A preliminary evaluation of nelfinavir mesylate, an inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 protease, to treat HIV infection

Characterizing classes of antiretroviral drugs by genotype

This paper develops methods for using HIV-1 genotypic information to group patients who are expected to have similar patterns of sensitivity or resistance to two or more drugs. The methods presented are an extension of prediction based classification to handle multiple drug responses. Here, the goal is to determine the probability that one antiretroviral therapy will be more favourable than another for an individual given the specific genotypic or other characteristics of the infecting viral population. This approach requires a model relating genotype to a vector of drug specific phenotypic responses. A comparison of Nelfinavir and Indinavir is provided using 2746 protease sequences and corresponding in vitro sensitivity assays provided to us by the Virco Group.

Primary nelfinavir (NFV)-associated resistance mutations during a follow-up period of 108 weeks in protease inhibitor naïve patients treated with NFV-containing regimens in an HIV clinic cohort

BACKGROUND

Nelfinavir (NFV) is a widely prescribed HIV-1 specific protease inhibitor (PI). However, there are only a few reports that have described the long-term effects of NFV-containing regimens, especially with regard to the emergence of drug resistance in inner-city clinics.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical and virologic responses to treatment with NFV-containing regimens for up to 108 weeks and determine the timing and rate of emergence of primary NFV-resistance associated mutations in daily clinical practice.

STUDY DESIGN

A cohort study in an inner-city clinic. Our study included 51 consecutive patients who were PI-nai;ve and commenced therapy in February 1997 through April 1999.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The proportions of patients who continued the same therapeutic regimen and showed virologic success (viral load <400 copies/ml) up to 108 weeks were 78 and 63%, respectively, based on intent-to-treat analysis. Among patients with a viral load persistently >400 copies/ml at week 12 (n=30), 11 developed primary NFV-resistance associated mutations by 108 weeks (stratified log-rank test; P<0.05). The Cox proportional hazard model showed that prior use of reverse transcriptase inhibitors (n=22) (relative hazard (RH); 2.10, 95% CI; 0.67-6.62), prior AIDS diagnosis (n=6) (RH; 1.70, 95% CI; 0.37-7.77), CD4 < 200/microl at baseline (n=19) (RH; 2.48, 95% CI; 0.78-7.81) and viral load >30,000 copies/ml at baseline (n=21) (RH; 2.10, 95% CI; 0.67-6.62) were not independent predictors of the NFV-resistance, although some tendency was noted. In total, 77% of the patients continued NFV-containing treatment without the NFV-resistance for 108 weeks. The viral load at week 12 could be used as a predictor of treatment success in our cohort study.

Acute stress reactions to recent life events among women and men living with HIV/AIDS

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the prevalence of acute stress reactions to recent life events among persons living with HIV/AIDS. A second aim was to investigate the relationship of acute stress reactions among HIV-infected men and women to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms to previous traumatic life events.

METHOD

Participants included 64 HIV-seropositive persons (33 men and 31 women) drawn from a larger study examining the effects of group therapy on quality of life and health behavior. These individuals were assessed at baseline on demographic and medical status characteristics and (PTSD) symptoms andthen randomly assigned to either receive group therapy plus education or education alone. Three months later they were assessed for acute stress reactions to recent life events.

RESULTS

Nearly a third (31.3 percent) of the participants reported levels of acute stress reactions to recent life events that met all symptom criteria for the diagnosis of acute stress disorder. However, only 9.4 percent of the respondents described a recent stressful life event that was threatening to the life or physical integrity of themselves or others. Acute stress reactions to recent life events were significantly and positively related to experiencing PTSD symptoms to prior traumatic life events. Acute stress did not differ significantly by gender, AIDS status, or whether or not participants had received 12 weeks of group therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

A subset of individuals with HIV/AIDS experience high levels of acute stress reactivity to life events considered non-traumatic. HIV-infected individuals who react strongly to ongoing life stressors are more likely to have developed PTSD symptoms in response to previous traumatic life events.

Determining the antiviral activity of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in treatment-naive chronically HIV-1-infected individuals

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) monotherapy by following the initial rate of decline in plasma viral load, which is a measure of the efficacy of therapy in blocking viral replication.

DESIGN

An open-label, single-site study of TDF monotherapy in 10 antiretroviral drug-naive chronically HIV-1-infected individuals.

METHODS

Antiviral responses were assessed at baseline and during 21 days of monotherapy with TDF by measuring plasma HIV-1 RNA levels. The rate of change in HIV-1 RNA from baseline was determined both by linear regression and by fitting to a published model. Slopes were compared with those previously determined for ritonavir monotherapy.

RESULTS

Over 21 days, mean plasma HIV-1 RNA levels in the TDF-treated patients fell 1.5 log(10) copies/ml (range, 0.7-2.0). The initial rates of decline in plasma HIV-1 RNA in the 10 TDF-treated patients and in 25 protease inhibitor-naive subjects treated with ritonavir monotherapy were nearly identical.

CONCLUSIONS

The reduction in plasma HIV-1 RNA with TDF monotherapy was comparable with the decline observed in previous studies of protease inhibitor monotherapy. TDF is a potent antiretroviral agent and has comparable inherent antiviral activity with that of ritonavir, a potent protease inhibitor. These data support further study of TDF-based regimens in simplified combinations of antiviral agents as initial treatment for chronic HIV-1 infection.

Antiretroviral-associated liver injury

ART-related hepatotoxicity can manifest in a variety of ways. Although benign, asymptomatic LEEs predominate, liver injury occurring in the context of either hypersensitivity or hyperlactatemia, represents a medical emergency and mandates immediate cessation of ART. Underpinning this broad spectrum of presentations are several, as yet poorly understood, mechanisms of liver damage that reflect contributions by constituents of HAART and host factors. Thus far, the most significant predisposing condition to emerge from clinical studies is chronic viral hepatitis. A more precise understanding, however, of the processes and factors that underlie ART-related hepatotoxicity is critical not only to the management of liver injury from current antiretroviral drugs but also to the design of safer drugs in the future.

Activities of atazanavir (BMS-232632) against a large panel of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 clinical isolates resistant to one or more approved protease inhibitors

To evaluate the cross-resistance profile of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease inhibitor (PI) atazanavir (BMS-232632), a panel of 551 clinical isolates exhibiting a wide array of PI resistance profiles and a variety of genotypic patterns were assayed for susceptibility to atazanavir and six other PIs: amprenavir, indinavir, lopinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, and saquinavir. In general, reductions in atazanavir susceptibility in vitro required several amino acid changes and were relatively modest in degree, and susceptibility was retained among isolates resistant to one or two of the currently approved PIs. There was a clear trend toward loss of susceptibility to atazanavir, as isolates exhibited increasing levels of cross-resistance to multiple PIs. Atazanavir appeared to have a distinct resistance profile relative to each of the other six PIs tested based on susceptibility comparisons against this panel of resistant isolates. Analysis of the genotypic profiles of 943 PI-susceptible and -resistant clinical isolates identified a strong correlation between the presence of amino acid changes at specific residues (10I/V/F, 20R/M/I, 24I, 33I/F/V, 36I/L/V, 46I/L, 48V, 54V/L, 63P, 71V/T/I, 73C/S/T/A, 82A/F/S/T, 84V, and 90M) and decreased susceptibility to atazanavir. While no single substitution or combination of substitutions was predictive of atazanavir resistance (change, >3.0-fold), the presence of at least five of these substitutions correlated strongly with loss of atazanavir susceptibility. Mutations associated with reduced susceptibility to each of the other six PIs were also determined.

A major role for a set of non-active site mutations in the development of HIV-1 protease drug resistance

A major problem in the chemotherapy of HIV-1 infection is the appearance of drug resistance. In the case of HIV-1 protease inhibitors, resistance originates from mutations in the protease molecule that lower the affinity of inhibitors while still maintaining a viable enzymatic profile. Drug resistance mutations can be classified as active site or non-active site mutations depending on their location within the protease molecule. Active site mutations directly affect drug/target interactions, and their action can be readily understood in structural terms. Non-active site mutations influence binding from distal locations, and their mechanism of action is not immediately apparent. In this paper, we have characterized a mutant form of the HIV-1 protease, ANAM-11, identified in clinical isolates from HIV-1 infected patients treated with protease inhibitors. This mutant protease contains 11 mutations, 10 of which are located outside the active site (L10I/M36I/S37D/M46I/R57K/L63P/A71V/G73S/L90M/I93L) and 1 within the active site (I84V). ANAM-11 lowers the binding affinity of indinavir, nelfinavir, saquinavir, and ritonavir by factors of 4000, 3300, 5800, and 80000, respectively. Surprisingly, most of the loss in inhibitor affinity is due to the non-active site mutations as demonstrated by additional experiments performed with a protease containing only the 10 non-active site mutations (NAM-10) and another containing only the active site mutation (A-1). Kinetic analysis with two different substrates yielded comparable catalytic efficiencies for A-1, ANAM-11, NAM-10, and the wild-type protease. These studies demonstrate that non-active site mutations can be the primary source of resistance and that their role is not necessarily limited to compensate deleterious effects of active site mutations. Analysis of the structural stability of the proteases by differential scanning calorimetry reveals that ANAM-11 and NAM-10 are structurally more stable than the wild-type protease while A-1 is less stable. Together, the binding and structural thermodynamic results suggest that the non-active site mutants affect inhibitor binding by altering the geometry of the binding site cavity through the accumulation of mutations within the core of the protease molecule.

Drug resistance mutations and outcome of second-line treatment in patients with first-line protease inhibitor failure on nelfinavir-containing HAART

OBJECTIVES

To determine resistance mutations emerging in HIV-1-infected patients experiencing their first protease inhibitor (PI)-failure on nelfinavir-containing highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), and to assess virological response to rescue regimens.

METHODS

Plasma HIV-1 RNA from 24 patients failing nelfinavir-containing HAART was sequenced. Failure was defined as two consecutive measurements of viral load > 400 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL. Patients with previous failure on other PIs were excluded. Data on response to second-line treatment was extracted from patient files.

RESULTS

At failure primary protease mutations were found in 14 patients (58%). Ten patients had D30N (38%), five patients had L90M (19%), two patients had V82A/F (8%) and two patients had M46I/L (8%). Two patients had both D30N and L90M. Pronounced increases of secondary protease mutations were seen at codon 88 (Delta: 33%), codon 36 (Delta: 30%) and codon 71 (Delta: 17%). Of eight patients with N88D, seven also harboured D30N (P < 0.01). Polymorphisms at codon 63 were detected at baseline in all patients who developed primary resistance mutations at failure (P < 0.01). On rescue regimens, 78% achieved viral loads below limit of detection (BLD). The presence of primary protease mutations was not associated with a higher risk of failure on second-line treatment.

CONCLUSION

In patients failing nelfinavir-containing HAART, D30N was detected frequently and L90M occasionally. A pronounced accumulation of the secondary protease mutations N88D, M36I, and A71V/T was found, and D30N was strongly associated with N88D. A high proportion of patients became undetectable on second-line treatment and the presence of primary resistance mutations did not negatively affect the outcome of rescue regimens.

Pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir and its active metabolite, hydroxy-tert-butylamide, in infants perinatally infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1

BACKGROUND

In children younger than 2 years of age vertically infected with HIV-1, the recommended pediatric dosing regimen for nelfinavir (20 to 30 mg/kg three times a day) provides insufficient drug exposure. This study was conducted to determine the steady state pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir and its active metabolite, M8, in this population.

METHODS

Fourteen infants (2.3 to 8.5 months) underwent 18 intensive pharmacokinetic studies of nelfinavir and M8 at steady state. Nelfinavir and M8 concentrations were measured by high performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry, and individual pharmacokinetic values were determined.

RESULTS

A mean nelfinavir daily dose of 135.7 +/- 18.8 mg/kg (twice or three times a day) resulted in median C(min), C(max), area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-24 h)) and CL/ for nelfinavir of 0.627 mg/l, 2.39 mg/l, 30.6 mg*h/l and 4.2 liters/h/kg, respectively. When normalized for a daily dose of nelfinavir of 150 mg/kg/day, 16.7% of C(max) and 27.8% of AUC(0-24 h) values were below the tenth percentile for adult values.

CONCLUSIONS

During the first year of life, nelfinavir requirement is much higher than in older children and adults to obtain similar drug exposure. The mechanisms underlying such differences may involve higher first past metabolism and/or drug interactions or might be related to feeding conditions.

Unusual binding mode of an HIV-1 protease inhibitor explains its potency against multi-drug-resistant virus strains

Protease inhibitors (PIs) are an important class of drugs for the treatment of HIV infection. However, in the course of treatment, resistant viral variants with reduced sensitivity to PIs often emerge and become a major obstacle to successful control of viral load. On the basis of a compound equipotently inhibiting HIV-1 and 2 proteases (PR), we have designed a pseudopeptide inhibitor, QF34, that efficiently inhibits a wide variety of PR variants. In order to analyze the potency of the inhibitor, we constructed PR species harboring the typical (signature) mutations that confer resistance to commercially available PIs. Kinetic analyses showed that these mutated PRs were inhibited up to 1,000-fold less efficiently by the clinically approved PIs. In contrast, all PR species were effectively inhibited by QF34. In a clinical study, we have monitored 30 HIV-positive patients in the Czech Republic undergoing highly active antiretroviral therapy, and have identified highly PI resistant variants. Kinetic analyses revealed that QF34 retained its subnanomolar potency against multi-drug resistant PR variants. X-ray crystallographic analysis and molecular modeling experiments explained the wide specificity of QF34: this inhibitor binds to the PR in an unusual manner, thus avoiding contact sites that are mutated upon resistance development, and the unusual binding mode and consequently the binding energy is therefore preserved in the complex with a resistant variant. These results suggest a promising route for the design of second-generation PIs that are active against a variety of resistant PR variants.

Catalytic efficiency and phenotype of HIV-1 proteases encoding single critical resistance substitutions

We have shown that a bacteriophage lambda genetic screen system may be useful in predicting the activity and phenotype of HIV-1 protease in the course of viral infection and antiretroviral therapy. This simple and rapid genetic screening system has been used here to characterize HIV-1 proteases encoding single primary resistance substitutions. Except for proteases with amino acid changes at positions 46 and 84, proteases containing single-resistance substitutions displayed a lower catalytic efficiency than the WT enzyme. Single mutants could be identified by their efficiency, demonstrating that modest differences in protease activity can be monitored with this simple assay. Overall, drug susceptibility could be reduced by introduction of single mutations. However, high-level protease inhibitor (PI) resistance was only achieved by multiple mutated proteases. The small but reproducible increase in resistance displayed by single mutants also demonstrated the ability of this genetic screen system for detecting minor reductions in drug susceptibility. These results show that the bacteriophage lambda genetic screen system used here is a useful tool in the analysis of specific contribution of mutations in the HIV protease-coding region or in specific cleavage sites that affect the process of PI resistance.

Position paper on therapeutic drug monitoring of antiretroviral agents

Monitoring drug concentrations in humans to optimize efficacy and reduce toxicity is not a new concept in clinical pharmacology. It has been successfully applied to many different classes of drugs. As a result of considerable concentration and response data, the concept of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has been expanded to certain antiretroviral compounds. In particular, protease inhibitors and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors may be viable candidates for TDM, and limited clinical trial data suggest monitoring plasma concentrations of these agents may indeed clinically benefit patients with HIV infection. A primary distinction between TDM of antiretroviral drugs compared with other drugs is that multiple agents are concomitantly used to treat HIV infection. As with all illnesses that require self-administered drug therapy, poor adherence is a major impediment to success. However, in the treatment of HIV infection, inadequate drug concentrations will result in the appearance or evolution of drug resistance mutations that can endanger present and future drug treatment options. Procedures for sample collection, cross-validation of analytical procedures, and interpretation of assay results should be standardized. More clinical data are needed to confirm this approach and methods of implementing TDM should be further explored. This position paper offers guidelines to aid clinicians who choose to incorporate TDM into the routine care of their patients.

Virologic response to nelfinavir-based regimens: pharmacokinetics and drug resistance mutations (VIRAPHAR study)

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of HIV-1 protease and reverse transcriptase (RT) mutations, and pharmacokinetic parameters on virological responses to nelfinavir (NFV)-containing highly active antiretroviral therapy.

DESIGN

Naive or antiretroviral-experienced HIV-1-infected subjects were included in a non-randomized, observational cohort study and received two nucleoside RT inhibitors + NFV (750 mg three times per day or 1250 mg twice per day). Virologic success was defined as a virus load < 50 copies/ml for > 6 months.

METHODS

RT and protease genes were sequenced at baseline and at the time of virological failure. Plasma NFV trough concentration (Cmin), maximum concentration (Cmax), and AUC0-tau at steady-state were subjected to population pharmacokinetic analysis.

RESULTS

Patients (n = 154) enrolled between November 1998 and February 2000 started a twice per day (n = 84) or three times per day (n = 70) NFV-based regimen as first- (n = 48) or second-line therapy when protease inhibitor-naive (n = 64) or -experienced (n = 42). Median follow-up duration was 16 months. Virologic failure occurred in 88 patients. No significant differences were observed between twice per day and three times per day regimens. According to multivariate analysis, NFV Cmin and Cmax, CD4 cell count, number of baseline RT + protease gene mutations, D67N, M184V, T215F/Y in RT, and M36I in protease, were independent factors that were significantly predictive of failure. At failure, L10I, D30N, M36I, V77I, N88S/D or L90M protease mutations had emerged since baseline. Pharmacokinetic parameters were similar in patients with or without emergence of these neo-mutations. The more discriminating NFV Cmin efficacy-threshold was estimated to be 1 mg/l.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data confirm the association among individual pharmacokinetic parameters, genotype pattern and virological response to NFV-containing regimens.

Dose-escalating study of the safety and pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir in HIV-exposed neonates

The pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir (NFV) in neonates younger than 4 weeks of age was assessed. Three cohorts of HIV-exposed neonates were enrolled in cohorts to receive 15, 30, and 45 mg of NFV/kg twice daily in combination with stavudine and didanosine for 4 weeks after birth. Trough NFV concentrations (C(min)) were measured at 1 and 7 days of age. Intensive pharmacokinetic evaluations were performed at 14 and 28 days of age. The median NFV C(min) values in the 15 mg/kg (6 patients), 30 mg/kg (5), and 45 mg/kg (11) cohorts at 1, 7, 14, and 28 days of age were 0.19, 1.21, 0.51, and 0.33; 1.02, 3.18, 0.73, and 0.55; and 0.67, 3.21, 0.70, and 0.73 mg/L, respectively. The median area under the plasma concentration-versus-time curve values over 12 hours in the three cohorts at 14 and 28 days of age were 14.4 and 8.7, 19.4 and 15.8, and 23.4 and 18.5 (h. mg)/L, respectively. No serious adverse events were observed. In conclusion, the systemic exposure of NFV decreased after 7 days of age, possibly because of hepatic enzyme maturation, autoinduction of NFV metabolism, and/or changes in NFV absorption. The highly variable systemic exposure observed in the study indicates that therapeutic drug monitoring seems warranted to ensure adequate NFV dosing in this population.

Rapid and sensitive oligonucleotide ligation assay for detection of mutations in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 associated with high-level resistance to protease inhibitors

A sensitive, specific, and high-throughput oligonucleotide ligation assay (OLA) for the detection of genotypic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) resistance to Food and Drug Administration-approved protease inhibitors was developed and evaluated. This ligation-based assay uses differentially modified oligonucleotides specific for wild-type or mutant sequences, allowing sensitive and simple detection of both genotypes in a single well of a microtiter plate. Oligonucleotides were designed to detect primary mutations associated with high-level resistance to amprenavir, nelfinavir, indinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir, and lopinavir, including amino acid substitutions D30N, I50V, V82A/S/T, I84V, N88D, and L90M. Plasma HIV-1 RNA from 54 infected patients was amplified by reverse transcription-PCR and sequenced by using dideoxynucleotide chain terminators for evaluation of mutations associated with drug resistance. These same amplicons were genotyped by the OLA at positions 30, 50, 82, 88, 84, and 90 for a total of 312 codons. The sensitivity of detection of drug-resistant genotypes was 96.7% (87 of 90 mutant codons) in the OLA compared to 92.2% (83 of 90) in consensus sequencing, presumably due to the increased sensitivity of the OLA. The OLA detected genetic subpopulations more often than sequencing, detecting 30 mixtures of mutant and wild-type sequences and two mixtures of drug-resistant sequences compared to 15 detected by DNA sequencing. Reproducible and semiquantitative detection of the mutant and the wild-type genomes by the OLA was observed by analysis of wild-type and mutant plasmid mixtures containing as little as 5% of either genotype in a background of the opposite genome. This rapid, simple, economical, and highly sensitive assay provides a practical alternative to dideoxy sequencing for genotypic evaluation of HIV-1 resistance to antiretrovirals.

Genotypic testing for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 drug resistance

There are 16 approved human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) drugs belonging to three mechanistic classes: protease inhibitors, nucleoside and nucleotide reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors, and nonnucleoside RT inhibitors. HIV-1 resistance to these drugs is caused by mutations in the protease and RT enzymes, the molecular targets of these drugs. Drug resistance mutations arise most often in treated individuals, resulting from selective drug pressure in the presence of incompletely suppressed virus replication. HIV-1 isolates with drug resistance mutations, however, may also be transmitted to newly infected individuals. Three expert panels have recommended that HIV-1 protease and RT susceptibility testing should be used to help select HIV drug therapy. Although genotypic testing is more complex than typical antimicrobial susceptibility tests, there is a rich literature supporting the prognostic value of HIV-1 protease and RT mutations. This review describes the genetic mechanisms of HIV-1 drug resistance and summarizes published data linking individual RT and protease mutations to in vitro and in vivo resistance to the currently available HIV drugs.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in HIV infection: current status and future directions

BACKGROUND

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) can suppress viral replication and prolong patient life substantially. However, HAART can fail for a number of reasons, including incomplete adherence, pharmacokinetic factors and the emergence of resistance. Because the number of possible antiretroviral combinations is limited, the use of existing treatment options must be optimized. Whether the application of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in routine clinical practice may help with this purpose remains a subject of debate. However, TDM has been introduced in some centres despite the lack of guidelines for optimal use of this test.

OBJECTIVE

In October 2000, a panel of experts met in Perugia, Italy, to discuss the key issues surrounding the introduction of TDM into routine clinical practice. The purpose of the meeting was to achieve a consensus among panel members on the following issues: (i) validity of data suggesting the utility of TDM in HAART; (ii) patient categories and clinical settings in which TDM may be of most benefit; (iii) target levels of antiretroviral agents; (iv) influence of covariables on target levels of drugs; (v) blood sampling and dosage adjustment strategies; and (vi) future research steps needed to elucidate issues regarding the applicability of TDM in clinical practice.

OUTCOME

This report, which has been updated to include data published or presented at conferences up to the end of August 2001, summarizes the data presented and issues discussed at the meeting. This article will guide the reader through the data and discussions that have allowed the panel to formulate a series of position statements regarding the current status and future applications of TDM in antiretroviral therapy. These statements have been formulated to provide suggestions for the design of future TDM clinical trials, as well as to provide useful points of reflection for centres in which TDM is already in use.

Interference between D30N and L90M in selection and development of protease inhibitor-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1

We studied the evolutionary relationships between the two protease inhibitor (PI) resistance mutations, D30N and L90M, of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). The former is highly specific for nelfinavir resistance, while the latter is associated with resistance to several PIs, including nelfinavir. Among patients with nelfinavir treatment failure, we found that D30N acquisition was strongly suppressed when L90M preexisted. Thus, D30N/L90M double mutations not only were detected in a very limited number of patients but also accounted for a minor fraction within each patient. In the disease course, the D30N and L90M clones readily evolved independently of each other, and later the D30N/L90M double mutants emerged. The double mutants appeared to originate from the D30N lineage but not from the L90M lineage, or were strongly associated with the former. However, their evolutionary pathways appeared to be highly complex and to still have something in common, as they always contained several additional polymorphisms, including L63P and N88D, as common signatures. These results suggest that D30N and L90M are mutually exclusive during the evolutionary process. Supporting this notion, the D30N/L90M mutation was also quite rare in a large clinical database. Recombinant viruses with the relevant mutations were generated and compared for the ability to process p55gag and p160pol precursor proteins as well as for their infectivity. L90M caused little impairment of the cleavage activities, but D30N was detrimental, although significant residual activity was observed. In contrast, D30N/L90M demonstrated severe impairment. Thus, the concept of mutual antagonism of the two mutations was substantiated biochemically and functionally.

Predictors of virological rebound in HIV-1-infected patients initiating a protease inhibitor-containing regimen

OBJECTIVE

To study the predictors of virological rebound in patients having early virological response to protease inhibitor (PI)-containing regimen.

DESIGN AND METHODS

APROCO cohort study prospectively enrolled 1283 HIV-infected patients starting a PI-containing regimen in 1997-1999. Adherence to therapy was measured with self-administered questionnaires after 4 months of therapy (M4). Virological rebound was defined as a viral load (VL) > 500 copies/ml in patients having early virological response, defined as a VL < 500 copies/ml at M4. Predictors of time to virological rebound were studied with multivariate proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 20 months, virological rebound was observed in 32% of the 830 patients with early virological response. Virological rebound was more frequent when patients had received previous antiretroviral treatment [adjusted hazards ratio (HR) = 2.4; P < 0.0001], were younger (HR = 1.4 per each 10 years younger; P < 0.0001), had baseline CD4 cell count < 500 x 106/l (HR = 2.3; P < 0.001), had higher baseline VL (HR = 1.4 per each log10 copies/ml higher; P < 0.001), reported low adherence to therapy at M4 (HR = 2.1; P < 0.001) or had stopped PI at M4 (HR = 1.7; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Initiation of treatment at a stage of preserved immunity is associated with a more durable virological response under protease inhibitor. Every effort should be made to monitor and strengthen adherence to therapy, even in patients having early virological response.

DPC 681 and DPC 684: potent, selective inhibitors of human immunodeficiency virus protease active against clinically relevant mutant variants

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitors (PIs) are important components of many highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens. However, development of phenotypic and/or genotypic resistance can occur, including cross-resistance to other PIs. Development of resistance takes place because trough levels of free drug are inadequate to suppress preexisting resistant mutant variants and/or to inhibit de novo-generated resistant mutant variants. There is thus a need for new PIs, which are more potent against mutant variants of HIV and show higher levels of free drug at the trough. We have optimized a series of substituted sulfonamides and evaluated the inhibitors against laboratory strains and clinical isolates of HIV type 1 (HIV-1), including viruses with mutations in the protease gene. In addition, serum protein binding was determined to estimate total drug requirements for 90% suppression of virus replication (plasma IC(90)). Two compounds resulting from our studies, designated DPC 681 and DPC 684, are potent and selective inhibitors of HIV protease with IC(90)s for wild-type HIV-1 of 4 to 40 nM. DPC 681 and DPC 684 showed no loss in potency toward recombinant mutant HIVs with the D30N mutation and a fivefold or smaller loss in potency toward mutant variants with three to five amino acid substitutions. A panel of chimeric viruses constructed from clinical samples from patients who failed PI-containing regimens and containing 5 to 11 mutations, including positions 10, 32, 46, 47, 50, 54, 63, 71, 82, 84, and 90 had mean IC(50) values of <20 nM for DPC 681 and DPC 681, respectively. In contrast, marketed PIs had mean IC(50) values ranging from 200 nM (amprenavir) to >900 nM (nelfinavir).

Sociodemographic characteristics associated with medical appointment adherence among HIV-seropositive patients seeking treatment in a county outpatient facility

BACKGROUND

Adherence is a major problem facing HIV-seropositive patients. Low adherence has been associated with faster disease progression as well as development of drug-resistant strains of HIV. Thus it is critical to understand factors associated with treatment compliance. This study examined the independent contributions of disease severity, age, gender, household income, homelessness, ethnicity, and sexual orientation on appointment adherence.

METHODS

Participants (n = 671) scheduled for appointments in an outpatient county treatment facility for HIV-related medical care completed demographic questionnaires and clinic staff collected appointment attendance data.

RESULTS

Multiple regression analyses indicated that patients diagnosed with AIDS, older in age, and receiving a higher income were more likely to keep medical appointments. Additionally, African American ethnicity and identifying as heterosexual were associated with missing scheduled medical appointments.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that cultural and sociodemographic characteristics influence patients' adherence to outpatient services. Implications for interventions aimed at increasing medical adherence are discussed.

Randomized, double-blind comparison of two nelfinavir doses plus nucleosides in HIV-infected patients (Agouron study 511)

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and antiretroviral activity of nelfinavir mesylate at two doses as part of a combination regimen in HIV-infected, antiretroviral-naive patients.

DESIGN

Phase III, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two-hundred and ninety-seven patients were randomized to one of three treatment groups: nelfinavir 750 mg three times daily (tid), nelfinavir 500 mg tid, or matching placebo, each in combination with open-label zidovudine (ZDV) 200 mg tid and lamivudine (3TC) 150 mg twice daily (bid). Data were analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven percent of patients receiving nelfinavir 750 mg tid, and 50% receiving nelfinavir 500 mg tid in combination with ZDV/3TC achieved HIV RNA < 400 copies/ml compared to 7% receiving ZDV/3TC plus placebo (P < 0.001); 55% and 30% of patients in the nelfinavir-containing arms achieved HIV RNA < 50 copies/ml at week 24. This compared with 4% in the placebo-containing arm. For patients continuing nelfinavir treatment (750 mg or 500 mg tid as treated) for a further 6 months, the proportions achieving < 400 copies/ml at week 48 were 75% and 54% (P = 0.001) and < 50 copies/ml 61% and 37%, respectively (P = 0.004). The mean increases from baseline in CD4 cell counts were also durable in patients receiving the triple combination nelfinavir therapy. The range and incidence of adverse events was similar for the two nelfinavir-containing arms, with diarrhea being the most common adverse event.

CONCLUSIONS

Nelfinavir plus ZDV/3TC was superior to ZDV/3TC/placebo. In addition, the 750 mg tid nelfinavir dose was better than the 500 mg tid dose. Virologic responses were sustained over 12 months.

Antiapoptotic mechanism of HIV protease inhibitors: preventing mitochondrial transmembrane potential loss

Treatment of cells with the HIV drugs ritonavir, saquinavir, or nelfinavir (Nfv) inhibits apoptosis induced by a variety of stimuli. Because these drugs are protease inhibitors, they have been postulated to inhibit apoptosis by blocking caspase activity. This study shows that Nfv has no effect on caspase activity or on the transcription or synthesis of a variety of apoptosis regulatory molecules. Instead, Nfv inhibits mitochondrial transmembrane potential loss (Delta psi(m)) and the subsequent release of apoptotic mediators. Consequently, the antiapoptotic effects of Nfv are restricted to apoptotic pathways that involve Delta psi(m). (Blood. 2001;98:1078-1085)

Pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir in human immunodeficiency virus-infected infants

BACKGROUND

Nelfinavir dosed at approximately 20 to 30 mg/kg three times a day (TID) in older children provides exposure similar to 750 mg TID in adults. However, the pharmacokinetics (PK) of nelfinavir in infants who are < 2 years of age is not well-described. The objective of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir in infants < 2 years of age.

METHODS

Nelfinavir concentrations were evaluated in 22 HIV-infected infants between 15 days and 2 years of age receiving nelfinavir as part of Pediatric ACTG Study 356. Nelfinavir therapy was initiated at approximately 25 mg/kg TID (n = 18) or approximately 55 mg/kg twice a day (n = 4) and given in combination with nevirapine, stavudine and lamivudine. PK samples were obtained predose and 1.5 and 4 h postdose at approximately 6-month intervals. Eight infants (all < or = 3 months of age) also had intensive PK samples collected at Week 1.

RESULTS

The median apparent clearance in the infants with intensive pharmacokinetic sampling was 2.7 liters/h/kg (range, 1.8 to > or = 10) and was similar between twice a day and TID dosing cohorts. Overall nelfinavir concentrations at all collection times were lower in these infants than previously reported in older pediatric patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Nelfinavir concentrations in infants are highly variable and lower than those seen in adult or older pediatric populations receiving labeled dosing. Therefore it is necessary to further evaluate nelfinavir safety, effectiveness and pharmacokinetics at higher doses than used among other pediatric populations.

Short-term measures of relative efficacy predict longer-term reductions in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA levels following nelfinavir monotherapy

We calculated the relative efficacy of treatment, defined as the rate of decline of virus levels in plasma during treatment relative to the rate of decline during highly potent combination therapy, in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) patients treated for 56 days with different doses of the protease inhibitor nelfinavir. Relative efficacies based on the rate of decline of HIV-1 RNA levels in plasma over the first 14 to 21 days correlated with drug dose and viral load reduction by day 56. Calculation of relative treatment efficacies over the first 2 to 3 weeks of treatment can allow rapid assessment of new antiretroviral agents and dosing regimens, reducing the need to keep subjects in clinical trials on monotherapy for prolonged periods of time. Relative efficacy may also serve as a measure of treatment efficacy in patients in initiating established therapies.

Circulating metabolites of the human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitor nelfinavir in humans: structural identification, levels in plasma, and antiviral activities

Nelfinavir mesylate (Viracept, formally AG1343) is a potent and orally bioavailable human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 (HIV-1) protease inhibitor (K(i) = 2 nM) and is being widely prescribed in combination with HIV reverse transcriptase inhibitors for the treatment of HIV infection. The current studies evaluated the presence of metabolites circulating in plasma following the oral administration of nelfinavir to healthy volunteers and HIV-infected patients, as well as the levels in plasma and antiviral activities of these metabolites. The results showed that the parent drug was the major circulating chemical species, followed in decreasing abundance by its hydroxy-t-butylamide metabolite (M8) and 3'-methoxy-4'-hydroxynelfinavir (M1). Antiviral assays with HIV-1 strain RF-infected CEM-SS cells showed that the 50% effective concentrations (EC50) of nelfinavir, M8, and M1 were 30, 34, and 151 nM, respectively, and that the corresponding EC50 against another HIV-1 strain, IIIB, in MT-2 cells were 60, 86, and 653 nM. Therefore, apparently similar in vitro antiviral activities were demonstrated for nelfinavir and M8, whereas an approximately 5- to 11-fold-lower level of antiviral activity was observed for M1. The active metabolite, M8, showed a degree of binding to human plasma proteins similar to that of nelfinavir (ca. 98%). Concentrations in plasma of nelfinavir and its metabolites in 10 HIV-positive patients receiving nelfinavir therapy (750 mg three times per day) were determined by a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry assay. At steady state (day 28), the mean plasma nelfinavir concentrations ranged from 1.73 to 4.96 microM and the M8 concentrations ranged from 0.55 to 1.96 microM, whereas the M1 concentrations were low and ranged from 0.09 to 0.19 microM. In conclusion, the findings from the current studies suggest that, in humans, nelfinavir forms an active metabolite circulating at appreciable levels in plasma. The active metabolite M8 may account for some of the antiviral activity associated with nelfinavir in the treatment of HIV disease.

International perspectives on antiretroviral resistance. Resistance to protease inhibitors

The availability of protease inhibitors (PIs) and their combination with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors marked the passage of antiretroviral therapy (ART) from potential for control to effective suppression and thus substantially reduced rates of morbidity and mortality related to HIV. Even so, what was first hoped to be an immutable HIV DNA treatment target has proved to be prone to resistance mutations, with substitutions identified at more than 20 amino acid sites, which reduces PI susceptibility and increases resistance to treatment. The mutation patterns associated with each PI have been defined, and have been observed to occur at one of two locations: at or near the active site, or in the substrate cleavage site. The natural history of PI resistance has been extensively studied, and the genetic and cellular pathways are described in detail in this article. In addition, cross-resistance among PIs is now recognized to be fairly extensive, although the degree of cross-resistance varies with the number of mutations and the variants selected by drug pressure. Thus, it is still possible to salvage a response with another PI after a first regimen with another PI has failed. The extensive basic science and clinical experience with PIs in the fight against HIV are reviewed in this article, which provides data on resistance-mutation profiles, cellular resistance mechanisms, viral fitness studies, and clinical outcome trials with various first-line and subsequent regimens that contain PIs. It is hoped that the information provided will guide physicians in best using PIs as part of a logical and successful ART strategy.

Phenotypic cross-resistance to nelfinavir: the role of prior antiretroviral therapy and the number of mutations in the protease gene

Cross-resistance to nelfinavir (NFV) is observed in patients failing protease inhibitor (PI)-containing therapies. We performed a study with 111 patients who started an NFV-based salvage regimen after failing PI-based therapy to evaluate genotypic changes and to identify factors associated with resistance to NFV. Genotypic and phenotypic resistance data at entry (111 and 51 samples) and after NFV failure (74 and 31 samples) were available. Median CD4(+) cell count was 208 x 10(6)/liter, HIV RNA level was 4.6 log(10) copies/ml, and median number of mutations in the protease was 9. At baseline, 51 and 14% of viral isolates showed high or intermediate phenotypic resistance to NFV. Phenotypic data correlated with virological outcome, reaching undetectability at the third month in 40, 14, and 0% of those patients with susceptible, intermediate, or resistant viral isolates, respectively. Phenotypic resistance to NFV was associated with the presence of the L90M mutation: 46% for resistant vs. 6% in susceptible strains. The number of mutations in the protease correlated with the fold-increase in the IC(50)-NFV. The D30N mutation was detected in only 1 of 74 patients who failed. In a logistic regression analysis, the number of mutations in the protease was associated with NFV cross-resistance (RR, 2.09 per each additional mutation; 95% CI 1.23-3.55; p < 0.01). In conclusion, phenotypic cross-resistance to NFV for PI-experienced patients can be predicted by the number of mutations in the protease. The L90M mutation is significantly associated with the subsequent failure of NFV-containing regimens. The presence of the D30N mutation was rare and not useful in identifying NFV-resistant isolates.

A Dose-Ranging Study to Evaluate the Antiretroviral Activity and Safety of Amprenavir Alone and in Combination with Abacavir in HIV-Infected Adults with Limited Antiretroviral Experience

Objective

To evaluate the antiretroviral activity and safety of multiple escalating doses of amprenavir administered alone, and in combination with abacavir in HIV-1-infected adults.

Design

Sixty-two HIV-1-infected subjects were enrolled in a multicentre, open-label, non-randomized, dose-escalating trial.

Methods

Subjects were assigned to one of six dose groups and received amprenavir 300 mg twice daily, 300mg three times daily, 900, 1050, or 1200 mg twice daily for 4 weeks. One dose group received amprenavir 900 mg twice daily in combination with abacavir 300 mg twice daily for 4 weeks. Antiretroviral activity was assessed by measuring changes from baseline in plasma HIV-1 RNA levels and CD4 cell counts. Safety was evaluated by monitoring clinical adverse events and changes in laboratory values. Genotypic and phenotypic analyses were performed using ABI sequencing and the recombinant virus assay, respectively.

Results

At week 4, amprenavir monotherapy (900, 1050, or 1200 mg twice daily) resulted in marked decreases in plasma HIV-1 RNA levels (1.3–1.6 log10 copies/ml), and substantial increases in CD4 cell counts in the two dose groups who received 1050 mg twice daily (118x106 cells/mm3) or 1200 mg twice daily (114x106 cells/mm3). Amprenavir/abacavir resulted in median plasma HIV-1 RNA reductions of 1.8 log10 copies/ml, and median CD4 cell count increases of 138x106 cells/mm3. Amprenavir was reasonably well tolerated with few treatment-limiting adverse events. No known active site mutations associated with amprenavir resistance were selected in any of the dose groups, and no significant phenotypic resistance to amprenavir developed during 4 weeks of therapy.

Conclusions

The antiviral effect of amprenavir monotherapy increased with escalating doses, and all amprenavir doses were reasonably well tolerated over 4 weeks of therapy. Amprenavir/abacavir combination therapy elicited a potent antiviral effect. The three highest doses of amprenavir (900, 1050 and 1200 mg twice daily) were selected to design subsequent Phase II and III studies that confirmed the safety profile and efficacy of amprenavir in combination regimens and led to the approval of amprenavir in the USA in 1999.

Reasons for modification and discontinuation of antiretrovirals: results from a single treatment centre

OBJECTIVE

To describe the reasons for, and factors associated with, modification and discontinuation of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens at a single clinic.

SUBJECTS

A total of 556 patients who started HAART at the Royal Free Hospital were included in analyses. Modification was defined as stopping or switching any antiretrovirals in the regimen, whereas discontinuation was defined as the simultaneous stopping of all antiretrovirals included in the initial regimen. Reasons were classified as immunological/virological failure (IVF) and toxicities and patient choice/poor compliance (TPC).

RESULTS

The median CD4 count at starting HAART was 171 x 10(6) cells/l and viral load 5.07 log copies/ml. During a median follow-up of 14.2 months, 247 patients (44.4%) modified their HAART regimen, 72 due to IVF (29.1%) and 159 due to TPC (64.4%) and a total of 148 patients (26.6%) discontinued HAART. Older patients were less likely to modify HAART [relative hazard (RH), 0.73 per 10 years; P = 0.0008], as were previously treatment-naive patients (RH, 0.65; P = 0.0050), those in a clinical trial (RH, 0.64; P = 0.027) and those who started nelfinavir (RH, 0.57; P = 0.035). Patients who started with four or more drugs (RH, 2.21, P < 0.0001), who included ritonavir in the initial regimen (RH, 1.41; P = 0.035) or who had higher viral loads during follow-up (RH per log increase, 1.51; P < 0.0001) were more likely to modify HAART.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a high rate of modification and discontinuation of HAART regimens in the first 12 months, particularly due to toxicities, patient choice or poor compliance.

Dual protease inhibitor therapy in the management of the HIV-1

Throughout the first 20 years of the HIV-1 epidemic, there have been tremendous advances in the development of antiretroviral therapy (ART). In 1995, the availability of protease inhibitors (PI) as part of triple drug regimens resulted in durable viral suppression with an associated decline in HIV-1-related morbidity and mortality. Despite this early success, limitations of therapy have become apparent. In particular, the need for highly potent antiviral regimens, the importance of outstanding adherence to therapy, drug-related toxicity and the increasing problem of drug-drug and drug-food interactions. Dual PI therapy has been investigated with the hope of overcoming these problems. Select PI combinations may result in synergistic antiviral activity with enhanced viral suppression. Moreover, the ability of select agents to inhibit the cytochrome P450 (CYP450) system results in pharmacologic enhancement that allows for dosing with fewer pills on a less frequent basis, both of which can enhance drug adherence. Furthermore, these pharmacologic interactions can overcome drug-drug and drug-food interactions. Finally, the ability to increase drug levels using certain PI combinations may allow for drug concentrations to exceed those needed to inhibit resistant strains of HIV-1. The rationale for using dual PI therapy, along with the results of clinical trials using various PI combinations in treatment-naïve and experienced patients, is reviewed in this article.

Nelfinavir mesylate

Nelfinavir is an inhibitor of the HIV-1 and HIV-2 protease, with good in vivo activity in HIV-infected patients. Nelfinavir is used in combination with other antiretroviral medications as part of a potent antiretroviral regimen. When used in this manner, 50-75% of patients who are naïve to antiretroviral therapy have plasma HIV RNA levels below the limit of detection (< 400 copies) after 12 months of treatment. This use of nelfinavir in combination regimens is associated with an increase of almost 200/mm3 CD4+ lymphocytes at 12 months of therapy. Initial trials and clinical experience indicate that nelfinavir is equipotent to other potent protease inhibitors (PIs). The drug is well-tolerated, with mild diarrhoea being the most common side effect in 12-20% of patients. Virologic failure of nelfinavir is associated with genotypic and phenotypic changes that have a unique pattern that may retain susceptibility to other PIs. The results of small, non-controlled trials suggest these failures can be rescued with a second protease-based regimen. Due to the above characteristics, nelfinavir has become the most frequently prescribed first line PI.

Adverse effects of antiretroviral therapy

Antiretroviral toxicity is an increasingly important issue in the management of HIV-infected patients. With the sustained major declines in opportunistic complications, HIV infection is a more chronic disease, and so more drugs are being used in more patients for longer periods. This review focuses on the pathogenesis, clinical features, and management of the principal toxicities of the 15 licensed antiretroviral drugs, including mitochondrial toxicity, hypersensitivity, and lipodystrophy, as well as more drug-specific adverse effects and special clinical settings.

In vitro resistance profile of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease inhibitor BMS-232632

BMS-232632 is an azapeptide human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 (HIV-1) protease inhibitor that displays potent anti-HIV-1 activity (50% effective concentration [EC(50)], 2.6 to 5.3 nM; EC(90), 9 to 15 nM). In vitro passage of HIV-1 RF in the presence of inhibitors showed that BMS-232632 selected for resistant variants more slowly than nelfinavir or ritonavir did. Genotypic and phenotypic analysis of three different HIV strains resistant to BMS-232632 indicated that an N88S substitution in the viral protease appeared first during the selection process in two of the three strains. An I84V change appeared to be an important substitution in the third strain used. Mutations were also observed at the protease cleavage sites following drug selection. The evolution to resistance seemed distinct for each of the three strains used, suggesting multiple pathways to resistance and the importance of the viral genetic background. A cross-resistance study involving five other protease inhibitors indicated that BMS-232632-resistant virus remained sensitive to saquinavir, while it showed various levels (0. 1- to 71-fold decrease in sensitivity)-of cross-resistance to nelfinavir, indinavir, ritonavir, and amprenavir. In reciprocal experiments, the BMS-232632 susceptibility of HIV-1 variants selected in the presence of each of the other HIV-1 protease inhibitors showed that the nelfinavir-, saquinavir-, and amprenavir-resistant strains of HIV-1 remained sensitive to BMS-232632, while indinavir- and ritonavir-resistant viruses displayed six- to ninefold changes in BMS-232632 sensitivity. Taken together, our data suggest that BMS-232632 may be a valuable protease inhibitor for use in combination therapy.

Simple algorithm derived from a geno-/phenotypic database to predict HIV-1 protease inhibitor resistance

BACKGROUND

Resistance against protease inhibitors (PI) can either be analysed genotypically or phenotypically. However, the interpretation of genotypic data is difficult, particularly for PI, because of the unknown contributions of several mutations to resistance and cross-resistance.

OBJECTIVE

Development of an algorithm to predict PI phenotype from genotypic data.

METHODS

Recombinant viruses containing patient-derived protease genes were analysed for sensitivity to indinavir, saquinavir, ritonavir and nelfinavir. Drug resistance-associated mutations were determined by direct sequencing. geno- and phenotypic data were compared for 119 samples from 97 HIV-1 infected patients.

RESULTS

Samples with one or two mutations in the gene for the protease were phenotypically sensitive in 74.3%, whereas 83.6% of samples with five or more mutations were resistant against all PI tested. Some mutations (361, 63P, 71V/T, 771) were frequent both in sensitive and resistant samples, whereas others (241, 30N, 461/L, 48V, 54V, 82A/F/T/S, 84V, 90M) were predominantly present in resistant samples. Therefore, the presence or absence of a single drug resistance-associated mutation predicted phenotypic PI resistance with high sensitivity (96.5-100%) but low specificity (13.3-57.4%). A more specific algorithm was obtained by taking into account the total number of drug resistance-associated mutations in the gene for the protease and restricting these to certain key positions for the PI. The algorithm was subsequently validated by analysis of 72 independent samples.

CONCLUSION

With an optimized algorithm, phenotypic PI resistance can be predicted by viral genotype with good sensitivity (89.1-93.0%) and specificity (82.6-93.3%). The reliability and relevance of this algorithm should be further evaluated in clinical practice.

A population pharmacokinetic analysis of nelfinavir mesylate in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients enrolled in a phase III clinical trial

A population pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted on nelfinavir in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) who were enrolled in a phase III clinical trial. The data consisted of 509 plasma concentrations from 174 patients who received nelfinavir at a dose of 500 or 750 mg three times a day. The analysis was performed using nonlinear mixed-effect modeling as implemented in NONMEM (version 4.0; double precision). A one-compartment model with first-order absorption best described the data. The timing and small number of early postdose blood levels did not allow accurate estimation of volume of distribution (V/F) and the absorption rate constant (k(a)). As a result, two models were used to analyze the data: model 1, in which oral clearance (CL/F), V/F, and k(a) were estimated, and model 2, in which V/F and k(a) were fixed to known values and only CL/F was estimated. Estimates of CL/F ranged from 41. 9 to 45.1 liters/h, values in close agreement with previous studies. Neither body weight, age, sex, race, dose level, baseline viral load, metabolite-to-parent drug plasma concentration ratio, history of liver disease, nor elevated results of liver function tests appeared to be significant covariates for clearance. The only significant covariate-parameter relationship was concomitant use of fluconazole on CL/F, which was associated with a modest reduction in interindividual variability of CL/F. Patients who received concomitant therapy with fluconazole had a statistically significant reduction in nelfinavir CL/F of 26 to 30%. Since serious dose-limiting toxicity and concentration-related toxicities are not apparent for nelfinavir, this effect of fluconazole is unlikely to be of clinical significance.

Incidence and impact of resistance against approved antiretroviral drugs

More than 15 antiretroviral drugs are now available for clinical use, and have led to significant reductions in morbidity and mortality for HIV infected individuals. Nevertheless, antiviral drug resistance emerges to all these drugs, which limits their benefit. This review addresses the biological basis of antiretroviral drug resistance, and the prevalence of specific drug resistance associated mutations in patients treated with the three currently available classes of agents, namely nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors, non nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors. In addition, data on prevalence of HIV drug resistance in untreated individuals published to date are summarised, and the implications of potential transmission of drug resistant HIV is discussed.

Prevalence of drug resistant mutants and virological response to combination therapy in patients with primary HIV-1 infection

Baseline genotype resistance analysis was carried out in 48 adults with primary HIV-1 infection between 1995 and 1998 before starting early combination therapy. Seventeen percent (8/48) of the isolates displayed key mutations conferring resistance to reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors such as amino acid substitutions 215Y/F (5/48,10%), 70R (3/48, 6%), 184V (2%). Two percent (1/48) had a major mutation associated with resistance to protease inhibitors (D30N). Other mutations at positions 10, 15, 20, 33, 36, 46, 63, 71, 77, 82, 93 of the protease gene were frequent (73%). Among the 46 patients who were given antiretroviral combination therapy and who responded durably to treatment after 6 and 12 months, there was no significant difference between those harboring RT mutant strains (Group I) and those with wild-type isolates (Group II). No significant difference was found at months 6 and 12 between the two groups in terms of CD4+ cell counts. These findings suggest that the presence of drug-resistant strains at the time of primary HIV-1 infection does not necessarily predict drug failure. Other factors, such as adherence to treatment, tolerance and pharmacokinetics parameters are probably major determinants of virological response in patients with early therapeutic intervention.

HIV-1 protease inhibitors

Treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection with regimens that include protease inhibitors (PIs) has contributed to marked improvements in HIV-related disease progression and mortality. Five PIs are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and have potent activity in vitro. PIs with 2 nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors have demonstrated prolonged suppression of HIV-1 replication in treated patients and improvements in disease progression and mortality. PIs combined with nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors or other PIs produce marked antiretroviral effects. Although not all patients have prolonged responses to PIs, and salvage treatment has had mixed results for patients who have not responded to initial PI therapy or whose HIV RNA levels have relapsed during such therapy, newer PIs currently being developed hold promise. Most patients can successfully tolerate PI-including regimens; however, long-term side effects, such as body fat redistribution, insulin resistance, and increased serum lipids, are now being observed in some patients receiving PI-including therapy.

Pharmacodynamics of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease inhibitors

Many factors are involved in the success or failure of antiretroviral therapy. Recent data suggest that there are significant differences in drug absorption and disposition for the protease inhibitor class of antiretroviral drugs, and relationships between plasma concentrations and their antiviral effect have been described. Consequently, the issue of whether therapeutic drug monitoring should be employed for patients receiving treatment with these drugs has arisen. Several criteria must be met before a drug is considered a candidate for therapeutic drug monitoring. These criteria include pharmacological, clinical, and analytic components. Although not all the necessary criteria have yet been met, some of these components have been defined, and additional data are being generated. However, prospectively designed clinical trials must be completed to determine if monitoring protease inhibitor plasma concentrations provides additional clinical benefit to the patient.

Phenotypic HIV-1 Resistance Correlates with Treatment Outcome of Nelfinavir Salvage Therapy

In order to analyse whether drug sensitivity testing would be beneficial for clinical decision-making in heavily pretreated patients, we retrospectively studied viral genotype and phenotypic drug resistance in 12 HIV-1-infected patients, each of them with a history of failing at least one therapeutic regimen including one or two protease inhibitors (PIs). The salvage therapy included nelfinavir as new PI in all cases. Four patients showed a sustained and five patients a transient viral load decrease. Three patients failed to show a significant decline of plasma HIV-1 RNA. In the baseline samples of these cases, resistance against all components of their combination therapy could be detected, whereas at least one antiretroviral drug was still active in the cases with transient treatment response. All patients with sustained therapy response harboured viruses that were either fully sensitive or resistant to only one of the drugs administered. In our study, phenotypic drug resistance was predictive for the success of antiretroviral salvage regimens.

Hepatitis C virus infection as an opportunistic disease in persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is an RNA virus of the Flaviviridae family and is a major cause of chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Owing to shared routes of transmission, HCV and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection are common, affecting approximately one-third of all HIV-infected persons in the United States. In addition, HIV coinfection is associated with higher HCV RNA level and a more rapid progression of HCV-related liver disease, which leads to an increased risk of cirrhosis. HCV infection may also impact the course and management of HIV disease, particularly by increasing the risk of antiretroviral drug-induced hepatotoxicity. Thus, chronic HCV infection acts as an opportunistic disease in HIV-infected persons, because the incidence of infection is increased and the natural history of HCV infection is accelerated in coinfected persons. Strategies to prevent primary HCV infection and to modify the progression of HCV-related liver disease are urgently needed for HIV-HCV-coinfected individuals.

Nelfinavir: an update on its use in HIV infection

Nelfinavir is one of several currently available protease inhibitors used to limit viral replication and improve immune function in HIV-infected individuals. It is administered in combination with other antiretroviral agents. Nelfinavir has been evaluated as first-line therapy with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) in treatment-naive patients, or as an additional antiretroviral agent in protease inhibitor-naive patients already receiving NRTIs. These studies have shown good efficacy in terms of HIV viral load reduction and increased CD4+ cell counts. When used in combination with NRTIs, nelfinavir 1250 mg twice daily produced similar results to 750 mg 3 times daily. The more convenient twice-daily dosage schedule, which is now approved in the US, may be beneficial in improving patient adherence to therapy. Nelfinavir has also been used successfully in combination with non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and/or other protease inhibitors, with or without NRTIs. Resistance to nelfinavir has been observed in vitro and in clinical isolates from patients experiencing insufficient or waning viral suppression during treatment. Nelfinavir primarily selects for the D30N mutation, which is not seen with other protease inhibitors, and alone does not cause resistance to other protease inhibitors in vitro. Several studies have shown that patients who experience virological failure while receiving nelfinavir can respond to salvage therapy with other protease inhibitors. Diarrhoea is the most frequent adverse event in patients receiving nelfinavir-based combination therapy, but was generally mild and resulted in minimal discontinuation of therapy in clinical trials. Diarrhoea can usually be controlled with drugs that slow gastrointestinal motility. Metabolic disturbances associated with protease inhibitor use (hypercholesterolaemia, hyperglycaemia and lipodystrophy) have also been reported with nelfinavir. Nelfinavir is associated with a number of clinically significant drug interactions and coadministration of some drugs (e.g. astemizole, cisapride, triazolam) is contraindicated. Coadministration of nelfinavir with other protease inhibitors generally resulted in favourable pharmacokinetic interactions (usually increased area under the concentration-time curve for both drugs).

CONCLUSION

Nelfinavir, in combination with reverse transcriptase inhibitors and/or other protease inhibitors, is effective in limiting HIV replication and increasing CD4+ cell counts in HIV-infected adults and children. The convenience of its dosage administration, the low incidence of adverse events, and the potential for salvage therapies indicate that nelfinavir (as part of combined antiretroviral therapy regimens) should be considered as a first-line option in protease inhibitor-naive patients and in those unable to tolerate other protease inhibitors.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir combined with efavirenz and stavudine during rescue treatment of heavily pretreated HIV-infected patients

Nelfinavir is a novel protease inhibitor that exhibits good inhibitory activity against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and is currently used in combination with reverse transcriptase inhibitors for the management of HIV infection. In this study we analysed the pharmacokinetic profile of nelfinavir after multiple oral doses in 18 HIV-infected patients during a combination regimen of nelfinavir plus efavirenz and stavudine. Patients who received the study drug for >/=4 weeks were considered for pharmacokinetic evaluation. Blood samples were obtained at the following times: 0 (before nelfinavir administration), 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 h after administration. Nelfinavir plasma concentrations were analysed by a specific and validated HPLC assay with ultraviolet detection. Nelfinavir concentration-time data were analysed by compartmental and non-compartmental techniques and the pharmacokinetic parameters of nelfinavir were determined according to a one-compartment model. We found a high variability between individuals in nelfinavir plasma concentrations. The mean average drug plasma concentration was 2.22 +/- 1.25 mg/L and the mean AUC during the dosing interval was 17.7 +/- 10.0 mg*h/L. The mean nelfinavir trough plasma concentration was 1.58 +/- 1.0 mg/L. A good relationship was found between AUC(0-8h) and the plasma concentrations measured at 6 h, and the trough plasma concentrations made total body exposure for nelfinavir less predictable. Alternatively, a 2 h abbreviated AUC provides a good estimate of the full AUC(0-8h). Comparing the pharmacokinetic parameters obtained in our patients with those reported for patients receiving nelfinavir monotherapy or nelfinavir combined with nucleoside analogues, one observes substantial overlap with nelfinavir concentrations achieved without efavirenz.

Dynamics of dominance of a dipeptide insertion in reverse transcriptase of HIV-1 from patients subjected to prolonged therapy

A small proportion (0.8%) of individuals of a cohort of HIV-1 infected patients subjected to prolonged therapy with nucleoside analogues included a recently recognised dipeptide insertion in their RT (Ser-Ser or Ser-Gly between RT codons 69 and 70). To study the dynamics of dominance of genomes with this genetic change, sequential HIV-1 isolates from two patients were analyzed with regard to consensus sequences and complexity of mutant spectra. The two patients displayed completely different, complex evolutionary patterns leading to temporary dominance of dipeptide insertions. In one patient, a virus very closely related to an ancestor virus from the same patient overtook the population at late times, displacing genomes encoding a Ser-Ser insertion. In another patient the sequential dominance of genomes with Ser-Ser insertion-->no insertion-->Ser-Gly insertion was observed. These three types of genomes coexisted in the mutant spectrum of one HIV-1 isolate. Complexity was also reflected in the shape of phylogenetic trees derived with genomes from the mutant spectrum at each time point. The results suggest that HIV-1 genomes encoding a dipeptide insertion between RT codons 69 and 70 do not show a clear selective advantage over other genomes lacking the insertion. Such an absence of a clear selective advantage will favor that such genomes encoding this RT insertion become dominant only in a transient fashion, and following disparate kinetics in different patients.

Efavirenz, nelfinavir, and stavudine rescue combination therapy in HIV-1-positive patients heavily pretreated with nucleoside analogues and protease inhibitors

Tolerability, activity, and pharmacokinetic parameters of a combination therapy with efavirenz (EFV), nelfinavir (NFV), and stavudine (d4T) were evaluated in this study. Forty-seven HIV-1-infected study subjects, naive to NFV and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), who had experienced virologic failure while being treated with combination antiretroviral therapies including protease inhibitors (PIs), were enrolled. At baseline, HIV-1 viral load in plasma was 4.8 log10, CD4+ count was 204 cells/microl (both mean values); patients had received a mean of 3.1 different treatments (range, 2-5 treatments). Study medications were generally well tolerated; 7 of 47 patients (14.8%) were dropped from the study because of related drug toxicity. At week 24, mean plasma viral load (pVL) was reduced by 1.9 log10, with mean CD4+ count increased to 324 cells/microl (+/-59% from baseline); pVL was below the limit of detection (500 copies/ml) in 46.1% of patients. An extended follow-up study was performed at 12 months. Results showed a reduction of 1.7 log10 in pVL from basal values that was consistent with values observed at months 3 and 6. A history of previous use of PIs represented a negative prognostic marker. Sequencing analysis, performed in a subset of patients, showed the presence of multiple point mutations associated with PI resistance. Pharmacokinetic analysis demonstrated a marked interindividual variability in NFV plasma concentrations, producing in 4 of 18 patients (22%) trough concentrations lower than minimum effective concentration. In pretreated patients, further studies are needed to characterize the pharmacokinetic factors that affect response to therapy and the association of these results with the 95% inhibitory concentration (IC95) determined by phenotyping.