Analysis of the prognostic significance of microscopic margins in 2,084 localized primary adult soft tissue sarcomas

Outcomes of Planned Marginal and Wide Resection of Sarcomas Associated with Major Vascular Structures in Extremities

Bone and soft tissue sarcomas of lower and upper extremities may sometimes be in close contact with neurovascular structures. In such cases, it is controversial that whether en bloc resection and vascular reconstruction to reach wider surgical margins or planned marginal resection with the help of adjuvant therapies should be preferred. This study aimed to determine surgical and oncological outcomes of planned marginal and wide resection of extremity sarcomas that are associated with major vascular structures in the extremities. The collected database of 54 patients treated by the same orthopedic and vascular surgeon for primary or locally recurrent soft and bone tissue sarcoma of extremities was retrospectively reviewed. Eligible subjects for this study were patients diagnosed with upper and lower extremity soft and bone tissue sarcomas that encased a maximum of 50% of the circumference of the major vascular structures, requiring limb-sparing resection. When microscopic positive (19 patients, 33.9%) and negative cases' (35 patients, 66.1%) surgical margins were compared, local recurrence, metastasis, amputation, and tumor type (soft/bone) parameters showed no statistically significant difference. When metastatic and non-metastatic patients were compared, it was shown that bone tumors metastasized more than soft tissue tumors (p = 0.001). However, there was no difference between metastasis and amputation, histopathology, grade, nerve involvement, surgical margins, or local recurrences. The mean survival was 1460.6 ± 137.4 days, and the 6-year mortality was 87.5%. Anesthetic and surgical complication rates may be higher since en bloc resection surgeries of large tumors with vascular reconstructions take a very long time. Therefore, we suggest marginal resection with sub-adventitial dissection in those locations and wide resection at other areas according to the surgeon's experiences about safe margin with the contribution of radiotherapy.

Unplanned reoperation after resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma: experience based on a high-volume sarcoma center

BACKGROUND

Most retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) operations require combined multi-organ resection, and the proportion of unplanned reoperation is high. However, there are no relevant studies on reoperation for RPS.

METHODS

Patients who underwent at least once unplanned reoperation at Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University, China, from August 2009 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The baseline characteristics, primary surgery, and reoperation information, postoperative complications, and survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 51 patients were included. Among them, 21 (41.2%) were male and 30 (58.8%) were female. The median age was 51 (interquartile range [IQR], 49-63) years. Most (88.3%) had a history of abdominal surgery. Dedifferentiated liposarcoma, well-differentiated liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, and others accounted for 50.9%, 21.6%, 15.7%, and 11.8%, respectively. The conditions of the primary operation were as follows: 35 (68.6%) patients achieved complete surgical resection, 48 patients had combined organ resection, and a median of 3 (IQR, 2-4) organs was removed, of which 5 (9.9%) were combined with pancreaticoduodenectomy. The median operative time was 330 (IQR, 245-440) min, and the median estimated blood loss was 1500 (IQR, 500-2600) ml. The median postoperative hospital stay was 42 (IQR, 23-82) days. For reoperation, the most common reasons were bleeding (31.3%), complications related to intestinal anastomosis (27.4%), and intestinal perforation (19.9%). The mortality rate after reoperation was 39.2% (20/51). Twelve (23.5%) patients underwent reoperation at least twice.

CONCLUSIONS

Unplanned reoperation among retroperitoneal sarcoma correlates with established measures of surgical quality.

What Are the Results of Limb Salvage Surgery for Primary Malignant Bone Tumor in the Forearm?

Background and Objectives

After diagnosing a primary bone tumor involving the forearm, various excision strategies and reconstruction methods must be considered. This study explored the oncological and functional outcomes of limb salvage surgery for primary malignant bone tumors in the forearm.

Methods

Patients with primary forearm bone tumors (n = 369) were retrospectively analyzed between 2000 and 2017. There were 266 patients with radial tumors, and 46 (17.3%) were malignant, whereas 103 patients had ulnar lesions and 22 (21.4%) were malignant tumors. The oncological results, prognostic factors, and functional results after limb salvage surgery of forearm malignancies were analyzed.

Results

The follow-up averaged 72.1 (7–192, median 62.5) months. Fifty-six patients who received limb salvage surgery were included in the final evaluation. Radius resection was performed in 38 patients, and distal radius (25 patients) was most frequent. Ulnar resection was performed in 18 patients, and the proximal ulna (13 patients) was most frequent. The surgical margins obtained were intralesional in 3 patients, marginal in 8 patients and wide in 45 patients. Local recurrence occurred in 11 patients (19.6%), and distant metastasis occurred in 14 patients (25%). The 5-year recurrence-free survival rate was 79.8%. Unplanned excision, ulnar involvement, proximal forearm location and inadequate surgical margins were associated with recurrence. The overall 5-year and 10-year survival rates were 83.5 and 71.7%, respectively. Distant metastasis was a poor prognostic factor for the survival rate. Forty-two patients were evaluated by MSTS score with an average of 27.9 ± 1.5.

Conclusions

The incidence of radial malignant tumors is higher than that of ulnar lesions. The distal radius and the proximal ulna are the most frequently involved sites. Unplanned excisions, ulnar tumors, proximal forearm tumors, and inadequate surgical margin are the risk factors for local recurrence. Distant metastasis is an independent poor prognostic factor of death. The oncology control and functional results of limb salvage surgery were satisfactory.

Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) clinical practice guidelines on the management of soft tissue tumors 2020 - Secondary publication

BACKGROUND

These clinical practice guidelines are intended to provide recommendations based on the best evidence obtained to date on key issues in clinical practice to improve the prognosis, diagnostic and therapeutic processes for patients with soft tissue tumors.

METHODS

The Guidelines Development Committee and Systematic Review Committee were composed of a multidisciplinary team of specialists who play an important role in soft tissue tumor care. Clinical questions (CQs) were determined by choosing key decision-making points based on Algorithms for the diagnosis and treatment of soft tissue tumors. The guidelines were developed according to the "Medical Information Network Distribution Service (Minds) Handbook for Clinical Practice Guideline Development 2014" and "Minds Manual for Clinical Practice Guideline Development 2017." Recommendation strength was rated on two levels and the strength of evidence was rated on four levels. The recommendations were decided based on agreement by 70% or more voters.

RESULTS

Twenty-two CQs were chosen by the Guidelines Development Committee. The Systematic Review Committee reviewed the evidence concerning each CQ, a clinical value judgment was added by experts, and the text of each recommendation was determined.

CONCLUSION

We established 22 CQs and recommendations for key decision-making points in the diagnosis and treatment of soft tissue tumors according to the Minds Clinical Practice Guideline development methods. We hope that these guidelines will assist the decision-making of all medical staff engaged in the treatment and diagnosis of soft tissue tumors, and eventually lead to improved soft tissue tumor care in the country.

The clinical significance of perioperative inflammatory index as a prognostic factor for patients with retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma

BACKGROUND

The prognostic factors of retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma (STS) have been explored but not yet certain. This study evaluated the prognostic impact of various preoperative clinical parameters and inflammatory indices in primary STS, with a particular focus on the transition of inflammatory index before and after tumor resection in de-differentiated liposarcoma (DD-LPS).

METHODS

The clinical data of 113 patients with primary retroperitoneal STS receiving tumor resection were reviewed. Six variables (neutrophils, platelets, C-reactive protein (CRP), lymphocytes, albumin, and hemoglobin) in the blood samples were measured and nine inflammatory indices (neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), CRP-lymphocyte ratio (CLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-albumin ratio (NAR), CRP-albumin ratio (CAR), platelet-albumin ratio (PAR), HALP (hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte and platelet), prognostic nutrition index (PNI), and modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS)) were calculated. The prognostic value of the indices was analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Elevated NLR, CLR, PLR, NAR, CAR, PAR, and mGPS were associated with a worse overall survival (p = 0.0124, 0.0011, 0.049, 0.0047, 0.0085, 0.0332, and 0.0086, respectively) in univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis showed that elevated CLR and DD-LPS were associated with poor overall survival (p = 0.0267 and 0.0218, respectively) in all retroperitoneal STS. In DD-LPD, patients with preoperative high CLR, whose postoperative CLR was normalized, demonstrated a favorable survival rate similar to those with preoperative low CLR.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated CLR before surgery as well as DD-LPS were poor prognostic markers for overall survival in primary retroperitoneal STS. Perioperative CLR normalization may be related to a favorable prognosis in DD-LPS.

Risk Factors for Occurrence and Relapse of Soft Tissue Sarcoma

The diagnosis and prognostic outcome of STS pose a therapeutic challenge in an interdisciplinary setting. The treatment protocols are still discussed controversially. This systematic meta-analysis aimed to determine prognostic factors leading to the development and recurrence of STS. Eligible studies that investigated potential risk factors such as smoking, genetic dispositions, toxins, chronic inflammation as well as prognostic relapse factors including radiation, chemotherapy and margins of resection were identified. Data from 24 studies published between 1993 and 2019 that comprised 6452 patients were pooled. A statistically significant effect developing STS was found in overall studies stating a causality between risk factors and the development of STS (p < 0.01). Although subgroup analysis did not meet statistical significances, it revealed a greater magnitude with smoking (p = 0.23), genetic predisposition (p = 0.13) chronic inflammation, (p = 0.20), and toxins (p = 0.14). Secondly, pooled analyses demonstrated a higher risk of relapse for margin of resection (p = 0.78), chemotherapy (p = 0.20) and radiation (p = 0.16); after 3 years of follow-up. Therefore, we were able to identify risk and relapse prognostic factors for STS, helping to diagnose and treat this low incidental cancer properly.

Overall Survival of Patients with Myxofibrosarcomas: An Epidemiological Study

Myxofibrosarcoma (MFS) is a rare mesenchymal soft tissue sarcoma type, with a high local recurrence (LR) rate. Robust epidemiological data on MFS are lacking. We, therefore, aimed to identify prognostic factors and describe real-life outcomes of a large cohort of 908 MFS patients obtained from the nationwide database of the Netherlands Cancer Registry and diagnosed between 2002 and 2019. Median Overall survival (OS) was 155 (range 0.1-215) months, with a five-year OS of 67.7%. No improvement of OS was found over time. Multivariable Cox regression survival analysis demonstrated known prognostic factors for OS, such as older age, tumour size, and histological grade with the addition of sex. Surgery at sarcoma expertise centres, instead of general hospitals, was associated with better OS outcomes. In a subcohort of 177 patients, 39% developed LR with a median time to recurrence of 20 months. From LR on, the median OS was 64.0 months (CI 95% 38.5-89.5). In 28%, distant metastases were diagnosed with a median OS of 34.3 months (CI 95% 28.8-39.8) after diagnosis of the primary tumour. In this largest nationwide cohort so far, survival outcomes and recurrence rates for MFS patients did not improve over time, emphasizing the need to improve treatment strategies and suggesting a role for sarcoma expertise centres.

Positive Margins Following Excision of Primary Bone & Soft Tissue Tumours in a Tertiary Centre and the Impact on Patient Outcomes

Background

Primary bone and soft tissue sarcoma treatment includes surgical resection, with or without peri-operative chemoradiotherapy. The aim of surgery is to achieve complete excision, to prevent localised recurrence and achieve cure. For various reasons, excision with adequate margins is not always possible. Our aim is to assess the occurrence of unexpected positive margins following primary excision within a tertiary centre and the impact on patient outcomes.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 567 patients discussed at the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital Multi-disciplinary team (MDT) meeting with positive margins between 1999-2020 was performed. Exclusion criteria included: excisions performed externally and lesions treated with curettage. Information gathering from electronic records highlighted 23 cases with unexpected positive margins following primary excision.

Results

All patients pre-operatively expected to achieve complete primary resection. The median age was 60 years (8-92), 10M:13F. Tumour location included lower limb (12), upper limb (six), pelvis (two) and trunk (three); eight bone tumours and 15 soft tissue. The overall recurrence rate was 30.4% (7/23). In those recommended for re-excision (n=16), the recurrence rate was 31.25% (5/16). Of the patients not initially recommended for re-excision (n=7), four proceeded to surveillance alone with 50% recurrence (2/4), both with metastatic disease not surviving to follow-up. A further three patients underwent post-operative radiotherapy alone with no recurrences at follow-up, one patient not surviving for further treatment due to stroke. The mean follow-up for patients was 3.1 years.

Conclusion

When positive margins do occur unexpectedly, the impact due to the need for further treatment and ultimately increased risk of recurrence can be significant. Results can be compared to those for unplanned excisions. Therefore, surgeons should be aware of the different circumstances in which positive margins occur to help guide treatment planning and managing patient expectations.

Score for the Risk and Overall Survival of Lung Metastasis in Patients First Diagnosed With Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Novel Nomogram-Based Risk Assessment System

Background: Metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients have a poor prognosis with a 3-year survival rate of 25%. About 30% of them present lung metastases (LM). This study aimed to construct 2 nomograms to predict the risk of LM and overall survival of STS patients with LM. Materials and Methods: The data of patients were derived from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database during the period of 2010 to 2015. Logistic and Cox analysis was performed to determine the independent risk factors and prognostic factors of STS patients with LM, respectively. Afterward, 2 nomograms were, respectively, established based on these factors. The performance of the developed nomogram was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic curves, area under the curve (AUC) calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: A total of 7643 patients with STS were included in this study. The independent predictors of LM in first-diagnosed STS patients were N stage, grade, histologic type, and tumor size. The independent prognostic factors for STS patients with LM were age, N stage, surgery, and chemotherapy. The AUCs of the diagnostic nomogram were 0.806 in the training set and 0.799 in the testing set. For the prognostic nomogram, the time-dependent AUC values of the training and testing set suggested a favorable performance and discrimination of the nomogram. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year AUC values were 0.698, 0.718, and 0.715 in the training set, and 0.669, 0.612, and 0717 in the testing set, respectively. Furthermore, for the 2 nomograms, calibration curves indicated satisfactory agreement between prediction and actual survival, and DCA indicated its clinical usefulness. Conclusion: In this study, grade, histology, N stage, and tumor size were identified as independent risk factors of LM in STS patients, age, chemotherapy surgery, and N stage were identified as independent prognostic factors of STS patients with LM, these developed nomograms may be an effective tool for accurately predicting the risk and prognosis of newly diagnosed patients with LM.

Multimodality treatment of undifferentiated pleomorphic soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity (eUPS) in the elderly

INTRODUCTION

This subgroup analysis of undifferentiated pleomorphic soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity (eUPS) from the PERSARC collaborative group aimed to achieve a more personalized multimodality treatment approach for primary eUPS in elderly patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A multicenter retrospective study including primary high-grade eUPS surgically treated with curative intent between 2000 and 2016. Overall survival (OS), local recurrence (LR) and distant metastasis (DM) curves were calculated by Kaplan Meier analysis. Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine the effect of radiotherapy.

RESULTS

From a total of 2511 patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma (eSTS) of the PERSARC study collaborative; 703 patients with eUPS were included in this study. In elderly patients with eUPS 5-year OS, LR and DM were 35.4 (95%CI 29.3-42.8), 17.7 (95%CI 12.7-22.6) and 24.6 (95%CI 19.1-30.1). eUPS was significantly less treated with radiotherapy compared with other eSTS, especially in elderly patients. Patients with R1-R2 margins treated with radiotherapy had about half the risk of developing LR compared with patients treated without radiotherapy (HR = 0.454, p = 0.033).

CONCLUSION

Elderly patients with eUPS were less often treated with radiotherapy and showed higher LR. Nowadays, given an increasing life expectancy in elderly patients, multimodality treatment should be considered.

Intraoperative Near-Infrared Fluorescence Guided Surgery Using Indocyanine Green (ICG) for the Resection of Sarcomas May Reduce the Positive Margin Rate: An Extended Case Series

BACKGROUND

Sarcomas are rare, aggressive cancers which can occur in any region of the body. Surgery is usually the cornerstone of curative treatment, with negative surgical margins associated with decreased local recurrence and improved overall survival. Indocyanine green (ICG) is a fluorescent dye which accumulates in sarcoma tissue and can be imaged intraoperatively using handheld near-infrared (NIR) cameras, theoretically helping guide the surgeon's resection margins.

METHODS

Patients operated on between 20 February 2019 and 20 October 2021 for intermediate to high grade sarcomas at our centres received either conventional surgery, or were administered ICG pre-operatively followed by intra-operative NIR fluorescence guidance during the procedure. Differences between the unexpected positive margin rates were compared.

RESULTS

115 suitable patients were identified, of which 39 received ICG + NIR fluorescence guided surgery, and 76 received conventional surgery. Of the patients given ICG, 37/39 tumours fluoresced, and surgeons felt the procedure was guided by the intra-operative images in 11 cases. Patients receiving ICG had a lower unexpected positive margin rate (5.1% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of NIR fluorescence cameras in combination with ICG may reduce the unexpected positive margin rate for high grade sarcomas. A prospective, multi-centre randomised control trial is now needed to validate these results.

Predicting distant metastases in soft-tissue sarcomas from PET-CT scans using constrained hierarchical multi-modality feature learning

Objective.Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is regarded as the imaging modality of choice for the management of soft-tissue sarcomas (STSs). Distant metastases (DM) are the leading cause of death in STS patients and early detection is important to effectively manage tumors with surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. In this study, we aim to early detect DM in patients with STS using their PET-CT data.Approach.We derive a new convolutional neural network method for early DM detection. The novelty of our method is the introduction of a constrained hierarchical multi-modality feature learning approach to integrate functional imaging (PET) features with anatomical imaging (CT) features. In addition, we removed the reliance on manual input, e.g. tumor delineation, for extracting imaging features.Main results.Our experimental results on a well-established benchmark PET-CT dataset show that our method achieved the highest accuracy (0.896) and AUC (0.903) scores when compared to the state-of-the-art methods (unpaired student's t-testp-value < 0.05).Significance.Our method could be an effective and supportive tool to aid physicians in tumor quantification and in identifying image biomarkers for cancer treatment.

Factors, treatments, and outcomes associated with primary soft tissue malignancies of the forearm: A series of 31 cases

Background

Primary soft tissue malignancies of the forearm constitute up to 24% of soft tissue extremity malignancies and present a difficult problem when attempting to preserve both life and forearm function. As described by Enneking, recurrence and metastasis are the two largest contributors to morbidity and mortality and therefore, the primary consideration must be to excise the entire tumor. However, since limb salvage is the preferred treatment over amputation in 95% of cases, many physicians elect to perform marginal resections over wide resections in the attempt to increase functional outcomes. Our study aimed to compare recurrence rates and forearm functional outcomes between these groups to better guide clinical decision making.

Questions/purposes

(1) What is the difference in recurrence rates between wide resection of the tumor and marginal resection? (2) Between wide and marginal resection groups, what is the functional difference as measured by MSTS functional outcome scores? The purpose of our study was to answer these two questions and better understand if marginal resection yielded better results compared to wide resection.

Patients and methods

Following IRB approval, we conducted a retrospective case series between 1999 and 2019. Included in the study were patients with a primary malignancy in the predetermined borders of the forearm with a minimum of two-year follow up post-operatively. All patients in the study were operated on by physicians in the Southern California Kaiser Permanente system. Thirty-one patients met criteria for the study. Recurrence rates and metastatic disease was determined through serial history and physical examination, with patients undergoing magnetic resonance (MRI) imaging of the affected area and computed tomography (CT) of the chest every 6 months for the first 2 years, and every 12 months for the following 3 years. MSTS scores were obtained in subsequent follow-ups following the guidelines set by the MSTS scoring system.

Results

Of the 31 patients evaluated, 4 (12.9%) had recurrence and 2 (6.5%) had signs of metastasis. Between the marginal excision and wide excision groups, all 4 recurrences happened in the marginal excision group and none occurred in the wide excision group. In addition, in the pathology report, excisions with 0.1 cm margins or less on any side had 3 instances of recurrence (31%) whereas there was only 1 recurrence (4.8%) outside of this group. MSTS scores for both wide excision and marginal excision were within 1 point with average scores being 26 and 26.9, respectively.

Conclusions

Consistent with the literature, our study found that closer surgical margins lead to higher rates of recurrence due to the increased likelihood of aberrant tumor. However, when looking at functional outcome scores, we found minimal benefit in marginal resections compared to wide resections. The lack of MSTS score difference between both groups highlighted that the perceived benefit of choosing a marginal resection over wide excision may be nominal at best. Therefore, we recommend performing an additional intraoperative resection on narrow margins to reduce the chance of recurrence. Of note, clinical discernment in the form of preserving valuable neurovascular structures such as the median nerve should still be an important consideration.

Diagnostic performance of MRI in detecting residual soft tissue sarcoma after unplanned excision: Systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate, in a systematic review and meta-analysis, the diagnostic performance of MRI in detecting residual disease after unplanned excision of soft tissue sarcoma.

METHODS

Medline and Embase were searched for original studies on the diagnostic performance of MRI detecting residual soft tissue sarcoma after unplanned excision. Study quality was assessed using QUADAS-2. Sensitivity and specificity were pooled using a bivariate random-effects model. A Chi-squared test was used to test for heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Ten studies were included, comprising a total of 469 patients. Median frequency of residual soft tissue sarcoma was 54.6% (range 31.6-73.1%). There was high risk of bias with respect to flow and timing in one study. There were applicability concerns with respect to patient selection in four studies. Nine studies reported to use the presence of a mass as a diagnostic criterion for residual soft tissue sarcoma. Sensitivities of included studies ranged between 36.4% and 86.7%, and specificities ranged between 77.8% and 100%. Pooled sensitivity was 65.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 55.5-74.9%) and pooled specificity was 85.1% (95% CI: 79.1-89.6%). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.852. The included studies were statistically heterogeneous in their estimates of sensitivity (P = 0.016) and statistically homogeneous in their estimates of specificity (P = 0.793).

CONCLUSION

The presence of a mass is the most commonly reported diagnostic criterion to diagnose residual soft tissue sarcoma after unplanned resection. MRI achieves moderate sensitivity and fairly high specificity. Pooled estimate of sensitivity was subject to heterogeneity, which needs further exploration.

Safe-margin surgery by plastic reconstruction in extremities or parietal trunk soft tissue sarcoma: A tertiary single centre experience

INTRODUCTION

Tertiary centers recruit a large proportion of locally advanced or recurrent soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) that may have been preoperatively irradiated. The objective of this study was to evaluate the results of oncoplastic surgery (OPS) for patients affected by extremities or parietal trunk STS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study includes patients who underwent a flap reconstruction after sarcoma resection between January 2018 and December 2020 at Institut Curie. The primary endpoint was the evaluation of the impact of OPS on the quality of surgical margins. The secondary endpoint was to quantify the morbidity of OPS and identify predictive factors for wound complications.

RESULTS

Of 211 patients, 89 (42.2%) had a flap reconstruction. Surgery was realized on an irradiated field in 56 (62.9%) patients. Without OPS, all patients were candidates either for amputation (n = 9,10.1%) due to vessels/nerve infiltration, or R1/R2 resection (n = 80,89.9%). Seventy-two (80.0%) pedicle flaps and 18 (20.0%) free flaps were used. No R2 resections were performed. R0 and R1 margins were achieved in 82 (92.1%) and 7 (7.9%), respectively. The median closest margin was 3 mm (IQR 1-6 mm). Among R1 patients, 5 had positive margins along a preserved critical structure, 2 patients had well-differentiated liposarcomas. The surgical morbidity rate was 33.3% (30/90 flaps). The reoperation rate was 15.7% (14/89 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

In a referral sarcoma center, the collaboration between the surgical oncologist and the plastic surgery team should be considered upfront in the surgical plan, allowing the most adequate wide oncological resection with acceptable postoperative morbidity.

Is local recurrence in bone and soft tissue sarcomas just a local recurrence or does it impact the overall survival, retrospective cohort from a sarcoma referral center

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Sarcoma local recurrence (LR) is often associated with metastasis, but it is unclear if LR can be a causal event leading to metastasis. We question if LR is best viewed as an independent oncologic event or as a worrisome harbinger threatening a patient's overall survival.

METHODS

We identified patients with LR and/or metastasis from an ongoing cohort of 629 patients with primary sarcoma and performed a detailed review to assess the timing of metastasis resulting in the following groups: (1) Isolated LR, (2) LR before metastasis, (3) LR within 6 months of metastasis, (4) LR 6-12 months after metastasis, (5) LR >12 months after metastasis, and (6) metastasis at diagnosis.

RESULTS

Overall, 43 patients met the inclusion criteria with an LR rate of 7%. Ten patients (2% of the entire cohort, 23% of LR) developed an LR before or within 6 months of metastasis. For patients without systemic disease preceding LR, 3 of 23 soft tissue sarcoma STS (13%) and 7 of 10 bone sarcoma (70%) subsequently developed metastasis (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

LR with subsequent metastasis is a rare event. LR appears to be best viewed as a marker of tumor aggressiveness rather than the cause of metastasis and poor survival. LR in bone sarcoma patients should warn providers of a high risk of imminent metastasis.

Giant chondroid lipoma of the breast: A case report and literature review

Chondroid lipoma is a rare benign lesion affecting the breast, in which the diagnosis of malignancy is difficult to be excluded during preoperative studies. In this respect, a correct histopathological diagnosis is mandatory in order to avoid overdiagnosis and subsequently overtreatment. In the present study, the case of a 61-year-old patient who self-referred for the development of a large tumor at the level of the left breast is reported. Biopsy raised the suspicion of a chondroid lipoma; thus, the patient was submitted to conservative surgery. The lesion was completely excised by performing a total mastectomy. The histopathological studies confirmed the presence of chondroid lipoma, with no signs of malignant transformation. At the 24-month follow-up interval no signs of recurrence were detected. In conclusion, although it may reach significant dimensions, giant chondroid lipoma of the breast is a benign lesion that may benefit from conservative treatment and does not recur.

A novel preoperative risk score to guide patient selection for resection of soft tissue sarcoma lung metastases: An analysis from the United States Sarcoma Collaborative

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection for sarcoma lung metastases has been associated with improved overall survival (OS).

METHODS

Patients who underwent curative-intent resection of sarcoma lung metastases (2000-2016) were identified from the US Sarcoma Collaborative. Patients with extrapulmonary metastatic disease or R2 resections of primary tumor or metastases were excluded. Primary endpoint was OS.

RESULTS

Three hundred and fifty-two patients met inclusion criteria. Location of primary tumor was truncal/extremity in 85% (n = 270) and retroperitoneal in 15% (n = 49). Forty-nine percent (n = 171) of patients had solitary and 51% (n = 180) had multiple lung metastasis. Median OS was 49 months; 5-year OS 42%. Age ≥55 (HR 1.77), retroperitoneal primary (HR 1.67), R1 resection of primary (HR 1.72), and multiple (≥2) lung metastases (HR 1.77) were associated with decreased OS(all p < 0.05). Assigning one point for each factor, we developed a risk score from 0 to 4. Patients were then divided into two risk groups: low (0-1 factor) and high (2-4 factors). The low-risk group (n = 159) had significantly better 5-year OS compared to the high-risk group (n = 108) (51% vs. 16%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We identified four characteristics that in aggregate portend a worse OS and created a novel prognostic risk score for patients with sarcoma lung metastases. Given that patients in the high-risk group have a projected OS of <20% at 5 years, this risk score, after external validation, will be an important tool to aid in preoperative counseling and consideration for multimodal therapy.

Role of the Prognostic Nutritional Index in Patients With Soft-tissue Sarcoma

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine whether the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) can predict the prognosis in patients with soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) before treatment and to examine whether there is an association between PNI values and clinical characteristics.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The data on 100 patients with primary STS were retrospectively reviewed. The cohort included 55 men and 45 women, with a mean age of 64 years. The mean follow-up duration was 41.7 months.

RESULTS

The median PNI was 51.35. The PNI was significantly inversely associated with tumor size, tumor grade, and age. We found that the PNI was a significant prognostic marker for disease-specific and event-free survival using univariate and multivariate analyses. Patients with a low PNI had poorer disease-specific and event-free survival than those with a high PNI.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that the PNI can be used as a prognostic marker in patients with STS.

Is perioperative chemotherapy recommended in childhood and adolescent patients with synovial sarcoma? A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Synovial sarcoma is the most common soft tissue sarcomas among childhood and adolescents, accounting for 8-10% of all soft tissue sarcoma. Synovial sarcoma is considered a relatively chemosensitive tumor compared with other soft tissue sarcomas. However, the role of perioperative chemotherapy in synovial sarcoma remains controversial. The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the role of perioperative chemotherapy in childhood and adolescent patients with synovial sarcoma.

METHODS

We evaluated studies published between 1 January 1990 and 31 December 2017. The following databases were searched: MEDLINE, Cochrane database (via PubMed) and Ichushi (in Japanese).

RESULTS

The search yielded 216 articles in English and Japanese. After the initial screening, based on the title and abstract, 160 articles were excluded. As a second screening, we then assessed the full text of the remaining 56 articles for eligibility. Finally, 10 articles were included in the systematic review. Surgical resection with R0 margin alone was recommended because of the excellent results of two prospective studies. Meta-analysis was performed using data from two retrospective studies of 261 patients. Perioperative chemotherapy did not have a significant effect on survival and event-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

We weakly do not recommend perioperative chemotherapy in patients with non-metastatic synovial sarcoma ≤ 5 cm when R0 resection is acquired. There was no consensus concerning the role of perioperative chemotherapy in patients with synovial sarcoma > 5 cm or those with ≤5 cm who undergo R1 or R2 resection.

Greater travel distance to specialized facilities is associated with higher survival for patients with soft-tissue sarcoma: US nationwide patterns

Purpose

The survival impact of geographic access to specialized care remains unknown in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas (STS). This study aimed to clarify the association between the patient travel distance and survival outcome and investigate the factors lying behind it.

Methods

A total of 34 528 patients with STS registered in the National Cancer Data Base, diagnosed from 2004–2016, were investigated.

Results

Tumor stage correlated with travel distance: patients with metastatic disease stayed closer to home. However, the type of facility showed greatest variation: 37.0%, 51.0%, 73.5%, and 75.9% of patients with ≤10 miles, 10.1–50 miles, 50.1–100 miles, and >100 miles, respectively (P<0.001), had a sarcoma care at academic/research centers. On a multivariable analysis, reduced mortality risk was associated with longer (versus short) travel distance (>100 miles: HR = 0.877; P = 0.001) and management at academic/research (versus non-academic/research) centers (HR = 0.857; P<0.001). The greatest divergence was seen in patients traveling very long distance (>100 miles) to an academic/research center, with a 26.9% survival benefit (HR = 0.731; P<0.001), compared with those traveling short distance (≤10 miles; 95.4% living in metropolitan area) to a non-academic/research center. There was no significant correlation between travel distance and survival in patients who had care at academic/research centers, whereas a survival benefit of management at academic/research centers was observed in every group of travel distance, regardless of tumor stage.

Conclusions

This national study demonstrated that increased travel distance was associated with superior survival, attributable to a higher proportion of patients receiving sarcoma care at distant academic/research centers. These data support centralized care for STS. Overcoming referral and travel barriers may enable more patients to be treated at specialized centers and may further improve survival rates for patients with STS, even when it imposes an increased travel burden.

Surgical resection of primary tumor in the extremities improves survival for metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma patients: a population-based study of the SEER database

PURPOSE

The objectives of this study were to clarify whether resection of primary tumor in the extremities for patients with metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) improves survival, and to clarify patient groups for whom primary tumor resection should be considered.

METHODS/PATIENTS

Using the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database, we identified 1453 patients with metastatic STS of the extremities at initial presentation between 1983 and 2016. Of these 1453 patients, 898 patients underwent primary tumor resection (Surgery group), and 555 patients did not (No-surgery group).

RESULTS

After adjusting for patient background by propensity score matching, a total of 804 patients were included for analysis. Patients in the Surgery group showed improved survival (cancer-specific survival (CSS) hazard ratio (HR) = 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50-0.71 overall survival rate (OS) HR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.51-0.70). In subclass analysis, patients with high-grade STS, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, or synovial sarcoma showed improved survival in the Surgery group (high grade-CSS HR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.45-0.72, OS HR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.48-0.71; undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma-CSS HR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.42-0.84, OS HR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.46-0.82; leiomyosarcoma-CSS HR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.33-0.75, OS HR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.35-0.72; synovial sarcoma-CSS HR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.31-0.68, OS HR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.30-0.62).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicated that primary tumor resection in metastatic STS exerts positive impacts on survival. Further clinical research is needed to confirm these results.

Radiological and histopathological assessment of bone infiltration in soft tissue sarcomas

BACKGROUND

Deep soft tissue sarcomas are frequently in contact with bone. The therapeutic decision of a composite resection strategy may be challenging, which is usually based on clinical and radiological criteria. The aims of the study were to evaluate the overall frequency of bone and periosteal infiltration in these patients in whom composite resection was indicated, and evaluate the role of magnetic resonance imaging and bone scintigraphy in this scenario.

METHODS

Forty-nine patients with a composite surgical resection (soft tissue sarcoma and bone), treated at a single institution between 2006 and 2018, were retrospectively included. Presurgical planning of the resection limits was based on clinical and imaging findings (magnetic resonance imaging and bone scintigraphy). Magnetic resonance imaging was performed in all patients (100%) and bone scintigraphy in 41 (83.7% of the cases). According to magnetic resonance imaging results, patients were divided into two groups: Group A, in which the tumor is adjacent to the bone without evidence of infiltration (n = 24, 48,9%), and Group B, patients with evidence of bone involvement by magnetic resonance imaging (n = 25, 51,1%). BS showed a pathological deposit in 28 patients (68.3%). Histological analysis of the resection specimen was preceded to identify bone and periosteal infiltration. For the analysis of the diagnostic validity of imaging tests, histological diagnosis was considered as the gold standard in the evaluation of STS bone infiltration.

RESULTS

Histological bone infiltration was identified in 49% of patients and isolated periosteal infiltration in 14.3%. In terms of diagnostic accuracy, magnetic resonance imaging and bone scintigraphy sensitivity values were 92% and 90%, and their specificity values were 91.7% and 52.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of bone and periosteal infiltration of soft tissue sarcomas in contact with bone is high. Presurgical bone assessment by MRI has proven to be a sensitive and specific tool in the diagnosis of bone infiltration. Due to its high negative predictive value, BS is a useful test to rule out it. In those cases, in which there is suspicion of bone infiltration not confirmed by MRI, new diagnostic protocols should be established in order to avoid inappropriate resections.

Novel imaging techniques for intraoperative margin assessment in surgical oncology: A systematic review

Inadequate margins continue to occur frequently in patients who undergo surgical resection of a tumor, suggesting that current intraoperative methods are not sufficiently reliable in determining the margin status. This clinical demand has inspired the development of many novel imaging techniques that could help surgeons with intraoperative margin assessment. This systematic review provides an overview of novel imaging techniques for intraoperative margin assessment in surgical oncology, and reports on their technical properties, feasibility in clinical practice and diagnostic accuracy. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane library were systematically searched (2013‐2018) for studies reporting on imaging techniques for intraoperative margin assessment. Patient and study characteristics, technical properties, feasibility characteristics and diagnostic accuracy were extracted. This systematic review identified 134 studies that investigated and developed 16 groups of techniques for intraoperative margin assessment: fluorescence, advanced microscopy, ultrasound, specimen radiography, optical coherence tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, elastic scattering spectroscopy, bio‐impedance, X‐ray computed tomography, mass spectrometry, Raman spectroscopy, nuclear medicine imaging, terahertz imaging, photoacoustic imaging, hyperspectral imaging and pH measurement. Most studies were in early developmental stages (IDEAL 1 or 2a, n = 98); high‐quality stage 2b and 3 studies were rare. None of the techniques was found to be clearly superior in demonstrating high feasibility as well as high diagnostic accuracy. In conclusion, the field of imaging techniques for intraoperative margin assessment is highly evolving. This review provides a unique overview of the opportunities and limitations of the currently available imaging techniques.

What's new?

While surgical resection is critical in the treatment of primary solid tumors, resection at tumor margins remains problematic, with inadequately resected margins facilitating tumor recurrence. In this systematic review, the authors collected information on novel imaging techniques applied to the intraoperative assessment of tumor margins across cancer types. A total of 16 groups of techniques were identified, with many in early stages of clinical application. Following comparison, no single technique was clearly superior in clinical feasibility or diagnostic accuracy. The review highlights the evolving nature of imaging techniques for intraoperative margin assessment and identifies opportunities and limitations in the field.

Re-excision after unplanned excision of soft tissue sarcoma: A systematic review and metanalysis. The rationale of systematic re-excision

In Soft Tissue Sarcomas (STS) referral centre many patients have already had an incomplete tumour resection. In the majority of specimen, tumoral residual is detected and linked to a worsen prognosis. Systematic surgical re-resection of the scar tissue area is often performed. Some authors suggested to postpone re-resections until a clinically evident local recurrence is detected. A searching strategy was applied to Pubmed-Central and Ovid Medline. Odds ratio (OR) for local recurrence (LR), distant metastasis (MTS) or overall survival (OS) were calculated comparing patients who had tumour residual to people who hadn't. OR of local recurrences, distant metastasis and OS were calculated in planned vs unplanned-excisions groups. OR to develop a metastasis and OS after a local recurrences were calculated. Residual tumour led to an OR for LR of 3,56, OR of MTS was 3,42; OR of decreased OS was 3,42. Having a LR lead to a OR of 1,55 for MTS and to a OR of decreased OS of 2,32. Patients who underwent a re-excision compared to planned surgery did not have an increased OR of LR and had an OR to develop a MTS of 0,56. Our data confirm that there is a strong correlation between local recurrences, distant relapses and overall survival. Although there is a selection bias; this analysis highlights the optimal oncological outcome in patients who underwent re-resection. The rationale for systematic re-resection after unplanned excision of soft tissue sarcomas is very strong and this treatment remains the gold standard of care in these patients.

Margin Assessment in Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Review of the Literature

Simple Summary

Many classifications to assess margins status for soft tissue sarcomas are reported in the literature. Most of the series are heterogeneous and variable in size, making it difficult to compare results from study to study. Thus, which is the best way to assess margins in order to predict the risk of local recurrence is still debated. The aim of this narrative review is to provide a comprehensive assessment of the literature on margins, and to highlight the need for a uniform description of the margin status for patients with soft tissue sarcomas (STS).

Abstract

Adequacy of margins must take into consideration both the resection margin width (quantity) and anatomic barrier (quality). There are several classification schemes for reporting surgical resection margin status for soft tissue sarcomas (STS). Most of the studies regarding treatment outcomes in STS included all histologic grades and histological subtypes, which include infiltrative and non-infiltrative subtypes and are very heterogeneous in terms of both histologic characteristics and treatment modalities (adjuvant treatments or not). This lack of consistency makes it difficult to compare results from study to study. Therefore, there is a great need for evidence-based standardization concerning the width of resection margins. The aim of this narrative review is to provide a comprehensive assessment of the literature on margins, and to highlight the need for a uniform description of the margin status for patients with STS. Patient cases should be discussed at multidisciplinary tumor boards and treatments should be individualized to clinical and demographic characteristics, which must include also a deep knowledge of specific histotypes behaviors, particularly infiltrative ones.

Intraoperative Near-infrared Fluorescence (NIR) Imaging With Indocyanine Green (ICG) Can Identify Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas Which May Provide Guidance for Oncological Resection

BACKGROUND

Complete excision of sarcomas to maximize function without compromising the oncological outcome can be challenging. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and potential drawbacks of near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green during resection of bone and soft tissue sarcomas.

METHODS

Eleven patients with high-grade sarcomas were enrolled in the study. All patients received intravenous indocyanine green (75 mg) between 16 and 24 hours before the resection. Sarcomas were resected under NIR guidance and specimens were sent for routine histopathological analysis.

RESULTS

Majority of treatment naive tumors demonstrated fluorescence. There were no adverse events from the indocyanine green administration. In 3 cases, the fluorescence was reported by the surgeon to have been of definite guidance leading to further tissue resection to improve the margin.

CONCLUSION

This is the first report of NIR fluorescence guidance in the setting of open sarcoma surgery. The technique is acceptable to patients and surgeons and was able to guide resection. Multicenter studies are required to assess the utility of this technique in a large cohort of patients with regards to quantification of fluorescence, resection guidance, and longer follow-up period.

Stereotactic radiosurgery as a primary treatment for metastatic skull base alveolar soft part sarcoma: a case report

Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) is a rare malignancy that typically arises in the trunk or extremities and preferentially metastasises to the brain. Radical resection is generally recommended for cranial metastatic ASPS, but stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a recognised alternative for tumours in surgically challenging locations. Here, we present the case of a 22-year-old female, who underwent SRS and systemic therapy with pazopanib for a metastatic ASPS in the left temporal bone. The tumour was successfully controlled without further intervention over 23 months following SRS, which should be considered for metastatic ASPS when surgical resection is not appropriate.

Lymphadenopathy in Fungating Extremity Soft-Tissue Sarcoma: Metastasis or Reactive?

BACKGROUND

Patients with fungating extremity soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) can develop lymphadenopathy, which can represent nodal metastasis or benign reactive adenopathy.

METHODS

In 1787 patients with STS, 67 (3.7%) had fungating extremity STS. In the 62 patients who met our inclusion criteria, we evaluated prevalence and histopathology of lymphadenopathy, factors associated with lymphadenopathy and nodal metastasis, and prevalence of and factors associated with lung metastasis and survival time from fungation. Logistic regression and Cox proportional-hazards models were used to analyze node pathology, lung metastasis, and survival duration with α = 0.05.

RESULTS

Lymphadenopathy occurred in 11 of 62 patients (18%), 6 with nodal metastasis and 5 with reactive adenopathy. The only factor associated with lymphadenopathy was location of primary tumor in the upper extremity (p = 0.02). No tumor characteristics were associated with nodal metastasis. In all five patients with reactive adenopathy, the condition was recognized within 3 days after tumor fungation. Lymphadenopathy recognized more than 3 days after tumor fungation was likely to be nodal metastasis. Forty-one percent of patients developed lung metastasis, which was not associated with presence of lymphadenopathy or any patient or tumor characteristic. Age, tumor size, and Black and Asian race were independently associated with greater risk of death.

CONCLUSIONS

Eighteen percent of patients with fungating extremity STS developed lymphadenopathy. Approximately half of cases represented nodal metastasis, and half represented reactive adenopathy. Lymphadenopathy that develops within 3 days after tumor fungation should increase suspicion for reactive adenopathy versus nodal metastasis.

A Proposed Staging System for Improved Prognostication of MDM2-amplified Liposarcoma

Despite the release of anatomic site-specific staging systems for soft tissue sarcomas in the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Cancer Staging Manual, the algorithms for sarcomas arising in the extremities/trunk and retroperitoneum differ only in the staging of lymph node metastasis. The retroperitoneum not only provides a larger potential space for tumor growth before the clinical presentation, but its anatomic complexities complicate surgical resection and adversely affect disease-free survival. Here, we propose a new staging system for MDM2-amplified liposarcomas (well-differentiated and dedifferentiated subtypes) that properly emphasizes retroperitoneal localization, degree of differentiation (histologic subtype), and presence of distant metastasis. A retrospective cohort of 4146 adult patients with surgically resected liposarcoma was extracted from the SEER database to compare the natural history of MDM2-amplified liposarcomas arising in the extremities/trunk or retroperitoneum. Separate training and validation datasets were created, and Cox proportional hazard regression, multivariable nonlinear regression, and nomographic analyses determined the most significant parameters in predicting sarcoma-specific death. A new staging system was derived and its predictive accuracy was compared with the AJCC, eighth edition system using areas under receiver operating characteristic curves and multiple concordance indices. Multivariable analysis showed that dedifferentiation (hazard ratio [HR]=3.7±0.5; P<0.0005), retroperitoneal location (HR=3.2±0.5; P<0.0005), and distant metastasis (HR=2.4±0.6; P=0.002), but not categorized tumor size (pT category), had the largest effects on sarcoma-specific survival. A new staging system based on these predictive factors demonstrated better discrimination between tumor stages, higher concordance with clinical outcomes, and greater predictive accuracy than the AJCC eighth edition staging system (86±1% vs. 83±2%; P=0.005). Statistical analysis of a large national cohort failed to confirm that categorized tumor size is a useful criterion by which to stage MDM2-amplified liposarcoma. A simplified staging system based on anatomic location and dedifferentiation outperforms the current AJCC staging system. Anatomic localization and histologic grade, and not tumor size, should be included in any future liposarcoma-specific staging system.

Surgical Treatment for Primary Chest Wall Sarcoma: A Single-Institution Study

BACKGROUND

Primary sarcomas of the chest wall are rare aggressive tumors. Surgery is part of the multimodal treatment. We describe our institutional patient cohort and evaluate prognostic factors.

METHODS

All patients who had curative intent surgery for primary chest wall sarcoma from 2004 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Impact on survival-calculated from the date of surgery until last follow-up- was assessed for the following variables: age, gender, type of resection, size, grading, stage, completeness of resection, and neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients (15 males, 65%) with a median age of 54 y (4 to 82) were included. Most common histology was chondrosarcoma (n = 5, 22%). Seven patients (30%) received neoadjuvant and 13 patients (57%) received adjuvant treatment. R0 resection was achieved in 83%. Extended chest wall resection was performed in 14 patients (61%), including lung (n = 13, 57%), diaphragm (n = 2, 9%) and pericardium (n = 1, 4%). Morbidity and 90-day mortality were 23% and 0%, respectively. Three- and 5-year overall survival was 53% and 35%, respectively. R0 resection was predictor of overall survival (P = 0.029). Tumor grade and extended resections were predictors for recurrence (P = 0.034 and P = 0.018, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection of primary chest wall sarcoma is a safe procedure even when extended resection is required.

Soft Tissue Sarcoma Follow-up Imaging: Strategies to Distinguish Post-treatment Changes from Recurrence

Soft tissue sarcomas encompass multiple entities with differing recurrence rates and follow-up intervals. The detection of recurrences and their differentiation from post-therapeutic changes is therefore complex, with a central role for the clinical radiologist. This article describes approved recommendations. Prerequisite is a precise knowledge of the current clinical management and surgical techniques. We review recurrence rates and treatment modalities. An adequate imaging technique is paramount, and comparison with previous imaging is highly recommended. We describe time-dependent therapy-related complications on magnetic resonance imaging compared with the spectrum of regular post-therapeutic changes. Early complications such as seromas, hematomas, and infections, late complications such as edema and fibrosis, and inflammatory pseudotumors are elucidated. The appearance of recurrences and radiation-associated sarcomas is contrasted with these changes. This systematic approach in follow-up imaging of soft tissue sarcoma patients will facilitate the differentiation of post-therapeutic changes from recurrences.

Locally recurrent extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma of the shoulder: a case of complete neoadjuvant radiotherapy response

BACKGROUND

Extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma (EMC) is a rare soft tissue tumor that typically affects the lower limbs of men between the ages of 50 and 60. EMC of the shoulder is rare with a high risk of local recurrence and distant metastasis. A planned surgical excision in sarcoma referral centers (SRCs) is mandatory to obtain the best outcome. The role of chemotherapy (CHT) and Radiotherapy (RT) on soft tissue chondrosarcoma is still controversial.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 47-year-old man presented to our referral center with a history of EMC in the right shoulder excised with microscopic positive surgical margins in a non-referral center. Staging imaging exams did not reveal distant metastasis or residual disease, but during follow-up a local recurrence was detected. After a multidisciplinary discussion, preoperative radiotherapy was administered with a total dose of 50 Gy, and then the patient underwent wide surgical excision. Histological examination was negative for viable tumor cells. No relapse occurred in a 24-months post-operative follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

The case here described suggests the importance of patient's management in SRCs. A planned combined treatments with both surgery and RT seems to be the best choice to improve local control. RT seems to be promising within this specific histotype. Further studies are needed to confirm if the observed efficacy of combined treatments reflects in a consistent survival benefit for EMC patients.

The role of surgical margin quality in myxofibrosarcoma and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma

OBJECTIVES

The effect of margin quality as a barrier against infiltration of soft-tissue sarcomas (STSs) has been unclear. We aimed to investigate the effect of margin quantity and quality on local control for myxofibrosarcoma (MFS) and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS).

METHODS

278 patients with a localised MFS and UPS were studied. Margin quality was categorized into five types; type 1, pseudocapsule/reactive zone; type 2, fat/fibrofatty tissue; type 3, muscle; type 4, fascia; type 5, periosteum.

RESULTS

The 5-year cumulative LR incidence was 22% and 13% in patients with positive and 0.1-9.9 mm margins, respectively, but decreased to 3% with ≥10.0 mm margins (p = 0.009); the cumulative LR incidence was significantly lower in patients with ≥10.0 mm margins than those with positive margins (p = 0.033) but was not significantly different in those with 0.1-9.9 mm margins (p = 0.183). In patients with 0.1-9.9 mm margins, the cumulative LR incidence was affected by margin quality; type 4 and 5 provided an LR risk less than 5% (p < 0.001), which was similar to those with margins ≥10.0 mm. Combining these two factors together, the LR risk in patients with positive or 0.1-9.9 mm margins without fascia/periosteum was approximately 11 × higher than patients with 0.1-9.9 mm margins with fascia/periosteum or margins ≥10.0 mm (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

A resection margin of 0.1-9.9 mm with fascia or periosteum provided a similar LR risk profile to ≥10 mm margins with any margin quality, which provided the lowest LR risk. The quality of fascial or periosteal tissue margins may be equivalent to a margin quantity of 10 mm as a barrier to LR.

The Role of Plastic Reconstructive Surgery in Surgical Therapy of Soft Tissue Sarcomas

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) treatment is an interdisciplinary challenge. Along with radio(chemo)therapy, surgery plays the central role in STS treatment. Little is known about the impact of reconstructive surgery on STS, particularly whether reconstructive surgery enhances STS resection success with the usage of flaps. Here, we analyzed the 10-year experience at a university hospital's Comprehensive Cancer Center, focusing on the role of reconstructive surgery.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of STS-patients over 10 years. We investigated patient demographics, diagnosis, surgical management, tissue/function reconstruction, complication rates, resection status, local recurrence and survival.

RESULTS

Analysis of 290 patients showed an association between clear surgical margin (R0) resections and higher-grade sarcoma in patients with free flaps. Major complications were lower with primary wound closure than with flaps. Comparison of reconstruction techniques showed no significant differences in complication rates. Wound healing was impaired in STS recurrence. The local recurrence risk was over two times higher with primary wound closure than with flaps.

CONCLUSION

Defect reconstructions in STS are reliable and safe. Plastic surgeons should have a permanent place in interdisciplinary surgical STS treatment, with the full armamentarium of reconstruction methods.

Risk of translocated soft-tissue sarcoma recurrence using perforator propeller flap: Case report and literature review

Tumor seeding after intra-abdominal and head and neck cancer surgery is a well-known entity. The risk of disseminating cancerous cells during surgery is also described for soft-tissue sarcoma of the extremities. Nonetheless, after reconstructive surgery using flaps, the risk of recurrence at the donor site is extremely rare. Up to this date, the literature describes only three cases, but none of them reported a translocated recurrence after a reconstruction with a propeller flap. Here, we report a case of high-grade pleomorphic sarcoma of the knee, which recurred at the proximal edge of a propeller flap 28 months after the first excision surgery. The reasons for such local recurrences are not clear and previous works have advocated different theories: direct contamination by tumor cells, physical manipulation of the tumor and creation of surgical wounds with tumor supportive properties. Although these particular cases of recurrence are exceedingly rare, certain precautionary meticulous surgical techniques and a thorough preoperative planning are pivotal to avoid the contamination of "clean" areas during the first excision surgery.

Microvascular tissue transfer after the resection of soft tissue sarcomas

BACKGROUND

Microvascular tissue transfer enables the oncological resection of soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities and the trunk by covering the resulting tissue defects that are often extensive. This study was performed to investigate the long-term survival and functional outcome of patients treated with free flaps after sarcoma resection.

METHODS

A total of 78 sarcoma patients received microvascular tissue transfer in our institution between March 2003 and January 2013. In a retrospective analysis, we investigated data such as tumor characteristics as well as survival time and disease-free survival. In a prospective analysis, we assessed the functional outcome and the health-associated quality of life with the TESS and SF-36 questionnaire, respectively.

RESULTS

Seventy patients qualified for disease-free survival after tumor resection, 41 patients remained disease free for over 5 years. Forty-five patients reached a survival time of more than 5 years. The functional results experienced by our patients were good with a mean score of 82.6% in the TESS. The physical health-related quality was lower than in the German norm sample and patients suffering from chronical illnesses or cancer, whereas the mental health was only slightly lower than in the norm sample and higher than in the groups with chronic illnesses or cancer (SF-36).

CONCLUSION

Microvascular tissue transfer enables tumor resection and limb salvage through the coverage of the resulting defects without impairing patients' prognosis. The long survival times after tumor resection emphasizes the need for good functional results as well as quality of life.

Spermatic Cord Sarcoma: A 20-Year Single-Institution Experience

Introduction: Spermatic cord sarcomas represent a rare genitourinary malignancy with a challenging diagnostic and therapeutic pathway. Different histotypes have been described and prognostic factors remain poorly defined due to the paucity of data presented in literature.

Methods: Retrospective chart review of 22 adult patients treated for spermatic cord sarcoma in a single institution in the last 20 years was performed. Clinicopathological characteristics of the tumors were collected with primary and subsequent treatment. Survival analysis was performed in order to identify prognostic factors of disease-specific survival.

Results: The median age at diagnosis was 68 years (58–78), the most common histotype was liposarcoma (14/22), and most patients (63.6%) were found to have positive surgical margins after surgery. The 5-year cancer specific survival was 91.3%. Grading (p = 0.480), histotype (p = 0.327), and type of intervention (p = 0.732) were not associated with survival. All patients dead of disease had positive surgical margins (p = 0.172).

Conclusion: We report a good prognosis at 5 years. Wide radical resection remains the first and probably the most important step; thus, according also to literature, negative surgical margins should be aimed.

Intraoperative Localization Using an Implanted Radar Reflector Facilitates Resection of Non-Palpable Trunk and Extremity Sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Resecting non-palpable soft tissue tumors presents a unique challenge, particularly with recurrent disease in which surrounding tissue has been surgically manipulated and often irradiated. SAVI SCOUT^® is a radar-based localization device that was developed for breast tumor localization and was recently FDA-approved for localization of soft tissue tumors. Application of this technology to soft tissue sarcoma has not been previously reported.

METHODS

We assembled a single-institution retrospective case series of patients with trunk and extremity sarcomas resected by five sarcoma surgeons using SAVI SCOUT^® from December 2018 to May 2020. Reflectors were placed preoperatively using image-guidance, and the radar detector was used intraoperatively to localize the target lesion. Clinical variables were abstracted from the electronic medical record including treatment history, pathology, and early oncologic outcomes. Using a focused review, we compared margin status and recurrence rates with previously published cohorts.

RESULTS

Ten SAVI SCOUT^®-localized sarcoma resections were performed. Eight were for locally recurrent disease, of which seven (83%) had prior radiation. The remaining lesions became non-palpable after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. SAVI SCOUT^® facilitated resection in all cases with a margin-negative resection rate (77%) comparable to prior cohorts. In this high-risk population with a median follow-up of 14 months, only one patient recurred locally 7.5 months after SAVI SCOUT^®-localized resection, requiring re-resection.

CONCLUSION

SAVI SCOUT^® technology facilitated resection of non-palpable recurrent sarcoma of the trunk and extremities in all ten cases attempted. In a high-risk patient population, the pattern of recurrence has been primarily distant with one instance of local tumor recurrence.

Defining a textbook surgical outcome for patients undergoing surgical resection of intermediate and high-grade soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities

BACKGROUND

Quality measures for the surgical management soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity are limited. The purpose of this study was to define a textbook surgical outcome (TO) for soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities (STS-E) and to examine its associations with hospital volume and overall survival.

METHODS

All patients in the National Cancer Database undergoing resection of primary STS-E between 2004 and 2015 were identified. The primary outcome was a TO, defined as: hospital length of stay (LOS) <75th percentile, survival >90 days from the date of surgery, no readmission within 30 days of discharge, and negative surgical margins (R0 resection).

RESULTS

Overall, 7658 patients met criteria for inclusion; a TO was achieved in 4291 (56%) patients. Of patients who did not achieve TOs, 51.9% (n = 1748) had an extended LOS, and 47.3% (n = 1591) did not have negative margins. Older age, more medical comorbidities, and non-white or black race were independently associated with not receiving a TO (P = .034). With respect to tumor and treatment characteristics, larger tumor size, lower extremity location and higher grade were independently associated with not receiving a TO (P < .001). Hospital volume was not associated with a TO. TOs conferred a significant survival benefit (hazrds ratio = 0.71 [0.65-0.78], P < .001). A TO was associated with a 27.5% longer survival time (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study defined a TO in intermediate and high-grade STS-E and demonstrated that this outcome measure is associated with overall survival. Facility volume was not associated with a TO.

The Effect of Resection Margin on Local Recurrence and Survival in High Grade Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremities: How Far Is Far Enough?

Simple Summary

In soft tissue sarcomas the width of surgical margins after resection determines the extent of surgery and the function after resection. But how far is really necessary? 305 patients with deep-seated, G2/3 soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity, the trunk wall, or the pelvis were reviewed. The 5-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) was 82%. Overall survival (OS) at 5 years was 66%. Positive (contaminated) margins worsened LRFS and OS. A margin of >10 mm did not improve LRFS and OS as compared to one of >5 mm. A resection margin of <1 mm showed a trend but not significantly better LRFS or OS compared to a contaminated margin. In conclusion the margin should at least be free of tumor, in sound tissue. A margin of >5 mm sound tissue seems to be sufficient. Resecting more tissue does not benefit the patient.

Abstract

Background: The significance of surgical margins after resection of soft tissue sarcomas in respect to local-recurrence-free survival and overall survival is evaluated. Methods: A total of 305 patients with deep-seated, G2/3 soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the extremity, the trunk wall, or the pelvis were reviewed. The margin was defined according to the Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer (FNCLCC) classification system (R0-2), the Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC) classification (R + 1 mm) for which a margin <1 mm is included into the R1 group, and in groups of <1 mm, 1–5 mm, >5 mm, or >10 mm. Results: Of these patients, 31 (10.2%) had a contaminated margin, 64 (21%) a margin of <1 mm, 123 (40.3%) a margin of 1–5 mm, 47 (15.4%) a margin of >5 mm, and 40 (13.1%) a margin of >10 mm. The 5-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) was 81.6%. Overall survival (OS) at 5 years was 65.9%. Positive margins worsened LRFS and OS. A margin of >10 mm did not improve LRFS and OS as compared to one of >5 mm. Conclusions: A resection margin of <1 mm showed a trend but not significantly better LRFS or OS compared to a contaminated margin. This finding supports use of the UICC classification. A margin of more than 10 mm did not improve LRFS or OS.

Oncologic safety of propeller flap and free flap in reconstruction after soft tissue sarcoma resection

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The propeller flap is a reliable option for reconstruction after soft tissue sarcoma resection. However, some parts of the resection margin may move away from its original position during flap rotation and thus can be excluded from the clinical target volume of adjuvant radiotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate local recurrence after soft tissue sarcoma resection with propeller flap or free flap reconstruction.

METHODS

Patients who underwent resection of soft tissue sarcoma followed by a free flap or propeller flap reconstruction and adjuvant radiotherapy at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

The 1- and 3-year local control rates were 94.6% and 88.6% in the free flap group vs 90.6% and 87.5% in the propeller flap group, without statistical significance. There were no statistically significant differences in 5-year local recurrence-free survival (88.6% vs 87.5%) and disease-free survival (82.5% vs 74.8%) between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there was no significant difference in local control and disease-free survival rates between propeller flap and free flap reconstruction after soft tissue sarcoma resection, a multidisciplinary approach is needed to obtain surgical information for determining the accurate clinical target volume of adjuvant radiotherapy and the area for meticulous follow-up postoperatively.

Low-grade soft-tissue sarcomas: What is an adequate margin for local disease control?

BACKGROUND

Whilst the resection margin is an established factor predictive of local control of soft-tissue sarcomas (STSs), the adequacy of margin width for low-grade STSs has been rarely described. We aimed to investigate the margin adequacy and its prognostic relevance in low-grade STSs.

METHODS

109 patients who underwent surgical treatment for a low-grade STS were studied. The prognostic value of margin status was evaluated according to the R-, R+1-classification, and width in millimetres.

RESULTS

The 10-year local recurrence (LR) rates were 6%, 27%, 54% in R0, R1, and R2, respectively (p < 0.001), according to the R-classification. The R+1-classification resulted in a decreased LR rate in R1, but no major differences in LR rates in R0 and R2; 7%, 14%, 54% in R0, R1, and R2, respectively (p < 0.001). When classified by metric distance, 10-year LR rates were 0%, 8%, and 38% by ≥ 2.0 mm, 0.1-1.9 mm, and 0 mm margins, respectively (p < 0.001). Patients with close margins (0.1-1.9 mm) who received adjuvant radiotherapy had a trend toward lower LR risk than those without radiotherapy (10-year, 4% vs. 12%; p = 0.406). The 5 and 10-year disease-specific mortality was 9% and 13%, respectively; margin width was not associated with disease-specific mortality but LR was a poor prognostic factor for survival (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Whilst negative margin provided local control over 90%, excellent local control was achieved with microscopic margins ≥2 mm. The role of margins is more important than radiotherapy in local control. Margins do not determine survival, but LR is associated with a poor prognosis.

Antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of wound infections after soft tissue sarcoma resection: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The use of antibiotic prophylaxis for soft tissue sarcoma resection varies widely while little evidence on this topic exists. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of antibiotic prophylaxis on the occurrence of wound infections.

METHODS

A single institutional retrospective cohort study was performed on patients who underwent truncal or extremity soft tissue sarcoma resection. The use of antibiotic prophylaxis was assessed and univariate and multivariate analysis of predictors of wound infections was performed.

RESULTS

Nine hundred and fifty-eight patients could be included. Thirty-two percent of patients had no antibiotic prophylaxis, 44% of patients received single-shot prophylaxis, and 24% of patients received single-shot plus continued antibiotic treatment. Wound infections occurred in 140 patients (15%). Independent risk factors for wound infections upon multivariate analysis were obesity, high American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status, high tumor size and grade, operation time over 120 minutes, and other complications. Antibiotic prophylaxis could not be identified as a protective factor in univariate or multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

A favorable effect of antibiotic prophylaxis on the occurrence of wound infections could not be observed. Although more studies on this subject are needed, our data do not support the general use of antibiotic prophylaxis for soft tissue sarcoma resection.

Outcomes of Sarcoma Resections Requiring Vascular Surgical Assistance: A Single-Center Experience

Objective: To describe the types of intervention and determine patency and survival after arterial and venous reconstruction after surgical excision of sarcomas. Methods: Between November 2001 and July 2015, 42 patients with sarcomas and vascular involvement underwent surgical oncologic resection followed by arterial or venous reconstruction or preservation of the native vascular bundle. Univariate, multivariate, and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed on abstracted data, which included demographics, risk factors, oncologic and vascular treatment modalities, postoperative complications, graft patency, and survival outcomes. Results: A total of 42 sarcomas required vascular assistance for oncologic removal. The majority of sarcomas were malignant fibrous histiocytoma (23.8%), and the most common anatomic location was the retroperitoneum (48%). A total of 12 revascularizations procedures were performed, including 5 arterial, 3 venous, and 2 concomitant arterial and venous. In 32 cases, a vascular surgeon was needed for vessel ligation, repair, or mobilization. The overall 2- and 5-year survival was 77.7% and 26.2%, respectively, with no significant survival difference between patients who underwent revascularization compared to those without revascularization. There was a 100% patency rate in all cases at last follow-up, regardless of the type of vascular reconstruction (median 18 months, range 1-29 months). On multivariate analysis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; P = .002) and positive surgical margins (P = .003) were associated with decreased survival. Most cases were performed in the last 5 years of the study (n = 27, 64.3%). Conclusions: Vascular reconstruction is feasible after surgical oncologic resection of sarcomas with good mid-term patency and limb preservation. Factors independently associated with mortality included COPD and positive surgical margins.