C3435T mutation in exon 26 of the human MDR1 gene and cyclosporine pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects

Pharmacogenomics of immunosuppressive drug metabolism

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The immunosuppressants are potent and toxic drugs with narrow therapeutic ranges. The pharmacokinetic variability of these drugs has made establishing appropriate dosing difficult. Currently, therapeutic drug monitoring is an important adjunct to achieving the precarious balance between efficacy and toxicity. However, pharmacogenomic analysis has the potential to improve dosing strategies. Several of the drugs in this category are metabolized through complex pathways, which have the potential to be affected by genetic traits. The current literature has addressed several genes and polymorphisms in relation to these drugs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Polymorphisms related to the coding of P-glycoprotein (coded by the MDR-1 gene) and cytochrome P450 3A enzymes have been the main focus of research. These gene products are involved in regulating the absorption and metabolism of the principal immunosuppessants. Two polymorphisms (C3435T and G2677[A/T]) of the MDR-1 gene have been shown to influence the bioavailability and toxicity of tacrolimus and cyclosporin. Phase I metabolism of these drugs has been shown to be affected by two polymorphisms (CYP3A5*1 and CYP3AP1*1), related to cytochrome P450 3A5 expression, rather than cytochrome P450 3A4.

SUMMARY

The current literature has shown disparity as to which are the most important polymorphisms affecting the metabolism of immunosuppressants. Although pharmacogenomics has the potential to allow improvements in devising optimal dosing regimes, it has not yet offered any definitive solutions to the problems of dosing, because the process of elucidating the complex influence of genetics on drug metabolism is only starting to be unravelled.

Amlodipine, but not MDR1 polymorphisms, alters the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine A in Japanese kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Cyclosporine A (CsA) is a critical immunosuppressive drug with a narrow therapeutic range and wide interindividual variation in its pharmacokinetics. Many factors, including P-glycoprotein (PGP), influence the oral bioavailability and interpatient variability of CsA. A number of polymorphisms have been identified in the human MDR1 gene, and some of them have been found to be associated with an altered expression of PGP. We have investigated the role of these polymorphisms in CsA absorption from kidney transplant recipients. In addition, we also investigated the effect of amlodipine on CsA absorption.

METHODS

The area under the time-concentration curve from 0 to 2 hr (AUC(0-2)) estimated by the trapezoidal rule was used for the evaluation of extent of CsA absorption. The genotypes were identified by a polymerase chain reaction, restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis.

RESULTS

No association was found between polymorphisms in the MDR1 and CsA AUC(0-2)/dose/kg. In contrast, the combination of amlodipine significantly increased CsA AUC(0-2)/dose/kg (706.2 microg x hr/L to 819.2 microg x hr/L, P<0.05). Furthermore, we attempted to compare MDR1 polymorphisms and the absorption of CsA again without patients receiving amlodipine, but there was still no significant difference.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no relationship between polymorphisms for MDR1 and CsA absorption, suggesting polymorphisms for MDR1 cannot account for the interpatient variability of CsA. Amlodipine, which is the substrate of PGP, significantly increased CsA absorption. These results indicate that PGP plays a significant role in CsA absorption, but its polymorphisms could not influence the CsA absorption.

Pharmacogenetics of MDR1 and its impact on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs

The multi-drug resistant transporter MDR1/P-glycoprotein, the gene product of MDR1, is a glycosylated membrane protein of 170 kDa, belonging to the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) superfamily of membrane transporters. MDR1 was originally isolated from resistant tumor cells as part of the mechanism of multi-drug resistance, but over the last decade, it has been elucidated that human MDR1 is also expressed throughout the body to confer intrinsic resistance to the tissues by exporting unnecessary or toxic exogeneous substances or metabolites. A number of various types of structurally unrelated drugs are substrates for MDR1, and MDR1 and other transporters are recognized as an important class of proteins for regulating pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. In 2000, Hoffmeyer et al. performed a systemic screening for MDR1 polymorphisms and indicated that a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), C3435T in exon 26, which caused no amino acid change, was associated with the duodenal expression of MDR1 and thereby the plasma concentrations of digoxin after oral administration. Interethnic differences in genotype frequencies of C3435T have been clarified, and, at present, a total of 28 SNPs have been found at 27 positions on the MDR1 gene. Clinical studies on the effects of C3435T on MDR1 expression and function in the tissues, and also on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics have been performed around the world; however, there are still discrepancies in the results, suggesting that the haplotype analysis of the gene should be included instead of SNP detection, and the design of clinical trials must be carefully planned to avoid misinterpretations. A polymorphism of C3435T is also reported to be a risk factor for a certain class of diseases such as the inflammatory bowel diseases, Parkinson's disease and renal epithelial tumor, and this might also be explained by the effects on MDR1 expression and function. In this review, the latest reports are summarized for the future individualization of pharmacotherapy based on MDR1 genotyping.

Association of the CYP3A4*1B 5'-flanking region polymorphism with cyclosporine pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects

To determine the relationship between CYP3A4*1B polymorphism and cyclosporine pharmacokinetic parameters among healthy volunteers, the oral cyclosporine pharmacokinetic study was performed in 14 healthy subjects. Blood cyclosporine concentrations were measured by a high performance liquid chromatography. Concentration-time data were analyzed by a non-compartmental method using WinNonLin, and the blood samples were genotyped for the CYP3A4*1B 5'-promotor region using the polymerase chain reaction and a restriction digest. Each cyclosporine pharmacokinetic parameter was compared using the one-way ANOVA test according to his or her CYP3A4*1B genotype. There were four (4) homozygous A/A (wild-type), four (4) homozygous G/G (variant) and six (6) heterozygous A/G genotypes for CYP3A4*1B in these 14 healthy volunteers. The mean AUC/D (ng.hr/mL/mg) of CsA were 21.5 +/- 6.0 (A/A), 11.7 +/- 3.2 (G/G) and 19.2 +/- 2.3 (A/G), P = 0.0103 and the mean CL/F (L/hr) were 49.4 +/- 13.9 (A/A), 83.5 +/- 16.0 (G/G), and 52.5 +/- 5.6 (A/G), P = 0.0024. All other parameters were not significantly different among the three genotypes.

Role of P-glycoprotein in pharmacokinetics: clinical implications

P-glycoprotein, the most extensively studied ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter, functions as a biological barrier by extruding toxins and xenobiotics out of cells. In vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated that P-glycoprotein plays a significant role in drug absorption and disposition. Because of its localisation, P-glycoprotein appears to have a greater impact on limiting cellular uptake of drugs from blood circulation into brain and from intestinal lumen into epithelial cells than on enhancing the excretion of drugs out of hepatocytes and renal tubules into the adjacent luminal space. However, the relative contribution of intestinal P-glycoprotein to overall drug absorption is unlikely to be quantitatively important unless a very small oral dose is given, or the dissolution and diffusion rates of the drug are very slow. This is because P-glycoprotein transport activity becomes saturated by high concentrations of drug in the intestinal lumen. Because of its importance in pharmacokinetics, P-glycoprotein transport screening has been incorporated into the drug discovery process, aided by the availability of transgenic mdr knockout mice and in vitro cell systems. When applying in vitro and in vivo screening models to study P-glycoprotein function, there are two fundamental questions: (i) can in vitro data be accurately extrapolated to the in vivo situation; and (ii) can animal data be directly scaled up to humans? Current information from our laboratory suggests that in vivo P-glycoprotein activity for a given drug can be extrapolated reasonably well from in vitro data. On the other hand, there are significant species differences in P-glycoprotein transport activity between humans and animals, and the species differences appear to be substrate-dependent. Inhibition and induction of P-glycoprotein have been reported as the causes of drug-drug interactions. The potential risk of P-glycoprotein-mediated drug interactions may be greatly underestimated if only plasma concentration is monitored. From animal studies, it is clear that P-glycoprotein inhibition always has a much greater impact on tissue distribution, particularly with regard to the brain, than on plasma concentrations. Therefore, the potential risk of P-glycoprotein-mediated drug interactions should be assessed carefully. Because of overlapping substrate specificity between cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and P-glycoprotein, and because of similarities in P-glycoprotein and CYP3A4 inhibitors and inducers, many drug interactions involve both P-glycoprotein and CYP3A4. Unless the relative contribution of P-glycoprotein and CYP3A4 to drug interactions can be quantitatively estimated, care should be taken when exploring the underlying mechanism of such interactions.

Pharmacogenomics of ABC transporters and its role in cancer chemotherapy

ATP-binding cassette (ABC) genes play a role in the resistance of malignant cells to anticancer agents. The ABC gene products, including ABCB1 (P-glycoprotein), ABCC1 (MRP1), ABCC2 (MRP2, cMOAT), and ABCG2 (BCRP, MXR, ABCP) are also known to influence oral absorption and disposition of a wide variety of drugs. As a result, the expression levels of these proteins in humans have important consequences for an individual's susceptibility to certain drug-induced side effects, interactions, and treatment efficacy. Naturally occurring variants in ABC transporter genes have been identified that might affect the function and expression of the protein. This review focuses on recent advances in the pharmacogenomics of ABC transporters, and discusses potential implications of genetic variants for the chemotherapeutic treatment of cancer.

MDR1 genotype-related pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics

The multidrug resistant transporter MDR1/P-glycoprotein, the gene product of MDR1, is a glycosylated membrane protein of 170 kDa, belonging to the ATP-binding cassette superfamily of membrane transporters. MDR1 acts as an energy-dependent efflux pump that exports its substrates out of cells. MDR1 was originally isolated from resistant tumor cells as part of the mechanism of multidrug resistance, but over the last decade, it has been elucidated that human MDR1 is also expressed throughout the body to confer intrinsic resistance to the tissues by exporting unnecessary or toxic exogeneous substances or metabolites. A number of structurally unrelated drugs are substrates for MDR1, and MDR1 and other transporters are recognized as an important class of proteins for regulating pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. In 2000, Hoffmeyer et al. performed a systemic screening for MDR1 polymorphisms and detected 15 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). They also indicated that a polymorphism in exon 26 at position 3435 (C3435T), a silent mutation, affected the expression level of MDR1 protein in duodenum, and thereby the intestinal absorption of digoxin. To date, the genotype frequencies of C3435T have been investigated extensively using a larger population and interethnic difference has been elucidated, and a total of 28 SNPs have been found at 27 positions on the MDR1 gene. Clinical studies on MDR1 genotype-related MDR1 expression and pharmacokinetics have also been performed around the world; however, results were not always consistent with Hoffmeyer's report. In this review, published reports are summarized for the future individualization of pharmacotherapy based on MDR1 genotyping. In addition, recent investigations have raised the possibility that MDR1 and related transporters play a fundamental role in regulating apoptosis and immunology, and in fact, there are reports of MDR1-related susceptibility to inflammatory bowel disease, HIV infection and renal cell carcinoma. Herein, these issues are also summarized, and the current status of the knowledge in the area of pharmacogenomics of other transporters is briefly introduced.