The effect of montelukast (MK-0476), a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist, on allergen-induced airway responses and sputum cell counts in asthma

The Effect of Clarithromycin on Inflammatory Markers in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Preliminary Data

BACKGROUND:

Clarithromycin is an antimicrobial agent that can be used for treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations with bronchodilator therapy. However, it has also been shown that clarithromycin has antiinflammatory effects by the inhibition of cytokine production.

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the antiinflammatory effect of clarithromycin on serum and sputum interleukin-8 (IL-8), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and leukotriene B4 levels in patients with COPD.

METHODS:

Thirty men with mild to moderate COPD were enrolled in this prospective, single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. None of the patients was receiving systemic or inhaled corticosteroids during the study. Subjects received either clarithromycin or placebo for 14 days. Before and after this treatment period, spirometric tests and arterial blood gas analysis were performed, blood was drawn for measurement of serum inflammatory markers, and sputum was induced.

RESULTS:

There were no statistically significant differences in baseline clinical or laboratory parameters between the groups. After the treatment, the induced sputum total cell counts, and IL-8 and TNF-α levels decreased significantly in the clarithromycin group compared with pretreatment levels (mean ± SD IL-8 1606 ± 367.3 vs 882 ± 143.6 pg/mL, p = 0.001; TNF-α 638.2 ± 287.5 vs 390 ± 235 pg/mL, p = 0.001). Similarly, decreases in serum inflammatory markers were found in the clarithromycin group while there was no significant change in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study demonstrated that the decrease in IL-8 and TNF-α levels might be related to the antiinflammatory effect of clarithromycin. Thus, we suggest that the use of clarithromycin in COPD exacerbations may either treat the infection or help control the inflammation. Future studies are needed to determine the clinical significance of these findings.

Randomized placebo-controlled trial comparing fluticasone aqueous nasal spray in mono-therapy, fluticasone plus cetirizine, fluticasone plus montelukast and cetirizine plus montelukast for seasonal allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Corticosteroids are considered to be particularly effective in reducing nasal congestion and are therefore recommended as first-line treatment in allergic rhinitis patients with moderate to severe and/or persistent symptoms.

OBJECTIVE

We compared the clinical efficacy of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray (FPANS) 200 microg given once daily, administered in mono-therapy or combined therapy with a H1 receptor antagonist (cetirizine, CTZ) or with a leukotriene antagonist (montelukast, MSK), and the combined therapy of CTZ plus MSK in the treatment of patients affected by allergic rhinitis to Parietaria during natural pollen exposure. In addition, we examined the effect of the treatment on eosinophil counts and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) in nasal lavage performed at beginning of season, during season and at the end of the season.

METHODS

One hundred patients aged 12-50 years (mean+/-SD 31.8+/-9.6) with a history of moderate to severe Parietaria pollen-induced seasonal allergic rhinitis were selected. A randomized, double-blind, double dummy, placebo (PLA)-controlled, parallel-group study design was used. Patients were treated FPANS 200 microg once daily (n=20) or with FPANS 200 microg once daily, plus CTZ (10 mg) in the morning (n=20), or with FPANS 200 microg once daily, plus MSK (10 mg) in the evening (n=20) or with CTZ (10 mg) in the morning plus MSK in the evening (n=20) or matched PLA (n=20). Assessment of efficacy was based on scores of daily nasal symptoms and on eosinophil counts and ECP in nasal lavage.

RESULTS

All treatments showed significant differences (P<0.001) compared with PLA in terms of total symptom, rhinorrhea, sneezing and nasal itching scores. Concerning nasal congestion on waking and daily only the groups treated with FPANS in mono-therapy or in combined therapy showed significant differences compared with PLA. Comparing the group treated with FPANS alone and the groups treated with FPANS plus CTZ, we found significant differences for total symptom score (P=0.04) and for nasal itching (P=0.003). The comparison between FPANS plus CTZ and FPANS plus MSK showed significant difference for nasal itching (P=0.003). Finally, there were significant differences between the group treated with FPANS and the group treated with CTZ plus MSK for total symptom score (P=0.009), for nasal congestion on waking (P<0.001) and nasal congestion daily (P<0.001). Also the comparisons between the group treated with FPANS plus CTZ and the group treated with CTZ plus MSK demonstrated significant differences (P<0.001) for total symptom, for nasal congestion on waking and for nasal congestion on daily, for rhinorrhea (P=0.04) and for nasal itching (P=0.003) scores. Concerning the comparison between the group treated with FPANS plus MSK and the group treated with CTZ plus MSK we found significant differences for total symptom score (P=0.005), for nasal congestion on waking (P<0.001) and for nasal congestion on daily (P<0.001). No other differences were observed between the groups. Concerning blood eosinophil counts, significant differences were found between the treatments with FPANS in mono-therapy or in combined therapy with PLA group during and at the end of the season (P=0.0003 and P<0.0001, respectively). Concerning eosinophils and ECP in nasal lavage, all treatments showed significant differences (P<0.001) compared with PLA. Besides, there were significant differences (P<0.001) between the groups treated with FPANS alone or in combined therapy and the group treated with CTZ plus MSK.

CONCLUSION

The results of this comparative study demonstrate that FPANS is highly effective for treating patients affected by allergic rhinitis, with efficacy exceeding that of CTZ plus MSK in combined therapy. In addition, the regular combined therapy of FPANS plus CTZ or plus MSK would not seem to offer substantial advantage with respect to FPANS in mono-therapy in patients affected by seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Biological markers in diagnosing, monitoring, and treating asthma: a focus on noninvasive measurements

Asthma is a major concern for society, healthcare professionals, and individuals and families directly affected by asthma due to rising morbidity rates and costs associated with the disease. The pathological hallmark of asthma is airway inflammation that is considered to be a major cause of exacerbations and persistent structural alterations of the airways. Assessing airway inflammation is important for investigating the underlying mechanisms of the disease and possibly for following the progression and resolution of the disease. The presence and type of airway inflammation can be difficult to detect clinically, and may result in delays in initiating appropriate therapy. The purpose of this article is to review noninvasive methods for assessing biological markers of airway inflammation and their potential role in the future for diagnosing, monitoring, and treating asthma. The article reviews the noninvasive measurements of induced sputum and exhaled nitric oxide as indicators of airway inflammation.

The effects of butterbur on the histamine and allergen cutaneous response

BACKGROUND

Butterbur or Petasites hybridus is an herbal remedy that exhibits antihistamine and antileukotriene activity and has been shown to attenuate the response to adenosine monophosphate challenge in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma. However, no data are available regarding its effects on the histamine and allergen cutaneous response.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of butterbur compared with fexofenadine and montelukast on the histamine and allergen wheal and flare cutaneous responses.

METHODS

Atopic patients were randomized into a double-blind, double-dummy, crossover study to receive for 1 week butterbur, 50 mg twice daily (8 AM and 10 PM); fexofenadine, 180 mg once daily (10 PM), and placebo once daily (8 AM); montelukast, 10 mg once daily (10 PM), and placebo once daily (8 AM); or placebo twice daily (8 AM and 10 PM). Patients attended the department at 10 AM and had measurements of the cutaneous wheal and flare responses to histamine, allergen, and saline control at 10-minute intervals for 60 minutes.

RESULTS

Twenty patients completed the study. The mean +/- SE histamine wheal and flare responses, respectively, were significantly attenuated (P < .05) by fexofenadine (9.4 +/- 1.8 mm2 and 13.5 +/- 3.2 mm2) compared with placebo (15.5 +/- 3.3 mm2 and 179.8 +/- 74.3 mm2) but not by butterbur (16.4 +/- 2.1 mm2 and 297.7 +/- 121.2 mm2) or montelukast (19 +/- 1.9 mm2 and 240.2 +/- 66.6 mm2). The allergen wheal and flare responses, respectively, were also significantly attenuated (P < .05) by fexofenadine (31.1 +/- 6.3 mm2 and 256.9 +/- 86.5 mm2) compared with placebo (65.4 +/- 15.2 mm2 and 1,014.5 +/- 250.0 mm2) but not by butterbur (50.4 +/- 9.2 mm2 and 1,110.3 +/- 256.1 mm2) or montelukast (58.8 +/- 9.1 mm2 and 1,463.6 +/- 295.6 mm2).

CONCLUSIONS

Butterbur did not produce any significant effects on the histamine and allergen cutaneous response compared with placebo, whereas mediator antagonism with fexofenadine but not montelukast produced significant attenuation. This finding would suggest that butterbur may not be effective in allergic skin disease.

Recent advances in the management of asthma using leukotriene modifiers

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease of the airways that affects approximately 100 million people worldwide. In order to reduce symptoms, improve pulmonary function, and decrease morbidity, current treatment guidelines emphasize the importance of controlling the underlying inflammation in patients with asthma. Leukotrienes are leukocyte-generated lipid mediators that promote airway inflammation. Recognition of the importance of leukotrienes in the pathogenesis of asthma has led to the development of leukotriene modifiers, the first new class of drugs for the treatment of asthma to become available in 25 years. Controlled clinical trials with the four currently used leukotriene modifiers (montelukast, zafirlukast, and zileuton in the US and pranlukast in Japan) have established their efficacy in improving pulmonary function, reducing symptoms, decreasing night-time awakenings, and decreasing the need for rescue medications. They exert anti-inflammatory effects that attenuate cellular infiltration and bronchial hyperresponsiveness and complement the anti-inflammatory properties of inhaled corticosteroids. In patients with moderate and severe asthma, they permit tapering of the corticosteroid dose. In patients with exercise-induced asthma, leukotriene modifiers limit the decline in and quicken the recovery of pulmonary functions without the tolerance issues seen with chronic long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist use. In patients with aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid)-induced asthma, they improve pulmonary function and shift the dose response curve to the right, reducing the patient's response to aspirin. In patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis, with or without concomitant asthma, they improve nasal, eye, and throat symptoms as well as quality of life. Leukotriene modifiers are generally safe and well tolerated with adverse effect profiles similar to that of placebo. The one safety issue raised with leukotriene modifiers, Churg-Strauss Syndrome, appears to be the unmasking of an already present syndrome that is manifested when the leukotriene modifiers permit corticosteroid doses to be reduced. Although current treatment guidelines recommend their use in patients with mild persistent asthma, these guidelines were developed just as leukotriene modifiers were coming to the market, before much of the clinical efficacy data were published. Because asthma is a heterogeneous disease, the different asthma phenotypes respond differently to therapies; consequently asthma therapy needs to be individualized. Leukotriene modifiers increase the therapeutic options for patients with asthma and, based on recent data, it is expected that future guidelines will describe expanded uses for these agents in clinical circumstances where these drugs are effective.

Inverse agonist activity of selected ligands of the cysteinyl-leukotriene receptor 1

Cysteinyl leukotrienes (CysLTs) are associated with several inflammatory processes, including asthma. Due to this association, considerable effort has been invested in the development of antagonists to the CysLT receptors (CysLT(1)R). Many of these molecules have been shown to specifically interact with CysLT(1)R, but little is known about their impact on the conformation of the receptor and its activity. We were especially interested in possible inverse agonist activity of the antagonists. Using a constitutively active mutant (N106A) of the human CysLT(1)R and the wild-type (WT) receptor coexpressed with the G(alphaq) subunit of the trimeric G protein, we were able to address this issue with ligands commonly used in therapy. We demonstrated that some of these molecules are inverse agonists, whereas others act as partial agonists. In cells expressing the CysLT(1)R mutant N106A exposed to Montelukast, Zafirlukast, or 3-[[3-[2-(7-chloroquinolin-2-yl)vinyl]phenyl]-(2-dimethylcarbamoylethylsulfanyl)methylsulfanyl] propionic acid (MK571), the basal inositol phosphate production was reduced by 53 +/- 6, 44 +/- 3, and 54 +/- 4%, respectively. On the other hand, 6(R)-(4-carboxyphenylthio)-5(S)-hydroxy-7(E),9(E),11(Z),14(Z)-eicosatetraenoic acid (BayU9773) and 1-[2-hydroxy-3-propyl-4-[4-(1H-tetrazole-5-YL)-butoxy]-phenyl ethanone] (LY171883) acted as partial agonists and alpha-pentyl-3-[2-quinolinylmethoxy] benzyl alcohol (REV 5901) as a neutral antagonist. However, in cells expressing CysLT(1)R and G(alphaq), all antagonists used had inverse agonist activity. The decrease in basal inositol phosphate production by ligands with inverse agonist activity could be inhibited by a more neutral antagonist, confirming the specificity of the reaction. We demonstrate here that Montelukast, MK571, and Zafirlukast can act as inverse agonists on the human CysLT(1) receptor.

Addition of anti-leukotriene agents to inhaled corticosteroids for chronic asthma

BACKGROUND

Anti-leukotriene (AL) agents are being considered as 'add-on' therapy to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), in chronic asthma.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the safety and efficacy of daily AL plus ICS compared to ICS alone, and determine the corticosteroid-sparing effect of AL when added to ICS in chronic asthma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL (until August 2003), reference lists of review articles and trials, contacted international headquarters of AL manufacturers and looked at American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society meeting abstracts (1998 to 2003).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised placebo-controlled trials of asthmatics aged two years and older with at least one month intervention.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers assessed quality and extracted data independently. Trials were grouped by asthma control at baseline (symptomatic or well-controlled) and dose of ICS in the control group (same or double).

MAIN RESULTS

Of 587 citations, 27 (25 adult and 2 paediatric) trials met inclusion criteria. Sixteen trials were published in full-text and 16 trials reported data in a way that allowed meta-analysis. In symptomatic patients, addition of licensed doses of anti-leukotrienes to ICS resulted in a non-significant reduction in the risk of exacerbations requiring systemic steroids: Relative Risk (RR) 0.64; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.38 to 1.07). A modest improvement group difference in PEF was seen (Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) 7.7 L/min; 95% CI 3.6 to 11.8 L/min) together with decrease in use of rescue short-acting beta2-agonist use (WMD 1 puff/week; 95%CI 0.5 to 2). With only 3 trials comparing the use of licensed doses of anti-leukotrienes with increasing the dose of inhaled glucocorticoids, no firm conclusion can be drawn about the equivalence of both treatment options. In ICS-sparing studies of patients who were well controlled at baseline, addition of anti-leukotrienes produced no overall difference in dose of inhaled glucocorticoids (WMD -21 mcg/d, 95%CI -65, 23 mcg/d), but it was associated with fewer withdrawals due to poor asthma control (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.95).

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

The addition of licensed doses of anti-leukotrienes to add-on therapy to inhaled glucocorticoids brings modest improvement in lung function. Although addition of anti-leukotrienes to inhaled glucocorticoids appears comparable to increasing the dose of inhaled steroids, the power of the review is insufficient to confirm the equivalence of both treatment options. Addition of anti-leukotrienes is associated with superior asthma control after glucocorticoid tapering; although the glucocorticoid-sparing effect cannot be quantified at present, it appears modest.

Expression of cysteinyl leukotriene synthetic and signalling proteins in inflammatory cells in active seasonal allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Cysteinyl leukotrienes (CysLTs) are bioactive lipids that have been shown to contribute to allergic and inflammatory diseases. Eosinophils and mast cells have the capacity to produce large amounts of CysLTs after allergic or non-allergic stimulation. Molecular identification of both the synthetic and signalling proteins in the CysLT pathway allows the investigation of expression of the CysLT enzymes and receptors in active allergic rhinitis.

OBJECTIVE

We examined the expression of the proteins involved in the synthesis of CysLTs and the cysteinyl leukotriene-1 (CysLT1) and cysteinyl leukotriene-2 (CysLT2) receptors in inflammatory cells from patients with active seasonal allergic rhinitis.

METHODS

Nasal lavage samples were obtained from patients during active seasonal allergic rhinitis. Specific cellular immunocytochemical techniques were used to detect the cysteinyl leukotriene synthetic proteins, namely 5-lipoxygenase (5-LO), 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein (FLAP) and leukotriene C4 synthase (LTC4S). In situ hybridization and immunocytochemical techniques were used to identify the mRNA and proteins for the CysLT1 and CysLT2 receptors.

RESULTS

5-LO, FLAP and LTC4S, and the CysLT1 and CysLT2 receptors were expressed in the majority of eosinophils and in subsets of mast cells and mononuclear cells. 5-LO, FLAP and the CysLT1 receptor, but not LTC4S or the CysLT2 receptor, were expressed in a subset of nasal neutrophils.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates the presence of CysLT pathway proteins in key allergic and inflammatory cells from the upper airway of patients with active seasonal allergic rhinitis. Our expression data highlight the potential of CysLT-modifying agents to treat both upper and lower airway symptoms in patients suffering from allergic rhinitis and asthma.

Pharmacology of airway inflammation in asthma and COPD

The current asthma therapies are not cures and symptoms return soon after treatment is stopped even after long term treatment. Although inhaled glucocorticoids are highly effective in controlling airway inflammation in asthma, they are ineffective in the small group of patients with glucocorticoid-dependent and -resistant asthma. With very few exceptions, COPD is caused by tobacco smoking, and smoking cessation is the only truly effective treatment of COPD available. Current pharmacological treatment of COPD is unsatisfactory, as it does not significantly influence the severity of the disease or its natural course. Glucocorticoids are scarcely effective in COPD patients without concomitant asthma. Bronchodilators improves symptoms and quality of life, in COPD patients, but, with the exception of tiotropium, they do not significantly influence the natural course of the disease. Theophylline is the only drug which has been demonstrated to have a significant effect on airway inflammation in patients with COPD. Here we review the pharmacology of currently used antiinflammatory therapies for asthma and COPD and their proposed mechanisms of action. Recent understanding of disease mechanisms in severe steroid-dependent and -resistant asthma and in COPD, has lead to the development of novel compounds, which are in various stages of clinical development. We review the current status of some of these new potential drugs.

Benefit-risk assessment of antileukotrienes in the management of asthma

Antileukotrienes are a relatively new class of anti-asthma drugs that either block leukotriene synthesis (5-lipoxygenase inhibitors) like zileuton, or antagonise the most relevant of their receptors (the cysteinyl leukotriene 1 receptor [CysLT1]) like montelukast, zafirlukast or pranlukast. Hence, their major effect is an anti-inflammatory one. With the exception of pranlukast, the other antileukotrienes have been studied and marketed in the US and Europe for long enough to establish that they are useful drugs in the management of asthma. Their effects, significantly better than placebo, seem more pronounced in subjective measurements (i.e. symptoms scores or quality-of-life tests) than in objective parameters (i.e. forced expiratory volume in 1 second or peak expiratory flow rate). Also, there is some evidence that these drugs work better in some subsets of patients with certain genetic polymorphisms - probably related to their leukotriene metabolism - or patients with certain asthma characteristics. There are a small number of comparative studies only, and with regard to long-term asthma control differences between the agents have not been evaluated. Nevertheless, their overall effect appears comparable with sodium cromoglycate (cromolyn sodium) or theophylline, but significantly less than low-dose inhaled corticosteroids. Antileukotrienes have been shown to have a degree of corticosteroid-sparing effect, but salmeterol appears to perform better as an add-on drug. Montelukast is probably the most useful antileukotriene for continuous treatment of exercise-induced asthma, performing as well as salmeterol without inducing any tolerance. All antileukotrienes are taken orally; their frequency of administration is quite different ranging from four times daily (zileuton) to once daily (montelukast). Antileukotrienes are well tolerated drugs, even though zileuton intake has been related to transitional liver enzyme elevations in some cases. Also Churg-Strauss syndrome (a systemic vasculitis), has been described in small numbers of patients taking CysLT1 antagonists. It is quite probable that this disease appears as a consequence of an 'unmasking' effect when corticosteroid dosages are reduced in patients with severe asthma once CysLT1 antagonists are introduced, but more data are needed to definitely establish the mechanism behind this effect. Overall, however, the benefits of antileukotrienes in the treatment of asthma greatly outweigh their risks.

The role of leukotrienes in asthma

Leukotrienes (LT), both the cysteinyl LTs, LTC(4), LTD(4) and LTE(4), as well as LTB(4) have been implicated in the clinical course, physiologic changes, and pathogenesis of asthma. The cysteinyl LTs are potent bronchoconstrictors, which have additional effects on blood vessels, mucociliary clearance and eosinophilic inflammation. In addition, the cysteinyl LTs are formed from cells commonly associated with asthma, including eosinophils and mast cells. LTB(4), whose role is less well defined in asthma, is a potent chemoattractant (and cell activator) for both neutrophils and eosinophils. In the last 5 years, drugs have been developed which block the actions or formation of these mediators. Clinical and physiologic studies have demonstrated that they are modest short-acting bronchodilators, with sustained improvement in FEV(1) occurring in double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials for up to 6 months. These drugs have demonstrated efficacy in preventing bronchoconstriction caused by LTs, allergen, exercise and other agents. Additionally, there are multiple published studies which have demonstrated improvement in asthma symptoms, beta agonist use and, importantly, exacerbations of asthma in both adults and children. Comparison studies with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) suggest that ICS are superior to leukotriene modifying drugs in moderate persistent asthma. However, several published studies now suggest that leukotriene modifying drugs are effective when added to ongoing therapy with ICS, either to improve current symptoms or to decrease the dose of ICS required to maintain control. While an anti-inflammatory effect is suggested, longer-term, earlier intervention, studies are needed to determine whether these compounds will have any effect on the natural history of the disease.

Effects of mediator antagonism on mannitol and adenosine monophosphate challenges

BACKGROUND

Airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR) to indirect stimuli is a useful non-invasive surrogate inflammatory marker in the evaluation of asthma, while histamine and cysteinyl leukotrienes are important inflammatory mediators.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate AHR to indirect bronchoconstrictor stimuli and time taken to recover following single doses of montelukast 10 mg and desloratadine 5 mg in combination, montelukast 10 mg alone and placebo.

METHODS

Fifteen mild-to-moderate persistent asthmatics completed a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study. Patients received encapsulated montelukast 10 mg/desloratadine 5 mg combination, montelukast 10 mg alone and placebo, 10-14 h prior to challenge on two separate occasions. The mannitol threshold dose, AMP threshold concentration and recovery times after challenge were measured along with lung function.

RESULTS

Compared to placebo, montelukast/desloratadine conferred improvements (P < 0.05) in adenosine monophosphate (AMP) threshold concentration and mannitol threshold dose: a 3.2-fold (95% CI 2.2-4.6) and 2.4-fold (95% CI 1.7-3.3) difference, respectively, while compared to montelukast this amounted to a 2.0-fold (95% CI 1.2-3.4) and 1.5-fold (95% CI 1.1-2.4) improvement, respectively. Montelukast was not significantly different from placebo. Both montelukast/desloratadine and montelukast compared to placebo, shortened recovery following both challenges (P < 0.05): a 27-min (95% CI 17-37) and 29-min (95% CI 20-36) reduction, respectively, for AMP, and a 27-min (95% CI 17-37) and 26-min (95% CI 17-35) reduction, respectively for mannitol.

CONCLUSION

The dissociated effects of single doses of montelukast alone but not montelukast/desloratadine combination on AHR and recovery time, highlights the relative roles of histamine in initiating the bronchoconstrictor response and cysteinyl leukotrienes in sustaining it. Similar improvements in AHR and recovery time were observed following both indirect bronchoconstrictor stimuli.

Management of asthma in adults: current therapy and future directions

Asthma is increasing in prevalence worldwide and results in significant use of healthcare resources. Although most patients with asthma can be adequately treated with inhaled corticosteroids, an important number of patients require additional therapy and an increasing number of options are available. A further minority of patients develop severe persistent asthma which remains difficult to manage despite current pharmacological therapies. This review discusses the various treatment options currently available for each stage of asthma severity, highlights some of the limitations of current management, and outlines directions which may improve the management of asthma in the future.

Second-line controller therapy for persistent asthma uncontrolled on inhaled corticosteroids: the step 3 dilemma

The asthma syndrome is characterised by airway inflammation with associated bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and reversible airflow obstruction. Therapy has benefited from an enhanced understanding of the pathophysiology of asthma and the resulting guidelines that emphasise the pivotal role of anti-inflammatory inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) as first-line therapy. Most patients with mild-to-moderate asthma can be adequately controlled on low-to-medium dosages of ICS alone. For patients with moderate-to-severe asthma who are not adequately controlled by ICS, it is unclear which medication should be added on. The two principal drugs under consideration are long-acting beta(2)-agonists (LABAs) and leukotriene antagonists (LTAs). Although both LABAs and LTAs are both effective at improving lung function, reducing symptoms and decreasing exacerbations, important differences exist that may determine the selection of one over the other in particular circumstances. LABAs and LTAs are equally effective at reducing exacerbations and improving symptoms and quality of life when used as add-on therapy. LABAs tend to be more effective bronchodilators than LTAs. Although LABAs stabilise the airway smooth muscle, they do not affect the underlying inflammatory process. Their long-term use also leads to subsensitivity of response to both LABAs and short-acting beta(2)-agonists (SABAs). The subsensitivity of response to SABAs is more pronounced in the presence of acute bronchoconstriction, which could be relevant during an acute attack. When combined with an ICS, LTAs provide additive non-steroidal anti-inflammatory properties and alleviate associated BHR, but do not induce subsensitivity of response. Not only is the efficacy of LTAs maintained over time, but also they do not affect the response to SABAs as reliever therapy. LTAs also have beneficial effects in patients who have concomitant allergic rhinitis, thus treating the unified airway. The choice between LABA and LTA as add-on therapy will therefore be determined by the needs of the individual patient in terms of providing anti-inflammatory versus bronchodilatory control. For patients with poor lung function where bronchodilatation is required, then an LABA would seem to be a logical choice. For the patient whose lung function is less impaired, with evidence of ongoing BHR where bronchoprotection is needed (e.g. exercise, allergen, cold air), or when there is concomitant allergic rhinitis, then an LTA would be more suitable.

Anti-inflammatory effects of high-dose montelukast in an animal model of acute asthma

BACKGROUND

Asthmatic inflammation is mediated by a network of cytokines, chemokines and adhesion molecules. Corticosteroids are the only effective agents available to control asthmatic inflammation. We investigated the effect of high-dose montelukast (MK), a selective cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 1 antagonist, on mediators of airway inflammation.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of a 3-day course of high-dose MK on mediators of airway inflammation induced by a single allergen challenge in sensitized mice.

METHODS

Ovalbumin (OVA)-sensitized BALB/c mice were treated with 25 mg/kg of MK or saline intravenously for 3 days. On the third day, a single inhalation challenge with OVA was given. Cellular infiltration was assessed in the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and in the lung. Expression of IL-4, IL-5, IL-13 and eotaxin in the BAL, and the lung was determined. Serum IL-5 and total IgE was measured. IL-5 and eotaxin mRNA expression in the lung was determined. Finally, eotaxin and VACM-1 expression in the lung was assessed by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

MK reduced the number of eosinophils in the BAL by > 90%. There was also significant reduction in IL-5 in the BAL, lung and the serum, and IL-5 mRNA expression in the lung. IL-4 level in the lung and BAL, and IL-13 level in the lung also significantly decreased. Serum IgE level and lung VCAM-1 expression was also significantly lower in treated animals, but eotaxin protein and mRNA expression in the lung remained unchanged.

CONCLUSION

MK exerts its anti-inflammatory effect through the suppression of T helper type-2 (Th2) cytokines. The use of high-dose MK as an anti-inflammatory agent in acute asthma should be further explored.

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in children: montelukast attenuates the immediate-phase and late-phase responses

BACKGROUND

Montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, attenuates exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. We and others have shown that there is a late-phase response 3 to 8 hours after exercise in a subset of asthmatic patients.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the protective effect of montelukast on immediate-phase and late-phase responses after exercise challenges.

METHODS

Twenty-two atopic asthmatic children aged 7 to 16 years with reproducible exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (minimum of 15% decrease of FEV(1) from baseline) were enrolled in this placebo-controlled crossover study. Exercise challenges were performed while breathing cold dry air, and FEV(1) measurements were taken up to 480 minutes after exercise. Patients underwent exercise challenges on a screening day and 1 week after placebo treatment. Subsequently, after a week with no treatment, pulmonary function was assessed after breathing dry cold air (control day). Finally, an exercise challenge was carried out after a week of treatment with montelukast.

RESULTS

Reproducible late-phase reactions occurred in 5 of 22 patients, which correlated with the extent of the immediate response (P <.05). After 1 week of treatment with montelukast, a significant decrease of immediate responses was observed. Montelukast treatment compared with placebo was associated with a lower mean maximum decrease of FEV(1) (mean +/- SEM: 17.3% +/- 2.4% and 35.1% +/- 2.6%, respectively), decrease of the area above the curve (267.8% +/- 42.7%/min and 868.0% +/- 103.8%/min, respectively), and shorter time for recovery (6.9 +/- 1.1 minutes and 30.9 +/- 4.0 minutes, respectively; P <.05). Treatment with montelukast also abolished late-phase responses.

CONCLUSION

Once daily treatment with oral montelukast attenuated the immediate-phase response and abolished the late-phase response induced by means of exercise challenge in asthmatic children.

Effects of cysteinyl leukotrienes and leukotriene receptor antagonists on markers of inflammation

The understanding that asthma pathophysiology includes an inflammatory component has spurred the more aggressive use of anti-inflammatory therapies and created a need for effective tools to measure inflammation. Biomarkers of airway inflammation proposed are obtained by methods that are direct but highly invasive (bronchial biopsy, bronchoalveolar lavage), moderately direct, and less invasive (indirect sputum, exhaled air, breath condensate) or indirect and least invasive (blood, urine). Several studies described in this review have implicated the cysteinyl leukotrienes (CysLTs) as inflammatory mediators in a wide range of diseases, implying that their biological activities reach far beyond acute bronchoconstriction, the activity traditionally ascribed to them. The validity of examining sputum for "biomarkers" has improved the understanding of asthma pathophysiology, optimization of asthma treatment and management, and investigation of the relation between CysLTs and airway inflammation in asthma. Nitric oxide is also a surrogate marker of asthma and reflects airway inflammation. The anti-inflammatory effects of the leukotriene receptor antagonists and the markers of their activity continue to grow.

Roles of cysteinyl leukotrienes in airway inflammation, smooth muscle function, and remodeling

A new paradigm for asthma pathogenesis is presented in which exaggerated inflammation and remodeling in the airways are a consequence of abnormal injury and repair responses arising from a subject's susceptibility to components of the inhaled environment. An epithelial-mesenchymal trophic unit becomes activated to drive pathologic remodeling and smooth muscle proliferation through complex cytokine interactions. Histamine, prostanoids, and cysteinyl leukotrienes (CysLTs) are potent contractile agonists of airway smooth muscle (ASM). The CysLTs appear to play a central role in regulating human ASM motor tone and phenotypic alterations, manifested as hypertrophy and hyperplasia in chronic severe asthma. The CysLTs augment growth factor-induced ASM mitogenesis through activation of CysLT receptors. Although they mediate their contractile effects by increasing phosphoinositide turnover and inducing increased cytosolic calcium, new data suggest that part of the contractile effect may be independent of calcium mobilization. Prostaglandin E(2), the predominant eicosanoid product of the airway epithelium, is a potent inhibitor of mitogenesis, collagen synthesis, and mesenchymal cell chemotaxis and therefore can suppress inflammation and fibroblast activation. The capacity of the epithelium for CysLT synthesis is inversely related to its ability to make PGE(2). The ASM is capable of expressing both leukotriene-synthesizing enzymes and CysLT receptors, and cytokines upregulate the receptor expression. This may be an explanation for the CysLTs promoting airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma. The CysLTs play an important role in the airway remodeling seen in persistent asthma that includes increases of airway goblet cells, mucus, blood vessels, smooth muscle, myofibroblasts, and airway fibrosis. Evidence from a mouse model of asthma demonstrated that CysLT(1) receptor antagonists inhibit the airway remodeling processes, including eosinophil trafficking to the lungs, eosinophil degranulation, T(H)2 cytokine release, mucus gland hyperplasia, mucus hypersecretion, smooth muscle cell hyperplasia, collagen deposition, and lung fibrosis.

Leukotriene receptor antagonists in the treatment of asthma: an update

Leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs), such as montelukast and zafirlukast, have been demonstrated in a number of studies to possess bronchodilating and anti-inflammatory properties, that make these drugs ideal candidates for the treatment of asthma. The last 1998-updating of the GINA Guidelines for the diagnosis and therapy of asthma recommends the use of LTRAs in the treatment of moderate and mild asthma. In patients with moderate asthma not completely controlled with moderate doses of inhaled corticosteroids, the addition of a LTRA is indicated in alternative to either the increase of the inhaled corticosteroid dose or the addition of an inhaled long-acting beta2-agonist. Both in vitro and in vivo evidences indicate that LTRAs possess an anti-inflammatory activity that is presumably complementary to that presented by corticosteroids. Moreover, clinical studies show that the addition of an LTRA, montelukast, is able to improve clinical and functional indexes in patients with asthma not controlled with inhaled corticosteroids, and to allow a reduction in corticosteroid dosage in patients with asthma well controlled by inhaled corticosteroids. In patients with mild persistent asthma monotherapy with an LTRA is indicated in alternative to a low-dose inhaled corticosteroid, an inhaled cromone, or an oral slow-release theophylline. Previous clinical studies in patients with mild to moderate asthma had demonstrated that monotherapy with LTRAs is able to improve airway function, asthma symptoms, use of as-needed medications, exacerbation rate, and quality of life, without evidence of tolerance with prolonged use. Recently, in a subgroup analysis of patients with mild persistent asthma, a 6-week treatment with oral montelukast or inhaled beclomethasone gave similar improvements in "rescue-free" days, days with well controlled asthma, FEV1, blood eosinophils, beta-agonist use, and nocturnal awakes due to asthma.

Clinical and genetic features underlying the response of patients with bronchial asthma to treatment with a leukotriene receptor antagonist

BACKGROUND

Treatment with antileukotriene drugs results in clinical improvement in many, though not all, patients with asthma. It can be hypothesized that the subpopulation of asthmatic patients, characterized by aspirin intolerance and cysteinyl-leukotriene overproduction, might profit most from antileukotriene treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We compared the clinical response to montelukast in two well-matched groups of patients with mild asthma: 26 aspirin-intolerant asthmatics (AIAs) and 33 aspirin-tolerant asthmatics (ATAs). We also searched for possible predictors of the clinical response among the parameters reflecting the expression and production of cysteinyl-leukotrienes (cys-LTs). This was an 8-week, single-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

RESULTS

Following a 3-week montelukast 10 mg day-1 treatment compared with placebo, there was a statistically significant reduction in the mean daytime and nocturnal asthma symptoms and beta 2-agonist use, as well as a significant improvement in the morning and evening peak expiratory flows and quality of life. Both groups showed a similar significant improvement in the parameters studied. Clinical response did not correlate with the baseline urinary LTE4 excretion level. Improvement of asthma was observed mostly in patients with a low baseline and non-IL-5 inducible expression of LTC4 synthase (LTC4S) mRNA in eosinophils. There was a trend toward a better response in carriers of LTC4S allele C, but no relationship to the CC10 genetic polymorphism.

CONCLUSIONS

No difference in the clinical response to the montelukast treatment was observed between the AIAs and the ATAs.

Effects of montelukast and budesonide on airway responses and airway inflammation in asthma

Inhaled corticosteroids are effective antiinflammatory therapy for asthma; however, they do not completely abolish allergen-induced airway inflammation. Leukotriene modifiers attenuate both early and late allergen responses and have antiinflammatory properties. We reasoned that treatment with budesonide and montelukast in combination might provide greater antiinflammatory effects than either drug alone, and the purpose of this study was to compare the effects of treatment with budesonide and montelukast, alone or in combination, on outcome variables after allergen inhalation. Ten subjects with asthma with dual responses after allergen inhalation were included in this randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Outcomes included early and late asthmatic responses, and changes in airway responsiveness and sputum eosinophilia, measured before and after challenge. Treatment with montelukast attenuated the maximal early asthmatic response compared with placebo (p < 0.001) and budesonide (p = 0.002). Both budesonide and montelukast, alone and in combination, attenuated the maximal late asthmatic response compared with placebo (p < 0.01). Budesonide and montelukast, alone and in combination, afforded protection against allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness (p < 0.05), although the treatment effect of budesonide was greater than that of montelukast (p < 0.05). Treatment with budesonide and montelukast, alone and in combination, also attenuated allergen-induced sputum eosinophilia. Thus, montelukast and budesonide attenuated allergen-induced asthmatic responses, airway hyperresponsiveness, and sputum eosinophilia, although combination treatment did not provide greater antiinflammatory effects than either drug alone.

Treatment of asthmatic patients with a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor-1 antagonist montelukast (Singulair), decreases the eosinophil survival-enhancing activity produced by peripheral blood mononuclear leukocytes in vitro

BACKGROUND

Montelukast (Singulair, MSD) has been shown to have a beneficial effect on the clinical symptoms of asthma. We aimed to investigate the effect of montelukast treatment on the production of eosinophil survival-enhancing cytokines by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNC).

METHODS

PBMNC obtained from 15 grass-allergic patients (7 treated with montelukast and 8 with a placebo) were cultured for 72 h. Eosinophils from allergic patients were cultured with MNC supernatants alone or with addition of neutralizing antibodies, and the proportion of living cells was assessed by flow cytometry. In another experiment PBMNC from 6 allergic patients were cultured in vitro in the presence of montelukast or vehicle. Following stimulation the production of GM-CSF in monocytes was assessed.

RESULTS

Eosinophil survival in the MNC supernatants from the placebo-treated patients was significantly (P < 0.05) higher than in supernatants from montelukast-treated patients. GM-CSF was the predominant cytokine responsible for the eosinophil survival-enhancing activity (ESEA). In vitro production of GM-CSF by allergen-stimulated monocytes was significantly suppressed by addition of montelukast.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of patients with montelukast decreased the production of MNC-derived cytokines, particularly GM-CSF. We suggest that cysteinyl leukotriene receptor-1 (CysLT-R1) antagonists may act, at least partially, by diminishing the production of GM-CSF from PBMNCs.

Leukotriene antagonism reduces the generation of endothelin-1 and interferon-gamma and inhibits eosinophilic airway inflammation

The cysteinyl leukotrienes (cysLTs) and the peptide hormone endothelin (ET)-1 are potent bronchoconstrictor substances, and these mediators are also claimed to be implicated in the development of eosinophilic airway inflammation. In the present study, we have investigated the effect of the cysLT1 receptor antagonist montelukaston the development of an eosinophilic airway inflammation 24 h after intratracheal Sephadex (SDX) provocation in rats. Furthermore, the effect of montelukast treatment on the generation of ET-1 and other pro-inflammatory mediators has been studied. The inflammatory response was significantly reduced in the animals receiving SDX + montelukast compared to animals receiving solely SDX, as evaluated by a decrease in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid total cell count (10.3 +/- 1.2 vs. 18.5 +/- 1.8 x 10(4) ml(-1), P<0.001), number of eosinophils (299.7 +/- 43.8 vs. 577.6 +/- 46.6 x 10(2) ml(-1), P<0.001), and lymphocytes (116.8 +/- 20 vs. 222.0 +/- 34.8 x 10(2) ml(-1), P<0.05), as well as the degree of tissue inflammation (P<0.05). Montelukast also inhibited the increase in the concentration of the pro-inflammatory mediators ET-1 (28.5 +/- 75 vs. 40.9 +/- 7.3 x pg ml(-1), P<0.05) and interferon (IFN)-gamma (4.3 +/- 2.2 vs. 15.6+/-8.7 x pg ml(-1), P<0.05), but not tumor necrosis factor-gamma or interleukin-8. In summary, treatment with the cysLT1 receptor antagonist montelukast reduced the inflammatory response during development of an eosinophilic airway inflammation, possibly by inhibiting the release of pro-inflammatory mediators like ET-1 and IFN-gamma.

Montelukast: a review of its therapeutic potential in asthma in children 2 to 14 years of age

Montelukast is a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist which is used as a preventive treatment for persistent asthma in patients > or =2 years of age. In children aged 6 to 14 years montelukast (5 mg/day) treatment resulted in a significant increase in FEV(1) (forced expiratory volume in 1 second, primary clinical outcome) during an 8-week randomized, double-blind trial. Moreover, significant improvements were observed for a range of secondary endpoints assessing symptoms, exacerbation rates, beta-agonist usage and quality of life. Concomitant administration of montelukast (5 mg/day) and inhaled budesonide (200 microg twice daily) resulted in a trend towards an increase in FEV(1) (p = 0.06, primary endpoint) and a statistically significant reduction in both as-needed beta(2)-agonist usage and the percentage of days with asthma exacerbations compared with budesonide plus placebo. No significant differences were observed in asthma-related quality of life between the two groups. During clinical trials both improvements in lung function and reductions in as-needed beta(2)-agonist usage were generally observed within 1 day after initiation of therapy in children 2 to 14 years of age with persistent asthma. Data from a randomized, nonblind trial in 6- to 11-year-old children and a 6-month extension to this trial suggest that both compliance to therapy and patient satisfaction are greater for montelukast than for either inhaled sodium cromoglycate or inhaled beclomethasone. In addition, patients and parents preferred oral montelukast over sodium cromoglycate. In 2- to 5-year-old children with persistent asthma, montelukast (4 mg/day) treatment resulted in significant improvements in a range of outcomes, such as as-needed beta(2)-agonist usage, symptom scores and percentage of days with asthma symptoms, as assessed during a randomized, double-blind trial primarily designed to assess tolerability. Data from small randomized, double-blind trials suggest that montelukast reduces exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in 6- to 14-year-old children. Montelukast is generally well tolerated. The frequency of adverse events in montelukast-treated children of all ages was comparable to that in patients receiving placebo.

CONCLUSION

Oral montelukast has shown efficacy as a preventive treatment for asthma during clinical trials in children aged 2 to 14 years. The drug offers benefits over more standard therapies such as inhaled sodium cromoglycate and nedocromil in terms of compliance and convenience. In addition, the drug offers significant benefits when added to inhaled corticosteroids (according to secondary endpoints). Montelukast offers an effective, well tolerated and convenient treatment option for children with asthma.

Bronchoprotective effects of leukotriene receptor antagonists in asthma: a meta-analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Cysteinyl leukotrienes are important proinflammatory mediators in the pathogenesis of asthma. Since bronchial hyperresponsiveness is a noninvasive surrogate marker of asthmatic airway inflammation, we evaluated the bronchoprotection afforded by leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs).

DESIGN

Systematic review of randomized, placebo-controlled trials in which LTRAs were administered for >or= 5 days. Studies in which active drug was administered as a first-line or second-line therapy were used.

SETTING

MEDLINE, BIDS, and Cochrane Library data registers.

MEASUREMENTS

The doubling dose/dilution difference that caused a 20% fall in the FEV(1) between LTRA and placebo.

RESULTS

Thirteen trials (353 subjects) fulfilled eligibility criteria. Combining the results the overall weighted estimated protection amounted to a 0.85 doubling dose shift (95% confidence interval, 0.69 to 1.02).

CONCLUSION

Since the estimated protection amounted to almost one doubling dose, this reinforces the role of LTRAs as anti-inflammatory therapy in asthma.

Use of oral montelukast in the treatment of asthma

Montelukast, a new leukotriene modifier, has several benefits in the treatment of asthma in adults and children including improved relief of asthma symptoms, rapid onset, a safety profile comparable with placebo, and oral, once-daily dosing means excellent adherence.

The efficacy of montelukast in the treatment of cat allergen-induced asthma in children

BACKGROUND

Montelukast is a leukotriene antagonist approved for the treatment of childhood asthma in children age 2 years and older. There are limited studies on its effects on allergic asthma in children.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate montelukast's effects on upper and lower airway responses to intense cat allergen exposure.

METHODS

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial 18 subjects aged 6 to 14 years with cat-induced asthma were randomly assigned to receive 1 week each of either montelukast or placebo, followed by a 1-hour cat challenge in an environmental exposure unit. Upper and lower respiratory tract symptoms were rated, and spirometry and acoustic rhinometry were performed. Challenges were stopped early if the subject became too uncomfortable or had a greater than 50% decrease in FEV1.

RESULTS

Overall changes in FEV1 were significantly different with montelukast treatment and remained significant after adjusting for allergen level (P =.02; adjusted P =.01). Lower respiratory tract symptom scores were significantly reduced with montelukast versus placebo (P =.007) but lost significance after adjusting for allergen level (P =.16). Challenge length was significantly longer with montelukast versus placebo (P <.001) and remained significant after adjusting for allergen level (P =.019). Montelukast did not significantly affect upper respiratory responses, as measured by means of symptom scores (P =.43) and changes in acoustic rhinometry (P =.078).

CONCLUSIONS

Montelukast was significantly more effective than placebo in attenuating lower respiratory responses and extending challenge length when cat-sensitive children with mild persistent asthma were exposed to high levels of cat allergen.

Where do leukotriene modifiers fit in asthma management?

Effective asthma treatment requires long-term inflammation control. Patient adherence to corticosteroid treatment regimens remains problematic. Leukotriene modifiers, a newer drug class, add to the pharmacologic approaches to asthma management. Here, we review the role of leukotrienes in asthma pathogenesis and appropriate uses for leukotriene modifiers in asthma management.

A randomized, double-blind trial of the effect of treatment with montelukast on bronchial hyperresponsiveness and serum eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP), soluble interleukin 2 receptor (sIL-2R), IL-4, and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (sICAM-1) in children with asthma

BACKGROUND

Anti-inflammatory properties of leukotriene modifiers and their effect on bronchial hyperresponsiveness have not been studied in children with asthma.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this study was to determine the changes in serum levels of inflammatory mediators, clinical efficacy, and bronchial hyperresponsiveness after treatment with montelukast.

METHODS

In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, 39 children with mild-to-moderate atopic asthma were randomly allocated to receive montelukast or placebo for 6 weeks. Main outcome measures were changes in serum concentrations of soluble interleukin 2 receptor (sIL-2R), IL-4, and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (sICAM-1); peripheral blood eosinophil count; and eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP). Asthma severity score, FEV(1), and bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) for histamine were secondary end points.

RESULTS

Compared to placebo, serum concentrations of IL-4, sICAM-1, and ECP and eosinophil blood counts significantly decreased after 6 weeks of treatment with montelukast. Montelukast significantly improved asthma control and FEV(1). Montelukast resulted in within-group significant decrease in levels of serum sIL-2R (611 vs. 483 pg/mL), IL-4 (0.123 vs 0.102 pg/mL), sICAM-1 (280 vs. 244 ng/mL), and ECP (74 vs. 59 microg/mL) and in eosinophil blood counts (349 vs. 310 cells/mm(3)). Mean FEV(1) value changed from 85% of predicted to 95% (P <.001) and for histamine (PC(20)H) from 2.8 mg/mL to 3.8 mg/mL (P <.001) after treatment with montelukast. There was no significant difference between montelukast and placebo recipients in the serum concentrations of sIL-2R and PC(20)H after treatment.

CONCLUSION

Montelukast provides clinical benefit to patients with chronic asthma and decreases bronchial hyperresponsiveness. Montelukast caused a statistically significant decrease of serum concentrations in cytokine, ICAM-1, and ECP and peripheral blood eosinophil counts over the 6-week treatment period. This observation raises the possibility that leukotriene receptor antagonists, such as montelukast, may have effects on parameters of asthmatic inflammation.

Addition of anti-leukotriene agents to inhaled corticosteroids for chronic asthma

BACKGROUND

Anti-leukotriene (AL) agents are being considered as "add-on" therapy to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), in chronic asthma.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the safety and efficacy of daily AL plus ICS compared to ICS alone, and determine the corticosteroid-sparing effect of AL when added to ICS in chronic asthma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched Medline, Embase, Cinahl (until September 2001), reference lists of review articles and trials, contacted international headquarters of AL manufacturers and ATS meeting abstracts (1998-2000).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised placebo-controlled trials of asthmatics aged 2 years and older with at least one month intervention.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers assessed quality and extracted data independently. Trials were grouped by asthma control at baseline (symptomatic or well-controlled) and dose of ICS in the control group (same or double).

MAIN RESULTS

Of 438 citations, 13 (12 adult and 1 paediatric) trials met inclusion criteria. Seven were published in full-text. In symptomatic patients, addition of licensed doses of anti-leukotrienes to ICS resulted in a non-significant reduction in the risk of exacerbations requiring systemic steroids: Relative Risk (RR) 0.61; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.36,1.05). A modest improvement group difference in PEF was seen (Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) 7.71 L/min; 95%CI 2.98, 12.44 L/min) together with beta2-agonist use (WMD= -0.32 puffs/day; 95%CI -0.0.08, -0.56). No trials that compared the use of licensed doses of anti-leukotrienes with doubling-dose of inhaled glucocorticoids could be pooled. In ICS-sparing studies in patients who were well controlled at baseline, addition of anti-leukotrienes produced no overall difference in dose of inhaled glucocorticoids (WMD -44.4 mcg/d, 95%CI -147.9, 59.0 mcg/d), but it was associated with fewer withdrawals due to poor asthma control (RR= 0.56, 95%CI 0.35, 0.89).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to firmly support the use of licensed doses of anti-leukotrienes as add-on therapy to inhaled glucocorticoids. Addition of anti-leukotrienes to inhaled glucocorticoids may slightly improve asthma control, but the available data do not permit this strategy to be recommended as a substitute for increasing the dose of inhaled glucocorticoids. Addition of anti-leukotrienes may be associated with superior asthma control after glucocorticoid tapering, but a glucocorticoid-sparing effect cannot be quantified at present.

Effects of pranlukast on chemical mediators in induced sputum on provocation tests in atopic and aspirin-intolerant asthmatic patients

BACKGROUND

Leukotrienes (LTs) are important in asthma, and LT modifiers modulate antigen-induced asthma. Overproduction of LT by suppression of cyclooxygenase activity is involved in patients with aspirin-intolerant asthma (AIA).

METHODS

House dust mite (HDM) inhalation provocation tests were performed in HDM-sensitive asthmatic inpatients without AIA (HDM group; n = 6), and aspirin oral provocation tests were performed in AIA patients (ASA group; n = 7). Tests were repeated using the same regimen after 7 days of treatment with pranlukast, an LT receptor antagonist (LTRA). The effects of pranlukast on changes in sputum LTC(4)-LTD(4), eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), eosinophil count, urinary LTE(4)/creatinine, 11-dehydrothromboxane B(2) (11-dhTXB(2))/creatinine, serum LTC(4)-LTD(4), ECP, and peripheral blood eosinophil count, during immediate asthmatic reaction (IAR) and late asthmatic reaction (LAR) in the HDM group and during IAR in the ASA group for each test, were compared in each group.

RESULTS

In the HDM group, IAR and LAR were observed. Sputum LTC(4)-LTD(4) and urinary LTE(4)/creatinine increased significantly both during IAR and LAR. Sputum ECP increased during IAR and further increased during LAR. Eosinophil count in the sputum did not increase during IAR but significantly increased during LAR. Pranlukast suppressed the fall in FEV(1) both during IAR and LAR (73.8% and 51.9%, respectively) and inhibited the increase in sputum eosinophil count during LAR and sputum ECP during IAR and LAR. In the ASA group, aspirin-induced IAR was associated with a fall in urinary 11-dhTXB(2)/creatinine, increased the levels of sputum LTC(4)-LTD(4) and ECP and urinary LTE(4)/creatinine. Pranlukast suppressed IAR and inhibited the increase of the level of sputum ECP, but failed to change aspirin-induced LT production in the sputum and urine. The levels of sputum LTC(4)-LTD(4) and urinary LTE(4)/creatinine in the stable phase in the ASA group were significantly greater than those in the HDM group.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicated that HDM-provoked asthma is associated with overproduction of LT with an antigen-antibody reaction, while AIA is associated with overproduction of LT with a shift to the 5-lipoxygenase series of the arachidonate cascade. LTRA may be useful against both types of asthma through inhibition of LT activity and eosinophilic inflammation of the airways.

Inhaled leukotriene E(4), but not leukotriene D(4), increased airway inflammatory cells in subjects with atopic asthma

Allergen-induced late airway responses are associated with increased numbers of airway eosinophils and basophils. The purpose of this study was to compare and contrast the effects of inhaled cysteinyl leukotrienes LTD(4) and LTE(4), which are released during allergen- induced airway responses, and allergen, on airway inflammatory cells. Fifteen subjects with atopic, mild asthma inhaled diluent, LTD(4), LTE(4), and allergen. Spirometry was performed for 7 h, and sputum inflammatory cells were measured before, 7 h, and 24 h after challenges. The maximum early percent fall in FEV(1) was 23.6 +/- 1.4%, 21.6 +/- 2.3%, 29.3 +/- 2.4%, and 4.0 +/- 1.1% after LTD(4), LTE(4), allergen, and diluent, respectively. Only inhaled LTE(4) and allergen significantly increased sputum eosinophils at 7 h and 24 h, and sputum basophils at 7 h. Six additional subjects underwent airway biopsies 4 h after inhalation. There were significantly more eosinophils in the lamina propria after inhalation of LTE(4) compared with LTD(4) and diluent (p < 0.05). These results suggest cysteinyl leukotrienes play a role in eosinophil migration into the airways in allergic asthma, and for the same degree of bronchoconstriction, inhaled LTE(4) causes more tissue and airway eosinophilia than LTD(4).

Effects of zafirlukast upon clinical, physiologic, and inflammatory responses to natural cat allergen exposure

BACKGROUND

Leukotriene receptor antagonists have been shown to attenuate physiologic changes in the upper and lower airways induced by allergen challenge. However, it is unknown whether these drugs modulate airway inflammation after exposure to allergen in a natural setting.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of the oral leukotriene receptor antagonist zafirlukast upon symptoms, changes in pulmonary function, and indices of inflammation in the upper and lower airways induced by natural exposure to cats.

METHODS

Zafirlukast, 20 mg twice daily, or placebo was administered to 18 cat-allergic asthmatic patients in this randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Cat room challenges were performed after a 1-week period of each treatment. Upper and lower airway symptoms were measured and spirometry performed before and at regular intervals during each challenge. Nasal lavage and sputum induction were performed 24 hours before and after each challenge.

RESULTS

Zafirlukast significantly improved the prechallenge baseline FEV1 (P = 0.001) and attenuated the decrease in FEV1 induced by cat challenge (P = 0.019). Zafirlukast also significantly reduced lower airway symptoms associated with cat challenge (P = 0.005) but had no effects on nasal symptoms. Although zafirlukast did not significantly differ from placebo in its effects on sputum inflammatory cells or eosinophil cationic protein, it significantly reduced the absolute counts of total white cells, lymphocytes, neutrophils, and basophils in nasal lavage fluid.

CONCLUSIONS

Zafirlukast, 20 mg twice daily for 1 week, demonstrated a significant protective effect on symptoms of asthma and alterations in pulmonary function induced by natural cat exposure, whereas nasal symptoms and markers of sputum inflammation were not affected by the medication.

The use of sputum cell counts to evaluate asthma medications

Total and differential cell counts from hypertonic-induced, dithiothreitol-dispersed sputum provide reproducible measurements of airway inflammatory cell counts, which are responsive to treatment with anti-inflammatory drugs. They have helped to understand the kinetics of inflammatory cell changes in asthma after the reduction of corticosteroids and the subsequent re-introduction of treatment. They have identified that the presence of sputum eosinophilia in asthma, chronic cough and chronic airflow limitation is a predictor of steroid-responsiveness and of lack of 'asthma control'. They can be used to study the dose-response effect of inhaled corticosteroids and may be useful to establish the relative potency of different corticosteroid formulations and delivery devices. Sputum cell counts are also useful to study the potential anti-inflammatory effects of drugs like theophylline, long-acting beta-adrenoceptor agonists, leukotriene antagonists and newer drugs in development. They may be helpful to select add-on therapy to corticosteroids in 'difficult-to-control' asthma.

The anti-inflammatory effects of leukotriene-modifying drugs and their use in asthma

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease of the airways. Anti-inflammatory drug therapy, primarily using corticosteroids, is now considered the first-line treatment in the management of all grades of asthma severity. Although corticosteroids are believed to be the most potent anti-inflammatory agents available, they do not suppress all inflammatory mediators involved in the asthmatic response. Leukotrienes, which are lipid mediators generated from the metabolism of arachidonic acid, play an important role in the pathogenesis of asthma. They produce bronchospasm, increase bronchial hyperresponsiveness, mucus production, and mucosal edema, and enhance airway smooth muscle cell proliferation and eosinophil recruitment into the airways, and their synthesis or release is unaffected by corticosteroid administration. The use of leukotriene synthesis inhibitors or leukotriene receptor antagonists as anti-inflammatory therapies in asthma has therefore been investigated. Beneficial effects of leukotriene-modifying drugs have been demonstrated in the management of all grades of asthma severity, and there is evidence that certain patient groups (such as those with exercise-induced asthma or aspirin-induced asthma) may be particularly suitable for such therapy.

Efficacy of antileukotriene agents in asthma management

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews information on the role of three antileukotrienes (anti-LTs), montelukast, zafirlukast, and zileuton, in the management of asthma. After reading this article, readers should have an understanding of the efficacy of anti-LTs in specific patient populations.

DATA SOURCES

Relevant and appropriately controlled clinical studies on the efficacy of anti-LTs were used. Only literature in the English language was reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION

Material was taken from peer-reviewed journals and published abstracts.

RESULTS

The efficacy of anti-LTs has been established in numerous randomized, controlled, multicenter trials involving patients with mild-to-moderate disease. These agents reduce asthma symptoms, beta2-agonist use, and asthma exacerbations, in addition to improving pulmonary function. The anti-LTs are also effective when added to low-dose or high-dose corticosteroid regimens in symptomatic asthma patients. They have proven efficacy in patients with aspirin-sensitive asthma, and they appear able to reduce nasal congestion in asthma patients with concomitant upper airway symptoms. Some anti-LTs have been shown to be effective in pediatric asthma patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In reviewing available clinical results as well as real-world experience in managing asthma patients, the Antileukotriene Working Group concludes that anti-LTs may be used in patients with mild persistent asthma as well as in combination with other asthma medications at all levels of disease severity for long-term maintenance of asthma control.

Regulation of leukotrienes in the management of asthma: biology and clinical therapy

Leukotrienes (LTs) are the ultimate synthetic product resulting from the intracellular hydrolysis of membrane phospholipid at the nuclear envelope in inflammatory cells. Activated cytosolic phospholipase (cPLA2) catalyzes the production of arachidonic acid, which is converted by cyclooxygenases into leukotriene A4 (LTA4) and subsequently into the chemotaxin LTB4, which has no direct bronchoconstrictor activity. In certain inflammatory cells, LTA4 is converted into the cysteinyl leukotriene (cysLT) LTC4, which is converted into LTD4 and finally to LTE4 after extracellular transport. All cysLTs occupy the same receptors and are extremely potent bronchoconstricting agents that are pathogenetic in both asthma and allergy. With the identification of the structure of the cysLT receptor, antileukotriene therapies have been developed that either (a) inhibit synthesis of leukotriene (through 5-lipoxygenase inhibition) or (b) block the cysLT receptor. Preliminary investigations indicate that corticosteroids also may partially block the synthesis of cysLT and that cysLTs may be chemotactic for other inflammatory cells, e.g. eosinophils, by a mechanism that has not yet been defined. Currently, anti-LT therapies are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) only for patients with asthma. These drugs generally are moderately efficacious agents, although they are highly efficacious in aspirin-induced asthma (AIA). In other forms of asthma, inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy has been more effective than anti-LT therapy in improving air flow obstruction. However, anti-LT agents are additive to beta-adrenoceptor and ICS in their effects. Accordingly, anti-LT therapies are used frequently as supplemental treatments in asthmatic patients whose asthma is not optimally controlled by a combination of other drugs, including long-acting beta-adrenoceptor drugs and ICS agents. The growth of leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) has been extraordinary in the United States. The exceptional safety of these agents and their ease of administration as tablets taken once or twice daily has spurred this growth. In the past year, the high-affinity cysLT receptor has been cloned. This holds forth the promise of a second generation of LTRA agents of even greater efficacy and possibly greater duration of action.

Anti-inflammatory and lung function effects of montelukast in asthmatic volunteers exposed to sulfur dioxide

BACKGROUND

Sulfur dioxide (SO(2)) gas may induce acute asthmatic responses when inhaled by individuals in the setting of community or occupational air pollution during exercise. Some asthma medications mitigate the SO(2) response, which is not fully understood but appears to involve multiple mechanisms.

OBJECTIVE

We tested the hypothesis that pretreatment with the cysteinyl-leukotriene inhibitor montelukast sodium protects against the inflammatory and bronchoconstrictive effects of SO(2) in the airways of asthmatic subjects.

METHODS

Asthmatic volunteers (enrolled, 12 subjects; completed study, 11 subjects) were exposed to 0.75 ppm SO(2) for 10-min periods during exercise (mean ventilation, 35 L/min) and were exposed similarly to filtered air (control condition) after double-blinded pretreatments with montelukast (10 mg/d for 3 days) and placebo.

RESULTS

After montelukast pretreatment, specific airways resistance, FEV(1), symptoms, and eosinophil counts in induced sputum showed statistically and clinically significant improvements in preexposure measurements and/or decreased responses to SO(2) exposure or exercise. The mean FEV(1) immediately after exposure was 95% of baseline FEV(1) with montelukast pretreatment vs 82% with placebo.

CONCLUSION

Montelukast significantly protects against airways eosinophilic inflammation and bronchoconstriction from SO(2) exposure during exercise. This implies a role for leukotrienes in SO(2)-induced lung effects.

Expression of the cysteinyl leukotriene 1 receptor in normal human lung and peripheral blood leukocytes

The cysteinyl leukotrienes (CysLTs) are important mediators of human asthma. Pharmacologic and clinical studies show that the CysLTs exert most of their bronchoconstrictive and proinflammatory effects through activation of a putative, 7-transmembrane domain, G-protein-coupled receptor, the CysLT1 receptor. The initial molecular characterization of the CysLT1 receptor showed by in situ hybridization, the presence of CysLT1 receptor messenger RNA (mRNA) in human lung smooth-muscle cells and lung macrophages. We confirmed the results of these in situ hybridization analyses for the CysLT1 receptor, and produced the first immunohistochemical characterization of the CysLT1 receptor protein in human lung. The identification of the CysLT1 receptor in the lung is consistent with the antibronchoconstrictive and antiinflammatory actions of CysLT1 receptor antagonists. We also report the expression of CysLT1 receptor mRNA and protein in most peripheral blood eosinophils and pregranulocytic CD34+ cells, and in subsets of monocytes and B lymphocytes.

Suppression of the early and late cutaneous allergic responses using fexofenadine and montelukast

BACKGROUND

The relative contribution of histamine and the cysteinyl leukotrienes to the early and late cutaneous allergic responses (ECAR and LCAR) can be studied using antagonists of these mediators.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relative suppression of the ECARs and LCARs using standard doses of an H1-receptor antagonist, a cysteinyl leukotriene1-receptor antagonist, and the two antagonists administered concurrently.

METHODS

We carried out a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-way crossover study in 12 highly allergic participants. Intradermal tests with standardized allergen, and with histamine phosphate, LTD4, and saline controls were performed on 5 different test days as follows: pretreatment baseline and at steady state immediately after the seventh and last dose of a 1-week course of treatment with once-daily fexofenadine, 120 mg; montelukast, 10 mg; fexofenadine and montelukast administered concurrently; or placebo. On each test day, the skin test results were read at intervals from 0.25 to 24 hours after the intradermal injections were performed.

RESULTS

After allergen injection, compared with baseline, all treatment regimens significantly decreased the ECAR and LCAR. After allergen injection, compared with placebo, fexofenadine significantly decreased the ECAR and the LCAR from 0.25 to 2 hours and at 8 hours. Montelukast did not significantly decrease the ECAR or LCAR. Fexofenadine and montelukast administered concurrently were not more effective than fexofenadine alone at any time. In the control skin tests, compared with placebo, fexofenadine, but not montelukast, significantly decreased the histamine-induced response, and montelukast, but not fexofenadine, significantly decreased the LTD4-induced response.

CONCLUSIONS

Fexofenadine and montelukast administered concurrently were not significantly more effective than fexofenadine alone in decreasing the ECAR and LCAR. Montelukast does not need to be discontinued before allergen skin testing. Further studies of the effect of concurrent treatment with higher doses of a histamine antagonist and a leukotriene modifier on the allergic response in the skin are needed.

Fluticasone propionate versus zafirlukast: effect in patients previously receiving inhaled corticosteroid therapy

BACKGROUND

The use of inhaled corticosteroids compared with leukotriene modifying drugs in the treatment of persistent asthma has not been extensively studied.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of a low dose of fluticasone propionate (FP) and zafirlukast in patients previously maintained on inhaled corticosteroids.

METHODS

Patients (> or = 12 years old; FEV1 = 60% to 85% of predicted) with persistent asthma who were previously treated with low doses of triamcinolone acetonide (TAA) 400 to 800 microg/day or beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 168 to 336 microg/day were randomized to treatment with FP aerosol 88 microg BID (FP, n = 221) or zafirlukast 20 mg BID (n = 216) over 6 weeks.

RESULTS

Treatment with FP significantly increased the mean change at endpoint (the last post-baseline observation) in FEV1 (0.22 L versus 0.03 L, P < .001), morning PEF (17.8 versus 3.1 L/min, P = .004), evening PEF (16.7 versus 2.6 L/min, P = .002), the percentage of symptom-free days (16.2 versus 7.1%, P = .007), and the percentage of rescue-free days (23.4 versus 9.3%, P < .001), and significantly decreased rescue albuterol use (-0.66 puffs/day versus an increase of 0.27 puffs/day, P < .001) and combined symptom scores (-0.13 versus an increase of 0.08, P < .001) compared with zafirlukast. Treatment with FP maintained the percentage of awakening-free nights (-1.0 +/- 1.0); in contrast, treatment with zafirlukast reduced the percentage of awakening-free nights (-9.0 +/- 1.6, P < .001). A clinically meaningful difference (change of > or = 0.5; P < .001) was observed between FP and zafirlukast in the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) global score and for each domain score except activity limitation (change of 0.3, P < .001). Significantly more patients in the zafirlukast group experienced an asthma exacerbation (n = 14) compared with FP-treated patients (n = 5, P = .035). Patients in the zafirlukast group were significantly more likely to be withdrawn due to lack of efficacy (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Switching patients from low doses of inhaled corticosteroids to a lower total microgram dose of FP improves pulmonary function, asthma symptoms, and quality of life, while switching to the leukotriene receptor antagonist zafirlukast may result in worsening of asthma control. This was indicated by the significant number of zafirlukast-treated patients who were dropped from the study due to lack of efficacy within 6 weeks of discontinuing inhaled corticosteroids.

Antiasthmatic effects of mediator blockade versus topical corticosteroids in allergic rhinitis and asthma

To compare the antiasthmatic efficacy of inflammatory mediator blockade versus topical corticosteroid therapy in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) and asthma, 14 patients were enrolled into a single-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled crossover study comparing 2 wk therapy of (1) 400 microgram orally inhaled budesonide plus 200 microgram intranasal budesonide (BUD) or (2) 10 mg oral montelukast plus 10 mg oral cetirizine (ML + CZ). Before each treatment period, patients received 7 to 10 d placebo washout. All treatments were given once daily in the morning. Throughout the study, patients recorded the following domiciliary measures: peak expiratory flow (PEF), rescue inhaler requirement, asthma symptoms, and daily activity score. Laboratory measurements were made at trough of adenosine monophosphate (AMP) bronchial challenge and exhaled nitric oxide (NO). Compared with pooled placebo (PL), there were significant (p < 0.05) improvements in all domiciliary measures with both treatments (mean PEF [L/min] PL: 463; BUD: 478; ML + CZ: 483). For geometric mean AMP PC(20) (mg/ml), there was an improvement (p < 0.05), compared with PL (47), for ML + CZ (133) but not for BUD (51); whereas for NO (ppb) there was significant suppression with BUD (7.6) but not ML + CZ (11.5) compared with PL (13.6). In conclusion, both combined mediator blockade and combined topical corticosteroids are equally effective antiasthma therapy in patients with asthma and SAR.

Role of leukotrienes in asthma pathophysiology

Inflammation is an essential component of asthma pathophysiology. While beta(2)-agonists are often used for short-term relief of acute bronchospasm, anti-inflammatory agents are required for the long-term management of chronic inflammation in this disease. Corticosteroids have emerged as the first-line anti-inflammatory therapy for asthma management. However, in some patients, especially children, the high doses of corticosteroids that may be required to control features of hyperresponsiveness, including exercise-induced asthma, raise safety concerns. Thus, there is a need for complementary anti-inflammatory, steroid-sparing agents in asthma therapy. Several inflammatory mediators have been targeted in an attempt to thwart this inflammatory process, but so far with little success. The cysteinyl leukotrienes (CysLT), LTC(4), LTD(4), and LTE(4), have been shown to be essential mediators in asthma, making them obvious targets for therapy. These cysteinyl leukotrienes, previously known as the slow-reacting substance of anaphylaxis (SRS-A), mediate many of the features of asthma, including bronchial constriction, bronchial hyperreactivity, edema, and eosinophilia. Data show that selective cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonists (CysLTRAs) effectively reverse these pathologic changes. Corticosteroids do not inhibit the production of CysLTs in vivo, suggesting that CysLTRAs and corticosteroids affect different targets. The bronchodilator properties of CysLTRAs seem to be additive to those of beta(2)-agonists and corticosteroids. These data suggest that CysLTs are important therapeutic targets in the management of inflammation in asthma.

Predictors of late asthmatic response. Logistic regression and classification tree analyses

To identify predictors of the late asthmatic response (LAR), we reviewed data from 60 asthmatic subjects who had undergone allergen challenge over the past 5 yr (33 females, age 31.4 +/- 6.7 yr [mean +/- SD], FEV(1) 90% +/- 14% predicted). Variables considered likely predictors of LAR included baseline FEV(1), PC(20) methacholine (PC(20)), sputum eosinophil percent, and the decrease in FEV(1) within 20 min of allergen challenge. A LAR (FEV(1) >/= 15% fall between 3 and 7 h after challenge) was documented in 57% of subjects. A variety of logistic regression methods revealed a significant inverse association between LAR and PC(20) (odds ratio [OR] = 0.14 [95% CI = 0.03-0.66]) and a positive association between LAR and the decrease in FEV(1) at 20 min (OR = 1.18 [1.04 -1.33]). Classification tree analysis revealed that a threshold of 0.25 mg/ml for PC(20) was most predictive of LAR; LAR developed in 87% of those with PC(20) </= 0.25 mg/ml (n = 23) and in 38% of those with PC(20) > 0.25 mg/ml (n = 37). Notably, in subjects with PC(20) > 0.25 mg/ml, the incidence of LAR increased from 38% to 57% if the allergen-induced decline in FEV(1) at 20 min was >/= 27%. Surprisingly, baseline FEV(1) and percent eosinophils in induced sputum were not significantly associated with LAR. We conclude that a threshold value of 0.25 mg/ml for PC(20) methacholine is a good predictor of LAR. Measuring the PC(20) methacholine may be useful as a screening method to improve the efficiency of identifying asthmatic subjects with a LAR.

Montelukast: a review of its therapeutic potential in persistent asthma

Montelukast is a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist used to treat persistent asthma in patients aged > or = 6 years. The drug has a rapid onset of action. Improvements in lung function and reductions in as-needed beta2-agonist usage are apparent within 1 day of initiating montelukast treatment in adults and adolescents (aged > or = 15 years treated with 10 mg/day) or children (aged 6 to 14 years treated with 5 mg/day) with persistent asthma as shown in clinical trials. In two 12-week, multicentre, randomised, double-blind studies in adults and adolescents aged > or = 15 years with persistent asthma [forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) = 50 to 85% predicted] there was significantly (p < 0.05) greater improvement in FEV1, symptom scores, peak expiratory flow (PEF), as-needed beta2-agonist use, peripheral eosinophil counts and health-related quality of life (QOL) in patients treated with montelukast 10 mg/day than in recipients of placebo. Improvements were significantly greater in patients treated with inhaled beclomethasone 400 microg/day than in recipients of montelukast 10 mg/day in 1 of these studies. Nonetheless, 42% of montelukast recipients experienced > or = 11% improvement in FEV1, the median improvement in this parameter in beclomethasone-treated patients. In an 8-week multicentre, randomised, double-blind, study in children aged 6 to 14 years with persistent asthma (FEV1 50 to 85% predicted), montelukast 5 mg/day produced significantly greater improvements in FEV1, clinic PEF, as-needed beta2-agonist use, peripheral eosinophil counts, asthma exacerbations and QOL scores than placebo. The combination of montelukast 10 mg/day plus inhaled beclomethasone 200 microg twice daily provided significantly better asthma control than inhaled beclomethasone 200 microg twice daily in adults with poorly controlled asthma (mean FEV1 = 72% predicted) despite 4 weeks treatment with inhaled beclomethasone. Patients receiving the combination experienced significant improvements in FEV1 and morning PEF, significant reductions in daytime symptom scores, as-needed beta2 agonist usage and night-time awakenings with asthma, and had significantly lower peripheral blood eosinophil counts after 16 weeks in this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Among adults (FEV1 > or = 70%) treated with montelukast 10 mg/day for 12 weeks, inhaled corticosteroid dosages were titrated downward by 47% (vs 30% in placebo recipients), 40% of patients were tapered off of inhaled corticosteroids (vs 29%), and significantly fewer patients (16 vs 30%) experienced failed corticosteroid rescues in a multicentre, randomised, double-blind study. During clinical studies, the frequency of adverse events in montelukast-treated adults, adolescents and children was similar to that in placebo recipients. In conclusion, montelukast is well tolerated and effective in adults and children aged > or = 6 years with persistent asthma including those with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and/or aspirin sensitivity. Furthermore, montelukast has glucocorticoid sparing properties. Hence, montelukast, as monotherapy in patients with mild persistent asthma, or as an adjunct to inhaled corticosteroids is useful across a broad spectrum of patients with persistent asthma.