Phase IIa study of the CD19 antibody MOR208 in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Loncastuximab tesirine for treatment of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

Approximately, a third of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have refractory or relapsed disease after initial treatment. Despite recent regulatory approval of several new agents, including CAR-T cell therapy, polatuzumab vedotin and tafasitamab, there is still a need for additional therapies that expand the therapeutic alternatives and improve outcomes for patients with DLBCL that progresses after first line therapy.

AREAS COVERED

Studies of recently approved agents for relapsed DLBCL are reviewed. The relevance of CD19 as an immunotherapeutic target. The pharmacologic composition of loncastuximab tesirine and its cytotoxic payload, a pyrrolobenzodiazepine dimer. Phase I and phase 2 data for loncastuximab tesirine in non-Hodgkin lymphoma, showing the safety profile of this drug and the emerging efficacy results in DLBCL.

EXPERT OPINION

Loncastuximab tesirine is an antiCD19 antibody drug conjugate with a novel cytotoxic payload. Early studies showed this drug is tolerable, with a safety profile that is different from other antibody drug conjugates approved for lymphoid malignancies. Efficacy data shows activity in different non-Hodgkin lymphoma entities, and a phase 2 study has been completed in DLBCL showing durable responses, including in high-risk subgroups. Loncastuximab tesirine will be an important addition to the treatment alternatives for DLBCL.

Therapeutic roles of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) in relapsed/refractory lymphomas

Relapsed or refractory lymphoma is commonly treated with combination chemoimmunotherapy and cellular immunotherapy. Modest response rates and associated toxicities are obstacles to achieving durable remission using traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy, especially in frail patients with advanced disease. Antibody drug conjugates represent a new class of novel targeted agents with significant improvement in therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of lymphomas. Several of these agents, which offer improved targeting, greater potency, and better therapeutic index over traditional chemotherapy, are changing the treatment landscape for lymphomas and other hematological malignancies. Despite the therapeutic potential of these agents, the delivery and release of cytotoxic agents to malignant cells through the combination of a monoclonal antibody, payload, and linker represents a complex design challenge. This article reviews the clinical data on currently available antibody drug conjugates and the ongoing development of novel antibody drug conjugates. Antibody drug conjugates constitute an important armamentarium for treatment of lymphomas and their evolving roles in the treatment spectrum are discussed.

Tafasitamab: First Approval

Tafasitamab (tafasitamab-cxix; MONJUVI^®) is an Fc-modified (i.e. two amino acid substitutions within the Fc region, resulting in increased Fcγ receptor affinity), humanized, anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody. Developed by MorphoSys AG, under a license from Xencor, it received accelerated approval (in July 2020) for use in combination with lenalidomide as a treatment for adults with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) not otherwise specified, including DLBCL arising from low grade lymphoma, and who are not eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). It is the first therapy to be approved as a second-line treatment for this patient population in the USA. The recommended dose of tafasitamab is 12 mg per kg of bodyweight, administered via an intravenous infusion. A regulatory assessment for tafasitamab plus lenalidomide for the treatment of adults with relapsed or refractory DLBCL is currently underway in the EU. Tafasitamab is also being clinically investigated as a therapeutic option in various other B-cell malignancies, including follicular lymphoma and other indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of tafasitamab leading to this first approval for its use in combination with lenalidomide in adults with relapsed or refractory DLBCL.

Comparison of the Effectiveness and Safety of the Oral Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export, Selinexor, in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma Subtypes

BACKGROUND

The SADAL study evaluated oral selinexor in patients with relapsed and/or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) after at least 2 prior lines of systemic therapy. In this post-hoc analysis, we analyzed the outcomes of the SADAL study by DLBCL subtype to determine the effects of DLBCL subtypes on efficacy and tolerability of selinexor.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from 134 patients in SADAL were analyzed by DLBCL subtypes for overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), duration of treatment response, progression-free survival, and adverse events rate.

RESULTS

ORR in the entire cohort was 29.1%, and similar in patients with germinal center (GCB) versus non-GCB DLBCL (31.7% vs. 24.2%, P = 0.45); transformed DLBCL showed a trend towards higher ORR than de novo DLBCL: 38.7% vs. 26.2% (P = 0.23). Despite similar prior treatment regimens and baseline characteristics, patients with DLBCL and normal C-MYC/BCL-2 protein expression levels had a significantly higher ORR (46.2% vs.14.8%, P = 0.012) and significantly longer OS (medians 13.7 vs. 5.1 months, hazard ratio 0.43 [95% CI, 0.23-0.77], P = 0.004) as compared with those whose DLBCL had C-MYC and BCL-2 overexpression. Among patients who had normal expression levels of either C-MYC or BCL-2 and baseline hemoglobin levels ≥ 10g/dL, ORR was 51.5% (n = 47), with median OS of 15.5 months and median PFS of 4.6 months. Similar rates of adverse events were noted in all subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, single agent oral selinexor showed strong responses in patients with limited treatment alternatives regardless of germinal center B-cell type or disease origin.

Advances in Immunotherapy for Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogeneous disease that is normally treated with combination chemotherapy combined with the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab. Although about two-thirds of patients are cured with initial chemo-immunotherapy, a sizable minority of patients will have relapsed or refractory (r/r) DLBCL. Standard therapy for r/r DLBCL is salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT); however, a minority of patients have long-term remission with this approach. In recent years, there has been a proliferation of immunotherapies for the treatment of DLBCL that have expanded our treatment options for these patients, providing the opportunity for durable remissions that were not previously possible. In this review, we discuss these novel immunotherapies, including monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells. The plethora of novel agents leaves patients with more therapeutic options, but leaves the practitioner faced with challenging decisions regarding the timing and indications for use of these immunotherapies. Although studies are ongoing, no agents have been verified as alternatives to standard salvage therapy followed by ASCT at first relapse. The opportunity for durable response and broad age range eligibility makes a strong case for CAR T cells to be used as third-line therapy. The remainder of the agents discussed can be useful in specific clinical scenarios including in patients who are not candidates for ASCT or CAR T cells, as bridging therapy to CAR T cells, or in the r/r setting after CAR T cell therapy failure.

The use of tafasitamab in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Patients who relapse or are refractory after first-line therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) frequently have poor prognoses, especially when they are not candidates for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Tafasitamab is a humanized monoclonal anti-CD19 antibody that has recently been approved by the FDA in combination with lenalidomide for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL in patients who are not eligible for ASCT. Tafasitamab has an Fc region which has been modified to have an increased affinity for Fcγ receptors, to potentiate antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and antibody-dependent cell-mediated phagocytosis. Here, we review the development, mode of action and clinical data for tafasitamab in combination with lenalidomide in R/R DLBCL, and discuss the various ways in which this novel antibody could be utilized in the treatment sequence to improve clinical outcomes for patients with DLBCL.

Immunotherapy in the treatment of lymphoma

Relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas, especially diffuse large B-cell lymphoma as well as relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphomas are hard-to-treat diseases. Patients who do not respond to initial therapy or experience relapse are treated with salvage regimens, and if eligible for aggressive therapy, treatment is continued with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. Current therapy options can cure substantial numbers of patients, however for some it is still an uncurable disease. Numerous new drugs and cell therapies are being investigated for the treatment of relapsed or refractory lymphomas. Different types of immunotherapy options have shown promising results, and some have already become the standard of care. Here, we review immunotherapy options for the treatment of lymphoma and discuss the results, positions, practical aspects, and future directions of different drugs and cellular therapies for the treatment of this disease.

NK Cells in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Their Therapeutic Implications

Key features of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are defects in the immune system and the ability of leukemic cells to evade immune defenses and induce immunosuppression, resulting in increased susceptibility to infections and disease progression. Several immune effectors are impaired in CLL, including T and natural killer (NK) cells. The role of T cells in defense against CLL and in CLL progression and immunotherapy has been extensively studied. Less is known about the role of NK cells in this leukemia, and data on NK cell alterations in CLL are contrasting. Besides studies showing that NK cells have intrinsic defects in CLL, there is a large body of evidence indicating that NK cell dysfunctions in CLL mainly depend on the escape mechanisms employed by leukemic cells. In keeping, it has been shown that NK cell functions, including antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), can be retained and/or restored after adequate stimulation. Therefore, due to their preserved ADCC function and the reversibility of CLL-related dysfunctions, NK cells are an attractive source for novel immunotherapeutic strategies in this disease, including chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) therapy. Recently, satisfying clinical responses have been obtained in CLL patients using cord blood-derived CAR-NK cells, opening new possibilities for further exploring NK cells in the immunotherapy of CLL. However, notwithstanding the promising results of this clinical trial, more evidence is needed to fully understand whether and in which CLL cases NK cell-based immunotherapy may represent a valid, alternative/additional therapeutic option for this leukemia. In this review, we provide an overview of the current knowledge about phenotypic and functional alterations of NK cells in CLL and the mechanisms by which CLL cells circumvent NK cell-mediated immunosurveillance. Additionally, we discuss the potential relevance of using NK cells in CLL immunotherapy.

Perspectives in immunotherapy: meeting report from the immunotherapy bridge (December 2nd-3rd, 2020, Italy)

Improved understanding of tumor immunology has enabled the development of therapies that harness the immune system and prevent immune escape. Numerous clinical trials and real-world experience has provided evidence of the potential for long-term survival with immunotherapy in various types of malignancy. Recurring observations with immuno-oncology agents include their potential for clinical application across a broad patient population with different tumor types, conventional and unconventional response patterns, durable responses, and immune-related adverse events. Despite the substantial achievements to date, a significant proportion of patients still fail to benefit from current immunotherapy options, and ongoing research is focused on transforming non-responders to responders through the development of novel treatments, new strategies to combination therapy, adjuvant and neoadjuvant approaches, and the identification of biomarkers of response. These topics were the focus of the virtual Immunotherapy Bridge (December 2nd-3rd, 2020), organized by the Fondazione Melanoma Onlus, Naples, Italy, in collaboration with the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer and are summarised in this report.

Why R-CHOP + X is not enough: lessons learned and next steps in the mission to improve frontline therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Two-thirds of newly diagnosed cases of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are cured with R-CHOP, an immunochemotherapy regimen that has been the standard of care for almost two decades. Ongoing molecular characterization of DLBCL has revealed a heterogeneous disease comprised of multiple subtypes based on putative cell of origin or somatic mutations with unique oncogenic signaling pathways. The door has been opened to the use of novel agents that target the specific molecular vulnerabilities of DLBCL, but despite this, multiple randomized studies have not identified a suitable drug 'X' to combine with R-CHOP. This report will review recent attempts to add individual novel agents to R-CHOP in the mission to improve frontline treatment for DLBCL and discuss promising ongoing studies. It will offer potential strategies to explore when designing future clinical trials, including exploiting synergy between multiple novel agents.

Antibody Therapies for Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Large B-cell lymphomas (LBCLs) constitute a subgroup of aggressive but highly curable lymphoproliferative diseases. Treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) patients still represents an unmet clinical need, and novel drugs and combinations are in continuous development. The pan–B cell panel of surface antigens that characterizes LBCL leads to a large umbrella of druggable targets. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) express their activity against lymphoma by targeting multiple tumor-specific antigens. This category consists of a number of molecules with different mechanisms of action, including naked mAbs, radioimmunoconjugates, antibody-drug conjugates, checkpoint inhibitors, and bispecific antibodies. In the last decade, apart from the well-known role of the anti-CD20 mAb rituximab, novel mAbs have led to remarkable steps forward in the treatment of R/R LBCL in monotherapy and combined with chemotherapy. Multiple studies are in development trying to bring these novel compounds into the frontline setting to empower the RCHOP effect or as alternative chemotherapy-free options for elderly/unfit patients. This review provides insight into antilymphoma mAbs, focused on the efficacy and safety of the main molecules approved or in development for LBCL andperspectives on the treatment of this disease.

Chemotherapy-Free Management of Follicular and Marginal Zone Lymphoma

Many patients with follicular (FL) or marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) are not eligible to receive immunochemotherapy due to advanced age or comorbidities. Recent innovations in the treatment of these indolent lymphomas provide options for multiple lines of chemotherapy-free management. More research is needed to determine which older patients are best served by a chemotherapy-free approach in the context of geriatric vulnerabilities. In the first line, regardless of disease burden, rituximab monotherapy can provide high rates of disease control with minimal toxicity, while judicious use of brief maintenance extends the duration of response. Radioimmunotherapy using ibritumomab tiuxetan is an effective and safe post-rituximab consolidation for older patients who have <25% bone marrow involvement. The combination of rituximab and lenalidomide, although "chemotherapy-free", does not improve tolerability over immunochemotherapy. However, studies support lower doses and shorter duration of lenalidomide exposure as a means to improve safety without materially compromising efficacy for older individuals. Extranodal MZL can often be effectively controlled with low-dose radiation therapy, and splenic MZL has excellent outcomes with rituximab monotherapy. For many patients with relapsed FL/MZL, simple retreatment with anti-CD20 antibodies will prove sufficient. Other currently available options for relapsed/refractory disease include ibritumomab tiuxetan, lenalidomide with rituximab, umbralisib as a potentially less toxic PI3K inhibitor, ibrutinib (for MZL), and tazemetostat (for FL, especially with EZH2 mutation). Emerging data with novel forms of immunotherapy (antibody-drug conjugates like polatuzumab vedotin or loncastuximab tesirine; T-cell-engaging bispecific antibodies like mosunetuzumab or epcoritamab; and chimeric antigen receptor CAR T-cells like axicabtagene ciloleucel) suggest that immune-directed approaches can produce very high and potentially durable responses in FL/MZL with limited toxicities, further obviating the need for chemotherapy.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: new targets and novel therapies

Newer, more effective and non-cytotoxic therapies are an unmet need for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and other B-cell malignancies. Recently approved agents include polatuzumab with bendamustine and rituximab, selinexor, and tafasitamab plus lenalidomide. Three CAR-T cell products are currently approved by the FDA, with others in clinical trials. Additional agents in development include bispecific antibodies and antibody drug conjugates. Combinations of targeted therapies should lead to further improvement in the outcome of patients with B-cell malignancies.

Tafasitamab for the treatment of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

Patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) require further treatment options, especially in cases that cannot tolerate stem cell transplant or cytotoxic chemotherapy. CD19 has emerged as an attractive target in B-cell malignancy and is the subject of several therapeutic strategies. The anti-CD19, humanized, monoclonal antibody tafasitamab (MOR208) has an engineered, modified Fc region with increased affinity for Fcγ receptors, leading to increased cytotoxicity via natural killer cells and macrophages (antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and antibody-dependent cell-mediated phagocytosis) in a promising approach.

AREAS COVERED

The development of tafasitamab is reviewed, together with the pharmacokinetics and clinical experience of tafasitamab in R/R DLBCL; clinical data have led to FDA approval and inclusion in NCCN treatment guidelines for tafasitamab in combination with lenalidomide in this indication.

EXPERT OPINION

Patients with R/R DLBCL who have failed rituximab-containing regimens may be resistant to CD20-directed therapies; therefore, therapies with an alternative mode of action are of great interest in this setting. Tafasitamab, an anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody, in combination with lenalidomide has demonstrated promising efficacy for patients with R/R DLBCL who are ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation. This could provide an alternative approach to classical chemotherapy-based regimens in the relapsed setting.

Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Large B-cell lymphomas, with an estimated 150,000 new cases annually worldwide, represent almost 30% of all cases of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Patients typically present with progressive lymphadenopathy, extranodal disease, or both and require therapy. Despite the advanced stage at presentation in the majority of patients, more than 60% can be cured with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) immunochemotherapy (Fig. 1A). Patients with treatment failure after R-CHOP often have a poor outcome — in particular, those with disease that is refractory to frontline or subsequent therapies — although some patients can have a durable remission and be cured after secondary therapies. Over the past two decades, improved insights into large B-cell lymphomas, in terms of epidemiology, prognostic factors, and biologic heterogeneity, have led to a refinement of disease classification and the development of new therapeutic approaches.

Cure rate in the elderly patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma deteriorates after the age of 80-results from a single-center survey

The prognosis of elderly patients diagnosed with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is considered to be clearly inferior to that of younger patients. Besides tumor biology and comorbidities, treatment selection due to an assumed reduced tolerability may contribute to this difference. With increasingly more patients diagnosed at advanced age, current treatment selections need to be reviewed carefully. Hence, we analyzed the results of patients above the age of 70 in whom a diagnosis of DLBCL was made. Whereas patients up to 80 were frequently selected for and were able to tolerate standard treatment (86% intended use, 74% completion), patients above the age of 80 years were not only treated more cautiously (67 and 60%, respectively) but did show inferior response to treatment with standard treatment (CR rate for intended R-CHOP use 64% vs. 43%). However, on an individual level, patients receiving and completing standard treatment obtained results that resemble the results of younger patients, irrespective if aged more than 80 and impose superior to prior reports in this age cohort. Median PFS for the entire group of patients was 3.44 years, with 4.83 years for patients below 80 and only 1.09 years for patients above the age of 80. The corresponding figures for OS were 7.38 years (estimated); after 2 years, OS was 81% in the younger cohort in contrast to 68% in patients > 80 years. However, for patients not planned to receive or not tolerating R-CHOP, results remain poor; tailored approaches for these patients are required.

Investigational drugs for the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Introduction: Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most frequent lymphoma in adults. 30-40% DLBCL eventually relapse and 10% are primary refractory, posing an unmet clinical need, especially in patients not eligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Knowledge of DLBCL molecular pathogenesis has identified druggable molecular pathways. Surface antigens can be targeted by novel antibodies and innovative cell therapies. Areas covered: This review illuminates those investigational drugs and cell therapies that are currently in early phase clinical trials for the treatment of DLBCL. New small molecules that modulate the pathways involved in the molecular pathogenesis of DLBCL, monospecific and bispecific monoclonal antibodies, drug-immunoconjugates, and cellular therapies are placed under the spotlight. A futuristic perspective concludes the paper. Expert opinion: A precision medicine strategy based on robust molecular predictors of outcome is desirable in the development of investigational small molecules for DLBCL. Novel monoclonal and bispecific antibodies may be offered to (i) relapsed/refractory patients ineligible for CAR-T cells because of comorbidities, and (ii) younger patients before CAR-T cell infusion to reduce a high tumor burden. A focus on the optimal sequencing of the emerging DLBCL drugs is appropriate and necessary.

Novel targets in aggressive lymphoma

Targeting CD20 with the monoclonal antibody rituximab has improved survival in patients with aggressive B-cell lymphomas, the majority of which are cured with chemoimmunotherapy. Patients progressing through or relapsing after their treatment have a poor prognosis. Despite a number of promising novel agents with efficacy in relapsed disease, randomized trials building on the chemoimmunotherapy backbone have failed to show further survival benefit. Significant progress has been made in the last few years in relapsed or refractory disease with the emergence of therapies that harness the patient's immune system to fight disease. The approval of 2 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell products has provided potential for curative therapy, although challenges remain with toxicities and access. The approval of the antibody drug conjugate polatuzumab in combination with chemoimmunotherapy has offered survival benefit to patients who are not candidates for more aggressive approaches and has the potential to change the standard of care for initial management. Several targeted agents have proven effective, but the majority do not produce durable responses, requiring development in combination with other targeted or conventional therapies. Herein, promising targets in aggressive lymphoma with the greatest potential for improving outcomes in these patients are discussed. Novel therapies, their toxicities, and their potential role in initial or subsequent treatment are highlighted.

Immunotherapy with drugs

The treatment of lymphomas has undergone a shift in the last few decades, from traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy toward immune-targeting agents that supplement or, in some cases, even supplant direct tumor killing with activation of antitumor systemic immunity. Since the introduction of the first known immunomodulatory modality, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, multiple immunotherapeutic approaches have been developed including monoclonal antibodies (mABs), antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific T-cell engagers, checkpoint inhibitors, small molecule inhibitors, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies, and vaccines. Many of these agents, either as monotherapies or as a component of a combination strategy, have shown impressive results, combining efficacy with tolerability. Immunotherapy ranging from mABs to checkpoint inhibitors and CAR T-cell therapy are now integrated into lymphoma treatment from the earliest lines of therapy to the relapsed and refractory setting for both Hodgkin (HL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Although further studies are needed to improve our understanding of the unique side effects of immunomodulation, to determine the optimal sequence and combinations of these agent with targeted therapies and standard chemotherapy, and to identify predictive biomarkers, they clearly represent a growing list of treatment options for both HL and NHL and an important step on our road toward cure of these diseases.

A Systematic Review of the Clinical Efficacy of Treatments in Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

Introduction

Novel treatment options are needed to improve outcomes in transplant-ineligible relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). This systematic literature review evaluated clinical evidence on treatments for patients with R/R DLBCL ineligible for, or relapsed following, stem cell transplantation.

Methods

We assessed the feasibility of conducting an indirect treatment comparison (ITC) or network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of polatuzumab vedotin in combination with bendamustine + rituximab versus other relevant treatments.

Results

Thirty-seven studies were identified, of which 20 were eligible [seven randomized, controlled trials (RCTs); 13 observational/single-arm trials]. Due to a lack of RCTs, an ITC/NMA summary of the relative efficacy and safety of the treatment options was not possible. Only two of the seven RCTs had positive outcomes.

Conclusions

These findings highlight the paucity of published RCTs to establish the comparative efficacy of treatments for transplant-ineligible R/R DLBCL and lack of standard of care in this setting.

Electronic Supplementary Material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-020-01507-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Current Immunotherapy Approaches in Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas

Non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs) are lymphoid malignancies of B- or T-cell origin. Despite great advances in treatment options and significant improvement of survival parameters, a large part of NHL patients either present with a chemotherapy-refractory disease or experience lymphoma relapse. Chemotherapy-based salvage therapy of relapsed/refractory NHL is, however, capable of re-inducing long-term remissions only in a minority of patients. Immunotherapy-based approaches, including bispecific antibodies, immune checkpoint inhibitors and genetically engineered T-cells carrying chimeric antigen receptors, single-agent or in combination with therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, immunomodulatory agents, chemotherapy or targeted agents demonstrated unprecedented clinical activity in heavily-pretreated patients with NHL, including chemotherapy-refractory cases with complex karyotype changes and other adverse prognostic factors. In this review, we recapitulate currently used immunotherapy modalities in NHL and discuss future perspectives of combinatorial immunotherapy strategies, including patient-tailored approaches.

Enhancing CDC and ADCC of CD19 Antibodies by Combining Fc Protein-Engineering with Fc Glyco-Engineering

Background: Native cluster of differentiation (CD) 19 targeting antibodies are poorly effective in triggering antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), which are crucial effector functions of therapeutic antibodies in cancer immunotherapy. Both functions can be enhanced by engineering the antibody’s Fc region by altering the amino acid sequence (Fc protein-engineering) or the Fc-linked glycan (Fc glyco-engineering). We hypothesized that combining Fc glyco-engineering with Fc protein-engineering will rescue ADCC and CDC in CD19 antibodies. Results: Four versions of a CD19 antibody based on tafasitamab’s V-regions were generated: a native IgG1, an Fc protein-engineered version with amino acid exchanges S267E/H268F/S324T/G236A/I332E (EFTAE modification) to enhance CDC, and afucosylated, Fc glyco-engineered versions of both to promote ADCC. Irrespective of fucosylation, antibodies carrying the EFTAE modification had enhanced C1q binding and were superior in inducing CDC. In contrast, afucosylated versions exerted an enhanced affinity to Fcγ receptor IIIA and had increased ADCC activity. Of note, the double-engineered antibody harboring the EFTAE modification and lacking fucose triggered both CDC and ADCC more efficiently. Conclusions: Fc glyco-engineering and protein-engineering could be combined to enhance ADCC and CDC in CD19 antibodies and may allow the generation of antibodies with higher therapeutic efficacy by promoting two key functions simultaneously.

Fc-Engineered Antibodies with Enhanced Fc-Effector Function for the Treatment of B-Cell Malignancies

Monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy has rapidly changed the field of cancer therapy. In 1997, the CD20-targeting mAb rituximab was the first mAb to be approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of cancer. Within two decades, dozens of mAbs entered the clinic for treatment of several hematological cancers and solid tumors, and numerous more are under clinical investigation. The success of mAbs as cancer therapeutics lies in their ability to induce various cytotoxic machineries against specific targets. These cytotoxic machineries include antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP), and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), which are all mediated via the fragment crystallizable (Fc) domain of mAbs. In this review article, we will outline the novel approaches of engineering these Fc domains of mAbs to enhance their Fc-effector function and thereby their anti-tumor potency, with specific focus to summarize their (pre-) clinical status for the treatment of B-cell malignancies, including chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL), and multiple myeloma (MM).

Mechanism and Treatment of Rituximab Resistance in Diffuse Large Bcell Lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common subtype B non-Hodgkin lymphoma in adults. After rituximab being introduced to treat DLBCL, the current first-line treatment is R-CHOP regimen. This regimen greatly improves patient's prognosis, however, relapsed or refractory cases are commonly seen, mainly due to the resistance to rituximab. Although a large number of experiments have been conducted to investigate rituximab resistance, the exac mechanisms and solutions are still unclear. This review mainly explores the possible mechanisms oft rituximab resistance and current new effective treatments for rituximab resistance in DLBCL.

Mantle cell lymphoma: insights into therapeutic targets at the preclinical level

INTRODUCTION

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a chronically relapsing B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma characterized by recurrent molecular-cytogenetic aberrations that lead to deregulation of DNA damage response, cell cycle progression, epigenetics, apoptosis, proliferation, and motility. In the last 10 years, clinical approval of several innovative drugs dramatically changed the landscape of treatment options in the relapsed/refractory (R/R) MCL, which translated into significantly improved survival parameters.

AREAS COVERED

Here, up-to-date knowledge on the biology of MCL together with currently approved and clinically tested frontline and salvage therapies are reviewed. In addition, novel therapeutic targets in MCL based on the scientific reports published in Pubmed are discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Bruton tyrosine-kinase inhibitors, NFkappaB inhibitors, BCL2 inhibitors, and immunomodulary agents in combination with monoclonal antibodies and genotoxic drugs have the potential to induce long-term remissions in majority of newly diagnosed MCL patients. Several other classes of anti-tumor drugs including phosphoinositole-3-kinase, cyclin-dependent kinase or DNA damage response kinase inhibitors have demonstrated promising anti-lymphoma efficacy in R/R MCL. Most importantly, adoptive immunotherapy with genetically modified T-cells carrying chimeric antigen receptor represents a potentially curative treatment approach even in the patients with chemotherapy and ibrutinib-refractory disease.

Dual specific CD19/CD22-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A case report

Clinical trials of chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) targeting CD19 have produced impressive results in hematological malignancies, including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, a notable number of patients with DLBCL fail to achieve remission after CD19 CAR T-cell therapy and may therefore require a dual targeted CAR T-cell therapy. A 31-year-old man with refractory DLBCL was assessed in the present case report. The patient was treated with sequential infusion of single CD19 CAR T cells followed by dual CD19/CD22-targeted CAR T cells. The outcome was that the patient achieved partial remission after the first single CD19 CAR T-cell infusion and complete remission after the dual CD19/CD22-targeted CAR T-cell infusion. Grade 1 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was observed after the single CD19 CAR T-cell infusion, while grade 3 CRS and hemophagocytic syndrome were observed after the dual targeted CAR T-cell infusion, but these adverse effects alleviated after the treatments. To the best of our knowledge, the present case report is the first to describe the successful application of dual CD19/CD22-targeted CAR T-cell therapy for the treatment of refractory DLBCL. The report suggests that dual CD19/CD22-targeted CAR T-cell therapy may represent a promising option for the treatment of refractory DLBCL; however, caution should be taken due to potential CRS development.

Polatuzumab vedotin for the treatment of adults with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

Polatuzumab vedotin is an antibody-drug conjugate comprised of an anti-CD79b monoclonal antibody conjugated to monomethyl auristatin (MMAE), a microtubule-disrupting cytotoxin. CD79b is almost exclusively expressed on normal and malignant B-cells, making it an appealing target for novel therapeutics.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the current literature on polatuzumab vedotin, including its pharmacology, as well as summarizing the results of clinical trials in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) as a single agent and in combination with other chemotherapies and chemoimmunotherapies. The current landscape of approved therapies for relapsed and refractory DLBCL, as well as other promising novel approaches, is discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

The recent approval of polatuzumab vedotin in combination with bendamustine and rituximab (BR) offers another option to patients with DLBCL who are not eligible for autologous hematopoietic cell transplant or chimeric antigen receptors (CAR)-T cell therapy. In younger patients and those without serious comorbidities, polatuzumab vedotin-BR may serve as bridging therapy to more intensive therapies with reasonable efficacy and tolerability. Polatuzumab vedotin is currently being studied in a randomized trial in the front line setting in combination with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP).

Tafasitamab plus lenalidomide in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (L-MIND): a multicentre, prospective, single-arm, phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

Patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who are ineligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation have poor outcomes and few treatment options. Tafasitamab (MOR208) is an Fc-enhanced, humanised, anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody that has shown preclinical and single-agent activity in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies. Preclinical data suggested that tafasitamab might act synergistically with lenalidomide. We aimed to assess the antitumour activity and safety of tafasitamab plus lenalidomide in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who were ineligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation.

METHODS

In this multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study (L-MIND), patients older than 18 years with histologically confirmed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, who relapsed or had refractory disease after previous treatment with one to three systemic regimens (with at least one anti-CD20 therapy), were not candidates for high-dose chemotherapy and subsequent autologous stem-cell transplantation, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and had measurable disease at baseline were recruited from 35 academic and community hospitals in ten countries. Patients received coadministered intravenous tafasitamab (12 mg/kg) and oral lenalidomide (25 mg/day) for up to 12 cycles (28 days each), followed by tafasitamab monotherapy (in patients with stable disease or better) until disease progression. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with an objective response (centrally assessed), defined as a complete or partial response according to the 2007 International Working Group response criteria for malignant lymphoma. Antitumour activity analyses are based on all patients who received at least one dose of both tafasitamab and lenalidomide; safety analyses are based on all patients who received at least one dose of either study medication. Recruitment is complete, and the trial is in follow-up. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02399085.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 18, 2016, and Nov 15, 2017, 156 patients were screened: 81 were enrolled and received at least one dose of either study medication, and 80 received at least one dose of both tafasitamab and lenalidomide. Median follow-up was 13·2 months (IQR 7·3-20·4) as of data cutoff on Nov 30, 2018. 48 (60%; 95% CI 48-71) of 80 patients who received tafasitamab plus lenalidomide had an objective response: 34 (43%; 32-54) had a complete response and 14 (18%; 10-28) had a partial response. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events of grade 3 or worse were neutropenia (39 [48%] of 81 patients), thrombocytopenia (14 [17%]), and febrile neutropenia (ten [12%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 41 (51%) of 81 patients. The most frequently reported serious adverse events (in two or more patients) were pneumonia (five [6%]), febrile neutropenia (five [6%]), pulmonary embolism (three [4%]), bronchitis (two [2%]), atrial fibrillation (two [2%]), and congestive cardiac failure (two [2%]).

INTERPRETATION

Tafasitamab in combination with lenalidomide was well tolerated and resulted in a high proportion of patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma ineligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation having a complete response, and might represent a new therapeutic option in this setting.

FUNDING

MorphoSys.

Fc-engineering significantly improves the recruitment of immune effector cells by anti-ICAM-1 antibody MSH-TP15 for myeloma therapy

Despite several therapeutic advances, patients with multiple myeloma (MM) require additional treatment options since no curative therapy exists yet. In search of a novel therapeutic antibody, we previously applied phage display with myeloma cell screening and developed TP15, a scFv targeting intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1/CD54). To more precisely evaluate the antibody's modes of action, fully human IgG1 antibody variants were generated bearing wild-type (MSH-TP15) or mutated Fc to either enhance (MSH-TP15 Fc-eng.) or prevent (MSH-TP15 Fc k.o.) Fc gamma receptor binding. Especially MSH-TP15 Fc-eng. induced potent antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) against malignant plasma cells by efficiently recruiting NK cells and engaged macrophages for antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) of tumor cells. Binding studies with truncated ICAM-1 demonstrated MSH-TP15 binding to ICAM-1 domain 1-2. Importantly, MSH-TP15 and MSH-TP15 Fc-eng. both prevented myeloma cell engraftment and significantly prolonged survival of mice in an intraperitoneal xenograft model. In the subcutaneous model MSH-TP15 Fc-eng. was superior to MSH-TP15, whereas MSH-TP15 Fc k.o. was not effective in both models - reflecting the importance of Fc-dependent mechanisms of action also in vivo. The efficient recruitment of immune cells and the potent anti-tumor activity of the Fc-engineered MSH-TP15 antibody hold significant potential for myeloma immunotherapy.

Cellular Immunotherapy for Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma in the Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Engineered T Cell Era: Still a Role for Allogeneic Transplantation?

Chimeric antigen receptor-engineered T (CART) cells are a promising new treatment option for patients with multiply relapsed and refractory (R/R) diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Because of the favorable outcome data reported for CART cells, uncertainty is emerging if there is still a role for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in the treatment of R/R DLBCL. This article provides an overview of available evidence and theoretical considerations to put these 2 types of cellular immunotherapy (CI) into perspective. Altogether, current data suggest that CART cells are preferred now over transplantation as first-choice CI in many clinical situations. However, the majority of patients will fail CART therapy, resulting in an unmet medical need where allo-HCT could be beneficial. In contrast, employing allo-HCT instead of CART cells as first CI should be presently restricted to situations where CART cell therapy is deemed not feasible or useful, such as patients with refractory cytopenia or incipient myelodysplastic syndrome. However, allo-HCT remains a standard treatment option as first CI for patients with chemosensitive R/R DLBCL when CARTs are not available or transplantation is preferred by the patient. Continuous collection and analysis of CI outcome data by professional registries appear to be of key importance for developing rational strategies of CI allocation and sequencing.

Advances in targeted therapy for malignant lymphoma

The incidence of lymphoma has gradually increased over previous decades, and it ranks among the ten most prevalent cancers worldwide. With the development of targeted therapeutic strategies, though a subset of lymphoma patients has become curable, the treatment of refractory and relapsed diseases remains challenging. Many efforts have been made to explore new targets and to develop corresponding therapies. In addition to novel antibodies targeting surface antigens and small molecular inhibitors targeting oncogenic signaling pathways and tumor suppressors, immune checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor T-cells have been rapidly developed to target the tumor microenvironment. Although these targeted agents have shown great success in treating lymphoma patients, adverse events should be noted. The selection of the most suitable candidates, optimal dosage, and effective combinations warrant further investigation. In this review, we systematically outlined the advances in targeted therapy for malignant lymphoma, providing a clinical rationale for mechanism-based lymphoma treatment in the era of precision medicine.

Indolent lymphomas: pushing the pace with novel agents

Chemoimmunotherapy has been a hallmark of treatment of indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas for the past 2 decades, with high response rates seen but relapses nearly inevitable and patients spending, on average, 20 years on and off treatment. Treatment advances, then, should be aimed at maintaining efficacy while minimizing toxicity or at achieving cure. Improved understanding of the genetic and molecular features of these diseases, as well as of the interaction between the tumor cell and its immune microenvironment, has resulted in an accelerated expansion of tolerable treatment options for patients, with new combinations of therapy holding promise that definitive therapy in these diseases is possible. These drugs include immunomodulating agents such as lenalidomide, small-molecule inhibitors of the B-cell receptor signaling pathway such as ibrutinib and idelalisib, B-cell lymphoma 2 homology 3 mimetics such as venetoclax, and enhancer of zeste homolog 2 inhibitors such as tazemetostat. Therapies that improve the host immune response against the malignant B cell are also of great interest, given the durable remission seen after allogeneic stem cell transplant in these diseases, and immune checkpoint inhibitors, agonist antibodies against immunostimulatory T-cell receptors, antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies, and finally chimeric antigen receptor T cells are all being investigated, with promising early efficacy signals. These treatments may not necessarily replace chemotherapy but rather augment it in an attempt to improve quality of life and survival for these patients.

Pembrolizumab for the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Introduction: Pembrolizumab is a novel monoclonal antibody that targets the interaction between programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1). Pembrolizumab has shown significant clinical efficacy in Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL), but results in non Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) are mixed. Some NHL subtypes, which share certain genetic features with HL, such as alterations in chromosome 9p24.1 and expression of PD-L1, have shown promising responses in early phase trials. Areas covered: In this review, we provide an overview of pembrolizumab as a compound, and present the available clinical efficacy and safety data in the treatment of diffuse large B cell lymphomas. Expert opinion: Current early phase data suggest that single agent pembrolizumab in NHL demonstrates both efficacy and a favorable safety profile. However, it is anticipated that future treatment strategies will be biomarker-driven and incorporate pembrolizumab into combination therapies with chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy agents.

Emerging therapies for the treatment of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (dlbcl) is an aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma, accounting for approximately 30% of lymphoma cases in Canada. Although most patients will achieve a cure, up to 40% will experience refractory disease after initial treatment, or relapse after a period of remission. In eligible patients, salvage therapy followed by high-dose therapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation (asct) is the standard of care. However, many patients are transplant-ineligible, and more than half of those undergoing asct will subsequently relapse. For those patients, outcomes are dismal, and novel treatment approaches are a critical unmet need. In this paper, we present available data about emerging treatment approaches in the latter setting and provide a perspective about the potential use of those approaches in Canada.

Prognostic Impact of Natural Killer Cell Count in Follicular Lymphoma and Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Patients Treated with Immunochemotherapy

PURPOSE

Natural killer (NK) cells are key effector cells for anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAb), such as obinutuzumab and rituximab. We assessed whether low pretreatment NK-cell count (NKCC) in peripheral blood or tumor tissue was associated with worse outcome in patients receiving antibody-based therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Baseline peripheral blood NKCC was assessed by flow cytometry (CD3^-CD56⁺ and/or CD16⁺ cells) in 1,064 of 1,202 patients with follicular lymphoma treated with obinutuzumab or rituximab plus chemotherapy in the phase III GALLIUM trial (NCT01332968) and 1,287 of 1,418 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with obinutuzumab or rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (G-CHOP or R-CHOP) in the phase III GOYA trial (NCT01287741). The prognostic value of tumor NK-cell gene expression, as assessed by whole-transcriptome gene expression using TruSeq RNA sequencing, was also analyzed. The association of baseline variables, such as treatment arm, was evaluated using multivariate Cox regression models using a stepwise approach.

RESULTS

In this exploratory analysis, low baseline peripheral blood NKCC was associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS) in both follicular lymphoma [hazard ratio (HR), 1.48; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02-2.14; P = 0.04] and DLBCL (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.01-1.83; P = 0.04), and overall survival in follicular lymphoma (HR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.26-3.86; P = 0.0058). Low tumor NK-cell gene expression was associated with shorter PFS in G-CHOP-treated patients with DLBCL (HR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.22-3.15; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that the number of NK cells in peripheral blood may affect the outcome of patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma receiving anti-CD20-based immunochemotherapy.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: 2019 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and treatment

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma originating from the germinal center, and it represents a heterogeneous group of diseases with variable outcomes that are differentially characterized by clinical features, cell of origin (COO), molecular features, and most recently, frequently recurring mutations.

DIAGNOSIS

DLBCL is ideally diagnosed from an excisional biopsy of a suspicious lymph node, which shows sheets of large cells that disrupt the underlying structural integrity of the follicle center and stain positive for pan-B-cell antigens, such as CD20 and CD79a. COO is determined by immunohistochemical stains, while molecular features such as double-hit or triple-hit disease are determined by fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis. Commercial tests for frequently recurring mutations are currently not routinely used to inform treatment.

RISK STRATIFICATION

Clinical prognostic systems for DLBCL, including the rituximab International Prognostic Index, age-adjusted IPI, and NCCN-IPI, use clinical factors for the risk stratification of patients, although this does not affect the treatment approach. Furthermore, DLBCL patients with non-germinal center B-cell (GCB)-like DLBCL (activated B-cell like and unclassifiable) have a poorer response to up-front chemoimmunotherapy (CI) compared to patients with GCB-like DLBCL. Those with c-MYC-altered disease alone and in combination with translocations in BCL2 and/or BCL6 (particularly when the MYC translocation partner is immunoglobulin) respond poorly to up-front CI and salvage autologous stem cell transplant at relapse.

RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY

This review will focus on differential treatment of DLBCL up-front and at the time of relapse by COO and molecular features.

The novel CD19-targeting antibody-drug conjugate huB4-DGN462 shows improved anti-tumor activity compared to SAR3419 in CD19-positive lymphoma and leukemia models

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) are a novel way to deliver potent cytotoxic compounds to cells expressing a specific antigen. Four ADC targeting CD19, including SAR3419 (coltuximab ravtansine), have entered clinical development. Here, we present huB4-DGN462, a novel ADC based on the SAR3419 anti-CD19 antibody linked via sulfo-SPDB to the potent DNA-alkylating agent DGN462. huB4-DGN462 had improved in vitro anti-proliferative and cytotoxic activity compared to SAR3419 across multiple B-cell lymphoma and human acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell lines. In vivo experiments using lymphoma xenografts models confirmed the in vitro data. The response of B-cell lymphoma lines to huB4-DGN462 was not correlated with CD19 expression, the presence of BCL2 or MYC translocations, TP53 inactivation or lymphoma histology. In conclusion, huB4-DGN462 is an attractive candidate for clinical investigation in patients with B-cell malignancies.

Treatment of aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma beyond frontline therapy in patients not eligible for stem cell transplantation: a structured review

Aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (aNHL) accounts for ∼50% of all NHL cases. The only potentially curative, broadly available treatment for patients with relapse, failing frontline treatment, is high-dose therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT); patients ineligible for/who have failed ASCT have limited standard-of-care options. We conducted a structured review of treatments for relapsed/refractory patients with aNHL based on literature published between 2006 and 2017. Of the 22 publications identified for inclusion, most described phase II, single-arm trials (N = 25-217), and only three were randomized studies (phase II [N = 96], phase II/III [N = 111] and phase III [N = 338]). The majority of treatments evaluated resulted in only modest efficacy (median progression-free survival, 2.1-20.0 months) and ultimately poor health outcomes (median overall survival, 25 weeks-15.5 months). In conclusion, there is an unmet need for novel, effective, and tolerable treatments for patients with relapsed/refractory aNHL who are ineligible for/have failed ASCT.

Novel therapies for relapsed/refractory aggressive lymphomas

Most patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma will be cured with initial chemoimmunotherapy; however, most patients with relapsed disease will not be cured and will die as a result of their disease. In these cases, continued treatment with conventional chemotherapy is typically not of benefit and can contribute to significant toxicities and decreased quality of life for patients. Fortunately, a number of therapies are currently available or under investigation for this group of patients, ranging from oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting multiple pathways within the malignant cells to adoptive cellular therapies that harness the patient's immune system to fight disease. Additionally, many agents that are modestly effective as monotherapies can be safely combined with additional novel and conventional therapies to improve response rates and duration. Chimeric antigen receptor T cells are among the most promising group of therapies and provide the potential for cure for patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma. In this chapter, we will review the currently available novel treatments as well as those still under investigation and discuss the most appropriate approach to patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive lymphoma. We will highlight the challenges associated with these therapies, as well as potential toxicities, and the need for additional clinical trials evaluating combinations and newer treatments.

High-affinity CD16-polymorphism and Fc-engineered antibodies enable activity of CD16-chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells for cancer therapy

BACKGROUND

CD16-chimeric antigen receptors (CAR) T cells recognise the Fc-portion of therapeutic antibodies, which can enable the selective targeting of different antigens. Limited evidence exists as to which CD16-CAR design and antibody partner might be most effective. We have hypothesised that the use of high-affinity CD16 variants, with increased Fc-terminus antibody affinity, combined with Fc-engineered antibodies, would provide superior CD16-CAR T cell efficacy.

METHODS

CD16-CAR T (wild-type or variants) cells were co-cultured with Panc-1 pancreatic cancer, Raji lymphoma or A375 melanoma cells in the presence or absence of anti-CD20, anti-MCSP, wild-type or the glycoengineered antibody variants. The endpoints were proliferation, activation, and cytotoxicity in vitro.

RESULTS

The CD16 158 V variant of CD16-CAR T cells showed increased cytotoxic activity against all the tested cancer cells in the presence of the wild-type antibody directed against MCSP or CD20. Glycoengineered antibodies enhanced CD16-CAR T cell activity irrespective of CD16 polymorphisms as compared with the wild-type antibody. The combination of the glycoengineered antibodies with the CD16-CAR 158 V variant synergised as seen by the increase in all endpoints.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that CD16-CAR with the high-affinity CD16 variant 158 V, combined with Fc-engineered antibodies, have high anti-tumour efficacy.

Through the barricades: overcoming the barriers to effective antibody-based cancer therapeutics

Since the turn of the century, cancer therapy has undergone a transformation in terms of new treatment modalities and renewed optimism in achieving long-lived tumor control and even cure. This is, in large part, thanks to the widespread incorporation of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) into standard treatment regimens. These new therapies have, across many settings, significantly contributed to improved clinical responses, patient quality of life and survival. Moreover, the flexibility of the antibody platform has led to the development of a wide range of innovative and combinatorial therapies that continue to augment the clinician's armory. Despite these successes, there is a growing awareness that in many cases mAb therapy remains suboptimal, primarily due to inherent limitations imposed by the immune system's own homeostatic controls and the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Here, we discuss the principal barriers that act to constrain the tumor-killing activity of antibody-based therapeutics, particularly those involving antibody glycans, using illustrative examples from both pre-clinical and market approved mAbs. We also discuss strategies that have been, or are in development to overcome these obstacles. Finally, we outline how the growing understanding of the biological terrain in which mAbs function is shaping innovation and regulation in cancer therapeutics.

How I manage patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma

Despite progress in the upfront treatment of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), patients still experience relapses. Salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard second‐line treatment for relapsed and refractory (R/R) DLBCL. However, half of the patients will not be eligible for transplantation due to ineffective salvage treatment, and the other half will relapse after ASCT. In randomized studies, no salvage chemotherapy regimen is superior to another. The outcomes are affected by the secondary International Prognostic Index at relapse and various biological factors. The strategy is less clear in patients who require third‐line treatment. A multicohort retrospective non‐Hodgkin lymphoma research (SCHOLAR‐1) study conducted in 636 patients with refractory DLBCL showed an objective response rate of 26% (complete response 7%) to the next line of therapy with a median overall survival of 6·3 months. In the case of a response followed by transplantation, long‐term survival can be achieved in DLBCL patients. There is clearly a need for new drugs that improve salvage efficacy. Encouraging results have been reported with chimeric antigen receptor ‐T cell engineering, warranting further studies in a well‐defined control group of refractory patients. The Collaborative Trial in Relapsed Aggressive Lymphoma (CORAL) was used as a handy framework to build the discussion.