A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of calcium supplementation for decreased bone density in corticosteroid-using patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a pilot study

Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Approach

GCs constitute a therapeutic class largely used in clinical medicine for the curative or supportive treatment of various conditions involving the intervention of numerous medical specialties. Beyond their favorable therapeutic effects, GCs almost invariably provoke bone loss and a rapid increase in bone fragility, with its host of fractures. Men and postmenopausal women constitute a preferential target for the bone complications of GCs. The premenopausal status is not, however, a shelter; bone loss also happens in young women who are on GCs. Exposure to GCs yields a fracture risk exceeding the risk conferred by a low BMD per se. Therefore, some reason exists to settle the BMD threshold for therapeutic intervention not at -2.5 T-scores but at -1.0 or -1.5 T-scores, even if no prospective randomized trial so far endorses that opinion. Nowadays, bisphosphonate therapy should be proposed to every patient at risk for fragility fracture, along with calcium and vitamin D supplementation. Studies of other therapeutic modalities (eg, promoters of bone formation) are in progress.

Prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in inflammatory bowel disease

The following are guidelines for evaluation and consideration for treatment of patients with inflammatory bone disease (IBD) after bone mineral density (BMD) measurements. The Crohn's & Colitis Foundation of America (CCFA) has indicated that its recommendations are intended to serve as reference points for clinical decision-making, not as rigid standards, limits, or rules. They should not be interpreted as quality standards.

Altered levels of biochemical indices of bone turnover and bone-related vitamins in patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

The pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease-associated osteopenia may be related to pathological rates of bone turnover; however, the literature shows mixed results.

AIM

To compare bone biomarkers in inflammatory bowel disease patients (Crohn's disease: n = 68, and ulcerative colitis: n = 32, separately) with age- and sex-matched healthy controls.

SUBJECTS

Patients and controls were recruited from Cork University Hospital and Cork City area, respectively.

RESULTS

Relative to that in their respective controls, Crohn's disease (n = 47) and ulcerative colitis (n = 26) patients (i.e. excluding supplement users) had significantly (P < 0.05-0.001) higher serum undercarboxylated osteocalcin (by 27% and 63%, respectively) and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (by 15% and 21%, respectively) and urinary Type I collagen cross-linked N-telopeptides concentrations (by 87% and 112%, respectively). Relative to that in their respective controls, Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis patients had significantly (P < 0.01) lower serum total osteocalcin (by 20% and 42%, respectively) and 25-hydroxyvitamin D (by 37% and 42%, respectively), while serum parathyroid hormone levels were similar. In the combined patient group (n = 100), undercarboxylated osteocalcin was positively associated with bone markers.

CONCLUSIONS

Both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis patients have altered bone turnover relative to that in healthy controls.

Intravenous pamidronate in combination with calcium and vitamin D: highly effective in the treatment of low bone mineral density in inflammatory bowel disease

OBJECTIVE

Decreased bone mineral density (BMD) is common in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and an increased risk of fractures has been reported. Guidelines state bisphosphonate treatment for IBD patients with decreased BMD, but orally available bisphosphonates have been associated with gastrointestinal side effects and the absorption is poor. We investigated whether intravenous pamidronate is a safe and effective treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty-nine IBD patients with decreased BMD as assessed by DEXA scan were treated with calcium 1000 mg and vitamin D 400 IU daily. In addition, 30 mg of pamidronate was administered intravenously every 3 months. DEXA scanning was performed prior to treatment, after 6 months and after 1 year.

RESULTS

Of 49 IBD patients, 40 were osteoporotic and 9 were osteopenic. Twenty-six patients were female (mean age 40.8) and 23 were male (mean age 43.3). Treatment was discontinued in one patient because of fever after infusion. Otherwise, tolerability was excellent, and no adverse events were documented. A mean 0.51 increase of lumbar spine (L1-L4) T-scores was observed (CI 95% 0.35-0.67; p<0.0004). The effect of treatment on left femoral neck T-scores was less pronounced: 0.39 (CI 95% 0.24-0.53; p<0.0004).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that intravenous pamidronate in combination with calcium and vitamin D is a well tolerated strategy for treating Crohn's disease associated osteopenia and osteoporosis. Although uncontrolled, treatment results in a significant increase of BMD in the lumbar spine.

Evidence-based guidelines for the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: a consensus document of the Belgian Bone Club

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are frequently prescribed for various inflammatory and/or life-threatening conditions concerning many systems in the body. However, they can provoke many aftereffects, of which osteoporosis (OP) is one of the most crippling complications, with its host of fractures. The dramatic increase in bone fragility is mainly attributable to the GC-induced rapid bone loss in all skeletal compartments. We have reviewed the meta-analyses and randomized controlled studies reporting medical therapeutic interventions currently registered in Belgium for the management of GC-OP comparatively with a placebo. Based on this research, an expert meeting developed a consensus on the prevention and therapy of GC-OP. The pathophysiology of GC-OP is complex. Several factors, acting separately or synergistically, have been described. Their great number could help to understand the rapidity of bone loss and of bone fragility occurrence, indicating that a rapid therapeutic intervention should be implemented to avoid complications. All patients on GCs are threatened with OP, so the prevention and/or therapy of GC-OP should be considered not only for postmenopausal females, but also for osteopenic premenopausal females and for males put on a daily dose of at least 7.5 mg equivalent prednisolone that is expected to last at least 3 months. Non-pharmacological interventions, such as exercise and avoidance of tobacco and alcohol, should be recommended, even if their role is not definitely settled in GC-OP prevention. Supplemental calcium and vitamin D should be considered as the first-line therapy because of the decrease in intestinal calcium absorption provoked by GCs. They also could be considered either as isolated therapy in patients taking less than 7.5 mg prednisolone daily and/or for a predicted period shorter than 3 months or as adjuvant therapy to other more potent drugs. Hormone replacement therapy could be considered in young postmenopausal females on GC, such as in postmenopausal OP, or in men with low androgen levels. Calcitonin appears to have a protective effect on trabecular bone in GC-OP, just as in postmenopausal OP. There is an increasing body of evidence supporting the antifracture efficacy of bisphosphonates, notably alendronate and risedronate. Preventative and curative therapy of GC-OP should be maintained as long as the patient is on GC treatment and could be stopped after weaning from GC, because there is more than circumstantial evidence of some recovery of BMD when GCs are stopped. There is no indication in GC-OP for any combination of two antiresorptive agents (except for calcium and vitamin D) or for an antiresorptive and an anabolic agent. There is indeed no proof that the increased costs of combined treatments will translate into increased therapeutic efficacy.

A double-blind placebo-controlled study of the effects of the bisphosphonate risedronate on bone mass in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Low bone density and fractures are common in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the bisphosphonate risedronate and calcium are safe and effective in preserving bone mass compared to calcium alone in IBD patients with low bone mass.

PATIENTS

Sixty-one ambulatory patients with Crohn's disease (n = 31) or ulcerative colitis (n = 30) and low bone density.

METHODS

Using a double-blind placebo-controlled trial format, patients were randomized to 12 months of therapy with risedronate 5 mg or placebo. All received a 600 mg calcium supplement. Bone density using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry was performed at baseline and at 12 months. Disease activity, use of corticosteroid, and adverse events were noted.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients completed the trial. Compared to the placebo group risedronate resulted in a 2.0% (95%CI, 0.02-3.97) and 1.9% (95%CI, 0.21-3.62) improvement in bone density at the spine and hip, respectively. IBD diagnosis, gender, therapy, and disease status had no effect on the results. There were no significant differences in the adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Risedronate improved bone density at the spine and hip in patients with either Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis and low bone mass. These data suggest that risedronate is a safe and effective therapy to improve bone mass in these patients.

Skeletal morbidity in inflammatory bowel disease

Patients with Crohn's disease are at increased risk of developing disturbances in bone and mineral metabolism because of several factors, including the cytokine-mediated nature of the inflammatory bowel disease, the intestinal malabsorption resulting from disease activity or from extensive intestinal resection and the use of glucucorticoids to control disease activity. Inability to achieve peak bone mass when the disease starts in childhood, malnutrition, immobilization, low BMI, smoking and hypogonadism may also play a contributing role in the pathogenesis of bone loss. The relationship between long-term use of glucocorticoids for any disease indication and increased risk for osteoporosis and fractures is well established. However, the relationship between Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis and bone loss remains controversial. Depending on the population studied the prevalence of osteoporosis has thus been variably reported to range from 12 to 42% in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In IBD most studies demonstrate a negative correlation between bone mineral density (BMD) and glucocorticoid use, but not all authors agree on the relationship between long-term glucocorticoid use and continuing bone loss. Whereas prospective studies do suggest sustained bone loss at both trabecular and cortical sites in long-term glucocorticoid users with inflammatory bowel disease, a decrease in bone mass is also observed in patients with active Crohn's disease not using glucocorticoids, and bone loss is not universally observed in patients with Crohn's disease using orally or rectally administered glucocorticoids. Data on vertebral fractures are scarce and there is no agreement about the risk of non-vertebral fractures in patients with Crohn's disease, although it has been suggested that non-vertebral fracture risk may be increased by up to 60% in patients with IBD. A recent publication reports an increased risk of hip fractures in Crohn's disease related to current and cumulative corticosteroid use and use of opiates, although these fractures could not be related to the severity of osteoporosis. The issue of the magnitude of the problem of osteoporosis has become particularly relevant in Crohn's disease, since the ability of therapeutic interventions to beneficially influence skeletal morbidity has been clearly established in patients with osteoporosis, whether post-menopausal women, men or glucocorticoid users. The main question that arises is whether all patients with Crohn's disease should be treated with bone protective agents on the assumption that they all have the potential to develop osteoporosis or whether the use of these agents should be restricted to patients clearly at risk of osteoporosis and fractures, providing these can be identified. We recommend, based on the available literature and our own experience, that all patients with Crohn's disease should be screened for osteoporosis by means of a bone mineral density measurement in addition to full correction of any potential calcium and vitamin D deficiency, to allow timely therapeutic intervention of the patient at risk while sparing the vast majority unnecessary medical treatment.

In whom and how to prevent glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

Glucocorticoid use is widespread in medicine. While it is often life-saving, side-effects are well known. The most common side-effect is osteoporosis. Today we have therapies with proven efficacy for the prevention of vertebral fractures and bone loss. Consequently recognition of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis is extremely important given the availability of effective therapy.

Bone loss in Crohn's disease: exercise as a potential countermeasure

Crohn's disease (CD) is associated with a number of secondary conditions including osteoporosis, which increases the risk of bone fracture. The cause of metabolic bone disease in this population is believed to be multifactorial and may include the disease itself and associated inflammation, high-dose corticosteroid use, weight loss and malabsorption, a lack of exercise and physical activity, and an underlying genetic predisposition to bone loss. Reduced bone mineral density has been reported in between 5% to 80% of CD sufferers, although it is generally believed that approximately 40% of patients suffer from osteopenia and 15% from osteoporosis. Recent studies suggest a small but significantly increased risk of fracture compared with healthy controls and, perhaps, sufferers of other gastrointestinal disorders such as ulcerative colitis. The role of physical activity and exercise in the prevention and treatment of CD-related bone loss has received little attention, despite the benefits of specific exercises being well documented in healthy populations. This article reviews the prevalence of and risk factors for low bone mass in CD patients and examines various treatments for osteoporosis in these patients, with a particular focus on physical activity.

Seasonality of vitamin D status and bone turnover in patients with Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

While winter-time vitamin D deficiency has been well-documented in Crohn's disease patients, less is known about vitamin D status during summertime and whether a seasonal variation exists in bone turnover.

AIMS

To compare vitamin D status and bone turnover markers in Crohn's disease patients with age- and sex-matched controls during late-summer and late-winter.

SUBJECTS

Crohn's disease patients (n = 44; mean age 36.9 years, currently in remission) and matched controls (n = 44) were recruited from Cork University Hospital and Cork City area, respectively.

METHODS

Bloods were analysed for 25-hydroxyvitamin D, parathyroid hormone, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin and urine analysed for N-telopeptides of type 1 collagen.

RESULTS

Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations were significantly (P < 0.003) lower in Crohn's disease patients than in control subjects during both seasons. In Crohn's disease patients, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations were lower (P < 0.0001) whereas serum parathyroid hormone, osteocalcin and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and urinary N-telopeptides of type 1 collagen levels were higher (P < 0.001) during late-winter than late-summer.

CONCLUSION

There were notable seasonal variations in vitamin D status and bone turnover markers in Crohn's disease patients. The impact of winter decline in vitamin D status and increase in bone turnover on long-term risk of osteopenia/osteoporosis in Crohn's disease patients is unclear.

Therapy Insight: osteoporosis in inflammatory bowel disease—advances and retreats

There is a discrepancy between the high rates of reduced bone mineral density (BMD) reported in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and the relatively low fracture rates observed in population-based studies. When fractures occur, they are most common among the elderly IBD population. It has become clear that BMD is but one of several important factors to be considered when assessing fracture risk. Ideally, BMD should be assessed selectively, as opposed to assessing this measure in all IBD patients simply because they carry an IBD diagnosis. Preventing bone loss should begin with an attempt to limit corticosteroid-induced bone loss. This can be done by using the minimum effective prednisolone dose, substituting budesonide when appropriate, administering other steroid-sparing immunomodulators, or by prescribing additional agents that enhance bone health. The administration of calcium and vitamin D appears to maintain or enhance bone mass. Bisphosphonates are of unclear additional benefit to the majority of patients who are at low fracture risk. Although more data are required to understand the best strategy to prevent fractures, a greater appreciation of the role of selective BMD testing and the utility of simple therapeutic strategies (such as calcium and vitamin D supplements) is emerging.

Vitamin D analogs versus native vitamin D in preventing bone loss and osteoporosis-related fractures: a comparative meta-analysis

It has been suggested that early postmenopausal women and patients treated with steroids should receive preventive therapy (calcium, vitamin D, vitamin D analogs, estrogens, or bisphosphonates) to preserve their bone mineral density (BMD) and to avoid fragility fractures. We designed the present study to compare the effects of native vitamin D to its hydroxylated analogs alfacalcidol 1-alpha(OH)D and calcitriol 1,25(OH)(2)D. All randomized, controlled, double-blinded trials comparing oral native vitamin D and its analogs, alfacalcidol or calcitriol, to placebo or head-to-head trials in primary or corticosteroids-induced osteoporosis were included in the meta-analysis. Sources included the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and a hand search of abstracts and references lists. The study period January 1985 to January 2003. Data were abstracted by two investigators, and methodological quality was assessed in a similar manner. Heterogeneity was extensively investigated. Results were expressed as effect-size (ES) for bone loss and as rate difference (RD) for fracture while allocated to active treatment or control. Publication bias was investigated. Fourteen studies of native vitamin D, nine of alfacalcidol, and ten of calcitriol fit the inclusion criteria. The two vitamin D analogs appeared to exert a higher preventive effect on bone loss and fracture rates in patients not exposed to glucocorticoids. With respect to BMD, vitamin D analogs versus placebo studies had an ES of 0.36 (P < 0.0001), whereas native vitamin D versus placebo had an ES of 0.17 (P = 0.0005), the interclass difference being highly significant (ANOVA-1, P < 0.05). When restricted to the lumbar spine, this intertreatment difference remained significant: ES = 0.43 (P = 0.0002) for vitamin D analogs and ES = 0.21 (P = 0.001) for native vitamin D (analysis of variance [ANOVA-1], P = 0.047). There were no significant differences regarding their efficacies on other measurement sites (ANOVA-1, P = 0.36). When comparing the adjusted global relative risks for fracture when allocated to vitamin D analogs or native vitamin D, alfacalcidol and calcitriol provided a more marked preventive efficacy against fractures: RD = 10% (95% Confidence interval [CI-2] to 17) compared to RD = 2% (95% CI, 1 to 2), respectively. The analysis of the spinal and nonspinal showed that fracture rates differed between the two classes, thereby confirming the benefits of vitamin D analogs, with significant 13.4% (95% CI 7.7 to 19.8) and. 6% (95% CI 1 to 12) lower fracture rates for vitamin D analogs, respectively. In patients receiving corticosteroid therapy, both treatments provided similar global ESs for BMD: ES = 0.38 for vitamin D analogs and ES = 0.41 for native vitamin D (ANOVA-1, P = 0.88). When restriced to spinal BMD, D analogs provided significant effects, whereas native vitamin D did not: ES = 0.43 (P < 0.0001) and ES = 0.33 (P = 0.21), respectively. The intertreatment difference was nonsignificant (ANOVA-1, P = 0.52). Neither D analogs for native vitamin D significantly prevented fractures in this subcategory of patients: RD = 2.6 (95%CI, -9.5 to 4.3) and RD = 6.4 (95%CI, -2.3 to 10), respectively. In head-to-head studies comparing D analogs and native vitamin D in patients receiving corticosteroids, significant effects favoring D analogs were found for femoral neck BMD: ES = 0.31 at P = 0.02 and spinal fractures: RD = 15% (95%CI, 6.5 to 25). Publication bias was not significant. Our analysis demonstrates a superiority of the D analogs atfacalcidol and calcitriol in preventing bone loss and spinal fractures in primary osteoporosis, including postmenopausal women. In corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis, the efficacy of D analogs differed depending on the comparative approach: indirect comparisons led to nonsignificant differences, whereas direct comparison did provide significant differences. In this setting, D analogs seem to prevent spinal fractures to a greater extent than do native vitamin D, but this assumption should be confirmed on a comprehensive basis in multiarm studies including an inactive comparator.

Randomized trial of etidronate plus calcium and vitamin D for treatment of low bone mineral density in Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Crohn's disease causes an increase in osteopenia and osteoporosis. This study assessed the efficacy of adding etidronate to calcium and vitamin D supplementation for treatment of low bone mineral density in Crohn's disease.

METHODS

One hundred fifty-four patients with Crohn's disease with decreased bone mineral density, determined by using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, were randomly assigned to receive etidronate (400 mg orally) or not for 14 days; both groups were then given daily calcium (500 mg) and vitamin D (400 IU) supplementation for 76 days. This cycle was repeated 8 times during a period of 24 months. Biochemical characteristics and bone mineral densities were assessed at 6, 12, and 24 months.

RESULTS

After 24 months bone mineral density significantly increased from baseline in both the etidronate- and the non-etidronate-treated groups (both groups receiving calcium and vitamin D supplementation) at the lumbar spine (P < .001), ultradistal radius (P < .001), and trochanter (P = .004) sites, but not at the total hip. The increase in bone mineral density was similar in each treatment group. No bone mineral density differences were found when groups were analyzed according to gender, corticosteroid use, bone mineral density at baseline, or age.

CONCLUSIONS

Low bone mineral density is frequently associated with Crohn's disease. Supplementation with daily calcium and vitamin D is associated with increases in bone mineral density. The addition of oral etidronate does not further enhance bone mineral density.

Vitamin K status in patients with Crohn's disease and relationship to bone turnover

BACKGROUND

There is a high prevalence of osteopenia among patients with Crohn's disease (CD). There is some evidence that a deficiency of certain bone-active nutrients (including vitamins K and D) may have a partial role in this bone loss.

AIMS

To compare the intake and the status of vitamin K in CD patients, currently in remission, with age- and sex-matched controls, and furthermore to investigate the relationship between vitamin K status and bone turnover in these patients.

SUBJECTS

CD patients (n = 44; mean age: 36.9 yr) and matched controls (n = 44) were recruited from the Cork University Hospital and Cork City area, respectively.

METHODS

Bloods were analyzed for the total and undercarboxylated (Glu)-osteocalcin and urine analyzed for cross-linked N-telopeptides of type I collagen (NTx). Vitamin K(1) intake was estimated by food frequency questionnaire.

RESULTS

Vitamin K(1) intake in CD patients tended to be lower than that of controls (mean (SD), 117 (82) vs 148 (80) mug/d, respectively; p= 0.059). Glu and NTx concentrations in CD patients were higher than controls (mean (SD), 5.1 (3.1) vs 3.9 (2.1) ng/ml, respectively; p= 0.03 for Glu; and 49 (41) vs 25.8 (19.5) nM BCE/mM creatinine, respectively; p= 0.001 for NTx). In CD patients, Glu was significantly correlated with NTx (r= 0.488; p < 0.001), even after controlling for age, gender, vitamin D status, calcium intake, and corticosteroid use.

CONCLUSION

Vitamin K status of CD patients was lower than that of the healthy controls. Furthermore, the rate of bone resorption in the CD was inversely correlated with vitamin K status, suggesting that it might be another etiological factor for CD-related osteopenia.

Review article: Osteoporosis and inflammatory bowel disease

Studies using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry have suggested a high prevalence of osteoporosis in inflammatory bowel disease. However, population-based data on fracture incidence suggest only a small increased risk of fracture amongst patients with inflammatory bowel disease compared with the general population. Therefore, it would be helpful to identify patients with inflammatory bowel disease at particularly high risk for fracture so that these risks might be modified or interventions might be undertaken. The data on calcium intake as a predictor of bone mineral density are conflicting. Although there are data suggesting that a one-time survey to determine current calcium intake will not help to predict bone mineral density in inflammatory bowel disease, persistently reduced calcium intake does appear to lead to lower bone mineral density. In the general population, body mass is strongly correlated with bone mineral density, which also appears to be true in Crohn's disease. Hence, subjects with inflammatory bowel disease and considerable weight loss, or who are obviously malnourished, could be considered for bone mineral density testing, and the finding of a low bone mineral density would suggest the need for more aggressive nutritional support. Although vitamin D is undoubtedly important in bone health, vitamin D intake and serum vitamin D levels do not correlate well with bone mineral density. Sex hormone deficiency can also adversely affect bone health, although a well-developed strategy for sex hormone measurements in patients with inflammatory bowel disease remains to be established. Ultimately, the determination of genetic mutations that accurately predict fracture susceptibility may be the best hope for developing a simplified strategy for managing bone health in inflammatory bowel disease. The therapy of osteoporosis in inflammatory bowel disease has been adapted from other osteoporosis settings, such as post-menopausal or corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. To date, there remains no therapy proven to be efficacious in inflammatory bowel disease-related osteoporosis; however, calcium and vitamin D supplementation and bisphosphonates have their roles.

The treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

Glucocorticoid use results in an increase risk for fractures. Over the past 10 years, we have a greater understanding of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid induced osteoporosis. This article reviews these recent findings and selective practice guidelines.

Metabolic bone disease in inflammatory bowel disease

Osteoporosis is associated with a high morbidity rate and is a risk factor for fractures. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease are at increased risk of developing osteopenia and osteoporosis. Corticosteroid use, malnutrition, and proinflammatory cytokines are unique risk factors for bone loss in ulcerative colitis and Crohn disease. Bone mineral density is assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and reported as a T score or number of standard deviations away from the mean. A T score < 1 SD below the mean is normal, 1 to 2.5 SD below the mean is consistent with osteopenia, and greater than 2.5 SD below the mean is defined as osteoporosis. Treatment includes a combination of basic preventative measures, for example, weight-bearing exercise, calcium, vitamin D, and pharmacologic agents, (e.g., bisphosphonates).

US and UK guidelines for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: Similarities and differences

Osteoporosis is a common and serious complication of glucocorticoid therapy. Recent advances in the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis have stimulated the development of guidelines for the prevention and treatment of this condition. In this report, the updated recommendations of the American College of Rheumatology and guidelines recently produced by the Bone and Tooth Society, National Osteoporosis Society, and Royal College of Physicians in the UK are discussed with respect to their similarities and differences.

A randomized controlled trial of calcium with vitamin D, alone or in combination with intravenous pamidronate, for the treatment of low bone mineral density associated with Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis is a common complication of Crohn's disease.

AIM

To study the effect on the bone mineral density of a bisphosphonate (pamidronate) given intravenously, in combination with oral calcium and vitamin D supplements, compared with oral calcium and vitamin D supplements alone.

METHODS

Seventy-four patients with Crohn's disease and low bone mineral density at the lumbar spine and/or hip were randomized to receive either a daily dose of 500 mg of calcium with 400 IU of vitamin D alone or in combination with four three-monthly infusions of 30 mg of intravenous pamidronate over the course of 12 months. The main outcome measure was the change in bone mineral density at the lumbar spine and hip, measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry, at baseline and 12 months.

RESULTS

Both groups gained bone mineral density at the lumbar spine and hip after 12 months. There were significant (P < 0.05) changes in the pamidronate group, with gains of + 2.6%[95% confidence interval (CI), 1.4-3.0] at the spine and + 1.6% (95% CI, 0.6-2.5) at the hip, compared with gains of + 1.6% (95% CI, - 0.1-3.2) and + 0.9% (95% CI, - 0.4-2.1) at the spine and hip, respectively, in the group taking vitamin D and calcium supplements alone.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with Crohn's disease and low bone mineral density, intravenous pamidronate significantly increases the bone mineral density at the lumbar spine and hip.

Lack of relationship of calcium and vitamin D intake to bone mineral density in premenopausal women with inflammatory bowel disease

OBJECTIVES

Low bone mineral density has been widely reported in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The exact etiology of this condition is not completely understood but is suggested to be multifactorial, possibly including low calcium and vitamin D intake. The objective of this study was to assess calcium and vitamin D intake and its relationship to bone mineral density (BMD) in premenopausal women with IBD.

METHODS

A total of 70 premenopausal women with IBD (mean age 33.3 yr, range 18-44 yr) drawn from the population-based University of Manitoba IBD Research Registry participated in the study. Calcium and vitamin D intake was determined using a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire and compared to the Dietary Reference Intake values for adequacy. BMD of total body, lumbar spine, femoral neck, and hip was measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

RESULTS

Of the 70 subjects, 66 successfully completed the study. Inadequate calcium intake (<1000 mg/day) was found in 69.7% of the subjects. This low intake group had a mean calcium intake of 508 mg/day. Inadequate vitamin D intake (<200 IU/day) was found in 53% of the subjects with a mean vitamin D intake of 76 IU/day in this group. Calcium and vitamin D intake correlated with each other with R2=0.57, p<0.00001. Daily calcium intake was not significantly different for subjects with T scores greater than -1 (901 mg) and for subjects with T scores less than -1 (875 mg, p=0.44). Daily vitamin D intake was not significantly different for subjects with T scores greater than -1 (297 IU) compared with subjects with T scores less than -1 was (267 IU, p=0.33). Comparing subjects with T scores greater than -1 to those with T score less than -1, there was no difference in the percentage of subjects ingesting >1 g/day calcium (14/43 vs 8/23, p=0.86) or in those with vitamin D intake >200 IU/day (21/43 vs 9/23, p=0.45).

CONCLUSIONS

The results show that, on average, premenopausal women with IBD have less than the recommended intake for calcium and vitamin D. However, this does not seem to influence BMD. Calcium and vitamin D intake is not a predictor of bone status in premenopausal women with IBD.

Risk of fracture in ulcerative colitis: a population-based study from Olmsted County, Minnesota

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Osteopenia is common in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), but less is known about fracture risk. Previously we were unable to demonstrate increased fractures in a population-based cohort with Crohn's disease.

METHODS

Medical records of 273 Olmsted County, Minnesota residents initially diagnosed with UC in 1940-1993 were reviewed for evidence of subsequent fractures, as were records of a control cohort of county residents matched on age and gender. Cumulative fracture incidence after diagnosis was estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method. The hazard ratio of fracture in cases relative to control subjects was estimated by Cox proportional hazards regression, which was also used to evaluate potential risk factors for fracture.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 13 years (range, 1 day-53 years). The cumulative incidence of any fracture from time of diagnosis was 40% at 25 years versus 42% in control subjects (P=0.615). The hazard ratio in cases compared to control subjects was 1.1 (95% confidence interval, 0.8-1.6) for any fracture and 1.3 (95% confidence interval, 0.6-2.8) for any osteoporotic fracture (hip, spine, or wrist as a result of moderate trauma). Other causes of secondary osteoporosis were associated with increased fracture risk, whereas estrogen use was protective. One hundred three cases received any corticosteroids (38%), and 34 (12%) had taken corticosteroids for 6 months or longer. Corticosteroids and bowel resection were not associated with fracture risk.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population-based cohort of patients with UC, fracture risk was not elevated relative to matched community control subjects. Use of corticosteroids did not appear to significantly influence the risk of fracture.

Perspectives on osteoporosis in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease

Osteoporosis is now recognized as a problem in children with chronic illness. Decreased bone mineral density and increased risk of fracture have been reported in children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Recent studies have led to a better understanding of the pathogenesis of bone loss. There are many risk factors for osteopenia and osteoporosis in children with IBD. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry remains the diagnostic procedure of choice for assessment of bone mineral density, but other modalities are being explored. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in children have not been established. This article reviews the current understanding of osteopenia and osteoporosis in children with IBD.

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

Therapeutic use of glucocorticoids can lead to many well-known adverse events. Of all potential serious side effects, glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) is one of the most devastating complications of protracted glucocorticoid therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. GIOP is the most common form of drug-induced osteoporosis. Although much has been written about the association of glucocorticoids with bone disease among patients with chronic inflammatory conditions, many issues remain unsettled. This article focuses on areas of continued controversies, including the epidemiology and pathogenesis of GIOP, specification of a "safe" dose, methods for diagnosis of GIOP, and an evidence-based approach for GIOP prevention.

Review article: nutrition and adult inflammatory bowel disease

Major advances in the understanding of the aetio-pathogenesis and genetics of inflammatory bowel disease have been accompanied by an escalation in the sophistication of immunomodulatory inflammatory bowel disease therapeutics. However, the basic 'triple' therapy (5-aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, azathioprine) and nutrition have maintained their central role in the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease over recent decades. This review provides an overview of the supportive and therapeutic perspectives of nutrition in adult inflammatory bowel disease. The objective of supportive nutrition is to correct malnutrition in terms of calorie intake or specific macro- or micronutrients. Of particular clinical relevance is deficiency in calcium, vitamin D, folate, vitamin B12 and zinc. There is justifiably a growing sense of unease amongst clinicians and patients with regard to the long-term use of corticosteroids in inflammatory bowel disease. This, rather than arguments about efficacy, should be the catalyst for revisiting the use of enteral nutrition as primary treatment in Crohn's disease. Treatment failure is usually related to a failure to comply with enteral nutrition. Potential factors that militate against successful completion of enteral nutrition are feed palatability, inability to stay on a solid-free diet for weeks, social inconvenience and transient feed-related adverse reactions. Actions that can be taken to improve treatment outcome include the provision of good support from dietitians and clinicians for the duration of treatment and the subsequent 'weaning' period. There is evidence to support a gradual return to a normal diet through exclusion-re-introduction or other dietary regimen following the completion of enteral nutrition to increase remission rates. We also review the evidence for emerging therapies, such as glutamine, growth factors and short-chain fatty acids. The future may see the evolution of enteral nutrition into an important therapeutic strategy, and the design of a 'Crohn's disease-specific formulation' that is individually tailored, acceptable to patients, cost-effective, free from adverse side-effects and combines enteral nutrition with novel pre- and pro-biotics and other factors.

Metabolic bone disease is present at diagnosis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

AIM

To establish whether bone disease is present at diagnosis in inflammatory bowel disease and to identify contributory metabolic abnormalities.

METHODS

Newly diagnosed patients with inflammatory bowel disease (19 males, 15 females; mean age, 44 years; range, 17-79 years; 23 ulcerative colitis, 11 Crohn's disease) were compared against standard reference ranges and a control group with irritable bowel syndrome (eight males, 10 females; mean age, 40 years; range, 19-64 years). Bone mineral density (g/cm2, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: lumbar spine and femoral neck) and biochemical bone markers were measured.

RESULTS

Femoral neck bone mineral density, T- and Z-scores (mean +/- s.d., respectively) were lower in inflammatory bowel disease patients than in irritable bowel syndrome controls (0.78 +/- 0.12 vs. 0.90 +/- 0.16, P = 0.0046; - 0.88 +/- 0.92 vs. 0.12 +/- 1.17, P = 0.0018; - 0.30 +/- 0.89 vs. 0.61 +/- 1.10, P = 0.0030). Lumbar spine bone mineral density and T-scores were also significantly lower in patients than controls (0.98 +/- 0.15 vs. 1.08 +/- 0.13, P = 0.0342; - 1.05 +/- 1.39 vs. - 0.14 +/- 1.19, P = 0.0304). Compared with controls, the urinary deoxypyridinoline : creatinine ratio was increased (7.66 vs. 5.70 nmol/mmol, P = 0.0163) and serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D was decreased (18.7 vs. 28.5 micro g/L, P = 0.0016); plasma osteocalcin and serum parathyroid hormone did not differ (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The bone mineral density is reduced at diagnosis, prior to corticosteroid treatment, in both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Our data suggest that this is attributable to increased resorption rather than decreased bone formation.

Long-term fracture risk in patients with Crohn's disease: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Osteoporosis is common in patients with Crohn's disease, but less is known about their risk of actual fractures.

METHODS

The medical records of all 238 Olmsted County, Minnesota, residents diagnosed with Crohn's disease between 1940 and 1993 were reviewed for evidence of subsequent fractures compared with a control group of county residents matched by age and sex. The risk ratio of fracture in patients relative to controls was estimated using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. The cumulative incidence of fracture following diagnosis was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients had 117 different fractures. The cumulative incidence of any fracture from the time of diagnosis onward was 36% at 20 years versus 32% in controls (P = 0.792). Compared with controls, the overall risk ratio for any fracture was 0.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6-1.4), whereas the relative risk for an osteoporotic fracture was 1.4 (95% CI, 0.7-2.7). The risk ratio for thoracolumbar vertebral fracture was 2.2 (95% CI, 0.9-5.5). Cox proportional hazards regression identified only age as a significant clinical predictor of fracture risk (hazard ratio per 10-year increase in age, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.5). Specifically, use of corticosteroids and surgical resection did not predict risk of fracture among these unselected patients with Crohn's disease from the community.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population-based inception cohort of patients with Crohn's disease, the risk of fracture was not elevated relative to age- and sex-matched controls.

The comparative efficacy of drug therapies used for the management of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis: a meta-regression

We determined the comparative efficacy of vitamin D, calcitonin, fluoride, and bisphosphonates for the management of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis using meta-regression models. A systematic search for trials was conducted using MEDLINE, bibliographic references, abstracts from national meetings, and contact with pharmaceutical companies and content experts. We included all randomized controlled trials, lasting at least 6 months, of adult patients on oral corticosteroids that evaluated treatment comparisons between vitamin D, calcitonin, bisphosphonates, or fluoride either with no therapy/calcium or with each other and that reported extractable results. The outcome measure of interest was change in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD). We identified 45 eligible trials, which provided 49 eligible treatment comparisons (some trials had three arms or more). Our results indicated that bisphosphonates were the most effective class (effect size 1.03; 95% CI: 0.85, 1.17); results were similar even when newer generations of nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates were excluded from analysis. We found the efficacy of bisphosphonates was enhanced further when used in combination with vitamin D (effect size, 1.31; 95% CI: 1.07, 1.50). Vitamin D and calcitonin were more effective than no therapy/calcium (effect size, 0.46; 95% CI: 0.27, 0.62; and effect size, 0.51; 95% CI: 0.33, 0.67, respectively) and were of similar efficacy, but both were significantly less effective than bisphosphonates. Fluoride appeared effective, but there were too few studies (n = 5) to draw robust conclusions regarding its efficacy compared with the other three therapies. In summary, bisphosphonates are the most effective of evaluated agents for managing corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. The efficacy of bisphosphonates is enhanced further with concomitant use of vitamin D.

Screening for osteoporosis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease by using urinary N-telopeptides

BACKGROUND

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease are at increased risk of osteoporosis.

DESIGN AND METHODS

We carried out a prospective study of bone mineral density and biochemical markers of bone metabolism like osteocalcin and urinary N-telopeptides in 72 patients with inflammatory bowel disease and evaluated if one of these markers detects osteoporosis. In addition, bone mineral density and N-telopeptides were analysed retrospectively in a second series of 93 patients with inflammatory bowel disease in order to assess predictive values found in the first patient group in an independent sample.

RESULTS

Multiple linear regression showed that N-telopeptides (P < 0.0001) and total white blood cell count (P = 0.006) correlated negatively with the bone mineral density of the lumbar spine and only N-telopeptides (P = 0.005) correlated negatively with the bone mineral density of the femoral neck. Using receiver operator characteristic curves N-telopeptide concentrations of > 40 (30) nmol N-telopeptides/mmol creatinine were chosen as best cut-off values to exclude osteoporosis at the lumbar spine (femoral neck). Using these cut-off values a negative predictive value of 100% (100%) and a positive predictive value of 37.5% (27.9%) were found in the first group, and a negative predictive value of 95.2% (96%) and a positive predictive value of 15.6% (23.3%) in the second, independent group of patients.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that N-telopeptide levels could be used as a tool for the screening of osteoporosis and for selecting those inflammatory bowel disease patients where bone mineral density measurement is indicated.

Osteoporosis in inflammatory bowel disease: effect of calcium and vitamin D with or without fluoride

BACKGROUND

Previous data have indicated low bone formation as a mechanism of osteoporosis in inflammatory bowel disease. Fluoride can stimulate bone formation.

AIM

To assess the effect of fluoride supplementation on lumbar spine bone mineral density in osteoporotic patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated in parallel with calcium and vitamin D.

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel and placebo-controlled study, 94 patients with inflammatory bowel disease (lumbar spine T score below - 2 standard deviations, normal serum 25OH vitamin D), with a median age of 35 years, were included. Bone mineral density was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Patients were randomized to receive daily either sodium monofluorophosphate (150 mg, n=45) or placebo (n=49) for 1 year, and all received calcium (1 g) and vitamin D (800 IU). The relative change in bone mineral density from 0 to 12 months was tested in each group (fluoride or placebo) and compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Lumbar spine bone mineral density increased significantly in both groups after 1 year: 4.8 +/- 5.6% (n=29) and 3.2 +/- 3.8% (n=31) in the calcium-vitamin D-fluoride and calcium-vitamin D-placebo groups, respectively (P < 0.001 for each group). There was no difference between the groups (P=0.403). Similar results were observed according to corticosteroid intake or disease activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Calcium and vitamin D seem to increase lumbar spine density in osteoporotic patients with inflammatory bowel disease; fluoride does not provide further benefit.

Bone mineral density in Crohn's disease: a longitudinal study of budesonide, prednisone, and nonsteroid therapy

OBJECTIVE

Corticosteroids may contribute to the bone loss associated with Crohn's disease (CD). We investigated the effect on bone mineral density (BMD) of treatment with budesonide, a steroid with low systemic activity, and compared the outcome with prednisone and nonsteroid therapy in patients with CD.

METHODS

Prospective annual BMDs of the lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) were measured for 2 yr in 138 patients with quiescent CD treated with mean daily doses of 8.5 mg of budesonide (n = 48), 10.5 mg of prednisone (n = 45), or nonsteroid drugs (n = 45).

RESULTS

Between baseline and 1 yr, the mean LS BMD decreased 2.36% in the budesonide group (p < 0.001), 0.61% in the prednisone group (ns), and 0.09% in the nonsteroid group (ns). The difference between budesonide and nonsteroid groups was significant (p = 0.003). In the 2nd yr, LS BMD did not change in the three groups. After 2 yr, FN BMD decreased 2.94% in the budesonide group (p < 0.01), 0.36% in the prednisone group (ns), and 1.05% in the nonsteroid group (ns); the differences among groups were not significant. The proportion of patients with bone loss of >2% per annum at the LS and FN was higher in the budesonide group than in the nonsteroid group (p < 0.001) and prednisone group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with CD receiving maintenance treatment for 2 yr with prednisone show little change in BMD, whereas treatment with budesonide may be associated with LS and FN bone loss. Budesonide does not confer an advantage over low-dose prednisone for the preservation of BMD.

Corticosteroid-Induced osteoporosis: detection and management

Corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis is a major cause of morbidity and is the leading secondary cause of osteoporosis today. Unfortunately, despite this knowledge, patients receiving corticosteroid therapy are often not offered any preventative treatment. Recent research has focused attention on the critical role the osteoblast has played in the pathophysiology of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. In addition to an initial increase in bone resorption, there is evidence that corticosteroids induce osteoblast and osteocyte apoptosis and as a result are important contributors to bone loss. Interesting work has suggested that the bisphosphonates and calcitonin may help to prevent osteoblast apoptosis from occurring. Large scale randomised controlled trials have also been completed with a variety of therapeutic agents. Of the many different therapies, it is now clear that the bisphosphonates have the greatest evidence to support their use. Increases in bone mineral density when compared with a control group, not only at the spine but also at the hip, have been demonstrated. These studies have shown clinically significant reductions in vertebral fracture rates seen for the most part in postmenopausal women. Other therapies may well be effective, as evidenced by maintenance of bone mass in the spine; however, maintenance of bone mass in the hip and reductions in fracture rate have yet to be demonstrated for many of these therapies. Given our current knowledge and the evidence that is outlined in this review, it is hoped that patients who require therapy with corticosteroids for more than 3 months will be offered appropriate preventative treatment.

Review article: the limitations of corticosteroid therapy in Crohn's disease

Corticosteroids are highly effective in inducing clinical remission in patients with active Crohn's disease. However, the role of corticosteroids in the treatment of this disease is primarily ameliorative because they are ineffective in maintaining remission or healing mucosal lesions. Nearly half of the patients who initially respond to corticosteroid therapy develop a dependency on corticosteroids or have a relapse within 1 year. In addition, use of these agents is often limited by a relatively high risk of serious adverse effects that can involve nearly every major body system. These effects include: bone loss, which can develop with even short-term and low-dose corticosteroid therapy; metabolic complications such as glucose intolerance and diabetes mellitus; increased intraocular pressure and glaucoma; and potentially lethal infections. To minimize the risk of toxicity, corticosteroids are increasingly recommended for short-term use only at the lowest effective dose to induce remission in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease. Corticosteroid formulations with low systemic bioavailability, such as controlled-release budesonide, may be associated with a lower rate of dermatologic adverse effects but appear to be somewhat less effective than conventional corticosteroids in inducing remission in patients with active Crohn's disease. Immunosuppressive agents such as azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, and methotrexate have demonstrated corticosteroid-sparing effects, facilitating the withdrawal of corticosteroids when initiated as maintenance therapy. Infliximab can be used as an alternative to corticosteroids.

Extraintestinal Complications of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Extraintestinal complications of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are often secondary to the underlying disease. Therefore, the first priority is to get active IBD into remission with medications, since surgery for IBD is not indicated for the treatment of extraintestinal complications. Symptoms of extraintestinal complications usually can be treated with simple agents; the treatment of patients with refractory symptoms and the use of more complex drug regimens should be done in cooperation with specialists on affected organ systems. Careful consideration of prescribed drugs is necessary because they may negatively influence the course of IBD.

Neoplastic and other complications of inflammatory bowel disease

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have long been known to be at increased risk of development of colorectal cancer; however, there are many nuances to cancer prevention strategies in IBD that remain unresolved. During the past year, two publications reported on the resection of otherwise typical adenoma-like masses by means of polypectomy, after which these patients were followed with continued endoscopic surveillance, rather than pursuing colectomy. Another concern in IBD is whether there is an increase in the number of other cancers, in particular lymphomas. One issue regarding lymphoma risk is whether immunomodulatory drug use predisposes to this cancer. One study of a large group of 6-mercaptopurine users did not suggest an increased risk for patients with IBD using this drug. There are a variety of nonintestinal problems that patients with IBD may confront. Osteopenia has received considerable attention in the past decade. This year, data have been published that quantify for the first time the risk of fractures in patients with IBD based on population, and these data were compared with a matched control group from the same population. Data on the further exploration of the issue of osteopenia in pediatric IBD have also been reported, as have some of the only studies of therapy for osteopenia in IBD. These and data on other extraintestinal manifestations of IBD have all emerged in the past year.

Alendronate increases lumbar spine bone mineral density in patients with Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Low bone mineral density (BMD) is a common complication of Crohn's disease and may lead to increased morbidity and mortality because of fractures. We investigated the effect of treatment with the bisphosphonate alendronate on bone mass and markers of bone remodeling in patients with Crohn's disease.

METHODS

A 12-month double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial examined the effect of a 10-mg daily dose of alendronate. Thirty-two patients with a bone mass T score of -1 of the hip or lumbar spine were studied. The main outcome measure was the difference in the mean percent change in BMD of the lumbar spine measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Secondary outcome measures included changes in BMD of the hip and total body and biochemical markers of bone turnover (S-osteocalcin, urine pyridinoline, and urine deoxypyridinoline excretion).

RESULTS

Mean (+/-SEM) BMD of the lumbar spine showed an increase of 4.6% +/- 1.2% in the alendronate group compared with a decrease of 0.9% +/- 1.0% in patients receiving placebo (P < 0.01). BMD of the hip increased by 3.3% +/- 1.5% in the alendronate group compared with a smaller increase of 0.7% +/- 1.1% in the placebo group (P = 0.08). Biochemical markers of bone turnover decreased significantly in the alendronate group (P < 0.001). Alendronate was well tolerated, and there was no difference in adverse events among treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with alendronate, 10 mg daily, significantly increased BMD in patients with Crohn's disease and was safe and well tolerated.

Increased urinary N-telopeptide cross-linked type 1 collagen predicts bone loss in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

OBJECTIVE

Reduced bone mineral density (BMD) is common in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but the factors associated with its longitudinal rate of change have not been established. We prospectively assessed the rate of change in BMD, and its association with biochemical markers of bone turnover.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients with Crohn's disease and 14 ulcerative colitis patients age 37.1 +/- 11.6 yr were followed for 2 yr. Lumbar spine (L2-L4) and femoral neck BMD were measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry at baseline and 24 months. Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, urinary N-telopeptide crosslinked type 1 collagen (NTx), parathyroid hormone, and 25-hydroxyvitamin-D were determined at baseline.

RESULTS

At baseline, 59% of Crohn's patients and 43% of ulcerative colitis patients were osteoporotic, with spine or femoral neck BMD T-score < -2.5. Spine BMD, and spine and femoral neck T-scores were lower and disease duration was longer in nine patients with ileal resection compared with nonoperated patients (0.84 +/- 0.15 g/cm2 vs 0.96 +/- 0.11 g/cm2, -3.0 +/- 1.5 vs -1.7 +/- 1.3, -3.2 +/- 1.5 vs -2.2 +/- 1.0, respectively; all p < 0.05). At 24 months, 13/36 (36%) and 14/36 (39%) patients experienced spinal and femoral neck bone loss, respectively, with mean annual percent BMD changes of -2.0% and -1.5%, respectively. NTx, a bone resorption marker, inversely correlated with spinal BMD rate of change (r = -0.4, p < 0.05). Using quartiles analysis, patients with the highest NTx (Q4) experienced the greatest decrease in spine BMD compared with patients with the lowest NTx (Q1).

CONCLUSIONS

Spine and femoral neck bone loss continues over time in more than one-third of IBD patients. Increased NTx level predicts spinal bone loss in IBD patients.

Management of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis

OBJECTIVES

To educate scientists and health care providers about the effects of corticosteroids on bone, and advise clinicians of the appropriate treatments for patients receiving corticosteroids.

METHODS

This review summarizes the pathophysiology of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis, describes the assessment methods used to evaluate this condition, examines the results of clinical trials of drugs, and explores a practical approach to the management of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis based on data collected from published articles.

RESULTS

Despite our lack of understanding about the biological mechanisms leading to corticosteroid-induced bone loss, effective therapy has been developed. Bisphosphonate therapy is beneficial in both the prevention and treatment of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. The data for the bisphosphonates are more compelling than for any other agent. For patients who have been treated but continue to lose bone, hormone replacement therapy, calcitonin, fluoride, or anabolic hormones should be considered. Calcium should be used only as an adjunctive therapy in the treatment or prevention of corticosteroid-induced bone loss and should be administered in combination with other agents.

CONCLUSIONS

Bisphosphonates have shown significant treatment benefit and are the agents of choice for both the treatment and prevention of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis.

Bone mineral metabolism in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease

The development of reliable techniques to measure bone densitometry and evolving effective drug treatment have kindled great interest in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in adults with inflammatory bowel disease. A number of studies have examined the prevalence of abnormal bone mineral metabolism in children and adolescents. Studies, conducted over the past decade, indicate a greater likelihood of clinically significant problems in Crohn's disease than in ulcerative colitis. Corticosteroids have been proven to impair bone mineral status. It is increasingly clear that inflammation and other factors play a bigger role than malabsorbtion of minerals or vitamin D in most patients. As the use of the bisphonate class of drugs is limited in pediatric patients, there is a need to emphasize the role of diet and exercise in children and teenagers, particularly in those affected by inflammatory bowel disease.

Metabolic bone disease in adults with inflammatory bowel disease

Bone loss is seen frequently in those with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It appears to be more common in those with Crohn's disease than in those with ulcerative colitis. Corticosteroids play an important role in the development of osteoporosis. The prevalence of osteoporosis in IBD, the effects of corticosteroids on bone metabolism, and treatment options are reviewed.

The role of vitamin D in corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis: a meta-analytic approach

OBJECTIVE

To determine if vitamin D is more effective than no therapy or calcium alone in the management of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis, and to determine how vitamin D compares with other osteoporosis therapies, e.g., bisphosphonates, calcitonin, or fluoride, for this condition.

METHODS

We evaluated all formulations of vitamin D, including its active metabolites and analogs. A systematic search for published and unpublished studies was conducted using MEDLINE (1966-December 1997), bibliographic references, abstracts from proceedings of recent national meetings, and contact with pharmaceutical companies and content experts. We included all randomized controlled trials lasting at least 6 months (and reporting extractable results), of patients receiving oral corticosteroids, that compared vitamin D with either 1) no therapy or calcium alone, or 2) bisphosphonates, calcitonin, or fluoride. The primary outcome measure of interest was change in lumbar spine bone mineral density.

RESULTS

We found a moderate beneficial effect of vitamin D plus calcium versus no therapy or calcium alone (9 trials) (effect size 0.60; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.34, 0.85; P < 0.0001). In comparisons of vitamin D with other osteoporosis therapies, bisphosphonates were more effective than vitamin D (6 trials) (effect size 0.57; 95% CI 0.09, 1.05). Calcitonin was similar in efficacy to vitamin D (4 trials) (effect size 0.03; 95% CI -0.39, 0.45). Fluoride was more effective than vitamin D, but there were only 2 trials.

CONCLUSION

Vitamin D plus calcium is superior to no therapy or calcium alone in the management of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. Vitamin D is less effective than some osteoporosis therapies. Therefore, treatment with vitamin D plus calcium, as a minimum, should be recommended to patients receiving long-term corticosteroids.

Effect of a low-impact exercise program on bone mineral density in Crohn's disease: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Physical exercise increases bone mineral density (BMD) in healthy young adults and slows the rate of bone loss in later life. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to investigate the effect of exercise on BMD in patients with Crohn's disease.

METHODS

A total of 117 patients with Crohn's disease were randomized to a control group or a low-impact exercise program of increasing intensity. BMD (g/cm2) was measured at baseline and 12 months at the hip and spine (L2-L4) by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry.

RESULTS

Nonsignificant gains in BMD occurred at the hip and spine in the exercise group compared with controls (P > 0.05). In fully compliant patients, BMD increased by 3.54% (7.95%) at the femoral neck, 2.97% (7.7%) at the spine, 4.1% (10.26%) at Ward's triangle, and 7.77% (8.2%) at the greater trochanter. Compared with controls, gain in BMD at the greater trochanter was statistically significant (difference in means, 4.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-8.48; P = 0.02). Increases in BMD were significantly related to the number of exercise sessions completed (femoral neck; r = 0.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.10-0.45; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Progressive low-impact exercise is a potentially effective method of increasing BMD in Crohn's disease. If sustained, the increases in BMD may reduce the risk of osteoporotic fracture.