Disability awareness arena in Sweden: voices of learning toward community facilities, universal design and disability perspective

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to describe knowledge, awareness and experience of different employees in a Swedish municipality (City of Gothenburg) concerning the disability perspective, accessibility and universal design in practice.

Design/methodology/approach

This study is based on an online survey. A total of 119 different employees responded to the survey. The data was analyzed from a mixed-method approach, using descriptive statistics and textual analysis. The study also included personal interviews with 19 employees in the City of Gothenburg.

Findings

A total of 521 employees in the City of Gothenburg participated in disability awareness exercises (DAE) at the Disability Awareness Arena to gain greater knowledge and insight on disability perspectives in different environments and services. Of these, 119 people representing different professions in soft and hard services and companies participated in the survey; and 19 people participated in personal interviews. The study showed that a vast majority of them were very satisfied and they have developed and practiced their new knowledge and attitude toward disability and accessibility.

Research limitations/implications

One limitation in this study is that it has investigated the experiences and effects of the DAE 6–12 months after its implementation. Therefore, it is not possible to analyze long-term effects that the DAE can have in practice.

Originality/value

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no prior study of these issues has been conducted in Sweden. This study is deemed to have significant social benefit because of the steadily increasing demand for disability simulations, awareness of disability perspective and accessibility in municipality settings. No other study has addressed the importance of the DAE in these perspectives. DAE is defined in this article as a unique concept for promoting the usage of the disability perspective in the everyday workplace.

Health care access and the Americans with Disabilities Act: A mixed methods study

BACKGROUND

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires that health care entities provide full and equal access to people with disabilities. However, results of previous studies have indicated that the ADA has been largely ineffective at creating systemic change in the delivery of health care.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to examine the current barriers to health care access experienced by people with disabilities under Titles II and III of the ADA.

METHODS

This study utilized a mixed methods multiphase design. In phase one, a survey and focus groups were conducted with individuals with disabilities who experienced barriers to health care access. In phase two, key informant interviews were conducted with individuals who had a role in ensuring equal access to health care for people with disabilities.

RESULTS

In the current context of health care reform, people with disabilities continue to experience multiple barriers to health care access under Titles II and III of the ADA. However, a notable result is that several provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) have likely bolstered existing directives implementing requirements for health care access under the ADA.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study provide additional support for a comprehensive examination of both the national standards for accessible health care and the enforcement of laws that prohibit discrimination on the basis of disability.

Explicit and implicit disability attitudes of healthcare providers

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE

Health care providers' attitudes of marginalized groups can be key factors that contribute to health care access and outcome disparities because of their influence on patient encounters as well as clinical decision-making. Despite a growing body of knowledge linking disparate health outcomes to providers' clinical decision making, less research has focused on providers' attitudes about disability. The aim of this study was to examine providers' explicit and implicit disability attitudes, interactions between their attitudes, and correlates of explicit and implicit bias. Research Method/Design: We analyzed secondary data from 25,006 health care providers about their disability attitudes. In addition to analyzing people's explicit and implicit attitudes (Disability Attitudes Implicit Association Test), we used Son Hing, Chung-Yan, Hamilton, & Zanna's (2008) model of two-dimensional prejudice to compare provider's explicit and implicit attitudes. Finally, we used linear regression models to examine correlates of providers' explicit and implicit attitudes.

RESULTS

While on average, provider's explicit attitudes (M = 4.41) indicated little prejudice, their implicit attitudes (M = 0.54) revealed they moderately preferred nondisabled people-they were aversive ableists. Correlates of providers' explicit and implicit attitudes also included age, gender, political orientation, and having relationships with disability (friends, family, and being a person with disability).

CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS

This study revealed that despite a majority of providers self-reporting not being biased against people with disabilities, implicitly, the overwhelming majority were biased. This study's findings can be used to better understand how provider disability bias can contribute to inequitable health care access and health outcomes for people with disabilities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Past, Present, and Future

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an autosomal recessive neuromuscular disease caused by deletions or mutations in the survival motor neuron (SMN1) gene. SMA is characterized by loss of lower motor neurons (anterior horn cells) in the spinal cord and brainstem nuclei, leading to progressive symmetrical muscle weakness and atrophy. It affects approximately 1 in 6,000 to 1 in 10,000 individuals and is the most common inherited cause of childhood mortality, but this may soon change given recent developments. In December 2016, nusinersen, an antisense oligonucleotide drug, was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of SMA, and in July 2018, SMA was added to the recommended uniform screening panel, a list of conditions that all states are encouraged to include in their newborn screening (NBS) panels. In this review, we begin with a brief clinical history of the diagnosis of SMA, discuss the current SMA clinical classification system, describe the current treatment, and discuss evolving treatment guidelines. We then discuss the path to include SMA in NBS programs as well as the controversies it engenders because the variability in age at symptom onset means early identification of asymptomatic patients who will not require therapy for years or decades. We also consider alternate population screening opportunities. Next, we consider experimental treatments. We conclude by supporting NBS for SMA with the caveat that a long-term follow-up registry is ethically essential to ensure that the benefits outweigh the harms for all screened infants, including those with milder and/or later-onset forms of SMA.

Factors that influence the use of community assets by people with physical disabilities: results of participatory mapping in Envigado, Colombia

BACKGROUND

Disability is an evolving concept that results from the complex interaction between a person with an impairment and the context in which he/she lives. There is limited understanding on the types, access and use of community assets valuable for people with disabilities, and the role of contextual factors in Colombia. Our goal with this work was to identify the factors at the levels of the socio-ecological framework, and their interaction, that influence the use of community assets among people with physical disabilities and community stakeholders in Envigado, Colombia.

METHODS

Using participatory mapping, a community based participatory approach, we carried out an assessment of community assets identified by people with disabilities and rehabilitation professionals. In-depth interviews (n = 32) informed the design of two participatory mapping activities, one among people with disabilities (n = 5) and a second with rehabilitation professionals (n = 4). Results were presented in a community forum to receive feedback on the findings.

RESULTS

Main findings indicate a chain of contextual factors that limit access and use of assets stemming from the personal (e.g. financial resources, inaccessible housing), interpersonal level (e.g. lack of a personal assistance or aid), and community levels (e.g. lack of accessible public transportation and inaccessible buildings). In most cases these barriers are heightened by system level barriers (e.g. lack of effective enforcement of the legal framework).

CONCLUSIONS

Identifying these contextual factors, and their interactions, calls for stronger enforcement of the existing legal framework through articulated work between different stakeholders, so that people with disabilities can enjoy community assets.

COVID-19 and the need for disability conscious medical education, training, and practice

The COVID-19 era exposes what was already a crisis in the medical profession: structural racism, ageism, sexism, classism, and ableism resulting in healthcare disparities for Persons with Disabilities (PWD). Early research highlights these disparities, but we do not yet know the full impact of this pandemic on PWD. Over the last 20 years, many medical schools have attempted to develop disability competency trainings, but discrimination and inequities remain, resulting in a pervasive distrust of medicine by the disability community at large. In this commentary, we suggest that disability competency is insufficient because the healthcare disparities experienced by PWD are not simply a matter of individual biases, but structural and systemic factors requiring a culture shift in the healthcare professions. Recognizing that disability is a form of diversity that is experienced alongside other systemic disadvantages like social class, race, age, sex, gender identity, and geographic location, we explore the transformative potential of disability conscious medical education, training, and practice that draws on insights from intersectional disability justice activism. Disability conscious medicine is a novel approach, which improves upon competency programs by utilizing disability studies and the principles of disability justice to guide us in the critique of norms, traditions, and institutions to more fully promote the respect, beneficence, and justice that patients deserve.

Children living with HIV-related disabilities in a resource-poor community in South Africa: caregiver perceptions of caring and rehabilitation

The care offered to children living with HIV (CLHIV) experiencing HIV-related disability is often challenged by caregiver illness, poverty and poor support structures in and around communities. Since caregiver needs directly influences the care offered to CLHIV this paper aimed to explore the experiences of the caregivers of CLHIV in order to inform an appropriate rehabilitation model in South Africa. A qualitative enquiry using in-depth interviews with 14 caregivers (one male and thirteen females) of CLHIV experiencing disability in a peri-urban setting was conducted. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Four themes emerged from the interviews: understanding of HIV-related disability and rehabilitation, challengers to care and well-being, enablers to care; and perceived needs of caregivers. The study revealed that caregiver burden is influenced by the availability of resources and social support services. Financial constraints, poor access to rehabilitation and reduced support networks challenged the care offered to CLHIV. The perceived needs of the caregivers in this study included appeals for improved social security, housing, accessible rehabilitation and education. Changes in government policy guiding social support, employment, education and rehabilitation interventions are needed to improve the availability of resources, education, health and well-being of CLHIV and their caregiver's in South Africa.

Barriers to accessing cancer services for adults with physical disabilities in England and Wales: an interview-based study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to explore the barriers to accessing cancer services faced by adults with pre-existing physical disabilities.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional, exploratory qualitative study. Data were collected by semistructured interviews and analysed thematically.

SETTING

Participants were recruited through statutory and third sector organisations in England and Wales between October 2017 and October 2018.

PARTICIPANTS

18 people with a diagnosis of cancer and a pre-existing physical disability.

RESULTS

The findings illustrate that people with physical disabilities in England and Wales face a variety of barriers to accessing cancer services. The overall theme that emerged was that participants experienced a lack of attitudinal and institutional preparation both from healthcare professionals and healthcare facilities. This overall theme is illustrated through three subthemes: lack of acknowledgment of disability, unseeing disability and physical inaccessibility.

CONCLUSIONS

As the population ages and increasing numbers of people live with cancer and disability, it is important to develop knowledge to respond to the needs of this population. The mere existence of services does not guarantee their usability. Services need to be relevant, flexible, and accessible and offered in a respectful manner. It is important that healthcare professionals work towards inclusive healthcare provision, enabling the utilisation of services by all. Necessary steps to be taken include better communication between the various professionals and across the different teams involved in patients' care, raising awareness of how physical disability can affect or interact with cancer-related treatment and creating more accessible physical environments.

Disabled people say 'Nothing about us without us'

BACKGROUND

This study explored disability community representatives' perspectives on why and how health professional education could be strengthened to address the prevalent challenges in health care experienced by disabled people.

METHODS

A total of 14 people from the disability community (disabled people, caregivers and disability advocates) in Auckland, New Zealand, participated in three focus groups moderated by a disabled community researcher. Audiorecordings were transcribed and analysed thematically to characterise broad themes.

FINDINGS

Participants described many barriers to health care experienced by disabled people, with service providers' inadequate knowledge of disability issues being a key contributor. Participants viewed educational approaches incorporating disabled peoples' diverse lived realities as critical to improving health system responses to these inequities. They recommended broadening concepts and teaching methods to shift common deficit framing of disability, engaging disabled people to develop and deliver curricula, improving communication, and promoting empathic provider-patient partnerships in care. Study participants strongly advocated inclusive participatory approaches across training pathways using assistive and multimedia technologies that optimise the engagement of disabled people and reduce respondent burden.

DISCUSSION

Disability community participants urged strengthening health professional training to address the prevalent inadequacies of health systems in responding to disabled people's needs. They viewed a greater awareness of the lived realities of disabled people and critical consciousness to overcome barriers to care as essential attributes of a competent workforce. These findings indicate the need to engage, empower and work in partnership with disabled people to develop reflexive health professional curricula. Core competencies should be considered mandatory given the increasing prevalence of disability globally. This study explored disability community representatives' perspectives on why and how health professional education could … address … challenges in health care experienced by disabled people.

Relationships between occupational therapy students' understandings of disability and disability attitudes

Background: Entering occupational therapy (OT) students have established beliefs, informed by sociocultural backgrounds. Understanding how students define and understand disability, and the relationships these understandings have to disability bias, can guide curriculum design decisions to integrate meso and macro level perspectives of disability into clinical reasoning.Aim/Objective: This study's aim was to explore incoming occupational therapy students' (n = 67) understandings of disability and their attitudes towards it.Material and method: An online survey was used to collect data on students' attitudes and definitions of disability. Mixed research methods were used to analyze students' definitions of disability (content analysis) in relation to disability attitudes (Disability Attitudes Implicit Association Test).Results/Finding: Findings reveal students enter curriculums with vast differences in understandings of people with disabilities and these may provide a basis for and contribute to differences in attitudes of disability.Conclusions: OT students have established beliefs of disability as individualized or more socially constructed and these influence disability biases.Significance: Students' education has considerable influence in shaping attitudes and ways of interacting with people with disability. Understanding students' assumptions as they enter a program is a first step to evaluate how curriculum design may influence development of student clinical reasoning strategies.

“The Bigger Picture”: Occupational Therapy Practitioners’ Perspectives on Disability Studies

OBJECTIVE. This qualitative study explored occupational therapy practitioners’ perspectives about integrating principles from the field of disability studies (DS) into clinical education and practice.

METHODS. After a conference presentation about DS, three simultaneous focus groups were conducted with 27 occupational therapy practitioners. A constant comparative, grounded-theory approach was used to identify themes across groups.

RESULTS. Identified themes included convergences and divergences between the profession of occupational therapy and the field of disability studies, influence of perspectives of disability on service delivery, clinician navigation of systemic barriers, and incorporation of DS-aligned intervention strategies into practice.

CONCLUSION. Despite points of alignment, occupational therapy has not fully addressed DS critiques. Practitioners recognized professional, systemic, and societal barriers and the need for more educational experiences, resources, and professional reflexivity and dialogue to inform the integration of DS concepts into practice.

Attitudes of health care professionals toward people with intellectual disability: a comparison with the general population

BACKGROUND

Few studies have examined attitudes that may promote the social inclusion of persons with an intellectual disability (ID) among health care providers (HCPs). Yet these attitudes could impact the accessibility and quality of services provided to this population, as well as the general attitudes of HCPs. The objectives of this study were to (1) examine HCPs' pro-inclusion attitudes toward people with ID, (2) compare these to the general population's attitudes and (3) examine how HCPs' attitudes vary as a function of their socio-demographic characteristics.

METHOD

The Attitudes Toward Intellectual Disability Questionnaire was administered to 367 HCPs and a representative sample of the Québec population (N = 1605).

RESULTS

Results indicated that at least half of HCPs displayed positive attitudes, that is, attitudes that are compatible with notions of social inclusion and equal rights, toward individuals with ID. Positive attitudes were less frequently observed for the Interaction and the Sensitivity or tenderness factors measured by the Attitudes Toward Intellectual Disability Questionnaire. In comparison with the general population, HCPs exhibited more positive attitudes on the Knowledge of causes and Sensitivity or tenderness factors and less positive attitudes on the Interaction factor. HCPs who regarded themselves as more knowledgeable about ID and those who reported higher quality contacts or interactions with persons with ID expressed attitudes that were more favourable toward social inclusion.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to providing general knowledge about ID and the specific health care needs of individuals with ID, training programmes should also promote interactions with this population. Further studies are needed to document HCPs' pro-inclusion attitudes toward people with ID and to assess the impact of interventions on these attitudes.

Nurturing constructive change that works: a critical theory-informed model for transforming health service psychologists’ views of people with disabilities

We have been developing and refining a disability training exercise for health service psychologists that is ever more effective at encouraging lasting change in the way students regard disabilities and the people who live with those disabilities. Although research suggests that simulation exercises tend to be ineffective at creating long-term attitude change in participants, quantitative and qualitative results indicate our exercise, composed of a simulation followed by debriefing and reflection, helps professionals better understand some of the challenges people with disabilities daily face, and how those challenges can affect their well being. We found this combination is more likely to yield long-term changes than any of these approaches alone. This paper is not principally the description of a pedagogical technique, but instead is an examination of how the combination of simulation, debriefing, and reflective journaling may challenge taken-for-granted assumptions about disabilities, e.g., that disabilities transform individuals into a different kind of human being (with either superhuman powers or as object of pity) instead of seeing these individuals as ordinary people facing extraordinary, and often society-created obstacles. One frequent call of Critical Theorists is to challenge those things we take for granted. Social and cultural structures create specific viewpoints and thus problematizing the apparent is necessary for understanding of, and emancipation from, potentially oppressive social structures. Inspired by this call to render the taken-for-granted as problematic, the exercise we describe creates inversions of performer/audience, professional/student, and scientist/researcher positions. In each of these inversions, the role of the objective observer is denied and the student is invited to engage in his or her own evaluative and potentially transformative experience. Through each of these inversions, different realities can be more readily utilized by thoughtful students to render problematic some of the dominant views about people with disabilities. To make this case, we utilize both qualitative and quantitative methods. The students’ own words, captured in their journals before and after the exercise, are examined in comparison with program goals and features. The weight of the evidence is impressive, indicating that the combination of simulation, debriefing and journaling reflection are effective at creating a space in which change of attitudes does occur.