The effect of spatial and temporal information on saccades and neural activity in oculomotor structures

Cognitive influences on predictive saccadic tracking

We have investigated the effects of mental set on predictive capabilities using a saccade square-wave tracking paradigm with ten normal subjects, comparing three amplitudes (10, 20, and 40 degrees ) and five inter-stimulus intervals (ISIs) (400, 500, 625, 1000, and 2000 ms). Subjects were instructed simply to "follow the lights" (passive, reflexive instruction) or explicitly "move your eyes in time with the lights" (active, volitional instruction). Saccades were defined as reflexive (latency>100 ms), predictive (-200 ms<latency<100 ms), or anticipatory (latency<-200 ms). We also calculated arrival time (saccade latency+saccade duration). Instructions had a striking effect on predictive performance. The effects were greatest with the longest ISIs (1000 and 2000 ms) and the largest target displacement (40 degrees ). With the active instruction there were more predictive and anticipatory saccades and with the passive instruction more reflexive saccades. Furthermore, with the active instruction subjects could take into account the duration of the impending saccade so that the eyes would arrive closer to the appearance of the target no matter what the amplitude of the required saccade. In sum, cognitive set, as determined by the specific instructions given to the subject, has a striking effect on predictive saccade behavior, which has important implications for interpreting physiological and imaging correlates of predictive behavior in normals and in patients with neurological disease.

Cortical regions involved in eye movements, shifts of attention, and gaze perception

Human vision is an active process that involves shifting attention across the visual scene, with or without moving the eyes. Such shifts of attention can be generated at will (endogenously) or be triggered automatically, i.e., generated in response to exogenous stimuli including socially relevant cues such as someone else's gaze. What are the common and distinct brain mechanisms involved in these processes? To address this question, we carried out a quantitative effect-location meta-analysis of 59 brain-imaging experiments whose results were published using standardized coordinates. For each condition of interest, namely voluntary and visually triggered eye movements, voluntary and visually triggered (covert) shifts of attention, and perception of someone else's gaze, we computed activation likelihood estimation (ALE) maps. Those maps represent at each voxel of the brain the probability of reporting a signal change related to the condition of interest. For eye movements, this analysis confirmed the spatial location of the frontal eye fields, supplementary eye fields, and parietal saccade-related regions. The map of covert shifts of attention demonstrated highest similarity with the map of saccadic eye movements. Gaze perception showed common activation likelihood with the other conditions in the right intraparietal sulcus and in the lateral precentral gyrus. It demonstrated more similarity with the reflexive than with the voluntary saccades and shifts of attention. We propose that a core network of frontoparietal and temporal brain regions is recruited when we shift the focus of our attention with or without eye movements in response to the appearance of a visual target, as well as when we see someone else shift his or her gaze.

Sequences of predictive eye movements form a fractional Brownian series--implications for self-organized criticality in the oculomotor system

When human subjects are presented with a pair of visual targets that alternate periodically, they track the targets with rapid eye movements known as saccades. In previous work we demonstrated that at low pacing rates (<0.5 Hz), saccades have a latency of about 180 ms, and the latencies are uncorrelated from trial to trial. At high pacing rates (>0.6 Hz), latencies are much shorter: subjects make predictive saccades that anticipate target motion. The predictive latencies are correlated and appear to form a fractional Brownian motion. Here we confirm this finding by examining the rate of decay of nonlinear forecasting of predictive latencies. We further characterize the nature of predictive saccade latencies through the use of detrended fluctuation analysis and surrogate data. These results lead us to conclude that predictive saccades may exhibit a form of self-organized criticality, which enables rapid response to changes in stimulus timing. We provide an experimental demonstration of this.

Executive functions and methylphenidate response in subtypes of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

BACKGROUND

Oculomotor tasks are a well-established means of studying executive functions and frontal-striatal functioning in both nonhuman primates and humans. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is thought to implicate frontal-striatal circuitry. We used oculomotor tests to investigate executive functions and methylphenidate response in two subtypes of ADHD.

METHODS

Subjects were boys, aged 11.5-14 years, with ADHD-combined (n = 10), ADHD-inattentive (n = 12), and control subjects (n = 10). Executive functions assessed were motor planning (tapped with predictive saccades), response inhibition (antisaccades), and task switching (saccades-antisaccades mixed).

RESULTS

The ADHD-combined boys were impaired relative to control subjects in motor planning (p < .003) and response inhibition (p < .007) but not in task switching (p > .92). They were also significantly impaired relative to ADHD-inattentive boys, making fewer predictive saccades (p < .03) and having more subjects with antisaccade performance in the impaired range (p < .04). Methylphenidate significantly improved motor planning and response inhibition in both subtypes.

CONCLUSIONS

ADHD-combined but not ADHD-inattentive boys showed impairments on motor planning and response inhibition. These deficits might be mediated by brain structures implicated specifically in the hyperactive/impulsive symptoms. Methylphenidate improved oculomotor performance in both subtypes; thus, it was effective even when initial performance was not impaired.

Functional Neuroanatomy of Anticipatory Behavior: Dissociation between Sensory-driven and Memory-driven Systems

The ability to anticipate predictable stimuli allows faster responses. The predictive saccade (PRED) task has been shown to quickly induce such anticipatory behavior in humans. In a PRED task subjects track a visual target jumping back and forth between fixed positions at a fixed time interval. During this task, saccade latencies drop from approximately 200 ms to <80 ms as subjects anticipate target appearance. This change in saccade latency indicates that subjects' behavior shifts from being sensory driven to being memory driven. We conducted functional magnetic resonance imaging studies with 10 healthy adults performing the PRED task using a standard block design. We compared the PRED task with a visually guided saccade (VGS) task using unpredictable targets matched for number, direction and amplitude of required saccades. Our results show greater activation during the PRED task in the prefrontal, pre-supplementary motor and anterior cingulate cortices, hippocampus, mediodorsal thalamus, striatum and cerebellum. The VGS task elicited greater activation in the cortical eye fields and occipital cortex. These results demonstrate the important dissociation between sensory and predictive neural control of similar saccadic eye movements. Anticipatory behavior induced by the PRED task required less sensory-related processing activity and was subserved by a distributed cortico-subcortical memory system including prefronto-striatal circuitry.

Sequences of predictive saccades are correlated over a span of approximately 2 s and produce a fractal time series

We previously demonstrated that there is an abrupt (rather than smooth) transition between reactive and predictive modes of eye-movement tracking of target lights (a phase transition). We also found evidence that the sequence of eye movements in the reactive mode was independent, whereas those in the predictive mode were correlated and possibly formed a random fractal sequence. Here we confirm the finding of fractal structure by quantifying the rate of decay of nonlinear forecasting when applied to these data. We also estimate the window over which consecutive trials are correlated and show that the duration of this window is fixed in time rather than number of trials. These results have implications for the neural mechanisms that drive predictive movements.

Eye movement control by the cerebral cortex

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review focuses on eye movement control by the cerebral cortex, mainly in humans. Data have emerged based on the important contribution of recent techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional magnetic resonance imaging, which provide complementary results to those of the classical lesion and electrical stimulation studies.

RECENT FINDINGS

The location of the human frontal eye field and its role in pursuit eye movement control were recently detailed. Cumulative evidence for the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in unwanted reflexive saccade inhibition, short-term spatial memory and prediction suggests that this area controls decisional processes governing ocular motor behaviour. The organization of spatial memory in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (short-term), the parahippocampal cortex (medium-term) and the hippocampal formation (long-term) is also reviewed with the results of recent transcranial magnetic stimulation studies. The relatively complicated anatomy of the posterior parietal cortex in humans is briefly described followed by some additional results concerning the location of the parietal eye field - within the posterior half of the intraparietal sulcus - and its role in visuo-spatial integration and attention. The other areas involved in spatial attention are also examined in the light of several recent contributing reports. Lastly, there are also new functional magnetic resonance imaging findings concerning the posterior cingulate cortex, which appears to be mainly involved in the control of externally guided eye movements and attentional mechanisms.

SUMMARY

Many new findings on the organization of saccades and pursuit eye movements at the cortical level have recently been reported. Furthermore, eye movements are increasingly used as a tool to elucidate relatively complex neuropsychological processes such as attention, spatial memory, motivation and decisional processes, and a considerable number of reports dealing with these questions have been observed.

The encoding of saccadic eye movements within human posterior parietal cortex

Over the last few years, several functionally distinct subregions of the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) have been shown to subserve oculomotor control. Since these areas seem to overlap with regions whose activation is related to attention, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to compare the cerebral activation pattern evoked by eye movements with different attentional loads, i.e., oscillatory saccades with different frequencies, as well as predictable, and unpredictable saccades. Our results show activation in largely overlapping networks with differing strength of activity and symmetry of involved areas. Predictable saccades having the shortest saccadic latency led to the most pronounced cerebral activity both in terms of cortical areas involved and signal intensity. Predictable and unpredictable saccades were dominated by activation within the right hemisphere, whereas oscillatory saccades showing the longest saccadic latency were dominated by activation within the left hemisphere. In all tasks, the centers of gravity of activation occurred within the posterior part of the intraparietal sulcus (IPS), while the predictable saccades additionally activated its anterior part. The enhanced activity during the execution of predictable saccades was probably related to top-down processing and/or the preparation of the upcoming eye movement. The hemispheric difference could arise from a predominant role of the right PPC for shifting spatial attention and the left PPC for shifting temporal attention. The differential encoding of saccadic eye movements within IPS indicates that the PPC splits up into different functional modules related to the particular demands of a saccade.

Cytoarchitecture and cortical connections of the posterior cingulate and adjacent somatosensory fields in the rhesus monkey

The cytoarchitecture and connections of the caudal cingulate and medial somatosensory areas were investigated in the rhesus monkey. There is a stepwise laminar differentiation starting from retrosplenial area 30 towards the isocortical regions of the medial parietal cortex. This includes a gradational emphasis on supragranular laminar organization and general reduction of the infragranular neurons as one proceeds from area 30 toward the medial parietal regions, including areas 3, 1, 2, 5, 31, and the supplementary sensory area (SSA). This trend includes a progressive increase in layer IV neurons. Area 23c in the lower bank and transitional somatosensory area (TSA) in the upper bank of the cingulate sulcus appear as nodal points. From area 23c and TSA the architectonic progression can be traced in three directions: one culminates in areas 3a and 3b (core line), the second in areas 1, 2, and 5 (belt line), and the third in areas 31 and SSA (root line). These architectonic gradients are reflected in the connections of these regions. Thus, cingulate areas (30, 23a, and 23b) are connected with area 23c and TSA on the one hand and have widespread connections with parieto-temporal, frontal, and parahippocampal (limbic) regions on the other. Area 23c has connections with areas 30, 23a and b, and TSA as well as with medial somatosensory areas 3, 1, 2, 5, and SSA. Area 23c also has connections with parietotemporal, frontal, and limbic areas similar to areas 30, 23a, and 23b. Area TSA, like area 23c, has connections with areas 3, 1, 2, 5, and SSA. However, it has only limited connections with the parietotemporal and frontal regions and none with the parahippocampal gyrus. Medial area 3 is mainly connected to medial and dorsal sensory areas 3, 1, 2, 5, and SSA and to areas 4 and 6 as well as to supplementary (M2 or area 6m), rostral cingulate (M3 or areas 24c and d), and caudal cingulate (M4 or areas 23c and d) motor cortices. Thus, in parallel with the architectonic gradient of laminar differentiation, there is also a progressive shift in the pattern of corticocortical connections. Cingulate areas have widespread connections with limbic, parietotemporal, and frontal association areas, whereas parietal area 3 has more restricted connections with adjacent somatosensory and motor cortices. TSA is primarily related to the somatosensory-motor areas and has limited connections with the parietotemporal and frontal association cortices.

Fixation stability and saccadic latency in élite shooters

This study tested the hypothesis that elementary visuo-motor functions involved in visual scanning, as measured by fixation and saccadic tasks, are better in a group of high-level clay target shooters (N=7) than in a control group (N=8). In the fixation task, subject were told to keep fixation as still as possible on a target for 1 min, both in the presence and absence of distracters. For shooters, time did not have an effect on fixation stability, and they had more stable fixation than controls in the distracters condition. Results indicate a difference between groups on both the temporal span of attention and selective attention. In the saccadic task, subjects were asked to saccade, as fast as possible, towards a peripherally displayed target. Two conditions were used: simple reaction to target onset and discrimination between targets and distracters. Shooters had faster saccadic latency to targets than controls in both conditions. Finally, to evaluate the effect of exercise on saccadic latency, we trained one control subject to saccade to a target displayed at a constant spatial position. At the end of the training, saccadic latency reached a value comparable to that recorded in shooters. Learning was largely retinotopic, not showing transfer to untrained spatial positions.