House dust mite and cat allergen in different indoor environments

Biology, ecology, and prevalence of dust mites

The house dust mites D. farinae, D. pteronyssinus, and E. maynei are sources of multiple potent allergens in the indoor environment. They are common inhabitants in homes worldwide. Many biologically significant studies have revealed how well adapted these mites are to the microhabitats in homes. Ambient RH is a key factor in determining where these mites are found. Many aspects of the biology of house dust mites are not understood. A greater understanding of the biology of dust mites may reveal new strategies for controlling dust mites and their allergens in homes.

Heredity, pet ownership, and confounding control in a population-based birth cohort

BACKGROUND

The association between pet ownership in childhood and subsequent allergic disease is controversial. Bias related to selection of pet exposure has been suggested as a reason for contradictory study results.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this investigation was to elucidate how pet exposure depends on family history of allergic disease, smoking, and socioeconomic factors in a prospective birth cohort.

METHODS

Parents of 4089 two-month-old children answered a questionnaire that included detailed questions about family history of asthma (maternal, paternal, and sibling), rhinoconjunctivitis, atopic eczema/dermatitis syndrome, pollen and pet allergy, smoking habits, parental occupation, and family pet ownership (cat and dog). Dust samples collected from the mothers' beds were analyzed for Fel d 1 and Can f 1 in a subgroup of the cohort.

RESULTS

Cats were less frequently kept in families with parental asthma, rhinoconjunctivitis, or pet or pollen allergy (3.5% to 5.8%) than in families without parental allergic disease (10.8% to 11.8%). Dogs were less common in families with (3.3%) than in families without (5.9%) parental atopic eczema/dermatitis syndrome. Families with smoking mothers and those with low socioeconomic index kept cats and dogs more frequently. Cat allergen levels were lower in homes with than in homes without maternal pet allergy, and this tended to hold true even for homes without a cat. Cat ownership decreased from birth to 2 years of age, especially in families with parental history of allergic diseases.

CONCLUSION

There seems to be a selection of pet exposure based on parental history of allergy, maternal smoking, and socioeconomic factors. This has to be taken into consideration in evaluations of risk associations between pet exposure and allergic disease in childhood.

Environmental allergens and asthma in urban elementary schools

BACKGROUND

Asthma in school children is rising, and indoor allergens are very common triggers of asthma attacks; however, the risk of the school environment on asthma has not been well studied.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the presence and the levels of common aeroallergens in schools, where asthma prevalence rates are high.

METHODS

Settled dust samples were collected from 12 Baltimore City public elementary schools, and they were analyzed for the following allergens: cockroaches (Bla g 1/2), dust mites (Der f 1/p 1), dog (Can f 1), cat (Fel d 1), and mouse (Mus m 1). School asthma prevalence rates were correlated with allergen levels, and association between allergen levels and other risk factors present in the schools' environment was examined.

RESULTS

The mean and range levels were 1.49 U/g (0 to 8) for Bla g 1/2; 0.38 microg/g (0 to 11.9) for the Der f 1/p 1; 1.44 microg/g (0.1 to 9.6) for Can f 1; 1.66 microg/g (0.2 to 12) for Fel d 1; and 6.24 microg/g (0.3 to 118.3) for Mus m 1. Dust mite, cat and dog allergens were significantly in rooms with carpet and/or area rugs, compared to rooms with bare floors (P < 0.05). Asthma prevalence rates varied from 11.8 to 20.8% between schools and positively correlation with the mean levels of Bla g 1/2 in the schools (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Common allergens that are known to trigger asthma were detected in all school environments, where asthma prevalence rates were high. However, the overall allergen levels were low, indicating that other factors, including exposures in the homes of asthmatic patients, may have more relevance to sensitization and symptoms than school exposures.

House dust mite allergen levels in carpeted sleeping accommodation are higher in private houses than public places

OBJECTIVE

To compare mite allergen levels in carpeted sleeping accommodation in private dwellings and public places.

METHODS

The concentration of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus Group 1 allergen in house dust was measured in mat-tresses and bedroom floors in 12 homes, 5 hotels, 11 child care centres and a university hall of residence. Indoor temperature and relative humidity were also measured. A questionnaire clarified details regarding the age of the building, age of the carpet, method and frequency of cleaning, frequency of room use and use of air-conditioning.

RESULTS

Median allergen levels in mattresses and carpets in private homes (21.1 and 20.6 micro g/g dust, respectively) were significantly higher than in public places (2.5 and 3.1 micro g/g, respectively; P < 0.0001). Mean relative humidity was significantly higher in private houses (68.5%; 95% CI 67.2-69.3%) than in public places (56.4%; 95% CI 52.7-60.1%; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Carpeted sleeping accommodation in public places has lower house dust mite allergen levels than private houses. Lower levels of relative humidity may be an important component of the explanation.

Allergens, Der p 1, Der f 1, Fel d 1 and Can f 1, in newly bought mattresses for infants

BACKGROUND

To avoid allergen exposure of newborn babies, the use of a new mattress for the baby bed may be recommended. However, it is not certain that new mattresses are always free of allergens.

OBJECTIVE

In the present study the allergen content of new infant mattresses was investigated.

METHODS

Dust samples were vacuumed from 90 new mattresses for infant beds bought in 50 different Dutch shops, and the concentrations of Der p 1, Der f 1, Fel d 1 and Can f 1 were determined by radioimmunoassays.

RESULTS

Most mattresses contained some allergen and often the allergen concentrations were surprisingly high. Only 15 of the 90 mattresses contained no detectable amounts of any of the four allergens. The highest concentration found for each allergen was 3.1, 46.5, 20.2 and 95.7 microg/g of dust, respectively. However, the total amount of allergen in a mattress was still rather low because the new mattresses contained only modest amounts of dust. Baby mattresses more often contained an increased allergen load than the larger, standard-sized, infant mattresses. This may be caused by differences in manufacturing procedure. Also, mattresses that were sold without a plastic encasement more often contained an increased allergen load.

CONCLUSIONS

It is advisable to buy a mattress that is wrapped in plastic, but it may still contain a substantial amount of allergen. Thorough vacuuming of a newly bought mattress before it is installed on a child's bed, is also advisable. After instalment, regular vacuuming of the mattress and washing of the bed linen as well as measures to eliminate allergen reservoirs in other parts of the house are important, because our observations indicate that mattresses easily pick up allergens from the environment.

Daycare centers and schools as sources of exposure to mites, cockroach, and endotoxin in the city of São Paulo, Brazil

BACKGROUND

Public places, including schools, have been identified as sources of exposure to allergens derived from mites, cockroach, cat, and dog and to endotoxin.

OBJECTIVES

The purposes of this study were to assess and compare exposure to allergens and endotoxin in 4 types of public child-care facilities in Brazil and to investigate whether the presence of children and the performance of cleaning procedures could have an influence on allergen and endotoxin levels.

METHODS

We have analyzed dust from bedding, floors, chairs, and tables of daycare centers (DCs), preschools, kindergartens, and elementary schools (ESs). Major allergens from mites, cockroach, cat, and dog were quantitated by means of ELISA, and endotoxin content was determined by using the Limulus Amebocyte Lysate assay.

RESULTS

Group 1 mite allergens were greater than 2 microg/g in 67% of DC and preschool samples and in 8.9% and 2.2% of kindergarten and ES samples, respectively. The presence of bedding in DCs and preschools accounted for increased levels of mite allergens in these settings. Levels of Bla g 1 were higher in ES floors compared with those found in DC and preschool floors. Low levels (<1 microg/g) of Fel d 1 e Can f 1 were found in most samples. Levels of endotoxin in DCs and preschools were 3 times higher than in ESs.

CONCLUSIONS

DCs and schools in Brazil should be considered as important sources of exposure to dust mites and cockroach allergens and to endotoxin. Recommendations for mite allergen avoidance should include appropriate care of bedding in DCs and preschools.

Dust mite allergens: ecology and distribution

The most important allergy-causing mites found in homes worldwide are the house dust mites Dermatophagoides farinae, D. pteronyssinus, Euroglyphus maynei, and the storage mite Blomia tropicalis. Most homes contain multiple species. The most prevalent mite species and allergen in homes differ geographically, between homes within a geographical region, and among areas within a home. Therefore, it is important to know which mite species are present in a geographical area when performing diagnostic testing and prescribing immunotherapy. The key factor that influences mite survival and prevalence is relative humidity. Mites are present in homes in humid geographical areas and are rare or absent in drier climates unless humidity is artificially raised. Generally speaking, dust mite allergen levels are low in public buildings and transportation compared to levels in homes.

Relationship among house-dust mites, Der 1, Fel d 1, and Can f 1 on clothing and automobile seats with respect to densities in houses

BACKGROUND

Locations where there are no dust mites or pets present may contain allergens that pose a risk factor for sensitizing and inducing rhinitis and asthma.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship among the prevalence of mites and mite, dog, and cat allergens in homes, on clothing, and on automobile seats.

METHODS

Over a 2-year period (July 1998 to July 2000), dust mite and mite, dog, and cat allergen densities were determined in homes, associated automobiles, and on the clothing of the drivers. During this period 87 homes were sampled one to five times each.

RESULTS

Low levels of live and dead mites were present in most dust samples obtained from automobile seats and in 16% from clothing. Seventy-two and 50% of the home samples had >2 microg and >10 microg Der l/g of dust, respectively, whereas 23% of automobiles seat samples had >2 microg Der l/g of dust with a mean of 1.3 microg/g. Mite and Der 1 densities were not different for homes with or without pets. However, homes with pets had significantly more Fel d 1 or Can f 1 allergen than homes without pets. Homes without cats and dogs had an average of 93 and 29 microg/g of Fel d 1 and Can f 1, respectively, which was well above threshold levels for sensitization and induction of allergic reactions. Although most clothing had detectable levels of pet allergen, the levels of these allergens were low.

CONCLUSIONS

Der 1 densities in some automobiles were sufficiently high (>2 microg/g of dust) to be risk factors for sensitization and allergic reactions. However, most automobile seats had levels of dog and cat allergen that were well above the threshold levels considered to be risk factors for both sensitization and symptoms, regardless of the presence of a pet in the home. The presence of live and dead mites and mite, cat, and dog allergens in automobiles and on clothing suggests that both are vehicles in the dispersal of mites and mite and pet allergen.

Efficacy of dry-cleaning in removing Fel d 1 allergen from wool fabric exposed to cats

BACKGROUND

The main cat allergen (Fel d 1) is ubiquitous, having been found even in indoor environments and public places where a cat has never been kept. Clothes of cat owners constitute a carrier for the distribution of Fel d 1 allergen in these environments. Schools, for example, may be a site of indirect exposure to cat allergens.

OBJECTIVE

Our goal was to investigate the efficacy of commercial dry-cleaning in removing cat allergens from wool fabrics that had been exposed to cats to evaluate a possible preventive procedure.

METHODS

Twenty-six identical wool "squares" (80 x 100 cm) were put in cat baskets for 1 week. In our laboratory, the squares were cut in half (40 x 50 cm), and one half was subjected to high-volume sampling for 5 minutes in a cat-free room. The other half was subjected to commercial dry-cleaning and then the high-volume sampling. Five wool squares not exposed to cats served as controls. Dust was collected from the wool squares with a high-volume air sampler. Particulate material was harvested onto glass fiber filters (AP 20 Millipore, Milan, Italy) with 25-mm diameter and 2-microm pore size. Each dust sample was assayed by affinity-purified monoclonal antibody against purified Fel d 1. The results were expressed as micrograms per filter. Statistical analysis was done by using the paired t test.

RESULTS

Before dry-cleaning, Fel d 1 allergen was detected on all cat-exposed wool squares. No appreciable cat allergen was detected on control materials. After commercial dry-cleaning, the amounts of Fel d 1 extracted from cat-exposed squares were significantly reduced (t = 14.63; P < 0.001) but not abolished. Three of the five control squares were contaminated by Fel d 1.

CONCLUSIONS

Commercial dry-cleaning effectively removes large amounts of cat allergen from wool materials exposed to cats but does not completely abolish this protein. Further, low Fel d 1 contamination may occur during this procedure.

Evaluation of Petri dish sampling for assessment of cat allergen in airborne dust

BACKGROUND

Dust reservoir sampling is the most commonly used method for assessment of indirect allergen exposure. Because assessment of personal exposure using person-carried pumps is time-consuming and expensive we evaluated the Petri dish sampling method for measurement of airborne cat allergen in classrooms.

METHODS

Petri dish sampling was evaluated in three study parts. Part I: by comparison between Petri dish sampling and personal air sampling in 44 classrooms with many (> or = 20%) and few (< or = 10%) cat owners and by additional Petri dish sampling in 40 pet-free homes. Part II: by sampling with duplicate Petri dishes in 28 classrooms. Part III: by sampling in three classrooms at four sampling heights during different sampling times. All samples were analyzed for cat allergen (Fel d 1) content with a monoclonal antibody two-site ELISA (enzyme linked immunosorbent assay), using signal amplification when necessary.

RESULTS

There was a significant correlation between Petri dish sampling and personal air sampling (r = 0.66; P < 0.0001). Levels were five-fold higher in classes with many cat owners than in classes with few cat owners, regardless of method. A corresponding difference was found in the homes. Duplicate sample values were in fair agreement (Bland-Altman test) and were correlated (r = 0.77; P < 0.0001). Cumulative levels collected weekly in one Petri dish were lower than using five daily Petri dishes, regardless of sampling height.

CONCLUSIONS

Petri dish sampling can be useful as an alternative method to personal air sampling of airborne allergens.

Why are allergies increasing?

The incidence of atopic allergy is increasing in certain 'Western' countries but this remains unexplained. Various hypotheses with differing amounts of evidence and/or relevance have been assessed, including increased awareness of the diseases, improved diagnostics, genetic susceptibility, psycho-social influences, allergen exposure, decreased immune-system stimulation, underlying disease, anti-allergic therapy and pollution.

Allergens in indoor air: environmental assessment and health effects

It has been suggested that the increase in morbidity and mortality for asthma and allergies, may also be due to an increase in exposure to allergens in the modern indoor environment. Indoor allergen exposure is recognised as the most important risk factor for asthma in children. House dust mites, pets, insects, plants, moulds and chemical agents in the indoor environment are important causes of allergic diseases. House dust mites and their debris and excrements that contain the allergens are normally found in the home in beds, mattresses, pillows, carpets and furniture stuffing, but they have also been found in office environments. Domestic animals such as cats, dogs, birds and rodents may cause allergic asthma and rhinoconjunctivitis. The exposure usually occurs in homes, but also in schools and kindergartens where domestic animals are kept as pets or for education; moreover, cat and dog owners can bring allergens to public areas in their clothes. Allergy to natural rubber latex has become an important occupational health concern in recent years, particularly among healthcare workers; when powdered gloves are worn or changed, latex particles get into the air and workers are exposed to latex aerosolised antigens. To assess the environmental risk to allergen exposure or to verify if there is a causal relationship between the immunologic findings in a patient and his/her environmental exposure, sampling from the suspected environment may be necessary.

The role and remediation of animal allergens in allergic diseases

Animal allergens are common causes of both acute and chronic allergic disease. The most important animal allergens are derived from mammals, principally cats, dogs, rats, mice, horses, and cows, which secrete or excrete allergens into the environment. Allergic sensitization may occur at home or in the workplace. Cat and dog allergens commonly cause allergies in the home and affect the general population. Laboratory animal handlers often have allergic reactions to rats and mice. Cow dander allergy is usually caused by occupational exposure and occurs in farmers and farm workers. Horse allergy occurs among people who regularly handle horses, either professionally or for recreational purposes. Over the past 20 years, the major animal allergens have been defined and characterized with regard to their molecular structure, immunogenicity, and environmental distribution. One remarkable finding has been the fact that most of the mammalian allergens that have thus far been cloned belong to a single family of proteins called the lipocalins. In addition to these molecular similarities, it has also been shown that most of the animal allergens are quite similar with regard to their aerodynamic properties. Although much is yet to be learned, progress is being made in our knowledge regarding the steps that may be necessary to control exposure to these allergens through environmental modifications in both homes and occupational settings. These measures include source control, air filtration devices, barrier devices, removal of carpeting and other reservoirs, and, in some cases, washing of the animal.

A new method for collecting airborne allergens

BACKGROUND

Measurement of airborne allergens has hitherto been done with the use of fixed-location pumps or personal air samplers. Our objective was to find out whether ionizers could be good tools for collecting airborne allergens. As a model we have used cat allergen (Fel d l). We have compared Fel d l levels collected by the ionizer at different time periods, as well as comparing Fel d l levels obtained with the ionizer with those of low- and high-volume pumps.

METHODS

Dust samples from floors and air samples collected with ionizers and pumps, obtained in 31 homes with cat, 23 homes without cats, and 28 day-care centres, were analysed for cat allergen content (Fel d I) by ELISA.

RESULTS

Fel d l was present in the reservoir in all homes with cats, ranging from 660 to 375,000 ng/g (GM 75,000) and in the air collected by the ionizer from 2.0 to 204 ng/24 h (GM 19.3). The allergen in homes without cat varied from < 55 to 1,800 ng/g (GM 166). Corresponding levels in air were found in two of these homes (2.3 and 7.3 ng/24 h). There was a correlation between the number of cats and the amount of airborne cat allergen (r: 0.47; P < 0.05). The levels in day-care centres were < 55 to 3,070 ng/g in dust (GM 360) and < 1.1 to 7.9 ng/24 h in the air (GM 1.6). We obtained a moderately strong correlation between air and dust samples in homes with cats (rs: 0.64; P< 0.001) and in day-care centres (rs: 0.49; P<0.05). We found that a collection period of 24 h is preferable for the ionizer. The intrahome reliability coefficient was nearly two times higher for the ionizer (r: 0.69) than the pump (r: 0.39).

CONCLUSIONS

The ionizer seems to be a good tool for monitoring the environment. It is easy to use and silent and does not disturb the airflow in the room.

Exposure to mite and cat allergens on a range of clothing items at home and the transfer of cat allergen in the workplace

BACKGROUND

Clothing has been proposed as an additional source of exposure to mite and cat allergens. Dispersal of allergen into public places has also been attributed to clothing.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to study the contribution of various types of clothing on mite and cat exposure in a domestic environment. Also, we studied the ability of clothing to transfer allergen in a workplace.

METHODS

Personal exposure to mite and cat allergen from a range of clothing was measured by using intranasal air samplers in 11 homes. Five categories of clothing were tested. Wearing no upper clothing was the sixth category tested to distinguish the contribution of clothing over ambient background exposure. An adhesive tape was used to sample allergen from the surface of clothing, and reservoir dust samples were also collected. The above techniques were also used in the workplace to examine the amount of cat allergen transferred from cat owners to non-cat owners.

RESULTS

The amount of mite and cat allergen inhaled differed among the clothing types worn and whether they had been washed recently. Wearing a woolen sweater increased personal allergen exposure to cat and mite allergen by a mean of 11 and 10 times, respectively. Clothing items that were less frequently washed carried more allergen whether assessed by vacuuming or sampled with adhesive tape. This corresponded to the amount of allergen inhaled. We also found that cat levels on non-cat owners' clothing increased significantly at the end of a working day, which lead to the increase in their personal allergen exposure to cat.

CONCLUSIONS

These studies strongly support the emerging model that personal clothing is an important source of both mite and cat allergen exposure. This article also demonstrates the importance of clothing as a means of distributing cat allergen into cat-free environments.

Respiratory morbidity among children following renovation of a water-damaged school

The authors sought to determine whether exposure to molds, resulting from moisture damage in a school, was associated with increased respiratory symptoms and morbidity among schoolchildren and whether the renovation of this building resulted in a decrease in prevalence of respiratory symptoms and morbidity. The study was a follow-up (1-y interval) of children between the ages of 7 and 12 y from two elementary schools in a Finnish suburb. In addition to a questionnaire completed by the parents, the authors assessed the respiratory health of children by examining the health records of a local health center. In the cross-sectional study, the prevalence of symptoms and infections were higher in the exposed group, as were visits to a physician and use of antibiotics. The school was renovated, after which all prevalence decreased and no significant differences remained, except for visits to a physician (according to questionnaire responses). Therefore, moisture damage and exposure to molds increased the indoor air problems of schools and affected the respiratory health of children.

Pets and cockroaches: two increasing causes of respiratory allergy in indoor environments. Characteristics of airways sensitization and prevention strategies

The increasing prevalence of allergic sensitization to indoor allergens such as dust mites, pets and cockroaches is the result of the changes in indoor environments induced by human activities. The Westernized lifestyle and the increasing time spent indoors determine a reduction in natural air ventilation and, consequently, higher levels of allergen concentrations and longer exposure to allergens. The major cat allergen Fel d 1 is carried by small-dimension particles (< 5 microm diameter) that readily become airborne and persist immodified for a long time. Fel d 1 must be considered a ubiquitous allergen because it has been found in indoor environments and even in public places where a cat has never been kept. Recent research has demonstrated that clothing of cat owners may contribute to the dispersal of Fel d 1 in cat-free environments. Therefore, washing Fel d 1-contaminated clothes should be considered a simple and effective method for removing this allergen from clothing and, consequently, reducing the risk of Fel d 1 dispersion. Cockroach allergens constitute another important cause of environment-related respiratory allergy and may trigger asthma exacerbations in sensitized individuals. In the prevention of cockroach allergy, the use of chemical agents associated with an intensive vacuum cleaning of indoor environments is an important tool in removing cockroach material containing allergenic proteins. Early recognition of allergy-predisposed babies, monitoring indoor allergens and adequate strategies of allergen avoidance are likely to be important means for reducing the prevalence of bronchial asthma.

The 18-kDa form of cat allergen Felis domesticus 1 (Fel d 1) is associated with gelatin- and fibronectin-degrading activity

BACKGROUND

Fel d 1, an important allergen from domestic cats, is a significant cause of asthma. In addition to directly promoting IgE synthesis, other biological activities of allergens may contribute to either allergic sensitization or the magnitude of allergic effector responses. For example, allergens that degrade proteins have been suggested to facilitate allergen presentation by increasing parallelular permeability of airways epithelium. However, little information exists to indicate whether Fel d 1 has other activities relevant to allergic responses.

OBJECTIVE

To study whether Fel d 1 is associated with enzyme activity.

METHODS

Fel d 1 was obtained by a rigorous purification strategy and its identity confirmed by laser desorption mass spectrometry, cleavage and sequencing. The ability of Fel d 1 to degrade gelatin, fibronectin and the artificial substrate N-benzoyl-FVR-p-nitroanilide was studied. The effect of Fel d 1 on the morphology of tight junctions in epithelial cell monolayers was also investigated.

RESULTS

The 18-kDa form of Fel d 1 caused degradation of denatured collagens (gelatin) and cleaved a 20-kDa fragment from the A chain of plasma fibronectin. Catalytic activity was not altered by inhibitors of cysteine peptidases, matrix metallopeptidases or by removal of divalent cations. In contrast, aprotinin and TLCK were inhibitors of Fel d 1. The absence of a serine peptidase catalytic triad in Fel d 1, together with the stoichiometry of the inhibition of TLCK and aprotinin, suggest that their inhibitory action may be due to noncatalytic site interactions. Alternatively, highly purified Fel d 1 may be associated with an active contaminant, although none were found.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that Fel d 1 is another example of a domestic allergen which is associated with enzyme activity. It remains to be established whether the activity resides in Fel d 1 itself or in an unresolved, and possibly related, protein.

Occurrence of dog, cat, and mite allergens in public transport vehicles

BACKGROUND AND METHODS

Helsinki City Transport buses, trams, and underground trains carry 687,000 passengers on a weekday. Of the passengers, 0.13% travel with a pet. We interviewed passengers and measured allergen levels in vehicles to determine what difficulties allergens cause to passengers with allergy and asthma.

RESULTS

Of 2,021 interviewed passengers, 14% complained about inconvenience caused by pets, usually health problems. Of 324 adult passengers with allergy or asthma, 53% had experienced symptoms in public transport; the corresponding figure for 75 children was 32%. The median concentration of the main dog allergen, Can f 1, in dust from seats and floors in public transport vehicles was 2,400 ng per g of dust (range 20-8,500 ng/g). For the main cat allergen, Fel d 1, the median was 870 ng/g (range 3-2,600 ng/g). These levels can be regarded as low or moderate, and they cause symptoms in sensitive persons. Concentrations of mite allergens were undetectable or low. Allergen levels were lower in vehicles where pets were not allowed than in vehicles where pets were allowed, lower in dust from uncovered seats than in dust from seats with a covering, and lower after cleaning vehicle floors and seats than before cleaning.

CONCLUSIONS

Dog and cat allergens are present in public transport vehicles in Helsinki at levels that cause symptoms in sensitive persons. Prohibiting pets would probably bring only a modest reduction in levels, as few pets are carried, and much allergen contamination comes from passengers' clothes.

The relationships among environmental allergen sensitization, allergen exposure, pulmonary function, and bronchial hyperresponsiveness in the Childhood Asthma Management Program

BACKGROUND

Sensitivity and exposure to indoor allergens constitutes a risk factor for the development and persistence of asthma in children.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to evaluate the relationship between sensitivity and exposure to inhalant allergens and lung function and bronchial responsiveness in a group of children (n = 1041) aged 8.9 +/- 2.1 years with mild to moderate asthma enrolled in the Childhood Asthma Management Program (CAMP).

METHODS

With use of the extensive CAMP baseline cross-sectional data on spirometry, bronchial responsiveness, allergen sensitivities, and household allergen levels, the relationship of sensitization and exposure to allergens to lung function and methacholine sensitivity was evaluated. Children who enrolled in CAMP stopped all antiasthma medication except rescue use of albuterol and prednisone for exacerbations during the 5- to 16-week screening period. During the last 2 of these weeks they underwent spirometry and methacholine challenge. Indoor allergen exposures were determined from questionnaires completed by the parent. Household levels of indoor allergens (mite, cat, dog, cockroach, mold) were determined on house dust samples. Allergen sensitivity was determined by percutaneous skin testing with a standard battery of allergens plus locally important pollen and fungal spores. Lung function and bronchial hyperresponsiveness were compared for children sensitive and not sensitive to both indoor and outdoor allergens on skin testing and, if sensitive, for exposed and not exposed to the allergens to which they were positive on skin testing.

RESULTS

There was a strong direct correlation between increased sensitivity to inhaled methacholine and skin test sensitivity to tree, weed, Alternaria, cat, dog, and indoor molds. When the relationship was examined by stepwise regression, the skin test sensitivities showing the strongest associations with the concentration of methacholine that caused a 20% fall in FEV(1) were dog (P =.003), Alternaria (P =.01), and cat (P =.05). Children sensitive to any one of the aeroallergens tested were compared for the presence or absence of exposure to that allergen at the time that the methacholine challenge was performed. Those who were sensitive and exposed to weed and cat had greater methacholine sensitivity than those similarly sensitive but not exposed (P =.003 and P =.02, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Sensitivity to dog or cat dander or Alternaria by skin testing was associated with increased bronchial responsiveness but not decreased lung function in children with mild to moderate asthma. These findings support the important role that sensitization to certain allergens plays in modulating bronchial responsiveness.

Mite, cat, and cockroach exposure, allergen sensitisation, and asthma in children: a case-control study of three schools

BACKGROUND

The amount of allergen necessary to sensitise genetically "at risk" children is unclear. The relation between allergen exposure and asthma is also uncertain.

METHODS

To ensure a wide range of allergen exposures the data from case-control studies of asthma in children aged 12-14 years attending three schools in Los Alamos, New Mexico and Central Virginia were combined. Skin prick tests to indoor and outdoor allergens and bronchial hyperreactivity to histamine were assessed in children with and without symptoms of asthma. The concentration of mite, cat, and cockroach allergens in dust from the children's homes was used as a marker of exposure.

RESULTS

Three hundred and thirty two children (157 with asthmatic symptoms and 175 controls) were investigated. One hundred and eighty three were classified as atopic on the basis of allergen skin prick tests and 68 as asthmatic (symptoms plus bronchial responsiveness). The prevalence and degree of sensitisation to mite and cockroach, but not cat, was strongly associated in atopic children with increasing domestic concentrations of these allergens. Asthma was strongly associated with sensitisation to indoor allergens (p<10(-6)) and weakly to outdoor allergens (p = 0.026). There was an association between current asthma and the concentration of mite allergen amongst atopic children (p = 0.008) but not amongst those who were specifically mite sensitised (p = 0.16).

CONCLUSIONS

The domestic reservoir concentration of mite and cockroach, but not cat, allergen was closely related to the prevalence of sensitisation in atopic children. However, the prevalence of current asthma had a limited relationship to these allergen measurements, suggesting that other factors play a major part in determining which allergic individuals develop asthma.

High prevalence of sensitization to cat allergen among Japanese children with asthma, living without cats

BACKGROUND

Cat allergy is common among children with asthma. Many cat-allergic patients in Japan and elsewhere do not keep cats, but nonetheless become sensitized through environmental exposure to cat allergen.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the frequency of cat allergy and cat-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody responses in young Japanese patients with asthma in relation to self-reported cat exposure and Fel d 1 levels in dust samples.

METHODS

Cat dander-specific IgE antibody was measured in sera from asthma patients using the CAP system. IgE and IgG antibody to Fel d 1 was measured by antigen binding radioimmunoassay and by chimeric enzyme immunoassay. Fel d 1 levels in dust samples from a subset of patients' homes were measured by monoclonal antibody-based enzyme immunoassay.

RESULTS

Cat-specific IgE (CAP class>/=2) was found in sera from 70% of 44 patients who kept cats and 34% of 394 patients who had never kept cats. The prevalence of sensitization increased progressively to age 6 years (40%: positive), and then increased gradually to age 16 years (approximately 60%: positive) in patients who had never kept cats. There was an excellent correlation between cat CAP values and IgE levels to Fel d 1. The absolute amount of IgE antibody to Fel d 1 ranged from 0.01 to 15.6% of total IgE. Most patients who did not keep cats were exposed to Fel d 1 levels ranging from 0.07-8 microg/g dust.

CONCLUSIONS

Sensitization to cat allergen is common among young asthmatic patients in Japan, even among patients who do not keep cats. Use of CAP and the chimeric enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay allows accurate diagnosis of cat allergy and quantification of specific IgE antibody levels.

Fel d 1 and Can f 1 in settled dust and airborne Fel d 1 in allergen avoidance day-care centres for atopic children in relation to number of pet-owners, ventilation and general cleaning

BACKGROUND

Special day-care centres for atopic children have been established in Sweden.

OBJECTIVE

To study concentrations of cat (Fel d 1) and dog (Can f 1) allergens in settled dust and airborne cat allergen in day-care centres in relation to pet ownership among children and staff, ventilation and general cleaning.

METHODS

Twelve allergen avoidance day-care centres and 22 conventional day-care centres were included in the study. Settled dust was collected and analysed with ELISA. Airborne cat allergen levels were measured in eight allergen avoidance and seven conventional centres with a personal air sampler and analysed with an amplified ELISA. Air change rate per hour (ACH) was measured. A questionnaire which focused on keeping of cat and dog among staff and children and frequency of general cleaning was used.

RESULTS

In the allergen avoidance day-care centres neither children nor staff reported ownership of cats or dogs, compared with 21/22 of the conventional centres in which children and staff kept furred animals. Fel d 1 and Can f 1 were found in settled dust in all day-care centres. In the allergen avoidance compared with the conventional centres the concentrations of Fel d 1 and Can f 1 were lower, Fel d 1: median 0. 64 microg/g vs 5.45 microg/g and Can f 1: 0.39 microg/g vs 2.51, both P < 0.001, and airborne Fel d 1 was also lower in the allergen avoidance centres compared with the control centres, 1.51 ng/m3 vs 15.8 ng/m3, P = 0.002. A correlation was found between airborne and settled Fel d 1, rs = 0.75, P < 0.001. Furthermore, a correlation was found between increased ACH and decreased levels of Fel d 1 in the air in the day-care centres with no cat-owners, rs = - 0.86, P = 0.007. No relation was found between levels of cat or dog allergen and amount of general cleaning.

CONCLUSION

Not keeping pets seems to reduce children's exposure to pet-allergen in their 'working environment'. Additionally, appropriate ventilation seems to reduce Fel d 1 in the air in day-care centres.

Risk levels for mite allergens. Are they meaningful?

Allergens found in house dust are among the most common environmental antigens to which man is naturally exposed. Standardized methods for measuring allergen exposure are essential for assessing the relationship between exposure, sensitization, and the severity of asthma. Monoclonal antibody-based assays are the most widely used method for assessing allergen exposure. In the effort to define the best "index of exposure" to mite allergens, several factors need to be investigated, including: 1) whether allergen should be measured in reservoir dust or airborne 2) whether the results of reservoir measurement should be expressed as recovered allergen per unit weight or per unit area. As yet, airborne sampling is insufficiently sensitive to produce reliable and repeatable results. Therefore, measurement of house-dust-mite allergen concentration in reservoir dust should be regarded as the best-validated index of exposure. The results should be expressed and reported both per unit weight (concentration) and per unit area. The strongest predictor of chronic symptoms and acute exacerbation of asthma is sensitization to indoor allergens. A simple dose-response relationship between IgE-mediated hypersensitivity and allergen exposure has been established. For example, exposure to more than 2 microg Group 1 mite allergen/g dust should be regarded as a risk factor for the development of IgE antibody and asthma in susceptible children. The quantitative relationship between exposure and symptoms in patients already sensitized is complex due to a number of possible confounding factors (e.g., other allergens, viruses, asthma medication). A simple threshold level for provocation of asthmatic symptoms has not been clearly defined.

Risk levels for mite allergen: are they meaningful, where should samples be collected, and how should they be analyzed?

Indoor allergen exposure plays a major role in the development of sensitization and triggering of asthma in children. All over the world, mites are common sources of indoor allergens. Risk levels for mite-allergen exposure have been recommended. A mite-allergen level of >/=2 microg/g dust is considered a risk level for sensitization and symptoms of asthma. Data from several ongoing prospective studies of children show that mite sensitization may occur below the suggested threshold level. However, from these studies, it seems that high mite-allergen exposure increases the risk of early sensitization, whereas low exposure levels probably take a longer time to induce sensitization. Assessment of allergen exposure and consideration of allergen-elimination strategies should not be limited only to the home environment. High levels of mite allergens are also found in day-care centers, schools, and various other public places, such as bars. Thus, in addition to homes, these environments should also be considered when allergen-avoidance measures are taken. Allergen content in dust can be expressed in several units, e.g., ng/g, ng/m2, and ng/sampling, and as the total amount of allergen. At present, there is no consensus on the best way to measure and express mite-allergen levels. In this paper, aspects of threshold levels for mite sensitization, various exposure environments, and sampling, determination, and expression units of mite exposure will be discussed in brief.

Exposure to an abundance of cat (Fel d 1) and dog (Can f 1) allergens in Swedish farming households

BACKGROUND

Earlier studies have shown that farmers are to a low degree sensitized to animal allergens. We have measured the amount of cat (Fel d 1) and dog (Can f 1) in farm households and examined the relationship between exposure and sensitization to cat and dog allergens.

METHODS

Dust samples from the homes of 403 farmers who had participated in an epidemiologic follow-up study on respiratory symptoms were analyzed for allergen content by two-site ELISA methods.

RESULTS

Fel d 1 was detected in 99.5% of the farmers' households ranging from 0.055 to 1455 microg/g dust in mattresses (GM 13.2) and to 3775 microg/g dust in living-room carpets (GM 17.1). Can f 1 was detected in 90.6% of the households from 0.2 to 116 microg/g dust in mattresses (GM 2.0) and to 504 microg/g dust in carpets (GM 4.3). Homes with pets present had the highest levels of the allergens (P<0.001). A total of 8.4% and 7.4% of the farmers were sensitized to cat and dog, respectively. A significant correlation was noted between exposure to the allergens and specific IgE to cat and dog, respectively (P<0.001). Sensitization to cat (OR = 4.9) and dog (OR = 17.8) was significantly associated with asthma.

CONCLUSIONS

In spite of the abundance of Fel d 1 and Can f 1, farmers are only to a low degree sensitized to cats and dogs.

House-dust-mite allergen (Der p 1) levels in university colleges

BACKGROUND

In coastal Australia, mean house-dust-mite allergen concentration is 20-40 times higher in homes than in public buildings. Allergen concentrations in university colleges, which share some characteristics of both homes and public buildings, are not known. The study aimed to compare bed mite-allergen concentration in colleges with local homes.

METHODS

Mattress dust was collected from three colleges (n = 60 in each) and local homes (n = 68) during summer. Der p 1 was measured by ELISA. Information was collected on the floor plan of the colleges, cleaning practices, age of building, and orientation of room.

RESULTS

Most college mattresses (94%) had Der p 1 concentrations less than the mean of homes in the same climate. The geometric means of Der p 1 in the mattresses of the colleges were as follows: A, 8.9 micrograms Der p 1/g fine dust (95% CI 6.9, 11.5); B, 1.9 (1.5, 2.3); and C, 1.5 (1.2, 2.0), compared to homes, 22.5 (17.6, 28.7). The percentages of college mattresses with less than 2 micrograms/g were 7%, 48%, and 58%, respectively, compared to 4% for homes. Higher Der p 1 concentrations were weakly associated with age of building in college A, and orientation in college B. Der p 1 concentrations were independent of floor level and age of mattress.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that low allergen concentrations are achievable without extreme hygiene and cleaning measures in a climate which supports mite proliferation in homes.

Concentrations of cat (Fel d1), dog (Can f1) and mite (Der f1 and Der p1) allergens in the clothing and school environment of Swedish schoolchildren with and without pets at home

To investigate whether our hypothesis that cat and dog owners bring allergens to public areas in their clothes was true or not, we studied the levels of Fel d1, Can f1, Der p1 and Der f1 in dust from the clothes and classrooms of children in a Swedish school. We also investigated the levels of allergen in different areas in the four classrooms used by the children. Thirty-one children were selected in four classes, forming three groups: cat owners, dog owners and children without a cat or dog at home. Furthermore, a group of children with asthma was included. Cat and dog allergens were detected in all 57 samples from clothes and classrooms. Mite allergen Der f1 was detected in low concentrations in 6 out of 48 and Der p1 in 5 out of 46 samples investigated. The concentrations of Can f1 were higher than those of Fel d1 in samples from clothes (geometric mean: 2676 ng/g fine dust and 444 ng/g) and classrooms (Can f1: 1092 ng/g, Fel d1: 240 ng/g). The dog owners had significantly higher concentrations of Can f1 (8434 ng/g fine dust) in their clothes than cat owners (1629 ng/g, p < 0.01), children without cat or dog (2742 ng/g, p < 0.05) and children with asthma (1518 ng/g, p < 0001). The cat owners did not have significantly higher levels of Fel d1 (1105 ng/g) in their clothes compared to the other three groups. (D: 247 ng/g, nCnD: 418 ng/g) but the levels were significantly higher than for all children without a cat at home (345 ng/g, p < 0.05). No concentrations of mite allergen and low concentrations of Fel d1 and Can f1 were found in the children's hair. There were significantly higher concentrations of Fel d1 and Can f1 in dust from curtains than in samples from floors and bookshelves (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the allergen concentrations in samples from curtains and from desks and chairs, including the teachers' chairs, the only upholstered furniture in the rooms. Our results support the hypothesis that cat and dog owners bring allergens to public areas in their clothes and support other studies showing that textiles and upholstered furniture function as reservoirs of cat and dog allergens. Thus, children with asthma and other allergic diseases will be exposed to cat and dog allergens at school and by contact with pet owners, even if they avoid animal allergens at home.

Effects of damp and mould in the home on respiratory health: a review of the literature

This review examines whether there is a direct or indirect relation between damp or mould in the home and respiratory health. Home dampness is thought to have health consequences because it has the potential to increase the proliferation of house-dust mites and moulds, both of which are allergenic. The results from the many studies conducted to investigate whether damp and mould are associated with health outcomes are difficult to compare because the methods of measuring exposures and health outcomes have not been standardized. However, the studies that have been conducted in children are probably the most reliable because the confounding effects of active smoking or occupational exposures are absent, and because the presence of symptoms of cough and wheeze have been consistently investigated in many studies. The increased risk of children having these symptoms if the home has damp or mould is fairly small with an odds ratio that is generally in the range 1.5-3.5, these estimates being statistically significant when the sample size has been large enough. This range is consistent with the measured effects of other environmental exposures which are considered important to health, such as environmental tobacco smoke or outdoor air pollutants. The potential benefits of reducing mould in the home have not been investigated, and the few studies that have investigated health improvements as a result of increasing ventilation or reducing damp in order to reduce house-dust mite levels suggest that this intervention is expensive, requires a large commitment, and is unlikely to be successful in the long term. This implies that houses need to be specifically designed for primary prevention of respiratory problems associated with indoor allergen proliferation rather than using post hoc procedures to improve indoor climate and reduce allergen load as a secondary or tertiary preventive strategy.

Distribution, aerodynamic characteristics, and removal of the major cat allergen Fel d 1 in British homes

BACKGROUND

Sensitisation to cat allergen (Fel d 1) is an important risk factor for asthma in the UK. A study was undertaken to investigate the distribution of cat allergen in British homes, the aerodynamic characteristics and particle size distribution of airborne Fel d 1, and the method of removing it.

METHODS

Dust was collected from 50 homes with a cat and from 50 homes without a cat, and airborne levels of Fel d 1 were measured in 50 homes with a cat and 75 homes without a cat. Particle size distribution was determined using an Andersen sampler (8 hours/day) in 10 homes with cats. This was repeated on five separate days in a house with four cats, and then one, two, four, seven, and 14 days after the cats were removed from the living room area. The effect of high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) cleaner on airborne levels of Fel d 1 was investigated in seven homes with cats. Samples were collected on two separate days from two rooms of each house concurrently, one of which contained the cat, one day with the HEPA cleaner on and the other day as a control. Three one hourly samples were collected over a nine hour period (baseline, 4-5 hours, 8-9 hours) using a high volume dust sampler (air flow rate 60 l/min) and the air sample was collected onto a microglass fibre filter (pore size 0.3 micron).

RESULTS

Fel d 1 concentrations were much lower in houses without a cat than in those with a cat (260-fold difference (95% CI 167 to 590) in living room carpets: geometric mean (GM) 0.9 microgram/g (range 0.06-33.93) versus 237 micrograms/g (range 2.8-3000); 314-fold difference (95% CI 167 to 590) in upholstered furniture: 1.21 micrograms/g (range 0.06-61.9) versus 380 micrograms/g (range 7.1-6000); 228-fold difference (95% CI 109 to 478) in bedroom carpets: 0.24 microgram/g (range 0.06-2.24) versus 55 micrograms/g (range 0.06-2304); and 215-fold difference (95% CI 101 to 456) in mattresses: 0.2 microgram/g (range 0.06-2.3) versus 55 micrograms/g (range 0.06-3400). Airborne levels of Fel d 1 were detected in all houses with cats, and the levels varied greatly between the homes (range 0.7-38 ng/m3). Low concentrations of airborne Fel d 1 (range 0.24-1.78 ng/m3) were found in 22 of 75 homes without a cat. Although airborne Fel d 1 was mostly associated with large particles (> 9 microns, approximately 49% of the allergen recovered), small particles (< 4.7 microns) comprised approximately 23% of the total airborne allergen. Total airborne Fel d 1 was reduced by 61.7% two days after removal of the cat but this was due predominantly to the decrease in larger particles (> 4.8 microns) which fell to 13% of their baseline level. Fel d 1 levels associated with small particles (< 4.8 microns) remained largely unchanged on days 1, 2 and 4 and then slowly decreased to 33% of the baseline levels at day 14. With HEPA cleaner a significant reduction in airborne Fel d 1 was observed compared with the control sampling (GM 5.04-0.88 ng/m3 versus 3.79-1.56 ng/m3 at baseline and 8 hours, active versus control group; p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Airborne Fel d 1 was detectable in undisturbed conditions in all homes with cats and in almost a third of homes without cats. In houses with cats a significant proportion (23%) of airborne Fel d 1 was associated with small particles (< 4.7 microns diameter). Removal of the cat from the living room and bedroom areas of the home and the use of HEPA air cleaner reduced airborne levels of cat allergen in homes with cats, but the reduction following cat removal was not evenly spread across the particle size range.

Domestic allergens in public places III: house dust mite, cat, dog and cockroach allergens in British hospitals

BACKGROUND

Exposure and sensitization to indoor allergens is a major cause of asthma.

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the levels of house dust mite, cat, dog and cockroach allergens in the dust and air in hospitals and the effects of regular vacuum cleaning on allergen levels in hospital chairs.

METHODS

Der p 1, Fel d 1, Can f 1 and Bla g 2 were measured in the dust collected by vacuuming upholstered chairs and a 1 m2 area of carpet and mattress in 14 hospitals. Air samples were collected using an air sampler (flow rate 60 L/min) on 10 separate days for 4 h in the outpatient department in one of the hospitals during busy clinics when patients were waiting for their appointments. In addition, dust samples were collected on four occasions, at 4-weekly intervals, from 36 fabric covered chairs in the outpatient area of a busy chest clinic by vacuuming each chair for 2 min. During the intervening weeks, 18 of the chairs (active group) were each cleaned by vacuuming for 1 min, three times per week. Der p 1, Fel d 1, Can f 1 and Bla g 2 were assayed using monoclonal antibody-based ELISA.

RESULTS

In total, 83 carpets, 69 mattresses and 42 upholstered chairs were sampled. The levels of dust mite allergen Der p 1 and cockroach allergen Bla g 2 found in the hospital setting were low. High levels of Fel d 1 (GM 22.9 microg/g, range 4.5-58) and Can f 1 (GM 21.6 microg/g, range 4-63) were found in upholstered chairs. Airborne Can f 1 was detected on every occasion (range 0.12-0.56 ng/m3), whilst detectable airborne Fel d 1 was found on 7 out of the 10 sampling days (range 0.09-0.22 ng/m3). Der p 1 and Bla g 2 were below the detection limit in all airborne samples. Following repeated vacuuming the mean cat and dog allergen levels decreased significantly (P<0.001) and were almost fivefold lower in the vacuumed chairs compared with the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Low levels of mite allergen are unlikely to be of any clinical significance to mite-sensitive asthmatic patients. However, upholstered chairs in hospitals constitute a significant reservoir of cat and dog allergen. Inhalation of airborne allergen in patients attending their hospital appointment may exacerbate asthma in those highly allergic to cats or dogs. These results question the wisdom of introducing soft furnishings and carpets into hospitals. Three-times weekly vacuuming significantly reduces allergen levels in upholstered chairs.

Sick building syndrome--a wolf in sheep's clothing

OBJECTIVE

Reading this article will acquaint the reader with possible outcomes associated with the diagnosis of "sick building syndrome." The definition, epidemiology, and precipitating events of this symptom complex are distinguished from other defined building-related illnesses.

DATA SOURCE

The author's experience with many patients presenting with this diagnostic label and selected studies on indoor pollution and "sick building syndrome" are carefully reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION

Pertinent scientific investigations on "sick building syndrome" and previously published reviews on this and related subjects that met the educational objectives were critically reviewed.

RESULTS

"Sick building syndrome" is a pseudodiagnosis composed of nonspecific, transient symptoms without proven biologic markers. Its application in the clinical setting invites frequent subsequent linkage to other similar vague diagnoses associated with chronic debility and lack of therapeutic intervention.

CONCLUSION

The reader is encouraged to avoid the use of this term in favor of a simpler, descriptive diagnosis (e.g., transient office-related annoyance and/or irritation) or if this seems inadequate, adoption of the diagnostic label of "idiopathic building intolerance."

Exposure chamber for allergen challenge. A placebo-controlled, double-blind trial in house-dust-mite asthma

Exposure chambers have proven to be valuable tools in the study of reactions to aeroallergens, and in monitoring the efficacy of antiallergic therapy. In the present study, 15 house-dust-mite-allergic asthmatics and five nonallergic volunteers were challenged in a recently developed exposure chamber. The trial was performed double-blinded with house-dust-mite allergen or placebo. Patients with allergy to house-dust mite (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus) (Der p) were included by positive skin prick test, allergen-specific IgE, and conventional bronchial allergen challenge, with nebulizer and mouthpiece. In the exposure chamber, a total allergen dose corresponding to 1200 ng Der p 1 was applied. All participants kept diaries, recording peak expiratory flow rates, symptoms, and medication in periods of at least 2 weeks before and after each challenge. Twelve of the 15 asthmatics reacted with asthmatic symptoms with a median change in FEV1 of -16.4% when exposed to the allergen, but not to placebo, in the exposure chamber. Three patients had only minor symptoms during both chamber exposures and experienced no impairment of pulmonary function. Late-phase reactions were less frequent (one vs three) after the exposure chamber challenges, as compared to the traditional challenges. None of the healthy subjects reacted to the challenges. In conclusion, our exposure chamber was able to elicit symptoms in allergic subjects, and this ability was obtained with only minor amounts of house-dust-mite allergen. The described method could prove to be a more physiologically relevant model to monitor individual responses to aeroallergens.