Surgical strategy for spinal metastases

A New Treatment Strategy for Spinal Metastasis: The "Systemic Conditions, Effectiveness of Systemic Treatment, Neurology, and Oncology" Decision Framework System

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Treating metastatic spinal tumors poses a significant challenge because there are currently no universally applied guidelines for managing spinal metastases. This study aims to propose a new decision framework for the 12-point epidural spinal cord compression grading system to treat patients with metastatic spinal tumors and investigate its clinical effectiveness in a multicenter analysis.

METHODS

This study analyzed 940 patients with metastatic spinal tumors between December 2017 and March 2023. The study provided the clinical evidence for the systemic conditions, effectiveness of systemic treatment, neurology, and oncology (SENO) decision framework among spine metastases. The SENO decision framework was launched in January 2021 in our hospitals, classifying patients into 2 groups: The non-SENO group (n = 489) consisted of patients treated between December 2017 and January 2021, while the SENO group (n = 451) comprised patients treated from January 2021 to March 2023.

RESULTS

Patients in the SENO group were more likely to receive minimally invasive surgery (67.85% vs 58.69%) and less chance of receiving spinal cord circular decompression surgery (14.41% vs 24.74%) than patients in the non-SENO group ( P < .001). Furthermore, patients in the SENO group experienced fewer perioperative complications (9.09% vs 15.34%, P = .004), incurred lower hospitalization costs ( P < .001), had shorter length of hospitalization ( P < .001), and received systematic treatments for tumors earlier ( P < .001). As a result, patients in the SENO group (329.00 [95% CI: 292.06-365.94] days) demonstrated significantly improved survival outcomes compared with those in the non-SENO group (279.00 [95% CI: 256.91-301.09], days) ( P < .001). At 3 months postdischarge, patients in the SENO group reported greater improvements in their quality of life, encompassing physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being, when compared with patients in the non-SENO group.

CONCLUSION

The SENO decision framework is a promising approach for treating patients with metastatic spinal tumors.

A patient with oligometastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer who achieved long-term progression-free survival following cytoreductive radical prostatectomy and metastasectomy

Introduction

Oligometastatic prostate cancer can be well-controlled through combined local and metastasis-directed therapies. However, the effects of cytoreductive radical prostatectomy and metastasectomy remain unclear.

Case presentation

A 52-year-old man presented with prostate cancer and isolated bone metastasis to the thoracic spine. Six months after neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, the patient underwent cytoreductive radical prostatectomy and total en bloc spondylectomy. The postoperative course was uneventful. Hormonal therapy was terminated 5 years after surgery, and no biochemical or radiological progression was observed at 7 years postoperatively.

Conclusion

Although careful patient selection is necessary, cytoreductive radical prostatectomy and metastasectomy are effective treatments for well-selected patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer.

Postoperative survival after lumbar instrumented surgery for metastatic spinal tumors: a nationwide population-based cohort analysis

BACKGROUND

It is difficult to predict the expected survival after lumbar instrumented surgery for metastases owing to the difference among different cancer origins and the relatively short survival after surgery.

AIMS

The aim of this study is to analyze the postoperative survival period of lumbar spinal metastasis patients who underwent lumbar instrumented surgery.

METHODS

Data were collected from the Korean National Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database. Patients who underwent lumbar spinal surgery with instrumentation between January 2011 and December 2015 for metastatic lumbar diseases were reviewed. The mean postoperative survival period of patients with metastatic lumbar cancer according to each primary cancer type was evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 628 patients were enrolled and categorized according to primary cancer type. The overall median survival rate was 1.11±1.30 years. The three most prevalent primary cancer groups were lung, hepatobiliary, and colorectal cancers, presenting relatively short postoperative survival rates (0.93±1.25, 0.74±0.75 and 0.74±0.88 years, respectively). The best postoperative survival period was observed in breast cancer (2.23±1.83 years), while urinary tract cancer showed the shortest postoperative survival period (0.59±0.69 years).

CONCLUSION

The postoperative survival period of patients with lumbar metastatic spinal tumors according to different primary cancers after instrumented fusion was ˃1 year overall, with differences according to different primary origins. This result may provide information regarding the expected postoperative survival after instrumented surgery for lumbar spinal metastases.

Outcomes in Patients with Spinal Metastases Managed with Surgical Intervention

BACKGROUND

Spinal metastases are a significant cause of morbidity in patients with advanced cancer, and management often requires surgical intervention. Although prior studies have identified factors that influence outcomes with surgery, the ability of these factors to predict outcomes remains unclear in the era of contemporary therapies, and there is a need to better identify patients who are likely to benefit from surgery.

METHODS

We performed a single-center, retrospective analysis to evaluate risk factors for poor outcomes in patients with spinal metastases treated with surgery. The primary outcome was mortality at 180 days.

RESULTS

A total of 128 patients were identified. Age ≥ 65 years at surgery (p = 0.0316), presence of extraspinal metastases (p = 0.0110), and ECOG performance scores >1 (p = 0.0397) were associated with mortality at 180 days on multivariate analysis. These factors and BMI ≤ 30 mg/kg2 (p = 0.0008) were also associated with worse overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Age > 65, extraspinal metastases, and performance status scores >1 are factors associated with mortality at 180 days in patients with spinal metastases treated with surgery. Patients with these factors and BMI ≤ 30 mg/kg2 had worse overall survival. Our results support multidisciplinary discussions regarding the benefits and risks associated with surgery in patients with these risk factors.

Different decision-making in spine metastasis management among radiation oncologists and orthopedic surgeons: a Korean online survey study

Purpose

To understand the current practice of radiation oncologists (ROs) and orthopedic surgeons (OSs) regarding spine metastasis.

Methods

In 2022, an internet-based survey was conducted for ROs and OSs who treat spinal metastasis in Korea. Respondents were asked to choose the treatment option for two clinical scenarios. Scenario 1 involved a case displaying symptoms of leg weakness due to spinal cord compression and Scenario 2 involved a case with back pain due to pathologic compression fracture. The survey also included a question that required respondents to rank the importance of 11 clinical factors that affect treatment decisions.

Results

Forty-nine ROs and 30 OSs responded to the survey. There were significant differences in treatment choices between two groups for both scenarios (P = 0.001). In Scenario 1, more OSs chose surgical resection than ROs (43.3% vs. 16.7%), while more ROs chose radiotherapy than OSs (83.3% vs. 53.3%). In Scenario 2, a similar proportion of OSs and ROs chose radiotherapy (OSs, 71.4% vs. ROs, 67.3%), while more OSs opted for prophylactic fixation after radiotherapy than ROs (95.0% vs. 42.4%). The top three factors influencing treatment decisions were general performance status, life expectancy, and spinal instability for both ROs and OSs. In both Scenarios 1 and 2, the treatment decisions of ROs changed significantly when clinical conditions related to these top three factors were altered.

Conclusion

Although ROs and OSs share the same factors influencing treatment decisions for spinal metastases, notable differences exist in their actual treatment preferences, with ROs preferring radiotherapy and OSs opting for surgical resection. Multidisciplinary discussions may be necessary to reduce the gap in decision-making.

The Role of En Bloc Resection in the Modern Era for Primary Spine Tumors

STUDY DESIGN

A literature review.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review is to provide an overview of benign and malignant primary spine tumors and a balanced analysis of the benefits and limitations of (and alternatives to) surgical treatment with en bloc resection.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Primary spine tumors are rare but have the potential to cause severe morbidity, either from the disease itself or as a result of treatment. The prognosis, goals, and treatment options vary significantly with the specific disease entity. Appropriate initial management is critical; inappropriate surgery before definitive treatment can lead to recurrence and may render the patient incurable, as salvage options are often inferior.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search of the PubMed database for articles relevant to primary spine neoplasms and en bloc spine surgery. Institutional review board approval was not needed.

RESULTS

Although Enneking-appropriate en bloc surgery can be highly morbid, it often provides the greatest chance for local control and/or patient survival. However, there is growing data to support modern radiotherapy as a feasible and less morbid approach to certain primary neoplasms that historically were considered radioresistant.

CONCLUSIONS

Choosing the optimal approach to primary spine tumors is complex. A comprehensive and up-to-date assessment of the evidence is required to guide patient care and to balance the often-competing goals of prolonging life and preserving quality of life.

Surgical Strategy for Recurrent Giant Cell Tumor in the Thoracolumbar Spine

OBJECTIVE

Recurrent giant cell tumor (RGCT) of the spine represents a clinical challenge for surgeons, and the treatment strategy remains controversial. This study aims to describe the long-term follow-up outcomes and compare the efficacy of en bloc spondylectomy versus piecemeal spondylectomy in treating RGCT of the thoracolumbar spine.

METHODS

A total of 32 patients with RGCT of the thoracolumbar spine treated from June 2012 to June 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 15 patients received total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) with wide or marginal margin while 17 patients received total piecemeal spondylectomy (TPS) with intralesional margin. Postoperative Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Score (ECOG-PS), Frankel classification and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were evaluated after surgery. Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and differences were analyzed with the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed with Cox regression to identify the independent prognostic factors affecting RFS.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 41.9 ± 17.5 months, all patients with compromised neurologic functions exhibit significant improvement, with the mean ECOG-PS decreasing from 1.5 ± 1.3 to 0.13 ± 0.3 (p < 0.05). Among the 17 patients treated with TPS, eight patients developed local recurrence after a median time of 15.9 ± 6.4 months and four patients died from progressive disease. On the other hand, local recurrence were well managed with TES, since only one out of 15 patients experienced local relapse and all patients are alive with satisfied function at the latest follow-up. The median RFS for patients receiving TES and TPS are 75.0 months (95% CI: 67.5-82.5 m) and 38.3 months (95% CI: 27.3-49.3 m) respectively (p = 0.008). Multivariate analysis shows that the Ki67 index (p = 0.016), resection mode (p = 0.022), and denosumab (p = 0.039) are independent risk factors affecting RFS.

CONCLUSIONS

TES with wide/marginal margin should be offered to patients with RGCT whenever feasible, given its long-term benefits in local control and symptom alleviation. Additionally, patients with lower Ki67 index and application of denosumab tend to have a better prognosis.

Prediction of Survival Prognosis for Spinal Metastasis From Cancer of Unknown Primary: Derivation and Validation of a Nomogram Model

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective and prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

Survival estimation is necessary in the decision-making process for treatment in patients with spinal metastasis from cancer of unknown primary (SMCUP). We aimed to develop a novel survival prediction system and compare its accuracy with that of existing survival models.

METHODS

A retrospective derivation cohort of 268 patients and a prospective validation cohort of 105 patients with SMCUP were performed. Univariate and multivariable survival analysis were used to generate independently prognostic variables. A nomogram model for survival prediction was established by integrating these independent predictors based on the size of the significant variables' β regression coefficient. Then, the model was subjected to bootstrap validation with calibration curves and concordance index (C-index). Finally, predictive accuracy was compared with Tomita, revised Tokuhashi and SORG score by the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

The survival prediction model included six independent prognostic factors, including pathology (P < .001), visceral metastases (P < .001), Frankel score (P < .001), weight loss (P = .005), hemoglobin (P = .001) and serum tumor markers (P < .001). Calibration curve of the model showed good agreement between predicted and actual mortality risk in 6-, 12-, and 24-month estimation in derivation and validation cohorts. The C-index was .775 in the derivation cohort and .771 in the validation cohort. ROC curve analysis showed that the current model had the best accuracy for SMCUP survival estimation amongst 4 models.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel nomogram system can be applied in survival prediction for SMCUP patients, and furtherly be used to give individualized therapeutic suggestions based on patients' prognosis.

Clinical and radiological outcomes of n-HA/PA66 cages in anterior spine reconstruction following total en bloc spondylectomy for tumors

Objective

This retrospective monocentric study was conducted to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of the nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide66 (n-HA/PA66) cage in reconstructing the anterior column of the spine following total en bloc spondylectomy (TES).

Methods

A cohort of 24 patients, 20 diagnosed with primary malignant tumors and 4 with metastatic malignancies, was selected based on specific inclusion criteria. All were subjected to TES and anterior column reconstruction with the n-HA/PA66 cage from January 2013 to July 2023 at a single institution. Pre-operative embolization was performed on all patients. Documented factors included operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, treatment history, and involved level. Mechanical complications and radiological parameters such as the local kyphotic angle (LKA), anterior vertebral height (AVH), posterior vertebral height (PVH), cage subsidence, and bone fusion time were evaluated. Quality of life and neurological function were gauged using tools like the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score, Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) scale, and American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grading.

Results

All patients were followed up for 12-127 months, with an average period of 39.71 months. An average operation time of approximately 8.57 h and a blood loss volume of about 1,384 ml were recorded. No instances of tumor recurrence or multiple organ metastases were reported, though recurrence was detected in 2 living patients. Solid fusion was achieved in all patients at a mean time of 6.76 ± 0.69 months. Cage breakage or migration was not observed. Subsidence into the adjacent vertebral bodies was identified in 3 patients but was deemed clinically irrelevant. Significant improvements in VAS, ECOG performance score, KPS scale, and ASIA scores were noted from pre- to post-surgery (P < 0.05). A marked enhancement in the AVH was observed from before surgery to immediately after (P < 0.05). LKA, AVH, and PVH values between postoperative and final follow-up showed no significant variance (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

The integration of TES and the n-HA/PA66 cage was found to yield promising clinical and radiological outcomes in anterior column spine reconstruction. The use of this material did not hinder oncological care, including the provision of adjuvant treatments (chemo/radiotherapy), ultimately contributing to the enhanced long-term quality of life for spinal tumor patients.

Does Low-Grade Versus High-Grade Bilsky Score Influence Local Recurrence and Overall Survival in Metastatic Spine Tumor Surgery?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Spinal cord compression caused by spinal tumors is measured using the epidural spinal cord compression scale, also known as the Bilsky score. Whether Bilsky score predicts short-/long-term outcomes remains unknown. The objectives were to determine the correlation of Bilsky score 0-1 vs 2-3 with regards to (1) preoperative presentation, (2) perioperative variables, and (3) long-term outcomes.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective evaluation of a cohort of patients undergoing metastatic spine surgery was performed between 01/2010 and 01/2021. Multivariable logistic/linear/Cox regression were performed controlling for age, body mass index, race, total decompressed levels, tumor size, other organ metastases, and postoperative radiotherapy/chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Of 343 patients with extradural spinal metastasis, 92 (26.8%) were Bilsky 0-1 and 251 (73.2%) were Bilsky 2-3. Preoperatively, patients with Bilsky 2-3 lesions were older ( P = .008), presented more with sensory deficits ( P = .029), and had worse preoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) ( P = .002). Perioperatively, Bilsky 2-3 patients had more decompressed levels ( P = .005) and transpedicular decompression ( P < .001), with similar operative time ( P = .071) and blood loss ( P = .502). Although not statistically significant, patients with Bilsky 2-3 had more intraoperative neuromonitoring changes ( P = .412). Although rates of complications ( P = .442) and neurological deficit ( P = .852) were similar between groups, patients with Bilsky 2-3 lesions had a longer length of stay ( P = .007) and were discharged home less frequently ( P < .001). No difference was found in 90-day readmissions ( P = .607) and reoperation ( P = .510) Long-term: LR ( P =.100) and time to LR (log-rank; P =0.532) were not significantly different between Bilsky 0-1 and Bilsky 2-3 lesions. However, patients with Bilsky 2-3 lesions had worse postoperative KPS ( P < .001), worse modified McCormick scale score ( P = .003), shorter overall survival (OS) (log-rank; P < .001), and worse survival at 1 year ( P = .012). Bilsky 2-3 lesions were associated with shorter OS on multivariable Cox regression (hazard ratio = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.27-2.49, P < .001), with no significant impact on time to LR (hazard ratio = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.37-1.44, P = .359).

CONCLUSION

Bilsky 2-3 lesions were associated with longer length of stay, more nonhome discharge, worse postoperative KPS/modified McCormick scale score, shorter OS, and reduced survival at 1 year. Higher-grade Bilsky score lesions appear to be at a higher risk for worse outcomes. Efforts should be made to identify metastatic spine patients before they reach the point of severe spinal cord compression..

Treatment strategy for vertebral metastases from anal squamous cell carcinoma: a comprehensive literature review and case report

Purpose/aim of the study: Purpose/aim of the study:Central nervous system (CNS), skull, and vertebral metastases from anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) are an exceedingly rare entity. We report the first case of multiple vertebral metastases from a primary anal SCC with the aim of define a target therapeutic strategy.Case presentation: We present the case of a 68-year-old male admitted to our hospital for acute exacerbation chronic low back pain and left L2 radiculopathy. His medical history included the diagnosis of a human papilloma virus related, moderately differentiated anal SCC (cT3N0M0-stage IIB), treated with standard chemoradiotherapy regimen two years earlier. Spinal magnetic resonance imaging revealed an isolated solid lesion of the L2 vertebral body. After the surgical removal, histopathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of moderately differentiated SCC. At 1-month radiological follow-up, two new lesions at the level of T7 to T11 were identified. Additional chemotherapy and radiotherapy for metastatic localization of L2, T7, and T11 were administered. Two-year follow-up demonstrated a radiologically and clinically well-controlled disease. To supplement our case, a systematic literature review on the CNS, skull, and vertebral metastases and their treatments has been performed.Conclusion: Despite several proposed guidelines for the management of vertebral metastases, at present, a universally accepted treatment strategy for vertebral metastases from anal SCC has not been defined. Based on our clinical experience and literature review, in case of vertebral metastases from anal SCC, a prompt and aggressive, local and systemic, and multimodal treatment of the vertebral lesions may be paramount to improve the patient outcomes.

Tumors and infections of the growing spine

The growing spine differs from the adult spine in several ways. Although tumors and infections cause only a small percentage of pediatric back pain incidences, delayed proper diagnosis and treatment may be disastrous. Benign lesions, such as osteoid osteoma, osteoblastoma, and aneurysmal bone cyst in the spine, are predominant during the first two decades of life, whereas malignant bony spinal tumors are rare. In the pediatric population, malignant spine tumors include osteosarcoma, Ewing's sarcoma, lymphoma, and metastatic neuroblastoma. Infections of the growing spine are rare, with the incidence of discitis peaking in patients under the age of 5 years and that of vertebral osteomyelitis peaking in older children. Spondylodiscitis is often a benign, self-limiting condition with low potential for bone destruction. Conservative treatments, including bedrest, immobilization, and antibiotics, are usually sufficient. Spinal tuberculosis is a frequently observed form of skeletal tuberculosis, especially in developing countries. Indications for surgical treatment include neurologic deficit, spinal instability, progressive kyphosis, late-onset paraplegia, and advanced disease unresponsive to nonoperative treatment. Spinal tumors and infections should be considered potential diagnoses in cases with spinal pain unrelated to the child's activity, accompanied by fever, malaise, and weight loss. In spinal tumors, early diagnosis, fast and adequate multidisciplinary management, appropriate en bloc resection, and reconstruction improve local control, survival, and quality of life. Pyogenic, hematogenous spondylodiscitis is the most common spinal infection; however, tuberculosis-induced spondylodiscitis should also be considered. Level of evidence: level 4.

Prognostic scoring system for surgical treatment of intramedullary spinal cord metastases

Although rare, intramedullary spinal cord metastases (ISCMs) are on the rise, most likely due to prolonged survival and improved outcomes as a result of the advances in cancer treatment for cancer patients. While the management of these lesions remains controversial, surgery for ISCM has recently been advocated for selected patients. We performed a retrospective analysis on 30 patients who were surgically treated for intramedullary spinal cord metastases in order to determine a preoperative prognostic scoring system to guide patient selection for surgical interventions. The scoring system was designed to decide between surgery or other therapeutic procedures. The five parameters selected and employed in the assessment system were: 1) patient's general condition, 2) age, 3) primary site of the cancer, 4) number of other extramedullary metastases and 5) severity of neurologic symptoms. Prognosis could not be predicted from a single parameter. These five factors were added together to give a prognostic score between 1 and 10. The average survival period of patients with a prognostic score between 1 and 3 points was 3 months; 11 patients with a score of 4 and 5 points had a mean survival of 7.63 months, while patients with a prognostic score between 6 and 10 was 14.8 months. According to our prognostic scoring system for surgical treatment of ISCM, surgery should be performed in those patients who score above 6 points, while radiotherapy/chemotherapy or palliative care is recommended for those who score between 1 and 3 points. A prognostic score of 4 and 5 represents a grey area where surgeons must use their judgment on whether to intervene either medically or surgically. This scoring system could facilitate decision-making in the management of patients with intramedullary spinal cord metastases.

Delay of Surgery for Spinal Metastasis due to the COVID-19 Outbreak Affected Patient Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

The present study is to analyze the effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID 2019) outbreak and the subsequent lockdown on the outcomes of spinal metastasis patients.

METHODS

The study was a retrospective analysis of data from a prospective cohort study. All patients underwent surgical intervention for spinal metastases between January 2019 and December 2021 and had at least 3 months of postoperative follow-up. The primary outcome was overall mortality during the 4 different stages (pre-COVID-19 era, COVID-19 pandemic except in Taiwan, national lockdown, lifting of the lockdown). The secondary outcomes were the oncological severity scores, medical/surgical accessibility, and patient functional outcome during the 4 periods as well as survival/mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 233 patients were included. The overall mortality rate was 41.20%. During the Taiwan lockdown, more patients received palliative surgery than other surgical methods, and no total en bloc spondylectomy was performed. The time from surgeon visit to operation was approximately doubled after the COVID-19 outbreak in Taiwan (75.97, 86.63, 168.79, and 166.91 hours in the 4 periods, respectively). The estimated survival probability was highest after the national lockdown was lifted and lowest during the lockdown. In the multivariate analysis, increased risk of mortality was observed with delay of surgery, with emergency surgery having a higher risk with delays above 33 hours, urgent surgery (below 59 and above 111 hours), and elective surgery (above 332 hours).

CONCLUSION

The COVID-19 pandemic and related policies have altered daily clinical practice and negatively impacted the survival of patients with spinal metastases.

Treatment strategies in vertebral metastasis. Need for multidisciplinary committees from the perspective of the surgeon. Narration of literatura

Improvements in cancer diagnosis and treatment have improved survival. Secondarily, the number of patients who present a vertebral metastasis and the number with some morbidity in relation to these metastases also increases. Vertebral fracture, root compression or spinal cord injury cause a deterioration of their quality of life. The objective in the treatment of the vertebral metastasis must be the control of pain, maintenance of neurological function and vertebral stability, bearing in mind that in most cases it will be a palliative treatment. The treatment of these complications needs a multidisciplinary approach, radiologists, interventional radiologists, oncologists and radiation therapists, spine surgeons, but also rehabilitation or pain units. Recent studies show that a multidisciplinary approach of these patients can improve quality of life and even prognosis. In the present article, a review and reading of the literature on the multidisciplinary management of these patients is carried out.

Management of symptomatic spine metastases: A multidisciplinary approach based flow-chart

We described an algorithm for the management of spinal metastases in which the importance of single parameters varies depending on when they are contemplated. Each patient follows his own «personal» sequential process which does not necessarily consider all the parameters each time as some may be irrelevant for the purpose of choosing the type of treatment for that single individual. For instance, a patient in general poor condition with a high ASA score is usually not a candidate for surgery, regardless of the primary tumor nature or the number of metastases. For this patient, the most important element would be the sensitivity of the tumor to adjuvant treatment. Similarly, a patient with acute and progressive spinal cord injury would undergo surgical decompression and stabilization without considering a more strenuous intervention.

Critical evaluation of the literature on decision-making in spinal metastases

Decision-making in patients with vertebral metastases is highly complex. Different factors of the patient, their cancer disease and treatment options are involved in it. Treatment schemes and strategies have been modified with the evolution of knowledge and treatment of disseminated oncological disease. This paper analyzes the bibliography that has been used for decision-making in the last three decades, as well as the evolution to the schemes that we could consider contemporary.

Management of symptomatic spine metastases: A multidisciplinary approach based flow-chart

We described an algorithm for the management of spinal metastases in which the importance of single parameters varies depending on when they are contemplated. Each patient follows his own "personal" sequential process which does not necessarily consider all the parameters each time as some may be irrelevant for the purpose of choosing the type of treatment for that single individual. For instance, a patient in general poor condition with a high "ASA" score is usually not a candidate for surgery, regardless of the primary tumor nature or the number of metastases. For this patient, the most important element would be the sensitivity of the tumor to adjuvant treatment. Similarly, a patient with acute and progressive spinal cord injury would undergo surgical decompression and stabilization without considering a more strenuous intervention.

The NOMS approach to metastatic tumors: Integrating new technologies to improve outcomes

Treatment paradigms for patients with spine metastases have evolved significantly over the past two decades. The most transformative change to these paradigms has been the integration of spinal stereotactic radiosurgery (sSRS). sSRS allows for the delivery of tumoricidal radiation doses with sparing of nearby organs at risk, particularly the spinal cord. Evidence supports the safety and efficacy of radiosurgery as it currently offers durable local tumor control with low complication rates even for tumors previously considered radioresistant to conventional external beam radiation therapy. The role for surgical intervention remains consistent, but a trend has been observed toward less aggressive, often minimally invasive techniques. Using modern technologies and improved instrumentation, surgical outcomes continue to improve with reduced morbidity. Additionally, targeted agents such as biologics and checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized cancer care by improving both local control and patient survival. These advances have brought forth a need for new prognostication tools and a more critical review of long-term outcomes. The complex nature of current treatment schemes necessitates a multidisciplinary approach including surgeons, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, interventionalists and pain specialists. This review recapitulates the current state-of-the-art, evidence-based data on the treatment of spinal metastases and integrates these data into a decision framework, NOMS, which is based on four sentinel pillars of decision making in metastatic spine tumors: Neurological status, Oncologic tumor behavior, Mechanical stability, and Systemic disease burden and medical co-morbidities.

The NOMS approach to metastatic tumors: Integrating new technologies to improve outcomes

Treatment paradigms for patients with spine metastases have evolved significantly over the past two decades. The most transformative change to these paradigms has been the integration of spinal stereotactic radiosurgery (sSRS). sSRS allows for the delivery of tumoricidal radiation doses with sparing of nearby organs at risk, particularly the spinal cord. Evidence supports the safety and efficacy of radiosurgery as it currently offers durable local tumor control with low complication rates even for tumors previously considered radioresistant to conventional external beam radiation therapy. The role for surgical intervention remains consistent, but a trend has been observed toward less aggressive, often minimally invasive techniques. Using modern technologies and improved instrumentation, surgical outcomes continue to improve with reduced morbidity. Additionally, targeted agents such as biologics and checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized cancer care by improving both local control and patient survival. These advances have brought forth a need for new prognostication tools and a more critical review of long-term outcomes. The complex nature of current treatment schemes necessitates a multidisciplinary approach including surgeons, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, interventionalists and pain specialists. This review recapitulates the current state-of-the-art, evidence-based data on the treatment of spinal metastases and integrates these data into a decision framework, NOMS, which is based on four sentinel pillars of decision making in metastatic spine tumors: neurological status, Oocologic tumor behavior, mechanical stability and systemic disease burden and medical co-morbidities.

Management of vertebral metastases in the cervico-occipital junction

Occipito-cervical metastases correspond to 0.5% of spinal metastases. The management of these lesions is complex and involves multiple radiological studies, such as simple radiology, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Is vascular involvement is suspected, tests to assess vascular permeability are also recommended (angioCT). This type of lesion, due to its complex location, may require different types of approaches, commonly it will be the posterior approach, but sometimes anterior or anterolateral approaches will be needed assisted by maxillofacial surgeons or otorhinolaryngologists for correct excision of the tumor. Pain with head turning can guide us to the diagnosis in an unstable spine. Magnetic resonance is the test of choice to diagnose and study these lesions. The presence of instability or progressive neurological symptoms are an indication for surgery.

[Translated article] Treatment strategies in vertebral metastasis. Need for multidisciplinary committees from the perspective of the surgeon. Narration of literature

Improvements in cancer diagnosis and treatment have improved survival. Secondarily, the number of patients who present a vertebral metastasis and the number with some morbidity in relation to these metastases also increase. Vertebral fracture, root compression or spinal cord injury cause a deterioration of their quality of life. The objective in the treatment of the vertebral metastasis must be the control of pain, maintenance of neurological function and vertebral stability, bearing in mind that in most cases it will be a palliative treatment. The treatment of these complications needs a multidisciplinary approach, radiologists, interventional radiologists, oncologists and radiation therapists, spine surgeons, but also rehabilitation or pain units. Recent studies show that a multidisciplinary approach of these patients can improve quality of life and even prognosis. In the present article, a review and reading of the literature on the multidisciplinary management of these patients is carried out.

[Translated article] Management of vertebral metastases in the cervico-occipital junction

Occipito-cervical metastases correspond to 0.5% of spinal metastases. The management of these lesions is complex and involves multiple radiological studies, such as simple radiology, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Is vascular involvement is suspected, tests to assess vascular permeability are also recommended (angioCT). This type of lesion, due to its complex location, may require different types of approaches, commonly it will be the posterior approach, but sometimes anterior or antero-lateral approaches will be needed assisted by maxillofacial surgeons or otorhinolaryngologists for correct excision of the tumour. Pain with head turning can guide us to the diagnosis in an unstable spine. Magnetic resonance is the test of choice to diagnose and study these lesions. The presence of instability or progressive neurological symptoms is an indication for surgery.

Prognostic Factors Associated With Overall Survival in Breast Cancer Patients With Metastatic Spinal Disease

Introduction The spine is the third most frequent site of metastasis, after the lungs and liver, in breast cancer patients. The current treatment modality is based on the prognosis calculated according to multiple clinical features; therefore, multiple scores have been developed to make the therapeutic decision; however, there are no specific scores to take an adequate therapeutic approach in the treatment of vertebral metastases due to breast cancer. The aim of the study is to identify the prognostic factors associated with survival in breast cancer patients with spinal metastatic disease. Methods A retrospective cohort study was carried out at the National Cancerology Institute (INCAN) in Mexico City from January 2011 to December 2017. To this extent, 56 consecutive cases of patients with breast cancer were included. Multiple demographic, laboratory, and clinical variables were taken into account for the survival calculation. Kaplan-Meier graphs and log-rank tests were performed to observe significant differences by subgroups in survival, and Cox regression was used for multivariate analysis. Results Concerning the survival analysis, the patients who presented extra-spinal metastases, an unstable spine, and Frankel grade C had a statistically significantly worse prognosis. In the multivariate analysis, the variables included extra-spinal metastases, age >50 years, spinal instability, serum alkaline phosphatase, and CA 15.3 serum levels, finding statistical significance with a p=0.015. Conclusion Prognostic factors associated with shorter overall survival in breast cancer patients with metastatic spinal disease were the presence of extra-spinal metastases and spinal instability. Additionally, the use of the Tomita and Tokuhashi scores for patients with breast cancer and spinal metastases is not justified at present. The study should be continued with a larger population to decrease biases and obtain a more homogeneous sample, as well as to obtain a personalized score to determine a more efficient treatment for these patients.

[Translated article] Critical evaluation of the literature on decision-making in spinal metastases

Decision-making in patients with vertebral metastases is highly complex. Different factors of the patient, their cancer disease and treatment options are involved in it. Treatment schemes and strategies have been modified with the evolution of knowledge and treatment of disseminated oncological disease. This paper analyzes the bibliography that has been used for decision-making in the last three decades, as well as the evolution to the schemes that we could consider contemporary.

Risk Factors for Postoperative Unfavorable Ambulatory Status After Spinal Surgery for Metastatic Spinal Tumor

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective comparative study.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate factors associated with postoperative unfavorable ambulatory status following surgery for metastatic spinal tumors using a nationwide in-hospital database.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Surgical treatment for metastatic spinal tumors can improve the ambulatory status and quality of life. However, some patients fail to regain the ability to walk, thereby resulting in poor quality of life. No large-scale study has previously evaluated factors associated with postoperative poor ambulatory status in this clinical context.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Diagnosis Procedure Combination database from 2018 to 2019 was used to extract data from patients who underwent surgical procedures for spinal metastasis. Postoperative unfavorable ambulatory status was defined as (1) nonambulatory at discharge or (2) a decreased mobility score of the Barthel Index between admission and discharge. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with postoperative unfavorable ambulatory status while adjusting for confounders.

RESULTS

This study analyzed 1786 eligible patients. Of whom, 1061 (59%) patients were ambulatory on admission and 1249 (70%) on discharge. Postoperative unfavorable ambulatory status was observed in 597 (33%) patients, with a significantly lower rate of discharge to home (41%/81%, P <0.001) and a longer postoperative hospital stay (46.2 days/31.4 days, P <0.001). Multivariable regression analysis revealed male sex [odds ratio (OR): 1.43, P =0.002], laminectomy without fusion (OR: 1.55, P =0.034), Charlson Comorbidity Index of ≥7 (OR: 1.37, P =0.014), and preoperative nonambulatory status (OR: 6.61, P <0.001) as factors associated with postoperative unfavorable ambulatory status.

CONCLUSIONS

Our large-scale database analysis revealed that 33% of patients experienced unfavorable ambulatory status following spinal metastasis surgery. Laminectomy without fusion and preoperative nonambulatory status were among several factors influencing the prospect of unfavorable ambulatory status following surgery.

Palliative Care Consultation Utilization Among Patient Undergoing Surgery for Metastatic Spinal Tumors

OBJECTIVE

In patients undergoing surgery for spinal metastasis, we sought to: (1) describe patterns of palliative care consultation, (2) evaluate the factors that trigger palliative care consultation, and (3) determine the association of palliative care consultation on longer-term outcomes.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective, case-control study was conducted for patients undergoing spinal metastasis surgery from February 2010 to January 2021. The primary outcome was receiving a palliative care consultation, and the timing of consultation was divided into same hospital stay consultation, preoperative versus postoperative consultation, and early (

RESULTS

Of 363 patients undergoing surgery for spinal metastasis, 62 (17.0%) patients received palliative care consultation during the same hospitalization, 11 (17.7%) were preoperative, and 51 (82.2%) were postoperative. Among same-stay consultations, 32 (51.6%) were early and 30 (48.4%) were late. Palliative care consultation recipients had worse preoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score (P < 0.001), were more likely to have other organ metastases (P = 0.005) or cord compression (P = 0.026), had longer hospitalization (P < 0.001), and were less likely to be discharged home (P < 0.001). Patients presenting with mechanical pain were more likely to receive preoperative consults compared with postoperative (P = 0.029), and earlier compared with later consultations (P = 0.046). Regarding long-term outcomes, patients with same-stay palliative care consultation had significantly shorter overall survival (log-rank; P < 0.001), worse KPS postoperatively (P = 0.017), and worse KPS and Modified McCormick Scale at the last follow-up (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Only 1 in 6 patients received palliative care consultation. Patients receiving same-stay palliative care consultation had more advanced local and systemic disease burden. Increased utilization of palliative care consultation in patients with spine metastasis is needed.

Collapse

Key Words

• Overall survival
• Palliative care
• Spinal metastasis
• Spinal tumors

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Palliative Care
• Spinal Neoplasms/secondary
• Retrospective Studies
• Case-Control Studies
• Spinal Cord Neoplasms
• Central Nervous System Neoplasms
• Referral and Consultation

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Jeffrey W Chen Vanderbilt University, School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
Hani Chanbour Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
Gabriel A Bendfeldt Vanderbilt University, School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
Lakshmi Suryateja Gangavarapu Vanderbilt University, School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
Mohana B Karlekar Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
Amir M Abtahi Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
Byron F Stephens Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
Scott L Zuckerman Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
Silky Chotai Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Collapse

Collaborators Collapse

Surgical Treatment of Spinal Metastatic Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma: A Single Institutional Cohort of 18 Patients

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES

To describe surgeries and treatment outcomes of metastatic pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs) on the spine.

METHODS

We reviewed a cohort of 18 patients with spinal PPGLs who were consecutively treated in our spinal center. Their clinical data was reviewed. The survival period and its relevant factors was then analyzed.

RESULTS

The cohort included ten cases of pheochromocytomas and eight paragangliomas. The local pain and neurological deficits were the two most common symptoms. One third of the spinal PPGLs were diagnosed as functional tumors, arousing secondary hypertension. The imaging features were consistent with those of osteolytic lesions. The surgical strategies for the cohort included percutaneous vertebroplasty, neurological decompression and partial tumor resection, and total en-bloc resection. The postoperative courses were uneventful except 1 patient developed heart failure. The adjuvant therapies were implemented in 6 patients with 131I-MIBG, five with radiotherapy, two with chemotherapy, and 1 with target therapy. The median survival period was 39 months, and the overall survival rate of 1 year was 77.8% (14/18). The patients' Karnofsky performance scores were positively correlated with the survival period (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Surgery is indicated for intractable local pain and neurological impairment in the patients with spinal PPGLs. Palliative surgical strategies, including neurological decompression and partial tumor resection, could bring fair outcomes, especially for the patients in poor physical conditions.

Preoperative Scoring System for Prediction of Early Adjacent Vertebral Body Fracture After Balloon Kyphoplasty Using X-Rays Taken in a Non-Weight-Bearing Position

BACKGROUND

Prevention of adjacent vertebral body fracture (AVF) following balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) is a key challenge. The objective of this study was to develop a scoring system that could be more extensively and effectively used to determine the surgical indications for BKP.

METHODS

The study involved 101 patients aged 60 years or older who had undergone BKP. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for early AVF within 2 months following BKP. Scoring was based on the odds ratio for risk factors, and cut-off values were determined from the receiver operating characteristics curve. The correlation between the total scores and the incidence of early AVF, and the area under the curve for the logistic regression model predicting early AVF using the scoring system were investigated.

RESULTS

29 cases (28.7%) experienced early AVF after BKP. The scoring system was created as follows: 1) age (<75 years: 0 points (P), ≥75 years: 1P), 2) number of previous vertebral fractures (0: 0P, 1 or more: 2P), and 3) local kyphosis (<7°: 0P, ≥7°: 1P). The total scores were found to be positively correlated with the incidence of early AVF (r = 0.976, P = 0.004). The area under the curve of the scoring system for predicting early AVF was 0.796. The incidence of early AVF was 4.2% at ≤1P and 44.3% at ≥2P (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A scoring system which can be applied to a broader patient population was developed. In cases where the total score is 2P or more, alternatives to BKP should be considered.

Spinal metastases from non-small cell lung cancer - Is surgical extent enough by following suggestions of the Tomita and Tokuhashi scores?

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

The Tomita, revised Tokuhashi and Tokuhashi lung scores are commonly used tools to predict the survival of patients with spinal metastases and to guide decisions regarding surgical treatment. These prognostic scores, however, tend to underestimate the prognosis of patients with lung cancer. We examined surgical outcome and hopefully provide a more accurate reference for management.

METHODS

The consistency between predicted and actual survival was examined using the Tomita and Tokuhashi scores. Various factors that may influence survival were analyzed. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), defined as the ambulatory time after the initial surgery. Secondary outcomes included reoperation events, blood loss, and hospitalization days.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-two patients were enrolled. Correct survival predictions were made for 28%, 42%, and 56% with the Tomita, revised Tokuhashi, and Tokuhashi lung scores, respectively. The Tokuhashi lung scores underestimated OS by 35%-40%. Body mass index ≥20, systemic treatment-naïve, good general condition, the use of denosumab, and adenocarcinoma were found to positively affect OS and PFS. There was no significant difference between palliative decompression and excisional surgery regarding OS and PFS.

CONCLUSION

Patients with spinal metastases from lung cancer had better prognosis than that predicted by the Tomita and Tokuhashi scores. Spine surgeons should acknowledge this discrepancy and treat these patients with at least the aggressiveness suggested. Patients with adenocarcinoma, amenable to target therapy, denosumab, good general condition, systemic treatment-naïve are better candidates for surgery. Those with cachexic status and unresectable visceral metastases are worse candidates.

A novel scoring system incorporating sarcopenia to predict postoperative survival in spinal metastasis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

As the prevalence of spinal metastasis rises, methods to predict survival will become increasingly important for clinical decision-making. Sarcopenia may be used to predict survival in these patients.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study to develop a prediction model incorporating sarcopenia for postoperative survival in patients with spinal metastasis.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

This study included 200 patients who underwent operative intervention for spinal metastasis in our institution, a tertiary, academic spine center.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was 1-year postoperative survival. The secondary outcome measures were 3-month and 6-month postoperative survival.

METHODS

Clinicopathological and survivorship data was collated. Sarcopenia was defined using the L3 Psoas/Vertebral Body Ratio on cross-sectional CT. Independent predictors of postoperative survival were assessed by multiple logistic regression.

RESULTS

Overall 1-year postoperative survival was 50%. L3/Psoas ratio ≥1.5 (OR 6.2), albumin ≥35g/l (OR 3.0) and primary tumor type were found to be independent predictors of 3 month, 6 month and 1 year postoperative survival on multivariable analysis. Age at surgery, ambulatory status and mode of presentation were not independent predictors of survival. Variables were used to generate a new scoring system, ProgMets, to predict postoperative survival. The ProgMets system had greater correlation and higher area under the curve (AUC, 0.80) for 1-year survival than other scoring systems.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first model to incorporate sarcopenia to predict survival in spinal metastasis patients and has good prediction of survival compared to previous models. This tool may be increasingly useful for informed decision making for patients and surgeons.

Posterior-only approach in patients with poor general condition and spinal metastatic vertebral fracture

PURPOSE

The surgical treatment of spinal metastases is mostly palliative in nature and focuses on improving the quality of life of patients. The posterior transpedicular surgical approach provides circumferential 360° decompression, allows reconstruction and stabilisation to be achieved in a single session and can be performed using an open, mini-open or minimally invasive approach. We present and discuss the surgical techniques and outcomes for patients with single-level metastatic spinal disease and in poor general condition who underwent surgery via the posterior-only transpedicular corpectomy approach and reconstruction with expandable corpectomy cages.

METHODS

Patients with a single level thoracolumbar metastatic disease (T3-L5) and a Karnofsky score of ≤70, who underwent a complete posterior transpedicular corpectomy with expandable cage reconstruction of the anterior spinal column were retrospectively reviewed. Patients' demographics, SINS, modified Tokuhashi scores as well as preoperative and postoperative ASIA scale, Karnofsky scores, VAS scores and vertebral height/Cobb angle values were analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 44 patients (24 M/20 F) (mean age 53.25±21.26 years) met the inclusion criteria. The modified Tokuhashi scores were as follows: score 0-8, 5 (11.4%) patients; score 9-11, 14 (31.8%) patients; and score 12-15, 25 (56.8%) patients. There were significant improvements in the postoperative VAS scores (mean 7.7-2.9), Karnofsky scores (mean 63.3-79.6) as well as the Cobb angles (18.6-12.8°) and vertebral height. Thirtyfive patients showed improved neurological function by at least one ASIA grade, whereas 9 showed no improvement during the postoperative period.

CONCLUSIONS

This technique, which has a low complication rate and a short recovery time, can help achieve satisfactory results even in patients with poor metabolic profiles and Karnofsky scores in the preoperative period. Further clinical studies with large patient groups are warranted to confirm the results of this study.

Assessing the Performance of Prognostic Scores in Patients with Spinal Metastases from Lung Cancer Undergoing Non-surgical Treatment

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to see how well the Tomita score, revised Tokuhashi score, modified Bauer score, Van der Linden score, classic Skeletal Oncology Research Group (SORG) algorithm, SORG nomogram, and New England Spinal Metastasis Score (NESMS) predicted 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year survival of non-surgical lung cancer spinal metastases.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

There has been no study assessing the performance of prognostic scores for non-surgical lung cancer spinal metastases.

METHODS

Data analysis was carried out to identify the variables that had a significant impact on survival. For all patients with spinal metastasis from lung cancer who received non-surgical treatment, the Tomita score, revised Tokuhashi score, modified Bauer score, Van der Linden score, classic SORG algorithm, SORG nomogram, and NESMS were calculated. The performance of the scoring systems was assessed by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. The predictive accuracy of the scoring systems was quantified using the area under the ROC curve (AUC).

RESULTS

A total of 127 patients are included in the present study. The median survival of the population study was 5.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.7-9.6 months). Low hemoglobin was associated with shorter survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.49; 95% CI, 1.00-2.23; p =0.049), while targeted therapy after spinal metastasis was associated with longer survival (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.21-0.51; p <0.001). In the multivariate analysis, targeted therapy was independently associated with longer survival (HR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.17-0.5; p <0.001). The AUC of the time-dependent ROC curves for the above prognostic scores revealed all of them performed poorly (AUC <0.7).

CONCLUSIONS

The seven scoring systems investigated are ineffective at predicting survival in patients with spinal metastasis from lung cancer who are treated non-surgically.

Spinal Metastases from Colorectal Cancer at Mass General Brigham: A Twenty-Year Case Series With Literature Review

OBJECTIVE

We present an institutional case series of patients treated for colorectal carcinoma (CRC) spinal metastases to investigate the outcomes between no treatment, radiation, surgery, and surgery/radiation.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of patients with CRC spinal metastases presenting to affiliated institutions between 2001 and 2021 wereidentified. Information related to patient demographics, treatment modality, treatment outcomes, symptom improvement, and survival was collected by chart review. Overall survival (OS) was compared between treatments by log-rank significance testing. A literature review was conducted to identify other cases series of CRC patients with spinal metastases.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine patients (mean age 58.5) with CRC spinal metastases across a mean of 3.3 levels met inclusion criteria: 14 (15.7%) received no treatment, 11 (12.4%) received surgery alone, 37 (41.6%) received radiation alone, and 27 (30.3%) received both radiation and surgery. Patients treated with combination therapy had the longest median OS of 24.7 months (range 0.6-85.9), which did not significantly differ from the median OS of 8.9 months (range 0.2-42.6) observed in patients who received no treatment (P = 0.075). Combination therapy provided objectively longer survival time in comparison to other treatment modalities but failed to reach statistical significance. The majority of patients that received treatment (n = 51/75, 68.0%) experienced some degree of symptomatic or functional improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Therapeutic intervention has the potential to improve the quality of life in patients with CRC spinal metastases. We demonstrate that surgery and radiation are useful options for these patients, despite their lack of objective improvement in OS.

Multiple Myeloma Spinal Lesion Care: Management of a Primary Bone Malignancy Rather Than a Spinal Metastasis

OBJECTIVE

Multiple myeloma (MM) is too often wrongly categorized as a spinal metastasis (SpM), although it is distinguishable from SpM in many aspects, such as its earlier natural history at the time of diagnosis, its increased overall survival (OS), and its response to therapeutic modalities. The characterization of these 2 different spine lesions remains a main challenge.

METHODS

This study compares 2 consecutive prospective oncologic populations of patients with spine lesions: 361 patients treated for MM spine lesions and 660 patients treated for SpM between January 2014 and 2017.

RESULTS

The mean time between the tumor/MM diagnosis and spine lesions was respectively 0.3 (standard deviation [SD] 4.1) and 35.1 months (SD 21.2) for the MM and SpM groups. The median OS for the MM group was 59.6 months (SD 6.0) versus 13.5 months (SD 1.3) for the SpM group (P < 0.0001). Regardless of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, patients with MM always have a significantly better median OS than do patients with SpM: ECOG 0, 75.3 versus 38.7 months; ECOG 1, 74.3 versus 24.7 months; ECOG 2, 34.6 versus 8.1 months; ECOG 3, 13.5 versus 3.2 months and ECOG 4, 7.3 versus 1.3 months (P < 0.0001). The patients with MM had more diffuse spinal involvement (mean, 7.8 lesions; SD 4.7) than did patients with SpM (mean, 3.9; SD 3.5) (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

MM must be considered as a primary bone tumor, not as SpM. The strategic position of the spine in the natural course of cancer (i.e., nurturing cradle of birth for MM vs. systemic metastases spreading for SpM) explains the differences in OS and outcome.

Establishing the Swiss Spinal Tumor Registry (Swiss-STR): a prospective observation of surgical treatment patterns and long-term outcomes in patients with primary and metastatic spinal tumors

Background

Tumors of the vertebral column consist of primary spinal tumors and malignancies metastasizing to the spine. Although primary spine tumors are rare, metastases to the spine have gradually increased over past decades because of aging populations and improved survival for various cancer subtypes achieved by advances in cancer therapy. Metastases to the vertebral column occur in up to 70% of cancer patients, with 10% of patients demonstrating epidural spinal cord compression. Therefore, many cancer patients may face spinal surgical intervention during their chronic illness; such interventions range from simple cement augmentation over decompression of neural elements to extended instrumentation or spinal reconstruction. However, precise surgical treatment guidelines do not exist, likely due to the lack of robust, long-term clinical outcomes data and the overall heterogeneous nature of spinal tumors. Objectives of launching the Swiss Spinal Tumor Registry (Swiss-STR) are to collect and analyze high-quality, prospective, observational data on treatment patterns, clinical outcomes, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in adult patients undergoing spinal tumor surgery. This narrative review discusses our rationale and process of establishing this spinal cancer registry.

Methods

A REDCap-based registry was created for the standardized collection of clinical, radiographic, surgical, histological, radio-oncologial and oncological variables, as well as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

Discussion

We propose that the Swiss-STR will inform on the effectiveness of current practices in spinal oncology and their impact on patient outcomes. Furthermore, the registry will enable better categorization of the various clinical presentations of spinal tumors, thereby facilitating treatment recommendations, defining the socio-economic burden on the healthcare system, and improving the quality of care. In cases of rare tumors, the multi-center data pooling will fill significant data gaps to yield better understanding of these entities. Finally, our two-step approach first implements a high-quality registry with efficient electronic data capture strategies across hospital sites in Switzerland, and second follows with potential to expand internationally, thus fostering future international scientific collaboration to further push the envelope in cancer research.

When Should Spinal Surgery Be Considered for Spinal Metastasis from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer?-Propensity Score Matched Study between Surgery with Radiotherapy and Radiotherapy Alone

(1) Background: Although metastatic spine disease is increasing, the debate on therapeutic modality remains due to the heterogeneity of tumors and patients. This study aims to evaluate the efficacies of surgery and risk factors for patients' survival from potentially unstable spinal metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer; (2) Methods: Twenty-two patients undergoing surgery and radiotherapy (group I) were compared with 22 patients undergoing radiotherapy alone (group II) using propensity score matching in a 1-to-1 format. Clinical outcomes included the performance status and ambulatory status. In addition, independent risk factors for patients' survival were evaluated, including the molecular targeted therapy for mutations; (3) Results: deterioration in neurologic status was only observed in group II compared to group I (22.7% vs. 0%, p-value = 0.018). In addition, five patients in the surgery group showed improved Frankel grades. Regarding the patients' survival, a smoking history of more than ten pack-years (hazard ratio (HR) = 12.18), worse performance status (HR = 6.86), and absence of mutations (HR = 3.39) were the independent risk factors; (4) Conclusions: Spinal surgery with radiotherapy could have advantages for improving the neurologic status including ambulation for potentially unstable spine due to metastasis. Thus, surgery should be considered for patients with a longer life expectancy resulting from better performance status and use of the targeted therapy.

Biomechanical effects of transverse connectors on total en bloc spondylectomy of the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

The influence of total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) on spinal stability is substantial, necessitating strong fixation to restore spinal stability. The transverse connector (TC) serves as a posterior spinal instrumentation that connects the left and right sides of the pedicle screw-rod system. Several studies have highlighted the potential of a TC in enhancing the stability of the fixed segments. However, contradictory results have suggested that a TC not only fails to improve the stability of the fixed segments but also might promote stress associated with internal fixation. To date, there is a lack of previous research investigating the biomechanical effects of a TC on TES. This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical effects of a TC on internal fixation during TES of the lumbar (L) spine.

METHODS

A single-segment (L3 segment) TES was simulated using a comprehensive L spine finite element model. Five models were constructed based on the various positions of the TC, namely the intact model (L1-sacrum), the TES model without a TC, the TES model with a TC at L1-2, the TES model with a TC at L2-4, and the TES model with a TC at L4-5. Mechanical analysis of these distinct models was conducted using the Abaqus software to assess the variations in the biomechanics of the pedicle screw-rod system, titanium cage, and adjacent endplates.

RESULTS

The stability of the surgical segments was found to be satisfactory across all models. Compared with the complete model, the internal fixation device exhibited the greatest constraint on overextension (95.2-95.6%), while showing the least limitation on left/right rotation (53.62-55.64%). The application of the TC had minimal effect on the stability of the fixed segments, resulting in a maximum reduction in segment mobility of 0.11° and a variation range of 3.29%. Regardless of the use of a TC, no significant changes in stress were observed for the titanium cage. In the model without the TC, the maximum von Mises stress (VMS) for the pedicle screw-rod system reached 136.9 MPa during anterior flexion. Upon the addition of a TC, the maximum VMS of the pedicle screw-rod system increased to varying degrees. The highest recorded VMS was 459.3 MPa, indicating a stress increase of 335.5%. Following the TC implantation, the stress on the adjacent endplate exhibited a partial reduction, with the maximum stress reduced by 27.6%.

CONCLUSION

The use of a TC in TES does not improve the stability of the fixed segments and instead might result in increased stress concentration within the internal fixation devices. Based on these findings, the routine utilisation of TC in TES is deemed unnecessary.

Intraoperative cell-salvaged autologous blood transfusion is safe in metastatic spine tumour surgery: early outcomes of prospective clinical study

PURPOSE

Allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT) is current standard of blood replenishment despite known complications. Salvaged blood transfusion (SBT) addresses majority of such complications. Surgeons remain reluctant to employ SBT in metastatic spine tumour surgery (MSTS), despite ample laboratory evidence. This prompted us to conduct a prospective clinical study to ascertain safety of intraoperative cell salvage (IOCS), in MSTS.

METHODS

Our prospective study included 73 patients who underwent MSTS from 2014 to 2017. Demographics, tumour histology and burden, clinical findings, modified Tokuhashi score, operative and blood transfusion (BT) details were recorded. Patients were divided based on BT type: no blood transfusion (NBT) and SBT/ABT. Primary outcomes assessed were overall survival (OS), and tumour progression was evaluated using RECIST (v1.1) employing follow-up radiological investigations at 6, 12 and 24 months, classifying patients with non-progressive and progressive disease.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients [39:34(M/F)] had mean age of 61 years. Overall median follow-up and survival were 26 and 12 months, respectively. All three groups were comparable for demographics and tumour characteristics. Overall median blood loss was 500 mL, and BT was 1000 mL. Twenty-six (35.6%) patients received SBT, 27 (37.0%) ABT and 20 (27.4%) NBT. Females had lower OS and higher risk of tumour progression. SBT had better OS and reduced risk of tumour progression than ABT group. Total blood loss was not associated with tumour progression. Infective complications other than SSI were significantly (p = 0.027) higher in ABT than NBT/SBT groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients of SBT had OS and tumour progression better than ABT/NBT groups. This is the first prospective study to report of SBT in comparison with control groups in MSTS.

Who Needs Surgical Stabilization for Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis? Retrospective Analysis of Non-Surgically Treated Patients

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To identify relevant clinical and radiographic markers for patients presenting with infectious spondylo-discitis associated with spinal instability directly related to the infectious process.

METHODS

We evaluated patients presenting with de-novo intervertebral discitis or vertebral osteomyelitis /discitis (VOD) who initiated non-surgical treatment. Patients who failed conservative treatment and required stabilization surgery within 90 days were defined as "failed treatment group" (FTG). Patients who experienced an uneventful course served as controls and were labeled as "nonsurgical group" (NSG). A wide array of baseline clinical and radiographic parameters was retrieved and compared between 2 groups.

RESULTS

Overall 35 patients had initiated non-surgical treatment for VOD. 25 patients had an uneventful course (NSG), while 10 patients failed conservative treatment ("FTG") within 90 days. Factors found to be associated with poorer outcome were intra-venous drug abuse (IVDA) as well as the presence of fever upon initial presentation. Radiographically, involvement of the same-level facets and the extent of caudal and rostral VB involvement in both MRI and CT were found to be significantly associated with poorer clinical and radiographic outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

We show that clinical factors such as IVDA status and fever as well as the extent of osseous and posterior element involvement may prove to be helpful in favoring surgical treatment early on in the management of spinal infections.

Spinal lesions in multiple myeloma: Primary bone tumors with distinct prognostic factors

PURPOSE

Although prognostic factors of spinal multiple myeloma (MM) seem to differ from those of other spine metastases (SpM), the data in the literature remains scarce.

METHODS

A prospective population of 361 patients treated for spine MM lesions between January 2014 and 2017.

RESULTS

OS for our series was 59.6 months (SD 6.0 months; CI 95%: 47.7-71.3). Cox multivariate proportional-hazards analysis showed that bone marrow transplant [HR: 0.390, 95% CI 0.264-0.577; p < 0.0001] and light-chain isotype [HR: 0.748, 95% CI 0.318-1.759; p = 0.005] were independent predictors of longer survival. In contrast, age >80 years [HR: 2.7, 95% CI 1.6-4.3; p < 0.0001], ISS III [HR: 2.510, 95% CI 2.01-3.124; p = 0.001], IgA isotype [HR: 1.475, 95% CI 1.031-2.11; p = 0.034] and IgD/M isotype [HR: 2.753, 95% CI 1.230-6.130; p = 0.013] were independent poor prognostic factors. However, ECOG (p = 0.486), spine surgery (p = 0.391), spine radiotherapy (p = 0.260), epidural involvement (p = 0.259), the number of vertebra lesions (p = 0.222), and synchronous/metachronous timeline (p = 0.412) were not significantly associated with improved OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal involvement in the context of MM does not influence OS. The main prognostic factors to consider before spinal surgery are the characteristics of the primary MM disease (ISS score, IgG isotype and systemic treatment).

Nutritional Status Is Associated With Survival Following Spinal Surgery in Patients With Metastatic Spinal Tumors

Background Preoperative and postoperative nutritional statuses are reported to influence the outcomes and complications of multidisciplinary treatment, including patient survival. However, a causal relationship between nutritional status and survival following spinal surgery has not been demonstrated in patients with metastatic spinal tumors. The present study was, therefore, designed to evaluate the correlation between the nutritional status and survival following spinal surgery in patients with metastatic spinal tumors. Methods Nutritional status was evaluated using the Japanese version of the modified Glasgow prognostic score (JmGPS), C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR), prognostic nutrition index (PNI), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), which were calculated from the results of preoperative laboratory tests. The survival period was defined as the interval between the day preoperative data were obtained and the day of death. Results Data from 57 of 113 consecutive surgeries were retrieved. The CAR, JmGPS, and PNI were significantly correlated with the survival period (CAR, r = -0.576, P < 0.01; JmGPS, r = -0.537, P < 0.01; PNI, r = 0.316, P = 0.02). Furthermore, patients with 0 points on the JmGPS had significantly longer survival. Using receiver operating characteristic curves, CAR cutoffs of ≥0.880 and ≤0.220 were found to be optimal in predicting the 90- and 180-day postoperative survival, respectively. Conclusions The findings of the present study indicate that preoperative assessment of the JmGPS, CAR, and PNI has utility in estimating nutritional status and predicting survival following spinal surgery in patients with metastatic spinal tumors.

Anterior spinal separation surgery to allow for stereotactic body radiotherapy: a novel approach permitting radical oncological treatment of oligometastatic disease

The treatment of spinal cancers has rapidly evolved in the past decade. Often the treatment for spinal metastases required highly morbid surgeries and with palliative outcomes. However, a paradigm shift in surgical oncology has allowed spinal metastases treatment to have curative results. In the state of oligometastatic disease (OMD), the accompaniment of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) as a primary modality or adjuvant treatment to surgery has been shown to excellent survival outcomes, lower morbidities and better pain management. This case report illustrates a novel approach to the treatment of spinal OMD utilizing anterior spinal separation surgery with a custom carbon fibre vertebral body replacement cage followed by postoperative SBRT with excellent radio-oncological outcomes over 30-month follow-up.

A Comparison of Prognostic Models to Facilitate Surgical Decision-Making for Patients With Spinal Metastatic Disease

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

OBJECTIVE

Compare the performance of and provide cutoff values for commonly used prognostic models for spinal metastases, including Revised Tokuhashi, Tomita, Modified Bauer, New England Spinal Metastases Score (NESMS), and Skeletal Oncology Research Group model, at three- and six-month postoperative time points.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Surgery may be recommended for patients with spinal metastases causing fracture, instability, pain, and/or neurological compromise. However, patients with less than three to six months of projected survival are less likely to benefit from surgery. Prognostic models have been developed to help determine prognosis and surgical candidacy. Yet, there is a lack of data directly comparing the performance of these models at clinically relevant time points or providing clinically applicable cutoff values for the models.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-four patients undergoing surgery from 2015 to 2022 for spinal metastatic disease were identified. Revised Tokuhashi, Tomita, Modified Bauer, NESMS, and Skeletal Oncology Research Group were calculated for each patient. Model calibration and discrimination for predicting survival at three months, six months, and final follow-up were evaluated using the Brier score and Uno's C, respectively. Hazard ratios for survival were calculated for the models. The Contral and O'Quigley method was utilized to identify cutoff values for the models discriminating between survival and nonsurvival at three months, six months, and final follow-up.

RESULTS

Each of the models demonstrated similar performance in predicting survival at three months, six months, and final follow-up. Cutoff scores that best differentiated patients likely to survive beyond three months included the Revised Tokuhashi score=10, Tomita score=four, Modified Bauer score=three, and NESMS=one.

CONCLUSION

We found comparable efficacy among the models in predicting survival at clinically relevant time points. Cutoff values provided herein may assist surgeons and patients when deciding whether to pursue surgery for spinal metastatic disease.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Spine Metastasis: Patients With Poor Performance Status (ECOG) Could benefit From Palliative Surgical Care! A Prospective Cohort Study

STUDY DESIGN

This study used a French prospective national multi-center database of patients with spine metastasis (SpM).

OBJECTIVE

The main challenge was to clarify if SpM patients presenting poor ECOG-PS could benefit from a surgical intervention.

BACKGROUND

Spine metastases (SpM) are debilitating lesions commonly found in the evolution of cancer. At present, patients with poor ECOG-PS do not benefit from surgical care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2014 and 2017, 176 SpM patients with poor initial ECOG-PS (3 or 4) were identified.

RESULTS

The median overall survival of patients was 2.1 months (SD 0.2). Seventy-one patients (40.3%) underwent surgery: for 49 patients (27.8%) the intervention consisted of a simple decompression and for 22 patients (12.5%) the previous was associated with an osteosynthesis. Patients who underwent surgery demonstrated significantly longer median overall survival than those who did not: 3.5 months (SD 0.4) versus 1.6 (SD 0.2) ( P <0.0001). No significant differences between operated/nonoperated patients were noted concerning median age (66.4 vs. 64.2 y, P =0.897), the median number of SpM (4.1 vs. 4.2, P =0.374), ECOG-PS 4 ratio (41.6 vs. 39.3%, P =0.616), or for primary tumors ( P =0.103). Patients who underwent surgery statistically improved their neurological impairment according to the Frankel score: 5/11 (45.4%) from A to C, 5/17 (29.4%) from B to C or D, 6/11 (54.5%) from C to D and 2/4 (50%). Twelve patients (16.9%) presented a postoperative complication.

CONCLUSION

Patients with poor ECOG-PS could benefit from surgery. Even though survival gain is small, it permits the preservation of their neurological function. By making ambulation possible, pain is decreased during the last months of their lives.

Efficacy of preoperative embolization for metastatic spinal tumor surgery using angiographic vascularity assessment

OBJECTIVES

Preoperative embolization (PE) for metastatic spinal tumors is a method of minimizing intraoperative blood loss during aggressive surgery. This study specified angiographic standards and investigated the influence of these and other factors on blood loss in patients with spinal metastases and various pathologies.

METHODS

The cohort comprised 126 consecutive patients receiving PE from 2015 to 2021. Their clinical, surgical, and angiographic characteristics were reviewed. Standard angiographic grading was used for vascularity assessment. Degree of embolization was divided into complete (≥ 90%), near complete (67 to < 90%), and partial (< 67%). Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate factors predictive of massive blood loss (> 2500 mL). A proportional odds model was used to assess factors predictive of the degree of embolization.

RESULTS

Mean intraoperative blood loss was 1676 mL. Among the patients, 62 had hypervascular tumors and 64 had nonhypervascular tumors, according to the angiographic classification. Intraoperative blood loss differed significantly with embolization degree, both overall (p < 0.001) and in the hypervascular and nonhypervascular groups (p = 0.01 and 0.03). Angiographic hypervascularity, spinal metastasis invasiveness index, and embolization degree were significant predictors of massive blood loss in univariate analysis, but only embolization degree was significant in multivariate analysis. Only the presence of the radiculomedullary artery at the target level was significant in both the univariate and multivariate analyses for embolization degree.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to pathological classification, angiographic vascularity assessment is valuable. Although complete embolization is a reasonable goal, it is challenging to achieve in cases of visible radiculomedullary artery.

KEY POINTS

• Angiography has a supplementary role in vascularity assessment for spinal metastatic surgery. • Better embolization degree is associated with less intraoperative blood loss in both angiographic hypervascular and nonhypervascular groups. • Presence of radiculomedullary artery in the target level causes worse embolization outcome.

Development and Validation of a Prognostic Model for Overall Survival in Patients with Primary Pelvis and Spine Osteosarcoma: A Population-Based Study and External Validation

Background: Primary pelvis and spine osteosarcoma (PSOS) is a specific type of osteosarcoma that is difficult to treat and has a poor prognosis. In recent years, the research on osteosarcoma has been increasing, but there have been few studies on PSOS; in particular, there have been a lack of analyses with a large sample size. This study aimed to construct and validate a model to predict the overall survival (OS) of PSOS patients, as currently there are no tools available for assessing their prognosis. Methods: Data including demographic information, clinical characteristics, and follow-up information on patients with PSOS were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, as well as from the Spine Tumor Center of Changzheng Hospital. Variable selection was achieved through a backward procedure based on the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). Prognostic factors were identified by univariate and multivariate Cox analysis. A nomogram was further constructed for the estimation of 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS. Calibration plots, the concordance index (C-index), and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) were used to evaluate the prediction model. Results: In total, 83 PSOS patients and 90 PSOS patients were separately collected from the SEER database and Changzheng Hospital. In the SEER cohort, liver metastasis, lung metastasis, and chemotherapy were recognized as independent prognostic factors for OS (p < 0.05) and were incorporated to construct the initial nomogram. However, the initial nomogram showed poor predictive accuracy in internal and external validation. Then, we shifted our focus to the Changzheng data. Lung metastasis involving segments, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) level, and en bloc resection were ultimately identified as independent prognostic factors for OS (p < 0.05) and were further incorporated to construct the current nomogram, of which the bias-corrected C-index was 0.834 (0.824–0.856). The areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) of the current nomogram regarding 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS probabilities were 0.93, 0.96, and 0.92, respectively. Conclusion: We have developed a predictive model with satisfactory performance and clinical practicability, enabling effective prediction of the OS of PSOS patients and aiding clinicians in decision-making.

Multidisciplinary Approach to Spinal Metastases and Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression—A New Integrative Flowchart for Patient Management

Metastatic spine disease (MSD) and metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) are major causes of permanent neurological damage and long-term disability for cancer patients. The development of MSD is pathophysiologically framed by a cooperative interaction between general mechanisms of bone growth and specific mechanisms of spinal metastases (SM) expansion. SM most commonly affects the thoracic spine, even though multiple segments may be affected concomitantly. The great majority of SM are extradural, while intradural-extramedullary and intramedullary metastases are less frequently seen. The management of patients with SM is particularly complex and challenging, with multiple factors—such as the spinal stability status, primary tumor radio and chemosensitivity, cancer biological burden, patient performance status and comorbidities, and patient’s oncological prognosis—influencing the clinical decision-making process. Different frameworks were developed in order to systematize and support this process. A multidisciplinary, personalized approach, enriched by the expertise of each involved specialty, is crucial. We reviewed the most recent evidence and proposed an updated algorithmic approach to patients with MSD according to the clinical scenario of each patient. A flowchart-based approach offers an evidence-based management of MSD, providing a valuable clinical decision tool in a context of high uncertainty and quick-acting need.

Case report: L5 tomita En bloc spondylectomy for oligometastatic liposarcoma with post adjuvant stereotactic ablative radiotherapy

Introduction

Tomita En-bloc spondylectomy of L5 is one of the most challenging techniques in radical oncological spine surgery. A 42-year-old female was referred with lower back pain and L5 radiculopathy with a background of right shoulder liposarcoma excision. CT-PET confirmed a solitary L5 oligometastasis. MRI showed thecal sac indentation hence wasn't suitable for Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) alone. The seeding nature of sarcoma prevents the indication of separation surgery hence excisional surgery is considered for radical curative treatment. This case report demonstrates dual-staged modified TES including the utilisation of novel techniques to allow for maximum radical oncological control in the era of SABR and lesser invasive surgery.

Methods

First-stage: Carbonfibre pedicle screws planned from L2 to S2AI-Pelvis, aligned, to her patient-specific rods. Radiofrequency ablation of L5 pedicles prior to osteotomy was performed to prevent sarcoma cell seeding. Microscope-assisted thecal sac tumour separation and L5 nerve root dissection was performed. Novel surgical navigation of the ultrasonic bone-cutter assisted inferior L4 and superior S1 endplate osteotomies. Second-stage: Vascular-assisted retroperitoneal approach at L4–S1 was undertaken protecting the great vessels. Completion of osteotomies at L4 and S1 to En-bloc L5: (L4 inferior endplate, L4/5 disc, L5 body, L5/S1 disc and S1 superior endplate). Anterior reconstruction used an expandable PEEK cage obviating the need for a third posterior stage. Reinforced with a patient-specific carbon plate L4–S1 promontory.

Results

Patient rehabilitated well and was discharged after 42 days. Cyberknife of 30Gy in 5 fractions was delivered two months post-op. Despite left foot drop, she's walking independently 9 months post-op.

Conclusion

These are challenging cases require a truly multi-disciplinary team approach. We share this technique for a dual stage TES and metal-free construct with post adjuvant SABR to achieve maximum local control in spinal oligometastatic disease. This case promotes our modified TES technique in the era of SABR and separation surgery in carefully selected cases.

Vertebral Primary Bone Lesions: Review of Management Options

The assessment and treatment of vertebral primary bone lesions continue to pose a unique yet significant challenge. Indeed, there exists little in the literature in the way of compiling and overviewing the various types of vertebral lesions, which can often have complicated intervention strategies. Given the severe consequences of mismanaged vertebral bone tumors-including the extreme loss of motor function-it is clear that such an overview of spinal lesion care is needed. Thus, in the following paper, we aim to address the assessment of various vertebral primary bone lesions, outlining the relevant nonsurgical and surgical interventional methods. We describe examples of primary benign and malignant tumors, comparing and contrasting their differences. We also highlight emerging treatments and approaches for these tumors, like cryoablation and stereotactic body radiation therapy. Ultimately, we aim to emphasize the need for further guidelines in regard to correlating lesion type with proper therapy, underscoring the innate diversity of vertebral primary bone lesions in the literature.