Mutational and computational analysis of the alpha(1b)-adrenergic receptor. Involvement of basic and hydrophobic residues in receptor activation and G protein coupling

Identification of cytoplasmic domains of hVPAC1 receptor required for activation of adenylyl cyclase. Crucial role of two charged amino acids strictly conserved in class II G protein-coupled receptors

The VPAC1 receptor mediates the action of two neuropeptides, vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide. It is a class II G protein-coupled receptor-activating adenylyl cyclase (AC). The role of the N-terminal extracellular domain of hVPAC1 receptor for VIP binding is now established (Laburthe, M., Couvineau, A. and Marie, J. C. (2002) Recept. Channels 8, 137-153), but nothing is known regarding the cytoplasmic domains responsible for AC activation. Here, we constructed a large series of mutants by substituting amino acids with alanine in the intracellular loops (IL) 1, 2, and 3 and proximal C-terminal tail of the receptor. The mutation of 40 amino acids followed by expression of mutants in chinese hamster ovary cells showed the following. (i) Mutations IL1 result in the absence of expression of mutants, suggesting a role of this loop in receptor folding. (ii) All residues of IL2 can be mutated without alteration of receptor expression and AC response to VIP. (iii) Mutation of residues IL3 points to the specific role of lysine 322 in the efficacy of the stimulation of AC activity by VIP. This efficacy is reduced by 50% in the K322A mutant. (iv) The proximal C-terminal tail is equipped with another important amino acid since mutation of glutamic acid 394 reduces AC response by 50%. The double mutant K322A/E394A exhibits a drastic reduction of >85% in the efficacy of VIP in stimulating AC activity in membranes and cAMP response in intact cells without alteration of receptor expression or affinity for VIP. These data highlight the role of charged residues in IL3 and the proximal C-terminal tail of hVPAC1 receptor for agonist-induced AC activation. Because these charged residues are absolutely conserved in class II receptors for peptides, which are all mediating AC activation, they may play a general role in coupling of class II receptors with the Gs protein.

Measurement of the millisecond activation switch of G protein-coupled receptors in living cells

Hormones and neurotransmitters transduce signals through G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR). Despite their common signaling pathways, however, the responses they elicit have different temporal patterns. To reveal the molecular basis for these differences we have developed a generally applicable fluorescence-based technique for real-time monitoring of the activation switch of GPCRs in living cells. We used such direct measurements to investigate the activation of the alpha(2A)-adrenergic receptor (alpha(2A)AR; neurotransmitter) and the parathyroid hormone receptor (PTHR; hormone) and observed much faster kinetics than expected: approximately 40 ms for the alpha(2A)AR and approximately 1 s for the PTHR. The different switch times are in agreement with the different receptors' biological functions. Agonists and antagonists could rapidly switch the receptors on or off, whereas a partial agonist caused only a partial signal. This approach allows the comparison of agonist and partial agonist intrinsic activities at the receptor level and provides evidence for millisecond activation times of GPCRs.

The role of a conserved region of the second intracellular loop in AT1 angiotensin receptor activation and signaling

The pleiotropic actions of angiotensin II are mediated by the primarily G(q) protein-coupled type 1 angiotensin (AT(1)) receptor. In this study a mutational analysis of the function of the conserved DRYXXV/IXXPL domain in the second intracellular loop of the rat AT(1A) receptor was performed in COS7 cells. Alanine substitution studies showed that single replacement of the highly conserved Asp(125) and Arg(126), but not Tyr(127), moderately impaired angiotensin II-induced inositol phosphate signaling. However, concomitant substitution of both Asp(125) and Arg(126) caused marked reduction of both inositol phosphate signaling and receptor internalization. Alanine scanning of the adjacent residues showed that substitution of Ile(130), His(132), and Pro(133) reduced agonist-induced inositol phosphate signal generation, whereas mutations of Met(134) also impaired receptor internalization. Expression of the D125A mutant AT(1A) receptor in COS7 cells endowed the receptor with moderate constitutive activity, as indicated by its enhanced basal Elk1 promoter activity and inositol phosphate response to partial agonists. Angiotensin II-induced stimulation of the Elk1 promoter showed parallel impairment with inositol phosphate signal generation in receptors containing mutations in this region of the AT(1A) receptor. These data confirm that Ca(2+) signal generation is required for the nuclear effects of angiotensin II-induced ERK activation. They are also consistent with the role of the conserved DRY sequence of the AT(1A) receptor in receptor activation, and of Asp(125) in constraining the receptor in its inactive conformation. Furthermore, in the cytoplasmic helical extension of the third helix, an apolar surface that includes Ile(130) and Met(134) appears to have a direct role in G protein coupling.

Sequences in the intracellular loops of the yeast pheromone receptor Ste2p required for G protein activation

The alpha-factor receptor of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae encoded by the STE2 gene is a member of the large family of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that mediate multiple signal transduction pathways. The third intracellular loop of GPCRs has been identified as a likely site of interaction with G proteins. To determine the extent of allowed substitutions within this loop, we subjected a stretch of 21 amino acids (Leu228-Leu248) to intensive random mutagenesis and screened multiply substituted alleles for receptor function. The 91 partially functional mutant alleles that were recovered contained 96 unique amino acid substitutions. Every position in this region can be replaced with at least two other types of amino acids without a significant effect on function. The tolerance for nonconservative substitutions indicates that activation of the G protein by ligand-bound receptors involves multiple intramolecular interactions that do not strongly depend on particular sequence elements. Many of the functional mutant alleles exhibit greater than normal levels of signaling, consistent with an inhibitory role for the third intracellular loop. Removal of increasing numbers of positively charged residues from the loop by site-directed mutagenesis causes a progressive loss of signaling function, indicating that the overall net charge of the loop is important for receptor function. Introduction of negatively charged residues also leads to a reduced level of signaling. The defects in signaling caused by substitution of charged amino acids are not caused by changes in the abundance of receptors at the cell surface.

Regulated and constitutive activation of specific signalling pathways by the human S1P5 receptor

1 We tested the hypothesis, whether G Protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) may differentially regulate specific signalling pathways by constitutive and agonist-induced activation using the human sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor S1P(5) as a model. 2 S1P(5) receptor-expressing HEK293 cells exhibited a high degree of basal activity for both inhibition of adenylyl cyclase and extracellular signal regulated kinase (ERK) when cultured in serum, which contains high levels of sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P). However, basal activity was independent of the presence of S1P: (i) constitutive activity remained when cells were cultured in delipidated serum, (ii) addition of S1P to delipidated serum did not increase basal S1P(5) receptor signalling. 3 Conversely, constitutive inhibition of forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase was further enhanced by S1P in S1P(5)-HEK293 cells. 4 Transfection of several mammalian cell lines (CHO-K1, HEK293, NIH-3T3, RH7777) with the S1P(5) receptor induced cell rounding, which was more pronounced in the presence of S1P-containing serum. Rounded cell morphology did not correlate with apoptotic cell death, but led to detachment of cells. 5 Cell surface ELISA assays showed that a fraction of plasma membrane S1P(5) receptors were dose-dependently internalized with S1P. 6 These data reveal that intrinsic inhibition of unstimulated adenylyl cyclase or ERK activity by the S1P(5) receptor is insensitive to ligand modulation. Conversely, effects on forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase, cell morphology and internalization can be further augmented with S1P. Our results suggest that different signal transduction pathways are not equally activated through constitutively active GPCRs with promiscuous signalling characteristics.

The crystallographic model of rhodopsin and its use in studies of other G protein-coupled receptors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are integral membrane proteins that respond to environmental signals and initiate signal transduction pathways activating cellular processes. Rhodopsin is a GPCR found in rod cells in retina where it functions as a photopigment. Its molecular structure is known from cryo-electron microscopic and X-ray crystallographic studies, and this has reshaped many structure/function questions important in vision science. In addition, this first GPCR structure has provided a structural template for studies of other GPCRs, including many known drug targets. After presenting an overview of the major structural elements of rhodopsin, recent literature covering the use of the rhodopsin structure in analyzing other GPCRs will be summarized. Use of the rhodopsin structural model to understand the structure and function of other GPCRs provides strong evidence validating the structural model.

Mutation of Asn293 to Asp in transmembrane helix VI abolishes agonist-induced but not constitutive activity of the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor

The beta(2)-adrenergic receptor has been shown to display significant constitutive activity (i.e., in the absence of agonist) in addition to agonist-induced activation. Various studies have suggested that a movement in transmembrane helix VI plays a role in activation of various G-protein-coupled receptors. Here we show that a mutation in this domain of the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor abolishes agonist activation but not constitutive activity. An Asn293Asp mutant of the human beta(2)-adrenergic receptor was expressed either transiently in COS-7 cells or stably in Chinese hamster ovary cells. The mutant receptors were unable to couple to G(s), as seen by the lack of high-affinity agonist binding as well as a reduction of the affinities of several agonists correlating with their intrinsic activities. The mutant receptors caused only minimal activation of adenylyl cyclase (2.5% of wild-type activity) and also failed to show agonist-induced phosphorylation by G-protein-coupled receptor kinase 2. In contrast, the mutant receptors were much less affected in their constitutive activity: transient transfection of wild-type and mutant receptors into COS-7 cells caused an increase in intracellular cAMP-levels that was dependent on the level of receptor expression and was maximally 5.4-fold for the mutant and 6.8-fold for the wild-type receptors (67% of wild-type activity). Introduction of the Asn293Asp mutation into a constitutively active mutant receptor did not affect the constitutive activity of this mutant. These results underscore the importance of transmembrane helix VI in controlling agonist-induced activation of the receptor and suggest that constitutive activity is different from agonist-induced activity. Furthermore, they indicate that Asn293 is a key residue in transferring conformational information from the agonist-binding site to the intracellular surface.

Molecular evolution of the mammalian alpha 2B adrenergic receptor

The alpha 2B adrenergic receptor (A2AB) is a heptahelical G protein-coupled receptor for catecholamines. We compared the almost complete coding region (about 1,175 bp) of the A2AB gene from 48 mammalian species, including eight newly determined sequences, representing all the 18 eutherian and two marsupial orders. Comparison of the encoded proteins reveals that residues thought to be involved in agonist binding are highly conserved, as are the regions playing a role in G protein-coupling. The three extracellular loops are generally more variable than the transmembrane domains and two of the intracellular loops, indicating a lower functional constraint. However, the greatest variation is observed in the very long, third intracellular loop, where only a few residues and a polyglutamyl tract are preserved. Although this polyglutamyl domain displays a great variation in length, its presence in all described A2ABs confirms its proposed role in agonist-dependent phosphorylation of the third intracellular loop. Phylogenetic analyses of the A2AB data set, including Bayesian methods, recognized the superordinal clades Afrotheria, Laurasiatheria, and Euarchontoglires, in agreement with recent molecular evidence, albeit with lower support. Within Afrotheria, A2AB strongly supports the paenungulate clade and the association of the continental African otter shrew with Malagasy tenrecs. Among Laurasiatheria, A2AB confirms the nesting of whales within the artiodactyls, as a sister group to hippopotamus. Within the Euarchontoglires, there is constant support for rodent monophyly.

Lessons from constitutively active mutants of G protein-coupled receptors

In the past decade, the concept of constitutive activity has profoundly modified our understanding of G protein-coupled-receptors (GPCRs). Here, we review the contribution of constitutively active mutants (CAMs) to our understanding of three aspects of GPCR physiopathology: (1) GPCR activation is a complex mechanism involving both the release of inactive state conformational constraints, mimicked by most CAMs, and the creation of new interactions that stabilize the active state and are mimicked by a restricted set of CAMs; (2) GPCR phosphorylation, internalization and desensitization processes are activated by receptor conformations, which partly overlap those activating G protein; (3) natural CAMs, mostly affecting GPCRs of the endocrine system, are found in several hereditary and acquired diseases, including cancers. One major remaining question is how CAMs recapitulate the different structural modifications of the agonist-induced active conformation(s) of the wild-type receptor. This characterization is a prerequisite for further use of CAMs as ligand-free models of active GPCRs in structural, cellular and physiological studies.

A model for constitutive lutropin receptor activation based on molecular simulation and engineered mutations in transmembrane helices 6 and 7

Many naturally occurring and engineered mutations lead to constitutive activation of the G protein-coupled lutropin receptor (LHR), some of which also result in reduced ligand responsiveness. To elucidate the nature of interhelical interactions in this heptahelical receptor and changes thereof accompanying activation, we have utilized site-directed mutagenesis on transmembrane helices 6 and 7 of rat LHR to prepare and characterize a number of single, double, and triple mutants. The potent constitutively activating mutants, D556(6.44)H and D556(6.44)Q, were combined with weaker activating mutants, N593(7.45)R and N597(7.49)Q, and the loss-of-responsiveness mutant, N593(7.45)A. The engineered mutants have also been simulated using a new receptor model based on the crystal structure of rhodopsin. The results suggest that constitutive LHR activation by mutations at Asp-556(6.44) is triggered by the breakage or weakening of the interaction found in the wild type receptor between Asp-556(6.44) and Asn-593(7.45). Whereas this perturbation is unique to the activating mutations at Asp-556(6.44), common features to all of the most active LHR mutants are the breakage of the charge-reinforced H-bonding interaction between Arg-442(3.50) and Asp-542(6.30) and the increase in solvent accessibility of the cytosolic extensions of helices 3 and 6, which probably participate in the receptor-G protein interface. Asn-593(7.45) and Asn-597(7.49) also seem to be necessary for the high constitutive activities of D556(6.44)H and D556(6.44)Q and for full ligand responsiveness. The new theoretical model provides a foundation for further experimental work on the molecular mechanism(s) of receptor activation.

Identification of domains directing specificity of coupling to G-proteins for the melanocortin MC3 and MC4 receptors

The melanocortin receptors, MC3R and MC4R, are G protein-coupled receptors that are involved in regulating energy homeostasis. Using a luciferase reporter gene under the transcriptional control of a cAMP- responsive element (CRE), the coupling efficiency of the MC4R and MC3R to G-proteins was previously shown to be different. MC4R exhibited only 30-50% of the maximum activity induced by MC3R. To assess the role of the different MC3R and MC4R domains in G-protein coupling, several chimeric MC3R/MC4R receptors were constructed. The relative luciferase activities, which were assessed after transfecting the chimeric receptors into HEK 293T cells, showed that the i3 (3rd intracellular) loop domain has an essential role in the differential signaling of MC3R and MC4R. To reveal which amino acid residue was involved in the MC4R-specific signaling in the i3 loop, a series of mutant MC4Rs was constructed. Reporter gene analysis showed that single mutations of Arg(220) to Ala and Thr(232) to either Val or Ala increased the relative luciferase activities, which suggests that these specific amino acids, Arg(220) and Thr(232), in the i3 loop of MC4R play crucial roles in G-protein coupling and the subtype-specific signaling pathways. An examination of the inositol phosphate (IP) levels in the cells transfected with either MC3R or MC4R after being exposed to the melanocortin peptides revealed significant stimulation of IP production by MC3R but no detectable increase in IP production was observed by MC4R. Furthermore, none of the MC4R mutants displayed melanocortin peptide-stimulated IP production. Overall, this study demonstrated that MC3R and MC4R have distinct signaling in either the cAMP- or the inositol phospholipid-mediated pathway with different conformational requirements.

Mutagenesis and modelling of the alpha(1b)-adrenergic receptor highlight the role of the helix 3/helix 6 interface in receptor activation

Computer simulations on a new model of the alpha1b-adrenergic receptor based on the crystal structure of rhodopsin have been combined with experimental mutagenesis to investigate the role of residues in the cytosolic half of helix 6 in receptor activation. Our results support the hypothesis that a salt bridge between the highly conserved arginine (R143(3.50)) of the E/DRY motif of helix 3 and a conserved glutamate (E289(6.30)) on helix 6 constrains the alpha1b-AR in the inactive state. In fact, mutations of E289(6.30) that weakened the R143(3.50)-E289(6.30) interaction constitutively activated the receptor. The functional effect of mutating other amino acids on helix 6 (F286(6.27), A292(6.33), L296(6.37), V299(6.40,) V300(6.41), and F303(6.44)) correlates with the extent of their interaction with helix 3 and in particular with R143(3.50) of the E/DRY sequence.

The alpha1b-adrenergic receptor subtype: molecular properties and physiological implications

The aim of this review is to summarize some of the main findings from our laboratory as well as from others concerning the biochemical, molecular, and functional properties of the alpha1b-adrenergic receptor. Experimental and computational mutagenesis of the alpha1b-adrenergic receptor have been instrumental in elucidating some of the molecular mechanisms underlying receptor activation and receptor coupling to Gq. The knockout mouse model lacking the alpha1b-adrenergic receptor has highlighted the potential implication of this receptor subtype in variety of functions including the regulation of blood pressure, glucose homeostasis, and the rewarding response to drugs of abuse.