51
|
de Brito Sanchez MG, Chen C, Li J, Liu F, Gauthier M, Giurfa M. Behavioral studies on tarsal gustation in honeybees: sucrose responsiveness and sucrose-mediated olfactory conditioning. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 2008; 194:861-9. [PMID: 18704443 DOI: 10.1007/s00359-008-0357-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2008] [Revised: 07/22/2008] [Accepted: 07/26/2008] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Although the forelegs of honeybees are one of their main gustatory appendages, tarsal gustation in bees has never been systematically studied. To provide a more extensive account on honeybee tarsal gustation, we performed a series of behavioral experiments aimed at characterizing (1) tarsal sucrose sensitivity under different experimental conditions and (2) the capacity of tarsal sucrose stimulation to support olfactory conditioning. We quantified the proboscis extension reflex to tarsal sucrose stimulation and to odors paired with tarsal sucrose stimulation, respectively. Our experiments show that tarsal sucrose sensitivity is lower than antennal sucrose sensitivity and can be increased by starvation time. In contrast, antennae amputation decreases tarsal sucrose sensitivity. Furthermore, we show that tarsal sucrose stimulation can support olfactory learning and memory even if the acquisition level reached is relatively low (40%).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Gabriela de Brito Sanchez
- Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, CNRS, Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, 118 route de Narbonne, 31062, Toulouse Cedex 9, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
52
|
Guerrieri FJ, d'Ettorre P. The mandible opening response: quantifying aggression elicited by chemical cues in ants. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2008; 211:1109-13. [PMID: 18344485 DOI: 10.1242/jeb.008508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Social insects have evolved efficient recognition systems guaranteeing social cohesion and protection from enemies. To defend their territories and threaten non-nestmate intruders, ants open their mandibles as a first aggressive display. Albeit chemical cues play a major role in discrimination between nestmates and non-nestmates, classical bioassays based on aggressive behaviour were not particularly effective in disentangling chemical perception and behavioural components of nestmate recognition by means of categorical variables. We therefore developed a novel bioassay that accurately isolates chemical perception from other cues. We studied four ant species: Camponotus herculeanus, C. vagus, Formica rufibarbis and F. cunicularia. Chemical analyses of cuticular extracts of workers of these four species showed that they varied in the number and identity of compounds and that species of the same genus have more similar profiles. The antennae of harnessed ants were touched with a glass rod coated with the cuticular extract of (a) nestmates, (b) non-nestmates of the same species, (c) another species of the same genus and (d) a species of a different genus. The mandible opening response (MOR) was recorded as the aggressive response. In all assayed species, MOR significantly differed among stimuli, being weakest towards nestmate odour and strongest towards odours originating from ants of a different genus. We thus introduce here a new procedure suitable for studying the chemical basis of aggression in ants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando J Guerrieri
- Centre for Social Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
| | | |
Collapse
|
53
|
Dyer AG, Spaethe J, Prack S. Comparative psychophysics of bumblebee and honeybee colour discrimination and object detection. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 2008; 194:617-27. [PMID: 18437390 DOI: 10.1007/s00359-008-0335-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 141] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2008] [Revised: 04/07/2008] [Accepted: 04/10/2008] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian G Dyer
- Department of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
54
|
Dyer AG, Rosa MGP, Reser DH. Honeybees can recognise images of complex natural scenes for use as potential landmarks. J Exp Biol 2008; 211:1180-6. [DOI: 10.1242/jeb.016683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
SUMMARY
The ability to navigate long distances to find rewarding flowers and return home is a key factor in the survival of honeybees (Apis mellifera). To reliably perform this task, bees combine both odometric and landmark cues,which potentially creates a dilemma since environments rich in odometric cues might be poor in salient landmark cues, and vice versa. In the present study, honeybees were provided with differential conditioning to images of complex natural scenes, in order to determine if they could reliably learn to discriminate between very similar scenes, and to recognise a learnt scene from a novel distractor scene. Choices made by individual bees were modelled with signal detection theory, and bees demonstrated an ability to discriminate between perceptually similar target and distractor views despite similar spatiotemporal content of the images. In a non-rewarded transfer test bees were also able to recognise target stimuli from novel distractors. These findings indicate that visual processing in bees is sufficiently accurate for recognising views of complex scenery as potential landmarks, which would enable bees flying in a forest to use trees both as landmark and/or odometric cues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian G. Dyer
- Centre for Brain and Behaviour, Department of Physiology, Monash University,Clayton 3800, VI, Australia
- Institut fur Zoologie III (Neurobologie) Johannes Gutenburg Universität,Mainz 55099, Germany
| | - Marcello G. P. Rosa
- Centre for Brain and Behaviour, Department of Physiology, Monash University,Clayton 3800, VI, Australia
| | - David H. Reser
- Centre for Brain and Behaviour, Department of Physiology, Monash University,Clayton 3800, VI, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Jørgensen K, Almaas TJ, Marion-Poll F, Mustaparta H. Electrophysiological Characterization of Responses from Gustatory Receptor Neurons of sensilla chaetica in the Moth Heliothis virescens. Chem Senses 2007; 32:863-79. [PMID: 17768225 DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjm057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Discrimination of edible and noxious food is crucial for survival in all organisms. We have studied the physiology of the gustatory receptor neurons (GRNs) in contact chemosensilla (insect gustatory organs) located on the antennae of the moth Heliothis virescens, emphasizing putative phagostimulants and deterrents. Sucrose and the 2 bitter substances quinine and sinigrin elicited responses in a larger proportion of GRNs than inositol, KCl, NaCl, and ethanol, and the firing thresholds were lowest for sucrose and quinine. Variations in GRN composition in individual sensilla occurred without any specific patterns to indicate specific sensillum types. Separate neurons showed excitatory responses to sucrose and the 2 bitter substances quinine and sinigrin, implying that the moth might be able to discriminate bitter substances in addition to separating phagostimulants and deterrents. Besides being detected by separate receptors on the moth antennae, the bitter tastants were shown to have an inhibitory effect on phagostimulatory GRNs. Sucrose was highly appetitive in behavioral studies of proboscis extension, whereas quinine had a nonappetitive effect in the moths.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kari Jørgensen
- Neuroscience Unit, Department of Biology, NTNU, Olav Kyrres gate 9, NO-7489, Trondheim, Norway.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
56
|
Glendinning JI, Jerud A, Reinherz AT. The hungry caterpillar: an analysis of how carbohydrates stimulate feeding inManduca sexta. J Exp Biol 2007; 210:3054-67. [PMID: 17704080 DOI: 10.1242/jeb.004671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
SUMMARYIn most insects, the taste of carbohydrates stimulates an immediate appetitive response. The caterpillar of Manduca sexta is an exception to this general pattern. Despite eliciting a strong peripheral gustatory response, high concentrations of carbohydrates (e.g. glucose or inositol)stimulate the same intensity of biting as water during 2-min tests. We suspected that the lack of feeding stimulation reflected the fact that prior studies used single carbohydrates (e.g. sucrose), which M. sextawould rarely encounter in its host plants. We hypothesized that the feeding control system of M. sexta responds selectively to carbohydrate mixtures. To test this hypothesis, we ran three experiments. First, we stimulated the two taste sensilla that respond to carbohydrates (the lateral and medial styloconic) with a battery of carbohydrates. These sensilla responded exclusively to sucrose, glucose and inositol. Second, we determined the response properties of the carbohydrate-sensitive taste cells within both sensilla. We found that one class of carbohydrate-sensitive taste cell responded to sucrose, and two other classes each responded to glucose and inositol. Third, we examined the initial biting responses of caterpillars to disks treated with solutions containing single carbohydrates (sucrose, glucose or inositol) or binary mixtures of these carbohydrates. The only solutions that stimulated sustained biting were those that activated all three classes of taste cell (i.e. sucrose+inositol or sucrose+glucose). We propose that the brain of M. sexta monitors input from the different classes of carbohydrate-sensitive taste cell, and generates protracted feeding responses only when all three classes are activated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John I Glendinning
- Department of Biological Sciences, Barnard College, Columbia University, 3009 Broadway, New York, NY 10027, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
57
|
Giurfa M. Behavioral and neural analysis of associative learning in the honeybee: a taste from the magic well. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 2007; 193:801-24. [PMID: 17639413 DOI: 10.1007/s00359-007-0235-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 279] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2007] [Revised: 04/21/2007] [Accepted: 04/22/2007] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Equipped with a mini brain smaller than one cubic millimeter and containing only 950,000 neurons, honeybees could be indeed considered as having rather limited cognitive abilities. However, bees display a rich and interesting behavioral repertoire, in which learning and memory play a fundamental role in the framework of foraging activities. We focus on the question of whether adaptive behavior in honeybees exceeds simple forms of learning and whether the neural mechanisms of complex learning can be unraveled by studying the honeybee brain. Besides elemental forms of learning, in which bees learn specific and univocal links between events in their environment, bees also master different forms of non-elemental learning, including categorization, contextual learning and rule abstraction, both in the visual and in the olfactory domain. Different protocols allow accessing the neural substrates of some of these learning forms and understanding how complex problem solving can be achieved by a relatively simple neural architecture. These results underline the enormous richness of experience-dependent behavior in honeybees, its high flexibility, and the fact that it is possible to formalize and characterize in controlled laboratory protocols basic and higher-order cognitive processing using an insect as a model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Giurfa
- Research Centre on Animal Cognition, CNRS - University Paul Sabatier, 118 route de Narbonne, 31062, Toulouse cedex 9, France.
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Jørgensen K, Stranden M, Sandoz JC, Menzel R, Mustaparta H. Effects of two bitter substances on olfactory conditioning in the moth Heliothis virescens. J Exp Biol 2007; 210:2563-73. [PMID: 17601960 DOI: 10.1242/jeb.004283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
SUMMARY
In nature, moths encounter nutritious and toxic substances in plants, and thus have to discriminate between a diversity of tastants. Whereas olfactory learning allowing memory of nutritious plants is well demonstrated, little is known about learning and memory of toxic items in adult lepidopterans. Moths may use bitter substances to detect and possibly learn to avoid noxious plants. We have studied the physiological and behavioural effects of two bitter substances, quinine and sinigrin, on the moth Heliothis virescens. Electrophysiological recordings showed responses to both compounds in gustatory receptor neurons on the antennae. The response patterns suggested a peripheral discrimination between quinine and sinigrin. We evaluated their putative aversive effect in an appetitive conditioning context where the moths learned to associate an odour with sucrose. We first aimed at enhancing olfactory conditioning of the proboscis extension response by testing the effect of the sucrose concentration on acquisition, retention and extinction. 2 mol l–1 and 3 mol l–1 sucrose concentration gave similar acquisition, retention and extinction performances. Experiments involving pre-exposure or facilitated extinction with an odour paired with quinine, sinigrin or no tastant showed a latent inhibitory effect,as well as an aversive effect of quinine and, to a lesser extent, of sinigrin. The results suggested that the two tastants may act as negative reinforcers in H. virescens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kari Jørgensen
- Neuroscience Unit, Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|