Assessing the validity, responsiveness and meaningfulness of the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) as the clinical endpoint for hidradenitis suppurativa treatment

Clinical selection criteria in new clinical trials of hidradenitis suppurativa: External validity and implications on the daily clinical practice

INTRODUCTION

There are an increasing number of biologic drugs in the pipeline for treating hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Clinical trials for these drugs usually share the same clinical selection criteria.

OBJECTIVES

(a) To describe the clinical profile of HS patients receiving first-line biologic treatment in an HS clinic setting, (b) to assess how this population would meet clinical criteria to participate in a clinical trial, and (c) to assess treatment effectiveness at week 16 in eligible vs non-eligible patients.

METHODS

Prospective observational study. Patients were grouped according to their eligibility for clinical trials. The effectiveness of adalimumab was assessed by HiSCR, IHS4-category-change and a-50%-reduction on IHS4 at week 16.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were included in the study: eight (21.05%) were eligible for clinical trials and 30 (78.95%) were not. The main reason for non-eligibility was not having an AN count ≥5. Both groups presented similar number of draining tunnels. Effectiveness at week 16 was lower in non-eligible than eligible patients when evaluated by HiSCR-response but similar if evaluated by the IHS4-category-change or the 50%-reduction in IHS4.

CONCLUSION

In our population, the external validity of current eligibility criteria for clinical trials is low. Most patients receiving adalimumab in real-life setting would not be eligible for clinical trials.

Weekly adalimumab treatment decreased disease flare in hidradenitis suppurativa over 36 weeks: integrated results from the phase 3 PIONEER trials

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic skin disease characterized by inflammatory lesions that flare unpredictably. The impact of weekly adalimumab (ADAew) on HS flare is not well-characterized.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of disease flare on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in moderate-to-severe HS patients and to determine the effect of ADAew on disease flare using integrated data from two phase 3 trials over 36 weeks.

METHODS

In period A (12 weeks), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score change from baseline was compared in patients who flared and those who did not, regardless of treatment. The proportion of patients experiencing flare, duration of flare and time to flare was evaluated for ADAew vs. placebo (PBO). In period B (24 weeks), proportion of patients experiencing flare who received continuous ADAew treatment through 36 weeks was assessed.

RESULTS

HRQOL was markedly improved among those who did not experience flare. In period A, the proportion of patients who experienced flare was significantly lower with ADAew vs. PBO (12.3% vs. 35.3%, P < 0.001). ADAew patients also had longer time to first flare (101 days vs. 57 days; P < 0.001) and shorter flare duration (18.9 days vs. 32.0 days, respectively; P = 0.001) vs. PBO. Through 36 weeks of treatment, 20.2% of ADAew patients flared, and for those who achieved at least a partial clinical response to ADAew at 12 weeks, only 5.7% flared.

CONCLUSIONS

Flare reduction is an important measure in HS that correlates with clinically meaningful improvement in HRQOL. ADAew reduces HS flare through 12 and subsequent 36 weeks of treatment.

Biologic therapies for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa

Introduction: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic skin disorder characterized by inflammatory nodules, abscesses, and fistulae. Patients tend to present in young adulthood and are predominantly female. The pathogenesis of HS involves apopilosebaceous gland follicle occlusion and affected areas often occur where this type of gland predominates. Treatment selection depends on HS severity, which is included in different scoring systems. In recent years, biological therapies have been evaluated and used with increasing frequency in moderate-to-severe HS disease.Areas covered: This review focuses on biological therapies for HS as assessed in case reports, case series, and clinical trials. The efficacy, hidradenitis suppurativa scoring systems, and long-term results of these therapies are discussed depending on the studies' endpoints.Expert opinion: Adalimumab is currently the only FDA-approved HS biological therapy. Some patients do not experience treatment efficacy with adalimumab at 40 mg/week, which may result in increasing the dose or seeking other treatments. Infliximab is the next line of HS treatment with demonstrated efficacy. Other biological therapies being studied have demonstrated efficacy in small patient groups, but lack study power. Further studies may provide answers to seeking treatment options for patients who fail to improve on current standard HS treatment.

Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Current Understanding of Pathogenic Mechanisms and Suggestion for Treatment Algorithm

Hidradenitis suppurativa is one of the most distressing dermatological conditions and has a significant negative impact on patients' quality of life. However, the exact pathogenic mechanisms remain incompletely understood and-therefore-efficient therapies are still lacking. The current manuscript focuses on new findings on its pathogenic mechanisms and aims to provide practical therapy recommendations.

Creation of a severity index for hidradenitis suppurativa that includes a validated quality-of-life measure: the HIDRAscore

Background

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, debilitating disease with a considerable effect on patient quality of life. Its clinical severity can be measured using different scoring systems; however, few of them include patient‐centred parameters.

Objective

To create a new scoring system for HS that includes a quality‐of‐life instrument, the HIDRAdisk.

Methods

This post hoc analysis was carried out within the framework of a multicentre, longitudinal, epidemiologic study conducted over 9 months on quality‐of‐life aspects of HS. The new severity score was created using as reference a question from the Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (SSQ) concerning the severity of HS as evaluated by the patient. Associated variables were selected using univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. The discriminant capabilities of the final model and of the final score were evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the Hosmer–Lemeshow test.

Results

The study population included 308 patients with HS of any severity grade. According to the results of the regression models, the variables associated with the reference SSQ measure were number of inflammatory nodules, abscesses and draining fistulas; the HIDRAdisk score; and the number of subumbilical lesions. The HIDRAscore is obtained by the sum of the scores associated with the number of these parameters. Possible scores range from 0 to 10.

Conclusion

The HIDRAscore is a new scoring system for HS severity which, in addition to the clinical evaluation by the physician, includes a validated patient‐reported outcome measure, the HIDRAdisk.

Tuscan consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa

BACKGROUND

A rationalized model of clinical and therapeutic management of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) should place the patients at the heart of the process, facilitating their access to diagnostic tests and treatments, providing the appropriate care for each grade of disease severity and optimizing the use of healthcare resources, both in economic and human terms.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This paper reports the results of a Consensus of the Tuscany HS working group for a rationalized model of diagnosis and management of HS.

RESULTS

The diagnostic and therapeutic protocols, the available technological equipments and the management models, are presented in the light of today's scientific evidence.

CONCLUSION

The goal of the Consensus is to bring the issue of HS management to the attention of the Tuscan regional government, in order to create unanimously accepted diagnostic and therapeutic protocols.

The surgeon’s perspective: a retrospective study of wide local excisions taken to healthy subcutaneous fat in the management of advanced hidradenitis suppurativa

Background

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic debilitating folliculopilosebaceous disease that affects the skin most commonly in the axilla, groin, inframammary, genital and buttock areas. Surgical intervention may be an appropriate option in selected cases, but there is a risk of recurrence. The purpose of this study was to assess the results of wide local excision (WLE) to healthy subcutaneous fat with secondary intention healing in patients with HS who were under concurrent surgical and dermatologic care.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of 192 consecutive HS consultations to a general surgical service, identifying patients treated with WLE. Cases involving minor procedures (deroofing, incision and drainage) were excluded. Data on patient demographics, surgical site, method of closure, complications and recurrence were extracted from patient charts. We also conducted a literature review of surgical procedures in the management of HS.

Results

A total of 66 patients underwent 133 WLE to healthy subcutaneous fat. All patients were under concurrent medical care directed by a dermatologist. No medical therapies, including biological treatments, were interrupted or withheld for surgery. One hundred procedures were closed primarily with rotation or advancement flaps and 33 by secondary intention healing. Local recurrence occurred in 18% of primary closures and 18% of secondary intention closures (p = 0.98, χ2 test, no difference between groups). One patient with secondary intention healing returned to the emergency department for bleeding; 34% of patients with primary closure experienced some dehiscence (23% major, 11% minor separation). Two patients with axillary disease had restrictions in their ability to raise their arm that required physiotherapy. Median follow-up was 14.5 (range 1–55) months.

Conclusion

Resection to healthy subcutaneous fat during WLE provides disease control comparable to that with deeper resections, simplifying care.

A Phase II Open-Label Study of Bermekimab in Patients with Hidradenitis Suppurativa Shows Resolution of Inflammatory Lesions and Pain

The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bermekimab, an IL-1α inhibitor, in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). This study was a phase II, multicenter, open-label study of two dose cohorts of bermekimab in patients with moderate-to-severe HS who are naïve to or have failed prior anti-TNF therapy. Patients with HS (n = 42) were divided into groups A and B based on whether or not they had previously failed an anti-TNF therapy. In group A (n = 24), bermekimab was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 400 mg weekly (13 doses) in patients who had previously failed anti-TNF therapy; in group B (n = 18), bermekimab was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 400 mg weekly (13 doses) in patients who were anti-TNF naïve. Bermekimab, previously found to be effective in treating HS, was evaluated using a subcutaneous formulation in patients with HS naïve to or having failed anti-TNF therapy. There were no bermekimab-related adverse events with the exception of injection site reactions. Bermekimab was effective despite treatment history, with 61% and 63% of patients naïve to and having failed anti-TNF therapy, respectively, achieving HS clinical response after 12 weeks of treatment. A significant reduction in abscesses and inflammatory nodules of 60% (P < 0.004) and 46% (P < 0.001) was seen in anti-TNF naïve and anti-TNF failure groups, respectively. Clinically and statistically significant reduction was seen in patients experiencing pain, with the Visual Analogue Scale pain score reducing by 64% (P < 0.001) and 54% (P < 0.001) in the anti-TNF naïve and anti-TNF failure groups, respectively. IL-1α is emerging as an important clinical target for skin disease, and bermekimab may represent a new therapeutic option for treating moderate-to-severe HS.

Hidradenitis suppurativa: infection, autoimmunity, or both?

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease mainly affecting areas rich in apocrine glands. Clinically, is characterized by painful subcutaneous nodules and if left untreated to pus secretion, abscess and fistula formation. Its frequency is estimated to be 0.5-4% of the general population, affecting women more often. Pathogenesis of HS is still not clearly defined. It seems to be a combination of genetic factors with alterations in the skin microbiome. Furthermore, at tissue (i.e. skin) as well as at serum level, several inflammatory cytokines are upregulated. The most important of the latter are tumor necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin (IL)-1, IL-17, and IL-23. Adding another level of complexity, it has been suggested that keratinocytes might be intrinsically activated, contributing also to the observed inflammation. Interestingly, it has been noted that frequency of HS is increased in some autoimmune rheumatic diseases, such as spondyloarthropathies (SpA). Of note, both HS and SpA have relatively strong association with metabolic diseases and obesity implying that there are indeed some common underlying pathophysiological pathways. Although no specific microbe has been identified, alterations in the microbiome of the skin of these patients have been reported. Of note, microbes with a capability for biofilm formation are abundant. Treatment of HS among others, include antibiotics as well as biologic drugs targeting TNF and other cytokines and used for autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Herein, we review the current evidence on links between HS and autoimmune diseases and infectious diseases with a focus on epidemiology and pathophysiology.

Clinical response rates, placebo response rates, and significantly associated covariates are dependent on choice of outcome measure in hidradenitis suppurativa: A post hoc analysis of PIONEER 1 and 2 individual patient data

BACKGROUND

The hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response (HiSCR) is the gold standard primary outcome measure for hidradenitis suppurativa clinical trials; however, it does not assess the presence of draining tunnels, a common finding in advanced disease. It is unclear what the effect of the presence or absence of draining tunnels has on the efficacy of adalimumab therapy in moderate and advanced disease.

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the efficacy of adalimumab versus placebo using the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Scoring System (IHS4). Additionally, we assessed the effect of draining tunnels on therapeutic response as measured by both the HiSCR and change in nodule counts.

METHODS

Reanalysis was conducted with the IHS4 and PIONEER 1 and 2 individual patient data. Both binary outcomes (achieving HiSCR and achieving change in IHS4 severity category) and continuous outcomes (nodule counts and IHS4 score) were calculated with R. Regression modeling was undertaken to assess the effect of draining tunnels and other variables. P < .05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The significance of adalimumab therapy depended on the outcome measure used. Placebo response rates were highest when binary outcome measures were used. Draining tunnels, smoking, antibiotics, and body mass index influenced HiSCR response in PIONEER 2. Significant differences in disease severity were observed between PIONEER 1 and 2 data sets.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated placebo response rates in PIONEER 1 and 2 are partially attributable to the use of binary outcome measures. Draining tunnels influence clinical response as measured by HiSCR and nodule counts in PIONEER 2. Further investigation into the effect of body mass index on clinical response is required.

Biologic Treatment for Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) are often undertreated and there are limited efficacious therapies available for treating this population. Biologics are an emerging therapeutic modality used in the management of many inflammatory conditions including HS. Implementation of biologics is typically reserved for moderate-to-severe cases or in those cases that are refractory to treatment. Though many biologics have been trialed for use in HS, only one biologic, adalimumab, is currently US FDA (Food and Drug Administration) approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe HS. Limitations in the use of biologics for HS include the many scoring systems utilized in research studies and the relatively few well-designed, adequately powered clinical trials.

Severity and Area Score for Hidradenitis (SASH): a novel outcome measurement for hidradenitis suppurativa

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, inflammatory skin disease with a large impact on patients' health-related quality of life. However, reliable and consistent outcome measures to assess body surface area (BSA) of HS have not been established.

OBJECTIVES

To develop and assess the reliability and validity of a novel outcome instrument for assessment of HS BSA in a clinical trial setting.

METHODS

Qualitative interviews and focus groups were conducted from July to August 2015 and October 2017 to January 2018. Evaluation of the measurement was assessed during a single-day grading session with patients in April 2018. Participants, who included clinicians or patients, were recruited from academic medical centres in the U.S. mid-Atlantic region.

RESULTS

Concept elicitation included input from 10 providers, of which 60% (n = 6) were female, 80% (n = 8) dermatology specialists and 20% (n = 2) gynaecology specialists. Cognitive debriefing was conducted with 11 providers, of which 82% (n = 9) were dermatologists and 18% (n = 2) gynaecologists. The evaluation stage included 10 clinicians and 23 patients. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for inter-rater reliability was 0·60 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0·44-0·74]. The ICC for intrarater reliability was 0·98 (95% CI 0·94-1·00). Transformation of the BSA score resulted in an increase in inter-rater reliability to 0·75 (95% CI 0·62-0·85) or 0·76 (95% CI 0·62-0·85). Scores all demonstrated concurrent validity, with statistically significant correlations with extant scoring methods.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel scale is a reliable and valid HS outcome instrument and may capture a wide range of patients by assessing BSA. Future research is necessary to demonstrate its responsiveness. What's already known about this topic? The major HS disease activity scales rely on lesions counts and have moderate-to-good reliability. Body surface area (BSA) is one of the physical signs included in the Core Outcome Set for HS, but is not a part of existing HS disease activity scales. What does this study add? A novel disease severity scale, the Severity and Area Score for Hidradenitis (SASH), was developed and the psychometric properties assessed. There was high inter-rater reliability of 0·75 and 0·76 when BSA was scored on an ordinal scale, and an excellent intrarater reliability of 0·98. The SASH score also demonstrated convergent validity with extant instruments. What are the clinical implications of this work? The ability of clinicians to accurately assess disease status will be improved. Implementation of the SASH score will help guide and assess the effectiveness of appropriate treatment choice.

Adalimumab medium-term dosing strategy in moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa: integrated results from the phase III randomized placebo-controlled PIONEER trials

Background

Weekly adalimumab (Humira^®) is approved for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) based on the 12‐week placebo‐controlled periods of the two phase III PIONEER trials.

Objectives

Using PIONEER integrated trial results, we aimed to evaluate the optimal medium‐term adalimumab maintenance dosing strategy for moderate‐to‐severe HS.

Methods

Each trial had two double‐blind periods; 12‐week Period A and 24‐week Period B. Patients randomized to adalimumab 40 mg every week (ADAew) (Period A), were rerandomized in Period B to ADAew (ADAew/ew), ADA every other week (ADAew/eow), or placebo (ADAew/pbo). Placebo‐randomized patients were reassigned in Period B to ADAew (PIONEER I) or placebo (PIONEER II). The primary outcome was HS Clinical Response (HiSCR). Patients who lost response during Period B were discontinued from the study and offered an option to enter the open‐label extension (OLE) to receive ADAew. Results are reported across the two study periods, and data were combined from the two study periods and the OLE.

Results

For week‐12 HiSCR achievers, the HiSCR week‐36 rate was 48·1% (ADAew/ew) vs. 46·2% (ADAew/eow) and 32·1% (ADAew/pbo). Combining (post hoc) these patients with week‐12 partial responders further differentiated outcomes in Period B (ADAew/ew 55·7% vs. ADAew/eow 40·0% and ADAew/pbo 30·1%). Period‐B adverse‐event rates were ADAew/ew 59·6% vs. ADAew/eow 57·4% and ADAew/pbo 65·0%. One patient (ADAew/ew) reported a serious infection.

Conclusions

Weekly adalimumab treatment, effective throughout 36 weeks, was the optimal maintenance medium‐term dosing regimen for this population. At least partial response after 12 weeks with continued weekly dosing had better outcomes than dose reduction or interruption. Patients who do not show at least a partial response to weekly adalimumab by week 12 are unlikely to benefit from continued therapy. No new safety risks were identified.

What's already known about this topic?

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory disease, commonly misinterpreted as an infection and treated with long‐term antibiotic regimens or surgical incisions.

Based on the chronicity of HS and the lack of evidence for efficacious and safe long‐term HS treatments, it is important to evaluate medium‐ to long‐term therapies for HS.

Weekly adalimumab (Humira^®) is approved for the treatment of moderate‐to‐severe HS based on the two phase III PIONEER trials.

What does this study add?

This study pooled data from the two PIONEER trials, providing a more robust assessment of outcomes.

After at least partial treatment success with weekly adalimumab short‐term therapy (12 weeks), continuing weekly dosing during the subsequent 24 weeks had better outcomes than dose reduction or treatment interruption.

Patients who do not show at least a partial response to weekly adalimumab by week 12 are unlikely to benefit from continued therapy.

Linked Comment: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.18437.

https://www.bjdonline.com/article/adalimumab-medium-term-dosing-strategy-in-moderate-to-severe-hidradenitis-suppurativa-integrated-results-from-the-phase-iii-randomized-placebo-controlled-pioneer-t/

A Novel Severity Assessment Scoring System for Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Importance

The variation in both clinical appearance and responses to diverse treatment options emphasize the importance of an accurate, clinically relevant, yet easy-to-use scoring system in hidradenitis suppurativa.

Objective

To propose and provide validation data for the newly designed Severity Assessment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa score.

Design, Setting, and Participants

We prospectively assessed disease severity using Hurley staging and the modified Hidradenitis Suppurativa Score in 355 patients referred to Ruhr-University Bochum Department of Dermatology between March 2016 and June 2017. We also assessed disease severity via the Severity Assessment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa score.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Evaluation and assessment of convergent validity and responsiveness to treatment of the Severity Assessment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa score.

Results

Eighty-eight of the 355 patients (134 [37.7%] men and 221 [62.3%] women with a median [IQR] age of 40 [30-49] years) were classified as Hurley stage I, 221 were Hurley stage II, and 46 were Hurley stage III, with an overall median modified Hidradenitis Suppurativa Score of 31 (interquartile range [IQR], 19.3-53). The median total Severity Assessment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa score was 6 (IQR, 4-9), significantly different among the 3 Hurley groups. The median SAHS score for patients in Hurley stage I was 5 (IQR, 3-6), 6 (IQR, 5-9) for patients in Hurley stage II, and 9 (IQR, 7-12) for patients in Hurley stage III (P < .001, Kruskal-Wallis test). Correlation analysis showed a significant correlation between the modified Hidradenitis Suppurativa Score and the Severity Assessment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa score (r = 0.79, P < .001). Disease severity assessment before and after 3 months of conservative systemic treatment showed a significant correlation between the Severity Assessment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa score and modified Hidradenitis Suppurativa Score. Both the mHSS (P = .001) and the SAHS score (P < .001) significantly differed between the baseline visit (median mHSS, 33 [IQR, 24-52]; median SAHS score, 6 [IQR, 5-9]) and the 3-month visit (median mHSS, 28 [IQR, 15-43.5]; median SAHS score, 5 [IQR, 4-6.3]). The 2 patient-reported items demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability with intraclass correlation coefficient values greater than 0.8.

Conclusions and Relevance

Our validation data demonstrated that the Severity Assessment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa score is a disease severity instrument that significantly correlates with Hurley staging and the modified Hidradenitis Suppurativa Score, and is responsive enough to measure treatment outcome.

Quality of life measurement in hidradenitis suppurativa: position statement of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology task forces on Quality of Life and Patient-Oriented Outcomes and Acne, Rosacea and Hidradenitis Suppurativa

This paper is organized jointly by the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) Task Force (TF) on Quality of Life (QoL) and Patient-Oriented Outcomes and the EADV TF on acne, rosacea and hidradenitis suppurativa (ARHS). The purpose of this paper was to present current knowledge about QoL assessment in HS, including data on HS-specific health-related (HR) QoL instruments and HRQoL changes in clinical trials, and to make practical recommendations concerning the assessment of QoL in people with HS. HS results in significant quimp that is higher than in most other chronic skin diseases. HS impact in published studies was assessed predominantly (84% of studies) by the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). There is a lack of high-quality clinical trials in HS patients where HRQoL instruments have been used as outcome measures. One double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial on infliximab with low number of participants reported significantly better HRQoL improvement in the treatment group than in the placebo group. Well-designed clinical studies in HS patients to compare different treatment methods, including surgical methods and assessing long-term effects, are needed. Because of lack of sufficient validation, the Task Forces are not at present able to recommend existing HS-specific HRQoL instruments for use in clinical studies. The EADV TFs recommend the dermatology-specific DLQI questionnaire for use in HS patients. The EADV TFs encourage the further development, validation and use of other HS-specific, dermatology-specific and generic instruments but such use should be based on the principles presented in the previous publications of the EADV TF on QoL and Patient-Oriented Outcomes.

A narrative review of the definition of 'flare' in hidradenitis suppurativa

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, inflammatory condition that can have periodic worsening or flares. Measurement of flare is important because it can inform treatment efficacy; however, it is unclear how HS flare should be defined.

OBJECTIVES

This study reviewed the literature for definitions of HS flare.

METHODS

The PubMed MEDLINE online database was searched on 10 January 2018 and the search was repeated on 8 December 2018 for new publications. Titles and abstracts were screened for inclusion. Subsequently, full articles were screened for inclusion. Papers were included if the publication was a systematic review, clinical trial, cohort study, case report or series, or cross-sectional study. Studies were excluded if they were journalistic reviews, did not discuss clinical findings of HS or did not use the words 'flare', 'exacerbation', 'relapse' or 'recurrence'.

RESULTS

Two hundred and seventy-four papers were identified and 154 fulfilled the study criteria. Of these, 27 (17.5%) included the term 'flare' and 16 (10.4%) included the term 'exacerbation'. Two of the 27 papers (7%) defined the term flare and both included patient report of changes in symptoms or signs. One of 16 papers (6%) defined exacerbation, which was taken as one new HS lesion. The terms 'recurrence' and 'relapse' were more apt to be defined: 13% (13 of 100) and 14% (six of 44), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The lack of a specific and measurable definition of HS flare is a barrier to assessment of this important outcome. Once a specific and measurable definition is established, validated and reliable measures of HS flare can be incorporated into future studies. What's already known about this topic? Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, relapsing inflammatory skin condition. The ability to assess flares is important to people who have HS; however, it is unclear how this is defined. HS flare is one of the core outcomes in the core outcome set for HS clinical trials; however, it is unclear how this should be assessed. What does this study add? This literature review reveals the paucity of measurable definitions associated with the use of the term 'flare' in the HS literature. It also highlights the variation and lack of a validated and reliable measure of HS flare.

Chitinase-3-like Protein 1 (YKL-40) Is Expressed in Lesional Skin in Hidradenitis Suppurativa

BACKGROUND/AIM

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic disease. Recently, we suggested, chitinase-3-like protein 1 (YKL-40) as a new biomarker for HS since its serum levels were found to be elevated in patients. The objective of this study was to examine YKL-40 tissue expression in HS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was conducted on 7 patients with HS. The biopsies were obtained from lesional and non-lesional skin. The tissue expression of YKL-40 was assessed using an immunohistochemical method.

RESULTS

Inflammatory infiltrates of various grades were visible in all samples of lesional skin. The inflammatory cells within those infiltrates showed a strong cytoplasmic expression of YKL-40. In non-lesional HS skin the pattern of YKL-40 expression was similar to that observed in healthy skin.

CONCLUSION

Inflammatory infiltrates in HS skin lesions may be responsible for the elevated YKL-40 serum level. YKL-40 can be considered one of the most valuable biomarkers of HS.

Consensus on the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa - Brazilian Society of Dermatology

Hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic immune mediated disease of universal distribution that causes great damage to the quality of life of the affected individual, whose prevalence is estimated at 0.41% in the Brazilian population. The objective of this work was update on physiopathogenesis, diagnosis and classification of hidradenitis suppurativa and to establish therapeutic recommendations in the Brazilian reality. It was organized as a work group composed of eight dermatologists from several institutions of the country with experience in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa and carried out review on the topic. Recommendations were elaborated and voted by modified Delphi system and statistical analysis of the results was performed. The Brazilian consensus on the clinical approach of hidradenitis suppurativa had the support of the Brazilian Society of Dermatology.

HIDRAdisk: validation of an innovative visual tool to assess the burden of hidradenitis suppurativa

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, relapsing, inflammatory skin disease characterized by painful inflamed nodules, recurrent abscesses and fistulas located in apocrine gland-bearing body sites. The negative impact of HS on patient's quality of life (QoL) has been reported to be greater than other dermatologic conditions as psoriasis and atopic eczema, and its improvement is an important goal in disease management. Nowadays, there are no specific validated QoL instruments available for HS and generic dermatologic questionnaires are used.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to demonstrate the validity, reliability and responsiveness of HIDRAdisk, a new innovative tool designed for rapid assessment of HS burden and, at the same time, an intuitive graphic visualization of the measurement outcome.

METHODS

A multicentre, longitudinal, observational study was conducted to validate the HIDRAdisk compared with other validated questionnaires [Skindex-16, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Work Productivity and Activity Impairment-General Health (WPAI:GH)] and to evaluate its correlation with disease severity in Italian patients with any degree of HS severity, as measured by Hurley stage and HS Physician Global Assessment (HS-PGA).

RESULTS

A total of 140 patients (59% women; mean age 34.9 ± 11.0 years) were enrolled in 27 dermatologic centres. HIDRAdisk showed a strong correlation with Skindex-16 and DLQI, and a good one with WPAI:GH (correlation coefficient: 0.7568, 0.6651 and 0.5947, respectively) and a statistically significant correlation with both Hurley stage and HS-PGA. Very good internal consistency (Cronbach coefficient >0.80; intraclass correlation coefficient >0.6), with correlation between the 10 items, good test-retest reliability (Spearman correlation coefficient, 0.8331; P < 0.0001) and responsiveness to changes were demonstrated.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that HIDRAdisk, a short and innovative visual HS QoL instrument, has been psychometrically validated in Italian language and it may help improve the management of HS once implemented in routine clinical practice.

A quantitative method for measuring the relationship between an objective endpoint and patient reported outcome measures

Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) become increasingly important for assessing the effectiveness of a drug or medical device. In order for a PROM to be claimed in labeling, the PROM has to be valid, reliable and able to detect a change if the targeted disease status changes. One approach to assess the quality of a patient reported outcome measure (PROM) is to investigate the association between the PROM and an objective clinical endpoint measuring the status of a disease/condition. However, methods assessing the association between continuous and discrete variables are limited, especially for correlated measurements. In this paper, we propose a method to assess such association with any type of samples with or without correlation. The method involves estimating the probability revealing the status of a subject’s disease/condition (called truth thereafter) through the subject’s reported outcomes. The probability is a conditional probability revealing truth given the relative location of the subject’s objective outcome compared to the subject-specific latent threshold in the objective endpoint. A consistent estimator for the probability is derived. The operating characteristics of the consistent estimator are illustrated using simulation. Our method is applied to hypothetical clinical trial data generated for an ophthalmic device as an illustration.

Hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa: a practical framework for treatment optimization - systematic review and recommendations from the HS ALLIANCE working group

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS)/acne inversa is a debilitating chronic disease that remains poorly understood and difficult to manage. Clinical practice is variable, and there is a need for international, evidence‐based and easily applicable consensus on HS management. We report here the findings of a systematic literature review, which were subsequently used as a basis for the development of international consensus recommendations for the management of patients with HS. A systematic literature review was performed for each of nine clinical questions in HS (defined by an expert steering committee), covering comorbidity assessment, therapy (medical, surgical and combinations) and response to treatment. Included articles underwent data extraction and were graded according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence‐based Medicine criteria. Evidence‐based recommendations were then drafted, refined and voted upon, using a modified Delphi process. Overall, 5310 articles were screened, 171 articles were analysed, and 65 were used to derive recommendations. These articles included six randomized controlled trials plus cohort studies and case series. The highest level of evidence concerned dosing recommendations for topical clindamycin in mild disease (with systemic tetracyclines for more frequent/widespread lesions) and biologic therapy (especially adalimumab) as second‐line agents (following conventional therapy failure). Good‐quality evidence was available for the hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response (HiSCR) as a dichotomous outcome measure in inflammatory areas under treatment. Lower‐level evidence supported recommendations for topical triclosan and oral zinc in mild‐to‐moderate HS, systemic clindamycin and rifampicin in moderate HS and intravenous ertapenem in selected patients with more severe disease. Intralesional or systemic steroids may also be considered. Local surgical excision is suggested for mild‐to‐moderate HS, with wide excision for more extensive disease. Despite a paucity of good‐quality data on management decisions in HS, this systematic review has enabled the development of robust and easily applicable clinical recommendations for international physicians based on graded evidence.

Efficacy of adalimumab in moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa: Real life data

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a relapsing, inflammatory disease characterized by painful nodules, abscesses, sinuses track formation and scarring. HS has a great impact on patients’ quality of life and its treatment may be really challenging. Adalimumab provides a new therapeutic option for HS. Our aim was to assess the therapeutic potential of adalimumab on patients with HS based on the data from the daily clinical practice of an HS Outpatient Clinic. 19 patients with clinically evident moderate to severe HS, under adalimumab treatment for at least 24 week, participated in this observational, retrospective study. The Hidradenitis Suppurativa Physician’s Global Assessment scale, Modified Santorius scale and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at baseline, week 4, week 12 and week 24 were retrieved from the records. Both Modified Santorius score and DLQI were significantly decreased during the weeks of evaluation (Friedman’s test; P < 0.001). The proportion of patients who achieved clinical response was 10.5% (n = 2) at week 4, 42.1% (n = 8) at week 12 and 63.2% (n = 12) at week 24. Treatment with adalimumab was linked with both clinical remission of HS and improvement of patients’ quality of life.

Reliability of the hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response in the assessment of patients with hidradenitis suppurativa

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response (HiSCR) is a validated clinical end point for measuring response to treatment in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Previous studies have reported on the validity, responsiveness and meaningfulness of the HiSCR.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the HiSCR for inter- and intrarater reliability characteristics.

METHODS

A stand-alone, two-site, prospective, non-interventional observational study consisted of 22 patients, with self-reported severity between mild, moderate and severe HS. The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) scale was completed by patients at Timepoint 2. Descriptive statistics of Hurley Stage, total abscesses, total draining fistulas, total inflammatory nodules and total AN count (sum of inflammatory nodules and lesions) were reported at two timepoints. Inter-rater reliability and intrarater reliability for the HS lesion count tool were evaluated at two timepoints (baseline and Day 7) using the HS lesion count tool. Intraclass correlation (ICC) coefficients of lesion counts were calculated to evaluate inter- and intrarater reliability of lesion counts between pairs of dermatologists.

RESULTS

The majority of patients demonstrated either no change or minimally worse PGI-C in HS scores. Descriptive statistics were similar between rater groups and timepoints assessed. Inter-rater ICC coefficients for abscess count at Timepoints 1 and 2 were 0.38 and 0.67. The ICC coefficients for draining fistula and AN count were ≥0.61 at both timepoints. In an exploratory model, ICC coefficients were ≥0.68 for all evaluated lesion counts. The test-retest reliability using ICC coefficients was ≥0.70 for total abscess, draining fistula, inflammatory nodule and AN count.

CONCLUSION

The HS lesion count tool had an acceptable inter- and intrarater reliability, indicating that HiSCR has a strong degree of reproducibility and consistency in the evaluation of patients with HS.

Current and future treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa

This scholarly review on the current and future treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) focuses on medical and surgical treatment options, while novel pipeline drugs are also discussed. Treatment goals are to limit the incidence and duration of flares, reducing inflammation and suppuration, achieving local cure after surgery and, most importantly, to improve the quality of life of patients with HS. The type of medication and/or surgery should be chosen based on the stage of the disease and the degree of inflammation. However, the lack of a simple scoring system and the lack of clear surgical outcome definitions hamper the interpretation of treatment efficacy and the comparison between different treatment strategies. The therapeutic pipeline for HS is gradually expanding, and will probably lead to a broader panel of more effective therapeutic options.

Apremilast for moderate hidradenitis suppurativa: Results of a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Effective anti-inflammatory treatments for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) are limited.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and short-term safety of apremilast in patients with moderate HS.

METHODS

A total of 20 patients with moderate HS were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to receive blinded treatment with apremilast, 30 mg twice daily, or placebo for 16 weeks. The primary outcome was the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response at week 16. Linear mixed effects modeling (analysis of covariance) was used to assess secondary clinical outcomes between treatment groups.

RESULTS

The HS clinical response was met in 8 of 15 patients in the apremilast group (53.3%) and none of 5 patients in the placebo group (0%) (P = .055) at week 16. Moreover, the apremilast-treated patients showed a significantly lower abscess and nodule count (mean difference, -2.6; 95% confidence interval, -6.0 to -0.9; P = .011), NRS for pain (mean difference, -2.7; 95% -4.5 to -0.9; P = .009), and itch (mean difference, -2.8; 95% confidence interval, -5.0 to -0.6; P = .015) over 16 weeks compared with the placebo-treated patients. There was no significant difference in the Dermatology Life Quality Index over time between the 2 treatment groups (mean difference, -3.4; 95% confidence interval, -9.0 to 2.3; P = .230). The most frequently reported adverse events in the apremilast-treated patients were mild-to-moderate headache and gastrointestinal symptoms, which did not result in dropouts.

LIMITATIONS

Small number of patients, relatively short study duration.

CONCLUSION

Apremilast, at a dose of 30 mg twice daily, demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy and was generally well tolerated in patients with moderate HS.

Prevalence of antinuclear antibodies in hidradenitis suppurativa

AIM

The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of antinuclear antibody (ANA) positivity in a cohort of patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), and to assess the frequency of seroconversion during treatment with tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitor therapy.

METHODS

This prospective study was conducted through the Wound Etiology and Healing (WE-HEAL) Study. Immunofluorescence ANA testing was performed at baseline, and repeated when clinically indicated. ANA titers of ≥1 : 160 were considered positive. Data were collected on demographics and disease activity scores including the Hurley stage, the HS Sartorius score (HSS) and the active nodule (AN) count.

RESULTS

At the time of data lock, 73 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of HS were enrolled, and four (5.4%) had baseline positive ANA. None of the patients had clinical evidence of systemic lupus erythematosus or other autoimmune diseases. There were no significant differences in demographics, baseline HSS (43.25 ± 47.55 compared to 59.48 ± 56.67, P = 0.58) or AN count (3.25 ± 3.20 compared to 3.45 ± 2.36, P = 0.87) in the ANA positive group. Of the 69 patients who were ANA negative at enrollment, 31 (45%) received TNF-α inhibitor therapy. During follow up, one patient developed drug-induced lupus secondary to TNF-α inhibitor use. Additionally, one patient seroconverted to ANA positive without sequelae and one patient developed drug-induced hepatitis secondary to TNF-α inhibitor use.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of baseline ANA positivity in this HS population was similar to that seen in the general population (5.4%). The rate of seroconversion and drug-induced complications in this population were low.

Long-term adalimumab efficacy in patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa: 3-year results of a phase 3 open-label extension study

BACKGROUND

The optimal long-term dosing strategy for adalimumab (ADA) in hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa (HS) was evaluated by pooling the results of the PIONEER phase 3 trials and an open-label extension (OLE) study.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the response to and tolerability of long-term administration of ADA in HS.

METHODS

The durations of the PIONEER I/II periods A, B, and OLE were 12, 24, and 52 or more weeks, respectively. Patients who entered the OLE and received ADA (40 mg every week continuously) and responders plus partial responders (PRRs) were evaluated. Primary efficacy assessments included measurement of HS clinical response (HiSCR), lesion counts, skin pain, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Treatment-emergent adverse events were assessed.

RESULTS

At week 12, 52.3% of those receiving ADA weekly and 73.0% of PRRs achieved HiSCR. Achievement of HiSCR was maintained through week 168 in 52.3% of patients who received ADA weekly and 57.1% of PRRs. Sustained improvement in lesion counts, skin pain, and DLQI score were also observed. The safety profile throughout the OLE was similar to the profiles observed in the PIONEER studies.

LIMITATIONS

The OLE was uncontrolled.

CONCLUSION

Continuous weekly dosing with ADA, 40 mg, is a reasonable treatment option for long-term control of moderate-to-severe HS.

Prevalence of positive QuantiFERON gold in-tube testing in hidradenitis suppurativa

AIM

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, recurrent, inflammatory disease of the apocrine sweat glands. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors are commonly used to treat HS. However, prior to initiating therapy patients must be screened for mycobacterium tuberculosis (mTB) exposure. Several mTB screening tests based on interferon gamma release assays are commercially available, but the performance of these assays in the HS population is unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate the performance of the QuantiFERON gold in-tube assay (QFT-GIT) in a cohort of patients with HS.

METHODS

This prospective study was conducted through the Wound Etiology and Healing (WE-HEAL) study. QFTGIT testing was performed using a commercial laboratory. Patients with positive test results underwent follow-up testing to evaluate for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). Data were collected on demographics and disease activity scores including Hurley stage, HS Sartorius score (HSS) and active nodule (AN) count.

RESULTS

Of the 69 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of HS, seven (10.1%) tested QFT-GIT positive and 5.8% were diagnosed with LTBI.

CONCLUSIONS

QFT-GIT results did not correlate with demographic characteristics or HS disease activity.

Longitudinal observational study of hidradenitis suppurativa: impact of surgical intervention with adjunctive biologic therapy

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis supppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the apocrine sweat glands affecting 1-4% of the population. While surgical excision is a mainstay of therapy, lesions often recur. Biologic therapies, including tumor necrosis factor-α and IL-12/23 inhibitors, are effective for mild to moderate HS. However, longitudinal studies investigating biologic therapy in conjunction with surgery are limited. The purpose of this analysis was to investigate impact of surgery and biologic therapy on HS disease activity.

METHODS

Data from 68 HS patients were analyzed. Outcome measures included hidradenitis suppurativa Sartorius Score (HSS), active nodule (AN) count, Hurley stage, and probability of achieving 75% reduction in active nodule count (AN75).

RESULTS

Mean age was 40 ± 14 years; 66% were female and 72% were African American. Mean disease duration was 10 years, and Hurley stage III disease was seen in 63% of patients. Patients who received biologics had a larger drop in HSS and AN count than those who never received biologics (P = 0.002). Biologic treatment was associated with average reduction in 22 (15-29) HSS points (P < 0.0001). The effect of biologics was greater in patients who also underwent surgery (P = 0.013). Timing of biologics relative to surgery did not impact efficacy. Patients who received HS surgery with biologic therapy were most likely to achieve the AN75 (P = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

In this diverse cohort of patients with severe HS, biologic therapy was associated with a more rapid decline in disease activity, with the greatest effect in patients who also underwent HS surgery.

Investigational drugs in clinical trials for Hidradenitis Suppurativa

INTRODUCTION

Hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic skin disease with a significant unmet need for treatment options. Randomized controlled trials are few and only a single drug (adalimumab) has Hidradenitis as a registered indication.

AREAS COVERED

The clinicaltrials.gov and the EudraCT clinical trials register for reported trials on Hidradenitis Suppurativa was searched on the 22-06-2017. Trials for upcoming new drugs for HS are reported focusing on drugs in phase I and II trials.The clinicaltrials.gov and the EudraCT clinical trials register for reported trials on Hidradenitis Suppurativa was searched on the 22-06-2017. Trials for upcoming new drugs for HS are reported focusing on drugs in phase I and II trials.

EXPERT OPINION

Currently, MABp1, Secukinumab, CJM112, Apremilast and IFX-1 are being investigated in Phase I and II trials and offer theoretical and promising new treatment options. A trial with the drug MEDI8968 has been terminated with disappointing results. Metformin, Botulinum Toxin B, Provodine, Benzoyl Peroxide and intralesional triamcinolone are being tested as well. Treatment of Hidradenitis remains a challenge and quality RTCs are needed. Studies indicates a range of potential targets for therapy such as interleukin-1 and interleukin-17, but 'broad-spectrum' immunosuppressants like phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors are being examined as well. A range of outcomes, including Physician Global Assessment, Sartorius scores and hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response are used in these trials, making future meta-analysis of the data difficult.

[Acne inversa/hidradenitis suppurativa: An update]

Acne inversa (AI)/hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic, recurrent, immune-mediated dermatosis characterized by deep inflammatory nodules, abscesses, fistulas, and undermined scars in skin areas bearing apocrine glands. In addition to the cutaneous manifestation, numerous AI patients show metabolic changes, spondyloarthritis, and depression. AI leads to a strong reduction in the quality of life and an impairment of the sexual life of affected individuals and often culminates in social withdrawal, stigmatization, unemployment, and suicidal thoughts. In this overview, we summarized the most important facts about AI and propose a simple algorithm for therapy.

MABp1 Targeting IL-1α for Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa Not Eligible for Adalimumab: A Randomized Study

Patients with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa failing adalimumab therapy, or those ineligible to receive it, remain a population with an unmet need. Twenty patients not eligible for adalimumab were randomized to receive 12 weeks of blind treatment with placebo or MABp1, a true human antibody targeting IL-1α. Hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response score at week 12 was the primary endpoint. The primary endpoint was met in 10% and 60% of placebo- and MABp1-treated patients, respectively (odds ratio = 13.50, 95% confidence interval = 1.19-152.51). Clinical efficacy was maintained at 24 weeks in 0% and 40%. Improvement in the visual analog scale was reported by 20% and 85.7%, respectively, of patients failing previous anti-TNF treatment. Ultrasonography showed decreased neovascularization and lesion skin depth in the MABp1 group. MABp1 treatment was associated with decrease of circulating IL-8 and of stimulated production of IL-8 by whole blood. Whole blood production for hBD-2 was negatively associated with changes on ultrasonography in the placebo group but not in the MABp1 group. MABp1 is a promising treatment for patients with hidradenitis suppurativa not eligible for adalimumab. Inhibition of neovascularization and modulation of the production of IL-8 and hBD-2 are suggested mechanisms of action.

Development and validation of the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4), a novel dynamic scoring system to assess HS severity

BACKGROUND

A validated tool for the dynamic severity assessment of hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa (HS) is lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To develop and validate a novel dynamic scoring system to assess the severity of HS.

METHODS

A Delphi voting procedure was conducted among the members of the European Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundation (EHSF) to achieve consensus towards an initial HS Severity Score System (HS4). Strengths and weaknesses of HS4 were examined by a multicentre prospective study. Multivariate logistic regression, discriminant analysis and receiver operating characteristic curves, as well as examination for correlation (Spearman's rho) and agreement (Cohen's kappa) with existing scores, were engaged to recognize the variables for a new International HS4 (IHS4) that was established by a second Delphi round.

RESULTS

Consensus HS4 was based on number of skin lesions, number of skin areas involved and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and was evaluated by a sample of 236 patients from 11 centres. Subsequently, a multivariate regression model calculated adjusted odds ratios for several clinical signs. Nodules, abscesses and draining tunnels resulted as the scoring variables. Three candidate scores were presented to the second Delphi round. The resulting IHS4 score is arrived at by the number of nodules (multiplied by 1) plus the number of abscesses (multiplied by 2) plus the number of draining tunnels (multiplied by 4). A total score of 3 or less signifies mild, 4-10 signifies moderate and 11 or higher signifies severe disease. Cohen's kappa was fair (κ = 0·32) compared with Hurley classification, and moderate (κ = 0·49) compared with Expert Opinion. Correlation was good (ρ > 0·6) with Hurley classification, Expert Opinion, Physician's Global Assessment and Modified Sartorius score, and moderate for DLQI (ρ = 0·36).

CONCLUSIONS

The novel IHS4 is a validated tool to dynamically assess HS severity and can be used both in real-life and the clinical trials setting.