Blood pressure control in Italy: results of recent surveys on hypertension

Global cardiovascular disease risk management in italian patients with metabolic syndrome in the clinical practice setting

BACKGROUND

Metabolic syndrome is a highly prevalent condition in the Italian population. This study assesses the feasibility and efficacy of a multifactorial approach for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease risk assessment in patients with metabolic syndrome in the daily clinical practice setting.

METHODS

726 patients were enrolled (males : females = 7 : 3), their ages ranging from 26 to 70 years, with metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular death risk ≥5%, computed by means of the European Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) algorithm. The first phase (3 months) consisted of an improvement in lifestyle and, if necessary, the initial administration of an antihypertensive therapy (valsartan 160 mg/day for patients with blood pressure ≥140/90 mmHg and ≥130/80 mmHg for diabetic patients). During phase 2 (6 months), patients with systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥90 mmHg (≥130/80 mmHg for diabetic patients) were administered valsartan 160 mg/day + hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg/day combined; those with total cholesterol levels ≥190 mg/dL (≥175 mg/dL for diabetic patients) started treatment with fluvastatin 80 mg prolonged release (XL), as prescribed in the guidelines. A control group was approached with another conventional treatment.

RESULTS

After 9 months of monitoring, the SBP dropped by 27 mmHg in the valsartan-treated patients and by 11 mmHg in the control group, while the DBP dropped by 12 mmHg in the former group and 2 mmHg in the latter. Total cholesterolaemia was reduced by 47 mg/dL in patients undergoing fluvastatin and valsartan therapy, by 19 mg/dL in those treated with valsartan only and by 33 mg/dL in those administered another conventional treatment. Relative risk reduction observed after 9 months, compared with the beginning of the study, was almost 48% in the valsartan/valsartan + fluvastatin group, versus 28% observed with the other conventional treatment. The reduction of risk at 60 years of age was an average of 39% at 3 months and 48% at 9 months, compared with the beginning of the study. Therapeutic success was accomplished with 78% of the patients treated with valsartan/valsartan + fluvastatin, compared with 47% of patients in the conventional therapy group.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrated that the normalization of the main cardiovascular risk factors in patients with metabolic syndrome may be easily achieved in standard clinical practice settings, by leading an adequate lifestyle and, if necessary, the administration of antihypertensive and/or lipid-lowering monotherapy at the usual doses.

Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in adults with diagnosed diabetes: the Fourth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES IV)

We evaluated the prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in Korean adults with diagnosed diabetes using nationally representative data. Among subjects aged ≥30 years who participated in the Fourth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in 2007 and 2008, a total of 745 subjects (336 men and 409 women) with a previous diagnosis of diabetes mellitus were analyzed. The prevalence of hypertension in adults with diagnosed diabetes was 55.5%. The rates of awareness, treatment and control were 88.0, 94.2, and 30.8%, respectively. Compared with the general population, the prevalence of hypertension in adults with diagnosed diabetes was higher in all age groups in both genders. Factors independently associated with a high prevalence of hypertension included being male, increasing age, single, <9 years of education, the presence of chronic kidney disease risk, hypercholesterolemia (≥240 mg dl(-1)) and high body mass index (≥25 kg m(-2)). Regular medical screening was positively associated with hypertension control, whereas a high triglyceride level (≥150 mg dl(-1)) was inversely associated. A high prevalence and a low control rate of hypertension in adults with diagnosed diabetes suggest that stringent efforts are needed to control blood pressure in diabetic patients.

Blood pressure control in Italian essential hypertensives treated by general practitioners

BACKGROUND

Adequate control of blood pressure (BP) is limited worldwide. This has serious consequences for public health because in hypertensive patients, uncontrolled BP is associated with a higher incidence of cardiovascular events, particularly stroke. The aim of this study was to investigate BP control in a cohort of treated patients with diagnosed hypertension, who were under general practitioner care in Italy.

METHODS

Data were collected by 2,643 physicians on 8,572 individual Italian patients. Office BP was measured 5 min after seating each patient and then 3-5 min later. For each patient, data such as medical history of patients, physical examination data, antihypertensive drug usage, and self-BP measurement frequency were obtained.

RESULTS

Male prevalence was 48.4%, and mean age was 64.3 ± 10.5 years. Based on the second measurement, BP control (<140/90 mm Hg) was observed in 33.5% of all patients (34.2% in men and 33.4% in women). BP control was much lower for systolic BP than for diastolic BP (35.9 vs. 61.3%, P < 0.0001); moreover, BP control was much more common in patients who were engaged in self-BP measurement (61.2 vs. 38.8%, P < 0.0001). A stricter BP control recommended by the guidelines of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) (<130/80 mm Hg) was observed in only 5.5% of diabetic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In treated Italian hypertensives effective BP control remains uncommon largely due to the failure to appropriately reduce the systolic BP. The stricter values recommended by the ESH/ESC guidelines for diabetic patients are achieved only by a small fraction of hypertensive diabetic population.

A survey on blood pressure levels and hypertension control in a sample of the Italian general population

BACKGROUND

Hypertension represents a major cardiovascular risk factor with relevant consequences on morbidity and mortality in the general population. An optimal control of blood pressure (BP) is far from being achieved.

AIM

The objective of this study was to explore awareness of BP levels, prevalence of risk factors and status of hypertension control in a sample of the Italian general population.

METHODS

Subjects aged 18 years or older were enrolled on a voluntary basis during the 7th and 8th World Hypertension Days at our hospital centre, S. Andrea Hospital in Rome, and at other hospitals throughout the Italian Lazio region. Along with BP measurement, a short questionnaire was completed at the time of the interview.

RESULTS

Of 1165 individuals enrolled into the analysis, 71.7% were aware of their BP levels (82.5% among hypertensive patients). Within the whole cohort, 31.9% of subjects were under antihypertensive treatment, while the overall rate of subjects found to be hypertensive patients at our visit was 52.9% (n = 616). Among hypertensive patients taking antihypertensive drugs, 47.1% had controlled BP values with the remaining 52.9% showing uncontrolled hypertension. Mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) was 138.2 ± 20.7 mmHg and mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was 80.4 ± 11.3 mmHg in subjects receiving antihypertensive treatment. Among older hypertensive patients (71-94 years of age), only 76.9% were under treatment. Hypertensive males were more frequently treated than females in all age groups (p = 0.001). Smoking habit negatively affected efficacy of antihypertensive therapy in the age groups of 48-53 and 54-62 years (p = 0.008 and p = 0.01, respectively). Diabetic patients had higher mean SBP values than non-diabetic subjects (137.3 ± 22.1 vs 129.3 ± 18.2 mmHg, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

The results of our survey strongly support the need for a continuing educational effort aimed at providing correct advertisement of healthy lifestyles and awareness of adequate BP control. Based on our observations, particular attention has to be paid to women, younger subjects, elderly subjects and diabetic patients in order to reach appropriate BP control and reduction of cardiovascular risk in these subject categories.

Blood pressure control in Italy: analysis of clinical data from 2005-2011 surveys on hypertension

INTRODUCTION

Blood pressure (BP) control is poorly achieved in hypertensive patients, worldwide.

AIM

We evaluated clinic BP levels and the rate of BP control in hypertensive patients included in observational studies and clinical surveys published between 2005 and 2011 in Italy.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical literature to identify observational studies and clinical surveys on hypertension between January 2005 and June 2011, which clearly reported information on clinic BP levels, rates of BP control, proportions of treated and untreated patients, who were followed in different clinical settings (mostly in general practice, and also in outpatient clinics and hypertension centres).

RESULTS

The overall sample included 158 876 hypertensive patients (94 907 women, mean age 56.6 ± 9.6 years, BMI 27.2 ± 4.2 kg/m(2), known duration of hypertension 90.2 ± 12.4 months). In the selected studies, average SBP and DBP levels were 145.7 ± 15.9 and 87.5 ± 9.7 mmHg, respectively; BP levels were higher in patients followed in hypertension centres (n = 10 724, 6.7%; 146.5 ± 17.3/88.5 ± 10.3 mmHg) than in those followed by general practitioners (n = 148 152, 93.3%; 143.5 ± 13.9/84.8 ± 8.9 mmHg; P < 0.01). More than half of the patients were treated (n = 91 318, 57.5%); among treated hypertensive patients, only 31 727 (37.0%) had controlled BP levels.

CONCLUSION

The present analysis confirmed inadequate control of BP in Italy, independently of the clinical setting. Although some improvement was noted compared with a similar analysis performed between 1995 and 2005, these findings highlight the need for a more effective clinical management of hypertension.

Efficacy and safety of delapril/indapamide compared to different ACE-inhibitor/hydrochlorothiazide combinations: a meta-analysis

The main objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of the combination of delapril and indapamide (D+I) to different angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) plus hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) combinations for the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension. A secondary objective was to examine the safety of these two combinations. Studies comparing the efficacy of D+I to ACEi+HCTZ combinations in hypertensive patients and published on computerized databases (1974–2010) were considered. Endpoints included percentage of normalized patients, of responders, change in diastolic and systolic blood pressure (DBP/SBP) at different time-points, percentage of adverse events (AEs), and percentage of withdrawal. Four head-to-head randomized controlled trials (D+I-treated, n = 643; ACEi+HCTZ-treated, n = 629) were included. Meta-analysis indicated that D+I-treated patients had a higher proportion with normalized blood pressure (P = 0.024) or responders (P = 0.002) compared to ACEi+HCTZ-treated patients. No difference was observed between treatments on absolute values of DBP and SBP at different time-points. Although the rate of patients reporting at least one AE was similar in both groups (10.4% versus 9.9%), events leading to study withdrawal were lower in the D+I group versus the ACEi+HCTZ group (2.3% versus 4.8%, respectively; P = 0.018). This meta-analysis suggests that treatment with D+I could provide a higher proportion of normalized or responder patients with good tolerability compared to ACEi+HCTZ combinations.

Global cardiovascular risk management in different Italian regions: an analysis of the Evaluation of Final Feasible Effect of Control Training and Ultra Sensitisation (EFFECTUS) educational program

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The Final Evaluation Feasible Effect of Ultra Control Training and Sensitization (EFFECTUS) is an educational program, aimed at improving global CV risk stratification and management in Italy. The present study evaluates differences on clinical approach to global CV risk among physicians involved in the EFFECTUS program and stratified in three geographical macro-areas (North, Center, South) of our Country.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Physicians were asked to submit data already available in their medical records, covering the first 10 adult outpatients, consecutively seen in the month of May 2006. Overall, 1.078 physicians (27% females, aged 50 ± 7 years) collected data of 9.904 outpatients (46.5% females, aged 67 ± 9 years), among which 3.219 (32.5%) were residents in Northern, 3.652 (36.9%) in Central and 3.033 (30.6%) in Southern Italy. A significantly higher prevalence of major CV risk factors, including obesity, physical inactivity, hypertension and diabetes, was recorded in Southern than in other areas. Accordingly, Southern physicians more frequently prescribed antihypertensive, glucose and lipid lowering agents than other physicians, who paid significantly more attention to life-style changes in their clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis of the EFFECTUS study demonstrates a high prevalence of CV risk factors in Italy, particularly in Southern areas, and indicates some important discrepancies in the clinical management of global CV risk among physcians working in different Italian regions.

Antihypertensive drugs and inflammation in acute ischemic stroke as a predictor factor of future cardiovascular mortality

The beneficial effects of antihypertensive drugs in secondary stroke prevention could not be based on their effects on lowering hypertension only.In this prospective study, the status of blood pressure, treatment regimens, new atherothrombotic event, blood sampling for hs-CRP and fibrinogen were asked at initial visit, 6th, and 12th months in 226 patients with atherothrombotic stroke.Eighty-seven percent of patients had an antihypertensive regimen, but hypertension control was achieved in 34.1% of patients.Neither use of six different antihypertensive drug regimens nor the change in blood pressure levels showed any difference on new atherothrombotic events, outcomes or survival rates.On the other hand, the higher levels of hs-CRP at baseline were found to be associated with higher mortality rates (p=0.020).Our findings emphasize the predictive role of inflammation in future cardiovascular mortality in patients with acute ischemic stroke, indicating that inflammatory mediators underlying the atherothrombotic process play a more important role than it is assumed.

Rationale for triple fixed-dose combination therapy with an angiotensin II receptor blocker, a calcium channel blocker, and a thiazide diuretic

Hypertension is a growing global health problem, and is predicted to affect 1.56 billion people by 2025. Treatment remains suboptimal, with control of blood pressure achieved in only 20%-35% of patients, and the majority requiring two or more antihypertensive drugs to achieve recommended blood pressure goals. To improve blood pressure control, the European hypertension guidelines recommend that angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) are combined with calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and/or thiazide diuretics. The rationale for this strategy is based, in part, on their different effects on the renin-angiotensin system, which improves antihypertensive efficacy. Data from a large number of trials support the efficacy of ACEIs or ARBs in combination with CCBs and/or hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ). Combining two different classes of antihypertensive drugs has an additive effect on lowering of blood pressure, and does not increase adverse events, with the ARBs showing a tolerability advantage over the ACEIs. Among the different ARBs, olmesartan medoxomil is available as a dual fixed-dose combination with either amlodipine or HCTZ, and the increased blood pressure-lowering efficacy of these two combinations is proven. Triple therapy is required in 15%-20% of treated uncontrolled hypertensive patients, with a renin-angiotensin system blocker, CCB, and thiazide diuretic considered to be a rational combination according to the European guidelines. Olmesartan, amlodipine, and HCTZ are available as a triple fixed-dose combination, and significant blood pressure reductions have been observed with this regimen compared with the possible dual combinations. The availability of these fixed-dose combinations should lead to improvement in blood pressure control and aid compliance with long-term therapy, optimizing the management of this chronic condition.

Use of carvedilol in hypertension: an update

β-blockers are effective antihypertensive agents and, together with diuretics, have been the cornerstone of pioneering studies showing their benefits on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality as a consequence of blood pressure reduction in patients with hypertension. However, evidence from recent meta-analyses have demonstrated no benefit afforded by atenolol compared with placebo in risk of mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke, and a higher risk of mortality and stroke with atenolol/propranolol compared with other antihypertensive drug classes. Thus, the effect of these agents on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertensive patients, especially their use in uncomplicated hypertension, has remained largely controversial. However, it is recognized that the clinical studies used in these meta-analyses were mainly based on the older second-generation β-blockers, such as atenolol and metoprolol. Actually, considerable heterogeneity in, eg, pharmacokinetic, pharmacological, and physicochemical properties exists across the different classes of β-blockers, particularly between the second-generation and newer third-generation agents. Carvedilol is a vasodilating noncardioselective third-generation β-blocker, without the negative hemodynamic and metabolic effects of traditional β-blockers, which can be used as a cardioprotective agent. Compared with conventional β-blockers, carvedilol maintains cardiac output, has a reduced prolonged effect on heart rate, and reduces blood pressure by decreasing vascular resistance. Studies have also shown that carvedilol exhibits favorable effects on metabolic parameters, eg, glycemic control, insulin sensitivity, and lipid metabolism, suggesting that it could be considered in the treatment of patients with metabolic syndrome or diabetes. The present report provides an overview of the main clinical studies concerning carvedilol administered as either monotherapy or in combination with another antihypertensive or more frequently a diuretic agent, with particular focus on the additional benefits beyond blood pressure reduction.

Global cardiovascular risk associated with hypertension and extent of treatment and control according to risk group

BACKGROUND

Hypertension (HTN) confers increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk; however, the variation in risk and how treatment and control rates may differ according to extent of risk needs clarification. We examined CVD risk distribution and treatment and control patterns according to risk group.

METHODS

We estimated 10-year Framingham global risk in 1,509 U.S. persons aged ≥30 years from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005-2006 with HTN and the proportion of subjects in low (<10%), intermediate (10-20%), and high (>20%) risk groups, or with pre-existing CVD, or who otherwise had high cardiometabolic risk according to European Society of Hypertension (ESH) criteria (diabetes (DM), metabolic syndrome (MetS), stage 3 HTN, or 3 additional CVD risk factors). We also examined HTN treatment and control rates by risk group.

RESULTS

From Framingham risk assessment, 24% of subjects were low risk, 21% intermediate risk, 23% high risk, and 32% had CVD. An additional 39% of low and 51% of intermediate risk subjects were at high or very high risk based on European criteria, for a total of 80% classified high risk or with CVD by either criterion. Treatment rates across Framingham risk groups ranged from 58 to 75%. HTN control rates were over 80% for lower risk persons, but under 50% for higher risk subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a wide variation in CVD risk in persons with HTN with control rates still suboptimal in higher risk subjects. Future guidelines should consider risk stratification combining shorter and longer-term risk assessment to best identify those who have the greatest CVD risk.

Incidence of cardiovascular events in Italian patients with early discontinuations of antihypertensive, lipid-lowering, and antidiabetic treatments

BACKGROUND

Aim of the present investigation was to quantify the early discontinuation phenomenon in patients treated for hypertension, dyslipidemia or diabetes, and to assess their clinical characteristics and incidence of cardiovascular (CV) outcomes to see whether an incorrect diagnosis was involved or treatment continuation might have been indicated.

METHODS

Using the health-care databases on beneficiaries of the National Health Service (NHS) living in Lombardy, we studied patients aged 40-79 years who received their first prescription during 2003. Patients were classified according to whether they received only one or multiple prescriptions and data were compared with those obtained in individuals who did not receive any prescription. Crude and standardized rates of hospitalization for CV outcomes were calculated from initial prescription until 2008.

RESULTS

Among the 203,302 patients on antihypertensive therapy, those experiencing only one prescription (35.7%) showed significant higher rates of cotreatments, comorbidities, and CV hospitalization than those who did not receive antihypertensive medications. Standardized CV rates were respectively 40.0 and 37.8 events every 10,000 person-year at risk (+7%). Similar findings were obtained for antidiabetic or lipid-lowering medications for which the between-group difference in CV rate was even greater (+21% and +18% respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In general practice management of hypertension, dyslipidemia and diabetes is characterized by a high rate of treatment discontinuation. Patients who early discontinued had an unfavorable risk profile and a greater incidence of CV events than untreated patients. This suggests that they include candidates in whom treatment continuation is advisable.

Use of aliskiren in a 'real-life' model of hypertension management: analysis of national Web-based drug-monitoring system in Italy

INTRODUCTION

In Italy, prescriptions of the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren (aliskiren) to high-risk hypertensive patients must be electronically filled by specialized physicians only when at least two antihypertensive drug classes (independently of the dosages), fails to normalize blood pressure (BP) levels.

AIM

To analyze the effects of the addition of aliskiren 150-300 mg daily to antihypertensive therapy in a population of high cardiovascular risk hypertensive patients with uncontrolled BP levels.

METHODS

Clinical data were derived from patients included in the national Web-based drug-monitoring system. Follow-up visits were required for measuring BP levels, and collecting data on drug safety and tolerability.

RESULTS

Between March 2009 and February 2010, aliskiren was prescribed by 6464 specialized physicians to 11 511 treated, uncontrolled hypertensive patients (47.6% women, aged 68.0 ± 11.1 years, BMI 28.4 ± 4.9 kg/m) with organ damage or comorbidities. During 6-month observation, only a few drug-related side-effects were reported (n = 33). At the entry and 1-month follow-up visits (n = 8197; 70.6%), BP levels were 158.9 ± 16.8 and 142.1 ± 15.2 mmHg for SBP and 90.8 ± 9.6 and 83.1 ± 8.5 mmHg for DBP, respectively. At 6-month (n = 4907; 42.3%), SBP and DBP levels were 137.9 ± 13.9 and 81.3 ± 8.0 mmHg, respectively. A consistent reduction in the use of all classes of concomitant antihypertensive drugs was recorded.

CONCLUSION

Although data derived from national registries need to be interpreted with caution, the Italian Web-based drug-monitoring system provided information on 'real-life' use of aliskiren in hypertension. In this uncontrolled, high-risk treated hypertensive population, SBP and DBP levels recorded during treatment with aliskiren were consistently lower than those recorded at entry visits in a context of a very low rate of reported side-effects.

Single-pill combination of telmisartan/amlodipine in patients with severe hypertension: results from the TEAMSTA severe HTN study

This 8-week, randomized, double-blind, controlled study compared efficacy and tolerability of telmisartan/amlodipine (T/A) single-pill combination (SPC) vs the respective monotherapies in 858 patients with severe hypertension (systolic/diastolic blood pressure [SBP/DBP] ≥180/95 mm Hg). At 8 weeks, T/A provided significantly greater reductions from baseline in seated trough cuff SBP/DBP (-47.5 mm Hg/-18.7 mm Hg) vs T (P<.0001) or A (P=.0002) monotherapy; superior reductions were also evident at 1, 2, 4, and 6 weeks. Blood pressure (BP) goal and response rates were consistently higher with T/A vs T or A. T/A was well tolerated, with less frequent treatment-related adverse events vs A (12.6% vs 16.4%) and a numerically lower incidence of peripheral edema and treatment discontinuation. In conclusion, treatment of patients with substantially elevated BP with T/A SPCs resulted in high and significantly greater BP reductions and higher BP goal and response rates than the respective monotherapies. T/A SPCs were well tolerated.

Modern clinical management of arterial hypertension: fixed or free combination therapies?

Blood pressure control is a key element in any cardiovascular prevention strategy. However, it is also one of the least frequently achieved goals in modern strategies for the clinical management of cardiovascular diseases, resulting in high impact in terms of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Among different factors that can be identified as the causes of poor blood pressure (BP) control in the general population of patients with hypertension, the excessive use of monotherapy, as opposed to combination therapy, is arguably one of the most significant. In this perspective, the use of combination therapies having synergic and complementary actions has been shown to reduce BP levels to increase the percentage of patients who respond to antihypertensive treatment and achieve the recommended BP targets. Moreover, recent studies have demonstrated that these strategies provide effective protection against hypertension-related organ damage, as well as a significant reduction of major cardiovascular events. While currently available evidence supports an increasingly important role of combination therapies compared with monotherapies, several other issues remain to be clarified. Among these, it has not yet been clearly established which classes of drugs should be considered for combination strategies, at what doses each component should be used, and whether combination strategies may be definitively considered as a first choice for the treatment of hypertensive patients at cardiovascular risk. Another relevant aspect concerns the choice between fixed and free combination therapies. This article discusses and analyses the different factors that may contribute to achieve effective BP control. In particular, the potential benefits and drawbacks associated with the use of fixed versus free combination therapies for hypertension treatment will be examined and discussed. The benefits of using combination strategies based on drugs that antagonize the renin-angiotensin system and dihydropyridine calcium antagonists will also be discussed, with a particular focus on amlodipine besylate combination therapies.

Prevalence of 'borderline' values of cardiovascular risk factors in the clinical practice of general medicine in Italy: results of the BORDERLINE study

INTRODUCTION

The prevalence of patients with 'borderline' levels of cardiovascular risk factors has been rarely investigated, being often reported in studies evaluating abnormal values of these parameters. The BORDERLINE study represents a pilot experience to primarily identify the prevalence of 'high-normal' conditions, such as pre-hypertension, lipid and glucose levels in the upper range of normality in the setting of general practice in Italy.

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of patients with 'borderline' values of cardiovascular risk factors in Italy.

METHODS

Involved physicians were asked to evaluate the first 20 outpatients, consecutively seen in June 2009. Data were collected in a study-designed case-report form, in which physicians identified thresholds rather than reported absolute values of several clinical parameters. High-normal values were defined as follows: blood pressure (BP) 130-140/85-90 mmHg; total cholesterol 180-200 mg/dL; low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) 130-150 mg/dL; high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) 30-40 mg/dL in males and 40-50 mg/dL in females; triglycerides 130-150 mg/dL and fasting glucose 100-110 mg/dL.

RESULTS

Fifty-three Italian physicians provided valuable clinical data on 826 individual outpatients, among which 692 (83.7%, 377 women, mean age 60.9 ± 13.2 years, body mass index 26.6 ± 5.0 kg/m2) were included in the present analysis. Prevalence of borderline values of systolic BP and total cholesterol levels were at least comparable with those in the normal limits of the corresponding parameters, whereas prevalence of borderline diastolic BP, LDL-C, HDL-C, triglycerides and fasting glucose levels was significantly lower than that of normal values, but higher than that of abnormal values of the corresponding parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Using this sample of healthy subjects in the setting of general practice in Italy, our results demonstrated a relatively high prevalence of borderline values of cardiovascular risk factors, which was at least comparable with that of normal, but significantly higher than that of abnormal thresholds. These preliminary findings may prompt more extensive investigations in the area of 'borderline' cardiovascular risk. This information may, in fact, potentially enable the design of more effective prevention strategies in the future to limit the burden of cardiovascular disease in the general population in Italy. Received for publication 4 March 2011; accepted for publication 20 April 2011.

Prevalence of left-ventricular hypertrophy in hypertension: an updated review of echocardiographic studies

Left-ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is a cardinal manifestation of hypertensive organ damage associated with an increased cardiovascular (CV) risk. We reviewed recent literature on the prevalence of LVH, as assessed by echocardiography, in order to offer an updated information on the magnitude of subclinical alterations in LV structure in contemporary human hypertension. A MEDLINE search using key words 'left ventricular hypertrophy', 'hypertension', 'echocardiography' and 'cardiac organ damage' was performed in order to identify relevant papers. Full articles published in English language in the last decade, (1 January 2000-1 December 2010), reporting studies in adult or elderly individuals, were considered. A total of 30 studies, including 37,700 untreated and treated patients (80.3% Caucasian, 52.4% men, 9.6% diabetics, 2.6% with CV disease) were considered. LVH was defined by 23 criteria; its prevalence ranged from 36% (conservative criteria) to 41% (less conservative criteria) in the pooled population. LVH prevalence was not different between women and men (range 37.9-46.2 versus 36.0-43.5%, respectively). Eccentric LVH was more frequent than concentric hypertrophy (range 20.3-23.0 versus 14.8-15.8, respectively, P<0.05); concentric phenotype was found in a consistent fraction (20%) of both genders. Despite the improved management of hypertension in the last two decades, LVH remains a highly frequent biomarker of cardiac damage in the hypertensive population. Our analysis calls for a more aggressive treatment of hypertension and related CV risk factors leading to LVH.

Better compliance to antihypertensive medications reduces cardiovascular risk

OBJECTIVE

The effect of compliance with antihypertensive medications on the risk of cardiovascular outcomes in a population without a known history of cardiovascular disease has been addressed by a large population-based prospective, cohort study carried out by linking Italian administrative databases.

METHODS

The cohort of 242 594 patients aged 18 years or older, residents in the Italian Lombardy Region, who were newly treated for hypertension during 2000-2001, was followed from index prescription until 2007. During this period patients who experienced a hospitalization for coronary or cerebrovascular disease were identified (outcome). Exposure to antihypertensive drugs from index prescription until the date of hospitalization or censoring was assessed. Proportional hazards models were fitted to assess the association between persistence on and adherence with antihypertensive drug therapy and outcome. Data were adjusted for several covariates.

RESULTS

During an average follow-up of 6 years, 12 016 members of the cohort experienced the outcome. Compared with patients who experienced at least one episode of treatment discontinuation, those who continued treatment had a 37% reduced risk of cardiovascular outcomes (95% confidence interval 34-40%). Compared with patients who had very low drug coverage (proportion of days covered ≤ 25%), those at intermediate (from 51 to 75%) and high coverage (>75%) had risk reductions of 20% (16-24%) and 25% (20-29%), respectively. Similar effects were observed when coronary and cerebrovascular events were considered separately.

CONCLUSIONS

In the real life setting, fulfillment compliance with antihypertensive medications is effective in the primary prevention of cardiovascular outcomes.

Modelling the costs of care of hypertension in patients with metabolic syndrome and its consequences, in Germany, Spain and Italy

The presence of metabolic syndrome in patients with hypertension significantly increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes and mortality. Our aim is to estimate the economic burden to the health service of metabolic syndrome (MetS) in patients with hypertension and its consequences, in three European countries in 2008, and to forecast future economic burden in 2020 using projected demographic estimates and assumptions around the growth of MetS. An age-, sex- and risk group-structured prevalence-based cost of illness model was developed using the United States Adult Treatment Panel III of the National Cholesterol Education Program criteria to define MetS. Data sources included published information and public use databases on disease prevalence, incidence of cardiovascular events, prevalence of type 2 diabetes, treatment patterns and cost of management in Germany, Spain and Italy. The economic burden to the health service of MetS in patients with hypertension has been estimated at 24,427 euro, 1,900 euro and 4,877 euro million in Germany, Spain and Italy, and is forecast to rise by 59, 179 and 157%, respectively, by 2020. The largest components of costs included the management of prevalent type 2 diabetes and incident cardiovascular events. Mean annual costs per hypertensive patient were around three-fold higher in subjects with MetS compared to those without and rose incrementally with the additional number of MetS components present. In conclusion, the presence of MetS in patients with hypertension significantly inflates economic burden, and costs are likely to increase in the future due to an aging population and an increase in the prevalence of components of MetS.

[Arterial hypertension in black subjects over 50 years of age in Lomé: epidemiological aspects and evaluation of cardiovascular risk (prospective and longitudinal study of 1485 patients)]

INTRODUCTION

High blood pressure is a public health problem for which the assumption of responsibility remains especially difficult in older subjects. Generally, it is associated with other cardiovascular risk factors. The objective of this study is to determine the prevalence of high blood pressure in older subjects in a particular environment and to evaluate the cardiovascular risk among these patients.

METHODOLOGY

This is a longitudinal exploratory study undertaken on 1485 hypertensive subjects of 50 years of age or older, selected from 1999 patients received in three health professional training centers of the community of Lomé, between June 1, 2004 and June 30, 2007. Information had been collected using a card of investigation. Classifications of high blood pressure were those of the JVCVII and the European Society of Cardiology. The data analysis had been made by computer tools.

RESULTS

The prevalence high blood pressure was of 74.29%. We had noted a female prevalence (63.8%) with a sex ratio of 0,57 and one middle age of 62.08±9.3 years. Dyspnea (45.9%), chest pains (16.2%) and palpitations (13.2%) were the principal found symptoms. The various listed risk factors were: dyslipidemia (58.1%), obesity (36.12%), alcoholism (16.7%) and diabetes (10.6%). The complications were cardiac (87.81%), ocular (79.8%), renal (19.86%), neurological (4.92%) and arterial (0.99%). The cardiovascular risk was very high at 58.05% of the patients. The mortality rate was of 1.9%.

CONCLUSION

High blood pressure is the most frequent cardiovascular risk factor in our country from 50 years of age. Assumption of responsibility for it is by information, education of the population and requires the mobilization of all the social components.

Comparison of the antihypertensive efficacy of irbesartan/HCTZ and valsartan/HCTZ combination therapy: impact of age and gender

This analysis aimed to explore whether low-dose irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) has superior blood pressure (BP)-lowering efficacy over low-dose valsartan/HCTZ in the elderly and across both genders. This is a post-hoc analysis of data from a multicenter, parallel group, open-label, blinded-endpoint study in patients with hypertension uncontrolled with HCTZ monotherapy. The reduction in systolic BP (SBP)/diastolic BP (DBP) and rate of BP control achieved following 8 weeks of treatment with irbesartan/HCTZ 150/12.5 mg or valsartan/HCTZ 80/12.5 mg were analyzed for older (≥65 years) vs. younger (<65 years) patients and for men vs. women. Blood pressure measurements were by home BP monitoring (HBPM). In the age and gender subgroups, both treatments significantly decreased home SBP and DBP (p < 0.0001). The reduction in home SBP and DBP was numerically greater with irbesartan/HCTZ compared to valsartan/HCTZ for all subgroups: the difference in DBP was significant for all except the elderly (p < 0.05), and the difference in SBP was significant in the elderly and in men (p < 0.03). In all subgroups, more patients achieved BP control (HBPM ≤135/85 mmHg) in the irbesartan/HCTZ arm (range 45%-58%) than in the valsartan/HCTZ arm (range, 23%-39%; p < 0.02). Both combination therapies were well tolerated and safety parameters were similar in both age and gender subgroups. More patients with mild or moderate hypertension, uncontrolled in HCTZ monotherapy alone, had their BP controlled with irbesartan/HCTZ 150/12.5 mg than with valsartan/HCTZ 80/12.5 mg, irrespective of age or gender.

Comparative efficacy of aliskiren monotherapy and ramipril monotherapy in patients with stage 2 systolic hypertension: subgroup analysis of a double-blind, active comparator trial

Aliskiren is the first direct renin inhibitor approved for the treatment of hypertension. Blood pressure (BP) control in stage 2 hypertension with aliskiren monotherapy has not been reported. This was a post hoc analysis of the subgroup of patients with stage 2 systolic hypertension (baseline mean sitting systolic BP [msSBP]≥160 mmHg) who completed the 12-week monotherapy phase of a 6-month, double-blind, randomized study. A total of 175 patients were randomized to aliskiren 150 mg (n = 88) or ramipril 5 mg (n = 87) with optional up-titration to aliskiren 300 mg or ramipril 10 mg, respectively, at weeks 6 and 12. In the subgroup of patients with stage 2 systolic hypertension, aliskiren lowered msSBP and mean sitting diastolic BP (msDBP) by 22.3/12.7 mmHg from baseline to week 12; compared with a reduction of 18.1/10.2 mmHg with ramipril. The maximum BP reductions achieved with aliskiren were 60.0/34.0 mmHg (from a baseline of 172.7/107.3 mmHg). Aliskiren was noninferior (P < 0.0001) to ramipril for SBP reduction with nonsignificant superiority (P = 0.052), and superior (P = 0.043) to ramipril for DBP reduction. The proportion of patients who achieved BP control (<140/90 mmHg) after 12 weeks of monotherapy was larger with aliskiren (34/88, 38.6%) than with ramipril (22/87, 25.3%; P = 0.038). In this post hoc analysis, 12 weeks of monotherapy with aliskiren 150-300 mg provided effective mean BP reductions (22/13 mmHg) and was superior to ramipril 5-10 mg in controlling BP in patients with stage 2 systolic hypertension.

Resistant hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy: an overview

Available data on subclinical cardiac damage in resistant hypertension (RH) are rather scanty. Thus, we sought to review the literature focusing on the association between RH and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). A MEDLINE search was performed to identify relevant articles using the key words "resistant hypertension, " "refractory hypertension," "left ventricular hypertrophy," "cardiac damage," and "left ventricular dysfunction." Full articles published in the English language in the last two decades (December 1, 1989, to July 31, 2010) reporting studies in adult or elderly individuals, were considered. Checks of the reference lists of selected articles complemented the electronic search. A total of 11 cross-sectional and longitudinal studies, including 3325 patients attending outpatient hypertension clinics, were considered. Prevalence rates of echocardiographic LVH, as assessed by updated criteria, ranged from 55% to 75% of patients with RH, peaking to 91% in the subgroup with concomitant electrocardiographic (ECG) LV strain. Reduction in ECG-LVH induced by treatment showed a relevant beneficial impact on cardiovascular prognosis. These data support the view that initial and on-treatment assessment of LVH in patients with RH is important for cardiovascular risk monitoring and therapeutic strategies decision-making.

Antihypertensive efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil and ramipril in elderly patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension: the ESPORT study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of the angiotensin II antagonist olmesartan medoxomil (O) and the ACE inhibitor ramipril (R) in elderly patients with essential arterial hypertension.

METHODS

After a 2-week placebo wash-out 1102 treated or untreated elderly hypertensive patients aged 65-89 years (office sitting diastolic blood pressure, DBP, 90-109 mmHg and/or office sitting systolic blood pressure, SBP, 140-179 mmHg) were randomized double-blind to 12-week treatment with O 10 mg or R 2.5 mg once-daily. After the first 2 and 6 weeks doses could be doubled in non-normalized [blood pressure (BP) < 140/90 mmHg for nondiabetic and < 130/80 mmHg for diabetic) individuals, up to 40 mg for O and 10 mg for R. Office BPs were assessed at randomization, after 2, 6 and 12 weeks of treatment, whereas 24-h ambulatory BP was recorded at randomization and after 12 weeks.

RESULTS

In the intention-to-treat population (542 patients O and 539 R) after 12 weeks of treatment baseline-adjusted office SBP and DBP reductions were greater (P < 0.01) with O [17.8 (95% confidence interval: 16.8/18.9) and 9.2 (8.6/9.8) mmHg] than with R [15.7 (14.7/16.8) and 7.7 (7.1/8.3) mmHg]. BP normalization rate was also greater under O (52.6 vs. 46.0% R, P < 0.05). In the subgroup of patients with valid ambulatory BP recording (318 O and 312 R) the reduction in 24-h average BP was larger (P < 0.05) with O [SBP: 11.0 (12.2/9.9) and DBP: 6.5 (7.2/5.8) mmHg] than with R [9.0 (10.2/7.9) and 5.4 (6.1/4.7) mmHg]. The larger blood pressure reduction obtained with O was particularly evident in the last 6 h from the dosing interval; a better homogeneity of the 24-h BP control with O was confirmed by higher smoothness indices. The proportion of patients with drug-related adverse events was comparable in the two groups (3.6 O vs. 3.6% R), as well as the number of patients discontinuing study drug because of a side effect (14 O vs. 19 R).

CONCLUSION

In elderly patients with essential arterial hypertension O provides an effective, prolonged and well tolerated BP control, representing a useful option among first-line drug treatments of hypertension in this age group.

Telemedicine: the role of specialist second opinion for GPs in the care of hypertensive patients

RATIONALE

To evaluate the feasibility of a second-opinion consultation in supporting general practitioners (GPs) during the daily diagnosis and therapeutic management of patients with essential hypertension.

METHODS

Italian GPs were encouraged to follow-up their patients by the use of the Telemedicine Service. All known hypertensive patients with signs and symptoms (teleconsultation for symptoms) and all asymptomatic patients (teleconsultation for clinical control) undergoing a visit by their GPs were enrolled. During the first visit, the GP performed electrocardiography (ECG), measured blood pressure and required cardiological teleconsultation.

RESULTS

399 GPs examined 1719 consecutive patients (mean age 73±13 years, 38% male). During teleconsultation for a routine control, GPs identified 36% of new episodes of atrial fibrillation in the absence of any symptom and about 70% of patients with uncontrolled blood pressure. In about 50% of the cases, 10 min of teleconsultation helped GP to quicken the solution of the clinical problems, reducing time and number of specialist's visit. In 8% of cases, an emergency department admission was suggested.

CONCLUSIONS

Telemedicine applied to hypertensive patients at high risk of cardiovascular problems offers to GPs an easy-to-use tool to control blood pressure by improving connection with second-opinion specialist consultations.

Efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg combination therapy versus olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg monotherapy in patients with moderate to severe hypertension: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre, multinational, phase III study

BACKGROUND

Current hypertension guidelines recommend using two antihypertensive agents when blood pressure (BP) control is not achieved with one single agent.

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to assess the antihypertensive benefit of the olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg combination versus olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg monotherapy in patients with moderate to severe hypertension.

METHODS

This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, up-titration, multicentre, multinational, phase III study. Following a 2-week single-blind placebo run-in phase, 846 hypertensive patients with mean seated systolic BP (SeSBP) of 160-200 mmHg and mean seated diastolic BP (SeDBP) of 100-120 mmHg were randomized (1 : 2 ratio) to receive double-blind treatment with olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg or olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg for 8 weeks (phase A). At week 8, patients not reaching BP goal (<140/90 mmHg; <130/80 mmHg in patients with diabetes mellitus) were up-titrated from olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg to olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg or from olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg to olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg/HCTZ 25 mg for an additional 8 weeks (phase B). Patients on goal continued their initial treatment. The primary efficacy parameter was the change in mean SeDBP during phase A.

RESULTS

Olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg reduced mean SeDBP significantly more (-18.9 mmHg) than olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg (-15.8 mmHg) after 8 weeks of double-blind treatment (difference: -3.1 mmHg, p < 0.0001). Olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg also reduced mean SeSBP significantly more than olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg (-5.4 mmHg, p < 0.0001). As a result, BP goal rates at week 8 were significantly higher with olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg than with olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg (58.5% vs 44.3%; odds ratio 1.88; 95% CI 1.32, 2.54). During phase B, mean BP reductions were greater in patients up-titrated from olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg to olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg than in those continuing on olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg (SeDBP: -9.3 mmHg vs -0.5 mmHg; SeSBP: -12.4 mmHg vs -0.5 mmHg). Similarly, mean BP reductions were greater in patients up-titrated from olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg to olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg/HCTZ 25 mg than in those continuing on olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg (SeDBP: -8.0 mmHg vs -0.3 mmHg; SeSBP: -12.1 mmHg vs -0.4 mmHg). In patients not on goal at week 8, addition of HCTZ 12.5 mg to olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg or up-titration from olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg to olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg/HCTZ 25 mg brought additional patients to goal at week 16 (38.8% vs 36.9%). All treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

The olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg combination is superior to olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg monotherapy in reducing SeDBP and SeSBP and increasing BP goal rates after 8 weeks. Patients not on goal at week 8 with olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg or olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg benefited from adding HCTZ 12.5 mg or up-titrating to olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg/HCTZ 25 mg, respectively, confirming that up-titration is a clinically meaningful way to improve BP control. [

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT00441350 (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier)].

Ambulatory monitoring of systolic hypertension in the elderly: Eprosartan/hydrochlorothiazide compared with losartan/hydrochlorothiazide (INSIST trial)

INTRODUCTION

Systolic hypertension is very common in the elderly and is strongly associated with the risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. The control of systolic hypertension is difficult and most patients require combination antihypertensive therapy. Few data are available regarding the efficacy of angiotensin II receptor antagonists on systolic hypertension of the elderly. The aim of this double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter study was to assess the efficacy of eprosartan 600 mg in combination with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg in comparison with losartan 50 mg in combination with HCTZ 12.5 mg, in reducing blood pressure in elderly patients with grade 2 systolic hypertension who did not optimally respond to eprosartan or losartan monotherapy.

METHODS

After a 3-week placebo wash-out, 155 patients with an Office trough sitting systolic blood pressure (Office sitSBP) >or=160 mmHg and <180 mmHg were randomized to eprosartan 600 mg (n=78) or losartan 50 mg (n=77) once daily for 6 weeks. In patients not optimally responding to monotherapy (Office sitSBP>or=130 mmHg) 12.5 mg HCTZ was added as fixed combination once daily for 6 weeks. A 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was performed at the end of wash-out and at the end of the fixed-combination period.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference was found between eprosartan/HCTZ and losartan/HCTZ on the primary endpoint (24-hour ABPM SBP) with an adjusted mean difference between treatments of 3.1 mmHg (95% CI: -0.32-6.59). However, the mean 24-hour ABPM SBP significantly decreased by 16.7 mmHg with eprosartan/HCTZ and 20.3 mmHg with losartan/HCTZ (P<0.001 vs. baseline). The mean Office sitSBP significantly decreased by 28.7 mmHg and 29.6 mmHg respectively, with eprosartan/HCTZ and losartan/HCTZ (P<0.001 vs.baseline and vs. monotherapy).

CONCLUSION

In this study, eprosartan/HCTZ did not demonstrate to be superior to losartan/HCTZ in reducing ABPM systolic hypertension in the elderly.

Management of essential hypertension

INTRODUCTION

Epidemiological studies have unequivocally shown that hypertension (HT)is a major cardiovascular (CV) risk factor and that a direct linear relationship exists between the severity of the blood pressure (BP) elevation and the occurrence of CV events.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT AND CONTROVERSY

The beneficial effects of the BP-lowering interventions have been recognized since a number of years. These include not only the reduction in CV morbidity and mortality but also the regression (or the delay of progression) of HT-related end-organ damage, such as left ventricular hypertrophy, vascular remodelling, endothelial dysfunction and renal damage. Along with these well-established features, antihypertensive drug treatment still faces a number of unmet goals and unanswered questions, such as the target BP values to achieve in high-risk patients, the threshold of treatment in low-risk patients as well as the choice of the therapeutic approach more likely to offer greater CV protection.

CONCLUSION

Despite unmet goals, antihypertensive treatment has provided throughout the years successful results. Future efforts will be need to achieve a better BP control in the population and thus to obtain a greater CV protection.

2007 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of hypertension, from theory to practice: global cardiovascular risk concept

Clinical evaluation of cardiovascular risk in patients with hypertension is evolving from independently assessing well-known, traditional risk factors (e.g. hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, obesity, diabetes mellitus, smoking) towards an integrated, multidisciplinary clinical approach, aimed at determining the global (or total) cardiovascular risk profile in each individual patient for planning early and effective strategies for cardiovascular prevention. A paradigmatic example is provided by hypertension, in which new clinical behaviour implies a shift from focusing only on high blood pressure levels towards a more integrated approach, aimed at identifying and reducing global cardiovascular risk, as is highlighted in the European Guidelines. This approach arises from the acknowledgement that a cluster of cardiovascular risk factors is the rule, rather than the exception in hypertension. In addition, major cardiovascular diseases often develop from a subclinical level, which can be discovered at an early stage, thus providing the opportunity promptly to intercept and treat high-risk patients early. Identification of organ damage and assessment of hypertension-related clinical conditions can further contribute to a more precise definition of an individual total cardiovascular risk profile, and to the decision on when, how and how much to treat patients with hypertension. Implementing a clinical behaviour based on global cardiovascular risk assessment will help to target global cardiovascular risk reduction, while maintaining specific therapeutic goals for individual risk factors. This synergistic approach holds the best promise for treating total cardiovascular risk and reducing the mounting global burden of cardiovascular disease associated with hypertension.

Long-term risk of sustained hypertension in white-coat or masked hypertension

It is debated whether white-coat (WCHT) and masked hypertension (MHT) are at greater risk of developing a sustained hypertensive state (SHT). In 1412 subjects of the Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate e Loro Associazioni Study, we measured office blood pressure (BP), 24-hour ambulatory BP, and home BP. The condition of WCHT was identified as office BP >140/90 mm Hg and 24-hour BP mean <125/79 mm Hg or home BP <132/82 mm Hg. Corresponding values for MHT diagnosis were office BP <140/90 mm Hg, 24-hour BP > or =125/79 mm Hg, and home BP >or =132/82 mm Hg. SHT was identified when both office and 24-hour BP means or home BP were over threshold values and normotension was under the threshold value. Subjects were reassessed 10 years later to evaluate the BP status of the various conditions defined previously. At the first examination, 758 (54.1%), 225 (16.1%), 124 (8.9%), and 293 (20.9%) subjects were normotensive, WCHT, MHT, and SHT subjects, respectively. At the second examination, 136 normotensives (18.2%), 95 WCHT (42.6%), and 56 MHT (47.1%) subjects became SHT. As compared with normotensives, adjusting for age and sex, the risk of becoming SHT was significantly higher for WCHT and MHT subjects (odds ratio: 2.51 and 1.78, respectively; P<0.0001). Similar results were obtained when the definition of the various conditions was based on home BP. Independent contributors of worsening of hypertension status were not only baseline BP, but also, although to a lesser extent, metabolic variables and age. Subjects with WCHT and MHT are at increased risk of developing SHT. This may contribute to their prognosis that appears to be worse as compared with that of normotensive subjects.

Management of hypertension and stroke prevention: results of the Italian cardiologist survey

OBJECTIVE

To provide an overview of current habits, priorities, perceptions and knowledge of cardiologists with regard to hypertension and stroke prevention in outpatient practice.

METHODS

A sample of 203 cardiologists operating in outpatient clinics and randomly selected amongst members of the largest Italian Outpatient Cardiologist Association were interviewed by e-mail, in April-May 2007.

RESULTS

The interviewed cardiologists reported that hypertensive outpatients represent a large percentage of their practice population, in which the clinical priority was blood pressure (BP) reduction. Stroke was identified as the most important event to prevent and it was also perceived as the most preventable hypertension-related cardiovascular event. A remarkably high rate of achieved BP control was reported, to a degree that it is inconsistent with current epidemiological reports and with the relatively low percentage use of combination therapies declared by cardiologists. Additional risk factors, organ damage, diabetes mellitus and atrial fibrillation were consistently reported in hypertensive patients. Among antihypertensive drug classes, a preference for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors has been expressed by the majority of physicians; this choice was generally justified by evidence derived from international trials or by the antihypertensive efficacy of this drug class.

CONCLUSIONS

The results confirm the presence of weaknesses in the current services for patients with hypertension, even when being managed by cardiologists. Discrepancies between perceptions and reality, or clinical practice and guideline recommendations are also highlighted. An analysis of these aspects may help to identify current areas of potential improvement for stroke prevention in the clinical management of hypertension in cardiology practice.

Increased prevalence of metabolic syndrome in uncontrolled hypertension across Europe: the Global Cardiometabolic Risk Profile in Patients with hypertension disease survey

OBJECTIVES

The Global Cardiometabolic Risk Profile in Patients with hypertension disease survey investigated the cardiometabolic risk profile in adult outpatients with hypertension in Europe according to the control of blood pressure (BP) as defined in the European Society of Hypertension and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESH/ESC) guidelines.

METHODS

Data on BP control and cardiometabolic risk factors were collected for 3370 patients with hypertension in 12 European countries. Prevalence was analyzed according to BP status and ATP III criteria for metabolic syndrome.

RESULTS

BP was controlled (BP < 140/90 mmHg for nondiabetic patients; BP < 130/80 mmHg for diabetic patients) in 28.1% of patients. Patients with uncontrolled BP had significantly higher mean weight, BMI, waist circumference, fasting blood glucose, total cholesterol and triglycerides and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were significantly lower (women only) compared with patients with controlled BP (P < 0.05). The prevalence of metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes was also significantly higher in patients with uncontrolled BP compared with controlled BP (P < 0.001) (metabolic syndrome: 66.5 versus 35.5%; diabetes 41.1 versus 9.8%, respectively). 95.3% of patients with both metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes had uncontrolled BP. In a multivariate analysis, diabetes and metabolic syndrome were found to be associated with a high risk of poor BP control: odds ratio, 2.56 (metabolic syndrome); 5.16 (diabetes).

CONCLUSION

In this European study, fewer than one third of treated hypertensive patients had controlled BP. Metabolic syndrome and diabetes were important characteristics associated with poor BP control. Thus, more focus is needed on controlling hypertension in people with high cardiometabolic risk and diabetes.

Prevalence of isolated uncontrolled systolic blood pressure among treated hypertensive patients in primary care in Belgium: results of the I-inSYST survey

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prevalence of isolated uncontrolled systolic blood pressure (on-treatment isolated systolic hypertension) in treated hypertensive patients and identify the characteristics and treatment strategy in these patients.

METHODS

Prospective cross-sectional survey in primary care. Participating physicians enrolled more than 13 consecutive treated hypertensive patients. Patients were considered to have isolated systolic hypertension when systolic blood pressure was at least 140 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure was less than 90 mmHg.

RESULTS

On-treatment isolated systolic hypertension occurred in 28% of evaluable patients (n = 11562) and in 36% of uncontrolled patients (n = 9080). Among the isolated systolic hypertension and among other uncontrolled patients, 53% and 47%, respectively, used more than one antihypertensive drug class. beta-Blockers were the most frequently prescribed antihypertensive drugs. Patients with isolated uncontrolled systolic blood pressure were more frequently treated with diuretics (43 vs. 39%) and angiotensin II receptor antagonists (23 vs. 17%). Despite blood pressure being under control in only 21% of the patients, hypertension treatment was not changed in 46% of patients with isolated uncontrolled systolic blood presssure vs. 14% of patients with both uncontrolled systolic and diastolic blood pressure.

CONCLUSION

In Belgium, the prevalence of on-treatment isolated systolic hypertension in treated hypertensive patients, was 28%. The goal blood pressure was likely not reached in most patients due to inadequate treatment. The overall control rate was worse for systolic than for diastolic blood pressure. Furthermore, antihypertensive treatment was less frequently adapted in patients with isolated uncontrolled systolic blood pressure than in those patients with both uncontrolled systolic and diastolic blood pressure.