Long-term effectiveness of vedolizumab in inflammatory bowel disease: a national study based on the Swedish National Quality Registry for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (SWIBREG)

Serum Biomarkers for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, is a chronic, inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract. As the novel therapeutic goal and biologicals are widely recognized, accurate assessment of disease and prediction of therapeutic response have become a crucial challenge in clinical practice. Also, because of the continuously rising incidence, convenient and economical methods of diagnosis and clinical assessment are urgently needed. Recently, serum biomarkers have made a great progress and become a focus in IBD study because they are non-invasive, convenient, and relatively inexpensive than are markers in biopsy tissue, stool, breath, and other body fluids.

Aims: To review the available data on serological biomarkers for IBD.

Methods: We searched PubMed using predefined key words on relevant literatures of serum biomarkers regarding diagnosis, evaluation of therapeutic efficacy, surveillance of disease activity, and assessment of prognosis for IBD.

Results: We reviewed serological biomarkers that are well-established and widely used (e.g., C-reactive protein), newly discovered biomarkers (e.g., cytokines, antibodies, and non-coding RNAs), and also recently advancements in serological biomarkers (e.g., metabolomics and proteomics) that are used in different aspects of IBD management.

Conclusions: With such a wealth of researches, to date, there are still no ideal serum biomarkers for IBD. Serum profiling and non-coding RNAs are just starting to blossom but reveal great promise for future clinical practice. Combining different biomarkers can be valuable in improving performance of disease evaluation.

Assessment of serum cytokines predicts clinical and endoscopic outcomes to vedolizumab in ulcerative colitis patients

AIMS

Vedolizumab (VDZ) prevents migration of activated leucocytes into inflamed mucosa. This study aimed to assess the patterns of serum cytokines in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients at baseline and during VDZ treatment, and to investigate their association with mucosal healing and clinical remission.

METHODS

We enrolled consecutive UC patients eligible for treatment with VDZ. A panel of serum cytokines were measured by fluorescence assay at weeks 0, 6 and 22. Colonoscopy was performed at baseline and week 54, to evaluate mucosal healing. The time trends of serum cytokines were analysed by log-linear mixed effect models, and their prognostic accuracy was evaluated by logistic regression.

RESULTS

Out of 27 patients included in the analysis, at week 54 mucosal healing was achieved in 12 (44%) and clinical remission in 17 (63%). Mucosal healing was associated with higher interleukin (IL)-8 values at baseline and with significant decrease in IL-6 and IL-8 levels over the first 6 weeks. A significant reduction of IL-6 and IL-8 levels over the first 6 weeks of treatment was associated also with clinical remission. Logistic models including, among the predictors, IL-6 and IL-8 at baseline and their changes over the first 6 weeks of treatment had 83% sensitivity and 87% specificity to predict mucosal healing, and 82% sensitivity and 90% specificity to predict clinical remission.

CONCLUSION

In UC patients, the serum patterns of IL-6 and IL-8 at baseline and over the first 6 weeks of treatment with VDZ could be useful to predict therapeutic outcome.

Are We Ready to Include Prognostic Factors in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Trials?

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by periodic episodes of flares and remission. Treatment is aimed at healing the bowel, to ultimately decrease hospitalization rates, need for surgeries and overall disability. In more recent years, treatment has transitioned from a reactive approach to a more proactive approach focusing on treating disease earlier and preventing complications. The challenge lies in identifying patients who need more intensive treatment early and trying to determine who will respond to which medications. Biomarkers and clinical activity scoring systems can be used to help guide treatment decisions. However, IBDs are very heterogeneous and the significance of these biomarkers can be difficult to discern on an individual basis. Recently, prognostic tools have been developed to aid in determining a patient's prognosis as well as their likelihood to respond to different therapies. Despite this progress, clinical trials have not routinely adopted this approach in their study design. Tools for stratification of disease severity and to personalize treatment choices have the potential to improve our studies both by enriching the patient population and further guiding clinical decision making in practice. This review aims to discuss biomarkers, current prognosticating tools, tools that determine response to therapy and how incorporating these into clinical trials will be beneficial.

Extent of Mucosal Inflammation in Ulcerative Colitis Influences the Clinical Remission Induced by Vedolizumab

Randomized controlled clinical trials and real-life observations indicate that less than 50% of patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) respond to vedolizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that blocks the α4β7 integrin. Since α4β7-expressing lymphocytes mainly infiltrate the left colon, we assessed whether localization of CD and UC influences vedolizumab-induced remission. One hundred and eighty-one patients (74 CD and 107 UC) receiving vedolizumab in 3 referral centers were retrospectively evaluated for clinical remission at week 14. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between remitters and non-responders, and multivariable multinomial analysis was performed to identify predictors of remission. Remission was achieved in 17 CD (23%) and 34 UC (32%) patients, respectively. In CD, localization of the lesions did not influence clinical remission. In UC, the remitters had more frequently a distal/left-sided colitis (21/34, 62%) as compared to the non-responders (9/47, 19%), and extensive colitis was more frequent in the non-responders (38/47, 81%) than in the remitters (13/34, 38%). The multivariable multinomial analysis showed that distal/left-sided colitis was associated with a higher probability of clinical remission while extensive colitis was inversely associated with induction of remission. Data indicate that UC patients with distal or left-sided colitis are more likely to achieve remission than patients with extensive colitis following vedolizumab treatment.

Effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab in inflammatory bowel disease patients aged 60 and over: an observational multicenter UK experience

Background

The GEMINI trials established the efficacy of vedolizumab in moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and demonstrated a favorable safety profile, suggesting it may be advantageous in older patients at greater risk of treatment-related complications. However, there is a paucity of data exploring the outcomes of vedolizumab in this group. Our objective was to determine the clinical effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab in older IBD patients within a real-world multicenter UK cohort.

Methods

A retrospective review of electronic records across 6 UK hospitals was undertaken to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety outcomes of vedolizumab in IBD patients aged ≥60 at start of therapy. Rates of clinical response, remission and corticosteroid-free remission were assessed at weeks 14 and 52, using validated clinical indices, and were compared to historical controls from real-world vedolizumab-treated cohorts unstratified by age.

Results

Of 74 patients aged 60 years or above (median 66 years), 48 were included in our effectiveness analysis (29 ulcerative colitis, 19 Crohn’s disease). Rates of clinical response, remission and corticosteroid-free remission at week 14 were 64%, 48% and 30%, respectively. By week 52, the rates of clinical response, remission, and corticosteroid-free remission were 52%, 38%, and 32%, respectively. Six (8%) patients experienced adverse effects. Effectiveness and safety outcomes were comparable to those of age-unstratified vedolizumab-treated cohorts.

Conclusion

Our 1-year outcome data suggests that vedolizumab is safe and effective in older IBD patients and broadly comparable to cohorts unselected by age.

Vedolizumab for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Two-Year Results of the Initiative on Crohn and Colitis (ICC) Registry, A Nationwide Prospective Observational Cohort Study: ICC Registry - Vedolizumab

Prospective data of vedolizumab treatment for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) beyond 1 year of treatment is scarce but needed for clinical decision making. We prospectively enrolled 310 patients with IBD (191 with Crohn's disease (CD) and 119 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC)) with a follow‐up period of 104 weeks (interquartile range: 103–104) in a nationwide registry. The corticosteroid‐free clinical remission rate (Harvey Bradshaw Index ≤ 4, Short Clinical Colitis Activity index ≤ 2) at weeks 52 and 104 were 28% and 19% for CD and 27% and 28% for UC, respectively. Fifty‐nine percent maintained corticosteroid‐free clinical remission between weeks 52 and 104. Vedolizumab with concomitant immunosuppression showed comparable effectiveness outcomes compared with vedolizumab monotherapy (week 104: 21% vs. 23%; P = 0.77), whereas 8 of 13 severe infections occurred in patients treated with concomitant immunosuppression. To conclude, the clinical effect was 19% for CD and 28% for UC after 2 years of follow‐up regardless of concomitant immunosuppression.

British Society of Gastroenterology consensus guidelines on the management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults

Ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease are the principal forms of inflammatory bowel disease. Both represent chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract, which displays heterogeneity in inflammatory and symptomatic burden between patients and within individuals over time. Optimal management relies on understanding and tailoring evidence-based interventions by clinicians in partnership with patients. This guideline for management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults over 16 years of age was developed by Stakeholders representing UK physicians (British Society of Gastroenterology), surgeons (Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland), specialist nurses (Royal College of Nursing), paediatricians (British Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition), dietitians (British Dietetic Association), radiologists (British Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology), general practitioners (Primary Care Society for Gastroenterology) and patients (Crohn's and Colitis UK). A systematic review of 88 247 publications and a Delphi consensus process involving 81 multidisciplinary clinicians and patients was undertaken to develop 168 evidence- and expert opinion-based recommendations for pharmacological, non-pharmacological and surgical interventions, as well as optimal service delivery in the management of both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Comprehensive up-to-date guidance is provided regarding indications for, initiation and monitoring of immunosuppressive therapies, nutrition interventions, pre-, peri- and postoperative management, as well as structure and function of the multidisciplinary team and integration between primary and secondary care. Twenty research priorities to inform future clinical management are presented, alongside objective measurement of priority importance, determined by 2379 electronic survey responses from individuals living with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, including patients, their families and friends.

British Society of Gastroenterology consensus guidelines on the management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults

Ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease are the principal forms of inflammatory bowel disease. Both represent chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract, which displays heterogeneity in inflammatory and symptomatic burden between patients and within individuals over time. Optimal management relies on understanding and tailoring evidence-based interventions by clinicians in partnership with patients. This guideline for management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults over 16 years of age was developed by Stakeholders representing UK physicians (British Society of Gastroenterology), surgeons (Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland), specialist nurses (Royal College of Nursing), paediatricians (British Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition), dietitians (British Dietetic Association), radiologists (British Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology), general practitioners (Primary Care Society for Gastroenterology) and patients (Crohn's and Colitis UK). A systematic review of 88 247 publications and a Delphi consensus process involving 81 multidisciplinary clinicians and patients was undertaken to develop 168 evidence- and expert opinion-based recommendations for pharmacological, non-pharmacological and surgical interventions, as well as optimal service delivery in the management of both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Comprehensive up-to-date guidance is provided regarding indications for, initiation and monitoring of immunosuppressive therapies, nutrition interventions, pre-, peri- and postoperative management, as well as structure and function of the multidisciplinary team and integration between primary and secondary care. Twenty research priorities to inform future clinical management are presented, alongside objective measurement of priority importance, determined by 2379 electronic survey responses from individuals living with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, including patients, their families and friends.

The Early Experience With Vedolizumab in the United States

BACKGROUND

Post-marketing studies of new inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) therapies are needed to establish clinical effectiveness and safety in clinical practice. We aimed to describe the U.S. experience with vedolizumab in a commercially insured population.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study in Quintiles-IMS Legacy PharMetrics Adjudicated Claims Database from May 2014 to June 2016. We included new vedolizumab users with Crohn disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) between 18 and 64 years with ≥12 months of continuous enrollment prior to initiating vedolizumab. Outcomes included treatment persistence >14 weeks, late steroid use, IBD-related surgery and infections associated with hospitalization. We built multivariable regression models to identify predictors of treatment persistence and late steroid use.

RESULTS

We identified 269 CD and 187 UC vedolizumab initiators. Only 60% of CD patients and 56% of UC patients remained on vedolizumab after 14 weeks without IBD-related hospitalization, surgery, and corticosteroid use. There were no significant predictors of treatment persistence. Steroid use in the first 2 months of vedolizumab initiation was a significant predictor of late steroid use in CD (odds ratio: 23.34; 95% confidence interval: 5.10-153.89). In the 6 months after vedolizumab initiation, 1.9% of CD and 5.9% of UC patients had an IBD-related surgery. Serious infections were <4%.

CONCLUSIONS

These data reflect the early U.S. experience with vedolizumab. The population-level response to vedolizumab therapy is just >50%. Steroids at the time of vedolizumab initiation is the strongest predictor of late steroid use in CD. Rates of surgery and serious infections are low.

Real-world Effectiveness and Safety of Vedolizumab for the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: The Scottish Vedolizumab Cohort

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Vedolizumab is an anti-a4b7 monoclonal antibody that is licensed for the treatment of moderate to severe Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. The aims of this study were to establish the real-world effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study involving seven NHS health boards in Scotland between June 2015 and November 2017. Inclusion criteria included: a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease with objective evidence of active inflammation at baseline (Harvey-Bradshaw Index[HBI] ≥5/Partial Mayo ≥2 plus C-reactive protein [CRP] >5 mg/L or faecal calprotectin ≥250 µg/g or inflammation on endoscopy/magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]); completion of induction; and at least one clinical follow-up by 12 months. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to establish 12-month cumulative rates of clinical remission, mucosal healing, and deep remission [clinical remission plus mucosal healing]. Rates of serious adverse events were described quantitatively.

RESULTS

Our cohort consisted of 180 patients with ulcerative colitis and 260 with Crohn's disease. Combined median follow-up was 52 weeks (interquartile range [IQR] 26-52 weeks). In ulcerative colitis, 12-month cumulative rates of clinical remission, mucosal healing, and deep remission were 57.4%, 47.3%, and 38.5%, respectively. In Crohn's disease, 12-month cumulative rates of clinical remission, mucosal healing, and deep remission were 58.4%, 38.9%, and 28.3% respectively. The serious adverse event rate was 15.6 per 100 patient-years of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Vedolizumab is a safe and effective treatment for achieving both clinical remission and mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease.

Swedish Inflammatory Bowel Disease Register (SWIBREG) - a nationwide quality register

Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic, inflammatory relapsing disease with increasing incidence. IBD research and long-term follow-up of patients have, however, been hampered by lack of detailed data on disease phenotype, patient-reported outcome measures, Physician Global Assessment, disease activity, and hospital-administered drugs. Aim: To review the Swedish IBD quality register (SWIBREG). Methods: Review of SWIBREG including questionnaire data from users and patients. Results: SWIBREG was launched in 2005, and as of April 2019, contains 46,400 patients with IBD (Crohn's disease: n = 15,705, ulcerative colitis: n = 21,540, IBD unclassified and other colitis (including e.g., microscopic colitis): n = 9155). Of these IBD patients, 7778 had been diagnosed in childhood (16.8%). Earlier research has shown that combining SWIBREG and the Swedish National Patient Register (NPR) yields a positive predictive value of 100% (95%CI = 95-100%) for having a diagnosis of IBD. Moreover, out of all patients in the NPR with a diagnosis of IBD plus either IBD-related surgery or immunomodulatory/biological treatment during the past 18 months, SWIBREG covers 59.0%. SWIBREG records not only information on conventional therapies but also on biological treatment, surgery, smoking, disease activity, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and patient-experienced measures (PREMs). Data are presented through a graphical decision support system. Conclusion: SWIBREG benefits patients with IBD, and offers an ideal opportunity for healthcare personnel and researchers to examine disease phenotype and activity, PROMs/PREMs, and hospital-administered drugs in patients with IBD.

Retrospective Claims Analysis Indirectly Comparing Medication Adherence and Persistence Between Intravenous Biologics and Oral Small-Molecule Therapies in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Introduction

Patients’ adherence to and persistence on treatment for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) can vary, depending on type and distribution of disease and treatment modality. We aim to identify differences in adherence and persistence with treatments with different administration routes (intravenous vs oral) in IBD.

Methods

A retrospective cohort analysis of a claims database of adult patients diagnosed with IBD or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who began treatment with vedolizumab, tofacitinib, or infliximab from January 2015 through December 2015. Adherence evaluated by proportion of days covered (PDC) and cumulative days with gaps at least 20% beyond expected interval (CG20) using multivariable generalized linear equation models. Persistence assessed as time to treatment discontinuation over 12 months of follow-up using Kaplan–Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models; proportion of persistent patients determined via multivariable logistic regression. Indirect comparisons across disease states adjusted using infliximab data.

Results

After indirect adjustment by disease, mean PDC difference was significantly higher (difference of 4.7%; P = 0.0376) and mean CG20 was lower (difference of 15 days; P = 0.0646) but not statistically significant in vedolizumab/IBD than tofacitinib/RA.

Conclusion

We describe a novel adjustment method for interdisease treatment differences using infliximab treatment patterns to bridge differences between IBD and RA. After adjustment, adherence was higher with infusions than oral medications, which may affect outcomes. Indirect comparisons between vedolizumab and tofacitinib are not generalizable and should be confirmed in tofacitinib-treated IBD patients.

Funding

Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.

Electronic Supplementary Material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-019-01037-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Mechanism-Based Treatment Strategies for IBD: Cytokines, Cell Adhesion Molecules, JAK Inhibitors, Gut Flora, and More

Background

Although TNF inhibitors revolutionized the therapy of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), we have been reaching a point where other therapies with different mechanisms of action are necessary. A rising number of elderly IBD patients with contraindications to established therapies and a growing group of patients losing response to anti-TNF therapy compel us to find safer, better-tolerated, and, ideally, personalized treatment options. However, in order to choose the right drug to fit a patient, it is indispensable to understand the pathomechanism involved in IBD.

Summary

The aim of this review is to explain the inflammatory signaling pathways in IBD and how to inhibit them with current and future therapeutic approaches. Next to biologic agents targeting inflammatory cytokines (anti-TNF agents, anti-IL-12/-23 agents, and specific inhibitors of IL-23), biologics blocking leukocyte trafficking to the gut (anti-integrin antibodies) are available nowadays. More recently, small molecules inhibiting the JAK-STAT pathway (JAK inhibitors) or preventing lymphocyte trafficking (sphingosine-1-phosphate modulators) have been approved or are under investigation. Furthermore, modifying the microbiota has potential therapeutic effects on IBD, and autologous hematopoietic or mesenchymal stem cell transplantation may be considered for a highly selected group of IBD patients.

Key Message

Physicians should understand the different mechanisms of action of the potential therapies for IBD to select the right drug for the right patient.

Comparative effectiveness of antitumour necrosis factor agents and vedolizumab in ulcerative colitis

INTRODUCTION

Antitumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents and vedolizumab are used to treat ulcerative colitis (UC) but the response is variable and there is little data on comparative effectiveness. Apart from previous exposure to anti-TNF agents, predictors of response have not been identified. We aimed to (i) compare the efficacy of anti-TNF agents and vedolizumab in UC and (ii) investigate the utility of clinical and biochemical parameters in predicting response.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients commencing any biological therapy for ambulant UC were included. Disease activity was monitored serially with the Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index for up to 12 months. We compared the efficacy of anti-TNF agents and vedolizumab for induction and maintenance of response and remission on an intention-to-treat basis. We examined the utility of faecal calprotectin (FC) and early normalization of FC to predict response.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven patients commencing anti-TNF and 42 commencing vedolizumab therapy were included. Vedolizumab-treated patients had significantly greater previous anti-TNF therapy exposure and a lower baseline FC. Response, remission and steroid-free remission rates were comparable between both groups at 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months. Clinical remission but not steroid-free remission at 12 months was higher in the vedolizumab group. There was a significant reduction in the Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index and FC at 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months compared with baseline in both groups. Baseline FC and early normalization did not predict response at 6 and 12 months.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of anti-TNF and vedolizumab in UC appear comparable. We could not identify any predictors of response and remission.

A product review of vedolizumab in inflammatory bowel disease

Vedolizumab is a monoclonal antibody to the α4β7 integrin that selectively reduces intestinal lymphocyte trafficking, thereby providing a safe and effective treatment option for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This product review outlines the unique mechanism of vedolizumab in addition to efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data from clinical trials, observational studies and meta-analyses. Vedolizumab has been shown to be effective as a first- or second-line induction and maintenance therapy in both ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). Prolonged induction therapy may increase efficacy, particularly in tumor necrosis factor-alpha-exposed CD patients. To date, no drug-specific safety signals have been identified. In addition to the presence of an apparent exposure-response relationship, vedolizumab has demonstrated consistent pharmacodynamic effects on α4β7, mucosal vascular addressin cell adhesion molecule 1 and other cell adhesion molecules. Future efforts should focus on identifying predictive biomarkers capable of guiding personalized IBD treatment with vedolizumab.

Long-term efficacy and safety of vedolizumab in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases: A real-life experience from a tertiary referral center

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of vedolizumab in a real-life cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases enrolled at a tertiary referral center.

METHODS

Data were retrospectively collected from August 2016 to November 2018. The primary outcomes were clinical response and remission at 14, 24, and 52 weeks, and steroid-free remission rate (SFRR) at 52 weeks. Endoscopic response and remission rates at 52 weeks were the secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Altogether 49 patients (22 with ulcerating colitis [UC] and 27 with Crohn's Disease [CD]) were enrolled. The clinical response rate gradually dropped from 85% and 50% in CD and UC, respectively, at week 14 to 59% and 25% at week 52, with significantly a higher response in CD at week 14. The endoscopic response at week 52 was 55% in CD and 25% in UC (P = 0.21). CD group had a higher SFRR than UC group (41% vs 20%) at 52 weeks, although the difference was not statistically significant. Similar clinical and endoscopic rates were observed in biologic-naive and -experienced patients. We reported no discontinuation due to adverse drug reactions, and only mild to moderate events.

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort the clinical response in the induction phase was similar to those of registered trials, despite surprising better results for CD. During the maintenance phase we observed an higher drop out than in the reported literatures. Of note, its good safety profile makes vedolizumab a reliable choice in patients with contraindications to anti-tumor necrosis factor agents.

Update on C-reactive protein and fecal calprotectin: are they accurate measures of disease activity in Crohn's disease?

'Treat-to-target' paradigms in Crohn's disease (CD) directed at suppressing intestinal inflammation require accurate and reliable measures of disease activity. Although endoscopy has traditionally been considered a gold standard, cost, complexity, resource limitations, and invasiveness are important limitations. Hence, substantial interest exists for non-invasive serum and fecal biomarkers, namely C-reactive protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin (FC), in the diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of CD. Areas covered: We review the evidence for using serum CRP and FC in distinguishing patients with CD from those with irritable bowel syndrome, categorizing disease activity among patients with an established diagnosis of CD, predicting the likelihood of treatment response, identifying asymptomatic patients in medically or surgically induced remission who are at risk for disease relapse, and as treatment targets. Expert commentary: Accurate interpretation of CRP and FC is dependent on several factors including the clinical context, the performance characteristics of the assay, the specified test cut-offs, and the pre-test probability of disease. Emerging evidence indicates that CRP and FC are valuable adjuncts for the management of CD in specific circumstances described in this review.

Early vedolizumab trough levels at induction in inflammatory bowel disease patients with treatment failure during maintenance

BACKGROUND

Vedolizumab (VDZ) is effective as an induction and maintenance treatment for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, but, as observed with antitumour necrosis factor-α (anti-TNFα) agents, some patients are nonetheless experiencing loss of response.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the pharmacokinetics of VDZ during induction on long-term treatment response.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study focused on a single cohort of 103 inflammatory bowel disease patients treated with VDZ. VDZ trough levels (TLs) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (n=536 samples), and thereafter correlated to clinical, biological, endoscopic and serological data. For patients exposed previously to infliximab, antibodies to infliximab were measured at baseline. On the basis of the outcome at the end of follow-up, patients were then categorized into long-term response, optimized and treatment failure groups.

RESULTS

During VDZ induction, at week 6, inflammatory bowel disease patients with long-term response had higher TLs compared with patients in the treatment failure group (33 vs. 24 µg/ml, P=0.02). A cut-off TL of 28 µg/ml predicted a sustained response in the follow-up with an area under curve of 0.723 (95% confidence interval=0.567-0.878, P=0.02). Patients with mucosal healing in maintenance had higher TLs at week 6 (41.65 µg/ml) compared with patients with mild (26 µg/ml) or severe endoscopic activity (20.8 µg/ml), P=0.009. Positive perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody serology was associated with lower TLs. Patients previously exposed to anti-TNFα had lower TLs than naive patients (22.5 vs. 36 µg/ml, P=0.03) without any impact of detectable antibodies to infliximab. Finally, the presence of an immunomodulator at induction did not impact on VDZ TLs at induction.

CONCLUSION

We confirmed that a drug exposure-efficacy association was found early on at induction. This study emphasizes that previous exposure to anti-TNFα and positive perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody serology are important factors influencing VDZ TLs at induction.

Dual biological therapy with anti-TNF, vedolizumab or ustekinumab in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review with pool analysis

Background: Inflammatory bowel diseases patients eligible for biological therapy represent a group with considerable disease burden and biologics only achieve 40% clinical remission rates in responders after 1 year of therapy. Aims: To collect all the published data about patients treated with dual biological therapy with an Anti-TNF, vedolizumab or ustekinumab, for a period of at least 3 months and to pool the data about the effectiveness and safety. Methods: A MEDLINE, and Web of Science search of all studies published in English until 1 January 2019 was conducted. Results: We included 7 studies with a total of 18 patients. Fifteen patients were treated with a combination of an anti-TNF and vedolizumab, 3 patients were treated with vedolizumab and ustekinumab. Fifty-six percent of patients were affected by Crohn's disease and 50% of patients were treated with an immunosuppressant drug or steroid too. A clinical improvement was obtained in 100% of patients, and an endoscopic improvement in 93% of patients. No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions: The use of dual biological therapy is an attractive therapeutic option and may be an opportunity to better tailor and personalize the therapies for patients. Further studies, as randomized control trials, to provide comparative efficacy and safety endpoints of combination therapies, and to clarify potential advantages of combined biological therapies, are needed.

What is the role of C-reactive protein and fecal calprotectin in evaluating Crohn's disease activity?

Historically, the evaluation of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) has centered on use of subjective symptom-based assessment. However, patients with CD experience a broad spectrum of non-specific symptoms that may not directly correlate with objective measures of inflammation. Endoscopy has been the gold standard for evaluating the burden and severity of mucosal disease. However, use of ileocolonoscopy for disease monitoring in long-term follow-up is limited by considerations of cost, resource utilization, and invasiveness. As treatment goals in CD have shifted towards 'treat-to-target' paradigms that emphasize tight control of inflammation, it has become increasingly evident that sensitive, accurate, and reliable measures of disease activity are required. The use of non-invasive serum and fecal biomarkers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin (FC) has been evaluated in patients with CD for categorizing disease activity, predicting treatment response, identifying patients at risk for disease relapse, and as a potential therapeutic target. In this review, we summarize the interpretation of CRP and FC in patients with CD within specific clinical contexts and according to assay performance characteristics.

Characterization of inflammatory bowel disease management by vedolizumab and concomitant treatments in real-life clinical practice

Limited data is available on vedolizumab combination therapies in real-world clinical practice. Here, we evaluated the concomitant corticosteroid, immunosuppressive, and 5-aminosalicylic acid utilization of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients treated with vedolizumab in a nationwide, retrospective, non-interventional, multi-centre chart review study. All adult patients from 27 Finnish gastroenterology centres with a diagnosis of Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) who had at least one vedolizumab infusion since it's availability in Finland were included in the study. Data were collected from medical charts at baseline (vedolizumab treatment initiation), week 14, and month 6. The majority of patients who used corticosteroids at the baseline and persisted on vedolizumab treatment for 6 months were taken off corticosteroid treatment by the 6-month time point (CD, 54.5%; UC, 69.8%). Modest corticosteroid dose reductions were observed among treatment persistent CD patients from the baseline until month 6. Corticosteroid users had less vedolizumab discontinuations due to primary ineffectiveness and more discontinuations due to adverse events than patients not using corticosteroids. Vedolizumab may have a corticosteroid sparing effect in real-world clinical practice. Concomitant corticosteroid use may lead to a lower rate of vedolizumab discontinuation due to primary ineffectiveness, but a higher discontinuation rate due to adverse events.

Efficacy and Safety of Induction Therapy With Calcineurin Inhibitors in Combination With Vedolizumab in Patients With Refractory Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Vedolizumab is used to treat patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), although there is a delay before it is effective. Induction therapy with a calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine or tacrolimus) in combination with vedolizumab as maintenance therapy could be an option for patients with an active steroid-refractory UC. We assessed the efficacy and safety of this combination.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective observational study, collecting data from 12 referral centers in France that were included in the Groupe d'Etude Thérapeutique des Affections Inflammatoires du tube Digestif. We collected information on 39 patients with an active steroid-refractory UC (31 with active severe UC and 36 failed by treatment with a tumor necrosis factor antagonist) who received a calcineurin inhibitor as induction therapy along with vedolizumab as maintenance therapy. Inclusion date was the first vedolizumab infusion. The outcomes were survival without colectomy, survival without vedolizumab discontinuation, and safety.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up period of 11 months, 11 patients (28%) underwent colectomy. At 12 months, 68% of the patients survived without colectomy (95% CI, 53%-84%) and 44% survived without vedolizumab discontinuation (95% CI, 27%-61%). No deaths occurred and 4 severe adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In a retrospective analysis of 39 patients with an active steroid-refractory UC (most refractory to a tumor necrosis factor antagonist), we found that initial treatment with a calcineurin inhibitor in combination with vedolizumab allowed more than two thirds of patients to avoid colectomy. Further studies are needed to assess the safety of this strategy.

Real world data on effectiveness, safety and therapeutic drug monitoring of vedolizumab in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. A single center cohort

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The efficacy of vedolizumab (VDZ) has been demonstrated in clinical trials. The aim of this report is to evaluate the long-term effectiveness and safety of VDZ in a real-world cohort and to explore possible associations between concentration measurements of VDZ and treatment effectiveness.

METHODS

This is a prospective clinical follow-up including all adult patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) treated with VDZ from October 2014 until September 2017 at a single center in Norway. The patients were followed for at least 14 weeks or until termination of treatment. Clinical and biochemical activity were obtained at every infusion throughout follow-up. Plasma measurements of VDZ (p-VDZ) were performed before every infusion during maintenance therapy.

RESULTS

In total, 71 patients received VDZ. Improvement of CRP and hemoglobin was observed in CD but not in UC, whereas Partial Mayo Score improved in UC while no change in Harvey Bradshaw Index was revealed in CD. Furthermore, CRP at baseline was negatively correlated with p-VDZ at week 14 in CD but not in UC patients.

CONCLUSION

Improvement of biochemical markers of inflammation was observed in CD while clinical activity scores improved in UC patients. For CD, baseline CRP was correlated with lower concentrations of p-VDZ at week 14.

Effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab for maintenance treatment in inflammatory bowel disease-The Israeli real world experience

INTRODUCTION

Several real-world experience (RWE) studies with vedolizumab (VDZ) for induction of remission in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) have been published; however, long-term RWE data is scarce.

AIMS

To describe the effectiveness and safety of VDZ in maintenance treatment of IBD.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective national study. The primary outcome of was clinical response at week 52; main secondary aims included clinical remission at week 52, rates of secondary loss of response and treatment discontinuation.

RESULTS

We included 193 (133-CD; 60-UC) patients from 9 Israeli IBD centers. At week 52, response was observed in 62/133 (46.7%) CD patients, including 28 (21%) in clinical remission; 71 (53.3%) discontinued treatment or did not respond. For UC, response at week 52 was observed in 27/60 (45%), including 20 (33%) in clinical remission; 33 (55%) discontinued treatment or did not respond. Secondary non-response by week 52 occurred in 19.4% and 23.5% of week 14 responders in CD and UC, respectively. Week 14 response was associated with treatment continuation at week 52: no predictors of secondary loss of response were identified.

SUMMARY

VDZ is safe and effective for maintenance of response and remission in IBD; week 14 response is positively associated with long-term response in both UC and CD.

A real-world, long-term experience on effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab in adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease: The Cross Pennine study

BACKGROUND

Real-life data on vedolizumab effectiveness in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are still emerging. Data on the comparative safety of the gut selective profile are of particular interest.

AIMS

To assess clinical outcome and safety in IBD patients treated with vedolizumab.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data of patients treated with vedolizumab at eight UK hospitals (August 2014-January 2018). Clinical response and remission at 14 and 52 weeks evaluated through Physician Global Assessment (PGA) and adverse events were recorded. Possible predictors of clinical response were examined.

RESULTS

Two hundred and three IBD patients (mean treatment 16 ± 8 months) were included. Of these, 135 patients (mean age 40.6 ± 16.0 years; F:M 1.9:1) had CD and 68 (mean age 44.5 ± 18.1 years; F:M 1:1.2) had UC. According to PGA, 106/135 (78.5%) CD and 62/68 (91.2%) UC patients (p = 0.02) had a clinical response/remission at 14 weeks, whereas 76/119 (63.9%) CD and 52/63 (82.5%) UC patients (p < 0.01) showed a sustained response or remission at 52 weeks, with a high adherence rate (97%). No predictors of clinical response were found. The cumulative incidence of infectious diseases was 11.9 per 100 person-years.

CONCLUSION

Vedolizumab is an effective therapy for inducing and maintaining remission of IBD, with better results for UC, and with a good safety profile.

Effectiveness and Safety of Vedolizumab in Anti-TNF-Naïve Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease-A Multicenter Retrospective European Study

BACKGROUND

Vedolizumab (VDZ) is effective for treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). In GEMINI trials, anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF)-naïve patients had a superior response compared with anti-TNF-exposed patients. In real-world experience (RWE), the number of included anti-TNF-naïve patients was low. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of VDZ in anti-TNF-naïve patients in an RWE setting.

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter European pooled cohort study included consecutive active anti-TNF-naïve IBD patients treated with VDZ. The primary end point was clinical response at week 14. Patients with follow-up beyond week 14 and those discontinuing VDZ at any time were included for maintenance outcomes analysis.

RESULTS

Since January 2015, 184 anti-TNF-naïve patients from 23 centers initiated VDZ treatment (Crohn's disease [CD], 50; ulcerative colitis [UC], 134). In CD, 42/50 (82%) patients responded by week 14 and 32 (64%) were in clinical remission; 26/50 (52%) achieved corticosteroid-free remission (CSFR). At last follow-up (44 weeks; interquartile range [IQR], 30-52 weeks), 27/35 (77.1%) patients with available data responded to treatment; 24/35 (68.6%) were in clinical remission, 21/35 (60%) were in CSFR. For UC, 116/134 (79.1%) responded to treatment by week 14, including 53 (39.5%) in clinical remission; 49/134 (36.6%) achieved CSFR. At last follow-up (42.5 weeks; IQR, 30-52 weeks), 79/103 (76.7%) patients responded to treatment, 69/103 (67.0%) were in remission, and 61/103 (59.2%) were in CSFR. Adverse effects were reported in 20 (11%) of the patients, leading to treatment discontinuation in 6 (3.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

VDZ is similarly effective in ant-TNF-naïve CD and UC patients. The efficacy is higher than reported in anti-TNF-experienced patients and is comparable to that of anti-TNF biologics in this population.

Short and long-term effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab in inflammatory bowel disease: results from the ENEIDA registry

BACKGROUND

Effectiveness of vedolizumab in real world clinical practice is unknown.

AIM

To evaluate the short and long-term effectiveness of vedolizumab in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS

Patients who received at least 1 induction dose of vedolizumab were included. Effectiveness was defined based on Harvey-Bradshaw index (HBI) in Crohn's disease (CD) and Partial Mayo Score (PMS) in ulcerative colitis (UC). Short-term response was assessed at week 14. Variables associated with short-term remission were identified by logistic regression analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate the long-term durability of vedolizumab treatment. Cox model was used to identify factors associated with discontinuation of treatment and loss of response.

RESULTS

521 patients were included (median follow-up 10 months [interquartile range 5-18 months]). At week 14, 46.8% had remission and 15.7% clinical response. CD (vs UC), previous surgery, higher CRP concentration and disease severity at baseline were significantly associated with impaired response. The rate of vedolizumab discontinuation was 37% per patient-year of follow-up (27.6% in UC and 45.3% in CD, P < 0.01). CD (vs UC), anaemia at baseline, steroids during induction and CRP concentration were associated with lower durability of treatment. Seven per cent of patients developed adverse events, infections being the most frequent.

CONCLUSIONS

Over 60% of IBD patients respond to vedolizumab. Many patients discontinue treatment over time. CD and disease burden impair both short- and long-term response. Vedolizumab seems to be safe in clinical practice.

A review of vedolizumab and ustekinumab for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases

Recent advancement in the understanding of the pathophysiology of inflammatory bowel disease has seen an expansion in therapeutic options. Vedolizumab, a selective α4β7 inhibitor, and ustekinumab, an IL 12/23 p40 inhibitor, have provided the much-awaited out-of-class alternatives for patients who have failed or who are intolerant to anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) therapy. However, questions remain as to how we may best use these novel therapeutic agents. We evaluate the evidence available from randomized controlled trials and postmarketing cohort studies and discuss their safety, efficacy, and limitations, in relation to anti-TNF therapy, in optimizing the treatment outcomes.

Update on the Use of Thiopurines and Methotrexate in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The increased use of biologic agents over the past two decades has led to a reappraisal of the role of the immunomodulators (thiopurines and methotrexate) in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. The purpose of this review is to summarize recent data on the use of thiopurines and methotrexate either as monotherapy or as part of combination therapy with biologic agents.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have addressed the need for concomitant immunomodulatory therapy in treatment-naïve patients starting anti-TNF-α therapy, the appropriate dose of the immunomodulator in this setting, the minimum duration of combination therapy, and the possible mechanisms by which immunomodulators enhance the effectiveness of anti-TNF-α agents. Little is known about the role of immunomodulators in combination with agents belonging to other classes of biologic therapies. Recent studies have shown that methotrexate is not effective in inducing or maintaining remission in ulcerative colitis. Finally, several studies have broadened our understanding of the infection and malignancy risks of the immunomodulators. Immunomodulators continue to have a place in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. However, with the ever-increasing list of biologic agents, properly positioning the immunomodulators within the overall therapeutic scheme is a complicated task. In order to optimize outcomes, each patient requires an individualized approach, which takes into account risks, benefits, cost, alternatives, and patient preferences.

Vedolizumab for Ulcerative Colitis: Treatment Outcomes from the VICTORY Consortium

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to quantify the safety and effectiveness of vedolizumab (VDZ) when used for UC, and to identify predictors of response to treatment.

METHODS

Retrospective review (May 2014-December 2016) of VICTORY Consortium data. Adults with follow-up after starting VDZ for clinically active UC were included. Primary effectiveness outcomes were cumulative rates of clinical remission (resolution of all UC-related symptoms) and endoscopic remission (Mayo endoscopic sub-score 0). Key secondary effectiveness outcomes included cumulative rates of corticosteroid-free remission and deep remission (clinical remission and endoscopic remission). Cox proportional hazard analyses were used to identify independent predictors of treatment effectiveness. Non-response imputation (NRI) sensitivity analyses were performed for effectiveness outcomes. Key safety outcomes were rates of serious infection, serious adverse events, and colectomy.

RESULTS

We included 321 UC patients (71% prior TNFα antagonist exposure, median follow-up 10 months). The 12-month cumulative rates of clinical remission and endoscopic remission were 51% and 41%, respectively. Corresponding rates for corticosteroid-free remission and deep remission were 37% and 30%, respectively. Using NRI, 12-month rates were 20% (n = 64/321) for clinical remission, 17% (n = 35/203) for endoscopic remission, 15% (n = 30/195) for corticosteroid-free remission, and 14% (n = 28/203) for deep remission. A majority of the patients without adequate follow-up at 12 months who were deemed non-responders using NRI had already achieved clinical remission (n = 70) or a significant clinical response (n = 36) prior to 12 months. VDZ discontinuation prior to 12 months was observed in 91 patients, for lack of response (n = 56), need for surgery (n = 29), or adverse event (n = 6). On multivariable analyses, prior exposure to a TNFα antagonist was associated with a reduced probability of achieving clinical remission (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.38-0.75) and endoscopic remission (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.29-0.88). Serious adverse events and serious infections were reported in 6% and 4% of patients, respectively. Overall cumulative rates of colectomy over 12 months were 13%, with lower rates observed in patients naive to TNFα antagonist therapy (2%) than those who had been exposed to TNFα antagonists (19%).

CONCLUSION

In this large real-world cohort we observed that VDZ was well tolerated and effective in achieving key clinical outcomes.

Outcome of continued infliximab therapy in Crohn's disease patients with response but without remission after one year of infliximab - a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Optimal management of Crohn's disease patients having responded to infliximab but without achieving remission is not well defined. The present study examined if these patients benefit from continued long-term infliximab maintenance therapy.

METHOD

Retrospective cohort study including all patients treated with infliximab for 1 year until the end of 2017 who have had a response but not reached remission on infliximab. Clinical outcomes were defined by the physicians' global evaluation, supported by clinical indices and objective markers of disease activity.

RESULTS

In total, 376 Crohn's disease patients received infliximab. Among these, 76 (20%) were classified as having response but non-remission (RNR) after 1 year of therapy. A great majority (n = 54; 71%) experienced no additional therapeutic benefit after a further year of infliximab maintenance therapy, thus still having RNR. Nineteen patients (25%) obtained remission during continued infliximab, whereas only 4% (n = 3) experienced treatment failure. Although infliximab therapy beyond 2 years (follow-up median 35 months, IQR: 23-55) was accompanied by a higher proportion attaining remission (40%), nearly half (46%) still failed to improve. Among patients who had discontinued infliximab while having RNR (n = 21), half (n = 11) experienced disease flare within five months (median 22 weeks, IQR: 12-31).

CONCLUSION

Most patients (71%) had no additional therapeutic benefit after an additional year of infliximab therapy, and after a median maintenance infliximab treatment period of 3 years, half still failed to improve further. Considering the importance of achieving complete remission, these patients appear to have an unmet medical need.

The real-world effectiveness of vedolizumab on intestinal and articular outcomes in inflammatory bowel diseases

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of vedolizumab in real-world practice is under evaluation, while its role in inflammatory bowel disease-associated spondyloarthritis is still unclear.

AIMS

To report real-world data about the effectiveness of vedolizumab on intestinal and articular symptoms after 10 and 22 weeks of treatment.

METHODS

Web-based data from the cohort of the Sicilian Network for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (SN-IBD) were extracted to perform a prospective multicentre observational study.

RESULTS

163 patients (84 with Crohn's disease and 79 with ulcerative colitis) were included. At week 10, a steroid-free remission was achieved in 71 patients (43.6%), while at week 22 a steroid-free remission was obtained in 40.8% of patients. A response on articular symptoms was reported after 10 weeks of treatment in 17 out of 43 (39.5%) patients with active spondyloarthritis at baseline, and in 10 out of 22 (45.4%) patients at week 22. The only factor associated with articular response was the coexistence of clinical benefit on intestinal symptoms (at week 10: OR 8.471, p = 0.05; at week 22: OR 5.600, p = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

Vedolizumab showed good effectiveness after 10 and 22 weeks of treatment. A subset of patients reported improvement also on articular symptoms, probably as a consequence of the concomitant control of gut inflammation.

Vedolizumab for inflammatory bowel disease: From randomized controlled trials to real-life evidence

The biologic antitumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) agents have revolutionised the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, some patients experience primary nonresponse, loss of response, or intolerance. Therefore, introducing a newer class of therapy with a mechanism of action that acts on different inflammatory pathways involved in IBD pathogenesis is appealing. Vedolizumab is a fully humanised monoclonal antibody that selectively targets α4β7 integrin. Based on the results of the pivotal clinical GEMINI trials, vedolizumab was approved for the treatment of adult patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) refractory or intolerant to either conventional therapy or TNFα inhibitors. This review describes the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of vedolizumab reported in both randomized, controlled, clinical trials and from real-world experience in patients with UC and CD in order to identify its place in treatment algorithms for IBD.

The impact of biologics in surgical outcomes in ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative Colitis (UC) is an immune mediated condition characterized by inflammation of colonic mucosa, associated with progressive damage of the colon and possible complications, such as hemorrhage, perforation and cancer. It is strongly advocated a treat to target approach in patients with UC consisting in an early and aggressive inflammatory control. Some patients can require colectomy for medically refractory disease or to treat colonic neoplasia. Even though the first line biologic therapy targeting the tumor necrosis factor-alfa (TNF-α) is associated with improvement of the inflammation in some patients, others do not respond at first or lose response over time. Novel drugs targeting different inflammatory pathways have been studied in UC, however, it remains unclear whether surgical rates have been reduced in the biological era. Controversy also exists if biological agents impair surgical postoperative complication rates in UC. The aim of this review is to describe all relevant data available and briefly summarize the real impact of biologics in surgical outcomes in ulcerative colitis.

Endoscopic Follow-up of Intestinal Transplant Recipients

The growing population of intestinal transplant recipients present a unique challenge to the gastroenterologists responsible for their support and evaluation. Improvements in patient and graft survival are largely attributed to surgical advancements, refined antirejection therapy, and enhanced endoscopic surveillance protocols that better perceive rejection and other complications. This article reviews the endoscopic management and interventions provided for transplant recipients at the University of Illinois Hospital with complications, such as acute rejection, ischemia, bleeding, fistula, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, and gastroparesis. Further research is needed on promising strategies currently used for related diseases to treat and sustain the intestinal graft.

Should we use vedolizumab as mono or combo therapy in ulcerative colitis?

Randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of vedolizumab monotherapy with combination therapy of vedolizumab and an immunomodulator in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) are lacking. Emerging pharmacokinetic data indicate that vedolizumab concentrations correlate with clinical outcomes, although the correlation may be less strong for vedolizumab compared with an anti-TNF agents. Associations between concomitant use of immunomodulators and decreased immunogenicity of vedolizumab have been reported, but this does not appear to translate into enhanced therapeutic effect of combination therapy, at least not based on present data. However, data are sparse and often based on post-hoc analyses. Future comparative effectiveness studies of patients with UC, naïve to vedolizumab as well as immunomodulators, are needed. This might be of specific relevance for subgroups of UC patients, such as young men and the elderly, in whom combination versus monotherapy therapy may have a different risk-benefit ratio, given the risk of malignancy associated with immunomodulators.

Combining Anti-TNF-α and Vedolizumab in the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Case Series

BACKGROUND

Anti-tumor necrosis factor α (anti-TNF-α) is important in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, but some patients experience only a partial response. In these patients, a combination of anti-TNF-α and vedolizumab (VDZ) may act as a bridge until the full VDZ effect occurs. At present, clinical data on combination treatment with anti-TNF-α and VDZ are not available. The aim of this case series was to evaluate the safety and clinical response of combination therapy with anti-TNF-α and VDZ in clinical practice.

METHODS

All patients started on combination treatment with anti-TNF-α and VDZ from November 2015 to July 2016 were prospectively followed for at least 12 months.

RESULTS

Six patients with ulcerative colitis and four patients with Crohn's disease received combination treatment. These patients were followed for a median of 1712-20 months. No more adverse events than expected with anti-TNF-α alone were observed during combination treatment. At the end of follow-up, all patients were in clinical remission, and 8 patients could discontinue anti-TNF-α treatment and receive VDZ monotherapy. Two of the patients with Crohn's disease required combination treatment throughout follow-up to obtain sustained remission.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that combination treatment with anti TNF-α and VDZ is safe and might represent a long-term treatment option in selected patients.

Review article: predictors of response to vedolizumab and ustekinumab in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Increased knowledge of pathways involved in the pathogenesis of IBD has led to the development of new treatment options for Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Two new biological agents have been recently approved for IBD: vedolizumab and ustekinumab. They have different therapeutic targets (α₄ β₇ integrin for vedolizumab and interleukin-12/23 pathways for ustekinumab) than the primary biological class, anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF) agents. As the armamentarium for IBD increases in coming years, it will become important to understand factors associated with response in order to best position and personalise therapy.

AIM

To summarise the current data on predictors of response to vedolizumab and ustekinumab in IBD patients.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive literature review. A PubMed search was performed using pre-defined key words and terms to identify relevant studies on predictors of response.

RESULTS

Patients with severe disease (by clinical activity and inflammatory biomarkers), or prior anti-TNF exposure are less likely to respond to vedolizumab. Ileocolonic disease, no prior surgery and uncomplicated phenotype were associated with better responses to ustekinumab in CD. Initial response seems to predict a better long-term maintenance in both therapies (P < 0.001). Contrary to anti-TNF therapies, immunogenicity appears to play less of a role in response.

CONCLUSION

As the number of new biological therapies increase in IBD, identifying patients who are most likely to benefit from specific agents is of paramount importance to help best position IBD therapies.

Immunopathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease and mechanisms of biological therapies

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract with a multifactorial pathophysiology. Full comprehension of IBD pathology is still out of reach and, therefore, treatment is far from ideal. Nevertheless, components involved in IBD pathogenesis including environmental, genetic, microbial, and immunological factors are continuously being investigated and the improved knowledge contributes to the development of new therapies. In this article we review the aspects of the immunopathogenesis of IBD, with focus on mucosal immunity, and discuss mechanisms of action for current and emerging biological therapies.

Combination Immunosuppression in IBD

Whether to use biologic treatment for inflammatory bowel disease as monotherapy or in combination with immunosuppressives has been a matter of debate in the last 2 decades. Combination therapy was not superior in any of the registration trials for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis for TNF antagonists, vedolizumab, or ustekinumab. It needs to be mentioned, though, that none of these trials were powered to detect such differences, and that many patients entered the trial after having failed conventional immunosuppressives.Postmarketing studies revealed that patients on background immunosuppression have a lower risk of immunogenicity (often resulting in infusion/injection reactions) than patients on monotherapy. In the SONIC and UC-SUCCESS trials, superiority of the combination azathioprine-infliximab was demonstrated in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, respectively. This trial design has not been used with any other biologic for IBD, so far. Meanwhile, it has also become clear that combination treatment with TNF antagonists is associated with increased toxicity, mainly infections, but also malignancy such as lymphoproliferative disease. This toxicity could perhaps be reduced by using lower doses of immunosuppressives, a strategy that has been shown to be equally potent in reducing immunogenicity. Additionally, combination treatment could be used for a limited period of time (12 months or even shorter) since most immunogenicity develops in the beginning of the biologic treatment. Patients who develop anti-drug-antibodies later on can often be rescued by reintroduction of thiopurines or methotrexate.In summary, combination treatment is certainly beneficial with infliximab, at least in the first 12 months of treatment. With other TNF antagonists, vedolizumab, and ustekinumab, the available data do not offer clear guidance. In patients without increased risk of toxicity, and certainly in those with limited treatment options, it may be wise to offer combination treatment with all biologics for the time being and at least during the initiation phase.

High treatment persistence rate and significant endoscopic healing among real-life patients treated with vedolizumab - a Finnish Nationwide Inflammatory Bowel Disease Cohort Study (FINVEDO). Scand J Gastroenterol 2018;53:158-167. [PMID: 29258369 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2017.1416160]

OBJECTIVES

The efficacy and tolerability of vedolizumab in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) has been demonstrated in an extensive GEMINI clinical trial programme. Clinical trials represent highly selected patient populations and, therefore, it is important to demonstrate effectiveness in real-life clinical practice. We set out to assess real-world treatment outcomes of vedolizumab in a nationwide cohort of treatment refractory Finnish Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) patients.

METHODS

This was a nationwide, retrospective, non-interventional, multi-centre chart review study. All adult patients from 27 Finnish gastroenterology centers with a diagnosis of UC or CD who had at least one vedolizumab infusion since the availability of the product in Finland, were included in the study. Data were collected retrospectively from medical charts at baseline, week 14, and month 6. The primary outcome measure was treatment persistence 24 weeks post-vedolizumab initiation.

RESULTS

A total of 247 patients were included (108 CD, 139 UC). A total of 75.0% (n = 81) of all CD patients and 66.2% (n = 92) of all UC patients, were persistent on vedolizumab therapy for 6 months post treatment initiation. At month 6, 41.8% (28/67) of the treatment persistent CD patients and 73.3% (63/86) of the treatment persistent UC patients achieved clinical remission. Significant improvement in endoscopic scores were observed among treatment persistent patients (CD, n = 17, ΔSES-CD=-5.5, p = .008; UC, n = 26, ΔMayo endoscopic score =-0.5, p = .003) at month 6.

CONCLUSIONS

Vedolizumab provides an effective and well-tolerated treatment option in real-world clinical practice even among treatment refractory IBD patients.

Vedolizumab in IBD-Lessons From Real-world Experience; A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis

BACKGROUND

Vedolizumab [VDZ] is an anti-integrin monoclonal antibody effective in ulcerative colitis [UC] and Crohn's disease [CD]. Several real-world experience [RWE] studies with VDZ have been published to date. The aim of this systematic review was to summarise the available real-life experience with VDZ.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the available RWE studies of VDZ in CD and UC. We performed a pooled analysis of the available efficacy and safety data for induction and maintenance treatment in adult cohorts. A narrative review of VDZ use in special clinical settings was also performed.

RESULTS

Nine studies including 1565 [571 UC, 994 CD] adult patients were identified. In CD, clinical response and remission were achieved in 54% (95% confidence interval [CI] 41-66%) and 22% [95% CI 13-35%] by Week 6 and in 49% [95% CI 37-51%] and 32% [95% CI 23-42%] by Week 14; at Week 52, 45% [95% CI 28-64%] and 32% [95% CI 12-62] of the patients responded, and were in clinical remission, respectively. In UC, clinical response and remission were achieved in 43% [95% CI 37-49] and 25% [95% CI 12-45] by Week 6, respectively, and in 51% [95% CI 43-61%]and 30% [95% CI 24-36%] by Week 14/22, respectively; at week 52, clinical response and remission were achieved in 48% and 39% of the patients, respectively. Adverse effects were mostly minor and occurred in 30.6% of the patients; infections were reported in 3.4% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

VDZ is efficacious in CD and UC and has a favourable safety profile in RWE studies.

Emerging oral targeted therapies in inflammatory bowel diseases: opportunities and challenges

To improve quality of life and prevent long-term risks in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs: Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis), it is essential to suppress inflammatory activity adequately. However, corticosteroids are only suitable for therapy of acute flares and the evidence for positive effects of immunosuppressive substances like azathioprine or 6-mercapropurine is mainly limited to maintenance of remission. In addition, only subgroups of patients benefit from biologicals targeting tumour necrosis factor α or α4β7 integrins. In summary, until now the disease activity is not sufficiently controlled in a relevant fraction of the patients with IBD. Thus, there is an urge for the development of new substances in the therapy of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Fortunately, new oral and parenteral substances are in the pipeline. This review will focus on oral substances, which have already passed phase II studies successfully at this stage. In this article, we summarize data regarding AJM300, phosphatidylcholine (LT-02), mongersen, ozanimod, filgotinib and tofacitinib. AJM300 and ozanimod were tested in patients with ulcerative colitis and target lymphocyte trafficking through inhibition of the α subunit of integrin, respectively binding to the sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (subtypes 1 and 5) on lymphocytes. Mongersen was utilized in patients with Crohn's disease and accelerates the degradation of SMAD7 mRNA, which consequently strengthens the mainly anti-inflammatory signalling pathway of transforming growth factor β1. Various Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors were developed, which inhibit the intracellular signalling pathway of cytokines. For example, the JAK1 blocker filgotinib was tested in Crohn's disease, whereas the JAK1/3 inhibitor tofacitinib was tested in clinical trials for both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. A different therapeutic approach is the substitution of phosphatidylcholine (LT-02), which might recover the colonic mucus. Taken together, clinical trials with these new agents have opened avenues for further clinical studies and it can be expected that at least some of these agents will be finally approved for clinical therapy.

Efficacy of vedolizumab for induction of clinical response and remission in patients with moderate to severe inflammatory bowel disease who failed at least two TNF antagonists

Background

Vedolizumab is a recently available monoclonal antibody targeting α4β7 integrin for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD).

Objective

The objective of this article is to evaluate the efficacy of vedolizumab induction therapy in anti-TNF-refractory/intolerant UC and CD patients in real life.

Methods

A cohort of 149 moderately to severely active UC and CD patients who failed or showed intolerance to at least two TNF antagonists participated in a medical need program and received vedolizumab in 37 Belgian centers (April-September 2015). Rates of clinical response and remission were retrospectively evaluated at Week 10 for UC and Week 14 for CD using the physician's global assessment (PGA), Mayo score and Harvey Bradshaw index (HBI) or Crohn's disease activity score (CDAI) scores.

Results

Eighty-four patients (29 UC, 55 CD) had sufficient data for analysis. For UC patients, clinical response was observed in 76% based on PGA and 59% based on the Mayo score. The corresponding percentages for CD patients were 80% for PGA and 65% for HBI/CDAI. Clinical remission rates were 10% and 40% for UC and CD, respectively. Steroid-free remission was observed in respectively 10% and 35%. Globally, corticosteroids were stopped in 14 out of 48 patients (29%). No new safety signals were reported.

Conclusion

Up to 70% TNF-refractory/intolerant UC and CD patients achieved a clinical response after 10 to 14 weeks of vedolizumab treatment in this real-life cohort.