Clinical significance of VEGF-C status in tumour cells and stromal macrophages in non-small cell lung cancer patients

Vascular endothelial growth factor-C and its receptor VEGFR-3 in non-small-cell lung cancer: concurrent expression in cancer cells from primary tumour and metastatic lymph node

INTRODUCTION

Investigation of the role of vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C) and VEGF receptor-3 (VEGFR-3) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has mainly focused on lymph node (LN) metastasis related to lymphangiogenesis. However, the coexpression of VEGF-C/VEGFR-3 by tumour cells can independently play an important role. The present study was therefore designed to evaluate VEGF-C/VEGFR-3 coexpression in tumour cells from the primary tumour and corresponding LN metastases.

METHODS

VEGF-C and VEGFR-3 expression in cancer cells were evaluated by immunohistochemistry in 92 NSCLC samples and 45 metastatic LNs. Ki67 expression and mitotic index (MI) in tumours and clinicopathological data were analysed concurrently.

RESULTS

VEGFR-3 and VEGF-C expression were observed in 42% and 74% of tumours, respectively. Concurrent expression of VEGF-C and VEGFR-3, observed in 39% of tumours, was significantly associated with a higher proliferation rate and a higher incidence of LN metastases. VEGF-C expression in tumour cells was observed in 100% of metastatic LN and VEGF-C/VEGFR-3 coexpression was observed in 71% of metastatic LN. Finally, concurrent expression of VEGF-C/VEGFR-3 in the primary tumour was associated with poor disease-free survival on univariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

In NSCLC cancer cells, VEGF-C/VEGFR-3 coexpression suggests an autocrine/paracrine loop responsible for a high proliferation rate in tumour cells. As VEGF-C/VEGFR-3 coexpression is very frequent in metastatic LN tumour cells, it can be hypothesised that this coexpression participates in the growth of LN metastasis.

Novel therapies targeting signaling pathways in lung cancer

Despite advances in chemotherapy, the prognosis for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains dismal. Increasing understanding of the biological processes responsible for lung carcinogenesis has led to development of new therapeutic strategies targeting this disease at a molecular level. This article examines the molecular events believed to lead to cellular changes in lung cancer, and how knowledge of these is used to develop new agents used individually or in combination with available cytotoxic drugs to improve survival. Finally, it explores how a deeper understanding of the embryonic signaling pathways responsible for airway epithelial repair and tumorogenesis, such as Hedgehog (Hh), Notch, and Wingless (Wnt), can lead to the development of newer and more specific therapies for lung cancer.

Lymphatic endothelial cells, tumor lymphangiogenesis and metastasis: New insights into intratumoral and peritumoral lymphatics

Lymphatic metastasis of tumor cells represents a series of extremely complex and sequential processes that include dissemination and invasion into surrounding stromal tissues from primary tumors, penetration into lymphatic walls and implantation in regional lymph nodes, and extravasation or proliferation in parenchyma of target organs. Recent developments in lymphatic biology and research, especially the application of unique molecular markers specific for lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs), LYVE-1, Prox-1 and podoplanin have provided exciting new insights into the tumor microenvironment and LEC-tumor cell interface. To date, established factors for determining the behavior and prognosis of primary tumors have been emphasized morphologically and physiologically, i.e., lymphatic impairment and vessel density, dysfunction of lymphatic valves, interstitial fluid pressure, as well as a series of lymphangiogenic growth factors including VEGF-C/-D, and other cytokines and chemokines. Increasing knowledge of the tumor biological significance in lymphatics within the tumors (intratumoral lymphatics, ITLs) and at the tumor periphery (peritumoral lymphatics, PTLs) has greatly promoted understanding of tumor access into the lymphatic system by inducing lymphangiogenesis or by co-opting preexisting lymphatics. Therefore, the targeting PTLs and ITLs, which have been proposed as an important route for antimetastatic approach, are deemed worthy of further study in various animal tumor models and human tumors.

Papillary thyroid carcinoma with lymph node metastases

Papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) is the most frequently occurring human thyroid cancer with good prognosis following appropriate treatment. Lymph node (LN) metastases are the main way through which PTC spread cancer cells. The mechanisms underlying PTC with local invasion, LN metastases and distant metastases are not well investigated. Tumor secrete cytokines, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-C and -D bind to VEGF receptors on lymphatic endothelial cells and induce proliferation (budding) from nearby lymphatic capillaries and growth of new lymphatic capillaries. About one-third of patients can be diagnosed at the time of surgical findings. Different image studies, such as ultrasonography with fine needle aspiration cytology, scintigraphic localization and positron emission tomography were reported to detect LN metastases. Important factors in predicting LN metastases are vascular invasion, male gender, absence of tumor capsule, and perithyroid involvement. Tumor recurrence in LN after primary treatment of PTC had an independent and highly significant negative effect on survival in patients over 45 year-old. Recombinant adeno-associated virus-mediated gene transfer of sVEGFR3-Fc is a feasible therapeutic scheme for blocking lymphogenous metastasis. In conclusion, aggressive surgical procedures performed by experienced surgeons or postoperative radioactive iodine therapy to minimize local recurrence of LN for PTC patients with high risk.

The role of the VEGF-C/VEGFR-3 axis in cancer progression

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor 3 (VEGFR-3) (also called VEGFR-3) is activated by its specific ligand, VEGF-C, which promotes cancer progression. The VEGF-C/VEGFR-3 axis is expressed not only by lymphatic endothelial cells but also by a variety of human tumour cells. Activation of the VEGF-C/VEGFR-3 axis in lymphatic endothelial cells can facilitate metastasis by increasing the formation of lymphatic vessels (lymphangiogenesis) within and around tumours. The VEGF-C/VEGFR-3 axis plays a critical role in leukaemic cell proliferation, survival, and resistance to chemotherapy. Moreover, activation of the VEGF-C/VEGFR-3 axis in several types of solid tumours enhances cancer cell mobility and invasion capabilities, promoting cancer cell metastasis. In this review, we discuss the novel function and molecular mechanism of the VEGF-C/VEGFR-3 axis in cancer progression.

Immunohistochemical markers of prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer: a review and proposal for a multiphase approach to marker evaluation

Characteristics of the tumour that affect and predict the survival outcome of patients with cancer are prognostic markers for cancer. In non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), stage is the main determinant of prognosis and the basis for deciding options for treatment. Patients with early-stage tumour are treated by complete surgical resection, which is curative in 40-70% of patients. That there are other factors important in determining the biology of these tumours, especially genes that have a role in metastasis, is indicated. Such factors could potentially be used to further classify patients into groups according to substages that may be treated differently. During the past decade, a large number of proteins that are putatively important in carcinogenesis and cancer biology have been studied for their prognostic value in NSCLC, but none of them have been proved to be sufficiently useful in clinical diagnosis. Several markers (epidermal growth factor receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, Ki-67, p53 and Bcl-2) have been studied exhaustively. Ki-67, p53 and Bcl-2 are suggested to be important but weak prognostic markers, by meta-analyses of the results. Cyclin E, vascular endothelial growth factor A, p16(INK4A), p27(kip1) and beta-catenin are promising candidates, but require further study in large randomised clinical trial samples by using standardised assays and scoring systems. Some issues and inconsistencies in the reported studies to date are highlighted and discussed. A guideline for a multi-phase approach for conducting future studies on prognostic immunohistochemistry markers is proposed here.

Medulloblastoma outcome is adversely associated with overexpression of EEF1D, RPL30, and RPS20 on the long arm of chromosome 8

Background

Medulloblastoma is the most common malignant brain tumor of childhood. Improvements in clinical outcome require a better understanding of the genetic alterations to identify clinically significant biological factors and to stratify patients accordingly. In the present study, we applied cytogenetic characterization to guide the identification of biologically significant genes from gene expression microarray profiles of medulloblastoma.

Methods

We analyzed 71 primary medulloblastomas for chromosomal copy number aberrations (CNAs) using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Among 64 tumors that we previously analyzed by gene expression microarrays, 27 were included in our CGH series. We analyzed clinical outcome with respect to CNAs and microarray results. We filtered microarray data using specific CNAs to detect differentially expressed candidate genes associated with survival.

Results

The most frequent lesions detected in our series involved chromosome 17; loss of 16q, 10q, or 8p; and gain of 7q or 2p. Recurrent amplifications at 2p23-p24, 2q14, 7q34, and 12p13 were also observed. Gain of 8q is associated with worse overall survival (p = 0.0141), which is not entirely attributable to MYC amplification or overexpression. By applying CGH results to gene expression analysis of medulloblastoma, we identified three 8q-mapped genes that are associated with overall survival in the larger group of 64 patients (p < 0.05): eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1D (EEF1D), ribosomal protein L30 (RPL30), and ribosomal protein S20 (RPS20).

Conclusion

The complementary use of CGH and expression profiles can facilitate the identification of clinically significant candidate genes involved in medulloblastoma growth. We demonstrate that gain of 8q and expression levels of three 8q-mapped candidate genes (EEF1D, RPL30, RPS20) are associated with adverse outcome in medulloblastoma.

Expression and localization of VEGF-C and VEGFR-3 in glioblastomas and haemangioblastomas

Primary human brain tumours account for approximately 2% of all cancers. High levels of expression of vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A), a potent angiogenic factor, are linked to poor prognosis. In contrast, the potential role in human brain tumour biology of newer VEGF family members, VEGF-C and VEGF-D, both of which are lymphangiogenic factors, is poorly understood. In the present study, the expression of all VEGFs (VEGF-A, -B, -C, and -D) and their receptors (VEGFR-1, -2, and -3) has been assessed in 39 primary human brain tumours. The well-established findings were confirmed with VEGF-A. Surprisingly, however, VEGF-C and VEGF-D, as well as VEGFR-3, were expressed in some tumour types such as haemangioblastomas and glioblastomas, despite their lack of lymphatic vessels. VEGF-C and VEGFR-3 transcripts were localized to the tumour palisade around necrotic areas in glioblastomas and were evenly distributed throughout haemangioblastomas. VEGF-C protein was localized by immunohistochemistry to the palisade layer in glioblastomas. More than 50% of VEGF-C-positive cells also expressed the intermediate-stage inflammatory macrophage marker CD163; however, a significant proportion of VEGF-C-positive cells were CD163-negative. These data demonstrate the presence of molecules, primarily described as regulators of lymphangiogenesis, in normal human brain and brain tumours that are devoid of lymphatics. Their localization in macrophages points to a role in tumour-associated inflammation.

The balance of VEGF-C and VEGFR-3 mRNA is a predictor of lymph node metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer

A positive association between vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C) expression and lymph node metastasis has been reported in several cancers. However, the relationship of VEGF-C and lymph node metastasis in some cancers, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), is controversial. We evaluated the VEGF-C and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3 (VEGFR-3) expression in NSCLC samples from patients who had undergone surgery between 1998 and 2002 using real-time quantitative RT–PCR and immunohistochemical staining. We failed to find a positive association between VEGF-C and VEGFR-3 mRNA expression and lymph node metastasis in NSCLC. An immunohistological study demonstrated that VEGF-C was expressed not only in cancer cells, but also in macrophages in NSCLC, and that VEGFR-3 was expressed in cancer cells, macrophages, type II pneumocytes and lymph vessels. The VEGF-C/VEGFR-3 ratio of the node-positive group was significantly higher than that of the node-negative group. Immunohistochemical staining showed that VEGFR-3 was mainly expressed in cancer cells. The immunoreactivity of VEGF-C and VEGFR-3 was roughly correlated to the mRNA levels of VEGF-C and VEGFR-3 in real-time PCR. VEGF-C mRNA alone has no positive association with lymph node metastasis in NSCLC. The VEGF-C/VEGFR-3 ratio was positively associated with lymph node metastasis in NSCLC. This suggests that VEGF-C promotes lymph node metastasis while being influenced by the strength of the VEGF-C autocrine loop, and the VEGF-C/VEGFR-3 ratio can be a useful predictor of lymph node metastasis in NSCLC.

Coexpression of VEGF-C and Cox-2 in human colorectal cancer and its association with lymph node metastasis

PURPOSE

Several lines of experimental evidence indicated that over-expression of vascular endothelial growth factor-C and cyclooxygenase-2 genes promotes angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis, both of which are essential for the growth and spreading of tumor cells. This study was designed to evaluate the coexpression of vascular endothelial growth factor-C and cyclooxygenase-2 in human colorectal carcinoma to determine their relationships and correlations with lymph node metastasis and prognosis.

METHODS

Tissue samples of primary tumors and metastatic lymph nodes from 150 patients undergoing intentionally curative surgical resections for colorectal adenocarcinoma were immunohistochemically examined for vascular endothelial growth factor-C, cyclooxygenase-2, and CD34 expressions. Then, we analyzed their relationships and correlations with clinicopathologic findings and patients' survival time.

RESULTS

The positivity rate of vascular endothelial growth factor-C and cyclooxygenase-2 in the primary tumor was 68 and 72.7 percent, respectively, and in the metastatic lymph nodes was 93.3 and 80 percent, respectively. A significant correlation was found between the expression scores of vascular endothelial growth factor-C and cyclooxygenase-2 (P < 0.0001), and both also were correlated to microvessels density and several clinicopathologic parameters, including primary tumor size, lymph node metastasis, lymphatic invasion, and TNM stage. Patients with vascular endothelial growth factor-C-positive and/or cyclooxygenase-2-positive tumors had a significant shorter survival time than those with negative tumors did. However, in a multivariate analysis, only cyclooxygenase-2 expression was recognized as an independent prognostic factor (P = 0.0412; relative risk ratio, 3.067; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.046-8.994).

CONCLUSIONS

These data show that in human colorectal carcinoma, vascular endothelial growth factor-C and cyclooxygenase-2 are coexpressed and significantly associated with lymph node metastasis and prognosis.

Tumor-induced lymphangiogenesis: a target for cancer therapy?

Recent advances in understanding the biology of lymphangiogenesis, the new growth of lymphatic vessels, have cast new light on the molecular basis of metastasis to regional lymph nodes. The receptor tyrosine kinase VEGFR-3 is virtually exclusively expressed on lymphatic but not blood endothelium in the adult, and activation of VEGFR-3 by its ligands VEGF-C and VEGF-D is sufficient to induce lymphangiogenesis. Correlative studies with human tumors and functional studies using animal tumor models show that increased levels of VEGF-C or VEGF-D in tumors lead to enhanced numbers of lymphatic vessels in the vicinity of tumors, which in turn promotes metastasis to regional lymph nodes by providing a greater number of entry sites into the lymphatic system for invading tumor cells. These findings have prompted studies to investigate whether inhibitors of VEGFR-3 activation might represent novel therapeutic agents for the suppression of metastasis. However, a number of points regarding the therapeutic potential of anti-lymphangiogenic treatments in the context of cancer remain to be addressed. The spectrum and relative importance of molecules that induce lymphangiogenesis and the regulation of their expression during tumor progression, the reversibility of tumor-induced lymphangiogenesis, and possible side-effects of anti-lymphangiogenesis-based therapies all need to be investigated. Most importantly, the extent to which lymph node metastases contribute to the formation of metastases in other organs remains to be elucidated. These aspects are the focus of this review, and their investigation should serve as a roadmap to possible translational application.

Lymphangiogenesis correlates with lymph node metastasis, prognosis, and angiogenic phenotype in human non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Recent experimental studies have revealed that lymphangiogenesis plays an important role in cancer progression, but its clinical significance in the case of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. Our aim was to assess the lymphangiogenesis of human NSCLC, and to correlate this with angiogenic phenotype (angiogenic versus nonangiogenic growth pattern) and clinical behavior.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

One hundred and three patients with NSCLC and complete follow-up information were included. Tumor samples were immunostained for vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C), the lymphatic endothelial markers, LYVE-1 and D2-40/Podoplanin, and the panvascular marker, CD31. Lymphatic vessel density (LVD) and perimeters were evaluated within the tumor and peritumorally.

RESULTS

LVDs at the tumor periphery were significantly higher in lymph node metastatic tumors (P < 0.005) and high LVDs correlated with poor overall survival (P < 0.001). However, this tendency proved to be significant only in the angiogenic tumor group (P < 0.001). Although 68% of the patients with nonangiogenic tumors had lymph node metastasis (P = 0.0048 versus angiogenic tumors), in the patient group with nonangiogenic NSCLCs, there was no information from the LVDs in any investigated tumor area (P > 0.05). In contrast to angiogenic tumors, which had actively sprouting lymphatics in all of the investigated tumor areas, nonangiogenic tumors showed no Ki67 staining intratumorally.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results reveal tumor lymphangiogenesis as a novel prognostic indicator for the risk of lymph node metastasis in NSCLC. Moreover, it also provides the first evidence that nonangiogenic NSCLCs mainly co-opt host tissue lymphatics during their growth, in contrast to most of the angiogenic tumors, which expand with concomitant lymphangiogenesis.

Vascular endothelial growth factor in the lung

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a pluripotent growth and permeability factor that has a broad impact on endothelial cell function. The lung tissue is very rich in this protein; many different lung cells produce VEGF and also respond to VEGF. VEGF is critical for the development of the lung and serves as a maintenance factor during adult life. In addition to the physiological functions of this protein, there is increasing evidence that VEGF also plays a role in several acute and chronic lung diseases, such as acute lung injury, severe pulmonary hypertension, and emphysema. Here we provide a comprehensive overview of the rapidly expanding literature.

Lymphangiogenesis and Angiogenesis in Bladder Cancer: Prognostic Implications and Regulation by Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors-A, -C, and -D

PURPOSE

Lymph vessel density (LVD) and microvessel density (MVD) correlate with the malignant potential of tumors and patient survival. Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF)-A, VEGF-C, and VEGF-D could modulate LVD and MVD. We investigated the clinical and prognostic significance of LVD and MVD on lymphangiogenic and angiogenic function of VEGF-A, VEGF-C, and VEGF-D in human bladder cancer.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We reviewed tissue samples from patients with nonmetastatic bladder cancer who had undergone transurethral resections (n = 126). The densities of D2-40-positive vessels (LVD) and CD34-positive vessels (MVD) were measured by a computer-aided image analysis system. Expression of VEGF-A, VEGF-C, and VEGF-D was examined by immunohistochemistry; survival analyses and their independent roles were investigated using multivariate analysis models.

RESULTS

LVD was associated with tumor grade but not with pT stage. LVD was associated with metastasis-free survival (log rank P = 0.039), but was not an independent prognostic factor. Although MVD affected survival, the combination of high LVD and high MVD in tumors was an independent predictor of metastasis-free survival. Although VEGF-C expression was positively associated with both LVD and MVD, VEGF-D was associated only with LVD. VEGF-A expression was associated with MVD in univariate analysis, however, it was not an independent factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Lymphangiogenesis and angiogenesis influence metastasis-free survival, and are regulated by VEGF-C and/or VEGF-D. Our results suggest that LVD and MVD are useful tools for the selection of postoperative management and treatment strategies in patients with bladder cancer.

Angiogenesis in non-small cell lung cancer: The prognostic impact of neoangiogenesis and the cytokines VEGF and bFGF in tumours and blood

BACKGROUND

Due to a dismal prognosis of advanced lung cancer, novel screening tools and more effective treatments are clearly needed. Lately, an increasing number of tumour-released angiogenic cytokines which affect vessel formation, tumour growth, invasion, and metastasis have been identified. Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) are among the most important angiogenic factors. Based on available literature, we have explored the mechanisms of angiogenesis and its prognostic significance in non-small cell lung cancer, estimated by microvessel density (MVD) and the presence of VEGF and bFGF in the tumour and blood from NSCLC patients.

METHODS

Several comprehensive Pubmed searches for the period January 1993 to May 2005 were performed using strategic combinations of the terms non-small cell lung cancer, angiogenesis, vascular endothelial growth factor, basic fibroblast growth factor, tumour expression, microvessel density, circulating, and serum.

RESULTS

NSCLC neoangiogenesis, as measured by MVD, and tumour expression of VEGF are poor prognostic factors for survival (MVD, HR 1.8-2.0; VEGF, HR 1.5). bFGF tumour expression is also associated with poor survival and more aggressive disease. When evaluating the prognostic impact of elevated VEGF levels in blood, 10 of 16 studies (63%) indicated a negative prognostic impact. Of five studies on the prognostic value of circulating bFGF, three studies reported a negative prognostic impact, while one indicated bFGF as a good prognostic factor and one was inconclusive.

CONCLUSION

Angiogenic factors are poor prognostic indicators for tumour aggressiveness and survival in NSCLC. Assessments of circulating levels of VEGF and possibly bFGF may be valuable future tools for treatment planning and monitoring of treatment effect and relapse. First, however, these blood tests need to be standardised and validated in large-scale prospective clinical trials.

Clinical significance of vascular endothelial growth factor-C and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 in patients with T1 lung adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C) plays an important role in lymphangiogenesis and activates VEGF receptor-3 (VEGFR-3). Lymphatic spread is an important prognostic factor in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. The aim of the current study was to determine whether the expression of VEGF-C and VEGFR-3 correlates with clinicopathologic factors and prognosis in patients with TNM classification T1 lung adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective review of 129 consecutive patients who underwent complete resection for T1 lung adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemical staining for VEGF-C, VEGF, VEGFR-3, CD34 (microvessels), tryptase (mast cells), and CD68 (macrophages) was performed to statistically analyze clinicopathologic implications of VEGF-C and VEGFR-3 status.

RESULTS

Of 129 patients with T1 lung adenocarcinoma, 56 (43.3%) patients were positive for tumor-cell VEGF-C and 73 (56.6%) and 69 (53.5%) patients were positive for tumor-cell and endothelial-cell VEGFR-3, respectively. Patients with positive staining for tumor-cell VEGF-C showed significantly less favorable survival rates than patients with negative staining (P = 0.031). The survival rates of patients with positive staining for tumor-cell and endothelial-cell VEGFR-3 were significantly lower than those with negative staining (P = 0.0034 and P = 0.0020, respectively). Patients with positive staining for both tumor-cell VEGF-C and endothelial-cell VEGFR-3 exhibited the most unfavorable prognoses. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that coexpression of tumor-cell VEGF-C and endothelial-cell VEGFR-3 was an independent negative prognostic factor (P = 0.0129) as well as N factor (P = 0.0020).

CONCLUSIONS

VEGF-C and VEGFR-3 status may be indicative of survival rates for patients with T1 lung adenocarcinoma.

Flt-4-positive endothelial cell density and its clinical significance in non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Experimental studies have revealed that fms-like tyrosine kinase (Flt)-4 plays important roles in lymphangiogenesis in malignant tumors, but the clinical significance remains unclear. We assessed Flt-4 expression in tumor cells and in endothelial cells in correlation with clinical outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

A total of 206 consecutive patients with resected pathological stage I-IIIA NSCLC were reviewed. Expression of Flt-4 was examined immunohistochemically, and Flt-4-positive microvessels were quantitatively evaluated (Flt-4-positive endothelial cell density).

RESULTS

There was no significant correlation between Flt-4-positive endothelial cell density and any characteristic of patients including nodal metastases. A significant correlation between Flt-4-positive endothelial cell density and Flt-4 status in tumor cells was documented (P < 0.001), but there was no significant difference in the mean Flt-4-positive endothelial cell density according to vascular endothelial growth factor-C or -D status in tumor cells. The 5-year survival rate for higher Flt-4-positive endothelial cell density tumor (56.4%) was significantly lower than that of lower Flt-4-positive endothelial cell density tumor (69.0%, P = 0.046); the prognostic significance was enhanced in pIIIA-N2 patients (5-year survival rates, 18.8% for higher Flt-4-positive endothelial cell density tumor and 50.0% for lower Flt-4-positive endothelial cell density tumor, respectively; P = 0.012). A multivariate analysis confirmed that higher Flt-4-positive endothelial cell density was a significant and independent prognostic factor (P = 0.019). CD34-positive vessel density or Flt-4 status in tumor cells was not a significant prognostic factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Flt-4-positive endothelial cell density, not Flt-4 status in tumor cells, was a significant prognostic factor in NSCLC.

Genomics of lung cancer may change diagnosis, prognosis and therapy

Despite significant improvements in tumor management in general, the prognosis of lung cancer patients remains dismal. It is a hope that our increasing knowledge in molecular aspects of tumor development, growth and progression will open new targets for therapeutic interventions. In this review we discuss some of the more recent results of this field. This includes the susceptibility factors, an association between genetic changes in EGFR pathway and tyrosine kinase inhibitors, the role of gene hypermethylation and genetic profiling, as well as different molecular aspects of tumor progression. Available data all support that lung cancer is a group of diseases with not only distinct histological but with similarly different genetic characters. Accordingly, the diagnosis, prognosis and therapy must accommodate this heterogeneity.