In-hospital prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by primary ventricular fibrillation

Early out-of-hospital lidocaine administration decreases the incidence of primary ventricular fibrillation in acute myocardial infarction

This study was designed to assess the effectiveness of early prehospital intravenous administration of lidocaine in preventing primary ventricular fibrillation (PVF) in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Sixty patients with suspected AMI, seen by the Mobile Coronary Care Unit (MCCU) of Florence, were randomly allocated at home to treatment with lidocaine (bolus i.v. of 1 mg/kg, followed by an infusion of 4 mg/min) or placebo (infusion of saline at a rate of 1 mL/min), respectively. The lidocaine group (27 patients) and the control group (33 patients) were not significantly different in age, clinical condition, or time of randomization. The diagnosis of AMI was confirmed in all 60 patients during the hospital stay. Ventricular fibrillation (VF) occurred in 5 patients in the control group in comparison to none in the lidocaine group (P < 0.05). Three patients experienced VF at home and were successfully resuscitated by an MCCU cardiologist. In another two patients, VF occurred during the first 4 hours after onset of symptoms. No major side effects were observed after the infusion of lidocaine. Our findings support the effectiveness of the prophylactic administration of lidocaine in preventing PVF in the prehospital phase of AMI and suggest that the drug can be safely administered in this setting by prehospital personnel.

Comparison of frequency, diagnostic and prognostic significance of pericardial involvement in acute myocardial infarction treated with and without thrombolytics. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto Miocardico (GISSI)

Data from the Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto Miocardico (GISSI) trial were reviewed to describe the epidemiology of pericardial involvement in patients treated with or without thrombolysis, and to establish its role as a marker of the extent of myocardial infarction and its prognostic value. In both GISSI-1 (n = 11,806) and 2 (n = 12,381), a specific item regarding presence/absence of clinically detected pericardial involvement was included in the study forms. In GISSI-1, patients with ST elevation and depression at the onset of myocardial infarction were admitted, whereas GISSI-2 included only those with ST elevation. Results of univariate analysis are presented as Mantel-Haenszel-Peto odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the independent prognostic significance of pericardial involvement for in-hospital and long-term mortality. The main results indicate that: (1) the incidence of pericardial involvement in patients treated with thrombolytic agents is approximately half of that in the control group (6.7 vs 12.0%); (2) the earlier is the treatment, the lower is the incidence of pericardial involvement; (3) pericardial involvement is strongly associated with infarction size, evaluated by electrocardiograms, creatine kinase peak and echo assessments; and (4) pericardial involvement is associated with a higher long-term mortality, but is not an independent prognostic factor (RR 1.02; 95% confidence interval 0.82-1.26). Pericardial involvement is a reliable bedside, cost-free marker of myocardial infarction size and poorer outcome. Because it may elude detection owing to its transitory and often short duration, it should be given greater attention.

Frequency and prognostic significance of secondary ventricular fibrillation complicating acute myocardial infarction. SPRINT Study Group

The incidence of secondary ventricular fibrillation (VF) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was 2.4% in a large cohort of unselected patients with AMI (142 of 5,839). Secondary VF was more frequent in patients with recurrent AMI (4%) than in those with a first AMI (1.9%) (p < 0.01). The hospital course was more complicated and in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in patients with secondary VF than in those with the same clinical hemodynamic condition but without VF (56 vs 16%; p < 0.0001). Multivariate analyses confirmed secondary VF complicating AMI as an independent predictor of high in-hospital mortality, with an odds ratio of 7 (95% confidence interval 4.6-10.6). However, long-term mortality after discharge (mean follow-up 5.5 years) was not increased in patients with as compared with those without secondary VF (39 vs 42%). These findings were also true when patients receiving beta blockers and antiarrhythmic therapy were excluded from analysis. Thus, this life-threatening arrhythmia occurring during hospitalization is not a marker of recurrent susceptibility to VF or an indicator of increased mortality after discharge from the hospital.

Declining incidence of ventricular fibrillation in myocardial infarction. Implications for the prophylactic use of lidocaine

BACKGROUND

The purposes of the present investigation were 1) to track the incidence of primary ventricular fibrillation (VF) in the control and lidocaine-treated groups in the randomized control trials (RCTs) of lidocaine prophylaxis against primary VF in acute myocardial infarction, with particular emphasis on the time frame of the randomized trial, and 2) to estimate the number of patients who must receive lidocaine currently to prevent one episode of VF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The following variables from RCTs published between 1969 and 1988 were entered into logistic regression models to predict the percent of patients developing VF: year of publication of the RCT, method of data analysis used in the RCT, route and technique of lidocaine administration, duration of monitoring for VF, and exclusion criteria before randomization (congestive heart failure/cardiogenic shock, ventricular tachycardia/VF, or bradycardia/atrioventricular block). Year of publication was a significant predictor of VF in both the control and lidocaine groups (p less than or equal to 0.002) even after adjusting for other covariates. Based on a univariate logistic regression model with year as the predictor variable, it was estimated that the incidence of primary VF in the control group fell from 4.51% in 1970 to 0.35% in 1990 and from 4.32% down to 0.11% for the lidocaine group over the same time period. Thus, about 400 patients would currently need prophylaxis with lidocaine to prevent one episode of VF.

CONCLUSIONS

Present estimates of the risk:benefit ratio of lidocaine prophylaxis should consider the low risk of VF in control patients and the large number who need lidocaine prophylaxis to prevent one episode of VF. When added to the previously reported trend toward excess mortality in lidocaine-treated patients, these data argue against the routine prophylactic use of lidocaine in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

The diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department; Part 1

Despite major advances in treatment, the accurate diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the emergency department (ED) remains a difficult clinical problem and is still mainly based on the history and interpretation of the electrocardiogram. Although the physician's clinical impression is a highly sensitive indicator for AMI, at least 4% of patients presenting to the ED with AMI may be mistakenly sent home. Although chest pain is the most common chief complaint, the clinical presentation can be extremely variable, particularly in the elderly. Complaints of sharp chest pain or chest wall tenderness should not be relied upon to exclude AMI. Radiation of chest pain is an important symptom. With careful analysis, the electrocardiogram may yield a higher diagnostic sensitivity than is commonly accepted.

Relation between acute ventricular arrhythmias, ventricular late potentials and mortality in acute myocardial infarction

The relation between ventricular late potentials and the occurrence of acute (in-hospital) and hyperacute (before hospital admission) ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation was studied in 281 consecutive patients with uninterrupted acute myocardial infarction. The prevalence of late potentials was significantly higher in patients with than without ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (65 vs 22%; p less than 0.01). These relations persisted among patients with left bundle branch block, although a different definition was used for identifying late potentials in these patients. Multivariate analysis showed that presence of late potentials and peak creatine kinase enzyme level were the only 2 independent variables associated with early ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation. Total in-hospital mortality, as well as in-hospital cardiac mortality, was significantly higher among patients with than without acute ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation. However, at 1 year, mortality rates did not differ between the 2 groups. The following conclusions were drawn from this study: (1) Late potentials are closely related to ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation in hyperacute and acute phases of infarction. (2) Presence of left bundle branch block does not mitigate against the finding of late potentials in these patients. (3) Early ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation in acute infarction is related to large infarctions and to a high in-hospital mortality rate.

Thrombolytic therapy in patients requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is often considered a contraindication to thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Of 708 patients involved in the first 3 Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction trials of lytic therapy for acute infarction, 59 patients required less than 10 minutes of CPR before receiving lytic therapy (CPR greater than 10 minutes was an exclusion of the trials) or required CPR within 6 hours of treatment. The patients receiving CPR were similar to the remainder of the group with respect to baseline demographics. The indication for CPR was usually ventricular fibrillation (73%) or ventricular tachycardia (24%). The median duration of CPR was 1 minute, with twenty-fifth and seventy-fifth percentiles of 1 and 5 minutes, respectively. The median number of cardioversions/defibrillations performed was 2 (twenty-fifth and seventy-fifth percentiles of 1 and 3 minutes, respectively). Patients receiving CPR were more likely to have anterior infarctions (66 vs 39%), the left anterior descending artery as the infarct-related artery (63 vs 38%) and lower ejection fractions on the initial ventriculogram (46 +/- 11 vs 52 +/- 12%) than those not receiving CPR. In-hospital mortality was 12 vs 6% with most deaths due to pump failure (57%) or arrhythmia (29%) in the CPR group and pump failure (38%) or reinfarction (25%) in the non-CPR group. At 7 day follow-up the CPR group had a significant increase in ejection fraction (+5 +/- 9%) compared with no change in non-CPR group. There were no bleeding complications directly attributed to CPR.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Prognosis of acute myocardial infarction complicated by primary ventricular fibrillation. Principal Investigators of the SPRINT Study

In 5,839 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), hospitalized between July 1981 and July 1983 in 14 coronary care units in Israel, the incidence of primary ventricular fibrillation (VF) was 2.1%. Patients with primary VF resembled counterparts without VF in terms of age, gender, frequency of previous AMI and past cigarette smoking habits. The hospital course of patients with primary VF revealed increased incidence of primary atrial fibrillation and atrioventricular block. Increased serum levels of glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase and lactic dehydrogenase were noted among the patients with primary VF. In-hospital mortality rate was 18.8% in 122 patients with primary VF compared with 8.5% in 3,707 patients forming the reference group (p less than 0.01). Adjustment by age using logistic function yielded an estimate of 2.86 for relative mortality odds associated with primary VF, and further adjustment by gender, history of AMI, systemic hypertension, and by enzymatically estimated infarct size slightly reduced the estimated odds, at 2.52 (95% confidence interval, 1.42 to 4.46). Prognosis after discharge from the hospital was independent of primary VF. In conclusion, primary VF exerts an independent, significant effect on in-hospital mortality.

Incidence and prognosis of secondary ventricular fibrillation in acute myocardial infarction. Evidence for a protective effect of thrombolytic therapy. GISSI Investigators

The multicenter randomized study of the Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi nell'Infarto Miocardico has provided the opportunity to analyze the impact of thrombolytic treatment on secondary ventricular fibrillation incidence in a large population of patients (11,712) with acute myocardial infarction. A reduction of about 20% in the frequency of secondary ventricular fibrillation was observed among patients allocated to thrombolytic treatment (streptokinase, 2.4% versus control, 2.9%; relative risk, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.00). Streptokinase appeared to exert its protective effect specifically in patients treated within 3 hours of onset of symptoms (streptokinase, 2.6% versus control, 3.7%; relative risk, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.95). This protection was essentially due to a reduced incidence of late ventricular fibrillation occurring after the first day of hospitalization. The 311 patients with secondary ventricular fibrillation represented an overall incidence of 2.7%. Such incidence was not related to infarct location or sex but was significantly more common in patients older than 65 years (3.3% versus 2.3% in younger patients). A significant excess of in-hospital deaths was found in patients with secondary ventricular fibrillation compared with those in the reference group (38% versus 24%; relative risk, 1.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.56-2.52). Conversely, secondary ventricular fibrillation was not a predictor of 1-year mortality for hospital survivors. Thrombolytic treatment with intravenous streptokinase affords protection against secondary ventricular fibrillation most probably by a limitation of infarct size. When the arrhythmia complicates the course of infarction, it is associated with an adverse short-term outcome, whereas the long-term prognosis is not influenced.

Management of the patient following coronary thrombolysis

Myocardial salvage can be maximized by the early institution of thrombolytic therapy and aspirin. Certain patients may benefit from the administration of intravenous heparin, beta blockers, or nitroglycerin. The routine use of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) or calcium-channel blockers does not appear to be warranted. Recurrent myocardial ischemia should be vigorously treated with medical therapy and there may be value in cardiac catheterization, followed by PTCA or bypass surgery, depending upon the extent of myocardium at risk and the underlying coronary anatomy. Long-term morbidity and mortality may be reduced by instituting aspirin and beta blockers as well as by modifying risk factors. There is no evidence for the long-term benefit from any calcium-channel blocker. Oral anticoagulation may be warranted in those patients with a mural thrombus, congestive heart failure, or atrial fibrillation. ACE inhibitors may be of value in the presence of left ventricular dysfunction and certainly in the presence of symptomatic congestive heart failure. Antiarrhythmic therapy is generally indicated only for symptomatic or life-threatening arrhythmias. Residual myocardial ischemia should be sought by exercise testing, and those patients with poor exercise tolerance generally warrant cardiac catheterization in consideration for revascularization.

Prognosis of late versus early ventricular fibrillation in acute myocardial infarction

To determine the prognosis of late ventricular fibrillation (VF) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the length of the monitoring period after AMI was extended. All patients in this series were continuously monitored in a coronary care unit to ensure observation of all VF within 18 days of AMI. From 1977 to 1985, 4,269 patients were admitted with AMI and 413 (9.6%) had in-hospital VF. Of these 281 (6.8%) had early VF (less than 48 hours after AMI) and 132 (3.2%) had late VF (greater than or equal to 48 hours after AMI). In-hospital mortality was 50 and 54% for early and late VF, respectively (p = 0.31). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed better survival after discharge for patients with early versus late VF (p = 0.009) but this difference was fully explained by the presence of heart failure. Survival analysis showed the same prognosis after 1, 3 and 5 years for early and late VF, when VF was not associated with heart failure. When VF was associated with heart failure (secondary VF) early VF had a greater mortality than late VF after 2 and 5 years. Logistic regression analysis showed that heart failure (relative risk 1.9 [1.1 to 3.1]) and cardiogenic shock (relative risk 3.9 [1.8 to 8.5]) were significant risk factors for in-hospital death. Late VF compared to early VF had no prognostic implication (relative risk 1.0 [0.6 to 1.6]). For patients discharged from the hospital, risk factors were heart failure (1.8 [1.1 to 2.8]) and previous AMI (1.6 [1.3 to 2.1]).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Mechanical and electrical complications of acute myocardial infarction

Although much of the current enthusiasm in the management of acute myocardial infarction is related to revascularization strategies, mechanical and electrical complications continue to pose a major threat to recovery in some patients. Some of the major complications of acute myocardial infarction are cardiogenic shock, rupture of the free wall and pseudoaneurysm, rupture of the ventricular septum, acute mitral regurgitation, right ventricular myocardial infarction, infarct expansion or extension, pericarditis and tamponade, peri-infarction hypertension, and tachyarrhythmias and bradyarrhythmias. For each of these complications, general guidelines for diagnosis and management are offered. Early, aggressive, and judicious treatment of these complications may substantially decrease the morbidity and mortality associated with acute myocardial infarction.

Reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction

During the past decade, the general acceptance of the primary role of thrombosis in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has led to intense interest in the potential efficacy of reperfusion therapy, particularly thrombolytic therapy, in AMI. Accumulating evidence indicates that systemic thrombolytic therapy administered early after the onset of symptoms of AMI can restore infarct-related artery patency, salvage myocardium, and reduce mortality. Recommendations about the proper use of thrombolytic therapy, contraindications, and concomitant therapies (such as aspirin, heparin, nitrates, beta-adrenergic blocking agents, and calcium channel blockers) are reviewed. Although percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is useful for subsets of patients with AMI (for example, patients with anterior infarctions with persistent occlusion of the infarct-related artery after thrombolytic therapy and those with cardiogenic shock), a conservative strategy, including angiography and PTCA only for postinfarction ischemia, is indicated for most patients with AMI in whom initial thrombolytic therapy is apparently successful. The use of PTCA after failed thrombolysis or as direct therapy for AMI seems promising, although further comparisons of PTCA and intravenous thrombolytic therapy are needed. Ongoing studies should help further define the risk-to-benefit ratio of various reperfusion strategies in different subsets of patients, define time limitations for reperfusion therapy, and provide data on therapeutic modalities that will limit reperfusion injury and therefore enhance salvage of myocardium.

Acute myocardial infarction: initial manifestations, management, and prognosis

In patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI), obtaining a thorough history is important for identifying both the cause of chest pain and any concurrent conditions that may complicate the management. Physical examination--including cardiac auscultation and determining the status of the peripheral vasculature--is important as a guide to immediate management and as a baseline for future comparison. The differential diagnosis of AMI is extensive, and various laboratory tests, such as electrocardiography, cardiac enzymes, radionuclide techniques, echocardiography, and cardiac catheterization, can aid in the diagnosis. The routine management of patients with AMI can include medical therapy with antithrombotic agents, nitrates, beta-adrenergic blockers, or calcium channel blocking agents. The major differences between Q-wave and non-Q-wave infarction are discussed. Some factors that affect early and late prognosis in patients with AMI are age of the patient, residual left ventricular function, residual myocardial ischemia, and substrates for sustained ventricular arrhythmias. Although much of the current enthusiasm in management of AMI is related to revascularization strategies, other important aspects of diagnosis and treatment should not be overlooked.

The case of GISSI in changing the attitudes and practice of Italian cardiologists

This report first describes the efficiency achieved by a large scale clinical trial (GISSI), which is widely recognized as having made an important contribution to the therapy of AMI, and second emphasizes how a comprehensive research project based upon an innovative clinical trial methodology can influence the attitude and the scientific productivity of a professional community operating within a national health system. To understand the methodology of GISSI, one must appreciate both the cultural and institutional setting in which the first GISSI trial took place as well as the strong economic and scientific expectation surrounding the second GISSI trial.

One-year prognosis of primary ventricular fibrillation complicating acute myocardial infarction. The GISSI (Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi nell'Infarto miocardico) investigators

The 1-year prognosis of 293 patients discharged alive from the hospital after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), who experienced primary ventricular fibrillation (VF) in the acute phase, was compared with that of a reference group of 6,337 patients identified from the same population included in the Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi nell'Infarto miocardico (GISSI) trial. There was no difference in the 6- and 12-month mortality between the patients with primary VF and the reference group (3.7 vs 2.7% and 4.1 vs 4.2%, respectively). Survival of the 2 groups was also similar when patients were stratified according to infarct site (anterior and posterior), and whether or not they received treatment with streptokinase during AMI. Thus, long-term mortality of patients discharged alive after AMI complicated by primary VF is low and is not influenced by previous fibrinolytic therapy or by infarct site. The excess mortality of patients with primary VF is confined to the hospital phase, after which survivors represent a low-risk subgroup.

Arrhythmia prophylaxis after acute myocardial infarction: a decade of controversy

Primary ventricular fibrillation continues to be a major complication of acute myocardial infarction occurring in 5-9% of patients in the coronary care unit and in a higher percentage of pre-hospital admissions. Prophylactic anti-arrhythmic drugs can prevent primary ventricular fibrillation. Lidocaine has been used for this purpose and can be administered safely and effectively in most patients by following well-established programs based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data. The in-hospital mortality for patients with primary ventricular fibrillation exceeds that of matched controls not having the arrhythmia, and many studies show a higher 1-, 3-, and 5-year mortality. Other studies have failed to confirm these long-term results and have produced controversy among cardiologists. I continue to recommend prophylactic antiarrhythmic drugs for all patients with acute infarction, especially in those undergoing early interventional therapy.

Late clinical outcome in patients with early ventricular fibrillation after myocardial infarction

Whether ventricular fibrillation occurring within 48 h after acute myocardial infarction is associated with particular clinical features and poor prognosis, especially in patients with anterior myocardial infarction, is still debated. Therefore, clinical variables and in-hospital and 1 year mortality rates were analyzed in 2,088 patients, aged 18 to 95 years (mean +/- SD 64 +/- 12), admitted to the hospital with acute myocardial infarction between 1979 and mid 1984. One hundred forty-seven patients (7%) had at least one episode of ventricular fibrillation occurring within 48 h of hospital admission. Of these, 25% died during their initial hospitalization compared with 13% of patients without early ventricular fibrillation (p less than 0.001). In greater than 50% of patients with early ventricular fibrillation, the immediate cause of death was left ventricular failure or cardiogenic shock. In contrast, the 1 year mortality rate after hospital discharge was not significantly greater in patients with than in those without early ventricular fibrillation (15 versus 11%, respectively), particularly in the subgroup of patients with anterior myocardial infarction in which the mortality rate tended to be lower in patients with early ventricular fibrillation (8 versus 14%, respectively). Similar mortality results were found when only primary (not associated with left ventricular failure) ventricular fibrillation was analyzed. The left ventricular ejection fraction and the incidence of complex ventricular arrhythmias from 24 h ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring obtained at hospital discharge were not different in survivors with or without early ventricular fibrillation (0.45 +/- 0.13 versus 0.49 +/- 0.14 and 41 versus 41%, respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)