Brief early psychological interventions following trauma: a systematic review of the literature

Emergency evaluation and intervention with female victims of rape and other violence

Given the high prevalence of crime within the general population and the increased rates of victimization among those seeking medical care, professionals who work in emergency departments, primary care medical facilities, or mental health settings need to be prepared to address physical and psychological problems related to sexual and physical assault. In this paper, interpersonal violence prevalence studies are reviewed in terms of study design and findings for sexual assault and physical assault. Common injuries following both forms of assault are documented, followed by a review of long-term medical outcomes. In addition to a review of physical health outcomes, primary psychological effects of violence are also reviewed. Strategies with which to screen for interpersonal violence in the medical setting are offered, and issues related to mandatory reporting are summarized. Interventions for assault victims that can be implemented in the medical setting are outlined, and a new hospital-based treatment for victims of rape is described.

Pharmacotherapy for posttraumatic stress disorder

BACKGROUND

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a prevalent and disabling disorder. By definition prior psychological trauma plays a causal role in the disorder, and psychotherapy is a widely accepted intervention. Nevertheless there is growing evidence that PTSD is characterized by specific psychobiological dysfunctions, and this has contributed to a growing interest in the use of medication in its treatment.

OBJECTIVES

The authors aimed to undertake a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the pharmacotherapy of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) following the guidelines and using the software of the Cochrane Collaboration, and to provide an estimate of the effects of medication in this disorder. Secondary objectives were to explore questions about whether particular classes of medication are more effective and/or acceptable than others in the treatment of PTSD, and about which factors (clinical and methodological) predict response to pharmacotherapy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Studies of the pharmacotherapy of PTSD were identified using literature searches of MEDLINE (1966 to 1999, using the textwords posttraumatic, post-traumatic, medication, pharmacotherapy) and other electronic databases (PSYCLIT; National PTSD Center Pilots database; Dissertation Abstracts; Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety & Neurosis Controlled Trials Register). In addition, published and unpublished RCTs were requested from PTSD researchers and pharmaceutical companies. An initial broad strategy was undertaken to find not only RCTs, but also open-label trials and reviews of the pharmacotherapy of PTSD; additional studies were sought in reference lists of retrieved articles and included studies in any language.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All RCTs of PTSD (including both placebo controlled and comparative trials), whether published or unpublished, but completed prior to the end of 1999 were considered for the review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Selected RCTs were independently assessed and collated by 2 raters, and Review Manager (RevMan) software was used to capture data on treatment response and PTSD symptom ratings. Ratings of subtypes of PTSD symptoms (intrusive/re-experiencing, avoidant/numbing, hyperarousal), of comorbid symptoms (depression, anxiety), and of quality of life were included where possible. A range of additional information, which may explain possible clinical and methodological heterogeneity amongst the trials, was also captured. Summary statistics for dichotomous and continous measures were calculated, heterogeneity was assessed, and subgroup/sensitivity analyses undertaken.

MAIN RESULTS

15 short-term (12 weeks or less) RCTs were found, of which 9 had sufficient data for inclusion in the analysis. Methodological limitations were particularly apparent in early work; these included short (5 weeks or less) duration of trials and a reliance on self-report scales (rather than use of standardized clinician-rated scales). Despite these and other potentially important differences between the trials, many trials demonstrated efficacy for medication over placebo. Summary statistics were calculated for the Clinical Global Impressions scale change item (CGI-C) or close equivalent from 10 sets of data including various antidepressants and other agents - the proportion of non-responders was lower in the pharmacotherapy group than in the control group (relative risk (95% CI) = 0.72 (0.64, 0.83)). Similarly, summary statistics for the intrusion, avoidance and total scales of the Impact of Events Scale (IES) from 4sets of data again including various agents showed a statistically (and clinically) significant difference between medication and placebo (Weighted Mean Difference (95% CI) = -3.81 (-6.72,-0.91), -3.31(-5.24,-1.37), -7.18 (-11.86,-2.50) respectively).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Medication treatments can be effective in PTSD, acting to reduce its core symptoms, and should be considered as part of the treatment of this disorder. The existing evidence base does not provide sufficient data to suggest particular predictors of response to treatment, or to demonstrate that any particular class of medication is more effective or better tolerated than any other. However, the largest trials showing efficacy to date have been with the SSRIs, and in contrast, there have been negative studies of some agents. Given the high prevalence and enormous personal and societal costs of PTSD, there is a need for additional controlled trials in this area. Additional questions for future research include the effects of medication on quality of life in PTSD, appropriate dose and duration of medication, the use of medication in different trauma groups, in pediatric and geriatric subjects, and the value of early (prophylactic), combined (with psychotherapy), and long-term (maintenance) medication treatment.

Ethical considerations in research participation among acutely injured trauma survivors: an empirical investigation

Posttraumatic behavioral and emotional disturbances occur frequently among physically injured trauma survivors. Despite increasing investigative interest in the evaluation and treatment of psychological distress in acutely injured patients, few studies have assessed ethical considerations surrounding research participation. The authors empirically investigated ethical considerations in research participation among 117 physically injured, hospitalized, motor vehicle accident and assault survivors. Immediately following a 1-hour research interview, participants responded to 10 questions assessing the experience of research participation. The majority of study subjects found participating in the protocol a positive experience. Most of the hospitalized patients reported that they experienced control over initiation and discontinuation of the protocol and that they derived benefit from their research participation. A minority of participants reported that they experienced unwanted thoughts and unanticipated upset during the protocol and that they felt they could not refuse participation. However, over 95% of patients reported that the benefits of protocol participation outweighed the costs and that in retrospect they would again agree to participate. These results suggest that while a minority of participants may have difficulties with specific aspects of protocol enrollment, overall research participation is well tolerated by the majority of acutely injured, hospitalized, trauma survivors.

Disaster mental health: current status and future directions

In times of disaster, emergency mental health services must be delivered in the field. This chapter reviews the current state of the literature and future trends in disaster mental health.