World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for biological treatment of schizophrenia, part 2: long-term treatment of schizophrenia

Long-acting antipsychotic drugs for the treatment of schizophrenia: use in daily practice from naturalistic observations

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines suggest specific criteria for oral or long-acting injectable antipsychotic drugs (LAIs). This review aims to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of the ideal profile of the patient with schizophrenia treated with LAIs, through the analysis of nonrandomized studies.

METHODS

A systematic review of nonrandomized studies in English was performed attempting to analyze the factors related to the choice and use of LAIs in daily practice. The contents were outlined using the Cochrane methods for nonrandomized studies and the variables included demographic as well as clinical characteristics. The available literature did not allow any statistical analysis that could be used to identify the ideal profile of patients with schizophrenia to be treated with LAIs.

RESULTS

Eighty publications were selected and reviewed. Prevalence of LAI use ranged from 4.8% to 66%. The only demographic characteristics that were consistently assessed through retrieved studies were age (38.5 years in the 1970's, 35.8 years in the 1980's, 39.3 years in the 1990's, to 39.5 years in the 2000's) and gender (male > female).Efficacy was assessed through the use of various symptom scales and other indirect measurements; safety was assessed through extrapyramidal symptoms and the use of anticholinergic drugs, but these data were inconsistent and impossible to pool. Efficacy and safety results reported in the different studies yielded a good therapeutic profile with a maximum of 74% decrease in hospital admissions and the prevalence of extrapyramidal symptoms with LAIs consistently increased at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months (35.4%, 37.1%, 36.9%, and 41.3%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis of the available literature strongly suggests that further observational studies on patients with schizophrenia treated with LAIs are needed to systematically assess their demographic and clinical characteristics and the relationships between them and patient outcome.Besides the good efficacy and safety profile of LAIs, health care staff must also take into account the importance of establishing a therapeutic alliance with the patient and his/her relatives when selecting the most appropriate treatment. LAIs seem to be a good choice not only because of their good safety and efficacy profile, but also because they improve compliance, a key factor to improving adherence and to establishing a therapeutic alliance between patients with schizophrenia, their relatives, and their health care providers.

World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) Guidelines for Biological Treatment of Schizophrenia, part 1: update 2012 on the acute treatment of schizophrenia and the management of treatment resistance

These updated guidelines are based on a first edition of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry Guidelines for Biological Treatment of Schizophrenia published in 2005. For this 2012 revision, all available publications pertaining to the biological treatment of schizophrenia were reviewed systematically to allow for an evidence-based update. These guidelines provide evidence-based practice recommendations that are clinically and scientifically meaningful and these guidelines are intended to be used by all physicians diagnosing and treating people suffering from schizophrenia. Based on the first version of these guidelines, a systematic review of the MEDLINE/PUBMED database and the Cochrane Library, in addition to data extraction from national treatment guidelines, has been performed for this update. The identified literature was evaluated with respect to the strength of evidence for its efficacy and then categorised into six levels of evidence (A-F; Bandelow et al. 2008b, World J Biol Psychiatry 9:242). This first part of the updated guidelines covers the general descriptions of antipsychotics and their side effects, the biological treatment of acute schizophrenia and the management of treatment-resistant schizophrenia.

One-year outcomes in schizophrenia after switching from typical antipsychotics to olanzapine in Japan: an observational study

Background

The purpose of this study was to assess the 1-year clinical, functional, and safety-related outcomes following a switch to olanzapine of at least one typical antipsychotic drug in the previous regimen in the treatment of patients of schizophrenia in Japan.

Methods

Using data from a large 1-year prospective, multicenter, naturalistic study of olanzapine for the treatment of schizophrenia in Japan, patients who were switched from any oral typical antipsychotic to olanzapine were identified. Mixed models for repeated measures, controlling for baseline demographics, were utilized to assess outcomes for clinical and functional measures.

Results

Of the 262 patients who switched from typical antipsychotics to olanzapine, 41% were outpatients and 59% were inpatients. Most of these patients were switched due to poor medication efficacy (71.0%) or medication intolerability (25.6%). Most patients (71.4%) completed the 1-year study. Clinically and statistically significant (P < 0.01) improvements were observed in patient illness severity and health-related quality of life, including improvements in global symptom severity and in positive, negative, depressive, and cognitive symptoms. Over half of the patients (58.3%) demonstrated a treatment response to olanzapine and 47.4% achieved symptom remission. Mean weight gain from baseline to endpoint was 2.31 ± 4.72 kg, with 30.4% of patients experiencing clinically significant weight gain (at least 7% of baseline weight).

Conclusion

During this 1-year naturalistic treatment of schizophrenia patients in Japan, switching from typical antipsychotics to olanzapine resulted in significant improvements in patients’ clinical and functional outcomes. Approximately one-third of patients had clinically significant weight gain. These findings highlight the favorable benefit to risk profile of switching to olanzapine following failure on typical antipsychotics.

How close is evidence to truth in evidence-based treatment of mental disorders?

Given the importance of the term 'evidence' in evidence-based medicine (EBM), the meaning of this term is evaluated, going back to the philosophical tradition and current meaning of the terms 'evidence' and 'truth'. Based on this, current problems in the definition of evidence and in the grading of evidence in EBM are described, taking examples from the field of psychiatry and especially pharmacopsychiatry. These problems underline that the use of the term evidence in EBM is inconsistent and inconclusive. This should be fairly stated in all EBM-related publications, especially in EBM-based guidelines, to avoid severe misunderstandings in and outside the field of psychiatry. Although EBM might have increased empirically driven rational decision-making in psychiatry/medicine, the current limitations should be carefully considered.

Chronic treatment with serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant (SSRI) combined with an antipsychotic regulates GABA-A receptor in rat prefrontal cortex

INTRODUCTION

The combination of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants and antipsychotics is currently used for the treatment of negative symptoms of schizophrenia. However, the biochemical mechanism mediating the clinical effectiveness of this treatment remains obscure. Previously, we have reported that acute haloperidol (HALO)-fluvoxamine (FLU) in vivo and in vitro treatment regulated GABA-Aβ2/3 receptor subunits, and protein kinase C (PKC) and mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling pathways.

FINDINGS

In the present study, we demonstrated that chronic HALO-FLU treatment, but not each drug alone, significantly decreased GABA-Aβ2/3 receptor expression (25 ± 6.2% vs. control) and caused receptor translocation from the membrane to the cytosol in rat prefrontal cortex. Phosphorylation of PKC and ERK2 was affected differently by HALO-FLU combination than by the individual drug treatments. HALO and FLU each given alone increased PKC phosphorylation levels (29 ± 15% and 40 ± 11.8%, vs. control, respectively) and did not affect ERK2 phosphorylation, while HALO-FLU combined treatment did not alter PKC phosphorylation levels and significantly decreased ERK2 phosphorylation levels (58 ± 4.4% vs. control). GABA-A receptor downregulation in the brain was accompanied by a decrease in GABA-A function, as shown in muscimol-induced loss of righting reflex (22 ± 9.8 min).

CONCLUSIONS

We provide a brief heuristic overview of our preclinical and clinical studies with the SSRI-antipsychotic combination and argue that the finding that it causes similar dynamic changes in laboratory and clinical domains, specifically in GABA-A β2/3 receptor and PKC, strongly supports the hypothesis that the GABA-A receptors and their regulatory systems are involved in the molecular mechanisms underlying the clinical effectiveness of SSRI augmentation.

Antipsychotic treatment for schizophrenia in the maintenance phase: a systematic review of the guidelines and algorithms

OBJECTIVE

Antipsychotic treatment strategy for the maintenance phase of schizophrenia has been inconsistent in the literature. The purpose of this systematic review is to overview recommendations in various guidelines and algorithms.

METHODS

The guidelines and algorithms for schizophrenia that were published or updated in English after 2000 were searched, using Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO with the following key words: guideline, algorithm, schizophrenia, and psychosis (last search: July 2011). The reference lists of the relevant reports were also examined.

RESULTS

Fourteen guidelines and algorithms were identified; only five of them clearly defined terms about the maintenance phase and treatment. Ten of 11 guidelines and algorithms did not recommend discontinuation of antipsychotics within five years; six of them partially recommended antipsychotic discontinuation for patients with first-episode schizophrenia exclusive. All nine guidelines and algorithms that referred to intermittent or targeted antipsychotic strategy endorsed against this strategy. Although being a hot topic of controversy, dose reduction of antipsychotics or lower dose therapy in the maintenance phase compared to the acute dosage is not recommended on the whole concerning atypical antipsychotics, whereas dose reduction appears sometimes considered acceptable for typical antipsychotics.

CONCLUSION

What constitutes maintenance phase and its treatment in schizophrenia has not yet been established in the literature. While discontinuation and intermittent or targeted strategies are not generally recommended, there is controversy regarding dose reduction or lower dose therapy, especially with regards to atypical antipsychotics. Further evidence is needed in order to derive treatment recommendations on antipsychotics in this critical treatment phase of schizophrenia.

Second-generation antipsychotic drugs and extrapyramidal side effects: a systematic review and meta-analysis of head-to-head comparisons

OBJECTIVE

While all second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are promoted for having a low risk of extrapyramidal side effects (EPS), clinical observations suggest differences between the various agents. Nevertheless, this question has never been examined in a systematic review and meta-analysis of head-to-head comparisons.

METHODS

We searched the register of the Cochrane schizophrenia group (last search May 2007), supplemented by MEDLINE (last search July 2009) for randomized, blinded studies comparing the following SGAs in the treatment of schizophrenia or related disorders: amisulpride, aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, sertindole, ziprasidone, and zotepine. At least 3 reviewers extracted the data independently. The primary outcome was "use of antiparkinson medication." The results were combined in a meta-analysis.

RESULTS

We included 54 studies with 116 arms. Risperidone was associated with more use of antiparkinson medication than clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, and ziprasidone. Ziprasidone showed more use of antiparkinson medication than olanzapine and quetiapine and zotepine more than clozapine. There was no significant difference between amisulpride and its comparators (olanzapine, risperidone, or ziprasidone). Quetiapine showed significantly less use of antiparkinson medication than the 3 other SGAs it was compared with (olanzapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone). Scale-derived data (Barnes Akathisia Scale and Simpson Angus Scale) were limited.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis demonstrates that there are differences between the SGAs in their ability to induce EPS that clinicians consider warrant treatment with antimuscarinic drugs. Even though the differences were relatively small, they might be important for individual patients and should be taken into account in drug choice.

Role of long-acting injectable second-generation antipsychotics in the treatment of first-episode schizophrenia: a clinical perspective

Approximately 80% of patients with the first-episode schizophrenia reach symptomatic remission after antipsychotic therapy. However, within two years most of them relapse, mainly due to low levels of insight into the illness and nonadherence to their oral medication. Therefore, although the formal data available is limited, many experts recommend prescribing long-acting injectable second-generation antipsychotics (mostly risperidone or alternatively paliperidone) in the early stages of schizophrenia, particularly in patients who have benefited from the original oral molecule in the past and agree to receive long-term injectable treatment. Early application of long-acting injectable second-generation antipsychotics can significantly reduce the risk of relapse in the future and thus improve not only the social and working potential of patients with schizophrenia but also their quality of life.

Adjunctive treatment of bimodal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in pharmacologically non-responsive patients with schizophrenia: a preliminary study

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the efficacy of bimodal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in treating pharmacologically non-responsive patients with schizophrenia.

METHODS

Ten patients with DSM-IV schizophrenia, unresponsive to pharmacological treatment, underwent treatment with 15 rTMS sessions, as an adjunctive therapy, for three weeks. Each session comprised 40 trains, beginning every 30s: 20 trains of 10 Hz rTMS to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) with a 3-s duration and 20 trains of 1 Hz rTMS to the left temporoparietal cortex (TPC) with a 30-s duration. We assessed patients via the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and Korean Version of the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (K-CDSS), at five time points: baseline, Days 8, 15, and 22, and 1 week after final treatment (Day 29). Patients who agreed to take neurocognitive tests underwent neurocognitive function evaluations at baseline and 1 week after final treatment.

RESULTS

At Day 29, all PANSS subscale scores in had decreased significantly compared to baseline (Z=-2.214, p=0.027, positive; Z=-2.132, p=0.033, negative; Z=-2.023, p=0.043, general pathology; Z=-2.371, p=0.018, total). Effect over time was significant for the PANSS positive and negative subscale scores and total score (χ(2)=13.35, p=0.010; χ(2)=10.27, p=0.036; and χ(2)=16.50, p=0.002, respectively) but not for the general pathology subscale. Among the neurocognitive tests, the fourth and fifth trials and total K-AVLT scores showed significant increases (Z=-2.041, p=0.041; Z=-2.251, p=0.024; and Z=-2.201, p=0.028, respectively), suggesting improvement in short-term auditory verbal memory.

CONCLUSIONS

Bimodal rTMS stimulation of left DLPFC and left TPC induced clinical improvement in pharmacologically non-responsive schizophrenia patients and may have improved their short-term verbal memories.

Aggressive behaviour in schizophrenic patients after abrupt treatment discontinuation

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study examined the demographic, clinical and pharmacological factors associated with aggressive behaviour after abrupt discontinuation of medication in schizophrenic patients.

METHOD

The study reports on a survey of 402 schizophrenic patients, who had abruptly discontinued their medication and had been involuntarily hospitalized to Psychiatric Hospital of Attika. The survey utilized the Discontinuation-Emergent Signs and Symptoms Checklist (DESS) to assess the signs and symptoms that patients exhibited (Rosenbaum et al., Biol Psychiatry 1998;44:77), as well the Aggression Scale (Delgado-Escueta et al., New England J Med 1981;305:711) to estimate the aggressive behaviour. Demographic and clinical variables as well as variables related to pharmacological treatment have been also investigated.

RESULTS

Analyses revealed that the presence of aggressive behaviour after abrupt drug discontinuation was associated positively with previous history of aggression, male gender , abrupt discontinuation of anticholinergics, delusions, nervousness or anxiety, elevated mood, irritability and negatively with negative symptoms. These predictors can correctly classify 76.3% of patients with aggressive behaviour and 64.0% of patients without aggressive behaviour.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that abrupt discontinuation of medication in schizophrenic patients may lead to aggressive behaviour, being connected at least in the acute phase with particular demographic, clinical and pharmacological parameters.

Previous hospital admissions and disease severity predict the use of antipsychotic combination treatment in patients with schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Although not recommended in treatment guidelines, previous studies have shown a frequent use of more than one antipsychotic agent among patients with schizophrenia. The main aims of the present study were to explore the antipsychotic treatment regimen among patients with schizophrenia in a catchment area-based sample and to investigate clinical characteristics associated with antipsychotic combination treatment.

METHODS

The study included 329 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia using antipsychotic medication. Patients were recruited from all psychiatric hospitals in Oslo. Diagnoses were obtained by use of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I disorders (SCID-I). Additionally, Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and number of hospitalisations and pharmacological treatment were assessed.

RESULTS

Multiple hospital admissions, low GAF scores and high PANSS scores, were significantly associated with the prescription of combination treatment with two or more antipsychotics. The use of combination treatment increased significantly from the second hospital admission. Combination therapy was not significantly associated with age or gender. Regression models confirmed that an increasing number of hospital admission was the strongest predictor of the use of two or more antipsychotics.

CONCLUSIONS

Previous hospital admissions and disease severity measured by high PANSS scores and low GAF scores, predict the use of antipsychotic combination treatment in patients with schizophrenia. Future studies should further explore the use of antipsychotic drug treatment in clinical practice and partly based on such data establish more robust treatment guidelines for patients with persistently high symptom load.

How long to wait before reducing antipsychotic dosage in stabilized patients with schizophrenia? A retrospective chart review

OBJECTIVE

Antipsychotic dose reduction is generally recommended to occur after six months of clinical stabilization despite inadequate evidence. This timing issue was addressed in this study.

METHODS

This is an observational, retrospective and medical chart-based study. Inclusion criteria were (1) diagnosis of schizophrenia (DSM-IV), (2) being acutely psychotic at their first outpatient visit from May, 2002 to April, 2003, (3) having responded to antipsychotics and achieved clinical stabilization of acute symptoms, indexed as a fixation of regimen for four or more weeks, and (4) having one or more years of follow-up. Patients who had their antipsychotic doses reduced were then identified, and they were divided into two groups based on the waiting period before dose reduction: <24 weeks (Early Group) and ≥24 weeks (Standard Group). The rate of dose escalation for ≥20% during follow-up period was investigated as a proxy of clinical worsening.

RESULTS

After excluding stable patients at baseline, 211 patients met inclusion criteria. The mean ± SD waiting period before reducing antipsychotics was 122 ± 102 days. The rates of patients needing dose escalation were not significantly different between patients whose dose was reduced (N = 83) and those who was not (N = 128) (57.8% vs. 59.4%), and between Early Group (N = 59) and Standard Group (N = 24) (61.0% vs. 50.0%) although the reduction rate in antipsychotic dosage was significantly greater in Early Group (58.7% vs. 43.3%, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

These findings may indicate that timeline until antipsychotic reduction in stable patients with schizophrenia could be earlier than recommended, although caution is needed in interpreting our retrospective results.

SSRI augmentation of antipsychotic alters expression of GABA(A) receptor and related genes in PMC of schizophrenia patients

Clinical studies have shown that negative symptoms of schizophrenia unresponsive to antipsychotic given alone can improve after augmentation with SSRI antidepressant. Laboratory investigations into the mechanism of this synergism showed that co-administration of SSRI and antipsychotic produces changes in GABA(A) receptor and related systems, which differ from the effects of each drug alone. To examine the clinical relevance of these findings, the current study examined the effects of SSRI augmentation treatment on GABA(A) receptor and related systems in schizophrenia patients. Schizophrenia patients with high levels of negative symptoms unresponsive to antipsychotic treatment received add-on fluvoxamine (100 mg/d). Blood was taken before and 1, 3 and 6 wk after adding fluvoxamine and peripheral mononuclear cells (PMC) isolated. RNA encoding for GABA(A)β3, 5-HT2A, and 5-HT7 receptors, PKCβ2, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) was assayed with real-time RT-PCR. Plasma BDNF protein was assayed using ELISA. Clinical symptoms were assessed with validated rating scales. We found significant increase in mRNA encoding for GABA(A)β3 and 5-HT2A, 5-HT7 receptors and BDNF and a reduction in PKCβ2 mRNA. Plasma BDNF protein concentrations were increased. There were significant correlations among the genes. Clinical symptoms improved significantly. mRNA expression of PKCβ2, 5-HT2A and 5-HT7 showed significant associations with clinical symptoms. Combined SSRI+antipsychotic treatment is associated with changes in GABA(A) receptor and in related signalling systems in patients. These changes may be part of the mechanism of clinically effective drug action and may prove to be biomarkers of pharmacological response.

The involvement of GABA(A) receptor in the molecular mechanisms of combined selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor-antipsychotic treatment

There is evidence that combining selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs may improve negative symptoms in schizophrenia and resistant symptoms in obsessive-compulsive and affective disorders. To examine the mechanism of action of this treatment we investigated the molecular modulation of γ-aminobutyric acid-A (GABA(A)) receptor components and biochemical pathways associated with GABA(A) receptor function following administration of the SSRI fluvoxamine (Flu) combined with the first-generation antipsychotic haloperidol (Hal) and compared it to the individual drugs and the atypical antipsychotic clozapine (Clz). We analysed prefrontal cortices of Sprague-Dawley rats injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) with the combination of Flu (10 mg/kg) and Hal (1 mg/kg), each drug alone, or Clz (10 mg/kg) after 30 min and 1 h. We found that haloperidol plus fluvoxamine (Hal-Flu) co-administration, and Clz, decreased the level of GABAAβ2/3 receptor subunit in the cytosolic fraction, and increased it in the membrane compartment in rat PFC. Flu or Hal alone did not produce changes in GABAAβ2/3 receptor protein expression. Additionally, Hal-Flu and Clz regulated molecular signalling pathways that modulate GABA(A) receptor function, including protein kinase C (PKC) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase-2 (ERK2). In primary cortical culture, short-term treatment (15 min) with Hal-Flu combination and Clz increased GABAAβ subunit phosphorylation levels. Pretreatment of the cells with PKC inhibitor abolished the effect of the combined treatment, or Clz on phosphorylation of GABA(A) receptor. Inhibition of ERK2 did not alter the effect of drugs on GABA(A) receptor phosphorylation levels. Our findings provide evidence that the combined treatment regulates GABA(A) receptor function and does so via a PKC-dependent pathway.

Evaluation of a multifaceted intervention to limit excessive antipsychotic co-prescribing in schizophrenia out-patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of a multifaceted educational intervention on the frequency of antipsychotic co-prescribing in adult schizophrenia out-patients.

METHOD

Controlled quasi-experimental study performed in two Danish municipalities matched for baseline prevalence of antipsychotic polypharmacy, socioeconomic status and functional level of patients. The intervention was aimed at psychiatric healthcare providers and consisted of 1 day of didactic lectures, six 3-h educational outreach visits and an electronic reminder during drug prescribing.

RESULTS

Between-group use of antipsychotic polypharmacy was compared at baseline (intervention group, N = 232/control group, N = 351) and after 1 year of intervention (intervention group, N = 216/control group, N = 386). The prevalence of antipsychotic polypharmacy at follow-up was not significantly different between treatment settings when adjusting for differences in case-mix (P = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

This multifaceted educational intervention failed to reduce the frequency of antipsychotic co-prescribing, but it suggested that future efforts to improve prescribing practice should address organizational barriers to implementation.

A small group aerobic exercise programme that reduces body weight is feasible in adults with severe chronic schizophrenia: a pilot study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility and effects of an exercise programme on people with severe, chronic schizophrenia.

METHOD

A single-group, pre-post pilot study incorporating a baseline familiarisation phase was followed by a 24-week, small-group aerobic exercise programme for up to 30-min each session, twice a week and a 30-min weekly walking session. Adherence was assessed by attendance, and by analysing the exercise supervisor's comments in a programme diary and in each participant's exercise logbook. Body weight, cardio-respiratory fitness (VO₂ max), walking endurance (6-min walk test) and psychiatric symptoms (the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale) were measured at each time point.

RESULTS

Eight participants (6 men, 2 women; mean age 45 years, 9 months (SD 10 years, 1 month); mean body mass index 27.0 (SD 4.2)) attended a mean of 73% of the scheduled exercise sessions, and 83% of the walking sessions, with no adverse events and no dropouts. All participants displayed positive and negative behaviours during training sessions. There were significant reductions in weight (2.4%) and body mass index (2.2%), but no changes in other measures.

CONCLUSIONS

It was feasible and safe to conduct a small-group aerobic exercise programme for adults with severe chronic schizophrenia that reduced body weight.

Lipid peroxidation in patients with schizophrenia

AIMS

There is evidence that dysregulation of free radicals metabolism associated with abnormal activities of antioxidative enzymes in schizophrenia can lead to lipid peroxidation in plasma, erythrocytes, blood platelets and cerebrospinal fluid. Injury to neurons in schizophrenia may affect their function, i.e. membrane transport, impairment of energy production in mitochondria, changes in membrane phospholipid composition, alteration of receptors and transporters as well as neurotransmission. The purpose of the present study was to assess the total antioxidant capacity (TAC) and lipid peroxidation (expressed as the level of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances [TBARS]) in plasma from schizophrenic patients taking olanzapine or risperidone. The level of TBARS estimated according to the Rice-Evans method and TAC ([ABTS; 2,2'-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) radical cation decolorization assay]) in plasma from schizophrenic patients (DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia, n = 30, age 18-36) taking olanzapine or risperidone and from healthy volunteers (n = 30) were measured.

METHODS

The level of TBARS in plasma from healthy volunteers after incubation with olanzapine or risperidone was also estimated.

RESULTS

Significantly lower plasma TAC (P < 0.05) and significantly increased level of TBARS (P < 0.001) in schizophrenic patients were observed. The in vitro study showed that after olanzapine or risperidone (at final concentrations corresponding to doses used in acute episodes of schizophrenia treatment) no changes of plasma lipid peroxidation were found (P > 0.05). The obtained results indicate that the pro-oxidant disturbances occur in schizophrenic patients (acute episode) taking stable doses of olanzapine or risperidone.

CONCLUSION

It seems that second-generation antipsychotics (olanzapine and risperidone) are not responsible for increase of plasma lipid peroxidation.

A review of hyperprolactinaemia and severe mental illness: Are there implications for clinical biochemistry?

Hyperprolactinaemia is a common adverse event reported in association with treatments used in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Recent data are suggestive that hyperprolactinaemia may have a range of significant short-and long-term clinical consequences. The objective of this review is to examine the causes, frequency and clinical consequences of hyperprolactinaemia in the severely mentally ill (SMI) with a focus on patients taking antipsychotic medications. A Medline search was carried out to identify relevant publications. Reference lists from previous review articles were also examined to search for additional data. Hyperprolactinaemia may be one of the most common adverse events associated with some antipsychotic medications. Precise rates with individual drugs had however until recently been poorly categorized. The relationship between hyperprolactinaemia and adverse outcomes in the SMI population appears similar to that in the general population. Adverse outcomes (such as sexual dysfunction) can occur acutely and in the longer term (bone fractures and possibly breast cancer), but the precise link between degree and length of hyperprolactinaemia and adverse outcome remains to be established. In conclusion, hyperprolactinaemia is a common treatment-emergent adverse event of some antipsychotic medications and may have clinical consequences. Physicians must balance the benefits and risks of treatment when determining appropriate therapy for individual patients.

Psychiatrists' attitude to antipsychotic depot treatment in patients with first-episode schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

Despite good clinical evidence, depot antipsychotics are only seldom prescribed to patients with first episode schizophrenia. The present study aims at investigating psychiatrists' reasons for this reservation.

METHOD

We surveyed 198 psychiatrists on their attitude toward offering depot treatment to first episode patients (FEP). Participants scored the extent of influence of individual factors on their decision on a seven-point-scale, additional data on their prescription practice and estimation of the relapse risk of FEP were collected.

RESULTS

Psychiatrists reported that only three out of 12 factors were of influence. These were the limited availability of different second generation antipsychotic depot drugs, the frequent rejection of the depot offer by the patients and the patients' skepticism based on the lack in experience of a relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

There is actually little specific reason for not prescribing depot to FEP according to the current survey. For those factors being reported to be of influence, psychoeducation, including profound information on depot treatment, the development of additional SGA depot drugs and the standard offer of depot treatment to all FEP in a shared-decision-making may be considered.

Time to 'get real': preliminary insights into the long-term management of schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

A brief file and medication chart review was undertaken to examine the 'real world' treatment of schizophrenia, with a particular focus on long-term treatment strategies that extend beyond existing evidence-based guidelines.

METHOD

Treatment strategies were identified through an audit of patient files and their medication charts for patients admitted 2-5 years in a non-acute psychiatric hospital.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine file reviews and 20 medication chart audits were conducted. High levels of diagnostic heterogeneity were identified with the presence of psychosis and mood-related diagnoses (primarily schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder) and high rates of comorbidity (86%). Functional impairment, poor insight and high levels of risk were present in most patients. Treatments largely consisted of combination strategies with 75% of patients prescribed two or more antipsychotics and an average of 3.4 psychotropic medications in total. While clozapine was commonly prescribed (65%), this was often in combination with, on average, two other psychotropic agents.

CONCLUSIONS

Notwithstanding the limited sample, these findings provide a valuable glimpse into the management strategies employed in the long-term management of schizophrenia. Evidence-based guidelines are largely of limited value for this cohort that often has complex presentations and further research is urgently needed to provide guidance into management strategies that extend beyond 5 years, with particular emphasis on the utility of medication combinations.

Increased motor activity in cycloid psychosis compared to schizophrenia

Although cycloid psychoses share psychopathological features with schizophrenia, their course and outcome are comparable to those seen in bipolar affective disorder. The diagnostic category is of interest because it has been demonstrated that cycloid psychoses can be diagnosed reliably and distinguished from other psychoses based on treatment response and neurophysiology. Despite this, only few studies have investigated the neurobiological differences between cycloid psychoses and schizophrenia, and although hyper- and hypoactivity have been observed in patients with cycloid psychoses, no studies have investigated motor activity in this group to date. Therefore, we aimed to quantify motor activity during the waking hours of the day as assessed by wrist actigraphy in 16 patients with cycloid psychosis and 16 patients with paranoid schizophrenia. All patients were matched for gender and age, and wrist actigraphic assessment took place during acute episodes. The level of activity and proportion of active vs. inactive periods during waking hours were significantly higher in patients with cycloid psychosis. The results of the present study are interpreted in light of a previously reported general arousal in cycloid psychoses that is expressed in motor activity. Our data support the concept of cycloid psychoses as a syndrome with distinct symptomatology and pathophysiology.

Gene expression of neuregulin-1 isoforms in different brain regions of elderly schizophrenia patients

One important risk gene in schizophrenia is neuregulin-1 (NRG1), which is expressed in different isoforms in the brain. To determine if alterations of NRG1 are present in schizophrenia, we measured gene expression of NRG1 and its main isoforms as well as the impact of genetic variation of NRG1 in an exploratory study examining three brain regions instead of only one as published so far. In all, we examined post-mortem samples from 11 schizophrenia patients and eight normal subjects. We investigated gene expression of total NRG1 and isoforms I, II and III by real-time PCR in the prefrontal cortex (Brodmann areas 9 and 10) and right hippocampal tissue. For the genetic study, we genotyped the NRG1 polymorphism SNP8NRG221533, which is within the core haplotype of the original publication. Compared to controls, gene expression of the NRG1 isoform I was decreased and isoform II increased in the prefrontal cortex (BA10) of schizophrenia patients. There were no statistically significant differences between individuals carrying at least one C allele of SNP8NRG221533 compared to individuals homozygous for the T allele. The decreased expression of NRG1 isoform I and overexpression of isoform II may be related to deficits in receptor function as well as abnormal migration and myelination. However, our study sample was small and results of this exploratory study should be verified in a larger sample.

The first- and second-generation antipsychotic drugs affect ADP-induced platelet aggregation

OBJECTIVE

Blood platelets play an important role in haemostasis and their hyperaggregability may lead to thrombosis and cardiovascular diseases. Increased incidence of mortality, caused by cardiovascular disease, and the increased risk of thrombotic complication in schizophrenic patients treated with antipsychotics have been reported. The effects of antipsychotic drugs on blood platelet function are not fully explained, therefore the purpose of the present study was to examine and compare the effects of the second-generation antipsychotic drugs used in schizophrenia (clozapine, risperidone and olanzapine), with the effects of the first generation antipsychotic, haloperidol, on the platelet aggregation induced by ADP in vitro.

METHODS

Blood obtained from healthy volunteers (n=25) collected into sodium citrate was centrifuged (250xg, 10 min) at room temperature to obtain platelet-rich plasma. Aggregation of blood platelets (10 microM ADP) was recorded (Chrono-log aggregometer) in platelet-rich plasma preincubated with antipsychotic drugs (final concentration: clozapine 420 ng/ml, risperidone 65 ng/ml, olanzapine 40 ng/ml, haloperidol 20 ng/ml) for 30 min.

RESULTS

Our results showed that all tested drugs inhibit platelet aggregation induced by ADP in vitro. Among studied antipsychotic drugs clozapine and olanzapine significantly reduced platelet aggregability in vitro. In comparison with control platelets (without the drug), clozapine inhibited ADP-induced platelet aggregation by 21% (P=3.7x10(-6)) and olanzapine by 18% (P=2.8x10(-4)), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The obtained results indicate that antipsychotic drugs, especially clozapine and olanzapine, contrary to haloperidol, reduced response of blood platelets to ADP measured as platelet aggregation. This suggests that therapy with such antipsychotics, particularly with second-generation antipsychotics, may partly reduce prothrombotic events associated with the increased platelet activation observed in schizophrenic patients. The mechanism of antiaggregatory influence of antipsychotics requires further studies.

Evidence-based medicine in psychopharmacotherapy: possibilities, problems and limitations

Psychopharmacotherapy should now be regulated in the sense of evidence-based medicine, as is the case in other areas of clinical treatment in medicine. In general this is a meaningful development, which principally will have a positive impact on routine health care in psychiatry. But several related problems should not be ignored. So far consensus on an internationally accepted evidence graduation could not be reached due to several difficulties related to this. For example, focussing on the results of meta-analyses instead of considering relevant single studies results in a decision-making logic which is in conflict with the rationale applied by drug authorities in the licensing process. Another example is the relevance of placebo-controlled trials: if randomized placebo-controlled phase-III studies are prioritized in the evidence grading, the evidence possibly deviates too far from the conditions of routine clinical care due to the special selection of patients in those studies. However, a grading primarily based on active comparator trials could lead to wrong conclusions about efficacy. This concerns especially the so-called "effectiveness" studies and other forms of phase-IV studies with their less restrictive methodological rigidity. Attempts to regulate psychopharmacotherapy in the sense of evidence-based medicine come closer to their limits the more complex the clinical situation and the respective decision-making logic are. Even in times of evidence-based medicine a large part of complex clinical decision-making in psychopharmacotherapy still relies more on clinical experience and a consensus on clinical experience, traditions and belief systems than on results of efficacy oriented phase-III and effectiveness-oriented phase-IV clinical studies.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of negative symptoms in residual schizophrenia: rationale and design of a sham-controlled, randomized multicenter study

Current meta-analysis revealed small, but significant effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. There is a need for further controlled, multicenter trials to assess the clinical efficacy of rTMS on negative symptoms in schizophrenia in a larger sample of patients. The objective of this multicenter, randomized, sham-controlled, rater- and patient-blind clinical trial is to investigate the efficacy of 3-week 10-Hz high frequency rTMS add on to antipsychotic therapy, 15 sessions per 3 weeks, 1,000 stimuli per session, stimulation intensity 110% of the individual motor threshold) of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for treating negative symptoms in schizophrenia, and to evaluate the effect during a 12 weeks of follow-up. The primary efficacy endpoint is a reduction of negative symptoms as assessed by the negative sum score of the positive and negative symptom score (PANSS). A sample size of 63 in each group will have 80% power to detect an effect size of 0.50. Data analysis will be based on the intention to treat population. The study will be conducted at three university hospitals in Germany. This study will provide information about the efficacy of rTMS in the treatment of negative symptoms. In addition to psychopathology, other outcome measures such as neurocognition, social functioning, quality of life and neurobiological parameters will be assessed to investigate basic mechanisms of rTMS in schizophrenia. Main limitations of the trial are the potential influence of antipsychotic dosage changes and the difficulty to ensure adequate blinding.

FDG-PET and MRI imaging of the effects of sertindole and haloperidol in the prefrontal lobe in schizophrenia

Sertindole, a 2nd generation antipsychotic with low movement disorder side effects, was compared with haloperidol in a 6-week crossover study. Fifteen patients with schizophrenia (mean age=42.6, range=22-59, 11 men and 4 women) received sertindole (12-24 mg) or haloperidol (4-16 mg) for 6 weeks and then received a FDG-PET scan and an anatomical MRI. Patients were then crossed to the other treatment and received a second set of scans at week 12. Dose was adjusted by a physician blind to the medication type. Brodmann areas were identified stereotaxically using individual MRI templates applied to the coregistered FDG-PET image. Sertindole administration was associated with higher dorsolateral prefrontal cortex metabolic rates than haloperidol and lower orbitofrontal metabolic rates than haloperidol. This effect was greatest for gray matter of the dorsolateral Brodmann areas 8, 9, 10, 44, 45, and 46. Patients were further contrasted with an approximately age and sex-matched group of 33 unmedicated patients with schizophrenia and with a group of 55 normal volunteers. Sertindole administration was associated with greater change toward normal values and away from the values found in the unmedicated comparison group for dorsolateral prefrontal cortex gray matter and white matter underlying medial prefrontal and cingulate cortex. These results are consistent with the low motor side-effect profile of sertindole, greater improvement on prefrontal cognitive tasks with sertindole than haloperidol, and with the tendency of 2nd generation antipsychotic drugs to have greater frontal activation than haloperidol.

Iloperidone: in schizophrenia

Iloperidone is an atypical antipsychotic that is approved for the treatment of adult patients with schizophrenia. In several large (n > 570 per trial), 4- or 6-week, double-blind, multinational, multicentre trials in adult patients with schizophrenia, recommended target dosages of oral iloperidone (6-12 mg twice daily) generally showed better efficacy than placebo, in terms of improvements in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores or Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) scores (primary endpoints) and also for most secondary endpoints, including PANSS subscale scores. In addition, pharmacogenomic studies identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that were associated with an enhanced response to iloperidone during acute treatment of schizophrenia. More limited data also support the role of these SNPs in enhancing responses to iloperidone during longer-term treatment. In a pooled analysis of three 52-week, double-blind, multinational, multicentre trials (n = 473), iloperidone treatment was shown to be equivalent to that with haloperidol, based on Kaplan-Meier estimates of the time to relapse (primary endpoint). Iloperidone was generally well tolerated and was associated with few extrapyramidal symptoms or changes in metabolic parameters in short- and longer-term clinical trials in adult patients with schizophrenia.

Abnormal microstructures of the basal ganglia in schizophrenia revealed by diffusion tensor imaging

There has been a hypothesis that deficits in the basal ganglia-thalamic system may play an important role in the dysfunctional goal-directed behaviour in schizophrenia. By using diffusion tensor imaging, we measured fractional anisotropy (FA) values in the basal ganglia-thalamic system in 42 schizophrenics and 42 matched controls to investigate microstructural tissue alterations in the basal ganglia-thalamic system in schizophrenia. Schizophrenics had significantly lower FA values in the bilateral globus pallidus and left thalamus compared to controls, suggesting that schizophrenics might have microstructural abnormalities in globus pallidus and thalamus. These data support the notion that myelination abnormalities in basal ganglia-thalamic system are related to the pathophysiology of schizophrenia.

Optimal thresholds of early response to atypical antipsychotics: application of signal detection methods

OBJECTIVE

Identify the optimal magnitude of response to antipsychotic medication at various early time points that best predicts subsequent non-response at 8 weeks.

METHODS

Data were pooled from 5 randomized, double-blind clinical trials of atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia and related disorders (n=1137 moderately-to-severely ill; n=300 less than moderately ill). Signal detection methods (receiver-operating characteristic curves) were used to identify the optimal response threshold based on percent change from baseline on the PANSS total score at different early time points (Weeks 1-4) to predict subsequent 'non-response' at 8 weeks (i.e., not 'minimally improved', 'much improved' or 'remitted') while holding the false positive rate to a level of 30% or less. Analyses were implemented separately for patients with schizophrenia who differed on baseline illness severity.

RESULTS

Using Area Under the Curve (AUC) >or=0.8 to define optimal discriminative ability at the earliest time point, the early response threshold in moderately-to-severely ill patients for predicting not 'minimally improved' was <15% reduction in PANSS total at Week 2, not 'much improved' was <23% at Week 2, and not 'remitted' was <26% at Week 4. Similarly, in less than moderately ill patients, the optimal early response threshold for predicting not 'minimally improved' was <12% reduction in PANSS total at Week 2, and not 'much improved' was <14% at Week 1.

CONCLUSION

Specific thresholds of response were identified at early time points for predicting subsequent non-response. Not attaining these early response thresholds may serve as important clinical markers of subsequent non-response to antipsychotic therapy.

How to improve adherence to antipsychotic treatment: Outcomes of the IMproving PAtient outComes in psychiaTry (IMPACT) Berlin 2009 meeting workshop

Objective. To challenge psychiatrists about their practice regarding patients' treatment adherence in severe mental disease, and make them discuss possible ways to improve this through their relationship with patients. Methods. A total of 423 physicians from 32 countries were assigned across 41 parallel groups during a workshop organised on adherence in severe mental diseases. Factors that influence adherence, and questions and measures to help patient-clinician interaction were discussed and rated. Results. The most important factor influencing adherence to treatment was considered to be insight. The factor over which clinicians felt they had the greatest influence was the therapeutic relationship. The question that most physicians considered the most useful for improving communication with patients was, "Does taking medication cause any problems for you?" Additional areas identified as important in improving adherence included addressing the positive and negative aspects of medication, patient expectations and what patients hoped to gain from seeing their physician. Intervention programmes to improve adherence included patient education, motivational interviewing and cognitive-behavioural therapy. A composite toolkit based on the top-rated questions to improve communication with patients and measures to aid adherence was recommended. Conclusion. Patient-centred practice is fundamental to ensuring adherence in mentally ill patients. Working tools can be successfully developed in interactive workshop settings, through reviewing and challenging current clinical practice.

Impact of neuregulin-1 on the pathophysiology of schizophrenia in human post-mortem studies

To a large extend schizophrenia has been shown to be heritable, with neuregulin-1 (NRG1) one of the candidate genes considered to play a role in the pathophysiology of the disorder. While several polymorphisms within this gene have been reported to be associated with schizophrenia, the impact of NRG1 risk genotypes on disturbed brain function and symptoms of the disease is unknown and might be elucidated using post-mortem studies. Neuregulins are signalling proteins and the NRG1 family encodes at least 15 different splice variants, classified into four isoforms. They play an important role in cell differentiation, migration, myelination and proliferation of oligodendrocytes and neurons. Dysfunction in these processes may be related to neurodevelopmental disturbances in schizophrenia. NRG1 isoforms are differentially expressed in relevant brain regions of schizophrenia patients such as the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus and may contribute to pathophysiological processes. Different NRG1 genotypes have been shown to influence gene expression of isoforms and the risk-associated variants are in primarily non-coding and promoter regions, probably operating by altering gene expression or splicing. In addition, NRG1 regulates the expression of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, and expression of the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA(A)) and N-methyl-D: -aspartate receptor in the brain. However, the contribution of NRG1 risk genotypes to expression of isoforms and cognitive or psychotic symptoms in patients remain to be investigated in prospective post-mortem studies. In animal models of ischemia/hypoxia, NRG1 has been shown to act as a therapeutic, neuroprotective agent and should be investigated in more detail in transgenic animal models.

Do effectiveness ("real world") studies on antipsychotics tell us the real truth?

In recent years, so-called "effectiveness studies" have gained increasing importance in the context of evidence-based medicine. These studies supposedly follow less restrictive methodological standards than phase III studies in terms of patient selection, co-medication and other design issues, and their results should therefore be better generalisable than those of phase III studies. Effectiveness studies, like other types of phase IV studies, can therefore contribute to the knowledge about antipsychotics or other psychopharmaceuticals and supply relevant information in addition to that gained from phase III trials. However, the less restrictive design and inherent methodological problems of phase IV studies mean that their results cannot falsify the results of phase III studies. The greater complexity of phase IV studies, for example the greater variance caused by the different kinds of confounders, means that their results have to be interpreted with great care and especially with a high degree of awareness of problematic design issues, such as insensitive primary outcome criteria, biased randomisation, unblinded treatment conditions, inclusion of chronic refractory patients, etc. Some recently published effectiveness studies on antipsychotic treatment of schizophrenia will be discussed under these methodological aspects. The main conclusions of these trials will be questioned on the basis of their severe methodological pitfalls.

Importance of open access to atypical antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: a European perspective

OBJECTIVE

To assess European psychiatrists' prescribing behaviour and their perceived need for access to a wide range of atypical antipsychotics for patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

METHODS

A blinded, internet survey of psychiatrists from the UK, Germany, Italy and the Netherlands occurred in 2007. Key inclusion criteria for psychiatrists: practising full time; practising for 5-35 years; prescribed atypical antipsychotics in prior 6 months to > or =20 patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. Eligible psychiatrists selected records for four patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder for whom they prescribed > or =1 atypical antipsychotic since January 2004.

RESULTS

Survey response rates were: UK, 14.8% (n = 107); Germany, 9.6% (n = 104); Italy, 8.9% (n = 101) and the Netherlands, 3.7% (n = 51); 363 psychiatrists reported on 1442 patients. Psychiatrists perceived a greater difference among atypical antipsychotics as a class (mean, 5.1 on a 7-point scale [7 = 'highly differentiated']) but not selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (mean, 3.6). On average, psychiatrists used 6.8 different atypical antipsychotics across their patients with schizophrenia and 4.4 across their patients with bipolar disorder, with 2.5 and 2.4 changes required following first-line treatment to stabilise therapy, respectively. The most common reason for switching medication was lack of efficacy. Psychiatrists reported that expected consequences for patients should access to atypical antipsychotics be restricted would include illness deterioration, non-adherence and hospitalisation.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this study is limited by potential selection biases, these data suggest that European psychiatrists tailor antipsychotic medications for patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder according to patients' needs and specific drug attributes.

Clozapine-induced myocarditis after long-term treatment: case presentation and clinical perspectives

Clozapine is the drug of choice for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Prompted by a patient who developed reversible clozapine-induced myocarditis after long-term treatment with clozapine for several years for chronic-resistant schizophrenia, we undertook a review of the relevant literature. Concerning the myocarditis, the patient recovered rapidly by withdrawal of clozapine and with supportive management. Psychiatric stabilisation of the patient was at least possible with a combination of quetiapine (600 mg) and amisulpride (800 mg). Well-designed studies with the aim to specifically investigate treatment options after clozapine are limited and clinical possibilities are discussed in this paper. Olanzapine and combinations using non-clozapine atypical neuroleptics have partly shown improvement, whereas evidence for successful augmentation with mood stabilisers, anticonvulsants or electroconvulsive therapy in treatment-resistant schizophrenia is limited.

Benefits and risks of antipsychotic polypharmacy: an evidence-based review of the literature

Combination antipsychotic prescription is an increasingly common practice in clinical psychiatry. This clinical practice is at odds with clinical guidelines promoting antipsychotic monotherapy. Moreover, there has been increased concern over the safety profile of atypical antipsychotics in the last 10-15 years. We reviewed the literature on antipsychotic combinations with a focus on safety and efficacy. Multiple electronic database searches were complemented by relevant bibliography cross-checking and expert discussions. The review showed a literature that is dominated by case reports and uncontrolled studies. Polypharmacy was unequally studied, with some recent combinations (i.e. clozapine and risperidone) being extensively, albeit inconclusively, studied and other more commonly used combinations (first- with second-generation agents) receiving little attention. From an evidence-based perspective, further trials of antipsychotic association of sufficient power to address safety issues are needed before recommending any antipsychotic combination. Particular weaknesses of the present literature are low number of participants, lack of adequate control of confounding variables, short duration of experimental follow-up and inadequate monitoring of potential adverse effects.

Current guidelines and their recommendations for prolactin monitoring in psychosis

Guidelines on the use of second-generation antipsychotics and physical health monitoring have begun to include information on hyperprolactinemia, and generally recommend that patients should be queried about possible symptoms related to elevated prolactin: menstrual abnormalities, galactorrhea and sexual dysfunction. However, with only two exceptions, none of the guidelines suggest performing baseline plasma prolactin levels. Although several of the guidelines mention the potential for hyperprolactinemia to be associated with osteopenia and osteoporosis, there is no guidance how to monitor for this. Product labeling for the different antipsychotics inform the clinician about potential risks but are not helpful with precise monitoring recommendations. The internal medicine literature contains important information regarding the pulsatile secretion of prolactin, differential diagnosis of hyperprolactinemia, and plasma levels of prolactin usually associated with certain symptoms that would be useful for the prescriber of antipsychotics to be aware of. The prudent clinician should consider obtaining a baseline plasma prolactin level and at least one follow-up measurement when starting any patient on a new antipsychotic. This will help guide clinical decisions about antipsychotic dosage, switching antipsychotic medications, or considering ancillary treatments to protect bone mass. These decisions would be within the context of considering other adverse events as well as the overall effectiveness of the antipsychotic medication being used.

Medications Development for the Treatment of Nicotine Dependence in Individuals with Schizophrenia

The development of medications for the treatment of nicotine dependence in patients with schizophrenia is a public health priority due to its high prevalence rates, devastating medical consequences, and difficulty to treat. It has been hypothesized that the high prevalence of nicotine dependence among patients with schizophrenia may be due to a shared neurobiological vulnerability. This shared vulnerability has been evidenced in reports showing that nicotine improves neuropsychological deficits associated with schizophrenia such as in the P50 evoked auditory potentials, spatial working memory, and attention. The common pathophysiologic pathways of smoking and schizophrenia may serve as the basis for the pharmacological evaluation of medications for the treatment of these concurrent disorders. Currently, little research of medications for the treatment of this comorbidity has been conducted. Studies have evaluated the efficacy of smoking cessation medications in patients with schizophrenia. These include the nicotine replacement therapy (patch, nasal spray) and sustained release bupropion. Others have evaluated the anti-smoking effect of medications (e.g., clozapine, haloperidol) used for the treatment of schizophrenia. In both cases, the results have not been conclusive. Newer smoking cessation approaches such as varenicline, selegiline, rimonabant, and nicotine vaccine, among others, have yet to be tested in this population. The purpose of this article is to review the results of the studies conducted to date and propose some potential pharmacotherapies based on the current knowledge of the pathophysiology of both disorders.

Probleme der „evidence-based medicine“ in der Psychopharmakotherapie: Problematik der Evidenzgraduierung und der Evidenzbasierung komplexer klinischer Entscheidungsprozesse

Psychopharmacotherapy should now be regulated in the sense of evidence based medicine, as is the case in other areas of therapeutic medicine. In general, this is a meaningful development which will have a positive impact on routine health care. However, related problems should not be ignored. One important problem is the different definition of degrees of evidence. If placebo-controlled studies are prioritized, evidence deviates too much from the conditions of routine clinical care. However, the restriction to active comparative trials could lead to false conclusions about efficacy. In addition, if the focus is placed on the results of meta-analyses instead of considering relevant single studies, the result is a decision making logic contrary to that of the licensing process.Due to inherent methodological problems of the meta-analytical approach, the narrative, systematic review should retain its traditional importance and be used to provide a complementary view. Attempts to regulate psychopharmacotherapy in the sense of evidence based medicine come closer to their limits the more complex the clinical situation and the respective decision making logic are. Even in times of evidence based medicine, a large part of complex clinical decision making in psychopharmacotherapy still relies more on a consensus about clinical experience and traditions than on relevant empirical databases.

Long-Acting Injectable Risperidone for the Treatment of Schizophrenia

Schizophrenia remains a severe disorder that is associated with a poor outcome in a large subgroup of patients. Major efforts should be made to improve treatment for all patients who have this debilitating disease. Second-generation antipsychotics were a major step forward in this respect; however, important unmet needs remain, such as a better solution for frequent noncompliance problems. Depot formulations are known to have advantages in this respect. However, for a long time, only depot formulations of conventional antipsychotics were available, with their high risk of extrapyramidal adverse effects. Therefore, there has been only very restricted use of depot antipsychotics, which mainly focused on patients with chronic disease who were difficult to treat and had a high risk of noncompliance. The situation may change with the advent of a depot formulation of an atypical antipsychotic. The first depot formulation of an atypical antipsychotic to be introduced to the market is long-acting injectable risperidone. On the basis of the pharmacokinetic properties of the depot formulation, a 2-week interval between administrations is recommended. The antipsychotic efficacy of long-acting risperidone was demonstrated in two 12-week, double-blind, randomised, phase III studies, one versus placebo and the other versus oral risperidone. These two studies, together with one open-label, long-term study over 12 months, belong to the core group of trials that were relevant for the licensing of long-acting risperidone. A relapse-prevention, control group study comparing the long-acting formulation versus oral risperidone was not performed because of the known principal methodological problems of such a comparison. Instead, as much clinical data as possible was collected from observational studies that investigated questions relevant for clinical practice, such as efficacy, safety and tolerability in different subgroups, and transition from pre-treatment with different kinds of antipsychotics to long-acting risperidone. On the basis of these data, it can be stated that the efficacy of the long-term formulation of risperidone is proven, and that the safety and tolerability are more or less comparable to those of oral risperidone. The local tolerability at the injection site is good. Because it is well known that noncompliance is a frequent feature of the treatment of schizophrenia, and considering the advantages of atypical antipsychotics, consideration of whether long-acting atypical antipsychotics should have a broader indication than is the case with the depot formulations of the classical antipsychotics is warranted.

Optimizing early prediction for antipsychotic response in schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

Researchers, by studying first-generation antipsychotics, have established an early prediction model, which had a favorable specificity but a low sensitivity. This study aims to optimize early prediction of treatment response for schizophrenia using a novel statistic method that can be done even under the Microsoft Excel system of a personal computer.

METHODS

One hundred twenty-three inpatients with acutely exacerbated schizophrenia were given optimal therapy of risperidone, a commonly used second-generation antipsychotic agent. Response was defined as a reduction of 20% or more in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score. We applied the generalized estimating equation method's logistic regression to establish an early prediction model based on the treatment results of the first and the second weeks.

RESULTS

The proposed method correctly predicted nonresponse at 4 and 6 weeks in 80.8% and 81.8% of the patients, respectively. The method also identified responder at 4 and 6 weeks in 80.0% and 82.8%, respectively. The predictive powers (or correct prediction rates) at 4 and 6 weeks were 80.3% and 82.4%, respectively. In addition, the results based on the responses in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale scores were slightly better than those in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the first 2 weeks' treatment results to predict the fourth or sixth week's treatment response is acceptable in terms of specificity, sensitivity, and predictive power. Further studies are needed. Moreover, whether this model could be applied to establish a prediction system for other psychotropics, such as antidepressants, also deserves research.