Liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome): safety data from a phase II/III clinical trial

Amphotericin B Formulations and Drug Targeting

Amphotericin B is a low-soluble polyene antibiotic which is able to self-aggregate. The aggregation state can modify its activity and pharmacokinetical characteristics. In spite of its high toxicity it is still widely employed for the treatment of systemic fungal infections and parasitic disease and different formulations are marketed. Some of these formulations, such as liposomal formulations, can be considered as classical examples of drug targeting. The pharmacokinetics, toxicity and activity are clearly dependent on the type of amphotericin B formulation. New drug delivery systems such as liposomes, nanospheres and microspheres can result in higher concentrations of AMB in the liver and spleen, but lower concentrations in kidney and lungs, so decreasing its toxicity. Moreover, the administration of these drug delivery systems can enhance the drug accessibility to organs and tissues (e.g., bone marrow) otherwise inaccessible to the free drug. During the last few years, new AMB formulations (AmBisome, Abelcet, and Amphotec) with an improved efficacy/toxicity ratio have been marketed. This review compares the different formulations of amphotericin B in terms of pharmacokinetics, toxicity and activity and discusses the possible drug targeting effect of some of these new formulations.

[Impact on renal function of an early switch from conventional to liposomal amphotericin B formulation in the empirical treatment of fungal infections]

OBJECTIVE

The authors had for aim to define the threshold of nephrotoxicity before switching to other antifungal treatment in hematological patients treated by conventional amphotericin B (AmB) as an empiric antifungal treatment.

DESIGN

A prospective randomised multicenter study was made on 32 neutropenic hematological patients receiving conventional AmB for empirical antifungal treatment. The patients were randomised after a greater than or equal to 30% increase of serum creatinine (sCr). Patients in the early-switch group received liposomal AmB just after randomisation and patients in the late-switch group received liposomal AmB only when serum creatinine increase was greater or equal to 100% or sCr reached 170mumol/L.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were analysed: 16 patients in the early-switch group and 15 patients in the late-switch group (seven switched to liposomal AmB and eight continued conventional AmB treatment). The mean age of patients was 48 years and 68% were men. The most frequent underlying haematological malignancy was acute leukemia (94%). In the late-switch group, the degradation of renal function continued after randomisation contrary to the early-switch group: median variations of calculated sCr clearance in early- and late-switch groups were -16.8 and -1.5%, respectively (P=0.03). Moreover, an early switch was cost-effective with a sCr lower duration of hospitalisation in comparison with a late switch.

CONCLUSIONS

This randomised trial suggests that an early switch to Liposomal AmB improves and preserves renal function in comparison with a late switch.

Invasive aspergillosis: epidemiology, diagnosis and management in immunocompromised patients

Morbidity and mortality caused by invasive Aspergillus infections are increasing. This is because of the higher number of patients with malignancies treated with intensive immunosuppressive therapy regimens as well as their improved survival from formerly fatal bacterial infections, and the rising number of patients undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell or organ transplantation. Early initiation of effective systemic antifungal treatment is essential for a successful clinical outcome in these patients; however, clinical clues for diagnosis are sparse and early microbiological proof of invasive aspergillosis (IA) is rare. Clinical diagnosis is based on pulmonary CT scan findings and non-culture based diagnostic techniques such as galactomannan or DNA detection in blood or bronchoalveolar lavage samples. Most promising outcomes can be expected in patients at high risk for aspergillosis in whom antifungal treatment has been started pre-emptively, backed up by laboratory and imaging findings. The gold standard of systemic antifungal treatment is voriconazole, which has been proven to be significantly superior to conventional amphotericin B and has led to a profound improvement of survival rates in patients with cerebral aspergillosis. Liposomal amphotericin B at standard dosages appears to be a suitable alternative for primary treatment, while caspofungin, amphotericin B lipid complex or posaconazole have shown partial or complete response in patients who had been refractory to or intolerant of primary antifungal therapy. Combination therapy with two antifungal compounds may be a promising future strategy for first-line treatment. Lung resection helps to prevent fatal haemorrhage in single patients with pulmonary lesions located in close proximity to larger blood vessels, but is primarily considered for reducing the risk of relapse during subsequent periods of severe immunosuppression. Strict reverse isolation appears to reduce the incidence of aspergillosis in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients and patients with acute myeloid leukaemia undergoing aggressive anticancer therapy. Well designed, prospective randomised studies on infection control measures effective to prevent aspergillosis are lacking. Prophylactic systemic antifungal treatment with posaconazole significantly improves survival and reduces IA in acute myeloid leukaemia patients and reduces aspergillosis incidence rates in patients with intermediate-to-severe graft-versus-host reaction emerging after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Voriconazole prophylaxis may be suitable for prevention of IA as well; however, the results of large clinical trials are still awaited.

Effects of dosing regimen on accumulation, retention and prophylactic efficacy of liposomal amphotericin B

OBJECTIVES

We hypothesized that effective prophylactic treatment of fungal infections would require adequate drug penetration and retention at potential infection sites. Using a mouse model, we examined liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) biodistribution, cell localization and retention in kidneys, lungs, liver and spleen to evaluate effective dosing regimens for prophylaxis of Candida glabrata and Candida albicans infections.

METHODS

Following treatment of mice with cumulative doses of L-AmB (60-225 mg/kg), a bioassay was done to determine tissue drug concentrations 12 h to 6 weeks post-treatment. Immunohistochemical staining with anti-amphotericin B antibodies was used for cellular drug localization. Mice were treated prophylactically with 15-90 mg/kg L-AmB and challenged intravenously 1-7 days later with C. glabrata or they were given a total of 60 mg/kg as daily or intermittent dosing followed by intravenous challenge with C. albicans 3 or 6 weeks later.

RESULTS

On the basis of microg/g tissue, the relative amount of drug was in the order spleen > liver > kidneys > lungs. Amphotericin B levels were maintained above the MIC for many fungi for 1 week in lungs and for as long as 6 weeks in kidneys and spleen. Drug localized in kidney tubular epithelial cells and in macrophages of liver and spleen. In prophylactic models, fungal burden was reduced by several 1000-fold or was undetectable within target tissues (kidneys, spleen).

CONCLUSIONS

These observations underscore the importance of including drug tissue levels to obtain a better understanding of L-AmB efficacy. The sustained concentrations of bioactive AmB in many tissues provide a further rationale for investigating L-AmB prophylactic regimens.

Adverse effects of antifungal therapies in invasive fungal infections: review and meta-analysis

Amphotericin B is the main therapeutic agent for the treatment of invasive fungal infections; however, it is associated with significant toxicities that limit its use. Other systemic antifungal agents have been developed to improve tolerability while maintaining the efficacy profile of conventional amphotericin B. Fifty-four studies involving 9,228 patients were assessed for the frequency of adverse effects of the main systemic antifungal agents. While the results suggest that liposomal amphotericin B is the least nephrotoxic of the lipid formulations (14.6%), that conventional amphotericin B is the most nephrotoxic (33.2%), and that itraconazole is the most hepatotoxic (31.5%), the lack of standard definitions of antifungal-related adverse effects limits the validity of these results. Furthermore, heterogeneous patient pools and differing protocols make it difficult to draw direct comparisons between studies. With the advent of newer classes of systemic antifungal agents, future trials should conform to definitions that are universally applicable and clinically relevant to allow for such comparisons and to enable evidence-based decision-making.

Efficacy of high loading doses of liposomal amphotericin B in the treatment of experimental invasive pulmonary aspergillosis

This study aimed to investigate whether initial treatment of experimental pulmonary aspergillosis with high loading doses can be used as an alternative to standard therapeutic regimens. Steroid-immunosuppressed rats, infected intratracheally with Aspergillus fumigatus, received either amphotericin B deoxycholate (d-AmB) 1 mg/kg/day, liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) 5 mg/kg/day, or underwent a 3-day course of L-AmB 10 mg/kg, or 10 mg/kg for the first 3 or 4 days of treatment, followed by 3 mg/kg until the end of treatment. Therapy started 24 h after fungal challenge and lasted for 7 days. Compared to controls, survival was improved significantly in animals receiving any L-AmB regimen (p <or= 0.003), but not d-AmB. Compared with d-AmB, L-AmB at initial doses of 10 mg/kg followed by 3 mg/kg/day was consistently more effective, but only when measured in terms of survival, lung weight and glucosamine levels, and not log CFU. Despite the absence of significant differences between any of the L-AmB regimens, a trend towards better response rates with the higher loading dose was observed.

Optimizing efficacy of amphotericin B through nanomodification

Fungal infections and leishmaniasis are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. The macrolide polyene antibiotic amphotericin B (AmB) has long been recognized as a powerful fungicidal and leishmanicidal drug. A conventional intravenous dosage form of AmB, AmB- deoxycholate (Fungizone or D-AmB), is the most effective clinically available for treating fungal and parasitic (leishmaniasis) infections. However, the clinical efficacy of AmB is limited by its adverse effects mainly nephrotoxicity. Efforts to lower the toxicity are based on synthesis of AmB analogues such as AmB esters or preparation of AmB-lipid associations in the forms of liposomal AmB (L-AmB or AmBisome), AmB lipid complex (Abelcet or ABLC), AmB colloidal dispersion (Amphocil or ABCD), and intralipid AmB. These newer formulations are substantially more expensive, but allow patients to receive higher doses for longer periods of time with decreased renal toxicity than conventional AmB. Modifications of liposomal surface in order to avoid RES uptake, thus increased targetability has been attempted. Emulsomes and other nanoparticles are special carrier systems for intracellular localization in macrophage rich organs like liver and spleen. Injectable nano-carriers have important potential applications as in site-specific drug delivery.

Economic Evaluation of Intravenous Itraconazole for Presumed Systemic Fungal Infections in Neutropenic Patients in Korea

Systemic fungal infections remain a major clinical problem in immunocompromised patients. Presumed systemic fungal infections (PSFI) are treated empirically with an intravenous antifungal agent to reduce the occurrence of documented infections and associated mortality. The objective of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of intravenous itraconazole (IVitra) treatment with the current first-line empirical treatment of PSFI with conventional amphotericin B (CAB) in cases of neutropenic cancer and bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Cost-effectiveness was expressed as cost per additional "responder" (defined as a patient without fever or major toxicity). We developed a medical decision analytical tree that included probabilities of toxicity, response and pathogen documentation, and second-line treatments. Clinical data were obtained from randomized clinical trials, and resource use data were obtained from a panel of clinical experts. The total cost of treating PSFI per neutropenic cancer patient was lower for IVitra than for CAB, and this lower cost resulted from a reduced need for second-line antifungals. In a cost-effectiveness analysis, IVitra treatment was superior to CAB treatment. Compared with current treatment with CAB, IVitra therapy was shown to be a cost-effective and cost-saving empirical treatment for PSFI in neutropenic cancer patients and BMT patients.

Penetration of amphotericin B in human lung tissue after single liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) infusion

The distribution of amphotericin B in lung tissue was studied in 18 patients with primary or secondary lung cancer who underwent thoracotomy and pulmonary resection. At different times before surgery the patients were treated with liposomal amphotericin B 1.5 mg/kg by i.v. infusion over 1h. Blood and lung tissue samples were collected during surgery (one subject for each collecting time) and assayed for amphotericin B levels by HPLC. Due to surgical requirements, it was possible to obtain data from the 10th to the 25th h after the end of infusion. Plasma amphotericin B concentrations progressively decreased from 3.4 microg/ml at the 10th h to 1 microg/ml at the 25th h after the end of intravenous infusion. In lung tissue samples the lowest amphotericin B concentration (about 1 microg/g) was observed at the 10th h, then a progressive increase was observed with the highest value (2.5 microg/g) determined at the 25th h.

Adverse effects of antifungal therapies in invasive fungal infections: review and meta-analysis

Amphotericin B is the main therapeutic agent for the treatment of invasive fungal infections; however, it is associated with significant toxicities that limit its use. Other systemic antifungal agents have been developed to improve tolerability while maintaining the efficacy profile of conventional amphotericin B. Fifty-four studies involving 9,228 patients were assessed for the frequency of adverse effects of the main systemic antifungal agents. While the results suggest that liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) is the least nephrotoxic of the lipid formulations (14.6%), that conventional amphotericin B (AmB) is the most nephrotoxic (33.2%), and that itraconazole is the most hepatotoxic (31.5%), the lack of standard definitions of antifungal-related adverse effects limits the validity of these results. Furthermore, heterogeneous patient pools and differing protocols make it difficult to draw direct comparisons between studies. With the advent of newer classes of systemic antifungal agents, future trials should conform to definitions that are universally applicable and clinically relevant to allow for such comparisons and to enable evidence-based decision-making.

Practical progress and new drugs for changing patterns of leishmaniasis

The problems surrounding leishmaniasis are changing. An increase in travel, the Indian and Sudanese epidemics of visceral leishmaniasis, parasite resistance to antimony and the emergence of AIDS-related leishmaniasis have all increased the urgency for new drugs, and led to reappraisals of the old ones, as discussed here by Piero Olliaro and Anthony Bryceson.

Amphotericin B

Invasive fungal infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in immunodeficient individuals (such as AIDS patients) and in transplant recipients or tumor patients undergoing immunosuppressive chemotherapy. Amphotericin B is one of the oldest, yet most efficient antimycotic agents. However, its usefulness is limited due to dose-dependent side-effects, notably nephrotoxicity. In order to improve its safety margin, new pharmaceutical formulations of amphotericin B have been designed especially to reduce its detrimental effects on the kidneys. Since the 1980s, a wide variety of new amphotericin B formulations have been brought forward for clinical testing, many of which were approved and reached market value in the 1990s. This review describes and discusses the molecular genetics, pharmacological, toxicological, and clinical aspects of amphotericin B itself and many of its innovative formulations.

[Amphotericin B and its lipid formulations]

More than 40 years after its approval, Amphotericin B is still the gold standard in the treatment of invasive fungal infections due to Candida and Aspergillus spp. Three different lipid formulations of Amphotericin B have been available for over 10 years, with only one of them, i.e. liposomal Amphotericin B (Ambisome), approved in Germany. Liposomal Amphotericin B is superior to conventional Amphotericin B due to its reduced nephrotoxicity, the option of a higher initial loading-dose, and fewer infusion-related side-effects, all this with identical or even higher efficacy.

Pancreatic toxicity after liposomal amphotericin B

Though liposomal amphotericin B has been available in Germany since 1992, efficacy and safety of this formulation of amphotericin B are still not well-documented in children. As far as gastrointestinal side-effects are concerned, an elevated alkaline phosphatase and elevated transaminases have been reported. In our department, liposomal amphotericin B had been used since 1994 to treat patients with proven or suspected fungal infections in a daily dose of 1-3 mg kg-1. Additionally, patients with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell support received liposomal amphotericin B prophylactically in a dose of 1 mg kg(-1) three times per week. We performed a retrospective analysis of all 31 patients who had received liposomal amphotericin B by 1999. In five patients, an isolated transient elevation of the serum lipase level during, or shortly after, the therapy with liposomal amphotericin B was detected. Three of these patients showed clinical signs of pancreatitis, with one patient displaying slightly elevated transaminases. So far, elevated levels of serum lipase have not been described as a possible side-effect of a liposomal amphotericin B therapy. The pathogenesis of this elevation is unclear. As possible reasons, an enzyme induction due to fat overload or a toxic damage of the pancreatic tissue by the liposomes or amphotericin B itself are discussed.

Liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) for fungal infections in immunocompromised adults and children

Invasive fungal infections are rare but life-threatening infections, most often occurring in immunocompromised patients. For a long time, Amphotericin B has been the best choice for treatment, because it is fungicidal with a broad antifungal spectrum and minimal risk of resistance development. The therapeutic use of amphotericin B has, however, been limited by its toxicity-both acute as well as chronic. To counter this, amphotericin B has been encapsulated in liposomes, which reduces its toxicity and allows higher doses to be given. Ambisome is a true, spherical, small unilamellar liposome with a median size of 80 nm. The pharmacokinetic profile was changed, and the maximum concentration and AUC of amphotericin B after AmBisome treatment were greater than those found with the conventional drug. The highest tissue concentrations of AmBisome were found in the liver and spleen, and less than 1% of the administered dose was recovered in other organs. At Huddinge University Hospital, we were the first to use and report on the experience of AmBisome. We now have more than 12 years' experience in transplant recipients, with a good safety profile, improved rate of curing mycological proven infections and reduced mortality in fungal infections. In two placebo-controlled prophylactic trials, we found that AmBisome was effective for preventing fungal colonization and invasive fungal infections, respectively, in allogeneic stem cell and liver transplantation. In uncontrolled and, more recently, in randomized controlled studies at other centers, AmBisome has revealed less toxicity and an efficacy equal or superior to that of the conventional drug in treating neutropenia-associated fever and proven invasive fungal infections in both adults as well as in children. Although investigators tend to increase the dose used, the optimal dose for probable or proven infection is still under debate. Based on our own experience in using AmBisome and the experience at other centers, we can conclude that AmBisome represents a major breakthrough in the treatment of invasive fungal infections, especially in immunocompromised patients.

Safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics of high-dose liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) in patients infected with Aspergillus species and other filamentous fungi: maximum tolerated dose study

We conducted a phase I-II study of the safety, tolerance, and plasma pharmacokinetics of liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB; AmBisome) in order to determine its maximally tolerated dosage (MTD) in patients with infections due to Aspergillus spp. and other filamentous fungi. Dosage cohorts consisted of 7.5, 10.0, 12.5, and 15.0 mg/kg of body weight/day; a total of 44 patients were enrolled, of which 21 had a proven or probable infection (13 aspergillosis, 5 zygomycosis, 3 fusariosis). The MTD of L-AMB was at least 15 mg/kg/day. Infusion-related reactions of fever occurred in 8 (19%) and chills and/or rigors occurred in 5 (12%) of 43 patients. Three patients developed a syndrome of substernal chest tightness, dyspnea, and flank pain, which was relieved by diphenhydramine. Serum creatinine increased two times above baseline in 32% of the patients, but this was not dose related. Hepatotoxicity developed in one patient. Steady-state plasma pharmacokinetics were achieved by day 7. The maximum concentration of drug in plasma (C(max)) of L-AMB in the dosage cohorts of 7.5, 10.0, 12.5, and 15.0 mg/kg/day changed to 76, 120, 116, and 105 microg/ml, respectively, and the mean area under the concentration-time curve at 24 h (AUC(24)) changed to 692, 1,062, 860, and 554 microg x h/ml, respectively, while mean CL changed to 23, 18, 16, and 25 ml/h/kg, respectively. These data indicate that L-AMB follows dose-related changes in disposition processing (e.g., clearance) at dosages of >or=7.5 mg/kg/day. Because several extremely ill patients had early death, success was determined for both the modified intent-to-treat and evaluable (7 days of therapy) populations. Response rates (defined as complete response and partial response) were similar for proven and probable infections. Response and stabilization, respectively, were achieved in 36 and 16% of the patients in the modified intent-to-treat population (n = 43) and in 52 and 13% of the patients in the 7-day evaluable population (n = 31). These findings indicate that L-AMB at dosages as high as 15 mg/kg/day follows nonlinear saturation-like kinetics, is well tolerated, and can provide effective therapy for aspergillosis and other filamentous fungal infections.

Eradication of severe neonatal systemic candidiasis with amphotericin B lipid complex

OBJECTIVE

To report the successful use of amphotericin B lipid complex in treating severe systemic candidiasis in a very-low-birth-weight infant.

CASE SUMMARY

A preterm female infant, born at 25 weeks' gestational age with a birth weight of 870 g, had received full supportive care in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), including mechanical ventilation, total parenteral nutrition, and placement of central venous catheters. At seven weeks of age, she developed severe disseminated candidiasis, which failed to respond to conventional amphotericin B and fluconazole therapy. Her progressive deterioration was reversed only after amphotericin B lipid complex (A-complex) was substituted for conventional amphotericin B. The improvement in her condition was impressive, and she made a full recovery without any adverse effect.

DISCUSSION

With increased reliance on invasive technologies for life support, systemic candida infections have become increasingly common among premature infants in the NICU. Such infections are potentially fatal for the high-risk neonate. A literature review shows limited documentation of the use of lipid-based formulations of amphotericin B, especially A-complex, in preterm infants. However, the collective experience with these products appears to show that they are effective and cause fewer adverse effects than conventional amphotericin B. The infant reported here had shown progressive deterioration from disseminated candidiasis until conventional amphotericin B therapy was replaced with A-complex. Her recovery corresponded to the clearance of the candidemia.

CONCLUSIONS

With favorable results and increasing experience with lipid-based formulations of amphotericin B, it is reasonable to consider these new formulations as therapy for candidemia in preterm infants who are at a high risk of nephrotoxicity or who have failed conventional therapy.

Determination of amphotericin B in human plasma using solid-phase extraction and high-performance liquid chromatography

A rapid and selective HPLC method is described and validated for measuring amphotericin B (AB) in plasma. The procedure involves the solid phase extraction of AB from plasma by incorporating 1-amino-4-nitronaphthalene as an internal standard during the last elution step in extraction followed by HPLC analysis with UV detection at 407 nm. The chromatographic separation is achieved in less than 10 min on a reversed-phase C-18 column using acetonitrile-disodium edetate (20 mM) (45:55, v/v) at pH 5.0 as eluent. A linear response over the concentration range of 0.0100--2.00 microg ml(-1) is obtained having a detection limit of 0.00500 microg ml(-1) for AB. The mean extraction recovery is found to be 98.1+/-1.1% (n=15). The within-day and day-to-day R.S.D. were less than 2% (n=15) and 6.54% (n=45) respectively. This method is applied for quantifying AB trough levels in the plasma of cancer patients who have been on antifungal therapy with AmBisome. It can further be applied either for AB therapeutic monitoring or single/multiple pharmacokinetic analysis of AB in plasma.

Lipid-based amphotericin B: a review of the last 10 years of use

The last decade has been remarkable for the dramatic increase in the prevalence of serious fungal infections in patients with haematological disorders and neutropenic cancer patients. The mortality rate of deep-seated infection has been in excess of 90% and there is no doubt that this is one of the greatest challenges currently facing haematologists and oncologists. The development of the lipid-based drugs - liposomal amphotericin (AmBisome(R)), amphotericin B lipid complex, ABLC (Abelcet(R)), amphotericin B colloidal dispersion, Amphocil (ABCD(R)), has meant that doses of amphotericin B can be safely escalated for the first time whilst the problems of nephrotoxicity, infusion related reactions (including chills, rigors, fevers and hypoxia) can be reduced. These toxicities are variably reduced with AmBisome more than Abelcet and more than Amphocil and there is little information from randomised trials other than for AmBisome. AmBisome used in the setting of persistent fever and neutropenia not responding after 3-4 days of intravenous antibiotics, is associated with less breakthrough systemic fungal infections. There is also much less need for premedication, including steroids, compared with amphotericin B and Abelcet. The use of intermittent doses of Ambisome given prophylactically is now being explored. A new and exciting era of antifungal therapy is opening up with new compounds, such as itraconazole voriconazole, posaconazole and echinocandins, being investigated and for the first time, we also have options for combination therapy and prophylaxis.

Severe hepatic injury associated with lipid formulations of amphotericin B

A 14-year-old girl with leukemia had Doppler ultrasound evidence of hepatic necrosis, thought to be caused by a lipid formulation of amphotericin B, which has not been previously reported. It seems prudent to exert caution when retreating patients with previous hepatocellular damage with lipid formulations of amphotericin B.

Review of comparative studies between conventional and liposomal amphotericin B (Ambisome) in neutropenic patients with fever of unknown origin and patients with systemic mycosis

Fungal infections are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. Treatment with amphotericin B is the main therapeutic approach. However, this treatment is limited by the substantial toxicity. We present the data of the first randomized prospective comparative trial in adults (134 patients with fever of unknown origin) with conventional amphotericin B and a liposomal formulation of amphotericin B (AmBisome, published in 1997 by Prentice et al. (Br. J. Haematol. 98, 711-718) and the data of adults with documented fungal infections (59 patients), treated in this trial. Patients received either conventional amphotericin B 1 mg kg-1 per day, liposomal amphotericin B 1 mg kg-1 per day or liposomal amphotericin B 3 mg kg-1 per day. Patients were entered if they had fever of unknown origin (FUO), defined as temperature of 38 degrees C or more, not responding to 96 h of systemic broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment, and neutropenia (< 0.5 x 10(9) l-1). Efficacy of treatment was assessed, with success defined as resolution of fever for three consecutive days (< 38 degrees C) in the group of patients with FUO and the freedom of clinical signs and/or the elimination of fungus in the group of patients with documented fungal infections. The safety of treatment and renal and hepatic toxicity of liposomal and conventional amphotericin B were compared. No statistically significant difference was found in the treatment efficacy in the three study arms. However, there is a tendency of better treatment results in the two groups of patients, who received liposomal amphotericin B. Thirty-five per cent of patients with documented fungal infections and 46% of patients with FUO responded to amphotericin B. In the patients group, that received 1 mg kg-1 liposomal amphotericin B it was 63 and 49%, in the group of patients that received 3 mg kg-1 liposomal amphotericin B it was 47 and 64%. Evidence of toxicity due to amphotericin B was seen in 50 patients (83%), toxicity due to liposomal amphotericin B, 1 mg kg-1, was seen in 35 patients (50%), and due to liposomal amphotericin B 3 mg kg-1 in 34 patients (54%). This was a statistically significant difference (P = 0.001). It was concluded that liposomal amphotericin B was safer than conventional amphotericin B, but both formulations are equivalent in treatment efficacy. The prophylactic use of amphotericin B in these immunocompromised patients is discussed.

Antifungal therapies for allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in people with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis (ABPA) is an allergic reaction to colonisation of the lungs with the fungus Aspergillus fumigatus and affects around 10% people with cystic fibrosis. ABPA is associated with an accelerated decline in lung function. Corticosteroids, in high doses, are the main treatment for ABPA although the long-term benefits are not clear and their many side effects are well documented. A group of compounds, the azoles, have activity against Aspergillus fumigatus and have been proposed as an alternative treatment for ABPA. Of this group, Itraconazole is the most active. A separate antifungal compound, Amphotericin B has been employed in aerosolised form to treat invasive infection with Aspergillus fumigatus, and may have potential for the treatment of ABPA. Antifungal therapy for ABPA in cystic fibrosis needs to be evaluated.

OBJECTIVES

The review tested the hypotheses that antifungal interventions for the treatment of ABPA in cystic fibrosis: 1. improve clinical status compared to placebo or standard therapy (no placebo); 2. do not have unacceptable adverse effects. If benefit was demonstrated, the optimal type, duration and dose of antifungal therapy was assessed.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group specialist trials register which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearching relevant journals and handsearching abstract books of conference proceedings. In addition, pharmaceutical companies were approached.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials, published or unpublished, where antifungal treatments have been compared to either placebo or no treatment, or where different doses of the same treatment have been used in the treatment of ABPA in patients with cystic fibrosis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

No completed randomised controlled trials were identified.

MAIN RESULTS

No completed randomised controlled trials were identified.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

At present, there are no randomised controlled trials to evaluate the use of antifungal therapies for the treatment of ABPA in people with cystic fibrosis. Trials with clear outcome measures are needed to properly evaluate this potentially useful treatment for cystic fibrosis.

Comparison of the effects of liposomal amphotericin B and conventional amphotericin B on propafenone metabolism and hepatic cytochrome P-450 in rats

The effects of conventional amphotericin B (AmB) dissolved in sodium deoxycholate on microsomal cytochrome P-450 concentrations and propafenone metabolism to 5-hydroxy-propafenone and N-desalkyl-propafenone were compared with those of liposomal AMB (Li-AMB) in rats. AmB (3 mg/kg/day, intravenously [i.v.]) given for 4 days caused a significant decrease in the concentration of hepatic microsomal cytochrome P-450 (0.43 +/- 0.06 nmol/mg versus 0.62 +/- 0. 05 nmol/mg for the control [P < 0.05]). Following the application of Li-AMB (15 mg/kg/day, i.v.), hepatic microsomal cytochrome P-450 concentrations were unchanged at 0.64 +/- 0.08 nmol/mg. AmB decreased ex vivo propafenone metabolism to 5-hydroxy-propafenone and N-desalkyl-propafenone significantly. Sodium deoxycholate (the vehicle of AmB) by itself induced a significant decline of 5-hydroxy-propafenone and N-desalkyl-propafenone production, while microsomal cytochrome P-450 concentrations remained unchanged. In contrast, Li-AMB did not change the levels of production of 5-hydroxy-propafenone or of N-desalkyl-propafenone at either substrate concentration tested (50 micromol and 200 micromol). Microsomal AmB concentrations were significantly higher following Li-AMB application (21.1 +/- 6.2 microg/g versus 3.7 +/- 1.4 microg/g for AmB [P < 0.05]). We conclude that Li-AMB, in contrast to AmB, decreases neither hepatic microsomal cytochrome P-450 nor hepatic propafenone metabolism in rats ex vivo. Sodium deoxycholate alone decreases propafenone metabolism in a similar way to AmB, suggesting that it participates in AmB-induced disturbance of hepatic metabolic function.

Liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) application and hepatic microsomal enzyme function in the rat

In the present study we investigated the influence of AmBisome, a lyophilized liposomal amphotericin B formulation on various hepatic cytochrome P450-dependent mixed function oxidases, antipyrine clearance and hepatic glucose-6-phosphatase activity in rats. Animals were treated intravenously for 6 days with AmBisome (15 mg kg-1 body weight). Subsequently, the enzyme activities and cytochrome P450 concentrations were measured ex vivo in hepatic microsomes. Following AmBisome the activity of the microsomal ethoxycoumarin-O-deethylase increased significantly from 333 +/- 77 pmol mg-1 to 459 +/- 125 pmol mg-1, whereas benzpyrenhydroxylase and glucose-6-phosphatase did not change compared with the controls. Accordingly, antipyrine clearance was not affected by AmBisome treatment. Microsomal cytochrome P450 concentrations as well as total microsomal protein concentrations were not changed following treatment with AmBisome and it did not affect either serum levels of liver transaminases or bilirubin. The results show that the application of a high AmBisome dose had no adverse effects on a variety of microsomal hepatic enzymes and the antipyrine clearance in rats. Thus, it seems likely that AmBisome does not seriously impair metabolic liver function.

Epidemiology of nosocomial fungal infections: invasive aspergillosis and the environment

The incidence rates of invasive aspergillosis have increased dramatically during the last two decades, and, despite all diagnostic and therapeutic efforts, outcome is often fatal. Therefore, preventive measures are of major importance in the control of invasive aspergillosis, and require full understanding of the epidemiology of this devastating disease. The environment has been suggested to play a crucial role in the epidemiology of invasive aspergillosis. Aspergillus spores are released in the air and may remain airborne for prolonged periods. As a result, spores are ubiquitously found in air and contaminate anything in contact with air. It has been hypothesized that the inhalation of airborne Aspergillus spores, either directly or through intermediate nasopharyngeal colonization, is a direct cause of pulmonary infection in immunocompromised patients. Recently, water has been suggested as an additional source of "airborne" Aspergillus spp. This review summarizes the current knowledge on the role of the environment in the epidemiology of invasive aspergillosis.

Lipid-based amphotericin B formulations: from animals to man

Amphotericin B has been the mainstay of systemic antifungal therapy for over 30 years, despite its serious side-effects, and, although numerous alternative antifungal agents have been developed, none to date has matched the efficacy of amphotericin B. However, modern drug delivery technology has improved the safety of amphotericin B by incorporating it into lipid-based delivery systems, including liposomes. Three such formulations, based on the natural affinity of amphotericin B for lipids, are currently marketed. All increase the therapeutic index of amphotericin B, thereby allowing more aggressive treatment than is possible with the conventional product. However, they differ in structure, side-effect profiles and evidence of proven efficacy as discussed in this review.

Emerging fungal pathogens, drug resistance and the role of lipid formulations of amphotericin B in the treatment of fungal infections in cancer patients: a review

The incidence of life-threatening invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised patients has increased dramatically in recent years. Candida spp other than C. albicans are increasingly being isolated, and Aspergillus infections also are on the increase, as well as infections due to previously uncommon organisms. It is likely that this phenomenon is multifactorial in origin, although the extensive use of antifungal prophylaxis may have played a role, especially for the emergence of non-albicans Candida. Amphotericin B remains the antifungal agent with the broadest spectrum of action available and is thus the standard treatment for immunocompromised patients with proven or suspected fungal infections, especially aspergillosis. However, its potential for nephrotoxicity limits its usefulness. Lipid formulations of amphotericin B may allow therapy to be administered with reduced renal toxicity. Three different lipid formulations of amphotericin B currently are available. These compounds have different pharmacokinetic properties and seem to achieve higher serum or tissue concentrations than amphotericin B. This statement is based on animal models and scattered human data. At present, there are no studies comparing the lipid formulations with each other and only a few randomized trials comparing them with conventional amphotericin B. However, a number of open clinical trials and compassionate-use protocols suggest that lipid-based forms of amphotericin B can achieve good response rates with minimal toxicity in patients with a variety of invasive mycoses, including those who have proved refractory or intolerant to previous therapy with conventional amphotericin B. Unfortunately, the cost of these compounds remains high and may represent a limiting factor to their use.

Liposomal amphotericin B for empirical therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group

BACKGROUND

In patients with persistent fever and neutropenia, amphotericin B is administered empirically for the early treatment and prevention of clinically occult invasive fungal infections. However, breakthrough fungal infections can develop despite treatment, and amphotericin B has substantial toxicity.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial comparing liposomal amphotericin B with conventional amphotericin B as empirical antifungal therapy.

RESULTS

The mean duration of therapy was 10.8 days for liposomal amphotericin B (343 patients) and 10.3 days for conventional amphotericin B (344 patients). The composite rates of successful treatment were similar (50 percent for liposomal amphotericin B and 49 percent for conventional amphotericin B) and were independent of the use of antifungal prophylaxis or colony-stimulating factors. The outcomes were similar with liposomal amphotericin B and conventional amphotericin B with respect to survival (93 percent and 90 percent, respectively), resolution of fever (58 percent and 58 percent), and discontinuation of the study drug because of toxic effects or lack of efficacy (14 percent and 19 percent). There were fewer proved breakthrough fungal infections among patients treated with liposomal amphotericin B (11 patients [3.2 percent]) than among those treated with conventional amphotericin B (27 patients [7.8 percent], P=0.009). With the liposomal preparation significantly fewer patients had infusion-related fever (17 percent vs. 44 percent), chills or rigors (18 percent vs. 54 percent), and other reactions, including hypotension, hypertension, and hypoxia. Nephrotoxic effects (defined by a serum creatinine level two times the upper limit of normal) were significantly less frequent among patients treated with liposomal amphotericin B (19 percent) than among those treated with conventional amphotericin B (34 percent, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Liposomal amphotericin B is as effective as conventional amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with fever and neutropenia, and it is associated with fewer breakthrough fungal infections, less infusion-related toxicity, and less nephrotoxicity.

Lipid-based amphotericin B for the treatment of fungal infections

The frequency of life-threatening fungal infections has increased dramatically over the past few decades. For more than 30 years amphotericin B has been the standard treatment for systemic and deep-seated fungal infections, primarily because of its broad spectrum of activity. Its usefulness is limited by a relatively high frequency of significant adverse events including infusion-related reactions and nephrotoxicity. In an effort to overcome these side effects, a number of lipid-based formulations were developed, each with its own composition and pharmacokinetic behavior. The clinical significance of these differences is unknown. Available clinical data suggest the formulations have a reduced propensity for causing nephrotoxicity. However, considering limited efficacy data, they should be reserved as second-line therapy for patients who cannot tolerate or fail an adequate trial of conventional amphotericin B or cannot benefit from other antifungal agents.

Treatment of fungal infections in neutropenic children

Fungal infections have emerged as one of the most significant complications of antineoplastic therapy and marrow transplantation in children. Morbidity and mortality associated with fungal infections are high. Recent trends indicate that the incidence and spectrum of fungal infections are increasing, partly because of the increase in the number of children receiving intensive chemotherapy and marrow transplantation, but also because of the successful management of bacterial and viral infections. Though many factors may contribute to risk for developing a fungal infection, prolonged neutropenia is the most important. Until recently, options for antifungal therapy were limited. Advances include less toxic formulations of amphotericin B and an expanding armamentarium of azoles as well as new antifungal compounds. This review addresses the therapeutic options available for treatment of fungal infections in immunocompromised children.

Antifungal agents. Part I. Amphotericin B preparations and flucytosine

Traditionally, amphotericin B has been the cornerstone of antifungal treatment. Toxicity, however, is a major dose-limiting factor of amphotericin B deoxycholate. Nevertheless, it continues to have a major role in the treatment of deep-seated mycotic infections. Recently, less nephrotic lipid formulations, including amphotericin B lipid complex, amphotericin B cholesteryl sulfate, and liposomal amphotericin B, have been introduced. The pharmacologic properties, main indications, recommended dosages, related costs, and adverse effects of these various preparations are summarized in this review. Orally administered flucytosine is useful in certain infections, particularly cryptococcal meningitis, but it should be used with caution in patients with renal insufficiency.

High-performance liquid chromatographic determination of amphotericin B in plasma and tissue. Application to pharmacokinetic and tissue distribution studies in rats

A sensitive HPLC method with piroxicam as internal standard was developed for assaying amphotericin B in plasma and tissue. An Ultrabase-C18 column and a simple mobile phase consisting of an acetonitrile-acetic acid (10%)-water (41:43:16) mixture were used. The flow-rate was 1 ml/min and the effluent was monitored at 405 nm. The linearity of the assay method was up to 1000 ng/ml and 100 micrograms/g for plasma and tissue, respectively. Intra-day and inter-day RSDs were below 10% for all the sample types. This HPLC assay has been applied to determine amphotericin B in plasma and tissue samples taken during pharmacokinetic and tissue distribution studies in rats.

Safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics of a small unilamellar liposomal formulation of amphotericin B (AmBisome) in neutropenic patients

The safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics of a small unilamellar liposomal formulation of amphotericin B (AmBisome) administered for empirical antifungal therapy were evaluated for 36 persistently febrile neutropenic adults receiving cancer chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation. The protocol was an open-label, sequential-dose-escalation, multidose pharmacokinetic study which enrolled a total of 8 to 12 patients in each of the four dosage cohorts. Each cohort received daily doses of either 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, or 7.5 mg of amphotericin B in the form of AmBisome/kg of body weight. The study population consisted of patients between the ages of 13 and 80 years with neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count, <500/mm3) who were eligible to receive empirical antifungal therapy. Patients were monitored for safety and tolerance by frequent laboratory examinations and the monitoring of infusion-related reactions. Efficacy was assessed by monitoring for the development of invasive fungal infection. The pharmacokinetic parameters of AmBisome were measured as those of amphotericin B by high-performance liquid chromatography. Noncompartmental methods were used to calculate pharmacokinetic parameters. AmBisome administered as a 1-h infusion in this population was well tolerated and was seldom associated with infusion-related toxicity. Infusion-related side effects occurred in 15 (5%) of all 331 infusions, and only two patients (5%) required premedication. Serum creatinine, potassium, and magnesium levels were not significantly changed from baseline in any of the dosage cohorts, and there was no net increase in serum transaminase levels. AmBisome followed a nonlinear dosage relationship that was consistent with reticuloendothelial uptake and redistribution. There were no breakthrough fungal infections during empirical therapy with AmBisome. AmBisome administered to febrile neutropenic patients in this study was well tolerated, was seldom associated with infusion-related toxicity, was characterized by nonlinear saturation kinetics, and was effective in preventing breakthrough fungal infections.

Administration of liposomal agents and blood clearance capacity of the mononuclear phagocyte system

As liposomes are cleared from the circulation to a substantial extent by the phagocytic cells of the mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS), there is a question whether administration of liposome-based therapeutic agents interferes with clearance of infectious organisms by the MPS from blood. In the present study, at first the effect of administration of three types of empty liposomes (devoid of drug), differing in blood residence time, on carbon clearance and bacterial clearance from blood was studied with mice. Classical liposomes (LIP A) and placebo liposomes with lipid composition as in AmBisome (LIP B) or as in Doxil (LIP C) were used. Liposomes were administered intravenously as a single dose. Second, the effect of multiple-dose administration of AmBisome on bacterial blood clearance was studied with rats. AmBisome was administered with two different dosage schedules. The blood clearance capacity of the MPS was monitored at different time points after the last liposome injection. It was shown that the carbon blood clearance capacity of the MPS was impaired only at a high lipid dose of empty classical liposomes. The bacterial blood clearance capacity was never impaired, not even after prolonged treatment with AmBisome administered in a clinically relevant regimen.

Treatment of invasive fungal infections in renally impaired patients with amphotericin B colloidal dispersion

Amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (ABCD) is a new formulation of conventional amphotericin B designed to minimize drug distribution in the kidney and reduce nephrotoxicity. We studied the safety and efficacy of ABCD in 133 renally compromised patients with invasive fungal infections. Patients had either nephrotoxicity from amphotericin B or preexisting renal disease. Intravenous treatment with ABCD (4 mg/kg of body weight daily) was administered for up to 6 weeks. Evaluations included clinical response to treatment and adverse events, with emphasis on changes in serum creatinine levels. ABCD did not appear to have an adverse effect on renal function: mean serum creatinine level tended to decrease slightly with days on therapy, and increases were not dose related. Complete or partial response to treatment was reported for 50% of the 133 intent-to-treat patients and 67% of the 58 evaluable patients.

Development of liposomal amphotericin B formulation

A considerable effort has been spent in the past three decades to investigate various aspects of liposomes as novel drug delivery systems. In 1990, the first amphotericin B (AmB) liposomal preparation (L-AmB) under the brand name AmBisome was introduced into the market by Vestar. The successful marketing of the product moved liposomes out of the stage of experimental obscurity to the realistic stage of clinical utility. The launch of AmBisome sparked off the introduction of other lipid-based AmB products marketed by Liposome Technology (Amphocil) and The Liposome Co. (Abelcet). The drive behind the development of a modified formulation of AmB was to improve the therapeutic index of this drug with respect to its major drawback associated with both acute and chronic toxic effects. In a 30-year-long experience with AmB, several reports were recorded in the literature of acute adverse effects, such as fever, rigors, vomiting, cardiotoxicity and hypotension occurring during infusion; while long-term therapy was reported to be associated with hypokalemia, renal dysfunction and hematological abnormalities. Another serious problem encountered with the drug had been the poor response obtained in immunocompromised patients like those with AIDS, neutropenia and cancer patients on chemotherapy. The encapsulation of amphotericin B in liposomal vesicles was hence targeted not only to obtain an improvement in the therapeutic index but also to see if it was useful in eradicating deep-seated fungal infections in immunocompromised patients. The liposomal AmB was found to have a better therapeutic index and lower toxicity than the commercial AmB preparations. The LD50 of AmBisome in mouse was 175 mg/kg compared with 3.7 mg/kg for Fungizone, the commercial preparation of AmB. Additionally, L-AmB has prolonged circulation time, and extravasates into the site of infection and delivers the drug directly to the site, with no nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity as experienced with AmB. This review traces the course of development of L-AmB and discusses the rationale behind the development of its liposomal preparation. The results in in vitro, in vivo and clinical studies, mechanism of action, biodistribution, and formulation considerations of L-AmB are described. The clinical experience with the marketed preparation is reviewed.

Liposomal amphotericin B treatment for neonatal fungal infections

BACKGROUND

Disseminated fungal infections are a major problem in high risk neonates. Conventional antifungal agents are often unsatisfactory and have a high incidence of severe adverse effects.

METHODS

We administered liposomal encapsulated amphotericin B (AmBisome), which is an alternative to conventional amphotericin B, to 40 preterm (mean birth weight, 1090 +/- 313.6 g; mean gestational age, 28.35 +/- 2.13 weeks) and 4 full term (mean birth weight, 3080 +/- 118 g; mean gestational age, 39 +/- 0.7 weeks) newborn infants with a severe fungal infection.

RESULTS

Candida albicans was the most frequent fungus isolated (70%). The duration of intravenous AmBisome therapy ranged from 7 to 49 days; the cumulative dose ranged from 7 to 138.8 mg/kg (median, 45.2 mg/kg). Administration of AmBisome was effective in 72.7% of patients; 5 of 6 cases of meningitis also recovered; 63.6% of 33 very low birth weight infants survived. No side effects were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge this is the largest study of the treatment of neonates with liposomal amphotericin B, and the results confirm its effectiveness and safety. However, randomized clinical trials are required to establish the most effective administration protocol for AmBisome, i.e. the starting dosage, the maximum effective dosage and the cumulative dosage, and to verify whether the preparation should be associated with another antifungal agent.

Candida infection in very low birth-weight infants: outcome and nephrotoxicity of treatment with liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome)

Systemic fungal infection occurs in 2 to 4.5% of very low birth-weight (VLBW) infants (< 1,500 g) and may be fatal in 25 to 54%. Candida sp. is the major pathogen and amphotericin B the treatment of choice. To reduce side effects and optimize drug action, a formulation of amphotericin B encapsulated in liposomes (AmBisome) has been introduced. Data on 21 VLBW infants who received a full course of AmBisome was collected and its toxic effects with emphasis on nephrotoxicity and hypokalemia assessed. The median gestational age was 25 weeks (range 23-31) with a median birth-weight of 730 g (range 450-1,370). Antifungal therapy was started at a median age of 13 days (range 1-49). The median dose given was 2.6 mg/kg/day (range 1-5), and the median duration of therapy was 28 days (range 11-79), corresponding to a median cumulative dose of 71 mg/kg (range 12-271). Hypokalemia (< 3.0 mmol/l) was observed in 30% before, and 15% during AmBisome treatment. Twenty-one days after the termination of therapy, hypokalemia was not present in any patient. Median maximum daily potassium supplementation did not exceed doses usually recommended for VLBW infants. The median of the maximum creatinine levels before treatment was 121 mumol/l (range 71-221) and fell to 68 mumol/l (range 31-171) during treatment and 46 mumol/l (range 26-62) 21 days after the termination of therapy. All patients treated with AmBisome eradicated fungi and recovered clinically. AmBisome showed no certain nephrotoxicity in VLBW infants in this study.

Pharmacokinetic profile of ABELCET (amphotericin B lipid complex injection): combined experience from phase I and phase II studies

Amphotericin B (AmB) has been the most effective systemic antifungal agent, but its use is limited by the dose-limiting toxicity of the conventional micellar dispersion formulation (Fungizone). New formulations with better and improved safety profiles are being developed and include ABELCET (formerly ABLC), but their dispositions have not been well characterized; hence, the reason for their improved profiles remains unclear. This report details the pharmacokinetics of ABELCET examined in various pharmacokinetic and efficacy studies by using whole-blood measurements of AmB concentration performed by high-pressure liquid chromatography. The data indicated that the disposition of AmB after administration of ABELCET is different from that after administration of Fungizone, with a faster clearance and a larger volume of distribution. It exhibits complex and nonlinear pharmacokinetics with wide interindividual variability, extensive distribution, and low clearance. The pharmacokinetics were unusual. Clearance and volume of distribution were increased with dose, peak and trough concentrations after multiple dosings increased less than proportionately with dose, steady state appeared to have been attained in 2 to 3 days, despite an estimated half-life of up to 5 days, and there was no evidence of significant accumulation in the blood. The data are internally consistent, even though they were gathered under different conditions and circumstances. The pharmacokinetics of ABELCET suggest that lower concentrations in blood due to higher clearance and greater distribution may be responsible for its improved toxicity profile compared to those of conventional formulations.

Pharmacokinetics of liposomal amphotericin B (Ambisome) in critically ill patients

The liposomal formulation of amphotericin B (AmBisome) greatly reduces the acute and chronic side effects of the parent drug. The present study describes the pharmacokinetic characteristics of AmBisome applied to 10 patients at a dose of 2.8 to 3.0 mg/kg of body weight and compares them to the pharmacokinetics observed in 6 patients treated with amphotericin B deoxycholate at the standard dose of 1.0 mg/kg. Interpatient variabilities of amphotericin B peak concentrations (Cmax) and areas under concentration-time curves (AUC) were 8- to 10-fold greater for patients treated with AmBisome than for patients treated with amphotericin B deoxycholate. At the threefold greater dose of AmBisome, median Cmaxs were 8.4-fold higher (14.4 versus 1.7 microg/ml) and median AUCs exceeded those observed with amphotericin B deoxycholate by 9-fold. This was in part explained by a 5.7-fold lower volume of distribution (0.42 liters/kg) in AmBisome-treated patients. The elimination of amphotericin B from serum was biphasic for both formulations. However, the apparent half-life of elimination was twofold shorter for AmBisome (P = 0.03). Neither hemodialysis nor hemofiltration had a significant impact on AmBisome pharmacokinetics as analyzed in one patient. In conclusion, the liposomal formulation of amphotericin B significantly (P = 0.001) reduces the volume of drug distribution, thereby allowing for greater drug concentrations in serum. The low toxicity of AmBisome therefore cannot readily be explained by its serum pharmacokinetics.