Interaction of Escherichia coli MutS and MutL at a DNA Mismatch

Escherichia coli mismatch repair protein MutL interacts with the clamp loader subunits of DNA polymerase III

It has been hypothesized that DNA mismatch repair (MMR) is coupled with DNA replication; however, the involvement of DNA polymerase III subunits in bacterial DNA MMR has not been clearly elucidated. In an effort to better understand the relationship between these 2 systems, the potential interactions between the Escherichia coli MMR protein and the clamp loader subunits of E. coli DNA polymerase III were analyzed by far western blotting and then confirmed and characterized by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) imaging. The results showed that the MMR key protein MutL could directly interact with both the individual subunits delta, delta', and gamma and the complex of these subunits (clamp loader). Kinetic parameters revealed that the interactions are strong and stable, suggesting that MutL might be involved in the recruitment of the clamp loader during the resynthesis step in MMR. The interactions between MutL, the delta and gamma subunits, and the clamp loader were observed to be modulated by ATP. Deletion analysis demonstrated that both the N-terminal residues (1-293) and C-terminal residues (556-613) of MutL are required for interacting with the subunits delta and delta'. Based on these findings and the available information, the network of interactions between the MMR components and the DNA polymerase III subunits was established; this network provides strong evidence to support the notion that DNA replication and MMR are highly associated with each other.

Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2-Msh3 acts in repair of base-base mispairs

DNA mismatch repair is thought to act through two subpathways involving the recognition of base-base and insertion/deletion mispairs by the Msh2-Msh6 heterodimer and the recognition of insertion/deletion mispairs by the Msh2-Msh3 heterodimer. Here, through genetic and biochemical approaches, we describe a previously unidentified role of the Msh2-Msh3 heterodimer in the recognition of base-base mispairs and the suppression of homology-mediated duplication and deletion mutations. Saccharomyces cerevisiae msh3 mutants did not show an increase in the rate of base substitution mutations by the CAN1 forward mutation assay compared to the rate for the wild type but did show an altered spectrum of base substitution mutations, including an increased accumulation of base pair changes from GC to CG and from AT to TA; msh3 mutants also accumulated homology-mediated duplication and deletion mutations. The mutation spectrum of mlh3 mutants paralleled that of msh3 mutants, suggesting that the Mlh1-Mlh3 heterodimer may also play a role in the repair of base-base mispairs and in the suppression of homology-mediated duplication and deletion mutations. Mispair binding analysis with purified Msh2-Msh3 and DNA substrates derived from CAN1 sequences found to be mutated in vivo demonstrated that Msh2-Msh3 exhibited robust binding to specific base-base mispairs that was consistent with functional mispair binding.

Protein roadblocks and helix discontinuities are barriers to the initiation of mismatch repair

The hemimethylated d(GATC) sequence that directs Escherichia coli mismatch repair can reside on either side of a mismatch at a separation distance of 1,000 bp or more. Initiation of repair involves the mismatch-, MutS-, and MutL-dependent activation of MutH endonuclease, which incises the unmethylated strand at the d(GATC) sequence, with the ensuing strand break serving as the loading site for the appropriate 3'-to-5' or 5'-to-3' excision system. However, the mechanism responsible for the coordinated recognition of the mismatch and a hemimodified d(GATC) site is uncertain. We show that a protein roadblock (EcoRI(E111Q), a hydrolytically defective form of EcoRI endonuclease) placed on the helix between the two DNA sites inhibits MutH activation by 70-80% and that events that escape inhibition are attributable, at least in part, to diffusion of EcoRI(E111Q) away from its recognition site. We also demonstrate that a double-strand break located within the shorter path linking the mismatch and a d(GATC) site in a circular heteroduplex abolishes MutH activation, whereas a double-strand break within the longer path is without effect. These findings support the idea that initiation of mismatch repair involves signaling along the helix contour.

The frequency and structure of recombinant products is determined by the cellular level of MutL

The presence of repeated DNA sequences is a genomic liability, because interrepeat recombination can result in chromosomal rearrangements. The mismatch repair system prevents recombination between nonidentical repeats, but the mechanism of antirecombination has not been established. Although the MutS protein binds to base pair mismatches in heteroduplex DNA, the role of the MutL protein in preventing recombination is unknown. In a screen designed to identify new cellular functions that suppress deletion formation involving nonidentical DNA repeats, we isolated a mutL mutant having a separation-of-function phenotype. The mutant showed an increased frequency of deletions but not of mutations. The split phenotype is due to a decreased MutL level, indicating that recombination, but not replication editing, is highly sensitive to MutL level. By altering the MutL level, we found that the frequency of deletion-generating recombination is inversely related to the amount of cellular MutL. DNA sequence analysis of the recombined repeats shows that the tolerance of base pair mismatches in heteroduplex DNA is also inversely correlated with MutL level. Unlike recombination, correction of misincorporation errors by mismatch repair is insensitive to fluctuations in MutL level. Overproduction of MutS does not affect either of these phenotypes, suggesting that, unlike MutL, MutS is not limiting for mismatch repair activities. These results indicate that MutL (i) determines effective DNA homology in recombination processes and (ii) fine tunes the process of deletion formation involving repeated, diverged DNA sequences.

Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH2–MSH3 and MSH2–MSH6 Complexes Display Distinct Requirements for DNA Binding Domain I in Mismatch Recognition

In eukaryotic mismatch repair (MMR) MSH2-MSH6 initiates the repair of base-base and small insertion/deletion mismatches while MSH2-MSH3 repairs larger insertion/deletion mismatches. Here, we show that the msh2Delta1 mutation, containing a complete deletion of the conserved mismatch recognition domain I of MSH2, conferred a separation of function phenotype with respect to MSH2-MSH3 and MSH2-MSH6 functions. Strains bearing the msh2Delta1 mutation were nearly wild-type in MSH2-MSH6-mediated MMR and in suppressing recombination between DNA sequences predicted to form mismatches recognized by MSH2-MSH6. However, these strains were completely defective in MSH2-MSH3-mediated MMR and recombination functions. This information encouraged us to analyze the contributions of domain I to the mismatch binding specificity of MSH2-MSH3 in genetic and biochemical assays. We found that domain I in MSH2 contributed a non-specific DNA binding activity while domain I of MSH3 appeared important for mismatch binding specificity and for suppressing non-specific DNA binding. These observations reveal distinct requirements for the MSH2 DNA binding domain I in the repair of DNA mismatches and suggest that the binding of MSH2-MSH3 to mismatch DNA involves protein-DNA contacts that appear very different from those required for MSH2-MSH6 mismatch binding.

The effects of nucleotides on MutS-DNA binding kinetics clarify the role of MutS ATPase activity in mismatch repair

MutS protein initiates mismatch repair with recognition of a non-Watson-Crick base-pair or base insertion/deletion site in DNA, and its interactions with DNA are modulated by ATPase activity. Here, we present a kinetic analysis of these interactions, including the effects of ATP binding and hydrolysis, reported directly from the mismatch site by 2-aminopurine fluorescence. When free of nucleotides, the Thermus aquaticus MutS dimer binds a mismatch rapidly (k(ON)=3 x 10(6) M(-1) s(-1)) and forms a stable complex with a half-life of 10 s (k(OFF)=0.07 s(-1)). When one or both nucleotide-binding sites on the MutS*mismatch complex are occupied by ATP, the complex remains fairly stable, with a half-life of 5-7 s (k(OFF)=0.1-0.14 s(-1)), although MutS(ATP) becomes incapable of (re-)binding the mismatch. When one or both nucleotide-binding sites on the MutS dimer are occupied by ADP, the MutS*mismatch complex forms rapidly (k(ON)=7.3 x 10(6) M(-1) s(-1)) and also dissociates rapidly, with a half-life of 0.4 s (k(OFF)=1.7 s(-1)). Integration of these MutS DNA-binding kinetics with previously described ATPase kinetics reveals that: (a) in the absence of a mismatch, MutS in the ADP-bound form engages in highly dynamic interactions with DNA, perhaps probing base-pairs for errors; (b) in the presence of a mismatch, MutS stabilized in the ATP-bound form releases the mismatch slowly, perhaps allowing for onsite interactions with downstream repair proteins; (c) ATP-bound MutS then moves off the mismatch, perhaps as a mobile clamp facilitating repair reactions at distant sites on DNA, until ATP is hydrolyzed (or dissociates) and the protein turns over.

Human MutLalpha: the jack of all trades in MMR is also an endonuclease

Recently, Paul Modrich's group reported the discovery of an intrinsic endonuclease activity for human MutLalpha. This breakthrough provides a satisfactory answer to the longstanding puzzle of a missing nuclease activity in human mismatch repair and will undoubtedly lead to new investigations of DNA repair and replication. Here, the implications of this exciting new finding are discussed in the context of mismatch repair in Escherichia coli and humans.

The UvrD helicase and its modulation by the mismatch repair protein MutL

UvrD is a superfamily I DNA helicase with well documented roles in excision repair and methyl-directed mismatch repair (MMR) in addition to poorly understood roles in replication and recombination. The MutL protein is a homodimeric DNA-stimulated ATPase that plays a central role in MMR in Escherichia coli. This protein has been characterized as the master regulator of mismatch repair since it interacts with and modulates the activity of several other proteins involved in the mismatch repair pathway including MutS, MutH and UvrD. Here we present a brief summary of recent studies directed toward arriving at a better understanding of the interaction between MutL and UvrD, and the impact of this interaction on the activity of UvrD and its role in mismatch repair.

Functional characterization of the DNA mismatch binding protein MutS from Haemophilus influenzae

This investigation demonstrates DNA mismatch repair activity in Haemophilus influenzae cell free extracts. The mutS gene as well as purified protein of H. influenzae restored repair activity in complementation assays performed with mutS deficient Escherichia coli strain. The difference in affinity for GT and AC mismatched bases by H. influenzae MutS was reflected in the efficiency with which these DNA heteroduplexes were repaired in vitro, with GT being repaired well and AC the least. Unlike E. coli MutS, the H. influenzae homolog failed to give protein-DNA complex with homoduplex DNA. Interestingly, MutS was found to bind single-stranded DNA but with lesser affinity as compared to heteroduplex DNA. Apart from the nucleotide- and DNA-mediated conformational transitions, as monitored by circular dichroism and limited proteolysis, our data suggest a functional role when H. influenzae MutS encounters single-stranded DNA during exonucleolytic step of DNA repair process. We propose that, conformational changes in H. influenzae MutS not only modulate mismatch recognition but also trigger some of the down stream processes involved in the DNA mismatch repair process.

Identifying an interaction site between MutH and the C-terminal domain of MutL by crosslinking, affinity purification, chemical coding and mass spectrometry

To investigate protein–protein interaction sites in the DNA mismatch repair system we developed a crosslinking/mass spectrometry technique employing a commercially available trifunctional crosslinker with a thiol-specific methanethiosulfonate group, a photoactivatable benzophenone moiety and a biotin affinity tag. The XACM approach combines photocrosslinking (X), in-solution digestion of the crosslinked mixtures, affinity purification via the biotin handle (A), chemical coding of the crosslinked products (C) followed by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (M). We illustrate the feasibility of the method using a single-cysteine variant of the homodimeric DNA mismatch repair protein MutL. Moreover, we successfully applied this method to identify the photocrosslink formed between the single-cysteine MutH variant A223C, labeled with the trifunctional crosslinker in the C-terminal helix and its activator protein MutL. The identified crosslinked MutL-peptide maps to a conserved surface patch of the MutL C-terminal dimerization domain. These observations are substantiated by additional mutational and chemical crosslinking studies. Our results shed light on the potential structures of the MutL holoenzyme and the MutH–MutL–DNA complex.

Electrochemical detection of mismatched DNA using a MutS probe

A direct and label-free electrochemical biosensor for the detection of the protein–mismatched DNA interaction was designed using immobilized N-terminal histidine tagged Escherichia coli. MutS on a Ni-NTA coated Au electrode. General electrochemical methods, cyclic voltammetry (CV), electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance (EQCM) and impedance spectroscopy, were used to ascertain the binding affinity of mismatched DNAs to the MutS probe. The direct results of CV and impedance clearly reveal that the interaction of MutS with the CC heteroduplex was much stronger than that with AT homoduplex, which was not differentiated in previous results (GT > CT > CC ≈ AT) of a gel mobility shift assay. The EQCM technique was also able to quantitatively analyze MutS affinity to heteroduplexes.

Mismatch repair factor MSH2-MSH3 binds and alters the conformation of branched DNA structures predicted to form during genetic recombination

Genetic studies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae predict that the mismatch repair (MMR) factor MSH2-MSH3 binds and stabilizes branched recombination intermediates that form during single strand annealing and gene conversion. To test this model, we constructed a series of DNA substrates that are predicted to form during these recombination events. We show in an electrophoretic mobility shift assay that S. cerevisiae MSH2-MSH3 specifically binds branched DNA substrates containing 3' single-stranded DNA and that ATP stimulates its release from these substrates. Chemical footprinting analyses indicate that MSH2-MSH3 specifically binds at the double-strand/single-strand junction of branched substrates, alters its conformation and opens up the junction. Therefore, MSH2-MSH3 binding to its substrates creates a unique nucleoprotein structure that may signal downstream steps in repair that include interactions with MMR and nucleotide excision repair factors.

Inhibition of Msh6 ATPase activity by mispaired DNA induces a Msh2(ATP)-Msh6(ATP) state capable of hydrolysis-independent movement along DNA

The Msh2-Msh6 heterodimer plays a key role in the repair of mispaired bases in DNA. Critical to its role in mismatch repair is the ATPase activity that resides within each subunit. Here we show that both subunits can simultaneously bind ATP and identify the Msh6 subunit as containing the high-affinity ATP binding site and Msh2 as containing a high-affinity ADP binding site. Stable binding of ATP to Msh6 causes decreased affinity of Msh2 for ADP, and binding to mispaired DNA stabilized the binding of ATP to Msh6. Our results support a model in which mispair binding encourages a dual-occupancy state with ATP bound to Msh6 and Msh2; this state supports hydrolysis-independent sliding along DNA.

MutL-catalyzed ATP hydrolysis is required at a post-UvrD loading step in methyl-directed mismatch repair

Methyl-directed mismatch repair is a coordinated process that ensures replication fidelity and genome integrity by resolving base pair mismatches and insertion/deletion loops. This post-replicative event involves the activities of several proteins, many of which appear to be regulated by MutL. MutL interacts with and modulates the activities of MutS, MutH, UvrD, and perhaps other proteins. The purified protein catalyzes a slow ATP hydrolysis reaction that is essential for its role in mismatch repair. However, the role of the ATP hydrolysis reaction is not understood. We have begun to address this issue using two point mutants: MutL-E29A, which binds nucleotide but does not catalyze ATP hydrolysis, and MutL-D58A, which does not bind nucleotide. As expected, both mutants failed to complement the loss of MutL in genetic assays. Purified MutL-E29A protein interacted with MutS and stimulated the MutH-catalyzed nicking reaction in a mismatch-dependent manner. Importantly, MutL-E29A stimulated the loading of UvrD on model substrates. In fact, stimulation of UvrD-catalyzed unwinding was more robust with MutL-E29A than the wild-type protein. MutL-D58A, on the other hand, did not interact with MutS, stimulate MutH-catalyzed nicking, or stimulate the loading of UvrD. We conclude that ATP-bound MutL is required for the incision steps associated with mismatch repair and that ATP hydrolysis by MutL is required for a step in the mismatch repair pathway subsequent to the loading of UvrD and may serve to regulate helicase loading.

A single mismatch in the DNA induces enhanced aggregation of MutS. Hydrodynamic analyses of the protein-DNA complexes

Changes in the oligomeric status of MutS protein was probed in solution by dynamic light scattering (DLS), and corroborated by sedimentation analyses. In the absence of any nucleotide cofactor, free MutS protein [hydrodynamic radius (Rh) of 10-12 nm] shows a small increment in size (Rh 14 nm) following the addition of homoduplex DNA (121 bp), whereas the same increases to about 18-20 nm with heteroduplex DNA containing a mismatch. MutS forms large aggregates (Rh > 500 nm) with ATP, but not in the presence of a poorly hydrolysable analogue of ATP (ATPgammaS). Addition of either homo- or heteroduplex DNA attenuates the same, due to protein recruitment to DNA. However, the same protein/DNA complexes, at high concentration of ATP (10 mm), manifest an interesting property where the presence of a single mismatch provokes a much larger oligomerization of MutS on DNA (Rh > 500 nm in the presence of MutL) as compared to the normal homoduplex (Rh approximately 100-200 nm) and such mismatch induced MutS aggregation is entirely sustained by the ongoing hydrolysis of ATP in the reaction. We speculate that the surprising property of a single mismatch, in nucleating a massive aggregation of MutS encompassing the bound DNA might play an important role in mismatch repair system.

The DNA binding activity of MutL is required for methyl-directed mismatch repair in Escherichia coli

The DNA binding properties of the mismatch repair protein MutL and their importance in the repair process have been controversial for nearly two decades. We have addressed this issue using a point mutant of MutL (MutL-R266E). The biochemical and genetic data suggest that DNA binding by MutL is required for dam methylation-directed mismatch repair. We demonstrate that purified MutL-R266E retains wild-type biochemical properties that do not depend on DNA binding, such as basal ATP hydrolysis in the absence of DNA and the ability to interact with other mismatch repair proteins. However, purified MutL-R266E binds DNA poorly in vitro as compared with MutL, and consistent with this observation, its DNA-dependent biochemical activities, like DNA-stimulated ATP hydrolysis and helicase II stimulation, are severely compromised. In addition, there is a modest effect on stimulation of MutH-catalyzed nicking. Finally, genetic assays show that MutL-R266E has a strong mutator phenotype, demonstrating that the mutant is unable to function in dam methylation-directed mismatch repair in vivo.

Detection of high-affinity and sliding clamp modes for MSH2-MSH6 by single-molecule unzipping force analysis

Mismatch repair (MMR) is initiated by MutS family proteins (MSH) that recognize DNA mismatches and recruit downstream repair factors. We used a single-molecule DNA-unzipping assay to probe interactions between S. cerevisiae MSH2-MSH6 and a variety of DNA mismatch substrates. This work revealed a high-specificity binding state of MSH proteins for mismatch DNA that was not observed in bulk assays and allowed us to measure the affinity of MSH2-MSH6 for mismatch DNA as well as its footprint on DNA surrounding the mismatch site. Unzipping analysis with mismatch substrates containing an end blocked by lac repressor allowed us to identify MSH proteins present on DNA between the mismatch and the block, presumably in an ATP-dependent sliding clamp mode. These studies provide a high-resolution approach to study MSH interactions with DNA mismatches and supply evidence to support and refute different models proposed for initiation steps in MMR.

Analysis of the human MutLalpha.MutSalpha complex

Human DNA mismatch repair is initiated by MutSalpha which ATP-dependently recruits MutLalpha. Analysis of this complex is difficult due to its transient and dynamic nature. We have optimized conditions for investigation of MutLalpha.MutSalpha complexes using a DNA pulldown assay. Non-specific DNA end-binding, which frequently interfered with analysis of the interaction, did not occur under the applied conditions. MutSalpha had significantly higher affinity to DNA mispairs, but its interaction with MutLalpha did not require a mismatch. Complex formation was best supported by low magnesium concentration and low temperature at physiological pH and salt concentration. Complex formation was delayed by the slowly hydrolyzable ATP analog ATPgammaS, undetectable with the non-hydrolyzable analog AMP-PNP, and occurred weakly with a combination of AMP-PNP and ADP, confirming that hydrolysis was required. The described conditions likely capture an intermediate of the repair reaction which has bound ATP and ADP in the two nucleotide-binding sites of MutSalpha.

Analysis of interactions between mismatch repair initiation factors and the replication processivity factor PCNA

In eukaryotes, the DNA replication factor PCNA is loaded onto primer-template junctions to act as a processivity factor for DNA polymerases. Genetic and biochemical studies suggest that PCNA also functions in early steps in mismatch repair (MMR) to facilitate the repair of misincorporation errors generated during DNA replication. These studies have shown that PCNA interacts directly with several MMR components, including MSH3, MSH6, MLH1, and EXO1. At present, little is known about how these interactions contribute to the mismatch repair mechanism. The interaction between MLH1 and PCNA is of particular interest because MLH1-PMS1 is thought to act as a matchmaker to signal mismatch recognition to downstream repair events; in addition, PCNA has been hypothesized to act in strand discrimination steps in MMR. Here, we utilized both genetic and surface plasmon resonance techniques to characterize the MLH1-PMS1-PCNA interaction. These analyses enabled us to determine the stability of the complex (K(D) = 300 nM) and to identify residues (572-579) in MLH1 and PCNA (126,128) that appear important to maintain this stability. We favor a model in which PCNA acts as a scaffold for consecutive protein-protein interactions that allow for the coordination of MMR steps.

Contribution of Msh2 and Msh6 subunits to the asymmetric ATPase and DNA mismatch binding activities of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2-Msh6 mismatch repair protein

Previous analyses of both Thermus aquaticus MutS homodimer and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2-Msh6 heterodimer have revealed that the subunits in these protein complexes bind and hydrolyze ATP asymmetrically, emulating their asymmetric DNA binding properties. In the MutS homodimer, one subunit (S1) binds ATP with high affinity and hydrolyzes it rapidly, while the other subunit (S2) binds ATP with lower affinity and hydrolyzes it at an apparently slower rate. Interaction of MutS with mismatched DNA results in suppression of ATP hydrolysis at S1-but which of these subunits, S1 or S2, makes specific contact with the mismatch (e.g., base stacking by a conserved phenylalanine residue) remains unknown. In order to answer this question and to clarify the links between the DNA binding and ATPase activities of each subunit in the dimer, we made mutations in the ATPase sites of Msh2 and Msh6 and assessed their impact on the activity of the Msh2-Msh6 heterodimer (in Msh2-Msh6, only Msh6 makes base specific contact with the mismatch). The key findings are: (a) Msh6 hydrolyzes ATP rapidly, and thus resembles the S1 subunit of the MutS homodimer, (b) Msh2 hydrolyzes ATP at a slower rate, and thus resembles the S2 subunit of MutS, (c) though itself an apparently weak ATPase, Msh2 has a strong influence on the ATPase activity of Msh6, (d) Msh6 binding to mismatched DNA results in suppression of rapid ATP hydrolysis, revealing a "cis" linkage between its mismatch recognition and ATPase activities, (e) the resultant Msh2-Msh6 complex, with both subunits in the ATP-bound state, exhibits altered interactions with the mismatch.

DNA mismatch repair

DNA mismatch repair (MMR) is an evolutionarily conserved process that corrects mismatches generated during DNA replication and escape proofreading. MMR proteins also participate in many other DNA transactions, such that inactivation of MMR can have wide-ranging biological consequences, which can be either beneficial or detrimental. We begin this review by briefly considering the multiple functions of MMR proteins and the consequences of impaired function. We then focus on the biochemical mechanism of MMR replication errors. Emphasis is on structure-function studies of MMR proteins, on how mismatches are recognized, on the process by which the newly replicated strand is identified, and on excision of the replication error.

Human mismatch repair: reconstitution of a nick-directed bidirectional reaction

Bidirectional mismatch repair directed by a strand break located 3' or 5' to the mispair has been reconstituted using seven purified human activities: MutSalpha, MutLalpha, EXOI, replication protein A (RPA), proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), replication factor C (RFC) and DNA polymerase delta. In addition to DNA polymerase delta, PCNA, RFC, and RPA, 5'-directed repair depends on MutSalpha and EXOI, whereas 3'-directed mismatch correction also requires MutLalpha. The repair reaction displays specificity for DNA polymerase delta, an effect that presumably reflects interactions with other repair activities. Because previous studies have suggested potential involvement of the editing function of a replicative polymerase in mismatch-provoked excision, we have evaluated possible participation of DNA polymerase delta in the excision step of repair. RFC and PCNA dramatically activate polymerase delta-mediated hydrolysis of a primer-template. Nevertheless, the contribution of the polymerase to mismatch-provoked excision is very limited, both in the purified system and in HeLa extracts, as judged by in vitro assay using nicked circular heteroplex DNAs. Thus, excision and repair in the purified system containing polymerase delta are reduced 10-fold upon omission of EXOI or by substitution of a catalytically dead form of the exonuclease. Furthermore, aphidicolin inhibits both 3'- and 5'-directed excision in HeLa nuclear extracts by only 20-30%. Although this modest inhibition could be because of nonspecific effects, it may indicate limited dependence of bidirectional excision on an aphidicolin-sensitive DNA polymerase.

Determination of protein-DNA binding constants and specificities from statistical analyses of single molecules: MutS-DNA interactions

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) is a powerful technique for examining the conformations of protein–DNA complexes and determining the stoichiometries and affinities of protein–protein complexes. We extend the capabilities of AFM to the determination of protein–DNA binding constants and specificities. The distribution of positions of the protein on the DNA fragments provides a direct measure of specificity and requires no knowledge of the absolute binding constants. The fractional occupancies of the protein at a given position in conjunction with the protein and DNA concentrations permit the determination of the absolute binding constants. We present the theoretical basis for this analysis and demonstrate its utility by characterizing the interaction of MutS with DNA fragments containing either no mismatch or a single mismatch. We show that MutS has significantly higher specificities for mismatches than was previously suggested from bulk studies and that the apparent low specificities are the result of high affinity binding to DNA ends. These results resolve the puzzle of the apparent low binding specificity of MutS with the expected high repair specificities. In conclusion, from a single set of AFM experiments, it is possible to determine the binding affinity, specificity and stoichiometry, as well as the conformational properties of the protein–DNA complexes.

Analysis of the interaction between the Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH2-MSH6 and MLH1-PMS1 complexes with DNA using a reversible DNA end-blocking system

The Lac repressor-operator interaction was used as a reversible DNA end-blocking system in conjunction with an IAsys biosensor instrument (Thermo Affinity Sensors), which detects total internal reflectance and allows monitoring of binding and dissociation in real time, in order to develop a system for studying the ability of mismatch repair proteins to move along the DNA. The MSH2-MSH6 complex bound to a mispaired base was found to be converted by ATP binding to a form that showed rapid sliding along the DNA and dissociation via the DNA ends and also showed slow, direct dissociation from the DNA. In contrast, the MSH2-MSH6 complex bound to a base pair containing DNA only showed direct dissociation from the DNA. The MLH1-PMS1 complex formed both mispair-dependent and mispair-independent ternary complexes with the MSH2-MSH6 complex on DNA. The mispair-independent ternary complexes were formed most efficiently on DNA molecules with free ends under conditions where ATP hydrolysis did not occur, and only exhibited direct dissociation from the DNA. The mispair-dependent ternary complexes were formed in the highest yield on DNA molecules with blocked ends, required ATP and magnesium for formation, and showed both dissociation via the DNA ends and direct dissociation from the DNA.

Asymmetric ATP binding and hydrolysis activity of the Thermus aquaticus MutS dimer is key to modulation of its interactions with mismatched DNA

Prokaryotic MutS and eukaryotic Msh proteins recognize base pair mismatches and insertions or deletions in DNA and initiate mismatch repair. These proteins function as dimers (and perhaps higher order oligomers) and possess an ATPase activity that is essential for DNA repair. Previous studies of Escherichia coli MutS and eukaryotic Msh2-Msh6 proteins have revealed asymmetry within the dimer with respect to both DNA binding and ATPase activities. We have found the Thermus aquaticus MutS protein amenable to detailed investigation of the nature and role of this asymmetry. Here, we show that (a) in a MutS dimer one subunit (S1) binds nucleotide with high affinity and the other (S2) with 10-fold weaker affinity, (b) S1 hydrolyzes ATP rapidly while S2 hydrolyzes ATP at a 30-50-fold slower rate, (c) mismatched DNA binding to MutS inhibits ATP hydrolysis at S1 but slow hydrolysis continues at S2, and (d) interaction between mismatched DNA and MutS is weakened when both subunits are occupied by ATP but remains stable when S1 is occupied by ATP and S2 by ADP. These results reveal key MutS species in the ATPase pathway; S1(ADP)-S2(ATP) is formed preferentially in the absence of DNA or in the presence of fully matched DNA, while S1(ATP)-S2(ATP) and S1(ATP)-S2(ADP) are formed preferentially in the presence of mismatched DNA. These MutS species exhibit differences in interaction with mismatched DNA that are likely important for the mechanism of MutS action in DNA repair.

Cadmium inhibits the functions of eukaryotic MutS complexes

Exposure of yeast cells to low concentrations of cadmium results in elevated mutation rates due to loss of mismatch repair (MMR), and cadmium inhibits MMR activity in extracts of human cells. Here we show that cadmium inhibits both Msh2-Msh6- and Msh2-Msh3-dependent human MMR activity in vitro. This inhibition, which occurs at a step or steps preceding repair DNA synthesis, is observed for repair directed by either a 3' or a 5' nick. In an attempt to identify the protein target(s) of cadmium inhibition, we show that cadmium inhibition of MMR is not reversed by addition of zinc to the repair reaction, suggesting that the target is not a zinc metalloprotein. We then show that cadmium inhibits ATP hydrolysis by yeast Msh2-Msh6 but has no effect on ATPase hydrolysis by yeast Mlh1-Pms1. Steady state kinetic analysis with wild type Msh2-Msh6, and with heterodimers containing subunit-specific Glu to Ala replacements inferred to inactivate the ATPase activity of either Msh2 or Msh6, suggest that cadmium inhibits ATP hydrolysis by Msh6 but not Msh2. Cadmium also reduces DNA binding by Msh2-Msh6 and more so for mismatched than matched duplexes. These data indicate that eukaryotic Msh2-Msh3 and Msh2-Msh6 complexes are targets for inhibition of MMR by cadmium, a human lung carcinogen that is ubiquitous in the environment.

Structure of the MutL C-terminal domain: a model of intact MutL and its roles in mismatch repair

MutL assists the mismatch recognition protein MutS to initiate and coordinate mismatch repair in species ranging from bacteria to humans. The MutL N-terminal ATPase domain is highly conserved, but the C-terminal region shares little sequence similarity among MutL homologs. We report here the crystal structure of the Escherichia coli MutL C-terminal dimerization domain and the likelihood of its conservation among MutL homologs. A 100-residue proline-rich linker between the ATPase and dimerization domains, which generates a large central cavity in MutL dimers, tolerates sequence substitutions and deletions of one-third of its length with no functional consequences in vivo or in vitro. Along the surface of the central cavity, residues essential for DNA binding are located in both the N- and C-terminal domains. Each domain of MutL interacts with UvrD helicase and is required for activating the helicase activity. The DNA-binding capacity of MutL is correlated with the level of UvrD activation. A model of how MutL utilizes its ATPase and DNA-binding activities to mediate mismatch-dependent activation of MutH endonuclease and UvrD helicase is proposed.

ATP increases the affinity between MutS ATPase domains. Implications for ATP hydrolysis and conformational changes

MutS is the key protein of the Escherichia coli DNA mismatch repair system. It recognizes mispaired and unpaired bases and has intrinsic ATPase activity. ATP binding after mismatch recognition by MutS serves as a switch that enables MutL binding and the subsequent initiation of mismatch repair. However, the mechanism of this switch is poorly understood. We have investigated the effects of ATP binding on the MutS structure. Crystallographic studies of ATP-soaked crystals of MutS show a trapped intermediate, with ATP in the nucleotide-binding site. Local rearrangements of several residues around the nucleotide-binding site suggest a movement of the two ATPase domains of the MutS dimer toward each other. Analytical ultracentrifugation experiments confirm such a rearrangement, showing increased affinity between the ATPase domains upon ATP binding and decreased affinity in the presence of ADP. Mutations of specific residues in the nucleotide-binding domain reduce the dimer affinity of the ATPase domains. In addition, ATP-induced release of DNA is strongly reduced in these mutants, suggesting that the two activities are coupled. Hence, it seems plausible that modulation of the affinity between ATPase domains is the driving force for conformational changes in the MutS dimer. These changes are driven by distinct amino acids in the nucleotide-binding site and form the basis for long-range interactions between the ATPase domains and DNA-binding domains and subsequent binding of MutL and initiation of mismatch repair.

Signaling from DNA mispairs to mismatch-repair excision sites despite intervening blockades

Mismatch-repair (MMR) systems promote genomic stability by correction of DNA replication errors. Thus, MMR proteins--prokaryotic MutS and MutL homodimers or their MutSalpha and MutLalpha heterodimer homologs, plus accessory proteins--specifically couple mismatch recognition to nascent-DNA excision. In vivo excision-initiation signals--specific nicks in some prokaryotes, perhaps growing 3' ends or Okazaki-fragment 5' ends in eukaryotes--are efficiently mimicked in vitro by nicks or gaps in exogenous DNA substrates. In some models for recognition-excision coupling, MutSalpha bound to mismatches is induced by ATP hydrolysis, or simply by binding of ATP, to slide along DNA to excision-initiation sites, perhaps in association with MutLalpha and accessory proteins. In other models, MutSalpha.MutLalpha complexes remain fixed at mismatches and contact distant excision sites by DNA looping. To challenge the hypothesis that recognition complexes remain fixed, we placed biotin-streptavidin blockades between mismatches and pre-existing nicks. In human nuclear extracts, mismatch efficiently provoked the initiation of excision despite the intervening barriers, as predicted. However, excision progress and therefore mismatch correction were prevented.

Mutations in the DNA mismatch repair proteins MutS and MutL of oxazolidinone-resistant or -susceptible Enterococcus faecium

Mutations in mutS and mutL, which encode DNA mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, can confer hypermutator phenotypes and may facilitate the emergence of mutational antibiotic resistance in bacteria. Linezolid-resistant enterococci (LRE) rarely emerge during therapy and contain mutations in 23S rRNA genes. As enterococci with defective MMR could be prone to the development of oxazolidinone resistance mutations, we investigated 13 clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecium, including 2 LRE, for mutations in mutSL. A 4,944-bp fragment spanning mutSL was sequenced from two pairs of linezolid-resistant (MICs, 64 micro g/ml) and linezolid-susceptible (MICs, 2 micro g/ml) E. faecium isolates (one pair from Austria and one pair from the United Kingdom) identical by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. The pairs represented distinct strains in which linezolid resistance had emerged during therapy. The MutSL peptides of all four isolates had amino acid substitutions compared with the sequence of E. faecium strain DO (used for genome sequencing). These were Val352Ile (one pair of isolates only) and Met628Leu in MutS and Leu387Pro, Tyr406Phe, Thr415Ser, Phe427Leu, and Phe565Ile in MutL. The significance of these changes remains unknown; these isolates did not show a demonstrable hypermutator phenotype. The same substitutions were found in two of nine geographically diverse linezolid-susceptible enterococcal isolates; the other seven isolates had MutSL sequences identical to that of strain DO. Multilocus sequence typing revealed that all isolates with alternate MutSL peptides belonged to a distinct lineage of a prevalent E. faecium clonal complex, designated CC17. Further studies are needed to investigate the prevalence of these MutSL mutations and their possible roles in the emergence of E. faecium strains resistant to oxazolidinones and other antibiotic classes.

DNA mismatch repair: molecular mechanisms and biological function

DNA mismatch repair (MMR) guards the integrity of the genome in virtually all cells. It contributes about 1000-fold to the overall fidelity of replication and targets mispaired bases that arise through replication errors, during homologous recombination, and as a result of DNA damage. Cells deficient in MMR have a mutator phenotype in which the rate of spontaneous mutation is greatly elevated, and they frequently exhibit microsatellite instability at mono- and dinucleotide repeats. The importance of MMR in mutation avoidance is highlighted by the finding that defects in MMR predispose individuals to hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. In addition to its role in postreplication repair, the MMR machinery serves to police homologous recombination events and acts as a barrier to genetic exchange between species.

Direct IBD mapping: identical-by-descent mapping without genotyping

Direct identical-by-descent (IBD) mapping is a technique, that combines genomic mismatch scanning (GMS) and DNA microarray technology, for mapping regions shared IBD between two individuals without locus-by-locus genotyping or sequencing. The lack of reagents has limited its widespread application. In particular, two key reagents have been limiting, 1). mismatch repair proteins MutS, L and H, and 2). genomic microarrays for identifying the genomic locations of the GMS-selected IBD fragments. Here, we describe steps that optimized the procedure and resources that will facilitate the development of direct IBD mapping.

Formation of a DNA mismatch repair complex mediated by ATP

The mismatch repair proteins, MutS and MutL, interact in a DNA mismatch and ATP-dependent manner to activate downstream events in repair. Here, we assess the role of ATP binding and hydrolysis in mismatch recognition by MutS and the formation of a ternary complex involving MutS and MutL bound to a mismatched DNA. We show that ATP reduces the affinity of MutS for mismatched DNA and that the modulation of DNA binding affinity by nucleotide is even more pronounced for MutS E694A, a protein that binds ATP but is defective for ATP hydrolysis. Despite the ATP hydrolysis defect, E694A, like WT MutS, undergoes rapid, ATP-dependent dissociation from a DNA mismatch. Furthermore, MutS E694A retains the ability to interact with MutL on mismatched DNA. The recruitment of MutL to a mismatched DNA by MutS is also observed for two mutant MutL proteins, E29A, defective for ATP hydrolysis, and R266A, defective for DNA binding. These results suggest that ATP binding in the absence of hydrolysis is sufficient to trigger formation of a MutS sliding clamp. However, recruitment of MutL results in the formation of a dynamic ternary complex that we propose is the intermediate that signals subsequent repair steps requiring ATP hydrolysis.

Hydrolytically Deficient MutS E694A Is Defective in the MutL-dependent Activation of MutH and in the Mismatch-dependent Assembly of the MutS · MutL · Heteroduplex Complex

The roles of ATP binding and hydrolysis by MutS in mismatch repair are poorly understood. MutS E694A, in which Glu-694 of the Walker B motif is substituted with alanine, is defective in hydrolysis of bound ATP and has been reported to support MutL-dependent activation of the MutH d(GATC) endonuclease in a trans DNA activation assay (Junop, M. S., Obmolova, G., Rausch, K., Hsieh, P., and Yang, W. (2001) Mol. Cell 7, 1-12). Because the MutH trans activation assay used in these previous studies was characterized by high background and low efficiency, we have re-evaluated the activities of MutS E694A. In contrast to native MutS, which can be isolated in a nucleotide-free form, purified MutS E694A contains 1.0 mol of bound ATP per dimer equivalent, and substoichiometric levels of bound ADP (0.08-0.58 mol/dimer), consistent with the suggestion that the ADP.MutS.ATP complex comprises a significant fraction of the protein in solution (Bjornson, K. P. and Modrich, P. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 18557-18562). In the presence of Mg2+, endogenous ATP is hydrolyzed with a rate constant of 0.12 min-1 at 30 degrees C, and hydrolysis yields a protein that displays increased specificity for heteroduplex DNA. As observed with wild type MutS, ATP can promote release of MutS E694A from a mismatch. However, the mutant protein is defective in the methyl-directed, mismatch- and MutL-dependent cis activation of MutH endonuclease on a 6.4-kilobase pair heteroduplex, displaying only 1 to 2% of the activity of wild type MutS. The mutant protein also fails to support normal assembly of the MutS.MutL.DNA ternary complex. Although a putative ternary complex can be observed in the presence of MutS E694A, assembly of this structure displays little if any dependence on a mismatched base pair.

DNA bending and unbending by MutS govern mismatch recognition and specificity

DNA mismatch repair is central to the maintenance of genomic stability. It is initiated by the recognition of base-base mismatches and insertion/deletion loops by the family of MutS proteins. Subsequently, ATP induces a unique conformational change in the MutS-mismatch complex but not in the MutS-homoduplex complex that sets off the cascade of events that leads to repair. To gain insight into the mechanism by which MutS discriminates between mismatch and homoduplex DNA, we have examined the conformations of specific and nonspecific MutS-DNA complexes by using atomic force microscopy. Interestingly, MutS-DNA complexes exhibit a single population of conformations, in which the DNA is bent at homoduplex sites, but two populations of conformations, bent and unbent, at mismatch sites. These results suggest that the specific recognition complex is one in which the DNA is unbent. Combining our results with existing biochemical and crystallographic data leads us to propose that MutS: (i) binds to DNA nonspecifically and bends it in search of a mismatch; (ii) on specific recognition of a mismatch, undergoes a conformational change to an initial recognition complex in which the DNA is kinked, with interactions similar to those in the published crystal structures; and (iii) finally undergoes a further conformational change to the ultimate recognition complex in which the DNA is unbent. Our results provide a structural explanation for the long-standing question of how MutS achieves mismatch repair specificity.

Msh2 separation of function mutations confer defects in the initiation steps of mismatch repair

In eukaryotes the MSH2-MSH3 and MSH2-MSH6 heterodimers initiate mismatch repair (MMR) by recognizing and binding to DNA mismatches. The MLH1-PMS1 heterodimer then interacts with the MSH proteins at or near the mismatch site and is thought to act as a mediator to recruit downstream repair proteins. Here we analyzed five msh2 mutants that are functional in removing 3' non-homologous tails during double-strand break repair but are completely defective in MMR. Because non-homologous tail removal does not require MSH6, MLH1, or PMS1 functions, a characterization of the msh2 separation of function alleles should provide insights into early steps in MMR. Using the Taq MutS crystal structure as a model, three of the msh2 mutations, msh2-S561P, msh2-K564E, msh2-G566D, were found to map to a domain in MutS involved in stabilizing mismatch binding. Gel mobility shift and DNase I footprinting assays showed that two of these mutations conferred strong defects on MSH2-MSH6 mismatch binding. The other two mutations, msh2-S656P and msh2-R730W, mapped to the ATPase domain. DNase I footprinting, ATP hydrolysis, ATP binding, and MLH1-PMS1 interaction assays indicated that the msh2-S656P mutation caused defects in ATP-dependent dissociation of MSH2-MSH6 from mismatch DNA and in interactions between MSH2-MSH6 and MLH1-PMS1. In contrast, the msh2-R730W mutation disrupted MSH2-MSH6 ATPase activity but did not strongly affect ATP binding or interactions with MLH1-PMS1. These results support a model in which MMR can be dissected into discrete steps: stable mismatch binding and sensing, MLH1-PMS1 recruitment, and recycling of MMR components.

Mismatch repair in human nuclear extracts: effects of internal DNA-hairpin structures between mismatches and excision-initiation nicks on mismatch correction and mismatch-provoked excision

DNA mismatch repair (MMR) couples recognition of base mispairs by MSH2.MSH6 heterodimers to initiation, hundreds of nucleotides away, of nascent strand 3'-5' or 5'-3' excision through the mispair. Mismatch-recognition complexes have been hypothesized to move along DNA to excision-initiation signals, in eukaryotes, perhaps ends of nascent DNA, or to remain at mismatches and search through space for initiation signals. Subsequent MMR excision, whether simple processive digestion of the targeted strand or tracking of an excision complex, remains poorly understood. In human cell-free extracts, we analyzed correction of a mismatch in a 2.2-kilobase pair (kbp) circular plasmid containing a pre-existing excision-initiation nick for initiation, and measured MMR excision (in the absence of exogenous dNTPs) at specific locations. Excision specificities were approximately 100:1 for nicked versus continuous strands, 80:1 for mismatched versus homoduplex DNA, and 30:1 for shorter (0.3-kbp) versus longer (1.9-kbp) nick-mispair paths. To test models for recognition-excision coupling and excision progress, we inserted potential blockades, 20-bp hairpins, into nick-mispair paths, using a novel technique to first generate gapped plasmid. Continuous strand longer-path hairpins did not affect mismatch correction, but shorter-path hairpins reduced correction 4-fold, and both together eliminated it. Shorter-path hairpins had little effect on initiation of (3'-5') excision, measured 30-60 nucleotides 5' to the nick, but blocked subsequent progress of excision to the mismatch; longer-path hairpins blocked the (lower level) 5'-3' excision to the mismatch. Thus, (a) MMR excision protein(s) cannot move past DNA hairpins. Hairpins at both ends of substrate-derived 0.5-kbp DNA fragments did not prevent ATP-induced dissociation of mismatch-bound human MSH2.MSH6, so recognition complexes at mismatches might provoke excision at nicks beyond hairpins, or loosely sliding MSH2.MSH6 dimers might move to the nicks.

Mismatch recognition-coupled stabilization of Msh2-Msh6 in an ATP-bound state at the initiation of DNA repair

Mismatch repair proteins correct errors in DNA via an ATP-driven process. In eukaryotes, the Msh2-Msh6 complex recognizes base pair mismatches and small insertion/deletions in DNA and initiates repair. Both Msh2 and Msh6 proteins contain Walker ATP-binding motifs that are necessary for repair activity. To understand how these proteins couple ATP binding and hydrolysis to DNA binding/mismatch recognition, the ATPase activity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2-Msh6 was examined under pre-steady-state conditions. Acid-quench experiments revealed that in the absence of DNA, Msh2-Msh6 hydrolyzes ATP rapidly (burst rate = 3 s(-1) at 20 degrees C) and then undergoes a slow step in the pathway that limits catalytic turnover (k(cat) = 0.1 s(-1)). ATP is hydrolyzed similarly in the presence of fully matched duplex DNA; however, in the presence of a G:T mismatch or +T insertion-containing DNA, ATP hydrolysis is severely suppressed (rate = 0.1 s(-1)). Pulse-chase experiments revealed that Msh2-Msh6 binds ATP rapidly in the absence or in the presence of DNA (rate = 0.1 microM(-1) s(-1)), indicating that for the Msh2-Msh6.mismatched DNA complex, a step after ATP binding but before or at ATP hydrolysis is the rate-limiting step in the pathway. Thus, mismatch recognition is coupled to a dramatic increase in the residence time of ATP on Msh2-Msh6. This mismatch-induced, stable ATP-bound state of Msh2-Msh6 likely signals downstream events in the repair pathway.

The coordinated functions of the E. coli MutS and MutL proteins in mismatch repair

The Escherichia coli MutS and MutL proteins have been conserved throughout evolution, although their combined functions in mismatch repair (MMR) are poorly understood. We have used biochemical and genetic studies to ascertain a physiologically relevant mechanism for MMR. The MutS protein functions as a regional lesion sensor. ADP-bound MutS specifically recognizes a mismatch. Repetitive rounds of mismatch-provoked ADP-->ATP exchange results in the loading of multiple MutS hydrolysis-independent sliding clamps onto the adjoining duplex DNA. MutL can only associate with ATP-bound MutS sliding clamps. Interaction of the MutS-MutL sliding clamp complex with MutH triggers ATP binding by MutL that enhances the endonuclease activity of MutH. Additionally, MutL promotes ATP binding-independent turnover of idle MutS sliding clamps. These results support a model of MMR that relies on two dynamic and redundant ATP-regulated molecular switches.

N-terminus of hMLH1 confers interaction of hMutLalpha and hMutLbeta with hMutSalpha

Mismatch repair is a highly conserved system that ensures replication fidelity by repairing mispairs after DNA synthesis. In humans, the two protein heterodimers hMutSalpha (hMSH2-hMSH6) and hMutLalpha (hMLH1-hPMS2) constitute the centre of the repair reaction. After recognising a DNA replication error, hMutSalpha recruits hMutLalpha, which then is thought to transduce the repair signal to the excision machinery. We have expressed an ATPase mutant of hMutLalpha as well as its individual subunits hMLH1 and hPMS2 and fragments of hMLH1, followed by examination of their interaction properties with hMutSalpha using a novel interaction assay. We show that, although the interaction requires ATP, hMutLalpha does not need to hydrolyse this nucleotide to join hMutSalpha on DNA, suggesting that ATP hydrolysis by hMutLalpha happens downstream of complex formation. The analysis of the individual subunits of hMutLalpha demonstrated that the hMutSalpha-hMutLalpha interaction is predominantly conferred by hMLH1. Further experiments revealed that only the N-terminus of hMLH1 confers this interaction. In contrast, only the C-terminus stabilised and co-immunoprecipitated hPMS2 when both proteins were co-expressed in 293T cells, indicating that dimerisation and stabilisation are mediated by the C-terminal part of hMLH1. We also examined another human homologue of bacterial MutL, hMutLbeta (hMLH1-hPMS1). We show that hMutLbeta interacts as efficiently with hMutSalpha as hMutLalpha, and that it predominantly binds to hMutSalpha via hMLH1 as well.

Overexpression and purification of isotopically labeled Escherichia coli MutH for NMR studies

MutH is one of the enzymes involved in the methyl directed -GATC-based DNA repair system. We report a significantly optimized protocol to prepare isotopically (15N and/or 13C) labeled MutH in minimal medium with high yields for NMR studies. Under the various conditions that we have standardized for the affinity purification of His(6) MutH, the yield of the purified MutH has been estimated to be 35-40 mg of protein from 1liter of M9 minimal media. The yield, thus, obtained by this method is significantly higher than those of previously reported methods. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectroscopy analysis revealed that the protein was pure and existed essentially in a monomeric form. Uniformly 15N-labeled protein, thus, produced has been characterized by recording a sensitivity enhanced 2D [15N]-[1H] HSQC spectrum. The dispersion seen in 15N-1H cross-peaks indicates the presence of a well-ordered structure for MutH and proper folding of the purified protein. The spectrum confirms further the existence of MutH as a monomer.

Differential and simultaneous adenosine di- and triphosphate binding by MutS

The roles of ATP binding and hydrolysis in the function of MutS in mismatch repair are poorly understood. As one means of addressing this question, we have determined the affinities and number of adenosine di- and triphosphate binding sites within MutS. Nitrocellulose filter binding assay and equilibrium fluorescence anisotropy measurements have demonstrated that MutS has one high affinity binding site for ADP and one high affinity site for nonhydrolyzable ATP analogues per dimer equivalent. Low concentrations of 5'-adenylylimidodiphosphate (AMPPNP) promote ADP binding and a large excess of AMPPNP is required to displace ADP from the protein. Fluorescence energy transfer and filter binding assays indicate that ADP and nonhydrolyzable ATP analogues can bind simultaneously to adjacent subunits within the MutS oligomer with affinities in the low micromolar range. These findings suggest that the protein exists primarily as the ATP.MutS.ADP ternary complex in solution and that this may be the form of the protein that is involved in DNA encounters in vivo.

Crystal structure and biochemical analysis of the MutS.ADP.beryllium fluoride complex suggests a conserved mechanism for ATP interactions in mismatch repair

During mismatch repair ATP binding and hydrolysis activities by the MutS family proteins are important for both mismatch recognition and for transducing mismatch recognition signals to downstream repair factors. Despite intensive efforts, a MutS.ATP.DNA complex has eluded crystallographic analysis. Searching for ATP analogs that strongly bound to Thermus aquaticus (Taq) MutS, we found that ADP.beryllium fluoride (ABF), acted as a strong inhibitor of several MutS family ATPases. Furthermore, ABF promoted the formation of a ternary complex containing the Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH2.MSH6 and MLH1.PMS1 proteins bound to mismatch DNA but did not promote dissociation of MSH2.MSH6 from mismatch DNA. Crystallographic analysis of the Taq MutS.DNA.ABF complex indicated that although this complex was very similar to that of MutS.DNA.ADP, both ADP.Mg(2+) moieties in the MutS. DNA.ADP structure were replaced by ABF. Furthermore, a disordered region near the ATP-binding pocket in the MutS B subunit became traceable, whereas the equivalent region in the A subunit that interacts with the mismatched nucleotide remained disordered. Finally, the DNA binding domains of MutS together with the mismatched DNA were shifted upon binding of ABF. We hypothesize that the presence of ABF is communicated between the two MutS subunits through the contact between the ordered loop and Domain III in addition to the intra-subunit helical lever arm that links the ATPase and DNA binding domains.

The alternating ATPase domains of MutS control DNA mismatch repair

DNA mismatch repair is an essential safeguard of genomic integrity by removing base mispairings that may arise from DNA polymerase errors or from homologous recombination between DNA strands. In Escherichia coli, the MutS enzyme recognizes mismatches and initiates repair. MutS has an intrinsic ATPase activity crucial for its function, but which is poorly understood. We show here that within the MutS homodimer, the two chemically identical ATPase sites have different affinities for ADP, and the two sites alternate in ATP hydrolysis. A single residue, Arg697, located at the interface of the two ATPase domains, controls the asymmetry. When mutated, the asymmetry is lost and mismatch repair in vivo is impaired. We propose that asymmetry of the ATPase domains is an essential feature of mismatch repair that controls the timing of the different steps in the repair cascade.

Site-specific protein modification to identify the MutL interface of MutH

We have mapped the region for the protein interaction site of the Escherichia coli mismatch repair protein MutH for its activator protein MutL by a site-specific protein modification approach. For this purpose we generated a cysteine-free variant of MutH and 12 variants thereof, each containing a single cysteine residue at surface positions selected on the basis of available structural and sequence information for MutH. All MutH variants displayed wild type activity both in vivo and in vitro. These variants were then site-specifically modified at their cysteine residues with thiol-specific reagents and then tested for their ability to be stimulated in their DNA cleavage activity by the activator protein MutL. Thereby we were able to identify a defined region in the MutH protein that is important for interaction with MutL, and most likely represents the MutL binding site of MutH.

Transfer of the MSH2.MSH6 complex from proliferating cell nuclear antigen to mispaired bases in DNA

Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) is thought to play a role in DNA mismatch repair at the DNA synthesis step as well as in an earlier step. Studies showing that PCNA interacts with mispair-binding protein complexes, MSH2.MSH3 and MSH2.MSH6, and that PCNA enhances MSH2.MSH6 mispair binding specificity suggest PCNA may be involved in mispair recognition. Here we show that PCNA and MSH2.MSH6 form a stable ternary complex with a homoduplex (G/C) DNA, but MSH2.MSH6 binding to a heteroduplex (G/T) DNA disrupts MSH2.MSH6 binding to PCNA. We also found that the addition of ATP or adenosine 5'-O-(thiotriphosphate) restores MSH2.MSH6 binding to PCNA, presumably by disrupting MSH2.MSH6 binding to the heteroduplex (G/T) DNA. These results support a model in which MSH2.MSH6 binds to PCNA loaded on newly replicated DNA and is transferred from PCNA to mispaired bases in DNA.

[Homologs of MutS and MutL during mammalian meiosis]

In eukaryotes, homologs of the Escherichia coli MutS and MutL proteins are crucial for both meiotic recombination and post-replicative DNA mismatch repair. Both pathways require the formation of a MutS homolog complex which interacts with a second heterodimer, composed of two MutL homologs. During mammalian meiosis, it is likely that chromosome synapsis requires the presence of a MSH4-MSH5 heterodimer. PMS2, a MutL homolog, seems to play an important role in this process. A MSH4-MSH5 heterodimer is also likely present later with other MutL homologs (MLH1 and MLH3) and is involved in the crossing-over process. The phenotype of msh4-/- mutant mice and MSH4 immunolocalization on meiotic chromosomes suggest that MSH4 has an early function in mammalian meiotic recombination. Both MSH4 and PMS2 directly interact with the RAD51 DNA strand exchange protein. In addition, MSH4 and RAD51 proteins co-localize on mouse meiotic chromosome cores. These results suggest that MSH4 and its partners could act, just after strand exchange promoted by RAD51, to check the homology of DNA heteroduplexes.