Immunologic responses to vaccinia vaccines administered by different parenteral routes

Transient decreases in human T cell proliferative responses following vaccinia immunization

To further study the immunosuppression associated with virus infections, we analyzed the proliferative responses of serial PBMC samples obtained following vaccinia virus immunization. In four of five volunteers, responses to PHA, anti-CD3, vaccinia virus, and recall antigens were markedly decreased at at least one time point between days 5 and 29 after vaccination. Responses to PHA were restored by the addition of IL-2 or irradiated autologous healthy PBMC in the two volunteers tested, suggesting that the proliferation defect is attributable to accessory cell dysfunction. In one donor, immobilized anti-CD3 failed to induce proliferation, but addition of immobilized anti-CD28 partially restored proliferation. These results indicate that vaccinia virus infection can transiently suppress proliferative responses of PBMC, in part by causing accessory cell dysfunction. Our findings extend the list of viral infections associated with systemic immunologic effects and demonstrate that suppression of proliferation can occur with localized virus infections.

DNA vaccination with vaccinia virus L1R and A33R genes protects mice against a lethal poxvirus challenge

Previously we found that passive transfer of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) specific to either the vaccinia virus (VACV) L1R or A33R gene product protected mice from challenge with VACV. The L1R-specific MAbs, which bind the intracellular mature virion (IMV), neutralized virus in cell culture, whereas the A33R-specific MAbs, which bind extracellular enveloped virions (EEV), did not. To investigate whether a protective response could be generated by vaccination with these genes, we constructed and evaluated DNA vaccines expressing the VACV L1R and/or A33R genes under control of a cytomegalovirus promoter. Mice were vaccinated with DNA-coated gold beads by using a gene gun and then challenged with VACV (strain WR) intraperitoneally. Mice vaccinated with L1R alone developed neutralizing antibodies and were partially protected. Mice vaccinated with a combination of both genes loaded on the same gold beads developed a robust anti-A33R response; however, no neutralizing antibody response was detected, and the mice were not protected. In contrast, when mice were vaccinated with L1R and A33R loaded on different gold beads, neutralizing (presumably anti-L1R) and anti-A33R antibody responses were detected, and protection was markedly improved. Our results indicated that vaccination with both L1R and A33R proteins, intended to evoke mechanistically distinct and complementary forms of protection, was more effective than vaccination with either protein by itself.

Clinical evaluation of a vaccinia-vectored Hantaan virus vaccine

We evaluated a vaccinia-vectored vaccine for hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome in clinical trials. A Phase I dose-escalation study in 16 volunteers divided into four groups demonstrated that subcutaneous inoculation of approximately 10(7) plaque-forming units of the recombinant virus was safe and immunogenic. Vaccination of a fifth group of 12 volunteers indicated that neutralizing antibody titers to both vaccinia virus and Hantaan virus were enhanced after a second inoculation. Comparing two routes of vaccination showed that scarification effectively induced neutralizing antibodies in vaccinia virus-naive volunteers but that subcutaneous inoculation was superior to scarification in vaccinia virus-immune individuals. A Phase II, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted among 142 volunteers. Two subcutaneous vaccinations were administered at 4-week intervals. Neutralizing antibodies to Hantaan virus or to vaccinia virus were detected in 72% or 98% of vaccinia virus-naive volunteers, respectively. In contrast, only 26% of the vaccinia virus-immune volunteers developed neutralizing antibody responses to Hantaan virus. J. Med. Virol. 60:77-85, 2000. Published 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Improved protection against Venezuelan equine encephalitis by genetic engineering of a recombinant vaccinia virus

An improved vaccine is needed against Venezuelan equine encephalitis (VEE) virus because the existing live attenuated vaccine, TC-83, causes a high incidence of adverse effects, and the Formalin-inactivated vaccine, C-84, does not protect against airborne infection. A recombinant vaccine had previously been constructed in which the VEE structural proteins were expressed by vaccinia virus. Although protection against subcutaneous challenge with VEE was achieved, the vaccine had limited efficacy against aerosolized virus. We made a similar construct (WR100) and compared its performance with that of a recombinant vaccinia virus which had been altered in two ways (WR103) in order to improve its performance as a vaccine: a synthetic promoter was inserted upstream of the VEE coding sequence to increase the amount of VEE proteins produced, and a single nucleotide in the E2 glycoprotein gene was altered to enhance immunogenicity. The WR103 virus expressed greater amounts of VEE proteins on the surface of infected cells than did WR100, and this difference was found to correspond to a 3.5-fold increase in VEE protein production. Sera from mice immunized with WR103 contained elevated levels of antibody to VEE, and enhanced protection against subcutaneous challenge with the pathogenic Trinidad donkey strain was achieved. This altered construct could form the basis for a better vaccine against VEE.

Synthesis and antiviral evaluation of analogs of adenosine-N1-oxide and 1-(Benzyloxy)adenosine

The activity of a series of compounds related to adenosine-N1-oxide (1) and 1-(benzyloxy)adenosine (42) against vaccinia virus has been determined both in vitro and in a vaccinia mouse tailpox model. Significant activities have been found both in vitro and in vivo for a number of the synthetic compounds.