Developmental potential of mouse embryos reconstructed from metaphase embryonic stem cell nuclei

Reprogramming of epigenetic inheritance by somatic cell nuclear transfer

Somatic cloning by nuclear transfer returns a differentiated cell to a totipotent stage, a process termed nuclear reprogramming. During this de-differentiation process, genes inactivated during tissue differentiation are re-activated in a temporal and spatial special manner. It is believed that tissue differentiation occurs through epigenetic mechanisms, genetic inheritance that does not involve changes in DNA sequences. Developmental abnormalities and a high mortality rate in cloned offspring have frequently been observed and probably result from incomplete nuclear reprogramming. In this review, the reprogramming of two epigenetic mechanisms, imprinting and X chromosome inactivation, as well as recent attempts to modify pre-existing epigenetic marks in donor cells to improve nuclear transfer efficacy, are discussed.

Improved in vitro development rates of sheep somatic nuclear transfer embryos by using a reverse-order zona-free cloning method

This paper describes a modified zona-free cloning protocol for examining the effects of short-term exposure of donor nuclei to maternal chromosomal components and associated factors. In vitro matured zona-free sheep oocytes were enucleated by micromanipulator-assisted aspiration either before or after fusion with adult fibroblast or granulosa donor cells. Subsequent kinetics of donor nuclei and maternal chromatin as well as in vitro embryo development rates were recorded. The effect of an additional activation stimulus in connection with the reverse-order cloning (fusion before enucleation) and the feasibility of manual enucleation by metal blade were also studied. As a result of the simultaneous fusion and activation, most donor nuclei remained in interphase but swelled in size. Maternal chromosomes reached anaphase II-telophase II stages within 1-2 h of activation, effectively facilitating telophase enucleation with both the micromanipulator-assisted aspiration and manual bisection. A significantly higher development rate to the blastocyst stage was achieved with the reverse-order protocol, suggesting further investigation into the possible role of oocyte nucleus-associated factors in reprogramming is warranted. Overall, the reverse-order zona-free cloning method was efficient in the production of transferable cloned sheep blastocysts and may offer yet another choice of methodology in the practical application of nuclear transfer technology.

Introduction to Cloning by Nuclear Transplantation

Despite its long history, the cloning of animals by nuclear transplantation is going through a "renaissance" after the birth of Dolly. The amount of work and achievements obtained in the last seven years are probably greater than those obtained in half a century of research. However, the principal obstacles outlined years ago with the work on somatic cell cloning in amphybia, are all still there in mammals. The importance of somatic cell nuclear transfer is, without any doubt, beyond the scope of replicating superior animal genotypes. It is an invaluable experimental tool to address fundamental scientific issues such as nuclear potency, cell de-differentiation, chromatin structure and function, epigenetics, and genome manipulation. For these reasons the importance of cloning is not for what it can achieve but for the technical support it can provide to biomedical research and in particular to the study of epigenetics, cancer and stem cell biology, cell therapy and regenerative medicine. In this introductory paper we will summarize the intellectual and technical framework of cloning animals by nuclear transfer that still remains the only absolute way of judging the success of the procedure. Together with the achievements of the recent past we will mention the very last developments and the many questions that still remain open. Current research efforts are expected to provide some answers and certainly new questions.

A Comparison of Established and New Approaches in Ovine and Bovine Nuclear Transfer

Several breakthroughs in nuclear transfer research were first achieved in sheep, although cattle soon became the main livestock species of interest. However, sheep still offer significant advantages both in basic and applied research. With increased interest in cloning of livestock, new approaches have been developed for both sheep and cattle nuclear transfer technology. These include methods for zona-free nuclear transfer that can be performed with or without the use of micromanipulator. Here we describe four different nuclear transfer methods including the traditional micromanipulation-assisted method in sheep, zona-free method in sheep in which the order of enucleation and nucleus delivery have been reversed ("reverse-order" cloning) and zona free manual cloning methods ("hand-made cloning") for embryonic and somatic cloning in cattle. The purpose of this paper is to encourage people to familiarize themselves with these different methods available and to help them choose and test the method most suitable for their particular circumstances.

Cloning animals by somatic cell nuclear transfer--biological factors

Cloning by nuclear transfer using mammalian somatic cells has enormous potential application. However, somatic cloning has been inefficient in all species in which live clones have been produced. High abortion and fetal mortality rates are commonly observed. These developmental defects have been attributed to incomplete reprogramming of the somatic nuclei by the cloning process. Various strategies have been used to improve the efficiency of nuclear transfer, however, significant breakthroughs are yet to happen. In this review we will discuss studies conducted, in our laboratories and those of others, to gain a better understanding of nuclear reprogramming. Because cattle are a species widely used for nuclear transfer studies, and more laboratories have succeeded in cloning cattle than any other species, this review will be focused on somatic cell cloning of cattle.

Nuclear transfer: progress and quandaries

Cloning mammals by nuclear transfer is a powerful technique that is quickly advancing the development of genetically defined animal models. However, the overall efficiency of nuclear transfer is still very low and several hurdles remain before the power of this technique will be fully harnessed. Among these hurdles include an incomplete understanding of biologic processes that control epigenetic reprogramming of the donor genome following nuclear transfer. Incomplete epigenetic reprogramming is considered the major cause of the developmental failure of cloned embryos and is frequently associated with the disregulation of specific genes. At present, little is known about the developmental mechanism of reconstructed embryos. Therefore, screening strategies to design nuclear transfer protocols that will mimic the epigenetic remodeling occurring in normal embryos and identifying molecular parameters that can assess the developmental potential of pre-implantation embryos are becoming increasingly important. A crucial need at present is to understand the molecular events required for efficient reprogramming of donor genomes after nuclear transfer. This knowledge will help to identify the molecular basis of developmental defects seen in cloned embryos and provide methods for circumventing such problems associated with cloning the future application of this technology.

Progress toward generating a ferret model of cystic fibrosis by somatic cell nuclear transfer

Mammalian cloning by nuclear transfer from somatic cells has created new opportunities to generate animal models of genetic diseases in species other than mice. Although genetic mouse models play a critical role in basic and applied research for numerous diseases, often mouse models do not adequately reproduce the human disease phenotype. Cystic fibrosis (CF) is one such disease. Targeted ablation of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene in mice does not adequately replicate spontaneous bacterial infections observed in the human CF lung. Hence, several laboratories are pursuing alternative animal models of CF in larger species such as the pig, sheep, rabbits, and ferrets. Our laboratory has focused on developing the ferret as a CF animal model. Over the past few years, we have investigated several experimental parameters required for gene targeting and nuclear transfer (NT) cloning in the ferret using somatic cells. In this review, we will discuss our progress and the hurdles to NT cloning and gene-targeting that accompany efforts to generate animal models of genetic diseases in species such as the ferret.

Effects of donor oocytes and culture conditions on development of cloned mice embryos

Mice have been successfully cloned from somatic and embryonic stem (ES) cells using the "Honolulu method." In the present study, different donor oocytes and different culture conditions were compared to evaluate the developmental potential of nuclear transfer embryos reconstructed with an inbred ES cell line HM-1. Oocytes were recovered from two different F1 donors B6D2F1 (C57BL/6 x DBA/2) and B6CBAF1 (C57BL/6 x CBA). There was no effect of oocyte origin on development of cloned embryos to the morulae/blastocyst stage (B6D2F1 44.1% vs. B6CBAF1 45.0%), and the transferred embryos could develop to term. Two culture conditions were compared to show their ability to support development to the morulae/blastocyst stage of reconstructed embryos with B6D2F1 oocytes. The total cell number in the cloned blastocysts cultured in M16 with 20% oxygen was much higher than that observed in CZB with 20% oxygen. Low oxygen concentration during culture of nuclear transfer embryos in CZB medium showed no beneficial effect on pre-implantation development, no embryos developed to term after transfer to surrogate mothers. Our results demonstrated that not only B6D2F1, but B6CBAF1 oocytes, can be used for nuclear transfer. M16 medium is superior for culture of nuclear transfer embryos and low oxygen concentration with CZB medium during culture shows no benefit on development of cloned embryos.

Reprogramming in nuclear transfer

Reprogramming a nucleus by transferring it to oocyte cytoplasm triggers epigenetic changes that eventually lead to the restoration of a totipotent state and the birth of a viable animal. A simplified way of studying this complex process is to study cell hybrids. These studies suggest that the pluripotent character of one nucleus is dominant over that of the other nucleus. The development of nuclear transfer embryos shows that there are several restriction points and that the extra-embryonic lineages may be the primary source of death. Successful reprogramming depends on the balance between epigenetic modifications and the regulative properties of development.

Nuclear cloning, stem cells, and genomic reprogramming

The generation of adult animals by nuclear cloning from adult donor cells is extremely inefficient, with most clones dying soon after implantation. In contrast, cloning from embryonic stem cell donor nuclei is significanty more efficient than from adult donor cells. However, regardless of donor cell type, all clones that survive to birth and beyond suffer serious phenotypic and gene expression abnormalities. All available evidence is consistent with the notion that the anomalous phenotypes of cloned animals are caused by faulty epigenetic reprogramming of the donor nucleus. Faulty reprogramming appears to be caused by the cloning process itself as well as by the epigenetic state of the donor nucleus. In contrast to reproductive cloning, faulty reprogramming of the donor nucleus does not tend to interfere with the application of nuclear transfer technology for therapeutic purposes (therapeutic cloning).

Chromatin as a regulative architecture of the early developmental functions of mammalian embryos after fertilization or nuclear transfer

Nuclear transfer of a somatic nucleus into an enucleated oocyte has demonstrated in several mammalian species that the chromatin of a differentiated nucleus can be reprogrammed so as to be able to direct the full development of the reconstructed embryo. This review focus on the timing of the early events that allow the return of somatic chromatin to a totipotent state. Our understanding of the modifications associated with chromatin remodeling is limited by the low amount of biological material available in mammals at early developmental stages and the fact that very few genetic studies have been conducted with nuclear transfer embryos. However, the importance of several factors such as the covalent modifications of DNA through the methylation of CpG dinucleotides, the exchange of histones through a reorganized nuclear membrane, and the interaction between cytoplasmic oocyte components and nuclear complexes in the context of nuclear transfer is becoming clear. A better characterization of the changes in somatic chromatin after nuclear transfer and the identification of oocyte factors or structures that govern the formation of a functional nucleus will help us to understand the relationship between chromatin structure and cellular totipotency.

Cloned mice derived from embryonic stem cell karyoplasts and activated cytoplasts prepared by induced enucleation

Our objective was to induce enucleation (IE) of activated mouse oocytes to yield cytoplasts capable of supporting development following nuclear transfer. Fluorescence microscopy for microtubules, microfilaments, and DNA was used to evaluate meiotic resumption after ethanol activation and the effect of subsequent transient treatments with 0.4 micro g/ml of demecolcine. Using oocytes from B6D2F1 (C57BL/6 x DBA/2) donors, the success of IE of chromatin into polar bodies (PBs) was dependent on the duration of demecolcine treatment and the time that such treatment was initiated after activation. Similarly, variations in demecolcine treatment altered the proportions of oocytes exhibiting a reversible compartmentalization of chromatin into PBs. Treatment for 15 min begun immediately after activation yielded an optimized IE rate of 21% (n = 80) when oocytes were evaluated after overnight recovery in culture. With this protocol, 30-50% of oocytes were routinely scored as compartmentalized when assessed 90 min postactivation. No oocytes could be scored as such following overnight recovery, with 66% of treated oocytes cleaving to the 2-cell stage (n = 80). Activated cytoplasts were prepared by mechanical removal of PBs from oocytes whose chromatin had undergone IE or compartmentalization. These cytoplasts were compared with mechanically enucleated, metaphase (M) II cytoplasts whose activation was delayed in nuclear transfer experiments using HM-1 embryonic stem cells. Using oocytes from either B6D2F1 or B6CBAF1 (C57BL/6 x CBA) donors, the in vitro development of cloned embryos using activated cytoplasts was consistently inferior to that observed using MII cytoplasts. Live offspring were derived from both oocyte strains using the latter, whereas a single living mouse was cloned from activated B6CBAF1 cytoplasts.

Effect of cell confluence on production of cloned mice using an inbred embryonic stem cell line

Mice have been successfully cloned from both somatic cells and hybrid embryonic stem (ES) cells. Heterozygosity of the donor ES cell genome has been suggested as a crucial factor for long-term survival of cloned mice. In the present study, an inbred ES cell line, HM-1 (129/Ola), and a well-tested ES cell line, R1 (129/Sv x 129/Sv-CP), were used as donor cells to evaluate the developmental potential of nuclear transfer embryos. We found that ES cell confluence dramatically affects the developmental potential of reconstructed embryos. With the ES cell line HM-1 and 80-90% confluence, 49% of reconstructed embryos developed to the morula/blastocyst stage, 9% of these embryos developed to live pups when transferred to the surrogate mothers, and 5 of 18 live pups survived to adulthood. By contrast, at 60-70% confluence, only 22% of embryos developed to the morula/blastocyst stage, and after transfer, only a single fetus reached term. Consistent with previous reports, the nuclei of R1 ES cells were also shown to direct development to term, but no live pups were derived from cells at later passages (>20). Our results show that the developmental potential of reconstructed embryos is determined by both cell confluence and cell passage. These results also demonstrate that the inbred ES cell line, HM-1, can be used to produce viable cloned mice, although less efficiently than most heterozygous ES cell lines.

Donor cells for nuclear cloning: many are called, but few are chosen

The few viable clones obtained at the end of a typical cloning experiment are genetic copies of the donor cell genome of a non-reproductive (somatic) or embryonic cell used for nuclear transfer. Nuclear totipotency has to be reestablished by erasing epigenetic constraints imposed on the donor genome during differentiation in a process which involves active chromatin remodeling. Various donor cell types and cell cycle combinations have proven to be capable of generating cloned offspring. However, an ideal nuclear donor may have not yet been found. This review summarizes current theoretical aspects of donor cell selection. It focuses on the impact of genetic and epigenetic differences between donor cell types on successful mammalian cloning.

Somatic cell nuclear transfer

Cloning by nuclear transfer from adult somatic cells is a remarkable demonstration of developmental plasticity. When a nucleus is placed in oocyte cytoplasm, the changes in chromatin structure that govern differentiation can be reversed, and the nucleus can be made to control development to term.

Novel approaches and hurdles to somatic cloning in cattle

The overall efficiency of somatic cloning in cattle is still low. Many factors are necessary for successful birth of live offspring. Among them, the source of donor cells reveals the importance of the donor genotype but also the influence of the cell line itself. The cell cycle stage has been intensively investigated, and recent results indicate that, in cattle, the G0 stage of the donor nuclei is not a prerequisite for reprogramming, as highly proliferating cultured fibroblasts also result in live offspring after nuclear transfer. A technical approach using direct microinjection of fibroblast nuclei, instead of fusion of the whole cell, has proved to result in high in vitro development rates in cattle. However, full-term development of somatic cloned embryos is still limited by long-lasting effects and a high incidence of losses at periimplantation time (as well as in late gestation and around calving).

Somatic cell nuclear transfer: recent progress and challenges

Somatic cell nuclear transfer (NT) offers new and exciting opportunities in many areas of research and biotechnology. However, the field as a whole is still in its infancy, with continuing inefficiencies in the process proving many early expectations premature. The technical steps of NT are complex, and success is highly susceptible to minor variations. Furthermore, the biological process of reprogramming is not fully understood, making it difficult to optimize the protocols for providing ideal recipient oocytes and donor cells. In this paper, we describe recent advances and novel approaches, which resulted in progress during the last year, including the birth of cloned piglets and farm animals with precise genetic changes. Key problems hindering further progress are addressed.

Dependence of DNA synthesis and in vitro development of bovine nuclear transfer embryos on the stage of the cell cycle of donor cells and recipient cytoplasts

The effect of the stage of the cell cycle of donor cells and recipient cytoplasts on the timing of DNA replication and the developmental ability in vitro of bovine nuclear transfer embryos was examined. Embryos were reconstructed by fusing somatic cells with unactivated recipient cytoplasts or with recipient cytoplasts that were activated 2 h before fusion. Regardless of whether recipient cytoplasts were unactivated or activated, the embryos that were reconstructed from donor cells at the G0 phase initiated DNA synthesis at 6-9 h postfusion (hpf). The timing of DNA synthesis was similar to that of parthenogenetic embryos, and was earlier than that of the G0 cells in cell culture condition. Most embryos that were reconstructed from donor cells at the G1/S phase initiated DNA synthesis within 6 hpf. The developmental rate of embryos reconstructed by a combination of G1/S cells and activated cytoplasts was higher than the rates of embryos in the other combination of donor cells and recipient cytoplasts. The results suggest that the initial DNA synthesis of nuclear transfer embryos is affected by the state of the recipient oocytes, and that the timing of initiation of the DNA synthesis depends on the donor cell cycle. Our results also suggest that the cell cycles of somatic cells synchronized in the G1/S phase and activated cytoplasts of recipient oocytes are well coordinated after nuclear transfer, resulting in high developmental rates of nuclear transfer embryos to the blastocyst stage in vitro.

Transgenic pig expressing the enhanced green fluorescent protein produced by nuclear transfer using colchicine-treated fibroblasts as donor cells

Fetal-derived fibroblast cells were transduced with replication defective vectors containing the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP). The transgenic cells were treated with colchicine, which theoretically would synchronize the cells into G2/M stage, and then used as donor nuclei for nuclear transfer. The donor cells were transferred into the perivitalline space of enucleated in vitro matured porcine oocytes, and fused and activated with electrical pulses. A total of 8.3% and 28.6% of reconstructed oocytes showed nuclear envelope breakdown and premature chromosome condensation 0.5 and 2 hr after activation, respectively. Percentage of pronuclear formation was 62.5, 12 hr after activation. Most (91.4%) of the 1-cell embryos with pronuclei did not extrude a polar body. Most (77.2%) embryos on day 5 were diploid. Within 2 hr after fusion, strong fluorescence was detectable in most reconstructed oocytes (92.3%). The fluorescence in all NT embryos became weak 15 hr after fusion and disappeared when culture to 48 hr. But from day 3, cleaved embryos at the 2- to 4-cell stage started to express EGFP again. On day 7, 85.8% of cleaved embryos expressed EGFP. A total of 9.4% of reconstructed embryos developed to blastocyst stage and 71.5% of the blastoctysts expressed EGFP. After 200 reconstructed 1-cell stage embryos were transferred into four surrogate gilts, three recipients were found to be pregnant. One of them maintained to term and delivered a healthy transgenic piglet expressing EGFP. Our data suggest that the combination of transduction of somatic cells by a replication defective vector with the nuclear transfer of colchicine-treated donors is an alternative to produce transgenic pigs. Furthermore, the tissues expressing EGFP from descendents of this pig may be very useful in future studies using pigs that require genetically marked cells.

Production of cloned pigs from cultured fetal fibroblast cells

Somatic cell nuclear transfer was used to produce live piglets from cultured fetal fibroblast cells. This was achieved by exposing donor cell nuclei to oocyte cytoplasm for approximately 3 h before activation by chemical means. Initially, an experiment was performed to optimize a cell fusion system that prevented concurrent activation in the majority of recipient cytoplasts. Cultured fibroblast cells were fused in medium with or without calcium into enucleated oocytes flushed from superovulated gilts. Cybrids fused in the presence of calcium cleaved at a significantly (P < 0.05) greater rate (69%, 37 out of 54) after 2 days of culture compared with those fused without calcium (10%, 7 out of 73), suggesting that calcium-free conditions are needed to avoid activation in the majority of recipient cytoplasts during fusion. In the second experiment, cybrids fused in calcium-free medium were activated approximately 3 h later with ionomycin, followed by incubation in 6-dimethylaminopurine to determine development in vitro. Following 2 days of culture, cleavage rates of chemically activated and unactivated cybrids (fusion without activation control) were 93% (100 out of 108) and 7% (2 out of 27), respectively. After an additional 5 days of culture, activated cloned embryos formed blastocysts at a rate of 23% (25 out of 108) with an average inner cell mass and trophectoderm cell number of 10 (range, 3 to 38) and 31 (range, 16 to 58), respectively. In the third experiment, activated nuclear transfer embryos were transferred to the uteri of synchronized recipients after 3 days of culture to assess their development in vivo. Of 10 recipients receiving an average of 80 cleaved embryos (range, 40 to 107), 5 became pregnant (50%) as determined by ultrasound between Day 25 and Day 35 of gestation. Of the five pregnant recipients, two subsequently farrowed one piglet per litter originating from two different cell culture lines. In this study, efficient reprogramming of porcine donor nuclei by fusing cells in the absence of calcium followed by chemical activation of recipient cytoplasts was reflected in high rates of development to blastocyst and pregnancy initiation leading to full term development.

Nuclear transfer technologies: between successes and doubts

Cloning of mammals by nuclear transfer can lead to the birth of healthy adult animals but more often compromises the development of the reconstructed embryos. A high incidence of fetal and postnatal losses has been observed in several species, revealing the existence of long-lasting effects induced by the nuclear transfer procedures. Remodeling of donor chromatin by the recipient cytoplasm after nuclear transfer is frequently associated with the deregulation of specific genes, and recent observations point to the potential importance of time-dependent DNA methylation events in the occurrence of these alterations. Screening strategies to design nuclear transfer procedures that would mimic the epigenetic remodeling occurring in normal embryos are being designed, and improvement in the efficiency of procedures could imply a pre-conditioning of donor cells. Early mammalian development appears to be rather tolerant to epigenetic abnormalities, raising the possibility that even a fully functional reprogrammed genome may have been subjected to some epigenetic alterations. Bringing nuclear transfer to routine practice requires greater knowledge and understanding of the basic biological processes underlying epigenetic controls of nuclear activities. An important issue at present is to limit the production of those aberrant phenotypes that may result in significant insult to the nature and welfare of animals.

Progress in producing knockout models for xenotransplantation by nuclear transfer

The pig is thought to be the most suitable non-human organ source for xenotransplantation. However, one of the major constraints to using pig organs for xenotransplantation is human natural antibody-mediated hyperacute rejection (HAR). Elimination of alpha(1, 3) galactosyltransferase (GGTA1) from the pig is expected to be a solution to the problem of hyperacute and delayed vascular rejection. Based on the extensive efforts made in characterization of GGTA1 in structure and function, improvement in the technique of DNA transfection of somatic cells and optimization of the pig nuclear transfer (NT) procedures, a specific modification has been made to one copy of the GGTA1 gene thus rendering it non-functional. When homozygosity of the genetic modification is achieved, this will allow concentrated efforts to address the role of galalpha(1, 3) gal specific natural antibody in HAR, acute vascular rejection and to examine the efficacy of xenotransplantation in a non-human primate model without HAR confounding the experiments. Since swine are widely used as models of human disease, the ability to make specific genetic modifications to swine as described here is predicted to have a large impact not only on production agriculture but also on biomedicine.