Standardizing Risk Assessment for Treatment-Related Gonadal Insufficiency and Infertility in Childhood Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer: The Pediatric Initiative Network Risk Stratification System

Late effects and frontline treatment selection for children with non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Approximately 1 in 640 adults between 20 and 40 years of age is a survivor of childhood cancer. However, survival has often come at the expense of increased risk of long-term complications, including chronic health conditions and higher mortality rates. Similarly, long-term survivors of childhood non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) experience significant morbidity and mortality related to prior cancer treatments, highlighting the importance of primary and secondary prevention strategies to mitigate late toxicity. As a result, effective treatment regimens for pediatric NHL have evolved to reduce both short- and long-term toxicity through cumulative dose reductions and elimination of radiation. The establishment of effective regimens facilitates shared decision-making opportunities for frontline treatment selection that considers efficacy, acute toxicity, convenience, and late effects of treatments. The current review seeks to merge current frontline treatment regimens with survivorship guidelines to enhance understanding of potential long-term health risks to facilitate best treatment practices.

Pediatric oncofertility care in limited versus optimum resource settings: results from 39 surveyed centers in Repro-Can-OPEN Study Part I & II

PURPOSE

As a secondary report to elucidate the diverse spectrum of oncofertility practices for childhood cancer around the globe, we present and discuss the comparisons of oncofertility practices for childhood cancer in limited versus optimum resource settings based on data collected in the Repro-Can-OPEN Study Part I & II.

METHODS

We surveyed 39 oncofertility centers including 14 in limited resource settings from Africa, Asia, and Latin America (Repro-Can-OPEN Study Part I), and 25 in optimum resource settings from the USA, Europe, Australia, and Japan (Repro-Can-OPEN Study Part II). Survey questions covered the availability of fertility preservation and restoration options offered in case of childhood cancer as well as their degree of utilization.

RESULTS

In the Repro-Can-OPEN Study Part I & II, responses for childhood cancer and calculated oncofertility scores showed the following characteristics: (1) higher oncofertility scores in optimum resource settings than in limited resource settings for ovarian and testicular tissue cryopreservation; (2) frequent utilization of gonadal shielding, fractionation of anticancer therapy, oophoropexy, and GnRH analogs; (3) promising utilization of oocyte in vitro maturation (IVM); and (4) rare utilization of neoadjuvant cytoprotective pharmacotherapy, artificial ovary, in vitro spermatogenesis, and stem cells reproductive technology as they are still in preclinical or early clinical research settings.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on Repro-Can-OPEN Study Part I & II, we presented a plausible oncofertility best practice model to help optimize care for children with cancer in various resource settings. Special ethical concerns should be considered when offering advanced and innovative oncofertility options to children.

A multidisciplinary pediatric oncofertility team improves fertility preservation and counseling across 7 years

BACKGROUND

Oncofertility is a developing field of increasing importance, particularly in pediatric oncology, where most patients are likely to survive long-term and have not yet had the opportunity to have children.

AIMS

We performed a quality improvement initiative to increase our rates of fertility preservation counseling and referral through the implementation of a pediatric oncofertility team, and we report outcomes 7 years following implementation of our initiative.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We compare our baseline oncofertility survey to 44 post-intervention survey respondents and electronic medical record documentation for 149 patients treated in 2019. Ninety-five percent of post-intervention survey respondents recalled fertility counseling (baseline 70%, p = .004) and 89.3% were appropriately referred for fertility preservation (baseline 50%, p = .017). Counseling was documented in 60.4% of charts; 81% of patients analyzed by chart review were appropriately referred for fertility preservation. Fertility preservation outcomes differed by sex assigned at birth.

CONCLUSION

Creation of an oncofertility team produced improvements in fertility counseling and fertility preservation referral across an extended period of time.

The evolution of fertility preservation care models in a large pediatric cancer and blood disorders center

BACKGROUND

Children and adolescents who receive gonadotoxic treatments are at risk for future infertility. While there is a growing focus on integrating fertility preservation (FP) within pediatric cancer and blood disorder centers, wide variations in care models and methods exist across institutions. The purpose of this work is to describe the evolution of FP care models within a large pediatric hematology/oncology center.

METHODS

Models of care and associated timeframes are described, including a pre-FP program model, establishment of a formal FP program, integration of nurse navigators, and the addition of FP consult stratification based on urgency (urgent/nonurgent). The number of patient consults within each model, patient sex, diagnosis (oncologic/hematologic), and consult timing (pre-gonadotoxic treatment/posttreatment completion) were abstracted from the clinical database.

RESULTS

The number of annual consults increased from 24 during the pre-FP program model (2015) to 181 during the current care model (2020). Over time, the proportion of consults for females and patients with nonmalignant hematologic disorders increased. Patient stratification reduced the proportion of consults needing to be completed urgently from 75% at the advent of the FP program to 49% in the current model.

CONCLUSIONS

The evolution of care models within our FP program allowed for growth in the number of consults completed, expansion of services to more patients with nonmalignant hematologic disorders, and more consults for female patients. Nurse navigators play a critical role in care facilitating referrals, coordination, and patient education. Urgency stratification has allowed FP team members to manage increasing FP-related encounters.

Fertility-related worry among emerging adult cancer survivors

PURPOSE

Cancer survivors with a history of gonadotoxic treatment are at risk for future infertility and reproductive concerns, including worry about infertility. The purpose of this study was to describe factors associated with fertility-related worry among emerging adult survivors of childhood cancer.

METHODS

This chart review included patients aged 18.00-25.99 years and > 1 year from cancer treatment completion with a history of gonadotoxic treatment. Survivors were offered structured fertility-focused discussions at age ≥ 18 years, which assessed worry about future infertility. Data from this discussion (i.e., reported fertility-related worry (yes/no), sociodemographic, and clinical characteristics were abstracted from the medical record. Multivariable logistic regression with backwards elimination was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) for factors associated with fertility-related worry.

RESULTS

Survivors (N = 249) were a mean age of 19.1 ± 1.2 years at initial fertility discussion; 55.8% were male, 58.2% non-Hispanic White, and 27.3% were at high risk for future treatment-related infertility. Fertility-related worry was reported by 66.3% of survivors. Factors related to worry on multivariable analysis included female sex (OR: 2.64, 95%CI: 1.44-4.96, p = .002), solid tumor diagnosis (OR: 2.31, 95%CI: 1.15-4.71, p = .019), moderate and high risk of infertility (OR: 2.94, 95%CI: 1.23-7.64, p = .02; OR: 3.25, 95%CI: 1.55-7.17, p = .002), and ≥ 2 fertility discussions during survivorship care OR: 2.71, 95%CI: 1.46-5.20, p = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

Two-thirds of emerging adult cancer survivors expressed worry about future infertility, which has been linked to a variety of adverse quality of life outcomes. Survivors who are worried about infertility may benefit from psychological interventions.

Factors Associated With Fertility Preservation in a Pediatric, Adolescent and Young Adult Population

OBJECTIVE

To determine the patient characteristics associated with pursuing fertility preservation (FP) before gonadotoxic therapy in a pediatric, adolescent and young adult patient population.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of patient data at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center. Demographics, clinical diagnoses, and treatment characteristics were compared between participants that selected FP versus those that declined. Variables were analyzed separately for males and females by logistic regression.

RESULTS

Patients with a hematologic cancer were less likely to be eligible for preservation: 53.9% of ineligible males, P <0.001, and 51.8% of ineligible females, P <0.0001. Among patients who were candidates for FP, those receiving high-risk therapy were more likely to elect for FP (65.3% males, P <0.0001, and 87.5% of females, P <0.0001). Pubertal males were more likely to undergo preservation than prepubertal males (70.5% vs. 29.5%, P <0.0001; however, this trend was not demonstrated among female patients. In both males and females, race, ethnicity, religion, primary language, and insurance status were not shown to be statistically significant factors in predicting utilization of FP.

CONCLUSION

Risk of infertility, type of cancer, and developmental status influenced decisions on pursuing FP in pediatric, adolescent and young adult patients facing iatrogenic infertility.

Leveraging Clinical Trial Populations and Data from the Children's Oncology Group for Cancer Survivorship Research

Children and adolescents diagnosed with cancer can now expect an average 85% 5-year overall survival, with significant improvements in longer-term morbidity and mortality reported over the past several decades. However, the long-term impact of therapeutic agents and modalities introduced in recent years remains unclear and will require dedicated follow-up in the years ahead. The Children's Oncology Group (COG), a part of the NCI's National Clinical Trials Network, with over 200 sites across North America and beyond, enrolls more than 10,000 patients onto research protocols annually, inclusive of first-line clinical trials and nontherapeutic studies. COG provides a platform to conduct survivorship research with several unique strengths: (i) a huge catchment to ascertain relatively rare but important adverse events, (ii) study populations that are otherwise too rare to study in smaller consortia, including access to highly diverse patient populations, (iii) long-term follow-up of clinical trial populations linked to the original trial data, and (iv) a natural platform for intervention research. Enhancements in COG infrastructure facilitate survivorship research, including a COG patient registry (Project:EveryChild), availability of a long-term follow-up tracking resource, and successful deployment of various remote-based study procedures to reduce the burden on participants and participating institutions.

A synopsis of global frontiers in fertility preservation

Since 2007, the Oncofertility Consortium Annual Conference has brought together a diverse network of individuals from a wide range of backgrounds and professional levels to disseminate emerging basic and clinical research findings in fertility preservation. This network also developed enduring educational materials to accelerate the pace and quality of field-wide scientific communication. Between 2007 and 2019, the Oncofertility Consortium Annual Conference was held as an in-person event in Chicago, IL. The conference attracted approximately 250 attendees each year representing 20 countries around the world. In 2020, however, the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted this paradigm and precluded an in-person meeting. Nevertheless, there remained an undeniable demand for the oncofertility community to convene. To maintain the momentum of the field, the Oncofertility Consortium hosted a day-long virtual meeting on March 5, 2021, with the theme of "Oncofertility Around the Globe" to highlight the diversity of clinical care and translational research that is ongoing around the world in this discipline. This virtual meeting was hosted using the vFairs ® conference platform and allowed over 700 people to participate, many of whom were first-time conference attendees. The agenda featured concurrent sessions from presenters in six continents which provided attendees a complete overview of the field and furthered our mission to create a global community of oncofertility practice. This paper provides a synopsis of talks delivered at this event and highlights the new advances and frontiers in the fields of oncofertility and fertility preservation around the globe from clinical practice and patient-centered efforts to translational research.

Factors Associated with Adolescent and Young Adult Males with Cancer Attending Fertility Consultation: A Population-Based Cohort Study in Ontario, Canada

Purpose: Cancer and its treatment can impair fertility in men. It is recommended that they be referred for fertility consultation before the start of treatment. This study examined factors associated with men attending a fertility consultation within 30 days of diagnosis. Methods: Males 15 to 39 years of age, diagnosed with cancer in Ontario, Canada, between 2006 and 2019, were identified from the Ontario Cancer Registry. Linked administrative data were used to obtain other clinical and sociodemographic variables. The main outcome was a fertility consultation within 30 days of diagnosis, defined using Ontario Health Insurance Plan billing codes (606 or 628). A backward selection multivariate logistic regression was performed. Results: Of 13,720 cases identified, 8.5% attended a fertility consultation within 30 days of diagnosis. A more recent year of diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] = 5.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.6-6.6), living in an urban area (OR = 1.3; 95% CI 1.0-1.8), receiving radiation therapy (OR = 1.4; 95% CI 1.2-1.6), chemotherapy (OR = 1.9; 95% CI 1.6-2.2), and reproductive organ-related cancer surgery (OR = 1.5; 95% CI 1.2-1.7) were associated with a greater likelihood of attending a consultation. Older age (OR = 0.2; 95% CI 0.1-0.2), living in a northern region (OR = 0.3; 95% CI 0.2-0.5), having a cancer with low (OR = 0.3; 95% CI 0.2-0.4) or moderate risk to fertility (OR = 0.6; 95% CI 0.5-0.7), and residing in a neighborhood with lower income (OR = 0.4; 95% CI 0.3-0.5) or residential instability quintile (OR = 0.8; 95% CI 0.6-1.0) were associated with being less likely to attend a consultation. Conclusion: Although rates of fertility consultation have increased over time, these remain low in various clinical and demographic groups. Funding for fertility preservation appears to have had an important impact on fertility consultation in young men with cancer.

Fertility after Curative Therapy for Sickle Cell Disease: A Comprehensive Review to Guide Care

Curative therapy for sickle cell disease (SCD) currently requires gonadotoxic conditioning that can impair future fertility. Fertility outcomes after curative therapy are likely affected by pre-transplant ovarian reserve or semen analysis parameters that may already be abnormal from SCD-related damage or hydroxyurea treatment. Outcomes are also likely affected by the conditioning regimen. Conditioning with myeloablative busulfan and cyclophosphamide causes serious gonadotoxicity particularly among post-pubertal females. Reduced-intensity and non-myeloablative conditioning may be acutely less gonadotoxic, but more short and long-term fertility outcome data after these approaches is needed. Fertility preservation including oocyte/embryo, ovarian tissue, sperm, and experimental testicular tissue cryopreservation should be offered to patients with SCD pursing curative therapy. Regardless of HSCT outcome, longitudinal post-HSCT fertility care is required.

Infrastructure of Fertility Preservation Services for Pediatric Cancer Patients: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group

PURPOSE

Fertility preservation (FP) services are part of comprehensive care for those newly diagnosed with cancer. The capacity to offer these services to children and adolescents with cancer is unknown.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was sent to 220 Children's Oncology Group member institutions regarding institutional characteristics, structure and organization of FP services, and barriers to FP. Standard descriptive statistics were computed for all variables. The association between site-specific factors and selected outcomes was examined using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-four programs (65.5%) returned surveys. Fifty-three (36.8%) reported a designated FP individual or team. Sperm banking was offered at 135 (97.8%) institutions, and testicular tissue cryopreservation at 37 (27.0%). Oocyte and embryo cryopreservation were offered at 91 (67.9%) and 62 (46.6%) institutions, respectively; ovarian tissue cryopreservation was offered at 64 (47.8%) institutions. The presence of dedicated FP personnel was independently associated with the ability to offer oocyte or embryo cryopreservation (odds ratio [OR], 4.7; 95% CI, 1.7 to 13.5), ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.2 to 6.0), and testicular tissue cryopreservation (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.4 to 97.8). Only 26 (18.1%) participating institutions offered all current nonexperimental FP interventions. Barriers included cost (70.9%), inadequate knowledge or training (60.7%), difficulty characterizing fertility risk (50.4%), inadequate staffing (45.5%), and logistics with reproductive specialties (38%-39%).

CONCLUSION

This study provides the most comprehensive view of the current landscape of FP infrastructure for children and adolescents with cancer and demonstrates that existing infrastructure is inadequate to offer comprehensive services to patients. We discuss modifiable factors to improve patient access to FP.

Fertility preservation in boys facing gonadotoxic cancer therapy

Patient survival following childhood cancer has increased with contemporary radiation and chemotherapy techniques. However, gonadotoxicity associated with treatments means that infertility is a common consequence in survivors. Novel fertility preservation options are emerging, but knowledge about these options amongst urologists and other medical professionals is lacking. Pre-pubertal boys generally do not produce haploid germ cells. Thus, strategies for fertility preservation require cryopreservation of tissue containing spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs). Few centres worldwide routinely offer this option and fertility restoration (including testicular tissue engraftment, autotransplantation of SSCs and in vitro maturation of SSCs to spermatozoa) post-thaw is experimental. In pubertal boys, the main option for fertility preservation is masturbation and cryopreservation of the ejaculate. Assisted ejaculation using penile vibratory stimulation or electroejaculation and surgical sperm retrieval can be used in a sequential manner after failed masturbation. Physicians should inform boys and parents about the gonadotoxic effects of cancer treatment and offer fertility preservation. Preclinical experience has identified challenges in pre-pubertal fertility preservation, but available options are expected to be successful when today's pre-pubertal boys with cancer become adults. By contrast, fertility preservation in pubertal boys is clinically proven and should be offered to all patients undergoing cancer treatment.

Fertility preservation in children and young adults with cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The issue of fertility preservation has become increasingly relevant as survival rates of children with cancer exceeds 80% at 5 years. Fertility preservation options are being utilized alongside less gonadotoxic therapeutic regimens in the treatment of these patients. The purpose of this review is to summarize the recent advances in fertility preservation in the pediatric, adolescent, and young adult population.

RECENT FINDINGS

Education research involves both patient and provider; to increase understanding on both sides for improved adoption of techniques and higher rates of posttreatment fertility. Basic science research, specific to the pediatric population, has worked to further understanding of protective techniques and cryopreserved tissue transfer. Research on the techniques of preservation confirms the safety of surgical gonadal (ovarian and testicular) tissue retrieval for cryopreservation but a viable pathway for testicular tissue utilization, as it has for ovarian, has yet to be realized. Outcomes may be improving but it is apparent that robust registries are necessary to track patients long-term. Possibly the largest advancement in the recent past are group efforts, such as by PanCareLIFE, to create guidelines for these issues using larger cohorts and registries than were available.

SUMMARY

Current research implies the need for the development of a national strategy to ensure that pediatric patients undergoing gonadotoxic regimens are educated, alongside their family, about fertility options and outcomes thereafter.

Fertility preservation education for pediatric hematology-oncology fellows, faculty and advanced practice providers: a pilot study

Infertility secondary to chemotherapy, myeloablative conditioning regimens prior to stem cell transplantation, radiation therapy, and/or surgery is an important cause of morbidity and psychosocial distress among pediatric cancer patients. Known options exist for fertility preservation; however, knowledge among providers varies. We conducted a pilot study with an educational intervention over one-hour for hematology-oncology faculty, fellows, and advanced practice providers. Participants completed pre-/post-test assessment on fertility preservation knowledge. Participants' pretest mean (SD) score was 53% (17%), which significantly increased to 72% (11%) in the post-test (p = 0.0004). We demonstrated that a fertility education intervention could improve knowledge regarding infertility risk assessment and fertility preservation options.

Ovarian tissue cryopreservation in young females with cancer and its impact on ovarian follicle density

BACKGROUND

Cancer therapy in young females results in irreversible damage to their ovaries potentially leading to premature ovarian failure (POF) and infertility. Ovarian follicle density (FD) serves as a key predictor of reproductive potential for a woman. FD is significantly reduced after cryopreservation in adult women with cancer. FD in young females with cancer has not been investigated. The specific aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of ovarian tissue cyropreservation (OTC) in young females with cancer by evaluating its impact on FD.

METHODS

An IRB approved prospective human and animal trial enrolled girls (ages 6-18 years) with cancer at high risk for POF from July 1, 2012 through June 30, 2018. All participants underwent pre-operative ultrasounds evaluating their ovaries.  Following a normal ultrasound, each patient underwent a left ovarian tissue harvest prior to cancer therapy. The ovarian tissue was sectioned for use in pathologic analysis, fertility preservation and xenotransplantation before and after cryopreservation. Comparative statistical analyses of the means of FD before and after cryopreservation were implemented using mixed regression modeling that accounted for the correlation among samples from the same patient and differences in age.

RESULTS

Six girls were enrolled (mean, 12 years; median, 13 years, range, 6-17 years). Pathologic analysis was carried out in all viable grafts and ovarian follicle densities were determined. Mean ovarian follicle density (+/- SEM) before cryopreservation was 50.5 +/- 4.26 follicles/mm² and after cryopreservation was 44.1 +/- 4.25 follicles/mm², p < 0.001. Following cryopreservation, on average the ovarian tissue retained 89.0.% of the FD of paired fresh samples (95% CI 82.8%, 95.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

FD in young females with cancer is significantly reduced following OTC. However, the degree of reduction may be less than that reported in adult women. This is the first study in adolescent girls to provide histologic evidence of preservation of ovarian follicle density and potential efficacy of the ovarian tissue cryopreservation strategy.  By providing this evidence base, the potential benefit to young females with cancer and their family may be prognostically and clinically significant.

Development of a fertility risk calculator to predict individualized chance of ovarian failure after chemotherapy

PURPOSE

To develop an innovative machine learning (ML) model that predicts personalized risk of primary ovarian insufficiency (POI) after chemotherapy for reproductive-aged women. Currently, individualized prediction of a patient's risk of POI is challenging.

METHODS

Authors of published studies examining POI after gonadotoxic therapy were contacted, and six authors shared their de-identified data (N = 435). A composite outcome for POI was determined for each patient and validated by 3 authors. The primary dataset was partitioned into training and test sets; random forest binary classifiers were trained, and mean prediction scores were computed. Institutional data collected from a cross-sectional survey of cancer survivors (N = 117) was used as another independent validation set.

RESULTS

Our model predicted individualized risk of POI with an accuracy of 88% (area under the ROC 0.87, 95% CI: 0.77-0.96; p < 0.001). Mean prediction scores for patients who developed POI and who did not were 0.60 and 0.38 (t-test p < 0.001), respectively. Highly weighted variables included age, chemotherapy dose, prior treatment, smoking, and baseline diminished ovarian reserve.

CONCLUSION

We developed an ML-based model to estimate personalized risk of POI after chemotherapy. Our web-based calculator will be a user-friendly decision aid for individualizing risk prediction in oncofertility consultations.

Disparities in Female Pediatric, Adolescent and Young Adult Oncofertility: A Needs Assessment

Advancements in cancer screening and implementation of targeted treatments have significantly improved survival rates to 85% for pediatric and AYA survivors. Greater than 75% of survivors will live to experience the long-term adverse outcomes of cancer therapies, termed late effects (LE), that disrupt quality of life (QoL). Infertility and poor reproductive outcomes are significant disruptors of QoL in survivorship, affecting 12-88% of survivors who receive at-risk therapies. To mitigate risk, fertility preservation (FP) counseling is recommended as standard of care prior to gonadotoxic therapy. However, disparities in FP counseling, implementation of FP interventions, and screening for gynecologic late effects in survivorship persist. Barriers to care include a lack of provider and patient knowledge of the safety and breadth of current FP options, misconceptions about the duration of time required to implement FP therapies, cost, and health care team bias. Developing strategies to address barriers and implement established guidelines are necessary to ensure equity and improve quality of care across populations.

The ethics of offering fertility preservation to pediatric patients: A case-based discussion of barriers for clinicians to consider

Decisions about fertility preservation can be difficult in general but the recent application of preservation techniques to pediatric patients has ushered in a host of new ethical considerations. Fertility preservation (FP) may be considered for all patients who are at risk for infertility due to their medical diagnosis or treatment, including those undergoing gonadotoxic chemotherapy, those with differences of sex development (DSD) undergoing gonadectomy,^1-3 and transgender patients undergoing gender affirming surgery. The focus of this paper is to review the ethical issues involved in offering FP to pediatric oncology patients and, to a lesser extent, the new ethical issues that apply to patients with DSD. Some of the techniques and approach to counseling will also apply to transgender individuals, although that is beyond the scope of this work. We aim to discuss several barriers to offering FP and to advise how to counsel families in the setting of rapid changes in this field. Families should be educated about:Specific guidance for clinicians regarding some of these points was recently published in an American Academy of Pediatrics Clinical Report,¹ and we will illustrate the use of these guidelines in four case presentations.

Case report: two cases of mature oocytes found in prepubertal girls during ovarian tissue cryopreservation

Objective

To report two cases of mature oocytes found in prepubertal girls undergoing ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC).

Design

Case report.

Setting

Large tertiary care children’s hospital and a private fertility clinic.

Patient(s)

An 8-year-old prepubertal girl with β-thalassemia and a 2-year-old girl with sickle cell disease who both underwent OTC before bone marrow transplantations.

Intervention(s)

Laparoscopic right oophorectomy was performed in each patient. The ovarian cortical tissue was processed for slow freezing and long-term storage, and all oocytes were subsequently vitrified.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Oocytes found at the time of OTC processing for fertility preservation.

Result(s)

After a complete right oophorectomy, one mature metaphase II oocyte was discovered on tissue processing for OTC in each patient. Neither patient has yet returned for use of tissue or oocytes.

Conclusion(s)

To our knowledge, this is the first report of mature oocytes found during prepubertal OTC processing. These findings may indicate the need for increased research regarding prepubertal oocyte development and suggest that the technique of examining the media for both mature and immature oocytes at the time of OTC should become more widespread and perhaps recommended in prepubertal patients to optimize fertility preservation methods.

Parent-Adolescent Concordance Regarding Fertility Perspectives and Sperm Banking Attempts in Adolescent Males With Cancer

OBJECTIVE

Approximately half of male childhood cancer survivors experience impaired fertility, yet fertility preservation (FP) remains underutilized. Although parent recommendation influences adolescents' decision-making, parents may be uncertain and/or underrate their sons' parenthood goals. This study assessed parent-adolescent and family-level concordance regarding adolescent fertility perspectives (i.e., values, goals) and associations with FP attempts.

METHODS

A prospective pilot study examined the impact of a family-centered values clarification tool (FAST) on banking attempts among adolescent males newly diagnosed with cancer at risk for infertility. The FAST assessed adolescent and parent perceptions of adolescents' fertility values and goals (i.e., perceived threat of infertility, perceived benefits/barriers to banking). Parent-adolescent concordance and family-level concordance on fertility perspectives were examined, along with associations with banking attempts and salient demographic factors.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight participants (32 adolescents aged 12-20, 37 mothers, 29 fathers) from 32 families completed the FAST before treatment initiation. Parent-adolescent dyads were concordant on approximately one-half of responses. Banking attempts were associated with higher family-level concordance regarding perceived benefits, r(32) = .40, p = .02. Older adolescent age was associated with higher family-level concordance regarding perceived threat, r(31) = .37, p = .04, and benefits, r(32) = .40, p = .03. Fathers' education was associated with higher family-level concordance regarding barriers, r(21) = .53, p = .01.

CONCLUSIONS

When parents were concordant with their son's fertility values and goals, particularly perceived benefits, adolescents were more likely to attempt FP. Clinicians should facilitate sharing of fertility perspectives within families before cancer treatment, especially with younger adolescents. Psychosocial support for families facing FP decisions is recommended at diagnosis and across the care continuum.

The Australian Youth Cancer Service: Developing and Monitoring the Activity of Nationally Coordinated Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Care

Adolescents and young adults (aged 15-25 years) diagnosed with cancer have unique medical and psychosocial experiences and care needs, distinct from those of paediatric and older adult patients. Since 2011, the Australian Youth Cancer Services have provided developmentally appropriate, multidisciplinary and comprehensive care to these young patients, facilitated by national service coordination and activity data collection and monitoring. This paper reports on how the Youth Cancer Services have conceptualised and delivered quality youth cancer care in four priority areas: clinical trial participation, oncofertility, psychosocial care and survivorship. National activity data collected by the Youth Cancer Services between 2016-17 and 2019-20 are used to illustrate how service monitoring processes have facilitated improvements in coordination and accountability across multiple indicators of quality youth cancer care, including clinical trial participation, access to fertility information and preservation, psychosocial screening and care and the transition from active treatment to survivorship. Accounts of both service delivery and monitoring and evaluation processes within the Australian Youth Cancer Services provide an exemplar of how coordinated initiatives may be employed to deliver, monitor and improve quality cancer care for adolescents and young adults.

Laparoscopic assisted extracorporeal ovarian harvest: A novel technique to optimize ovarian tissue for cryopreservation in young females with cancer

BACKGROUND

Advances in pediatric cancer therapy have improved the long-term survival for many children with cancer. The awareness of quality of life aspects, specifically fertility preservation, has become a reality for many of these families and children. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation has emerged as an available fertility option for young females with cancer. Safe and effective removal of ovarian tissue in these girls is paramount. We report a laparoscopic assisted extracorporeal ovarian harvest technique that achieves this goal.

OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE

We place a 5 mm port at the umbilicus and in the right lower quadrant. Under laparoscopic guidance we place a 12 mm port in the left suprapubic area. Utilizing the 12 mm port site a monofilament traction suture is placed through the left ovary. The traction suture is used to translocate the ovary to an extracorporeal position via the 12 mm port site. Ovarian tissue is then excised utilizing standard surgical technique with the scalpel. Hemostasis is obtained and the capsule is closed with a running absorbable suture. The ovary is placed back in its native position laparoscopically.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of this extracorporeal ovarian harvesting technique is a safe and effective method to optimize removal and minimize tissue injury. Utilization of this technique, may have potential benefit to the young female with cancer.

Building Organs Using Tissue-Specific Microenvironments: Perspectives from a Bioprosthetic Ovary

Recent research in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine has elucidated the importance of the matrisome. The matrisome, effectively the skeleton of an organ, provides physical and biochemical cues that drive important processes such as differentiation, proliferation, migration, and cellular morphology. Leveraging the matrisome to control these and other tissue-specific processes will be key to developing transplantable bioprosthetics. In the ovary, the physical and biological properties of the matrisome have been implicated in controlling the important processes of follicle quiescence and folliculogenesis. This expanding body of knowledge is being applied in conjunction with new manufacturing processes to enable increasingly complex matrisome engineering, moving closer to emulating tissue structure, composition, and subsequent functions which can be applied to a variety of tissue engineering applications.

Impact of a novel family-centered values clarification tool on adolescent sperm banking attempts at the time of a new cancer diagnosis

PURPOSE

Over half of males experience fertility impairment after childhood cancer therapy, which often causes psychosocial distress. Yet, fertility preservation (FP) remains underutilized. The goals of this study were to determine the feasibility and impact of implementing a family-centered FP values clarification tool on sperm banking attempts among adolescent males newly diagnosed with cancer, and identify key determinants of banking attempts.

METHODS

A prospective pilot study was conducted among families of males (12-25 years old), prior to cancer therapy. Thirty-nine of 41 families agreed to participate (95%); 98 participants (32 adolescents, 37 mothers, 29 fathers) completed the Family-centered Adolescent Sperm banking values clarification Tool (FAST). Analyses assessed the impact of the FAST on banking attempts and examined associations between demographic/medical characteristics, FAST subscales (perceived threat, benefits, barriers), and banking attempts.

RESULTS

Twenty-three (59%) adolescents attempted to bank, compared to 8 adolescents (33%) during baseline assessment (p=.04). Significant associations were identified between banking attempts and adolescents' report of perceived threat (r_pb=.45, p=.01) and benefits (r_pb=.57, p=.01). Only mothers' proxy reports of adolescent perceived threat (r_pb=.42, p=.01) and benefits (r_pb=.47, p=.003) were associated with banking attempts, while fathers' self-reported perceived benefits (r_pb=.43, p=.03), self-reported barriers (r_pb=.49, p=.01), and proxy reports of adolescent perceived threat (r_pb=.38, p=.04) and benefits (r_pb=.59, p=.02) were associated with banking attempts.

CONCLUSION

Adolescent sperm banking attempt rates significantly increased after implementation of a family-centered FP values clarification tool prior to cancer treatment. Findings underscore the importance of targeting both adolescents and their parents, particularly fathers, in FP efforts.

Fertility Considerations in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients Undergoing Cancer Therapy

Survivors of pediatric cancer are at increased risk for infertility and premature hormonal failure. Surgeons caring for children with cancer have an important role to play in understanding this risk, as well as advocating for and performing appropriate fertility preservation procedures. Fertility preservation options in males and females vary by pubertal status and include nonexperimental (oocyte harvest, ovarian tissue cryopreservation, sperm cryopreservation) and experimental (testicular tissue cryopreservation) options. This review summarizes the basics of risk assessment and fertility preservation options and explores unique considerations in pediatric fertility preservation.

Young Adult Cancer Survivorship: Recommendations for Patient Follow-up, Exercise Therapy, and Research

Survivors of adolescent and young adult cancers (AYAs) often live 50 to 60 years beyond their diagnosis. This rapidly growing cohort is at increased risk for cancer- and treatment-related 'late effects' that persist for decades into survivorship. Recognition of similar issues in pediatric cancer survivors has prompted the development of evidence-based guidelines for late effects screening and care. However, corresponding evidence-based guidelines for AYAs have not been developed. We hosted an AYA survivorship symposium for a large group of multidisciplinary AYA stakeholders (approximately 200 were in attendance) at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) to begin addressing this disparity. The following overview briefly summarizes and discusses the symposium's stakeholder-identified high-priority targets for late effects screening and care and highlights knowledge gaps to direct future research in the field of AYA survivorship. This overview, although not exhaustive, is intended to stimulate clinicians to consider these high-priority screening and care targets when seeing survivors in clinical settings and, ultimately, to support the development of evidence-based late effects screening and care guidelines for AYAs.

2019 Pediatric Initiative Network: Progress, Proceedings, and Plans

Impairment of fertility and sexual/reproductive health are common after oncologic therapy, and are known to have negative impacts on romantic relationships and psychosocial well-being among childhood cancer survivors. The Pediatric Initiative Network (PIN) is an international, multidisciplinary group of providers within the Oncofertility Consortium dedicated to preserving and protecting the fertility of children and adolescents at risk for infertility due to medical conditions or treatments. The PIN and its Best Practices and Research committees meet virtually throughout the year, with one annual in-person meeting. The purpose of this "proceedings" is to highlight key discussion points from the annual PIN meeting which took place on November 11, 2019, to 1) provide a context for pediatric groups across the country on what oncofertility programs are currently doing and why, and 2) inform stakeholders of past, present and future initiatives that may be of value to them and the patient populations they serve.