Intraoperative diastolic function assessed by TEE does not agree with preoperative diastolic function grade in CABG patients

OBJECTIVE

To compare the agreement of the 2016 ASE/EACVI guidelines for grading diastolic dysfunction (DD) with the most commonly used intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-based diastolic function grading algorithm in cardiac surgical patients, and to describe the contribution of the echocardiographic variables used in the algorithms to any observed differences.

DESIGN

Retrospective data analysis.

SETTING

University tertiary medical center.

PARTICIPANTS

Hundred and one patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) at a single institution from June 2017 to February 2019.

INTERVENTIONS

Preoperative transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) diastolic function grade determined by the 2016 American Society of Echocardiography (ASE)/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) guidelines was compared to intraoperative diastolic function grade obtained by TEE.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Incidence of DD on preoperative TTE was only 19.8%, while 62.3% of patients were graded as having DD on the intraoperative TEE exam. There was grade agreement between TTE and TEE in only 47/101 patients (46.5%). The McNemar test showed poor agreement between the two algorithms (OR for disagreement = 15.33, CI = 4.77-49.30; p < 0.0001). Despite the low incidence of DD on preoperative TTE, mean lateral e' values were significantly lower on TTE compared to TEE (7.7 cm/s vs 9.5 cm/s; p = < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

There is strong disagreement between TTE and TEE-based DD grading algorithms. Due to the different echocardiographic variables used in each and the unique clinical settings in which they are applied, they produce fundamentally different results.

Invasive validation of the left ventricular global longitudinal strain for estimating left ventricular filling pressure

PURPOSE

An elevated left ventricular (LV) filling pressure is the main finding in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction, which is estimated with an algorithm using echocardiographic parameters recommended by the recent American Society of Echocardiography (ASE)/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) guidelines. In this study, we sought to determine the efficacy of the LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) in predicting an elevated LV filling pressure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 73 prospectively selected patients undergoing LV catheterization (mean age 63.19 ± 9.64, 69% male) participated in this study. Using the algorithm, the LV filling pressure was estimated using the echocardiographic parameters obtained within 24 hours before catheterization. The LV GLS was measured using an automated functional imaging system (GE, Vivid E9 USA). Invasive LV pre-A pressure corresponding to the mean left atrial pressure (LAP) was used as a reference, and a LAP of >12 mm Hg was defined as elevated. Invasive LV filling pressure was elevated in 43 patients (59%) and normal in 30 patients (41%). Nine of 73 (12%) patients were defined as indeterminate based on the 2016 algorithm. Using the ROC method, -18.1% of LV GLS determined the elevated LAP (AUC =0.79; specificity, 73%; sensitivity, 84%) with better sensitivity compared to that by the algorithm (AUC =0.76; specificity, 77%; sensitivity, 72%).

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that LV GLS was an independent predictor of elevated LAP as the E/e' ratio and TR jet velocity and may be used as a major criterion for the diagnosis of HFpEF.

Cirrhotic Cardiomyopathy Predicts Posttransplant Cardiovascular Disease: Revelations of the New Diagnostic Criteria

The diagnostic criteria for cirrhotic cardiomyopathy (CCM) were recently revised to reflect the contemporary advancements in echocardiographic technology. This study evaluates the prevalence of CCM, according to the new criteria, and its impact on posttransplant cardiovascular disease (CVD). This is a single-center retrospective matched cohort study of liver transplantation (LT) recipients who underwent LT between January 1, 2008 and November 30, 2017. A total of 3 cohorts with decompensated cirrhosis (nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, alcohol-related liver disease, or other etiologies) were matched based on age, sex, and year of transplant after excluding patients listed without evidence of hepatic decompensation. CCM was defined, according to 2020 criteria, as having diastolic dysfunction, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤50%, and/or a global longitudinal strain (GLS) absolute value <18%. The study echocardiographers were blinded to the clinical data. Posttransplant CVD included new coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, atrial and ventricular arrhythmia, and stroke. The study included 141 patients of whom 59 were women. The mean age at LT was 57.8 (±7.6) years. A total of 49 patients (34.8%) had CCM. Patients with CCM were at an increased risk for post-LT CVD (hazard ratio, 2.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-5.5; P = 0.016). Changes in CCM individual parameters pretransplant, such as GLS, early diastolic transmitral flow to early diastolic mitral annular velocity, and left atrial volume index were associated with an increased risk for posttransplant CVD. CCM, defined by the new diagnostic criteria, affects approximately one-third of decompensated LT candidates. CCM predicts an increased risk for new CVD following LT. Studies into addressing and follow-up to mitigate these risks are needed.

Deep-Learning Models for the Echocardiographic Assessment of Diastolic Dysfunction

OBJECTIVES

The authors explored a deep neural network (DeepNN) model that integrates multidimensional echocardiographic data to identify distinct patient subgroups with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).

BACKGROUND

The clinical algorithms for phenotyping the severity of diastolic dysfunction in HFpEF remain imprecise.

METHODS

The authors developed a DeepNN model to predict high- and low-risk phenogroups in a derivation cohort (n = 1,242). Model performance was first validated in 2 external cohorts to identify elevated left ventricular filling pressure (n = 84) and assess its prognostic value (n = 219) in patients with varying degrees of systolic and diastolic dysfunction. In 3 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-funded HFpEF trials, the clinical significance of the model was further validated by assessing the relationships of the phenogroups with adverse clinical outcomes (TOPCAT [Aldosterone Antagonist Therapy for Adults With Heart Failure and Preserved Systolic Function] trial, n = 518), cardiac biomarkers, and exercise parameters (NEAT-HFpEF [Nitrate's Effect on Activity Tolerance in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction] and RELAX-HF [Evaluating the Effectiveness of Sildenafil at Improving Health Outcomes and Exercise Ability in People With Diastolic Heart Failure] pooled cohort, n = 346).

RESULTS

The DeepNN model showed higher area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve than 2016 American Society of Echocardiography guideline grades for predicting elevated left ventricular filling pressure (0.88 vs. 0.67; p = 0.01). The high-risk (vs. low-risk) phenogroup showed higher rates of heart failure hospitalization and/or death, even after adjusting for global left ventricular and atrial longitudinal strain (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.96; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.24 to 12.67; p = 0.021). Similarly, in the TOPCAT cohort, the high-risk (vs. low-risk) phenogroup showed higher rates of heart failure hospitalization or cardiac death (HR: 1.92; 95% CI: 1.16 to 3.22; p = 0.01) and higher event-free survival with spironolactone therapy (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.46 to 0.90; p = 0.01). In the pooled RELAX-HF/NEAT-HFpEF cohort, the high-risk (vs. low-risk) phenogroup had a higher burden of chronic myocardial injury (p < 0.001), neurohormonal activation (p < 0.001), and lower exercise capacity (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This publicly available DeepNN classifier can characterize the severity of diastolic dysfunction and identify a specific subgroup of patients with HFpEF who have elevated left ventricular filling pressures, biomarkers of myocardial injury and stress, and adverse events and those who are more likely to respond to spironolactone.

The prevalence of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy according to different diagnostic criteria

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Recently published criteria by 2019 Cirrhotic Cardiomyopathy Consortium set a lower threshold for reduced ejection fraction to diagnose systolic dysfunction in cirrhotic patients, and stress testing was replaced by echocardiography strain imaging. The criteria to diagnose diastolic dysfunction are in general concordant with the 2016 ASE/EACVI guidelines and differ considerably from the 2005 Montreal recommendations. We aimed to assess the prevalence of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy according to different diagnostic criteria.

METHODS

Cirrhotic patients without another structural heart disease, arterial hypertension, portal vein thrombosis, HCC outside Milan criteria and presence of TIPS were enrolled. Speckle-tracking echocardiography was performed by EACVI certified investigators.

RESULTS

A total of 122 patients with cirrhosis fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Overall prevalence of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy was similar for 2005 Montreal and 2019 CCC: 67.2% vs 55.7% (P = .09); and significantly higher compared to 2009 ASE/EACVI criteria: 67.2% vs 35.2% (P < .0001) and 55.7% vs 35.2% (P = .002) respectively. Significantly more patients had diastolic dysfunction according to the 2005 Montreal compared to the 2009 ASE/EACVI and 2019 CCC criteria: 64.8% vs 32.8% (P < .0001) and 64.8% vs 7.4% (P < .0001). Systolic dysfunction was more frequently diagnosed according to 2019 CCC criteria compared to 2005 Montreal (53.3% vs 16.4%,P < .0001) or ASE/EACVI criteria (53.3% vs 4.9%,P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy was present in around 60% of cirrhotic patients when applying the hepatological criteria. A considerably higher prevalence of systolic dysfunction according to the 2019 CCC criteria was observed. Long-term follow-up studies are needed to establish the validity of these criteria to predict clinically relevant outcomes.

LA reservoir strain: a sensitive parameter for estimating LV filling pressure in patients with preserved EF

An elevated left ventricular (LV) filling pressure is the main finding in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and LV filling pressure is estimated with an algorithm in the recent American Society of Echocardiography (ASE)/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) guideline. In this study, we sought to determine the efficacy of LA global longitudinal strain to estimate elevated LV filling pressure. Seventy-one consecutive patients (mean age of 63.2  ±  9.75, 70% male) who underwent left ventricular catheterization were included. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed within 24 h before catheterization. The LV filling pressure was estimated using echo parameters based on the 2016 ASE/EACVI algorithm. LA GLS was measured using 2D speckle tracking echocardiography in a four-chamber view (GE, Vivid E9 USA). Invasive LV pre-A pressure corresponding to the mean left atrial pressure (LAP) was used as a reference, and > 12 mm Hg was defined as elevated. Invasive LV filling pressure was defined as elevated in 41 (58%) and normal in 30 patients (42%). The LV filling pressure of 9 (13%) of 71 patients was defined as indeterminate based on the 2016 algorithm. Using the ROC method, 25.5% of LA reservoir strain (LASr) had a higher sensitivity (AUC = 0.79, specificity 77%, sensitivity 80%) in estimating LV filling pressure than the 2016 ASE/EACVI algorithm (AUC = 0.75, specificity 77%, sensitivity 70%). LASr, with higher sensitivity than 2016 ASE/EACVI algorithm, may be used as a single parameter to estimate LV filling pressure and hence may add incremental value toHFpEF diagnosis.

Prevalence and determinants of systolic and diastolic cardiac dysfunction and heart failure in acute ischemic stroke patients: The SICFAIL study

AIMS

Ischaemic stroke (IS) might induce alterations of cardiac function. Prospective data on frequency of cardiac dysfunction and heart failure (HF) after IS are lacking. We assessed prevalence and determinants of diastolic dysfunction (DD), systolic dysfunction (SD), and HF in patients with acute IS.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The Stroke-Induced Cardiac FAILure in mice and men (SICFAIL) study is a prospective, hospital-based cohort study. Patients with IS underwent a comprehensive assessment of cardiac function in the acute phase (median 4 days after IS) including clinical examination, standardized transthoracic echocardiography by expert sonographers, and determination of blood-based biomarkers. Information on demographics, lifestyle, risk factors, symptoms suggestive of HF, and medical history was collected by a standardized personal interview. Applying current guidelines, cardiac dysfunction was classified based on echocardiographic criteria into SD (left ventricular ejection fraction < 52% in men or <54% in women) and DD (≥3 signs of DD in patients without SD). Clinically overt HF was classified into HF with reduced, mid-range, or preserved ejection fraction. Between January 2014 and February 2017, 696 IS patients were enrolled. Of them, patients with sufficient echocardiographic data on SD were included in the analyses {n = 644 patients [median age 71 years (interquartile range 60-78), 61.5% male]}. In these patients, full assessment of DD was feasible in 549 patients without SD (94%). Prevalence of cardiac dysfunction and HF was as follows: SD 9.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.6-12.2%]; DD in patients without SD 23.3% (95% CI 20.0-27.0%); and clinically overt HF 5.4% (95% CI 3.9-7.5%) with subcategories of HF with preserved ejection fraction 4.35%, HF with mid-range ejection fraction 0.31%, and HF with reduced ejection fraction 0.78%. In multivariable analysis, SD and fulfilment of HF criteria were associated with history of coronary heart disease [SD: odds ratio (OR) 3.87, 95% CI 1.93-7.75, P = 0.0001; HF: OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.04-5.05, P = 0.0406] and high-sensitive troponin T at baseline (SD: OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.31-2.42, P = 0.0003; HF: OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.17-2.33, P = 0.004); DD was associated with older age (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.05-1.11, P < 0.0001) and treated hypertension vs. no hypertension (OR 2.84, 95% CI 1.23-6.54, P = 0.0405).

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial proportion of the study population exhibited subclinical and clinical cardiac dysfunction. SICFAIL provides reliable data on prevalence and determinants of SD, DD, and clinically overt HF in patients with acute IS according to current guidelines, enabling further clarification of its aetiological and prognostic role.

Associations Between HIV Serostatus and Cardiac Structure and Function Evaluated by 2-Dimensional Echocardiography in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study

Background

We aimed to investigate whether there are differences in cardiac structure and systolic and diastolic function evaluated by 2‐dimensional echocardiography among men living with versus without HIV in the era of combination antiretroviral therapy.

Methods and Results

We performed a cross‐sectional analysis of 1195 men from MACS (Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study) who completed a transthoracic echocardiogram examination between 2017 and 2019. Associations between HIV serostatus and echocardiographic indices were assessed by multivariable regression analyses, adjusting for demographics and cardiovascular risk factors. Among men who are HIV+, associations between HIV disease severity markers and echocardiographic parameters were also investigated. Average age was 57.1±11.9 years; 29% of the participants were Black, and 55% were HIV+. Most men who were HIV+ (77%) were virally suppressed; 92% received combination antiretroviral therapy. Prevalent left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction <50%) was low and HIV serostatus was not associated with left ventricular ejection fraction. Multivariable adjustment models showed that men who were HIV+ versus those who were HIV− had greater LV mass index and larger left atrial diameter and right ventricular (RV) end‐diastolic area; lower RV function; and higher prevalence of diastolic dysfunction. Higher current CD4+ T cell count ≥400 cell/mm³ versus <400 was associated with smaller LV diastolic volume and RV area. Virally suppressed men who were HIV+ versus those who were HIV− had higher indexed LV mass and left atrial areas and greater diastolic dysfunction.

Conclusions

HIV seropositivity was independently associated with greater LV mass index, left atrial and RV sizes, lower RV function and diastolic abnormalities, but not left ventricular ejection fraction, which may herald a future predisposition to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction among men living with HIV.

Pulmonary and cardiac variables associated with persistent dyspnea after pulmonary embolism

INTRODUCTION

Persistent dyspnea is common in follow-up after pulmonary embolism (PE), but the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study included subjects aged 18-75 years with confirmed PE by computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) 6-72 months earlier. A total of 180 participants underwent clinical examination, incremental shuttle walk test, laboratory tests, transthoracic echocardiography, pulmonary function tests and ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy. In further analysis, we divided participants into two groups; "dyspnea" or "no dyspnea", based on interview and questionnaires at inclusion. The association of cardiac and pulmonary variables with persistent dyspnea was assessed using multiple logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 44% (95% CI: 39%-51%) of the participants reported persistent dyspnea after PE. Age (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.93 per year, 95% CI: 0.90-0.97, P = 0.001), body mass index (BMI) (aOR 1.14 per kg/m², 95% CI: 1.04-1.25, P = 0.004), recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) (aOR 3.69, 95% CI: 1.45-9.38, P = 0.006) and diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) (aOR 0.95 per increase of 1%, 95% CI: 0.92-0.98, P = 0.001) were independently associated with persistent dyspnea.

CONCLUSIONS

Persistent dyspnea was prevalent after PE. Age, BMI and recurrent VTE were independently associated with dyspnea. Apart from reduced DLCO, no other cardiac or pulmonary variables were associated with persistent dyspnea.

Do Elderly Patients With Diastolic Dysfunction Require Higher Doses of Norepinephrine During General Anesthesia for Noncardiac Surgeries? A Prospective Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Diastolic dysfunction is a risk factor for postoperative major cardiovascular events. During anesthesia, patients with diastolic dysfunction might experience impaired hemodynamic function and worsening of diastolic function, which in turn, might be associated with a higher incidence of postoperative complications.We aimed to investigate whether patients with diastolic dysfunction require higher doses of norepinephrine during general anesthesia. Furthermore, we aimed to examine the association between the grade of diastolic dysfunction and the E/e' ratio during anesthesia. A high E/e' ratio corresponds to elevated filling pressures and is an important measure of impaired diastolic function.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational cohort study at a German university hospital from February 2017 to September 2018. Patients aged ≥60 years and undergoing general anesthesia (ie, propofol and sevoflurane) for elective noncardiac surgery were enrolled. Exclusion: mitral valve disease, atrial fibrillation, and implanted mechanical device.The primary outcome parameter was the administered dose of norepinephrine within 30 minutes after anesthesia induction (μg·kg-1 30 min-1). The secondary outcome parameter was the change of Doppler echocardiographic E/e' from ECHO1 (baseline) to ECHO2 (anesthesia). Linear models and linear mixed models were used for statistical evaluation.

RESULTS

A total of 247 patients were enrolled, and 200 patients (75 female) were included in the final analysis. Diastolic dysfunction at baseline was not associated with a higher dose of norepinephrine during anesthesia (P = .6953). The grade of diastolic dysfunction at baseline was associated with a decrease of the E/e' ratio during anesthesia (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

We did not find evidence for an association between diastolic dysfunction and impaired hemodynamic function, as expressed by high vasopressor support during anesthesia. Additionally, our findings suggest that diastolic function, as expressed by the E/e' ratio, does not worsen during anesthesia.

Prognostic utility of the assessment of diastolic function in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy

Conflicting data exist about the relationship between cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and diastolic function. Aims of the study are to assess diastolic patterns in patients undergoing CRT according to the 2016 recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and to evaluate the prognostic value of diastolic dysfunction (DD) in CRT candidates. METHODS AND RESULTS: One-hundred ninety-three patients (age: 67 ± 11 years, QRS width: 167 ± 21 ms) were included in this multicentre prospective study. Mitral filling pattern, mitral tissue Doppler velocity, tricuspid regurgitation velocity, and indexed left atrial volume were used to classify DD from grade I to III. CRT-response, defined as a reduction of left ventricular (LV) end-systolic volume > 15% at 6-month follow-up (FU), occurred in 132 (68%) patients. The primary endpoint was a composite of heart transplantation, LV assisted device implantation, or all-cause death during FU and occurred in 29 (15%) patients. CRT was associated with a degradation of DD in non-responders. At multivariable analysis corrected for clinical variables, QRS duration, mitral regurgitation, CRT-response and LV dyssynchrony, grade I DD was associated with a better outcome (HR 0.37, 95% CI: 0.14-0.96). Non-responders with grade II-III DD had the worse prognosis (HR 4.36, 95%CI: 2.10-9.06). CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of DD in CRT candidates allows the prognostic stratification of patients, independently from CRT-response.

Impact of Updated 2016 ASE/EACVI VIS-À-VIS 2009 ASE Recommendation on the Prevalence of Diastolic Dysfunction and LV Filling Pressures in Patients with Preserved Ejection Fraction

BACKGROUND

Assessment of diastolic dysfunction (DD) and left ventricular filling pressures (LVFP) by echocardiography is complex in patients with preserved ejection fraction (EF). The American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (ASE/EACVI) jointly published recommendations in 2016 to simplify the diagnosis and classification of DD and the assessment of LVFP. We aimed to study the impact of the updated 2016 ASE/EACVI guidelines vis-à-vis the 2009 ASE recommendations on prevalence of DD and LVFP in patients with preserved EF.

METHODS

Five hundred patients referred to the echocardiography laboratory from March 2020 to May 2020 were analyzed. Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50% were excluded. All patients underwent comprehensive transthoracic echocardiography. DD and LVFP were assessed by the 2016 ASE/EACVI and 2009 ASE recommendations. The concordance between the guidelines was analyzed by kappa coefficient and overall proportion of agreement.

RESULTS

Mean age was 53 ± 13 years and 63.4% were men. Prevalence of DD and abnormal LVFP were significantly lower with the 2016 recommendations than with the 2009 recommendations (9.4% vs. 16.8%, p < 0.001 and 8.4% vs. 12.8%, p < 0.05). Patients with Grade 1 DD (100%) and Grade 2 DD (46.4%) were reclassified by the 2016 recommendations. Indeterminate diastolic function (9.8%) was strikingly high according to the 2016 recommendations. The concordance between the two recommendations was moderate (kappa = 0.569). The overall proportion of agreement was 85.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence of DD and abnormal LV filling pressures were lower with application of the 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendations in patients with preserved EF. There was moderate agreement between the 2009 and 2016 recommendations.

Sex, racial differences and healthy aging in normative reference ranges on diastolic function in Ethnic Asians: 2016 ASE guideline revisited

BACKGROUND

Diastolic dysfunction (DD) has shown to be a hallmark pathological intermediate in the development of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We aim to establish age- and sex-stratified normal reference values of diastolic indices and to explore racial-differences.

METHODS

We explored age- and sex-related structural/functional alterations from 6023 healthy ethnic Asians (47.1 ± 10.9 years, 61.3% men) according to 2016 American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) diastolic dysfunction (DD) criteria. Racial comparisons were made using data from London Life Sciences Prospective Population (LOLIPOP) study.

RESULTS

Age- and sex-based normative ranges (including mean, median, 10% and 90% lower and upper reference values) were extracted from our large healthy population. In fully adjusted models, advanced age was independently associated with cardiac structural remodeling and worsened diastolic parameters including larger indexed LA volume (LAVi), lower e', higher E/e', and higher TR velocity; all p < 0.001), which were more prominent in women (P interaction: <0.05). Broadly, markedly lower e', higher E/e' and smaller LAVi were observed in ethnic Asians compared to Whites. DD defined by 2016 ASE criteria, despite at low prevalence (0.42%) in current healthy population, increased drastically with advanced age and performed perfectly in excluding abnormal NT-proBNP (≥125 pg/mL) (Specificity: 99.8%, NPV: 97.6%).

CONCLUSION

This is to date the largest cohort exploring the normative reference values using guideline-centered diastolic parameters from healthy Asians, with aging played as central role in diastolic dysfunction. Our observed sex and ethnic differences in defining healthy diastolic cut-offs likely impact future clinical definition for DD in Asians.

Feasibility, repeatability, and reproducibility of contemporary diastolic parameters and classification

PURPOSE

To evaluate feasibility, time of acquisition, retest repeatability and reproducibility of echocardiographic indexes and classification algorithms of diastolic function.

METHODS

A total of 356 patients were examined before coronary artery bypass-grafting and/or aortic valve surgery. A subgroup of 50 was examined with 3 successive echocardiograms in conditions reflecting daily clinical practice. Diastolic parameters were obtained and analysed according to previous (2009) and current (2016) guidelines. Acquisition and analysis time, plus intra- and inter-observer variability were assessed.

RESULTS

Feasibility of diastolic parameters was between 93 and 99%, except the maximal tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TR Vmax) (65%). Mean acquisition and analysis time were highest for left atrial volumes (141 ± 24 s) in contrast to other parameters which were obtained in approximately one minute. Mean 368 and 360 s were needed to classify diastolic function according to the 2009 and 2016 algorithms, respectively (non-significant). Reproducibility was overall moderate (Pearson r = 0.62 to 0.87), with TR Vmax having the highest (r = 0.62) and mitral valve E/A ratio the lowest (r = 0.87) variation. The 2009 algorithm resulted in more indeterminate cases than the 2016 algorithm. Inter-examiner analysis resulted in reclassification of 20 vs. 8 patients using the 2009 and 2016 algorithms, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Diastolic parameters are highly feasible and moderately reproducible, except TR Vmax. The 2016 algorithm is more restrictive than the 2009 algorithm in classifying patients with advanced stages of diastolic dysfunction. Time of acquisition according to the two guidelines is not significantly different.

Impact of Pulse Wave Velocity and Parameters Reflecting Android Type Fat Distribution on Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction in Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndromes

Background: Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) is caused by a decreased left ventricle relaxation and is associated with an increased risk of symptomatic heart failure (HF) and excessive mortality. Aim: To evaluate the frequency and factors related to LVDD in the population with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS). Methods: 200 patients (mean age 63.18 ± 8.12 years, 75.5% male) with CCS were included. LVDD was diagnosed based on the recent echocardiography guidelines. Results: LVDD was diagnosed in 38.5% of CCS population. From the studied factors, after adjustment for age, sex, and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), LVDD associated positively with android/gynoid (A/G) fat mass ratio, left ventricular mass index (LVMI), and negatively with Z-score and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). In stepwise backward logistic regression analysis, the strongest factors associated with LVDD were pulse wave velocity value, handgrip strength and waist to hip ratio (WHR). Conclusions: LVDD is common among CCS patients and it is associated with parameters reflecting android type fat distribution regardless of NT-proBNP and high-sensitivity troponin T concentrations. Deterioration in diastolic dysfunction is linked with increased aortic stiffness independently of age and sex. Further studies evaluating the effects of increasing physical fitness and lowering abdominal fat accumulations on LVDD in CCS patients should be considered.

Training, competence, and quality improvement in echocardiography: the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging Recommendations: update 2020

The primary mission of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) is ‘to promote excellence in clinical diagnosis, research, technical development, and education in cardiovascular imaging’. Echocardiography is a key component in the evaluation of patients with known or suspected cardiovascular disease and is essential for the high quality and effective practice of clinical cardiology. The EACVI aims to update the previously published recommendations for training, competence, and quality improvement in echocardiography since these activities are increasingly recognized by patients, physicians, and payers. The purpose of this document is to provide the general requirements for training and competence in echocardiography, to outline the principles of quality evaluation, and to recommend a set of measures for improvement, with the ultimate goal of raising the standards of echocardiographic practice. Moreover, the document aims to provide specific guidance for advanced echo techniques, which have dramatically evolved since the previous publication in 2009.

Impact of the updated diastolic function guidelines in the real world

BACKGROUND

Echocardiographic assessment of diastolic function is complex but can aid in the diagnosis of heart failure, particularly in patients with preserved ejection fraction. In 2016, the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) published an updated algorithm for the evaluation of diastolic function. The objective of our study was to assess its impact on diastolic function assessment in a real-world cohort of echo studies.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 71,727 consecutive transthoracic echo studies performed at a tertiary care center between February 2010 and March 2016 in which diastolic function was reported based on the 2009 ASE Guidelines. We then programmed a software algorithm to assess diastolic function in these echo studies according to the 2016 ASE/EACVI Guidelines.

RESULTS

When diastolic function assessment based on the 2009 guidelines was compared to that using the 2016 guidelines, there were significant differences in proportion of studies classified as normal (23% vs. 32%) or indeterminate (43% vs. 36%) function, and mild (23% vs. 23%), moderate (10% vs. 8%), or severe (1% vs. 2%) diastolic dysfunction, with poor agreement between the two methods (Kappa 0.323, 95% CI 0.318-0.328). Furthermore, within the subgroup of studies with preserved ejection fraction and no evidence of myocardial disease, there was significant reclassification from mild diastolic dysfunction to normal diastolic function.

CONCLUSION

The updated guidelines result in significant differences in diastolic function interpretation in the real world. Our findings have important implications for the identification of patients with or at risk for heart failure.

Subclinical ventricular dysfunction in rheumatoid arthritis

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at higher risk for having underdiagnosed heart failure, however there are no recommendations regarding echocardiographic screening. We aimed to determine the prevalence of subclinical ventricular dysfunction in RA applying current echocardiographic guidelines, its association with patients' characteristics, biomarkers and prognostic parameters and compare the 2016 guidelines to the recommendations from 2009. Prospective study of RA patients without known heart disease, categorized as preserved ventricular function (PVF), systolic dysfunction (SD), isolated diastolic dysfunction (DD) or indeterminate diastolic function (IDF) as per the 2016 echocardiography guidelines-or any ventricular dysfunction (AVD) comprehending the last 3. The median age was 58 years and 78% were females. The majority had PVF (73%), followed by DD (13%), IDF (11%) and SD (4%). Concordance with the 2009 echocardiographic guidelines was low. Compared with PVF, AVD patients were older (65 vs 55 years, p < 0.001), had a higher prevalence of hypertension and dyslipidaemia (56% vs 38%, p = 0.003 and 60% vs 41%, p = 0.002, respectively). In multivariable analysis, age (particularly > 57 years) was the only independent predictor of AVD or DD. AVD was significantly associated with higher NT-proBNP and lower distance in 6-min walk test. There were no significant independent associations between characteristics of RA disease and ventricular function. A total of 17% of RA patients without known cardiovascular disease presented subclinical systolic or diastolic dysfunction, which was associated with older age. The echocardiographic screening may have clinical value in identifying subclinical ventricular dysfunction, especially in older RA patients.

The Effect of Anti-TNF Therapy on Cardiac Function in Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Observational Study

Congestive heart failure (CHF) is the second most prevalent cause of death in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The systemic inflammatory state in RA patients is deemed responsible for this finding. Anti-inflammatory treatment with anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy decreases CV risk and subsequently might improve the cardiac function by lowering the overall inflammatory state. This study investigated the effect of anti-TNF on the cardiac function in RA patients. Fifty one RA patients were included, of which thirty three completed follow-up. Included patients were >18 years, had moderate-high disease activity and no history of cardiac disease. Patients were assessed at baseline and after six months of anti-TNF treatment. Patients underwent conventional Speckle tracking and tissue Doppler echocardiography in combination with clinical and laboratory assessments at baseline and follow-up. The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) showed no changes during follow-up, LVEF 63% (±9) to 62% (±8) p = 0.097 and GLS -20 (±4) to -20 (±3) p = 0.79, respectively. Furthermore, E/e' nor E/A changed significantly between baseline and follow-up, respectively 8 (7-9) and 8 (7-9) p = 0.17 and 1.1 (±0.4) and 1.1 (±0.4) p = 0.94. Follow-up NT-proBNP decreased with 23%, from 89 ng/L (47-142) to 69 ng/L (42-155), p = 0.10. Regression analysis revealed no association between change in inflammatory variables and cardiac function. Echocardiography showed no effect of anti-TNF treatment on the cardiac function in RA patients with low prevalence of cardiac dysfunction. Moreover, NT-proBNP decreased, possibly indicating (subtle) improvement of the cardiac function.

Assessment of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function using Phonocardiogram Signals: A Comparison with Echocardiography

This paper presents a fully-automated end-to-end phonocardiogram(PCG)-based wearable system capable of providing echocardiography-like metrics for left ventricular (LV) diastolic function assessment. Proxy metrics for five echocardiographic parameters were calculated based on physiologically-motivated features extracted from PCG signals using noise-subtraction, heartbeat-segmentation, and quality-assurance algorithms. The clinical value of these proxy metrics was evaluated using the latest American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging guidelines for evaluation of LV diastolic function. When tested on a group of n=34 patients, proxy metrics successfully identified LV diastolic dysfunction in a n=29 subset with 87.5% accuracy, and elevated LV filling pressures in a n=17 subset with 75% accuracy.

Impact of the 2016 ASE/EACVI Guidelines on diastolic function reporting in routine clinical practice

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of 2016 ASE/EACVI guidelines on Diastolic Function (DF) reporting during routine clinical practice.

METHODS

Transthoracic echos performed 9 months before and 18 months after the 2016 guidelines (DF2016) were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Twenty thousand eight hundred forty three echos performed between July 1, 2015, and September 30, 2017, were analyzed. Quarterly trends showed a stable proportion of normal DF (nDF), diastolic dysfunction (DD), indeterminate DF (DF-I), and nonreported DF (DF-NR) for 3 quarters preceding DF2016. After DF2016 release, reporting of DD decreased by 57% (P < .001), nDF increased by 76% (P < .001), DF-NR increased by 266% (P < .001), and DF-I did not change significantly (P = .40). Grade 1 DD decreased by 64% (P < .001), grade 2 DD decreased by 51% (P < .001), and grade 3 DD did not change significantly (P = .18). Provider level analysis showed increased heterogeneity in grade 1 DD reporting and decreased heterogeneity in DD grades 2 or higher, after DF2016. Systolic dysfunction reporting remained relatively stable (22%→21%→20%) compared to a significant decrease in isolated DD (35%→21%→10%).

CONCLUSION

The 2016 guidelines update has impacted DF reporting patterns significantly. The likelihood of reporting DD decreased significantly, especially for grades 1 and 2. Inter-provider heterogeneity in DF reporting improved for grades 2 and 3 but worsened for grade 1. There was more than threefold increase in failure to report DF, suggesting a decrease in provider confidence.

Diastolic dysfunction in men with severe obstructive sleep apnea syndrome but without cardiovascular or oxidative stress-related comorbidities

Background:

We aimed to evaluate whether the severity of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) per se affects the prevalence of left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction in patients without comorbidities.

Methods:

A total of 42 patients with first-diagnosed severe OSAS [apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) > 30] and 25 controls (AHI < 5), having been referred for snoring to the Sleep Laboratory Department of our tertiary Hospital, were enrolled in the study. Inclusion criteria were absence of any cardiovascular or oxidative stress-related comorbidities, and age between 20 and 70 years. Clinical, laboratory, echocardiographic, and polysomnographic data were recorded prospectively. Diastolic dysfunction diagnosis and grading was based on 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendations.

Results:

Severe OSAS was associated with significantly increased prevalence and degree of diastolic dysfunction (26/42; 61.9%) compared with controls (7/25; 28%) (p = 0.007). AHI ⩾ 55 (dichotomous value of severe OSAS subset) was also characterized by greater prevalence and degree of diastolic dysfunction compared with 30 < AHI < 55 patients (p = 0.015). In the severe OSAS subset, age >45 years-old, height <1.745 m, body-mass index (BMI) >27.76 kg m⁻², OSAS severity (AHI > 57.35), oxidative stress (overnight reduction of reduced to oxidized glutathione ratio < 18.44%), and BMI/height ratio > 16.155 kg m⁻³ (an index describing ‘dense’, short-heavy patients) presented significant diagnostic utility in identifying diastolic dysfunction in ROC-curve analysis (0.697 ⩾ AUC ⩾ 0.855, 0.001 ⩽ p ⩽ 0.018). In binary logistic regression model, advanced age (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.025–1.477; p = 0.026) and AHI (OR 1.123, 95% CI 1.007–1.253; p = 0.036) showed independent association with diastolic dysfunction in severe OSAS.

Conclusions:

The present prospective study may suggest that severe OSAS is significantly associated with LV diastolic dysfunction; OSAS clinical severity exerts a positive influence on (and possibly constitutes an independent risk factor of) LV diastolic dysfunction.

The reviews of this paper are available via the supplementary material section.

Redefining Cirrhotic Cardiomyopathy for the Modern Era

Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy (CCM) is cardiac dysfunction in patients with end-stage liver disease in the absence of prior heart disease. First defined in 2005 during the World Congress of Gastroenterology, CCM criteria consisted of echocardiographic parameters to identify subclinical cardiac dysfunction in the absence of overt structural abnormalities. Significant advancements in cardiovascular imaging over the past 14 years, including the integration of myocardial deformation imaging into routine clinical practice to identify subclinical cardiovascular dysfunction, have rendered the 2005 CCM criteria obsolete. Therefore, new criteria based on contemporary cardiovascular imaging parameters are needed. In this guidance document, assembled by a group of multidisciplinary experts in the field, new core criteria based on contemporary cardiovascular imaging parameters are proposed for the assessment of CCM. This document provides a critical assessment of the diagnosis of CCM and ongoing assessment aimed at improving clinical outcomes, particularly surrounding liver transplantation. Key points and practice-based recommendations for the diagnosis of CCM are provided to offer guidance for clinicians and identify gaps in knowledge for future investigations.

Difference in the prevalence of subclinical left ventricular impairment among left ventricular geometric pattern in a community-based population

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy is reported to cause LV diastolic dysfunction. This study aimed to examine the prevalence of LV diastolic dysfunction in each group categorized by the geometric pattern of LV hypertrophy in a community-based population.

METHODS

We studied 1260 community-dwelling subjects who experienced no symptoms of obvious heart disease (461 men, 799 women) and who participated in annual health check-ups in a rural Japanese community. The subjects were divided into 4 groups according to LV mass index and relative wall thickness: normal geometry, concentric remodeling, eccentric hypertrophy, and concentric hypertrophy. We investigated the prevalence of LV diastolic dysfunction in the overall and stratified population by LV geometric pattern. LV diastolic function was determined by 3 echocardiographic parameters of LV diastolic function: early diastolic myocardial velocity, the ratio of early diastolic mitral inflow velocity and myocardial velocity, and indexed left atrial dimension. LV diastolic dysfunction was defined as the presence of abnormal values in more than 2 of 3 echocardiographic parameters.

RESULTS

The prevalence of LV diastolic dysfunction was higher in the categories with more severe LV hypertrophy. However, LV mass index, rather than relative wall thickness, was a significant determinant of LV diastolic dysfunction, after adjustment for comorbidities. In addition, 71 (10%) out of 740 subjects with normal LV geometric pattern had LV diastolic dysfunction even without obvious LV geometric change.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of LV diastolic dysfunction was higher in the subjects with more severe LV hypertrophy in a community-based population. Subclinical LV diastolic dysfunction without obvious LV geometric change should be noted and its clinical impact should be elucidated.

Prognostic utility of diastolic dysfunction and speckle tracking echocardiography in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Aims

We hypothesized that grading of diastolic dysfunction (DDF) according to two DDF grading algorithms and strain imaging yields prognostic information on all‐cause mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

Methods and results

We enrolled ambulatory HFrEF (left ventricular ejection fraction < 45%; N = 1 065) patients who underwent echocardiography and speckle tracking assessment of global longitudinal strain (GLS). Patients were stratified according to DDF grades (Grades I–III) according to two contemporary DDF grading algorithms. Prognostic performance was assessed by C‐statistics. Of the originally 1 065 enrolled patients, a total of 645 (61%) patients (age: 67 ± 11 years, male: 72%, ejection fraction: 27 ± 9%) were classified according to both DDF grading algorithms. Concordance between the algorithms was moderate (kappa = 0.48) and the reclassification rate was 33%. During a median follow‐up of 3.3 years (1.9, 4.7 years), 101 (16%) died from all causes. When comparing DDF Grade I vs. Grade III, both algorithms provided prognostic information [Nagueh: (hazard ratio) HR 2.09, 95% confidence interval (CI),1.32–3.31, P = 0.002; Johansen: HR 2.47, 95% CI, 1.57–3.87, P < 0.001]. However, when comparing DDF Grade II vs. Grade III, only the Johansen algorithm yielded prognostic information (Nagueh: HR 1.04, 95% CI, 0.60–1.77, P = 0.90; Johansen: HR 2.26, 95% CI, 1.35–3.77, P = 0.002). We found no difference in prognostic performance between the two algorithms (C‐statistics: 0.604 vs. 0.623, P = 0.24). Assessed by C‐statistics, the most powerful predictors of the endpoint from the two algorithms were E/e'‐ratio (C‐statistics: 0.644), tricuspid regurgitation velocity (C‐statistics: 0.625) and E/A‐ratio (C‐statistics: 0.602). When adding GLS to a combination of these predictors, the prognostic performance increased significantly (C‐statistics: 0.705 vs. C‐statistics: 0.634, P = 0.028).

Conclusions

Evaluation of DDF in patients with HFrEF yields prognostic information on all‐cause mortality. Furthermore, adding GLS to contemporary algorithms of DDF adds novel prognostic information.

Verification of Echocardiographic Assessment of Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction in Patients With Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Using the American Society of Echocardiography and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging 2016 Recommendations

Background: Non-invasive evaluation of left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction (DD) and elevated LV filling pressure are crucial for diagnosing heart failure. The 2016 American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (ASE/EACVI) recommendations for evaluating elevated LV filling pressure (algorithm B) have acceptable diagnostic accuracy, including in patients with reduced LV ejection fraction (EF). No prior study, however, has assessed the diagnostic accuracy of algorithm A of the ASE/EACVI recommendations for evaluating LVDD in patients with normal LVEF.

Methods and Results: We evaluated the clinical relevance of algorithm A in 94 patients who underwent invasive LV pressure measurement. Algorithm A identified invasively defined LVDD (time constant τ≥48 ms and/or LV end-diastolic pressure ≥16 mmHg) with low sensitivity (22.4%) but high specificity (90.7%). Algorithm A also identified elevated LV filling pressure with low sensitivity (41.7%) but high specificity (87.5%), and with a high negative predictive value (90.9%).

Conclusions: Algorithm A may not be useful for screening LVDD in patients with normal LVEF. Negative findings using algorithm A, however, may identify a patient with normal LVDD with high specificity, and most of such patients will have LV pre-A pressure in the normal range.

Practical Impact of New Diastolic Recommendations on Noninvasive Estimation of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function and Filling Pressures

BACKGROUND

In 2016, an update of the 2009 recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular (LV) diastolic function (DF) was released by the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. The aims of this study were to assess the concordance between the 2016 and 2009 recommendations and to test the impact of the consideration of "myocardial disease" recommended in the 2016 update on the evaluation of diastolic dysfunction (DD) and LV filling pressures in patients with normal and reduced LV ejection fractions referred to a general echocardiography laboratory.

METHODS

A total of 1,508 outpatients referred to an echocardiography laboratory during a predefined 5-month period were prospectively enrolled. All patients underwent targeted clinical history and Doppler echocardiographic examination. DD and LV filling pressures were assessed according to 2009 and 2016 recommendations. Concordance was calculated using the κ coefficient and overall proportion of agreement.

RESULTS

Overall proportion of agreement between the two recommendations was 64.7% (κ = 0.43). Comparing the 2009 and 2016 recommendations, 47.5% and 36.1% patients, respectively, had DD (P < .0001), and 22.7% and 12.6% had elevated LV filling pressures (P < .0001). This difference remained significant in the setting of patients with normal LV ejection fractions (21.6% vs 10.7%, P < .0001). In the application of the 2016 recommendations, whether or not the presence of "myocardial disease" was considered, the prevalence of indeterminate diastolic function was, respectively, 7.3% versus 13.7%, while patients in whom the DD grade could not be determined were 8.1% versus 14.4% (P < .0001 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the presence of myocardial disease when applying the 2016 recommendations resulted in a lower prevalence of inconclusive diagnosis.

Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction in Type 2 Diabetes-Progress and Perspectives

In-depth understanding of early cardiovascular manifestations in diabetes is high on international research and prevention agendas given that cardiovascular events are the leading cause of death for diabetic patients. Our aim was to review recent developments in the echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) as a telltale pre-clinical disturbance preceding diabetic cardiomyopathy. We analyzed papers in which patients had been comprehensively assessed echocardiographically according to the latest LVDD guidelines (2016), and those affording comparisons with previous, widely used recommendations (2009). We found that the updated algorithm for LVDD is more effective in predicting adverse cardiovascular events in patients with established LVDD, and less specific in grading other patients (labelled "indeterminate"). This may prove instrumental for recruiting "indeterminate" LVDD cases among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in future screening programs. As an interesting consideration, the elevated values of the index E/e' can point to early diastolic impairment, foretelling diabetic cardiomyopathy. Identifying subclinical signs early makes clinical sense, but the complex nature of T2DM calls for further research. Specifically, longitudinal studies on rigorously selected cohorts of diabetic patients are needed to better understand and predict the subtle, slow onset of cardiac manifestations with T2DM as a complicating backdrop.

Application of the newest European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging Recommendation regarding the long-term prognostic relevance of left ventricular diastolic function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

OBJECTIVE

The long-term predictive value of the new proposed algorithm in the updated 2016 guidelines of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging to assess diastolic dysfunction (DD) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has not been validated.

METHODS

The analysis included 451 patients who were diagnosed with HFpEF as confirmed via echocardiography. The endpoints were mortality and hospitalization for HF. The Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models were generated to determine the risk of all-cause mortality based on the 2016 and 2009 DD grading algorithm, respectively. We evaluated the net reclassification index of outcomes on the basis of 2009 DD grade after abiding by the 2016 recommendations.

RESULTS

After a follow-up of 2976 days, 119 patients (26.4%) died. According to the 2016 DD grading, grade III DD was associated with a significantly higher risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 2.209; 95% CI 1.144-4.266) and HF hospitalization (HR, 2.047; 95% CI 1.348-3.870), as compared with grade I DD. Grade II DD was also associated with a higher risk of mortality (HR, 1.538; 95% CI 1.313-1.924). However, only grade III DD was independently associated with worse mortality based on 2009 DD grading. The net reclassification index for mortality increased significantly after grading by 2016 algorithm (10.6%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The 2016 DD grading algorithm showed improved prognostic value of long-term mortality in patients with HFpEF. Based on the findings of the study, the appropriate grading of DD is important in the prognostication of patients with HFpEF.

KEY POINTS

• The application of the 2016 European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging recommendations diastolic dysfunction (DD) grading algorithm improves the predictive value for mortality. • Our analysis suggests DD grades II and III based on 2016 guidelines is associated with poor outcomes as compared with grade I. The echocardiographic indices of the new algorithm should be obtained and applied to effectively evaluate DD.

Comparing the influence of 2009 versus 2016 ASE/EACVI diastolic function guidelines on the prevalence and echocardiographic characteristics of preclinical diastolic dysfunction (stage B heart failure) in a Hispanic population with type 2 diabetes mellitus

AIMS

To identify prevalence and predictors of undetected pre-clinical diastolic dysfunction (PDD) in a cohort of adult Hispanic patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), and compare variations in epidemiology and echocardiographic characteristics between categorization based on the 2009 versus 2016 guidelines.

METHODS

From 2013 to 2016, a cross-sectional cohort study of adults with T2D was performed. Patients without signs/symptoms of heart failure (HF) underwent 2D/Doppler echocardiographic screening, and were grouped into two subcohorts: 1) normal diastolic function, and 2) PDD, defined by the 2009 or 2016 ASE/EACVI criteria.

RESULTS

Among 307 Hispanic subjects, by 2009 criteria, 193 (62.9%) had normal diastolic function, 113 (36.8%) diastolic dysfunction and 1 (0.3%) indeterminate. Those that had diastolic dysfunction (DD) were older (mean age 59.1 ± 12.7 vs 52.2 ± 12.2 years, p< 0.0001), with higher proportion female (69.0 vs 53.9%, p = 0.0092), and higher systolic blood pressure (136.5 ± 18.6 vs 131.7 ± 19.9, p = 0.0372). By 2016 criteria, 261 (85%) had normal diastolic function, 22 (7.2%) diastolic dysfunction and 24 (7.8%) indeterminate. Among those that had normal diastolic function (n = 261) by 2016 criteria, 29% (n = 76) had DD by 2009 criteria, and they were more likely to have higher E/e' and left atrial volume index (LAVI).

CONCLUSIONS

By applying the 2016 versus the 2009 diastolic function criteria to a Hispanic population with T2D, the prevalence of PDD decreased significantly from 37% to 7%. These findings are consistent with recent studies demonstrating that the 2016 ASE/EACVI guidelines are more specific for diagnosing DD and hence less sensitive leading to lower prevalence of diastolic dysfunction.

The year 2018 in the European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging: Part I

The European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging has become one of the leading multimodality cardiovascular imaging journal, since it was launched in 2012. The impact factor is an impressive 8.366 and it is now established as one of the top 10 cardiovascular journals. The journal is the most important cardiovascular imaging journal in Europe. The most important studies from 2018 will be highlighted in two reports. Part I of the review will focus on studies about myocardial function and risk prediction, myocardial ischaemia, and emerging techniques in cardiovascular imaging, while Part II will focus on valvular heart disease, heart failure, cardiomyopathies, and congenital heart disease.

Clinical utility of the 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function in the stratification of post-discharge prognosis in patients with acute heart failure

Aims

Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) has prognostic significance in heart failure (HF). We aimed to assess the impact of LVDD grade stratified by the updated 2016 echocardiographic algorithm (DD2016) on post-discharge outcomes in patients admitted for acute HF and compare with the previous 2009 algorithm (DD2009).

Methods and results

The study included 481 patients hospitalized for acute decompensated HF. Comprehensive echocardiography and LVDD evaluation were performed just before hospital discharge. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death and readmission for HF. The concordance between DD2016 and DD2009 was moderate (κ = 0.44, P < 0.001); the reclassification rate was 39%. During the follow-up (median: 15 months), 127 (26%) patients experienced the primary endpoint. In the Kaplan–Meier analysis, Grade III in DD2016 showed a lower event-free survival rate than Grades I and II (log rank, P < 0.001 and P = 0.048, respectively) and was independently associated with a higher incidence of the primary endpoint than Grade I [hazard ratio 1.89; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17–3.04; P = 0.009]. Grade II or III in DD2016, reflecting elevation of left ventricular (LV) filling pressure, added an incremental predictive value of the primary endpoint to clinical variables irrespective of LV ejection fraction. DD2016 was comparable to DD2009 in predicting the endpoint (net reclassification improvement = 11%; 95% CI −7% to 30%, P = 0.23).

Conclusion

Despite simplification of the algorithm for LVDD evaluation, the prognostic value of DD2016 for post-discharge cardiovascular events in HF patients was maintained and not compromised in comparison with DD2009.

New Diastology Guidelines: Evolution, Validation and Impact on Clinical Practice

The 2016 American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Echocardiography (ASE/EACVI) guidelines on the assessment of diastolic function sought to simplify the assessment of diastolic function by recommending a streamlined, stepped approach with a focus on four key variables. Haemodynamic validation using simultaneous cardiac catheterisation and echocardiographic assessment of diastolic function have shown robust prediction of left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP) using the streamlined 2016 algorithms, with favourable comparisons to the 2009 guidelines. Similarly, prognostic validation data demonstrates that the 2016 algorithms are easier to implement in clinical practice, have superior inter-observer reliability across a broad range of observer experience, and are better at predicting clinical outcomes. Furthermore, published data show improved classification of clinical heart failure patients. However, increased specificity of the updated 2016 guidelines results in a lower prevalence of diastolic dysfunction compared to the 2009 recommendations. Further refinement of guidelines for the identification and diagnosis of diastolic dysfunction is possible through incorporation of new diastolic parameters.

The 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendations may be able to more accurately identify patients at risk for diastolic dysfunction in living donor liver transplantation

Background

The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence of diastolic dysfunction between the 2016 American Society of Echocardiography (ASE)/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and 2009 ASE/European Association of Echocardiography recommendations in patients undergoing living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

Patients and methods

A total of 312 adult patients who underwent LDLT at our hospital from January 2010 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Exclusion criteria were systolic dysfunction, arrhythmia, myocardial ischemia, and mitral or aortic valvular insufficiency.

Results

The study population was largely male (68.3%), and the median age was 54 (49–59) years. The median model for end-stage liver disease score was 12 (6–22) points. A predominant difference in the prevalence rates of diastolic dysfunction was observed between the two recommendations. The prevalence rates of diastolic dysfunction and indeterminate diastolic function were lower according to the 2016 recommendations than the 2009 recommendations. The level of concordance between the two recommendations was poor. The proportion of patients with a high brain natriuretic peptide level (> 100 pg/mL) decreased significantly during surgery in the normal and indeterminate groups according to the 2009 recommendations; however, only the normal group showed an intraoperative decrease in the proportion according to the 2016 recommendations. Patients with diastolic dysfunction showed a poorer overall-survival rate than those with normal function according to both recommendations. However, there was a difference in the survival rate in the indeterminate group between the two recommendations. A significant difference in patient survival rate was observed between the dysfunction and indeterminate groups according to the 2009 recommendations; however, the difference was not significant in the 2016 recommendations.

Conclusions

The 2016 classification may be better able to identify patients with a risk for diastolic dysfunction. Particularly, patients in the 2016 indeterminate group seemed to require a cardiac diastolic functional evaluation more frequently during and after surgery than those in the 2009 indeterminate group.