Predictors of long-term response to protease inhibitor therapy in a cohort of HIV-infected patients

Identification of key mutations in HIV reverse transcriptase gene can influence the clinical outcome of HAART

Therapeutic failures due to in vivo loss of drug sensitivity are still a major problem in AIDS care. Currently, the role of and methods for detecting resistant mutant strains in patients before therapeutic choices are still under debate. To investigate the relevance of screening for key mutations alone the commercial INNO-LiPA HIV-1 RT method was applied retrospectively to analyzing several HIV codons correlated with resistance to RTI (reverse-transcriptase inhibitors) in sera from 62 patients before starting HAART protocols, selected on the basis of clinical parameters. INNO-LiPA detected several resistant mutant strains, which were strictly consistent with previous selective pressure in the patients. A significant correlation between genotype pattern and response to HAART was found. The presence of key mutations associated with resistance to one or two RTI included in the protocol correlated with a decrease in treatment benefits, whereas patients with wild-type or non-resistant viral strains exhibited better response to HAART. Even if this information had been available when treatment was started, 45 of the patients would not have received different treatment. When compared with the total number of patients, the subgroup receiving a treatment that was considered retrospectively as consistent with the key mutation pattern exhibited a significantly better outcome. Although the interpretation of resistance-related key mutations needs improvement, this surrogate LiPA method seems to maintain a predictive role in the management of HIV infection, and is less expensive.

Detrimental effects of continued illicit drug use on the treatment of HIV-1 infection

OBJECTIVE

To identify the effects of substance abuse status (active, former, and never) on utilization of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), medication adherence, and virologic and immunologic responses to therapy.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study of 764 HIV-1-infected patients who attended an urban HIV clinic and participated in a standardized interview.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Past utilization of HAART, self-reported nonadherence with antiretroviral therapy, and changes in HIV-1 RNA level and CD4+ lymphocyte count relative to prior peak and nadir, respectively.

RESULTS

Forty-four percent of active drug users failed to utilize HAART compared with 22% of former drug users and 18% of non-drug users (p <.001 for both comparisons). Among participants who were taking antiretroviral therapy when interviewed, active drug users were more likely to report medication nonadherence (34% vs. 24% of nonusers and 17% of former users), had a smaller median reduction in HIV-1 RNA from baseline (0.8 log10 copies/ml vs. 1.7 in nonusers and 1.6 in former users), and had smaller median increases in CD4+ lymphocyte count from baseline (65 cells/mm3 vs. 116 in nonusers and 122 in former users) (p <.05 for all comparisons with active users).

CONCLUSIONS

Active drug use was strongly associated with underutilization of HAART, nonadherence, and inferior virologic and immunologic responses to therapy, whereas former drug users and non-drug users were similar in all outcomes. Effective strategies are needed that integrate HIV-1 and substance abuse treatments.

Prognostic factors of combined viral load and CD4+ cell count responses under triple antiretroviral therapy, Aquitaine cohort, 1996-1998

OBJECTIVE

To describe the viroimmunologic response and its prognostic factors 6 months after initiating triple antiretroviral therapy in a cohort of HIV-1-infected patients.

METHODS

Positive virologic response during follow-up (VL+) was defined as plasma HIV RNA level <500 copies/ml and positive immunologic response (CD4+) as an increase of CD4+ count of at least 50 cells/mm3. Four categories of response were defined: VL+/CD4+; VL+/CD4-; VL-/CD4+ and VL-/CD4-. Prognostic factors were studied through a polytomous logistic regression (VL-/CD4-, as reference).

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics of the 478 studied patients were: 22% at AIDS stage, 77% pretreated, median CD4+ cell count 195/mm3 and HIV RNA level 4.42 log. At 6 months 37.5% were VL+/CD4+; 15.7% VL+/CD4-; 23.8% VL-/CD4+ and 23.0% VL-/CD4-. Baseline HIV RNA level was associated to a higher risk of VL-/CD4+ response. More advanced age was associated with a higher risk of isolated immunologic failure (VL+/CD4-), whereas pretreatment and saquinavir therapy were associated with a lower frequency of positive virologic response independently of immunologic response.

CONCLUSION

HIV-RNA level, pretreatment, and saquinavir therapy were already known to be linked to therapeutic response. Based on our results, a high baseline HIV-RNA level is associated with isolated immunologic response; moreover, age should be of importance in treatment decision.

Limits of deep salvage antiretroviral therapy with nelfinavir plus either efavirenz or nevirapine, in highly pre-treated patients with HIV disease

The virological and immunological response to an efavirenz-containing rescue regimen was compared with that of a nevirapine-containing one in a prospective, open-label 12-month study performed in patients previously treated with > or = 12 months of nucleoside analogue monotherapy, and > or = 15 months of indinavir- or ritonavir-containing HAART. Pooled laboratory data were assessed according to change or continuation of nucleoside analogues, at the time of start of salvage treatment. An improvement of markers of HIV disease progression occurred in all 59 evaluable patients (with a higher viral load decrease in the efavirenz over the nevirapine group at the third month), but the virological response was neither complete nor sustained at the end of study, irrespective of efavirenz or nevirapine adjunct, and complete viral suppression was attained in only 16.9% of subjects. A progressively increasing mean CD4+ lymphocyte count characterized the immunological response of all patients. The 35 patients who changed at least one nucleoside analogue when introducing salvage therapy had a better outcome, irrespective of the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor chosen. Rescue strategies are increasingly needed in HIV-infected patients treated for a long time with HAART. The association of nelfinavir, a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, and dual nucleoside analogues, is popular among patients who fail first-line HAART. When prolonged prior treatment with nucleoside analogue monotherapy and HAART are of concern, and a quite elevated viral load is present, this salvage regimen may not allow a complete and sustained virological response in a 1-year period, while a more favourable immunological recovery can be expected. However, the concurrent change of nucleoside analogues significantly improves treatment outcome.

Clinical outcome among HIV-infected patients starting saquinavir hard gel compared to ritonavir or indinavir

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical response among patients who initiate protease inhibitor therapies with different virological potency.

DESIGN

We analysed patients who started indinavir, ritonavir or saquinavir hard gel capsule (hgc) as part of at least triple therapy during prospective follow-up within the EuroSIDA study.

METHODS

Changes in plasma viral load (pVL) and CD4 cell count from baseline were compared between treatment groups. Time to new AIDS-defining events and death were compared in Kaplan--Meier models, and Cox models were established to further assess differences in clinical progression (new AIDS/death). Adjustment was made for differences in baseline parameters, in particular pVL, CD4 cell count, and region of Europe.

RESULTS

A total of 2708 patients (median follow-up: 30 months) were included, of which 556 started ritonavir (21%), 1342 indinavir (50%), and 810 saquinavir hgc (30%). The three groups were fairly evenly balanced at baseline regarding CD4 count, previous diagnosis of AIDS and pVL, After 12 months, the median changes in CD4 cell count were 90, 96 and 74 x 10(6) cells/l, respectively;P < 0.001, the proportions of patients with pVL < 500 copies/ml were 47, 54 and 41%; P < 0.001, and the proportions with clinical progression were 11.9, 9.2 and 11.9%, respectively; P = 0.20 (log-rank test). In multivariate models the relative risk of clinical progression for indinavir compared with saquinavir hgc was: 0.77 (0.60--0.99); P = 0.043, and for ritonavir 0.83 (0.62--1.11); P = 0.20.

CONCLUSIONS

Saquinavir hgc was associated with an inferior long-term clinical response relative to indinavir, which was consistent with the observed differences in virological and immunological responses.

Immunologic and virologic response to highly active antiretroviral therapy in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate prior antiretroviral therapy experience and host characteristics as determinants of immunologic and virologic response to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART).

METHODS

We studied 397 men from the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS) who initiated HAART between October 1995 and March 1999. CD4 cell count and HIV-1 RNA responses to HAART were measured at the first visit following HAART (short-term) and extending from the first visit to approximately 33 months after HAART (long-term). Prior antiretroviral experience was classified into three groups based on antiretroviral therapy use during the 5 years prior to HAART. Age, race and host genetic characteristics also were assessed for their effects on treatment response.

RESULTS

Better short- and long-term CD4 cell and HIV-1 RNA responses were observed in the treatment-naive users. Intermittently and consistently experienced users did not significantly differ in response. Whereas race did not independently affect response, among those initiating HAART with > 400 x 10(6) CD4 cells/l, younger age and the Delta32 CCR5 genotype were associated with a better short-term CD4 cell response. There was a suggestion that having the protective CCR5 genotype also was associated with a better long-term CD4 cell response.

CONCLUSION

Immunologic and virologic response to HAART was stronger in individuals who had no prior experience with the antiretroviral therapy agents subsequently included in their initial HAART regimen. Age, level of immune competence and immunogenetics appeared to play a role in the subsequent immune reconstitution following use of highly effective HIV therapy.

Identification of novel HLA-A2-restricted human immunodeficiency virus type 1-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte epitopes predicted by the HLA-A2 supertype peptide-binding motif

Virus-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) responses are critical in the control of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection and will play an important part in therapeutic and prophylactic HIV-1 vaccines. The identification of virus-specific epitopes that are efficiently recognized by CTL is the first step in the development of future vaccines. Here we describe the immunological characterization of a number of novel HIV-1-specific, HLA-A2-restricted CTL epitopes that share a high degree of conservation within HIV-1 and a strong binding to different alleles of the HLA-A2 superfamily. These novel epitopes include the first reported CTL epitope in the Vpr protein. Two of the novel epitopes were immunodominant among the HLA-A2-restricted CTL responses of individuals with acute and chronic HIV-1 infection. The novel CTL epitopes identified here should be included in future vaccines designed to induce HIV-1-specific CTL responses restricted by the HLA-A2 superfamily and will be important to assess in immunogenicity studies in infected persons and in uninfected recipients of candidate HIV-1 vaccines.

The virological response to highly active antiretroviral therapy over the first 24 weeks of therapy according to the pre-therapy viral load and the weeks 4-8 viral load

OBJECTIVES

To describe the viral response to HAART by weeks 4 and 8 in previously antiretroviral-naive patients. To assess whether the weeks 4 or 8 viral loads are useful predictors of viral suppression by week 24.

DESIGN

A large clinical database including 453 antiretroviral-naive patients whose plasma viral load was monitored every 4 weeks.

METHODS

Observed probabilities of achieving a viral load < or = 500 copies/ml by week 24 (days 84-168) from starting highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) were calculated according to viral loads at weeks 4 and 8.

RESULTS

A total of 42.4% of patients (153/361) reached < or = 500 copies/ml viral load by week 4 and 70.4% (245/348) by week 8. Viral suppression below 500 copies/ml by 4-8 weeks was similar irrespective of the pre-HAART viral load. In patients with viral loads above 10000 copies/ml at week 4, 60.6% (20/33) achieved < or = 500 copies/ml by week 24. In patients with viral loads still above 10000 copies/ml at week 8, only 42.3% (11/26) achieved < or = 500 copies/ml by week 24, and only 33.3% (3/9) maintained viral suppression below 500 copies/ml to week 48.

CONCLUSION

Viral loads at weeks 4 and 8 should be monitored to detect early signs of low subsequent viral suppression. For previously antiretroviral-naive patients whose viral loads after 8 weeks of HAART are still above 10000, there is an urgent need to assess adherence to therapy, drug levels and resistance, so management can be modified accordingly to reduce the rate of week 24 virological failure.

Predictors of Virological Response in HIV-Infected Patients to Salvage Antiretroviral Therapy that Includes Nelfinavir

Different salvage strategies have been used to regain control in patients with HIV who have virological failure on combination antiretroviral therapy. We conducted a cohort study of 63 extensively antiretroviral pretreated patients who initiated nelfinavir as part of salvage therapy, to determine predictors of virological response. The maximum HIV RNA response was >0.5 log10 copies/ml reduction in 43 patients (68%), including 21 patients (33%) who had suppression to <500 copies/ml. Corresponding response rates at 24 weeks were 41 and 19%, respectively. Responders and non-responders could not be distinguished by mean baseline HIV RNA or CD4 cell count, duration of prior protease inhibitor (PI) use, introduction of an initial non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor or the number of antiretroviral agents changed when nelfinavir was added, likely reflecting the homogeneity of the population studied. The only parameter predictive of response was virus genotype. Response rates were lower in patients with increasing numbers of primary ( P=0.045) or secondary ( P=0.001) PI mutations. The addition of increasing numbers of reverse transcriptase mutations further impaired response rates ( P=0.004).

Long-term outcome and treatment modifications in a prospective cohort of human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients on triple-drug antiretroviral regimens. Triest Cohort Investigators

We designed a cohort in order to assess the long-term effects of triple-drug antiretroviral combinations in 608 patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). We recruited patients who had been previously treated with nucleoside analogues as well as treatment-naive patients who were starting triple-drug antiretroviral combinations consisting of nucleoside analogues, either alone or in combination with a protease inhibitor. After a median follow-up time of 22 months, the incidence rates of acquired immune deficiency syndrome-defining events and death were, respectively, 6.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.3-8.8) and 2.9 (95% CI, 1.9-4.2) per 100 person-years. Advanced clinical stage of disease (P=.004), a low CD4(+) cell count (P=.002), and a low quality-of-life score (P=.001) at baseline were independent predictors of clinical progression. The initial triple-drug combination was modified a total of 647 times in 321 patients. The only independent predictor of treatment modification was previous exposure to a nucleoside analogue in patients who did not receive a new nucleoside analogue at inclusion (P=.001). Plasma HIV RNA values below 500 copies/mL were obtained in 88% of the treatment-naive patients and in 57% of the previously treated patients (P<.001). Compared with previously treated patients who received > or = 1 new nucleoside analogue at enrollment, previously treated patients who did not receive a new nucleoside analogue at enrollment were twice as likely to have plasma HIV RNA values >500 copies/mL at the last visit (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-2.8), and the antiretroviral-naive patients were significantly less likely to have plasma HIV RNA values >500 copies/mL at the last visit (adjusted OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.1-0.4).

Impact of combination antiretroviral therapy on the risk of tuberculosis among persons with HIV infection

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association between use of different antiretroviral regimens and incidence of tuberculosis among HIV-infected individuals.

DESIGN

Observational, multicenter, prospective cohort study.

SETTING AND PATIENTS

Twenty-eight infectious diseases hospital units in Italy. A total of 2160 HIV-infected persons were considered for enrolment in a study on the implementation of tuberculosis preventive therapy between 1 May 1995 and 30 April 1996. The 1360 subjects who completed tuberculin screening at base-line were included in this analysis. Information on the use of antiretroviral therapies over time was collected. The median duration of follow-up was 104 weeks and 997 subjects (73.3%) completed the study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Incidence of active tuberculosis according to different types of antiretroviral therapy.

RESULTS

Eighteen cases of tuberculosis were observed with an overall incidence rate of 0.79 per 100 person-years of observation [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.51-1.31]. Tuberculin positivity and low CD4+ lymphocyte count were the only base-line variables independently associated with the risk of tuberculosis. During follow-up, 637 patients took double combination antiretroviral therapy and 387 took triple combination therapy. After adjusting for base-line characteristics of enrolled individuals, the relative hazard of tuberculosis was 0.16 (95% CI, 0.03-0.74) for double combination therapy and 0.08 (95% CI, 0.01-0.88) for triple combination therapy compared with no therapy or monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination antiretroviral therapy significantly reduced the risk of tuberculosis in HIV-infected persons. In industrialized countries, the widespread use of this treatment may determine a decrease in the incidence of HIV-associated tuberculosis, possibly contributing to a reduction in the overall incidence of tuberculosis.

Three-year effectiveness of highly active antiretroviral treatment in the Luxembourg HIV cohort

Clinical trials have shown that highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART) is able to reduce HIV plasma viral loads to undetectable in 70% to 90% of patients and to increase CD4 cell counts. HAART in community settings (i.e., nonclinical trial situations) is reported to be much less effective.

STUDY DESIGN

Observational study.

PURPOSE

The aim of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness of protease inhibitor (PI)-based HAART in the Luxembourg HIV cohort after 36 months of treatment in previously treated and untreated patients. The secondary aim was to identify surrogate markers associated with long-term virologic and immunologic outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Seventy-three PI-naive patients, who started on HAART, combining one PI and two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs),with a follow-up of 3 years, were evaluated with plasma viral load and CD4 cell counts every 3 months and were analyzed retrospectively. Patients who had been treated previously with NRTI (n = 48) were at a more advanced stage of disease.

RESULTS

Overall, there was a mean decrease in viral load compared to baseline of -1.89 log RNA copies/mL (SD = 1.40) that persisted at month 36. Sixty-two percent (62%) of patients reached an undetectable viral load (i.e., below 500 copies/mL): 82% and 53% of NRTI-naive and NRTI-experienced patients, respectively (p =.013). CD4 cell counts increased progressively in both groups with a sustained effect (mean increase of 146 cells/mL +/- 241) at month 36. NRTI-naive patients had a mean increase of 257 cells/mL (SD = 305), in contrast to experienced patients who had an increase of 108 cells/mL (SD = 206) at 3 years. Proportions of patients with a CD4 count under 200 cells/mL fell after 3 years for NRTI-naive (from 66% to 43%) and for experienced patients (from 32% to 13%). Predictors of short duration of viral load response were in decreasing order of importance: clinical AIDS, the use of saquinavir hard gel formulation as initial PI, and the number of NRTIs previously used. Viral load response was the only significant predictor of CD4 changes.

CONCLUSION

In a community setting, effectiveness of PI-based HAART at 3 years is still achieved for most patients. NRTI-experienced patients have a good long-term response rate even if it is lower than NRTI-naive patients. A poor treatment response is associated with a more advanced stage of disease before HAART is introduced.

Adherence, side effects and efficacy of stavudine plus lamivudine plus nelfinavir in treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate adherence, side effects and efficacy of a modality of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in HIV-infected patients.

METHODS

In a cohort, prospective study, 65 previously treated patients received stavudine plus lamivudine plus nelfinavir. Fifty-three participants (81%) had a history of intravenous drug use. Patients were evaluated at 3-month intervals. The association of adherence with demographic variables, hepatitis C virus infection, number of stopped antiretroviral regimens, HIV RNA level, CD4 cell count, and adverse effects to drugs was assessed.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 12 months, 30 participants (46%) showed adequate adherence in all visits. An association was observed between adherence and female sex: 18 of 47 men (38%) vs. 12 of 18 women (67%) presented adequate adherence in all visits (P=0. 0416). An association was also observed between adherence and low baseline HIV RNA level (P=0.0229). Discontinuation of treatment took place because of refusal to take medication in 11 participants (17%) and because of side effects in seven participants (11%). Undetectable HIV RNA level was achieved in 26 patients (40%) at 3 months and in lower percentages at months 6, 9 and 12.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall adherence to the employed HAART regimen was poor. Female sex and low baseline HIV RNA were associated with better adherence. Refusal to take medications and side effects were the main reasons to stop therapy. At 3 months' follow-up, virological efficacy was achieved in 40% of patients.

Phenotypic testing predicts virological response in successive protease inhibitor-based regimens

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the importance of the number of active drugs, as determined by phenotypic resistance testing, in achieving virological response in successive salvage regimens.

DESIGN

Phenotypic study of 57 plasma samples corresponding to 24 patients who had sequentially received three protease inhibitor-containing regimens. Phenotypic susceptibility to a drug (active drug) was defined as less than a four-fold-increase in the IC50 in comparison with the wild type.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Virological response according to the number of active drugs (three versus two or fewer), HIV load, length of antiretroviral exposure, and line of protease inhibitor-based therapy (first, second and third regimen).

RESULTS

Before the first protease inhibitor-based therapy, the median time on antiretroviral treatment was 42 months, and before the second and third protease inhibitor-salvage regimens it was 10 and 8 months, respectively. The number of patients receiving three active drugs simultaneously was 24, 35 and 31% in each line of therapy. At week 12, a close correlation was found between the presence of three active drugs in the antiretroviral regimen and the rate of virological response, in comparison with those patients receiving two or fewer active drugs [76 versus 45%, relative risk (RR), 1.7; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-2.6; P = 0.028]. In a multivariate analysis, the use of two or fewer active drugs was an independent predictor of lack of response, regardless of HIV load, length of previous antiretroviral exposure and line of salvage therapy (RR, 4.5; 95%CI, 1.1-18.3; P = 0.03). Of note, a higher rate of response was observed in patients receiving the first protease inhibitor-containing regimen in comparison with those in subsequent protease inhibitor-based salvage regimens (83 versus 50 versus 28%, P < 0.01), even when only those patients receiving three active drugs were included (100 versus 71 versus 60%).

CONCLUSIONS

This data confirm the usefulness of phenotypic testing in guiding antiretroviral therapy in heavily pretreated patients. The number of active drugs and the line of salvage therapy are independent predictors of virological response, regardless of HIV load and the length of antiretroviral exposure.

[Influence of a day care hospital on the incidence of hospital admission of AIDS patients]

BACKGROUND

Day care units have become an usual way of medical care for AIDS patients. However, their influence on the incidence of hospital admissions has not been evaluated.

METHODS

Observational and longitudinal study of a cohort of 308 patients with aids diagnosed between 1990 and 1994 and followed-up to June 1996. The incidence of hospital admissions according to the hospital of follow-up (with or without day care unit) was analyzed. A multivariate analysis of the number of hospital admissions was performed using regression model adjusted to a distribution of Poisson.

RESULTS

After AIDS diagnosis, the incidence of hospital admissions was 108 per 100 patient-years of follow up (21 days as inpatient per patient-year). Those patients controlled in the hospital with day care unit have less hospital admissions (relative risk after adjusting by CD4+ cells count and type of diagnostic disease: 0.64; CI95% 0.55-0.76), and less days as inpatient through their follow-up (11 to 31 days less). There was no difference in survival among patients followed in both hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

A day care unit decrease the incidence of hospital admissions in aids patients. This positive impact is more evident in patients with lesser CD4+ cell counts.

The Virgo Study: Nevirapine, Didanosine and Stavudine Combination Therapy in Antiretroviral-Naive HIV-1-Infected Adults

The virological and immunological efficacy of the triple regimen containing nevirapine (once or twice daily), didanosine (once daily) and stavudine, in antiretroviral-naive patients infected with HIV-1, was evaluated in an open-label, prospective, non-randomized, multi-centre, 52-week study. The first 60 patients (VIRGO I) received nevirapine as the standard dose, 200 mg twice daily; the subsequent 40 patients (VIRGO II) received nevirapine at a dose of 400 mg once daily. All patients received 400 mg of didanosine once daily and 40 mg of stavudine twice daily, adjusted for body weight. At baseline, the median CD4 cell count and plasma viral load (pVL) were 414 cells/mm3 and 4.59 log10 copies/ml in VIRGO I, and 412 cells/mm3 and 4.87 log10 copies/ml in VIRGO II. Using an intent-to-treat, ‘non-completer equals failure’, analysis, 78% (95% CI, 68–88%) of patients in VIRGO I and 68% (95% CI, 53–83%) of those in VIRGO II had a pVL <500 copies/ml at 24 weeks; the proportions achieving a pVL of <50 copies/ml were 62% (95% CI, 50–74%) and 50% (95% CI, 35–65%), respectively. The week 24 median CD4 cell count increase was 168 cells/mm3 (VIRGO I) and 139 cells/mm3 (VIRGO II). At week 52, 39/45 (87%) of VIRGO I patients had pVL <500 copies/ml and 30/45 (67%) <50 copies/ml. Of the 100 patients, 44 experienced grade 2 to 4 adverse events; 20 permanently discontinued study medication because of an adverse event. Combination therapy with the three reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors stavudine, once-daily didanosine and either once- or twice-daily nevirapine could be considered as an alternative option for first-line antiretroviral therapy.

A novel phenotypic drug susceptibility assay for human immunodeficiency virus type 1

Although combination antiretroviral therapy has resulted in a considerable improvement in the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 (HIV-1) infection, the emergence of resistant virus is a significant obstacle to the effective management of HIV infection and AIDS. We have developed a novel phenotypic drug susceptibility assay that may be useful in guiding therapy and improving long-term suppression of HIV replication. Susceptibility to protease (PR) and reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors is measured by using resistance test vectors (RTVs) that contain a luciferase indicator gene and PR and RT sequences derived from HIV-1 in patient plasma. Cells are transfected with RTV DNA, resulting in the production of virus particles that are used to infect target cells. Since RTVs are replication defective, luciferase activity is measured following a single round of replication. The assay has been automated to increase throughput and is completed in 8 to 10 days. Test results may be useful in facilitating the selection of optimal treatment regimens for patients who have failed prior therapy or drug-naive patients infected with drug-resistant virus. In addition, the assay can be used to evaluate candidate drugs and assist in the development of new drugs that are active against resistant strains of HIV-1.

Phase III study of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in advanced HIV disease: effect on infections, CD4 cell counts and HIV suppression. Leukine/HIV Study Group

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of adjuvant granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (sargramostim, yeast-derived recombinant human GM-CSF) on incidence and time to opportunistic infection or death, plasma HIV-RNA, and CD4 cell count in patients with advanced HIV disease.

METHODS

This Phase III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled subjects with CD4 cell counts < or = 50 x 10(6)/l or < or = 100 x 10(6)/l with a prior AIDS-defining illness on stable antiretroviral therapy. Subjects were stratified by baseline HIV-RNA level (> or = or < 30,000 copies/ml) and randomized to receive subcutaneous injections of GM-CSF 250 microg or placebo three times per week for 24 weeks. Subjects were permitted to continue on blinded drug for up to 20 months. Subjects were evaluated for infections, plasma HIV-RNA, lymphocyte counts, changes in antiretroviral therapy, toxicity, and survival.

RESULTS

Three-hundred and nine subjects received at least one dose of study drug, 70% completed 24 weeks of therapy. Groups were well matched at baseline. Significant increases in CD4 cell and neutrophil counts were observed at 1, 3, and 6 months in the GM-CSF group. GM-CSF significantly reduced the incidence of overall infections (78% placebo versus 67% GM-CSF; P = 0.03) and delayed time to first infection (56 days placebo versus 97 days GM-CSF; P = 0.04). No statistical difference in cumulative opportunistic infections was observed between groups; however, among subjects without an opportunistic infection prior to study, the GM-CSF group demonstrated a trend towards fewer subjects with an opportunistic infection on study (26% placebo versus 8% GM-CSF; P = 0.08). Change in HIV-RNA was not significantly different between groups, but significantly fewer GM-CSF subjects with baseline viral load < 30,000 copies/ml had changes in antiretroviral therapy for increased viral load (42% placebo versus 21% GM-CSF; P = 0.01). In patients with HIV-RNA levels below the limit of detection at baseline, more GM-CSF patients maintained an undetectable viral load at 24 weeks (54% placebo versus 83% GM-CSF; P = 0.02). GM-CSF was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

GM-CSF significantly increased CD4 cell count and decreased virological breakthrough and overall infection rate in subjects with advanced HIV disease.

Incidence of adverse reactions in HIV patients treated with protease inhibitors: a cohort study. Coordinamento Italiano Studio Allergia e Infezione da HIV (CISAI) Group

OBJECTIVE

To assess the probability that protease inhibitor (PI) therapy might be discontinued because of adverse events (AE) and to evaluate the incidence rate of adverse reactions during PI treatment.

DESIGN

A prospective cohort, multicenter study on HIV-positive patients starting treatment with at least one PI.

SETTING

Ten departments of infectious diseases in Northern Italy.

PATIENTS

A total of 1207 patients who started PI therapy in September 1997 and were consecutively observed up to April 1999.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Adverse reactions following initiation of PI therapy, and time to therapy discontinuation due to AE.

RESULTS

During the study period, 35.9% patients presented adverse reactions of any grade, whereas 9.7% presented at least one serious AE. After 12 months of treatment, the percentage of patients who had interrupted treatment was 36% of ritonavir-treated patients, 14.2% of those treated with indinavir, 13.6% of ritonavir-saquinavir hard gel capsules (HGC)-treated patients, and 8.5% and 2.1%, respectively, for those treated with nelfinavir and saquinavir HGC. Women and patients with hepatitis experienced a significantly greater number of adverse events compared with other categories. Gastrointestinal events were more frequently observed in patients treated with either ritonavir alone or in combination with saquinavir HGC, as well as in patients receiving nelfinavir, although in this group serious events were rare. Here again, neurologic, metabolic, and hepatic toxicity occurred more frequently in ritonavir and ritonavir-saquinavir HGC treated patients. Allergic reactions were more often observed in patients receiving nelfinavir. Indinavir-treated patients presented the highest incidence of renal toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Ritonavir is the drug associated with the largest number of reactions, which appear during the first few months of treatment. Saquinavir HGC and nelfinavir are the best tolerated drugs in a clinical setting.

A randomized, comparative study of lamivudine plus stavudine, with indinavir or nelfinavir, in treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients

OBJECTIVE

To compare adherence and clinical outcome with two modalities of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), in HIV-infected patients.

DESIGN

Randomized, open-label, prospective study.

SETTING

Tertiary care centre in Spain.

PATIENTS

A total of 112 non-naive HIV-infected patients, recruited from March 1998 through August 1998, were studied.

INTERVENTIONS

Triple drug therapy with stavudine and lamivudine, plus indinavir or nelfinavir.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Adherence, side-effects, and immunological, virological, and clinical efficacy of treatment were assessed at 3-month intervals.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 9 months, 32% of patients in the indinavir group versus 50% of those in the nelfinavir group showed adequate adherence in all clinical appointments (P= 0.0559). Adherence was superior in the nelfinavir group in every visit. After 6 months of treatment 48% of subjects in the indinavir group and 70% of those in the nelfinavir group exhibited adequate adherence (P= 0.0311). After 9 months 35% of patients in the indinavir group and 59% of those in the nelfinavir group showed adequate adherence (P= 0.0291). Side-effects provoked discontinuation of treatment in 34% of patients in the indinavir group and 12% of patients in the nelfinavir group (P= 0.0073). Immunological and virological efficacy were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to a HAART regimen with stavudine plus lamivudine plus nelfinavir was superior to a regimen with stavudine plus lamivudine plus indinavir. Side-effects provoked more discontinuation of treatment in the indinavir group than in the nelfinavir group.

Factors associated with clinical and virological failure in patients receiving a triple therapy including a protease inhibitor

OBJECTIVE

To determine the predictors of virological and clinical failure in patients receiving a protease inhibitor as part of triple therapy.

METHODS

From the French Hospital Database on HIV, 1402 protease inhibitor-naive patients starting a highly active antiretroviral therapy regimen with ritonavir, saquinavir-hard gel capsule (hgc) or indinavir between July 1996 and March 1997, and with measured HIV RNA at baseline and at 12 months, were studied for progression to a new AIDS-defining event (ADE) or death. Virological failure was defined as plasma HIV RNA > 1000 copies/ml at 12 months. Multivariate analyses were performed using Cox models for clinical outcomes and logistic regression for virological outcomes.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 14.1 months, 94 (6.7%) patients experienced an ADE or died. At 12 months, 700 patients (49.9%) had virological failure. In the multivariate analysis, baseline CD4 cell count and viral load were found to be independent predictors of both virological and clinical failure. Neither the type of the first protease inhibitor taken nor previous antiretroviral therapy experience was associated with risk of clinical progression. For virological failure, the use of saquinavir-hgc was associated with a significant 1.96-fold increase in risk compared with indinavir; pre-treated patients were at higher risk than antiretroviral therapy-naive patients.

CONCLUSION

In this study with large samples of patients, the use of saquinavir-hgc was associated with higher risk of virological failure at 12 months than were ritonavir and indinavir; no differences between protease inhibitors were found for clinical progression. As biases cannot be excluded, a longer duration of follow-up will be necessary to answer the question of whether the results are really discrepant or simply reflect the delay between virological failure and clinical manifestations.

Persisting Long-Term Benefit of Genotype-Guided Treatment for HIV-Infected Patients Failing Haart. The Viradapt Study: Week 48 Follow-Up

Objective

We report the 12 months follow-up of the patients who participated in the Viradapt study.

Methods

A total of 108 HIV-infected patients failing antiretroviral (ARV) therapy (HIV RNA >10000 copies/ml, therapy >6 months with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, >3 months with protease inhibitors (PIs) were randomized into two arms: standard of care in the control arm, and treatment according to the resistance mutations in the protease and reverse transcriptase genes in the study arm. After the first 6 months of the randomized study, open-label, genotype-guided treatment was offered in both arms. A multivariate analysis was performed to assess the predictive factors of treatment success (HIV RNA <200 copies/ml).

Results

The two arms were comparable in terms of risk factors, age, sex, previous treatments, CD4 cell count and log10 HIV-1 RNA at baseline. At week 24, an interim combined analysis showed a statistically significant difference in the drop in viral load at months 3 and 6 ( P=0.015, repeated measures analysis of variance) in favour of the genotype group. Patients in both arms were then offered open-label genotyping. Genotype analysis was performed every 3 months, and treatment changes could accordingly be made. As some of the patients in the control arm had already progressed to months 9 or 12, only 69% (30/43) of these patients received genotype-guided treatment changes. In the genotype arm, the mean drop in HIV RNA of 1.15 log10 copies/ml, obtained at month 6, persisted at months 9 and 12 (1.15 log10 copies/ml ±0.17). In the control arm, an additional drop in HIV RNA to 0.98 log10 ±0.22 copies/ml was observed by month 12. In control patients receiving open-label genotype, the percentage of patients with HIV-1 RNA levels below detection limit (200 copies/ml) rose from 14% at month 6 to 30.5% at month 12. This percentage in the study arm remained stable at 31.3% and 30% at months 9 and 12, respectively. Genotype-guided therapy, primary protease mutations and PI plasma concentrations were significantly correlated with virological success.

Conclusions

In this heavily pretreated patient population, genotype-guided therapy resulted in a sustained reduction in HIV RNA of greater than one log10 throughout a 1 year follow-up period. Performance of genotype-guided therapy may have contributed to the additional viral load reduction seen in patients in the control group who received open-label genotyping after the 6 month point. Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of primary protease mutations, performance of genotype-guided treatment changes and PI plasma concentrations independently affected virological response.

Evaluating supervised HAART in late-stage HIV among drug users: a preliminary report

OBJECTIVE

To examine response to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) among a sample of treatment-experienced patients in the late stage of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in residential health care facilities (RHCFs) in New York City facilities designated for HIV/AIDS (acquired immunodeficiency syndrome) when access and adherence are maximized.

METHODS

Medical record review of 111 patients.

RESULTS

Demographics were mean age 42 years; 58% male; 60% African-American; 31% Hispanic; 57% injection drug users (IDUs); 23% with history of dementia; 52% hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody seropositive; 80% on HAART, of whom 18% had lipodystrophy. Of 88 patients on HAART, 52% had a decreased viral load (>1/2 log) versus 13% of 23 not on HAART (P<.05); a >1/2 log viral load increase was seen in 8% and 35%, respectively (P<.05). Those with viral load increase were more likely than those with stable/decreased viral load to be IDUs (71% vs. 64%) and to have HCV seropositivity (86% vs. 53%), even with similar initial CD4+ cell count, viral load, and follow-up time.

CONCLUSION

In a predominantly minority IDU population who are treatment experienced, 50% of the patients successfully responded to treatment with supervised therapy. The RHCFs in New York City provide a unique opportunity to examine further factors associated with response to HAART in an environment in which medication administration and adherence are maximized and monitored carefully.

Saquinavir hard gel suppresses viral load insufficiently in HIV-infected patients naive to anti-retroviral therapy: a retrospective cohort study

Protease inhibitors are important components in anti-retroviral regimens. In this retrospective study 29 HIV-infected patients treated with a regimen of zidovudine, lamivudine and saquinavir hard gel in 1 centre in Denmark were compared with 58 patients treated with zidovudine, lamivudine and ritonavir or indinavir followed at 5 other centres in Scandinavia. All patients were naive to anti-retroviral therapy prior to institution of the actual anti-retroviral regimen and were followed for a median of 1.3 and 1.4 y respectively. The 2 groups did not differ significantly with respect to age, gender, route of infection, ethnic background, viral load, CD4 count, AIDS at baseline or frequency of clinical controls. Six and 12 months after initiating anti-retroviral therapy, 31% and 34% of the patients on the saquinavir regimen obtained HIV-RNA < or = 500 compared with 76% and 73% in the control group (p < 0.001). In contrast to viral load, the increase in CD4 count did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. In conclusion, we found that with respect to suppression of viral load a regimen of saquinavir, zidovudine and lamivudine seemed to be inferior to a regimen of zidovudine, lamivudine and ritonavir or indinavir.

The relationship between ritonavir plasma levels and side-effects: implications for therapeutic drug monitoring

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether the neurological or gastrointestinal adverse effects of ritonavir correlate with parameters of ritonavir systemic exposure.

METHODS

Peak (Cmax) and trough (Cmin) ritonavir plasma levels were compared in 11 patients experiencing side-effects (group A) versus 10 patients without side-effects (group B). Ritonavir was administered with the following escalation dosing scheme: 300, 400, 500 mg twice a day for 3, 4, and 5 days, respectively, then the full dose of 600 mg twice a day. Blood sampling was done in group A within 24 h of the occurrence of side-effects and in group B after at least 3 days of the full dosage regimen.

RESULTS

Both Cmax and Cmax were significantly higher (Mann-Whitney U test) in patients with side-effects. Cmax was [median (interquartile range)] 26.7 (22.7-33.3) mg/l versus 16.2 (13.4-17.0) mg/l (P = 0.001) and Cmin was 12.6 (9.1-13.9) versus 7.5 (4.9-8.6) mg/l (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Patients with higher ritonavir concentrations are at a higher risk of experiencing neurological or gastrointestinal side-effects. Individualization of the dosage regimen, e.g. a downward titration of the ritonavir dose in patients with side-effects, guided by plasma level monitoring, may result in a substantial increase in the percentage of patients tolerating ritonavir without increasing the risk of treatment failure as a result of suboptimal systemic exposure.

Stavudine, lamivudine and indinavir in drug abusing and non-drug abusing HIV-infected patients: adherence, side effects and efficacy

OBJECTIVES

To compare adherence and clinical outcome with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in intravenous drug users (IDUs) and subjects with other HIV risk behaviours (non-IDUs).

METHODS

A total of 133 non-naive HIV-infected patients, 95 (71%) IDUs and 38 (29%) non-IDUs received triple drug therapy with stavudine, lamivudine, and indinavir. Adherence, side effects, and immunological and virological efficacy of treatment were assessed every 3 months.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 12 months, 43 patients (32% of the total) showed adequate adherence in all clinical appointments. Adherence was superior in non-IDUs than in IDUs in every visit, but a significant difference was found only at 6 months, when 22 (58%) non-IDUs versus 37 (39%) IDUs were adherent (P = 0.047). Mildly increased bilirubin was observed in 69 (52%) patients, and renal colic in 34 (26%). No difference in side effects was found between IDUs and non-IDUs. After 6 months of treatment, 35 (43%) participants presented a CD4 cell count increase >100x10(6)/l, and 47 (58%) achieved undetectable HIV RNA (lower limit of detection: 200 copies/ml). CD4 cell count and HIV RNA responses were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to the employed HAART regimen was poor. Non-IDUs were more adherent than IDUs, but the difference between both groups was small. Side effects and efficacy were similar in IDUs and non-IDUs.

Effect of indinavir and higher CD4+ T-cell count on viral load response after 6 months of highly active antiretroviral therapy

This retrospective, unmasked chart review was undertaken to determine which HIV-infected patients receiving protease inhibitors (PIs) for the first time were most likely to experience a decrease in plasma viral load (PVL) and which factors were associated with a PVL < 500 copies/mL below the detectable limits after 6 months. A total of 308 patients aged > 15 years with a PVL > 500 copies/mL received therapy that included a PI in addition to other antiretroviral therapies (128 patients, saquinavir hard-gel capsule 600 mg TID; 107 patients, indinavir 800 mg TID; and 73 patients, ritonavir 600 mg BID). The choice of drug was at individual clinicians' discretion. Patients were followed for a median of 10 (range, 6 to 21) months. Of the 128 patients who received saquinavir, 45% were switched to another PI (33%, indinavir; 12%, ritonavir). Seventy percent of the 73 patients initially given ritonavir were switched (45%, indinavir; 25%, saquinavir), as were 23% of the 107 patients initially given indinavir (15%, saquinavir; 8%, ritonavir). A total of 34.1% (n = 105) of patients achieved a PVL < 500 copies/mL; in 51.6%, PVL decreased > 0.5 log copies/mL. In this subgroup, both treatment-naive patients and those who were receiving a new combination of antiretroviral therapy when they started PI treatment had a more pronounced decline in PVL (P < 0.001). After adjustment by logistic regression analysis for age, sex, mode of transmission, and duration of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), CD4+ cell count and initial type of PI received were independently associated with PVL < 500 copies/mL. In the present study, the treatment success rate was low (34.1%) compared with rates observed in randomized, controlled trials. A higher CD4+ cell count and use of indinavir at the initiation of HAART are associated with a better viral load response.

Randomized trial comparing saquinavir soft gelatin capsules versus indinavir as part of triple therapy (CHEESE study)

OBJECTIVE

To compare efficacy and tolerability of saquinavir soft gelatin capsule (SQV-SGC) formulation and indinavir, both given as part of a triple drug regimen containing zidovudine and lamivudine, in HIV-1-infected individuals.

DESIGN

Randomized, open label, multicentre study.

PATIENTS

A total of 70 patients who were antiretroviral-naive and who had a CD4 cell count < 500 x 10(6)/I and/or > 10000 HIV RNA copies/ml plasma and/or HIV-related symptoms. Subjects were assigned randomly to zidovudine 200 mg three times per day plus lamivudine 150 mg twice per day plus either SQV-SGC 1200 mg three times per day (SQV-SGC group) or indinavir 800 mg three times per day (indinavir group). Data are presented for all patients up to week 24.

RESULTS

Mean baseline CD4 cell counts (+/- SE) were 301+/-29 x 10(6) cells/l and 310 +/-43 x 10(6) cells/l in the SQV-SGC and indinavir groups, respectively. The log10 median baseline HIV RNA load was 5.00 copies/ml in the SQV-SGC group and 4.98 copies/ml in the indinavir group. No difference in antiretroviral effect between the treatment arms could be demonstrated. Intention-to-treat analysis (last observation carried forward [LOCF]) at week 24 revealed that RNA levels decreased to < 50 copies/ml in 74.3% of patients in the SQV-SGC group and in 71.4% of the patients in the indinavir group (P = 0.78). In the on-treatment analysis the proportion of patients < 50 copies/ml at week 24 was 88.0% in the SQV-SGC group and 84.6% in the indinavir group (P = 0.725). Intriguingly, the mean increase of CD4 cells in the first 24 weeks was 162+/-20 x 10(6) cells/l in the SQV-SGC group and 89+/-21 x 10(6) cells/l in the indinavir group (P = 0.01), but preliminary data indicate that this difference in CD4 cell count gain may disappear after 24 weeks of treatment. Both regimens were generally well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

During the first 24 weeks of the study, we found no difference in antiviral potency between the indinavir group and the SQV-SGC group. A significantly higher CD4 response in the SQV-SGC group was observed.

Effectiveness and Pitfalls of Initial Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV-Infected Patients in Routine Clinical Practice

Objective

To assess the long-term effectiveness of and factors associated with response to protease inhibitors (PIs) in a cohort of treatment-naive HIV-infected patients.

Design and setting

Prospective study in a tertiary care centre.

Subjects

A total of 207 treatment-naive patients starting PIs from March 1996 to May 1998. Main outcome measures: Clinical, virological and immunological outcomes, and adherence to therapy after 12 months.

Results

Baseline median CD4 cell count and viral load were 160 cells/mm3 and 5 log10 copies/ml, respectively. After 48 weeks, 168 patients (81%) reached plasma HIV-RNA levels below 400 copies/ml, and the mean increase in CD4 cell count was 196 cells/mm3. Clinical events were observed in 29 patients (14%) after a median time of 100 days on therapy, yet mortality was extremely low (0.9%). By multivariate analysis, adherence over 90% [relative risk (RR), 16.66; 95% confidence interval (CI), 5.26–50; P=0.00001] and AIDS diagnosis at baseline (RR 0.35; 95% CI, 0.14–0.90; P=0.02) were the strongest predictors for virological suppression. An immunological recovery over 100 cells/mm3 was significantly associated with an initial virological response (RR 2.94; 95% CI, 1.31–6.66; P=0.009) and adherence over 90% (RR 3.44; 95% CI, 1.61–7.69; P=0.005). There were high rates of change with the first PI (40%), mostly due to adverse events (51%), but it did not compromise long-term effectiveness. Conclusions: Initial PI treatment in the clinical setting is able to reach equally good outcomes as those found in controlled trials. Changes in therapy due to toxicity do not compromise a successful outcome, which clearly depends on an adequate adherence to therapy.

Percentage of Adherence Correlates with the Risk of Protease Inhibitor (PI) Treatment Failure in HIV-Infected Patients

Objectives

To determine the effect of adherence on the rate of protease inhibitor (PI) treatment failure among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients.

Methods

A prospective study of a cohort of 282 patients who initiated PI therapy from March 1996 to December 1997. Adherence was quantified as the percentage of prescribed doses reportedly taken and treatment failure was defined as HIV RNA levels above 200 copies/ml after 1 year on therapy.

Results

Overall, 190 patients (67%) missed prescribed doses. However, mean percentage of doses taken was 91% (range, 21–100%). Demographic, virological and immunological characteristics could not predict adherence outcomes. The causes of non-adherence included intolerance or side effects (35%), complexity of treatment (23%), or recurrence in active drug abuse (17%), whereas abandonment owing to HIV-related disease was uncommon (6%). A degree of adherence above 90% correlated significantly with viral suppression [relative risk (RR) 1.69; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1–2.56; P<0.01]. In a multivariate analysis, a lower degree of adherence (RR, 0.96; P=0.006), a higher HIV viral load (RR, 2.03; P=0.0001), prior antiretroviral therapy (RR, 2.5; P=0.01), and use of saquinavir-hard gel capsules (saquinavir-HGC) (RR, 1.77; P=0.03) were strongly associated with treatment failure.

Conclusion

The percentage of adherence and initial HIV viral load are the most important determinants of virological response to PI therapy and non-adherence is related to treatment-related factors in the majority of cases.

Clinical progression and virological failure on highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1 patients: a prospective cohort study. Swiss HIV Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in suppression of HIV-1 is well documented. We investigated virological and clinical outcomes of HAART in routine practice.

METHODS

We analysed prospective data from the Swiss HIV Cohort Study on suppression of viral load and progression to AIDS or death in 2674 outpatients (median age 36 years, 27.3% women) who started HAART in 1995-98. Viral rebound was defined as two consecutive HIV-1-RNA measurements of more than 400 copies/mL. We analysed separately outcomes in patients with a history of antiretroviral treatment and in treatment-naïve patients.

FINDINGS

An estimated 90.7% of treatment-naïve patients reached undetectable viral load (<400 copies/mL) by 12 months. Among pretreated patients, estimates ranged from 70.3% treated with one new drug to 78.7% on three new drugs. 2 years after reaching undetectable concentrations, an estimated 20.1% of treatment-naïve patients and 35.7-40.1% of pretreated patients had viral rebound. At 30 months, an estimated 6.6% (95% CI 4.6-8.6) of patients who had maintained undetectable concentrations, 9.0% (5.5-12.5) who had viral rebound, and 20.1% (15.3-24.9) who had never reached undetectable concentrations developed AIDS or died. Compared with patients who maintained undetectable viral load, the adjusted relative hazard of AIDS or death was 1.00 (0.66-1.55) for patients with viral rebound, and 2.40 (1.72-3.33) for patients who failed to reach undetectable concentrations.

INTERPRETATION

The rate of virological failure of HAART was high among these patients, but the probability of clinical progression was low even in patients with viral rebound.

Incidence of discontinuation of highly active antiretroviral combination therapy (HAART) and its determinants

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence and determinants for discontinuation of initial highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART).

DESIGN

In this retrospective follow-up study from hospital files and pharmacy dispensing data, a standard dataset was collected including patient characteristics, therapy characteristics, and HIV-monitoring parameters (e.g., CD4+ lymphocyte counts, viral load determinations). Kaplan-Meier estimates of the cumulative probability of discontinuation of initial HAART were calculated. Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to identify determinants for discontinuation of initial HAART.

PATIENTS

All patients starting HAART (n = 99) during June 1996 to February 1997 at our regional AIDS center.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Incidence and determinants for discontinuation of HAART.

RESULTS

During the mean follow-up of 450+/-10 days, 27 patients switched initial HAART, 3 patients stopped any antiretroviral therapy. Reasons for switching were increasing viral load (18x), insufficient decrease of viral load (3x), and adverse events (6x). Nonnaivete for antiretroviral therapy and a lower CD4+ lymphocyte count at start were identified as determinants for discontinuation of initial HAART.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall incidence density for discontinuation of initial HAART was 25 per 100 patients/year. The main reason for switching was an increasing viral load. CD4+ lymphocyte counts at start and nonnaivete for antiretroviral therapy were identified as determinants for discontinuation.