Regulators of G protein signaling: a bestiary of modular protein binding domains

Expression patterns of the RGS9-1 anchoring protein R9AP in the chicken and mouse suggest multiple roles in the nervous system

In retinal photoreceptors, the duration of G protein signalling is tightly regulated by the GTPase-activating protein RGS9-1. RGS9-1 is anchored to the disk membranes of photoreceptor outer segments by association with the membrane-spanning protein R9AP. Here we report the cloning of chicken R9AP from an inner ear cDNA library and the isolation of a murine R9AP cDNA from a retinal library. In the chicken, R9AP appears to be expressed in a variety of neuronal tissues, particularly in sensory cells including inner ear hair cells, photoreceptors, and dorsal root ganglion neurons. In the mouse, R9AP is detectable predominantly in photoreceptors, but it is also weakly expressed in other areas of the central nervous system. The expression of R9AP beyond photoreceptors led us to examine potential alternative roles for R9AP besides anchoring RGS9-1 and we found sequence homology and structural similarity of the protein with members of the SNARE protein family. Expression of chicken and mouse R9AP interfered with intracellular trafficking of an indicator protein in an in vitro assay, suggesting a more active role of the protein, possibly in targeting. GTPase-activating proteins to specific membranous compartments.

Genetic Analysis of RGS Protein Function in Caenorhabditis elegans

Caenorhabditis elegans has close homologs or orthologs of most mammalian (RGS) and G proteins, and mutants for all the RGS and G-protein genes of C. elegans have been generated. C. elegans RGS proteins can be matched to the specific Galpha proteins they regulate in vivo by comparing the defects in animals lacking or transgenically overexpressing an RGS protein with defects in a specific Galpha mutant. Transgenic expression of mutated RGS proteins or subdomains in C. elegans has also been used to carry out structure/function studies of RGS proteins. We propose that similar strategies can be used to understand the function of RGS proteins from other organisms by expressing them in C. elegans. This article describes general considerations regarding such experiments and provides detailed protocols for quantitatively measuring G-protein signaling phenotypes in C. elegans.

Analysis of the Regulation of Microtubule Dynamics by Interaction of RGSZ1 (RGS20) with the Neuronal Stathmin, SCG10

Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS proteins) are a diverse family of proteins that act to negatively regulate signaling by heterotrimeric G proteins; however, recent data have implied additional functions for RGS proteins. Previously, we employed the yeast two-hybrid system and identified the microtubule-destabilizing protein, superior cervical ganglia neural-specific 10 protein (SCG10), as a potential effector protein of RGSZ1. This article describes the expression and biochemical purification of both RGSZ1 and SCG10 and details the development of various in vitro assays to evaluate microtubule polymerization?depolymerization. Both turbidimetric and microscopy-based assays can be employed to study the impact that RGS proteins have on SCG10 function. The application of these in vitro assays may help identify a novel role for RGS proteins in regulating the cytoskeletal network.

Gα protein dependent and independent effects of human RGS1 expression in yeast

Regulators of G-protein Signalling (RGS) regulate the functional lifetime of G-Protein Coupled Receptor (GPCR)-activated heterotrimeric G-protein by serving as GTPase Accelerating Proteins (GAPs) for the G(alpha) subunit. A number of mammalian RGSs can functionally replace the yeast RGS containing SST2 gene and inhibit GPCR signalling. Using yeast strains harbouring a G(betagamma)-responsive FUS1-LacZ reporter gene, we demonstrate that heterologously expressed mammalian RGS1 also serves to decrease basal signalling in the absence of agonist. Although this effect was dependent on the expression of a GPA1-encoded functional G(alpha) protein, the GPCR itself was nevertheless not required. Using the GAL1 inducible promoter to express RGS1, we further demonstrate that in addition to serving as a GAP for Gpa1p in yeast, RGS1 is a dosage-dependent inhibitor of growth. This effect is specific to RGS1 since growth is not altered in cells expressing either mammalian RGS2 or RGS5. We further demonstrate that neither of the two yeast G(alpha) proteins is responsible for mediating this growth inhibitory effect of RGS1. Taken together, our results indicate that RGS1 can function in both G-protein-dependent and -independent manners in yeast.

Dynamic expression of RGS4 in the developing nervous system and regulation by the neural type-specific transcription factor Phox2b

Previous studies have shown that members of the family of regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS), including RGS4, have a discrete expression pattern in the adult brain (Gold et al., 1997). Here, we describe for RGS4 a distinct, mostly transient phase of neuronal expression, during embryonic development: transcription of RGS4 occurs in a highly dynamic manner in a small set of peripheral and central neuronal precursors. This expression pattern overlaps extensively with that of the paired-like homeodomain protein Phox2b, a determinant of neuronal identity. In embryos deficient for Phox2b, RGS4 expression is downregulated in the locus coeruleus, sympathetic ganglia, and cranial motor and sensory neurons. Moreover, Phox2b cooperates with the basic helix-loop-helix protein Mash1 to transiently switch on RGS4 after ectopic expression in the chicken spinal cord. Intriguingly, we also identify a heterotrimeric G-protein alpha-subunit, gustducin, as coexpressed with RGS4 in developing facial motor neurons, also under the control of Phox2b. Altogether, these data identify components of the heterotrimeric G-protein signaling pathway as part of the type-specific program of neuronal differentiation.

The DEP domain determines subcellular targeting of the GTPase activating protein RGS9 in vivo

DEP (for Disheveled, EGL-10, Pleckstrin) homology domains are present in numerous signaling proteins, including many in the nervous system, but their function remains mostly elusive. We report that the DEP domain of a photoreceptor-specific signaling protein, RGS9 (for regulator of G-protein signaling 9), plays an essential role in RGS9 delivery to the intracellular compartment of its functioning, the rod outer segment. We generated a transgenic mouse in which RGS9 was replaced by its mutant lacking the DEP domain. We then used a combination of the quantitative technique of serial tangential sectioning-Western blotting with electrophysiological recordings to demonstrate that mutant RGS9 is expressed in rods in the normal amount but is completely excluded from the outer segments. The delivery of RGS9 to rod outer segments is likely to be mediated by the DEP domain interaction with a transmembrane protein, R9AP (for RGS9 anchoring protein), known to anchor RGS9 on the surface of photoreceptor membranes and to potentiate RGS9 catalytic activity. We show that both of these functions are also abolished as the result of the DEP domain deletion. These findings indicate that a novel function of the DEP domain is to target a signaling protein to a specific compartment of a highly polarized neuron. Interestingly, sequence analysis of R9AP reveals the presence of a conserved R-SNARE (for soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor) motif and a predicted overall structural homology with SNARE proteins involved in vesicular trafficking and fusion. This presents the possibility that DEP domains might serve to target various DEP-containing proteins to the sites of their intracellular action via interactions with the members of extended SNARE protein family.

Altered expression of regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) mRNAs in the striatum of rats undergoing dopamine depletion

Quantitative in situ hybridization was used to investigate the effect of prolonged striatal dopamine or monoamine depletion on the mRNA density of regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) 2-12 proteins. Two types of treatments were studied: a 6-hydroxydopamine-induced unilateral lesion of the nigrostriatal pathway and a 5-day reserpine treatment. The results clearly show a selective increase in the mRNA levels of RGS2, 5 and 8 and a decrease in RGS4 and 9 mRNA levels following nigrostriatal denervation. In this model, we observed no change in the mRNA levels of RGS10 and other RGS proteins that are weakly expressed in the striatum (RGS3, 6, 7, 11 and 12). On the other hand, the mRNA levels RGS2, 4, 5, 8, 9 and 10 were found to be significantly decreased after prolonged reserpine treatment. In contrast, the densities of these transcripts (in particular, RGS2, 4 and 10) tend to increase after an acute administration of reserpine, used as control. These results provide further evidence for the influence of dopamine and/or other monoamines in the regulation of RGS protein expression in the striatum. In connection with the previously documented acute regulation of RGS proteins after modulation of the dopaminergic transmission [Geurts et al., Neurosci Lett 2002;333:146-50], the present study demonstrates that alteration in their genetic expression can be long-lasting and this could reflect the adaptation processes that occur in certain pathological states, such as Parkinson's disease.

In through the out door: nuclear localization of the regulators of G protein signaling

The regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) are an extraordinary class of diverse multifunctional signaling proteins best known for their potent capacity to down-regulate the activity of Galpha subunits at the plasma membrane. In certain circumstances, some RGS proteins undergo translocation to the nucleus or plasma membrane from the cytoplasm. Translocation demonstrates a potentially dynamic alternative mechanism for Galpha subunit or effector regulation. The nuclear localization of the regulators of G protein signaling proteins further suggests these proteins possess even greater functional heterogeneity than that envisioned previously, as regulators of transcription and cell cycle control.

Albumin: a Galpha(s)-specific guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor and GTPase activating protein

Heterotrimeric GTP binding protein (G protein)-mediated signal transduction events are regulated by their effectors and regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) protein family. The latter proteins function as GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) for G protein alpha subunits and terminate signaling events. In a search for proteins that modulate the activity of the stimulatory G protein of adenylyl cyclase (Galpha(s)), we found that bovine serum albumin (BSA) inhibits the steady-state GTPase activity of Galpha(s), but not the inhibitory G protein (Galpha(i1)). This effect of BSA is mediated by decreasing the rate of GDP dissociation from Galpha(s) and decreasing the rate of GTP binding. Thus, BSA functions as a guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor for Galpha(s). Moreover, BSA also increased the intrinsic GTPase activity of Galpha(s), but not Galpha(i1), demonstrating that BSA functions as a Galpha(s)-specific GAP. Using mutants of Galpha(s) (Q227L, Q227N, R201C, and R201K), we demonstrate that BSA mediates its GAP function by modulating the ability of R201 to increase GTPase activity. Moreover, using wild-type and Q227N forms of Galpha(s), our studies demonstrate that the GDI function of BSA decreases the ability of Galpha(s) to stimulate adenylyl cyclase. These findings assign a novel function to BSA as a regulator of G protein signaling.

Specificity of G protein-RGS protein recognition is regulated by affinity adapters

RGS proteins regulate the duration of cell signaling by modulating the lifetime of activated G proteins. The specificity of RGS-G protein mutual recognition is critical for meeting unique timing requirements of numerous G protein-mediated pathways. Our study of two splice isoforms of RGS9 expressed in different types of neurons revealed a novel mechanism whereby this specificity is determined by specialized protein domains or subunits acting as affinity adapters. The long RGS9 isoform contains a C-terminal domain that provides high-affinity interaction with its target G protein. The lack of this domain in the short RGS9 isoform is compensated by the action of a G protein effector subunit that is structurally similar to this C-terminal domain. This allows the short isoform to specifically target the complex between the G protein and its effector. Thus, the specific timing needs of different signaling pathways can be accommodated by affinity adapters positioned at various pathway components.

Regulators of G-protein signalling: multifunctional proteins with impact on signalling in the cardiovascular system

Regulator of G-protein signalling (RGS) proteins form a superfamily of at least 25 proteins, which are highly diverse in structure, expression patterns, and function. They share a 120 amino acid homology domain (RGS domain), which exhibits GTPase accelerating activity for alpha-subunits of heterotrimeric G-proteins, and thus, are negative regulators of G-protein-mediated signalling. Based on the organisation of the Rgs genes, structural similarities, and differences in functions, they can be divided into at least six subfamilies of RGS proteins and three more families of RGS-like proteins. Many of these proteins regulate signalling processes within cells, not only via interaction with G-protein alpha-subunits, but are G-protein-regulated effectors, Gbetagamma scavenger, or scaffolding proteins in signal transduction complexes as well. The expression of at least 16 different RGS proteins in the mammalian or human myocardium have been described. A subgroup of at least eight was detected in a single atrial myocyte. The exact functions of these proteins remain mostly elusive, but RGS proteins such as RGS4 are involved in the regulation of G(i)-protein betagamma-subunit-gated K(+) channels. An up-regulation of RGS4 expression has been consistently found in human heart failure and some animal models. Evidence is increasing that the enhanced RGS4 expression counter-regulates the G(q/11)-induced signalling caused by hypertrophic stimuli. In the vascular system, RGS5 seems to be an important signalling regulator. It is expressed in vascular endothelial cells, but not in cultured smooth muscle cells. Its down-regulation, both in a model of capillary morphogenesis and in an animal model of stroke, render it a candidate gene, which may be involved in the regulation of capillary growth, angiogenesis, and in the pathophysiology of stroke.

Role of palmitoylation/depalmitoylation reactions in G-protein-coupled receptor function

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute one of the largest protein families in the human genome. They are subject to numerous post-translational modifications, including palmitoylation. This review highlights the dynamic nature of palmitoylation and its role in GPCR expression and function. The palmitoylation of other proteins involved in GPCR signaling, such as G-proteins, regulators of G-protein signaling, and G-protein-coupled receptor kinases, is also discussed.

Noncatalytic domains of RGS9-1.Gbeta 5L play a decisive role in establishing its substrate specificity

The complex between the photoreceptor-specific regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) protein, RGS9-1, and type 5 G protein beta-subunit, Gbeta5L, regulates the duration of the cellular response to light by stimulating the GTPase activity of G protein, transducin. An important property of RGS9-1.Gbeta5L is that it interacts specifically with transducin bound to its effector, cGMP phosphodiesterase, rather than with transducin alone. The minimal structure within the RGS9-1.Gbeta5L complex capable of activating transducin GTPase is the catalytic domain of RGS9. This domain itself is also able to discriminate between free and effector-bound transducin but to a lesser degree than RGS9-1.Gbeta5L. The goal of this study was to determine whether other, noncatalytic domains of RGS9-1.Gbeta5L enhance the intrinsic specificity of the catalytic domain or whether they set the specificity of RGS9-1.Gbeta5L regardless of the specificity of its catalytic domain. We found that a double L353E/R360P amino acid substitution reversed the specificity of the recombinant catalytic domain but did not reverse the specificity of RGS9-1.Gbeta5L. However, the degree of discrimination between free and effector-bound transducin was reduced. Therefore, noncatalytic domains of RGS9-1.Gbeta5L play a decisive role in establishing its substrate specificity, yet the high degree of this specificity observed under physiological conditions requires an additional contribution from the catalytic domain.

Structure, chromosomal localization and expression of the mouse regulator of G-protein signaling10 gene (mRGS10)

Regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins negatively regulate signaling pathways involving seven transmembrane receptors and heterotrimeric G proteins. The purpose of this study was to determine the chromosomal localization, structure and expression profile of the gene coding for mouse regulator of G-protein signaling10 (mRGS10). Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis indicated that mRGS10 maps to band F3-F4 of the mouse chromosome 7. Sequence analysis revealed that the RGS10 gene encompasses six exons spanning more than 40 kb of genomic DNA. The RGS domain is encoded by exons 3-6; alternative splicing of the first exons allows the generation of two isoforms in the mouse system which differ in their N-terminal portion. Thus, mRGS10 encodes two intracellular proteins of 167 and 181 amino-acids which are highly homologous to the human and rat polypeptides. The deduced amino-acid sequences of mouse RGS10 show 92% sequence identity to their orthologues from human. The mRGS10 gene is expressed predominantly in brain and testis but it is also found in heart, lung, bone marrow, lymph node and spleen. Differential display between mature B lymphocytes and marginal zone B cells, as well as reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and Northern blot, showed that mRGS10 is differentially transcribed during B-cell differentiation. Finally, mRGS10 protein was detected in plasma cells of secondary lymphoid organs by immunofluorescence.

Alternative splicing of RGS8 gene determines inhibitory function of receptor type-specific Gq signaling

The regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins modulate heterotrimeric G protein signaling. RGS8 is a brain-specific RGS protein of 180 aa. Here we identified a short isoform of RGS8, RGS8S, that arises by alternative splicing. RGS8S cDNA encodes a N terminus of 7 aa instead of amino acids 1-9 of RGS8 and 10-180 of RGS8. The subcellular distribution of RGS8 and RGS8S did not differ significantly in transfected cells. RGS8S accelerated, not as efficiently as RGS8, the turning on and off of Gi/o-mediated modulation of G protein-gated inwardly rectifying K(+) channels in Xenopus oocytes. We next examined the effects of RGS8 and RGS8S on Gq-mediated signaling. RGS8 decreased the amplitude of the response upon activation of m1 muscarinic or substance P receptors, but did not remarkably inhibit signaling from m3 muscarinic receptors. In contrast, RGS8S showed much less inhibition of the response of either of these Gq-coupled receptors. By quantitative analysis of the inhibitory effect and the protein expression level, we confirmed that the difference of inhibitory effect is caused by both the qualitative difference between RGS8 and RGS8S and the quantitative difference of the protein expression level. We also confirmed that the receptor-type specificity of inhibition is not caused by the difference of the expression level of the receptors. In summary, we showed that 9 aa in the N terminus of RGS8 contribute to the function to inhibit Gq-coupled signaling in a receptor type-specific manner and that the regulatory function of RGS8S is especially diminished on Gq-coupled responses.

Regulation of stress response signaling by the N-terminal dishevelled/EGL-10/pleckstrin domain of Sst2, a regulator of G protein signaling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

All members of the regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) family contain a conserved core domain that can accelerate G protein GTPase activity. The RGS in yeast, Sst2, can inhibit a G protein signal leading to mating. In addition, some RGS proteins contain an N-terminal domain of unknown function. Here we use complementary whole genome analysis methods to investigate the function of the N-terminal Sst2 domain. To identify a signaling pathway regulated by N-Sst2, we performed genome-wide transcription profiling of cells expressing this fragment alone and found differences in 53 transcripts. Of these, 40 are induced by N-Sst2, and nearly all contain a stress response element (STRE) in the promoter region. To identify components of a signaling pathway leading from N-Sst2 to STREs, we performed a genome-wide two-hybrid analysis using N-Sst2 as bait and found 17 interacting proteins. To identify the functionally relevant interacting proteins, we analyzed all of the available gene deletion mutants and found three (vps36 Delta, pep12 Delta, and tlg2 Delta) that induce STRE and also repress pheromone-dependent transcription. We selected VPS36 for further characterization. A vps36 Delta mutation diminishes signaling by pheromone as well as by downstream components including the G protein, effector kinase (Ste11), and transcription factor (Ste12). Conversely, overexpression of Vps36 enhances the pheromone response in sst2 Delta cells but not in wild type. These findings indicate that Vps36 and Sst2 have opposite and opposing effects on the pheromone and stress response pathways, with Vps36 acting downstream of the G protein and independently of Sst2 RGS activity.

Regulation of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor (GnRHR) by RGS proteins: role of the GnRHR carboxyl-terminus

The cytoplasmic carboxyl-terminus of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), absent in the mammalian gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor (GnRHR), plays an important role in receptor expression, desensitization, internalization and efficiency of coupling to G proteins. Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) likewise are involved in regulating GPCR-G protein mediated responses and can regulate transcription of other genes. In this study, we evaluate differential expression, ligand binding and effector coupling of the rat GnRHR (rGnRHR) and a chimera of rGnRHR with the pre-mammalian carboxyl domain (rGnRHR-C-tail). Membrane expression of the chimeric receptor and G(q)alpha and G(s)alpha-mediated signaling was increased 2- and 1.5-fold, respectively by RGS10, while RGS3 did not interfere with rGnRHR and rGnRHR-C-tail cell surface expression in spite of negatively regulating GnRH-stimulated G(q)alpha-mediated signaling by both receptors. The rGnRHR and rGnRHR-C-tail showed similar internalization rates in the presence of either RGS protein, indicating that the modification of rGnRHR expression and regulation in the presence of a carboxyl-terminus by RGS10 was not caused by alteration of the internalization rate. The observations in this study implicate the carboxyl domain of the receptor as a site of interaction for RGS10, but not RGS3. This is the first evidence of an altered cell surface expression and regulation of the GnRHR bearing a carboxyl-terminus by RGS proteins.

The interaction of RGSZ1 with SCG10 attenuates the ability of SCG10 to promote microtubule disassembly

RGS proteins (regulators of G protein signaling) are a diverse family of proteins that act to negatively regulate signaling by heterotrimeric G proteins. Initially characterized as GTPase-activating proteins for Galpha subunits, recent data have implied additional functions for RGS proteins. We previously identified an RGS protein (termed RGSZ1) whose expression is quite specific to neuronal tissue (Glick, J. L., Meigs, T. E., Miron, A., and Casey, P. J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 26008-26013). In a continuing effort to understand the role of RGSZ1 in cellular signaling, the yeast two-hybrid system was employed to identify potential effector proteins of RGSZ1. The microtubule-destabilizing protein SCG10 (superior cervical ganglia, neural specific 10) was found to directly interact with RGSZ1 in the yeast system, and this interaction was further verified using direct binding assays. Treatment of PC12 cells with nerve growth factor resulted in Golgi-specific distribution of SCG10. A green fluorescent protein-tagged variant of RGSZ1 translocated to the Golgi complex upon treatment of PC12 cells with nerve growth factor, providing evidence that RGSZ1 and SCG10 interact in cells as well as in vitro. Analysis of in vitro microtubule polymerization/depolymerization showed that binding of RGSZ1 to SCG10 effectively blocked the ability of SCG10 to induce microtubule disassembly as determined by both turbidimetric and microscopy-based assays. These results identify a novel connection between RGS proteins and the cytoskeletal network that points to a broader role than previously envisioned for RGS proteins in regulating biological processes.

G proteins and phototransduction

Phototransduction is the process by which a photon of light captured by a molecule of visual pigment generates an electrical response in a photoreceptor cell. Vertebrate rod phototransduction is one of the best-studied G protein signaling pathways. In this pathway the photoreceptor-specific G protein, transducin, mediates between the visual pigment, rhodopsin, and the effector enzyme, cGMP phosphodiesterase. This review focuses on two quantitative features of G protein signaling in phototransduction: signal amplification and response timing. We examine how the interplay between the mechanisms that contribute to amplification and those that govern termination of G protein activity determine the speed and the sensitivity of the cellular response to light.

G proteins and pheromone signaling

All cells have the capacity to respond to chemical and sensory stimuli. Central to many such signaling pathways is the heterotrimeric G protein, which transmits a signal from cell surface receptors to intracellular effectors. Recent studies using the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae have produced important advances in our understanding of G protein activation and inactivation. This review focuses on the mechanisms by which G proteins transmit a signal from peptide pheromone receptors to the mating response in yeast and how mechanisms elucidated in yeast can provide insights to signaling events in more complex organisms.

Regulation of G protein-initiated signal transduction in yeast: paradigms and principles

All cells have the capacity to evoke appropriate and measured responses to signal molecules (such as peptide hormones), environmental changes, and other external stimuli. Tremendous progress has been made in identifying the proteins that mediate cellular response to such signals and in elucidating how events at the cell surface are linked to subsequent biochemical changes in the cytoplasm and nucleus. An emerging area of investigation concerns how signaling components are assembled and regulated (both spatially and temporally), so as to control properly the specificity and intensity of a given signaling pathway. A related question under intensive study is how the action of an individual signaling pathway is integrated with (or insulated from) other pathways to constitute larger networks that control overall cell behavior appropriately. This review describes the signal transduction pathway used by budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) to respond to its peptide mating pheromones. This pathway is comprised by receptors, a heterotrimeric G protein, and a protein kinase cascade all remarkably similar to counterparts in multicellular organisms. The primary focus of this review, however, is recent advances that have been made, using primarily genetic methods, in identifying molecules responsible for regulation of the action of the components of this signaling pathway. Just as many of the constituent proteins of this pathway and their interrelationships were first identified in yeast, the functions of some of these regulators have clearly been conserved in metazoans, and others will likely serve as additional models for molecules that carry out analogous roles in higher organisms.

Phosphatidic acid modulates G protein regulation of phospholipase C-beta1 activity in membranes

Regulation of G protein stimulated phospholipase C-beta1 (PLC-beta1) activity by phosphatidic acid (PA) was determined in membranes. In cerebral cortical membranes, PLC-beta1 is under dual regulation by G protein stimulatory and inhibitory mechanisms. PA stimulated basal activity and was synergistic with G protein activation in increasing PLC-beta1 activity. Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) also stimulated PLC-beta1 activity, but was less effective then PA. PA stimulation of PLC-beta1 activity was relatively independent of acyl chain length. PA decreased the Ca2+ dependence for G protein stimulation of PLC-beta1 activity. PA modulated the dual G protein regulation of PLC-beta1 activity, increasing stimulatory regulation and reducing inhibitory G protein regulation. The sensitivity to guanosine 5'-[gamma-thio]trisphosphate (GTP-gamma-S) and carbachol stimulation of PLC-beta1 activity was increased by PA. These results demonstrate that PA regulates both basal activity and G protein stimulation of PLC-beta1 activity. The data indicates that PA regulates the PLC-beta1 signaling pathway and thus may have an important role in the modulation of cell activation.

Ontogenetic development of the G protein-mediated adenylyl cyclase signalling in rat brain

Maturation of the brain adenylyl cyclase (AC) signalling system was investigated in the developing rat cortex, thalamus and hippocampus. Expression of AC type II, IV and VI measured by Western blot dramatically increased in all tested brain regions during the first 3 weeks after birth and these levels were maintained in adulthood. AC type I did not change during ontogenesis. In parallel, AC enzyme activities were determined in order to obtain the functional correlates to the preceding structural (immunoblot) analyses of trimeric G proteins [Ihnatovych et al., Dev. Brain Res. (2002) in press]. Surprisingly, basal, manganese-, fluoride-, forskolin- and GTP-stimulated adenylyl cyclase developed similarly. The relatively low enzyme activities, which were determined at birth, progressively increased (about four times) to a clear maximum around postnatal day PD 12. This was followed by a progressive regression to adulthood so that activity of AC at PD 90 was comparable with the low neonatal level. The peak of AC activities at PD 12 was detected in all tested brain regions. Stimulatory (isoproterenol) effect on basal AC activity as well as inhibitory (baclofen) effect on forskolin-stimulated AC activity were unchanged between PD 12 and PD 90. Thus, comparison of results of the structural and functional analyses of adenylyl cyclase signalling system revealed a clear dissociation between the increase in the amount protein of various AC isoforms and the decrease of total G-protein mediated enzyme activities between PD 12 and adulthood. As none of the complex changes in trimeric G protein levels can explain this difference, the future research has to be oriented to identification of potential negative regulators of AC in the course of brain development. Among these, the newly discovered group of GTPase activating proteins, RGS, appears to be of primary importance because these proteins represent potent negative regulators of any G protein-mediated signalling in brain.

Inhibition of somatostatin receptor 5-signaling by mammalian regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) in yeast

Regulators of G-protein signaling (RGSs) are negative regulators of G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR)-mediated signaling that function to limit the lifetime of receptor-activated G(alpha)-proteins. Here we show that four mammalian RGSs differentially inhibit the activation of a FUS1--LacZ reporter gene by the STE2 encoded GPCR in yeast. In order to examine the role of the GPCR in modulating RGS function, we functionally expressed the human somatostatin receptor 5 (SST(5)) in yeast. In the absence of RGSs, FUS1--LacZ activation in response to somatostatin increased in a dose-dependent manner in cells expressing SST(5). In contrast to the results obtained with Ste2p, all RGSs completely inhibited SST(5)-mediated signaling even at concentrations of agonist as high as 10(minus sign5) M. The ability of RGSs to inhibit SST(5) signaling was further assessed in cells expressing modified Gpa1 proteins. Even though SST(5)-mediated FUS1--LacZ activation was 5-fold more efficient with a Gpa1p/G(i3alpha) chimera, response to somatostatin was completely abolished by all four RGSs. Furthermore, we demonstrate that RGS1, RGS2 and RGS5 have reduced ability to inhibit SST(5)-mediated activation of the RGS-resistant Gpa1p(Gly302Ser) mutant suggesting that the ability to interact with the G(alpha)-protein is required for the inhibition of signaling. Taken together, our results indicate that RGSs serve as better GAPs for Gpa1p when activated by SST(5) than when this G-protein is activated by Ste2p.

Engineering a V(2) vasopressin receptor agonist- and regulator of G-protein-signaling-sensitive G protein

It is extremely difficult to detect guanine nucleotide exchange or hydrolysis stimulated by receptors which couple to G(s)alpha. Furthermore, G(s)alpha is largely resistant to the GTPase-activating properties of RGS proteins. Coexpression of the vasopressin V(2) receptor with a series of chimeric G protein alpha subunits in which the C-terminal 6-12 amino acids of G(i1)alpha were replaced with the equivalent sequence of G(s)alpha allowed robust vasopressin-stimulated [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding. Vasopressin did not stimulate the GTPase activity of fusion proteins between the V(2) receptor and either G(s)alpha or G(i1)alpha. However, it produced a concentration-dependent stimulation of V(max) for a V(2) receptor-G(i1)alpha/Gs6alpha fusion protein. This construct bound [(3)H]vasopressin with high affinity and this was competed by other ligands with rank order anticipated for the V(2) receptor. RGS1 enhanced vasopressin stimulation of V(2) receptor-G(i1)alpha/G(s)6alpha in a concentration-dependent manner. RGS-GAIP was substantially less potent. Enzyme kinetic analysis demonstrated that RGS1 increased both V(max) of the GTPase activity and the observed K(m) for GTP, consistent with RGS1 accelerating the rate of GTP hydrolysis of the chimeric G protein, whereas the agonist vasopressin accelerates guanine nucleotide exchange. This approach provides a sensitive assay for V(2) receptor agonist ligands and may be amenable to many other G(s)alpha-coupled receptors.

RGS14 is a bifunctional regulator of Galphai/o activity that exists in multiple populations in brain

Members of the regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) family modulate Galpha-directed signals as a result of the GTPase-activating protein (GAP) activity of their conserved RGS domain. In addition to its RGS domain, RGS14 contains a Rap binding domain (RBD) and a GoLoco motif. To define the cellular and biochemical properties of RGS14 we utilized two different affinity purified antisera that specifically recognize recombinant and native RGS14. In brain, we observed two RGS14-like immunoreactive bands of distinct size (60 kDa and 55 kDa). Both forms are present in brain cytosol and in two, biochemically distinct, membrane subpopulations: one detergent-extractable and the other detergent-insensitive. Recombinant RGS14 binds specifically to activated Galphai/o, but not Galphaq/11, Galpha12/13, or Galphas in brain membranes. In reconstitution studies, we found that RGS14 is a non-selective GAP for Galphai1 and Galphao and that full-length RGS14 is an approximately 10-fold more potent stimulator of Galpha GTPase activity than the RGS domain alone. In contrast, neither full-length RGS14 nor the isolated RBD domain is a GAP for Rap1. RGS14 is also a highly selective guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor (GDI) for Galphai but not Galphao, and this activity is restricted to the C-terminus containing the GoLoco domain. These findings highlight previously unknown biochemical properties of RGS14 in brain, and provide one of the first examples of an RGS protein that is a bifunctional regulator of Galpha actions.

Bridging with GAPs: receptor communication through RGS proteins

The regulators of heterotrimeric guanosine triphosphate (GTP)-binding protein (G protein) signaling (RGS proteins) were named for their ability to act as GTP-activating proteins (GAPs) for G proteins and, thus, limit the signal generated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). In addition to this characteristic biochemical trait, RGS proteins constitute a large family of structurally diverse proteins with variable sequence motifs that permit additional specific interactions. RGS proteins may also serve as a bridge from GPCRs to receptor tyrosine kinases or transmembrane channels, allowing signals from GPCRs to regulate signaling through other types of receptors, and vice versa.

RGS9-G beta 5 substrate selectivity in photoreceptors. Opposing effects of constituent domains yield high affinity of RGS interaction with the G protein-effector complex

RGS proteins regulate the duration of G protein signaling by increasing the rate of GTP hydrolysis on G protein alpha subunits. The complex of RGS9 with type 5 G protein beta subunit (G beta 5) is abundant in photoreceptors, where it stimulates the GTPase activity of transducin. An important functional feature of RGS9-G beta 5 is its ability to activate transducin GTPase much more efficiently after transducin binds to its effector, cGMP phosphodiesterase. Here we show that different domains of RGS9-G beta 5 make opposite contributions toward this selectivity. G beta 5 bound to the G protein gamma subunit-like domain of RGS9 acts to reduce RGS9 affinity for transducin, whereas other structures restore this affinity specifically for the transducin-phosphodiesterase complex. We suggest that this mechanism may serve as a general principle conferring specificity of RGS protein action.

Chronic treatment with certain antipsychotic drugs preserves upregulation of regulator of G-protein signalling 2 mRNA in rat striatum as opposed to c-fos mRNA

Quantitative in situ hybridization on rat coronal brain sections with radiolabelled oligonucleotide probes was performed to investigate the effects of antipsychotic drugs on mRNA levels of regulator of G-protein signalling (RGS) 2 and c-fos. This study demonstrated a similar increase of RGS2 mRNA level in the striatum upon both a single and a 21-day treatment with either haloperidol (2 mg/kg) or risperidone (7.5 mg/kg) in contrast to clozapine (20 mg/kg). Otherwise, the acute c-fos mRNA induction in the striatum was abolished by 74 to 89% upon chronic treatment with either haloperidol or risperidone. In conclusion, the induction of RGS2 mRNA in the striatum, in contrast to the immediate early gene c-fos mRNA, is preserved upon chronic treatment with haloperidol and risperidone.

Molecular biological approaches to unravel adenylyl cyclase signaling and function

Signal transduction through the cell membrane requires the participation of one or more plasma membrane proteins. For many transmembrane signaling events adenylyl cyclases (ACs) are the final effector enzymes which integrate and interpret divergent signals from different pathways. The enzymatic activity of adenylyl cyclases is stimulated or inhibited in response to the activation of a large number of receptors in virtually all cells of the human body. To date, ten different mammalian isoforms of adenylyl cyclase (AC) have been cloned and characterized. Each isoform has its own distinct tissue distribution and regulatory properties, providing possibilities for different cells to respond diversely to similar stimuli. The product of the enzymatic reaction catalyzed by ACs, cyclic AMP (cAMP) has been shown to play a crucial role for a variety of fundamental physiological cell functions ranging from cell growth and differentiation, to transcriptional regulation and apoptosis. In the past, investigations into the regulatory mechanisms of ACs were limited by difficulties associated with their purification and the availability of the proteins in any significant amount. Moreover, nearly every cell expresses several AC isoforms. Therefore, it was difficult to perform biochemical characterization of the different AC isoforms and nearly impossible to assess the physiological roles of the individual isoforms in intact cells, tissue or organisms. Recently, however, different molecular biological approaches have permitted several breakthroughs in the study of ACs. Recombinant technologies have allowed biochemical analysis of adenylyl cyclases in-vitro and the development of transgenic animals as well as knock-out mice have yielded new insights in the physiological role of some AC isoforms. In this review, we will focus mainly on the most novel approaches and concepts, which have delineated the mechanisms regulating AC and unravelled novel functions for this enzyme.