Phase II study of paclitaxel in pretreated patients with locally advanced/metastatic cancer of the bladder and ureter

Vinflunine in the treatment of bladder cancer

Vinflunine (VFL) is a third-generation bifluorinated semi-synthetic vinca alkaloid obtained by superacidic chemistry from its parent compound, vinorelbine. As with the other vinca alkaloids, the main antineoplastic effects of VFL arise from its interaction with tubulin, the major component of microtubules in mitotic spindles. In contrast to other vinca alkaloids, VFL shows some distinctive properties in terms of tubulin binding, possibly explaining its superior antitumor activity in vitro and in vivo compared with vinorelbine as well as its excellent safety profile. In transitional cell carcinoma (TCC), two single-agent phase II trials were performed testing VFL in platinum-pretreated patients, showing moderate response rates and promising disease control rates. Therefore, the first phase III trial in modern times for second-line TCC of the urothelium was designed in order to further investigate the activity of VFL. First results were presented at the 2008 ASCO conference. VFL appears to be a possible treatment option for patients with TCC progressing after first-line platinum-containing chemotherapy.

New developments in first- and second-line chemotherapy for transitional cell, squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the bladder

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the systemic treatment, patient selection and treatment outcome of transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder, squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma, focusing on advances and findings within the last year.

RECENT FINDINGS

Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is considered to be the standard treatment for transitional cell carcinoma. In recent updates of randomized trials, patients with favorable prognostic factors were shown to have a chance of long-term disease-free survival even after chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Patient selection for cisplatin, newer drugs or alternative combinations is crucial. New genetic markers like excision repair cross-complementing 1 expression were developed and tested for this purpose. Adequate evaluation of renal function plays an important role for treatment selection, especially in the elderly population. Newer chemotherapeutics like oxaliplatin, vinflunine and pemetrexed have been studied in the first- or second-line settings. Their efficacy is promising, but there is still a need for further testing. Only few data are available on the systemic treatment of squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. Complete resection seems to be more important than chemotherapy in the rare cases of adenocarcinoma of the urinary tract.

SUMMARY

In locally advanced and metastatic disease patient- and tumor-related prognostic factors and predictive factors for response to treatment will guide treatment decisions in the future.

Gemcitabine and ifosfamide as a second-line treatment for cisplatin-refractory metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a phase II study

Few treatment options are available for cisplatin-refractory urothelial carcinoma. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a new regimen composed of gemcitabine and ifosfamide as a second-line salvage chemotherapy for the disease. The gemcitabine and ifosfamide regimen consists of gemcitabine 800 mg/m/day intravenously for 30 min on days 1, 8, and 15; ifosfamide 1500 mg/m/day intravenously for 24 h on days 8-10; and mesna 800 mg intravenously bolus before ifosfamide and 1500 mg/m/day intravenously for 24 h on days 8-11. Cycles are repeated every 28 days. Between 1998 and 2005, 23 patients (median age 66) unresponsive to cisplatin-based chemotherapy (n=10) or who had tumor progression within 6 months of a previous response to cisplatin-based therapy (n=13) were enrolled. The median interval between the two chemotherapy regimens was 1.8 months (range 0.9-5.6). In total, 82 treatment cycles (median 3, range 1-8) were given. The overall response rate was 22% (95% confidence interval 5-39) with one complete response and four partial responses. Twenty-one patients succumbed to the disease. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.5 and 4.8 months, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 leukopenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 10 and eight patients, respectively. One, two and two patients complicated with grade 3 vomiting, diarrhea and stomatitis were present, respectively. No grade 3 or 4 neurotoxicity or nephrotoxicity was seen in these patients. The gemcitabine and ifosfamide regimen has an acceptable toxicity profile, but shows insufficient clinical activity in patients with cisplatin-refractory urothelial carcinoma to warrant further testing.

New chemotherapy regimens for metastatic bladder cancer

M-VAC remains the standard of care for metastatic transitional cell carcinoma (TCC), but its limitations include significant toxicity and infrequent durable disease-free survival. Recent investigation has focused on the identification of novel chemotherapeutics with single-agent activity in metastatic TCC and on their incorporation into more active combination regimens. Paclitaxel, gemcitabine and ifosfamide are among the most active new agents. Numerous phase II trials of novel combinations have yielded promising preliminary results. Longer follow-up and results from randomized trials will be necessary to determine the impact of newer chemotherapy regimens on survival.

State-of-the-art management of metastatic disease at initial presentation or recurrence

Carcinoma of the bladder is the second most prevalent genitourinay malignancy and the fifth most common solid tumor in the USA. On the basis of favorable response rates and survival data, cisplatin-based regimens can be considered the standard treatment for fit patients with metastatic urothelial cancer. Since cisplatin-containing regimens are contraindicated for patients with impaired renal function, gemcitabine plus either paclitaxel or docetaxel may be an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for these patients. Randomized trials are needed to determine the future role of these combinations in the management of advanced transitional cell carcinoma. The optimal regimens for the medically unfit patients and second-line chemotherapy remain undefined. Postchemotherapy surgical resection of residual cancer may result in a disease-free survival in highly selected patients who would otherwise die of the disease. Progresses in the understanding of the molecular biology of bladder cancer and identification of new targeted therapies will undoubtedly provide new opportunities but whether or not this approach to therapy will lead to better results must still be determined.

Systemic chemotherapy in locally advanced and/or metastatic bladder cancer

Transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder is a common malignancy. Advanced urothelial cancer is a chemosenstive neoplasm. Whereas the MVAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) regimen was long-considered the standard of care for patients with advanced disease, the evaluation of newer agents with retained activity and improved tolerability has been the focus of much investigation over the past decade. Combinations such as cisplatin-gemcitabine (GC) and intensified, G-CSF supported MVAC have shown more favourable toxicity profile and equal or even improved efficacy. Specific groups of patients (elderly, patients with renal dysfunction or poor performance status or co-morbidities) who cannot tolerate cisplatin-based therapy, should receive carboplatin, gemcitabine or taxane-based treatment. Continuing improvements in our understanding of the molecular phenotype of individual patient tumors may lead to the appropriate therapies that target molecular aberrations unique to this malignancy. This review will summarize recent developments in the management of locally advanced (T4b, N 2-3) and/or metastatic (M1) bladder cancer.

A phase II study of vinflunine in bladder cancer patients progressing after first-line platinum-containing regimen

A multicentre phase II trial to determine the efficacy of vinflunine as second-line therapy in patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder; secondary objectives were to assess duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and to evaluate the toxicity associated with this treatment. Patients had tumours that failed or progressed after first-line platinum-containing regimens for advanced or metastatic disease, or had progressive disease after platinum-containing chemotherapy given with adjuvant or neoadjuvant intent. Response and adverse events were assessed according to WHO criteria and NCI-CTC (version 2), respectively. Out of 51 patients treated with 320 mg m(-2) of vinflunine, nine patients responded to the therapy yielding an overall response rate of 18% (95% CI: 8.4-30.9%), and 67% (95%CI: 52.1-79.3%) achieved disease control (PR+SD). Of note, responses were seen in patients with relatively poor prognostic factors such as a short (<12 months) interval from prior platinum therapy (19%, including an 11% response rate in those progressing <3 months after platinum treatment), prior treatment for metastatic disease (24%), prior treatment with vinca alkaloids (14%) and visceral involvement (20%). The median duration of response was 9.1 months (95% CI: 4.2-15.0) and the median PFS was 3.0 months (95% CI: 2.4-3.8). The median OS was 6.6 months (95% CI: 4.8-7.6). The main haematological toxicity was grade 3-4 neutropenia, observed in 67% of patients (42% of cycles). Febrile neutropenia was observed in five patients (10%) and among them two were fatal. Constipation was frequently observed (but was manageable and noncumulative) and was grade 3-4 in only 8% of patients. The incidence of grade 3 nausea and vomiting was very low (4 and 6% of patients, respectively). Neither grade 3-4 sensory neuropathy nor severe venous irritation was observed. Moreover, and of importance in this particular study population, no grade 3-4 renal function impairment was observed. Vinflunine is an active agent for the treatment of platinum-pretreated bladder cancer, and these results warrant further investigation in phase III trials, either as monotherapy or in combination with other agents as treatment of advanced/metastatic TCC of the bladder.

The role of taxanes in the management of bladder cancer

Transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder is a chemo-sensitive neoplasm. Whereas the MVAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) regimen was long considered the standard of care for patients with advanced disease, the evaluation of newer agents with retained activity and improved tolerability has been the focus of much investigation over the past decade. Among the most important of these newer agents are taxanes. Whereas taxane-containing regimens have not yet been shown to improve the survival of patients with transitional cell carcinoma in randomized trials, ongoing phase III trials will further define the role of these agents in both the perioperative and advanced disease settings.

Randomised phase II trial of gemcitabine and paclitaxel second-line chemotherapy in patients with transitional cell carcinoma (AUO Trial AB 20/99)

The objectives are to evaluate and compare the response and toxicity of a 3-weekly and a 2-weekly regimen of gemcitabine (Gem) and paclitaxel (Pac) second-line treatment in patients with transitional cell carcinoma (TCC). Between June 2000 and July 2001, 30 patients with progressive disease (PD) during first-line chemotherapy (n = 11) or relapse after adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy of a metastatic or locally advanced TCC (n = 18) have been randomised to receive either six cycles (schedule A) of 3-weekly Gem (1000 mg/qm, days 1 and 8) and Pac (175 mg/qm, day 1) or 2-weekly treatment until disease progression (schedule B) with Gem (1250 mg/qm, day 1) and Pac (120 mg/qm, day 2). Restaging was performed after every 6 weeks by clinical imaging. Of 30 patients, one patient in schedule A and two patients in schedule B were not evaluable for response due to serious adverse events (SAEs) during the first cycle. The overall objective response (OR) was 44% (12 of 27) with eight complete remissions (CRs) and four partial remissions. Median time to progression (TTP) was 11 (3-41) months in schedule A and 6 (1-15+) months in schedule B. Median survival was 13 (5-46) months in schedule A and 9 (0-16) months in schedule B. Schedule A showed a significantly higher rate of CRs (7 vs. 1, p < 0.05). With a median number of six (1-6) cycles (A) and nine (1-23) cycles (B), TTP and survival were not significantly different. In schedule B, one patient had WHO grade IV anaemia and leucopenia. WHO grade III toxicities were seen in schedule A/B as follows: anaemia 3 (23%)/2 (16%) patients, leucopenia 5 (38%)/2 (16%), thrombocytopenia 0/2 (16%) and alopecia 10 (76%)/4 (32%). The combination of Gem and Pac is an effective second-line regimen in patients with mainly poor prognosis due to PD after cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Except for three SAEs (uncertainly therapy related), both regimens were tolerated well. The 3-weekly schedule with a nonsplit Pac dose showed a significantly higher complete response rate in our small study population and, thus, might be superior to the 2-weekly schedule.

Chemotherapy for Metastatic Bladder Cancer

This paper reviews the current status of systemic chemotherapy in the management of advanced and metastatic urothelial cancer. The activity of a number of single agents and combination drug regimens is discussed, and the small number of randomised-controlled studies available is also considered. Prognostic factors for response and survival, particularly long-term survival after systemic chemotherapy, are also reviewed. Special consideration is given to the role of systemic chemotherapy as a precursor to surgery (or radiotherapy) in locally advanced disease that is initially considered incurable. Therapeutic options for patients unable to tolerate cisplatin owing to renal impairment or other comorbidities are explored. Future directions are explored, including the role of molecular phenotyping in providing prognostic information, indicators of the likely success of conventional therapeutic measures and the development of specific targeted therapies.

Multicentre EORTC study 16997: feasibility and phase II trial of farnesyl transferase inhibitor & gemcitabine combination in salvage treatment of advanced urothelial tract cancers

In this study, the feasibility and activity of combined chemotherapy of the farnesyl transferase inhibitor SCH66336 and gemcitabine was evaluated. This therapy was used as second-line treatment in patients with advanced urothelial tract cancer and the influence of SCH66336 exposure on the pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine was also determined. Patients who had received one previous chemotherapy regime for advanced urothelial cancer were treated with a combination of SCH66336 (150 mg in the morning and 100 mg in the evening) and Gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 on day 1, 8 and 15 per 28-day cycle). Dosages of gemcitabine and its metabolite dFdU were performed on day one of cycle 1 before exposure to SCH66336 and day one of cycle 2. A total of 152 cycles were administered in 33 patients (median 3, range: 1-15). No patients had severe hematological toxicity, defined as Grade 4 thrombocytopenia or febrile neutropenia. Nine partial responses and one complete response were achieved in 31 assessable patients and corresponded to an overall response rate of 32.3% [95% CI:17%-51%]. There was no influence of exposure to SCH66336 on the level of gemcitabine or dFdU in 11 assessable patients. In conclusion, a combination of SCH66336 and gemcitabine is feasible in terms of toxicity and active as second-line treatment in patients with advanced urothelial tract cancer. SCH66336 had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine. Randomised trials should be undertaken to clarify the role of SCH66336 in combination with gemcitabine in cancer treatment.

Gemcitabine and docetaxel as first-line treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma: a phase II study

The purpose of the study was to investigate the toxicity and efficacy of the combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel in untreated advanced urothelial carcinoma. Patients with previously untreated, locally advanced/recurrent or metastatic urothelial carcinoma stage-IV disease were eligible. Patients with Performance status: PS ECOG >3 or age >75 years or creatinine clearance <50 ml min(-1) were excluded. Study treatment consisted of docetaxel 75 mg m(-2) (day 8) and gemcitabine 1000 mg m(-2) (days 1+8), every 21 days for a total of six to nine cycles. A total of 31 patients with urothelial bladder cancer, 25 men and six women, aged 42-74 (median 64) years were enrolled. The majority of patients had a good PS (51.6%; PS 0). In all, 15 (48.3%) patients had locally advanced or recurrent disease only and 16 (54.8%) presented with distant metastatic spread, with multiple site involvement in 22.5%. Toxicity was primarily haematologic, and the most frequent grade 3-4 toxicities were anaemia 11 (6.7%) thrombocytopenia eight (4.9%), and neutropenia 45 (27.6%), with 10 (6.1%) episodes of febrile neutropenia. No toxic deaths occurred. A number of patients had some cardiovascular morbidity (38.7%). Nonhaematological toxicities except alopecia (29 patients) were mild. Overall response rate was 51.6%, including four complete responses (12.9%) and 12 partial responses (38.7%), while a further five patients had disease stabilisation (s.d. 16.1%). The median time to progression was 8 months (95% CI 5.1-9.2 months) and the median overall survival was 15 months (95% CI 11.2-18.5 months), with 1-year survival rate of 60%. In conclusion, this schedule of gemcitabine and docetaxel is very active and well tolerated as a first-line treatment for advanced/relapsing or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Although its relative efficacy and tolerance as compared to classic MVAC should be assessed in a phase III setting, the favourable toxicity profile of this regimen may offer an interesting alternative, particularly in patients with compromised renal function or cardiovascular disease.

Systemic chemotherapy for patients with bladder cancer – current controversies and future directions

Many localised, superficial bladder cancers can be effectively controlled. However, disease which has spread to nodes outside the pelvis or to distant organs is generally incurable and systemic therapies, rather than surgery, are appropriate. Combination chemotherapy based around established cytotoxic drugs such as cisplatin has proven benefit in palliating symptoms and prolonging survival in responsive patients with advanced disease. Combination chemotherapies which include newer cytotoxic drugs such as gemcitabine provide the potential for equivalent efficacy with less toxicity than established regimens. Between the extremes of superficial and advanced disease, muscle-invasive bladder cancers have traditionally been treated, with curative intent, by radical surgery or radiotherapy. However, newly published data suggest, for the first time, genuine survival benefits from peri-operative chemotherapy. This article reviews the evidence for cisplatin-based chemotherapy in advanced disease, assesses the potential benefits of newer cytotoxic drugs, discusses the latest evidence pertaining to peri-operative chemotherapy in muscle-invasive disease, and looks forward to potential new biological agents in the systemic therapy of bladder cancer.

The role of systemic chemotherapy in the management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer

Patients with localised but muscle-invasive transitional-cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder are at high risk of relapse and death from metastatic disease after local treatment by cystectomy, radiation, or both. Despite improvements in treatment, patients with metastatic TCC have a median survival of about a year. TCC is quite sensitive to chemotherapy, and patients are able to tolerate newer regimens such as gemcitabine plus cisplatin better than older regimens such as methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin. However, the role of chemotherapy in the management of locally advanced muscle-invasive TCC remains uncertain. Most trials of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy have shown no significant improvement in survival, but many of these studies had suboptimum design, evaluated chemotherapy that was less effective than regimens in current use, and had sample sizes that were too small for important changes in survival to be detected or ruled out. Recent trials show trends in the direction of improved survival when optimum chemotherapy is used. Large trials that recruit more than 1000 patients are required to assess the effectiveness of adjunctive chemotherapy, and a large intergroup trial is in progress. Other trials should address the role of molecular markers in selecting patients for chemotherapy. Whenever possible, chemotherapy for locally advanced muscle-invasive TCC should be given in the context of a well-designed clinical trial.

Localized and locally advanced bladder cancer

Localized and locally advanced bladder cancer represents a heterogeneous spectrum of diseases with different biologic and clinical behavior. It varies with respect to invasive potential, propensity for metastases, and sensitivity to chemotherapy. Although several significant surgical advances have been made over the past 20 years in the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer, resulting in decreases in perioperative morbidity and mortality and improvement of quality of life in patients with continent urinary diversions, the natural history of the disease has remained unaltered. Advances in chemotherapy for metastatic disease have prompted trials of systemic therapy in patients with early stage, high-risk disease administered before or after local therapy consisting of cystectomy or radiotherapy. The data available from nonrandomized and randomized trials have not definitively established the exact role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and its impact on survival. Even if neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not improve survival, preliminary data suggest that bladder preservation may be possible in selected patients and that such combined therapy will hopefully lead to better patient management. The trials of postoperative chemotherapy provide insufficient evidence to support the routine use of adjuvant chemotherapy in clinical practice as a result of small sample size, confusing analyses, and the reporting of questionable conclusions. New large-scale, multicenter trials are imperative to provide convincing results. A better understanding of the microbiology of bladder cancer will influence the search for new therapeutic modalities. Molecular-targeted small-molecule therapy and monoclonal antibodies have begun to dominate contemporary studies.

High-risk metastatic urothelial cancer: chances for cure?

The median survival of patients with metastatic bladder cancer treated with methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin, and cisplatin chemotherapy is approximately 1 year and long-term survival occurs in a small proportion of patients. Recent efforts to improve the outcome of patients with metastatic transitional cell carcinoma have focused on the identification of new drugs with single agent activity and on their incorporation into platinum-based combination regimens. Paclitaxel, docetaxel, ifosfamide and gemcitabine are among the most active new agents. A large number of phase I/II trials have evaluated these agents in two- and three-drug combination regimens. The response proportion observed with these combinations varies considerably and median survival times range from 8 to 20 months. Because it is known that pretreatment prognostic features have an impact on individual patient outcome, the variation in reported survival in patients treated with chemotherapy may be a consequence of pretreatment patient characteristics. The role of surgery in metastatic bladder cancer is still controversial. After a significant response to chemotherapy, resection of residual resistant disease may be performed with intent to cure in highly selected patients. As obtainment of complete remission is a prerequisite for long-term survival, new therapeutic strategies, such as molecular targeted small molecule therapy and monoclonal antibodies, and new molecular markers predictive of response have the potential to be incorporated into the current treatment strategies, increasing the rate of cure.

The present and future of combination chemotherapy in bladder cancer

The combination of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) has dominated the landscape of chemotherapy for advanced bladder cancer for over 15 years. Randomized studies have shown its superiority over cisplatin alone or in combination with cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin. However, it exhibits a significant toxicity profile and achieves only a slight impact on overall survival. Gemcitabine is among the new cytotoxic drugs in development for treatment of advanced urothelial cancer. The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin represents a new standard alternative of treatment in the disease based on similar efficacy to and lower toxicity than the classic MVAC regimen. Future drug development will focus on the clinical usefulness of three-drug regimens (including gemcitabine, paclitaxel or docetaxel, and a platinum salt), and nonplatinum-based combinations, as well as showing the impact of adjuvant postcystectomy chemotherapy on survival.

Phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced urothelial cancer

PURPOSE

We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of weekly paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced urothelial cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with urothelial cancer who had received one prior systemic chemotherapy regimen for advanced disease and had evidence of disease progression were eligible for enrollment. Patients received paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) by 1-hour intravenous infusion weekly. A cycle of therapy consisted of four weekly treatments.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 31 patients. Mean age was 66 years, and 45% of patients had three or more involved metastatic sites. Only 26% of patients had responded to prior chemotherapy. The median number of cycles delivered was three (range, one to eight) at a mean weekly paclitaxel dose of 79 mg/m(2). Three patients achieved a partial response (10%; 95% confidence interval, 0% to 20%). Median time to progression was 2.2 months, and median overall survival time was 7.2 months. Therapy was well tolerated with minimal hematologic toxicity. Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicities were also uncommon.

CONCLUSION

Although the overall response rate to weekly paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced urothelial cancer was modest, the chemotherapy-refractory nature of the study population should be considered.

Weekly chemotherapy with docetaxel, gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced transitional cell urothelial cancer: a phase II trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a combination of weekly docetaxel, gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-five chemotherapy-naïve (adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy was allowed) patients with advanced TCC received intravenous docetaxel 35 mg/m2, gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 and cisplatin 35 mg/m2, on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor was given from days 3 to 6 and days 10 to 15, anti-emetics were used routinely.

RESULTS

Most (27) patients (77.1%) had a performance status of 0 to 1 and eight (22.9%) had received prior adjuvant or neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the objective response rate was 65.6% [23/35 patients, 95% confidence interval (CI) 47.8% to 80.9%]. Ten patients (28.5%) achieved a complete response (95% CI 14.6% to 46.3%) and 13 (37.1%) a partial response (95% CI 21.5% to 55.0%). Median survival time was 15.5 months, median duration of response was 10.2 months and median time to progression was 8.9 months. Ten patients (28.5%) developed grade 3/4 neutropenia, including five (14.3%) who experienced febrile neutropenia, which was successfully treated. Grade 3/4 anaemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 20% and 25.7% of patients, respectively; four patients required platelet transfusions. There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly docetaxel, gemcitabine plus cisplatin is a highly effective treatment for chemotherapy-naïve advanced TCC, and causes only moderate toxicity. This regimen should be considered as a suitable option that deserves further prospective evaluation through randomised phase III trials.

Current and future perspectives in advanced bladder cancer: is there a new standard?

The methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin/cisplatin (MVAC) regimen has been the standard treatment in patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial cancer for the past 15 years. The minimal or moderate survival benefit-depending on prognostic features-and the severe toxicity associated with the MVAC regimen have made the search for new drugs and drug combinations of utmost importance to increase efficacy and/or decrease toxicity. In this respect, the taxanes and gemcitabine are promising new drugs. Paclitaxel and docetaxel as single agents have yielded overall response rates of 7% to 56%, depending on whether the patients have received prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. The combination of paclitaxel and cisplatin has been explored in three studies with a total of 104 evaluable patients, a pooled overall response (OR) rate of 61%, and a complete response (CR) rate of 20%. There are two studies of docetaxel and cisplatin with a total of 91 evaluable patients, an OR rate of 54%, and a CR rate of 16%. The OR rate for paclitaxel and carboplatin in six studies was 43%, with a CR rate of 13%; however, the reported median survival was only 8.5 to 9.5 months. The OR rate for single-agent gemcitabine based on five studies was 26%, with a CR rate of 9%, which was apparently independent of whether the patients had received prior chemotherapy. The OR rate for gemcitabine and cisplatin in four phase II studies ranged from 41% to 57%, with a CR rate of 15% to 22% and a median survival of 12.5 to 14.3 months. Based on the encouraging results for the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC), a randomized phase III trial comparing GC and MVAC was begun in late 1996. This study of 405 randomized patients showed that the two regimens were associated with similar response rates, time to progression, and overall survival, whereas GC was associated with less toxicity than MVAC. On the basis of this superior risk-benefit ratio, the GC regimen should be favored as a new standard treatment in patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial cancer. Other promising combinations include gemcitabine and paclitaxel, with or without cisplatin, and the combination of ifosfamide, paclitaxel, and cisplatin. The triple combination of gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and cisplatin has yielded an OR rate of 78%, a CR rate of 28%, and a median survival of 24 months. An international phase III trial comparing this triple combination with GC in patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial cancer has now been initiated.

Paclitaxel and gemcitabine chemotherapy for advanced transitional-cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract: a phase II trial of the Minnie pearl cancer research network

PURPOSE

To evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel and gemcitabine in patients with advanced transitional-cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-four patients with advanced unresectable urothelial carcinoma entered this multi-centered, community-based, phase II trial between May 1997 and December 1999. All patients were treated with paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) by 1-hour intravenous (IV) infusion on day 1 and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) IV on days 1, 8, and 15; courses were repeated every 21 days. Patients who had objective response or stable disease continued treatment for six courses.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine of 54 patients (54%; 95% confidence interval, 40% to 67%) had major responses to treatment, including 7% complete responses. With a median follow-up of 24 months, 16 patients (30%) remain alive and nine (17%) are progression-free. The median survival for the entire group was 14.4 months; 1- and 2-year actuarial survival rates were 57% and 25%, respectively. Seven (47%) of 15 patients previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy responded to paclitaxel/gemcitabine. Grade 3/4 toxicity was primarily hematologic, including leukopenia (46%), thrombocytopenia (13%), and anemia (28%). Ten patients (19%) required hospitalization for neutropenia and fever, and one patient had treatment-related septic death.

CONCLUSION

The combination of paclitaxel and gemcitabine is active and well tolerated in the first- or second-line treatment of patients with advanced transitional-cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract. Response rate and duration compare favorably with those produced by other active, first-line regimens. This regimen should be further evaluated in phase II and III studies, as well as in patients with compromised renal function.

Cross-resistance and combined cytotoxic effects of paclitaxel and cisplatin in bladder cancer cells

PURPOSE

We studied the cross-resistance and combined cytotoxic effects of cisplatin and paclitaxel in bladder cancer cells in vitro.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The cytotoxicity of the 2 agents alone or in combination were studied in the bladder cancer cell line NTUB1 and the 2 sublines NTUB1/P, which is cisplatin resistant, and NTUB1/T, which is paclitaxel resistant, using the microculture tetrazolium assay. Schedule dependence of the 2-drug combination was assayed using 3 treatment schedules, including 1 concurrent and 2 sequential exposures.

RESULTS

The mean cisplatin concentration plus or minus standard error of the means inhibiting 50% of the growth of NTUB1, NTUB1/P and NTUB1/T was 1.9 +/- 0.19, 19.3 +/- 2.33 and 2.1 +/- 0.15 microM., respectively, and the mean paclitaxel concentration inhibiting 50% of the growth of the 3 cell lines was 30 +/- 3.9, 1,033 +/- 120 and 110 +/- 15 nM., respectively. NTUB1/P had strong cross-resistance to paclitaxel. In contrast, NTUB1/T was as sensitive as NTUB1 to cisplatin. On median effect analysis the combined effects of the 2 agents given concurrently were sub-additive in the low fraction affected range of 0.1 to 0.3 and additive in the median to high fraction affected range of 0.4 to 1.0 in the 3 cell lines. Combined cytotoxicity was more synergistic when paclitaxel was given 24 hours earlier than cisplatin. The effects were less synergistic when cisplatin was given before paclitaxel. This phenomenon was noted in sensitive and resistant cells.

CONCLUSIONS

In our bladder cancer cell model cisplatin resistant cells have strong cross-resistance to paclitaxel, whereas paclitaxel resistant cells are sensitive to cisplatin. The combined effects may be optimized by sequential use of the 2 agents, preferably paclitaxel given 24 hours before cisplatin. Our results have clinical implications for the treatment of bladder cancer.

Evidence for a schedule-dependent deleterious interaction between paclitaxel, vinblastine and cisplatin (PVC) in the treatment of advanced transitional cell carcinoma

A phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of vinblastine, paclitaxel and cisplatin (PVC) in previously untreated patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma. Chemotherapy naive patients with locally advanced or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma received the intravenous combination of paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2)over three hours followed by cisplatin 70 mg/m(2)over 3 hours on day 1 and vinblastine 3 mg/m(2)as a bolus on days 1 and 8 on a 21-day cycle, to a maximum of 6 cycles. The day 8 vinblastine was omitted if the total neutrophil count was <1.0. 15 patients (13 M, 2 F) of median age 66 (54-75) received a median of 5 cycles of treatment. There were two complete responses (13%; 95% CI 2-40%) and five partial responses (33%; 95% CI 12-62%), for an overall response rate of 46% (95% CI 21-73%). Responses occurred only in those with locally recurrent tumours and/or lymph nodes involved. Neutropenia at Grade 3-4 occurred in 14 of 67 cycles (21%) resulting in 7 episodes of neutropenic sepsis. Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia was not observed. Other Grade 3 toxicity included alopecia (10 pts), diarrhoea (2 pts), constipation resulting in bowel obstruction (2 pts), nephrotoxicity (1 pt), myalgic pain (1 pt) and peripheral neuropathy (1 pt). Six patients developed Grade 2 paraesthesia. The median time to progression was 6 months and the median survival was 11 months. The regimen PVC was both less effective against transitional cell carcinoma and less toxic than expected. This may reflect an inhibitory interaction between vinblastine and paclitaxel and this schedule cannot be recommended for further investigation.

Gemcitabine and paclitaxel combination therapy in transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium

Transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelium is considered a chemosensitive malignancy; however, few patients receiving standard therapies achieve long-term disease control. Thus, new treatment approaches using more effective and less toxic agents are needed to improve prognosis in these patients. Two new agents currently being studied are gemcitabine and the taxanes; both of which have produced overall response rates ranging from 22.5 to 28% (gemcitabine), and 7-56% (paclitaxel) when used as single agents in this disease. Both agents have been well tolerated. Results of two phase II studies of gemcitabine combined with paclitaxel have been published. In one, 60% (15/25) of evaluable patients with advanced stage IV TCC responded; in the other, 53% (8/15) of patients with advanced and/or metastatic TCC responded. Several trials evaluating different dosing regimens of gemcitabine plus paclitaxel or docetaxel are ongoing or planned.

Preliminary results of simultaneous radiochemotherapy with paclitaxel for urinary bladder cancer

BACKGROUND

Paclitaxel (Taxol) has been shown to be effective in metastatic bladder cancer as single agent and in combination with other cytotoxic drugs. Its efficacy seems to be comparable to cisplatin. We have used paclitaxel as alternative to cisplatin in selected patients with simultaneous radiochemotherapy. The objective of this article is to summarize the preliminary results with regard to feasibility and toxicity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 10/97 through 10/98 7 patients with locally advanced or recurrent urothelial bladder cancer were treated with radiotherapy and simultaneous paclitaxel + cisplatin. All patients had macroscopic irresectable residual tumor after transurethral surgery or cystectomy. Paclitaxel was given twice weekly in a daily dosage of 25 through 35 mg/m2 as 1-hour-infusion. Cisplatin was given in a dosage of 25 mg/m2 daily on days 1 to 5.

RESULTS

All patients completed the scheduled therapy regimen. The acute toxicity consisted mainly of enteritis (Grade I to II CTC). As severe toxicity, 1 severe skin reaction in the groins (Grade III) after 20 Gy and 1 Grade-III enteritis were noted. Both patients with severe complications recovered within 4 weeks after treatment. Hematological toxicity was mild to moderate in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

This report suggests that paclitaxel is a promising agent for simultaneous radiochemotherapy protocols. The clinical value remains to be better defined especially the question whether paclitaxel may improve the results if used as alternative to standard cisplatin. At the moment paclitaxel offers at least an attractive alternative to cisplatin in patients with impaired renal function.

Paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with metastatic transitional cell cancer of the urinary tract

OBJECTIVES

The combination of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) is currently considered the most effective chemotherapy for metastatic transitional cell cancer (TCC) of the urinary tract, but because of its considerable toxicity, alternative regimens appear very interesting. We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of a combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line therapy for metastatic TCC.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients (8 women, 24 men; mean age 67.03 years, range 50 to 79) with metastatic TCC of the bladder or upper urinary tract were included in the study. Paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) was given as a 3-hour intravenous infusion, carboplatin was dosed to an area under the plasma concentration curve of 5 mg/m/min calculated according to the Calvert formula [(creatinine clearance + 25) x 5] as a 30-minute intravenous infusion immediately after paclitaxel. Response evaluation was performed after every 2 cycles and additional therapy depended on response. The maximum number of cycles was 6.

RESULTS

With a mean follow-up of 13.1 months (range 2 to 28), 23 of 32 patients responded to treatment (response rate 71.9%), with 31.3% complete remission (CR) (10 of 32) and 40.6% partial remission (PR) (13 of 32). Four patients (12.5%) had stable disease, and 5 patients (15.6%) showed progression. These results compare well with the outcome after MVAC. Toxicity was mainly characterized by neurotoxicity grade 3 and 4 in 9.4%, grade 3 and 4 leukopenia in 37.5%, and grade 3 thrombocytopenia in 3.1% of the patients. No nephrotoxicity was observed, but all patients developed alopecia. Time to progression after CR was a mean of 7.0 months (range 4 to 13) and after PR a mean of 5.9 months (range 2 to 9).

CONCLUSIONS

Paclitaxel/carboplatin is an effective therapy for metastatic TCC, with low toxicity.

Gemcitabine and other new chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of metastatic bladder cancer

An improved quality of life secondary to reduced chemotherapy toxicity is an important end point in the treatment of all patients with metastatic cancer. In this review, we have demonstrated that gemcitabine and gemcitabine/cisplatin combinations appear to have a reduced toxicity profile compared with MVAC. Phase II studies with gemcitabine and cisplatin have shown good response rates that are possibly equivalent to MVAC, and a Phase III trial is now completed. Similar data have been reported for the paclitaxel/carboplatin combination and a Phase III trial comparing that combination with MVAC is planned. For patients with TCC who are in mild renal failure or who have significant underlying medical conditions, gemcitabine can also be considered as a reasonable single agent therapy. Complete responses can be seen, even in patients who are older than the age of 70. Moore et al., for example, demonstrated near complete responses to gemcitabine monotherapy in 4 patients older than 80 years of age. In conclusion, chemotherapy options for patients with metastatic bladder cancer have changed significantly with the addition of gemcitabine and other drugs to the armentarium. The integration of gemcitabine into the initial chemotherapy plan for these patients is still being developed. It is clear that this agent should be included in the management discussions of all patients with metastatic bladder cancer.

[Chemotherapy for urothelial infiltrating tumors]

Since 1985, the gold standard regimen for metastatic tumours of the urothelial tract is a combination of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin (M-VAC protocol). Randomised studies have shown the superiority of the M-VAC regimen over cisplatin alone or in combination with cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin. The limited gain in survival shows that, although chemosensitive, metastatic tumours cannot be cured by the available drug combinations. Amongst new cytotoxic drugs in development, paclitaxel and gemcitabine are likely to be involved in the standard regimen of the future. The studies published to date do not support the routine use of chemotherapy in the neo-adjuvant or adjuvant setting for the management of early stage urothelial tumours.