Improved cardiovascular risk profile and renal function in renal transplant patients after randomized conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus

One-year results with extended-release tacrolimus/MMF, tacrolimus/MMF and cyclosporine/MMF in de novo kidney transplant recipients

Once-daily tacrolimus extended-release formulation (Prograf XL, formerly referred to as MR or MR4) was compared with the twice-a-day tacrolimus formulation (TAC) and cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA), all administered in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), corticosteroids and basiliximab induction, in a phase 3, randomized (1:1:1), open-label trial in 638 de novo kidney transplant recipients. In combination with MMF and corticosteroids, XL had an efficacy profile comparable to TAC and CsA. XL/MMF and TAC/MMF were statistically noninferior at 1-year posttransplantation to CsA/MMF for the primary efficacy endpoint, efficacy failure (death, graft loss, biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR) or lost to follow-up). One-year patient and graft survival were 98.6% and 96.7% in the XL/MMF group, 95.7% and 92.9% in TAC/MMF group and 97.6% and 95.7% in CsA/MMF group. The safety profile of XL in comparison with CsA was similar to that observed with TAC in this study and consistent with previously published reports of TAC in comparison with CsA. The results support the safety and efficacy of tacrolimus in combination with MMF, corticosteroids and basiliximab induction, as well as XL as a safe and effective once-daily dosing alternative.

Immunosuppressive drug-induced diabetes

Post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) has emerged as a major adverse effect of immunosuppressive drugs (ISD). As recipients of organ transplants survive longer, the complications of diabetes mellitus have assumed greater importance. The predominant factor for causing PTDM by corticosteroids seems to be the aggravation of insulin resistance, however several studies have displayed deleterious effects on insulin secretion and beta-cells. Calcineurin inhibitors induce PTDM by a number of mechanisms, including decreased insulin secretion and a direct toxic effect on the pancreatic beta-cells. Recent in vitro studies stress on the increased apoptosis of beta-cells when exposed to these drugs. Studies involving other immunosuppressive agents (mycophenolate mofetil [MMF], sirolimus) are scarcer and lead to conflicting results, while daclizumab seems to have a neutral effect. Clinical studies have consistently shown a greater potential of tacrolimus to induce PTDM compared with cyclosporine. Reducing PTDM incidence is a feasible goal while using corticosteroid-sparing regimens and/or lower tacrolimus trough levels. In patients developing PTDM, conversion from tacrolimus to cyclosporine could improve or reverse glucose tolerance abnormalities. In the absence of well-designed studies in this specific indication, treatment of PTDM is based on the same principles as type 2 diabetes mellitus. Thiazolidinediones do not display any pharmacological interaction with calcineurin inhibitors, but their safety and efficacy in PTDM need to be confirmed in large-scale randomized trials. Use of sulfonylureas has to be cautious regarding the suspected interaction of some of them with calcineurin inhibitors. If needed, insulin regimens have to be adapted in patients who display the particular glycaemic profile of corticosteroid-induced diabetes. Incretin-based therapies, due to their specific action on beta-cell apoptosis and proliferation, raise promises that have to be confirmed in clinical studies. Until methods for inducing specific graft tolerance become available, immunosuppressive regimens should be tailored to the individual patient on the basis of predictive criteria for the development of PTDM.

A comparison of the effects of C2-cyclosporine and C0-tacrolimus on renal function and cardiovascular risk factors in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

There are few data directly comparing the effects of two-hour postingestion monitored cyclosporine (C2-CsA) vs. trough-monitored tacrolimus (C0-Tac) on renal function and cardiovascular risk factors.

METHODS

We studied 378 (202 C2-CsA vs. 176 C0-Tac) incident kidney transplant recipients in Toronto, Canada, from August 1, 2000 and December 31, 2003. Outcomes included changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR at 1 and 6 months by modification of diet in renal disease four-variable equation), mean arterial pressure (MAP), total cholesterol (TC), and new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) at six months posttransplant. The independent effect of treatment/monitoring strategies on continuous outcomes and time-to-NODM was modeled using linear and Cox regression, respectively.

RESULTS

Mean eGFR was 59.5 vs. 62.9 ml/min at one month and 50.6 vs. 61.2 ml/min at six months for C2-CsA vs. C0-Tac, respectively. Multiple linear regression revealed the slope of eGFR to be 0.93 ml/min/month lower in C2-CsA patients. This was equivalent to an adjusted average eGFR difference of 4.64 ml/min between months one and six posttransplant. There was no significant difference in average MAP and TC. In a stepwise multivariable Cox model and a propensity score analysis, there was no significant association between the type of treatment/monitoring strategy and time-to-NODM.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a greater decline in eGFR for patients on C2-CsA (vs. C0-Tac) between one and six months posttransplant. However, MAP, TC, and the risk of NODM were comparable in both treatment/monitoring groups. The long-term impact of short-term reductions in eGFR as a function of the type of treatment/monitoring strategy requires further study.

High Rejection Rate during Calcineurin Inhibitor-Free and Early Steroid Withdrawal Immunosuppression in Renal Transplantation

Morbidity and mortality due to cardiovascular disease are major problems after renal transplantation. The effects of three immunosuppressive protocols on cardiovascular end points were investigated in a single-center, randomized, parallel (1-1-1) group. Acute rejection was a secondary safety endpoint. Groups were as follows: group one, tacrolimus+sirolimus; group two, tacrolimus+mycophenolate mofetil (MMF); group three, sirolimus+MMF+daclizumab. All groups received two days methylprednisolone only. The Ethical Committee demanded an interim analysis when 50% of the patients were included. In this analysis, 54 patients with a median follow-up of 9.2 months were studied. The Kaplan-Meyer analysis showed a difference in rejection free survival between group one (82%) and group three (34%, P=0.03) and between groups one and two (tacrolimus-based, 76%) and group three (calcineurin-free, 34%, P=0.04). Calcineurin-free immunosuppression with two days of steroids only showed an unacceptable high incidence of acute rejection and re-rejection, and the study had to be stopped.

Conversion From Cyclosporine Microemulsion to Tacrolimus in Stable Kidney Transplant Patients With Hypercholesterolemia Is Related to an Improvement in Cardiovascular Risk Profile: A Prospective Study

The aim of this prospective multicenter study was to evaluate the effect of conversion from cyclosporine (CsA) to tacrolimus (Tac) on cardiovascular risk factors in stable kidney transplant patients with hyperlipidemia. Twenty-six patients were switched from CsA to Tac at 81.7 +/- 44.4 months after transplantation. Tac was started at 0.15 mg/kg/d. Patient outcomes were evaluated up to 6 months after conversion. Significant reductions were seen in systolic blood pressure (143 +/- 13 baseline to 136 +/- 9 mm Hg at 6 months, P = .026) as well as the need for antihypertensive medication, with no changes in diastolic blood pressure. There was a significant reduction in total cholesterol (247 +/- 41 to 221 +/- 35 mg/dL, P = .003), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (150 +/- 24 to 127 +/- 27 mg/dL, P = .001), total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol ratio (4.9 +/- 1.9 to 3.9 +/- 1, P = .02), and triglyceride levels (228 +/- 175 to 148 +/- 71 mg/dL, P = .026). No significant modifications in HDL cholesterol, Apo A1 and Apo-B levels, or in the need for lipid-lowering medication were observed. Glucose levels did not change, but an increase in HbAC1 took place (5.8 +/- 1.1 to 6.2 +/- 1, P = .002). In men Framingham risk score significantly decreased from 11.5 +/- 11.3 to 8.4 +/- 7.2. (P = .0023). In conclusion, elective conversion from CsA to Tac in stable kidney transplant patients with hyperlipidemia was related to an improved blood pressure and lipid profile, both suggesting a decrease in the estimated 10-year coronary heart disease risk in men.

Effect of Atorvastatin Therapy and Conversion to Tacrolimus on Hypercholesterolemia and Endothelial Dysfunction After Renal Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Hypercholesterolemia is a frequent complication in renal transplant patients treated with cyclosporine A (CsA). Whether it is preferable to treat hypercholesterolemia with statins or to switch patients from CsA to tacrolimus (TRL) has not been investigated.

METHODS

Twelve CsA-treated kidney transplant recipients with hypercholesterolemia were successively crossed over from CsA alone to: CsA plus atorvastatin; TRL alone; and TRL plus atorvastatin. Total cholesterol (C), Low density lipoprotein (LDL)-C, high density lipoprotein (HDL)-C, LDL and HDL alpha-tocopherol content, lag-time of LDL oxidation, plasma levels of oxidized LDL and the percentage of small dense LDL were assayed at the end of each treatment period. Endothelial function was assessed by high resolution ultrasound measurement of flow-mediated brachial artery vasodilatation (FMD).

RESULTS

Atorvastatin therapy was more efficient in reducing total cholesterol and LDL-C levels than conversion from CsA to TRL. Combining TRL with atorvastatin further reduced LDL-C levels as compared to TRL alone, but was no more efficient than the CsA-statin combination. Neither atorvastatin therapy nor conversion to TRL significantly changed the proportion of dense LDL, lipoprotein alpha-tocopherol contents or the lag time of LDL oxidation. Addition of atorvastatin to CsA increased FMD from 4.0+/-1.8% to 6.5+/-4.0% (P<0.05 vs. CsA). Conversion from CsA to TRL caused a slight improvement in FMD (5.1+/-2.1%, P<0.05 vs. CsA). Adding atorvastatin to TRL had no detectable effect on FMD (5.5+/-2.3%, P=NS vs. TRL).

CONCLUSIONS

Atorvastatin was more efficient in reducing total and LDL cholesterol levels of CsA-treated renal transplant patients than conversion to TRL and significantly improved endothelial dysfunction.

Slowing the progression of chronic allograft nephropathy by conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is a multifactorial process with immunologic and nonimmunologic factors. Because tacrolimus (Tac) has been ascribed a beneficial effect on some of these factors when compared to cyclosporine A (CyA), a randomized controlled trial was conducted to investigate whether conversion from CyA to Tac can ameliorate the progression of renal dysfunction in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) with CAN.

METHODS

Of the 46 patients with biopsy-proven CAN enrolled, 24 were converted from CyA to Tac, whereas 22 patients were maintained on CyA. Serum creatinine (SCrea), lipid profiles and an antihypertensive score (AHS) were determined after 3, 6 and 12 months. AHS is based on the total number and dosages of antihypertensive medications used. SCrea and AHS were additionally evaluated at 36 months.

RESULTS

SCrea was decreased in the Tac group (Tac(baseline): 297 +/- 67 micromol/L; Tac(6): 261+/- 70 micromol/L, P < 0.001; Tac(12): 254 +/- 55 micromol/L, P < 0.001; Tac(36): 255 +/- 78 micromol/L, P = 0.235), whereas a significant increase of SCrea was detected in the CyA group (CyA(baseline): 279 +/- 77 micromol/L, CyA(12): 333 +/- 98 micromol/L, P < 0.001; CyA(36): 317 +/- 89 micromol/L, P < 0.001). Compared to CyA therapy, SCrea in the Tac group declined after 12 and 36 months (P = 0.011 and 0.048, respectively) as well as AHS (Tac(12): 59 +/- 13, CyA(12): 83 +/- 14, P < 0.001; Tac(36): 60 +/- 12, CyA(36): 84 +/- 14, P < 0.001). LDL cholesterol was lower in the Tac group after 12 months (Tac(12): 2.5 +/- 0.5 mmol/L, CyA(12): 3.5 +/- 0.6 mmol/L, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Conversion from CyA to Tac in KTR with CAN improves allograft function, lowers blood pressure, and reduces LDL cholesterol. This superior profile may translate into improved long-term graft survival.

Prednisone withdrawal in pediatric kidney transplant recipients on tacrolimus-based immunosuppression: four-year data

Corticosteroids have been used in renal transplant immunosuppression for over 40 yr. Despite their adverse effects, steroid therapy continues to be part of early as well as maintenance immunosuppression in most pediatric renal transplant centers. The association of steroids with growth retardation, weight gain, and acne may be particularly distressing during the critical years of adolescence and young adulthood, increasing the risk of medication non-adherence. This study reviews the outcomes of pediatric renal transplant patients treated with low-dose tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, or azathioprine, and planned prednisone withdrawal. Thirty-seven pediatric renal transplant recipients were withdrawn from steroids. The mean follow-up after steroid withdrawal was 42+/-19 months. Graft and patient survival were 100%. The mean serum creatinine levels and calculated creatinine clearances remained stable throughout the period of observation. The mean creatinine clearance was 96+/-24 mL/min/1.73 m2 at steroid withdrawal and 93+/-20 mL/min/1.73 m2 at the latest follow-up. Five patients restarted prednisone; in four (11%) it was for suspected or confirmed acute rejection. Improvements were observed in serum lipid profiles, blood pressure, and body mass index. Most patients experienced catchup or stable growth after prednisone withdrawal. Four patients developed viral infections; all were successfully treated. The potential benefits of steroid withdrawal in pediatric renal transplantation are supported by our results.

Complete avoidance of calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplantation: a randomized trial comparing sirolimus and tacrolimus

Calcineurin inhibitors have decreased acute rejection and improved early renal allograft survival, but their use has been implicated in the development of chronic nephrotoxicity. We performed a prospective, randomized trial in kidney transplantation comparing sirolimus-MMF-prednisone to tacrolimus-MMF-prednisone. Eighty-one patients in the sirolimus group and 84 patients in the tacrolimus group were enrolled (mean follow-up = 33 months; range 13-47 months). At 1 year, patient survival was similar in the groups (98% with sirolimus, 96% with tacrolimus; p = 0.42) as was graft survival (94% sirolimus vs. 92% tacrolimus, p = 0.95). The incidence of clinical acute rejection was 10% in the tacrolimus group and 13% in the sirolimus group (p = 0.58). There was no difference in mean GFR measured by iothalamate clearance between the tacrolimus and sirolimus groups at 1 year (61 +/- 19 mL/min vs. 63 +/- 18 mL/min, p = 0.57) or 2 years (61 +/- 17 mL/min vs. 61 +/- 19 mL/min, p = 0.84). At 1 year, chronicity using the Banff schema showed no difference in interstitial, tubular or glomerular changes, but fewer chronic vascular changes in the sirolimus group. This study shows that a CNI-free regimen using sirolimus-MMF-prednisone produces similar acute rejection rates, graft survival and renal function 1-2 years after transplantation compared to tacrolimus-MMF-prednisone.

Cardiovascular complications of immunosuppressive agents in renal transplant recipients

Fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events are the most important cause of graft loss in patients with a functioning graft following transplantation. The available data indicate that transplant patients have a high prevalence of hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and new onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation. The aetiology and pathogenesis of post-transplant hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and diabetes are multifactorial. In addition, disease of the native kidney and recurrence of renal disease can contribute to the development of cardiovascular disease in transplant recipients. Most transplant patients are at risk of clinically important drug-drug interactions involving immunosuppressive agents. Adverse reactions and drug-drug interactions should not be neglected when selecting an agent for treatment of cardiovascular risk factors in transplant recipients.

One-Year Observation of Kidney Allograft Recipients Converted From Cyclosporine Microemulsion to Tacrolimus

The results from previous trials suggested that tacrolimus-based treatment in kidney transplantation was associated with a significantly lower incidence of acute rejection, and that cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA-Me)-treated patients converted to tacrolimus had numerically better 6-year graft survival than those remaining on CsA-Me. Death with a functioning graft and chronic graft nephropathy are the leading causes of late allograft loss. While standard cardiovascular risk factors are relevant, renal function itself becomes an important risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in kidney transplantation patients. Expected benefits of the conversion from CsA-Me to tacrolimus with respect to renal function and cardiovascular status were the rationale for this observational study. Twenty one patients underwent conversion due to nephrotoxicity of cyclosporine (n = 18) or side effects (n = 3). Two out of 21 patients did not complete the study. The patient survival after 1 year was 100% in this group of patients; graft survival 94.7%. No cases of de novo diabetes mellitus were identified. Mean serum creatinine fell from 2.13 +/- 0.4 to 1.84 +/- 0.3 mg/dL (P < .02) and calculated glomerular filtration rate increased from 49.6 +/- 14.4 to 56.2 +/- 15.5 mL/min (P < .01). Total cholesterol decreased from 229.4 +/- 50.1 to 195.9 +/- 28.5 mg/dL (P < .005) and, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol from 125.7 +/- 37.3 to 104.4 +/- 22.6 mg/dL (P < .02). No significant changes in mean systolic or diastolic pressure or blood glucose levels were observed. The results of this observational study showed that in a group of patients with raised creatinine levels at entry, conversion to tacrolimus resulted in improved graft function and a more favorable cardiovascular risk profile.

Influence of cyclosporine on low-density lipoprotein uptake in human lymphocytes

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels are often elevated in renal transplant recipients, and cyclosporine (CsA) therapy in these patients has been implicated. Cardiovascular disease is the major cause of mortality in transplant recipients, and alterations of lipid metabolism represent a common risk factor. The role of CsA on LDL metabolism is still partially defined. The aim of the study was to evaluate the LDL receptor uptake of CsA-transported LDL (CsA-LDL) compared with normal LDL in normal and CsA-treated lymphocytes. Forty-seven healthy unrelated subjects and 6 CsA-treated patients were consecutively enrolled as donors of lymphocytes to measure receptor-mediated LDL metabolism. Normal LDL and CsA-LDL were isolated from blood donors and from patients under CsA immunosuppressive therapy, respectively. Lipoproteins were labeled with a fluorochrome, and LDL receptor uptake was measured by flow cytometry. Normal LDL uptake was 13.95% +/- 4.5%, whereas CsA-LDL uptake was 32.47% +/- 10.84% (P < .001) in healthy lymphocytes. In CsA-treated lymphocytes, normal LDL uptake was 7.48% +/- 2.32% vs 12.49% +/- 2.44% CsA-LDL (P < .01). Lymphocytes of every subject showed at least a 2-fold increased uptake of CsA-LDL vs normal LDL. Our data show that CsA-LDL is internalized more than normal LDL via the LDL receptor in both human healthy and CsA-treated lymphocytes. CsA-treated lymphocytes, in comparison to normal lymphocytes, exhibit a reduced LDL receptor activity.

Cardiovascular risk profile with the new immunosuppressive combinations after renal transplantation

Cardiovascular disease remains the main cause of death among kidney transplant patients. Cardiovascular risk burden already present at the moment of transplantation is substantially worsened by chronic use of immunosuppressants. On the other hand, chronic allograft nephropathy, a clinical-pathological result of immunological and non-immunological damage of the graft, is the main cause of graft loss in the long-term. Among the non-immunological factors contributing to the development of chronic allograft nephropathy, cardiovascular risk factors also seem to play a role. In the present review, we analyse the impact of the different immunosuppressive medications on cardiovascular risk factors after renal transplantation, including renal function.

Effect of Calcineurin Inhibitors on Low-Density Lipoprotein Oxidation

INTRODUCTION

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) oxidation is considered a key factor in the biological processes that trigger and accelerate atherosclerosis. Reported data suggest that tacrolimus improves the lipid profile in renal transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to analyze the effect of converting from cyclosporine to tacrolimus on lipoprotein oxidation in renal transplant recipients.

METHODS

We studied a group of 12 recipients (6 men and 6 women of mean age 55 +/- 11 years) treated with a cyclosporine-mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)-prednisone combination that was converted to tacrolimus-MMF-prednisone because of gingival hyperplasia. The LDL fraction was isolated by density-gradient ultracentrifugation. Oxidative stress was studied before converting (baseline) and at 6 and 12 weeks, thereafter by in vivo oxidation analysis of LDL, a direct assay of oxidized LDL (oxLDL) and oxLDL autoantibodies (Ab-oxLDL) using enzyme-immunoassay techniques. We measured total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride, LDL-cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, ApoA1, ApoB, and Lp(a) levels.

RESULTS

The change to tacrolimus resulted in significant decreases in TC levels, 213 +/- 30 (B) versus 185 +/- 27 (12s) (P < .01); LDL, 129 +/- 24 (B) versus 104 +/- 14 (12s) (P = .002); and ApoB 98 +/- 15 (B) versus 85 +/- 10 (12s) (P < .01). HDL levels significantly increased (45 +/- 10 vs 48 +/- 10 [12s]; P = .018), whereas oxLDL concentrations decreased significantly after conversion (B) (55.42 +/- 10.61 vs 12s 45.76 +/- 10.21; P < .01). Converting to tacrolimus produced a nonsignificant decrease in Ab-oxLDL (baseline 204.88 +/- 134.49 vs 12s 179.51 +/- 143.54). A correlation was observed between LDL and oxLDL (r = 65, P = .02 [B] and r = 0.7, P = .01 [12s]) but not between oxLDL levels and Ab-oxLDL concentration (r = -0.05, P = .87 [3] and r = -0.1, P = .77 [12s]).

CONCLUSIONS

In renal transplantation, tacrolimus therapy was associated with a better lipid profile and lower in vivo LDL oxidation when compared with cyclosporine treatment.

Freedom From Graft Vessel Disease in Heart and Combined Heart- and Kidney-transplanted Patients Treated With Tacrolimus-based Immunosuppression

BACKGROUND

In end-stage cardiomyopathy where concomitant chronic renal failure is a contraindication for cardiac transplantation (HTx), simultaneous heart and kidney transplantation (HKTx) may be the only feasible therapeutic option. Due to the increased donor shortage, the clinical outcome of combined HKTx patients on tacrolimus-based immunosuppression was assessed and compared with a group of HTx patients.

METHODS

Three hundred forty-nine HTxs, including 13 (4%) combined HKTxs, were performed since 1995. Two hundred twenty-one HTx and all HKTx recipients received tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. Acute rejection episodes (AREs), infections, renal function and clinical outcome were evaluated. Pre-operative renal diagnoses for HKTx patients included cystic nephropathy (n = 4), glomerulonephritis (n = 4), cytostatica-induced nephropathy (n = 1), chronic rejection after renal transplant (n = 1), reflux nephropathy (n = 2) and chronic calcineurin-inhibitor -induced nephropathy after HTx (n = 1). Twelve patients (92%) were on hemodialysis pre-operatively, 1 underwent implantation of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) before HKTx.

RESULTS

After 4.7 +/- 2 years, 92% of HKTx compared with 85% of HTx patients had survived (p = 0.42). Acute cardiac rejection episodes were more frequent in HTx than in HKTx patients (0.04 +/- 0.09 vs 0.02 +/- 0.04 ARE/100 patient-days; p = 0.07). Incidence of infection was comparable (0.3 +/- 0.2 vs 0.5 +/- 0.4 infection/100 patient-days). Freedom from transplant vasculopathy was 100% in the HKTx group compared with 71% in the HTx group after 4 years (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Tacrolimus-based immunosuppression yields promising long-term results in HKTx and HTx. The incidence of transplant vasculopathy seems to be lower after HKTx than after HTx. If these results are secondary to a protective effect of tacrolimus-induced tolerance or of tolerance-associated co-transplantation they will need to be investigated in prospective multicenter trials.

Conversion from tacrolimus to cyclosporin is associated with a significant improvement of glucose metabolism in patients with new-onset diabetes mellitus after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

The incidence of new-onset posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is increased in renal transplant patients treated with tacrolimus.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c levels as well as the dose of glucose-lowering agents in 34 renal transplant patients converted from tacrolimus to cyclosporine (CsA) for PTDM. Diabetes was defined according to current guidelines as repeated fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels > or =126 mg/dL.

RESULTS

At conversion, 11 patients received insulin, 5 received oral agents, and 18 had no glucose-lowering therapy. Fasting plasma glucose levels decreased from 146 +/- 64 mg/dL at conversion to 111 +/- 26 mg/dL at 3 months and 104 +/- 21 mg/dL at 12 months (P < .001). HbA1c levels decreased from 6.8 +/- 0.8% at conversion to 6.0 +/- 0.6% at 12 months (P = .001). Insulin was stopped in 3, the dose reduced in 7, and remained stable in 1 of the patients. The average daily insulin dose among these patients was reduced from 31 +/- 17 units at conversion to 13 +/- 12 units at 12 months (P < .05). There was no significant change in the number of patients treated with oral glucose-lowering agents. Diabetes reversed (fasting plasma glucose < or = 125 mg/dL without glucose-lowering therapy) in 44% (95% confidence interval, 23% to 64%) of patients during the first year after conversion (P < .001). Graft function, blood pressure, and lipid levels remained stable after conversion but the proportion of patients receiving lipid-lowering therapy increased from 18% to 49% (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Conversion from tacrolimus to CsA for PTDM was associated with a marked improvement in glucose metabolism and frequent reversal of diabetes.

Strategies for minimizing immunosuppression in kidney transplantation

Immunosuppression remains the cause of most morbidity following organ transplantation. However, its use is also responsible for the outstanding graft and patient survival rates commonplace in modern transplantation. Thus, the predominant challenge for transplant clinicians is to provide a level of immunosuppression that prevents graft rejection while preserving immunocompetence against environmental pathogens. This review will outline several strategies for minimizing or tailoring the use of immunosuppressive drugs. The arguments for various strategies will be based on clinical trial data rather than animal studies. A distinction will be made between conventional immunosuppressive drug reduction based on over-immunosuppression, and newer induction methods specifically designed to lessen the need for chronic immunosuppression. Based on the available data we suggest that most patients can be transplanted with less immunosuppression than is currently standard.

Conversion From Cyclosporine Microemulsion to Tacrolimus-Based Immunoprophylaxis Improves Cholesterol Profile in Heart Transplant Recipients With Treated but Persistent Dyslipidemia: The Canadian Multicentre Randomized Trial of Tacrolimus vs Cyclosporine Microemulsion

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus improves lipid profile in renal and liver transplant recipients. The impact of conversion from cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral) to tacrolimus (Prograf) in a large randomized study of stable heart transplant recipients with treated but persistent mild dyslipidemia is reported.

METHODS

One hundred twenty-nine long-term (>or=12 months) cyclosporine microemulsion-treated heart transplant recipients with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol >2.5 mmol/liter and/or a total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio >4 were recruited for the study. Complete lipid profile was assessed before (baseline) and after 6 months of treatment with either cyclosporine microemulsion maintenance (n=64) or tacrolimus conversion (n=65).

RESULTS

At 6 months, tacrolimus-converted patients exhibited a greater decrease in total cholesterol (from 5.51 +/- 0.16 to 4.88 +/- 1.22 mmol/liter [tacrolimus], vs 5.61 +/- 1.36 to 5.38 +/- 0.87 mmol/liter [cyclosporine]; p = 0.0078). This decrease in cholesterol was caused largely by a decrease in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-0.41 +/- 0.54 [tacrolimus] vs -0.13 +/- 0.55 [cyclosporine]; p=0.0018). There were no changes in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride levels, but apolipoprotein B therapy was reduced in tacrolimus-converted vs cyclosporine-maintained patients (p=0.0003). By 6 months, 23.7% of tacrolimus- vs 6.7% of cyclosporine-treated patients met the target lipid levels for high-risk patients (p=0.0094). Conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus resulted in decreases in blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and uric acid without any changes in glucose, HbA(1C), and insulin levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Conversion from cyclosporine microemulsion- to tacrolimus-based immunoprophylaxis resulted in decreased cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, urea, creatinine, and uric acid without any clinically evident perturbation of glucose metabolism in stable heart transplant recipients with treated but persistent mild dyslipidemia.

Tacrolimus and Posttransplant Diabetes Mellitus in Renal Transplantation

The most prominent side effect of tacrolimus is the induction of posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM). In this review, the authors discuss the incidence, mechanism, prevention, and treatment of tacrolimus-induced PTDM in renal patients.

Cardiovascular Risk Estimates and Risk Factors in Renal Transplant Recipients

Cardiovascular morbidity, including coronary artery disease and left ventricular hypertrophy, and mortality are high in patients following renal transplantation. Cardiovascular disease is thought to be due to traditional (hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus and smoking) as well as nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors (microinflammation). Furthermore, immunosuppressive drugs, namely, calcineurin inhibitors, sirolimus, and steroids, have been reported to adversely affect cardiovascular risk factors (e.g., hypertension, hyperlipidemia, hyperglycemia). Evidence from comparative trials and from conversion studies suggest that blood pressure, hyperlipidemia, and hyperglycemia after renal transplantation may be differentially affected by the calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporine and tacrolimus. In the European Tacrolimus versus Cyclosporin A Microemulsion Renal Transplantation Study, 557 patients were randomly allocated to therapy with tacrolimus (n = 286) versus cyclosporine (n = 271). In addition, to blood pressure, serum cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and blood glucose, we estimated the 10-year risk of coronary heart disease (Framingham risk score). Tacrolimus resulted in a significantly lower time-weighted average of serum cholesterol (P < .001), and mean arterial blood pressure (P < .05), but a higher time-weighted average of blood glucose (P < .01) than cyclosporine. Mean 10-year coronary artery disease risk estimate was significantly lower in men treated with tacrolimus, (10.0% versus 13.2%; P < .01) but was unchanged in women (4.7% versus 7.0%). Tacrolimus and cyclosporine microemulsion have compound-specific effects on cardiovascular risk factors that differentially affect the predicted rate of coronary artery disease.

Do Blood Pressure and Arterial Wall Properties Change After Conversion From Cyclosporine to Tacrolimus?

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in renal transplant recipients. Arterial wall properties are surrogate markers for arteriosclerosis. Previous investigations have shown that the cardiovascular risk profile is better with tacrolimus compared to cyclosporine. Renal function, blood pressure, and lipid levels improve. The hypothesis is that arterial wall properties will improve after conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus. Thirty-four stable renal recipients were converted from cyclosporine microemulsion to tacrolimus without changing concomitant medication. Before and after conversion we performed wall track ultrasounds of the carotid and the brachial arteries; pulse wave velocity (PWV); laboratory investigations; 24-hour ABPM; estimates of renal function; and Framingham risk scores. After conversion the 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) did not change. Total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides improved significantly. Renal function (Cockroft) improved. There were no significant changes in arterial wall properties, or in PWV. Framingham comparative risk scores improved only significantly in patients not receiving statins. In conclusion, 3 months after conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides were significantly decreased and renal function significantly improved. Contrary to expectation, ABPM did not change, probably due to prolonged use (>10 years) of cyclosporine. There was also no difference in arterial wall properties.

Cyclosporine and Tacrolimus: Influence on Cardiovascular Risk Factors

After allogenic transplantations, a dramatic increase in the development of arteriosclerotic plaques can be observed, which might be due to metabolic alterations, changes in the transplant organ, or the immunosuppression regimen. Many studies have demonstrated beneficial effects of tacrolimus compared with cyclosporine with regard to these conditions. These results have suggested that conversion to tacrolimus from cyclosporine is advantageous. Our study investigated whether patients with deteriorating renal function profit from this conversion. Thirty renal transplant patients were studied retrospectively, using data recorded from 3 years before to 3 years after conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus. While renal function (GFR) deteriorated progressively under cyclosporine, it stabilized and even improved under tacrolimus (creatinine: DeltaCyc = +1.4 mg/d; DeltaTac = -0.7 mg/dL; GFR: DeltaCyc = -35 mL/min; DeltaTac = 14 mL/min). In addition, uric acid levels (7.0 mg/dL vs 6.4 mg/dL, P < .05) and cholesterol levels (258 mg/dL vs 225 mg/dL, P < .05) were both significantly lower under tacrolimus. Conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus is recommended for kidney transplant patients in whom there has been a progressive fall in renal function. It leads to stabilization or even improvement of transplant function and a reduction in cardiovascular risk factors.

Conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus after renal transplantation improves cardiovascular risk factors

BACKGROUND

It is vital that after, renal transplantation, immunosuppression is efficacious and causes few complications. It is especially important that hyperlipidaemia, hypertension and toxic influences should be avoided because these conditions can reduce patient and transplant survival. Many studies have demonstrated beneficial effects of tacrolimus in comparison with cyclosporine with regard to these conditions. These results have suggested that a conversion to tacrolimus from cyclosporine is advantageous. Our study investigated whether patients with deteriorating renal functions can profit from this conversion.

METHODS

Thirty patients with a renal transplant were studied retrospectively, using data recorded from 3 years before to 3 years after conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus.

RESULTS

While renal function (glomerular filtration rate [GFR]) deteriorated progressively under cyclosporine, it stabilised and even improved under tacrolimus (creatinine: Delta(Cyc)=+1.4 mg/d; Delta(Tac=)-0.7 mg/dl; GFR: Delta(Cyc)=-35 ml/min; Delta(Tac)=14 ml/min). In addition, uric acid level (7.0 vs. 6.4 mg/dl, p<0.05) and cholesterol level (258 vs. 225 mg/dl, p<0.05) were both significantly lower under tacrolimus.

CONCLUSION

Conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus is recommended for patients with a kidney transplant, in which there has been a progressive fall in renal function. It leads to stabilisation or even improvement of transplant function and a reduction in cardiovascular risk factors.

Effect of immunosuppressive agents on long-term survival of renal transplant recipients: focus on the cardiovascular risk

In the control of acute rejection, attention is being focused more and more on the long-term adverse effects of the immunosuppressive agents used. Since cardiovascular disease is the main cause of death in renal transplant recipients, optimal control of cardiovascular risk factors is essential in the long-term management of these patients. Unfortunately, several commonly used immunosuppressive drugs interfere with the cardiovascular system. In this review, the cardiovascular adverse effects of the immunosuppressive agents currently used for maintenance immunosuppression are thoroughly discussed. Optimising immunosuppression means finding a balance between efficacy and safety. Corticosteroids induce endothelial dysfunction, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and diabetes mellitus, and impair fibrinolysis. The use of corticosteroids in transplant recipients is undesirable, not only because of their cardiovascular effects, but also because they induce such adverse effects as osteoporosis, obesity, and atrophy of the skin and vessel wall. Calcineurin inhibitors are the most powerful agents for maintenance immunosuppression. The calcineurin inhibitor ciclosporin (cyclosporine) not only induces these same adverse effects as corticosteroids but is also nephrotoxic. Tacrolimus has a more favourable cardiovascular risk profile than ciclosporin and is also less nephrotoxic. It has little or no effect on blood pressure and serum lipids; however, its diabetogenic effect is more prominent in the period immediately following transplantation, although at maintenance dosages, the diabetogenic effect appears to be comparable to that of ciclosporin. The diabetogenic effect of tacrolimus can be managed by reducing the dose of tacrolimus and early corticosteroid withdrawal. The effect of tacrolimus on endothelial function has not been completely elucidated. The proliferation inhibitors azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) have little effect on the cardiovascular system. Yet, indirectly, by inducing anaemia, they may lead to left ventricular hypertrophy. MMF is an attractive alternative to azathioprine because of its higher potency and possibly lower risk of malignancies. Sirolimus also induces anaemia, but may be promising because of its antiproliferative features. Whether the hyperlipidaemia induced by sirolimus counteracts its beneficial effects is, as yet, unknown. It may be combined with MMF, however, initial attempts resulted in severe mouth ulcers.

Impact of kidney transplantation on the progression of cardiovascular disease

Kidney transplantation, of all the treatment modalities for end-stage renal disease, affords the greatest potential for prolonged survival and improved quality of life. Great strides in immunosuppressant therapy have improved graft survival and forced clinicians to consider other health-care needs of kidney transplant recipients. Chief among these needs is the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease. Cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of death among patients with a working renal allograft. Because therapies for primary and secondary prevention are successful in the general population, transplant clinicians are increasingly focused on preventing or limiting the progression of cardiovascular disease. Initiation of aggressive management of conventional atherosclerotic risk factors and uremia-related risk factors, ideally during the early stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) or after kidney transplantation, and efforts to delay the progression of kidney disease will hopefully reduce the cardiovascular burden in transplant recipients.

Predicting coronary heart disease in renal transplant recipients: A prospective study

BACKGROUND

Current cardiovascular risk calculators, widely used in the general population, have not yet been validated in renal transplant recipients. We conducted a prospective study to determine the incidence and risk factors for ischemic heart disease in renal transplant recipients and to assess the relevance of the Framingham Heart Study risk calculator in this population.

METHODS

Three hundred and forty four consecutive renal transplant recipients free of vascular disease were enrolled. Coronary events were registered and analyzed with respect to traditional and nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors. The risk of coronary events was assessed through the Framingham Heart Study formula and the relevance of this equation was then analyzed.

RESULTS

The patients were followed for a mean duration of 72 +/- 14 months. Twenty seven coronary events occurred in 27 patients (7.8%). In addition to risk factors included in the Framingham Heart Study score, C-reactive protein (CRP) level (P= 0.009), and hyperhomocysteinemia (P= 0.01) were found to be independent risk factors for ischemic heart disease events in renal transplant recipients. The Framingham Heart Study model did not predict absolute ischemic heart disease risk in the transplant population as a whole.

CONCLUSION

Nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors greatly contribute to increased incidence of ischemic heart disease events in renal transplant recipients. They should therefore be considered in preventive care of these patients which relies on reduction of overall absolute risk. Although the Framingham Heart Study score has an excellent predictive value in low-risk renal transplant recipients, it tends to underestimate the real cardiovascular risk in high-risk patients.

Conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus improves quality-of-life indices, renal graft function and cardiovascular risk profile

Long-term use of cyclosporine after renal transplantation results in nephrotoxicity and an increased cardiovascular risk profile. Tacrolimus may be more favorable in this respect. In this randomized controlled study in 124 renal transplant patients, the effects of conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus on renal function, cardiovascular risk factors, and perceived side-effects were investigated after a follow-up of 2 years. After conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus renal function remained stable, whereas continuation of cyclosporine was accompanied by a rise in serum creatinine from 142 +/- 48 micromol/L to 157 +/- 62 micromol/L (p < 0.05 comparing both groups). Conversion to tacrolimus resulted in a sustained reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and a sustained improvement in the serum lipid profile, leading to a reduction in the Framingham risk score from 5.7 +/- 4.3 to 4.8 +/- 5.3 (p < 0.05). Finally, conversion to tacrolimus resulted in decreased scores for occurrence of and distress due to side-effects. In conclusion, conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus in stable renal transplant patients is beneficial with respect to renal function, cardiovascular risk profile, and side-effects. Therefore, for most renal transplant patients tacrolimus will be the drug of choice when long-term treatment with a calcineurin inhibitor is indicated.

Long-term graft survival with neoral and tacrolimus: a paired kidney analysis

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) are an important component of most immunosuppressive protocols utilized in renal transplantation. Both CNI available (cyclosporine and tacrolimus) have been used for many years. Studies comparing the efficacy of these two agents in terms of long-term graft or patient survival have thus far failed to show an advantage for either agent. This failure to show a difference could possibly be due to underpowering of clinical trials. The authors used the SRTR database to analyze 5-yr graft survival of the microemulsion formulation of cyclosporine (Neoral) as compared with tacrolimus. To minimize the donor variability and bias, a paired kidney analysis was used. Deceased donors from the years 1995-2002 were analyzed from the SRTR database. All paired kidneys during this period, where one kidney was allocated to a patient receiving initial Neoral therapy and its mate allocated to a patient receiving initial tacrolimus therapy were evaluated. Multivariate and univariate analysis were performed. Univariate analysis demonstrated equivalent graft survival for Neoral compared with tacrolimus (66.9% versus 65.9%, respectively). Multivariate analysis could not demonstrate a difference in risk for 5-yr patient survival or graft loss. Renal function was superior for tacrolimus at all time points, whereas the slope of 1/Cr over time did not differ for the two agents. In this paired kidney analysis, no difference in 5-yr renal allograft survival could be found between the two agents. Renal function was superior in the patients receiving initial tacrolimus therapy; however, slope of 1/Cr did not differ between the agents.

Cardiovascular risk in stage 4 and 5 nephropathy

Severity of heart disease of almost all types, as well as mortality risk associated with heart disease, increases in step with severity of kidney disease, although not necessarily in a linear fashion. Heart failure is more common and just as lethal as ischemic heart disease in patients with severe chronic kidney disease (CKD). The incidence of nonfatal heart disease in dialysis and transplant populations has now been described in detail. Although standard risk factors for heart disease that are more common among patients with CKD than in the general population do not adequately explain the greatly increased risk of heart disease in patients with severe CKD, neither do as yet identified "nontraditional" risk factors. However, in addition to the factors not common in the general population, such as anemia, hyperphosphatemia, and markers of systemic inflammation, patients with CKD in the modern era may also exhibit excessive thrombotic tendencies. Screening for heart disease in this population relies mainly on dobutamine stress echocardiography or nuclear scintigraphy. The role of electron beam CT (EBCT) scanning is currently controversial. The indications for coronary angiography are the same for patients with CKD as for the general population, but patients with CKD are at greatly increased risk for contrast-associated nephropathy, the least controversial preventive therapy, which consists of isotonic saline and N-acetylcysteine. Finally, patients with CKD do not currently receive adequate medical therapy for prevention and treatment of heart disease.

Experience with cyclosporine in the Canary Islands

Cyclosporine (CsA) is currently the basis of most immunosuppressive protocols after solid organ transplantation. The introduction of Neoral, a new microemulsion formulation of CsA, and more recently a range of adjunctive immunosuppressants have further enhanced short-term efficacy and tolerability of CsA-based immunosuppression. In addition, Neoral C2 monitoring has been shown to have advantages not only in the early posttransplant period, but also for maintenance transplant patients. The major long-term disadvantage associated with CsA is the development of nephrotoxicity and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN), which is the second major cause of graft failure. Thus, strategies to reduce the risk of CAN include CsA-sparing protocols, use of C2 level monitoring, introduction of non-nephrotoxic adjunctive immunosuppressants, and optimal management of additional risk factors. Other important side effects related to CsA-based immunosuppression include hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia. Optimal management of these conditions may lead to significant reduction of cardiovascular-related morbidity and mortality following solid organ transplantation.

Cyclosporine: advantages versus disadvantages vis-à-vis tacrolimus

Despite a different molecular structure and biochemical properties, cyclosporine and tacrolimus--by inhibiting calcineurin activity--have been shown in the previous two decades of solid organ transplantation to be well tolerated and effective immunosuppressants. Initial randomized clinical trials showed a lower incidence of acute rejection in tacrolimus than in cyclosporine-treated patients, in combination with steroids and azathioprine. But in conjunction with mycophenolate mofetil, the difference in the incidence of acute rejection episodes is less clear. In general, short- and medium-term outcome variables (1-year serum creatinine, graft and patient survival) with cyclosporine and tacrolimus are excellent, and (almost) identical, with both substances having the same intrinsic nephrotoxic potential. On the other hand, cyclosporine and tacrolimus have a different impact on cardiovascular risk factors with tacrolimus having a better profile on arterial tension and lipid metabolism and cyclosporine on glucose metabolism. However, at present no data are available to discern that these differences in risk profile alter patient or graft survival or long-term cardiovascular morbidity/mortality. Therefore, prospective long-term trials are needed to study the quantitative impact of different immunosuppressive agents and concomitant cardiovascular risk factors on long-term patient and graft survival, before evidence-based (patient, graft, or cardiovascular) risk reduction can be firmly claimed by tailoring calcineurin inhibitors.