Impact of an evidence-based bundle intervention in the quality-of-care management and outcome of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia

Prediction of mortality in Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection using quick Pitt bacteremia score

OBJECTIVES

The quick Pitt bacteremia score (qPitt) predicts mortality in patients with serious infections due to gram-negative bacteria. This retrospective cohort study examines utility of qPitt to predict mortality in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (SAB).

METHODS

Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine risk factors for 28-day mortality in hospitalized adults with SAB at four Prisma Health hospitals in South Carolina, USA from January 2015 to December 2017. Area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to examine model discrimination.

RESULTS

Among 692 patients with SAB, 305 (44%) had methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), and 129 (19%) died within 28 days. After adjustment for age, comorbidities, and MRSA, each component of the qPitt was associated with 28-day mortality. There was a 3-fold increase in the risk of 28-day mortality for each one-point increase in qPitt. Predicted 28-day mortality was 3%, 9%, 22%, 45%, and 70% for qPitt of 0, 1, 2, 3, and ≥4, respectively. AUROC of the qPitt in predicting 28-day, 14-day, and in-hospital mortality were 0.80, 0.81, and 0.80, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The qPitt predicts mortality with good discrimination in SAB. These results support using qPitt as a measure of acute severity of illness in future studies.

The Impact of a Pharmacist-Driven Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia Initiative in a Community Hospital: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

Purpose: Staphylococcus aureus is a leading cause of bacteremia with a 30-day mortality of 20%. This study evaluated outcomes after implementation of a pharmacist-driven Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) initiative in a community hospital. Methods: This retrospective cohort analysis compared patients admitted with SAB between May 2015 and April 2018 (intervention group) to those admitted between May 2012 and April 2015 (historical control group). Pharmacists were notified of and responded to blood cultures positive for Staphylococcus aureus by contacting provider(s) with a bundle of recommendations. Components of the SAB bundle included prompt source control, selection of appropriate intravenous antibiotics, appropriate duration of therapy, repeat blood cultures, echocardiography, and infectious diseases consult. Demographics (age, gender, and race) were collected at baseline. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Compliance with bundle components was also assessed. Results: Eighty-three patients in the control group and 110 patients in the intervention group were included in this study. Demographics were similar at baseline. In-hospital mortality was lower in the intervention group (3.6% vs. 15.7%; p = 0.0033). Bundle compliance was greater in the intervention group (69.1% vs. 39.8%; p < 0.0001). Conclusions: We observed a significant reduction in in-hospital mortality and increased treatment bundle compliance in the intervention cohort with implementation of a pharmacist-driven SAB initiative. Pharmacists’ participation in the care of SAB patients in the form of recommending adherence to treatment bundle components drastically improved clinical outcomes. Widespread adoption and implementation of similar practice models at other institutions may reduce in-hospital mortality for this relatively common and life-threatening infection.

Antimicrobial Stewardship with and without Infectious Diseases Specialist Services to Improve Quality-of-Care in Secondary and Tertiary Care Hospitals in Germany: Study Protocol of the ID ROLL OUT Study

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs aim to secure the rational prescription of antibiotics through implementing department- or hospital-level activities. Infectious disease (ID) specialists improve the quality of care and outcomes in infection patients predominantly by individual consultations and patient-level interventions. While hospital AMS programs are established to various extents in Germany, ID specialist services are rarely available in this country. In the ID ROLL OUT study, we will implement and evaluate hospital-level AMS tools with and without ID specialist services in secondary and tertiary care hospitals. We aim to identify means to comprehensively and sustainably improve the quality of care of patients with infectious diseases.

METHODS

This project is a clustered, two-armed intervention study, which will be conducted in ten secondary and tertiary (non-university) care hospitals in Germany. The intervention groups are stratified by key characteristics of the hospitals. We will compare two interventional strategies: implementation of AMS teams and implementation of AMS teams combined with the activities of ID specialists (AMS + IDS).

PLANNED OUTCOMES

The primary outcome is the quality of care as measured in changes in a Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) score (as an indicator of difficult-to-treat infections) and a community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) score (as an indicator of common infections) compared to a baseline pre-interventional period. Our secondary outcomes comprise patient- and hospital-level outcomes, such as the quality and frequency of antibiotic treatment, in-hospital mortality, duration of hospitalization, and C. difficile incidence (associated diarrhea episodes). The study may provide urgently needed key information for the aspired advancement of ID care in Germany.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

DRKS00023710 (registered on 9th April 2021).

Readmission after hospitalization with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in children

BACKGROUND

Readmission rate is an important quality measure and can inform patient care. However, readmission of S. aureus bacteremia in children requires further research.

METHODS

We performed a population-based longitudinal observational study using the State Inpatient Database from New York, Florida, and Washington, 2009-2015. Children aged 18 years or younger hospitalized with S. aureus bacteremia were included. The outcome of non-elective readmission was assessed by developing Cox proportional hazards regression models.

RESULTS

Of 1240 children with S. aureus bacteremia, 223 (18.0%) and 351 (28.3%) had non-elective readmission within 30 days and 90 days after discharge, respectively. On multivariable analysis, catheter related infection (hazard ratio, HR: 1.79, 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.31-2.45) was associated with 30-day readmission. The median cost of the original hospitalization for S. aureus bacteremia was $29 914 (interquartile range, IQR: $13 276-$71 284), and that of 30 day readmission was $10 956 (IQR: $5765-$24 753).

CONCLUSIONS

S. aureus bacteremia is associated with a high rate of readmission in children, particularly in those with catheter related infection. Hospitalization with S. aureus bacteremia and readmission are costly. Future research should seek interventions to improve outcomes of S. aureus bacteremia in children, and the results of this study can serve as a benchmark.

Enterococcus faecalis bloodstream infection: does infectious disease specialist consultation make a difference?

PURPOSE

To evaluate the relationship between mortality or relapse of bloodstream infection (BSI) due to Enterococcus faecalis and infectious diseases specialist consultation (IDC) and other factors potentially associated with outcomes.

METHODS

In a tertiary-care center, consecutive adult patients with E. faecalis BSI between January 1, 2016 and January 31, 2019, were prospectively followed. The management of E. faecalis BSI was evaluated in terms of adherence to evidence-based quality-of-care indicators (QCIs). IDC and other factors potentially associated with 90-day-mortality or relapse of E. faecalis BSI were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 151 patients with a median age of 68 years were studied. IDC was performed in 38% of patients with E. faecalis BSI. 30 cases of endocarditis (20%) were diagnosed. All-cause in-hospital mortality was 23%, 90-day mortality was 37%, and 90-day relapsing E. faecalis BSI was 8%. IDC was significantly associated with better adherence to 5 QCIs. Factors significantly associated with 90-day mortality or relapsing EfB in multivariate analysis were severe sepsis or septic shock at onset (HR 4.32, CI 2.36e7.88) and deep-seated focus of infection (superficial focus HR 0.33, CI 0.14e0.76).

CONCLUSION

Enterococcus faecalis bacteremia is associated with a high mortality. IDC contributed to improved diagnostic and therapeutic management.

Impact of a pharmacist-facilitated, evidence-based bundle initiative on Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia management

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a pharmacist-facilitated evidence-based bundle (EBB) initiative with infectious disease consultation (IDC) for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB).

METHODS

This was a before-and-after quasi-experimental study of adult patients with SAB before and after the pharmacist-facilitated EBB initiative, which included IDC, timely definitive antibiotics, source control, echocardiography, and repeat blood cultures.

RESULTS

Ninety and 111 patients were included in pre- and post-intervention cohorts, respectively. We observed significant increases in adherence to all 5 (4.4% vs 68.5%, P < 0.001) and 4 (10.0% vs 76.6%, P < 0.001) EBB elements. Time to definitive antibiotics (48 vs 16 hours, P < 0.001), time to IDC (43.5 vs 32 hours, P < 0.001), SAB duration (95 vs 66 hours, P = 0.009), persistent SAB (18.9% vs 9.0%, P = 0.041), and length of stay (14 vs 13 days, P = 0.027) also improved. No statistically significant differences for SAB-related readmission or all-cause mortality were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Our pharmacist-facilitated SAB initiative was associated with improved EBB adherence and clinical outcomes.

"Mortality in Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia remains high despite adherence to quality indicators: secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study"

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the association between compliance with previously published quality indicators (QIs) for the management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) and 30-day mortality.

METHODS

We conducted a post hoc analysis of all adult patients with SAB who were hospitalized at a Spanish university hospital between 2013 and 2018. We evaluated the compliance with 7 QIs of SAB management (i.e., Infectious Diseases consultation, follow-up blood cultures, early source control, echocardiography, early cloxacillin or cefazolin, vancomycin monitoring, and appropriate treatment duration). The QIs compliance rate was considered good if ≥75% of the QIs recommended in each patient were performed. We studied the impact of different risk factors (including QIs compliance) on 30-day all-cause mortality adjusting by multivariable modeling and propensity-matched analysis.

RESULTS

We included 441 patients with SAB. The QIs compliance rate was ≥75% in 361 patients (81.9%). A total of 95 patients (21.5%) died within 30 days after the index blood culture. In the multivariable model, the variables associated with 30-day mortality were: age (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.1), Charlson comorbidity index (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.4), persistent bacteraemia >72 h (OR, 6.0; 95% CI, 3.2-11.5), infective endocarditis (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.2-6.7), and SAB of unknown source (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.5-7.1). We did not find an association between a global QIs compliance rate of ≥75% or any individual QI with 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

SAB 30-day mortality remains high despite good adherence to previously published QIs for the management of SAB. Future research should focus on additional factors to further improve SAB-related mortality.

The Effect of Combination Therapy on Mortality and Adverse Events in Patients with Staphylococcus aureus Bacteraemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Introduction

The findings of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, and meta-analyses vary regarding the effectiveness and safety of combination therapy for patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB). We aimed to identify the effectiveness and safety of combination therapy in patients with SAB compared with those of monotherapy.

Methods

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare combination therapy versus monotherapy in patients with SAB. Two authors independently searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library of clinical trials until 17 February 2021. Any RCT comparing mortality or adverse events (AEs) of combination therapy versus monotherapy for patients with SAB was eligible. Summary risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were evaluated using a random-effects model. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at any time point. This meta-analysis is registered with the PROSPERO database (CRD42020188176) and reported according to PRISMA guidelines.

Results

In total, 1906 articles were identified and screened, and 14 studies (2367 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in the risk of all-cause mortality between the two groups (RR = 1.00; 95% CI 0.83–1.20; P = 0.99; I² = 0%). Similar results were obtained by subgroup analysis of mortality recording time, endocarditis, pathogen resistance, article publication time, number of patients, and adjuvant antibiotics. Notably, combination treatment might significantly increase the risk of drug-related AEs (RR = 1.68; 95% CI 1.06–2.66; P = 0.03; I² = 67%) and nephrotoxicity (RR = 2.30; 95% CI 1.68–3.16; P < 0.00001; I² = 0%), although the occurrences of AEs leading to treatment discontinuation and serious AEs were not significantly different between the two groups.

Conclusions

The meta-analysis suggested that combination therapy could not reduce mortality but might increase the risk of drug-related AEs and nephrotoxicity and should be applied very cautiously. Future studies on combined drug therapy for SAB need careful and rigorous design for specific antibiotic combinations.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40121-021-00539-y.

Daptomycin versus Vancomycin for the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection with or without Endocarditis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an important cause of invasive infections, mainly bloodstream infections (BSI) with or without endocarditis. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare vancomycin, the mainstay treatment, with daptomycin as therapeutic options in this context. Materials: PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Database were searched from their inception to 15 February 2020. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included clinical failure, infection recurrence, persistence of infection, length-of-stay, antibiotic discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) and 30-day re-admission. This study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42020169413. Results: Eight studies (1226 patients, 554 vs. 672 in daptomycin vs. vancomycin, respectively) were included. No significant difference in terms of overall mortality was observed [odds ratio (OR) 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40–1.33, I² = 67%]. Daptomycin was associated with a significantly reduced risk of clinical failure (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38–0.89, I² = 60%), as confirmed by pooling adjusted effect sizes (adjusted OR against the use of vancomycin 1.94, 95%CI 1.33–1.82, I² = 41%), and was linked with fewer treatment-limiting AEs (OR 0.15, 95%CI 0.06–0.36, I² = 19%). No difference emerged between the two treatments as secondary outcomes. Results were not robust to unmeasured confounding (E-value lower than 95% CI 1.00 for all-cause mortality). Conclusions: Against MRSA BSI, with or without endocarditis, daptomycin seems to be associated with a lower risk of clinical failure and treatment-limiting AEs compared with vancomycin. Further studies are needed to better characterize the differences between the two drugs.

Cefazolin versus ceftriaxone as definitive treatment for Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia: a retrospective multicentre study in Singapore

BACKGROUND

Ceftriaxone is the preferred treatment for bacteraemia caused by non-MDR (antibiotic-susceptible) Klebsiella pneumoniae. Excessive and widespread ceftriaxone use creates selection pressure for ESBLs. Cefazolin is an alternative, although there are theoretical concerns that SHV-1 β-lactamase in K. pneumoniae may inactivate cefazolin in an inoculum-dependent manner.

OBJECTIVES

In this retrospective study, we investigated the outcomes in K. pneumoniae bacteraemia patients treated with IV cefazolin versus IV ceftriaxone as definitive therapy.

METHODS

A total of 917 patients infected with K. pneumoniae from 1 January to 31 December 2016 in three public acute care hospitals in Singapore were screened for study eligibility. Consecutive unique episodes of monomicrobial bacteraemia caused by cefazolin- and/or ceftriaxone-susceptible K. pneumoniae were analysed (n = 284).

RESULTS

There were 143 patients (50.4%) in the cefazolin group and 141 patients (49.6%) in the ceftriaxone group. Demographics, baseline illness severity and risk factors for healthcare-associated bacteraemia were comparable in the two treatment groups. The primary outcome of 28 day all-cause mortality was not significantly different between the cefazolin and ceftriaxone groups (10.5% versus 7.1%, P = 0.403). Both in the crude analysis and using a multivariable logistic regression model with inverse probability weighting based on propensity score, cefazolin treatment was not associated with increased risk of 28 day mortality (OR 1.51 with ceftriaxone as the reference group, 95% CI 0.67-3.53; adjusted OR 1.55, 95% CI 0.33-7.40).

CONCLUSIONS

Cefazolin may be a ceftriaxone-sparing alternative treatment for antibiotic-susceptible K. pneumoniae bacteraemia. This observation may provide sufficient clinical equipoise for a randomized controlled trial.

The impact of an automated antibiotic stewardship intervention for the management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia utilizing the electronic health record

BACKGROUND

Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) management bundles have been shown to improve performance measures and clinical outcomes. SAB bundles often require direct intervention by infectious diseases (ID) physicians or antibiotic stewardship programme (ASP) members or pharmacists. The purpose of this study was to evaluate an automated, real-time ASP intervention utilizing clinical decision support (CDS) in the electronic health record (EHR) for the management of SAB.

METHODS

A retrospective, single-centre quasi-experimental study of hospitalized patients with known SAB was conducted. The intervention was the implementation of a hard-stop best practice advisory (BPA) alert that would prompt physicians to use an electronic order set, on identification of SAB, with management recommendations, including ID consultation. The primary outcome was overall adherence to six institutional ASP SAB bundle elements. Secondary outcomes included both clinical and process outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 227 patients were included, 111 in the pre-intervention and 116 in the post-intervention period. Completion of all six bundle elements improved by 27.2% in the post-intervention group (29.7% versus 56.9%, P < 0.001). BPA activation and order-set utilization occurred in 95.7% and 57.8% in the post-intervention group, respectively. Composite outcome of 30 day mortality or 90 day readmission with SAB complication decreased in the post-intervention group by 9.6% (24.3% versus 14.7%, P = 0.092).

CONCLUSIONS

Optimization of CDS within the EHR, using real-time BPA alert and order set, demonstrated an immediate, sustainable intervention that improved adherence to institutional performance measures for SAB management without direct prospective audit with intervention and feedback.

Vertebral osteomyelitis in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection: Evaluation of risk factors for treatment failure

OBJECTIVES

Staphylococcus aureus is the most common cause of pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis (VO). Studies indicate that S. aureus VO results in poor outcome. We aimed to investigate risk factors for treatment failure in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (SAB) and VO.

METHODS

We conducted a post hoc-analysis of data from a German bi-center prospective SAB cohort (2006-2014). Patients were followed-up for one year. Primary outcome was treatment failure defined as relapse and/or death within one year.

RESULTS

A total of 1069 patients with SAB were analyzed, with 92 VO patients. In addition to antibiotic treatment, surgery was performed in 60/92 patients. Treatment failed in 44/92 patients (death, n = 42; relapse, n = 2). Multivariable analysis revealed higher age (HR 1.04 [per year], 95%CI 1.01-1.07), Charlson comorbidity index (HR 1.20, 95%CI 1.06-1.36), presence of neurologic deficits (HR 2.53, 95%CI 1.15-5.53) and local abscess formation (HR 3.35, 95%CI 1.39-8.04) as independent risk factors for treatment failure. In contrast, surgery seemed to be associated with a favourable outcome (HR 0.45 (95%CI 0.20-0.997)).

CONCLUSION

SAB patients with VO exhibit a high treatment failure rate. Red flags are older age, comorbidities, neurologic deficits and local abscess formation. Whether these patients benefit from intensified treatment (e.g. radical surgery, prolongation of antibiotics) should be investigated further.

Successful Use of Telemedicine Infectious Diseases Consultation With an Antimicrobial Stewardship-Led Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia Care Bundle

Background

Telemedicine (TM) programs can be implemented to deliver specialty care through virtual platforms and overcome geographic/resource constraints. Few data exist to describe outcomes associated with TM-based infectious diseases (ID) management. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes associated with TM and onsite standard-of-care (SOC) ID consultation after implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship (AMS)-led Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) bundle.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on the effects of a SAB bundle comparing ID consult delivery (SOC or TM) at 10 US hospitals within Atrium Health in adult patients admitted from September 2016 through December 2017. The type of ID consult provided was based on the admitting hospital; no hospital had both modalities. Bundle components included the following: (1) ID consult, (2) appropriate antibiotics, (3) repeat blood cultures until clearance, (4) echocardiogram obtainment, and (5) appropriate antibiotic duration. The AMS facilitated bundle initiation and compliance. The primary outcome was bundle adherence between groups. Differences in clinical outcomes were also assessed.

Results

We evaluated 738 patients with SAB (576 with SOC, 162 with TM ID). No differences were observed in overall bundle adherence (SOC 86% vs TM 89%, P = .33). In addition, no significant differences resulted between groups for hospital mortality, 30-day SAB-related readmission, persistent bacteremia, and culture clearance. Groups did not differ in 30-day mortality when controlling for demographics, bacteremia source, and physiological measures with multivariable logistic regression.

Conclusions

Our findings provide evidence to support effective use of TM ID consultation and AMS-led care bundles for SAB management in resource-limited settings.

The Current State of Antifungal Stewardship in Immunocompromised Populations

Inappropriate antifungal use is prevalent and can lead to drug-resistant fungi, expose patients to adverse drug events, and increase healthcare costs. While antimicrobial stewardship programs have traditionally focused on antibiotic use, the need for targeted antifungal stewardship (AFS) intervention has garnered interest in recent years. Despite this, data on AFS in immunocompromised patient populations is limited. This paper will review the current state of AFS in this complex population and explore opportunities for multidisciplinary collaboration.

Knowledge, Perception, and Antibiotic Prescribing Practice in the Intensive Care Unit: Findings from the Malaysian Public Setting

Introduction:

Approach to managing infection in the intensive care unit (ICU) often varies between institutions and not many readily adapt to available local guidelines despite it was constructed to suite local clinical scenario. Malaysia already has two published guidelines on managing infection in the ICU but data on its compliance are largely unknown.

Objectives:

A cross-sectional survey was carried out and sent to a total of 868 specialists working primarily in the ICU. The aim of this study was to explore knowledge, perception, and the antibiotic prescribing practice among specialists and advanced trainees in Malaysian ICU.

Materials and Methods:

A cross-sectional survey was used, consisted of three sections: knowledge, perception, and antibiotic prescribing practice in ICU. Three case vignettes on hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), infected necrotizing pancreatitis (INP), and catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) were used to explore antibiotic prescribing practice.

Results:

A total of 868 eligible subjects were approached with 104 responded to the survey. Three hundred eighty-nine antibiotics were chosen from seven different classes in the case vignettes. All respondents acknowledged the importance of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) in antibiotic optimization and majority (97.2%) perceived that current dosing is inadequate to achieve optimal PK/PD target in ICU patients. Majority (85.6%) believed that antibiotic dose should be streamlined to the organisms’ minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). In terms of knowledge, only 64.4% provided the correct correlations between antibiotics and their respective PK/PD targets. Compliance rates in terms of antibiotic choices were at 79.8%, 77.8%, and 27.9% for HAI, INP, and CRBSI, respectively.

Conclusion:

Malaysian physicians are receptive to use PK/PD approach to optimize antibiotic dosing in ICU patients. Nonetheless, there are still gaps in the knowledge of antibiotic PK/PD as well as its application in the critically ill, especially for β-lactams.

Impact of a Best Practice Advisory for Pediatric Patients With Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

BACKGROUND

Infectious diseases (ID) consultation and optimal antibiotic therapy improve outcomes in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB). Data on strategies to improve adherence to these practices in children are limited.

METHODS

This was a quasi-experimental study evaluating the impact of an electronic medical record (EMR)-based best practice advisory (BPA) for SAB, recommending ID consult and optimal antibiotic therapy based on rapid mecA gene detection. Inpatients < 21 years old with SAB before (January 2015-July 2017) and after (August 2017-December 2018) BPA implementation were included. Primary outcome was receipt of ID consult. Secondary outcomes included receipt of optimal therapy, time to ID consult and optimal therapy, recurrent SAB, and 30-day all-cause mortality. ID consultation rates pre- and postimplementation were compared using interrupted time series (ITS) analysis. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for time to optimal therapy were calculated using Cox regression.

RESULTS

We included 99 SAB episodes (70 preintervention, 29 postintervention). Preintervention, 48 (68.6%) patients received an ID consult compared to 27 (93.1%) postintervention, but this was not statistically significant on ITS analysis due to a preexisting trend of increasing consultation. Median hours to optimal therapy decreased from 26.1 to 5.5 (P = .03), most notably in patients with methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) (42.2 to 10.8; P < .01). On Cox regression, BPA implementation was associated with faster time to optimal therapy (HR, 3.22 [95% CI, 1.04-10.01]).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of an EMR-based BPA for SAB resulted in faster time to optimal antibiotic therapy, particularly for patients with MSSA. ID consultation increased throughout the study period and was not significantly impacted by the BPA.

Impact of follow up blood cultures on outcomes of patients with community-onset gram-negative bloodstream infection

BACKGROUND

The role of follow up blood cultures (FUBC) in the management of gram-negative bloodstream infection (GN-BSI) remains controversial. This retrospective cohort study examines the association between obtaining FUBC and mortality in GN-BSI.

METHODS

Hospitalized adults with community-onset GN-BSI at Prisma Health-Midlands hospitals in South Carolina, USA from January 1, 2010 to June 30, 2015 were identified. Patients who died or were discharged from hospital within 72 h were excluded to minimize impact of survival and selection biases on results, respectively. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was used to examine association between obtaining FUBC and 28-day all-cause mortality after adjustment for the propensity to obtain FUBC.

FINDINGS

Among 766 patients with GN-BSI, 219 (28.6%) had FUBC obtained and 15 of 219 (6.8%) FUBC were persistently positive. Overall, median age was 67 years, 438 (57%) were women, 457 (60%) had urinary source of infection, and 426 (56%) had BSI due to Escherichia coli. Mortality was significantly lower in patients who had FUBC obtained than in those who did not have FUBC (6.3% vs. 11.7%, log-rank p = 0.03). Obtaining FUBC was independently associated with reduced mortality (hazards ratio 0.47, 95% confidence intervals: 0.23-0.87; p = 0.02) after adjustments for age, chronic comorbidities, acute severity of illness, appropriateness of empirical antimicrobial therapy, and propensity to obtain FUBC.

INTERPRETATION

Improved survival in hospitalized patients with GN-BSI who had FUBC is consistent with the results of recent publications from Italy and North Carolina supporting utilization of FUBC in management of GN-BSI.

FUNDING

This study had no funding source.

Impact of an Education-Based Antimicrobial Stewardship Program on the Appropriateness of Antibiotic Prescribing: Results of a Multicenter Observational Study

To evaluate the effect that an education-based Antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) implemented in two hospitals in southern Italy had on the quality and appropriateness of antibiotic prescription. We conducted a multicenter observational study in two hospitals in the Campania region. Only some departments of both hospitals were already participating in the ASP. We collected data on all patients admitted on the day of evaluation in antibiotic therapy or prophylaxis through a case report form. The primary outcome was to investigate the difference in the appropriateness of the antibiotic prescriptive practice in the departments that had joined the ASP and in those that had not participated in the project (non-ASP). The total number of patients assessed was 486. Of these, 78 (16.05%) were in antibiotic prophylaxis and 130 (26.7%) in antibiotic therapy. The prescriptive appropriateness was better in the units that had joined ASP than in those that had not, with respectively 65.8% versus 22.7% (p < 0.01). Patients in the non-ASP units more frequently received unnecessary antibiotics (44.9% versus 0%, p = 0.03) and, as surgical prophylaxis, the use of antibiotics not recommended by the guidelines (44.2% versus 0%, p = 0.036). Multivariable analysis of the factors associated with prescriptive appropriateness identified ASP units (p = 0.02) and bloodstream or cardiovascular infections (p = 0.03) as independent predictors of better prescriptive appropriateness. The findings of the present study reinforce the importance of adopting an educational ASP to improve the quality of antimicrobial prescription in clinical practice.

Quality of care indicators in the MAnageMent of BlOOdstream infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae (MAMBOO-E study): state of the art and research agenda

OBJECTIVES

The impact on outcome of five interventions was reviewed in order to investigate the state of the art for management of Enterobacteriaceae bloodstream infection (E-BSI).

METHODS

We searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies published from January 2008 to March 2019 in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library. Populations consisted of patients with E-BSI. Interventions were as follows: (i) performance of imaging to assess BSI source and/or complications; (ii) follow-up blood cultures (FU-BCs); (iii) use of loading dose followed by extended/continuous infusion (E/CI) of β-lactams; (iv) duration of treatment (short- versus long-term); and (v) infectious diseases (ID) consultation. Patients without intervention were considered as controls. The main outcome was 30-day mortality. RoB 2.0 and ROBINS-I tools were used for bias assessment.

RESULTS

No study was eligible for interventions i, iii and v. For FU-BCs, one observational study including 901 patients with E-BSI was considered. Intervention consisted of repeating BCs within 2-7 days after index BCs. All-cause 30-day mortality was 14.2% (35/247) in the intervention group versus 14.7% (96/654) in the control group. For short treatment duration, two RCTs and six observational studies were included comprising 4473 patients with E-BSI. All-cause mortality was similar in the short and long treatment groups (OR = 1.10, 95% CI 0.83-1.44).

CONCLUSION

Of the assessed interventions, only short treatment duration in non-immunocompromised patients with E-BSI is supported by current data. Studies investigating the use of systematic imaging, FU-BCs, E/CI β-lactams and ID consultation in patients with E-BSI are needed.

Management of Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections

Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections are associated with a high morbidity and mortality. Nevertheless, significance of a positive blood culture with this pathogen is often underestimated or findings are misinterpreted as contamination, which can result in inadequate diagnostic and therapeutic consequences. We here review and discuss current diagnostic and therapeutic key elements and open questions for the management of Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections.

Long-Term Impact of an Educational Antimicrobial Stewardship Program on Management of Patients with Hematological Diseases

Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) in hematological patients are especially relevant. However, information about ASPs in this population is scarce. For 11 years, we quarterly assessed antimicrobial consumption and incidence and death rates of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bloodstream infections (BSI) in the hematology Department. Healthcare activity indicators were also monitored yearly. We performed an interrupted time-series analysis. Antimicrobials showed a sustained reduction with a relative effect of −62.3% (95% CI −84.5 to −40.1) nine years after the inception of the ASP, being especially relevant for antifungals (relative effect −80.4%, −90.9 to −69.9), quinolones (relative effect −85.0%, −102.0 to −68.1), and carbapenems (relative effect −68.8%, −126.0 to −10.6). Incidence density of MDR BSI remained low and stable (mean 1.10 vs. 0.82 episodes per 1000 occupied bed days for the pre-intervention and the ASP period, respectively) with a quarterly percentage of change of −0.3% (95% CI −2.0 to 1.4). Early and late mortality of MDR BSI presented a steady trend (quarterly percentage of change −0.7%, 95% CI −1.7 to 0.3 and −0.6%, 95% CI −1.5 to 0.3, respectively). Volume and complexity of healthcare activity increased over the years. The ASP effectively achieved long-term reductions in antimicrobial consumption and improvements in the prescription profile, without increasing the mortality of MDR BSI.

Are Follow-Up Blood Cultures Useful in the Antimicrobial Management of Gram Negative Bacteremia? A Reappraisal of Their Role Based on Current Knowledge

Bloodstream infections still constitute an outstanding cause of in-hospital morbidity and mortality, especially among critically ill patients. Follow up blood cultures (FUBCs) are widely recommended for proper management of Staphylococcus aureus and Candida spp. infections. On the other hand, their role is still a matter of controversy as far as Gram negative bacteremias are concerned. We revised, analyzed, and commented on the literature addressing this issue, to define the clinical settings in which the application of FUBCs could better reveal its value. The results of this review show that critically ill patients, endovascular and/or non-eradicable source of infection, isolation of a multi-drug resistant pathogen, end-stage renal disease, and immunodeficiencies are some factors that may predispose patients to persistent Gram negative bacteremia. An analysis of the different burdens that each of these factors have in this clinical setting allowed us to suggest which patients’ FUBCs have the potential to modify treatment choices, prompt an early source control, and finally, improve clinical outcome.

Reduction of 30-day death rates from Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia by mandatory infectious diseases consultation: Comparative study interventions with and without an infectious disease specialist

OBJECTIVES

Most Japanese hospitals need to keep to higher Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) quality-of-care indicators (QCIs) and create strategies that can maximize the effect of these QCIs with only a small number of infectious disease specialists. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients with SAB before and after the enhancement of the mandatory infectious disease consultations (IDCs).

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Japan. The primary outcome was the 30-day mortality between each period. A generalized structural equation model was employed to examine the effect of the mandatory IDC enhancement on 30-day mortality among patients with SAB.

RESULTS

A total of 114 patients with SAB were analyzed. The 30-day all-cause mortality differed significantly between the two periods (17.3% vs. 4.8%, P = 0.02). Age, three-QCI point ≥ 1, and Pitt bacteremia score ≥ 3 were the significant risk factors for 30-day mortality. The intervention was also significantly associated with improved adherence to QCIs.

CONCLUSION

Mandatory IDCs for SAB improved 30-day mortality and adherence to QCIs after the intervention. In Japan, improving the quality of management in patients with SAB should be an important target.

The benefits and safety of oral sequential antibiotic therapy in non-complicated and complicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia

BACKGROUND

Treatment optimization for serious infections, such as Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB), is a challenge for antimicrobial stewardship teams. Currently, SAB guidelines recommend a completely intravenous therapy (CIT).

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the study was to analyze the usefulness and safety of oral sequential therapy (OST) in SAB.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, observational study in a tertiary teaching hospital in Spain. The inclusion criteria were complicated and non-complicated monomicrobial SAB and an adequate duration of therapy, with patients classified into OST or CIT. The primary endpoint was the 90-day recurrence of S. aureus infection. We also analyzed the mortality, the length of the hospital stay, and the duration of the intravenous antibiotic administration.

RESULTS

Of a total of 201 patients with SAB, 125 (62%) underwent OST. The most commonly administered oral antibiotic was trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (66% of patients). Of those administered OST, 43% had complicated bacteremia (most with an osteoarticular source of infection), and 6% had an intravascular device. The 90-day recurrence rate was 4%, with no differences between the two groups. The duration of the therapy (22 [16-28] vs. 13 days [8-17] for CIT and OST, respectively; p < 0.001) and the hospital stay (36 [27-71] vs. 18 days [13-29] for CIT and OST, respectively; p < 0.001) were shorter for OST. MRSA was related with mortality (OR 4.4, 95% CI [1.67-11.37]; p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

OST for properly selected patients with SAB could be a safe therapeutic option and can reduce their use of CIT and their hospital stay.

How do I manage a patient with enterococcal bacteraemia?

BACKGROUND

Enterococcal bacteraemia (EB) is common, particularly in the nosocomial setting, and its management poses a challenge for clinicians and microbiologists.

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to summarize the more relevant features of EB and to provide a practical state-of-the-art on the topics that more directly affect its management.

SOURCES

Pubmed articles from inception to 31 May 2020.

CONTENT

The following topics are covered: epidemiological, clinical and microbiological characteristics and factors associated with prognosis of EB; diagnosis and work-up, including the use of echocardiography to rule out endocarditis; antibiotic management with special focus on antimicrobial resistance and complicated EB; and the role of infectious disease consultation and the use of bundles in EB. In addition, three clinical vignettes are presented to illustrate the practical application of the guidance provided, and major gaps in the current evidence supporting EB management are discussed.

IMPLICATIONS

EB is associated with large burdens of morbidity and mortality, particularly among fragile and immunosuppressed patients presenting complicated bacteraemia due to multidrug-resistant enterococci. Most cases of EB are caused by Enterococcus faecalis, followed by E. faecium. EB often presents as polymicrobial bacteraemia. Rapidly identifying patients at risk of EB is crucial for timely application of diagnostic techniques and empiric therapy. Early alert systems and rapid diagnostic techniques, such as matrix-assisted desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry, especially if used together with infectious disease consultation within bundles, appear to improve management and prognosis of EB. Echocardiography is also key in the work-up of EB and should probably be more extensively used, although its exact indications in EB are still debated. Multidisciplinary approaches are warranted due to the complexity and severity of EB.

[Antibiotic stewardship : Structure and implementation]

Antibiotic resistance is a part of bacterial evolution and therefore unavoidable. Scarcity of novel treatment options requires prudent use of available antibiotics in order to decelerate the spread of resistance. This is the aim of antibiotic stewardship (ABS) programmes. The implementation of strategies that optimize antibiotic prescription and therapy necessitates the deployment of personnel as well as of structural resources. Necessary requirements for staff and strategies based on their evidence are described in the updated German S3 ABS Guideline. In the future, patients with infectious diseases will benefit from accelerated microbiological diagnostics as early adequate treatment not only reduces antibiotic consumption but also improves patient outcome. In addition, training of infectious disease specialists will substantially contribute to enhanced quality of care of patients with infectious disease.

Assessing the impact of a 'bundle of care' approach to Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in a tertiary hospital

Background

Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. There is evidence that standardised care bundle implementation may improve the rates of appropriate investigations and improve overall management. A S. aureus bacteraemia care bundle was introduced at Christchurch Hospital, New Zealand in early 2014. We assessed the impact of the intervention on the management and outcome of S. aureus bacteraemia.

Methods

A cohort study of cases of S. aureus bacteraemia was conducted following standardised care bundle introduction. Prospective enrolment of post-intervention patients occurred from 1^st January 2014 to 30^th June 2015, with retrospective review of pre-intervention cases from 1^st January 2009 to 31^st December 2013.

Results

In the pre-intervention period 447 patients had at least one episode of S. aureus bacteraemia compared to 151 patients in the post-intervention period. The two groups were similar by gender, ethnicity, and age. Significant increases in Infectious Diseases consultation rate (86.6% vs 94.8%; p=0.009), echocardiography (76.3% vs 96.3%; p<0.001), urine culture (74.0% vs 91.9%; p<0.001), follow up blood cultures (44.2% vs 83.0%; p<0.001), and at least 2 weeks of parenteral therapy (83.5% vs 92.9%; p=0.014) were observed after introduction of the bundle. There were no significant differences in rates 30-day mortality (18.6% vs. 20.5%; p=0.596), but there was a reduction in episodes of relapsed infection in the post-intervention cohort (7.4% vs 1.3%; p=0.004).

Conclusion

An integrated care bundle for the management of S. aureus bacteraemia resulted in increased use of quality of care indicators and infectious diseases review and improved patient outcome.

Development of quality indicators for the management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia

Background

Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) is a serious and often fatal infectious disease. The quality of management of SAB is modifiable and can thus affect the outcome. Quality indicators (QIs) can be used to measure the quality of care of the various aspects of SAB management in hospitals, enabling professionals to identify targets for improvement and stimulating them to take action.

Objectives

To develop QIs for the management of hospitalized patients with SAB.

Methods

A RAND-modified Delphi procedure was used to develop a set of QIs for the management of SAB in hospitalized patients. First, available QIs for the management of SAB were extracted from the literature published since 1 January 2000 (MEDLINE and Embase databases). Thereafter, an international multidisciplinary expert panel appraised these QIs during two questionnaire rounds with an intervening face-to-face meeting.

Results

The literature search resulted in a list of 39 potential QIs. After appraisal by 30 medical specialists, 25 QIs describing recommended care at patient level were selected. These QIs defined appropriate follow-up blood cultures (n=2), echocardiography (n=6), source control (n=4), antibiotic therapy (n=7), antibiotic dose adjustment (n=2), intravenous-to-oral switch (n=2), infectious disease consultation (n=1) and medical discharge report (n=1).

Conclusions

A set of 25 QIs for the management of SAB for hospitalized patients was developed by using a RAND-modified Delphi procedure among international experts. These QIs can measure the quality of various aspects of SAB management. This information can be fed back to the relevant stakeholders in order to identify improvement targets and optimize care.

Impact of β-Lactam and Daptomycin Combination Therapy on Clinical Outcomes in Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

Mortality rates from Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia are high and have only modestly improved in recent decades. We compared the efficacies of a β-lactam in combination with daptomycin (BL/D-C) and β-lactam monotherapy (BL-M) in improving clinical outcomes in methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) bacteremia.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of MSSA bacteremia was performed in a tertiary hospital from January 2011 to December 2017. Patients receiving BL/D-C and BL-M were compared to assess 7-, 30-, and 90-day mortality rates. A 1:2 propensity score matching analysis was performed. Differences were assessed using Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Of the 514 patients with MSSA bacteremia, 164 were excluded as they had received combination therapies other than BL/D-C, had pneumonia, or died within 48 hours of admission. Of the remaining 350 patients, 136 and 214 received BL/D-C and BL-M, respectively. BL/D-C patients had higher Pitt scores and persistent bacteremia more often than BL-M patients. In the raw analysis, there were no differences in mortality rates between groups. After propensity score matching, there were no significant differences between the BL/D-C (110 patients) and BL-M (168 patients) groups for all-cause mortality rates at 7 days (8.18% vs 7.74%; P = 1.000), 30 days (17.3% vs 16.1%; P = .922), and 90 days (22.7% vs 23.2%; P = 1.000), even in a subanalysis of patients with high-risk source of infection and in a subgroup excluding catheter-related bacteremia.

CONCLUSIONS

BL/D-C failed to reduce mortality rates in patients with MSSA bacteremia. Treatment strategies to improve survival in MSSA bacteremia are urgently needed.

Early Oral Switch to Linezolid for Low-risk Patients With Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections: A Propensity-matched Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Oral switch to linezolid is a promising alternative to standard parenteral therapy (SPT) in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB).

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study of all adult cases of SAB between 2013 and 2017 in a Spanish university hospital. We compared the efficacy, safety, and length of hospital stay of patients receiving SPT and those where SPT was switched to oral linezolid between days 3 and 9 of treatment until completion. We excluded complicated SAB and osteoarticular infections. A k-nearest neighbor algorithm was used for propensity score matching with a 2:1 ratio.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, we included 45 patients from the linezolid group and 90 patients from the SPT group. Leading SAB sources were catheter related (49.6%), unknown origin (20.0%), and skin and soft tissue (17.0%). We observed no difference in 90-day relapse between the linezolid group and the SPT group (2.2% vs 4.4% respectively; P = .87). No statistically significant difference was observed in 30-day all-cause mortality between the linezolid group and the SPT group (2.2% vs 13.3%; P = .08). The median length of hospital stay after onset was 8 days in the linezolid group and 19 days in the SPT group (P < .01). No drug-related events leading to discontinuation were noted in the linezolid group.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of SAB in selected low-risk patients with an oral switch to linezolid between days 3 and 9 of treatment until completion yielded similar clinical outcomes as SPT, allowing earlier discharge from the hospital.

Going for the Gold: A Description of the Centers of Excellence Designation by the Infectious Diseases Society of America

Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and World Health Organization and mandated by the Joint Commission to curb antimicrobial resistance. However, <50% of institutions have optimal ASPs in place. Building on its experience of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) advocacy, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) developed the AMS Centers of Excellence (CoE) program, which will serve as a conduit to share best practices and highlight the standards for other hospitals to achieve in order to advance the field of AMS. A designation of CoE signifies that these institutions deliver high-quality care consistently, serve as the "gold" standard for executing novel AMS principles, and demonstrate commitment to their ASP. Here, we describe the process and purpose of designating institutions as AMS CoEs, provide awareness to clinicians on opportunities available through IDSA with this CoE designation, and discuss the evolution of the program.

An Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention Improves Adherence to Standard of Care for Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection

INTRODUCTION

Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections (SABSI) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States, and proper management is important to effect cure and prevent metastatic foci of infection. We aimed to utilize our antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) to improve practices at a large academic hospital system.

METHODS

Our ASP implemented a SABSI educational campaign directed at the hospital medicine, cardiology, and infectious diseases divisions. A stewardship intervention was then begun for all patients with SABSI recommending infectious diseases consultation, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), source control, and preliminary antibiotic changes. A retrospective review was performed for all SABSI cases 2 years before and after implementation of the SABSI intervention.

RESULTS

Two hundred forty-three cases before intervention and 259 after intervention were included. An increase in obtaining follow-up negative blood cultures (79.8% vs. 89.6%), infectious diseases consultation (52.7% vs. 86.5%), TEE (25.5% vs. 54.8%), beta-lactam switch for methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (55.2% vs. 74.4%), and source control (41.2% vs. 57.9%) was demonstrated. We demonstrated similar durations of bacteremia, length of stay, relapse, mortality, and rates of infective endocarditis.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to standard of care for patients with SABSI can be dramatically improved through provider education, leveraging antimicrobial stewardship resources, and infectious diseases consultation.

Moving beyond unsolicited consultation: additional impact of a structured intervention on mortality in Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia

BACKGROUND

Some evidence-based bundles have tried to standardize the management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) to improve the outcome. The aim of our study was to analyse the additional impact on mortality of a structured intervention in patients with SAB.

METHODS

Compliance with the bundle was evaluated in an ambispective cohort of patients with SAB, which included a retrospective cohort [including patients treated before and after the implementation of a bacteraemia programme (no-BP and BP, respectively)] and a prospective cohort (i-BP), in which an additional specific intervention for bundle application was implemented. Multivariate logistic regression was used to measure the influence of the independent variables including compliance with the bundle on 14 and 30 day crude mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 271 adult patients with SAB were included. Mortality was significantly different among the three groups (no-BP, BP and i-BP): mortality at 14 days was 18% versus 7% versus 2%, respectively, P = 0.002; and mortality at 30 days was 20% versus 12% versus 5%, respectively, P = 0.011. The factors associated with 14 and 30 day mortality in multivariable analysis were heart failure (OR = 7.63 and OR = 2.27, respectively), MRSA infection (OR = 4.02 and OR = 4.37, respectively) and persistent bacteraemia (OR = 11.01 and OR = 7.83, respectively); protective factors were catheter-related bacteraemia (OR = 0.16 and OR = 0.19, respectively) and >75% bundle compliance (OR = 0.15 and OR = 0.199, respectively). Time required to perform the intervention and the follow-up was 50 min (IQR 40-55 min) per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

High-level compliance with a standardized bundle of intervention for management of SAB that requires little time was associated with lower mortality at 14 and 30 days.

Description of a pharmacist-driven safety algorithm in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: Compliance, interventions, and good saves

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of a pharmacist-driven Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) safety bundle supported by leadership and to compare compliance before and after implementation.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study with descriptive and before-and-after analyses.

SETTING

Tertiary-care academic medical center.

PATIENTS

All patients with documented SAB, regardless of the source of infection, were included. Patients transitioned to palliative care were excluded from before-and-after analysis.

METHODS

A pharmacist-driven safety bundle including documented clearance of bacteremia, echocardiography, removal of central venous catheters, and targeted intravenous therapy of at least 2 weeks duration was implemented in November 2015 and was supported by leadership with stepwise escalation for nonresponse. A descriptive analysis of all patients with SAB during the study period included pharmacy interventions, acceptance rates, and escalation rates. A pre-post implementation analysis of 100 sequential patients compared bundle compliance and descriptive parameters.

RESULTS

Overall, 391 interventions were made in the 20-month period following implementation, including 20 "good saves" avoiding potentially major adverse events. No statistically significant differences in complete bundle compliance were detected between the periods (74% vs 84%; P = .08). However, we detected a significant increase in echocardiography after the bundle was implemented (83% vs 94%; P = .02) and fewer patients received suboptimal definitive therapy after the bundle was implemented (10% vs 3%; P = .045).

CONCLUSIONS

This pharmacist-driven SAB safety bundle with leadership support showed improvement in process measures, which may have prevented major adverse events, even with available infectious diseases (ID) consultation. It provides a critical safety net for institutions without mandatory ID consultation or with limited antimicrobial stewardship resources.

Impact of Mandatory Infectious Diseases Consultation and Real-time Antimicrobial Stewardship Pharmacist Intervention on Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia Bundle Adherence

Background

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of infectious diseases consultation (IDC) and a real-time antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) review on the management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB).

Methods

This retrospective study included adult inpatients with SAB from January 2016 to December 2018 at 7 hospitals. Outcomes were compared between 3 time periods: before mandatory IDC and AMS review (period 1), after mandatory IDC and before AMS review (period 2), and after mandatory IDC and AMS review (period 3). The primary outcome was bundle adherence, defined as appropriate intravenous antimicrobial therapy, appropriate duration of therapy, appropriate surveillance cultures, echocardiography, and removal of indwelling intravenous catheters, if applicable. Secondary end points included individual bundle components, source control, length of stay (LOS), 30-day bacteremia-related readmission, and in-hospital all-cause mortality.

Results

A total of 579 patients met inclusion criteria for analysis. Complete bundle adherence was 65% in period 1 (n = 241/371), 54% in period 2 (n = 47/87), and 76% in period 3 (n = 92/121). Relative to period 3, bundle adherence was significantly lower in period 1 (odds ratio [OR], 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37–0.93; P = .02) and period 2 (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.20–0.67; P = .0009). No difference in bundle adherence was noted between periods 1 and 2. Significant differences were seen in obtaining echocardiography (91% vs 83% vs 100%; P < .001), source control (34% vs 45% vs 45%; P = .04), and hospital LOS (10.5 vs 8.9 vs 12.0 days; P = .01). No differences were noted for readmission or mortality.

Conclusions

The addition of AMS pharmacist review to mandatory IDC was associated with significantly improved quality care bundle adherence.

A Narrative Review of Early Oral Stepdown Therapy for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: Yay or Nay?

Historically, intravenous (IV) antibiotics have been the cornerstone of treatment for uncomplicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB). However, IV antibiotics are expensive, increase the rates of hospital readmission, and can be associated with catheter-related complications. As a result, the potential role of oral antibiotics in the treatment of uncomplicated SAB has become a subject of interest. This narrative review article aims to summarize key arguments for and against the use of oral antibiotics to complete treatment of uncomplicated SAB and evaluates the available evidence for specific oral regimens. We conclude that evidence suggests that oral step-down therapy can be an alternative for select patients who meet the criteria for uncomplicated SAB and will comply with medical treatment and outpatient follow-up. Of the currently studied regimens discussed in this article, linezolid has the most support, followed by fluoroquinolone plus rifampin.

Bacterial sepsis : Diagnostics and calculated antibiotic therapy

The mortality of patients with sepsis and septic shock is still unacceptably high. An effective calculated antibiotic treatment within 1 h of recognition of sepsis is an important target of sepsis treatment. Delays lead to an increase in mortality; therefore, structured treatment concepts form a rational foundation, taking relevant diagnostic and treatment steps into consideration. In addition to the assumed infection and individual risks of each patient, local resistance patterns and specific problem pathogens must be taken into account during the selection of anti-infective treatment. Many pathophysiologic alterations influence the pharmacokinetics (PK) of antibiotics during sepsis. The principle of standard dosing should be abandoned and replaced by an individual treatment approach with stronger weighting of the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) index of the substance groups. Although this is not yet the clinical standard, prolonged (or continuous) infusion of β‑lactam antibiotics and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can help to achieve defined PK targets. Prolonged infusion is sufficient without TDM, but for continuous infusion, TDM is generally necessary. A further argument for individual PK/PD-oriented antibiotic approaches is the increasing number of infections due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens in the intensive care unit. For effective treatment, antibiotic stewardship teams (ABS teams) are becoming more established. Interdisciplinary cooperation of the ABS team with infectious disease (ID) specialists, microbiologists, and clinical pharmacists leads not only to rational administration of antibiotics, but also has a positive influence on treatment outcome. The gold standards for pathogen identification are still culture-based detection and microbiologic resistance testing for the various antibiotic groups. Despite the rapid investigation time, novel polymerase chain reaction(PCR)-based procedures for pathogen identification and resistance determination are currently only an adjunct to routine sepsis diagnostics, due to the limited number of studies, high costs, and limited availability. In complicated septic courses with multiple anti-infective therapies or recurrent sepsis, PCR-based procedures can be used in addition to treatment monitoring and diagnostics. Novel antibiotics represent potent alternatives in the treatment of MDR infections. Due to the often defined spectrum of pathogens and the practically (still) absent resistance, they are suitable for targeted treatment of severe MDR infections (therapy escalation). (Contribution available free of charge by "Free Access" [ https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00101-017-0396-z ].).

Therapy of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: Evidences and challenges

Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is still a daily challenge for clinicians. Despite all efforts, the associated mortality and morbidity has not significantly improved in the last 20 years. The available evidence suggests that adherence to some quality-of-care indicators with regard to clinical management is important in improving the outcome of patients, but it is lower than desired in many hospitals; as such, management of patients with SAB by infectious diseases specialists has been demonstrated to contribute in the reduction of the mortality rate of these patients. In this article, the most relevant clinical studies published over the last few years evaluating the efficacy and safety of alternative drugs for the treatment of SAB are reviewed. However, classic drugs are still used in a high proportion of patients because the promising results obtained from in vivo and in vivo studies with these alternative drugs have not translated as frequently as expected into evident superiority in clinical studies. Nevertheless, some data suggest that certain alternatives may offer advantages in specific situations. Overall, an individualised and expert approach is needed in order to decide the best treatment according to the source, severity, complications, patients' features and microbiological data.

Hospital-wide ELectronic medical record evaluated computerised decision support system to improve outcomes of Patients with staphylococcal bloodstream infection (HELP): study protocol for a multicentre stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial

INTRODUCTION

Staphylococci are the most commonly identified pathogens in bloodstream infections. Identification of Staphylococcus aureus in blood culture (SAB) requires a prompt and adequate clinical management. The detection of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), however, corresponds to contamination in about 75% of the cases. Nevertheless, antibiotic therapy is often initiated, which contributes to the risk of drug-related side effects. We developed a computerised clinical decision support system (HELP-CDSS) that assists physicians with an appropriate management of patients with Staphylococcus bacteraemia. The CDSS is evaluated using data of the Data Integration Centers (DIC) established at each clinic. DICs transform heterogeneous primary clinical data into an interoperable format, and the HELP-CDSS displays information according to current best evidence in bacteraemia treatment. The overall aim of the HELP-CDSS is a safe but more efficient allocation of infectious diseases specialists and an improved adherence to established guidelines in the treatment of SAB.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The study is conducted at five German university hospitals and is designed as a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial. Over the duration of 18 months, 135 wards will change from a control period to the intervention period in a randomised stepwise sequence. The coprimary outcomes are hospital mortality for all patients to establish safety, the 90-day disease reoccurrence-free survival for patients with SAB and the cumulative vancomycin use for patients with CoNS bacteraemia. We will use a closed, hierarchical testing procedure and generalised linear mixed modelling to test for non-inferiority of the CDSS regarding hospital mortality and 90-day disease reoccurrence-free survival and for superiority of the HELP-CDSS regarding cumulative vancomycin use.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study is approved by the ethics committee of Jena University Hospital and will start at each centre after local approval. Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at scientific conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

DRKS00014320.

Association of Infectious Diseases Consultation With Long-term Postdischarge Outcomes Among Patients With Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

IMPORTANCE

Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is common and associated with poor long-term outcomes. Previous studies have demonstrated an association between infectious diseases (ID) consultation and improved short-term (ie, within 90 days) outcomes for patients with SAB, but associations with long-term outcomes are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association of ID consultation with long-term (ie, 5 years) postdischarge outcomes among patients with SAB.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cohort study included all patients (N = 31 002) with a first episode of SAB who were discharged alive from 116 acute care units of the nationwide Veterans Health Administration where ID consultation was offered. Data were collected from January 2003 to December 2014, with follow-up through September 30, 2018. Data analysis was conducted from February to December 2019.

EXPOSURES

Infectious diseases consultation during the index hospital stay.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was time to development of a composite event of all-cause mortality or recurrence of SAB within 5 years of discharge. As secondary outcomes, SAB recurrence and all-cause mortality with and without recurrence were analyzed while accounting for semicompeting risks.

RESULTS

The cohort included 31 002 patients (30 265 [97.6%] men; median [interquartile range] age at SAB onset, 64.0 [57.0-75.0] years). Among 31 002 patients, there were 18 794 (60.6%) deaths, 4772 (15.4%) SAB recurrences, and 20 414 (65.8%) composite events during 5 years of follow-up; 12 773 deaths (68.0%) and 2268 recurrences (47.5%) occurred more than 90 days after discharge. Approximately half of patients (15 360 [49.5%]) received ID consultation during the index hospital stay; ID consultation was associated with prolonged improvement in the composite outcome (adjusted hazard ratio at 5 years, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.68-0.74; P < .001). Infectious diseases consultation was also associated with improved outcomes when all-cause mortality without recurrence and SAB recurrence were analyzed separately (all-cause mortality without recurrence: adjusted hazard ratio at 5 years, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.74-0.81; P < .001; SAB recurrence: adjusted hazard ratio at 5 years, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.64-0.72; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Having an ID consultation during the index hospital stay among patients with SAB was associated with improved postdischarge outcomes for at least 5 years, suggesting that contributions of ID specialists to management during acute infection may have a substantial influence on long-term outcomes. Further investigations of the association of ID consultation with outcomes after S aureus should include long-term follow-up.

Opportunities for antibiotic optimisation and outcome improvement in patients with negative blood cultures: study protocol for a cluster-randomised crossover trial, the NO-BACT study

INTRODUCTION

Patients with negative blood cultures (BCx) represent 85%-90% of all patients with BCx taken during hospital admission. This population usually includes a heterogeneous group of patients admitted with infectious diseases or febrile syndromes that require a blood culture. There is very little evidence of the clinical characteristics and antibiotic treatment given to these patients.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

In a preliminary exploratory prospective cohort study of patients with BCx taken, the clinical/therapeutic characteristics and outcomes/antimicrobial stewardship opportunities of a population of patients with negative BCx will be analysed. In the second phase, using a cluster randomised crossover design, the implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship intervention targeting patients with negative BCx will be evaluated in terms of quality of antimicrobial use (duration and de-escalation), length of hospital stay and mortality.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study has been and registered with clinicaltrials.gov. The findings of our study may support the implementation in clinical practice of an antimicrobial stewardship intervention to optimise the use of antibiotics in patients with negative BCx. The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated at national and international conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03535324.

Clinical significance of follow-up blood culture in patients with a single Staphylococcus aureus-positive blood culture

Background: We evaluated the frequency of a positive result in follow-up blood cultures (FUBCs) and clinical outcome when FUBCs were not performed, in patients with a single Staphylococcus aureus-positive blood culture.Methods: We analyzed blood culture results in a prospective, observational cohort of patients with S. aureus bacteraemia (SAB) at a tertiary-care hospital. All adult patients with only a single positive blood culture set from at least two blood culture sets drawn at the initial SAB episode were enrolled in the study. We analyzed FUBC results performed within 5 days after bacteraemia onset and compared the characteristics and outcomes between patients with and without FUBCs.Results: Of 305 patients with a single S. aureus-positive blood culture, FUBCs were obtained in 274 (90%) and were positive in 15% (42/274), of whom 50% were afebrile. The rate of positivity of FUBCs was significantly higher in methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) than in methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (19% versus 9%, p = .03). In 190 patients with a single MRSA-positive blood culture, the demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between patients with and without FUBCs (167 versus 23). Although mortality was comparable between the two groups, relapse of SAB was significantly more frequent in patients in whom FUBCs were not performed (17% versus 2%, p = .008).Conclusions: Even if a patient has a single S. aureus-positive blood culture and no fever, FUBCs should be performed to manage the infection properly and to prevent SAB relapse.

Appropriate empirical antibiotic use in the emergency department: full compliance matters!

Background

Little is known about determinants of appropriate antibiotic use in the emergency department (ED). We measured appropriateness of antibiotic use for seven quality indicators (QIs) and studied patient-related factors that determine their variation.

Patients and methods

A retrospective analysis of 948 patients presumptively diagnosed as having an infection needing empirical antibiotic treatment in the ED was performed. Outcomes of seven previously validated QIs were calculated using computerized algorithms. We used logistic regression analysis to identify patient-related factors of QI performance and evaluated whether more appropriate antibiotic use in the ED results in better patient outcomes (length-of-stay, in-hospital mortality, 30 day readmission).

Results

QI performance ranged from 57.3% for guideline-adherent empirical therapy to 97.3% for appropriate route of administration in patients with sepsis. QI performance was positively associated with patients’ disease severity on admission (presence of fever, tachycardia and hypotension). Overall, the clinical diagnosis and thus the guidelines followed influenced QI performance. The difference in complexity between the guidelines was a possible explanation for the variation in QI performance. A QI performance sum score of 100% was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality. QI performance was not associated with readmission rates.

Conclusions

We gained insights into factors that determine quality of antibiotic prescription in the ED. Adherence to the full bundle of QIs was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality. These findings suggest that future stewardship interventions in the ED should focus on the entire process of antibiotic prescribing in the ED and not on a single metric only.

Impact on Mortality of a Bundle for the Management of Enterococcal Bloodstream Infection

Objective

In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of a management bundle for Enterococcus spp bloodstream infection (E-BSI).

Method

This was a single-center, quasi-experimental (pre/post) study. In the prephase (January 2014 to December 2015), patients with monomicrobial E-BSI were retrospectively enrolled. During the post- or intervention phase (January 2016 to December 2017), all patients with incident E-BSI were prospectively enrolled in a nonmandatory intervention arm comprising infectious disease consultation, echocardiography, follow-up blood cultures, and early targeted antibiotic treatment. Patients were followed up to 1 year after E-BSI. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality.

Results

Overall, 368 patients were enrolled, with 173 in the prephase and 195 in the postphase. The entire bundle was applied in 15% and 61% patients during the pre- and postphase, respectively (P < .001). Patients enrolled in the postphase had a significant lower 30-day mortality rate (20% vs 32%, P = .0042). At multivariate analysis, factors independently associated to mortality were age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00–1.05), intensive care unit admission (HR, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.18–3.89), and healthcare-associated (HR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.05–5.16) and hospital-acquired infection (HR, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.34–4.76), whereas being enrolled in the postphase period (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.32–0.75) was associated with improved survival. Results were consistent also in the subgroups with severe sepsis (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.16–0.90) or healthcare-associated infections (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.31–0.93). A significantly lower 1-year mortality was observed in patients enrolled in the postphase period (50% vs 68%, P < .001).

Conclusions

The introduction of a bundle for the management of E-BSI was associated with improved 30-day and 1-year survival.