Critical binding and regulatory interactions between Ras and Raf occur through a small, stable N-terminal domain of Raf and specific Ras effector residues

Cell type-specific regulation of B-Raf kinase by cAMP and 14-3-3 proteins

Cyclic AMP can either activate or inhibit the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway in different cell types; MAPK activation has been observed in B-Raf-expressing cells and has been attributed to Rap1 activation with subsequent B-Raf activation, whereas MAPK inhibition has been observed in cells lacking B-Raf and has been attributed to cAMP-dependent protein kinase (protein kinase A)-mediated phosphorylation and inhibition of Raf-1 kinase. We found that cAMP stimulated MAPK activity in CHO-K1 and PC12 cells but inhibited MAPK activity in C6 and NB2A cells. In all four cell types, cAMP activated Rap1, and the 95- and 68-kDa isoforms of B-Raf were expressed. cAMP activation or inhibition of MAPK correlated with activation or inhibition of endogenous and transfected B-Raf kinase. Although all cell types expressed similar amounts of 14-3-3 proteins, approximately 5-fold less 14-3-3 was associated with B-Raf in cells in which cAMP was inhibitory than in cells in which cAMP was stimulatory. We found that the cell type-specific inhibition of B-Raf could be completely prevented by overexpression of 14-3-3 isoforms, whereas expression of a dominant negative 14-3-3 mutant resulted in partial loss of B-Raf activity. Our data suggest that 14-3-3 bound to B-Raf protects the enzyme from protein kinase A-mediated inhibition; the amount of 14-3-3 associated with B-Raf may explain the tissue-specific effects of cAMP on B-Raf kinase activity.

Point mutants of c-raf-1 RBD with elevated binding to v-Ha-Ras

A mutational analysis of the Ras-binding domain (RBD) of c-Raf-1 identified three amino acid positions (Asn(64), Ala(85), and Val(88)) where amino acid substitution with basic residues increases the binding of RBD to recombinant v-Ha-Ras. The greatest increase in binding (6-9-fold) was observed with the A85K-RBD mutant. The elevated binding for the A85K-RBD and V88R-RBD mutants was also detected with Ras expressed in cultured mammalian cells, namely NIH-3T3 and BAF cells. None of the wild type residues in RBD positions Asn(64), Ala(85), and Val(88) have been previously implicated in the interaction with Ras (Block, C., Janknecht, R., Herrmann, C., Nassar, N., and Wittinghofer, A. (1996) Nat. Struct. Biol. 3, 244-251; Nassar, N., Horn, G., Herrmann, C., Scherer, A., McCormick, F., and Wittinghofer, A. (1995) Nature 375, 554-560). The discovery of elevated binding among the mutants in these positions implies that additional RBD residues can be used to generate the Ras. RBD complex. These findings are of particular significance in the design of Ras antagonists based on the RBD prototype. The A85K-RBD mutant can be used to develop an assay for measuring the level of activated Ras in cultured cells; Sepharose-linked A85K-RBD.GST fusion protein served as an activation-specific probe to precipitate Ras.GTP but not Ras.GDP from epidermal growth factor-stimulated cells. A85K-RBD precipitates up to 5-fold more Ras.GTP from mammalian cells than wild type RBD.

Phosphorylation of serine 43 is not required for inhibition of c-Raf kinase by the cAMP-dependent protein kinase

The activity of the serine/threonine kinase c-Raf (Raf) is inhibited by increased intracellular cAMP. This is believed to require phosphorylation with the cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA), although the mechanism by which PKA inhibits Raf is controversial. We investigated the requirement for PKA phosphorylation using Raf mutants expressed in HEK293 or NIH 3T3 cells. Phosphopeptide mapping of (32)P-labeled Raf (WT) or a mutant lacking a putative PKA phosphorylation site (serine to alanine, S43A) confirmed that serine 43 (Ser(43)) was the major cAMP (forskolin)-stimulated phosphorylation site in vivo. Interestingly, the EGF-stimulated Raf kinase activity of the S43A mutant was inhibited by forskolin equivalently to that of the WT Raf. Forskolin also inhibited the activation of an N-terminal deletion mutant Delta5-50 Raf completely lacking this phosphorylation site. Although WT Raf was phosphorylated by PKA, phosphorylation did not inhibit Raf catalytic activity in vitro, nor did forskolin treatment inhibit the activity of an N-terminally truncated Raf protein (Raf 22W) or a full-length Raf protein (Raf-CAAX) expressed in NIH 3T3 cells. In contrast, forskolin inhibited the EGF-dependent activation of a Raf isoform (B-Raf), lacking an analogous phosphorylation site to Ser(43). Thus, these results demonstrate that PKA exerts its inhibitory effects independently of direct Raf phosphorylation and suggests instead that PKA prevents an event required for the EGF-dependent activation of Raf.

Elucidation of binding determinants and functional consequences of Ras/Raf-cysteine-rich domain interactions

Raf-1 is a critical downstream target of Ras and contains two distinct domains that bind Ras. The first Ras-binding site (RBS1) in Raf-1 has been shown to be essential for Ras-mediated translocation of Raf-1 to the plasma membrane, whereas the second site, in the Raf-1 cysteine-rich domain (Raf-CRD), has been implicated in regulating Raf kinase activity. While recognition elements that promote Ras.RBS1 complex formation have been characterized, relatively little is known about Ras/Raf-CRD interactions. In this study, we have characterized interactions important for Ras binding to the Raf-CRD. Reconciling conflicting reports, we found that these interactions are essentially independent of the guanine nucleotide bound state, but instead, are enhanced by post-translational modification of Ras. Specifically, our findings indicate that Ras farnesylation is sufficient for stable association of Ras with the Raf-CRD. Furthermore, we have also identified a Raf-CRD variant that is impaired specifically in its interactions with Ras. NMR data also suggests that residues proximal to this mutation site on the Raf-CRD form contacts with Ras. This Raf-CRD mutant impairs the ability of Ras to activate Raf kinase, thereby providing additional support that Ras interactions with the Raf-CRD are important for Ras-mediated activation of Raf-1.

Crosstalk between protein kinase A and growth factor receptor signaling pathways in arterial smooth muscle

Crosstalk between the cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) and growth factor receptor signaling is one of many emerging concepts of crosstalk in signal transduction. Understanding of PKA crosstalk may have important implications for studies of crosstalk between other, less well known, signaling pathways. This review focuses on PKA crosstalk in arterial smooth muscle. Proliferation and migration of arterial smooth muscle cells (SMCs) contribute to the thickening of the blood vessel wall that occurs in many types of cardiovascular disease. PKA potently inhibits SMC proliferation by antagonizing the major mitogenic signaling pathways induced by growth factors in SMCs. PKA also inhibits growth factor-induced SMC migration. An intricate crosstalk between PKA and the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK/ERK) pathway, the p70 S6 kinase pathway and cyclin-dependent kinases has been described. Further, PKA regulates expression of growth regulatory molecules. The result of PKA activation in SMCs is the potent inhibition of cell cycle traverse and SMC migration. In this review, we discuss recent advances in our understanding of the crosstalk between PKA and signaling pathways induced by growth factor receptors in SMCs, and where relevant, in other cell types in which interesting examples of PKA crosstalk have been described.

Activation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2 by metabotropic glutamate receptors

Activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) leads to modulation of a variety of second messenger pathways probably including the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases (ERK). MAPK play a key role in the control of cellular responses to changes in the external environment by regulating transcriptional activity and the phosphorylation state of several cytoplasmic targets. In this study, Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells permanently transfected with rat mGluR1a, mGluR2 and mGluR4 were employed as a model to examine the activation of MAPK by glutamate through mGluRs. All three mGluR subtypes rapidly stimulated ERK activation. In particular, mGluR1a and mGluR2 preferentially mediated phosphorylation and activation of ERK2 in a pertussis toxin (PTX)-sensitive and concentration-dependent manner. The activation was blocked completely by pretreatment with the antagonist (rs)-alpha-methyl-4-carboxyphenylglycine (MCPG) or with the MEK inhibitor PD098059. Furthermore, mGluR1a-mediated ERK activation was suppressed by the depletion of endogenous protein kinase C (PKC) activity and by the PKC inhibitors staurosporine and calphostin C, but not chelerythrine. When cAMP was elevated in mGluR2-expressing cells, by forskolin or dibutyryl-cAMP, slight elevation of ERK activity was observed. However, glutamate-stimulated ERK activation remained unaffected. In these cells, the phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K) inhibitor wortmannin produced a significant, albeit only partial, inhibition of mGluR2-mediated ERK activation. These findings raise the possibility of a MAPK cascade involvement in glutamate-dependent neuronal plasticity mediated through stimulation of mGluRs.

A method for computational combinatorial peptide design of inhibitors of Ras protein

A computational combinatorial approach is proposed for the design of a peptide inhibitor of Ras protein. The procedure involves three steps. First, a 'Multiple Copy Simultaneous Search' identifies the location of specific functional groups on the Ras surface. This search method allowed us to identify an important binding surface consisting of two beta strands (residues 5-8 and 52-56), in addition to the well known Ras effector loop and switch II region. The two beta strands had not previously been reported to be involved in Ras-Raf interaction. Second, after constructing the peptide inhibitor chain based on the location of N-methylacetamide (NMA) minima, functional groups are selected and connected to the main chain Calpha atom. This step generates a number of possible peptides with different sequences on the Ras surface. Third, potential inhibitors are designed based on a sequence alignment of the peptides generated in the second step. This computational approach reproduces the conserved pattern of hydrophobic, hydrophilic and charged amino acids identified from the Ras effectors. The advantages and limitations of this approach are discussed.

The ankyrin repeat-containing adaptor protein Tvl-1 is a novel substrate and regulator of Raf-1

Tvl-1 is a 269-amino acid ankyrin repeat protein expressed primarily in thymus, lung, and testes that was identified by screening a murine T-cell two-hybrid cDNA library for proteins that associate with the serine-threonine kinase Raf-1. The interaction of Tvl-1 with Raf-1 was confirmed by co-immunoprecipitation of the two proteins from COS-1 cells transiently transfected with Tvl-1 and Raf-1 expression constructs as well as by co-immunoprecipitation of the endogenous proteins from CV-1 and NB2 cells. Tvl-1 interacts with Raf-1 via its carboxyl-terminal ankyrin repeat domain. The same domain also mediates Tvl-1 homodimerization. Tvl-1 was detected by immunofluorescence in both the cytoplasm and the nucleus suggesting that in addition to Raf-1 it may also interact with nuclear proteins. Activated Raf-1 phosphorylates Tvl-1 both in vitro and in vivo. In baculovirus-infected Sf9 insect cells, Tvl-1 potentiates the activation of Raf-1 by Src and Ras while in COS-1 cells it potentiates the activation of Raf-1 by EGF. These data suggest that Tvl-1 is both a target as well as a regulator of Raf-1. The human homologue of Tvl-1 maps to chromosome 19p12, upstream of MEF2B with the two genes in a head to head arrangement.

Nuclear magnetic resonance and molecular dynamics studies on the interactions of the Ras-binding domain of Raf-1 with wild-type and mutant Ras proteins

The Ras protein and its homolog, Rap1A, have an identical "effector region" (residues 32-40) preceded by Asp30-Glu31 and Glu30-Lys31, respectively. In the complex of the "Ras-like" E30D/K31E mutant Rap1A with the Ras-binding domain (RBD), residues 51-131 of Raf-1, Glu31 in Rap1A forms a tight salt bridge with Lys84 in Raf-1. However, we have recently found that Raf-1 RBD binding of Ras is indeed reduced by the E31K mutation, but is not affected by the E31A mutation. Here, the "Rap1A-like" D30E/E31K mutant of Ras was prepared and shown to bind the Raf-1 RBD less strongly than wild-type Ras, but slightly more tightly than the E31K mutant. The backbone 1H, 13C, and 15N magnetic resonances of the Raf-1 RBD were assigned in complexes with the wild-type and D30E/E31K mutant Ras proteins in the guanosine 5'-O-(beta,gamma-imidotriphosphate)-bound form. The Lys84 residue in the Raf-1 RBD exhibited a large change in chemical shift upon binding wild-type Ras, suggesting that Lys84 interacts with wild-type Ras. The D30E/E31K mutant of Ras caused nearly the same perturbations in Raf-1 chemical shifts, including that of Lys84. We hypothesized that Glu31 in Ras may not be the major salt bridge partner of Lys84 in Raf-1. A molecular dynamics simulation of a model structure of the Raf-1 RBD.Ras.GTP complex suggested that Lys84 in Raf-1 might instead form a tight salt bridge with Asp33 in Ras. Consistent with this, the D33A mutation in Ras greatly reduced its Raf-I RBD binding activity. We conclude that the major salt bridge partner of Lys84 in Raf-1 may be Asp33 in Ras.

RNA aptamers that specifically bind to the Ras-binding domain of Raf-1

RNA aptamers that bind to the Ras-binding domain (RBD) of a proto-oncogene product, Raf-1, were isolated from a pool of random sequences using a glutathione S-transferase-fused RBD (GST-RBD). The RNA molecules bind to the GST-RBD, but not to GST, with dissociation constants of about 300 nM. In contrast, these RNA aptamers do not bind to the Ras-binding domain of the RGL protein, which is also known to be activated by Ras. The aptamers actually compete with Ras for binding to the Raf-1 RBD. The anti-Raf-1 aptamers may be used to specifically inhibit the Ras-Raf interaction in the complicated signaling network in mammalian cells.

Byr4 and Cdc16 form a two-component GTPase-activating protein for the Spg1 GTPase that controls septation in fission yeast

BACKGROUND

Spatial and temporal control of cytokinesis ensures the accurate transmission of genetic material and the correct development of multicellular organisms. An excellent model system in which to study cytokinesis is Schizosaccharomyces pombe because there are similarities between cytokinesis in S. pombe and mammals and because genes involved in S. pombe cytokinesis have been characterized. In particular, formation of the septum is positively regulated by the Spg1 GTPase and its effector, the Cdc7 kinase. Septation is negatively regulated by Cdc16, a protein similar to GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) for Ypt GTPases, and by Byr4, a protein of unknown biochemical function. This study investigates the relationship between Byr4, Cdc16, and Spg1.

RESULTS

Genetic interactions were observed between byr4, cdc16, and spg1 mutants. Byr4 bound to Cdc16 and Spg1 in yeast two-hybrid assays and in coprecipitations in vitro and in yeast. Byr4 inhibited the dissociation and hydrolysis of GTP bound to Spg1, but when Byr4 and Cdc16 were combined together they displayed Spg1GAP activity in vitro; Cdc16 alone had no detectable GAP activity. The binding of Byr4 to Spg1 and the Byr4-Cdc16 Spg1GAP activity were specific because Byr4 and Cdc16 did not bind to or affect the GTPase activities of the seven known S pombe Ypt family GTPase.

CONCLUSIONS

Byr4 and Cdc16 form a two-component GAP for the Spg1 GTPase. Byr4 and Cdc16 appear to negatively regulate septation in S. pombe by modulating the nucleotide state of Spg1 possibly in a spatially or temporally controlled manner.

Identification of residues in the cysteine-rich domain of Raf-1 that control Ras binding and Raf-1 activity

We have identified mutations in Raf-1 that increase binding to Ras. The mutations were identified making use of three mutant forms of Ras that have reduced Raf-1 binding (Winkler, D. G., Johnson, J. C., Cooper, J. A., and Vojtek, A. B. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 24402-24409). One mutation in Raf-1, N64L, suppresses the Ras mutant R41Q but not other Ras mutants, suggesting that this mutation structurally complements the Ras R41Q mutation. Missense substitutions of residues 143 and 144 in the Raf-1 cysteine-rich domain were isolated multiple times. These Raf-1 mutants, R143Q, R143W, and K144E, were general suppressors of three different Ras mutants and had increased interaction with non-mutant Ras. Each was slightly activated relative to wild-type Raf-1 in a transformation assay. In addition, two mutants, R143W and K144E, were active when tested for induction of germinal vesicle breakdown in Xenopus oocytes. Interestingly, all three cysteine-rich domain mutations reduced the ability of the Raf-1 N-terminal regulatory region to inhibit Xenopus oocyte germinal vesicle breakdown induced by the C-terminal catalytic region of Raf-1. We propose that a direct or indirect regulatory interaction between the N- and C-terminal regions of Raf-1 is reduced by the R143W, R143Q, and K144E mutations, thereby increasing access to the Ras-binding regions of Raf-1 and increasing Raf-1 activity.

Binding of c-Raf1 kinase to a conserved acidic sequence within the carboxyl-terminal region of the HIV-1 Nef protein

Nef is a membrane-associated cytoplasmic phosphoprotein that is well conserved among the different human (HIV-1 and HIV-2) and simian immunodeficiency viruses and has important roles in down-regulating the CD4 receptor and modulating T-cell signaling pathways. The ability to modulate T-cell signaling pathways suggests that Nef may physically interact with T-cell signaling proteins. In order to identify Nef binding proteins and map their site(s) of interaction, we targeted a highly conserved acidic sequence at the carboxyl-terminal region of Nef sharing striking similarity with an acidic sequence at the c-Raf1-binding site within the Ras effector region. Here, we used deletion and site-specific mutagenesis to generate mutant Nef proteins fused to bacterial glutathione S-transferase in in vitro precipitation assays and immunoblot analysis to map the specific interaction between the HIV-1LAI Nef and c-Raf1 to a conserved acidic sequence motif containing the core sequence Asp-Asp-X-X-X-Glu (position 174-179). Significantly, we demonstrate that substitution of the nonpolar glycine residue for either or both of the conserved negatively charged aspartic acid residues at positions 174 and 175 in the full-length recombinant Nef protein background completely abrogated binding of c-Raf1 in vitro. In addition, lysates from a permanent CEM T-cell line constitutively expressing the native HIV-1 Nef protein was used to coimmunoprecipitate a stable Nef-c-Raf1 complex, suggesting that molecular interactions between Nef and c-Raf1, an important downstream transducer of cell signaling through the c-Raf1-MAP kinase pathway, occur in vivo. This interaction may account for the Nef-induced perturbations of T-cell signaling and activation pathways in vitro and in vivo.

In vitro inhibition of Ras-Raf association by short peptides

Seven amino acid peptides were tested as in vitro inhibitors of oncogenic Ras-Raf association. The sequences of these peptides were derived from the H-Ras effector region (amino acids 25 to 51) and the Ras binding domain of Raf-1 (amino acids 64 to 105). Eleven out of the twenty-one Ras 7-mers tested inhibited formation of the Ras-Raf complex by at least 20% at 100 microM. The most potent of these inhibitory peptides contained the effector residues 32 to 37 or 40 to 45. Of the Raf-1 peptides tested, only the 94-ECCAVFR-100 and 95-CCAVFRL-101 peptides were significant inhibitors of Ras-Raf binding. The 95-101 Raf peptide had an IC50 value of 7 microM and also inhibited Ras-RalGDS binding. Analysis of the 95-101 peptide showed that its inhibitory activity required at least one cysteine followed by several hydrophobic residues. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of using small molecules as inhibitors of Ras protein-protein interactions.

The RAF family: an expanding network of post-translational controls and protein-protein interactions

Protein kinase RAF is strategically located in the "Ras-MAP-kinase signal transduction pathway", a principle system which transmits signals from growth factor receptors to the nucleus, resulting in cell proliferation. Growth factor responses are mediated in part by activation of Ras, which in turn activates RAF to phosphorylate MEK, its downstream substrate. MEK activates MAP-kinase to influence nuclear events. It is clear, however, that a network of signals other than those carried by Ras plays a role in RAF regulation. These orthogonal influences are mediated by: serine/threonine kinases, tyrosine kinases, and protein-protein interactions. As a further complication to the RAF network, three isoforms of RAF have been established which have divergent N-terminal regulatory domains. Whereas these divergent regulatory domains implicate isoform-specific functions, no clear evidence or hypothesis for distinct functions for individual isoforms has been presented. Recently, "isoform-specific protein interactions" have been identified among numerous proteins interacting with RAF. These studies may serve to delineate independent functions for RAF isoforms.

Insulin signal transduction through protein kinase cascades

This review summarizes the evolution of ideas concerning insulin signal transduction, the current information on protein ser/thr kinase cascades as signalling intermediates, and their status as participants in insulin regulation of energy metabolism. Best characterized is the Ras-MAPK pathway, whose input is crucial to cell fate decisions, but relatively dispensable in metabolic regulation. By contrast the effectors downstream of PI-3 kinase, although less well elucidated, include elements indispensable for the insulin regulation of glucose transport, glycogen and cAMP metabolism. Considerable information has accrued on PKB/cAkt, a protein kinase that interacts directly with Ptd Ins 3'OH phosphorylated lipids, as well as some of the elements further downstream, such as glycogen synthase kinase-3 and the p70 S6 kinase. Finally, some information implicates other erk pathways (e.g. such as the SAPK/JNK pathway) and Nck/cdc42-regulated PAKs (homologs of the yeast Ste 20) as participants in the cellular response to insulin. Thus insulin recruits a broad array of protein (ser/thr) kinases in its target cells to effectuate its characteristic anabolic and anticatabolic programs.

Selective inhibition of Ras interaction with its particular effector by synthetic peptides corresponding to the Ras effector region

Ras proteins possess multiple downstream effectors of distinct structures. We and others demonstrated that Ha-Ras carrying certain effector region mutations could interact differentially with its effectors, implying that significant differences exist in their Ras recognition mechanisms. Here, by employing the fluorescence polarization method, we measured the activity of effector region synthetic peptides bearing various amino acid substitutions to inhibit association of Ras with the effectors human Raf-1 and Schizosaccharomyces pombe Byr2. The effect of these peptides on association with another effector Saccharomyces cerevisiae adenylyl cyclase was also examined by measuring inhibition of the Ras-dependent adenylyl cyclase activity. The peptide corresponding to the residues 17-44 competitively inhibited Ras association with all the three effectors at the Ki values of 1 approximately 10 microM, and the inhibition was considerably attenuated by the D38A mutation. The peptide with the D38N mutation inhibited association of Ha-Ras with Byr2 but not with the others, whereas that with the P34G mutation inhibited association of Ha-Ras with Raf-1 and Byr2 but not with adenylyl cyclase. Thus, the specificity observed with the whole Ras protein was retained in the effector region peptide. These results suggest that the effector region residues constitute a major determinant for differential recognition of the effector molecules, raising a possibility for selective inhibition of a particular Ras function.

Interactions of the amino acid residue at position 31 of the c-Ha-Ras protein with Raf-1 and RalGDS

The Ras and Rap1A proteins can bind to the Raf and RalGDS families. Ras and Rap1A have Glu and Lys, respectively, at position 31. In the present study, we analyzed the effects of mutating the Glu at position 31 of the c-Ha-Ras protein to Asp, Ala, Arg, and Lys on the interactions with Raf-1 and RalGDS. The Ras-binding domain (RBD) of Raf-1 binds the E31R and E31K Ras mutants less tightly than the wild-type, E31A, and E31D Ras proteins; the introduction of the positively charged Lys or Arg residue at position 31 specifically impairs the binding of Ras with the Raf-1 RBD. On the other hand, the ability of the oncogenic RasG12V protein to activate Raf-1 in HEK293 cells was only partially reduced by the E31R mutation but was drastically impaired by the E31K mutation. Correspondingly, RasG12V(E31K) as well as Rap1A, but not RasG12V(E31R), exhibited abnormally tight binding with the cysteine-rich domain of Raf-1. On the other hand, the E31A, E31R, and E31K mutations, but not the E31D mutation, enhanced the RalGDS RBD-binding activity of Ras, indicating that the negative charge at position 31 of Ras is particularly unfavorable to the interaction with the RalGDS RBD. RasG12V(E31K), RasG12V(E31A), and Rap1A stimulate the RalGDS action more efficiently than the wild-type Ras in the liposome reconstitution assay. All of these results clearly show that the sharp contrast between the characteristics of Ras and Rap1A, with respect to the interactions with Raf-1 and RalGDS, depends on their residues at position 31.

Discrimination of amino acids mediating Ras binding from noninteracting residues affecting raf activation by double mutant analysis

The contribution of residues outside the Ras binding domain of Raf (RafRBD) to Ras-Raf interaction and Ras-dependent Raf activation has remained unresolved. Here, we utilize a double mutant approach to identify complementary interacting amino acids that are involved in Ras-Raf interaction and activation. Biochemical analysis demonstrates that Raf-Arg59 and Raf-Arg67 from RafRBD are interacting residues complementary to Ras-Glu37 located in the Ras effector region. Raf-Arg59 and Raf-Arg67 also mediate interaction with Ras-Glu37 in Ras-dependent Raf activation. The characteristics observed here can be used as criteria for a role of residues from other regions of Raf in Ras-Raf interaction and activation. We developed a quantitative two-hybrid system as a tool to investigate the effect of point mutations on protein-protein interactions that elude biochemical analysis of bacterially expressed proteins. This assay shows that Raf-Ser257 in the RafCR2 domain does not contribute to Ras-Raf interaction and that the Raf-S257L mutation does not restore Raf binding to Ras-E37G. Yet, Raf-S257L displays high constitutive kinase activity and further activation by Ras-G12V/E37G is still impaired as compared with activation by Ras-G12V. This strongly suggests that the RafCR2 domain is an independent domain involved in the control of Raf activity and a common mechanism for constitutively activating mutants may be the interference with the inactive ground state of the kinase.

Identification and characterization of mutations in Ha-Ras that selectively decrease binding to cRaf-1

The oncoprotein Ras transforms cells by binding to one or more effector proteins. Effector proteins have been identified by their ability to bind to Ras in the GTP but not GDP form, and by their requirement for the Ras effector domain for binding. The best understood Ras effectors are serine/threonine kinases of the Raf family, but other candidate Ras effectors, including a Ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3 kinase) have also been identified. To investigate the mechanism of binding of cRaf-1 to Ras, and to investigate the roles of other candidate Ras effectors in transformation, we have isolated and characterized mutants of activated Ras with decreased binding to cRaf-1 relative to other candidate effectors. Examination of these mutants indicates that surface-exposed residues of Ras outside the minimal effector domain interact differentially with cRaf-1 and other Ras-binding proteins, and that fibroblast transformation correlates with cRaf-1 binding and mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase activation. Furthermore, activation of PI3 kinase can occur in the absence of significant MAP kinase activation, suggesting that PI3 kinase activation is a primary effect of Ras.

Cyclic AMP inhibitors inhibits PDGF-stimulated mitogen-activated protein kinase activity in rat aortic smooth muscle cells via inactivation of c-Raf-1 kinase and induction of MAP kinase phosphatase-1

In rat aortic smooth muscle cells (RASMC), pretreatment with forskolin inhibited the activation of p42/44 isoforms of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAP) kinase stimulated in response to low concentrations of PDGF (10 ng/ml). This correlated with a strong inhibition of PDGF-stimulated MEK and C-Raf-1 kinase activity. However, the effect of forskolin could be surmounted by increasing the concentration of PDGF. Under such conditions forskolin was only effective against prolonged MAP kinase activation. The ability of forskolin to inhibit the late phase of MAP kinase activity was reversed by pretreatment of the cells with cycloheximide, suggesting the involvement of a protein synthesis step. This was not due to effects upstream of MAP kinase since PDGF-stimulated MEK activation was decreased by cycloheximide, an effect potentiated by forskolin. Forskolin stimulated the induction of the dual specific phosphatase MAP kinase phosphatase-1 (MKP-1), although this effect was small relative to levels induced by PDGF and angiotensin II. However, PDGF stimulated induction of MKP-1 was abolished by the protein kinase A inhibitor H89 and this correlated with the reversal of forskolin-mediated inhibition of PDGF-stimulated MAP kinase activity. These studies implicate a role for intracellular cyclic AMP in at least two aspects of MAP kinase signaling, including both the inhibition of Raf-1 activation and the induction of MKP-1.

Dominant mutations of Drosophila MAP kinase kinase and their activities in Drosophila and yeast MAP kinase cascades

Eight alleles of Dsor1 encoding a Drosophila homologue of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase kinase were obtained as dominant suppressors of the MAP kinase kinase kinase D raf. These Dsor1 alleles themselves showed no obvious phenotypic consequences nor any effect on the viability of the flies, although they were highly sensitive to upstream signals and strongly interacted with gain-of-function mutations of upstream factors. They suppressed mutations for receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs); torso (tor), sevenless (sev) and to a lesser extent Drosophila EGF receptor (DER). Furthermore, the Dsor1 alleles showed no significant interaction with gain-of-function mutations of DER. The observed difference in activity of the Dsor1 alleles among the RTK pathways suggests Dsor1 is one of the components of the pathway that regulates signal specificity. Expression of Dsor1 in budding yeast demonstrated that Dsor1 can activate yeast MAP kinase homologues if a proper activator of Dsor1 is coexpressed. Nucleotide sequencing of the Dsor1 mutant genes revealed that most of the mutations are associated with amino acid changes at highly conserved residues in the kinase domain. The results suggest that they function as suppressors due to increased reactivity to upstream factors.

Cell cycle-dependent activation of Ras

BACKGROUND

Ras proteins play an essential role in the transduction of signals from a wide range of cell-surface receptors to the nucleus. These signals may promote cellular proliferation or differentiation, depending on the cell background. It is well established that Ras plays an important role in the transduction of mitogenic signals from activated growth-factor receptors, leading to cell-cycle entry. However, important questions remain as to whether Ras controls signalling events during cell-cycle progression and, if so, at which point in the cell-cycle it is activated.

RESULTS

To address these questions we have developed a novel, functional assay for the detection of cellular activated Ras. Using this assay, we found that Ras was activated in HeLa cells, following release from mitosis, and in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts, following serum-stimulated cell-cycle entry. In each case, peak Ras activation occurred in mid-G1 phase. Ras activation in HeLa cells at mid-G1 phase was dependent on RNA and protein synthesis and was not associated with tyrosine phosphorylation of Shc proteins and their binding to Grb2. Significantly, activation of Ras and the extracellular-signal regulated (ERK) sub-group of mitogen-activated protein kinases were not temporally correlated during G1-phase progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Activation of Ras during mid-G1 phase appears to differ in many respects from its rapid activation by growth factors, suggesting a novel mechanism of regulation that may be intrinsic to cell-cycle progression. Furthermore, the temporal dissociation between Ras and ERK activation suggests that Ras targets alternate effector pathways during G1-phase progression.

Identification of a novel RalGDS-related protein as a candidate effector for Ras and Rap1

Although Ras and Rap1 share interaction with common candidate effector proteins, Rap1 lacks the transforming activity exhibited by Ras proteins. It has been speculated that Rap antagonizes Ras transformation through the formation of nonproductive complexes with critical Ras effector targets. To understand further the distinct biological functions of these two closely related proteins, we searched for Rap1b-binding proteins by yeast two-hybrid screening. We identified multiple clones that encode the COOH-terminal sequences of a protein that shares sequence identity with RalGDS and RGL, which we have designated RGL2. A 158-amino acid COOH-terminal fragment of RGL2 (RGL2 C-158) bound to Ras superfamily proteins which shared identical effector domain sequences with Rap1 (Ha-Ras, R-Ras, and TC21). RGL2 C-158 binding was impaired by effector domain mutations in Rap1b and Ha-Ras. Furthermore, RGL2 C-158 bound exclusively to the GTP-, but not the GDP-bound form of Ha-Ras. Finally, coexpression of RGL2 C-158 impaired oncogenic Ras activation of transcription from a Ras-responsive promoter element and focus-forming activity in NIH 3T3 cells. We conclude that RGL2 may be an effector for Ras and/or Rap proteins.

Oligomerization activates c-Raf-1 through a Ras-dependent mechanism

The c-Raf-1 proto-oncoprotein is a Ras-GTP-regulated protein kinase that associates in situ with 14-3-3 proteins, which are naturally dimeric. In COS cells, recombinant Raf is found in oligomeric assemblies. To examine whether induced oligomerization can alter Raf kinase activity, sequences encoding the FK506-binding protein FKBP12 were fused to the amino terminus of c-Raf-1, introducing a binding site for FK506. Oligomerization of recombinant FKBP-Raf in situ, induced by the addition of the dimeric FK506 derivative FK1012A, activated Raf kinase activity at least half as well as epidermal growth factor (EGF). As with EGF, activation of FKBP-Raf by FK1012A is entirely Ras-GTP dependent. Thus oligomerization of Raf per se promotes Raf activation through a Ras-dependent mechanism.

What's new in ras genes? Physiological role of ras genes in signal transduction and significance of ras gene activation in tumorigenesis

Ras gene mutations have been found with variable prevalence in different tumor types. While during the past decade a lot of information has been accumulated on the frequency of ras oncogene activation in tumors, the last two years brought considerable progress in elucidating molecular mechanisms of signal transduction for which cellular ras proteins are key elements. They transmit signals from upstream tyrosine kinases to downstream serine/threonine kinases ultimately leading to changes of gene expression cytoskeletal architecture, cell-to-cell interactions and metabolism. These signalling pathways are of interest for the physiological regulation of proliferation and differentiation in normal, as well as in cancer tissue. Mutational activation of cellular ras genes to transforming oncogenes is thought to promote cell growth even in the absence of extracellular stimuli, and may thereby contribute to the initiation and/or progression of tumors.

Loss of Raf-1-binding activity of v-Ha-Ras by the deletion of amino acid residues 64-72 and 143-151

In order to elucidate the molecular events in signal transduction, examination of the interaction between Ras and Raf-1 seems crucial. Many Raf-1 mutants have been investigated in terms of their binding activities to Ras, where only a few Ras mutants have been examined thus far. We have investigated the Raf-1-binding activities of v-Ha-Ras and 21 insertion/deletion mutants of this protein. The results show that the mutants have varying levels of Raf-1-binding activity that are related neither to their transforming activity nor to their guanine nucleotide-binding activity. Deletion in the effector domain of Ras did not completely abolish Raf-1-binding, whereas the deletion in amino acid residues 64-72 or 143-151 resulted in complete loss of Raf-1-binding activity.

Dual role of cAMP and involvement of both G-proteins and ras in regulation of ERK2 in Dictyostelium discoideum

Dictyostelium discoideum expresses two Extracellular signal Regulated Kinases, ERK1 and ERK2, which are involved in growth, multicellular development and regulation of adenylyl cyclase. Binding of extracellular cAMP to cAMP receptor 1, a G-protein coupled cell surface receptor, transiently stimulates phosphorylation, activation and nuclear translocation of ERK2. Activation of ERK2 by cAMP is dependent on heterotrimeric G-proteins, since activation of ERK2 is absent in cells lacking the Galpha4 subunit. The small G-protein rasD also activates ERK2. In cells overexpressing a mutated, constitutively active rasD, ERK2 activity is elevated prior to cAMP stimulation. Intracellular cAMP and cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) are essential for adaptation of the ERK2 response. This report shows that multiple signalling pathways are involved in regulation of ERK2 activity in D.discoideum.

p21ras in carcinogenesis

The activation of p21ras proteins is required in signal transduction pathways that lead to cell proliferation. More recently, a role for p21ras proteins has also been suggested in pathways to apoptosis and in the regulation of the cell cycle. Pointmutated p21ras oncogenes code for constitutively activated p21ras proteins, which disturb the balance between cell growth and cell death in favour of cell growth. In this way, p21ras oncoproteins may contribute to carcinogenesis. The binding of growth factors to their receptors triggers a cascade of protein interactions, including activation of the p21ras proteins. In turn, p21ras proteins set the machinery for cell division in motion by stimulating different effector proteins which regulate the morphological alterations, the nutritional requirements, and the changes in gene expression necessary for cell division. The presence of p21ras oncoproteins constitutively stimulate proliferation, whilst the apoptotic pathway is suppressed along with the loss of cell cycle regulation. This review describes the function of the p21ras proteins in signal transduction pathways that control proliferation and apoptosis, and regulate the cell cycle. The dysregulation of these signal transduction pathways due to the presence of p21ras oncoproteins is discussed in the context of early carcinogenesis.

Prostaglandin A2 blocks the activation of G1 phase cyclin-dependent kinase without altering mitogen-activated protein kinase stimulation

Prostaglandin A2 (PGA2) reversibly blocked the cell cycle progression of NIH 3T3 cells at G1 and G2/M phase. When it was applied to cells synchronized in G0 or S phase, cells were blocked at G1 and G2/M, respectively. The G2/M blockage was transient. Microinjected oncogenic leucine 61 Ras protein could not override the PGA2 induced G1 blockage, nor could previous transformation with the v-raf oncogene. The serum-induced activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase was not inhibited by PGA2 treatment. These data suggest that PGA2 blocks cell cycle progression without interfering with the cytosolic proliferative signaling pathway. Combined microinjection of E2F-1 and DP-1 proteins or microinjected adenovirus E1A protein, however, could induce S phase in cells arrested in G1 by PGA2, indicating that PGA2 does not directly inhibit the process of DNA synthesis. In quiescent cells, PGA2 blocked the normal hyperphosphorylation of the retinoblastoma susceptible gene product and the activation of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 2 and CDK4, in response to serum stimulation. PGA2 treatment elevated the p21Waf1/Cip1/Sdi1 protein expression level. These data indicate that PGA2 may arrest the cell cycle in G1 by interfering with the activation of G1 phase CDKs.

Equilibrium and kinetic measurements reveal rapidly reversible binding of Ras to Raf

Raf is a serine/threonine kinase that binds through its amino-terminal regulatory domain to the GTP form of Ras and thereby activates the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. In this study, we have characterized the interaction of the Ras-binding domain of Raf with Ras using equilibrium binding methods (scintillation proximity assay and fluorescence anisotropy), rather than with more widely used nonequilibrium procedures (such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and affinity precipitation). Initial studies using glutathione S-transferase fusion proteins with either residues 1-257 or 1-190 of Raf showed that although it was possible to detect Ras binding using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or affinity precipitation, it was substoichiometric; under equilibrium conditions with only a small excess of Raf almost no binding was detected. This difference was probably due to the presence of a high percentage of inactive Raf protein. Further studies used protein containing residues 51-131 of Raf, which expressed in Escherichia coli as a stable glutathione S-transferase fusion. With this protein, binding with Ras could readily be measured under equilibrium conditions. The catalytic domain of neurofibromin inhibited binding of Ras to Raf, and Raf inhibited the binding of Ras to neurofibromin showing that Raf and neurofibromin cannot be bound simultaneously to Ras. The affinities of interaction of neurofibromin and Raf with Harvey-RasLeu-61 were similar. The rate constant for dissociation of Raf from Ras was estimated to be >1 min-1, suggesting that Ras, Raf, and neurofibromin may be in rapid equilibrium in the cell. In contrast to previous reports, under equilibrium conditions there was no evidence for a difference in affinity between the minimal Ras binding domain of Raf (residues 51-131) and a region containing an additional 16 carboxyl-terminal amino acids, suggesting that residues 132-147 do not form a critical binding determinant.

Differential structural requirements for interaction of Ras protein with its distinct downstream effectors

Ras proteins have multiple effectors of distinct structures that do not share significant structural homology at their Ras interaction sites. To prove possible differences in their recognition mechanisms of Ras, we screened 44 human Ha-Ras proteins carrying mutations in the effector region and its flanking sequences for interaction with human Raf-1, Schizosaccharomyces pombe Byr2, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae adenylyl cyclase. The Ras binding specificities were largely shared between Raf-1 and Byr2 although Ras mutants, Y32F, T35S, and A59E, had their affinities for Byr2 selectively reduced. The only exception was Ras(D38N), which lost the ability to bind Raf-1 while retaining the activity to bind Byr2 and complement the Byr2- phenotype of S. pombe. On the other hand, adenylyl cyclase had quite distinct requirements for Ras residues; mutations P34G and T58A selectively abolished the ability to bind and activate it without considerably affecting the interaction with Raf-1 and Byr2. Y32F mutant, whereas losing the ability to activate Raf-1 and Byr2, could activate adenylyl cyclase efficiently. In addition, V45E mutation was found to impair the ability of Ras to activate both Raf-1 and adenylyl cyclase without significantly affecting the binding affinities for them. These results demonstrate that significant differences exist in the recognition mechanisms by which the three effector molecules associate with Ras and suggest that a region of Ras required for activation of the effectors in general may exist separately from that for binding the effectors.

Post-translational modification of H-Ras is required for activation of, but not for association with, B-Raf

B-Raf is regulated by Ras protein and acts as a mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase kinase kinase in PC12 cells and brain. Ras protein undergoes a series of post-translational modifications on its C-terminal CAAX motif, and the modifications are critical for its function. To elucidate the role of the post-translational modifications in interaction with, and activation of, B-Raf, we have analyzed a direct association between H-Ras and B-Raf, and constructed an in vitro system for B-Raf activation by H-Ras. By using methods based on inhibition of yeast adenylyl cyclase or RasGAP activity and by in vitro binding assays, we have shown that the segment of B-Raf corresponding to amino acid 1-326 binds directly to H-Ras with a dissociation constant (Kd) comparable to that of Raf-1 and that the binding is not significantly affected by the post-translational modifications. However, when the activity of B-Raf to stimulate MAP kinase was measured by using a cell-free system derived from rat brain cytosol, we observed that the unmodified form of H-Ras possesses an almost negligible activity to activate B-Raf in vitro compared to the fully modified form. H-RasSer-181,184 mutant, which was farnesylated but not palmitoylated, was equally active as the fully modified form. These results indicate that the post-translational modifications, especially farnesylation, are required for H-Ras to activate B-Raf even though they have no apparent effect on the binding properties of H-Ras to B-Raf.

Insulin, growth factors, and cAMP: antagonism in the signal transduction pathways

Depending on the cell type and the response, cAMP may either oppose or facilitate the actions of insulin and/or growth factors that signal via receptor tyrosine kinases. Recent findings indicate that the effects of the cyclic nucleotide are mediated in part by changes in the activities of important elements in the signal transduction pathways utilized by insulin and growth factors.

Quantitative structure-activity analysis correlating Ras/Raf interaction in vitro to Raf activation in vivo

Binding of Ras to c-Raf-1 is a pivotal step of many mitogenic signalling pathways. Based on the recent crystal structure of the complex of Rap1A with the Ras-binding domain of Raf, mutations were introduced in c-Raf-1 and their effects on Ras/Raf binding affinity in vitro and Ras/Raf regulated gene expression in vivo were analysed. Our data reveal an empirical semilogarithmic correlation between dissociation constants and Raf-induced gene activity. The functional epitope that primarily determines binding affinity consists of residues Gln 66, Lys 84 and Arg 89 in Raf. This quantitative structure-activity investigation may provide a general approach to correlate structure-guided biochemical analysis with biological function of protein-protein interactions.

Ras-interacting domain of RGL blocks Ras-dependent signal transduction in Xenopus oocytes

RalGDS family members (ralGDS and RGL) interact with the GTP-bound form of Ras through its effector loop. The C-terminal region (amino acids 602-768) of RGL is responsible for binding to Ras. In this paper we characterized a Ras-interacting domain of RGL using deletion mutants of RGL(602-768). RGL(602-768), RGL(632-768), and RGL (602-734) bound to the GTP-bound form of Ras and inhibited the GAP activity of NF-1. RGL(646-768) showed a low binding activity to Ras and inhibited GAP activity of NF-1 weakly. None of RGL(659-768), RGL(685-768), RGL(602-709), and RGL(602-686) bound to Ras or inhibited GAP activity of NF-1. These results indicate that amino acids 632-734 of RGL constitute a nearly minimal domain that contains the binding element for Ras. RGL(632-734) inhibited v-Ras- but not progesterone-induced Xenopus oocyte maturation. Furthermore, RGL(632-734) inhibited v-Ras- but not v-Raf- dependent extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation in Xenopus oocytes. These results clearly demonstrate that the Ras-interacting domain of RGL is important for Ras-dependent signal transduction in vivo.

Regulation of interaction of ras p21 with RalGDS and Raf-1 by cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase

RalGDS is a GDP/GTP exchange protein for ral p24, a member of small GTP-binding protein superfamily. We have recently shown that RalGDS interacts directly with the GTP-bound active form of ras p21 through the effector loop of ras p21 in vitro, in insect cells and in the yeast two-hybrid system. These results suggest that RalGDS functions as an effector protein of ras p21. Here, we report that RalGDS interacts with ras p21 in mammalian cells in response to an extracellular signal. Epidermal growth factor (EGF) induced the interaction of c-ras p21 and RalGDS in COS cells expressing both proteins, but not in the cells expressing RalGDS and c-ras p21T35A, which is an effector loop mutant of ras p21. We also found that cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase (protein kinase A) regulated the selectivity of ras p21-binding to either RalGDS or Raf-1. Protein kinase A phosphorylated RalGDS as well as (1-149)Raf (amino acid residues 1-149). Although the phosphorylated (1-149)Raf had a lower affinity for ras p21 than the unphosphorylated (1-149)Raf, both the phosphorylated and unphosphorylated RalGDS had the similar affinities for ras p21. The phosphorylation of RalGDS did not affect its activity to stimulate the GDP/GTP exchange of ral p24. Pretreatment of COS cells with forskolin further stimulated the interaction of ras p21 and RalGDS induced by EGF under the conditions that EGF-dependent Raf-1 activity was inhibited. These results indicate that ras p21 distinguishes between RalGDS and Raf-1 by their phosphorylation by protein kinase A.

Ras interaction with two distinct binding domains in Raf-1 may be required for Ras transformation

Although Raf-1 is a critical Ras effector target, how Ras mediates Raf-1 activation remains unresolved. Raf-1 residues 55-131 define a Ras-binding domain essential for Raf-1 activation. Therefore, our identification of a second Ras-binding site in the Raf-1 cysteine-rich domain (residues 139-184) was unexpected and suggested a more complex role for Ras in Raf-1 activation. Both Ras recognition domains preferentially associate with Ras-GTP. Therefore, mutations that impair Ras activity by perturbing regions that distinguish Ras-GDP from Ras-GTP (switch I and II) may disrupt interactions with either Raf-1-binding domain. We observed that mutations of Ras that impaired Ras transformation by perturbing its switch I (T35A and E37G) or switch II (G60A and Y64W) domain preferentially diminished binding to Raf-1-(55-131) or the Raf-1 cysteine-rich domain, respectively. Thus, these Ras-binding domains recognize distinct Ras-GTP determinants, and both may be essential for Ras transforming activity. Finally, since Ha-Ras T35A and E37G mutations prevent Ras interaction with full-length Raf-1, we suggest that Raf-Cys is a cryptic binding site that is unmasked upon Ras interaction with Raf-1-(55-131).

Cysteine-rich region of Raf-1 interacts with activator domain of post-translationally modified Ha-Ras

The interaction between "switch I/effector domain" of Ha-Ras and the Ras-binding domain (RBD, amino acid 51-131) of Raf-1 is essential for signal transduction. However, the importance of the "activator domain" (approximately corresponding to amino acids 26-28 and 40-49) of Ha-Ras and of the "cysteine-rich region" (CRR, amino acids 152-184) of Raf-1 have also been proposed. Here, we found that Raf-1 CRR interacts directly with Ha-Ras independently of RBD and that participation of CRR is necessary for efficient Ras-Raf binding. Furthermore, Ha-Ras carrying mutations (N26G and V45E) in the activator domain failed to bind CRR, whereas they bound RBD normally. On the contrary, Ha-Ras carrying mutations in the switch I/effector domain exhibited severely reduced ability to bind RBD, whereas their ability to bind CRR was unaffected. Mutants that bound to either RBD or CRR alone failed to activate Raf-1. Ha-Ras without post-translational modifications, which lacks the ability to activate Raf-1, selectively lost the ability to bind CRR. These results suggest that the activator domain of Ha-Ras participates in activation of Raf-1 through interaction with CRR and that post-translational modifications of Ha-Ras are required for this interaction.

Mechanisms regulating Raf-1 activity in signal transduction pathways

Raf-1 is a key protein involved in the transmission of developmental and proliferative signals generated by receptor and nonreceptor tyrosine kinases. Biochemical and genetic studies have demonstrated that Raf-1 functions downstream of activated tyrosine kinases and Ras and upstream of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and MAPK kinase (MKK or MEK) in many signaling pathways. A major objective of our laboratory has been to determine how Raf-1 becomes activated in response to signaling events. Using mammalian, baculovirus, and Xenopus systems, we have examined the roles that phosphorylation and protein-protein interactions play in regulating the biological and biochemical activity of Raf-1. Our studies have provided evidence that the activity of Raf-1 can be modulated by both Ras-dependent and Ras-independent pathways. Recently, we reported that Arg89 of Raf-1 is a residue required for the association of Raf-1 and Ras. Mutation of this residue disrupted interaction with Ras and prevented Ras-mediated, but not protein kinase C-or tyrosine kinase-mediated, enzymatic activation of Raf-1 in the baculovirus expression system. Further analysis of this mutant demonstrated that kinase-defective Raf-1 proteins interfere with the propagation of proliferative and developmental signals by binding to Ras and blocking Ras function. Our findings have also shown that phosphorylation events play a role in regulating Raf-1. We have identified sites of in vivo phosphorylation that positively and negatively alter the biological and enzymatic activity of Raf-1. In addition, we have found that some of these phosphorylation sites are involved in mediating the interaction of Raf-1 with potential activators (Fyn and Src) and with other cellular proteins (14-3-3). Results from our work suggest that Raf-1 is regulated at multiple levels by several distinct mechanisms.

Regulatory GTPases

The past year has witnessed a tremendous increase in our understanding of the structures and interactions of the GTPases. The highlights include crystal structures of G alpha subunits, as well as the first complex between a GTPase (Rap1A) and an effector molecule (c-Raf1 Ras-binding domain). In the field of elongation factors (EFs), three very important structures have been determined: EF-G, the ternary complex of EF-Tu.GTP with aminoacyl-tRNA, and the EF-Tu.EF-Ts complex.

Interactions between Ras and Raf: key regulatory proteins in cellular transformation

Ras proteins function during cell growth and development as essential, plasma membrane-bound signaling proteins. Current evidence suggests that Ras is part of a signal transduction chain extending from extracellular signals to transcriptional regulation in the nucleus. Growth factor and cytokine activation of many tyrosine kinase and kinase-linked receptors recruits many proteins to the plasma membrane including Ras-specific guanine nucleotide releasing proteins (GNRP). Under the influence of a GNRP, Ras proteins bind GTP, resulting in activation of the Ras signal. The GTP-bound form of Ras is capable of interacting directly with RasGAP, neurofibromin, and the Raf kinases. Although believed to be endowed with some signaling capacity, RasGAP and neurofibromin act primarily to negatively regulate Ras. Based upon genetic and biochemical studies in a variety of diverse organisms, the Raf kinases are considered the primary targets of Ras signaling. Activation of the Raf kinases is the first step in a cascade of multiple protein kinases, including Mek, Erk1, and Erk2. We are attempting to understand structurally how activated Ras proteins interact specifically with Raf kinases to induce the downstream signals necessary for cell division. Using mutagenesis, peptide epitope scanning, and in vitro reconstitution of protein interactions, we have identified specific sites of association between the Ras-GTP and c-Raf-1 proteins. The interaction between these contact points is essential for the plasma membrane localization of Raf, which ultimately leads to kinase activation. The formation of this protein complex is negatively regulated by protein kinase A (PKA) through phosphorylation of the c-Raf-1 N-terminus. Phosphorylation of c-Raf-1 serine 43 is believed to cause an N-terminal cap structure to cover the Ras docking site.