Insulin-associated weight gain in obese type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: What can be done?

Rationale for Timely Insulin Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes Within the Framework of Individualised Treatment: 2020 Update

Type 2 diabetes is characterised by chronic hyperglycaemia and variable degrees of insulin deficiency and resistance. Hyperglycaemia and elevated fatty acids exert harmful effects on β-cell function, regeneration and apoptosis (gluco-lipotoxicity). Furthermore, chronic hyperglycaemia triggers a vicious cycle of insulin resistance, low-grade inflammation and a cascade of pro-atherogenic processes. Thus, timely near to normal glucose control is of utmost importance in the management of type 2 diabetes and prevention of micro- and macroangiopathy. The majority of patients are multimorbid and obese, with critical comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease, heart failure and chronic kidney disease. Recently published guidelines therefore recommend patient-centred risk/benefit-balanced use of oral glucose-lowering drugs or a glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, or switching to insulin with glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) out of target. This article covers the indications of early insulin treatment to prevent diabetes-related complications, particularly in subgroups with severe insulin deficit, and to achieve recovery of residual β-cell function. Furthermore, the individualised, risk/benefit-balanced, timely initiation of insulin as second and third option is analysed. Timely insulin initiation may prevent diabetes progression, reduce diabetes-related complications and has less serious adverse effects. Basal insulin is the preferred option in most clinical situations with consequences of undertreatment of chronic hyperglycaemia.

Efficacy of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A numerous studies have reported that obese patients (OP) are easily to have type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Although a variety of managements are available to treat such disorder, their efficacy is still limited. Previous studies have reported that laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSGT) can benefit OP with T2DM. However, no study specifically and systematically explores this topic. Thus, this study will assess the efficacy and complications of LSGT for the management of OP with T2DM.

METHODS

The search strategy will be performed in the electronic databases from inception to the March 31, 2020 without limitations of language and publication time: PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, AMED, WANGFANG, VIP, and CNKI. Two authors will independently identify the articles, collect the data, and assess the risk of bias using Cochrane risk of bias tool. We will invite a third author to solve any differences between two authors. We will use RevMan 5.3 software to investigate the statistical analysis.

RESULTS

This study will supply a high-quality synthesis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the analysis of LSGT for the management of OP with T2DM.

CONCLUSIONS

This study will help to build proposals that aim at providing high quality RCTs in the management of LSGT in OP with T2DM.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

INPLASY202040128.

Performance and improvement of the DiaRem score in diabetes remission prediction: a study with diverse procedure types

BACKGROUND

The DiaRem score has proven to be a reliable predictor tool for diabetes remission in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), as well as laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). To our knowledge there are no studies that analyze DiaRem in patients undergoing biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS).

OBJECTIVE

To test the validity of the DiaRem score as a predictor of type 2 diabetes remission at 1 year post surgery in patients who underwent LABG, LSG, RYGB, and BPD/DS, as well as to develop and test a novel model that uses DiaRem to predict type 2 diabetes remission by procedure type (LABG, LSG, RYGB, and BPD/DS).

SETTING

University Medical Center, United States.

METHODS

A retrospective review of institutional records identified patients who underwent primary bariatric procedures (LAGB, LSG, RYGB, and BPD/DS) between January 1, 2000 to April 10, 2017, had a diagnosis of diabetes and had complete preoperative and 1-year postoperative follow-up information. A univariable logistic regression model was fit to assess the association between DiaRem score and diabetes remission. A multivariable logistic regression model was created, including procedure type and other preoperative characteristics. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) was calculated to analyze the performance of both models for the entire cohort as well as a BPD/DS only subgroup.

RESULTS

A total study cohort of 602 was obtained. The majority of patients underwent RYGB (456; 75.7%), followed by LSG (84; 14.0%), BPD/DS (35; 5.8%), and LAGB (27; 4.5%). The multivariable regression model with RYGB as the reference procedure, showed that BPD/DS results in higher odds of type 2 diabetes remission at 1 year post surgery (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27, 8.51), while LSG (adjusted OR .52, 95%CI .29, .93) and LAGB resulted in lower odds (adjusted OR.23, 95% CI.09,.60). The univariable DiaRem model and the novel model were determined to be moderately strong in classifying diabetes remission in the entire cohort (AUROC: .79, 95% CI: .75, .83 and .82, 95% CI: .79, .85, respectively) as well as in the BPD/DS sub-group (AUROC: .85, 95% CI: .70, .99 and .84, 95% CI .69, .99, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that the DiaRem score is a reliable tool to predict diabetes remission, amongst a wide variety of different procedures as well as specifically those receiving BPD/DS. Our novel model, which takes into account procedure type, not only shows that BPD/DS patients have the highest odds of diabetes remission than other procedures, but also that this model performs significantly better at predicting diabetes remission than DiaRem alone.

GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Call of Attention to Nephrologists

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) represents the main cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESKD), and diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in diabetes. Despite advances in the nephroprotective treatment of T2DM, DKD remains the most common complication, driving the need for renal replacement therapies (RRT) worldwide, and its incidence is increasing. Until recently, prevention of DKD progression was based around strict blood pressure (BP) control, using renin-angiotensin system blockers that simultaneously reduce BP and proteinuria, adequate glycemic control and control of cardiovascular risk factors. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) are a new class of anti-hyperglycemic drugs shown to improve cardiovascular and renal events in DKD. In this regard, GLP-1RA offer the potential for adequate glycemic control in multiple stages of DKD without an increased risk of hypoglycemia, preventing the onset of macroalbuminuria and slowing the decline of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in diabetic patients, also bringing additional benefit in weight reduction, cardiovascular and other kidney outcomes. Results from ongoing trials are pending to assess the impact of GLP-1RA treatments on primary kidney endpoints in DKD.

Evaluating the effectiveness and feasibility of nurse-led distant and face-to-face interviews programs for promoting behavioral change and disease management in patients with diabetic nephropathy: a triangulation approach

BACKGROUND

We examined whether telecommunication-device-based distance interviews are inferior to face-to-face interviews in terms of facilitating behavioral changes and disease management in patients with diabetic nephropathy. We also examined the feasibility of a newly designed six-month telenursing program.

METHODS

This study represents a post-hoc analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial, in which we compared the efficacy of remote self-management education with that of direct education for patients with diabetic nephropathy. The participants were 40 company employees, who were randomly divided into two groups. Over 6 months, the intervention group (n = 21) received three distance interviews using a tablet computer. Meanwhile, the control group (n = 19) received three face-to-face interviews. In addition, both groups received biweekly nine telephone calls. A triangulation approach was used. We first compared the two groups in inferiority tests. Then, we analyzed data from semi-structured interviews with all participants and nurses, examining whether trusting relationships and motivation were developed, and the accuracy of the information exchanges. Further, for the intervention group, we also enquired about the overall operability of the telenursing device.

RESULTS

The completion rates for the program were 81.0 and 78.9% for the participants in the intervention and control groups, respectively. Both groups showed similar behavioral changes, and the participants verified the feasibility of the distance interviews. The participants in the intervention group felt that they understood the severity of their diseases and the necessity of self-management, and felt confidence in the nurses. On the other hand, their degree of behavioral change regarding self-monitoring was lower than that shown by the control group.

CONCLUSION

Our findings show that both interview methods are effective for encouraging the adoption of self-management; further, in terms of taking medication and improving the main clinical indicators, we found that the distance method is not inferior to the direct face-to-face method. However, when considering long-term effects, based on the respective degrees of improvement in behavioral change, the direct method seems to be more effective.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network clinical trial registry (No. UMIN000026568) on March 15, 2017, retrospectively.

Association of Apolipoprotein e2 Allele with Insulin Resistance and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Among an Admixed Population of Mexico

PURPOSE

This study aimed to analyze the association of the apolipoprotein E (ApoE) polymorphisms with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) among the admixed population of West Mexico.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

ApoE genotypes were determined in 168 T2DM patients and 449 non-diabetic control subjects from the general admixed population of West Mexico. The non-diabetic subjects were stratified according to body mass index (BMI) in normal weight (n=186), overweight (n=138), and obesity (n=125). ApoE genotypes were assessed by using a TaqMan allelic discrimination assay, insulin resistance (IR) by HOMA-IR, and biochemistry with a dry chemistry assay.

RESULTS

The rate of dyslipidemias and IR increased by BMI category among the control subjects. The greater shift in the prevalence of dyslipidemia was observed from normal weight (51.4%) to overweight (76.6%), p<0.01. Normal weight or obese e4 allele carriers had a higher level of total cholesterol and hypercholesterolemia than non-e4 carriers. Among the T2DM patients, the e2 carriers had abnormal HOMA-IR value than the non-e2 carriers (p=0.002). Comparatively, between the T2DM patients vs non-diabetics, the e2e3 genotype or e2 allele conferred a higher risk for T2DM (adjusted OR= 2.36, 95% CI 1.28-4.34, p=0.006 and adjusted OR=2.1, 95% Cl 1.20-3.79, p=0.009, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The ApoE e2 allele was associated with IR and the risk of T2DM in subjects from the general admixed population of West Mexico.

Low-energy total diet replacement intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity treated with insulin: a randomized trial

OBJECTIVES

The management of patients with long-standing type 2 diabetes and obesity receiving insulin therapy (IT) is a substantial clinical challenge. Our objective was to examine the effect of a low-energy total diet replacement (TDR) intervention versus standardized dietetic care in patients with long-standing type 2 diabetes and obesity receiving IT.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In a prospective randomized controlled trial, 90 participants with type 2 diabetes and obesity receiving IT were assigned to either a low-energy TDR (intervention) or standardized dietetic care (control) in an outpatient setting. The primary outcome was weight loss at 12 months with secondary outcomes including glycemic control, insulin burden and quality of life (QoL).

RESULTS

Mean weight loss at 12 months was 9.8 kg (SD 4.9) in the intervention and 5.6 kg (SD 6.1) in the control group (adjusted mean difference -4.3 kg, 95% CI -6.3 to 2.3, p<0.001). IT was discontinued in 39.4% of the intervention group compared with 5.6% of the control group among completers. Insulin requirements fell by 47.3 units (SD 36.4) in the intervention compared with 33.3 units (SD 52.9) in the control (-18.6 units, 95% CI -29.2 to -7.9, p=0.001). Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) fell significantly in the intervention group (4.7 mmol/mol; p=0.02). QoL improved in the intervention group of 11.1 points (SD 21.8) compared with 0.71 points (SD 19.4) in the control (8.6 points, 95% CI 2.0 to 15.2, p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with advanced type 2 diabetes and obesity receiving IT achieved greater weight loss using a TDR intervention while also reducing or stopping IT and improving glycemic control and QoL. The TDR approach is a safe treatment option in this challenging patient group but requires maintenance support for long-term success.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN21335883.

Effects of fasting intervention regulating anthropometric and metabolic parameters in subjects with overweight or obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Previous studies have shown that fasting produces a potential effect in the prevention and treatment of many diseases.

Clinical potential of treatment with semaglutide in type 2 diabetes patients

Glucagon-like receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are included in current national and international guidelines as second-line treatment especially in patients with type 2 diabetes and concomitant cardiovascular disease (CVD). First-generation GLP-1RAs were two- or once-daily injectables, but longer-acting GLP-1RAs have now been developed for once-weekly administration – e.g., exenatide ER, dulaglutide and semaglutide. With semaglutide, the same prolongation principle as designed in liraglutide is used (spacer and fatty acid chain). However, the similarity to endogenous human GLP-1 is well preserved, sharing 94% homology. It is administered with a simple device and without resuspension before use. The efficacy and safety of semaglutide have been investigated in an extensive clinical development program including more than 9,000 patients with type 2 diabetes. Semaglutide has been compared head-to-head with a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4)-inhibitor, GLP-1RAs and basal insulin. Further head-to-head studies are awaiting that compare semaglutide against a sodium-dependent-glucose transporter-2 (SGLT2)-inhibitor. In these studies, semaglutide was found to provide significant and clinically relevant reductions in HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glucose excursions, body weight and blood pressure. The reduction in glycaemic parameters was more pronounced than that in the comparator GLP-1RAs. The rate of hypoglycemia is very low during treatment with semaglutide if not combined with sulphonylureas or insulin. A cardiovascular outcome trial (CVOT) was performed before the approval of semaglutide, at the request of legal authorities. Not only non-inferiority was confirmed, but also superiority compared with placebo used in a population of patients with type 2 diabetes and CVD treated with oral antihyperglycaemic drugs (OADs) and/or insulin with regard to the primary composite endpoint: death from cardiovascular (CV) causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction or nonfatal stroke. The safety of treatment with semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes has been extensively investigated. Overall, gastrointestinal side effects dominate, as observed with other GLP-1RAs, and was observed in the same range as for comparator GLP-1RAs. As observed with other GLP-1RAs, side effects such as nausea and vomiting diminished over time during continuous treatment. Regarding microvascular complications, an unexpected increase in diabetes-related retinopathy was observed in the CVOT; Semaglutide Unabated Sustainability in Treatment of Type 2 diabetes’ [SUSTAIN 6]), but not in other studies. The reason for this increase is not finally elucidated, but may be due to a nonspecific effect of a rapid decrease in glycaemic parameters in patients with preexisting retinopathy with high HbA1c at the start of the treatment. There is currently a warning in the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) for semaglutide concerning treatment in patients with preexisting retinopathy. Further studies are needed to clarify this.

Open-Label Study to Assess the Efficacy of Ipragliflozin for Reducing Insulin Dose in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Receiving Insulin Therapy

Background and Objective

To avoid insulin-induced hypoglycemia and weight gain, the minimum dose of insulin should be used. In this study, therefore, we examined insulin dose reduction by ipragliflozin add-on therapy in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with long-acting basal insulin.

Methods

In this multicenter, open-label study, patients received one ipragliflozin 50-mg tablet once daily in combination with basal insulin for 24 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change and percent change in insulin dose from baseline to Week 24. Secondary efficacy endpoints included changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycoalbumin, cholesterol, leptin, adiponectin, C-peptide, glucagon, body weight, and blood pressure, and number of patients achieving withdrawal of insulin at the end of treatment (EOT). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were evaluated for safety.

Results

In total, 114 patients were screened, 103 were registered, and 97 completed the study. The mean age was 59 years and 72.8% of patients were male. The mean change in insulin dose from baseline at Week 24 was − 6.6 ± 4.4 units/day (p < 0.001); the mean percent change was − 29.87%. HbA1c, FPG, glycoalbumin, glucagon levels, body weight, and blood pressure significantly decreased from baseline to EOT (p < 0.05). Cholesterol, leptin, and adiponectin were unaffected. One patient was able to stop insulin treatment at Week 16. The incidence of TEAEs was 60.2%. Hypoglycemia (10.7%) and pollakiuria (13.6%) were the most common drug-related TEAEs. Conclusions Once-daily 50-mg ipragliflozin enabled a 30% dose reduction of insulin by Week 24 compared with baseline. No major safety concerns were raised.

Clinical Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02847091)

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s40261-019-00851-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Initial injectable therapy in type 2 diabetes: Key considerations when choosing between glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and insulin

Managing type 2 diabetes is complex and necessitates careful consideration of patient factors such as engagement in self-care, comorbidities and costs. Since type 2 diabetes is a progressive disease, many patients will require injectable agents, usually insulin. Recent ADA-EASD guidelines recommend glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) as first injectable therapy in most cases. The basis for this recommendation is the similar glycemic efficacy of GLP-1 RAs and insulin, but with GLP-1 RAs promoting weight loss instead of weight gain, at lower hypoglycemia risk, and with cardiovascular benefits in patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease. GLP-1 RAs also reduce burden of glucose self-monitoring. However, tolerability and costs are important considerations, and notably, rates of drug discontinuation are often higher for GLP-1 RAs than basal insulin. To minimize risk of gastrointestinal symptoms patients should be started on lowest doses of GLP-1 RAs and up-titrated slowly. Overall healthcare costs may be lower with GLP-1 RAs compared to insulin. Though patient-level costs may still be prohibitive, GLP-1 RAs can replace 50-80 units of insulin daily and reduce costs associated with glucose self-monitoring. Decisions regarding initiating injectable therapy should be individualized. This review provides a framework to guide decision-making in the real-world setting.

Use of Insulin Glargine 100 U/mL for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in East Asians: A Review

Insulin glargine (IGlar) 100 U/mL (IGlar-100) is widely used in East Asian countries for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and is the gold standard of basal insulin treatment. In this review we summarize key information about clinical experience with IGlar-100 in East Asian patients with T2DM, including findings from clinical trials and postmarketing studies. We also provide recommendations and opinions on the optimal use of IGlar-100 in this population. The findings from the studies highlighted in our review indicate that IGlar-100 can be a suitable treatment option for East Asians with T2DM, from initial therapy in combination with oral antihyperglycemic medications through to different combinations and intensification models. FUNDING: Eli Lilly and Company.

Novel nonapeptide GLP (28-36) amide derivatives with improved hypoglycemic and body weight lowering effects

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) has emerged as a major therapeutic target for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. The nonapeptide GLP-1 (28-36) amide is one of the biological C-terminal products of GLP-1 modified by the neutral endopeptidase (NEP) 24.11 with limited hypoglycemic activity. In this study, we focused on the modification of GLP-1 (28-36) amide for the first time and synthesized a series of GLP-1 (28-36) amide analogues. Results of biological activity evaluation in INS-1 cell, STZ-induced diabetic and diet induced obesity (DIO) mice indicated that S3 as a promising candidate to treat type 2 diabetes and obesity.

Lilly Insulin Glargine Versus Lantus® in Insulin-Naïve and Insulin-Treated Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized, Controlled Trial (ELEMENT 5)

INTRODUCTION

This study compared the efficacy and safety of similar U-100 insulin glargine products, namely, Lilly insulin glargine (LY IGlar; Basaglar®) and the reference insulin glargine product (IGlar; Lantus®), used once daily in combination with oral antihyperglycemic medications (OAMs) in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

METHODS

ELEMENT 5 was a phase III, randomized, multinational, open-label, treat-to-target, 24-week trial. Participants were insulin naïve (glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c] ≥ 7.0% to ≤ 11.0%) or on basal insulin (IGlar, neutral protamine Hagedorn or insulin detemir; HbA1c ≤ 11.0%) and taking ≥ 2 OAMs. The primary objective was to show  that LY IGlar is noninferior to IGlar in terms of HbA1c reduction (0.4% noninferiority margin).

RESULTS

The study population (N = 493) was predominantly Asian (48%) or White (46%), with similar baseline characteristics between arms (P > 0.05). At 24 weeks, LY IGlar was noninferior to IGlar in terms of change in HbA1c level from baseline (- 1.25 vs. - 1.22%, respectively; least squares mean difference - 0.04%; 95% confidence interval - 0.22%, 0.15%). Other 24-week efficacy and safety results were also similar between treatments (P > 0.05), including insulin dose; percentage of patients having HbA1c of < 7% and ≤ 6.5%; overall rate and incidence of total, nocturnal, and severe hypoglycemia; adverse events; insulin antibody response; and weight gain. Daily mean 7-point self-monitored blood glucose reduction was similar between treatments at 24 weeks, with no differences at any time point except premorning-meal (fasting) blood glucose (LY IGlar - 2.37 mmol/L; IGlar - 2.69 mmol/L; P = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

Overall, LY IGlar and IGlar combined with OAMs provided similar glucose control and safety findings in this T2D population, which included a greater proportion of Asian patients and had broader background basal insulin experience than a previously studied T2D population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02302716.

FUNDING

Eli Lilly and Company and Boehringer Ingelheim. Plain language summary available for this article.

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors as add-on therapy to insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

Addition of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors to insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) may achieve better glycemic control. However, results of pilot randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are inconsistent. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis of RCTs to evaluate efficacy and safety of DPP4 inhibitors compared with placebo/no treatment as add-on therapy to insulin in T2DM patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Relevant studies were identified via a search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. A fixed or random effect model was applied according to the heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Overall, 22 RCTs with 6,957 T2DM patients were included. Addition of DPP4 inhibitors to insulin was associated with significantly reduced HbA1c as compared with controls (weighed mean difference [WMD]: -0.54%, p<0.001). The benefits of DPP4 inhibitors as add-on therapy on HbA1c were independent of study design, follow-up duration, categories of DPP4 inhibitors used, and using of fixed/adjustable insulin doses as indicated by predefined subgroup analyses. Moreover, addition of DPP4 inhibitors to insulin was associated with significantly reduced fasting blood glucose (WMD: -0.47mmol/L, p<0.001), postprandial glucose at 2 hrs (WMD: -2.03 mmol/L, p<0.001), and daily dose of insulin (WMD: -2.73U/d, p<0.001), while body weight (WMD: 0.02 g, p=0.81) or risk of symptomatic hypoglycemia (risk ratio: 0.92, p=0.37) were not affected.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of DPP4 inhibitors to insulin significantly improved the glycemic control in T2DM patients without further increasing the risk of weight gain and hypoglycemia.

Assessment of Pharmacological Responses to an Anti-diabetic Drug in a New Obese Type 2 Diabetic Rat Model

Introduction

The number of diabetic patients has recently been increasing worldwide, and numerous anti-diabetic drugs have been developed to induce good glycemic control. In particular, metformin, which exhibits glucose-lowering effects by suppressing gluconeogenesis in the liver, is widely used as a first line oral anti-diabetic drug for type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Material and Methods

In this study, the pharmacological effects of metformin were investigated using female and male Spontaneously Diabetic Torii (SDT) fatty rats, a new obese type 2 diabetic model.

Results

Two experiments were performed: an assessment of repeated treatment with metformin in female SDT fatty rats 5 to 13 weeks of age (experiment 1), and an assessment of repeated treatment with metformin in male SDT fatty rats 6 to 10 weeks of age (experiment 2). In female SDT fatty rats, metformin treatment led to good glycemic control, increases in sensory nerve conduction velocity, and improvements in pancreatic abnormalities such as irregular boundaries and vacuole form of islets. In male SDT fatty rats, metformin decreased blood glucose levels 4 weeks after treatment.

Conclusion

Metformin treatment led to maintained good glycemic control and improved neuropathy and pancreatic lesions in female SDT fatty rats. The SDT fatty rat is useful for the development of novel anti-diabetic agents that show potential to improve glucose metabolic disorders in the liver.

High-glucose 3D INS-1 cell model combined with a microfluidic circular concentration gradient generator for high throughput screening of drugs against type 2 diabetes

In vitro models for screening of drugs against type 2 diabetes are crucial for the pharmaceutical industry. This paper presents a new approach for integration of a three-dimensionally-cultured insulinoma cell line (INS-1 cell) incubated in a high concentration of glucose as a new model. In this model, INS-1 cells tended to aggregate in the 3D gel (basement membrane extractant, BME), in a similar way to 3D in vivo cell culture models. The proliferation of INS-1 cells in BME was initially promoted and then suppressed by the high concentration of glucose, and the function of insulin secretion also was initially enhanced and then inhibited by the high concentration of glucose. These phenomena were similar to hyperglycemia symptoms, proving the validity of the proposed model. This model can help find the drugs that stimulate insulin secretion. Then, we identified the difference between the new model and the traditional two-dimensional model in terms of cell morphology, inhibition rate of cell proliferation, and insulin secretion. Simultaneously, we developed a circular drug concentration gradient generator based on microfluidic technology. We integrated the high-glucose 3D INS-1 cell model and the circular concentration gradient generator in the same microdevice, tested the utility of this microdevice in the field of drug screening with glipizide as a model drug, and found that the microdevice was more sensitive than the traditional device to screen the anti-diabetic drugs.

Diabetes Intervention Accentuating Diet and Enhancing Metabolism (DIADEM-I): a randomised controlled trial to examine the impact of an intensive lifestyle intervention consisting of a low-energy diet and physical activity on body weight and metabolism in early type 2 diabetes mellitus: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity are syndemic and will have a significant impact on affected individuals and healthcare services worldwide. Evidence shows that T2DM remission can be achieved with significant weight loss in those who are younger with early diabetes and requiring fewer medications for glycaemic control. DIADEM-I aims to examine the impact of an intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) using a low-energy diet (LED) meal replacement approach combined with physical activity in younger individuals with early T2DM.

Methods

The planned study is an ongoing, non-blinded, pragmatic, randomised controlled, parallel-group trial examining the impact of an LED-based ILI on body weight and diabetes remission in younger (18–50 years) T2DM individuals with early diabetes (≤ 3-year duration). The ILI will be compared to usual medical care (UMC). The primary outcome will be weight loss at 12 months. Other key outcomes of interest include diabetes remission, glycaemic control, diabetes complications, cardiovascular health, physical activity, mental health, and quality of life. It is planned for the study to include 138 subjects for assessment of the primary outcome. Safety will be assessed throughout.

Discussion

If DIADEM-I demonstrates a clinically significant effect for younger individuals with early T2DM, it will inform clinical guidelines and services of the future for management of T2DM.

Trial registration

ISRCTN: ISRCTN20754766 (date assigned: 7 June 2017); ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03225339 Registered on 26 June 2017.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2660-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.