Human epidermal Langerhans' cells are targets for the immunosuppressive macrolide tacrolimus (FK506)

Mechanisms of action of topical therapies and the rationale for combination therapy

The advent of new topical agents such as topical calcineurin inhibitors, as well as the reformulations of older agents in new vehicles, has broadened the treatment approaches to psoriasis and atopic dermatitis. The clinician must now consider additional novel physiologic pathways and mechanisms of action as well as expanding options for combination therapy. Combination therapy is especially beneficial when the selected agents possess differing mechanisms of action that provide additive or synergistic efficacy, reducing the required doses of the individual agents compared with monotherapy and potentially limiting side effects. Therapeutic approaches also can be rotated or used in various sequences for maintenance therapy. In psoriasis, a number of trials have demonstrated the effectiveness of combination therapy. Although combination therapy has not been extensively studied in atopic dermatitis, many practitioners combine topical corticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors in their clinical practice because the two drug classes have different and possibly complementary mechanisms of action. For both diseases, the decision as to what agents are combined must also be tempered by patient type, disease presentation or severity, and patient preferences.

Cilomilast, tacrolimus and rapamycin modulate dendritic cell function in the elicitation phase of allergic contact dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Cilomilast and tacrolimus as well as rapamycin are potential drugs for the treatment of allergic skin diseases like atopic dermatitis and allergic contact dermatitis.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the in vitro and in vivo immunomodulatory effects of the phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor cilomilast with those of tacrolimus and rapamycin.

METHODS

The in vitro action of cilomilast, tacrolimus and rapamycin were tested in a mixed leucocyte reaction (MLR). In vivo, the inhibitory action of the immunomodulatory drugs was compared in the toluene-2,4-diisocyanate (TDI)-induced allergic inflammatory response with particular focus on dendritic cell (DC) function.

RESULTS

Cilomilast, tacrolimus and rapamycin were all able to inhibit DC-mediated T-cell activation in a MLR. But it was demonstrated for cilomilast that the target cells are T cells rather than DC. In vivo, a combination of systemic and topical administration of each of these three substances significantly inhibited swelling in the murine ear 16 h after TDI challenge. There was also a reduction in the weight of the draining auricular lymph node, in lymphocyte cell count, and in the number of emigrated DC. The density of Langerhans cells in the epidermis was correspondingly higher in mice treated with cilomilast, tacrolimus and rapamycin than in those treated with vehicle. All three substances were found to inhibit DC migration ex vivo in a skin DC migration assay performed on ear tissue after TDI challenge.

CONCLUSIONS

DC migration into the draining lymph node also takes place in the elicitation phase of allergic contact dermatitis and this migration can be influenced by tacrolimus and rapamycin, and, to a lesser extent, by cilomilast.

The mode of topical immunomodulators in the immunological network of atopic dermatitis

For a long time, therapeutic strategies of atopic dermatitis (AD) have been dominated by the application of local or systemic steroids or other immunosuppressive agents, which have been limited by their potential for unwanted local or systemic side effects. Recently, the use of a new generation of topical nonsteroidal, immunomodulatory drugs has revolutionized the therapeutic options of this often recalcitrant allergic-inflammatory skin disease. Research work has focused on the identification of the exact mode of action and the immune specificities of the so-called 'topical immunomodulators' (TIMs) such as tacrolimus and pimecrolimus in AD. In addition to the previous findings about the mode of action of TIMs on T cells, other target cells of TIMs such as keratinocytes, mast cells, eosinophils and dendritic cells have been identified recently as potential therapeutic targets. In this overview, we provide a research update about the anti-inflammatory and anti-allergic properties of TIMs on effector cells of AD that may be involved in the complex pathophysiology of AD.

Tacrolimus Ointment

Tacrolimus ointment (Protopic) is a topically applied macrolide lactone immunomodulator effective in the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Its mechanism of action primarily involves calcineurin inhibition, which interrupts cytokine gene expression and leads to the downregulation of T-cell activity. Tacrolimus ointment (0.03% and 0.1% for adults and 0.03% for children) is an effective treatment for atopic dermatitis of the trunk and limbs, as well as sensitive skin areas such as the face. Its efficacy is similar to or greater than that of hydrocortisone acetate 1%, hydrocortisone butyrate 0.1% and betamethsone valerate 0.12% ointments and pimecrolimus 1% cream. Systemic absorption of tacrolimus from the ointment is minimal, and adverse events, which are mostly associated with the application site and include skin burning and pruritus, tend to resolve early in treatment. Unlike topical corticosteroids, tacrolimus ointment is not associated with skin atrophy, and it is a well tolerated treatment for adults or children with atopic dermatitis, particularly when long-term treatment is indicated or the face or skin-fold regions are involved.

Investigation on the clinical efficacy and safety of 0.1% tacrolimus ointment (Protopic) in canine atopic dermatitis: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, cross-over study

Topical tacrolimus is successfully used in people with atopic dermatitis. Preliminary studies in dogs with atopic dermatitis using tacrolimus in a compounded lotion formulation indicated that tacrolimus significantly decreased erythema and pruritus according to investigator, but no significant improvement was reported by the dog owners. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of the commercially available 0.1% tacrolimus ointment (Protopic) in dogs with atopic dermatitis. The study was designed as a double-blinded, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. Selected dogs were allocated to either tacrolimus or placebo for 4 weeks. After 4 weeks there was a wash-out period of 2 weeks and treatments were switched. Twelve dogs completed the study. Clinical signs were scored. Blood samples were collected for complete blood count, chemistry panels and tacrolimus levels at week 0 and 4 of each treatment. Tacrolimus ointment significantly decreased severity of symptoms for both owners and investigators at the end of the trial. When the same dogs received the placebo, there were no differences between week 0 and week 4 scores. Dogs with localized disease responded better than dogs with generalized disease. Tacrolimus was detected in the blood of animals receiving the active ingredient. Levels were below the level of toxicity and no adverse effects were reported in any of the dogs. No changes in complete blood count and chemistry parameters were detected between groups or within groups. In conclusion, tacrolimus appears to be a safe alternative treatment in dogs with atopic dermatitis, especially in those with localized disease.

Pimecrolimus - an anti-inflammatory drug targeting the skin

Pimecrolimus is the most recent member of calcineurin inhibitors available for the therapy for inflammatory skin diseases. It targets T-cells and mast cells and inhibits the production and release of cytokines and other inflammatory mediators, as well as the expression of signals essential for the activation of inflammatory T-lymphocytes. Pimecrolimus has a cell-selective mode of action. In contrast to corticosteroids, it does not affect, e.g., Langerhans'cells/dendritic cells (LC/DC), as demonstrated in vitro with human monocyte-derived DC and in vivo with epidermal LC in mice, nor human primary fibroblasts. As shown in vitro with human skin and by comparison of clinical pharmacokinetic data from patients with atopic dermatitis, pimecrolimus permeates less through skin than tacrolimus and much less than corticosteroids. It, thus, has a lower potential for transcutaneous resorption after topical administration, resulting in a lower risk of systemic effects. Pimecrolimus has high anti-inflammatory activity in animal models of skin inflammation, including a model reflecting neurogenic inflammation, but a more favourable balance of anti-inflammatory vs. immunosuppressive activity than tacrolimus. Pimecrolimus does not affect sensitization in a murine model of allergic contact dermatitis and has a lower potency in various models of immunosuppression after systemic administration, compared to tacrolimus. In conclusion, the results of preclinical studies show that pimecrolimus has a selective pharmacological profile, suited for effective and safe treatment for inflammatory skin diseases.

The role of topical calcineurin inhibitors in atopic dermatitis:

For more than five decades, topical corticosteroids and emollients have been the mainstay of therapy for atopic dermatitis. However, the potential for side-effects limits the clinical utility of corticosteroids in providing long-term disease control. With a unique mode of action that differs from that of corticosteroids, the steroid-free topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs), tacrolimus ointment and pimecrolimus cream, provide skin-selective treatment that targets key factors involved in the pathogenesis of this chronic disease. An extensive series of clinical trials involving more than 16,000 patients with predominantly moderate to severe atopic dermatitis in tacrolimus studies and over 2000 patients with primarily mild to moderate disease in pimecrolimus studies has shown that both TCIs provide effective and well-tolerated treatment for atopic dermatitis. Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that tacrolimus is superior to conventional hydrocortisone-based regimens and does not cause skin atrophy or other steroidal side-effects. Both tacrolimus and pimecrolimus prevent disease flares and provide progressive and sustained disease improvement with long-term therapy. These and other clinical benefits of TCIs are discussed, together with the safety profiles of tacrolimus and pimecrolimus and their use in clinical practice. In addition, this review summarizes findings from the many trials carried out with these agents and outlines how TCIs can provide long-term treatment and control of a chronic skin disease that may persist for years.

Topical treatment of atopic dermatitis

Topical therapy of atopic dermatitis should incorporate an understanding of the underlying immune abnormalities of this complex chronic skin disease. Avoidance of irritants and proven allergens, skin hydration, and use of emollients and anti-inflammatory therapy help maintain a normal skin barrier. Topical calcineurin inhibitors have been added to the topical treatment armamentarium. Although the optimal treatment approach remains to be defined, several studies suggest the use of topical calcineurin inhibitors as early intervention therapy and topical corticosteroids as rescue therapy.

Tacrolimus ointment causes inflammatory dendritic epidermal cell depletion but no Langerhans cell apoptosis in patients with atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

The topical immunomodulators tacrolimus and pimecrolimus are novel therapeutic options for atopic dermatitis (AD). The inhibition of nuclear factor of activated T cell-dependent proinflammatory cytokine production in cutaneous lymphocytes is an established effect of topical immunomodulators, which additionally influence mast cells, eosinophils, and dendritic cells (DCs). The latter include a reduced expression of the high-affinity IgE receptor FcepsilonRI, a reduced stimulatory capacity of lesional DCs, and a selective depletion of the inflammatory dendritic epidermal cells (IDECs) but not of Langerhans cells (LCs) from the lesional skin.

OBJECTIVE

Because induction of apoptosis in lymphocytes is a reported tacrolimus effect, we asked whether tacrolimus ointment induces apoptosis of LCs or IDECs in AD lesions.

METHODS

Epidermal single-cell suspensions were prepared from AD lesions of 9 tacrolimus-treated and 5 hydrocortisone butyrate-treated patients with AD before and after 1 week of treatment. Cell numbers, apoptosis rate, and immunophenotype were assessed by using the standardized FACS technique with terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling, Annexin V, and 3-color immunophenotyping. Freshly isolated LCs and monocyte-derived DCs served as in vitro controls.

RESULTS

Tacrolimus and steroid ointment induced a selective depletion of IDECs from the epidermis and reduced the expression of the costimulatory molecules CD80 and CD86. Tacrolimus ointment did not increase the rate of apoptotic DCs, whereas steroid ointment did so. The isolation-induced high apoptosis rate of freshly isolated LCs was unaffected by both drugs.

CONCLUSION

Tacrolimus ointment selectively depletes IDECs and alters the immunophenotype of epidermal DCs in AD lesions, but there is no evidence for tacrolimus-induced DC apoptosis in this phenomenon.

[Successful topical treatment of cutaneous sarcoidosis with tacrolimus]

A 56-year old female patient with cutaneous sarcoidosis in the face was treated with fumaric acid esters and doxycycline without any effect. Topical tacrolimus led clinically and histologically to a nearly complete remission within three months, which continued after 4 months of follow-up.

Collapse and restoration of MHC class-I-dependent immune privilege: exploiting the human hair follicle as a model

The collapse of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class-I-dependent immune privilege can lead to autoimmune disease or fetal rejection. Pragmatic and instructive models are needed to clarify the as yet obscure controls of MHC class I down-regulation in situ, to dissect the principles of immune privilege generation, maintenance, and collapse as well as to develop more effective strategies for immune privilege restoration. Here, we propose that human scalp hair follicles, which are abundantly available and easily studied, are ideally suited for this purpose: interferon-gamma induces ectopic MHC class I expression in the constitutively MHC class-I-negative hair matrix epithelium of organ-cultured anagen hair bulbs, likely via interferon regulatory factor-1, along with up-regulation of the MHC class I pathway molecules beta(2)microglobulin and transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP-2). In the first report to identify natural immunomodulators capable of down-regulating MHC class I expression in situ in a normal, neuroectoderm-derived human tissue, we show that ectopic MHC class I expression in human anagen hair bulbs can be normalized by treatment with alpha-MSH, IGF-1, or TGF-beta1, all of which are locally generated, as well as by FK506. These agents are promising candidates for immune privilege restoration and for suppressing MHC class I expression where this is clinically desired (eg, in alopecia areata, multiple sclerosis, autoimmune uveitis, mumps orchitis, and fetal or allograft rejection).

Corticosteroids But Not Pimecrolimus Affect Viability, Maturation and Immune Function of Murine Epidermal Langerhans Cells

Given the importance of dendritic cells in the immune response, we investigated the effect of corticosteroids (CS) on the integrity, survival, and function of murine Langerhans cells (LC) in comparison with pimecrolimus, a novel anti-inflammatory drug for the topical treatment of atopic dermatitis. BALB/c mice were treated twice on one day with ethanolic solutions of the compounds. At 24-72 h after the last application, we observed fragmented DNA, caspase-3 activity, and an upregulation of CD95 expression in LC from mice treated with CS but not in LC of pimecrolimus- or vehicle-treated animals. CS-epidermal cell (EC) supernatants but not pimecrolimus-EC supernatants contained significantly lower amounts of soluble factors (GM-CSF, TNF-alpha, IL-1alpha) required for LC survival and maturation than EC supernatants from vehicle-treated mice. With regard to LC maturation, CS but not pimecrolimus inhibited the expression of CD25, CD205, and costimulatory molecules. In line with this, LC from pimecrolimus-treated mice were similar to LC from vehicle-treated mice in their capacity to stimulate antigen-presenting function and migration, whereas LC from CS-treated mice were greatly impaired in these abilities. In summary, our data show for the first time that CS but not pimecrolimus induce apoptosis in LC in situ, implying that the prolonged use of CS could have adverse effects on the skin immune system.

Long-term safety of tacrolimus ointment in children treated for atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, relapsing, highly pruritic inflammatory skin disease that is particularly prevalent in the paediatric population. Emollients and topical corticosteroids have represented the standard of treatment for patients with AD, despite their numerous adverse effects and patients' tendency towards steroid resistance. Topical tacrolimus marks the introduction of an entirely new class of medications, the non-corticosteroid topical immunomodulators. Numerous short- and long-term and ongoing paediatric and adult studies have demonstrated the excellent efficacy and superb safety profile of this anti-inflammatory agent. The authors review many of these landmark studies and discuss the mechanism of action and safety profile of tacrolimus, in the context of the pathophysiology of AD.

Pimecrolimus does not affect the differentiation, maturation and function of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells, in contrast to corticosteroids

Clinically, corticosteroids (CS) are among the first line drugs in the therapy of autoimmune and allergic diseases and potently inhibit the activation of immune cells. However, due to their pleiotropic mode of action, the prolonged use of CS is generally associated with a range of undesirable side-effects. In this study, we compared the activity of pimecrolimus, a novel immunomodulatory drug for the treatment of inflammatory skin disorders, and the CS dexamethasone (Dex) and beta-methasone-valerate (beta-MSV) in different in vitro assays addressing the cytokine-induced differentiation and maturation of monocyte-derived dendritic cells (M-DC), the susceptibility of M-DC to drug-induced apoptosis and the potency of differentiated M-DC to induce primary T cell activation. In contrast to pimecrolimus, Dex and beta-MSV strongly induced apoptosis of M-DC precursors if added at the start of the DC differentiation culture. Flow cytometric analysis of surviving cells on day 6 of culture showed that the expression of several DC-specific antigens such as CD1a, CD40 and CD80 was inhibited by 50% to 80% at concentrations between 1 nm and 10 nm of either Dex or beta-MSV. Furthermore, the presence of CS during the final maturation of M-DC inhibited the synthesis of IL-12p70, the expression of critical DC costimulatory molecules, such as CD83 and CD86 and impaired their ability to activate primary CD4+ T cell proliferation. In contrast, pimecrolimus did not inhibit the LPS-induced secretion of IL-12, surface expression of costimulatory molecules or the maturation of M-DC into potent stimulators of T cells. Taken together, these data indicate that pimecrolimus does not interfere with the differentiation and viability of dendritic cells and their precursors or with the function of mature M-DC to prime naïve T lymphocytes, and thus may have a lower potential than CS to interfere with DC-mediated immunosurveillance.

Influence of immunosuppressive drugs on dendritic cells

Immunosuppressive drugs used to control allograft rejection and in efforts to promote transplant tolerance are well recognized for their abilities to inhibit lymphocyte activation and proliferation. In recent years, evidence has accumulated that these diversely acting agents (anti-proliferative drugs, calcineurin inhibitors, rapamycin, deoxyspergualin and glucocorticoids) also affect the development and functional immunobiology of dendritic cells, in vitro and in vivo. Here we review the influence of immunosuppressive drugs on the differentiation and function of these important antigen-presenting cells. We also consider how these effects influence immune reactivity and tolerance induction, implications for furthermore understanding of dendritic cell biology and prospects for improving the outcome of organ transplantation and therapy of other immune-mediated disorders by impacting dendritic cell function.

Pimecrolimus inhibits the elicitation phase but does not suppress the sensitization phase in murine contact hypersensitivity, in contrast to tacrolimus and cyclosporine A

Pimecrolimus (SDZ ASM 981, Elidel) is a nonsteroid inflammatory cytokine inhibitor specifically developed for the treatment of inflammatory skin diseases. Its effect on the elicitation and sensitization phases of oxazolone-induced contact hypersensitivity was compared with tacrolimus and cyclosporine A (CyA) in BALB/c mice using the ear swelling assay. The compounds were administered orally. Elicitation was dose-dependently inhibited by all three compounds. The minimal effective doses were 30 mg per kg (pimecrolimus, tacrolimus) and 90 mg per kg (CyA), respectively. There was no impairment of sensitization by pimecrolimus up to the highest dose tested (120 mg per kg), in contrast to CyA (60% inhibition at 60 mg per kg) and tacrolimus (71% inhibition at 30 mg per kg). Weight and cellularity of the draining lymph nodes in mice treated with tacrolimus or CyA during sensitization were reduced. In addition, proliferation of T cells after secondary stimulation was inhibited in cell cultures from lymph nodes of mice treated with tacrolimus or CyA. Thus, in contrast to tacrolimus and CyA, pimecrolimus exerts a more selective immunomodulatory effect. It does not impair the primary immune response (sensitization phase) but effectively inhibits the secondary phase, the elicitation phase that is the clinical manifestation of contact hypersensitivity.

Advances in allergic skin diseases

During the past year there have been significant advances in our understanding of the mechanisms underlying allergic skin diseases. This article reviews some of these advances in atopic dermatitis and urticaria. The introduction of a new class of topical anti-inflammatory medications, topical calcineurin inhibitors, has significantly increased our treatment options and led to a rethinking of potential management approaches in atopic dermatitis.

Unraveling the mission of FcepsilonRI on antigen-presenting cells

A decade ago, the discovery of the high-affinity receptor for IgE (FcepsilonRI) on epidermal Langerhans cells documented the end of the dogma that FcepsilonRI is only expressed on effector cells of anaphylaxis. Since then, the functional significance of this receptor on antigen-presenting cells (APCs) has been an area of intense research work. Scientists have focused on a better understanding of the molecular structure, regulation, and role of FcepsilonRI on APCs in the human immune system. Insights into the cellular events linked to the activation of APCs on ligation of FcepsilonRI by IgE and allergens might provide the basis for new aspects in the pathophysiology of allergic diseases and the design of future diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. This review is dedicated to the 10th anniversary of the discovery of FcepsilonRI on APCs and describes the numerous areas of research in this field.

Effects of FK506 (tacrolimus hydrate) on chronic oxazolone-induced dermatitis in rats

Chronic allergic contact dermatitis was induced in rat ear by repeated application of oxazolone. This dermatitis was accompanied by sustained ear swelling and marked epidermal hyperplasia. In the induced ear, there was marked inflammatory cell infiltration into the dermis site and the interferon-gamma amount increased in both protein and mRNA, while the interleukin-4 amount changed minimally. Topical administration of FK506 (tacrolimus hydrate) dramatically suppressed ear swelling and epidermal hyperplasia as well as the increase in interferon-gamma expression. Betamethasone valerate also showed suppressive effects, but 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) (calcitriol) had no effect. These results suggest that interferon-gamma plays an important role in dermatitis and this model could be a useful pharmacological model for chronic dermatitis featuring epidermal hyperplasia in which interferon-gamma plays a crucial role, such as psoriasis. FK506 demonstrating suppressive effects as potent as those of betamethasone valerate shows potential as a topically usable drug for such skin disorders.

Topical noncorticosteroid immunomodulation in the treatment of atopic dermatitis

At present, the first-line drugs for treating atopic dermatitis are topical corticosteroids. They are effective when used short-term; however, long-term use of the corticosteroids is associated with suppressive effects on the connective tissue, seen as skin atrophy or resistance to therapy. Currently, two topical noncorticosteroid immunomodulators tacrolimus (FK506) and pimecrolimus (SDZ ASM 981) are under development, or already on the market in some countries for atopic dermatitis. These two compounds show structural similarity. In T lymphocytes they bind to the same cellular receptor, the FK-binding protein (FKBP) or macrophilin-12. Tacrolimus shows a 3-fold greater affinity to FKBP compared with pimecrolimus. The tacrolimus/ pimecrolimus-FKBP complex further binds to calcineurin, an enzyme vital for the early activation of T cells. The consequence of calcineurin binding is a lack of activation of both T helper cell types 1 and 2. Further effects of these compounds have been suggested on other inflammatory cells, such as Langerhans cells and mast cells/basophils. In contrast to corticosteroids, no suppressive effects on connective tissue cells have been observed. Taken together, treatment of inflammation results in healing of the barrier function of the skin. This again results in reduced bioavailability of the drug, as compared with systemic use. Placebo-controlled studies have shown the efficacy of both tacrolimus (at 0.03 and 0.1%) and pimecrolimus (at 0.6 and 1%). The main adverse event in these studies has been a burning sensation and increased pruritus at the site of application. Typically, these adverse events are observed only during the first days of treatment. Long-term safety studies, of up to one year, have not revealed any new adverse events. So far, long-term use of topical noncorticosteroid compounds has not been associated with signs of immune deficiency. Although there is currently no evidence for clinically relevant, prolonged adverse effects, some of these, such as an increased risk of photocarcinogenesis, need to be monitored. There is evidence from tacrolimus studies that monotherapy results in better long-term results when compared with combination therapy with corticosteroids. Tacrolimus and pimecrolimus could replace topical corticosteroids as the first-line treatment of atopic dermatitis.

Characterization of monocyte subtypes in the allergic form of atopic eczema/dermatitis syndrome

BACKGROUND

Monocyte (Mo) subsets exhibiting distinct phenotypic and functional properties identified in peripheral blood are assumed to be under the control of soluble factors from their surrounding micromilieu. Atopic eczema/dermatitis syndrome (AEDS) is accompanied by humoral and cellular alterations among which an increased expression of the high-affinity receptor for IgE (Fc epsilon RI) on antigen presenting cells, like Mo, could be found. Therefore we analyzed the assembly of circulating Mo populations and their Fc epsilon RI surface expression during the course of AEDS.

METHODS

Blood samples were taken from AEDS patients before and after topical treatment as well as from psoriasis patients and healthy control donors. Detailed analysis of Mo subsets was done by flow cytometry. Meticulous clinical scoring included quantification of the surface damage using the eczema area and severity index (EASI score) as well as evaluation of the serum level of thymus- and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC); this was done before and after 2 weeks of topical treatment with tacrolimus ointment 0.1%.

RESULTS

During the exacerbation phase of AEDS, patients harboured a different assembly of Mo subtypes from normal nonatopic individuals and patients with psoriasis with a significant increased population of CD14(+)CD64(-) CD16(+) Mo. Clinical improvement led to a significant decrease of this subpopulation in favor of CD14(+)CD64(+)CD16(-) Mo, leading to a composition of Mo subsets similar to the state found in healthy donors. Interestingly, Fc epsilon RI expression was confined to the CD14(+)CD64(+)CD16(-) Mo subpopulation and the percentage of this Fc epsilon RI(+) Mo subset increased significantly in the peripheral blood after topical treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our data provide for the first time clear evidence that fluctuations of Mo subsets in AEDS might reflect qualitatively and quantitatively distinct contributions of Mo subsets to the development of AEDS.

Investigation on the use of 0.3% tacrolimus lotion for canine atopic dermatitis: a pilot study

The efficacy of 0.3% tacrolimus lotion (maximum dosage: 0.3 mg kg-1 per day) for treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) was evaluated. Systemic absorption and effects on complete blood cell counts (CBC) and chemistry panels were also investigated. Eight dogs were assigned randomly to either a tacrolimus or a vehicle lotion treatment group. Both owners and investigator were blinded to the treatment. After 4 weeks, there was a 2-week wash-out period and treatments were reversed. Owners scored pruritus weekly while the investigator scored pruritus and erythema at the beginning and end of each treatment period. Investigator scores for pruritus in the tacrolimus group significantly decreased by the end of the study (P = 0.03). Investigator scores for erythema in the tacrolimus group were significantly lower than those in the placebo group at the end of the study (P = 0.005). There was no difference between groups with respect to owner scores for pruritus. No changes in the CBC and chemistry panels were noted. Mean blood concentrations of tacrolimus were below toxic levels.

Tacrolimus ointment. A review of its therapeutic potential as a topical therapy in atopic dermatitis

Tacrolimus, a macrolide immunomodulator, is believed to control atopic dermatitis by inhibiting T lymphocyte activation, altering cell surface expression on antigen-presenting dendritic cells and modulating the release of inflammatory mediators from skin mast cells and basophils. Tacrolimus ointment penetrates human skin with no systemic accumulation after repeated applications; systemic absorption is generally low, with most patients in clinical trials having blood concentrations of the drug below the limit of quantification. Moderate to severe atopic dermatitis significantly improved (measured using multiple end-points, including > or = 90% improvement in Physician's Global Evaluation of Clinical Response) with tacrolimus 0.03 and 0.1% ointment compared with vehicle in both adult (n = 304 and 328) and pediatric (n = 351) patients in three 12-week, double-blind, randomized, phase III trials. In adults, tacrolimus ointment was effective therapy for the treatment of atopic dermatitis on all skin regions, including the head and neck. The 0.1% concentration was more effective than the 0.03% concentration. Clinical improvement in moderate to severe atopic dermatitis in adult (n = 316) or pediatric (n = 255) patients was seen as early as week 1, and improvement continued and/or was maintained for up to 6 and/or 12 months in long-term studies. The 0.1% formulation was also effective and well tolerated for up to 2 years. Tacrolimus 0.03 and 0.1% ointment was associated with significant quality-of-life benefit in adults, children (aged 5 to 15 years) and toddlers (aged 2 to 4 years) with atopic dermatitis in 12-week phase III trials (n = 985). Skin burning and pruritus were the most common application site adverse events in adult and pediatric patients in short-term and long-term trials. These events were generally of short duration and mild or moderate severity. Cutaneous infections occurred with a similar incidence after treatment with tacrolimus ointment to that seen after vehicle in short-term trials.

CONCLUSION

Both short- and long-term monotherapy with tacrolimus 0.03 and 0.1% ointment improves moderate to severe atopic dermatitis in adult and pediatric patients. Topical tacrolimus ointment is well tolerated, with the majority of adverse events being localized, transient in nature and of mild or moderate severity. Tacrolimus ointment provides a promising addition to the currently available treatments for atopic dermatitis; it can be used as a short- or long-term intermittent therapy for moderate to severe disease, including disease on the head or neck, in adult (0.1 and 0.03% formulations) and pediatric (0.03% formulation) patients who are not adequately responsive to or are intolerant of conventional treatments.

Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus ointment compared with that of hydrocortisone butyrate ointment in adult patients with atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Vehicle-controlled studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus ointment for patients with atopic dermatitis.

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to compare 0.03% and 0.1% tacrolimus ointment with 0.1% hydrocortisone-17-butyrate ointment, a midpotent to potent topical corticosteroid, in the treatment of adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.

METHODS

Patients applied ointment twice daily to all affected areas for 3 weeks in this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. The primary endpoint was the modified eczema area and severity index (mEASI) mean area under the curve as a percentage of baseline.

RESULTS

Five hundred seventy patients were randomized and received treatment. Discontinuations included 22 of 193 patients from the 0.03% tacrolimus group, 22 of 191 patients from the 0.1% tacrolimus group, and 17 of 186 patients from the hydrocortisone butyrate group. The median mEASI mean area under the curve as a percentage of baseline was 47.0%, 36.5%, and 36.1% for patients who received 0.03% tacrolimus, 0.1% tacrolimus, and 0.1% hydrocortisone butyrate, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between 0.1% tacrolimus and 0.1% hydrocortisone butyrate; however, the lower improvement in mEASI for 0.03% tacrolimus was statistically significant when compared with 0.1% tacrolimus (P <.001) or hydrocortisone butyrate (P =.002). Skin burning and pruritus at the application site showed a higher incidence in the tacrolimus treatment groups than in the hydrocortisone butyrate group (P <.05). Laboratory parameters showed no treatment differences and no marked changes over time.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of 0.1% tacrolimus ointment was similar to that of 0.1% hydrocortisone butyrate ointment and was lower for 0.03% tacrolimus ointment. No serious safety concerns were identified.

Tacrolimus: a review of its use for the management of dermatoses

The newly developed immunomodulator tacrolimus (FK506) is the first of a new class of agents that have enormous potential to change the way that dermatoses are treated and managed. Tacrolimus has been found to be active in a topical formulation with the latter exerting its effects by acting on the signal transduction pathways inside T cells and inhibiting gene transcription. The result is decreased responsiveness of T cells to antigens. Percutaneous absorption of tacrolimus is higher in diseased skin as opposed to healthy skin and, therefore, the drug will be taken in at progressively lower quantities as lesions heal. There is limited systemic absorption of tacrolimus over the course of therapy. The most extensive experience with tacrolimus has been in treating atopic dermatitis. In numerous trials, tacrolimus ointment 0.03-0.3% has shown to be effective in reducing the symptoms and severity of atopic dermatitis in adults and the paediatric population. Furthermore, there have been no significant toxic effects associated with topical therapy with tacrolimus. The most common complaint is that of local irritation after applying the ointment. This is generally transient and the patient is able to continue with therapy. The other dermatoses where tacrolimus has been used include contact dermatitis, psoriasis and pyoderma gangrenosum.

Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus ointment compared with that of hydrocortisone acetate ointment in children with atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Vehicle-controlled studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus ointment in the treatment of patients with atopic dermatitis (AD).

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to compare 0.03% and 0.1% tacrolimus ointment with 1% hydrocortisone acetate ointment in children 2 to 15 years of age with moderate-to-severe AD.

METHODS

Treatment was twice daily to affected areas for 3 weeks in this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. The primary endpoint was the modified eczema area and severity index (mEASI) mean area under the curve (mAUC) as a percentage of baseline.

RESULTS

Five hundred sixty patients were randomized and received at least one application of ointment. Discontinuations included 21 of 189 patients from the 0.03% tacrolimus group, 13 of 186 patients from the 0.1% tacrolimus group, and 20 of 185 patients from the hydrocortisone acetate group. The median mEASI mAUC as a percentage of baseline showed 0.03% and 0.1% tacrolimus to be significantly more effective than 1% hydrocortisone acetate (P <.001) and 0.1% tacrolimus to be more effective than 0.03% tacrolimus (P =.006). The mEASI mAUC as a percentage of baseline was 44.8%, 39.8%, and 64.0% for patients who received 0.03% tacrolimus, 0.1% tacrolimus, and 1% hydrocortisone acetate, respectively. Transient skin burning was the only adverse event to show a higher incidence in the tacrolimus treatment groups than in the hydrocortisone acetate group (P <.05). Laboratory parameters showed no treatment differences and no marked changes over time.

CONCLUSION

Tacrolimus, 0.03% and 0.1%, was significantly more effective than 1% hydrocortisone acetate and 0.1% tacrolimus was more effective than 0.03% tacrolimus in the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD in children. No safety concerns were identified.

Tacrolimus and pimecrolimus: from clever prokaryotes to inhibiting calcineurin and treating atopic dermatitis

Tacrolimus ointment, a topical inhibitor of the phosphatase calcineurin, has recently been approved in the United States for use in the treatment of atopic dermatitis. It is the first topical immune suppressant that is not one of the hydrocortisone derivatives, important allies in dermatology for nearly 50 years. Although tacrolimus is less able to penetrate thick skin than glucocorticoids, it does not cause dermal atrophy, an important advantage over the hydrocortisone class. Pimecrolimus (ASM 981), a newer calcineurin inhibitor closely related to tacrolimus, is also being developed for atopic dermatitis therapy. Pimecrolimus has an altered skin penetration profile but the same mechanism of action as tacrolimus. In this review we chronicle the discovery of the calcineurin inhibitors, their presumed evolutionary role as a bacterial "smart bomb" against fungi, molecular and cellular mechanisms of action in the immune system, systemic and topical side effects, efficacy in atopic dermatitis, and future applications within the specialty of dermatology. Particular attention is given to the issues of systemic absorption of tacrolimus, the conditions in which absorption can become a concern, efficacy relative to glucocorticoids, and the choice of 0.03% or 0.1% tacrolimus ointment for use in adults and children.

Pathophysiologic mechanisms in atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis is a common, chronic inflammatory skin disease that frequently predates the development of asthma and/or allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. Recent studies have provided new insights into how the complex interrelationship of genetic, environmental, and immunologic factors may contribute to the development of atopic dermatitis. This article examines some of the factors involved in chronic cutaneous inflammation in this disease. Greater understanding of the mechanisms that underlie the pathophysiology of atopic dermatitis may lead to improved treatment strategies for this increasingly common skin disease.

Standardized extracts from Chinese herbs induce IL-10 production in human monocyte-derived dendritic cells and alter their differentiation in vitro

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) as a treatment for atopic dermatitis has been evaluated in clinical trials. Until now, the underlying mechanism of this treatment has remained completely elusive; this is particularly true of its putative effects on dendritic cells (DCs), which might play a pivotal role in the disease.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the influence of a standardized extract from 10 Chinese herbs that was successfully used in clinical trials on the generation of monocyte-derived DCs from atopic donors.

METHODS

Detailed phenotypic and functional exploration of DCs generated in the presence of IL-4 and GM-CSF and treated with different concentrations of TCM or a placebo control was performed.

RESULTS

TCM profoundly affected the morphology and phenotype of the developing DCs. They lost their typical dendritic morphology and decreased their expression of CD1a as well as the low-affinity IgE receptor CD23. Most importantly, TCM-exposed DCs exhibited a diminished stimulatory activity toward autologous antigen-specific and allogeneic T cells while secreting high amounts of IL-10.

CONCLUSION

TCM induces immunopharmacologic alterations on DCs from atopic donors in vitro. These alterations might account, at least in part, for the therapeutic effect of this treatment in AD in vivo.

Antigen-presenting cells in allergy

The complex interaction of the innate and adaptive immune system requires flexibility and cooperation among various cell types. In this regard, antigen-presenting-cells (APCs) play a pivotal role in transferring information from the periphery of the organism to lymphoid organs, where they initiate the activation of naive T cells. Dendritic cells, Langerhans' cells (LCs), and macrophages are also critical in the induction of allergic inflammation by presenting allergens to T lymphocytes and by contributing to the local recruitment of effector cells. Because of a complex genetic background, atopic individuals exhibit a dysregulation of T cell-mediated immune mechanisms. Attempts to understand the role APCs play in these pathophysiologic conditions are in progress and may allow development of new treatment strategies. In this review we will focus on the biology of APCs and their unique role in the induction and control of allergic inflammation.

Topical tacrolimus for the treatment of inflammatory skin diseases

Chronic inflammatory skin disorders, such as atopic eczema, can cause considerable impairment of life quality. Their treatment is mainly driven by systemic or topical glucocorticosteroids which have the risk of many side effects. Recently, immunosuppressive macrolides which act via the inhibition of cytokine expression in T-lymphocytes have been shown to exert good therapeutic potency in inflammatory skin disorders. Cyclosporin, widely used in transplantation medicine, is also effective in psoriasis and atopic eczema but is not suitable for topical treatment. Tacrolimus (FK506) has been found to be 10-100 times more potent than cyclosporin and to penetrate skin much better due to a lower molecular weight. Initial clinical investigations have shown efficacy of topical tacrolimus in patients with atopic eczema. Large multi-centre studies have proven that long-term therapy with 0.03% and 0.1% tacrolimus ointment reveals effectiveness and safety both in adults and in children with severe atopic eczema. A burning sensation at the site of application is the most frequently observed local side effect. Relevant systemic adverse events were not detected. In Japan and the US, the drug is already licensed for the treatment of atopic eczema. The European admission for the pharmaceutical market is expected in the year 2002. Tacrolimus represents a milestone in topical therapy of inflammatory skin disorders which has so far been dominated by corticosteroid formulations and gives hope for the development of further topical immunosuppressive agents of its class in the future.

Fc epsilon ri-mediated activation of transcription factors in antigen-presenting cells

Professional antigen-presenting cells (APC) such as monocytes and dendritic cells (DC) bearing high-affinity IgE receptors (Fc epsilon RI) efficiently present IgE-bound antigens to T cells. Fc epsilon RI expression is upregulated on APC from atopic donors, especially in inflamed tissues. These data suggest a pathophysiological concept of an IgE-mediated delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction in atopic diseases. However, Fc epsilon RI ligation also leads to the synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines and other molecules involved in inflammatory reactions. The investigation of transcription factors mediating these effects has only recently commenced. In general, members of the NF-kappa B family are known to regulate APC function and differentiation, with the RelB subunit being especially important in DC generation. In addition, Ikaros and PU.1 have also been shown to be essential factors for DC differentiation, whereas Oct-2 is upregulated by differentiation towards macrophages. Recently, Fc epsilon RI has been demonstrated to induce NF-kappa B activation via I kappa B-alpha serine phosphorylation and degradation in monocytes and DC. Inhibitors of NF-kappa B activation such as N-acetylcysteine or N-tosyl-L-phenylalanine chloromethyl ketone can suppress Fc epsilon RI-induced TNF-alpha and MCP-1 release. Interestingly, in human epidermal Langerhans' cells (LC), NF-kappa B activation can only be observed when large amounts of Fc epsilon RI are present. In addition, the composition of NF-kappa B complexes differs between monocytes, monocyte-derived DC and LC, suggesting a cell type-specific regulation. Moreover, the transcription factor NFAT is induced upon Fc epsilon RI ligation in human APC. The elucidation of further transcription factors involved in Fc epsilon RI signaling in APC should contribute to the employment of new inhibition strategies for the treatment of atopic and other inflammatory diseases.

[Pharmacological profile and clinical effect of tacrolimus ointment (Protopic ointment) for atopic dermatitis]

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is thought to be induced by a complex of various allergic reactions and T cells are implicated in its etiology. Since tacrolimus strongly inhibits T cell activation, tacrolimus ointment has been developed as a novel drug for AD throughout the world. Tacrolimus inhibits mast cell and eosinophil activation and antigen presenting activity of Langerhans cells in vitro. In the in vivo experimental animal models of AD, such as contact and spontaneous dermatitis in mice and repeated hapten treated skin inflammation in rats, tacrolimus ointment showed inhibitory activity. In clinical studies with AD patients in Japan, USA and Europe, tacrolimus ointment showed a marked effect. In comparative studies in Japan, it showed the same efficacy as a strong class steroid ointment on eczema at the trunk and extremities and superior efficacy at the face and neck compared to a medium class steroid. The most prominent adverse event is experienced at the local application site with reactions such as a burning sensation and erythema. Systemic side effects were rarely observed. While there is a possibility of skin infections when using tacrolimus, skin atrophy, even after long term treatment, was not observed. Thus tacrolimus ointment could be an efficient alternative to steroid ointment for AD.

Topical tacrolimus (FK506) leads to profound phenotypic and functional alterations of epidermal antigen-presenting dendritic cells in atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease in which antigen-presenting epidermal dendritic cells (DCs), ie, Langerhans cells and the so-called inflammatory dendritic epidermal cells (IDECs) expressing the high-affinity receptor for IgE (FcepsilonRI) may play a significant pathophysiologic role. Therapeutic efficacy of the immunosuppressive macrolide tacrolimus (FK506) in AD has been demonstrated in clinical trials, but little is known of its mode of action.

OBJECTIVE

The present study focused on the effects of topical tacrolimus treatment on epidermal CD1a+/FcepsilonRI+ DC populations in lesional AD.

METHODS

Immunohistological analysis, epidermal DC phenotyping, and functional studies were performed on skin biopsy specimens from treated and untreated lesional skin of 10 patients with AD participating in a clinical trial with tacrolimus.

RESULTS

Untreated lesional skin was characterized by a high proportion of CD1a+ cells, which was largely due to a high proportion of IDECs strongly expressing FcepsilonRI. Epidermal DCs isolated from untreated lesional skin exhibited high stimulatory activity toward autologous T cells, which was strongly reduced while clinical improvement was seen during application of tacrolimus. Concomitantly, a decreased FcepsilonRI expression was observed in both Langerhans cells and IDECs. Finally, topical tacrolimus led to a progressive decrease in the IDEC population within the pool of CD1a+ epidermal DCs and also to a decrease in their CD36 expression, which is indicative of lower local inflammation.

CONCLUSION

Epidermal CD1a+ DCs may represent a target for topical tacrolimus in the treatment of AD.