory substantially underestimates measured facility-level CH4 emissions by >10-40 times for five UNG sites in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Omara
- Center for Atmospheric Particle Studies and the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
| | - Melissa R Sullivan
- Center for Atmospheric Particle Studies and the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
| | - Xiang Li
- Center for Atmospheric Particle Studies and the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
| | - R Subramanian
- Center for Atmospheric Particle Studies and the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
| | - Allen L Robinson
- Center for Atmospheric Particle Studies and the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
| | - Albert A Presto
- Center for Atmospheric Particle Studies and the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
Thoma ED, Brantley HL, Oliver KD, Whitaker DA, Mukerjee S, Mitchell B, Wu T, Squier B, Escobar E, Cousett TA, Gross-Davis CA, Schmidt H, Sosna D, Weiss H. South Philadelphia passive sampler and sensor study. JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION (1995) 2016; 66:https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2016.1184724. [PMID: 32636605 PMCID: PMC7340175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED From June 2013 to March 2015, in total 41 passive sampler deployments of 2 wk duration each were conducted at 17 sites in South Philadelphia, PA, with results for benzene discussed here. Complementary time-resolved measurements with lower cost prototype fenceline sensors and an open-path ultraviolet differential optical absorption spectrometer were also conducted. Minimum passive sampler benzene concentrations for each sampling period ranged from 0.08 ppbv to 0.65 ppbv, with a mean of 0.25 ppbv, and were negatively correlated with ambient temperature (-0.01 ppbv/°C, R2 = 0.68). Co-deployed duplicate passive sampler pairs (N = 609) demonstrated good precision with an average and maximum percent difference of 1.5% and 34%, respectively. A group of passive samplers located within 50 m of a refinery fenceline had a study mean benzene concentration of 1.22 ppbv, whereas a group of samplers located in communities >1 km distant from facilities had a mean of 0.29 ppbv. The difference in the means of these groups was statistically significant at the 95% confidence level (p < 0.001). A decreasing gradient in benzene concentrations moving away from the facilities was observed, as was a significant period-to-period variation. The highest recorded 2-wk average benzene concentration for the fenceline group was 3.11 ppbv. During this period, time-resolved data from the prototype sensors and the open-path spectrometer detected a benzene signal from the west on one day in particular, with the highest 5-min path-averaged benzene concentration measured at 24 ppbv. IMPLICATIONS Using a variation of EPA's passive sampler refinery fenceline monitoring method, coupled with time-resolved measurements, a multiyear study in South Philadelphia informed benzene concentrations near facilities and in communities. The combination of measurement strategies can assist facilities in identification and mitigation of emissions from fugitive sources and improve information on air quality complex air sheds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eben D Thoma
- U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development, National Risk Managment Research Laboratory, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Halley L Brantley
- U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development, National Risk Managment Research Laboratory, Durham, NC, USA
- Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Engineering Fellow, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Karen D Oliver
- U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development, National Exposure Research Laboratory, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Donald A Whitaker
- U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development, National Risk Managment Research Laboratory, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Shaibal Mukerjee
- U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development, National Risk Managment Research Laboratory, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Bill Mitchell
- U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development, National Risk Managment Research Laboratory, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Tai Wu
- U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development, National Risk Managment Research Laboratory, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Bill Squier
- U.S. EPA, Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, National Environmental Investigations Center, Denver, CO, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Dennis Sosna
- City of Philadelphia, Department of Public Health, Air Management Services Laboratory, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Hallie Weiss
- City of Philadelphia, Department of Public Health, Air Management Services Laboratory, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Brantley HL, Thoma ED, Eisele AP. Assessment of volatile organic compound and hazardous air pollutant emissions from oil and natural gas well pads using mobile remote and on-site direct measurements. JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION (1995) 2015; 65:1072-82. [PMID: 26067676 DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2015.1056888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) from oil and natural gas production were investigated using direct measurements of component-level emissions on pads in the Denver-Julesburg (DJ) Basin and remote measurements of production pad-level emissions in the Barnett, DJ, and Pinedale basins. Results from the 2011 DJ on-site study indicate that emissions from condensate storage tanks are highly variable and can be an important source of VOCs and HAPs, even when control measures are present. Comparison of the measured condensate tank emissions with potentially emitted concentrations modeled using E&P TANKS (American Petroleum Institute [API] Publication 4697) suggested that some of the tanks were likely effectively controlled (emissions less than 95% of potential), whereas others were not. Results also indicate that the use of a commercial high-volume sampler (HVS) without corresponding canister measurements may result in severe underestimates of emissions from condensate tanks. Instantaneous VOC and HAP emissions measured on-site on controlled systems in the DJ Basin were significantly higher than VOC and HAP emission results from the study conducted by Eastern Research Group (ERG) for the City of Fort Worth (2011) using the same method in the Barnett on pads with low or no condensate production. The measured VOC emissions were either lower or not significantly different from the results of studies of uncontrolled emissions from condensate tanks measured by routing all emissions through a single port monitored by a flow measurement device for 24 hr. VOC and HAP concentrations measured remotely using the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Other Test Method (OTM) 33A in the DJ Basin were not significantly different from the on-site measurements, although significant differences between basins were observed. IMPLICATIONS VOC and HAP emissions from upstream production operations are important due to their potential impact on regional ozone levels and proximate populations. This study provides information on the sources and variability of VOC and HAP emissions from production pads as well as a comparison between different measurement techniques and laboratory analysis protocols. On-site and remote measurements of VOC and HAP emissions from oil and gas production pads indicate that measurable emissions can occur despite the presence of control measures, often as a result of leaking thief hatch seals on condensate tanks. Furthermore, results from the remote measurement method OTM 33A indicate that it can be used effectively as an inspection technique for identifying oil and gas well pads with large fugitive emissions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Halley L Brantley
- a Oak Ridge Institute of Science and Education Fellowship , U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Research Triangle Park , NC , USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
64
|
Zimmerle DJ, Williams LL, Vaughn TL, Quinn C, Subramanian R, Duggan GP, Willson B, Opsomer JD, Marchese AJ, Martinez DM, Robinson AL. Methane Emissions from the Natural Gas Transmission and Storage System in the United States. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2015. [PMID: 26195284 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b01669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
The recent growth in production and utilization of natural gas offers potential climate benefits, but those benefits depend on lifecycle emissions of methane, the primary component of natural gas and a potent greenhouse gas. This study estimates methane emissions from the transmission and storage (T&S) sector of the United States natural gas industry using new data collected during 2012, including 2,292 onsite measurements, additional emissions data from 677 facilities and activity data from 922 facilities. The largest emission sources were fugitive emissions from certain compressor-related equipment and "super-emitter" facilities. We estimate total methane emissions from the T&S sector at 1,503 [1,220 to 1,950] Gg/yr (95% confidence interval) compared to the 2012 Environmental Protection Agency's Greenhouse Gas Inventory (GHGI) estimate of 2,071 [1,680 to 2,690] Gg/yr. While the overlap in confidence intervals indicates that the difference is not statistically significant, this is the result of several significant, but offsetting, factors. Factors which reduce the study estimate include a lower estimated facility count, a shift away from engines toward lower-emitting turbine and electric compressor drivers, and reductions in the usage of gas-driven pneumatic devices. Factors that increase the study estimate relative to the GHGI include updated emission rates in certain emission categories and explicit treatment of skewed emissions at both component and facility levels. For T&S stations that are required to report to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), this study estimates total emissions to be 260% [215% to 330%] of the reportable emissions for these stations, primarily due to the inclusion of emission sources that are not reported under the GHGRP rules, updated emission factors, and super-emitter emissions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Zimmerle
- †Energy Institute and Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80524, United States
| | - Laurie L Williams
- ‡Department of Physics and Engineering, Fort Lewis College, Durango, Colorado 81301, United States
| | - Timothy L Vaughn
- †Energy Institute and Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80524, United States
| | - Casey Quinn
- †Energy Institute and Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80524, United States
| | - R Subramanian
- §Center for Atmospheric Particle Studies (CAPS) and the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
| | - Gerald P Duggan
- †Energy Institute and Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80524, United States
| | - Bryan Willson
- †Energy Institute and Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80524, United States
| | - Jean D Opsomer
- ∥Department of Statistics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80524, United States
| | - Anthony J Marchese
- †Energy Institute and Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80524, United States
| | - David M Martinez
- †Energy Institute and Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80524, United States
| | - Allen L Robinson
- §Center for Atmospheric Particle Studies (CAPS) and the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Zavala-Araiza D, Lyon D, Alvarez RA, Palacios V, Harriss R, Lan X, Talbot R, Hamburg SP. Toward a Functional Definition of Methane Super-Emitters: Application to Natural Gas Production Sites. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2015; 49:8167-74. [PMID: 26148555 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Emissions from natural gas production sites are characterized by skewed distributions, where a small percentage of sites-commonly labeled super-emitters-account for a majority of emissions. A better characterization of super-emitters is needed to operationalize ways to identify them and reduce emissions. We designed a conceptual framework that functionally defines superemitting sites as those with the highest proportional loss rates (methane emitted relative to methane produced). Using this concept, we estimated total methane emissions from natural gas production sites in the Barnett Shale; functionally superemitting sites accounted for roughly three-fourths of total emissions. We discuss the potential to reduce emissions from these sites, under the assumption that sites with high proportional loss rates have excess emissions resulting from abnormal or otherwise avoidable operating conditions, such as malfunctioning equipment. Because the population of functionally superemitting sites is not expected to be static over time, continuous monitoring will likely be necessary to identify them and improve their operation. This work suggests that achieving and maintaining uniformly low emissions across the entire population of production sites will require mitigation steps at a large fraction of sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Zavala-Araiza
- †Environmental Defense Fund, 301 Congress Avenue, Suite 1300, Austin, Texas 78701, United States
| | - David Lyon
- †Environmental Defense Fund, 301 Congress Avenue, Suite 1300, Austin, Texas 78701, United States
| | - Ramón A Alvarez
- †Environmental Defense Fund, 301 Congress Avenue, Suite 1300, Austin, Texas 78701, United States
| | - Virginia Palacios
- †Environmental Defense Fund, 301 Congress Avenue, Suite 1300, Austin, Texas 78701, United States
| | - Robert Harriss
- †Environmental Defense Fund, 301 Congress Avenue, Suite 1300, Austin, Texas 78701, United States
| | - Xin Lan
- ‡Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77004, United States
| | - Robert Talbot
- ‡Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77004, United States
| | - Steven P Hamburg
- §Environmental Defense Fund, 18 Tremont Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02108, United States
| |
Collapse
|
66
|
Yacovitch TI, Herndon SC, Pétron G, Kofler J, Lyon D, Zahniser MS, Kolb CE. Mobile Laboratory Observations of Methane Emissions in the Barnett Shale Region. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2015; 49:7889-95. [PMID: 25751617 DOI: 10.1021/es506352j] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Results of mobile ground-based atmospheric measurements conducted during the Barnett Shale Coordinated Campaign in spring and fall of 2013 are presented. Methane and ethane are continuously measured downwind of facilities such as natural gas processing plants, compressor stations, and production well pads. Gaussian dispersion simulations of these methane plumes, using an iterative forward plume dispersion algorithm, are used to estimate both the source location and the emission magnitude. The distribution of emitters is peaked in the 0-5 kg/h range, with a significant tail. The ethane/methane molar enhancement ratio for this same distribution is investigated, showing a peak at ∼1.5% and a broad distribution between ∼4% and ∼17%. The regional distributions of source emissions and ethane/methane enhancement ratios are examined: the largest methane emissions appear between Fort Worth and Dallas, while the highest ethane/methane enhancement ratios occur for plumes observed in the northwestern potion of the region. Individual facilities, focusing on large emitters, are further analyzed by constraining the source location.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara I Yacovitch
- †Aerodyne Research Inc., Billerica, Massachusetts 01821, United States
| | - Scott C Herndon
- †Aerodyne Research Inc., Billerica, Massachusetts 01821, United States
| | - Gabrielle Pétron
- ‡Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States
- §NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States
| | - Jonathan Kofler
- ‡Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States
- §NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States
| | - David Lyon
- ∥Environmental Defense Fund, 301 Congress Ave Suite 1300, Austin, Texas 78701, United States
| | - Mark S Zahniser
- †Aerodyne Research Inc., Billerica, Massachusetts 01821, United States
| | - Charles E Kolb
- †Aerodyne Research Inc., Billerica, Massachusetts 01821, United States
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
Lan X, Talbot R, Laine P, Torres A. Characterizing Fugitive Methane Emissions in the Barnett Shale Area Using a Mobile Laboratory. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2015; 49:8139-8146. [PMID: 26148552 DOI: 10.1021/es5063055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Atmospheric methane (CH4) was measured using a mobile laboratory to quantify fugitive CH4 emissions from Oil and Natural Gas (ONG) operations in the Barnett Shale area. During this Barnett Coordinated Campaign we sampled more than 152 facilities, including well pads, compressor stations, gas processing plants, and landfills. Emission rates from several ONG facilities and landfills were estimated using an Inverse Gaussian Dispersion Model and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Model AERMOD. Model results show that well pads emissions rates had a fat-tailed distribution, with the emissions linearly correlated with gas production. Using this correlation, we estimated a total well pad emission rate of 1.5 × 10(5) kg/h in the Barnett Shale area. It was found that CH4 emissions from compressor stations and gas processing plants were substantially higher, with some "super emitters" having emission rates up to 3447 kg/h, more then 36,000-fold higher than reported by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Landfills are also a significant source of CH4 in the Barnett Shale area, and they should be accounted for in the regional budget of CH4.
Collapse
|
68
|
Nathan BJ, Golston LM, O'Brien AS, Ross K, Harrison WA, Tao L, Lary DJ, Johnson DR, Covington AN, Clark NN, Zondlo MA. Near-Field Characterization of Methane Emission Variability from a Compressor Station Using a Model Aircraft. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2015; 49:7896-7903. [PMID: 26011292 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
A model aircraft equipped with a custom laser-based, open-path methane sensor was deployed around a natural gas compressor station to quantify the methane leak rate and its variability at a compressor station in the Barnett Shale. The open-path, laser-based sensor provides fast (10 Hz) and precise (0.1 ppmv) measurements of methane in a compact package while the remote control aircraft provides nimble and safe operation around a local source. Emission rates were measured from 22 flights over a one-week period. Mean emission rates of 14 ± 8 g CH4 s(-1) (7.4 ± 4.2 g CH4 s(-1) median) from the station were observed or approximately 0.02% of the station throughput. Significant variability in emission rates (0.3-73 g CH4 s(-1) range) was observed on time scales of hours to days, and plumes showed high spatial variability in the horizontal and vertical dimensions. Given the high spatiotemporal variability of emissions, individual measurements taken over short durations and from ground-based platforms should be used with caution when examining compressor station emissions. More generally, our results demonstrate the unique advantages and challenges of platforms like small unmanned aerial vehicles for quantifying local emission sources to the atmosphere.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian J Nathan
- †William B. Hanson Center for Space Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, 800 West Campbell Road, Richardson, Texas 75080, United States
| | - Levi M Golston
- ‡Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, EQuad E-209A, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, United States
- §Center for Mid-Infrared Technologies for Health and the Environment, Princeton University, 70 Prospect Ave., Princeton, New Jersey 08540, United States
| | - Anthony S O'Brien
- ‡Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, EQuad E-209A, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, United States
- §Center for Mid-Infrared Technologies for Health and the Environment, Princeton University, 70 Prospect Ave., Princeton, New Jersey 08540, United States
| | - Kevin Ross
- ‡Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, EQuad E-209A, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, United States
- §Center for Mid-Infrared Technologies for Health and the Environment, Princeton University, 70 Prospect Ave., Princeton, New Jersey 08540, United States
| | - William A Harrison
- †William B. Hanson Center for Space Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, 800 West Campbell Road, Richardson, Texas 75080, United States
| | - Lei Tao
- ‡Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, EQuad E-209A, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, United States
- §Center for Mid-Infrared Technologies for Health and the Environment, Princeton University, 70 Prospect Ave., Princeton, New Jersey 08540, United States
| | - David J Lary
- †William B. Hanson Center for Space Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, 800 West Campbell Road, Richardson, Texas 75080, United States
| | - Derek R Johnson
- ∥Center for Alternative Fuels, Engines, and Emissions, West Virginia University, 395 Evansdale Drive, Morgantown, West Virginia 26505, United States
| | - April N Covington
- ∥Center for Alternative Fuels, Engines, and Emissions, West Virginia University, 395 Evansdale Drive, Morgantown, West Virginia 26505, United States
| | - Nigel N Clark
- ∥Center for Alternative Fuels, Engines, and Emissions, West Virginia University, 395 Evansdale Drive, Morgantown, West Virginia 26505, United States
| | - Mark A Zondlo
- ‡Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, EQuad E-209A, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, United States
- §Center for Mid-Infrared Technologies for Health and the Environment, Princeton University, 70 Prospect Ave., Princeton, New Jersey 08540, United States
| |
Collapse
|
69
|
Tong F, Jaramillo P, Azevedo IML. Comparison of life cycle greenhouse gases from natural gas pathways for medium and heavy-duty vehicles. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2015; 49:7123-7133. [PMID: 25938939 DOI: 10.1021/es5052759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
The low-cost and abundant supply of shale gas in the United States has increased the interest in using natural gas for transportation. We compare the life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from different natural gas pathways for medium and heavy-duty vehicles (MHDVs). For Class 8 tractor-trailers and refuse trucks, none of the natural gas pathways provide emissions reductions per unit of freight-distance moved compared to diesel trucks. When compared to the petroleum-based fuels currently used in these vehicles, CNG and centrally produced LNG increase emissions by 0-3% and 2-13%, respectively, for Class 8 trucks. Battery electric vehicles (BEVs) powered with natural gas-produced electricity are the only fuel-technology combination that achieves emission reductions for Class 8 transit buses (31% reduction compared to the petroleum-fueled vehicles). For non-Class 8 trucks (pick-up trucks, parcel delivery trucks, and box trucks), BEVs reduce emissions significantly (31-40%) compared to their diesel or gasoline counterparts. CNG and propane achieve relatively smaller emissions reductions (0-6% and 19%, respectively, compared to the petroleum-based fuels), while other natural gas pathways increase emissions for non-Class 8 MHDVs. While using natural gas to fuel electric vehicles could achieve large emission reductions for medium-duty trucks, the results suggest there are no great opportunities to achieve large emission reductions for Class 8 trucks through natural gas pathways with current technologies. There are strategies to reduce the carbon footprint of using natural gas for MHDVs, ranging from increasing vehicle fuel efficiency, reducing life cycle methane leakage rate, to achieving the same payloads and cargo volumes as conventional diesel trucks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fan Tong
- Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
| | - Paulina Jaramillo
- Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
| | - Inês M L Azevedo
- Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
| |
Collapse
|