Conventional adjuvant chemotherapy with or without high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation in high-risk breast cancer

Allogeneic MHC gene transfer enhances an effective antitumor immunity in the early period of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

PURPOSE

In autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), lymphopenia-induced homeostatic proliferation of T cells is driven by the recognition of self-antigens, and there is an opportunity to skew the T-cell repertoire during the T-cell recovery by engaging tumor-associated antigens, leading to a break of tolerance against tumors. However, the homeostatic proliferation-driven antitumor responses seem to decline rapidly in association with tumor growth. We hypothesized that a tumor-specific immune response induced by an immune gene therapy could enhance and sustain homeostatic proliferation-induced antitumor immunity.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The antitumor effect of allogeneic MHC (alloMHC) gene transfer was examined at the early phase of the immune reconstitution after syngeneic HSCT.

RESULTS

Syngeneic HSCT showed significant tumor growth inhibition of syngeneic colon cancer cells within a period of 30 days; however, the tumor then resumed rapid growth and the survival of the mice was not prolonged. In contrast, when the alloMHC plasmid was intratumorally injected at the early phase after syngeneic HSCT, the established tumors were markedly regressed and the survival of recipient mice was prolonged without significant toxicities, whereas no survival advantage was recognized in recipient mice injected with a control plasmid. This tumor suppression was evident even in the other tumors that were not injected with the alloMHC plasmid. The antitumor response was characterized by the development of tumor-specific T cell- and natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicities.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest the efficacy and safety of integrating intratumoral alloMHC gene transfer with an autologous HSCT for the treatment of solid cancers.

Randomized trial of high-dose adjuvant chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem-cell support versus standard-dose chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with 10 or more positive lymph nodes: overall survival after 6 years of follow-up

Investigation of high-dose chemotherapy (HD-CT) compared with standard-dose chemotherapy (SD-CT) as adjuvant treatment in patients with primary breast cancer and >/=10 axillary lymph nodes. From November 1993 to September 2000, 307 patients were randomized to receive after four cycles of epirubicin (90 mg/m(2)), cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m(2)) i.v. (every 21 days) and either HD-CT of cyclophosphamide (1500 mg/m(2)), thiotepa (150 mg/m(2)) and mitoxantrone (10 mg/m(2)) i.v. for four consecutive days followed by stem cell transplantation or a SD-CT of three cycles CMF (cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2), methotrexate 40 mg/m(2), 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2), i.v. on day 1 and 8, respectively, every 28 days). After a median follow-up of 6.1 years, 166 events with respect to event-free survival (EFS) (SD-CT: 91, HD-CT: 75) have been observed. The hazard ratio of HD-CT versus SD-CT is estimated as 0.80 [95% confidence interval (0.59, 1.08)], P = 0.15. The trend to a superiority of HD-CT as compared with SD-CT with respect to EFS seems to be more pronounced in premenopausal patients as compared with postmenopausal patients and in patients with tumor grade 3 as compared with patients with tumor grade 1/2. With a follow-up of 6 years, there was a trend in favor of HD-CT with respect to EFS not being significant. A proper meta-analysis needs to be undertaken for an evaluation of subgroups of patients who might benefit from HD-CT.

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem cell support for solid tumors in adults

Supported by experimental evidence and convincing results of early phase II studies, since the 1980s high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with autologous hematopoietic stem cell support (AHSCT) has been uncritically adopted by many oncologists as a potentially curative option for several solid tumors. As a result, the number (and size) of randomized trials comparing this approach with conventional chemotherapy initiated (and often abandoned before completion) in this setting was limited and the benefit of a greater escalation of dose of chemotherapy with stem cell transplantation in solid tumors remains, with the possible exception of breast carcinoma (BC) and germ cell tumors (GCT), largely unsettled. In this article, we review and comment on the data from studies to date of HDC for solid tumors in adults.

Chemotherapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Paradigm in Flux

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women in the United States. A reduction in breast cancer mortality has been observed over recent years and is in part attributable to general use of adjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab. Besides the addition of specific therapeutic agents, the therapy of early-stage breast cancer has benefited from dose-dense approaches, identification of molecular markers, and translational research innovations such as prognostic gene expression assays. Treatment recommendations for adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy are traditionally guided by results from clinical studies reflecting a general population; however, molecular and genomic information can potentially enable clinicians to formulate more refined therapeutic decisions. These advances also generate further questions regarding situations where application of therapy is necessary to optimize efficacy and circumstances where sparing therapy is appropriate. Taken together, the advances made through early-stage breast cancer chemotherapy positions us closer to fulfilling the promise of personalized medicine. This article reviews the recent progress of adjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab in breast cancer.

Phase III study to evaluate the use of high-dose chemotherapy as consolidation of treatment for high-risk postoperative breast cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group study, JCOG 9208

A randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) as consolidation of the treatment of high-risk postoperative breast cancer. Patients under 56 years of age with stage I to IIIB breast cancer involving 10 or more axillary lymph nodes were eligible. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS). Between May 1993 and March 1999, 97 patients were enrolled, and two patients became ineligible. The median age of the 97 patients was 46 years (range 27-55 years), and 72 (74%) were premenopausal. The median number of involved axillary nodes was 16 (range 10-49). All patients had undergone a radical mastectomy. Major characteristics were well balanced between the treatment arms. Forty-eight patients in the standard-dose (STD) arm received six courses of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and 5-fluorouracil followed by tamoxifen. Forty-nine patients were assigned to undergo HDC with cyclophosphamide and thiotepa after six courses of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and 5-fluorouracil followed by tamoxifen; however, 15 of these patients (31%) did not undergo HDC. HDC was well tolerated without any treatment-related mortality. At a median follow-up of 63 months, the 5-year RFS of 47 eligible patients in the STD arm and 48 eligible patients in the HDC arm was 37% and 52% on an intent-to-treat basis, respectively (P = 0.17). Five-year overall survival of all randomized patients was 62% for the STD arm and 63% for the HDC arm (P = 0.78). Although the prespecified values of the two arms were not so accurate as to allow detection of the observed difference, no advantage of HDC was observed in terms of RFS or overall survival.

Is there any Prognostically Different Subgroup among Patients with Stage IIIC (Any TN3M0) Breast Carcinoma?

BACKGROUND

We investigated whether there are prognostically different subgroups among patients with stage IIIC (any TN3M0) breast carcinoma.

METHODS

The file records of 348 female patients operated for stage IIIC breast carcinoma were reviewed. The endpoint was disease recurrence.

RESULTS

Patients with a T1, T2 or T3 tumor had significantly better disease-free survival (DFS) compared to those with a T4 tumor. In the patient group with T1,2,3N3M0 disease, the DFS was significantly better in patients with between 10 and 15 metastatic axillary lymph nodes, compared to patients with 16 or more metastatic lymph nodes (p = 0.0360) and in patients with a nodal ratio ( number of metastatic lymph nodes divided by number of removed nodes) less than or equal to 0.80, compared to patients with a nodal ratio greater than 0.80 (p = 0.0003). In the patient subgroup with between 10 and 15 metastatic lymph nodes, those with a nodal ratio greater than 0.80 had significantly worse DFS, whereas in the patient subgroup with 16 or more metastatic lymph nodes the nodal ratio had no prognostic significance. The DFS of patients with 10 to 15 positive lymph nodes and a nodal ratio of up to 0.80 was significantly better than that of both the patients with 10 to 15 positive lymph nodes and a nodal ratio greater than 0.80 (p = 0.0002), and the patients with 16 or more positive lymph nodes (p = 0.0002); survival of the latter two patient groups was similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with T1,2,3N3M0 disease can be divided into prognostically different subgroups according to the number of metastatic lymph nodes in the axilla and the nodal ratio; in this way, different patient subgroups may be offered different treatment strategies.

Prognostic significance of overexpression and phosphorylation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the presence of truncated EGFRvIII in locoregionally advanced breast cancer

PURPOSE

The prognostic value of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in breast cancer and more specifically, in patients with locoregionally advanced disease, is still undefined. We hypothesized that EGFR status plays a major prognostic role in this setting, through expression, activation, or the presence of its mutated variant EGFRvIII.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed tumor samples of 225 patients treated uniformly in prospective trials of high-dose chemotherapy for four to nine positive axillary nodes, > or = 10 positive nodes, or inflammatory carcinoma, and observed for a median of 9 years (range, 3 to 13 years). We analyzed the effect on outcome of expression of EGFR, phosphorylated EGFR (phospho-EGFR), and EGFRvIII, as studied by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

EGFR expression, phospho-EGFR, and mutated EGFRvIII were detected in 43%, 54%, and 4% of the patients, respectively. EGFR expression correlated with negative hormone receptor status, and was associated with significantly worse relapse-free survival (59% v 79%; P < .001) and overall survival (61% v 81%; P = .001) than no expression. There was no association of phospho-EGFR or EGFRvIII with outcome. Multivariate models confirmed the prognostic effect of EGFR independent of other known prognostic variables in this population. The prognostic value of EGFR was most prominent in the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) -positive and the estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor-negative subgroups.

CONCLUSION

EGFR expression, but not phospho-EGFR or EGFRvIII expression, is an independent adverse prognostic factor in patients with high-risk primary breast cancer, particularly when it is coexpressed with HER-2. Our results suggest the potential benefit of dual EGFR/HER-2 receptor targeting in this setting.

Prognostic analysis of tumour angiogenesis, determined by microvessel density and expression of vascular endothelial growth factor, in high-risk primary breast cancer patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy

In contrast to early breast cancer, the prognostic effect of tumour angiogenesis in tumours with advanced axillary spread has been less studied. We retrospectively analysed the effect of microvessel density (MVD) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) by immunohistochemistry on the outcome of 215 patients treated uniformly within prospective trials of high-dose chemotherapy for 4-9 and >/=10 positive nodes, and followed for a median of 9 (range 3-13) years. Microvessel density was associated with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression (P<0.001) and tumour size (P=0.001). Vascular endothelial growth factor overexpression (51% of patients) was associated with overexpression of EGFR (P=0.01) and HER2 (P<0.05), but not with MVD (P=0.3). High MVD was associated with worse relapse-free survival (74 vs 44%, P<0.001) and overall survival (76 vs 44%, P<0.001). Vascular endothelial growth factor overexpression had no effect on outcome. Multivariate analyses showed a prognostic effect of MVD independently of other known prognostic factors in this patient population. In conclusion, tumour angiogenesis, expressed as MVD, is a major independent prognostic factor in breast cancer patients with extensive axillary involvement.

Randomized trial of low-dose interleukin-2 vs cyclosporine A and interferon-γ after high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood progenitor support in women with high-risk primary breast cancer

High-risk primary breast cancer patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and stem cell support (SCS) have shown prolonged disease-free survival (DFS) in many studies; however, only one trial has demonstrated an overall survival benefit (OS). We hypothesize that the period following myeloablative therapy is ideal for immunologic manipulation and studied the effects of two different methods of immunotherapy following HDC with SCS aimed at the window of immune reconstitution. Seventy-two women with high-risk stage II or III breast cancer were randomized following HDC to receive either interleukin 2 (IL-2) at 1 million units/m(2) SQ daily for 28 days or combined cyclosporine A (CsA) at 1.25 mg/kg intravenously daily from day 0 to +28 and interferon gamma (IFN-gamma) 0.025 mg/m(2) SQ every 2 days from day +7 to +28. At a median follow-up of 67 months, no significant difference was observed in DFS or OS between the two treatment groups. The IL-2 arm had a 59% DFS (95% CI (0.45, 0.78)) and a 72% OS (95% CI (0.58, 0.88)) at 5 years. The CsA/INF-gamma arm had a similar outcome with a 55% DFS (95% CI (0.40, 0.76)) and a 78% OS (95% CI (0.65, 0.94)) at 5 years. Treatment was well tolerated, without increased toxicity.

Cost-effectiveness of intensive adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk breast cancer: is tailored and dose-escalated chemotherapy with growth factor support (GFS) more costly and less effective than marrow-supported high-dose chemotherapy - results from a randomized study

Based on randomized studies bone-marrow supported (BMS) high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) is not superior to conventional CT as adjuvant treatment for high-risk breast cancer. To compare the cost-effectiveness of these treatments we examined the data of Finnish patients in the SBG9401 trial 1. Patients were randomized to receive either dose-escalated (de FEC) (group A, n =59) or FEC and HDCT+BMS (group B, n =70). They received adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) + tamoxifen. All direct health care costs of first line treatment at the oncology units were considered as well as productivity costs within the first 3 years of follow-up. Effectiveness was measured by the number of survival days during 5 years of follow-up. The mean direct health care costs were significantly higher in group B (25829 euro in group A vs. 36605 euro in group B, p <0.001), mainly due to a higher number of hospital days. Half of the costs in group A was due to the use of filgrastim (15335 euro in A and 2969 euro in B, p <0.001). The costs of RT were only 5% of total costs. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the number of survival days, but sensitivity analysis based on bootstrapping suggested that treatment A would be a less costly and more effective alternative in a great majority of cases.

High dose chemotherapy for poor prognosis breast cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

High dose chemotherapy with autologous transplantation of bone marrow or peripheral stem cells (autograft) has been considered promising for treating poor prognosis breast cancer. We reviewed the relevant evidence.

METHODS

We included randomised controlled trials comparing high dose chemotherapy and autograft with conventional chemotherapy for women with early poor prognosis breast cancer. We searched medical databases (Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE), websites (co-operative cancer research groups, American Society of Clinical Oncologists) and citations of articles found, to September 2006. Where appropriate, data were pooled to obtain a relative risk, using a fixed effects model. Clinical, methodological and statistical heterogeneity were examined with sensitivity analyses.

FINDINGS

Thirteen trials with 5064 women were included. There was a significant benefit in event-free survival for the high dose group at three years (RR 1.19 (95% CI 1.06, 1.19)) and four years (RR 1.24 (95% CI 1.03, 1.50)) and at five years this benefit approached statistical significance (RR 1.06 (95% CI 1.00, 1.13)). Overall survival rates were not significantly different at any stage of follow up. There were significantly more treatment-related deaths on the high dose arm (RR 8.58 (95% CI 4.13, 17.80)). Morbidity was higher in the high dose group but there was no significant difference in the incidence of second cancers. The high dose group reported significantly worse quality of life immediately after treatment, but there were few differences by one year.

INTERPRETATION

There is insufficient evidence supporting routine use of high dose chemotherapy with autograft for treating early poor prognosis breast cancer.

Intensive dose-dense compared with high-dose adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk operable breast cancer: Southwest Oncology Group/Intergroup study 9623

PURPOSE

Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG)/Intergroup study 9623 was undertaken to compare treatment with an anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy regimen followed by high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell support (AHPCS) with a modern dose-dense dose-escalated (nonstandard) regimen including both an anthracycline and a taxane.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Participants in this phase III randomized study had operable breast cancer involving four or more axillary lymph nodes and had completed mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to receive four cycles of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by HDC with AHPCS or to receive sequential dose-dense and dose-escalated chemotherapy with doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and cyclophosphamide. The primary end point of this study was disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

Among 536 eligible patients, there was no significant difference between the two arms for DFS or overall survival (OS). Estimated five-year DFS was 80% (95% CI, 76% to 85%) for dose-dense therapy and 75% (95% CI, 69% to 80%) for transplantation. Estimated 5-year OS was 88% (95% CI, 84% to 92%) for dose-dense therapy and 84% (95% CI, 79% to 88%) for transplantation.

CONCLUSION

There is no evidence that transplantation was superior to dose-dense dose-escalated therapy. Transplantation was associated with an increase in toxicity and a possibly inferior outcome, although the hazard ratios were not significantly different from 1.

Breast cancer patients with 10 or more involved axillary lymph nodes treated by multimodality therapy: influence of clinical presentation on outcome

PURPOSE

To analyze tumor control and survival for breast cancer patients with 10 or more positive lymph nodes without systemic disease, treated by adjuvant radiation alone or combined-modality therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We reviewed the records of 309 consecutive patients with these characteristics who received locoregional radiotherapy (RT) at our institution. The majority of patients had clinical Stage II or IIIA-B disease (43% and 48%, respectively). The median number of positive axillary lymph nodes was 15 (range, 10-78). Adjuvant therapy consisted of RT alone, with or without chemotherapy, tamoxifen, and/or ovarian castration.

RESULTS

The overall 5-year and 10-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 20% and 7%, respectively. Median DFS was higher for patients with Stage I-II compared with those with Stage IIIABC (28 vs. 19 months; p = 0.006). Median DFS for patients aged <or=35 years was lower than that of older patients (12 vs. 24 months; p < 0.0001). Patients treated with a combination therapy had a higher 5-year DFS rate compared with those treated by RT alone (26% vs. 11%; p = 0.03). In multivariate analysis, clinical stage (III vs. I, II; relative risk = 1.8, p = 0.002) and age (<or=35 vs. others; relative risk = 2.6, p <0.001) were found to be independent variables for DFS.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective data analysis identified young age and advanced clinical stage as pertinent and independent clinical prognostic factors for breast cancer patients with advanced axillary disease (10 or more involved nodes). These factors can be used for further prognostic classification.

Long-term follow-up of the SBG 9401 study comparing tailored FEC-based therapy versus marrow-supported high-dose therapy

BACKGROUND

The purpose was to investigate adjuvant marrow-supportive high-dose chemotherapy compared with an equitoxicity-tailored comparator arm.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Five hundred and twenty-five women below the age of 60 years with operated high-risk primary breast cancer were randomised to nine cycles of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor supported and individually tailored FEC (5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide), (n = 251) or standard FEC followed by marrow-supported high-dose therapy with CTCb (cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, carboplatin) therapy (n = 274), followed by locoregional radiotherapy and tamoxifen for 5 years.

RESULTS

There were 104 breast cancer relapses in the tailored FEC group versus 139 in the CTCb group (double triangular method by Whitehead, P = 0.046), with a median follow-up of all included patients of 60.8 months. The event-free survival demonstrated 121 and 150 events in the tailored FEC- and CTCb group, respectively [P = 0.074, hazard ratio (HR) 0.804, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.633-1.022]. Ten patients in the tailored FEC regimen developed acute myeloid leukaemia (AML)/myelodysplasia (MDS). One hundred deaths occurred in the tailored FEC group and 121 in the CTCb group (P = 0.287, HR 0.866, 95% CI 0.665-1.129).

CONCLUSION

The update of this study shows an improved outcome linked to the tailored FEC treatment in relation to breast cancer relapse, but also an increased incidence of AML/MDS.

Randomized trial of high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell support for high-risk primary breast carcinoma: follow-up at 12 years

BACKGROUND

The authors previously reported results from a randomized trial of standard-dose chemotherapy with combined 5-fluorouracil (1000 mg/m2 per cycle), doxorubicin (50 mg/m2 per cycle), and cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2 per cycle) (FAC) versus FAC followed by high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous stem cell support (ASCS) for patients with high-risk primary breast carcinoma. After a median follow-up of 6.5 years, no significant differences were observed in recurrence-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS) between the 2 arms. This report updates the survival analyses.

METHODS

Patients with >or=10 positive axillary lymph nodes after primary surgery or >or=4 positive lymph nodes at surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were eligible. All patients were to receive 8 cycles of FAC. Patients were assigned randomly to receive either no further chemotherapy or 2 cycles of combined high-dose cyclophosphamide (5250 mg/m2 per cycle), etoposide (1200 mg/m2 per cycle), and cisplatin (165 mg/m2 per cycle) with ASCS. Primary endpoints were RFS and OS. RFS and OS were calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank statistic was used to compare treatment arms.

RESULTS

Between 1990 and 1997, 78 patients were registered, and 39 patients were assigned randomly to each arm. The median follow-up for all patients who were alive at last follow-up was 142.5 months (range, 45-169 months). An intention-to-treat analysis showed no significant difference between the 2 arms in terms of RFS (at 10 years: 40% with FAC vs. 26% with FAC plus HDCT; P=.11) or OS (at 10 years: 47% with FAC vs. 42% with FAC plus HDCT; P=.13).

CONCLUSIONS

With a median follow-up of nearly 12 years for patients who remained alive, this trial continued to demonstrate no RFS or OS advantage for patients with high-risk primary breast carcinoma treated with HDCT after standard-dose FAC chemotherapy.

Etoposide and illegitimate DNA double-strand break repair in the generation of MLL translocations: new insights and new questions

Faithful repair of chromosomal double-strand breaks (DSBs) is central to genome integrity and the suppression of genome rearrangements including translocations that are a hallmark of leukemia, lymphoma, and soft-tissue sarcomas [B. Elliott, M. Jasin, Double-strand breaks and translocations in cancer, Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 59 (2002) 373-385; D.C. van Gent, J.H. Hoeijmakers, R. Kanaar, Chromosomal stability and the DNA double-stranded break connection, Nat. Rev. Genet. 2 (2001) 196-206]. Chemotherapy agents that target the essential cellular enzyme topoisomerase II (topo II) are known promoters of DSBs and are associated with therapy-related leukemias. There is a clear clinical association between previous exposure to etoposide and therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) characterized by chromosomal rearrangements involving the mixed lineage leukemia (MLL) gene on chromosome band 11q23 [C.A. Felix, Leukemias related to treatment with DNA topoisomerase II inhibitors, Med. Pediatr. Oncol. 36 (2001) 525-535]. Most MLL rearrangements initiate within a well-characterized 8.3 kb region that contains both putative topo II cleavage recognition sequences and repetitive elements leading to the logical hypothesis that MLL is particularly susceptible to aberrant cleavage and homology-mediated fusion to repetitive elements located on novel chromosome partners. In this review, we will discuss the findings and implications of recent attempts to confirm this hypothesis.

Controversies in breast cancer: adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy

Initial randomised studies of chemotherapy and endocrine therapy showed that systemic treatments had a substantial impact on the survival of women with early breast cancer. The original assumption was that the efficacy of these treatments was limited to those patients presenting with more adverse prognostic features. Subsequently, meta-analyses of randomised trials revealed that the benefits of chemotherapy and endocrine therapy are not mutually exclusive and extend to all the prognostic subgroups. However, the absolute benefit varies according to baseline characteristics such as tumour stage and other biological factors. Over the last 10 years, considerable progress has been made with the introduction of new drugs into the adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment of women with breast cancer. Taxanes and third-generation aromatase inhibitors are providing proof of additional benefits compared with standard reference treatments. In parallel, research on the biology of breast cancer is establishing novel prognostic and predictive factors, which may allow better treatment tailoring. Currently, however, women with early breast cancer and their doctors face the difficult task of making therapeutic decisions often based on early results from positive studies. In a disease where follow up is crucial to fully assess the benefit and long-term toxicities of an intervention, current knowledge leaves unanswered questions that generate debate and controversy. This review will summarise recent results from randomised trials of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy in women with early breast cancer and focus on the current controversies.

Cardiac toxicity of trastuzumab in metastatic breast cancer patients previously treated with high-dose chemotherapy: a retrospective study

HER-2 overexpression is associated to a poor prognosis in high-risk and metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy (HDC). HER-2 status is also a predictive factor and when trastuzumab is administered in combination with or sequentially to chemotherapy, a significant disease-free and/or overall survival improvement has been observed in HER-2+ early and MBC. Unfortunately, in both settings, trastuzumab is associated with an increased risk of cardiac dysfunction (CD). We have reviewed the clinical charts of HER-2-overexpressing MBC patients treated with trastuzumab after HDC. Age, baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), radiation therapy on cardiac area, exposure to anthracycline, single or multiple transplant, high-dose agents, trastuzumab treatment duration were recorded as potential risk factors. In total, 53 patients have been included in the analysis. Median LVEF at baseline was 60.5%; at the end of trastuzumab (data available for 28 patients only), it was 55% (P = 0.01). Five out of the 28 (17.9%) patients experienced CD. Two out of 53 (3.8%) patients developed a congestive heart failure. Age > or = 50 years and multiple transplant procedure were potential risk factors for CD. The overall incidence of CD observed in this population of HER-2+ MBC patients treated with trastuzumab after HDC is not superior to that reported with concomitant trastuzumab and anthracyclines. However, patients with age > or = 50 years or receiving multiple course of HDC should be considered at risk for CD.

Efficacy of high-dose alkylating chemotherapy in HER2/neu-negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND

High-dose chemotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer has been abandoned by many.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

885 patients with stage III primary breast cancer and four or more axillary lymph node metastases were randomised to receive either five courses of FEC (fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide) followed by radiation therapy and tamoxifen, or the same treatment but with high-dose alkylating chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, thiotepa and carboplatin) replacing the fifth course of FEC. Of these patients, 621 had HER2/neu-negative disease, as determined by immunohistochemistry and chromogenic in situ hybridisation.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 84 months, a trend for a better relapse-free survival was observed in the high-dose arm: (hazard ratio (HR) 0.84, P = 0.076, two-sided). The 621 patients with HER2/neu-negative disease benefited from high-dose therapy, while patients with HER2/neu-positive disease did not (test for interaction, P = 0.006). There was a marked relapse-free survival benefit for patients with HER2/neu-negative disease (71.5% versus 59.1%, 5 years after randomisation; HR 0.68, P = 0.002) and also a survival benefit (78.2% versus 71.0% at 5 years; HR 0.72, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings from this subgroup analysis provide additional evidence that HER2/neu-positive breast cancer is relatively resistant to alkylating agents. For HER2/neu-negative tumours, however, high-dose chemotherapy should remain the subject of clinical studies.

Controversies in the therapy of early stage breast cancer

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among U.S. women, with more than 200,000 new cases diagnosed annually. In the U.S., mortality from breast cancer has declined in recent years as a result of more widespread screening, leading to earlier detection, as well as advances in the adjuvant treatment of early-stage disease. It is widely accepted that the appropriate use of adjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy improves the disease-free and overall survival of patients with early-stage breast cancer. It is, therefore, standard clinical practice to administer adjuvant systemic therapy to patients with node-positive and high-risk, node-negative breast cancer. There remain, however, many controversies in the primary systemic therapy of breast cancer, which are discussed in this review.

Multicycle Dose-Intensive Chemotherapy for Women With High-Risk Primary Breast Cancer: Results of International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial 15-95

Purpose

To compare adjuvant dose-intensive epirubicin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy administered with filgrastim and progenitor cell support (DI-EC) with standard-dose anthracycline-based chemotherapy (SD-CT) for patients with early-stage breast cancer and a high risk of relapse, defined as stage II disease with 10 or more positive axillary nodes; or an estrogen receptor–negative or stage III tumor with five or more positive axillary nodes.

Patients and Methods

Three hundred forty-four patients were randomized after surgery to receive seven cycles of SD-CT over 22 weeks, or three cycles of DI-EC (epirubicin 200 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 4 gm/m2 with filgrastim and progenitor cell support) over 6 weeks. All patients were assigned tamoxifen at the completion of chemotherapy. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS).

Results

After a median follow-up of 5.8 years (range, 3 to 8.4 years), 188 DFS events had occurred (DI-EC, 86 events; SD-CT, 102 events). The 5-year DFS was 52% for DI-EC and 43% for SD-CT, with hazard ratio of DI-EC compared with SD-CT of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.58 to 1.02; P = .07). The 5-year overall survival was 70% for DI-EC and 61% for SD-CT, with a hazard ratio of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.56 to 1.11; P = .17). There were eight cases (5%) of anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy (two fatal) among those who received DI-EC. Women with hormone receptor–positive tumors benefited significantly from DI-EC.

Conclusion

There was a trend in favor of DI-EC with respect to disease-free survival. A larger trial or meta-analysis will be required to reveal the true effect of dose-intensive therapy.

Prognostic and predictive effects of immunohistochemical factors in high-risk primary breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

To analyze prognostic and predictive effects of immunohistochemical factors within a randomized study of high-dose versus standard-dose chemotherapy in high-risk breast cancer with >10 involved lymph nodes.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Histopathologic specimens in 188 of 302 patients were analyzed for Ki-67, p16, maspin, Bcl-2, Her2/neu, and p53.

RESULTS

In a univariate analysis after adjustment for therapy, tumor size, and estrogen receptor, Her2/neu positivity (P = 0.001) was a negative and Bcl2 positivity (P = 0.003) was a positive prognostic factor for event-free survival. In a multivariate analysis, Her2/neu positivity (hazard ratio, 3.68; 95% confidence interval, 2.01-6.73; P = 0.0001) had a negative influence on event-free survival, whereas p53 positivity (hazard ratio, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.95; P = 0.03) and Bcl2 positivity (hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.64; P = 0.0006) were associated with a better event-free survival. Analyzing the predictive effect of the immunohistochemical factors, an interaction between p53 and treatment could be shown (P = 0.005). The hazard ratio for high-dose chemotherapy versus standard chemotherapy is estimated as 2.3 (95% confidence interval, 0.67-7.92) in p53-negative patients and as 0.46 (95% confidence interval, 0.2-1.07) in p53-positive patients, which indicates a superiority of high-dose chemotherapy in p53-positive patients and an inferiority in p53-negative patients. No interactive effect could be shown for the other factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Her2/neu and Bcl-2 are prognostic but not predictive factors in patients with high-risk primary breast cancer; p53-positive patients might benefit more from high-dose chemotherapy than from standard chemotherapy, and p53-negative patients might benefit more from standard chemotherapy than from high-dose therapy.

Five-Year Update of an Expanded Phase II Study of Dose-Dense and -Intense Doxorubicin, Paclitaxel and Cyclophosphamide (ATC) in High-Risk Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of dose-dense and -intense sequential doxorubicin (A), paclitaxel (T) and cyclophosphamide (C) as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer (BC) with >or=4 ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes.

METHODS

Patients were recruited after BC surgery if >or=4 axillary nodes were involved by metastatic cancer. Planned treatment was A 90 mg/m(2) three times every 14 days (q14d x 3), T 250 mg/m(2) q14d x 3 and C 3 g/m(2) q14d x 3 combined with filgrastim support.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 85 eligible patients. The median number of lymph nodes involved was 9. Mean dose intensity was >94% of planned for each drug. Common grade 3 toxicities included nausea and/or vomiting (24%), mucositis (18%), neuropathy (16%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (12%), myalgia (6%) and arthralgia (6%). Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 77 (91%) patients, and 32 (38%) patients had neutropenic fever. One patient developed acute leukemia. Sixty-nine (81%) patients are alive, and 59 (69%) patients are alive and free of distant disease at a median follow-up of 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

ATC is a feasible regimen for adjuvant therapy of high-risk BC, with a relatively low rate of relapse at the 5-year follow up.

Phase II study of dose-dense sequential doxorubicin and docetaxel for patients with advanced operable and inoperable breast cancer

Rapid sequential delivery of doxorubicin 75 mg/m2 q 2 weeksx3 cycles followed by docetaxel 100 mg/m2 q 2 weeksx3 cycles, with filgrastim support was evaluated in patients with inoperable and large operable breast cancers who were not initially candidates for breast conservation therapy. Postoperative CMF chemotherapy and/or radiation were administered based on surgical findings. Median age of the 39 enrolled patients was 47 (range 27-59), stage IIA (6 patients), IIB (14 patients), IIIA (10 patients), IIIB (9 patients), and 23 patients (59%) had clinical nodal involvement. The average bidimensional tumor size before treatment was 30 cm2. Clinical responses included 13 (33%) complete responses, 23 (59%) partial responses, 1 stable disease, and 2 progressive disease, for an overall response rate of 92%. Clinical response rate was 11/13(85%) in HER2/neu positive patients compared to 25/26 (96%) in tumors that did not express HER2/neu. Twenty patients (51%) underwent breast conservation surgery. Pathologic tumor response at the time of definitive surgery included 4 pathologic CR (pCR, 10%), 4 microscopic invasion (pINV), and 14 (36%) pathologically negative axillary nodes. pCR was not observed in any HER2/neu positive patients. 5/39 patients were unable to complete all cycles of docetaxel and 8 patients required dose reduction of docetaxel due to development of grade 3-4 mucositis and hand-foot syndrome. This observation prompted a protocol change requiring 3 weeks between doxorubicin and docetaxel. Primary chemotherapy with dose-dense doxorubicin and docetaxel given sequentially is well tolerated and allows a high rate of breast sparing in patients with large breast cancers.

Reversibility of trastuzumab-related cardiotoxicity: new insights based on clinical course and response to medical treatment

PURPOSE

Trastuzumab is an important biologic agent with significant activity in breast cancers that overexpress the HER2/neu marker. However, trastuzumab is associated with cardiotoxicity that has not yet been fully explored. We present our experience with patients who developed trastuzumab-related cardiotoxicity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Over a 4-year period, 38 patients with HER2/neu-positive breast cancer were referred for suspected trastuzumab-related cardiotoxicity. All patients had previously received anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Results After doxorubicin but before trastuzumab, the mean (+/- standard deviation) left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 0.61 +/- 0.13, and the LVEF decreased to 0.43 +/- 0.16 after trastuzumab (P < .0001). After withdrawal of trastuzumab, the LVEF increased to 0.56 +/- 0.11. Mean time to recovery of LVEF was 1.5 months and was temporally associated with medical treatment in 32 (84%) of the 38 patients but occurred without treatment in six patients (16%). Increases in LVEF were noted in 37 of the 38 patients. Twenty-five of these patients were re-treated with trastuzumab; three patients had recurrent left ventricular dysfunction, but 22 patients (88%) did not. All re-treatment patients continued on their therapeutic regimen for heart failure when rechallenged with trastuzumab. Nine patients underwent endomyocardial biopsy. Ultrastructural changes were not seen.

CONCLUSION

Patients who develop cardiotoxicity while receiving trastuzumab therapy generally improve on removal of the agent. The mechanism of trastuzumab-related cardiac dysfunction is different from that of anthracycline cardiotoxicity, in part, demonstrated by the absence of anthracycline-like ultrastructural changes. Reintroducing trastuzumab may be appropriate for some individuals who previously have experienced trastuzumab-related cardiac dysfunction.

Comparison of rapidly cycled tandem high-dose chemotherapy plus peripheral-blood stem-cell support versus dose-dense conventional chemotherapy for adjuvant treatment of high-risk breast cancer: results of a multicentre phase III trial

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer with extensive axillary-lymph-node involvement has a poor prognosis after conventional treatment. In trials with historical controls, high-dose chemotherapy produced improved outcomes. We compared an intensive double-cycle high-dose chemotherapy regimen with an accelerated conventionally dosed regimen in high-risk breast cancer in a multicentre trial.

METHODS

Patients with at least nine positive nodes were randomly assigned either two courses of accelerated (2-week intervals, with filgrastim support), conventionally dosed epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by two courses of high-dose chemotherapy (epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, and thiotepa supported by peripheral-blood progenitors) or four identical cycles of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by three cycles of accelerated cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil. The primary endpoint was event-free survival. Analyses were done both by intention to treat and per protocol.

FINDINGS

403 patients were enrolled; 201 were assigned high-dose chemotherapy and 202 conventional treatment. The mean number of positive nodes was 17.6, and median follow-up was 48.6 months. 4-year event-free survival (intention-to-treat analysis) was 60% (95% CI 53-67) in the high-dose chemotherapy group and 44% (37-52) in the control group (p=0.00069). The corresponding overall survival was 75% (69-82) versus 70% (64-77; p=0.02). There were no treatment-related deaths.

INTERPRETATION

Our finding of significant improvements in both event-free and overall survival for high-dose chemotherapy compared with a dose-dense conventional regimen contrasts with the results of other studies. The discrepancy might be due partly to design differences (tandem, brief induction) between our regimen and those studied in other trials. This approach merits further study.

Fatigue and Relating Factors in High-Risk Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Adjuvant Standard or High-Dose Chemotherapy: A Longitudinal Study

Purpose

Determine whether standard or high-dose chemotherapy leads to changes in fatigue, hemoglobin (Hb), mental health, muscle and joint pain, and menopausal status from pre- to post-treatment and to evaluate whether fatigue is associated with these factors in disease-free breast cancer patients.

Patients and Methods

Eight hundred eighty-five patients were randomly assigned between two chemotherapy regimens both followed by radiotherapy and tamoxifen. Fatigue was assessed using vitality scale (score ≤ 46 defined as fatigue), poor mental health using mental health scale (score ≤ 56 defined as poor mental health) both of Short-Form 36, muscle and joint pain with Rotterdam Symptom Checklist, and Hb levels were assessed before and 1, 2, and 3 years after chemotherapy.

Results

Fatigue was reported in 20% of 430 assessable patients (202 standard-dose, 228 high-dose) with at least a 3-year follow-up, without change over time or difference between treatment arms. Mean Hb levels were lower following high-dose chemotherapy. Only 5% of patients experienced fatigue and anemia. Mental health score was the strongest fatigue predictor at all assessment moments. Menopausal status had no effect on fatigue. Linear mixed effect models showed that the higher the Hb level (P = .0006) and mental health score (P < .0001), the less fatigue was experienced. Joint (P < .0001) and muscle pain (P = .0283) were associated with more fatigue.

Conclusion

In 3 years after treatment, no significant differences in fatigue were found between standard and high-dose chemotherapy. Fatigue did not change over time. The strongest fatigue predictor was poor mental health.

High-dose therapy for breast cancer - a case of suspended animation

The role of high-dose chemotherapy in breast cancer is still controversial despite 20 years of clinical studies. Several nonrandomized studies had demonstrated improvement for patients with primary breast cancer. This led to the premature acceptance of high-dose therapy as a new standard of care for patients with high-risk breast cancer. There followed a phase of disillusionment after some of the randomized studies did not show any significant benefit and after a case of scientific misconduct. High-dose chemotherapy studies in breast cancer have been unpopular for the last 5 years. There is new evidence that warrants a new critical look. Fourteen randomized studies with a total of 5,592 patients have been carried out in patients with high-risk breast cancer on adjuvant therapy. Some of them showed significant improvement; others are coming to maturation now. In all randomized studies high-dose therapy in metastatic breast cancer leads to an equivalent or better disease-free survival, but because of their low power, none of these studies achieved an improvement in overall survival. It is thus necessary to perform a meta-analysis of all these studies to acquire insight into the choice of high-dose regimens. It is further necessary to look at the biology of breast cancer in the context of high-dose chemotherapy studies.

A multicenter randomized clinical trial evaluating interleukin-2 activated hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and post-transplant IL-2 for high risk breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

This Phase III randomized multicenter trial compared progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for autologous peripheral blood stem cell (aPBSC) transplantation with or without immunotherapy in high-risk breast cancer patients.

METHODS

Eligible patients had American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 5th Edition Stage II/IIIA with > or = 4 axillary nodes, Stage IIIB, or chemotherapy-sensitive or stable Stage IV disease. Following treatment with cyclophosphamide, thiotepa and carboplatin (STAMP V), patients were randomized to aPBSC transplant with or without immunotherapy. Patients on immunotherapy received cells that were incubated in interleukin-2 (IL-2) for 24 h followed by parenteral IL-2 for 5 days then 2 days of rest for 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients were treated (35 Stage II/IIIA; 13 Stage IIIB; 11 Stage IV), 30 patients were randomized to immunotherapy and 29 patients to no immunotherapy. Neutrophils engrafted a median of 10 days post-transplant in both groups. The median times to platelet engraftment were 9 and 10 days after transplant in the no-immunotherapy and immunotherapy groups, respectively (p = 0.03). There was no statistical evidence (p = 0.61) of a difference in progression-free and surviving (PFS) at 3 years for patients receiving immunotherapy (53%) compared with no immunotherapy (48%). There was some evidence of superiority in overall survival (OS) at 3 years for patients receiving immunotherapy (83%) compared with no immunotherapy (69%), but the difference between survival curves was not statistically significant (p = 0.08). Also, there was some evidence that patients developing acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) had superior PFS (p = 0.02) but not OS (p = 0.19) than patients not developing aGVHD. Toxicities were transient and similar between groups, with no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

This phase III study of high-risk breast cancer patients randomized to immunotherapy or no immunotherapy demonstrated that a well-tolerated immunotherapy regimen added to aPBSC transplant did not improve PFS, but there was some improvement in OS, but not by an amount that was statistically significant (p = 0.08).

Cardiac toxicity of high-dose chemotherapy

Cardiac toxicity is an uncommon but potentially serious complication of high-dose (HD) chemotherapy and little is known about incidence, severity and underlying mechanisms. We have systematically reviewed the literature of the last 30 years to summarize and appraise the published evidence on cardiac toxicity associated with HD chemotherapy. HD cyclophosphamide-containing regimens have been most commonly associated with cardiac toxicity, with a progressively decreasing incidence over time. Dosage, application regimens and coadministration of other chemotherapeutic agents emerged as risk factors. While cardiac toxicity has been rarely associated with other cytotoxic drugs, an unexpected incidence of severe cardiotoxicity resulted from reduced-intensity conditioning regimens containing melphalan and fludarabine. Predictive value of cardiologic examination of patients is limited, and patients with a slight depression of cardiac performance could tolerate HD chemotherapy. Clinical examination, resting electrocardiography and dosage adjustment in overweight patients remain the mainstay of prevention, with bidimensional echocardiography (2D echo) for patients with a history of anthracycline exposure. Strategies to decrease the long-term negative impact of anthracycline administration on cardiac performance are being investigated. New 2D echo-based techniques and circulating markers of cardiac function hold promise for allowing identification of patients at high risk for and early diagnosis of cardiac toxicity.

High-dose mitoxantrone–vinblastine–cyclophosphamide and autologous stem cell transplantation for stage III breast cancer: final results of a prospective multicentre study

BACKGROUND

Stage III breast cancer patients continue to suffer high relapse and death rates despite standard chemotherapy regimens. High-dose alkylator chemotherapy does not further improve outcome. This phase II study evaluated a novel high-dose chemotherapy regimen which combined active breast cancer agents with differing mechanisms of action.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligibility included at least seven involved axillary nodes (AxLNs) for tumours <5 cm, at least four AxLNs for tumours >5 cm or locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). Patients received four cycles of fluorouracil-adriamycin-cyclophosphamide (FAC) followed by one cycle of mitoxantrone 63 mg/m(2)-vinblastine 12.5 mg/m(2)-cyclophosphamide 6 g/m(2) (MVC) with autologous blood stem cell transplantation (ASCT).

RESULTS

Between April 1995 and December 1998, 92 patients aged 21-65 years (median 45 years) were enrolled, of whom 25 were treated preoperatively for LABC and 67 were treated postoperatively. Although there was no early treatment-related mortality, one late death occurred from secondary acute myeloid leukaemia. The 7-year event-free and overall survival rates were 53% (95% confidence interval 42-64%) and 62% (95% CI 52-73%), respectively, with no significant difference between pre- and postoperative groups.

CONCLUSION

FAC followed by MVC-ASCT is feasible and reasonably well tolerated, but does not result in improved survival rates compared with other conventional or high-dose regimens for stage III breast cancer.

Establishing a platform for immunotherapy: clinical outcome and study of immune reconstitution after high-dose chemotherapy with progenitor cell support in breast cancer patients

Tumor vaccine after high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) aims at directing immune recovery toward tumor responses after optimizing minimal residual disease. We have characterized T-cell recovery and tumor response after a regimen devised as a platform for such immunotherapy. One hundred patients with high-risk or metastatic breast cancer received 3 to 7 cycles of paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide (overall response rate, 78%) and then HDC with melphalan and etoposide. Seventy-one patients received HDC and ASCT (no mortality at 100 days). At 24 months after transplantation, progression-free and overall survival probabilities for patients with stage IIIA, IIIB, and IV disease were 82%, 81%, and 42% and 100%, 94%, and 68%, respectively. The median progression-free and overall survivals from entry on study for stage IV patients were 15.3 and 38.1 months, respectively. CD3 + , CD8 + , and CD4 + cells were severely depleted after ASCT. Although total CD8 + T-cell numbers approached the normal range by 3 months, most of these cells were CD28 - . Naive CD45RA + CD4 + T cells approached the normal range only 18 months after ASCT and only in younger patients. The described observations provide the basis for devising a strategy for cancer vaccine administration after ASCT. Incorporating immune reconstitution enhancement after ASCT may be advantageous.

Drug-Metabolizing Enzyme Polymorphisms Predict Clinical Outcome in a Node-Positive Breast Cancer Cohort

Purpose

Adjuvant chemotherapy cures only a subset of women with nonmetastatic breast cancer. Genotypes in drug-metabolizing enzymes, including functional polymorphisms in cytochrome P450 (CYP) and glutathione S-transferases (GST), may predict treatment-related outcomes.

Patients and Methods

We examined CYP3A4*1B, CYP3A5*3, and deletions in GST μ (GSTM1) and θ (GSTT1), as well as a priori–defined combinations of polymorphisms in these genes. Using a cohort of 90 node-positive breast cancer patients who received anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy followed by high-dose multiagent chemotherapy with stem-cell rescue, we estimated the effect of genotype and other known prognostic factors on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

Patients who carried homozygous CYP3A4*1B and CYP3A5*3 variants and did not carry homozygous deletions in both GSTM1 and GSTT1 (denoted low-drug genotype group) had a 4.9-fold poorer DFS (P = .021) and a four-fold poorer OS (P = .031) compared with individuals who did not carry any CYP3A4*1B or CYP3A5*3 variants but had deletions in both GSTT1 and GSTM1 (denoted high-drug genotype group). After adjustment for other significant prognostic factors, the low-drug genotype group retained a significantly poorer DFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 4.9; 95% CI, 1.7 to 14.6; P = .004) and OS (HR = 4.8; 95% CI, 1.8 to 12.9; P = .002) compared with the high- and intermediate-drug combined genotype group. In the multivariate model, having low-drug genotype group status had a greater impact on clinical outcome than estrogen receptor status.

Conclusion

Combined genotypes at CYP3A4, CYP3A5, GSTM1, and GSTT1 influence the probability of treatment failure after high-dose adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer.

High dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow or stem cell transplantation versus conventional chemotherapy for women with early poor prognosis breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Overall survival rates are disappointing for women with early poor prognosis breast cancer. Autologous transplantation of bone marrow or peripheral stem cells (in which the patient is both donor and recipient) has been considered a promising technique because it allows much higher doses of chemotherapy to be used.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness of high dose chemotherapy and autograft versus conventional chemotherapy for women with early poor prognosis breast cancer. Outcomes were survival rates, toxicity and quality of life.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group specialised register, The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2004), MEDLINE (1966 to November 2004), EMBASE (1980 to November 2004), PsycINFO (1984 to November 2004), Cinahl (1982 to November 2004), web sites of co-operative research groups and ASCO (American Society of Clinical Oncologists) and reference lists of articles found.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing high dose chemotherapy and autograft versus conventional chemotherapy for women with early poor prognosis breast cancer.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Fifteen trials were considered. Thirteen were included and two were excluded. Three independent reviewers extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

Analysis included 2535 women randomised to receive high dose chemotherapy with autograft and 2529 randomised to receive conventional chemotherapy. There were 65 treatment-related deaths on the high dose arm and four on the conventional dose arm (RR 8.58 (95% CI 4.13, 17.80). Many studies have not completed follow-up and have reported only preliminary results. There was a statistically significant benefit in event-free survival for women in the high dose group at three years (RR 1.12 (95% CI 1.06, 1.19)) and at four years (RR 1.30 (95% CI 1.16, 1.45)). At five and six years there was no statistically significant difference between the groups in event-free survival. With respect to overall survival, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups at any stage of follow up. Morbidity was more common and more severe in the high dose group. However there was no statistically significant difference between the groups with respect to the incidence of second cancers at five to seven years' follow up. Women in the high dose group reported significantly worse quality of life scores immediately after treatment, but few statistically significant differences were found between the groups by one year.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to support the routine use of high dose chemotherapy with autograft for women with early poor prognosis breast cancer.

High-dose chemotherapy of cyclophosphamide, thiotepa and carboplatin (CTCb) followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation as a consolidation for breast cancer patients with 10 or more positive lymph nodes: a 5-year follow-up results

PURPOSE

The benefit of consolidation high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) for high-risk primary breast cancer is controversial. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of consolidation HDC with cyclophosphamide, thiotepa and carboplatin (CTCb) followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) in resected breast cancer patients with 10 or more positive lymph nodes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between December 1994 and April 2000, 22 patients were enrolled. All patients received 2 to 6 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery for breast cancer. The HDC regimen consisted of cyclophosphamide 1,500 mg/m(2)/day, thiotepa 125 mg/m(2)/day and carboplatin 200 mg/m(2)/day intravenous for 4 consecutive days.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 58 months, 11 patients recurred and died. The median disease-free survival (DFS) and median overall survival (OS) were 49 and 69 months, respectively. The 5-year DFS and OS rates were 50% and 58%, respectively. The 12 patients with 10 to 18 involved nodes had better 5-year DFS (67%) and OS (75%) than 10 patients with more than 18 involved nodes (30% and 38%, respectively). The most common grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicity was diarrhea, which occurred in 5 patients (23%). No treatment-related death was observed.

CONCLUSION

Consolidation HDC with CTCb followed by ASCT for resected breast cancer with more than 10 positive nodes had an acceptable toxicity but does not show promising survival.

Evaluation of the effect of age on treatment-related mortality and relapse in patients with high-risk primary breast cancer receiving high-dose chemotherapy

There are contradictory results regarding a potential increased responsiveness of younger women with high-risk primary breast cancer to high-dose compared with standard-dose chemotherapy. Observations from some, but not all, randomized trials, suggest that the potential benefit of high-dose treatment may be limited to younger patients. We analyzed, at median follow-up of 8 years, the prognostic effect of age in 264 patients enrolled in prospective phase II and III trials of high-dose chemotherapy, using a uniform regimen. Median age was 49 (range, 36-71). Among patients < or = 49 and > 49 years of age, the relapse rates were 27% and 25%, respectively (P = 0.7). In those age groups, the transplant-related mortality rates were 6.5% and 4%, respectively (P = 0.8). No age differences were observed between patients surviving transplant (median age 49) and those who experienced transplant-related mortality (median 47.5) (P = 0.9). Event-free survival (P = 0.3) and overall survival (P = 0.4) did not differ between patients < or = 49 and > 49 years of age. In conclusion, we did not detect a detrimental effect of older age on transplant-related mortality or relapse after high-dose chemotherapy for high-risk primary breast cancer at long-term follow-up. The debate about the age effect in this population remains unsettled.

Relevance of high-dose chemotherapy in solid tumours

Drug resistance is a major problem in the treatment of solid tumours. Based on a steep dose-response relationship for especially alkylating agents on tumour cell survival, high-dose chemotherapy was considered of interest for the treatment of solid tumours. Results of phase 1 and 2 studies with high-dose chemotherapy in a variety of tumour types showed good response rates. Nowadays, several phase 3 studies are available especially in metastatic and high-risk breast cancer patients. The high expectations of high-dose chemotherapy did not come true. This review analyses results of randomised studies and comments on the discrepancy between findings in patients versus those in tissue culture. Potential factors involved are the presence of tumour stem cells with different characteristics from more mature tumour cells, limitations in drug escalation in the clinic, transplant mortality, trial design and tumour cell contamination of the haematopoietic stem cell transplant. Maturation of the results from recent studies indicating a more modest benefit in, e.g., adjuvant breast cancer balanced versus long-term side effects will ultimately determine the role of high-dose chemotherapy in certain solid tumours. In case of well-defined indications for high-dose chemotherapy, further selection of patients based on patient and tumour characteristics as well as the introduction of new agents will most likely play a role.

High dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation as adjuvant therapy for primary breast cancer patients with four or more lymph nodes involved: long-term results of an international randomised trial

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess whether a short course of anthracycline containing chemotherapy followed by high dose therapy with autologous stem-cell support improves disease-free and overall survival as compared with conventional, anthracycline containing chemotherapy, in patients with primary breast cancer and four or more histologically involved lymph nodes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred and eighty one patients entered into a randomised clinical trial were allocated to receive standard, conventional treatment (5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide-FEC for six cycles) or FEC for three cycles followed by high dose therapy consisting of cyclophosphamide, thiotepa and carboplatin and stem cell rescue (HDT). To be eligible, patients had to be free of overt metastatic disease and be < or =60 years of age. Analyses were according to intention to treat.

RESULTS

At a median follow up of 68 months, 118 patients have experienced a relapse or death from breast cancer (62 in the FEC followed by HDT arm and 56 in the conventional FEC arm) and a total of 100 patients have died (54 in the FEC followed by HDT arm and 46 in the conventional FEC arm). No significant difference was observed in relapse-free survival [hazard ratio 1.06, 95% CI 0.74-1.52, p = 0.76] or overall survival [hazard ratio 1.18, 95% CI 0.80-1.75, p = 0.40]. Five patients died from treatment related causes, three as a consequence of HDT and two in the conventional FEC arm.

CONCLUSIONS

At the present time, no benefit has been observed from replacing three cycles of conventional chemotherapy with the HDT regimen described here. Patients should continue to receive conventional chemotherapy as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer.

Prospective, randomized comparison of high-dose chemotherapy with stem-cell support versus intermediate-dose chemotherapy after surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy in women with high-risk primary breast cancer: a report of CALGB 9082, SWOG 9114, and NCIC MA-13

PURPOSE

The prognosis for women with primary breast cancer involving multiple axillary nodes remains poor. High-dose chemotherapy with stem-cell support produced promising results in initial clinical trials conducted at single institutions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seven hundred eighty-five women aged 22 to 66 years with stage IIA, IIB, or IIIA breast cancer involving 10 or more axillary lymph nodes were randomized after surgery and standard adjuvant chemotherapy to either high-dose cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, and carmustine (HD-CPB) with stem-cell support or intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, and carmustine (ID-CPB) with G-CSF support but without stem cells. Planned treatment for all patients included locoregional radiation therapy. Hormone-receptor-positive patients were to receive 5 years of tamoxifen. Event-free survival (EFS) was the primary end point.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 7.3 years. Event-free survival was not significantly different between the two treatment groups (P = .24). The probability of being free of an event at 5 years with HD-CPB was 61% (95% CI, 56% to 65%), and was 58% (95% CI, 53% to 63%) for ID-CPB. Thirty-three patients died of causes attributed to HD-CPB, compared with no therapy-related deaths among women treated with ID-CPB. Overall survival for the two arms was identical at 71% at 5 years (P = .75).

CONCLUSION

HD-CPB with stem-cell support was not superior to ID-CPB for event-free or overall survival among all randomized women with high-risk primary breast cancer.

The analysis of relapse-free survival curves: implications for evaluating intensive systemic adjuvant treatment regimens for breast cancer

Results of adjuvant dose intensification studies in patients with localised breast cancer have raised questions regarding the clinical usefulness of this treatment strategy. Here, we develop and fit a natural history model for the time to clinical tumour recurrence as a function of the number of involved lymph nodes, and derive plausible predictions of the effects of dose intensification under various conditions. The time to tumour recurrence is assumed to depend on the residual postoperative micrometastatic burden of tumour, the fractional reduction of residual tumour burden (RTB) by treatment, and the rate of regrowth of the RTB to a clinically detectable size. It is assumed that a proportion of micrometastatic tumours are unresponsive to adjuvant chemotherapy even at maximal dose intensity. Data fitted included the San Antonio Cancer Institute (SACI) database of untreated patients, and CALGB #9082, a study comparing a highly intensive and moderately intensity adjuvant regimen in patients with 10+ positive axillary nodes. The proportion of tumours unresponsive to maximally intensive adjuvant treatment is estimated to be 48% (29-67%). The estimated log kill for intermediate-dose therapy from CALGB #9082 was 6.5 logs, compared with 9 logs or greater for high-dose therapy. The model is consistent with a modest but nonnegligible advantage of dose intensification compared with standard therapies in patients with sensitive tumours who have 10+ positive axillary nodes, and suggests that much of this clinical benefit could be achieved using intermediate levels of treatment intensification. The model further suggests that, in patients with fewer than 10 involved axillary nodes, any advantage of treatment intensification over standard therapy would be much reduced, because in patients with smaller tumour burdens of sensitive tumour, a larger proportion of cures achievable with intensified therapy could be achieved as well with standard therapy.

Cost of cancer clinical trials in elderly patients

Of all cancers, > 50% currently occur in individuals >or= 65 years of age and this figure is expected to rise to 70% by 2030, due to a progressive expansion of the older population [1]. Clinical trials are needed in order to establish the benefits and risks of antineoplastic treatment in older individuals. It is reasonable to expect that the costs of these trials may be higher than in younger individuals, as older patients are more vulnerable to therapeutic complications and may need more supportive care, and the benefits of treatment may be less because of a reduced life-expectancy and competitive causes of death [2]. This article explores a cost-effective approach to clinical trials in older individuals, after reviewing the basic concepts of economic analysis and unique aspects of geriatric oncology that may affect the cost of treatment. In the process, the cost differences of cancer treatment in younger and older patients will be explored.

Reflections on Ethical Concerns Arising from the Incorporation of Results of Randomized Trials of Antineoplastic Therapy into Routine Clinical Practice

There has been little discussion in the medical literature regarding the process whereby physicians elect to accept or reject the incorporation of results of randomized trials into their routine clinical practice. This decision-making process has the potential to result in serious ethical dilemmas.